WEBVTT - 7/30/25: Mayor Pete Refuses To Accept Zohran Win, Crypto Dire Warning, Sydney Sweeney Jeans Ad

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Hey, guys, Saga and Crystal here.

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and we are so excited about what that means for

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the future of the show.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the only place where you can find honest

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>perspectives from the left and the right that simply does

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>not exist anywhere else.

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 2>So if that is something that's important to you, please

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 2>go to Breakingpoints dot com. Become a member today and

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad free,

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and all put together for you every morning in your inbox.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>We need your help to build the future of independent

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>news media and we hope to see you at Breakingpoints

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com.

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's go ahead and get to Zoron, and let's start

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 2>off with a clip of Pete Buddhagic talking about why

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 2>he thinks that Zoron won. And Pete says, you know,

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>his policy, like that, really that really wasn't the thing.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>I think people are reading too much into this whole

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 2>like free bust thing. Let's take a listen to to

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Pete explaining his version of why Zoron was so successful.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of people are focused on the leftism,

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the ideological leftism that I think we shouldn't be so

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 3>surprised that prevailed in a New York Democratic Party primary.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 3>But I think if my party wants to learn lessons

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 3>from Mamdani's success that are portable to a place like Michigan,

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 3>where I live, it's less about the ideology and more

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 3>about the message discipline of focusing on what people care about,

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 3>and the tactical wisdom of getting out there and talking

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 3>to everybody.

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Nailed and I love.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I've seen several different versions of this where it's like

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the assessment is, oh, well, he's young, he's charismatic, he

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 2>was talking about costs of living, you know, they say

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>in this very amorphous way, like the specifics of his

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 2>proposals didn't matter, and or it's oh, he understood social

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>media and he knew how to make videos. Anything to

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>keep from grappling with the fact that a central part

0:01:55.280 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>of his appeal are his specific policies, including, by the way,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 2>his support for Palestinian rights. The data is just totally

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 2>clear at this point that he didn't win in spite

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 2>of his willingness to, you know, stand on business of

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 2>being an anti Zionist. He won in part because that

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 2>was such an appealing position to take in the context

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 2>especially of a Democratic primary.

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 5>I mean, he's the millennial Like, he's who a lot

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 5>of establishment Democrats see as like the ambassador the party's

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 5>like next best ambassador to millennials and to millennial men

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 5>because he's young and a man. But he's not. It's

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 5>actually kind of interesting. This made me think about this

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 5>when it comes to Buddha Judge for the first time

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 5>in the sense that like, he doesn't capture any of

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 5>the mood of millennials for sure, or of like people

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 5>again under the age of forty roughly in the country.

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 5>And you'd think that Democrats would understand that about him.

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 5>He's so you know, he's he's able to talk like

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 5>a normal Midwestern dude when he's on with Andrew Schultz

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 5>or a different podcast hosts, but he definitely like doesn't

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 5>at all reflect like Mam Donnie. Is also a cheerful candidate,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 5>right like he I think Soccer has pointed this out,

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 5>like a guy's always smiling wherever he goes, even though

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 5>he's speaking to the miseries of younger Americans millennial generation ze.

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 5>But Buddha Judge is not somebody who comes across this

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 5>like really understanding that and really like, do you know

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 5>what I'm saying, Like, that's not what he speaks to

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 5>he he sort of like seems to gloss over a

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 5>lot of that. And I think this is this clip

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 5>is a pretty good example of him saying, well, New

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 5>York City is deep blue.

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 4>It was a vibes election.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, It's true Cuomo was a bad candidate and

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 5>all of that, but Mam Donnie is powerful for Democrats

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 5>precisely because he kind of understands the precariousness of the

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 5>situation that the twenty four year old man finds himself

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 5>in in very particular ways that you don't really hear

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 5>Buddha Judge talking about at all.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, Democrats took this lesson from the Trump election. I'm

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 2>basically like, we need to go on podcasts.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right, right, right, right, right right.

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 2>But they didn't realize that it's not just you need

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 2>to go on podcasts. It's like, you need to be

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 2>able to say something when you're on those podcasts that

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 2>is going to have appeal.

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 4>You need to.

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 5>Exclame the dem establishment, because that is what Trump did

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 5>with a Republican establishment. That's what Jadie Vance does with

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Republican establishment.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Whether or not. You think they believe it. That's why

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Joe Rogan likes them.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I mean again, Israel is really central here.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sorry to keep picking on center Slacken, because

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 2>I actually really appreciate her coming on our show. But

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think I asked her like, what did

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 2>you want? Why did you want to talk to us,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 2>and she basically said, like, well, my staff pitches and

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 2>pitched me on it. And you know, we all have

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 2>this sense of basically we need to get out into

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 2>independent media, but if you don't understand the audience is

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 2>there and what they need to hear from a politician

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 2>in order for them to trust you and for you

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 2>to have any credibility with them at all, Like you

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 2>can go on every podcast in the world and it's

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>not going to help you one bit whatsoever.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 4>And like if Yabla Harris had gone on Rogan, Yeah.

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, And you know, I really do think, like I've

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>become quite convinced that the sort of price of entry

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>into credibility in those spaces on the democratic side is

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 2>being like having any sort of soul and conscience around

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Palestinian life. And you know, if we look at here,

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 2>we've got a bunch of interesting poll numbers with regard

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 2>to Zorn.

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 6>We can put C two up on the screen.

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 2>This one reflects what the top contributors to his success

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 2>in the race ultimately were. And Number one his plans

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 2>to lower costs.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 6>That's great.

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Eighty nine percent said that was really important to me.

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Number two his plans to tax the wealthy and stand

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 2>up to corporations. Now that's part of why Pete wants

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>to say, oh, no, no, no, it didn't have anything to

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>do with his policy positions, because you know, he's interested

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 2>in like a maintenance of the status quo. But number

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>three on that list is his support for Palestinian rights.

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Sixty two percent of people said that was important to me,

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 2>and only twelve percent said it wasn't that it wasn't

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 2>important to them at all in terms of how they voted.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 2>So Zoran didn't didn't try to make, you know, Palestinian

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 2>rights central to his campaign, but his opponents decided to

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 2>make that a central question in the campaign. And there's

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>just no doubt that they did him a tremendous favor

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 2>by you know, trying to smear him as an anti

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Semite and constantly talking about, you know what do you

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>go to Israel and where does he stand on this?

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>That was a huge boon to him in this primary.

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 2>I think the numbers are quite clear at this point,

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 2>and we've also got pulling emily about where he stands

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 2>for the general election. If this polling is to believe,

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 2>be believed, and I don't see any reason why it shouldn't,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 2>given that, you know, the heavily democratic makeup of the

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 2>city of New York, Zorin looks set to coast to

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 2>victory whether or not all of his current opponents stay

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 2>in the race or not. Let's put C three up

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.239
<v Speaker 2>on the screen. You can see all of the different

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 2>demographic groups that he is strongest with. This isn't a

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 2>five way vote. I mean, just look at this list.

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 2>So young Asians, he's winning eighty nine percent of them.

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Men eighteen to thirty four, a key demographic group that

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Democrats did not do so hot with in the general election.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 2>He's winning eighty five percent of them, young women seventy

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 2>nine percent, overall ages twenty five to seventy nine percent.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>You can just go down this list. A couple more

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 2>that I just want to highlight here Jews age eighteen

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>to forty four, he is winning sixty seven percent of

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 2>young Jewish voters. Overall Jewish voters, okay, forty three percent,

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 2>which is much larger by you know, by double digits.

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 4>That's a lot of anti Semitic Jews.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, but that he wins the plurality of Jews,

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 2>and it's not close, it's by double digits. So you know,

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>we really need to put to bed this idea that

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 2>he constantly is getting HARANGI, Oh, you have work to

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 2>do with the Jewish community and you need to talk

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 2>to them, and you're going to make Jews unsafe, blah

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>blah blah. Well, if somebody needs to ask Andrew Cuomo

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 2>why Jewish voters apparently don't trust him and why he's

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 2>got so much work to do apparently with the Jewish community,

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 2>since he is losing now to Zoron among those groups,

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and according to Cuomo's numbers, lost Jewish voters in the primary.

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Majority of them, according to Cuomo, voted for Zoron in

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 2>the primary as well. So you know, frankly, it's anti

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 2>semitic to project onto Jewish voters that they all have

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 2>this one monolichlithic view that they are all on board

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 2>with Israel committing a genocide in the Gaza strip and

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 2>that this is a top priority and top issue for

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 2>them is like how many times you're going to visit

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Israel and how much you love Benjamin Ntt Yahoo. This

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>is just thoroughly debunked and honestly a disgusting view of

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:06.719
<v Speaker 2>the electorate.

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 5>Can we just put the graphic up on the screen

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 5>one more time? Sorry, There's there's one that caught my

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 5>eye that I wanted to point out.

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 6>The last one.

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 5>Check a check out Curtis leiwa there, Crystal forty percent

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 5>of Staten Island.

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, white Catholics, Staten Island, white union household is interesting

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 2>and white non college that's his strength.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely crushing it on Staten Island. Sorry, I had to

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 5>point that one out.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 7>I saw.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I also, I think this chart is so important

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 2>because it just completely exposes the lie of the idea

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 2>that oh Zorn's just winning like affluent white socialists in Brooklyn.

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point, Like, look at this list. You know,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 2>it's it's overwhelming. I he's winning black women fifty one

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 2>percent of the all of the you know, the caricature

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 2>of where his appeal is is very much debunked by

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 2>this chart showing where he's strongest, which is like basically everywhere.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, forty three percent of non college Yeah, I think

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and one hundred ninety nine household income. That's

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 5>fifty three percent, fifty to ninety nine. He's at fifty

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 5>three percent of household income. So I think that is

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 5>a really good point as well, Crystal. Sample sizes, I

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 5>will say, in that pool are pretty small, it even

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 5>says down there on the screen. Results should be treated

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 5>as directional.

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 4>But we'll see.

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 5>More in the days to come, and certainly some of

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 5>this matches up with what we saw from results after

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 5>the primary. Let's go ahead and put C four on

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 5>the screen. This is I think it's actually even from

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 5>the same poll, isn't it, Crystal the data for Progress.

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 5>This is New York City Democratic primary voters believe Israel

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 5>is committing genocide in Gaza, all likely voters, that is

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 5>at seventy eight percent, and only thirteen percent say no,

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 5>nine percent say don't know. So if you are interested

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 5>in why Cuomo's approach during the primary failed dramatically, this

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 5>pole makes that pretty clear.

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and we've got another one in the same vein

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 2>about Netanya Who. So it's Zorn's position, which I fully support,

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 2>that if Netanna Who comes to New York City, he

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>should be arrested because there's an outstanding international criminal court

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 2>arrest for it against him for being an alleged war criminal.

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's alleged, but whatever. Yeah, New York

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 2>voters are on board with that too. Sixty three percent

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 2>of Democratic peorrimory voters were like, yes, actually you should

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 2>arrest Benjamin Natna who in only twenty percent say no.

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 2>The other sixteen percent say they are not sure. Just

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 2>to give you a sense of on what sala solid

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 2>ground he was on with all of his positions, which

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 2>again his opponents really made central to the race. He

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 2>made cost of living central to the campaign he was running,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 2>but his opponents were bound and determined to put these

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 2>issues at the center of the race, and only I

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 2>think aided him in securing a crushing primary victory. But

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 2>don't worry, Emily, his adversaries not given up. We can

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 2>put C five up on the screen. We have a

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 2>new you know, billionaire to multimillionaire effort to try to

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 2>defeat Zoron in the general election. You've got a new

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 2>anti mom Donnie super Pac forming a Hedge funder and

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Trump voter, pledged five hundred thousand of his own cash.

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>If you want to join his zoom call on how

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 2>to stop Zoron, you will need to pay at least

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 2>twenty five thousand dollars is the price of admission to

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 2>this must be the greatest zoom call of all time.

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 2>But in this you know, in this polling that just

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 2>came out, even if all the even if everybody drops

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>out except Cuomo, who appears to be his strongest head

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to head opponent in the general election, you still have

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 2>in this poll Zoron winning by twelve points, which coincidentally

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 2>is exactly what you want the primary buy as well.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it's just utterly absurd at this point,

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 2>and really discussing that Chuck Schumer Keem Jeffries can't bother

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 2>to endorse the Democratic nominee who has much higher favorability

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 2>ratings that either one of them do in New York. Actually,

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the only candidate, the only politician has higher approval rating

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 2>in New York than Zoron is AOC. And they think that, yeah,

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they just because they're worried about their donors,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>and they don't like his position on Israel. They refuse

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 2>to endorse the Democratic nominee. And you know, I think

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 2>it is only hastening the decline and exposing the hypocrisy

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 2>and the distance between democratic leadership and where the democratic

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 2>base is at this point.

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 5>So I believe on Dami this is the last thing

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 5>I'll say is on his way back from Uganda, and

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 5>there has been some talk in Maga circles that the

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 5>administration should detain him on his way back. That's something

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 5>we have seen happen in a couple of cases of

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 5>the first six months the Trump administration to people who

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 5>have been critical of US foreign policy, particularly when it

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 5>comes to Israel. So that's just something to watch today, Crystal,

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if that was on your radar, but

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm pretty sure that's been discussed. So we'll keep everybody

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 5>updated with any news we hear on that.

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, it would both be obviously outrageous and go to

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 2>ask if they did that, and also just a massive

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 2>boost too Zorn and his campaign.

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 6>It would be a lot closely.

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 5>It would be so like politically foolish of them to

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 5>do so.

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, we will see.

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 5>Let's move on to Crypto Crystal Republicans making a big

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 5>push to just boost the crypto industry before heading on

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 5>in August Recess. Nothing more important to do, So we

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 5>will be joined by Peter Ryan shortly. Well, we're happy

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 5>to be joined now by Peter Ryan. He's the CEO

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 5>and founder of Ryan Research, and he has been on

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 5>a bit of a journey when it comes to crypto.

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Peter has been in the space.

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 5>He's going to tell us all about this for a

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 5>long time. Came to sour on crypto, wrote an excellent essay.

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 5>This is the first element we can go ahead and

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 5>put up on the screen for Compact magazine recently that

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 5>I cannot recommend to people enough, especially if you're sort

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 5>of crypto curious. There's a lot of great explainer details

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 5>in this piece, and it's just it's a really really

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 5>helpful kind of glimpse inside of the industry that goes

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 5>into granular details.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 4>So Peter, thank you so much for being here. We

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 4>appreciate it.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Also has a fantastic headline there, money by vile means.

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 8>Yes, thanks for having me for the Shakespeare buffs out there.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 7>That's where that line is from.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yes, of course, so tell us a little bit

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 5>and people can read more about this in the essay.

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 5>But you have such an interesting background in the crypto space,

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 5>and right now, Republicans, this is the so called news

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 5>hook that we want to talk about, made a big

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 5>push with the Genius Act before they headed out for

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 5>August research at Recess, and people right now are kind

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 5>of trying to figure out what it means for the industry.

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 5>The industry was pretty supportive of the Genius Act, although

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 5>there were some controversy about it, but it regulates stable coins. So, Peter,

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 5>we'll get in all of that. Let's start with your

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 5>background as somebody who was initially in the thrall of

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 5>crypto's promise to decentralize the monetary system and came to

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 5>sour on it.

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 4>What was that process like for you?

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so I got into bitcoin in twenty thirteen. It

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 8>was some of the early crazy days. It really attracted

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 8>me because I was sort of part of this generation

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 8>of the Ron Paul movement and its response to the

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 8>financial crisis that occurred in two thousand and eight, and

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 8>bitcoin seemed like this great way to marry the private

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 8>sector with all these Austrian economic beliefs and so that's

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 8>how it was sold in Many of the early bitcoiners

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 8>were these idealists. But as time went on and I

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 8>started to work in depth inside the industry, I met

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 8>a lot of the big players. I saw a different

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 8>historical events transpire that would reveal some of the inner

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 8>workings of how this market operated. From there, after being

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 8>employed as a research analyst with Coindesk, I started to

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 8>doubt some of these idealistic tenets. And then in about

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 8>twenty nineteen, I really came full circle and saw a

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 8>lot of what was sold in twenty thirteen to me,

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 8>just did not cut the mustard. It wasn't true. History

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 8>proved it was not true. And so ever since then,

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 8>I've been an independent consultant talking about my skepticism on Bitcoin,

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 8>on crypto in general, and more recently the very specific

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 8>and unique role of stable coins in the government's policy.

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I want to get more to stable coins because that's

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 2>a very important piece and ties into the quote unquote

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Genius Act that just passed. But you wrote in your piece,

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 2>when bitcoin, the first cryptocurrency, was invented, it was promoted

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 2>as a financial technology that would empower individuals and wrest

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 2>power away from the state and centralized elites. Just a

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 2>decade and a half later, those same elites, including the

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration and bipart of some majorities in Congress, have

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 2>embraced cryptocurrencies. But this is because rather than lifting up

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 2>ordinary citizens, crypto has become a new means of expanding

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 2>elite power and wealth. Can you elaborate some on that

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 2>for us, Peter, sure.

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 8>So what you have to understand is that the reason

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 8>the government is attracted to crypto and bitcoin right now

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 8>is because it helps government. Yep, that's sort of a

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 8>pretty obvious point, but a lot of people aren't so.

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Clear on that, Peter, can you speak to as well?

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 5>It helps government and helps big business right exactly.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 8>So a way to sum this up is that the

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 8>cryptocurrency system, with all these coins with stable coins at

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 8>the heart of it, they are a shadow central bank

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 8>system conducting shadow money printing to do shadow debt monetization

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 8>and shadow quantitative easing. So that's the shortest way I

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:01.959
<v Speaker 8>can describe it. What that means is essentially, there is

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 8>all this paper value being generated in the crypto markets,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 8>and as that paper value keeps going up, as that

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 8>asset inflation keeps going up, that allows the froth to

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 8>spill over and very specifically start buying US debt as

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.959
<v Speaker 8>the rest of the world enters its multipolar phase and

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 8>stops buying US debt. So this is why stable coins,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 8>where they need to be backed by US debt in

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 8>order to operate, are now a bigger holder of US

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 8>debt than countries like Germany. And then as we get

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 8>into the private sector, all of this frauth that's coming

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 8>out is actually starting to enter the private sector, enter equities,

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 8>and that's going to create a knock on effect that's

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 8>going to start pushing that up. So basically, the crypto

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 8>sector wins, the government wins, and the traditional incumbent corporate

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 8>elites win through this big triangular system.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 5>So this, obviously this leads us to the question of

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 5>how you have still so many true believers in the

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 5>crypto space, people who haven't been on the journey but

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 5>started from the point a that you started on and

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 5>are still there who continue. I did see some criticism

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 5>of Genius and some of the other legislation that's been

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 5>considered by Republicans in particular from that kind of true

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 5>believer crowd who are worried about central bank digital currency

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 5>and all of that. But you have people, I think

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 5>of the Winklevoss guys who are like libertarian ish, and

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 5>maybe they're not the best example because they aren't like

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 5>from the libertarian kind of crunchy world that came out

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 5>of the Ron Paul twenty twelve, of the movement in particular.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 4>But there are true believers still in the.

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 5>Space who continue to believe that crypto is a benefit

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 5>when it comes to decentralization and when it comes to

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 5>undermining globalism and all of that. So can you tell

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 5>us more about why people you think, you know, people

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 5>you've spent time around, are still kind of clinging to

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 5>that in the face of which just seems so obvious

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 5>to be a centralization effort. And maybe even also if

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 5>you're aware of some fissures in the movement as well,

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:21.239
<v Speaker 5>that you could fill us in on.

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 8>Sure, So this is where the technology, the sense of mechanics, innovation,

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 8>anything like that is really not what's causing those true

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 8>believers to stay in the bitcoin camp. I think it's

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 8>more exactly that it's belief. I think Jannis Veri Faccus,

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 8>the Greek economists, put it best when he talked about

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 8>how class caliberalism and neoliberals in centered the market as

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 8>this divinity. And then, as he's written more recently in

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 8>his new Conception of that, which is like techno lordism,

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 8>he says, that's transition from the market to the algorithm

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 8>to the code, and that's the new divinity.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 7>And I think that's what's.

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 8>Going on here, that people are trying to externalize what

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 8>is ultimately a democratic process to shape society in the

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 8>way that the majority of voters would like it to be.

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 8>But instead of doing that the hard and very direct way,

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 8>it's this sense of externalizing the problem into these things, Well,

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 8>the market will fix it or the algorithm will fix it.

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 8>So I think that is that is really inherently baked

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 8>into the bitcoin thesis, and that's why people can't really

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:37.479
<v Speaker 8>break out of that.

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:40.479
<v Speaker 2>I'd like for you to talk a little bit more

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 2>about that, because I'm sort of fascinated by I mean,

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 2>it is almost like a religious devotion. You know, there's

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 2>like a cult like aspect to people who are those

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 2>like Dinamal true believers, and you were one of those people,

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 2>so I'm curious. You know, it's very hard when someone

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:59.239
<v Speaker 2>has sort of like this, you know, this ideal, this

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 2>ideology they've committed themselves to, They've you know, like committed

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to it personally. There may be financial aspects, assets at stake,

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. What was like the first piece of information

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 2>that for you was like wait a second. That started

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 2>you on the trajectory away from thinking that this was,

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, some sort of solution and that it would

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>actually empower people and is serving in exactly the opposite capacity.

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 7>Sure.

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 8>So one way that this divinity of the code starts

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 8>to come into play is how people always talk about

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 8>big coins a hard asset. It has a fixed supply,

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 8>it's twenty one million coins, it's capped, it's like gold.

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 8>So people always talk about that, but no one really

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 8>asked the follow up question. And so I started to

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 8>ask some of these follow up questions, which in the

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 8>end seem very simple, but it's like, why is that

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 8>the case? Please demonstrate how that maintains the case. Because

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 8>gold is something you have to dig out of the ground.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 8>But bitcoin is a software and as anybody could tell you, humans,

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 8>right software, Humans also have to update software.

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and so.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, And so once you start thinking that, then

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 8>you immediately start to go, well, who are these humans, Like,

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 8>does anyone care, like who these people operating this huge

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 8>asset in our economy now that's becoming so interdependent, and

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 8>no one seems to really want to broadcast that examination.

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 8>But like, if I were to just show you a

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 8>little stat here, like would it be surprising that only

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 8>forty two software developers have written ninety percent of Bitcoin's code,

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 8>And there's about five software developers give or take on

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 8>the year that have sort of administrative privileges on top

0:24:59.359 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 8>of bitcoins.

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 7>And we can monitor these.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 8>People, we can identify them, we can see what they're

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 8>chatting about, but no one wants to sort of comment

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 8>on this. But if we start to look into it,

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 8>then we can see, oh, well, this property of fixed

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 8>supply is only a subjective whim of this something that

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 8>looks to me like almost a central bank committee of

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 8>software developers deciding what their monetary policy is on bitcoin.

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 8>So you could say, maybe they choose the fixed supply

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 8>and that's good monetary policy, that that does not change

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 8>the fact that there is centralization going.

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 5>On there, and also globalization, which lends itself to centralization

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 5>in a high tech age. And this is Peter one

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 5>of the questions I always have for people in the

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 5>crypto space because I'm not, you know, somebody who's like

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 5>super super deep in the details. I'm not like major investor.

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm not doing code, I'm not doing any of that stuff.

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 5>But I have never understood how structurally crypto can exist

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 5>with any regulation in a way that is utopian or

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't mean that in a pejorative sense, in a

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 5>way that's true to the spirit that I'm totally sympathetic

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 5>too and supportive of decentralization. So when I see someone

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 5>like Cynthia Alumus, Republican Senator, has been very, very supportive

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 5>of crypto over the years, going to these conferences and

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 5>being met and lauded and praised by people in that space,

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 5>I just am curious, structurally, if we steal man this,

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 5>is there actually a way, in a fantasy, hypothetical scenario

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 5>where crypto could exist in the year of Our Lord

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty five, in the twenty first century in a

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 5>way that is not with any regulation, in a way

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 5>that maintains the spirit of decentralization, Because that to me

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 5>just seems impossible on its face. But I don't know, like,

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 5>is it possible to regulate crypto and also have crypto

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 5>be decentralizing force just I don't get it.

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 8>So there's a theoretical argument that academics can have on

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 8>the core concept of peer to peer technology. Now, when

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 8>you look at the academic literature and the case studies involved,

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 8>usually small scale peer to peer technology works. But the

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 8>challenge is when you scale it. This is where the

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 8>problems of centralization come in. Now, when you combine that

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 8>with money and saturating people's financial transactions, incorporating into state

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 8>institutions like the Treasury and so forth, that's even a

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 8>harder problem to try to figure out. So and even

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 8>in the structural ways that bitcoin's designed, a lot of

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 8>people say that, oh, well, it's it's censorship resistant, it's decentralized.

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 8>You can just transact and send money anywhere you want.

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 8>But there are middleman in bitcoin, the miners in bitcoin,

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 8>those really power hungry server farms out there. Those are

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 8>the middlemum of bitcoin, and they're the ones that get

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 8>your transactions and decide if they're going to process them

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 8>on the blockchain or not. And we've already have documented

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 8>examples of these miners complying with the Treasury's O fact standards.

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 8>To sanction and blacklist certain bitcoin addresses, and there's even

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 8>more advanced ways to do that that are too long

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 8>to get into.

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.360
<v Speaker 7>But this is.

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 8>Where we've already been through the looking glass year. A

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 8>company like Mahra has championed this idea of being compliant

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 8>with the OPAC standards in the mining industry and goes

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 8>on to say their CEO, I believe that the way

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 8>for the US to increase its share of bitcoin miners

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 8>is that the US spased bitcoin point miners need to

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 8>be more compliant to OFAC. So it really gets into

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 8>this catch Trowny two that as the US grows it's

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:14.479
<v Speaker 8>bitcoin industry in wider crypto industry, it keeps diminishing those

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 8>ideals of decentralization. So I would say it's a very

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 8>hard nut to crack. But where we get into now

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 8>with this legislation coming forward and how we've accepted that

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 8>crypto is now a normal part of our economy. Where

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 8>I look at that, it's not innovation, it's not a

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 8>new product or surf that's really adding value. What's going

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 8>on is we have two financial systems to financial infrastructures.

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 8>One is the traditional one with all the regulations and

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 8>that would have been a real fight to try to

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 8>deregulate that. But why go through the pain of doing

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 8>that when you can just open up a parallel system

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 8>with all the deregulation, and then when you combine them

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 8>and aggregate, the net is that you have a more

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 8>deregulated financial system. So that's really the trick going on here.

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, and that leads to my final question, which is,

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, are we looking at some sort of a

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 2>crypto crypto bubble bursting and taxpayers being on the hook

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 2>for a big crypto bailout given that there's no longer

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 2>this no longer separate ecosystem. This is completely mainstreamed within

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 2>our financial institutions. In President of the United States obviously

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 2>like you know himself benefiting to the tune of millions,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 2>if not billions of dollars from the crypto industry. So,

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, does that seem to you like where we're headed?

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 7>It is very likely.

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 8>I have suggested that this strategy of pumping up the

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 8>crypto markets has a short term logic to it, But

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 8>like all bubbles, all bubbles have a short term logic.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.959
<v Speaker 8>They go up, that's the nature of bubbles. Yeah, so

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 8>it's no one can ever predict the exact time when

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 8>a bubble will pop. But it seems like once we

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 8>get outside of you know, the five to ten year horizon,

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 8>that's where the wheels come off. And let's compare this

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 8>to the housing bubble, there was at least an argument

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 8>there was a physical house.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 7>You know, there was a rationale to.

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 8>Why the value could keep going up and why there

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 8>was fundamental value underlying it. With this, we almost have

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 8>a parody where these are completely digital, fictitious casino tokens practically,

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 8>and they're making up more and more nominal value. And

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 8>when these things pop, you know, there's nothing underlying it.

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 8>And so what ends up happening is we just start

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 8>piling more and more risk into this type of asset

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 8>class and making it, you know, collateralized to traditional transactions

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 8>that we do in the economy. If you start looking

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 8>into how mortgages are starting to accept these as collateral

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 8>and so forth another way, and so once that keeps

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 8>getting saturated, now this asset class, which is you know,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 8>no one would think it's crazy for this thing to

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 8>like go down fifty percent in a day, even with

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 8>the stable coins that are supposed to be the safest

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 8>thing there. Traditionally, we've seen a lot of allegations that

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 8>they don't actually back their coins with one to one reserves,

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 8>which is what they say they are doing. The New

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 8>York AG actually said this in twenty nineteen about one

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 8>of the major stable coins. She said they lied, She

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 8>said that they did not have the reserves. They said

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 8>their lawyers had to admit it, and they ultimately settled

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 8>with the New York AG. And so like this has

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 8>all been documented. We have cases where the market has

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 8>found this out, has broken the peg on the stable coins,

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 8>we have legal sources that have proven this the case,

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 8>like the New York AG, and we just have our

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 8>sort of other historical examples of cryptogaling pop. So the

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 8>fact that it's going to be bigger than all past

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:09.719
<v Speaker 8>bubbles of crypto in the past doesn't really negate the

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 8>fact that there is no underlying value.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:13.719
<v Speaker 7>This stuff is very risky.

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 8>There are multiple vectors where this thing could have a problem.

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 8>Whether it's on the technical side, there could just be

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 8>a bug that sends everything down, so very very unsavory prospects.

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean the value to the extent that there

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 5>is values of it being peer to peer and decentralized

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 5>and that goes away. And so I guess my last

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 5>question for you, Peter, as we're wrapping this up.

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Is do you think there will be more people?

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 5>Because you know people in the space, and I know

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 5>many people in this space and people that I really

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 5>like and totally sympathetic to, like Ron Paul type people.

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 5>Do you think there will be people in the space

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 5>that come away with your perspective soon? Do you think

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 5>maybe we're in like a heightened the contradiction phase postgenious

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 5>Act and regulation that might be coming from this Republican

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 5>administration where others start to get really worried, or do

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 5>you think everything is so attractive and appealing right now

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 5>that it's just kind of going to be pedaled to

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 5>the medal for the next year or so.

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's hard to distract people from the

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 8>gloss of a bubble. They're certainly going to be momentum

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 8>piling in now with this legislation. There's a lot of

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 8>business institutions that want to incorporate this, get old people

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 8>to put their retirement and get young people that are

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 8>busy sports gambling to do more crypto gambling. So there's

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 8>momentum here, But I think in terms of the early bitcoiners,

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 8>a lot of them would actually be sympathetic to my

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 8>point of view, even though they might not go all

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 8>the way that I have. I'll reference one individual. He's

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 8>the editor in chief of Bitcoin magazine, Mark Goodwin. He

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 8>wrote the book The Bitcoin Dollar. We generally agree about

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 8>eighty to ninety percent on all of these problems and criticisms.

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 7>So I would say, right there, if.

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 8>The editor in chief of Bitcoin magazine, who's like a

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 8>real hardcore bitcoiner, has these very similar opinions and sympathetic

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 8>to the way I see it, you know, that's probably

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 8>saying something. As another little citation here, when I released

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 8>this compact article, the founder of the Peer to Peer Foundation,

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 8>which included a forum which actually was the place Satoshi

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 8>Nakamato first announced his white paper introducing bitcoins to the world,

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 8>the founder of that actually endorsed my compact article saying

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 8>this was actually very legitimate and valid criticisms. So I

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 8>would say, when with those two sympathizers from the early days,

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 8>it's hard to make a claim that this is that

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 8>outside the norm. But there's a lot of people, newer

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 8>faces and maybe people with you know, more dollar signs

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 8>in their eyes, not so much Bitcoin signs that are

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 8>looking forward to this current bubble momentum.

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 4>Fascinating.

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 5>Peter Ryan and Ryan Research, thank you for taking the

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 5>time to talk to us about this piece. Thank you

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 5>for writing the piece. We hope to have you back,

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 5>appreciate it.

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 7>Great to be here. Thank you.

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 2>So emily much anticipated section of our show here. Sidney

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Sweeney is the new face of American Eagle, the you know,

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of iconic mall brand, and her ad campaign has

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 2>sparked quite a bit of discussion and controversy on the

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Internet that we wanted to dig into.

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 6>So first let's take.

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 2>A look at the ad that was the most controversial.

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Jans are passed on from parents to offspring, often determining

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 2>traits like her color, personality, and you have an eye color.

0:36:58.000 --> 0:36:58.879
<v Speaker 6>My jeans are blue.

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 5>Sidney Sweeney hasburg keens.

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 2>So you see what they did there with the like

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 2>hereditary gens blue jeans.

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:07.919
<v Speaker 4>At the ad.

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 5>The end of the ad ends with her saying, see

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 5>what I did there?

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah exactly, yeah, as if we didn't if we didn't

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 2>get it. So a lot of people are looking at

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 2>this myself, including and going this feels a little like

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 2>eugenics adjacent, and you know, the whole like the gene talk,

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the blue eyes in particular, it's got a real sort

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 2>of master race vibe. And of course many people, i'm

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.839
<v Speaker 2>sure yourself included, be like, you're ridiculous and you have

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 2>derangement syndrome, et cetera. But my case to you, Emily

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 2>would be, I'm not saying that. I'm not saying that

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 2>American Eagle is like a bunch of secret or open

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 2>fascist and Nazis. They are capitalists though, and they're looking

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 2>at the culture. They realize that paid advertisements really don't

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 2>do a whole hell of a lot of good at

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 2>this point if they don't come with eyeballs and attention

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 2>and controversy. So this is the thing to touch on,

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 2>to play with, and the moment to get a reaction,

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 2>which they got. And so that's my I mean, it's

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 2>not even I think this is just like correct and

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.799
<v Speaker 2>accurate that they knew this would spark this sort of

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 2>discussion and controversy. They gave just enough of a nod

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 2>to like sort of eugenics racy Q kind of type

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 2>of content to have plausible deniability, and then they delighted

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 2>in the fervor and the attention around the ad campaign

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 2>based on sort of touching on that, you know, like

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 2>correctly taboo subject.

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 5>So it's hard to it's very hard to ignore when

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 5>they're panning the camera and saying that Sidney Sweeney in

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 5>the script is saying that her genes are blue and

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 5>they have it on her blue eyes. I think Crystal,

0:38:56.000 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 5>my case would be that you were overestimating the competence

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 5>of people in the advertising industry and an American eagle

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 5>who might have, let's say, cynically said it would be

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 5>a real boost to our Sidney Sweeney ad campaign to

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 5>do a little wink and nod to white supremacy in

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 5>the gene marketing campaign that you know, we'll generate all

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 5>kinds of media height by doing like a wink wink

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:30.359
<v Speaker 5>white supremacy like undertone to the Sydney Sweeney ad. So

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 5>I think what this speaks to is, well, first of all,

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 5>I don't think Sidney Sweeney's people if they saw this

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 5>as being anywhere in the vein of white supremacy. Although

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 5>she's sort of become this interesting flashpoint and it's sort

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 5>of like people are polarizing politically around the question of

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 5>Sidney Sweeney, whereas like people on the left are saying,

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 5>she's like a clear canary in the coal mine for

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 5>the rise of fascism, and people on the right are saying,

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 5>some people on the far far front saying, yes, exactly,

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 5>this is why we love Sydney. People on the right

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 5>are saying, what the hell are you talking about. She's

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 5>just super good looking and wearing an all American brand,

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 5>which is where I think I fall into. But I

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 5>don't think if this was if this was intentional Sydney's,

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 5>Sweeney's people got taken for a ride. I have a

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 5>hard time believing that somebody like Sidney Sweeney would intentionally

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 5>be part of a covert white supremacy campaign to generate clicks.

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 5>And I just, I genuinely don't think there's any like

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 5>I get what you're saying about the buzz that you

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 5>can generate by doing a sort of like intentional Kendall

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 5>Jenner Pepsi's situation, But I also don't think that it

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 5>would be to any brand they would say the cost

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:48.879
<v Speaker 5>benefit analysis of being linked in with literal eugenesis.

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 6>Well premise.

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think the the flaw in your analysis

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 2>is that it ignores how sort of mainstreamed this stuff

0:40:57.640 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 2>has become. I mean you've literally got you have a

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, a town, an all white town being founded

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.879
<v Speaker 2>in Arkansas as we speak, where they explicitly say it's

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 2>whites only, and we believe we have freedom of association

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and so we can keep black and brown people out.

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 6>We have s Miller fringe.

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 4>Steven Miller's not the French Miller.

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Stevin Miller is not the fringe. Who is you know,

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 2>running vast portfolio in the government, including you know, very

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 2>like eugenics inspired immigration policy.

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:29.240
<v Speaker 6>Who and who but who?

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 2>Trump himself says like, this guy is basically a white nationalist.

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean he's you know, that's that's who he is.

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's pretty hard to deny that's who he is.

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 2>And then you've got you know, this isn't emblematic of

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 2>like every young Republican, but you have this very increasingly

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 2>like empowered and influential fringe that you know, are in

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 2>like the Raper movement and are the type of people

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 2>who went on Jubilee and probably like declared himself a

0:41:55.719 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 2>fascist and whatever. You have the New York Times getting

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:05.760
<v Speaker 2>scoops from this race. IQ you know online race IQ dude.

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:07.800
<v Speaker 4>So this is.

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:10.280
<v Speaker 6>Quite mainstreamed in the culture.

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 2>And you know, it like for me, harkens back a

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 2>little bit to the obviously neither of us were alive

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 2>at this time, but the way that Madison Avenue glommed

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 2>onto the like sixties counterculture movement and appropriated that to

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 2>sell coke and mainstream brands, et cetera. And so you know,

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:33.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it takes a rocket scientist for a

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 2>cynical ad ezac who's just out there looking, Okay, how

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 2>can we get attention to our brand and sell some

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 2>blue jeens to go, well, this is the thing that's

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 2>out there in the culture right now. This is the

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 2>thing that's like the you know, transgressive hot button to

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 2>push to stoke controversy. And I just don't know why

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 2>else you're talking about genetics in a blue gene ad

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 2>if you're not intentionally trying to push that button. And

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 2>to the point about Sydney herself, like I don't know,

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't have any like particular grudge about

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 2>against Sydney Sweeney. I know there was like a lot

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:06.400
<v Speaker 2>of discussion about her boobs on SNL or something that

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 2>I never really totally understood, but we can put you know,

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 2>one of the people who was involved in this ad

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 2>campaign posted delighted in the success of the campaign. She says, specifically,

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 2>during a Zoom call with Sidney, we asked the question,

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:20.719
<v Speaker 2>how far do you want to push it? With that hesitation,

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 2>she smirked and said, let's push it.

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 6>I'm game.

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Our response challenge accepted. So in any case, you know,

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's like crazy to imagine that. She

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 2>also was like, yeah, sure, let's play into this controversy

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and create a lot of attention for ourselves. And you know,

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 2>it'll be great for me, it'll be great for the company.

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 2>The stock price is up, et cetera. So that's to me,

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 2>like pretty clearly what's going on here. And I don't,

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, as someone who is very opposed to eugenics

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and very disturbed by its mainstreaming and how increasingly like

0:43:56.600 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 2>openly accepted and disgusted is et cetera, Like, I'm not

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 2>sure what the right way is to react to something

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 2>like this that does, in my view, intentionally try to

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 2>like play with those themes, because what they wanted is

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the attention of the controversy. But then are you just

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 2>supposed to like not say anything. When these sorts of

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 2>things and themes are being mainstreamed in the culture, it's

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 2>to me, it's like a catch twenty two.

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 5>So I interpreted the Sidney Sweeney has great genes LinkedIn

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 5>posts we're really going deep on this that we just

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 5>had up on the screen, this would be my counterpoint.

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 5>I interpreted that as Sidney Sweeney's sort of controversy for

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 5>a long time has been whether or not she's mid,

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 5>which is just a ridiculous controversy. She's beautiful, but the

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 5>like that's been the thing about Sidney Sweeney that everybody's like, oh,

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 5>she's mid. People like her because she has you know,

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:52.360
<v Speaker 5>fill in the blank. And that's where you know, the

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 5>entire appeal of Sidney Sweeney is wrapped up in And

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 5>so I think what they're talking about when they say

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 5>they're kind of going down the hammers panning down Sidney

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 5>Sweeney's full body, is her saying like, that's why they're

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 5>talking about genes in a j E.

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 4>A ns ad is like, Sidney Sweeney is actually.

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Pretty pretty hot, and Sidney Sweeney is willing to take

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 5>you up on this conversation about whether or not, she's

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 5>mid and she's willing to just like kind of bear

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.839
<v Speaker 5>it all even if she's clad in gene So that's

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 5>my interpretation of what they say they're like being quote

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 5>unquote cheeky about in the ad, is that I still

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 5>think that a mainstream brand wanting to be affiliated with

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 5>white supremacy or eugenicism. As much as I do share

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 5>your concerns about seeing people like Nick Quentas go massively

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 5>viral and have whatever pole he has with gen Z,

0:45:48.800 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 5>as much as I genuinely share those concerns and also

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 5>share the concerns about eugenicism when you look at what's

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 5>happened and this is probably something that we disagree on,

0:45:57.360 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 5>but if you look at what's happened in places like Iceland,

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 5>for example, where they use new you know, testing technology

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 5>on unborn kids and basically get rid of down syndrome, Like,

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:10.759
<v Speaker 5>I actually think that eugenics is a serious question that

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 5>confronts US as a society right now. But yeah, I mean, yeah,

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 5>like I don't disagree with that, I share that, I

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:19.240
<v Speaker 5>still just think it's far fetched that a mainstream American

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:23.439
<v Speaker 5>brand would want to eagerly affiliate itself, even if it's

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 5>just to create buzz with white supremacy or eugenics or

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 5>neo Nazism, as some people have said.

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 4>They have the eagle in the brand.

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:35.759
<v Speaker 5>And to you know, be talking intentionally about Aran Jenes

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:38.840
<v Speaker 5>in an ad goes right along with the quote American

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 5>eagle in their title and logo.

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 6>I just think it's all very far.

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:44.879
<v Speaker 2>I take it that far, okay, just to be clear,

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 2>that didn't even occur to me, But now I'm going

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 2>to think about it now. I mean, look at I mean,

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 2>paid advertising campaigns don't really get you very far these

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 2>days because people can click off, you can fast forward

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:58.920
<v Speaker 2>through your watching things. I mean, it's just like very

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 2>hard to get people to pay attention to your brand.

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 2>So what better to get you attention than a beautiful

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:08.719
<v Speaker 2>woman plus a little race?

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 7>I Q.

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:13.439
<v Speaker 2>Controversy with plausible deniability, like they're never gonna come, oh yeah,

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 2>we were like flirting with you, Jeda, They're never going

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:17.240
<v Speaker 2>to say that. But their stock price went up because

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 2>of that controversy.

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:20.320
<v Speaker 4>I think, because.

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:25.399
<v Speaker 2>Why is anyone talking about Sidney Sweeney's ad. It's only

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.359
<v Speaker 2>because I mean, you know, yes, she's had star power,

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. But the reason it got so much attention

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 2>is because of exactly this controversy, which these are not

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 2>stupid people, like I don't know, they you know, they

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 2>knew what they were doing with this, Come on, they knew.

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I still just think you need even.

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:46.359
<v Speaker 6>Your explanation too.

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:48.719
<v Speaker 2>By the way, that this is like a rebuttal to

0:47:48.719 --> 0:47:51.879
<v Speaker 2>the idea that she's mid the way she's if that's really,

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:54.960
<v Speaker 2>which I think that's a stretch, but if that's really

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 2>her argument is like, no, I'm not mid because I'm

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 2>of good genetic stock.

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 6>Like even that is disturbing.

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:03.360
<v Speaker 4>It's weird.

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, like that's what I just think. It's so weird, and.

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm yeah, I mean, it's not weird if you realize

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:15.839
<v Speaker 2>that what they're doing is intentionally touching on something that

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 2>is again justifiably like Foreboden, I mean, and you know,

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:22.840
<v Speaker 2>has been for a long time pushed out the mainstream

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and is now like back being mainstream.

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 5>If you look at public polling, like across the board,

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 5>the American people are very anti racist, maybe not in

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:35.280
<v Speaker 5>the candy sense, but like race relations in the United

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 5>States have come remarkably far, and it's not as though

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 5>the American public. While there are some people on the

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 5>fringes that may be energized by Flints and whomever else,

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't behoove a major brand, like you don't have

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 5>to even be a smart marketing executive.

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 6>But it is behooving them. They are behooved.

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 5>And I don't think people are watching the ad. But

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:58.399
<v Speaker 5>your point is that they're being behooved by the controversy

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 5>created by the ad. And it's not that American Eagle

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.320
<v Speaker 5>supports eugenics and white supremacy.

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 6>Oh, that they got attention.

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 2>That no, no publicity is bad publicity. I mean, this

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 2>is the secret of Donald Trump's success and his realization

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 2>that like I mean he even said this about like

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:15.719
<v Speaker 2>Doug Bergram when he picked him for Secretary of the Interiors,

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Like yeah, he just doesn't you know, he's not controversial

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 2>enough so he can't get attention.

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:21.360
<v Speaker 6>This is the attention economy.

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 2>The way to get attention isn't to just like, you know,

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:26.799
<v Speaker 2>have another ad with the beautiful women women. There are

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:30.920
<v Speaker 2>a million other ads that have other similar like beautiful stars.

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 2>The way to get attention is to spark a conversation.

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:37.239
<v Speaker 2>We're not covering the Beyonce Levi's ad. Are we No,

0:49:37.280 --> 0:49:39.760
<v Speaker 2>we're covering this one because they played with race science

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 2>and eugenics, and that's why we're talking about it.

0:49:42.920 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 5>I think they played with it. I think intentionally they

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:46.799
<v Speaker 5>played with This is where we disagree. I think they

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:49.359
<v Speaker 5>played with The entire pun was about Sidney Sweeney being

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 5>hot or not, and that's when they say they're going

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 5>she said she wants to go far. It's that and

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:57.280
<v Speaker 5>I think it was like obviously a very strange ad,

0:49:57.320 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 5>but their stock is going up because people like the ad,

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:02.879
<v Speaker 5>like Sidney Sweeney and the jeans. They look great and

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:06.360
<v Speaker 5>American Eagle is a sendate because they have a young

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:09.799
<v Speaker 5>star like Sydney Sweeney repping them. It used to be

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:13.840
<v Speaker 5>by the way Dawson's Creek. I think they outfitted everybody

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 5>on on Dawson's Creek. Yeah, I'm pretty sure a while

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 5>they did. But anyways, well, they have a history of

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:21.920
<v Speaker 5>sort of partnering with I mean, for a young brand

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 5>like that, we're not going to agree in this, Crystal.

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:28.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm just my last piece is I will say even

0:50:28.280 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 2>your explanation to be is very eugenicsy, that you would

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:33.440
<v Speaker 2>be like, I am hot because I come from the right,

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 2>genetic stock is.

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:37.319
<v Speaker 5>But that is I mean, like people are hot because

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 5>of their like that either like people. But to be fair,

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 5>like it's like the science of whether or not people

0:50:43.560 --> 0:50:45.800
<v Speaker 5>are attractive to other people comes down to facial symmetry,

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:46.800
<v Speaker 5>which is genetic.

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't like any like.

0:50:48.680 --> 0:50:50.959
<v Speaker 5>I hope we don't start tinkering with genetics.

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I like, it's a weird thing to say. That's a

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 2>weird thing to say. Is like, no, I can, I

0:50:58.040 --> 0:51:01.240
<v Speaker 2>can prove genetically, but I'm.

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm not mid you because that.

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:06.920
<v Speaker 6>Is but that makes sense, but.

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I know I do.

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 5>I actually think that helps my argument because on social

0:51:09.680 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 5>media there have been deep, deep analyzes done on Sidney

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:18.600
<v Speaker 5>Sweetey's like facial symmetry over the years. So yeah, I mean,

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 5>I like people have literally been debating this, which is

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:24.400
<v Speaker 5>completely insane. Maybe that's our next debate is Sydney Sidney

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:27.040
<v Speaker 5>Sweeney mid but maybe we agree on that we don't

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:27.680
<v Speaker 5>even have that beata.

0:51:27.680 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't think.

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think she's not mid. Like, I'm actually disgusted

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:32.799
<v Speaker 2>by this. It's like such a common thing, not just

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 2>with Sidney Sweeney, of taking some like absolutely flawlessly gorgeous

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 2>woman and then picking one photo of her where like

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:41.759
<v Speaker 2>she's not at her best and being like she I

0:51:41.760 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 2>don't even forget it. She's so mid it's like, you know,

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:47.440
<v Speaker 2>fuck off. Like she's a beautiful woman, like just stop,

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 2>just stop. And it's always like some guy who looks terrible,

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:56.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, and is like overweight and could never have

0:51:56.360 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 2>a prayer of being with this woman who's posting this

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:03.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of so yeah, that that particular conversation, whether it's

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Sidney Sweeney or many other beautiful women, is kind of

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 2>disgusting to me.

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:09.759
<v Speaker 5>This is what happens when Ryan goes on vacation for

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 5>a week to take over the show with debate of right,

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 5>you know who would have been really excited for this

0:52:15.200 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 5>debate when Sager would have loved this well.

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I did debate with Sager off off air on this.

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Of course he thinks my view is ridiculous. But there

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 2>you go.

0:52:24.719 --> 0:52:26.240
<v Speaker 6>Many in many cases.

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:30.800
<v Speaker 5>Many such cases. We can continue this conversation on Friday.

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 5>Of course, Sager will be back in with Crystal tomorrow.

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:36.439
<v Speaker 4>Thanks everyone for tuning in.

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 5>As a reminder, if you want to get those interviews,

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 5>like the great conversation that Sager and Crystal had with

0:52:43.160 --> 0:52:46.320
<v Speaker 5>Senator Lissa Slotkin yesterday, headlines all over the world.

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:47.760
<v Speaker 4>You can become a member.

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 5>If you want to help support the work that makes

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:52.279
<v Speaker 5>those interviews possible, you can become a member of at

0:52:52.320 --> 0:53:06.840
<v Speaker 5>breakingpoints dot com