WEBVTT - How to do Research Online

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology with

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Poulette

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and I am an editor here at how stuff works

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Sitting across from me as usual, at least

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>as far as when I looked it up last, is

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>senior writer Jonathan Strickland. There's special providence in the fall

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of a sparrow. Okay, and guess what, guys, it's your

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>job to look that up and tell me where it's from.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Special listener challenge. Yeah, it's it's easy enough. Um. So

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about conducting research online. I'll to

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>use online tools to research. Because a lot of you

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>out there are in middle school and high school. We

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>get emails from you all the time, and first of all,

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>shout out to all of you guys. You guys are

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>awesome and keep up the great work, especially listening to

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>wonderful podcasts like ours. But beyond that, we've also received

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:11.839
<v Speaker 1>email from others who have asked us about research techniques.

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>UM see uh Is and Marie Right and Marie I

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>see I didn't write your name down, Emory. I apologize.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And Marie has written to us on a couple of

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>occasions asking if we might address research techniques and citations

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>things like that. Well, really, the whole citations element is

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of outside the scope of tech stuff, but we

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>can certainly address how to conduct research online and how

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to get the best information for whatever it is that

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you're searching for. UM, because a lot of us are

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>just simply using Google in the most basic way and

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>not getting the best information. Google is doing a lot

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes to try and give us the best

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>information based upon what we tell Google we want to see,

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes it has to make guesses. Sometimes the keywords

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>we throw in there are just a mishmash, and Google's like, well,

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you this. I think it's what you want.

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>But there are ways where you can you can refine

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>your search, whether you're using Google or some other search methods,

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>some other search engine. I use Google because it's almost

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>become like xerox or Kleenex the universal term, but I

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>do realize that people use other search engines. Um, there

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>are techniques you can use to get the best information possible. Yes, UM,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>actually I would recommend this really groovy article on how

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com about the Google algorithm and what

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>makes it so special. I was written by as a hack,

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>some guy Strickland. Anyway, Yeah, if you if you're really

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>interested in knowing how Google specifically works, because Google sort

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of revolutionized the search industry online. I mean for many

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>years when Yahoo was doing everybody loved Yahoo, but they

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>were doing it by end, which is actually a very

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>effective way to do it, except in that it requires

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people and a lot of time to

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>do that, which and of course, as more people joined

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, more content was created on the Internet, meaning

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>more content had to be sorted through, so it becomes

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a losing game eventually, because unless you have hired everyone

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>on the planet to also help categorize and rank information,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you just can't keep up with the amount of info

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's out there. So Google's algorithm helped automate that, so

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have to worry about doing it by hand. Yes,

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>but I know you did want to to speak on

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a specific tactic if you want to use Google more effectively. Yeah,

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk a little bit about bullying logic. Okay,

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that's named after George bole Yes and bullying logic is

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a fairly complex UH concept, but it's a it's a

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>mathematical concept, right. It's a way, it's the way of

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>using operators to UH to make an argument or search

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for information. As it turns out, because a lot of

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>arch engines are very good at at incorporating Boolean logic,

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so not all of them, not all of them, and

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>some of them have a specific advanced search function that

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>makes this even easier. But we're going to go through

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the basic operators and what they do and what they

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>mean within most search engines, and then we'll talk a

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit maybe about advanced search options, and then we'll

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>go into more detail about other other things online that

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you can use for for research. So the basic operators

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and Boolean logic, as far as it pertains to search,

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>are and or and not. Okay, So I'll start with OR.

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Now OR helps you increase your your range of searches.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>You know your search results. You're gonna get a wider

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>range of search results using or as an operator. And

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>this lets you search for two terms. Usually you're using

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>two terms that are kind of interchangeable or mean more

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>or less the same thing. Um and you use that

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to try and get a wider net of results. So

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you might say, uh, dogs or canines in your search,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you're going to get search results that have

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the keyword dogs or canines featured in them in some way,

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>because some results may use one term and the others

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>may use another, and you want to be able to

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>see everything that's out there, So you're gonna get more

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>results that way than if you search for just dogs

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>or just canines. Um. Now, if you use and, you

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>might think, oh, well, doesn't that do the same thing. Actually, no,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and narrows your search because with and, it's going to

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>look for search results that have both terms. And when

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I say both, you should keep in mind this is

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not limited to just to search terms. Technically, you can

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>throw in as many search terms as you want and uh,

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it just is going to continually narrow your field of arch.

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, you may want to look for

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>let's let's say you're searching for horror and science fiction.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>You're only going to get results that have both of

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>those terms in them. Right now, if you use horror

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>or science fiction, you would get all of them had

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>either or both of those terms. So and narrows your search.

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>This can be really helpful if you're looking for specific

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>news about a particular topic. So if you did Gulf

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>of Mexico and oil spill and solutions, that would help

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you narrow your search to potential solutions to fix the

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, right theoretically anyway, Um,

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and then there is think you think the company would

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>have lifted those up? Yeah? Oh, there it is. It's

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>on Google. Oh we're gonna get male. I'm kidding, BP,

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Please don't send your goons after us. I notice I

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't say who it was son of up. So anyway,

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the third one. Not now not helps

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you get search results for one term and excludes results

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that contain a specific related term. So let's say that

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to do a research on on mice but

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>not you don't want anything to do about rats, So

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you could do a search for mice not rats, and

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you would only get search results that talked about mice.

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>If rats were mentioned in the search, in the in

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the in the page, it would be excluded from the

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>search results. So again, it's another way to narrow your

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>search so that you don't get information that is not

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>relevant to what you need. Now, advanced search options usually

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>make this easier because I mean, you can type these

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>things in actually, and you usually don't need to type

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in at all. That's understood. If you just do a

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>string of keywords in your search, it's the search engine

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>generally a suit whoms that you mean and Yes, But

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're using the bullion operators um, if you really

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically want to use them, you do need to put

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>them in all caps yes, because because that's that's the

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that tells it, Oh, you specifically want these things.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you're looking for a specific search string which

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>includes things uh, words that would normally be discarded called

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>stop wards, things like and and the um, because it's

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for the big words in the title, the things

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that are are unique and those words, those stop wards

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>are so common that Google it's meaningless to do a

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>search for them. Yes, you can do a search for

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the UM, but Google just says everything. But if you

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>will allow me to to bore everyone but probably the

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>educators and library geeks among you, since I just got

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 1>my degree and I want to use it for something. UM.

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about two things here called precision and recall Um,

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>these things are inversely proportional. So the more precise your

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>search results are, the let the fewer of them you're

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get, and vice versa, or increases your recall.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So you're going to get lots and lots and lots

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, but you're not going to have very precise results.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>If you want precision, you need to narrow it down, um,

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>using and and and you know to some degree not

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>or yeah, um wait not yes, okay, UM, So just

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind what you're trying to do. And you know,

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people when they are looking

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for information kind of like poking around, you know, the

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>serendipity search, What am I gonna find? Want to do this?

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But if you're in a hurry, boolean operators can really

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>be your friend. Yeah. And as as I was saying

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>earlier about advanced search options, these usually if you if

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you choose the advanced search option on a on a

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>search engine, and I'm going to stick with Google because

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that's just well, it's a popular one. It's easy to

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Um. It usually opens up a a a

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>new screen with additional options for search. So it'll have

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>one field where you can type in all the keywords

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that you want that you that should appear in the

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>search result, and may have a separate field for any

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>keywords that you do not want to be in your

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>search result. So that would be the not feature. The

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>first one was the end. The other one, or actually

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess the first one that's the first one is

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the end because all of them do appear. They also

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>have once where you can say this or that you

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>know anything that has this or that should come back

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to me. Um. So it incorporates the boolean logic in

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>actual little fields that you fill out, so you don't

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>have to remember the operators or or type them in

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>or anything, because you just type this, You type the

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>right keywords in the right fields, and it does it

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for you. But it also gives you other options. Uh.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>For example, you can search for exact phrasing, which you

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>can actually do in a regular search engine. You just

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have to know to put it into quotation marks. Yes,

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>like anything within quotation marks, the search engine interprets that

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>as look for this specific sequence of words. So nuclear radiation,

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you put that within quotation marks, it

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>would look for search results that use the phrase nuclear radiation,

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>which theoretically would get you closer to the results you need,

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know you don't want articles just on radiation

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in general, because not all radiation is nuclear, So you know,

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this would help you narrow that search. Again, it's another

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>way of narrowing. But it can also do things like

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Google's will allow you to search for specific file types.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you're looking for like you know that you

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>saw an article online once and it was in PDF

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>format but you can't quite remember, you know, you can

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>narrow your search that way and say just PDFs and

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Google will look for just pds online. Um, that's just

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>one example. Obviously, Uh, it allows you to search within

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a domain. You can also do this in the general

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>search bar if you know the right trick, which is

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>really just typing site s I T E. Colon, then

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the address of the or the domain of the site

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're searching, and then whatever your search terms are

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that will do perform a Google search within a specific domain.

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you happen to know that the

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>information that you're looking for was in an article that

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>appeared on the register, you could you could use the

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that to specify the search so that way it doesn't

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>look anywhere else for this information, you're not going to

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>get any irrelevant results from other sites. Uh. It can

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>definitely be a time saver. It's really helped me out

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>many many times. You can even do that on on

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>parts of the site if you happen to know if

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it's if it's divided. For example, if you were looking

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on how stuff works dot com for um, just to

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>stick with name recognition, if we have a number of

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>articles on Google um, and most of those are in

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the computer channel, so as computer dot how stuff works

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com instead of www dot how stuff works dot com.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But let's say you were interested in finding a video,

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you could do site colon videos dot how stuff works

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com and see and then put a space in

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>there in type Google and if you it should returns

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>just that the results from that video channel. And of

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>course it's going to depend on the information architecture of

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the site and whether or not that's possible. But for example,

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's why I picked how stuff Works dot

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>com because I know it works with our site and

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to find articles if you happen to now um.

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>But it also sort of depends on how well you

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>know this site that you're searching. Yeah, and and the

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>advanced search also allows you to do other things like

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you can search within a range of dates, so you

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>can look for information that was that you know was

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>uploaded at a specific time. Um. If you know something

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>like maybe it's an article that appeared last spring, then

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you can put in a range of dates. Again, you're

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>excluding anything that falls outside that range. You don't have

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to worry about sorting through other stuff. Um. You can

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>even search for results based on the usage rights. Now, granted,

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>this is going to depend mainly upon the metadata that

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>is in the the web page. This is something that

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the administrator of that web page has to include so

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that Google can can identify it. Because Google is not

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>quite smart enough yet to know the usage rights of

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>every single web page it's out there. Um, because in

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>some cases it may not even be explicitly stated. Uh.

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Then you know, you can even uh specify where on

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the web page the keywords should appear, which allows you

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to search. Let's say that you want to search for

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>articles that are about a specific topic, but you don't

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>want to get back articles that just kind of have

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a little aside about that topic. You can actually have

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it so that it's only the pages that have the

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>keywords within the page title, which theoretically should get you

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>results that are more relevant to your search. So really,

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>advanced search is a huge boon. I mean that's that alone.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>For we even get into anything more specific. Will really

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>help help you narrow down your searches so that you

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>can get at relevant information quickly. Now, again, Google does

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good job at at having the relevant search

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>most relevant things to your keywords at any rate appear

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the list, so you normally don't

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>have to dig down too far. Um. It's not always

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the case, but they do a pretty good job of it. Yes,

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, well, Chris got all choked up. Yes I did.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just you know, they talk about the search topics. Um.

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Actually that's a good point, Jonathan, because um, I was

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>just going to mention that, Uh, you might look at

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever played around, especially right after Being came

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>out Microsoft launch Being, people were playing around with it

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to see how the results compared to Google. And you

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>can put in the same topic on a Being search

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and a a Google search, and they're going to turn

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>up probably some of the same results on the first page,

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>but not necessarily all of them. They might be ranked differently. UM.

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>If you are a fan of one or the other,

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you might go, well, mind, my favorite is the best.

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe not necessarily. It sort of depends on the topic.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And one way to to sort of get everybody together

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>um is to use a meta search engine, something like

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>dogpile or um or surf wax for example surf wax

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and both of these use search multiple search

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>engines at the same time, so it will look for

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the topic you request on Google and bing and Yahoo

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and ask dot com and possibly even Excite and Lycos

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and some of the others that have been around for

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time that use different methods to rank pages.

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of people really really like the meta

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>search engines. I know that that some of the people

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>here at how stuff works dot com are are really

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>fond of of a couple of them because they're not

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>h they give you sort of a more in depth

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>look at how the different sites rank the articles. And

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that use in different search engine might give

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you better results for any particular topic. Right, so you

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>might use Google for one search and being for a

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>different search, or asked dot com for a different search,

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>just depending on the results. Because one you may be

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for something particular that you know, one search engine

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>turns up and the other does not, especially when you

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>consider that the algorithms these different search engines use can

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>UH that can determine what results you get on one

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>day to the next. You can do the exact same

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Google search or search on Being or any other real

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>search engine that relies upon an algorithm, you can do

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>with that search on various dates and get completely different

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>results based upon how those pages rank UH due to

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm. So now some are going to change less

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>frequently than others. Some you may do the search and

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>then it will look the exact same way six months

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>from now, but others, like you know, Google definitely does

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 1>change over time. If you do the same search result

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or same search I'm sorry key words, UM, you'll get

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>different results sometimes from one day to the next, sometimes

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>one morning to one afternoon. UM. It kind of depends

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>upon the topic and whether or not, especially since Google

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>will search across multiple UH features, like there's Google News

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>where you'll get the latest articles. That's obviously going to

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>change pretty rapidly compared to the more static web pages

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that are about a general topic. Right, I mean a

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people noticed a couple of months ago when

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Google will change the search results page because down the

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>left side of the bar, now you've got you know, everything, news, images, books, blog,

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>shopping and all those other topics. And people either loved

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it or hated it. Um. I'm one of the people

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>who happens to like it actually, But I mean that's

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>that's a different Basically, they're grouping, they're sort of breaking

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it down for you into commonly searched topics like images.

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>You can think of like the general search as pot pourri.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>It's everything, but you can break it down into smaller

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>groups U. And another one that would might be of

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>particular help to students is Google scholar, which allows you

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>to search scholarly articles, journals. UM. It allows you to

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>look at patents, UH, and even legal opinions if you

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to enable that, you can, and you

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>can choose which options to enable and which ones to

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>leave out. So if you don't want any results that

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>have to do with patents, you can click a little

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>checkbox and it will leave those results out. And UH,

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that can definitely help you find specific scholarly articles about subjects. Now,

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I should hasten to add that does not necessarily mean

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>that you'll be able to go to a link and

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>read the article in full. Many of these journals are

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>online have an online journal where you have to have

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a subscription in order to access that journal. So it

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe that you'll be able to read an excerpt, but

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you won't get the full article. In order to do that,

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you'll need some other tool. A lot of schools, UM

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of library systems have a database or

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a search engine that's similar in style to Google, but

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically for this kind of thing, where you do get

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>access to the full articles. UM. Depending on who designed

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that system, it may or may not be as user

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>friendly as your as your general search engine, but you

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.239
<v Speaker 1>may need access to something like that. Now, a lot

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of school systems do have this UH, so it's good

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to to find out if yours does, UM and and

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>make use of it. We mentioned in a previous podcast

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>about education and technology. Then in Georgia we have a

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>system called Galileo, and in Galileo we can search these

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>scholarly articles and get access to the full article without

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>having a specific um uh subscription to that particular publication.

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>UM that that's really helpful now, granted, even then you're

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>going to be limited by whatever range of journals that

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>particular service has access to. It's not necessarily going to

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>have access to every single journal that is out there,

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>but that that can sometimes pick up the slack that

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the Google will leave, because Google has no control over

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>what the actual content is on these pages, and in

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>some cases, like I said, it may just be an

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>excerpt which can give you some helpful like guidance, but

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to give you the information you necessarily

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>need for an academic paper. There are a couple of

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>things that I think we should address to now that

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>we're getting into the more mature part of our podcast.

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's get that very web music in here. No no, no, wait,

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>not that I was short of you using that as

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a euphemism as saying, we're slowly running out of time

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and probably should address some other things. Not alright, go Um.

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I think we should address

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is quality of resources. Yes, actually, one of the things

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk about was primary versus secondary. Yes. Yes,

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>what I was basically getting into was, um, you know,

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>as we have mentioned many many times in the podcast,

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>especially during the education series, we do have a lot

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of listeners who are still in school, And I want

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>to stress to all of you that not everything you

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>read on the internet is accurate or yes, you have

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind where the information is coming from,

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>who it's coming from, and whether or not things may

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have been biased. For example, maybe you're reading something that

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>from a source that you do trust pretty well, and

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they say that a study financed by you know, the

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>ACME Soup Corporation says that soup is beneficial to your eyesight,

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're going, okay, well, that's great. Apparently soup is

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>beneficial to your eyesight. But and then you think about it.

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, the people funding the study have a soupy.

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>They see a direct benefit from the increase of super

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>consumption exactly. So I mean, it may even be from

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a reasonably trusted resource, and maybe it came from a

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>press release from the company, and perhaps it's true, but

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>they do have a season for people to spread the

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>good news about soup. Now, there does come a point

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>where you eventually have to take that leap and and

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>say that whoever it is that did that provide this

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>information did so in good faith and without bias, Because

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately all these when we think of scientific research and

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or research in general. Really, the money to fund that

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>research has to come from somewhere. Sure, and if you

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>play the money tracing game to to ludicrous levels, it's

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>going to seem like nothing out there is reliable. But

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>there are some cases where this is far more obvious

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>than others, where you're saying, Okay, well, this this particular

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>study is suspect because it's directly funded by this company

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>that has a vested interest, and the results of the

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>study seem to favor that company. That would be enough

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.479
<v Speaker 1>to maybe give you pause to say, maybe I need

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to find another study, not necessarily say that this one's

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>wrong out of hand, but at least find some other

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>um research out there that either corroborates or refutes the

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>evidence of that particular study before just leaping on and

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>saying Okay, this is what I'm going to use as

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a source on my paper. Yeah. Um, but I was

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>going to. I did mention primary versus secondary sources. Some

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of you may not really know what that means. Uh.

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>We talked about a little bit in our our Wikis

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>episode because we talked about how Wikipedia is not supposed

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to be used as a primary source. Primary source is Essentially,

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it's the originator of any particular data. It's the original

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>source of some form of information. So a primary source

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>could include a scientific report that summarizes a specific experiment.

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>That would be a good primary source. So that's a

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>direct communication from the people who conducted the study to

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the people who are interested in reading about it. Now,

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a secondary source is kind of an intermediary. That's that's

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a source that's reporting or relaying that information, but it

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is not uh, directly responsible for creating that information. So, uh,

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Scientific American could be a good example here. Uh, they

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 1>do some excellent articles, but it's reporting. You know, most

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the articles in Scientific American would be something where it's

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>reporting on a study and it's trying to report the

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>results in a way that is um easily understandable by

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the readership of Scientific American. So it's still a secondary

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>source if you want, if you want to cite a

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>primary source, you need to actually go to the study

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that's mentioned in the secondary source and read it yourself.

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Because whether we mean to or not, we have to

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>filter information through our own uh you know, our own experiences,

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>in our own understanding, right, and sometimes we're wrong because

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>humans often are and so it's possible that a secondary source,

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>even though they're trying to report on a primary source accurately,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it could be inaccurate. You just in the sense of

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to summarize a report, you could end up being inaccurate. Yes,

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And this happens all the time without bias. Now it

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>can happen with bias too, but it it happens innocently

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>all the time because it is really hard sometimes to

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>summarize what a specific, uh scientific study is all about

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in a thousand words in a way that's understandable to

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>your audience. So it's very important to try and go

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>back to primary sources so that you can see what

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 1>was actually said about the study. And here's something else

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it now would be a good time to

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>bring it up, because we're running out of time. Um,

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>And that is, don't copy and paste stuff that you

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>read on the internet or anywhere else for that matter.

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Plagiarism is bad. Plagiarism is bad. That's called plagiarism, as

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you may have guessed. And uh, that's the thing. If

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 1>you find some useful information in a journal, say a

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>peer of your journal science, um, you want to use

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that in your your report well, that's great, you can,

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but you need to give credit where credit is due.

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Copying somebody else's words verbatim, even a couple of them,

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that's plagiarism. And you can even plagiarize yourself if you

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have written a paper and you go, oh, man, I

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>did this paper last year and I totally this paragraph

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>would be perfect for this new paper. Now, that's plagiarizing yourself.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>It has to be original. You can use it, but

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>give credit to the person who who wrote it. And

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>that's what the value the primary source to write. And

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the flip side of that coin is that, uh, you can't.

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>In most academic papers, you can't necessarily you can't just

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>say that this is common understanding. Like any particular piece

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of information, UM, you have to be able to back

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>up that information by providing a source that that that

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>gives you the foundation to make that statement. This doesn't

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>mean that you can't draw your own conclusion is from

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that information, but you can't just take something for granted

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and say, uh, this is true. You know, you have

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to back that up. This is why

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>if you go to a site like Wikipedia, UM, you'll

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>see often in these articles you'll see something like citation needed.

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>It's because it Wikipedia is very focused on trying to

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>present the best information possible. But that's you know, it's

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a work in progress and it always will be

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just based upon the nature of that tool, and citation

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 1>needed just means that there needs to be a foundation

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>to support the statement that was made in that article.

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And without a foundation, you can't really make that statement

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>because it could not it might not be true, you say,

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>silent greenest people, but we need proof. Yeah, you know,

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it varies from person to person anyway. So uh, and

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we did say this in another podcast about Wikipedia and

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>using Wikipedia as a worse and why a lot of

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>teachers frown on that, And again, part of that is

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's all secondary. Wikipedia by its nature says it

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>cannot be used as a primary source. So if you

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>conduct a scientific study, you can't use Wikipedia to publish

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>your findings. Um, that's not what it's for. So Wikipedia

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily a bad tool. It can definitely give

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you an understanding of a subject. But the best thing

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you can do is, once you get that understanding, dive

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 1>down and find those primary sources. Because Wikipedia is really

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>just it's just a tool to get you started. Yeah,

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and I mean a lot of people thought we were

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>are picking on Wikipedia, but it's the idea behind it

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is great, you know, being able to to contribute to

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>scholarly research and and and getting an idea for what's

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>going on with a particular topic. But the fact of

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the matter is, you know, things change over time. People

0:29:57.880 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>can go in and mess with it just because they

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>want to. It doesn't happen often, but it does happen.

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of people have done serious work on

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to improve Wikipedia and make it more of a

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>primary type resource. But in the end, you really need

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to go back and look at the sources to see

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>where they got the information from, and you'll get an

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>idea of how accurate you can really be with it. Yeah,

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>just remember that, I mean, we talked a lot about

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this in terms of scientific studies because that's a pretty

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>simple um example. But just remember that there are such

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>things as bad studies out there too. People get people

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>have their studies retracted. I've heard several on the you know,

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>there have been a few high profile, very famous one

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>recently that I was very very happy about getting retracted

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>out of the British School of our British Journal of Medicine. Yes,

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so that was a peer of you journal, and somebody

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>might have written a paper based on that because it is,

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, a peer. By the way, peer of you

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>means that other doctors in this case had looked at

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the research and said, okay, well this article seems sound.

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it was. Well, experts have looked at it. Hey,

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it should be right right, right, and then occasionally they say, whoops, no,

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we were wrong, and this happened. That's what happened in

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>this case. And that can happen in any kind of

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>scientific journals, just medical. Um. So critical thinking is necessary

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to do accurate research on the internet. Yeah, and it

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it's a lot of else. It sounds like

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of work. But the nice thing about

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this is even though every individual paper that I ever

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>had to write, I felt like, oh God, I can't

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>believe I have to write another one of these. But

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it taught me to think and it taught me

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to really be critical when I was looking at information.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's a skill you can use everywhere, absolutely, and

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it makes you look good if you can do this,

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just in your academic career. Guys and

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and ladies as well. I got chastise in real life

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for using the term guys in a non gender specific form.

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>It happens. Yeah, But at any rate, this is a

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>skill you can use everywhere, like even something as simple

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>as taking your car and to get worked on that.

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Those critical thinking skills could be the difference between you

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>getting you know, a a fifty dollar fix on something

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and a thousand dollar job that didn't need to be done. Um.

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.719
<v Speaker 1>You know it just it really does help you separate

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what is good information from what is bad. And really

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we use that all the time. And uh, so that

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>was a really good discussion. I think I hope that

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Anne Marie liked that discussion about research. I hope that

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is useful to um. I believe that Marie is a teacher,

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>so I hope that's useful to your students. And I

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>hope that that pleases you and fellow teachers. Uh. The

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>internet is a wonderful resource. It is also full of

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff that is not as wonderful. So just use that

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking, use these tips that we gave you, and uh,

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and and that that will put you on a good

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>start to getting some really strong information. So hopefully that's

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a good help. If you have any suggestions for future topics,

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a ucation and technology or just technology in general,

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you can write us. Our email address is tech stuff

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com and Chris and I

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you again really soon if you're a

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff and be sure to check us out on

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Twitter tech Stuff hs ws R handle, and you can

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>also find us on Facebook at Facebook dot com slash

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff h s W. For more on this and

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>thousands of other topics, does how stuff Works dot com,

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and be sure to check out the new tech stuff

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>blog now on the how Stuff Works homepage, brought to

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready,

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>are you