WEBVTT - Not So Fast Episode 22

0:00:01.230 --> 0:00:05.189
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Not So Fast with Andrew Perloff and Paul Pabst,

0:00:05.390 --> 0:00:08.690
<v Speaker 1>where two longtime friends challenge each other on the biggest

0:00:08.730 --> 0:00:12.610
<v Speaker 1>sports stories of the day. Here's Andrew Perloff and Paul Pabst.

0:00:13.490 --> 0:00:14.610
<v Speaker 2>Not So Fast, my friends.

0:00:16.950 --> 0:00:18.090
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Not So Fast.

0:00:18.150 --> 0:00:18.910
<v Speaker 2>I'm Andrew Perloff.

0:00:18.970 --> 0:00:19.970
<v Speaker 3>He's Paul Pabst.

0:00:20.090 --> 0:00:23.750
<v Speaker 4>We are still in the baseball portion of the Man Cave,

0:00:24.090 --> 0:00:25.090
<v Speaker 4>and it's October 1st.

0:00:25.820 --> 0:00:28.220
<v Speaker 3>The greatest month in sports, Paul.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's not really up for debate. And let me

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 5>give you some bonus coverage before we get to the

0:00:31.700 --> 0:00:36.430
<v Speaker 5>MLB playoffs. Starting tonight, 61 straight days of college football

0:00:36.510 --> 0:00:38.470
<v Speaker 5>or NFL. And it ends December 3rd. I don't know

0:00:38.490 --> 0:00:40.330
<v Speaker 5>what's going on there. We've got to find a game

0:00:40.350 --> 0:00:43.290
<v Speaker 5>to put December 3rd. But 61 straight days of college

0:00:43.310 --> 0:00:44.010
<v Speaker 5>or pro football.

0:00:44.050 --> 0:00:44.290
<v Speaker 2>Love it.

0:00:44.310 --> 0:00:44.630
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:00:45.030 --> 0:00:49.100
<v Speaker 4>Okay, well, obviously, yesterday we had baseball. Let's start with

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 4>the Yankees-Red Sox. Yankees blow out the Red Sox two

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 4>straight games. Who are these guys on the Yankees are hitting?

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:56.970
<v Speaker 4>I did not expect this at all.

0:00:57.010 --> 0:00:59.990
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, two rookies, George Lombard, Spencer Jones. I think what

0:01:00.330 --> 0:01:02.430
<v Speaker 5>the vibe is when you go into that Yankees series,

0:01:02.730 --> 0:01:05.390
<v Speaker 5>I think the national coverage was about Aaron Judge being gone.

0:01:05.750 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 5>But then I looked at the local coverage. They were

0:01:08.230 --> 0:01:10.100
<v Speaker 5>much more confident going into the game. And if you

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.390
<v Speaker 5>look at what they did, You allowed Aaron Judge to

0:01:12.430 --> 0:01:14.010
<v Speaker 5>get a couple more days rest and be ready for

0:01:14.030 --> 0:01:14.610
<v Speaker 5>the next series.

0:01:14.790 --> 0:01:16.789
<v Speaker 4>I wonder, though, are they getting a little too confident

0:01:16.830 --> 0:01:19.010
<v Speaker 4>about some of these bottom of the lineup guys? You know,

0:01:19.030 --> 0:01:21.350
<v Speaker 4>they're facing the Rays a much deeper rotation than the

0:01:21.410 --> 0:01:21.850
<v Speaker 4>Red Sox.

0:01:21.890 --> 0:01:22.810
<v Speaker 3>Is this going to continue?

0:01:22.830 --> 0:01:24.919
<v Speaker 5>But you know the theory. Rookies don't know any better.

0:01:25.030 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 5>They don't know that they're rookies. They don't know that

0:01:26.620 --> 0:01:28.140
<v Speaker 5>they're on the Yankees and not supposed to be this

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 5>good this early. Like the catcher for the Padres is

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 5>20 years old. But I think that the Yankees have

0:01:32.980 --> 0:01:35.020
<v Speaker 5>to be obviously in great shape. But not just great

0:01:35.060 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 5>shape is that you can win without your star. And

0:01:38.140 --> 0:01:39.980
<v Speaker 5>a team like the Dodgers can win without their star.

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 5>But the Red Sox, that was a no-show.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.820
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, again, you can beat one team in the wild card.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:45.559
<v Speaker 3>We'll see. We'll see.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.820
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I think the game of the day, down in Atlanta,

0:01:48.900 --> 0:01:52.470
<v Speaker 4>the Phillies beat the Braves. It was harrowing. Of course,

0:01:52.510 --> 0:01:55.190
<v Speaker 4>I'm a Phillies fan. Tough day, but I got through it.

0:01:55.330 --> 0:01:58.490
<v Speaker 5>That was almost awful. Bryce Harper had that misjudged fly

0:01:58.530 --> 0:02:00.770
<v Speaker 5>ball in the middle innings. And when that went over

0:02:00.810 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 5>his head, Phillies fans were like, that's it.

0:02:02.890 --> 0:02:03.250
<v Speaker 2>It's over.

0:02:03.270 --> 0:02:05.230
<v Speaker 5>It's not going to work out. If you watch his play,

0:02:05.790 --> 0:02:08.260
<v Speaker 5>he just took one step in, one step out, and

0:02:08.300 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 5>got frozen. And after that, you're like, this is how

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 5>it's going to end. This is how his offseason is

0:02:12.460 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 5>going to be.

0:02:13.340 --> 0:02:13.980
<v Speaker 3>Oh, absolutely.

0:02:14.060 --> 0:02:16.579
<v Speaker 4>But every Phillies fan knows Bryce Harper should not be

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 4>in right field because he should be at first base,

0:02:19.580 --> 0:02:20.940
<v Speaker 4>but he moved to help the team.

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.750
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Harper has his detractors, but he is a team guy.

0:02:25.270 --> 0:02:26.730
<v Speaker 4>So I don't think people are going to kill him

0:02:26.770 --> 0:02:29.490
<v Speaker 4>as much as nationally they might because it did look ridiculous.

0:02:29.510 --> 0:02:31.250
<v Speaker 5>It's one of those plays that if the game ends

0:02:31.310 --> 0:02:33.450
<v Speaker 5>there or they don't make the comeback with his home

0:02:33.490 --> 0:02:36.590
<v Speaker 5>run and Schwarber's home run, that play is the entire offseason.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.220
<v Speaker 4>I think so, but with Bryce Harper and the Phillies,

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 4>they just want him healthy and out there. There was

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot of sort of backroom and a little bit

0:02:44.100 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 4>on-air discussion today, Paul, about Bryce Harper.

0:02:46.620 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 3>You want to clue people in what was going on?

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Dylan earlier on the Dan Patrick Show said, is

0:02:50.820 --> 0:02:52.989
<v Speaker 5>Bryce Harper a Hall of Famer? And he threw it

0:02:53.010 --> 0:02:55.190
<v Speaker 5>out there kind of out of nowhere. And Bryce Harper,

0:02:55.210 --> 0:02:57.350
<v Speaker 5>I think, is 33. He's got at least five years

0:02:57.389 --> 0:02:59.829
<v Speaker 5>left on his contract. But I guess if you stopped

0:02:59.850 --> 0:03:02.430
<v Speaker 5>what he did today, I think we're in year 15,

0:03:02.430 --> 0:03:04.380
<v Speaker 5>is he a Hall of Famer? I think I know

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 5>your answer, but go ahead. The floor is yours.

0:03:06.419 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know what?

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if they could pull it up. Forget

0:03:08.340 --> 0:03:11.260
<v Speaker 4>my answer. Let's talk about, I don't know, Harold Reynolds,

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 4>who is a great baseball player. He weighed in on

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.869
<v Speaker 4>this after Dan asked him, is Bryce Harper a Hall

0:03:16.889 --> 0:03:17.310
<v Speaker 4>of Famer?

0:03:19.669 --> 0:03:23.030
<v Speaker 2>No doubt about it. No doubt. No doubt.

0:03:25.910 --> 0:03:29.540
<v Speaker 4>That was pretty succinct, and I agree completely. First ballot,

0:03:29.580 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 4>Hall of Fame.

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.100
<v Speaker 5>Okay, a couple nuances here. I think he's going to

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 5>go to the Hall of Fame some day. But if

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 5>you look at his rise to become a phenom, I

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 5>don't think it matches what he did on the field.

0:03:39.460 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 5>I think he had three great years, a bunch of

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.260
<v Speaker 5>good years, and then he had some seasons where he

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.470
<v Speaker 5>hit like 248 and 22 home runs. And he was

0:03:46.510 --> 0:03:49.550
<v Speaker 5>a top five MVP candidate twice. Now, he won both

0:03:49.590 --> 0:03:52.010
<v Speaker 5>those years, but he had too many average years. And

0:03:52.030 --> 0:03:54.130
<v Speaker 5>it's almost like a running back running for 1,000 yards.

0:03:54.510 --> 0:03:56.830
<v Speaker 5>It's not greatness. And I'm going to compare him to

0:03:57.150 --> 0:04:00.030
<v Speaker 5>Paul Goldschmidt. Paul Goldschmidt is a player you're like, oh, yeah,

0:04:00.050 --> 0:04:00.570
<v Speaker 5>he was a good hitter.

0:04:00.590 --> 0:04:00.670
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.140
<v Speaker 5>But Paul Goldschmidt has no name recognition, no household name,

0:04:04.180 --> 0:04:06.660
<v Speaker 5>no juice, no buzz. He was not a phenom. Their

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 5>stats for their first 15 years are almost identical. Paul

0:04:09.620 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 5>Goldschmidt's not a first ballot Hall of Famer, and he

0:04:11.490 --> 0:04:14.450
<v Speaker 5>shouldn't be. He'll probably sneak in someday. Bryce Harper's getting

0:04:14.510 --> 0:04:17.089
<v Speaker 5>in because of the aura around him and a very

0:04:17.130 --> 0:04:17.589
<v Speaker 5>good career.

0:04:18.270 --> 0:04:21.230
<v Speaker 4>I completely disagree. I mean, first of all, he's much

0:04:21.270 --> 0:04:23.650
<v Speaker 4>younger than Paul Goldschmidt. He's already got as many more

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:24.260
<v Speaker 4>home runs.

0:04:24.070 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Than Paul Goldschmidt. And Paul Goldschmidt, that's kind of all

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:27.300
<v Speaker 3>he does is hit home runs.

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.540
<v Speaker 5>Okay, his batting average is better. There are a lot

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:31.020
<v Speaker 5>of stats.

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.630
<v Speaker 3>Again, I'm going to have to nerd out here. Bryce

0:04:33.670 --> 0:04:36.969
<v Speaker 3>Harper is a get-walks guy. He led the entire league.

0:04:36.790 --> 0:04:37.609
<v Speaker 2>In walks this year, Paul.

0:04:37.630 --> 0:04:38.990
<v Speaker 5>You can't walk your way into the Hall of Fame.

0:04:39.029 --> 0:04:39.710
<v Speaker 3>He's walking his way.

0:04:39.770 --> 0:04:44.150
<v Speaker 4>He's probably Juan Soto's great at, too. Bryce Harper, he

0:04:44.170 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 4>had the 10th highest OBP in the whole league, and.

0:04:46.710 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 3>He had an off year.

0:04:47.620 --> 0:04:49.779
<v Speaker 4>He had a better on-base percentage than Shohei Otani. He

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 4>gets on base because he walks.

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 5>Paul Goldschmidt. I can't believe we're discussing Goldschmidt versus Harper,

0:04:53.900 --> 0:04:59.130
<v Speaker 5>but 390 home runs to Harper's 392. 286 to Harper's, 279.

0:04:59.130 --> 0:05:02.799
<v Speaker 5>Four gold gloves, zero for Harper. Silver slugger, five for Goldschmidt,

0:05:02.940 --> 0:05:05.700
<v Speaker 5>four for Bryce Harper. War, which I don't understand, but

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.490
<v Speaker 5>smart people like you do. War for Paul Goldschmidt, 65,

0:05:09.490 --> 0:05:11.030
<v Speaker 5>56 for Bryce Harper.

0:05:11.050 --> 0:05:13.409
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but by the time Bryce Harper's his age, he'll

0:05:13.430 --> 0:05:14.010
<v Speaker 3>be way above that.

0:05:14.130 --> 0:05:16.790
<v Speaker 5>So here's the other question. The graphic up there said

0:05:16.850 --> 0:05:17.930
<v Speaker 5>first ballot Hall of Fame.

0:05:17.930 --> 0:05:19.510
<v Speaker 3>100%.

0:05:19.510 --> 0:05:21.350
<v Speaker 5>All right, that's where it actually bothers me a little

0:05:21.370 --> 0:05:23.290
<v Speaker 5>bit because Bryce Harper is, I don't think, even close

0:05:23.710 --> 0:05:23.970
<v Speaker 5>to that.

0:05:23.990 --> 0:05:24.589
<v Speaker 2>He's 33.

0:05:24.589 --> 0:05:27.469
<v Speaker 3>Paul, he's at 392. He's definitely going to get 500.

0:05:27.470 --> 0:05:29.060
<v Speaker 5>Do you think he's going to get better in the

0:05:29.070 --> 0:05:29.620
<v Speaker 5>next five years?

0:05:29.650 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 4>Do you think Bryce Harper's not? 500 home runs and

0:05:32.260 --> 0:05:35.299
<v Speaker 4>two MVPs and tons. You know, I have a stat.

0:05:35.500 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 4>He has the highest OPS for one team in the

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 4>postseason of any current player. The only two players historically

0:05:41.540 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 4>above him are Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig.

0:05:43.730 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 3>He's an incredible. Incredible playoff player.

0:05:45.700 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 5>Maybe this is wrong of me, but I say first

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.740
<v Speaker 5>ballot for Albert Pujols, for Mike Trout, for maybe Otani.

0:05:52.100 --> 0:05:54.230
<v Speaker 5>The guys where it's like there is zero doubt. There's

0:05:54.250 --> 0:05:55.790
<v Speaker 5>not even a discussion. Stamp it.

0:05:55.930 --> 0:05:56.330
<v Speaker 3>Move on.

0:05:56.610 --> 0:05:59.550
<v Speaker 5>Like if you look at Pujols' first 10 years, he

0:05:59.630 --> 0:06:02.490
<v Speaker 5>was top five for MVP nine out of his first

0:06:02.490 --> 0:06:04.890
<v Speaker 5>10 years. It's galactic. Same with Trout. Same with Griffey.

0:06:05.290 --> 0:06:07.030
<v Speaker 5>And it's nothing against Bryce Harper. And I think I'm

0:06:07.110 --> 0:06:10.450
<v Speaker 5>skewed by the expectations with the cover of SI. It's

0:06:10.470 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 5>just it was a very good career.

0:06:12.339 --> 0:06:13.100
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God.

0:06:13.100 --> 0:06:16.830
<v Speaker 4>500 home runs and two MVPs. If that's not first ballot,

0:06:16.850 --> 0:06:18.330
<v Speaker 4>you're not going to have a lot of first ballots.

0:06:18.410 --> 0:06:19.690
<v Speaker 4>I mean, two MVPs is hard to win.

0:06:19.730 --> 0:06:19.930
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:06:20.250 --> 0:06:22.290
<v Speaker 3>I think Dale Murphy did not get in with two MVPs.

0:06:22.330 --> 0:06:24.270
<v Speaker 4>I was shocked by that. I still don't understand that.

0:06:24.290 --> 0:06:26.670
<v Speaker 4>I think it's one of the dumbest omissions of all time.

0:06:27.010 --> 0:06:30.529
<v Speaker 4>But Harper also incredible. Does popularity play into it? Because

0:06:31.190 --> 0:06:32.229
<v Speaker 4>the jersey still sells.

0:06:32.370 --> 0:06:34.940
<v Speaker 5>Image star power. He feels like a superstar. He feels

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:35.660
<v Speaker 5>like a Hall of Famer.

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:37.260
<v Speaker 4>By the way, he would have won a third MVP,

0:06:37.300 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 4>but he got hurt halfway through the season.

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.060
<v Speaker 5>He was having a great year. We're going to get

0:06:40.100 --> 0:06:42.370
<v Speaker 5>back to this. Hit us up not so fast on

0:06:42.410 --> 0:06:44.790
<v Speaker 5>Twitter with your opinion on this because clearly we don't agree.

0:06:45.370 --> 0:06:48.250
<v Speaker 5>Cubs no-showed versus the Padres. The Padres and their fans

0:06:48.290 --> 0:06:51.620
<v Speaker 5>showed up. The Cubs hit 129 in the series. Pete

0:06:51.660 --> 0:06:53.460
<v Speaker 5>Crowe Armstrong, he's not going to be in a good

0:06:53.500 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 5>mood the day he gets his MVP award. He was

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 5>0 for 7. And what makes it even worse for

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.980
<v Speaker 5>a Cub fan is that hours before the White Sox

0:07:02.100 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 5>advance in the playoffs. The White Sox, who had zero

0:07:04.690 --> 0:07:07.229
<v Speaker 5>expectations this year, are in the playoffs, and the Cubs

0:07:07.270 --> 0:07:08.250
<v Speaker 5>are sitting at home this week.

0:07:08.270 --> 0:07:09.830
<v Speaker 3>Well, break it down for me. You're from Chicago.

0:07:10.350 --> 0:07:12.350
<v Speaker 4>Do they get mad when one team is doing better

0:07:12.370 --> 0:07:14.510
<v Speaker 4>than the other? Because in New York, for example, nobody

0:07:14.570 --> 0:07:18.110
<v Speaker 4>cares what the Nets do. The Knicks fans are completely oblivious.

0:07:18.350 --> 0:07:20.190
<v Speaker 5>I think a Cubs fan, or I should say a

0:07:20.210 --> 0:07:22.110
<v Speaker 5>White Sox fan, always in that town feels like a

0:07:22.150 --> 0:07:25.860
<v Speaker 5>second-class citizen. They don't get the coverage nationally, especially locally,

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.380
<v Speaker 5>even more so. And now White Sox fans are like, scoreboard,

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.220
<v Speaker 5>we're playing next week. We're going to have a home

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:31.580
<v Speaker 5>game next week.

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:32.820
<v Speaker 3>So they do compete with the Cubs fans.

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 6>Totally.

0:07:33.460 --> 0:07:36.700
<v Speaker 5>And I'd say it's more for relevancy than wins-losses. But

0:07:36.740 --> 0:07:38.700
<v Speaker 5>the White Sox advance, the last time they were this

0:07:38.750 --> 0:07:40.750
<v Speaker 5>deep was... 05 World Series.

0:07:41.020 --> 0:07:42.730
<v Speaker 4>I feel like the Clippers could be in game six

0:07:42.770 --> 0:07:45.290
<v Speaker 4>of the NBA Finals and the radio calls would be

0:07:45.350 --> 0:07:46.070
<v Speaker 4>about the Lakers.

0:07:46.210 --> 0:07:47.870
<v Speaker 5>And the White Sox, the one thing about the White Sox,

0:07:47.950 --> 0:07:50.370
<v Speaker 5>they have very little star power on their roster. There's

0:07:50.390 --> 0:07:52.050
<v Speaker 5>not a lot of household names where a comedy is

0:07:52.090 --> 0:07:54.450
<v Speaker 5>really getting there, but they're like two most famous fans

0:07:54.530 --> 0:07:56.190
<v Speaker 5>is a former president and a sitting pope.

0:07:56.930 --> 0:07:57.570
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty cool.

0:07:57.650 --> 0:07:59.670
<v Speaker 3>That's not bad. All right, let's turn to football.

0:07:59.850 --> 0:08:03.830
<v Speaker 4>Last night in the wee hours, Steelers trade Joey Porter Jr.

0:08:03.850 --> 0:08:07.350
<v Speaker 3>To Dallas. Now, Joey Porter Jr. had been injured or

0:08:07.410 --> 0:08:08.410
<v Speaker 3>holding out or something.

0:08:08.590 --> 0:08:09.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, combo.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.300
<v Speaker 4>And now he's traded Dallas, second round pick in two years.

0:08:14.020 --> 0:08:15.620
<v Speaker 4>Let's look at it from a Dallas standpoint. What was

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 4>your reaction for the Cowboys?

0:08:16.820 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 5>I love this for the Cowboys. You add a guy

0:08:18.620 --> 0:08:20.860
<v Speaker 5>who's a quality starter, if he's not the best player

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:22.300
<v Speaker 5>in the world, but you didn't give up a lot

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.940
<v Speaker 5>for him. A second round draft pick, you're getting a

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 5>guy who's better than that draft pick. And their defensive

0:08:28.180 --> 0:08:31.510
<v Speaker 5>backs aren't that good. Their run defense is better. All

0:08:31.550 --> 0:08:33.470
<v Speaker 5>hands on deck. And I think this is also about,

0:08:33.910 --> 0:08:35.710
<v Speaker 5>it's almost like you see the state of their division change.

0:08:36.290 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 5>The Eagles don't seem like a Super Bowl team, a

0:08:38.150 --> 0:08:42.300
<v Speaker 5>good team. And Washington's middling around, and the Giants are bad.

0:08:42.500 --> 0:08:44.500
<v Speaker 5>Why not go all in, as Jerry Jones likes to say?

0:08:44.620 --> 0:08:46.700
<v Speaker 4>That point is true. And also, Jerry Jones is not

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 4>a young man. It's time to go all in.

0:08:48.500 --> 0:08:50.179
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he's not building for the future.

0:08:50.420 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 4>But I have a question. So they trade Micah Parsons,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:54.740
<v Speaker 4>and they said, we're going to do things differently. We're

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 4>going to build a foundational defense, and we're going to

0:08:57.540 --> 0:08:58.420
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of good guys.

0:08:58.440 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:08:58.900 --> 0:09:00.730
<v Speaker 3>And now they get Joey Porter Jr.

0:09:00.750 --> 0:09:03.729
<v Speaker 4>They're probably going to pay him $ 35 million.

0:09:03.290 --> 0:09:04.490
<v Speaker 3>A year after the season.

0:09:04.590 --> 0:09:05.090
<v Speaker 5>After the season.

0:09:05.130 --> 0:09:07.510
<v Speaker 4>Their entire team is free agents. They have all these

0:09:07.730 --> 0:09:10.420
<v Speaker 4>named free agents, Quinn and Williams, that are paying. I

0:09:10.460 --> 0:09:12.580
<v Speaker 4>don't understand what Dallas is doing in the sense that

0:09:12.660 --> 0:09:14.340
<v Speaker 4>the entire team is going to be a free agent

0:09:14.380 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 4>after this year.

0:09:14.860 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 3>They're going to have some tough choices.

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.119
<v Speaker 4>And if you gave up a second-round pick for a

0:09:19.140 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 4>player that they're not going to re-sign, then it becomes

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:22.500
<v Speaker 4>a questionable deal.

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.140
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, if it doesn't work out on the field, it

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.540
<v Speaker 5>becomes a loss. If he plays well, you're glad to

0:09:26.580 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 5>give him the contract. Are you, though?

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.540
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how many contracts are Dallas going to give out?

0:09:30.580 --> 0:09:33.470
<v Speaker 4>They already paid Dak. They paid Quentin Williams. They're going

0:09:33.490 --> 0:09:36.350
<v Speaker 4>to pay C.D., George Pickens. I don't think they're going

0:09:36.370 --> 0:09:37.510
<v Speaker 4>to be able to afford Joey Porter long-term.

0:09:37.530 --> 0:09:39.189
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that they're going to pay George Pickens

0:09:39.210 --> 0:09:41.490
<v Speaker 5>the big money. Why not? I think he's a very

0:09:41.530 --> 0:09:43.530
<v Speaker 5>good player, but I think they think they got his

0:09:43.610 --> 0:09:45.250
<v Speaker 5>best work and they're not going to invest in this

0:09:45.290 --> 0:09:47.490
<v Speaker 5>guy's future. Mark this one down. in the control room.

0:09:47.510 --> 0:09:48.740
<v Speaker 5>I don't think they will sign big deal.

0:09:48.940 --> 0:09:51.420
<v Speaker 4>George Pickens is still a young man. I mean, I'd

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 4>rather Pickens and Porter any day.

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.059
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, both are a little bit of head cases. I

0:09:55.100 --> 0:09:57.170
<v Speaker 5>will say this. It really goes back to who the

0:09:57.190 --> 0:09:59.260
<v Speaker 5>general manager is. It's your owner, and he's in his 80s.

0:09:59.250 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 5>He doesn't make traditional football decisions. He makes reactionary football decisions.

0:10:02.980 --> 0:10:03.260
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:03.939
<v Speaker 2>That's my point.

0:10:03.980 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 3>It seems like same old cowboys in many ways.

0:10:06.059 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 5>But he got bared out. His decision to let Micah

0:10:08.970 --> 0:10:12.370
<v Speaker 5>Parsons go because Parsons is injured makes it look like

0:10:12.410 --> 0:10:14.429
<v Speaker 5>a fantastic trade, which is happenstance.

0:10:14.590 --> 0:10:16.270
<v Speaker 3>Well, you say that. We came into this year saying

0:10:16.330 --> 0:10:18.630
<v Speaker 3>finally they fixed their defense. Guess what's awful right now?

0:10:19.070 --> 0:10:20.069
<v Speaker 3>Their defense.

0:10:20.090 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 4>So, yeah, I don't know where that narrative came that

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.179
<v Speaker 4>they fixed their defense because they absolutely have not.

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:25.900
<v Speaker 3>We'll see.

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 4>The other thing is he's a press man coverage. He's

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.610
<v Speaker 4>going to play a lot of zone in Dallas. We'll

0:10:29.630 --> 0:10:31.530
<v Speaker 4>see how that works out. I think this looks like

0:10:31.550 --> 0:10:35.949
<v Speaker 4>a headline win for Dallas, but not necessarily an on-the-field win.

0:10:36.110 --> 0:10:38.189
<v Speaker 5>Why do the Steelers let Porter go? You have a

0:10:38.230 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 5>good player in your building. You can just pay him.

0:10:41.179 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 5>He seems like a quality defensive player. Look at the Steelers'

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.739
<v Speaker 5>angle of this. Is this waving the white flag or

0:10:46.780 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 5>just financially, fiscally conscious?

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.940
<v Speaker 3>Well, actually, I'm saving that for my warm takes.

0:10:51.980 --> 0:10:54.069
<v Speaker 4>I have a lot of thoughts on the Steelers because

0:10:54.390 --> 0:10:56.020
<v Speaker 4>You look at Joey Porter, you can say, this guy

0:10:56.059 --> 0:10:59.260
<v Speaker 4>is awesome. You know, he basically never let up a touchdown.

0:10:59.300 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 4>This is his first game in 2023. Save it for

0:11:01.179 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 4>the take. All right, yeah, I'm getting into it. We

0:11:03.620 --> 0:11:04.660
<v Speaker 4>have a lot to get to.

0:11:05.540 --> 0:11:06.380
<v Speaker 3>Joey Porter Jr.

0:11:06.740 --> 0:11:10.189
<v Speaker 4>however, in 2024, did lead the league in interceptions. We'll

0:11:10.210 --> 0:11:15.290
<v Speaker 4>get into all of that. Okay, next segment, warm takes. Paul,

0:11:15.610 --> 0:11:18.110
<v Speaker 4>I am so excited about the Cleveland Browns. You're going

0:11:18.130 --> 0:11:21.300
<v Speaker 4>to have to just contain me. Not only are they 2-1,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 4>they're 3-1. Oh, my God, am I on that bandwagon.

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.870
<v Speaker 4>We'll dive into that and much more next Not So Fast.

0:11:36.950 --> 0:11:40.790
<v Speaker 2>We're going to have a challenge.

0:11:46.500 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Could the Phillies keep their season alive with an ABS

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.020
<v Speaker 1>challenge this afternoon?

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:54.870
<v Speaker 2>The answer is yes.

0:11:55.390 --> 0:11:55.730
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:11:56.290 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh my God.

0:12:00.510 --> 0:12:02.690
<v Speaker 5>Back on Not So Fast with Paps and Perloff. That's

0:12:02.730 --> 0:12:05.209
<v Speaker 5>a midday pick-me-up. That's for you, Perloff. You bailed on

0:12:05.230 --> 0:12:08.410
<v Speaker 5>your Phillies. You said they would win last night and

0:12:08.429 --> 0:12:11.250
<v Speaker 5>then rip your hearts out tonight. That was Phillies reliever

0:12:11.470 --> 0:12:16.580
<v Speaker 5>Andrew Painter with the first-ever playoff challenge-off. There's walk-offs. Now

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.460
<v Speaker 5>we have a challenge-off, a delayed reaction and celebration.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:23.020
<v Speaker 4>That is the most mild reaction to a game-winning strikeout

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:24.740
<v Speaker 4>I've ever seen in my life, and that's.

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Where we are.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 5>It was like a 10-second delay. There's this long pause

0:12:27.700 --> 0:12:30.790
<v Speaker 5>and like a... But you know what? That system is working.

0:12:30.910 --> 0:12:31.750
<v Speaker 5>It worked last night.

0:12:31.970 --> 0:12:32.510
<v Speaker 3>No, that's true.

0:12:32.550 --> 0:12:34.330
<v Speaker 4>The same thing's happening in the NFL, by the way.

0:12:34.370 --> 0:12:37.620
<v Speaker 4>They're emphasizing holding. So I've seen at least 25 touchdowns

0:12:37.660 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 4>get called back. So every time the guy starts dancing

0:12:40.020 --> 0:12:41.860
<v Speaker 4>or something and the other guy's tapping on his shoulder, no,

0:12:41.900 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 4>it's a holding.

0:12:42.540 --> 0:12:42.719
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:12:42.980 --> 0:12:45.230
<v Speaker 4>It happened at least 15 times last weekend.

0:12:45.250 --> 0:12:47.190
<v Speaker 5>We should start doing this in this show. When we

0:12:47.210 --> 0:12:49.290
<v Speaker 5>do something wrong, we just... Can we get a review?

0:12:49.330 --> 0:12:50.330
<v Speaker 2>Can we get a review just now?

0:12:50.429 --> 0:12:53.309
<v Speaker 4>I know people who are so bothered by replay killing

0:12:53.370 --> 0:12:56.460
<v Speaker 4>the excitement of the moment. Are you one of those

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 4>more replay, less replay guys? Because you do lose some

0:12:59.360 --> 0:12:59.939
<v Speaker 4>of those moments.

0:13:00.020 --> 0:13:03.060
<v Speaker 5>I'm usually less, but what MLB did this year with

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.650
<v Speaker 5>the review, there's strategy involved. You can't use it too

0:13:05.710 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 5>early if you burn one. So it's become part of

0:13:08.150 --> 0:13:10.740
<v Speaker 5>the game quickly, and the delay is weird, but the

0:13:10.780 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 5>review is really fast.

0:13:11.740 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 4>What if it was Game 7 of the World Series,

0:13:13.820 --> 0:13:17.140
<v Speaker 4>full count, bases loaded, and you have to wait?

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 5>You're a Phillies guy. Tug McGraw throwing the thing up

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 5>in the air, and he, wait, wait, just give me

0:13:21.020 --> 0:13:21.870
<v Speaker 5>a 20, and we celebrate.

0:13:21.990 --> 0:13:22.970
<v Speaker 3>And they're just sort.

0:13:22.790 --> 0:13:23.449
<v Speaker 2>Of standing around.

0:13:23.470 --> 0:13:25.550
<v Speaker 3>A guy looked at his watch. Yeah, I have an

0:13:25.610 --> 0:13:27.109
<v Speaker 3>issue with it. I think you need to keep it

0:13:27.150 --> 0:13:28.610
<v Speaker 3>a little more in the moment. But didn't that.

0:13:28.550 --> 0:13:31.530
<v Speaker 5>Happen in the Super Bowl with James White and Tom Brady,

0:13:31.570 --> 0:13:34.300
<v Speaker 5>his pass to James White for the two-point conversion? Didn't

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.219
<v Speaker 5>that get reviewed, and then they had to celebrate or re-celebrate?

0:13:37.540 --> 0:13:39.340
<v Speaker 3>Could be. Yeah, I don't remember.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 2>That was a long time ago.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.540
<v Speaker 5>All right, it's time for warm takes here on Not

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.250
<v Speaker 5>So Fast. We are fired up. We're shot out of

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.690
<v Speaker 5>a cannon. I'm going to go first. So I'm going

0:13:46.710 --> 0:13:49.469
<v Speaker 5>to stay with baseball. In sports, when your team is

0:13:49.510 --> 0:13:51.730
<v Speaker 5>knocked out, whatever sport it is, it's depressing. It bums

0:13:51.750 --> 0:13:53.750
<v Speaker 5>you out. You get sports depressed. And I think this

0:13:53.790 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 5>has an acute effect on hardcore baseball fans. Not everybody

0:13:57.410 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 5>is hardcore, but people who are. If you're a Cub fan,

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 5>if you're an Astros fan, if you're a Red Sox fan,

0:14:04.330 --> 0:14:07.410
<v Speaker 5>You watch all 162. It's part of your daily routine.

0:14:07.450 --> 0:14:10.050
<v Speaker 5>You get up, you listen to sports radio, you get

0:14:10.090 --> 0:14:11.730
<v Speaker 5>ready for the day game or night game, and you

0:14:11.770 --> 0:14:14.819
<v Speaker 5>listen or watch to all 162 games. And there's not

0:14:15.020 --> 0:14:16.819
<v Speaker 5>like football where it's like a game and then a

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.180
<v Speaker 5>week to chop it up. It's day by day by day,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.620
<v Speaker 5>and you watch all 162. And when your team has

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.250
<v Speaker 5>the rug pulled out from under them, like the Red

0:14:23.310 --> 0:14:25.090
<v Speaker 5>Sox or the Cubs who thought they could do some

0:14:25.110 --> 0:14:27.710
<v Speaker 5>damage this year, You're kind of like an untethered boat.

0:14:28.170 --> 0:14:29.750
<v Speaker 5>What do I do now? I'm like, look at that guy.

0:14:29.790 --> 0:14:31.230
<v Speaker 5>He had to put this dummy hat on. He was

0:14:31.250 --> 0:14:33.170
<v Speaker 5>so upset. I don't know what that hat does, but

0:14:33.210 --> 0:14:36.190
<v Speaker 5>it's not making things any better. And if you're a

0:14:37.050 --> 0:14:38.550
<v Speaker 5>White Sox fan, you're in a great mood. But an

0:14:38.630 --> 0:14:41.350
<v Speaker 5>Astros fan, you're like, what do we do? And you

0:14:41.370 --> 0:14:43.290
<v Speaker 5>have a daily schedule as a baseball fan. Look at

0:14:43.310 --> 0:14:48.130
<v Speaker 5>that guy. That's the look. The thousand-yard stare of the offseason.

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.620
<v Speaker 5>Now you feel like, what do I do with my life?

0:14:52.140 --> 0:14:53.860
<v Speaker 5>I know you have football. I know you have hockey

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.150
<v Speaker 5>coming up. But baseball fans, and I'm talking to the

0:14:56.190 --> 0:14:59.780
<v Speaker 5>hardcore ones, they have a lifestyle that they live April

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 5>through the end of September, and now they don't know

0:15:01.980 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 5>what to do.

0:15:02.620 --> 0:15:04.060
<v Speaker 3>I was looking at some math here, Paul.

0:15:04.100 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 4>There's 162 games, and then your season can be over

0:15:07.300 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 4>in two games. So it's the longest regular season, shortest

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.220
<v Speaker 4>playoff exit. Because in basketball or hockey, there's usually a five-

0:15:14.260 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 4>or seven-game series. In football, you only have 17 games.

0:15:17.260 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 3>If you go out on the wild card in football,

0:15:19.500 --> 0:15:21.590
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't feel like this. Baseball, you're right.

0:15:21.900 --> 0:15:25.050
<v Speaker 4>Your whole life's set around this team, and then they're gone.

0:15:25.530 --> 0:15:28.130
<v Speaker 5>It's over. And today, you feel like— Remember when you

0:15:28.150 --> 0:15:30.650
<v Speaker 5>graduated from college, and you're no longer in school, and

0:15:30.670 --> 0:15:32.470
<v Speaker 5>you're like, I'm just a person. I've got to get

0:15:32.510 --> 0:15:34.010
<v Speaker 5>a job. It feels like that with baseball.

0:15:34.110 --> 0:15:35.170
<v Speaker 3>Oh, absolutely. Okay.

0:15:35.910 --> 0:15:40.570
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to go to the NFL and tonight's game, Browns-Steelers. Paul,

0:15:40.690 --> 0:15:43.670
<v Speaker 4>the numbers on the Browns, I would say, are shocking.

0:15:43.810 --> 0:15:46.850
<v Speaker 4>I'm genuinely shocked. And it's not even that complex of numbers.

0:15:47.430 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 4>The Browns apparently are unbeatable on Thursday night. They're 9-1

0:15:53.740 --> 0:15:55.900
<v Speaker 4>in Thursday night home games and won nine in a

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.140
<v Speaker 4>row after losing their first game against Denver in 08.

0:15:59.140 --> 0:16:00.830
<v Speaker 3>The Steelers... have.

0:16:00.750 --> 0:16:03.700
<v Speaker 4>Been at Cleveland four times on Thursday night and have

0:16:03.820 --> 0:16:06.270
<v Speaker 4>not won a single one of those. Not only that,

0:16:06.510 --> 0:16:09.239
<v Speaker 4>the Steelers have lost four straight at Cleveland. Now, I

0:16:09.300 --> 0:16:12.420
<v Speaker 4>told you before last week's Steelers-Bengals game, that was a

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.420
<v Speaker 4>game the Steelers always win. Steelers always beat a team

0:16:15.460 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 4>they shouldn't, and then they lose to the Browns. We've

0:16:17.540 --> 0:16:20.300
<v Speaker 4>seen it so many times. The Browns are great on

0:16:20.340 --> 0:16:22.790
<v Speaker 4>Thursday night. But in all seriousness, yesterday you talked about

0:16:22.810 --> 0:16:25.950
<v Speaker 4>the Padres' home field advantage. The Browns will have a

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 4>home field advantage tonight, and that's a factor, especially in

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 4>this rivalry.

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.180
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there's nothing more Browns than being great on weekdays

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 5>and terrible on weekends when games are usually played. But

0:16:34.780 --> 0:16:37.610
<v Speaker 5>you're right, this is a very weird position for Browns fans.

0:16:37.670 --> 0:16:39.570
<v Speaker 5>If you asked them a month ago, will this game matter?

0:16:40.050 --> 0:16:41.750
<v Speaker 5>You're like, I hope it matters, but I don't think

0:16:41.790 --> 0:16:42.310
<v Speaker 5>it's going to matter.

0:16:42.350 --> 0:16:44.390
<v Speaker 4>But honestly, it has nothing to do with what happened.

0:16:44.610 --> 0:16:47.350
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't matter if they're 2-1. They're always good on

0:16:47.430 --> 0:16:50.970
<v Speaker 4>Thursday night. They could be typical, awful Browns fans. That

0:16:51.010 --> 0:16:52.530
<v Speaker 4>is not the team you're going to see tonight. They

0:16:52.620 --> 0:16:53.790
<v Speaker 4>could probably be pretty good.

0:16:53.820 --> 0:16:56.060
<v Speaker 5>You know what's fascinating? We could dive into this another day,

0:16:56.100 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 5>but the fallout, if Deshaun Watson plays well and they

0:16:59.140 --> 0:17:01.540
<v Speaker 5>finish above. 500, they have to sign him again.

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.690
<v Speaker 3>They have to get another... They are above 500 now,

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:05.620
<v Speaker 3>and he's not played well.

0:17:06.140 --> 0:17:09.620
<v Speaker 5>He hasn't played poorly. Let's say he averages 200 yards

0:17:09.660 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 5>a game and two touchdowns. I think that's what he's

0:17:11.540 --> 0:17:15.169
<v Speaker 5>done the past two weeks. They are so hungry for

0:17:15.250 --> 0:17:18.939
<v Speaker 5>decent quarterback play that if he finishes with, like, 25

0:17:18.940 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 5>touchdowns and 12 picks, they're going to look like that's

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:22.010
<v Speaker 5>Dan Marino.

0:17:22.180 --> 0:17:24.449
<v Speaker 4>I'd be shocked if Deshaun Watson gets a 25 with

0:17:24.470 --> 0:17:26.510
<v Speaker 4>this team. You know, Baker played pretty well, and they

0:17:26.550 --> 0:17:27.010
<v Speaker 4>let him go.

0:17:27.690 --> 0:17:28.290
<v Speaker 5>Exactly.

0:17:29.190 --> 0:17:31.090
<v Speaker 4>If you watch the Browns, they've got to get their

0:17:31.190 --> 0:17:33.619
<v Speaker 4>penalties in order. They're second in the league in penalties,

0:17:33.630 --> 0:17:34.780
<v Speaker 4>but it feels like they're first.

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:35.740
<v Speaker 3>Watch tonight.

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 4>If they can just avoid all the pre-snap penalties, that'll

0:17:39.140 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 4>be a difference maker. I think they have a lot

0:17:41.340 --> 0:17:43.260
<v Speaker 4>of flaws in these first three games. I think that

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.790
<v Speaker 4>2-1 is kind of thin. Although they have a great chance,

0:17:45.810 --> 0:17:46.570
<v Speaker 4>the numbers say tonight.

0:17:46.590 --> 0:17:48.369
<v Speaker 5>All right, it's time for my next warm take, and

0:17:48.390 --> 0:17:50.129
<v Speaker 5>this is on behalf of both of us and the

0:17:50.170 --> 0:17:53.550
<v Speaker 5>entire Not So Fast crew. This is an angry take

0:17:53.609 --> 0:17:56.790
<v Speaker 5>more than a warm take. Everyone knows Bears third-string quarterback

0:17:56.830 --> 0:17:58.730
<v Speaker 5>Case Keenum had a really nice night the other night

0:17:58.770 --> 0:18:01.450
<v Speaker 5>against the Eagles. He's had a nice pro career, and

0:18:01.470 --> 0:18:02.929
<v Speaker 5>I bet you saw the other day when they were

0:18:02.950 --> 0:18:05.410
<v Speaker 5>talking about Case Keenum of how great his career was

0:18:05.450 --> 0:18:07.949
<v Speaker 5>at the University of Houston. He threw for 19,000 yards

0:18:07.970 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 5>at Houston. That's nuts. 155 touchdowns. He is, objectively... one

0:18:14.700 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 5>of the greatest statistical and everything quarterbacks in college football history.

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.379
<v Speaker 5>Guess what he's not? He's not in the College Football

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.179
<v Speaker 5>Hall of Fame. With those numbers, he's not in the

0:18:24.220 --> 0:18:26.459
<v Speaker 5>College Football Hall of Fame. He should be in with

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 5>half of those numbers.

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:28.090
<v Speaker 2>I looked it up.

0:18:28.460 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 5>He is not eligible for the College Football Hall of Fame.

0:18:30.980 --> 0:18:31.060
<v Speaker 7>What?

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:31.380
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:18:31.859 --> 0:18:34.580
<v Speaker 5>The Hall of Fame has a criteria. You must be

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 5>first team or second team All-American in some level, UPI, AP,

0:18:39.290 --> 0:18:42.250
<v Speaker 5>coaches poll. There's like four different openings. Now, the problem

0:18:42.330 --> 0:18:44.430
<v Speaker 5>is when Case Keenum was great, and he was great

0:18:44.450 --> 0:18:47.530
<v Speaker 5>in college, I think Sam Bradford was All-American or Colt

0:18:47.550 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 5>McCoy or RG3. I went and I actually called this

0:18:51.130 --> 0:18:52.910
<v Speaker 5>morning and woke some people up at the College Football

0:18:52.950 --> 0:18:55.500
<v Speaker 5>Hall of Fame. Very nice people. We've been there, Pearl.

0:18:55.540 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 5>It's a great place. The College Football Hall of Fame

0:18:58.220 --> 0:19:00.580
<v Speaker 5>does not decide who goes in the College Football Hall

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 5>of Fame. Stay with me for a second. The National

0:19:04.140 --> 0:19:07.300
<v Speaker 5>Football Foundation sets the criteria for how to get in

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 5>the College Football Hall of Fame. The Hall of Fame

0:19:09.020 --> 0:19:11.890
<v Speaker 5>is a showcase. They don't handle the rules. So the NFF,

0:19:12.070 --> 0:19:14.820
<v Speaker 5>the National Football Foundation, you have a rule that prevents

0:19:14.890 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 5>Case Keenum because he didn't make some subjective list, right?

0:19:19.180 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 5>You can't take away 19,000 yards, 155 touchdowns. Rules are

0:19:23.500 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 5>not supposed to prevent honoring of greatness. Case Keenum clearly

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 5>belongs in the College Football Hall of Fame. I mean,

0:19:28.660 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 5>he should be first ballot. This is an easy one.

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 5>Get the guys together, go to an offsite, play some golf,

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 5>have a meeting, and say, hey, we're going to suspend

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.060
<v Speaker 5>the rules case-by-case basis. Everyone would agree with it because

0:19:40.100 --> 0:19:42.180
<v Speaker 5>Case Keenum, it's shocking that he's not in the College

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.660
<v Speaker 5>Football Hall of Fame, and he should be now, like

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.830
<v Speaker 5>this time. Wow. I'm actually bothered by this.

0:19:46.970 --> 0:19:49.410
<v Speaker 3>I thought I was a Case Keenum apologist. I love this.

0:19:49.470 --> 0:19:51.719
<v Speaker 5>This is great. it's not about knowing Case Keenum. It's

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 5>about some arbitrary rule that's based off voting. And the

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.699
<v Speaker 5>reason Case Keenum wasn't All-American was because he played at Houston.

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 5>If he did, you know, and they weren't 11-0, so

0:20:02.060 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 5>they gave it to the big boys, Sam Bradford, RG3.

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.090
<v Speaker 4>Now, one thing I will counter, the counterargument is some

0:20:08.109 --> 0:20:11.150
<v Speaker 4>of these offensive systems create huge numbers.

0:20:11.170 --> 0:20:12.530
<v Speaker 3>You know, Case has all these numbers.

0:20:12.570 --> 0:20:15.010
<v Speaker 4>Timmy Chang at Hawaii and June Jones is kind of

0:20:15.170 --> 0:20:16.250
<v Speaker 4>three or four levels below.

0:20:16.290 --> 0:20:17.810
<v Speaker 5>I would be fine with that. If you said he

0:20:17.830 --> 0:20:20.030
<v Speaker 5>did it for one year, like Graham Harrell at Texas

0:20:20.070 --> 0:20:23.450
<v Speaker 5>Tech had that one monstrous year or one and a half. Fine,

0:20:23.590 --> 0:20:26.430
<v Speaker 5>but this is four years of awesome quarterbacking.

0:20:26.470 --> 0:20:28.649
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I love, Case has talked about his coaches.

0:20:28.670 --> 0:20:30.050
<v Speaker 3>He had Art Bryles, who's one.

0:20:29.990 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 4>Of the greatest offensive coaches, and then Cliff Kingsbury came

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.260
<v Speaker 4>in and was QB coach. He was at a great spot.

0:20:35.740 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 4>So I don't think, I'm not sure Case cares right now.

0:20:38.220 --> 0:20:41.050
<v Speaker 4>He's obviously focused on the NFL, but he does deserve it.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:41.820
<v Speaker 3>You're absolutely right.

0:20:41.980 --> 0:20:44.340
<v Speaker 5>We have an email in to the National Football Foundation.

0:20:44.380 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 5>They're going to get back to us today. We'll have

0:20:45.700 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 5>an update tomorrow. Case, if you're watching, which I know

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:49.139
<v Speaker 5>he watches, stay tuned.

0:20:49.380 --> 0:20:52.230
<v Speaker 4>I have a Pabst and Perloff history trivia question for you.

0:20:52.530 --> 0:20:54.129
<v Speaker 4>Do you remember when we were down at the College

0:20:54.170 --> 0:20:56.770
<v Speaker 4>Football Hall of Fame, who joined us and did a

0:20:56.810 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 4>tour with us?

0:20:57.330 --> 0:20:58.250
<v Speaker 3>He's a Hall of Famer.

0:20:58.270 --> 0:21:02.109
<v Speaker 5>Oh, Dat Nguyen, linebacker, Texas A &amp; M walk-off. Nice call, Perl.

0:21:02.270 --> 0:21:03.970
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I didn't think you were going to get that.

0:21:04.020 --> 0:21:05.740
<v Speaker 5>He happened to be in the building that day.

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.500
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and he was a super nice guy. He would

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 3>hit you, man.

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:10.100
<v Speaker 5>Oh, he could have killed both of us.

0:21:10.180 --> 0:21:10.820
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely.

0:21:10.940 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Okay, for my next warm take, going back to tonight's game,

0:21:15.580 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 4>the Pittsburgh Steelers.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 3>Steelers... Train a Joey Porter Jr. I don't get it.

0:21:21.220 --> 0:21:24.260
<v Speaker 3>The one player they need right now is Joey Porter Jr.

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.340
<v Speaker 3>They're in a division with Zay Flowers, who's playing awesome

0:21:27.380 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 3>for Baltimore.

0:21:28.580 --> 0:21:32.870
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, they missed him tremendously against Jamar Chase last Sunday.

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.710
<v Speaker 4>And then you got Denzel Boston on Cleveland, who looks

0:21:35.730 --> 0:21:38.430
<v Speaker 4>like the perfect guy for Joey Porter to cover. Now,

0:21:38.570 --> 0:21:40.930
<v Speaker 4>Porter's a bit polarizing because he gets a lot of penalties.

0:21:41.270 --> 0:21:43.389
<v Speaker 4>Two years ago, led the league. But the guy has

0:21:43.450 --> 0:21:47.350
<v Speaker 4>not allowed a touchdown since his first game. And that

0:21:47.369 --> 0:21:51.010
<v Speaker 4>was three years ago. He is a shutdown corner. You

0:21:51.109 --> 0:21:53.990
<v Speaker 4>look at different metrics for guys. He is way up there.

0:21:54.630 --> 0:21:58.110
<v Speaker 4>According to PFF, I believe he has the highest passer

0:21:58.130 --> 0:22:00.290
<v Speaker 4>rating against for a quarterback.

0:22:00.609 --> 0:22:02.790
<v Speaker 3>Or lowest. Actually, lowest. That would make more sense.

0:22:02.810 --> 0:22:03.390
<v Speaker 5>I think you're right.

0:22:03.410 --> 0:22:05.850
<v Speaker 3>Lowest. I think you want to be lowest. But he's

0:22:05.869 --> 0:22:07.690
<v Speaker 3>a very good lockup cornerback.

0:22:07.730 --> 0:22:09.530
<v Speaker 4>He is very physical, so he puts a lot of

0:22:09.550 --> 0:22:12.510
<v Speaker 4>pressure on the officials. That's not what Dallas necessarily needs

0:22:12.550 --> 0:22:14.669
<v Speaker 4>in their defense. They play a lot of zone in Dallas.

0:22:15.020 --> 0:22:15.490
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh.

0:22:15.910 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 4>They're so dependent on this guy. I guess they think

0:22:18.420 --> 0:22:20.060
<v Speaker 4>that we're 2-1 and we don't need him, but it

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.139
<v Speaker 4>doesn't make sense to me because a second-round pick in

0:22:23.140 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 4>2028 is not worth that much.

0:22:24.420 --> 0:22:26.630
<v Speaker 3>That's about a third-round pick next year.

0:22:26.710 --> 0:22:28.210
<v Speaker 5>So what are they doing? I think if I'm a

0:22:28.230 --> 0:22:30.710
<v Speaker 5>Steelers fan, I'm lightly bothered by this. You draft a guy,

0:22:30.850 --> 0:22:33.330
<v Speaker 5>he becomes really good, you pay him. It's kind of

0:22:33.369 --> 0:22:35.990
<v Speaker 5>what you want. Christian Gonzalez, the defensive back for the Patriots,

0:22:36.619 --> 0:22:39.419
<v Speaker 5>and he's fantastic. You've got to pay sometimes, and What

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 5>are you doing in the draft if you're not trying

0:22:40.940 --> 0:22:42.500
<v Speaker 5>to find a guy who you want to give a

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 5>second contract to?

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, the thing is, who are the Steelers

0:22:45.420 --> 0:22:49.260
<v Speaker 4>paying to? They just re-signed Nick Herbig and Darnell Washington.

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 5>They're not spending any money at the quarterback position.

0:22:51.060 --> 0:22:54.350
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, they are spending in other spots, though. Yes.

0:22:55.109 --> 0:22:58.010
<v Speaker 4>But they also did re-sign Darnell Washington. That was going

0:22:58.030 --> 0:23:00.869
<v Speaker 4>to be my other warm take. He's my number one

0:23:00.890 --> 0:23:03.050
<v Speaker 4>favorite player in the NFL. The massive tight end for

0:23:03.070 --> 0:23:04.629
<v Speaker 4>the Steelers. Watch him tonight.

0:23:04.650 --> 0:23:07.250
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, Joey Porter Jr., I don't like this trade, but

0:23:07.290 --> 0:23:07.609
<v Speaker 3>if you.

0:23:07.510 --> 0:23:10.890
<v Speaker 4>Throw to Darnell Washington enough times, I would be happy.

0:23:11.430 --> 0:23:13.550
<v Speaker 4>It's like Ridge Perry playing tight end.

0:23:13.609 --> 0:23:14.389
<v Speaker 3>It's amazing.

0:23:14.430 --> 0:23:16.710
<v Speaker 5>He's a walking eclipse. You can't see behind the guy.

0:23:16.730 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 5>All right, coming up next, we talk to Mark Grant,

0:23:18.990 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 5>Padres broadcaster, also NBC sports broadcaster. Padres, a feel-good story,

0:23:23.700 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 5>great fans. Can they go on a run? We'll find

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 5>out next. Stick around.

0:23:26.660 --> 0:23:30.570
<v Speaker 3>Not so fast. Welcome back to Not So Fast. I'm

0:23:30.650 --> 0:23:34.629
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Perloff. He is Paul Paps, NBC Sports Now and Peacock.

0:23:35.050 --> 0:23:37.909
<v Speaker 4>And if you're watching, he looks like he's happy, but

0:23:37.930 --> 0:23:39.970
<v Speaker 4>we got a sad Cubs fan in the house.

0:23:40.010 --> 0:23:41.770
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, trying to keep my chin up, trying to be

0:23:41.790 --> 0:23:43.190
<v Speaker 5>a professional, but that was brutal.

0:23:43.390 --> 0:23:43.710
<v Speaker 3>You know what?

0:23:43.810 --> 0:23:46.550
<v Speaker 5>When your team lays an egg that big, it's like

0:23:46.570 --> 0:23:47.490
<v Speaker 5>it wasn't even close.

0:23:47.710 --> 0:23:50.669
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, last night the Padres beat the Cubs 4-1 to

0:23:50.730 --> 0:23:54.410
<v Speaker 4>finish off that series. And of course, now we're into

0:23:54.430 --> 0:23:57.139
<v Speaker 4>the Padres, so we had to talk to Padres broadcaster

0:23:57.220 --> 0:24:00.630
<v Speaker 4>Mark Grant is going to join us off the Padres

0:24:00.650 --> 0:24:01.750
<v Speaker 4>two-game sweep of the Cubs.

0:24:02.150 --> 0:24:04.350
<v Speaker 3>Mark, how you doing? How exciting was last night?

0:24:05.410 --> 0:24:07.410
<v Speaker 2>Oh, guys, it was unbelievable.

0:24:07.550 --> 0:24:10.530
<v Speaker 6>It was really electric downtown San Diego.

0:24:10.550 --> 0:24:14.050
<v Speaker 2>I was listening to you guys before you went to break.

0:24:14.050 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 6>3.3 million fans clicking through the turnstiles this year, downtown

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:20.300
<v Speaker 6>San Diego.

0:24:20.820 --> 0:24:21.940
<v Speaker 2>And last night, you're right.

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.860
<v Speaker 6>It was like a college football event. Every seat was full.

0:24:26.410 --> 0:24:28.570
<v Speaker 6>A lot of times people were just out of their seats,

0:24:28.650 --> 0:24:31.580
<v Speaker 6>just having a great time, waving those gold towels.

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:33.500
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it was a sight to be seen.

0:24:33.580 --> 0:24:34.980
<v Speaker 5>It was awesome. I want to get to the team

0:24:35.020 --> 0:24:36.460
<v Speaker 5>on the field, Mark, but I want to know the

0:24:36.500 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 5>kind of genesis of this because I was blown away

0:24:38.820 --> 0:24:41.100
<v Speaker 5>by the home crowd, by the Padres. I've seen Padres games,

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.620
<v Speaker 5>but you know the postseason is different. Is this like

0:24:43.660 --> 0:24:46.510
<v Speaker 5>a 10-year build? The town loses the Chargers, and it's

0:24:46.550 --> 0:24:48.690
<v Speaker 5>very sad. I thought that was wrong. But it's like

0:24:49.030 --> 0:24:51.990
<v Speaker 5>we have this team. Let's support it all in. Great stadium.

0:24:52.369 --> 0:24:54.450
<v Speaker 5>They spent on some players. Is this like a 10-year

0:24:54.470 --> 0:24:55.950
<v Speaker 5>buildup to this level of fandom?

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's become like one of the things to do.

0:24:59.820 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 6>And when you talk about losing the Chargers, Paul and Andrew,

0:25:04.380 --> 0:25:06.100
<v Speaker 6>that was a big deal. I mean, I'll be honest,

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 6>with all the bad baseball through the years, I mean,

0:25:08.270 --> 0:25:10.710
<v Speaker 6>in 58 seasons, there's been a lot of bad baseball

0:25:10.770 --> 0:25:14.330
<v Speaker 6>in San Diego. So when the Chargers left, it was

0:25:14.369 --> 0:25:17.030
<v Speaker 6>like the only, you know, people were saying, oh, you know,

0:25:17.070 --> 0:25:18.330
<v Speaker 6>now San Diego's Portland.

0:25:18.730 --> 0:25:21.410
<v Speaker 2>You know, they have the Blazers. Well, you know, we only.

0:25:21.230 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 6>Have now the Padres. It was a Charger town. There's

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.770
<v Speaker 6>no doubt about it. And when they left, it was like, okay,

0:25:27.810 --> 0:25:30.310
<v Speaker 6>Petco Park, and now it's the place to be. Now,

0:25:30.390 --> 0:25:33.190
<v Speaker 6>you know what happens. You feel the good team. You're

0:25:33.210 --> 0:25:36.109
<v Speaker 6>going to get some attendance. The people are going to

0:25:36.150 --> 0:25:39.669
<v Speaker 6>be excited. And there's always been the loyal Padre fans.

0:25:40.210 --> 0:25:42.810
<v Speaker 6>But everywhere we go, they travel well now.

0:25:43.270 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 2>You see the jerseys in every single seat.

0:25:45.890 --> 0:25:48.130
<v Speaker 6>I mean, when the Padres do well on the road,

0:25:48.230 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, there's like an eruption. It's not like just

0:25:50.900 --> 0:25:53.140
<v Speaker 6>two or three guys, oh, the Padres scored. They click

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 6>open a beer, and they go, oh, okay, yeah, whatever,

0:25:54.820 --> 0:25:57.219
<v Speaker 6>let's get to work. But, you know, it's great. The

0:25:57.260 --> 0:25:59.859
<v Speaker 6>whole thing now, it's become a thing downtown San Diego.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:01.460
<v Speaker 6>It's a great venue, of course.

0:26:01.820 --> 0:26:04.420
<v Speaker 4>Mark, full disclosure, I am a Phillies fan, so that

0:26:04.500 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 4>would inform this next question. You know, the Padres felt

0:26:07.180 --> 0:26:09.420
<v Speaker 4>like they had teams that were ready to go really

0:26:09.530 --> 0:26:12.710
<v Speaker 4>far but didn't make it. Watching these two games against

0:26:12.730 --> 0:26:15.310
<v Speaker 4>the Cubs, I said to myself, this might be different

0:26:15.350 --> 0:26:15.649
<v Speaker 4>this year.

0:26:15.670 --> 0:26:16.510
<v Speaker 3>Do you get that feeling?

0:26:17.190 --> 0:26:19.330
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Andrew. You know what? Everything is clicking.

0:26:19.390 --> 0:26:22.109
<v Speaker 6>When teams, and we all know this, when teams get

0:26:22.150 --> 0:26:24.270
<v Speaker 6>hot at the right time, that's the team you have

0:26:24.290 --> 0:26:27.210
<v Speaker 6>to be worried about. And it's like preseason football in

0:26:27.230 --> 0:26:29.690
<v Speaker 6>the NFL. You can throw all that stuff out the

0:26:29.750 --> 0:26:32.150
<v Speaker 6>window once the season starts. I think the same thing

0:26:32.210 --> 0:26:33.830
<v Speaker 6>with the postseason in baseball.

0:26:36.090 --> 0:26:38.470
<v Speaker 2>You're a fighting fan, and that's great.

0:26:38.490 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 6>And by the way, as a side note, from landing

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.740
<v Speaker 6>to takeoff in Philly, soup to nuts, I love that town.

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 6>I love everything about it. I mean, I grew up

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:54.340
<v Speaker 6>in Joliet, Illinois. I'm a White Sox fan now, but anyway,

0:26:54.380 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 6>I grew up a Cubs fan. That's a different story.

0:26:56.900 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 6>But it's been great, and it's just something to be seen.

0:27:00.940 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 2>It's great.

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.300
<v Speaker 5>All right, Mark, let's get to some baseball. By the way,

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 5>I know you went to Joliet Catholic. I went to

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:06.380
<v Speaker 5>Marion Catholic, not too far away.

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Did you? Sure thing.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 5>Oh, wow. I was like in seventh grade, and I

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:12.940
<v Speaker 5>think I saw you play baseball because you were a stud.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 5>Let's not kid each other at Joliet Catholic. I'm not kidding,

0:27:15.570 --> 0:27:17.350
<v Speaker 5>because you're about four years older than me, and you

0:27:17.369 --> 0:27:19.330
<v Speaker 5>were throwing some heat, buddy.

0:27:19.470 --> 0:27:22.050
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I remember going up to Chicago Heights.

0:27:22.230 --> 0:27:24.409
<v Speaker 5>Chicago Heights, Mary and Kathy, I think you blanked us.

0:27:25.369 --> 0:27:29.170
<v Speaker 6>Oh, well, you guys could hit the fastball, and that's

0:27:29.210 --> 0:27:29.830
<v Speaker 6>all I had.

0:27:30.590 --> 0:27:32.750
<v Speaker 5>You're a little wild. Let me ask you about a pitcher,

0:27:32.890 --> 0:27:35.650
<v Speaker 5>because the other day I was watching you on NBC

0:27:35.690 --> 0:27:38.169
<v Speaker 5>in the broadcast of the game, and I think Michael King,

0:27:38.210 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 5>the Padres' ace, is completely undercovered, underrated. He completely destroyed

0:27:43.340 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 5>the Cubs. You were talking about him, and you kind

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 5>of compared him. You said he's kind of like a professor.

0:27:47.220 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 5>He's a Tom Brady. He just lives to prepare for

0:27:49.900 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 5>the ballgames. How underrated is Michael King nationally?

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Oh, under the radar.

0:27:56.220 --> 0:27:58.540
<v Speaker 6>He's got such great stuff. He's been the most consistent

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.899
<v Speaker 6>starter for the Padres. And, you know, San Diego's the

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.100
<v Speaker 6>type of market. They're making the name for themselves, obviously,

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 6>going deep into the playoffs, hopefully, and bringing the World

0:28:06.859 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 6>Series home. But Michael King's one of those guys that,

0:28:10.270 --> 0:28:13.910
<v Speaker 6>He's prepared as anybody. One of the luxuries we have, guys,

0:28:13.970 --> 0:28:16.390
<v Speaker 6>is you go into the clubhouse and you see guys,

0:28:16.410 --> 0:28:19.530
<v Speaker 6>how they interact with guys. And Michael couldn't be a

0:28:19.790 --> 0:28:22.950
<v Speaker 6>sweeter prince of a kid. But when it's game time

0:28:22.990 --> 0:28:25.609
<v Speaker 6>and it's getting prepared, he's got his little book. We

0:28:25.630 --> 0:28:28.790
<v Speaker 6>saw him on the bench looking at a book going

0:28:28.830 --> 0:28:31.710
<v Speaker 6>over hitters for the next inning. But he's prepared as anybody.

0:28:32.070 --> 0:28:34.830
<v Speaker 6>And when he is on his game like he was

0:28:35.330 --> 0:28:37.100
<v Speaker 6>right out of the gate, You know what you're going

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.420
<v Speaker 6>to get from Michael King. And he answered like he

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 6>did against Atlanta that one time in the wild card

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 6>when he pitched at Petco a.

0:28:44.260 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Couple years ago as well.

0:28:45.620 --> 0:28:47.060
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I want to make one thing clear. I don't

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 4>want any 85 Bears talk the rest of this interview.

0:28:49.340 --> 0:28:51.550
<v Speaker 4>I didn't realize I was talking to two Chicago guys.

0:28:51.740 --> 0:28:54.390
<v Speaker 4>No Ditka here. And I'm going to bring it back

0:28:54.430 --> 0:28:57.870
<v Speaker 4>to my hometown. What do you expect in Game 3, Phillies-Braves,

0:28:58.670 --> 0:29:00.230
<v Speaker 4>tonight at 8 o'clock NBC?

0:29:00.990 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 2>You know what, the Phillies... Even though, you know, Larry

0:29:03.740 --> 0:29:04.660
<v Speaker 2>Bowe and I are good friends.

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.700
<v Speaker 6>Larry was my manager with the Padres back in 87,

0:29:07.700 --> 0:29:09.290
<v Speaker 6>and you should see some of the texts that go

0:29:09.350 --> 0:29:10.110
<v Speaker 6>back and forth.

0:29:09.930 --> 0:29:12.630
<v Speaker 2>Between he and I regarding the Phillies and the Padres.

0:29:13.390 --> 0:29:16.090
<v Speaker 6>But, you know, the Phillies are a team that always

0:29:16.450 --> 0:29:19.860
<v Speaker 6>concerned me and scare me. And even though they didn't

0:29:19.940 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 6>do well down the stretch, I mean, they got into

0:29:22.260 --> 0:29:24.890
<v Speaker 6>the playoffs, right? But they're always a team with that

0:29:24.990 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 6>lineup and with that pitching that always concerns me.

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 2>So I would not be surprised.

0:29:29.340 --> 0:29:32.260
<v Speaker 6>It would not be surprised if today the Phillies win

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.460
<v Speaker 6>in Atlanta and advance.

0:29:34.620 --> 0:29:39.330
<v Speaker 2>It's just, once again, you can not do well. You

0:29:39.410 --> 0:29:39.910
<v Speaker 2>just get in.

0:29:39.980 --> 0:29:41.380
<v Speaker 6>By the skin of your teeth and then you hit

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 6>the playoffs and you get to that wildcard series and

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:45.490
<v Speaker 6>you win a couple games and.

0:29:45.890 --> 0:29:47.390
<v Speaker 2>Next thing you know, you're on your way. But they're

0:29:47.410 --> 0:29:48.510
<v Speaker 2>always a team that concerns me.

0:29:48.530 --> 0:29:49.570
<v Speaker 5>All right, Mark, we're going to get you out of

0:29:49.590 --> 0:29:51.390
<v Speaker 5>here pretty soon. But I want to ask you two questions.

0:29:51.410 --> 0:29:51.930
<v Speaker 2>I want to stay.

0:29:51.950 --> 0:29:53.350
<v Speaker 5>I want to stay longer. I can chop it up

0:29:53.370 --> 0:29:54.310
<v Speaker 5>with you all day.

0:29:54.350 --> 0:29:55.340
<v Speaker 2>Hey, not so fast.

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:56.100
<v Speaker 3>Not so fast.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.540
<v Speaker 5>You've always been a big fan of not so fast

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:02.020
<v Speaker 5>for years. I mean, you played. Luckily, you got to

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:03.620
<v Speaker 5>play with the Padres. You got to play with the

0:30:03.660 --> 0:30:06.380
<v Speaker 5>great Tony Gwynn. I always quote Tony Gwynn's stats. I'm

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.050
<v Speaker 5>the biggest fan. And he had a season where he hit.

0:30:09.030 --> 0:30:12.230
<v Speaker 5>394 and he had 19 strikeouts. If you had to

0:30:12.270 --> 0:30:14.709
<v Speaker 5>tell us one thing for those who don't realize how

0:30:14.770 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 5>great Tony Gwynn was, it would be what?

0:30:17.900 --> 0:30:20.459
<v Speaker 6>People don't realize that he was more proud of his

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:22.980
<v Speaker 6>gold gloves than his batting titles.

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:23.660
<v Speaker 2>How about that?

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:25.340
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 6>Tony, I could go on and on about Tony. And

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 6>another thing, too, I used to throw batting practice to him.

0:30:29.900 --> 0:30:31.780
<v Speaker 6>He would call the pitches out of my hand even

0:30:31.820 --> 0:30:32.940
<v Speaker 6>before the ball left my hand.

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:38.310
<v Speaker 2>That's disheartening. Change up. Basketball. Yeah, he was remarkable.

0:30:38.490 --> 0:30:40.770
<v Speaker 5>Okay, last thing, and now you've got to go, but...

0:30:41.690 --> 0:30:44.550
<v Speaker 5>Tough break for the Cubs. Not a good season. I

0:30:44.650 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 5>sure wish Harry Carey was here to give his reaction.

0:30:47.190 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Holy cow! Welcome, everybody, to Cubs baseball.

0:30:50.420 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 6>Once again, they need to find a trainer who knows

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 6>the Heimlich Maneuver.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Because right now, the Cubs... All my friends back home

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:00.040
<v Speaker 2>in Chicago, I tell them my Cub fans are just

0:31:00.260 --> 0:31:02.300
<v Speaker 2>losing it right now. I can just imagine.

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.590
<v Speaker 6>But holy cow! Now the Potteries are on the clock.

0:31:06.030 --> 0:31:08.490
<v Speaker 6>Now it's their chance to try to win a World Series.

0:31:09.020 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 6>What are the Cubs going to do now? Holy cow.

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Mark.

0:31:12.980 --> 0:31:13.660
<v Speaker 5>That was awesome.

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Mark, thanks.

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.300
<v Speaker 2>All right, guys. Andrew, Paulie, thank you so much.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.330
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, enjoy the rest of the postseason. Paul, that was

0:31:19.350 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 3>a treat.

0:31:19.850 --> 0:31:21.709
<v Speaker 5>That was a treat. Mark's a character. He's been with

0:31:21.730 --> 0:31:23.570
<v Speaker 5>the Padres for a long, long time. He does a

0:31:23.610 --> 0:31:26.270
<v Speaker 5>great Harry Carey, and he's a Southsider, but that was good.

0:31:26.470 --> 0:31:29.270
<v Speaker 5>And the Padres fans, they're becoming part of this story.

0:31:29.290 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 5>He talked about It's a town with the Padres and

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.670
<v Speaker 5>not a lot else, a lot of stuff other than

0:31:34.690 --> 0:31:36.810
<v Speaker 5>sports to do, but the Padres are the focal point.

0:31:36.890 --> 0:31:37.410
<v Speaker 3>Really cool.

0:31:37.470 --> 0:31:40.770
<v Speaker 4>And so he's from Joliet High. That's Joliet Jake from

0:31:40.790 --> 0:31:41.290
<v Speaker 4>Blues Brothers.

0:31:41.430 --> 0:31:44.500
<v Speaker 5>Well, Joliet Catholic, if you remember the movie Rudy, that's

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:45.180
<v Speaker 5>where Rudy went.

0:31:45.340 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh, really?

0:31:46.180 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 5>Dan Rudiger went to Joliet Catholic. I went to Marion Catholic.

0:31:49.180 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 5>Big rivals.

0:31:50.180 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 4>And not to dive too much into Paul Pabst's history,

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:54.740
<v Speaker 4>but who is the football player who went to marry

0:31:54.770 --> 0:31:55.860
<v Speaker 4>a Catholic, I.

0:31:55.810 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Believe, with you?

0:31:56.900 --> 0:31:59.209
<v Speaker 5>Oh, there's a couple. Well, there's Rodney Harrison.

0:31:59.270 --> 0:32:01.270
<v Speaker 3>Rodney Harrison, who played in San Diego.

0:32:01.330 --> 0:32:01.550
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

0:32:01.850 --> 0:32:03.290
<v Speaker 5>He was younger than me, but Rodney Harrison.

0:32:03.310 --> 0:32:04.370
<v Speaker 3>We could have done that with Mark.

0:32:04.390 --> 0:32:05.450
<v Speaker 5>We could have chopped it up all day.

0:32:05.530 --> 0:32:05.930
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:32:06.330 --> 0:32:07.970
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, we could have talked to him forever.

0:32:08.530 --> 0:32:11.190
<v Speaker 4>But coming up next, we got to get back to football.

0:32:11.270 --> 0:32:11.590
<v Speaker 2>J.J.

0:32:11.630 --> 0:32:14.180
<v Speaker 4>Watt was on the DP show and had a lot

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 4>of very interesting things to say, including some things about

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 4>our friend Paul Paps.

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 3>That's next. Not so fast.

0:32:23.570 --> 0:32:25.090
<v Speaker 2>How real are the Raiders?

0:32:26.900 --> 0:32:29.459
<v Speaker 8>This is where we find out. Um, I think that

0:32:29.500 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 8>the takeaways on defense.

0:32:30.980 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Have been massive.

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 8>I mean, nine and three games is tough to sustain,

0:32:35.980 --> 0:32:38.450
<v Speaker 8>but it reminds me a lot of the bears last year.

0:32:38.710 --> 0:32:39.890
<v Speaker 2>And the, for the.

0:32:39.850 --> 0:32:41.810
<v Speaker 8>Longest time, you're like, can they keep us going? Can

0:32:41.830 --> 0:32:43.830
<v Speaker 8>they keep, and they did for a very long time,

0:32:43.850 --> 0:32:46.210
<v Speaker 8>but it did cover up some things. I think that,

0:32:46.270 --> 0:32:48.830
<v Speaker 8>that I think the defense is strong. I do think

0:32:48.850 --> 0:32:52.610
<v Speaker 8>the takeaways are huge. Um, I think that Kirk Cousins

0:32:52.670 --> 0:32:57.070
<v Speaker 8>is playing phenomenally well in Clint's offense. Three touchdowns, three

0:32:57.110 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 8>straight games. You do have to, and I know people

0:33:01.100 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 8>don't like this, but it's just the facts of the situation.

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 8>The opponents they've played are 1-8. And they now go

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.459
<v Speaker 8>on a stretch where they have the hardest schedule in

0:33:09.500 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 8>football from weeks 4 to 11.

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.110
<v Speaker 5>Back on Not So Fast, this is the Clip Joint

0:33:14.150 --> 0:33:16.270
<v Speaker 5>Paps and Perloff. That was our old buddy J.J. Watt

0:33:16.350 --> 0:33:18.610
<v Speaker 5>earlier on the Dan Patrick Show today. And I thought

0:33:18.630 --> 0:33:21.270
<v Speaker 5>it was really good perspective because The Raiders are a

0:33:21.290 --> 0:33:23.850
<v Speaker 5>likable story. It's a September story. But when you look

0:33:23.870 --> 0:33:25.890
<v Speaker 5>at the schedule, it's like now it gets real. And

0:33:25.910 --> 0:33:28.570
<v Speaker 5>is it cute? Can you run the ball in October?

0:33:28.590 --> 0:33:29.290
<v Speaker 5>Because you haven't yet.

0:33:29.670 --> 0:33:32.090
<v Speaker 4>Well, they do have my guy, Mike Washington Jr., who

0:33:32.170 --> 0:33:33.690
<v Speaker 4>finally broke out the other day.

0:33:33.750 --> 0:33:35.290
<v Speaker 5>He might be playing better than Ashton Genting.

0:33:35.730 --> 0:33:37.950
<v Speaker 4>Well, Ashton Genting is a great all-around back. He's a

0:33:37.990 --> 0:33:40.390
<v Speaker 4>great pass catcher. I kind of like that combo. I

0:33:40.790 --> 0:33:42.730
<v Speaker 4>have a take on the Raiders later in the show.

0:33:42.890 --> 0:33:45.970
<v Speaker 4>But can you keep Kirk Cousins upright? And that turnover

0:33:45.990 --> 0:33:47.370
<v Speaker 4>stat is so interesting, too, because you're right.

0:33:47.410 --> 0:33:49.090
<v Speaker 3>It's the Bears. You can look at it. They have

0:33:49.130 --> 0:33:49.709
<v Speaker 3>nine turnovers.

0:33:50.450 --> 0:33:52.670
<v Speaker 4>Turnovers tend to go back to the median, so that

0:33:52.710 --> 0:33:54.970
<v Speaker 4>will go away, but then it doesn't always go away.

0:33:54.990 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think also long-term, short-term. We talked about this

0:33:57.660 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 5>a month ago on Not So Fast. What do you

0:33:59.540 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 5>do with Mendoza? Do you start him early, start him late?

0:34:01.540 --> 0:34:03.380
<v Speaker 5>Now they're in a position where they don't have to

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.620
<v Speaker 5>play him for the first half of the season because

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 5>they're doing well.

0:34:06.340 --> 0:34:08.140
<v Speaker 4>It's like a double good thing. Well, it could go

0:34:08.260 --> 0:34:09.879
<v Speaker 4>full Patrick Mahomes. It's him the whole season.

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 3>But actually, what J.J.

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.750
<v Speaker 4>Said that really caught my attention was he had a

0:34:14.070 --> 0:34:16.230
<v Speaker 4>wardrobe comment on one of the Danettes.

0:34:16.270 --> 0:34:18.770
<v Speaker 3>Let's hear what J.J. Watt had to say about Paulie.

0:34:20.830 --> 0:34:22.930
<v Speaker 8>Can I see a shot of Paulie quick? Because the

0:34:23.010 --> 0:34:25.130
<v Speaker 8>shirt he was wearing today, when I flipped this on

0:34:25.170 --> 0:34:27.250
<v Speaker 8>and I saw Paulie's shirt, to me, it looked like

0:34:27.290 --> 0:34:31.290
<v Speaker 8>he might have been going dancing in a nightclub.

0:34:30.210 --> 0:34:31.090
<v Speaker 5>After the show.

0:34:31.150 --> 0:34:31.509
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:34:31.570 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Paulie's on this kick of unbuttoning a button that you

0:34:35.380 --> 0:34:37.899
<v Speaker 1>probably don't normally do it when you're married.

0:34:37.620 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 2>With a couple of kids. But Paul is going for

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 2>a look here.

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't want to go school teacher buttoned up,

0:34:43.780 --> 0:34:45.660
<v Speaker 5>but I don't have a middle ground, and I have

0:34:45.700 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 5>no chest hair whatsoever, JJ.

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:47.380
<v Speaker 1>Mm-hmm.

0:34:48.190 --> 0:34:50.169
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but I mean, you look like you could head

0:34:50.250 --> 0:34:54.810
<v Speaker 8>directly out to Miami, to a nice night.

0:34:54.890 --> 0:34:55.710
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Thank you.

0:34:56.850 --> 0:34:58.910
<v Speaker 5>That's just a man who knows football and fashion, not

0:34:58.930 --> 0:35:00.140
<v Speaker 5>necessarily in that order, Perloff.

0:35:00.340 --> 0:35:01.779
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I couldn't tell if this was a

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:03.460
<v Speaker 3>compliment or he was making fun of you.

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, now the shirt is dark blue, not black. I

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.250
<v Speaker 5>don't wear black shirts, but like. J.J., I think there

0:35:08.270 --> 0:35:10.570
<v Speaker 5>was just a 10% compliment in there somewhere.

0:35:10.910 --> 0:35:13.690
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I didn't really see that. I didn't see that.

0:35:14.550 --> 0:35:16.109
<v Speaker 5>Now, it's the same size he would wear. He would

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.359
<v Speaker 5>wear a large or a medium. Now, he's 70 pounds heavier.

0:35:19.420 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, it depends on the TV screen because it

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:22.460
<v Speaker 3>does look a little black. Right.

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:24.259
<v Speaker 4>I've been having that issue myself because I see you

0:35:24.300 --> 0:35:26.219
<v Speaker 4>in real life. I can confirm for the audience that

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 4>is navy black. But you're flirting with black and you

0:35:28.890 --> 0:35:30.529
<v Speaker 4>can't really wear black shirts around.

0:35:30.610 --> 0:35:32.350
<v Speaker 5>You sure can't. Not around here. But you know what?

0:35:32.969 --> 0:35:34.750
<v Speaker 5>Chest up, chest down. We'll do whatever we can here

0:35:34.770 --> 0:35:35.910
<v Speaker 5>to get the ladies to watch the show.

0:35:36.110 --> 0:35:38.750
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. By the way, does J.J. Watt watch regularly? I

0:35:38.790 --> 0:35:40.589
<v Speaker 3>know you know this answer. You know J.J. pretty well.

0:35:40.969 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 5>Does he watch the Dan Patrick show or our show regularly?

0:35:45.980 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 3>Don't answer that second question. I meant the first one.

0:35:48.340 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 5>In all seriousness, no. He will text. He will text Dan.

0:35:51.340 --> 0:35:53.860
<v Speaker 5>He will text Fritzy. He will text me during the

0:35:53.910 --> 0:35:55.930
<v Speaker 5>Dan Patrick show if he's bothered by something. We were

0:35:55.969 --> 0:35:58.739
<v Speaker 5>talking about Aaron Donald, how could he come back and

0:35:58.780 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 5>how would he be used?

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 2>J.J.

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.570
<v Speaker 5>Texted and said, I can't come on today, but here's

0:36:03.610 --> 0:36:05.870
<v Speaker 5>some thoughts. So it's nice that he knows the show

0:36:06.050 --> 0:36:07.150
<v Speaker 5>and kind of can chop.

0:36:06.950 --> 0:36:07.290
<v Speaker 2>It up with us.

0:36:07.290 --> 0:36:09.730
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I could have listened to Dan and J.J. chop

0:36:09.750 --> 0:36:11.370
<v Speaker 4>it up for about an hour, but that was awesome.

0:36:11.390 --> 0:36:13.530
<v Speaker 5>All right, let's get to a quarterback situation in Chicago

0:36:13.550 --> 0:36:16.590
<v Speaker 5>that hasn't been resolved yet. Head coach Ben Johnson of

0:36:16.610 --> 0:36:19.450
<v Speaker 5>the Bears, he's got good problems, I guess. Caleb Williams

0:36:19.510 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 5>appears to be out with a hamstring. Tyson Bajent was

0:36:22.739 --> 0:36:25.500
<v Speaker 5>in the concussion protocol, now out. And then Case Keenum

0:36:25.540 --> 0:36:28.979
<v Speaker 5>plays lights out on Monday Night Football. Ben Johnson, he's coy.

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.580
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we've got three guys, and we'll kind of work

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:36.029
<v Speaker 6>through the week and see where they're at.

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:37.290
<v Speaker 7>What would be the factors?

0:36:38.489 --> 0:36:39.229
<v Speaker 2>One direction or another.

0:36:41.110 --> 0:36:42.950
<v Speaker 3>Whoever we feel like gives us the best chance to win.

0:36:43.170 --> 0:36:45.250
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to take the last swing at this quarterback thing.

0:36:45.370 --> 0:36:48.850
<v Speaker 7>There's obviously some competitive incentive to you being up here.

0:36:48.890 --> 0:36:51.500
<v Speaker 7>How do you, on a short week, create the directions

0:36:52.170 --> 0:36:54.609
<v Speaker 7>in the quarterback's room just so that those guys make

0:36:54.710 --> 0:36:56.270
<v Speaker 7>use of every second that they've.

0:36:56.090 --> 0:37:00.330
<v Speaker 2>Got between them. The direction's already been made, so we'll

0:37:00.350 --> 0:37:01.450
<v Speaker 2>be in good shape for Sunday.

0:37:03.390 --> 0:37:05.930
<v Speaker 3>Best coach in the NFL, maybe? He's awesome.

0:37:06.090 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 5>That is fantastic coach speak. I like how they took

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:11.180
<v Speaker 5>multiple shots at Ben Johnson as if he'd go, you

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.810
<v Speaker 5>know what? You got me. I'll tell you, it's Keenum.

0:37:13.969 --> 0:37:15.129
<v Speaker 5>I'm just going to let you know it's Keenum.

0:37:15.330 --> 0:37:17.589
<v Speaker 4>You know, Ben Johnson looks less tired this year. Last

0:37:17.610 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 4>year he looked bedraggled every week. Now he looks like

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 4>he's in total control. He is feeling himself because the

0:37:22.540 --> 0:37:25.820
<v Speaker 4>criticism of him was that he had only won games

0:37:25.860 --> 0:37:28.150
<v Speaker 4>with number one overall picks, Jared Goff and Caleb Williams.

0:37:28.710 --> 0:37:31.870
<v Speaker 4>Now he has an undrafted free agent out of the

0:37:31.910 --> 0:37:34.210
<v Speaker 4>University of Houston, as we know, who won a game.

0:37:34.230 --> 0:37:36.509
<v Speaker 4>So Ben Johnson had almost as big a week as

0:37:36.570 --> 0:37:37.739
<v Speaker 4>Case Keenum in a weird way.

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 5>Well, let's chop this up for a second because I

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 5>see both sides of this. Case Keenum, you would think,

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.819
<v Speaker 5>you stay with the hot hand, the veteran playing well

0:37:44.900 --> 0:37:47.910
<v Speaker 5>against the Jets. But I wonder if Ben Johnson is like,

0:37:48.430 --> 0:37:50.210
<v Speaker 5>you know, you don't lose your job due to injury,

0:37:50.390 --> 0:37:52.850
<v Speaker 5>and Tyson Bajent would have been the starter in that game.

0:37:53.330 --> 0:37:55.430
<v Speaker 5>Maybe he's a bigger part of the Bears' future, and

0:37:55.469 --> 0:37:57.850
<v Speaker 5>you may say, I can go to Tyson Bajent, and

0:37:57.870 --> 0:37:59.750
<v Speaker 5>I have a great backup plan with Casey. I'm not

0:37:59.790 --> 0:38:01.569
<v Speaker 5>saying you should do that, but I wonder if that's

0:38:01.590 --> 0:38:02.140
<v Speaker 5>what they're thinking.

0:38:02.340 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, the upcoming opponent, the Jets, is a tricky one

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 4>because Aaron Glenn can play some good defense at times.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:09.380
<v Speaker 3>I know the Jets aren't a good team, but their

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 3>defense can be confusing.

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.500
<v Speaker 4>I would obviously go Case Keenum because you have to

0:38:15.739 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 4>let him go on a heater.

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:18.380
<v Speaker 3>You can't stop a guy in the middle of a heater.

0:38:18.580 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 5>Would you worry at all about the fan reaction if

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:24.029
<v Speaker 5>you didn't start Keenum, started Bajent, he plays subpar, and

0:38:24.050 --> 0:38:24.489
<v Speaker 5>you lose?

0:38:25.190 --> 0:38:27.089
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't know. I mean, you're a Chicago guy.

0:38:27.530 --> 0:38:30.350
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't strike me as, it's not a Philadelphia fan base.

0:38:30.650 --> 0:38:33.210
<v Speaker 3>I feel like it's a little Midwestern. They would maybe understand.

0:38:33.290 --> 0:38:35.049
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this is a very weird position to be in.

0:38:35.130 --> 0:38:37.450
<v Speaker 5>I could speak for Bears fans here. They've had three

0:38:37.489 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 5>good quarterbacks in the first hundred years of the franchise.

0:38:39.950 --> 0:38:42.589
<v Speaker 5>They currently have three good quarterbacks on the roster. And

0:38:42.930 --> 0:38:45.700
<v Speaker 5>the Bears fans like all three. They think Bajan is

0:38:45.739 --> 0:38:48.720
<v Speaker 5>a high-end backup. They think Case can walk on water

0:38:48.739 --> 0:38:51.810
<v Speaker 5>this week. And, of course, Caleb Williams runs the city.

0:38:51.930 --> 0:38:52.549
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's funny.

0:38:52.610 --> 0:38:55.390
<v Speaker 4>We were talking Bajan versus Keenum. Caleb Williams is still

0:38:55.570 --> 0:38:57.469
<v Speaker 4>looming out there. I think he only sat out a

0:38:57.489 --> 0:38:59.450
<v Speaker 4>week because he was embarrassed because he yelled too loud

0:38:59.510 --> 0:39:02.170
<v Speaker 4>after his hamstring injury. So he might be just fine. And,

0:39:02.210 --> 0:39:04.790
<v Speaker 4>by the way, you don't need a Hall of Famer

0:39:04.810 --> 0:39:08.069
<v Speaker 4>to beat the Jets. You just need competent quarterback play.

0:39:08.180 --> 0:39:10.339
<v Speaker 4>I would go with Keenum, rest Caleb a little longer.

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Because you don't know how Bajan had a bad concussion.

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 4>He hasn't played really a lot of meaningful football. Why

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:19.739
<v Speaker 4>not just the safest course to me seems best.

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.660
<v Speaker 5>It does seem simple, safe, and there's a lot more

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:22.890
<v Speaker 5>upside with Keenum in week two.

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:23.649
<v Speaker 2>Yep. All right.

0:39:23.670 --> 0:39:25.350
<v Speaker 3>Let's stay in Chicago for our next clip.

0:39:25.630 --> 0:39:29.339
<v Speaker 4>This is White Sox Murakami and Vassil on clinching the

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 4>ADLS spot.

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:36.250
<v Speaker 3>Mooney, Kenzo, this is your second time in one of these.

0:39:36.310 --> 0:39:37.630
<v Speaker 3>What'd you learn from your first one?

0:39:41.860 --> 0:39:42.660
<v Speaker 5>No, I'm drunk.

0:39:45.340 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 6>Oh my God.

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:48.629
<v Speaker 5>You guys came in here with a mission. You knew

0:39:48.690 --> 0:39:51.230
<v Speaker 5>you could do this against the Houston Astros. How does

0:39:51.290 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 5>it feel to have finally done it?

0:39:52.730 --> 0:39:54.570
<v Speaker 2>How does it feel to watch all you guys celebrate?

0:39:54.570 --> 0:39:54.730
<v Speaker 4>100.

0:39:54.730 --> 0:39:55.069
<v Speaker 3>Oh my God.

0:39:55.090 --> 0:39:56.830
<v Speaker 5>I feel so good. Mike, your thoughts about going to Cleveland.

0:39:56.870 --> 0:39:58.010
<v Speaker 5>My thoughts about going to Cleveland?

0:39:58.030 --> 0:39:58.509
<v Speaker 2>That's right, sir.

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:13.700
<v Speaker 6>Well, what we're going to do, we're going to get

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 6>on a plane and we're going to head to Cleveland, Ohio.

0:40:16.780 --> 0:40:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Somebody's pouring alcohol down my pants.

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:19.380
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:40:19.660 --> 0:40:20.580
<v Speaker 6>And what we're going to do is we're going to

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.420
<v Speaker 6>show up, play White Sox baseball, and we're going to

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 6>kick some ass.

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, Mike, go get them. Oh, yeah, come on.

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:32.779
<v Speaker 5>That is awesome. That's where they deserve to party like that.

0:40:32.820 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 5>It's been 20 years.

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Right, because of the White Sox. Exactly. If another team

0:40:36.140 --> 0:40:38.190
<v Speaker 3>did that, if the Yankees did that, I would rip

0:40:38.230 --> 0:40:38.750
<v Speaker 3>them to shreds.

0:40:38.770 --> 0:40:41.509
<v Speaker 5>And Murakami, he's becoming, he's a very good player, but

0:40:41.550 --> 0:40:43.890
<v Speaker 5>he's becoming a star because of his celebration. And his

0:40:43.930 --> 0:40:45.190
<v Speaker 5>translator is becoming a star as well.

0:40:45.350 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Can you imagine if a team in the NFL celebrated

0:40:48.020 --> 0:40:49.700
<v Speaker 4>a wild card win like that, you'd be like, what

0:40:49.739 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 4>on earth are you doing? You have a game coming

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:53.980
<v Speaker 4>up in five days. It says so much about baseball

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.700
<v Speaker 4>to me because baseball, don't tell me about fitness and baseball.

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:58.660
<v Speaker 3>Those guys are drinking their face off, and they have

0:40:58.760 --> 0:40:59.980
<v Speaker 3>ALDS coming up.

0:41:00.060 --> 0:41:01.839
<v Speaker 5>Yes, you would get crushed in football if you did that.

0:41:01.860 --> 0:41:04.050
<v Speaker 5>All right, it's time for the rando, something rando we saw.

0:41:04.070 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 5>We're going to stick with baseball. Check this one out.

0:41:06.660 --> 0:41:09.350
<v Speaker 5>The Braves maybe only have one more home game, but

0:41:09.370 --> 0:41:12.190
<v Speaker 5>look at this hammer. It's called the Long Ball Sandwich.

0:41:12.310 --> 0:41:17.830
<v Speaker 5>Spiced beef, sausage, bourbon mustard, onions. bacon jam, Carolina barbecue sauce,

0:41:17.870 --> 0:41:21.290
<v Speaker 5>don't sleep on that, smoked cheddar, pickled green tomatoes, only

0:41:21.810 --> 0:41:25.489
<v Speaker 5>public service announcements in section 156, Pearl. Only one spot

0:41:25.510 --> 0:41:26.350
<v Speaker 5>in the stadium you can get that.

0:41:26.810 --> 0:41:28.630
<v Speaker 3>And how do you bring it to your seat and

0:41:28.690 --> 0:41:28.910
<v Speaker 3>eat it?

0:41:29.050 --> 0:41:31.170
<v Speaker 5>It's two feet long. It's brought to you. We did

0:41:31.190 --> 0:41:33.469
<v Speaker 5>some research. Oh, okay. The Not So Fasters did some

0:41:33.510 --> 0:41:36.280
<v Speaker 5>research on this. It's brought to you in the sweet area.

0:41:36.590 --> 0:41:38.110
<v Speaker 5>They chop it up and give you plates so you

0:41:38.140 --> 0:41:39.340
<v Speaker 5>can just hammer down this sandwich.

0:41:39.460 --> 0:41:42.340
<v Speaker 3>That sounds amazing, but sweet area sounds kind of fancy.

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 2>A little bougie, a little bougie.

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:45.969
<v Speaker 5>Coming up next, we've got a lot coming up. the conservative,

0:41:46.410 --> 0:41:50.890
<v Speaker 5>and also Superloftips. Superloftips are back. Can't wait. Stick around.

0:41:51.260 --> 0:41:52.020
<v Speaker 5>Not so fast.

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:56.340
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Not So Fast. I'm Perloff. He is Paps.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:00.820
<v Speaker 3>You know him. You love him. It is time for Superloftips.

0:42:00.860 --> 0:42:01.980
<v Speaker 5>Waiting all week for these, Perl.

0:42:02.180 --> 0:42:02.399
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 4>I call them the Indomitian Superloftips. My best and worst

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:10.360
<v Speaker 4>of the NFL. We're going to start with the best

0:42:10.380 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 4>0-3 team. Paul, I am choosing, no big surprise, the

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 4>Houston Texans. And let me tell you why. I think

0:42:18.300 --> 0:42:20.580
<v Speaker 4>they're still good. Tough game against Dallas this weekend.

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.010
<v Speaker 3>But C.J. Stroud looks fine. Is he great?

0:42:24.330 --> 0:42:27.370
<v Speaker 4>No. Does he need to be great? Absolutely not. But

0:42:27.410 --> 0:42:29.590
<v Speaker 4>last year in the playoffs, he threw one touchdown and

0:42:29.650 --> 0:42:32.410
<v Speaker 4>five picks. So far this season, three touchdowns.

0:42:32.750 --> 0:42:33.250
<v Speaker 3>No picks.

0:42:33.290 --> 0:42:36.570
<v Speaker 4>He's given the exact kind of adequate play they need.

0:42:37.110 --> 0:42:39.180
<v Speaker 4>to let the defense win the games. Now, I don't

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:41.420
<v Speaker 4>know what happened. Week one, Josh Allen's legs were a

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:44.420
<v Speaker 4>massive problem. But they actually looked great against Cincinnati in

0:42:44.460 --> 0:42:48.780
<v Speaker 4>week two. And then they looked fine against Indianapolis. Indianapolis

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 4>is not a terrible team. I think Houston is just fine.

0:42:51.020 --> 0:42:51.580
<v Speaker 3>I think C.J.

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.420
<v Speaker 4>Stroud did not forget how to play football. I will

0:42:54.460 --> 0:42:55.820
<v Speaker 4>take this level of C.J.

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:56.110
<v Speaker 3>Stroud.

0:42:56.140 --> 0:42:57.830
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it's a good bandwagon to get on

0:42:57.850 --> 0:42:59.029
<v Speaker 5>because everyone bailed on them.

0:42:59.130 --> 0:42:59.430
<v Speaker 3>C.J.

0:42:59.450 --> 0:43:01.290
<v Speaker 5>Stroud in the playoffs last year was It was bad.

0:43:01.390 --> 0:43:01.690
<v Speaker 3>Brutal.

0:43:01.710 --> 0:43:04.509
<v Speaker 5>And when they limp into the season defensively, everyone bailed.

0:43:04.750 --> 0:43:05.149
<v Speaker 3>Everybody bailed.

0:43:05.410 --> 0:43:05.810
<v Speaker 5>What's next?

0:43:05.830 --> 0:43:08.890
<v Speaker 3>Oh, okay. Now I have my worst 3-0 team.

0:43:09.489 --> 0:43:11.610
<v Speaker 4>This sounds really mean, especially after J.J.

0:43:11.630 --> 0:43:13.300
<v Speaker 3>Watt just praised them. I'm sorry.

0:43:13.340 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 4>The Las Vegas Raiders played nobody. Their opponents are 1-5

0:43:18.180 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 4>on the season. It gets much tougher, starting, obviously, with

0:43:21.700 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 4>KC this week.

0:43:23.500 --> 0:43:27.150
<v Speaker 3>The nine turnovers. Awesome. I'm so happy for them.

0:43:27.469 --> 0:43:31.110
<v Speaker 4>There's no way they sustained, especially against these quality offenses.

0:43:31.150 --> 0:43:34.170
<v Speaker 3>I forget New England, but they have the Bills, the Rams,

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:35.379
<v Speaker 3>the Niners.

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:37.819
<v Speaker 4>The Raiders are coming back to earth, and it's not

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 4>even a massive critique. It's just we're going to see

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 4>where they really belong, which is not a 14-3 team.

0:43:44.380 --> 0:43:45.740
<v Speaker 3>That 3-0 is a total barrage.

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:47.339
<v Speaker 5>You know what I'm weirdly looking forward to? You know

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:50.300
<v Speaker 5>I like awkward quarterback situations. What if they play a

0:43:50.340 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 5>little better than you think and they maybe get nine

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 5>wins and maybe just on the cusp of the playoffs?

0:43:55.670 --> 0:43:57.650
<v Speaker 5>What do you do about Kirk Cousins? And maybe not

0:43:57.690 --> 0:44:00.500
<v Speaker 5>with them, but Kirk Cousins plays another year somewhere else.

0:44:00.660 --> 0:44:02.219
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was going to say, you wave bye-bye and

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.859
<v Speaker 4>wish him luck. Again, Patrick Mahomes, Alex Smith. The Chiefs

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 4>said goodbye to Alex Smith and had no problem with it.

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:10.420
<v Speaker 4>And also, watching Mendoza in the preseason, he's not ready

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:10.660
<v Speaker 4>to go.

0:44:10.920 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, now I have my most confusing 3-0 or 0-3 team.

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:14.980
<v Speaker 3>Love it.

0:44:15.190 --> 0:44:18.870
<v Speaker 4>Most confusing, no doubt about it, the Los Angeles Chargers.

0:44:18.890 --> 0:44:21.190
<v Speaker 4>And I'll tell you why they confuse me, Paul. Last week,

0:44:21.230 --> 0:44:24.030
<v Speaker 4>we talked a lot about the Chargers-Bills game. You predicted

0:44:24.050 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 4>the Chargers would win, and it was a good prediction

0:44:26.140 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 4>because they were up 10-0. They were outplaying Buffalo in

0:44:29.380 --> 0:44:31.790
<v Speaker 4>every aspect of the game, led the game again in

0:44:31.810 --> 0:44:32.470
<v Speaker 4>the third quarter.

0:44:32.790 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 3>But somehow... The Chargers find a way to lose. I

0:44:36.219 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 3>cannot wrap my head around it.

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:40.620
<v Speaker 4>I know Justin Herbert is great at football, but for

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:42.280
<v Speaker 4>some reason it is not happening.

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I think his receiver, Quentin Johnson, screwed him pretty bad

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:46.629
<v Speaker 3>last week.

0:44:46.750 --> 0:44:51.210
<v Speaker 4>Oh, this drop right here. This was terrible. Again, oh no,

0:44:51.250 --> 0:44:52.730
<v Speaker 4>not that drop. He had another drop on a key

0:44:52.770 --> 0:44:53.270
<v Speaker 4>third down.

0:44:53.989 --> 0:44:56.450
<v Speaker 3>Why are the Chargers not better? They're the most confusing

0:44:56.469 --> 0:44:57.589
<v Speaker 3>0-3 team by far.

0:44:57.690 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 5>And I don't think it's going to get better. I

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.020
<v Speaker 5>think they play to the level of their opponents. And

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 5>you look at their schedule. Seattle, that's not going to

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.140
<v Speaker 5>work out. And then if you look at later in

0:45:05.180 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 5>the season, they had the Jets, and then they had

0:45:07.540 --> 0:45:09.779
<v Speaker 5>the Dolphins. I worry about games like that because they

0:45:09.820 --> 0:45:11.100
<v Speaker 5>like big eggs, the Chargers.

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't think this 0-3 thing is going to last.

0:45:13.900 --> 0:45:15.899
<v Speaker 4>I think that they come back towards the middle. That's

0:45:15.940 --> 0:45:16.700
<v Speaker 4>why I find them competing.

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:18.940
<v Speaker 5>Keep it friendly. I'll make you a bet. At Thanksgiving,

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:21.090
<v Speaker 5>the Chargers are under. 500.

0:45:21.090 --> 0:45:23.259
<v Speaker 3>Thanksgiving. I was about to say, I think they finished

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:25.739
<v Speaker 3>8-9 for the season. They're 0-3, Paul. What kind of

0:45:25.780 --> 0:45:26.299
<v Speaker 3>bet is that?

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:27.140
<v Speaker 5>I know math.

0:45:27.420 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not betting an 0-3 team is going to be.

0:45:29.660 --> 0:45:31.570
<v Speaker 5>500 points Thanksgiving. I was trying to take advantage of you.

0:45:31.580 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 5>The Phillies are making you upset. I was trying to

0:45:33.020 --> 0:45:34.220
<v Speaker 5>take advantage of your little side bet.

0:45:34.390 --> 0:45:35.029
<v Speaker 3>All right, it's time.

0:45:35.070 --> 0:45:36.290
<v Speaker 5>Those are good superlatives, Pearl.

0:45:36.690 --> 0:45:37.069
<v Speaker 2>Here we go.

0:45:37.110 --> 0:45:39.890
<v Speaker 5>Constructive criticism time. We don't know what's coming. They'll choose

0:45:39.930 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 5>it back there. Let's see what they got for us.

0:45:42.010 --> 0:45:44.069
<v Speaker 5>Here's our constructive criticism. Here's the first one.

0:45:44.390 --> 0:45:44.810
<v Speaker 3>Here we go.

0:45:45.820 --> 0:45:46.839
<v Speaker 5>Oh, this is a post from me.

0:45:46.860 --> 0:45:47.220
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:45:47.300 --> 0:45:47.540
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:45:48.110 --> 0:45:49.819
<v Speaker 5>Trying to think of a reason not to buy this.

0:45:49.940 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 5>None come to mind. That is a early 80s El Camino,

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:56.540
<v Speaker 5>and it's gorge. Pearl, I would love to buy this.

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:58.500
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't understand where you are going to put

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:00.529
<v Speaker 4>all these cars, because every time I'm out with you,

0:46:00.570 --> 0:46:04.069
<v Speaker 4>you'll see an old Wagoneer. Oh, man, I need to

0:46:04.110 --> 0:46:08.090
<v Speaker 4>buy that. You're obsessed with sort of 80s cars and fashion.

0:46:08.130 --> 0:46:11.450
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and the color's great. It's two-tone. It's brown and tan,

0:46:11.489 --> 0:46:12.390
<v Speaker 5>kind of Padres colors.

0:46:12.469 --> 0:46:12.820
<v Speaker 2>It's gorgeous.

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 5>If you don't, I will. Large from Barstool, our good

0:46:15.660 --> 0:46:16.180
<v Speaker 5>buddy Large.

0:46:16.219 --> 0:46:16.379
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:46:17.110 --> 0:46:19.070
<v Speaker 5>Go for it, Large. Maybe we could do a sharing situation.

0:46:19.110 --> 0:46:21.890
<v Speaker 4>This isn't really a question for Large or for even you.

0:46:22.150 --> 0:46:24.450
<v Speaker 4>How does your wife feel about your obsession with these

0:46:24.510 --> 0:46:24.970
<v Speaker 4>old cars?

0:46:25.210 --> 0:46:28.130
<v Speaker 5>She is giving up. She does not fight it anymore.

0:46:28.150 --> 0:46:30.649
<v Speaker 5>I just take her on a vacation and then buy

0:46:30.710 --> 0:46:33.690
<v Speaker 5>some junky old car. If you're not the coolest person

0:46:33.730 --> 0:46:35.209
<v Speaker 5>on your street, it's all I've got.

0:46:35.450 --> 0:46:36.350
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah.

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:38.669
<v Speaker 5>I'd be by far the coolest person on any street,

0:46:38.750 --> 0:46:39.569
<v Speaker 5>whatever street you got.

0:46:39.969 --> 0:46:42.350
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've been actually in a truck with you that

0:46:42.390 --> 0:46:44.690
<v Speaker 4>was really cool, but it did not function properly at

0:46:44.770 --> 0:46:45.330
<v Speaker 4>a certain point.

0:46:45.370 --> 0:46:46.850
<v Speaker 5>I'd rather look good than be able to drive down

0:46:46.870 --> 0:46:47.069
<v Speaker 5>the street.

0:46:47.090 --> 0:46:48.330
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we were pushing it up a hill in Vermont.

0:46:48.670 --> 0:46:50.290
<v Speaker 5>We'll keep an eye on that story, but let's get

0:46:50.350 --> 0:46:53.050
<v Speaker 5>to the feel good. It's going to be Padres related

0:46:53.090 --> 0:46:55.350
<v Speaker 5>because nothing feels more than them. Here we go.

0:47:00.030 --> 0:47:01.009
<v Speaker 3>I don't think this is going to go well for

0:47:01.030 --> 0:47:01.690
<v Speaker 3>your Cubs ball.

0:47:02.219 --> 0:47:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for that.

0:47:11.910 --> 0:47:12.549
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I was right.

0:47:12.850 --> 0:47:16.410
<v Speaker 5>That is Gavin Sheets. They're chanting his name, chanting his name,

0:47:16.469 --> 0:47:19.020
<v Speaker 5>thousands of people, and he parks one and looks back

0:47:19.060 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 5>to the crowd.

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 3>That has to talk about feel good.

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.739
<v Speaker 4>Can you imagine the adrenaline of hitting a home run

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:27.820
<v Speaker 4>in front of that crowd in the playoffs?

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:28.540
<v Speaker 3>Amazing.

0:47:28.620 --> 0:47:30.970
<v Speaker 5>Great crowd. We keep talking about it. Bonus coverage for

0:47:31.010 --> 0:47:33.510
<v Speaker 5>the feel good. Our friend John Fant of NBC Sports

0:47:33.950 --> 0:47:36.089
<v Speaker 5>hung out, when I say hung out, got doused by

0:47:36.110 --> 0:47:40.180
<v Speaker 5>Fernando Tentis after the game. Thank you. Everything that happens

0:47:40.219 --> 0:47:41.779
<v Speaker 5>over here is because of them.

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:43.260
<v Speaker 2>The energy that they bring.

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.950
<v Speaker 5>The fans are the best, man, and they're off the chart.

0:47:46.989 --> 0:47:49.350
<v Speaker 5>What I have done for this city, man, we definitely

0:47:49.370 --> 0:47:50.969
<v Speaker 5>want to bring it for them because they deserve it.

0:47:51.310 --> 0:47:51.730
<v Speaker 2>Congrats.

0:47:52.010 --> 0:47:52.370
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:47:55.710 --> 0:47:58.470
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I was going to say John's too dry.

0:48:01.020 --> 0:48:04.379
<v Speaker 5>You know, Fanta, that slicker's not protecting that blazer, that

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 5>Natalie tired blazer you had there. And that wool jacket,

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:09.300
<v Speaker 5>what is Fanta thinking?

0:48:09.580 --> 0:48:11.509
<v Speaker 4>No, he was just asking to get poured on it.

0:48:11.550 --> 0:48:12.700
<v Speaker 4>But I've got to be honest, it looked like he

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:14.010
<v Speaker 4>was having a great time regardless.

0:48:14.130 --> 0:48:16.330
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I did have this happen. In 1999, I got

0:48:16.350 --> 0:48:18.830
<v Speaker 5>to work the World Series. And after the Yankees won,

0:48:19.350 --> 0:48:21.029
<v Speaker 5>I waited and waited and got a little bit of

0:48:21.070 --> 0:48:23.770
<v Speaker 5>sound from Roger Clemens. He was all by himself. And

0:48:23.790 --> 0:48:25.890
<v Speaker 5>I was very excited. And I said, thanks. And then

0:48:25.910 --> 0:48:28.230
<v Speaker 5>he just dumped champagne all over my head. It was

0:48:28.270 --> 0:48:29.049
<v Speaker 5>one of the best of all time.

0:48:29.070 --> 0:48:29.630
<v Speaker 3>Was it on camera?

0:48:29.910 --> 0:48:30.290
<v Speaker 5>Not at all.

0:48:30.710 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Oh. Not like Tim Carver and Dion.

0:48:32.930 --> 0:48:34.220
<v Speaker 5>Not at all. But it was in a nice way,

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:34.910
<v Speaker 5>Roger Clemens.

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:35.900
<v Speaker 3>Oh!

0:48:36.020 --> 0:48:38.060
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he was actually like, hey, man, and he poured

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 5>it right on my head.

0:48:38.500 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 3>But you thought it was in a nice way.

0:48:39.540 --> 0:48:41.839
<v Speaker 5>Tune in to the Dan Patchow tomorrow on NBC Sports

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:44.419
<v Speaker 5>Network and NBC Sports Now. Then hang with us after

0:48:44.460 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 5>the baseball.

0:48:45.340 --> 0:48:45.630
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:48:46.020 --> 0:48:47.939
<v Speaker 5>Phillies, let's go.