WEBVTT - Episode 50: The Bechdel Test

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Hello, Hello, welcome to another edition of d I

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>am one half of your host Danny Fan isn't sitting

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>across from me as always as if you way, how

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? I'm doing good? If you were you

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>asking me or were you asking the audience collectively? And

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you know I was asking the royal We everyone involved,

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>front to back, side to side, up and down all around. Yeah,

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.919
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing? How are you feeling? Maybe you

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>know today was a rough day and you were along

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 1>with me for it. And you know, people can keep

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>up with my life on social media, so I know

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Danny was going through hard stuff. Meanwhile, I was playing

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Apex Legends all day. Your your your struggle was also

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>hard you uh you know you'd be you know. Something

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to note is they released a new hero out uh

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>called Octane, who is Latin x h yeah and he

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>uh he's also disabled. He has to uh metal legs

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and he runs real fast. Now you know they've been

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>It's it's funny because they've been effortlessly diversifying the game,

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>like they have Bloodhound, who is uh non binary. You

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have uh, you know Gibraltar, who is a you know,

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Maori gay biker. Uh you know, so so you know

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff, all that stuff that and and it's

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>people in the real world are what's fun about it

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>is it's such a good game that no one's been

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>complaining too much about it. I was there's someone I

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>still don't know if it's a joke or not, honestly

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>don't care. But the one white male character is this

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>guy who who drops like this toxic bombs. And so

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>someone made a YouTube video that was like, the one

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>white male is the toxic white male read between the lines.

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>There's like it's funny because it's like, oh man, this

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>is a great character if it is. But we live

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in a time where you just can't tell. But if

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you're doing a character, good job. If you're not, you

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. Um, I wanted to introduce our guests.

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>They are both They are in our studio here there

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>at our how stuff work stuff. I heart media studio.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>There we go podcast studio works. What we are Disney. Um.

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>That's Caitlin Dante and Jimmy Loftus of Bechtel Cast. Thank

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you for joining us. Yeah, we today are talking about

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bechtel Tests. Yeah, really excited about it. Me and Caitlin.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.679
<v Speaker 1>We're matching. We both have pesta. You're the same. Yeah,

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we take a picture. Yeah, let's do it. Look my Instagram,

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>always trying to show the looks and always trying to

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>show the friends. I was on y'all's podcast Were You

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>on It? Black Panther episode lauded as one of the

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>best episodes of their podcast, people that Yes, look I was.

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>You caught me out a good time. I was charged

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>up on Black Panther Energy. I was doing voices, I

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>was re enacting scenes. It is the most ridiculous I've

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>been on any podcast ever. You're reenacting full scenes, like

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>playing every single part I was going to. I was

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>on the Lota Croft tomb Raider episode and introduced the

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>cast to women in fridges watches, Uh yeah, fridging the

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>doom fridging and how gayl Simone came up with that

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>whole website. If you don't know what that is, it's

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially when a female character is killed to further the

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>plot of a male character, which is very common, and

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that website still exists. It's really cute because I think

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it still has like almost n these ish looking software too.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>It like a space Jam website. Yeah, I think they

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>did that with Captain Marvel too. They made it like

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>nineties for her website. Yeah, so we are talking about

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bechdel tests. Wh Why did y all decide that

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to make a podcast about this? Caitlin, Well,

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it was my idea, Bragg, But basically, I

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>am a huge film buff, to the extent that I

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>stupidly got two different degrees in film and spent you know,

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of dollars on an education and film

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and uh yeah, I mean movies. Movies are life for me,

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>umnestly crazy, I mean brave, really really brave. Yeah, everyone

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>started hashtaging Caitlin brave. Um. So I love movies and

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk about them and kind of reconcile

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that a lot of my favorite movies treat

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>women horribly, or at least the movies that I grew

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>up with and just had become accustomed to watch. Some

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of those that you discovered, like, oh crap, I love

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>me awful, but I didn't didn't have the representation of

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>women yet, right, Um. The Big Three were like for me,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it was like the like trilogies of Back to the Future,

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Indiana Jones, and Star Wars like those were like the

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>crux of my childhood movie development. Uh and then just

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>any I mean most movies since and before those were

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.119
<v Speaker 1>also not great to women. So I just I wanted

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to kind of examine these movies more closely, just any

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>movie that has had like a big cultural impact and uh,

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, take a look at them and figure out,

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe how much media is responsible for the

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>patriarchy still being a thing. Um. And so yeah, we

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>just to I I asked Jamie if she wanted to

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>collaborate with me on this idea, and she was very down.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And two and a half years later, here we are,

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, that sounds about the same as krilling it.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And eventually nerdifficent. I was like, hey, you want to

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>do this. I was like, yeah, yeah, good idea. And

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I had seen, like, I have not seen a lot

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of well now I have when the podcast started, I

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>had not seen like most of I had also technically

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>onto film school, but technically I went, but I've majored

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in radio, so I had also had to use the

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>medium more radio worth it thousands in debt. Uh. But yeah,

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and I hadn't seen most of the movies that we

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>covered and so it was like an in real time education.

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think it helps to get those two different

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>perspectives from like me, who like is apologetic to a

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of these movies and then you're like, oh, I'm

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just seeing them for the first time and wow, they're

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not good. Yeah that makes sense, Yeah, because you're watching

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>them with like an air of nostalgia too. Yeah. So

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>for people that don't know what is the Bechdel test

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is our favorite thing to explain to the Bechdel Test.

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>We can get into the history of it, but just

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>like the version and the way that we use it,

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>because there's a few different like permutations of it. But

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a test that is applied to media, usually movies

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and TV, in which a movie that passes the Bechtel

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>test has a scene with two female identifying characters who

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>have names, who talk to each other about something other

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>than a man for at least two lines of dialogue.

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>That's our version. That's our version. There's a bunch of

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>different versions. They're simpler ones, there's more demanding ones, but

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.239
<v Speaker 1>that's the one we use, okay. Yeah, And it originally

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:00.559
<v Speaker 1>started from Alison Bechdel, right, who wrote in a comic

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>strip that was Dikes to Watch out for that appeared

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in nine and we'll have a link to the actual

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>comics so y'all can see it. But it was essentially

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>two women that were trying to go see a movie

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and had that same thing where they were saying, I

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>only go to see a movie if it satisfies three

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>basic requirements, when it has to have at least two

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>women in it who talked to each other and about

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.679
<v Speaker 1>something other than a man. And then it ends with saying,

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the last movie I saw was Alien. Yes, that was

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, which is funny because that movie barely passes

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>the Bee. So because they're talking about the alien and

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>or protocol on the shipsina monster as with every like

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>major sci fi movie as a vaginal monster because yourgina's

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>are scary, scary, so wild. And then there's just to

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>give a little bit more context on that is Alison

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Bechdel is a queer cartoonist. A lot of her work

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>has been about, you know, her identity as a queer woman.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>And if you've seen fun Home, which is like a

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>very famous comic book and musical, now that that was

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>all her. Yeah, And in the context, this test derives

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>from it's these two women who basically they they've established

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>these kind of guidelines for this test because they there's

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>so little representation of queer women in movies that they

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, well, if two women are in a

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>movie and they're not talking about men, that kind of

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>allows me to ship them together and pretend that I

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>am seeing like two queer women on screen. So like,

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit more of the context that has

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>gone largely ignored in conversations about the Bechtel tests, like

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.239
<v Speaker 1>as it's been sort of appropriated to more like mainstream

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>entertainment stuff. But and and yeah, like unlike I mean,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess sort of like a lot of these metrics

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that have come more into the conversation in the past

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>ten years, it wasn't originally intended to be a metric.

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It was just like a joke that she she said,

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>it was a quote, a little lesbian joke in an

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 1>alternative feminist newspaper um And then like twenty years after

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it came out, everyone's like, oh, this is here, it

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is this is the rule and the hard and fast

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>tests feminism. But it was I mean, at the at

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the time that it was the only thing that anyone

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>had it's so strange. It's and we've found, like through

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>our podcast that it's definitely it's not the test by

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>any means. It's definitely flawed. You can have two women

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in a movie talking about some really dark um that

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't test. There's very often they're talking about something extremely

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>domestic and still pretty starry types um that makes sense

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>talking and movies are always talking about either clothes, food,

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>or cooking other domestic chores birth like babies. There are,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of course exceptions, but we come up on this a

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>lot where a movie will pass the test and then

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 1>it's like, but they talked about cooking, but there's like,

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>but that exchange was so or is this like an

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>exchange that's so like just like, hey, what's up? Nothing?

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And then they're like, wow, it's a feminist text. Um. Yeah. So.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Alison Bechdel also credited the idea to her friend Liz

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Wallace and the writings of Virginia Wolf. After the test

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>became more widely discussed in the two thousands, a number

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>of variants like y'all were saying came out that we

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>will also get into. So in her nineteen essay A

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Room of One's Own Virginia Wolf observed about the literature

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of her time with what equivalent would be of the

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Bechdel test back then that essentially it was largely the

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing, largely male. I mean, also who was Who's

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 1>writing most of these roles? You know? Like that for

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>because a study of gender portrayals in eight hundred and

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty five of the most financially successful US films ranging

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen five d to two thousand and six, And

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>they did another study after that, but during that range

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>show that there were on average two male characters for

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>each female character, a ratio that has remained stable over time.

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Female characters were portrayed as being involved in sex twice

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>as often as male characters, and their proportion of scenes

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>with explicit sexual content increased over time. Have you all

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>seen that as you've had to watch all these because

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you watch like a movie a week for your podcast. Yeah,

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think we do. It's we rarely cover

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>movies that didn't come out post seventy ish. We've only

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>done a few older movies. But you can see. I mean,

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I always I feel like I always get harsh feedback

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>every time I'm like really critical of eighties movies. But

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is like the eighties and nineties,

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of had problematic peak um for for stuff

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 1>like that. I've found, I don't what do you think.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Yeah, it depends on the filmmaker, and it

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>depends on a few different things. But yeah, there's a

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>whole swaw of very problematic movies from those eras and

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 1>from before and from yesterday. So it's just an ongoing trend.

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And the more we watch, I mean, yeah, we definitely

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>we're noticing a lot of trends. We're noticing a lot

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>of tropes in terms of how women are represented and treated.

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean the ones that you listed, there's also you know,

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>so few women of color in movie in mainstream movies,

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>or so few queer women, uh so, a few you know,

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>women with disabilities, any any group that's marginalized. It is

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>rare to see them represented, and when they're represented, it's

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>always in very specific trophy ways. Yeah, this was a

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation that I tried to have on Twitter as civilly

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>as possible about you know, people people really okay, because

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing with Netflix and Steven Spielberg trying to

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>basically discredit some of the films that were on there,

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>including Roma, which won an Academy Award. So my argument

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>about Netflix, which also just canceled one day at a time,

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>so not great. This my argument was before that happened,

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>but which was a great representation of both women of

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>color and the queer community and veterans. To be honest, um,

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>but my issue is that a lot of people are like, oh,

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Netflix doesn't care about about real cinema, and if you did,

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you would have films from the fifties, you know, you

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>only have these current films. I'm like, yeah, but okay,

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>those films from the fifties didn't really include us at all,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you know. I'm like, there weren't so great for women

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of color, people of color in general. So the fact

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's such a wealth of of filmmakers of color

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and specifically women of color that are in a lot

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of these Netflix films, to me, it's like, I understand

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying, but also it is giving a more

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>diverse platform for people that didn't previously have it. And

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>also we are still considered real film Like to me,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>when you say that, when you say, oh, they don't

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>have real films, what you're saying is Oh, these films

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of these people that don't look like me in these

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>stories I don't care about. That's why it's not real.

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>In your nineteen fifties film is real cinema. And to me,

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like, no, that there's a clear just like there's

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a clear issue of why you're saying that that you

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>don't you don't care about our stories as much, or

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't care about you know, these these filmmakers. Well,

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like anytime you put real in front of,

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like as a descriptor in front of any subject, it's

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>usually followed by some bs like real women have curl,

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>really don't cry. Real blank, you know, like it's it's

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a nothing term and it's something used to be elitist,

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, and because usually when the person is using

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>real blankety blank blank blank, it usually means the latter.

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's like real films. No, a real film is

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>any film made, work put into it. Because if if

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you've ever tried to shoot anything, not even necessarily a film,

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you know how much of a labor of love and collaboration.

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It is so too for anyone, you know, to disc

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>credit anything because they think it's cool and edgy, because

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it's in black and white, you know what I'm saying, Like,

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>like Clerks did it in black and white, and they

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to be in the fifties. I think also

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not. I mean when you look at to the

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>amount of people who are are allowed to have theatrical releases,

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>because that's essentially what he was saying is, oh, no,

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the film should have to have a theatrical release. Well,

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>think about who gets that type of funding, and think

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>about the stories that don't get that funding, you know,

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in the studio and the and it's nice that we're

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>able so many eyes on Netflix are able to see

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>our stories and are able to see the work of

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>these filmmakers, and it's unfortunate. Of course they want to

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>have theatrical releases. It doesn't mean the studio is going

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to help them with that. Yeah. I think what it

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>all comes down to is this just that old head mentality,

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>which is all funny because as I explained that there's

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>still going to be some like light irony stuff because

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like a lot of old head mentality

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is this idea that now it's becoming easier to do

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>what I worked hard to do. The reason that's irony

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is because especially a lot of creative spaces. Uh. You know.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The reason you're right, the reason there are a lot

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of these issues are because it's primarily dominated by white men,

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>specifically older white men who have been in the game

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for longer than The reason they've been in the game

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>for longer is because they've had this ability to like

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>whenever I hear like a story of this filmmaker who

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>had a camera at like three, and he always got

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it like my my dad would never let me touch

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a camera because we didn't have the money to burn

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>on me wasting the family camera like I didn't, so

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you have. And and then also I was talking about

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit in the E Sports episode, and

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.959
<v Speaker 1>I think it's kind of the same, the same kind

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of symptom of it, where it's like there's all these risks,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>like for me to pursue my career, it was it

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>caused like a real huge, big blow up in my

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>family for me to you know, my dad comes here

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>from Nigeria and he wants me to be something that

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is guaranteed to make money, like a doctor or a lawyer,

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>or an accountant or a pharmacist. You know. I I

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>used to want to draw and I got talked out

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of going to college for art because he said there's

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>no money in that. So when you think of that

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>mentality from parents who and usually families uh from poverty,

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>like even you know, even like some white families. And

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>then you add like a layer to it where like

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>say you are a person of color, or if you

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>are a female or a woman, uh, you know, sorry,

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a black thing. You know, you have to move

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>it out my vernacular. Uh, if you're a woman and

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you're like expected to like especially like a lot of

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>immigrant families are like you when you're a woman, it's

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like you have to make yourself presentable for a husband.

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>You need to. You can't intimidate them. So like me

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to go into this field that is like, yeah,

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I could be in this for thirty years and nothing happens.

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Luckily for me, things have been happening and my dad

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>has been able to sigh release and now he's bragging

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>as if I did get a doctorates. But but that's

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>what you know, people of color and women are usually

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>facing where it's like because I don't have anyone to

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>point to and hopefully now you know, you know, even

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>on my stream, you know, he means it jokingly, but

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>hopefully like you know someone he's like, he's like, you know,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I can show you like, um, this guy Draco, he's

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>he's Nigerian, he's in the UK, and he's like, I

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>can show my mom that you have dreads and and

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>she'll let me get dreads. Because that's really how it works.

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, when you can point to a Steven Spielberg,

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Peter Jackson, any name, any one of them and be like, look,

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's who I want to be, and your parents are like, oh, yeah,

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you know you are a young white kid and yeah

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you look like that. But if if I'm like, you know,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, hey, I want to be like Steven Spielberg

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Peter Jackson, there's all this baggage where my dad's like, well, no,

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not like them, you you you gotta go, you

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta do the lawyer. And then you add even more

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>compound that's from an immigrant perspective, where like some people

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>who grow up in the hood and think the only

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>way out is basketball, sports or or or wrapping those

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>those are the only two options. So of course, yeah,

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be dominated by this. And then

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you add in the effects of like, okay, you got

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>like college you know, bonds, so you got like Emmerson mafia.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>If you wrote for the what you McCall it the

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm talking about, But what's the comedy

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>thing over there that's real big, right for the Lampoon.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>You have all these connections, and you have this expectation

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>where you have these these these like Ivy League folks

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>in these rooms, um show runners who who think that, oh,

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm good because I went to an Ivy League school

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily because they're funny, and they may have

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>a person of color or a woman in front of

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>them who is genuinely funny, but they're like, well, they

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't go to Emerson, they didn't go to an Ivy

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>League school, they didn't write for the National Lampoon. And

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that's my like bar for comedy. When it's like, oh no,

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>it's this whole funny thing like that's you know, and

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it and it gets even more insulting. I'm doing a

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>tangent ran again, but it gets even more insulting when

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you see like how often people pluck from black Twitter

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>memes and pluck from the things that we are saying

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and use it in their bs and then uh, and

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>then still have the goal to not want to hire

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>black people for some BS bar that we can't reach

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>because even then, ivye have a hard time letting in

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>black people. And I and when I say black people,

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean black people. Africans get in higher on average,

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>just so they can say they're letting in black people,

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>but they're letting in Africans. And there goes a whole

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>another baggage that I can but anyway to reel it

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>all in that is that I don't barely scratch the

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>surface of the baggage. But that's what is up against

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>all of people of color and women, and that type

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of stuff isn't carried. And that's generally what people talk about,

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>just in case someone needs to hear this, When they

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>mean privilege, that doesn't mean that you didn't have a

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>hard life. That doesn't mean that you may not have

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>been poor. But if you were poor and white, you

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>still have a better chance of getting at Harvard than

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a poor and black person. It's just simple facts, and

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>there's data to back that up. Affirmative action help no

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>one but white women, straight up. And it's and it's

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's just why let's just stick to the back.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 1>But I would say to go to end that point

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is essentially that is what studios are more willing to

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>take a risk on, their less willing to take a

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>risk on filmmakers of color, and they're less willing to

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>take a risk on stories from people of color. And

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that has been shown throughout these decades and even now,

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a conversation that we've had in the last

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of podcasts, we're still dealing with that. So all

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to say is when people are like, oh,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't have real film, you know, because it's we

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have film from the nineteen fifties. It's not that

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that you can't watch those. I'm just saying

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that you're invalidating the current landscape of what they have

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>on there that is hard hitting stuff from people of coloring.

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's the thing. You even like what you like,

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but don't try and uh nag or knocked down something

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>someone else likes to try and prop up the thing

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you like, And which is like Steven Spielberg game by

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 1>saying something like what is he losing out on by

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>making that criticism, and just like it just seems so

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>empty to do in the first place. It's just the

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the old head thing. It's that idea of like it's

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>so easy when I worked so hard, when you should

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>be happy about it. It's it's very much like crabs

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in the barrel, like I made it and everyone should

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>should that. That's what separated the cream from the crop.

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, now there's a lot of other

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's separated. And it wasn't even the cream of

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the crop. It was the cream of the who had

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the most known father or uncle or somebody who can

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>give them a leg up. It's it's as simple as that.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>We all know it. It's all part of it. Nepotism

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>is part of it, and and that's not and this

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>always will be a part of it, because like I said,

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a very collaborative scene. So even even everyone in

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this room is probably gonna hire someone who is their

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>friend or homie. But then that just means the onus

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>is if you see a hole or a blind spot

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in the people you're hiring, maybe hire one less homie

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and put someone on who you think deserves it. Fritzing

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>out And I want to end on a positive a note.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Before I know Danny is about to take us to

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>break because I don't like to be so like negative

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>in the industry. I am without like shining line on

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>some positivity. And I will say, and Danny is really

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>good about this. Because of that, there are a lot

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of dope programs to highlight and shine women and people

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of color to get them at that point, Danny is

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>real good about posting when all of these are entering in.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>So don't listen to this and and think that I

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have a chance with all that that whole diet tribe.

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>If you do have a chance, and they are working

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to fix it. It's a long problem to fix when

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to fix so many stems and loops and

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>all that. But there is a shot. And I think

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want it bad enough, even with nothing you

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>know really in front of you, just go for it,

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, just make a safe thing. Make sure you

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>don't kill yourself doing it, but just go for it.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Never let anything stop you from doing what you believe

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you are set out in this world to do. If

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you thank you for that, I'm gonna I'm gonna save

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that and listen to whenever I feel like giving up. Um,

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I do post on my If you follow me on Twitter,

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I do post. I try to post as often as

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>possible for different writers and creators of color when they're

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>accepting submissions for things. We do have to take an

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>ad break. We will be right back to talk more

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>about the Bechdel Test. And we're back still joined by

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin and Jamie, and I wanted to ask y'all about

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the films that we're surprising that didn't pass

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bechdel test. Okay, let me pull up our list.

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>There's I'm never surprised when a movie does not pass

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bechdel times. I mean sometimes they seem to be

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>marketed specifically for women, right, and there's even some of

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 1>those don't pass it. I think the most famous example

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of that that we get. We haven't covered it on

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the show, but it comes up all the time is

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like ane late nineteen thirties movie called

0:25:56.680 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>The Women and we're all female past. It's like ten

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>women you do not like your famously, and the way

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it was marketed like it was like you don't see

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a man on screen the whole time, and that is true.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It does not pass the back because they're only talking

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk to each other. But it's always about it's

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>always about a gotten, it's always about a man named Steve.

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>They're talking about Steve the whole movie. Do you know

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>who wrote that? Let me the womenkay written by? Oh,

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it was written by It was written by two women

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>over so really uh really uh job, no no way

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to no way around it. No, the thing is for me.

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I tend to not remember unless it's like it very

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>handily passes, or it is very clear that the movie

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>would not pass because it only has one woman in

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the entire movie see Raiders of the Lost Dark see

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you Know a New Hope, that kind of thing. Um.

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I tend not to really remember if a movie passes

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bechdel Test or not us because it's a metric

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>that is a useful metric first starting off point to

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about representation of women in movies. But that's pretty

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>much all we use it for is just like, Okay,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this initiates a larger conversation that we can talk about

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a whole stoe of other things. So whether or not

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a movie passes Jamie, as you said, like like the Room,

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that famously horrible, horrible movie past test, but like it's

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>still such a piece of and you know, it's fun

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to watch, but you know, it doesn't mean anything that

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that movie passes. And then I think, like we determine

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>chart here, our our friends are very studious and make

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>up the chart. I would say one that I found

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>surprising was You've Got Mail because it's a rom com. Yeah,

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you didn't think like movies that are like made right

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>for women in theory. And that was came out like

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>what two decades ago. So yeah, I think they talked

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.719
<v Speaker 1>about you know, well, no, I think I think it's

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>probablyly in her book in the scenes in the bookstore,

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, when she because she's talking about her mom

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and she's talking about you know what I mean, Like,

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably how it passed. It. The whole

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>order of the Rings trilogy does not pass the Vachtel test,

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>not one of it's a ten hour it doesn't pass.

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. It has every opportunity and it doesn't. Uh.

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And then another one we did recently that I thought,

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess sort of for the same reason you were saying,

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Danny about You've Got Mail, is five Days of Summer

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't pass the Vechtel test um. Wait, were you saying

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that it does it does pass? Yeah, it does pass.

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm saying I find that surprising because it's

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a rom com. You think, like you know, because she

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>was yeah, okay, yeah, I mean rom coms often don't pass.

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we did. We did an episode about we

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't done um you've got mail yet, but we did

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>do when Harry met Sally and Sleepless in Seattle, And

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there are most of those. There might be like a

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>very quick conversation that just happens to not be about men,

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>but often in rom comms, I mean, there's it's it's

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because like there are certain genres that almost

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>never passed, like action movies like often do not pass

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>because there's usually one woman and she's the love interest.

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>She gets captured, she has to be saved, like she's

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone's like, oh my god, she can kick. I mean

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>even if she's allowed to fight. Usually women are not

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>allowed to fight. Usually they just actual or if you're

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in the locks arc, your only weapon can be like

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a domestic item like a frying pan or in Halloween,

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like all domestic items that that are weapons and

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>oh boy, well this is such an interesting statistics. So um, vactives.

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Authors found that films from thirteen that passed the test

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>earned a total of four point two billion in the US,

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>while those that failed earned only two point sixty six billion,

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that Hollywood makes more money by having more women

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>on screen, which, hello, we've been seeing that, you know,

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>as Yeah, it's kind of interesting that you might be

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>able to capture that whole other demographic of our population.

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we make up half or more than

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>half of the population. Yeah, I mean, it's I mean,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>hopefully people will continue to I mean the past three

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>years is there's been an increase in diversity almost across

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the board, and it's like, can we, for the love

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of God keep that going. There's it's not it's like

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it's good business to like, there's no reason except being

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a bigot toll to not do that. Like people want

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to see these stories, and people will pay to see

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>these stories, So make it happen. Stop making the same

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>boring movie over and over and over. There's a couple

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.479
<v Speaker 1>of other tests it looks like that have come up.

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>There's GLADS, which is Studio Responsibility Index, So that has

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to do with queer characters. So essentially their criteria is Um,

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the film contains a character that is identifiably lesbian, gay, bisexual,

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>or transgender. The character must not be solely or predominantly

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>defined by their sexual orientation. We see that so much.

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like, that's my personality. Um, that's who I am.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>That's my character trait is that I'm gay. That's it. Um,

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I see that. Also. I don't know if there's a

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>if there's a marker for this one, but for plus

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>size women it's normally I'm fat. That's it. That's my character.

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And I remember people like tweeting, hey, you know the

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>fact girl you can like actually give her a storyline

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and other things. Right, she's almost always like the butt

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of jokes. But yeah, exactly. Yeah, the test you were

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just talking about is the Vito Russo tests. And yeah,

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think the third caveat of that is that

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that character, if they were removed from the story, it

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>would have like significant impact on the plot. So basically,

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like their integration into the story, uh needs to be

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>so important that removing them would affect how the story

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>plays out. Um, So few movies that we've done on

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that I've seen in general past the Vito

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Russo test, which is very upsetting. Um. But yeah, there's

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that one. UM. There's another one that I like is

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the way test, which the rules of it are movie

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>passes if there's a black woman in the work who's

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in a position of power and she's in a healthy relationship. UM.

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Of the top fifty movies, five movies passed that very

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>simple metric. Um. There there was a project that five

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight did at the I think it was at

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty at the end of where they

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>invited women of you know, like every every type of

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>woman you could think of to make up their own metrics. UM.

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And there were more. There were more intersectional tests. There

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>were tests that focused for behind the camera, which is

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think something that we don't get a chance to

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>get a lot in our show, but like it's one

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>thing to have. UM. I mean, there's so many movies

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>we've covered where we're like, oh, cool, a female protagonist.

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I think Carrie is a movie that we covered

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that It's like, Okay, you have a movie that is

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>about women, but so much of it is Uncanny Valley

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>because everyone behind the camera is a man. So it's

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>like a man writing a woman's story, and so you're

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>like the story doesn't make sense. Um, and I don't

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>know everyone, everyone check it out. There's I think like

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty or forty different positive tests. Here's something I want

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to butt in with two because I know, you know,

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>whenever you have these conversations, there's this like weird like

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>so there shouldn't be any movies about white wo men,

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, no, that's not the case. I just

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to just drop a number to kind of help

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you realize how this actually isn't a huge impact and

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you still can have your cake and eat it with

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>us representing other people and still making movies about white men.

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Because look, I love Ryan Gosling. You put him in

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>anything that he's my favorite white dude. I'm sorry, I'm

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna sen but there are a total of two thousand,

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and seventy seven films produced each year on

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>average around the world. So yeah, I feel like you

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't really know the difference if you sprinkled it in. Especially,

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I want everyone to take two seconds to try and

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>remember every movie you saw it last year and see

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>if they're see which ones you even remember. We see

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>so many movies and there are are only ones that

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>stick with us, and I think that's okay, because that's

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>how stories work. We're gonna see a lot of stories,

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and certain stories are going to impact us and hold

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a place within us. I still have yet to see anything,

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so so I think it really wouldn't make a difference

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>if every week one movie only one, not even asking

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I want more, But I'm just saying, in

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>this hypothetical, if every year one movie is featuring just

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>solely underrepresented characters and actors and people, that would not

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>even impact the movie scene in a big way. You

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even notice. So so that's that's always And once again,

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the things we because you know we

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>which which I forget which episode we're talking about, we

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>were talking about like you know, white men writing, you know,

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:10.320
<v Speaker 1>people of color and women and this, and you know,

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I was contacted by you know, two different people who

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>were who were writers and we're concerned about, like, well,

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>can I not write? And I was like no. What

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we're saying is there's a difference when it's handled by

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 1>certain people, and actually it's it wouldn't be a problem

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:28.919
<v Speaker 1>if the people representing being represented were able to write

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 1>their own stories. And we just want everybody to write.

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But when someone's taking the center stage and getting to

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.959
<v Speaker 1>tell all the stories, when they're getting all the chips

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>in the bowl and the salsa and we were stuck

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>with the crumbs, then we're gonna look at your chips

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in all your hand and be like, hey, but if

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>everybody's getting chips, everyone's happy. And that's that's what it is.

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>It's more equity than anything, right. We talked about this

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>on the episode we did on the Beguild, which was

0:35:53.640 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that Sofia couple of remakes forgot. It's like, what was

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>just a wretched movie, but it's it's an adapt She

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 1>remade a movie that Clint Eastwood was in from I

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>think the seventies, and that was an adaptation from a

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 1>novel um and basically she erases all of the people

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:16.959
<v Speaker 1>of color in the book, so it's only white women

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in this. In this story, she there was there was

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a character who was a slave because it takes place

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>during the Civil War, but that character gets erased and

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>then when asked about it was like, oh, well, I

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't think I would be qualified to write that character,

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>so I just took her out her completely instead of

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>hiring someone Ellab someone I thought I hadn't. I thought,

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>like I saw a couple of people commenting on this,

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was also because then it would

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 1>make her white female protagonists harder to root for if

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they had slaves. It's like, well then you need to

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>write a better than don't. Don't make that Like it's

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 1>as simple as that. It wasn't a good movie to

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>begin with. It was not. It was also the that

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>I never saw it. I mean, not to come down

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>too hard on the nepotism scale, but like that was

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 1>on that same press tr Sophia. Couple of us like

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what am the beck tailed tests? Just like I just

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:15.919
<v Speaker 1>I sure feminist hero you know, I mean everyone, Yeah,

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:18.879
<v Speaker 1>that movie was trash. Did you want to go over

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the Maco Morey sure? Yeah. This is another interesting one.

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>This originates from the film The Masterpiece Pacific rim and

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the Maco Morey test requires that there must be at

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:36.839
<v Speaker 1>least one prominent female character in the movie who has

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>her own narrative arc and which is not about supporting

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a man's story, right, so it's those three conditions. Is

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>named after the character in the movie whose name is

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Macomoory who who whose arc does pass that test? And

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>she has I mean, she has like her own story.

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>I My main criticism of that movie is that, in

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>spite of the fact that she's given her own storyline

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's satisfying and as dependent on a man, she

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:03.919
<v Speaker 1>has launched out of the climax of that movie, which

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 1>made me gasp, and she doesn't get to participate. They

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are putting her in a pod and she can't be

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the movie. And then at the

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>end she's bobbing at the top of the It's just ridiculous.

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But didn't she say? It also didn't pass the Bechdel

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>tests that that movie, and I don't think that yeah, yeah, um.

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>There's also the Duvernate test um, which is says that

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>characters who are people of color have fully realized lives

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than serving as the scenery in white stories, which

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.320
<v Speaker 1>is something that we do see a lot in the

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>movies that we cover on the podcast, where there might

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 1>be one person of color who's the best friend of

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the protagonists, but they don't have their own narrative arc.

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>They only exist to basically serve as scenery. I feel

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>like that's every nineties movie, really, I do. I feel

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>like that's every It was like, you know, the black friend,

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the Latina friend, you know, and it was like, oh,

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a sassy one, you know. And then they normally

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>die or get killed, like I'm thinking of scary movies,

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.839
<v Speaker 1>but they you know, comes, It's like they never get

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>a fully realized their own Yeah. Yeah, that reminds me

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of Sorry, I was going to say, that reminds me

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of Dave Chappelle showed up randomly and you've got veil

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>also also in A Star is Born, he just shows

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>up randomly. It's like, Dave Chappelle, why are you in

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this movie? And then by the time you get the

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>chance to ask that question, he's gone. You don't. I

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>don't why you keep drinking your brother telling you what wrunk?

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I love a minute, but I just was like, wait,

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>he shows up and then he never comes, you know.

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>That's what I want for the twilight of my career

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is just to show up in movie like he's just

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>been showing up, like he showed up at the Means,

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>he showed up at the oscars. That's That's where I

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.799
<v Speaker 1>need my career to That sounds nice. That sounds nice.

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So then there's the Riz test Uh, named after a

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Riz amn Muslim character based on either their ethnicity, their clothing,

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or language they speak. Do they talk about or are

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the victim of a perpetrator of islamis terrorism? Are they

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>shown as being irrationally angry? Is the character anti modern

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>culturally backwards? Are superstitious? Do they get presented as a

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>threat to the Western way of life? And when it

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to the gender of the Muslim character, is the

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>male character presented as being misogynistic? Does a female character

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>get presented as someone who is oppressed by males, which

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>which just seems like all these tests are like are

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you doing the stereotype? You know, like yeah, yeah, just

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>don't adhere to stereotypes, because yeah, I imagine people listening like,

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, we have to do all of these tests,

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, no, it's just if you have a

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>person of color, if you have you know, if you

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:50.280
<v Speaker 1>have a woman, if you have these which you should,

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>but like actually make them real characters and not just

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>side characters and not just stereotypes. Well, my new answer

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>is like, if you're a good writer, you have nothing

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to worry about because you know, as as I've been

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 1>just writing more and more, you go back and like

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>there there are like blind spots, Like I was thinking

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.399
<v Speaker 1>about this episode today and uh, you know, and one

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of my pilots I was like, damn, there's like two women,

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>uh actually three, but they all are so disjointed that

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>they literally can't pass the Bechdel test because they don't

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>have any scenes together. So then you you have to wonder,

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you know. I I've eventually came to terms that it

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of served the story I was telling. But but

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>like and I think that's an important thing too. Whereas

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>like that's something to have in my head and say,

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know this gets picked up to a series, baby,

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, like then I have to make an honest

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.439
<v Speaker 1>effort to rectify that and make sure you know, we're

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 1>getting scenes with women, adding more women, I think. Uh so,

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like in the case of you know, white women, Uh,

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had a we write stuff for ourselves

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're six black dudes, so we make sure that

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we write something that we are including women.

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's funny looking at our old stuff

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>because some of our old stuff we're like, we failed y'all,

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>uh simply put, but we're like, you know, going forward,

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we need to be more aware of that because you know,

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got six men locked in there, and what can

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you do do here? And I think it's literally that simple.

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And like sometimes if you're like, if the story is

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 1>so important that it serves us, you know, then yeah,

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>then you just go forward with that in your mind

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and be considerate of that and considered just the women

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you do have in your story, how are they, how

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 1>are they communicating with people, how are they being portrayed?

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And and that's really all you need to think about.

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I was had one show concept that had you know,

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and an Asian woman in it who like had the

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the like tiger mom type thing, and I like called

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>up a friend I don't think she's been on the

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.879
<v Speaker 1>cash Jinny Yang, and I like walked through the beats

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of the character is to make sure like I'm not

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>doing anything offensive and and we hash it in it

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>with something great. And obviously if that show got picked up,

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like you're in the room. But like you know,

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, when it's just me the writer, you have

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>to do your due diligence. And those are examples of

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>ways that you can represent people appropriately, talk to have

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>them read it. You know, if you if you have

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>black people in your story and you're wondering like, oh,

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is this gonna be offensive? Find a black friend sended

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to them and have them read it. They'll tell you straight.

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>It's so it's so frustrating, Like and I like when

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 1>a writer is like, well, I'm too anxious to try

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to represent people that aren't exactly me. That's like what

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>perpetuates this problem every single time. So I'm just going

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:42.359
<v Speaker 1>to go out and say you're not a good writer

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>if you don't want to do that. If you're limiting

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:47.479
<v Speaker 1>your if you're putting training wheels on your scripts because

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:49.319
<v Speaker 1>you're afraid of messing up, you're not a good writer

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 1>because you're supposed to be challenging yourself. And right, like

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:53.360
<v Speaker 1>what we said, like if you have queer characters, that

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be their whole That's why if you're saying, like

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not a good writer, that shouldn't be their whole

0:43:57.320 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>thing is that they're queer. That's just the part of

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>who they are, but it's not their whole personality. Yeah,

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not a fleshed out character, is just queer. So

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on that we have to take a quick break and

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we will be right back to talk more about the

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Bechtel test, and we're back. I was going to say,

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we have a Latin next one,

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think if we did, I would want to

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Are they superstitious? Do they have a decal of Virgin

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Mary on the back of their car? Do they at

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>some point say that's in so many school? When I

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was at Io in their screenwriting class, I was like,

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>please stop writing us, like we don't all say that. Well,

0:44:41.280 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 1>this is your opportunity to make up. Yes, the IF test,

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the IFI test for you know, movies feature in Nigerian?

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Am I in it? It fails? Or you're racist? Um?

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think those were the main tests that I

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:05.359
<v Speaker 1>could find. There's no please go ahead. There's something called

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the sexy lamp test. Gosh, she told me this and

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>it was terrifying. Isn't that based around a Christmas story.

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the Christmas story that has the the late woman's

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 1>leg as like the base of a lamp um. So basically,

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:24.240
<v Speaker 1>if you can replace your female character with that sexy

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 1>lamp in your story and the story is still basically works,

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>then that movie fails. Were the ones that they tried

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to do that with. I mean, I would say, like,

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:37.880
<v Speaker 1>are they saying a Christmas story? Is that movie? You

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 1>could replace them? Or no, not so much that they're

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>just borrowing that sexy leg lamp from that movie. But

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I would I would say that, like apply the sexy

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>lamp test to a lot of like Bond films. I

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>bet those would fail like anyone though, there's just like

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 1>a token woman who is like the male heroes, like

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, girlfriend back home that he has to like

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>have sex with once and then like or like a

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 1>woman who's there to like give one piece of information

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and then disappear like it could have been from the lamp. Yeah, talking,

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:17.720
<v Speaker 1>would you count Lars in the Real Girl? Oh my gosh,

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting well we have this com We had

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 1>this conversation before we started recording. I think about Solo

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>about the robot. Do you count? Like do those do

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>female characters that aren't human count? I would? I would

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>say so, yeah, if they are, if they seem to

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>identify as female in some way. And I would also

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>extend like so that we're not being so rigid with

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like gender, if they are like non binary, if there's

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a non binary character who talks to a woman or

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>another non binary character like I would and if they're

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 1>not talking about a man, I would say that pass,

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, we don't, we don't want to like you know,

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>place these rigid restrictions on anything like that. But yeah,

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 1>and then there's just like our men not talking the

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 1>whole movie, liked about right right or the subject of

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>every conversation. Yeah, another one I like this. This is

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>like a more specific vision of the behind the camera stuff.

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Is the Reese Davies test by Katerie Davies. A movie

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>passes if every department has two or more women, which

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is not which which is something that doesn't happen very much.

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Only about a third of movies pass this test because

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>there is such a disproportionate representation behind the camera as well,

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>which is something that I want to be better on

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 1>our show about like paying attention to of. Like it's

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 1>so rare to see female composers, female editors, photographers, um,

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 1>where it's usually where I we're talking about directors, writers

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and talent. But there's like there's so many things that

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 1>like when a movie is edited by women, they're probably

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>going to edit out the shot where you know, probably

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the male cinematographer. It's like a lingering shot of a

0:48:02.880 --> 0:48:07.719
<v Speaker 1>woman in a swimsuit exactly. Yeah. Um, there's another one

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that is, uh, I think lesser known because it's it's newer,

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's called the Kent Test. It's from um Clarkesha Kent,

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's there are many different components to it, so

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll just name kind of the main one. But it

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>determines whether a film or other piece of media has

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 1>provided the audience with adequate representation of women or fans

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of color. And then it has all these different like

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>criteria by which you can like basically, it's like, I

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 1>think twelve different things, and if it scores higher than

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like a six or an eight or some some number,

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 1>then it's like, oh, it's doing pretty well. A lot

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of movies don't fare very well on this test. I

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say, for if he for your episode of

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Black Panther, I'm assuming that that passed the Bechdel test, right.

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And I love the fact that Ryan Coogler had Rachel Morrison,

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 1>who's his DP and has worked with him on Fruitvale

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Station and on Black Panther, So that was that is

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a huge thing that that was pretty cool that he

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 1>had a woman behind the scenes. Um, as one of

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the head people of his crew. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. And

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 1>then I was pointing I was pointing this out to

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you the other day that George Miller, who made Mad Max,

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:17.319
<v Speaker 1>his wife edited it and he there's this quote where

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>his wife was like, why do you want me to

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>edit this movie? Was like, because if I have a

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>man edited, it's gonna look like every other action movie.

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And that that's true. Like one of the benefits you

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:32.320
<v Speaker 1>get from having an underrepresented peace to your film is

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a different perspective. I mean, in a good

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 1>writer's room, that's why you want different perspective. I was

0:49:39.000 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and probably one of the most diverse writing room a

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, and you know, we had you know

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:48.799
<v Speaker 1>me uh, you know, the showrunner was Indian. You had uh,

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:54.239
<v Speaker 1>we had like two women to two men who were writing. Uh.

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And and it was just interesting too, like you know,

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have you just your different things to the way people say, like,

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's all. It's very interesting too to

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 1>have just the one line that I always like to

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:14.400
<v Speaker 1>hear in those situations, uh, you know when someone speaking

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and goes, oh, a woman wouldn't say that, you know,

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 1>like his because because I just even from my perspective,

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:23.880
<v Speaker 1>whenever you see like a black person written by a

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:26.800
<v Speaker 1>white person, you're like, no black person in their life

0:50:27.200 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 1>would ever say that, you know, even just I think

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we were saying that a few episodes ago. Just even

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the relationship to the police, you know, like you, black

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:38.439
<v Speaker 1>people have a different relationship to the police. Black people

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.239
<v Speaker 1>have a different relationship to food. Family eating. There's a

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 1>different dynamic and one parent, two parent households, how they

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 1>look at wealth, how they look at fame. There's it's

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 1>just a whole different worldview. So without someone in there

0:50:51.239 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to check you and be like, oh, that would be whack.

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is why, And I can like totally break

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>down why that person wouldn't say that. You know, it

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>really does help you give that film that extra And

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:06.839
<v Speaker 1>if you just pay attention to what people say when

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:10.080
<v Speaker 1>films nail at on Twitter, I don't see why no,

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>not everyone does it. You know, what were some of

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the films since we're closing up here, what are some

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 1>great films if someone want to check out that do

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 1>pass the Bechtel test that you guys really love well?

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You you just had your Captain Marvel episode, Yeah, that

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>handily passes if we're talking about recent movies that pass

0:51:30.080 --> 0:51:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the Bechtel test, I mean we always talk about Moana. Uh,

0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that's just like kind of the golden standard of all movies. Um,

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 1>are there any Selman? Louise is one of my faves

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know passes handily, and it like Beckham is

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:53.480
<v Speaker 1>covered semi recently that that does really well with representing

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different types of female relationships, where there's

0:51:57.560 --> 0:52:01.440
<v Speaker 1>relationships between women of different uh, generations, of different races,

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of different um like income levels. There's there's a lot

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:07.279
<v Speaker 1>of different types and that's something that I think is

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a blind spot of I mean of the many blind

0:52:09.239 --> 0:52:11.239
<v Speaker 1>spots of the Bechtel test too. It takes it doesn't

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>take into account what type of women are you seeing? Right,

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:21.439
<v Speaker 1>because there's a jillion funnily funnily is that a word?

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to make it funnily enough. Um. Netflix tweeted

0:52:25.920 --> 0:52:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that out on International Women's Day and they were just like,

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:32.839
<v Speaker 1>when taking positive representative this is what they tweeted from

0:52:33.000 --> 0:52:36.200
<v Speaker 1>at Netflix Film, when taking positive representation for women, we

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>need to be critical of what good representation looks like,

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>not just for white women, but for women of color.

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:43.800
<v Speaker 1>To here are some films to watch on International Women's

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Day that not only passed the Bechtel test, but the

0:52:45.840 --> 0:52:51.120
<v Speaker 1>DuVernay test too. Awesome. Yeah so and then people, oh, um,

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:55.720
<v Speaker 1>let's see Roma, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, The Breaker Uppers,

0:52:56.400 --> 0:52:59.760
<v Speaker 1>High Flying Bird to all the boys I've loved before.

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Lot of people wrinkling time. Um. People got you know,

0:53:04.200 --> 0:53:06.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of through some shade at them by tweeting back

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>at them their senior leadership team which is all white men. Um,

0:53:11.200 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and so what I know. But I think for me,

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted something like, we are aware of the problems.

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's so many issues we're aware of. Who

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 1>runs the studios, We're aware of you know. Even when

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Netflix, I think Netflix is more has

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:29.240
<v Speaker 1>been more willing to take risks and giving a platform

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:32.799
<v Speaker 1>to these voices than say other studios. Um. So that's

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:35.640
<v Speaker 1>where I'm a win for it. But it's not flawless.

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>None of these are none of them are so um

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:43.279
<v Speaker 1>in this progress. Yes, So it's it's gonna take time.

0:53:43.320 --> 0:53:46.440
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna take time for there to be you know,

0:53:46.640 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>more diverse, like you know, studio execs and and directed

0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:55.879
<v Speaker 1>everyone through every step of the process. So yeah, it's

0:53:55.920 --> 0:54:00.360
<v Speaker 1>just kind of waiting it out and contributing to the

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:05.760
<v Speaker 1>diversity if you are, you know, a writer, young writer, yeah,

0:54:06.040 --> 0:54:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and not a straight ciss white man. Yeah. I think

0:54:10.719 --> 0:54:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that wraps everything up, unless you had something iffy. No.

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>The only thing I have is where can people find you? Wow?

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You can follow our podcast and listen to it on

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:26.320
<v Speaker 1>all the places that you would find a podcast anywhere

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:28.960
<v Speaker 1>where you get your podcast, which podcasting Apple because I

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:31.440
<v Speaker 1>find that or probably, and then you can follow us

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on social media on Twitter and Instagram at bechtel Cast

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and then on Facebook as well. Just type in bectel

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:39.839
<v Speaker 1>cast if you don't know how to spell it because

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are like, yeah, I tried to

0:54:41.400 --> 0:54:42.800
<v Speaker 1>look you up and I don't know how to spell

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 1>this damn word. It's a b E C H D

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:49.120
<v Speaker 1>E L. And just check out Alison Becktel's work because

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:52.879
<v Speaker 1>it's really good. Um. Yeah, that's where you can find

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:56.359
<v Speaker 1>should be, I guess individually. Yeah, please do. You can

0:54:56.400 --> 0:54:59.400
<v Speaker 1>find me on Twitter at Jamie Left His Help or

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Instagram am at Jamie christ Superstar, and you can follow

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter and Instagram at Caitlin Toronte. Thank you

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for having Yeah, thanks for coming on and

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>for going on. I learned some new tests, and I

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 1>think that that's really cool. Many tests to make my

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:22.239
<v Speaker 1>own tests, Like like you're saying, if they're all like

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 1>basically common sense a good writer, So just have common

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Speaker 1>sense to the top of your intelligence. Yeah, and I'm

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:35.719
<v Speaker 1>asked someone smarter than you. I do script notes professionally

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 1>not to plug but yeah, if you should, because we

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you actually are taking submissions. We have

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a ton of you know, newer writers that we constantly

0:55:46.400 --> 0:55:49.800
<v Speaker 1>hit us up. So yeah, I do. I'm a professional

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:56.400
<v Speaker 1>story analyst. I give thorough notes and uh, I'm so

0:55:56.719 --> 0:55:59.600
<v Speaker 1>excited for all the resources we give the people that

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 1>listen to this podcast. I'm such a nerd, but I

0:56:02.320 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 1>like we had voice actors giving advice. We've had we

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 1>had Xavier come on and and also take he's taking

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:13.319
<v Speaker 1>horror scripts that he'll read, and like, oh man, I'm

0:56:13.400 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 1>so excited. Hit me up at Caitlin Dronte on Twitter.

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, so I don't know tag me. I

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you slide into my d M S.

0:56:22.000 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how things work professionally, sally professionally, you

0:56:29.000 --> 0:56:33.800
<v Speaker 1>can just slide into my dar. For whatever reason, I

0:56:33.880 --> 0:56:37.520
<v Speaker 1>don't respond, but I do read them. Hey, how's it going?

0:56:37.600 --> 0:56:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know that's your boy. If I f y

0:56:40.000 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 1>n w A d i w E on Twitter and Instagram,

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the discord is Discord dot g g slash Salt Squad

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can watch me on Twitch at if D

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:52.960
<v Speaker 1>s I f d E easy on Twitch. We're getting

0:56:53.000 --> 0:56:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it in uh and yeah. Also, you know, if you

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:58.200
<v Speaker 1>like clothes and you need them. If you're listening to

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:00.279
<v Speaker 1>this and you look down and you're like, all my

0:57:00.560 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 1>clothes got holes in them, you can go to Tea Public.

0:57:03.360 --> 0:57:05.960
<v Speaker 1>We have a Tea Public store with lots of narraw

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Diifficent merch always at new stuff and we're like hitting

0:57:08.920 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you up with the I don't know if you could tell.

0:57:11.120 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We've had a themed merchant there. We had the Captain

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Marvel March for the Captain Marvel episode. We had Harley

0:57:17.280 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 1>during the Terror Strong Harley Quinn episode. So just thank you.

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Peep it. Yeah, it's t public dot com slash near Deifficent.

0:57:25.320 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm at miss Danny Fernandez. If you're going to Wonder Con,

0:57:27.760 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I will also be there on Friday. I have a

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:33.000
<v Speaker 1>panel with Aurice Wanser who was on our show. Also

0:57:33.080 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Chris Lam who has a who's going to be on

0:57:35.040 --> 0:57:38.520
<v Speaker 1>one of our future shows. It's LGBT and minority host

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:41.360
<v Speaker 1>How to break Through. I know that we kind of

0:57:41.400 --> 0:57:43.200
<v Speaker 1>did an episode on that, so then you can hear

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>even more if you're interested in becoming a host. That's

0:57:45.800 --> 0:57:48.160
<v Speaker 1>at four pm, Um, I'm going to tweet out all

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of this, and then Saturday, I'm on the Most Dangerous

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Women panel with some killer women that I love, and

0:57:54.720 --> 0:57:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that is at eleven am. So if you're at Wonder Con,

0:57:57.440 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 1>come and say hi to me. Very very so approachable

0:58:05.640 --> 0:58:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and like we always say, stay neardy, stay neardy on