WEBVTT - The Mark Moss Show 2-23-24

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:01.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Mass Show. We always talk about the way the world

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is changing as we look at it through the lens

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>of politics, finance, and technology, and today we are going

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to look at where the economic world is moving into.

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>This continues to further discussions that we've had showing what

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the natural constraints of the central bankers and politicians are.

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So we know what moves are coming and so we're

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>going to break that down. So, like I said, most

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>people have been watching the doom, the doom and the gloom,

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the doom scrolling if you will, across YouTube and Twitter

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram, et cetera, and unfortunately the doom and gloom cells,

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>which is why people continue to do it. I have

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>found myself in this trap all though for the last

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>year so I've been trying to be much more optimistic.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I always was, but I was still using some doom

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to sort of bring people in. However, I've been trying

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to change that and a lot of people aren't. And

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that. The reason why is we kind of

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>know this. We see social media post things for engage.

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Rage gets more engagement, rage fear those to get more engagement,

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it starts to divide us. Mainstream media they show us

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>all the doom and gloom, and unfortunately, like I said,

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>that's what sells. And while most people are so worried

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>about their watching every video on, you know, the debt

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and the bond market's going to

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>implode and the yield curve is going to reinvert, and

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to mean recession. Recession, recession, recession. What does

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:31.279
<v Speaker 1>that mean? Everyone's afraid of a recession. But why well,

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean technically, a recession would be that growth is slowing,

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>so that means businesses aren't doing as good, You're not

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>making as much money, and ultimately your quality of life

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>would go down. Okay, that that sounds pretty bad and

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it is. However, we also then the other side of

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a recession. We have what's called the markets. So we

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.559
<v Speaker 1>have the economy and we have the markets. Now, those

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>things used to be the same. You see in the

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>economy when businesses when when you and I the people

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>did good, then the business is good. When the businesses

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>did good, then the markets did good because we would

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>buy those businesses through publicly traded stocks and equities. And

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>when those businesses did good, meaning their revenues went up,

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>their profits went up, then their stock would go up,

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and so then we were all in this together. We

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 1>made more money, which means we spent more money, which

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>means the business did better. So the economy did better,

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>which then meant the markets did better. But that's no

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>longer the case. As a matter of fact, I've been

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>most economists talk about sort of pre COVID era. I don't.

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Maybe maybe we can call it BC before COVID.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And really the world changed in two thousand and eight,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and specifically the markets and the economy changed. Specifically, the

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>way that the governments and central banks work in the

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>markets changed. This is something I've talked about quite extensively. Really,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the way central banks and the governments changed the way

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they interacted the markets happened in two thousand and eight,

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and since then it's only continued to accelerate and get

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger. We've seen it.

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not going to go through the whole

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>timeline and history of this, but twenty twenty, I mean,

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it was just put into steroids, was put into overdrive.

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And so now we sort of have to when we

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>look at economic data financial data, we have to sort

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of look at like pre COVID era, and so we'll

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 1>talk about a little bit of that. We also to

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>look at like two thousand and eight era. But what

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say is in the twenty twenty era,

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>what we saw maybe for the first time, or really

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>became obvious to everybody for the first time, was that

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the economy in the market split. They were no longer

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>equal to each other anymore like they did in the past.

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So what we saw is that literally literally all, you know,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>not all, but a majority of businesses, the economy was

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>shut down like a light switch, turn the lights off,

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>turned the economy off, not just in the United States,

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but most of the world, pretty much the whole world

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. So the economy was shut down.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>We saw countless people lose their jobs. We saw countless

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>millions of businesses literally shut down. Businesses that have been

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>around for multiple decades, multiple generations, were shut down permanently

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for good. A lot of them never made it. You know,

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>here in southern California, up in like Hollywood, you have

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>all these iconic restaurants that have been around for decades.

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, served, served, famous, serve famous, famous athletes from

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>way way way back, and they're just gone. Now. Landmarks

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>are gone. Right, And so we saw literally the economy

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>shut off, but then the markets, meaning the stock markets

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and things like that made crazy all new all time high.

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So how does that work? How can we have a

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>recession and yet we have a boom in the markets

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Well, that's the world that we

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>live in, and so it's important to understand that. So

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>when everyone's afraid of a recession, we have to understand

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>what are we afraid of? You See, this is a

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>question that I get asked a lot mark. What are

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>we going to do to protect ourselves from inflation, or

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>from a recession, or from central bank digital currencies, or

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>from attacks on our privacy things like that, if what

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>if the electricity goes out? All these different things. And

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>what I always typically, always, typically, typically always reply back

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>with is what is the attack vector you're trying to

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>protect against? So, for example, if I think that if

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about a recession, okay, then what is it

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>that I'm afraid of the recession for while I'm afraid

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that my job might get taken out? Okay? Well, if

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you're in a if you're in a job you work

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>for a business that's highly dependent on the let's say

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>on economy, that would be highly influenced by a recession,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that could be a problem. But I could have a

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>job that's not recession. I guess that that is recession proof.

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So let me give you an example. If I was

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in a business that was only catered to tourists, for example,

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it was all tourism based. Well, in a bad recession,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>tourism might slow down, and so my business might be

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>impacted by that. I might lose my job, or if

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I have a business in that sector, I might suffer. However,

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I have a buddy who has a business where he

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>does like flood and fire restoration. So if your house

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>floods or your house gets a fire, he works for

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the insurance companies and he will go fix your house.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>That business is recession proof. It doesn't matter where the

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>recession's at. If you have a fire or flood at

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>your house, insurance going to pay for it. And so

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to kind of think about what am I

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to protect against. Some people think, well, a recession

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is just bad for the market. So like if we

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have a recession, then my retirement accounts are going to

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>get cut in half, my value of my home is

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>going to get cut in half. And that's where we

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about today because is that necessarily the case.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's just take a look at some of the data.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>So what we saw this week officially Japan, the Japanese

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>economy officially shrinks unexpectedly. In the final quarter of twenty

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, the gross domestic product or GDP was down

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>zero point one percent. Very dramatic. I know, I know,

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>very dramatic, but it's down and it's technical, right we

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>want it. We ow to understand this. Japan dropped a

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>rank in the global standings and went to become the

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>fourth largest economy now after the weekend of twenty twenty three,

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and it was weaker than what most economists had projected it.

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So these economist always trying to project where things are

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>going because markets are forward looking. And so what we

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>see is that the economists had forecasted zero point two growth,

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but then the economy actually contracted, so is much worse

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>than what they had thought. Now zero point one doesn't

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>sound like a lot, but technically, now the Japanese economy

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is in a recession, and because it's now contracted for

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>two consecutive quarters. Now, if you remember, the Biden administration

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>changed the definition of that, So technically two quarters and

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to contracting quarters consecutive quarters don't mean a recession in

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States anymore. But in this case, they're declaring

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Japan to technically be in a recession. Now, the data

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is preliminary, is small enough I mean, zero point one,

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and small enough to leave room for doubt. So what

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>does that mean. I mean this preliminary, It means they're

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>still gonna retally the numbers and the margin is so

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>small we might be able to just find a little

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of extra you know, economic activity over here in

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the corner and bring it in and then when we

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>revise the estimates that are going to come in next month,

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe it could paint a different picture. So

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're at. Okay, So technically, as of today

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we've slipped. It could be revised and will be out.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>But does it really matter whether Japan is in a

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.439
<v Speaker 1>recession right now? Could be debatable? Right, Like I said that,

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the information is still gonna get revised. And what's interesting

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>about this is though, even though the GDP contracted for

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>a second straight quarter. When we look at other data,

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>such as business surveys, it tells us a completely different story.

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is why you can't rely on any one indicator.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>You have to look at lots of different things. So

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>when we look at some of the business data, some

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of the business surveys, and we look at the labor market,

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it looks like something different. So, for example, if you

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>look at Japan's unemployment, and don't worry, it's not all

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about Japan. We're going to talk about EU. We're gonna

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about the We're gonna talk about the the EU,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about England, and we're gonna talk about the

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>United States. We're gonna get through all these but we're

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about Japan for a second here. But I gotta

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 1>take a very quick break. If you're just tuning in

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>your listening to the Mark Moas Show, we're talking about

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>recession and markets and booms and busts and so much more.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:27.719
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to miss what's coming up next. Don't

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>go away, I'll be right back, all right, Welcome back.

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>If you just tune in your listening to the Mark

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Moas Show, we're talking about how the United States and

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>other major nations that major economies around the world are

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>technically falling into recession, but is it as bad as

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>what people think it is? And so we're looking at that,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Japan right now. We'll get to the EU,

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to Britain, we'll get into the US, but

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>right now we're just talking about Japan. And so what

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>I was saying is technically we're in a recession, very

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>very small zero point one percent of contraction in that. However,

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the data is still going to be revised and be

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>released next month, and so it could change. But the

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>point that I was making is though even though that

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>never came out, some of the other data is contradictory

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. And so, for example, business surveys of the

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>labor market are telling a different story. We can see

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in the unemployment which fell to an eleven month low

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>in December, which is pretty interesting. So typically you think

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 1>of a recession like, oh my gosh, gross slows down,

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably going to lose my job, But in this case,

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>unemployment actually has continues to fall lower and lower and lower,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>which showed that business conditions across all industries and firm

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 1>sizes were the strongest they've been since twenty eighteen. It's

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting. So GDP's slowing down, although the job markets

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the strongest it's been since twenty eighteen. Now we're going

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk about why that is in a minute. Let's

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>just keep going. We can see that many economists expect

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>makeup Japan to now end its policy of negative short

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>term interest rates. They had wanted them to the Japan

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the boj bankup Japan kept saying they were going to.

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>But how can they now? And we'll talk about why

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>this is important, But how can with these GDP numbers

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of contracting growth, how could the boj think about ending

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>negative vent rates or going to a tightening cycle. And

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the answer is they probably can't. So this leads into

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>where we're going. But let me just hit on a

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>couple more points here about Japan. Like I said, it

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>lost its spot from the third biggest economy to go

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>into the fourth and now is in this technical recession.

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And so what comes next and again understanding of some

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of the constraints, we'll talk about that, but let's jump

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>over to the European continent for a minute, and what

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 1>we can see over in Europe is sort of the

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>same thing the whole Euro Area. For the most part,

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the EU shows that the economy is now losing momentum

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're starting to downgrade or slash their outlooks. So

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the EU, we saw the GDP gross

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>domestic product was expanded expanded the zero point eight percent,

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the outlook, but they had projected one point two

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 1>percent in a prior prediction. And again when you look

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>at public financials, when you look at governments, they try

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to project out what the growth of our revenue profits

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>will be. The problem is when businesses, companies and governments

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>miss those projections and so downgrading that is pretty bad.

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And going from one point two, which is bad growth

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to zero point eight is like almost no growth, So

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty pretty big deal. Now, on the bright side,

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>they say that inflation has slowed down to two point

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>seven percent this year, which is basically matching the European

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank's estimate, So that's good. So apparently they're getting

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it under control. What we can see is that this

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>is through the EU, but in the UK they are

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>also suffering from the same thing. As a matter of fact,

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they're dealing with the recession now as well, we can

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>see the UK recession deals a fresh blow to Sunak's

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>economic promises. And so what is that means? So again

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the intersection of politics, finance and technology,

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>and finance should not be technical. I'm sorry, finance should

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>not be political, but yet it is. And so that's

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about here. We can see that GDP

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>fell zero point three percent in the fourth quarter of

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>last year. Again, they had projected a zero point one

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.719
<v Speaker 1>percent drop, so again it was worse than they had expected.

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Now we can see that this is affecting their Prime

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Minister Rishi Sunac, who so far has failed to meet

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>his pledge to grow the economy. And so this is

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the big key. In order for politicians to stay in power,

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>one they have to promise more things. So each politician

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is incentivized to offer you more free things. That's why

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Biden is trying to slash student debt. Right. We have

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to continue to give more and more stuff with to

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>buy the votes, if you will. And so Prime Minister

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Rishi came in with a whole bunch of promises. I'm

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>going to list them here in a second, one of

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>which was to grow the economy and in the United States,

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it's also as important. We'll come to the US, but

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>no income and president or maybe only one meaning a

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>returning president, has won. In a time of recession, the

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>economy has to be growing. Rishi Sunik pledged that he

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>would grow the economy, but yet grossmc product is falling,

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's falling faster than what the economists had predicted.

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>It says. While the economy still grews zero point one

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>percent across the entire year as a whole, it's the

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>slowest annual expansion the UK has seen since two thousand

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and nine. So that's pretty bad now. If you think

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>about that. That's two thousand and eight. Two thousande was

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the Great financial Crash, so after the worst crash in history,

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we had a rebound that typically happens. But since then

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we've been in this up trend for the last decade,

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve years, fourteen years, and it's the worst that it's

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>been since that time. It's pretty bad now. We can

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>see that this is a like I said, it was

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>anticipate paid, but it's giving the Bank of England the

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>same problem that the Bank of Japan is having, which

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is actually the same problem that the US central banks,

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve is having as well, which is what

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>can they do to fight inflation when at the same

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>time they're fighting recession. You see, the recession needs stimulation.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>The recession needs easy monetary policy to try to get

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy out of the recession. If we can make

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>money cheaper, then people will buy more of it, will

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>take on more house, car, boat loans, We'll expand our businesses,

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll go remodel our house, fix our yard up. We'll

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>spend more money, and that stimulation in the market will

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>bring us out, hopefully. The goal is to bring us

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>out of recession. The problem is is that it restokes inflation,

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and so on one hand they're fighting the inflation, but

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>they're overtightening, which is then causing the recession. It's the

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>rock and the hard place. We've been talking about this

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. Now made again, like I said,

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>made growing the economy one of five key pledges after

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>he took office back in October of twenty twenty two.

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>The other ones were cutting the debt, having inflation, reducing

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>health services, waiting lists, and stopping boat migration across the

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:23.359
<v Speaker 1>English Channel. So far, out of all those pledges, those promises.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Elect me, and I'll get these things done. Out of

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>all of those, the only thing he's been able to

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>do is been able to slow down price growth. Now

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I say he's been able to do, he's certainly not

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>responsible for that. A lot of it is returning to

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the mean. So again, we had this COVID era, this

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>massive I call it like a sugar rush, all this

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>money dumped in the economy that created all these distortions,

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of it's coming back to normal. So

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly not going to give him credit for that,

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>but to his credit, he'll certainly claim it. The one

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>thing out of all of those things is inflation has

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>started to come back down. But migrants that's not better,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>health services waiting less, that hasn't gotten better. The debt

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly hasn't gotten any less. That's laughable. And so none

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of these things have worked. So what do they do well?

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>We need to kind of dig in a little bit

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of nuance here. Like I said, one,

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>we want to understand what are the constraints. So we

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>know that this puts a lot of pressure on the

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>central bank. The bank now has to start cutting rates

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>faster and deeper than they had wanted to do, because

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>again they're trying to keep inflation at bay. And just

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like all central banks Japan wanted to start tightening, they

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 1>can't do that now. The fed's trying to FED in

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the US is trying to delay their pivot, but they're

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>being forced into it sooner. In the UK, same thing,

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>they're being forced into faster rate cuts at a faster rate,

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>psyching highicle than they had wanted to. Now, this is

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the Europe, Europeans the EU, this is the UK, this

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is Japan. And now we'll talk about the United States,

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>because retail sales are plunging in January, the worst year

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>over your growth since the COVID lockdown. But this is

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>only about the economy. What about the markets. I'll cover

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 1>that in a minute when I come back. If you're

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>just tuning in, youth in too, the Mark Mass Show,

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about recession and markets, don't go away. We'll be

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.479
<v Speaker 1>back with more a minute. Beer back, all right, welcome back.

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're just tune in you Lily too, the Mark

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Mass Show. We're talking about the whole world and going

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>into a recession right now, and does it matter and

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>if so, what should we do about it. So we're

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about we talked about Japan going into recession technically

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>potentially could be revised out what technically it is, the

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>EU and then the UK, and now we'll talk about

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the US. But the story is the same. All governments

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and central banks have been fighting inflation, which inflation was

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>caused by printing too much money, creating too much money

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>through increasing the monitary base and credit expansion. The problem

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is they created too much inflation by expanding that, and

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to bring inflation back under control because people

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>get restless when you can't afford to feed your family

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>and you can't afford the same quality of life that

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you've been living, and you're unhappy. And when people become unhappy,

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>then governments don't last very long. So they want to

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>bring inflation back down. But at the same time, by

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to bring inflation back down, they have to do

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. They have to contract the money supply them.

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But when they contract the money supply, then the entire

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>economy starts to contract. Growth slows down or goes negative

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what we're seeing. And then if people lose

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>their jobs, then they're even more unhappy. So what do

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we do Damn. If we do dan, if we don't write,

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we either continue to print the money that we need

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>for all of our endless programs that we want to

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to fund and stimulate the economy and face inflation,

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>or we try to bring things back under control and

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>then we crash the economy. Those are the two choices. Now,

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>what we can see in the United States is retail

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sales plunged in January. Like I said, worst year over

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>year growth since the COVID lockdown, which is pretty bad.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>We saw that they unexpectedly surged in November and December,

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>now driven in a large pot by a jump in

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the food services headline. Retail sales in January expected to

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>decline by just zero point two percent, but it was worse,

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and it had been zero point six percent, so again

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>worse than expectations. This is the worst monthly decline since

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>March of twenty twenty three, and the worst year over

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>year rise since May of twenty twenty so that's a

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>big problem. We have the same issues going on in

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States. The retail cells are plunging. Now we're

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not technically in a recession like we have over in

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Japan and we have in the EU and we have

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. Technically the US is not, but it's slowing.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It's slowing now technically to be in a recession, to

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>be two negative quarters, we're not at that point yet.

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's the trend, it's the direction that we're trying

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to. We can see that motor vehicles

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and parts and building materials saw the largest decline month

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>over month on a year over year basis. Gas stations

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>building materials were the big drag, while online retailers and

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>food services were the biggest upside drivers of this. We

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>also saw core retail sales declined zero point five percent

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>month over month, which dragged the year overyear levels down

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to the lowest level since the COVID lockdowns. Again, so

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we can see that this is starting to be a

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>big problem. Basically, if we sum this up, Americans just

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't buying as much stuff as they used to. That's

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>basically what this means. And so are we get into

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that recession? Will we get to a recession? We don't

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>know how do we fight that, but we already know

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the constraints that we're in. I believe, and I say

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this all the time, I believe that when push comes

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to shove, when you're forced to choose, when the central banks,

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the BOJ, the ECB, the FED, when they're forced to

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>choose between one of two choices. And this is what

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>people don't understand. They have to choose one or the other.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to go right down the middle, but unfortunately

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>one or the other prevails. And the two choices, as

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I already laid them out, are one we continue easing

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the monetary cycle so we don't crash the entire economy.

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>People don't lose their jobs, business don't go under, and

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we can continue to fund all these wars and all

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>these social programs and all these other programs. So we ease.

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>The problem if we do that is we have high inflation.

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>On the other side is we want to bring inflation

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>down because people get unhappy when they can't afford the

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>quality of life. But the problem is that then we

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>crash the economy. And I believe when flaced between those

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>two choices, they will choose inflation every time. And the

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>reason why is I think inflation is more incremental. I

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>would rather see my assets going higher. I would rather

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>see my bitcoin going up, which, by the way, it's

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>shooting to the moon right now. I love it. I'd

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>rather see my value of my homegowup. I'd rather see

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the value of my stocks, my retirement account going up.

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And if the prices of all my assets were going

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>up and my pay is going up, I can stomach

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the higher prices I have to pay at the gas

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>pump and the airline tickets and my food and all

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>those things. However, if I lose my job, I lose

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>my business, and I lose all my income, I'm very unhappy.

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>So I think most people would be okay paying a

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit higher prices, but seeing the value of all

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the things go up, then to lose everything, lose their

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>business and lose their job, and so I think, and

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>then that's the government's trying to keep us, as we

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the people happy, complacent. But if you think about it

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>from a government perspective as well, if they have a

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>recession and then we go into some sort of deflation,

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that could be the end of the governments as we

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>know it, right because all the debt is collateralized, and

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>so then it starts to unwind this debt bubble. I'm

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to go through all that right now, I've

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about it extensively. But if they're forced to choose

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>between the people, do we want to give them inflation

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to deflation? But if they're forced to choose for themselves,

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>do we allow deflation and everything just to fall apart

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and we go bankrupt? Or do we continue to print

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>money to pay our debts? Of course, they're going to

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>continue to print money every single time. All right, Now,

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>here's what I want to talk about though. So we're

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>going into recessions. So what so what? Well, I've already said,

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>so what maybe your job? So think about your job

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>or your business. Are you like in a recession proof

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>business or job or are you more at risk from that?

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>So that's one way you need to think about that.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But now let's talk about our money, our assets. So,

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>as I said, in twenty twenty, things really changed. We

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>saw first and foremost that no longer do the economy,

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>no longer does the economy equal to markets. As I said,

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw the entire economies of the world literally shut

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>off with a light switch, and yet markets went to

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>new all time highs Now, was that an anomaly in

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the COVID era or is that the way things are

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>now today? And is that the way things are going well,

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe some of both. As a matter of fact, what

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>we can see is that the UK and Japan show

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that markets are going up, not down after technical recessions.

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting. So we have the UK and Japan are

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>slipping into technical recessions with their GDP releases. It's an

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>opportune moment to underscore that while such developments may generate

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of headlines, they have no forward looking information

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>content for investors. That's a key piece. They have no

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>forward looking information. You see, markets are what we call

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>future discounting. We're basically trying to buy something cheaper today

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>than it's worth in the future. So we're not buying

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>something for how much it's worth today. We're buying for

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>something for how much we think it will be worth

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in the future. So we have to be forward looking.

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And what happens is some of these data we have

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>lagging indicators, we have leading indicators. So GDP is a

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>lagging indicator. GDP tells us what happened in the past,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>but we're trying to guess on where things will be

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>in the future. And so what they're saying here is

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>these GDP releases they have no forward looking information. For US,

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>technical recessions typically precede rising asset returns. It's pretty weird.

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the opposite of what most people think. But as

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we can see both of these countries going into recessions,

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we can see this playing out in real time. Why

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is this the case, Well, there's two main problems with

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this categorization. One, when we look at just the recession

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and the GDP, it's overly simplistic. Okay, when we look

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>at like Japan, like I said, it was like zero

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>point one percent two percent, there's little to no difference

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>between an economy that contracts it zero percent zero point

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>two percent one quarter and is flat the next, which

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>would be no recession, or one that sees growth fall

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>by zero point one percent for two quarters in a row,

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>which would be a recession. You see what I'm saying,

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So technically a technical recession, what's the difference if I

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>get zero point two percent one year and one quarter

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 1>in the next quarter, it's flat or zero point one

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>percent both, Right, So that's what I'm talking about, overly simplistic.

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Second of all, which is why probably why the Biden

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>administration said that's not technically the recession. We need to

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>look at more data than them. Second is because like

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, GDP's a lagging indicator, is telling us where

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the economy was, not where the economy is going. But

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the markets are trying to predict the future. They're forward looking,

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and so us as investors, we need to focus our

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>energies on leading indicators of the economy rather than GDP,

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>which is again a lagging indicator. Some information content can

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>be gained by gap by looking at by trying to

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>discern by gauging the composition of the growth, but there's

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing in a GDP report that will give us any

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>indication of an approaching turning point when markets typically see

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest moves When it comes to the UK, leading

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>indicators are rising, So what are those. I'm going to

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>come back with those in a minute. If you're just

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>tune in your listening to the markmas Show, I'm going

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to take a very quick break. When we come back,

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about the leading indicators that show it's rising.

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Don't go away, I'll be right back, all right, Welcome back.

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>If you just tune in your listening to the Mark

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Maas Show, We're talking about how the major economies of

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the world are all slipping into recession. But yet surprise, surprise,

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>surprise is the markets are making highs, which is pretty interesting.

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about why looking at the GDP and

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff are lagging indicators and it doesn't tell us what's

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>happened in the future. And so that's one of the

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.719
<v Speaker 1>reasons why we see that it's going down but markets

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>are going up because it told us what already happened.

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>But the markets are telling us what is going to happen.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So better understand that we're trying to look forward leading indicators,

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>not lagging indicators, and when it comes to the UK,

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>leading indicators are rising, suggesting the worst could have already

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.239
<v Speaker 1>passed for the economy. That's what people are saying. I mean,

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what the market's telling us. Anyway, they're saying it's

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>already happened. It's similar same thing in Japan. The yen

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and the JGB yields fall in the shorter term. Then

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>when that happens, the Nikki, which is their index, their

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>stock index, treads water in the short term after the

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>technical recession, but after twelve months it returns an average

0:28:54.440 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of ten point seven percent. That's what we've seen. Good

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>now again back in the US, the US is nowhere

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>near a technical recession at the moment, but same we're

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>also the average mean positive returns after we can see

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that after recession, we see that we see big returns

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>over the next three to twelve months historically, So what

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we see is technical recessions generate a lot of heat,

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>but not much light. There are sometimes oftentimes most times

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>just a distraction for us and as investors. So we

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>can see again back to the United States, we had

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a technical recession, then the Bide administration told us it wasn't.

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>But then market's rallied in one of the best years

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that we've had in decades. And that's exactly what we're seeing.

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>And so the recession in the UK, the EU and

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Japan could already be over because it's lagging. Indicators in

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the markets are giving us those forward looking indicators. Now,

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the things that we can pick up from

0:29:56.440 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Japan is, like I said, because it's forward looking, it

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of tells us what's going to happen. And so

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Japan had been wanting to and the ECB and the

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>FED as well been wanting to again fighting inflation, wanted

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates. Japan specifically wanted to get out of

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this negative interest rate policies they've had. But going into

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the recession right now, EU, UK, JGB, potentially the US

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>going to that recession shows us that there's no way

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>they can tighten that market back up, and most of

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>these countries ecb US, etcetera are going to have to

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.719
<v Speaker 1>start easing, and that's what the markets are picking up on.

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>You See, you have to understand the causal, the cause

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and effect mechanism here. If we go into recession, then

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the Feds will ease, and so what the markets are saying, well, okay,

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we get the recession, but that's what happened last quarter.

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Now we understand because of that the central banks will

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>have to ease, and so we now expect an expansion.

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to bid the stocks up, right, That's

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about. So, like back to Japan, the

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Nikkei Index more than doubled from the COVID lows and

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it's about to breach its all time bubble highs that

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>were set in the back in nineteen eighty nine. So

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the Nikki index is making a new high that hasn't

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>been set for multiple decades, and it's right after Japan

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>technically entered a recession. You see what we're talking about here.

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>So the recession happened, but what's happening next? The markets

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are trying to tell us, at least what they think.

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Now it's anybody's guests. None of us have a crystal ball.

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>But people are putting their money where their mouth is,

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. And that's exactly what the markets are saying.

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And so it's confirming that only central banks matter in

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a world where the economy clearly does not. Back to

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, the entire economy was turned off like a

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>light switch all across the globe simultaneously. At the same time,

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the economy, the jobs, the businesses, but yet the markets

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>screamed to all new time highs. And so what that

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>means is that the money printers override real businesses. Now,

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this is fake, it's artificial, it's non sustainable, and it

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>only leads to paying death and destruction eventually. But for now,

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, this is what matters, which is

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>why we focus on the central bank policy. We focus

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>on are their policies going to be tight, are they

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be loose? What will they do? And we

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>try to understand the leading indicators that show us what

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll have to do. So, for example, this is exactly

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about. The central banks say they want

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to tighten, but given the fact that economies are going

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>into recession, they can't, and so we can start to

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>front run them. We can start to guess where they're

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>going to go based off of understanding these natural constraints,

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and rather than trying to spend all our time focusing

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on what the economy is doing, really what we're understanding

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is it's the central banks that matter the most. That

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. It's why I talked about probably the greatest

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>investor in I don't want to say he's the greatest,

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the greatest investors in history. I don't know,

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know totally. But he went forty

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>years without a loss in a twenty billion dollar portfolio,

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>forty years without a loss and averaged a thirty percent return.

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Arguably one of the greatest ever. Talking about Stanley drucken Miller,

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he worked under George Soros, and I mean, he's just

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a legend. But what we saw is that there there

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>was a book written New Money Wizards, New Market Wizards,

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and he talked about how when he first started his career,

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he win did all this research into these stocks and

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>these companies and looked at all the fundamental analysis and

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>looked at, you know, the earnings and the profits and

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>all these things, and he took it to the fund

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>manager and they said, this is this is all garbage's

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>none of this matters to us. And he's like, what

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean None of this matters? He said,

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>go find out the real thing that drives prices up

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and down. And Stanley Druckon Miller was kind of confused.

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>He said, what do you mean, go find out the

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>real thing? I thought I did, So he went back

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to the drawing board and what he concluded was that

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>none of those fundamentals matter. What really matters is the liquidity.

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what matters. And liquidity is supplied by the central banks.

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that change the price of money, they're

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the ones that add money whatever. And so it's basically

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>what led to his success for thirty or forty years.

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's the same playbook that we can and we're

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing it front and foremost right here Japan, EU, UK

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and now potentially the US slipping into recession. Wall markets

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are screaming to new all time highs. It's pretty incredible.

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And again we're seeing it in the US as well.

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Now the US is not technically in a recession, but

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>growth has slowed way down, and everyone's afraid that we're

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>going to go into recession any moment. But we can

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>see that Wall Street is at its highest level ever,

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five hundreds breaking new levels. We

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>see that we have higher retail sales and markets are

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>going up. US stocks closed higher on Thursday as retail

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>sales data declined more than expected. So the sales data

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>went down, meaning the economy is not doing good, meaning

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we could be slipping into recession, but stocks went up. Huh,

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>how does that work? Wait, so sales the business went down,

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>but the stocks went up. Are you starting to understand?

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Are you starting to understand why? Well, because then we

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>understand what comes next. If retail sales go down, that

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 1>means the economy is slowing down. That means the recession

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>is coming. If that happens, then what you have to

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself, second, third, fourth, fifth order? Then what well?

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Then the Federal Reserve will start cutting interest rates in

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>coming months. You see, and this is what stocks are

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>starting to price for a Commerce Department report showed US

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>retail sales dropped zero point eight percent in January, so

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you know things are slowing down pretty bad. Investors are

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>cheering the fact that we got a weaker than anticipated

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>retail report. When our investors cheering that, why do they

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>want a weaker than anticipated retail report? Well, because if

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the retail port was stronger than anticipated, then the FED

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>would push off the pivot, they'd push off the rate decreases.

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>But because it was weaker than expected, the investors are

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>cheering it because they want that to come. It says,

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it shows that maybe the economy might be a little weak,

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and so that's sort of bad news. That's potentially good news,

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.240
<v Speaker 1>good news, bad news. It's good it's it's bad news

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that the economy is getting weak, but it's good news

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>because it means the FED is more likely to cut rates,

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>said Thomas Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt. So this

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is this is where we're at. You have to understand

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>what is the problem I'm afraid of? What am I

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to protect myself from in a recession? Is my job?

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Is my business at risk? What can I do to

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>shore that up, and then what should I expect with

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>my investments? To understand those are two separate things that

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have to be addressed and managed separately. I know this

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>is we I know this is a new world. But

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>as Einstein said, the answers have changed. The way the

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>central banks and the politicians and the governments interact in

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the markets changed in two thousand and eight, it changed

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>again in twenty twenty, and we are a new paradigm.

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're just tuning in your listening to the Mark

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Maus Show, talking about the way the world is changing

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 1>as we look at through lens of politics, finance, and technology.

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I got for today. That's a wrap.

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for listening.