WEBVTT - Rob Mahoney Recaps the SI Top 100

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>We know the seventy Sixers infused the roster without this summer,

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but how much I personally find the Sixers always to

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>be a really fascinating team just by the nature of

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the personnel that they put on the floor. And you

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>know this year especially so. Each of the Sixers five

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>projected starters landed on the annual Sports Illustrated Top one

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>hundred list, Top five or top six in rotation. They're

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>really about a solid as via teams come. That is

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Rob Mahoney. He compiled all the rankings and he talks

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>about them on this episode of the broadcast. Yes, yes, yes,

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we are getting that much closer to the start of

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing and watching and observing some tangible basketball developments for

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 1>two nineteen two twenty with the Philadelphia seventy Sixers. How

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you doing out there, seventy six Ers pod people, I'm

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Brian Seltzer. Yes, the start of training camp on Tuesday,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>October first is less than a week away. Cannot wait.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Media Days on Monday, and then things get rolling. In

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>recent days and weeks, lots of media outlets out there

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>have been pushing out and publishing their lists of player

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>rankings for the season ahead and in the opinion of yours. Truly,

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>there's none better than the one compiled by Rob Mahoney,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>our man from Sports Illustrated. It's a yearly thing that

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>he and I have done going back a few seasons now,

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about the SI Top one hundred and the seventy

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>sixers who appear on that list this year. For twenty

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty Josh Richardson, Tobias Harris, Ben Simmons, Al Horford,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and Joel Embiid, all of whom could very likely be

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>the starting five for the seventy sixers, made it to

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the list, and we're going to dissect the rankings and

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>what went into them with Rob in a moment. First,

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a reminder that to subscribe to the podcast, you can

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>go to just about any one of your favorite podcasting platforms.

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Type in Sixers podcast Network. You will then find our feed, subscribe, follow,

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do whatever you gotta do. In the offseason, we've had

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a new episode about once every week to ten days.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Once training camp starts, we're gonna be hitting you weekly

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>at the latest with new, fresh episodes of the podcast,

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>so do not miss out. Rob Mahoney, he's our guy

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>from Sports Illustrated and for the first time. Ever, he

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>did single handedly the SI Top one hundred. We talk

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.399
<v Speaker 1>about it right now, Rob mahoney. We have established over

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>time that the SI Top one hundred is a very

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>comprehensive and lengthy exercise. But do you ever get to

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a point where you're sick of talking about it or

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>hearing about it, discussing it, debating it. There are certainly

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>times in the process of making it or I'm a

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>little tired of thinking about it. I mean, you go

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with the same players over and over.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>There's kind of only so much deliberation you can do

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>before your mind threatens to kind of ooze out your ears.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So but I've had some time to recover from that.

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm fully prepared and ready to talk about it as

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>much as you'd like. Because Goliver bailed on you this year,

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>did you have to talk to yourself more like who

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>did you have the internal debates with when you're trying

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to sort the list down? Yeah? Yeah, without without Ben

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this year, the entire ranking process, in terms of you know,

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of final cut as it were, was on my shoulders.

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So it was a lot more arguing with myself and

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>then still stink feedback from the rest of our staff

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at Sports Illustrated too. They were really great in terms of,

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, checking biases, checking perceptions, bringing information on the

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>table that you know, when you're thinking about this volume

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of players, there's inevitably some piece of information that slips

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>through the cracks, and so making sure we're being as

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>honest and consistent as possible in this ranking. It really

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>really wouldn't have been possible without them as well. How

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>often would you get to point the list where you

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>were surprised with where a player ended up or did

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a pretty general idea going into it of

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>who would fall on what type of range. I think

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the ranges. I mean, I think the

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>top ten was more or less kind of what I

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>thought it would be, and then things started getting a

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>little strange from maybe fifteen to thirty or so, because

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a year in which a lot

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of the players who have been kind of established commodities

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in that range are starting to age out, or they're

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>starting to get more injured or transitioned in a different

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>stage of their career, and so there's a lot of

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether it's younger guys, whether it's players who

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>have you know, noticeable holes in their game or something

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to prove. Guys are kind of jumping into that grouping,

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that Eric had a little a

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>little more unpredictable than maybe in previous years. And of

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>course later in the ranking too, there's there's obviously some

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>spots where you know, whether it's kind of classic top

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred favorites end up further down the list than

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you may think, or some new players who are kind

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of jumping into the list for the first time end

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>up higher on the list than you might expect. This

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>has become a most looked forward to a preseason right

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of passage the last couple of years for us here

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>at the podcast in seventy six ers Land. But as

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a refresher, if there's anyone new out there listening who

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>has not heard our conversations the past couple of years,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>could you give us a refresher the rundown of how

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you formulate your rankings and things you look at. Yeah,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, I mean, so we're looking at solely the

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>upcoming season, who are going to be the most valuable

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>players within that parameter only, and within that we're trying

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>to look at players in a vacuum, So we don't

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>want to hold it against somebody if they play for

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a bad team. We don't want to boost somebody just

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>because they play for a playoff team or a championship

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>caliber team. We're looking at conceptually, what does it mean

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to have LaMarcus Aldridge or Jimmy Butler or Lebron James

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on your team? What does that do for you from

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a team building standpoint? What does that open up for

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>your team? What does it take away? And so we're

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to account for health. You know, if a player

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>has an established injury, we're trying to account for the

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that they're going to miss a month or two

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>months or six months of the season, if they have

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>an injury history, we're trying to kind of hedge in

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that regard. And also if they're a younger player or

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>an older player, we're trying to kind of project a

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit in terms of where they might be by

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season. So we're looking at the

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>regular season, the playoffs both combined in terms of what

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>could a player give you over the course of the

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>upcoming year. Unfortunately, you could fill a portion of an

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>all star roster with some guys who would probably project

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with him the top fifteen to the top ten. Was

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>this year more than previous ones more tricky with the

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>impact of injuries in creating the list. I think that's

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>always the hardest part of our list. And oh, I

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>should have clarified as well. We don't include any rookies

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>in our ranking as well, so you know, Zion Williams

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and not in the top one hundred, even though you

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>may think of him as a top one hundred player.

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>But as far as the injury piece goes, I mean

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant is the hardest one because he's expected to

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>miss the entirety of the season with his achilles injury.

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think I was, you know, kind of in

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the mind for him going into this before his injury.

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, over the course of the season, I'm constantly

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>making notes about where guys might be adjusted or you know,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>how to consider some guys in the ranking, and all

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>of my notes pointed to Kevin duran being the number

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>one player in the league this season. And so for

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>him to be out not only is obviously that devastating

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for him personally, and it's something he's gonna have to

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>work through and get back, you know, into playing shape

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and playing form, and I'm eager to see him do that,

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but particularly tough given that, you know, Lebron James has

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>had such a stranglehold on the top spot in our

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>ranking for so long, and this really was Katie's first

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>best shot at taking that away. The seventy Sixers were

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in pretty rare company in having five players within the

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>top seventy five of the list. You can correct me

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>if I'm wrong. I think only one other team had

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>five guys inside the top seventy five. I tried to

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>audit that as best I could, but before we zero

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in on the five particular players who cracked that portion

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of the list, what are your general thoughts, Robin, where

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the seventy Sixers are as they head into a season

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>with lots of expectations amidst the change landscape, especially in

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern Conference. I mean, I personally find the Sixers

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>always to be a really fascinating team just by the

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>nature of the personnel that they put on the floor.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this year, especially so with the you

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>know edition about Horford, with you know, all the trades

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they made over the course of the last year, and

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, losing Jimmy Butler now, but giving to Bias

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a chance to really settle in and find his legs

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>with the organization. What his new role is going to

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.559
<v Speaker 1>be in terms of, you know, where their talent matches

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>up with the league. I think we see something kind

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of consistent with the sixers teams passed in the sense

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that the top five itself is going to be very strong.

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The questions are going to be, you know, moving into

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the bench, moving deeper into the rotation, are they going

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to be able to get enough from those guys, because

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, top five or top six in

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the rotation, they're really about as solid as VA teams come.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to bounce around a little bit and not

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>go totally in sequential numerical order, either ascending or descending,

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but I will start with the highest rated seventy sixer

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on your list, Joel Embid number seven. He was number

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>nine this time last year. When you're a top ten

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>player on the top of one hundred, what does that

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>generally say about you, especially given as you explained a

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>few minutes ago, how you do the rankings looking at

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>players within a vacuum and somewhat within isolation. I mean,

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends on where you want to mark

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of the tiers of the league in terms of

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>who is really in that elite class of player. I think,

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joel's maybe just outside of it. When you're

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, really the cream of the crowd

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>being that top maybe five or so from Jannis and

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Kauai and Lebron, Steph Curry and James Harden. Those guys

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>are really in kind of a class by themselves, and

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>that next group maybe six to ten, six to eleven

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>or twelve, depending on how you want to define it.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Those are the players who you know, may have a

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>case to move up in the right circumstances, may be

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>able to, you know, in Joel's case, to develop, you know,

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's his game or you know, getting an even

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>better condition, showing that he can stay healthy for you know,

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>even longer stretches of time. So we can kind of

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>put some of that stuff to rest, have a case

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>to move up into that group and are really kind

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of knocking on the door of it. And so I

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's a really exciting place to be. I think

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>by being in the top ten, you're kind of saying

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>about a player this could be you know, the best

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>player on a championship level team or at least a

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>high level contending team, and that's, you know, exactly where

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers want to be. Obviously, taking a look at

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>his three seasons worth of work in the NBA, where

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>would you say at this point Joel is impacting the

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>game the most when he's on the floor. It's a

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough question, just because you know, with him,

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>even more so than other players in the top ten,

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about a guy who could be the defensive

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>player of the year on pretty much an annual basis,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and also just has the capacity to absorb so much

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>offensive attention. I think his offense as a whole could

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>use even a little bit more improvement if he could

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>stand to be a little bit more efficient. The jumper

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is obviously still a work in progress, and shot selection

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of tied into that in terms of when to

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>take those threes, when to take the long face up twos.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously he's still kind of trying to curtail

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>his turnovers, which, as I noted in writing about him,

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is really kind of a product of his ambition. You know,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Joel is a guy who will try all kinds of

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>moves that makes him such an exciting player to watch

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and such a difficult one to defend. But in some cases,

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, he lets his foot work get away from him,

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>or he picks up, you know, his pivot and commits

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to a move before it's really there. So if he

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>can bring down on those turnovers and some of those

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>aspects of this game, clean up a couple of the mistakes,

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about what could be one of the most

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>impactful offensive players in the game, just because not only

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>is he incredibly productive as a score as we saw

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>last season, but he's a guy who just demands a

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of your attention. From a game planning perspective, if

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Joel is on the floor, he all but demands a

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>certain level of big in order to come back him,

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a certain level of strength and size that opponents have

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to commit to, which takes them further and further away from,

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they want to play small ball, if

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>they want to play whatever their best lineups are, now

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden they have to tweak their rotation

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to deal with him specifically. And so I think he's

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult guy to stay in terms of which

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>side is you know, his bigger asset at this point,

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the bigger, bigger contribution to the game, just because he

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>does have that that incredible balance. Thinking back to this

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>time last year, I think my excitement for the seventy

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>six or season was based upon that. The previous year.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Talking about twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, they finally broke through.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>They got to the playoffs, made a great run of

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the second round. They were limited by the Celtics. They

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>took a lot of the same core going into eighteen nineteen.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>They reached the seventh game of the second round. Obviously

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>they lost the Raptors. But this year the team's going

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to look different. There's more veterans on the bench. Obviously

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the projected starting five could look different. And that's where

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to move to the next guy who I'm

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring up with you, Al Horford, who is number

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>eighteen on your list this year, expected to see a

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of time alongside Joel Embiid. Al Horford at this

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>stage of his career, where do you see him at?

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he's still a pretty incredible player. And some

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of it, you know, in making the top one hundred,

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at, as I mentioned, kind of the flexibility

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and the malleability of these particular talents. And so in Horford,

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>you have not only one of the best centers in

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the league, but a center who you can now transpose

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to the sixers and him be one of the best

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>power forwards in the league. And then you move into

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that backup center spot, you know, conceivably behind Joel and

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>really help stop that gap there, which is always a

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>problem when you're talking about how do you replace the

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>minutes when you're superstar isn't on the floor. Horford, I think,

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who he makes your defense kind of

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>holistically better, great communicator, great in rotation, really preemptive, and

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the Philadelphia in particular, a team that

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>already defends at a really high level already has so

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>many varied, inversatile pieces to move around the board to

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 1>help control matchups. I think Horford is just an incredible

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>piece to have in that equation. And so you have that,

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:27.839
<v Speaker 1>and then as well, you have a great playmaking big,

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy who can stretch the floor but also who

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 1>can take some bigs off the dribble, as we've seen

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>him do against Joel for example, in previous playoffs. So

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Horford is a guy who I think is

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>tricky for fans who are looking for a very particular

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of dominance. If you're looking for a guy who's

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>going to you know, powerpost like Joel does, who's going

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to fill up the box score like some other bigs do,

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>who's going to be just demonstratively dominant on every possession,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not that guy. But he's the kind of player

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>who when you watch him as a member of your

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>team over the course of a season, you start to

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>notice and all these little accumulations of these things he's

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>contributing to the game, not to mention the fact that

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>he's just a beloved teammate around the league, a guy

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know, players respect and listened to a lot,

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>which I think, as we talked about for the Sixers,

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>could go a long way as well. How curious are

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you to see how Horford and Joel are used on

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the defense end of the floor. We saw times last

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>year in the postseason. Think of when Joel covered Pascal Siakam,

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>he was more up against a four. Obviously, Al Horford

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>can take on both positions as well. What do you

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>envision happening there is as far as how they split

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>reps between those two spots. I think it's really fun

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>because when you're talking about playoff matchups in particular, you know,

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you're really getting into the micro level detail of an opponent,

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is you know, singling out almost a very specific kind

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of pick and roll matchup for example, to attack, you know,

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>whether they want to go at Joel or away from

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Joel or whatever it is. And so having you know,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>two bigs who are really you know, all League caliper defenders,

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it really leaves you no quarter, you know, as an

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>opponent in terms of who you're going to go at,

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>who you're going to engage, which then forces you into

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of other action. Then you're really kind of

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>dwelling on the perimeter a little bit more. You're getting

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>out of your comfort zone as a team when you

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>take away you know, even basic pick and roll stuff.

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, I like that flexibility in terms

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of if you have a guy like Siakam or you know,

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>someone who really is oriented towards attacking the basket, then

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you could put Joel in front of them and really

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>use his link to that kind of great advantage. And

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking to defend in space as the Sixers.

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Now you have Forford, who really does that about as

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>well as anyone in the league in terms of reading

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>those situations and understanding kind of where to take the step,

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>how to cut off the angle, all these things that

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of go into the microprocessing of managing a possession

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>at the NBA level, and so there really aren't many

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>teams that have that flexibility. I'm sure there will be

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>tradeoffs to playing as big as the Sixers do, but defensively,

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of managing those kinds of matchups and those

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>kinds of situations, I think they're in a really unique

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and powerful position. Were you surprised that he signed with

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers? Very just because I didn't know. You know,

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>with al there's always the question of do you want

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to be playing center? You know? And how much is

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that important to him? Because in some ways I think

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it is probably his best position, just because you can

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>leverage the unique things that he does more effectively. There

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>but the idea that, for one, I didn't know how

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers were going to make the math work. There's

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>already the question of you know, Jimmy and Tobias, you know,

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what are they going to offer these guys? Are they

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to bring them both back then

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously with the situation with Jimmy and moving on from

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that and being able to flip effectively him into both

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>al and also bringing in Josh Richardson as well. I mean,

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a very delicate line to walk from a salary

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>cap standpoint that I honestly just didn't know that they

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>had the room for. I was in the camp that

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>figured that, you know, Horford would end up kind of

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>resigning with the Celtics, maybe just on a one year

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>deal or opting in for you know, for his contract,

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of figured he would end up staying there.

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So to see him in Philadelphia is a nice surprise,

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>just from the perspective of seeing new and fun things

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in the league. A domino that definitely dropped in terms

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of that whole equation was Jimmy Butler ending up with

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Heat Josh Richardson coming to the seventy sixers

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in the sign and trade. He was number seventy one

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>going into last season, on the top one hundred, number

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 1>seventy one again this year. Defensively, he's got a lot

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of things to be excited about. Offensively, it seems like

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>he can do a couple different things, play at two

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>different spots. So versatility is that one of the more

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>prominent themes that stands out to you, Robin when talking

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>about Josh Richardson. I think so. And that's really a

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>credit to the work he and the Miami Heats developmental

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>staff have done over the last two years in particular

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>where they really needed a lot of ball handling help.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And so part of that experiment was, you know, with

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>both him and Justice Winslow, kind of stretching out how

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>much those guys can contribute from a ball handling and

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>creative perspective. And so we saw, you know, Josh Richardson

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>do a lot more coming off of curls into a

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>pick and roll kind of similar actions in a way

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to I think what Sixers fans would be familiar with

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>what JJ Redick has done and some of the same implementations.

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>He's not the same shooter, but he's a guy who

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe is even more comfortable in terms of putting the

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>ball on the floor and making that next move, whether

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a pass to the corner, whether it's pulling up

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>for a mid range jumper, whether it's going all the

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>way to the basket. I think he has a little

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more flexibility to that part of his game. So

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about his offense, obviously he's going to

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>be a spot up option in certain scenarios. You know,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a postal player like Joel Empide, you want

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that the floor is spread. But with

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh Richardson, I think he gives you some variability in

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of how possessions unfold from beginning to end, a

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit more unpredictability in kind of navigating a defense

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>and what they're throwing at you. And then defensively, as

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, I think it's just a great pressure defender

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>can really get up and into people in a way

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that makes a lot of sense, combining with kind of

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the catch all defensive guys like Embid and Horford. Where

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>do you see his ceiling being at. I don't know

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that he has a big step left to take. I

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>think he's kind of where in the general range of

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>where he's going to be, just because unless there's some

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>just dramatic change in terms of the burst off the

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>first step or his jumper, those are kind of the

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 1>two areas where you would you would look for him

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to improve because He's already a guy who is kind

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>of maxing out from an effort standpoint, He's really dialed

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>into every possession he's on the floor. He's already a

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>very good defensive player. You know, a guy that I've

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>voted for All NBA Second Team in the past, and

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of in that group with all those

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>great perimeter defenders. And so then it's question of where

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>does this guy take a step And it's kind of

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.479
<v Speaker 1>the hardest area in a sense in terms of being

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>more efficient as a creator, being more efficient while putting

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>up more volume. You know, that's a big hurdle to

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>jump as a wing guy in the NBA, And it

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>really is what separates guys like Josh Richardson from that

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>next class of player, whether you know, maybe a class

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>where you might consider to bias to be in that

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>group or even higher in terms of guys who can

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>really create a bit more for themselves without a lot

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of help. Where Josh, I think, is kind of been

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a range where he needs a little bit more screening action,

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more offball stuff, just to free him

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit more because off the dribble, he's

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily you know, he doesn't have the most shake

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to his game, I'll put it that way. So along

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>those lines, is it simply plug him into the system

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the seventy Sixers had been running the last two years

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>since they got the full compliment of their core and

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>started to go on these postseason runs, or do you

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>envisioned things being tweaked a little bit? Perhaps? I think

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll have to be tweaked, just because the threat of

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Josh Richardson's shot is not the same as the threat

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of JJ Reddick shot. And you know, those handoffs between

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>him and Ebide, for example, were just such an important

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>part of what the Sixers were running pretty much all

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the time. So when you have the calculus of that changed,

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and then of course you're bringing in a very new

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and different piece and a guy like Horford, I think

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it not only kind of opens up the playbook in

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a sense because you have another playmaking big on the

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>floor or another connector who can get you kind of

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>from one side to the other, from one action to

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the next, but you're also gonna have to deal with

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the things you're giving up, whether that's JJ shooting,

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>whether that's what Jimmy was giving you, you know, as

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>an isolation and as a pick role player, there are

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 1>some things to offset here, and so I think the

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Sixers are you know, they're They're always kind of one

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of the more unique offenses in the league in terms

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of how they run, and I think they're in a

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>position to kind of take some some even more some

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some even more unique steps in different steps going forward,

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of no no team has personnel like this,

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and that, you know, really opens up the door for

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of creativity, for a lot of ingenuity on

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the part of Brett Brown and his staff, which is

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a big part of the reason why I'm eager to

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>see how this works. That segues nicely into the themes

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>surrounding Tobias Harris for this year, who before even getting

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>into his role with the Sixers this season, and how

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it might be different from what we saw last year.

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>For a guy to jump, I'm gonna do quick math

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>because I'm terrible at It's sixteen spots on your list.

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Tobias Harris was sixty five going into last year and

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>he's now number forty nine going into this season. Is

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that a pretty substantial jump. It's definitely a substantial jump,

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think you could even argue within that jump

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, with the sorts in particular, I think

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Tobias was asked to give up a lot of what

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he does well, especially in terms of running kind of

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the pick and roll game. Really great

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>complete pick and roll player, whether he's initiating and or screening.

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And the Sixers just don't run a lot of pick

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and roll in a traditional sense, and so Tobias was

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>so often kind of a guy on the week side

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of the floor, balancing things. He was involved in different capacities.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think certainly a player who could do more

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>in a post Jimmy Butler era, and as you know,

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers look to get even more, to get even

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>weirder in a sense of the stuff that they're willing

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to run. I think he could be the beneficiary of

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that a lot. But just you know, top to bottom,

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>even with all of that understood, just a very impressive

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>season from Tobias in terms of his three point shooting,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, his complete scoring game, and also kind of

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:45.959
<v Speaker 1>finding his way a little bit as a team defender.

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he still has some room to grow in

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that regard and settle in to really be a you know,

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>an even more solid team guy on that side of

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball. But I think he has a chance to

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>be to be pretty reliable from what you've observed, from

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you've heard from other people. What do you things allowed

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>him to continue to develop his game, It seems like

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in a pretty linear fashion over the course of his

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>career in the league. I think some of it is

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>just that he's been given such different opportunities even from

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>year to year. He's been on a lot of, you know,

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.479
<v Speaker 1>very differently shaped teams and of course bouncing around through

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different franchises, and I think, you know,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>it's curious kind of the way that no team has

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>really been able to commit to him until now in

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of your guy we really want to feature within

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>our team that we want to build around, that we

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>want to cultivate even more. But that has put a

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure on him to really take steps every year.

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>There's never really been a position where he could be comfortable.

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And so some guys, I think, whither in that kind

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>of environment and they fall out of the league or

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they followed the rotation, and Tobias has really kind of

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>taken the opposite tact where I think it's encouraged him

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to add little things to his game, to you to

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>tweak his game even a little bit. Not to mention

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I think that you know, the the

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, the tenor of the modern game suits him

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>very well in terms of of a big who can

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>put the ball on the floor, or wing however you

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>want to classify him, but a bigger wing certainly put

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the ball on the floor, create for himself a little bit,

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>makes them plays, has a nice kind of in between

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>game that can work through the seams of a defense.

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of exactly what teams need right now,

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>because you know, India defenses, professional defenses are so sophisticated.

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You really need guys who can kind of find their way,

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and Tobias is so good at that and really has

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>developed that part of his game in particular, you know,

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>since leaving you know, the Orlando Magic or so over

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. We'll wrap things up with

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>number twenty three on the list. Up three spots from

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>this time of year ago. That would be Ben Simmons.

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>What growth areas did you see from Ben in your

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>number two in the NBA? Well, I mean, obviously there's

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the question moving forward of you know, his shot and

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>how that plays into, you know, the future of his game.

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.479
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of the rest of it, I think

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>there's there's just so much to like. You know, you're

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about a player who's you know, probably the most

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>versatile point guard defender in the league in terms of

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy who you can throw just at normal point

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>guards and live with that matchup on most nights, He's

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not going to get beat by most opponents. He's so big,

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>he can take away a lot of things in terms

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of driving angles and shooting angles that other guards rely on.

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Great rebrounder obviously for his position, really really interesting and

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>creative playmaker in terms of the things that he sees

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and finds on the floor, and a pace Accelleran, a

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>guy who's going to get you easy you know, a

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>lot more easy shots just by being on the floor,

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>because when he gets that board, he's going to go.

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And so when you have already that kind of foundation,

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>already a pretty well versus well balanced game, who can

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>work some dribble handoffs, who can do, you know, just

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like to buy us both sides of a pick and

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>roll game if he needs to, Who can be more

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of a facilitator and a connector. I think he's such

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>an interesting player from a team building standpoint because he

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>allows you to go in so many different directions. Whether

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that means you want to play him as a kind

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of traditional buy the book point guard, whether that means

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to work him into a different kind of

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>role depending on your lineup. He just allows you to

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>experiment with so much. And I think that's kind of

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the strength of Ben's game is the idea, if you

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>have a Jimmy Butler on your team, or to Bias

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Harris on your team, we're now at all Horford on

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>your team, that you can lean into those players' strengths

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and still find things for Ben to do that are

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.239
<v Speaker 1>really effective and really important on the floor. A lot

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of the talk around here after the playoffs last year

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>was the job that Ben did, specifically on the defensive

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the floor in the opening round series against

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the Brooklyn Nets and Angel Russell, and then doing as

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>much as he could against Kawhi Leonard for the bulk

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Toronto series. Did you like what you saw

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>out of him defensively? Did he show you something a

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit more? I think a little bit more, But

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>he was already a pretty impressive defender to begin with.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he was already working from a pretty high bar,

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>high bar, excuse me, And so there were some added

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>challenges in terms of the you know, the personnel that

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you're describing, really kind of handling those matchups is a

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>different level of scrutiny, requires a different level of attention

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>than what he's been asked to do previously. But he's

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>always been very impressive and dependable already on that end.

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, just in terms of the versatility of that,

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea that your point guard could be the guy

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you throw at Kawhi Leonard, Andy Angelo Russell, there just

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't many players who can handle, you know, that breadth

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>of assignment, and so that that piece of it is

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>very impressive and certainly allows the Sixers to do a

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of interesting things with how they juggle their matchups.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>As you put a bow on all this zooming back

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>up to around thirty thousand feet, it sounds like for

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a team that's been pretty steady defensively the last couple

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of years, would you think the Sixers have a chance

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to take their team collective defense to another level this year?

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I mean just you know, even in

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, having Jimmy Butler for part of the season,

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and Jimmy is you know, really an impressive on ball

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>defender in particular. But when you're looking at how do

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.719
<v Speaker 1>you replace a player like that or move on from

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a player like that, you know, Josh Richardson is certainly

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a great start in terms of replicating a lot of

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing what Jimmy was doing defensively and maybe

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>you can even be more dedicated on that because he

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>won't be called to do so much offensively. And then

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Al Horford just in terms of kind of your your

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>defensive brain trust, having another guy who's thinking the game

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>at that level on the floor and helping to run

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>things can only be a boon for your defense. So

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have the standout defensive talents in both

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Joel and Bid and Ben Simmons, two young players who

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you know really could only take another step defensively as

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 1>they keep maturing and keep growing. You have, you know,

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this defensive type captain in terms of All Horford and

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a new guy in Josh Richardson and Tobias who you know,

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>at the very least as a big body and a

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>guy who can move around to a lot of different matchups.

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>There's there's again, just so much to work with there.

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the consistent theme with the Sixers

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and what makes them, you know, in some ways difficult

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>because this is not a buy the book team, this

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is not a traditional team. There when you have all

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>these options on the table, it can be a little

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>bit exhausting, I imagine to try to find, you know,

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the best avenue to deploy all of these different weapons.

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But that's exactly the kind of problem of coaching staff

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>wants to have, wellne with this. The third week of

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>May has been the crossroads point for the seventy sixers

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in two eighteen and twenty nineteen, where they run in

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the postseason has come to an end. Do you think

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>there'll be more seventy six of stuff on the court

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about beyond that date come May twenty twenty,

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I definitely do. I mean, I think that this is

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a team that just has an incredible amount of potential

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the upward mobility, and some of that

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is Joel you know where you know, as we're talking

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>about the top ten guys, the top fifteen guys in

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the league's he's one of the few players who I

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>think in the near term future, whether that's the next

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>two or three years or so, you could really be

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about him as is he you know, in the

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation of is he the best player in the league?

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Does he's that kind of a growth arc that he

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>could take to his game. He has that kind of

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>foundation already, and so when you're working from from that

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>place to begin with and adding all of this, you know,

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this talent and repositioning this talent in an Eastern conference

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that I think, other than the Bucks, doesn't have a

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of teams that I think are credible challengers to

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the six She's in it. From a talent standpoint, I

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>think this is a really great opportunity for them this year.

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be a lot to figure out, but there's

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>there's really a nice window here for them to do

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>something important. Awesome, great stuff is always Rob Mahoney, the

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>man from Sports Illustrated. Thanks so much, as always for

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the time and excellent to get the wisdom and insights.

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course, thanks Rattingie. Before we part ways on this

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>episode of the podcast, I want to leave you with

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a piece of sound from Brett Brown's annual media lunching

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>with reporters that was held this past week on Wednesday,

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>September twenty fifth in Center City. He talks about what

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to expect from the seventy sixers in this season ahead,

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that by playing it into this episode

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that could whet the appetite for some of the storylines

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get to see coming out of training camp

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>starting next week. So here's Bretton at his media lunching.

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I know we're going to play defense. That still is

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>real my day. It's where my head is scented as

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>our starting point. You git me talk about Philly edge

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>hard and real. It's true in the city. You know

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>what I'm gonna say. And so I feel comfortable that

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to defend because we can, and it's how

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I see the world. I think that we're going to

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>score because we have options. I believe we have a

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>championship Calibertina. It is just about upon us training camp

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and the preseason. We're going to dig into it that

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>much more next time on the broadcast to see it