WEBVTT - Tech News: Beavers Hate the Internet

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech stuff a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>You see a sponsored post as your browsing Instagram, then

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you go to a shopping app to buy a product

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that you saw on Instagram. Well, you know that Facebook

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>would love to know all about that. And so numerous

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>app developers gather even more information about users than the

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>users might be aware, because that information can include stuff

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>outside of the developers own apps. What the A T

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>T function does is give users a notification about how

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 1>an app wants to access their data, including whether they

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>want to collect data that is generated in between different apps,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.599
<v Speaker 1>and it gives users the opportunity to opt out of that.

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>And businesses like Facebook do not like this because they

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>suspect and probably correct e, that most people are going

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to decline to share such data. That's not fair, yells Facebook,

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you're hurting small businesses. Ah yes, Facebook, champion of small business.

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I'm gonna drop the sarcasm and just say

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.839
<v Speaker 1>outright that if Facebook is upset about a feature that's

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>meant to give users more transparency as to how their

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>data is being collected and used, it's not because it

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:34.919
<v Speaker 1>will quote hurt small businesses end quote. It's because Facebook

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>profits off of user data, and any restriction to access

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of user data represents a decrease in revenue for Facebook. Anyway,

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple isn't backing down, though. I will say a t

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>T was ready months ago, but Apple actually held off

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>implementing it in order to get developer feedback and build

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in some other options that would protect user data while

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>still giving companies marketing data. I'm signing with Apple on

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this one, and that I think giving people the option

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to either be part of a data collection system or

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to be excluded from it, that's a good thing for

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the individual consumer. Not that I think Apple is necessarily

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>being angelic here, that the company is taking a stance

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that I can agree with. It also seems to be

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:27.839
<v Speaker 1>in line with previous conversations Tim Cook and Mark Zuckerberg

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>reportedly had with one another. Uh. There's a story that

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg asked Cook about his advice of what Zuckerberg should

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>do in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal over

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook, and Cook said that Facebook should just delete

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>all user data that was generated by third parties, and

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg totally thought that was unreasonable. Um. Again, I side

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>with Cook on this one, But then Apple's business is

0:02:55.919 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally different from Facebook's business. A Taiwanese publication claims that

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple is behind schedule with regard to testing out it's

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>augmented reality glasses. According to reports, those glasses look a

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>lot like you know, high end sunglasses, but with thicker

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>frames to house all the electronics. The lenses themselves would

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>act as displays and allow you to see augmented reality

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>views of the world around you. If Apple can get

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this right, they could represent a truly revolutionary a R device.

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>They could you know, step away from the dorky awkwardness

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of products like Google Glass. And I say that as

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>someone who used to own a pair of Google Glass.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>The original schedule, according to these reports, would have had

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple in the second phase of testing at this point,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>but that appears to have not happened yet. I should

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>add all of these reports are coming from non Apple sources,

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and the company itself has remained pretty quiet about this

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>whole project. Apple would likely need to hold another phase

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of testing after the second one, before going through you know,

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>more refined testing to tweak things and get it just right,

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and then move toward volume production to make them at scale.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>The original plan, according to these various third party sources.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Was to get into volume production by the beginning of

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, but now that might not be very likely.

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>We might see Apple announced this project at some point

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this year, but we shouldn't expect to actually get our

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>hands on a pair of these until mid twenty twenty

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>two at the earliest, and it might be significantly later

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>than that. Then again, it's always possible that these sources

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are off and maybe we'll get one more thing by

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of one That would be spectacular. I imagine

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>these things are also going to be really expensive once

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they launch. And one bit of good news for Apple,

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the company has announced it will be opening up an

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>East Coast campus in North Carolina within the raw A.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Durham Research Triangle Park area. This is a part of

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina that has a very high density of tech

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>companies doing some pretty amazing R and D in fields

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>like qualtum computing, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and lots of

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff that requires people way smarter than I am. Apple

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>says it's going to invest more than a billion dollars

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>into creating this campus and that they will employ at

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>least three thousand people there. That's a big office Anyway,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to see what sort of facility they create.

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'll even be able to visit it one day.

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, North Carolina is like next door to me,

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of switching from Apple to fellow goliath Google. There

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is a battle raging between Google and Roku, the company

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>that makes online video streaming devices like the Roku stick.

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Roku sent a message out to customers on Monday saying

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that the live TV service part of YouTube TV might

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>be shut down on Roku and possibly removed entirely. So

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>why is that Moroku's saying we're not doing it? According

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to Roku, Google has been engaging in some anti competitive

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>demands and that Google has been looking to implement practices

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that would quote manipulate your search results, impact the usage

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of your data, and ultimately cost you more end quote.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>A Roku rep also said Google might remove consumer access

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to YouTube TV on Roku because Google has been demanding

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>these processes and Roku has been resisting those demands. It's

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>all a bit vague, and as I record this, I

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have many more details. It sounds kind of like

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the next generation version of carriage disputes, and these are

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>disagreements and negotiations that happened between platforms like a cable

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>service provider and content providers like channels. So, like I said,

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you would occasionally see this with cable TV packages. If

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you've ever been a customer of a specific cable company

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and you wondered why a particular channel, or maybe even

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a group of channels just mysteriously vanished from your service,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it's likely due to a carriage disagreement. We're seeing similar

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>issues now in the world of streaming, but it obviously

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is taking a slightly different tack than the cable version

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and sticking with the online entertainment world. Engagement in that

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>world is currency. Creators who can show that they get

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>great engagement numbers, can secure sponsorships, and they can make

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>lucrative deals. They can get contract work. Heck, drive enough

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>engagement and you don't have to hustle. Instead, you have

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to manage the influx of collaboration and sponsorship requests, and

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you get to decide who you're going to work with

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.679
<v Speaker 1>and who you're not. But what happens if it turns

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>out that those engagement numbers of yours are based on

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a lie, Well, that's not so good. And sure enough

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it is a problem. Just as people would pay money

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to get tons of followers on Twitter and

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>raise their online social standing, there have been those who

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>have been doing that on Twitch to boost viewer numbers,

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and recently Twitch struck back. The Amazon owned company has

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.239
<v Speaker 1>banned more than seven and a half million bot accounts

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that Twitch says we're contributing to fake engagement. In other words,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>these were bots that exist solely for the purpose of

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>making Twitch streamers seem more popular than they really are.

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>The accounts didn't belong to real people, according to Twitch,

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>They're all just sort of empty shells. And now Twitch

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is using a machine learning process to discover fake accounts

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and then banned them, cutting way back on those fake

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>engagement numbers. Now related to this issue are other issues

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>where people have used fake accounts to harass streamers, not

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to boost their numbers, but to give them grief. They

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>might direct accounts to join a particular person stream and

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>then use those accounts to flood that streamer's chat with

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>abut and those streamers who weren't trying to boost their

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 1>own numbers, they had nothing, you know, connected to all

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>those bots suddenly coming on. They might have their reputations

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>tarnished in the process because their numbers take this huge

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>jump that they can't easily explain. It makes them look

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like they were the ones trying to buy views. So

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>from hustlers taking shortcuts to abusers leveraging tech to intimidate

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>or harass other streamers, these boats are pretty lousy, and

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad Twitch is making moves to get them off

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the platform. Hey have you ever wanted to go to Mars?

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Are you just dying to go there? Well you might

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>want to give Elon Musk a call. Then, the SpaceX

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>founder said in an interview that people going to Mars

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>might not come back alive and that quote a bunch

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of people will probably die in the beginning end quote.

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you're looking for a one way ticket now,

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I should say that. On the one hand, I credit

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Musk's blind honesty here. Space is incredibly dangerous. I have

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>said many times that space is trying to kill you,

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and Mars isn't much friendlier. The planet's atmosphere is far

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>too thin, with too little oxygen for people to breathe,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>so you would have to wear a space suit or

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>otherwise be in a pressurized craft. The thin atmosphere coupled

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>with a lack of magneto sphere, means that Mars offers

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.239
<v Speaker 1>no real protection against stuff like cosmic radiation, and exposure

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to cosmic radiation is not great. Most proposals I've seen

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for colonies on Mars include building structures underground to take

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the soil's protection. Cosmic radiation is not good

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at penetrating soil, so you know, put a meter or

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>three of ground between you and the cosmos isn't a

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>bad idea. We might be able to harvest water on

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Mars and thus be able to both supply water and

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>potentially oxygen to people, as well as create rocket fuel,

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but there are unanswered questions as to whether we'd be

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>able to actually grow anything in Martian soil yet. And

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the trip to Mars requires months of travel, and once

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you're there, you gotta wait around two years of Earth

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>time before Earth and Mars are lined up so that

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you can make a trip back home. That also means

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to figure out how you're going to make

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that trip back home, so you have to use a

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>spacecraft that can land and then take off again from Mars.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You could presumably take stuff with you to make this easier.

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But obviously everything you end up taking is going to

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>require a much larger effort back here on Earth and

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>or descended to Mars in the first place. And all

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of this is really theoretical right now, Obviously we haven't

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>sent anyone to Mars. But Musk is right, the project

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of going to Mars is incredibly dangerous with really high risks. Ideally,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.239
<v Speaker 1>whomever undertakes this challenge will do so with enough support

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to stand a good chance of making it to Mars

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and back again alive. Like that. That is the goal, right,

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't just dismiss it. So I don't disagree with

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Musk's assessment that it is incredibly dangerous. However, I do

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>feel the way you phrased it seems to be dismissive

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of human life, which I do have a problem with.

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know what else, I have a problem with

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>some mammals. You see, Residents of Tumbler Bridge, British Columbia,

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>experienced a series of Internet outages early Saturday morning this

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>past weekend, and the reason was pretty much exactly what

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you would expect. Beavers. Yep, it was a beaver problem,

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>as some of those furry critters chewed through fiber cable

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>at a couple of different points, severing the connection to

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the Internet at large. The cable had been buried three

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>ft underground and it also was coated with a conduit

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that was four and a half inches thick to protect it.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But that beaver, it didn't care and went to town

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on that cable. It dug it up and chewed through.

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>It turns out the beaver was upset at how Bitcoin

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>took a tumble last week. Just kidding, The beaver just

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the way the Falcon and the Winter Soldier ended,

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>and it was very upset. It's gonna have to wait

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks for Loki to come out on Disney Plus. Now

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm still kidding. The beaver, as far as I know,

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>has never actually been online, so this was not some

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>form of, you know, technological commentary. It did, however, use

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the stuff it chewed through to be part

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of its dam, so it made better use of the

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Internet than a lot of us do. And finally, in

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>our news that has no relevance to Jonathan whatsoever segment

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is opening up a quote high tech hair salon

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>end quote in London. Now, I have not had to

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>see a barber since nine that's the last time I

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.719
<v Speaker 1>had hair. So for all I know, hair salons now

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have robots and food and pill form and flying hairdressers.

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>But according to the BBC, this high tech sal on

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>will have magic mirrors. Okay, well they're not magic, but

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>they are mirrors that incorporate augmented reality features in them

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that will allow customers to see how certain hairstyles and

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>colors would look on them before they commit to anything.

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So they'll see their reflection in the mirror, but their

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>hairstyle will be a digital overlay and they can figure

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>out which one they prefer, So a customer could sit

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>down in the chair and flip through different options on

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the mirror to find one that suits them. And I

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's pretty cool, and it would mean that people

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>like me would avoid the embarrassment that comes with agreeing

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to a stylist feathering your hair when you don't happen

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to know what that actually means. And it was the

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>eighties and shut up. The hair salon will also offer

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>various beauty products, each one coupled with a QR code,

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>so customers can just scan the code on their phones

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and then purchase those beauty products. Through trumpet Please Amazon,

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>big surprise there. The whole thing is an experi perament

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon says isn't an indicator of the future. The

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>company says it doesn't have plans to expand this further.

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>There are other hairdressers in London who have already expressed

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>criticism for Amazon's move, pointing out that the salon industry

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>as a whole was hit really hard because of the pandemic,

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like lots of those places went out of business and

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>had no way of coming back, and people lost their livelihoods.

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And meanwhile, Amazon has been breaking in enormous amounts of

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>revenue all through the pandemic. It does feel a little

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>bit like the big, mega corporation is making huge moves

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>on smaller businesses. But you could also say that's Amazon's

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>corporate history from the beginning when you really break it

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>all down. And that wraps up the news for today, Tuesday,

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>April twenty one. If you have suggestions for topics I

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>should cover on tech Stuff, let me know over on Twitter.

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The handle there is text Stuff h s W and

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff is

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the I heart Radio app, Apple podcasts,

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.