WEBVTT - Previewing Taiwan's Inauguration, Iran's President Missing After Crash

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak Aisia podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. You can join Brian

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Curtis and myself for the stories, making news and moving

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>markets in the APAC region. You can subscribe to the

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>show anywhere you get your podcast and always on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan's president or in president elect, Lijingda is to be

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>sworn in as president today and that will put him

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 2>right at the center of very difficult relations between the

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 2>United States and China. And joining us for some discussion

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.279
<v Speaker 2>of this is Ron A Mitter, who is Professor of

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 2>US Asia Relations at the Harvard Kennedy School, to get

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 2>some insights on this. So, by most accounts, Leijingda is

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>likely to make a speech today that would be one

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>of continuity, but there's always the chance that there'll be

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>some thing in there that rocks the boat. What are

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>you expecting in terms of the tone.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think Brian that he's going to try and

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 3>pump up the volume a little bit when it comes

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 3>to the question of Taiwan being separated from the mainland.

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 3>His predecessor who's just leaving office president saying one was

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty careful to make sure that she didn't trigger that

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 3>red line, which Beijing has always said is going to

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 3>be the trigger for an all out opposition by them,

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 3>and that is, of course, the decoration of independence by Taiwan. Now,

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's highly unlikely that lightingder As the new president,

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>is going to actually utter the I word of independence,

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 3>but he may try and use language that's a bit

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 3>more forceful than that of his predecessor. That having been said,

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure that there will have been extremely strong signals

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 3>from the United States from the Biden administration, but he

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 3>should not try and upset the current status quo, particularly

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 3>since mainland mainland China's relations with the US have been

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>getting better in the last year, and so while they're

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be stronger rhetoric, I don't expect to hear

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 3>any difference in terms of Taiwan's policy.

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Mister Lai managed to get around forty percent of the

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>popular vote, so there is not a strong mandate, is there.

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, forty percent is pretty strong. I think there are

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 3>an awful lot of politicians who would like to have

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>that In the context of Taiwan, which is three major

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 3>candidates all coming together. It is certainly the case that

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 3>if the two candidates who lost, Coen Jur and Ho

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 3>Yui had actually managed to get together with their respective

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>parties and run together against him, then it's possible he

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 3>might have lost. But that having been said, he can

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 3>certainly go back and say he actually does have the

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 3>presidential mandate because he's got a lot more votes than

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 3>either of the other two. His problem is a little

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 3>bit similar to the one in the US at the moment,

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 3>which is that even though he has the presidency, Congress

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 3>is split. Essentially the opposition KMT Nationalist Party does have

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 3>a very significant number of seats, pretty much actually slightly

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 3>more I think one more than the ruling DPP in

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the presidency actually has, and that means that it may

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 3>be hard to get legislation through Taiwan's Congress, even though

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 3>lighting the does have the presidency in his hands.

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Professor, I'm curious about the nuanced line between declaring independence

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 2>and stating that we already have independence, because that's basically

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 2>what William Lai has been saying. He's pushing for the

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 2>status quo. The status quo is de facto independence. So

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 2>how nervous would China be if he starts talking about

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 2>that in great detail? And even if it isn't a

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>declaration officially, it's statement that we have it.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, that phrasing of we don't need to declare independence

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 3>because essentially we have it already was actually used in

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 3>the form by saying one his predecessor as well, so

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 3>it's not completely new in that sense. I think that

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Beijing is getting more and more nervous about the idea

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 3>that there might be any kind of formal separation, and

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 3>that's why we've seen, in fact, just today that there

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 3>have been yet more sorties of fighter craft in the skies,

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 3>not quite above the island, but certainly quite close to it.

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 3>And they've made it very clear again that they regard

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 3>any statement that goes in the direction of independence to

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 3>be one that they would consider a trigger warning from

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 3>their point of view. That said, it is certainly the

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 3>case that they've acknowledged for a long time that Taiwan

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 3>has been autonomous. That might be a better word to

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 3>use than independent. And the question now comes as to

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 3>how long they're willing to tolerate something that looks genuinely

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 3>like the status quo. In other words, that Taiwan will

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 3>not get and probably won't move very hard to seek

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 3>formal independence for its status, but rather seek to try

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 3>and find, say, international organizations such as the WTO or

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 3>sections of the United Nations, where it can have a

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 3>sort of substate role. There are precedents for other entities

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 3>which are not fully recognized states getting some sort of

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 3>recognition in international organizations. The question is whether Beijing will

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 3>consider that now part of its red line.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So what does this mean for the United Sis dates,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the context of a US presidential election at

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year that may say a change

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in administrations, but.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 3>The rest of this calendar year. My guess is that

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty much baked into the calculations on both the

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 3>side of Beijing and of Washington. In other words, they

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 3>know that both sides have known that this inauguration was

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 3>going to happen. The election actually happened four months ago

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 3>in January, and what's happened so far has not produced

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 3>any great surprises since then. Also, both sides essentially don't

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>have a great interest in raising the temperature on US

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 3>China relations more broadly, in the run up to that

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 3>presidential election. Essentially, the Chinese side know that if President

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 3>Biden is re elected that at that point they're going

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 3>to have to work out how they'll deal with the

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 3>timeline question over the four years after that, in the

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 3>face of an administration which has made it very clear that

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 3>it does continue the consider the continued status quoa of

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan to be a core US interest. If President Trump

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 3>is re elected, then I think the general sense from

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 3>the Beijing side is that they're not sure what he

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 3>might do, anything from actually doubling down on harsh words

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>or actions with China to maybe being less involved as

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 3>a sort of more isolationist position from the outside world.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 3>And so from that point of view, Beijing will speak

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 3>strong language, it will send those fighter planes into the

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 3>skies near Taiwan, but it's unlikely to want to trigger

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>any kind of major confrontation now before it knows the

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>result of that US presidential election.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Everything we've seen in the past is that Taiwan people

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:37.239
<v Speaker 2>would not in any way support becoming a part of China.

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's the sense of things. And you talked

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>about autonomy. How much has what's happened to Hong Kong

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 2>hurt China in the eyes of Taiwan people, losing its

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 2>semi autonomous status here right, I.

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:54.799
<v Speaker 3>Mean the parting of the National Security Law in twenty

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty in Hong Kong had an extremely negative effect on

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 3>impressions of getting closed to China in Taiwan, and in fact,

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 3>in the previous presidential election back in twenty twenty, which

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 3>was held in the kind of shadow of that Hong

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Kong National Security Law, Taiing Ian was essentially able to

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 3>get reelection in large part by citing the example of

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong. But there are other means of getting close.

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Political closeness, as you've said, is something that most Taiwanese

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 3>people don't seem to want to have. They prefer a

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 3>version of the status quo. But something like eighty percent

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 3>of Taiwan's businesses are in some way tied to the mainland,

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 3>and the mainland has shown certainly in the last few

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 3>months that it's capable of operating partial boycotts or sanctions

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 3>against Taiwanese goods. It could be pineapples, it could be chemicals.

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Both of those have been hit recently to show that

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 3>if it wants to squeeze Taiwan's economy, then it has

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 3>the capacity to do that. I would look to that

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 3>sort of area, or for instance, companies like fox Conn,

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 3>run by a Taiwan millionaire, Terry Gull, but operating largely

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 3>in factories on the south coast of China, for where

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Beijing may choose to squeeze less on the military front,

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 3>probably more on the economic front.

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Professor, what do we know about the cabinet of the

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>incoming president? Who is he surrounding himself with.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, he does have, amongst others, people who know the

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 3>United States very well, including Vice President be Kim, who

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 3>is of course someone who has American family and is

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 3>very well known in Washington. In addition, it's fairly likely

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 3>that he's going to push hard on domestic economic issues

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 3>with his cabinet, one of the reasons being that although

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>one of the factors that most analysts would say led

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 3>to his reelection was the fear of the opposition parties

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 3>getting too close to China, at least on the part

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>of forty percent of the voters, there is a lot

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 3>of dissatisfaction within Taiwan itself about the state of the economy,

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 3>and because of that, issues such as youth unemployment, for instance,

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be important for Li's government to essentially

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 3>come up with more economic growth. So figures like Selby

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Kim will be important in terms of US relations, but

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 3>the domestic economy and domestic politics will probably be much

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 3>more at the center of what happens in the next

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 3>four years than it might appear on inauguration day itself,

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 3>when obviously attention is much more on what Beijing is

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 3>going to do.

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Excellent stuff. Thank you very much. Professor Professor Roni Mitter,

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Professor of US Asia Relations at Harvard Kennedy School, joining

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 2>us in our studios for a closer look at China

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and indeed the Asia Pacific is Fred Newman, Chief Asia

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Economist and co head of Global Research for Asia at HSBC.

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>So Frederick, thank you very much for joining us here

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 2>in our studios. As usual, let's start off with China,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 2>looking at some of the measures of late Again, we're

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>hearing from economists that you know, it's a step in

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 2>the right direction, but it may not be enough, and

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 2>you know the chasm is huge and such. Your thoughts

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 2>on the developments we saw at the end of last weekend,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 2>whether they might.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 4>Work well, it's not the magic bullet that we've been

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 4>ho we'revoping for. But look, they're taking new measures. That is,

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 4>they had rolled out new tools to actually address the

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 4>housing problem. Now you could say the money they put

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 4>behind is not large enough, but at least they're thinking

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 4>a little bit outside the box. For example, they brought

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 4>a new central bank tool. The Central Bank will provide

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 4>money at very low interest rates to commercial banks to

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 4>buy excess housing. We hadn't had that specific program before.

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 4>And so the hope is here that look that at

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 4>least they're opening the toolbox a little bit, and that

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 4>would give them then the potential opening to add further

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 4>funds in the future. But certainly in themselves, this is

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 4>not going to solve the housing crisis. And once we fell, swoop.

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So let's say that we're going to get incremental

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>steps over in the future, something of the same order

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude. How many years is going to take fred

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>for China to get out from underneath this problem?

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 4>Well, look, we already three years, three plus years into this,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 4>and you think that housing market corrections magnitude would take

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 4>five six years with the economy to fully digest. So

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 4>I would say we're looking another couple of years here

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 4>at least before you really can say the housing crisis

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 4>behind us, and that's you know, that's in the US.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 4>It took many years as well for this to be digested. That.

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 4>The thing though, at the moment, is we yet need

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 4>to stop the bleeding. We're not even talking about recovery.

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 4>We still talking about prices falling, We're still talking about

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 4>housing construction being under pressure, we still talk about demand falling.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 4>We just want to arrest those downward trends, stabilize things,

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 4>and then it's going to take another couple of years

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 4>before you see things really accelerate again.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 2>The ultra long sovereign bond sales, which you know is

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>going to be done in several trenches, walk us through

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the mechanism for mean, because what it seems like is

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 2>that it's the federal govern you know, raising money and

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 2>enabling local provinces to buy up some of these unsold homes.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 2>What's the transmission mechanism? How does that money move from

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 2>the federal to the provincial governments.

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're not quite clear exactly how much of that

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 4>money will be put towards housing purchases, right, so it's

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 4>a bit of a black box. Nevertheless, we know that

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 4>the government's saying we need to raise more money. We

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 4>need to essentially put more money into the economy, be

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 4>it in housing or be it in other infrastructure projects

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 4>for example. So by putting out long term bonds, you

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 4>really try to raise money essentially for the long term.

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 4>You're not going to attack short term money markets. It

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 4>aims at a different class of investors, and it's really

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 4>trying to establish long term funding mechanisms that local governments

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 4>and ultimately could use as well. So that's the idea.

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 4>It's going to building a long term funding market. It's

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 4>less so that the money is all going to be

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 4>available for housing purchases.

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's say maybe we're at the halfway point in

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of the recovery for the property market in China,

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and then once we get, you know, fully through this

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>period of recovery, maybe we can talk about kind of

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a recovery in the broader economy. But I'd like to

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about what's going on in Taiwan.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>The installation of a new president will happen later today.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that we were talking about over

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, Brian and myself, we know that semiconductor manufacturing

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is very, very concentrated in Taiwan. TSMC obviously the largest

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>player globally. I think ninety percent of the chips in

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the world come out of out of that manufacturing facility.

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But as countries like the US and maybe countries in

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Europe seek to diversify, so it's not so concentrated. What

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is the economic future for Taiwan if companies like TSMC

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>begin to lose their heft.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's certainly a big headwind for the Taiwanese economy

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 4>because of course semiconductor advanced semiconductor manufacturing is you write,

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 4>is the driving force of the Taiwanese economy, and so

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 4>losing those fabs to other countries would certainly be a setback.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 4>But make no mistake, the Taiwanese economy is much larger

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 4>than this. Yes, they have spectacular advances in high end chips,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 4>but it's very concentrated to one company, a couple of factories.

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 4>It's not like thousands of workers work there. It's a

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 4>big profit driver, but it doesn't really employ that many people.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 4>So if you just talk about overall economic growth, the

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 4>direct significance isn't that large. It's more significant because it

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 4>gives other companies in Taiwan access to advanced semiconductors. But

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 4>I would argue that ultimately Taiwan has a fairly diversified economy.

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 4>We always talk about chips, but there's petrochemicals, there's electronics,

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 4>there's other types of manufacturing, and you know, ultimately it

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 4>is a very small island's only twenty million people. They

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 4>need to if their companies want to grow, they have

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 4>to grow overseas. They can't just grow domestically, right, So

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 4>there's a limit to which you can actually expand capacity

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 4>Taiwan anyway, So it's not necessarily deathnel here to the

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Tawanese economy.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm curious though, whether or not you think that

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan plays a bigger role in between China and the

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 2>United States, or whether or not it continues to be

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of there in the background, a potential danger, but

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 2>not playing such an active role. So that's the first

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 2>part of the question. The second part is in China's

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 2>response to the US so far, it's been more words

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 2>than actions. Do you expect more in terms of.

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Actions, maybe in terms of the protection on the trade side, Yeah, yes,

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 4>some of those things. Yeah, Well on that first, so

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 4>we have seen actually the Chinese so far actually not

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 4>taken much action against the US lying low and they're

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 4>just taking on the Chin and they're still open for

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 4>US companies to do business in China. But visa of

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 4>a Europe, we've actually seen the Chinese start to say,

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 4>if you start to impose these measures, we may have

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 4>to retaliate. So they're a bit more aggressive visa of

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 4>a Europe because they don't want Europe to follow the United States.

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 4>The other thing that the Chinese could alter do is

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 4>they could make a life for US companies in China

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 4>much much harder. That's not on the cards yet, and

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 4>so far they want US companies to be involved. But

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 4>of course if there is a you know, if there's

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 4>an opportunity then to kind of pay back the US

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 4>by shutting out US companies, I think that might be

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 4>sort of the next way to do it. In terms

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 4>of Taiwan, I think it's going to play more of

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 4>a backstory here. The temperature has declined, you know, around Taiwan,

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 4>and so we'll have to see how the US election

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 4>shapes up. That's of course always a point where you

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 4>could see escalating tensions. But I think broadly speaking, things

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 4>are not quite as acute as some of the headlines suggests.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>You know you read the news. I mean China preparing

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to take countermeasures against the European Union if it continues

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a series of investigations around subsidies. We were talking a

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>moment ago about the Canadian Trade Minister looking at the

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>possibility of tariffs on Chinese evs. We know what we

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>heard last week from the Bike administration when it came

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to new tariffs on Chinese goods. Do you are you

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.959
<v Speaker 1>worried about a new trade war, or at least a

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>hotter trade war.

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 4>I think the worrying trend here is that if the

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 4>US imposes restrictions, other countries will start to follow. And

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 4>there's a certain logic to this, because if the US

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 4>says no thank you to Chinese electric vehicles, and these

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 4>vehicles are being redirected into other markets and they necessarily

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 4>get overwhelmed, and then they start to pose restrictions as well,

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 4>And so the risk is that you have a cascading

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.959
<v Speaker 4>effect here with the European Union, in Canada and everybody

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 4>else it's following the US. And that's not necessarily good

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 4>for the world economy. It's not necessarily good for consumers,

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 4>and so we want to kind of contain trade restrictions

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.239
<v Speaker 4>to a bare minimum. It doesn't say that they're not

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 4>justifications in some instances, but remember, any disruption to trade

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 4>is ultimately a negative for the world economies, a negative

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 4>for consumer for consumer choice, and so the hope is

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 4>that other countries will become a bit more judicious in

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 4>terms of their application of these measures than kind of

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 4>using brute force.

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Are we about to see the yen play a more

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 2>important role in the global economy and are you expecting

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 2>to see weakness in the dollar anytime soon?

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 4>So yen is unlikely to play a stronger role. It's

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 4>so much pressure at the moment. I don't think it

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 4>will re establish itself as a reserve currency necessarily anytime soon.

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 4>And there's pressures on the en remain quite severe. That's

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 4>because US interest rates are sky high and Japanese interest

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 4>rates are what they are, and so there is probably

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 4>ongoing pressure in the Japanese end. The Japanese Center Bank

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 4>is trying to push back against this, allowing yields to

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 4>rise to kind of slow down to this end of

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 4>the Japanese end. But remember a weaker Japanese end plays

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 4>a functional role in Japan's reflation. It raises inflation, it

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 4>raises competitiveness, and that's ultimately good for Japan.

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Frederick, thank you for coming into our studios

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and joining us here on a Monday morning. We do

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it. Fred Newman, Chief Asia Economist and co head

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>of Global Research for Asia at HSBC.

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a closer look at the President of Iran

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>at this helicopter crash. Michael Heath joins us Bloomberg ecogov editor,

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>joining us from our studios in Sydney. Michael, I know

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it's still early in this event. We have information kind

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of trickling in even before the announcement of this crash, though,

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say that relations between Tehran

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and Washington were very, very strained. Do we know anything

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about what's happening in Iran right now? Irrespective of the

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>search for the crash site.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 5>The pictures that are being broadcast on I run in

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 5>safe TV and mainly of people either either praying for

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 5>the health of the president or obviously emergency vehicles heading

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 5>up to the area. As to the higher level politics

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 5>of it, it doesn't seem to have been a great

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 5>deal said. The US has announced that President Biden has

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 5>been briefed on it, but it's very very unclear sort

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.959
<v Speaker 5>of the status of it. Was it just a hard landing,

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 5>is it something more serious, It's just unknown at the moment.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 5>That's a particularly mountainous part of Iran, and obviously the

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 5>pictures have shown very very thick fog there as well

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 5>in rain. So really we're just as you say, the

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 5>little bits and bobs of information are trickling out, but

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 5>until we get something official, it's really just speculation. At

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 5>this stage.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 2>We understand that Iran asked Turkey to send a rescue

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 2>helicopter and one with night vision capabilities. It looks to

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 2>be very close to the border. Do we know whether

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 2>this crashes on the Iranian side or on the Turkysh side.

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 5>It seems to be on the Iran inside. I mean

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 5>that area is actually also known as Azerbaijan. It's said

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 5>to have crashed in East Azerbaijan. So you've got the

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 5>Republic of Azerbaijan former Soviet republic, and then you've got

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 5>in northwest Iran, you've got another region called Azerbaijan, and

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 5>there's west and East and so it does seem to

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 5>have happened just over the border inside Iran, but the

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 5>area is known as Azerbaijan. But he was flying back

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 5>that those three helicopters involved in the three helicopters, one

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 5>of the which was containing the president, was flying back

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 5>after the opening of a dam between Azerbaijan and Iran

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 5>as they sort of try and warm relations between the

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 5>two sides. As well.

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the person of mister Raisi, I think

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>he's an ultra conservative cleric. He's obviously the president of

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the country, and many analysts believe that he was being

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>groomed to become the next supreme leader of Iran. So

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 1>obviously with his absence, I mean that that would lead

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge void.

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 4>It would it would.

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean, look, in the worst case scenario, it does

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 5>really open up a lot of questions because obviously the

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 5>Supreme Leader, who is the ultimate authority in Iran. Unlike

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 5>other countries where the presidents sort of head of state,

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 5>in Iran, it's the supreme leader, you know, sort of

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 5>the religious leader of this theocracy. But as you say,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 5>race he was being he was well known to be groomed,

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 5>being groomed potentially to take over a Supreme Leader at

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 5>some point, so yes, that that would rule will him

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 5>out and then of course you under the constitution at

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 5>this stage you'd have the first vice President who would

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 5>step into his role, and then there would be a

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 5>group of guardians who would come together and within fifty

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 5>days they'd be they'd be expected to hold elections. But

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 5>you're right, I mean, if if if he's he's sort

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 5>of had quite a meteoric assent through the through the

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 5>ranks in Iran, and if that was the ultimate goal

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 5>for him, it really would open up a gap avoid

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 5>in terms of the succession planning there.

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>In addition to Ibrahim Raisi. Do we know much about

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 2>who else was board the flight?

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we know the Foreign minister was on there, and

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 5>then there was there were some guards, There was a

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 5>representative of the Supreme Leader from the region where they

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 5>were they were flying over, and the governor there is

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 5>my understanding as well. That's about all the detail that

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 5>we have, but yeah, it was it was a three

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 5>three helicopter convoy and as you were reported in the news,

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 5>it seems that it's the President's the president's helicopter that's

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 5>had the hard landing there. But Yeah, we're really really

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 5>fed on information or detail at this stage.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it nonetheless, Michael for your insight and perspective.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Heath, Bloomberg ecogov editor, joining us from Sydney, talking

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>about the helicopter crash. The flight carrying Iranian President Raisi

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and his foreign minister which crashed on Sunday in the

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Mountainous Area North in the northwest portion of Iran.

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast, bringing to the

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 2>stories making news and moving markets in the Asia Pacific.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Visit the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to get more

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 2>episodes of this and other shows from Bloomberg. Subscribe to

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 2>the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen,

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 2>and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business app.