WEBVTT - Selects: The Rubik's Cube Episode

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, it's me Josh and for this week's select

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I've chosen our August two thousand nineteen episode I'm one

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of the best selling toys of all time, the Rubik's Cube.

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>It's an engaging episode on an unlikely global trend sprung

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>from a Hungarian architects beautiful mind. So enjoy. Welcome to

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you should know, a production of I Heart Radio. Hey,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you're welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, and there's

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Charles W. Chuck Bryant, Jerry's over there, and we're cubing

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it up with Rubic the Cube. Did you see um

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>that cartoon, Rubic the Amazing Cube? Did you come across that? And? Okay,

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I I feel like we are um well within our

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>rights as far as fair use goes, since we are

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about this, to at least play the highly disturbing

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>but also st hugely cute voice of Rubic the Amazing Cube.

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Can I play this real quick? Sure? Okay? That is it?

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>It is awfully unusual, especially when you see this cube

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they just basically took do you remember the goblin face

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on maximum overdrive on that on the front of that

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>semi sort of it's kind of like a cuter version

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of that that they put onto a Rubik's Cube, put

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>some feet on it, and then gave it superpowers. That's

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Rubic the Amazing Cube. So back to Rubic, Chuck. Yeah,

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of hard to believe that it took

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>until two thousand fourteen for this thing to be granted

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>National Toy Hall of Fame inductee status. Uh. It seems

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>like it would have been much sooner than that because

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they have sold hundreds and hundreds of millions of Rubik's

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Cube since I had one. I still have one. I

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>could do it at one point. Oh really, Yeah, I

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>could do it in a couple of minutes. Wow, Chuck,

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm impressed. I had no idea. Yeah, I can still do.

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I can still do one side and like the top

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>row surrounding that side on all sides, and that's where

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I completely forget. Oh, I see, So you couldn't do

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it in a couple of minutes now you just have

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you could in the past. Yeah when I was nine. Okay, Um,

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm impressed. I've never been able to solve a Rubik's Cube.

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I've never been sucked in enough to um like, really

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>spend a significant amount of time. But um I was

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>playing with my niece's Rubik's Cube the other day studying

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>for this, and um I was like, yeah, I could

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>see how somebody would become obsessed with this kind of

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>thing for sure. Yeah, it was fun and it was

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, to call it all the rage as an understatement.

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>It was one of the most popular toys of all time,

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and then in by a math enthusiast in Hungary, an

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>architect professor named er No Rubik. Appropriately enough, they named

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>him after the cube. That's right. And if you don't

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>know what we're talking about, it seems weird to describe

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a Rubik's Cube, but we'll probably be taking a task

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>if we do not. I would say, just come out

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>from under the rock that you've been living under. But

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we may have some young listeners who don't even know

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>what this thing is, this piece of eighties ephemera, even

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>though it's not ephemera because they're still pretty popular. But

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it is a cube made up of twenty six little

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>mini cubes called cubs, which is kind of a cute

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>little name. I think. So you're not as cute as

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Rubic the Amazing Cube, but yeah, little cubs and they're

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in a three inch by three inch by three inch

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>well that's not quite true, a three by three by

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>three grid, eventually creating a cube that measures two point

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>two five inches or five point seven centimeters per side. Right,

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And so what there's six six cube faces because it's

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a cube, and each face has a different color. There's orange, blue, green, yellow, white,

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and red and um. When you when you mix these

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>things up, it's just a jumble, a riot of different

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>colors like you've never seen your life. But the point

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is to move these cubes around through the eighteen different

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>ways you can move any given cube, um, so that

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the colors are lined up, all the colored

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>cubes are all the same on each face. And it

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds easy, friends, it is not easy, not at all.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe for some people it's easy, but for the

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of us, normal focus normis, it is not easy

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in any way, shape or form. No, it is not.

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh And in fact, they even suggest that you read

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>about how to solve the Rubik's cube. It is the

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>very rare individual that can literally just figure here it

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>out without any help at all. Um, that's really tough

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to do. So it's not like you're not a cheat.

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>If you look at like how to solve the Rubik's

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>cube and then memorize these patterns and practice them. That's

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>sort of the point, right, Yeah, like go look it

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>up like it's fine. No one will will get mad

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>at you for that, because it's no fun to never

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>solve a puzzle. Well, that's why I think I've never

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>gotten sucked in. I was like, I'm not even there's

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>no way I'm gonna possibly stumble across this, and I

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>just don't think like this. My spatial reasoning is terrible.

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm not great at math. I'm color blind. Everything just

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>looks white. You. No, it's really not. I can't discern

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>squares from from circles. It's just I'm off. So um. Originally,

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rubik's cube was called the magic cube, and it

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>was invented, like you said, by Erno Rubik, who was Hungarian.

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So it was originally called the Beavish Kotzka, which is

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>magic cube, and the Hungarian means butt head. I believe

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it does. The magic butt head was Bevish and butt head.

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, nice man, It's like, where's he going with

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this after all these years? It's good. No, I didn't,

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>but I was like, I'm I'm going with this, Chuck.

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I trust him and I paid off. So Mr Rubik

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>got his Hungarian patent on the mechanical design of this

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>in nine and it was in Hungary only for a while. Uh,

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and it did pretty well and hungry. Um, but that's

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of where it stayed. It was. Uh. It was

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>because of the politics of the time and the fact

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that it was hungry. It was not super easy to

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>get a an American patent or to bring it over

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and market it here in the West, so it was

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty much a Hungarian local sensation for it's early like

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>probably first year. Yeah, he had like a Hungarian toy

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer make like ten thousand of them, but he wasn't

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 1>happy with him, so he cut the runoff at five thousand.

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So there were five thousands of these things floating around

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Budapest and and maybe Hungry in general. And it was

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>just total serendipity that there was a guy named Tibor Laxi.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm quite sure that's not exactly how you say

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>his last name, but that's how it's how it spelled.

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It's probably like Lucia or something like that. But um,

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>t Bor, I'm I just love that name. It's a

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>great name. Um. He was an entrepreneur who had left

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Hungry and moved to Austria, so he had really developed

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.239
<v Speaker 1>a taste for capitalism. While he happened to be visiting

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>back home in Budapest when he was at a restaurant

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and he noticed a waiter playing with the Beavish kotska,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the magic cube, and um, he said, you there, what

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is that? And uh, he said, well, it's the Beavish kotzka.

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>How about I sell it to you for a dollar?

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And I believe he bought that for a dollar, played

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>around with it for a minute. It was like this

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>could be big. So he found out who invented it,

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and he scheduled a meeting with Erno Rubic. Yeah, and

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he would later on that he that Erno Rubik had

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with why he decided to get

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>into business with him. Here's his quote. He said, when

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Rubik first walked into the room, I felt like giving

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>him some money. He looked like a beggar. He was

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>terribly dressed. You gotta remember this guy's a professor, so

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not known for their sharp attire. He was terribly

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>dressed and he had a cheap Hungarian cigarette hanging out

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of his mouth. But I knew I had a genius

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on my hands, and I told him we could sell millions.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he was right. Oh man, was he ever right?

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>He understated it? Actually, um the t Boar, I'm just

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna call him t Boar. He took this magic cube

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and he started going to toy fairs. Uh, And I

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>think he struck out at a few of them. But

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>he really hit it out of the park at the

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Nuremberg Toy Fair when he met a toy expert who

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>had connections with Ideal Toy company. Remember Ideal back in

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the day. I think I do for sure. I'm pretty

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>sure they made that um the the uh what was

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the daredevil's name, Evil kin? I think they made the

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Evil kinevil stunt bike. You know what's funny is um

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they make those now for other they have there's like

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>an incredible stunt bike with plastic girl. It's the same

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>exact function. We have one in our house and you

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>load it up and crank it and there she goes.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it the exact same mold? They just put like

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>different pain on it or something like that knockoff toys? Man,

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's slightly different. Uh, in its design, but it's clearly

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>like the same exact toy. So at the Nuremberg Toy Fair, Uh,

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Tibor runs into the guy from Ideal and they end

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>up purchasing it. They purchased the rights to this, the

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>global rights, and they they they basically sign up to

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>create a million Rubik's cubes. Yeah, also we should say

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it this toy fair. He did a pretty smart thing.

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Instead of like buying a booth, he just came and

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>worked the floor with Rubik's cubes and got this like

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>ground buzz going by walking around and giving these things

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to people, and like that's genius. Like for something like this,

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the perfect way to pique someone's curiosity is not

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to have some flashy uh like spinning giant Rubik's cube,

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is to actually get in the hands of people walking

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>around the floor. Especially if you say, I'm Tibor, let's party.

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Should I bet you want to call it t boards Cube?

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty good name. He probably did, although he was

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>smart because I remember originally it was called the Magic Cube.

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>At some point. If it wasn't t Boor, it was

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Ideal who said we're gonna rename this the Rubik's Cube.

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure erno Rubik was like, oh, okay, I

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>guess if you insist. I wonder if he was into

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it or not, or if he pushed forward, or if

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>he was like, I'm not really into that, but if

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you think it'll sell cubes, That's what I'm guessing he

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>probably did. I don't think he was going to stand

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in the way of it, but he was not like

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>vying for or by any means. That's my impression. But

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just totally making that up, but that I have

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the same impression, which means that if you put our

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>two in persons together, it equals fact. So Ideal sells

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million Rubik's cubes in the first two years.

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>They just signed up to sell one million. They sold

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million in two years. Yeah, I mean, I'm

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>sure they had problems keeping up with production. Uh. Some

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>of the accolades and eight and eighty one at won

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the UK's Toy the Year Award two years running. Um

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>In eighty two, there were five books about solving it

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on the New York Times bestseller list, one of which

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I owned. I owned the classic The Simple Solution to

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>the Rubik's Cube by James G. Norris. He was a

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>chemistry student at Stanford And get this, dude, this book

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>was the number one best selling book of nine one period.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>He sold six point seven million books and it is

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>still the fasting selling book in the history of Bantam Books.

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? Can you believe that out of all

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the books that year, that was the number one? I can,

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>because that really kind of underscores just how nuts the

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>not just America, the world went for Rubik's Cube, that

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the number one selling book was a book about solving

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the toy. That that that was it. Yeah, they had

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sold five hundred million of them by the time rolled around.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So so talking about the books though for another second.

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>At one point the number one, two, and four positions

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>on the New York Times bestseller list where all Rubik's

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Cube Solution books. Three he was probably Stephen King or

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>something probably, and one of those books was written by

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>a twelve year old named Patrick Bossart called You Can

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Do the Cube, which is pretty adorable if you think

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>about it, and Christians later made a movie called Gleaming

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cube, one of my all time favorites, which had

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with Rubik's Cubes. As it turns out,

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it was about skateboarding. That's right. Um, So there's a

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>just a craze going on around the world, like everyone

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>is into the Rubik's cube. Everyone's buying one. They sold

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like I've seen anywhere from three hundred and fifty million.

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>The highest I've seen is six hundred million. They sold

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a ton of these things, hundreds and hundreds of millions

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of them. Are those are the official too? There were

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>plenty of knockoffs. Sure, there was books on the New

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>York Times bestseller list about this. It was featured in Times, Scientific,

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>American News, Scientists. Um. There was a paper that was

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>printed in the New England Journal of Medicine that talked

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>about cubists thumb, which is a real thing. It's a

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>type of tendonitis in your thumb that you get in

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>your non dominant hand because that's the hand that you

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>used to stabilize the Rubik's cube. And so the edge

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>of the cube pressing into the heel of your thumb

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>where it meets the rest of your thumb um, that

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>could create tendonitis. For people who were staying up for

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>days on end just playing with this thing, trying to

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>beat this puzzle. There was a craze like like no other.

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I say, we take a break, okay, uh, and we

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>come back and we talk about uh Mr Rubick, or

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's a doctor. I'm gonna call him Dr Rubik,

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and how he created the mechanics of this puzzle. Alright,

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So supposedly Dr Rubik, surely he's a doctor. I would

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>let's call him Professor Ruby because he was definitely an

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>architecture professor in a math genius. Actually though, I'm I'm

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>with you, he's got to be doctor, all right, Professor

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Dr Rubik. Uh supposedly was not even trying to create

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this puzzle in I'm sorry seventy four when he first

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>started out um, as legend has it, he was trying

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to create a mathematical model for three D design class,

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>which makes sense considering his job. Other people say, no,

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>he was just really kind of guy to like to tinker.

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>He was fascinated by geometry and shapes, and he was

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to just solve a problem of mechanics in three dimensions.

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But according to the Toy Hall of Fame, he was

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>very much trying to invent a puzzle. Uh. And that

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>may just be folklore. Yeah, he he knew what he wanted.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to make this three by three cube that

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>was made up of smaller cubes that could all like

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>interact and twister around like he had the idea for

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Rubik's cube, which was step one, but step two

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>was a doozy, and that was figuring out how to

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>invent a mechanical solution to make this thing work the

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>way he wanted it to, and apparently was um. There

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty good article on mental floss by a

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>guy named Noah Davis who recounted that um. One day,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Rubic was walking down the Danube alongside the Danube in

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Budapest and looked down and noticed that there was just

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a pile of nice, polished rounded river rocks and thought,

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got it. I've been thinking about a cube. Everything's

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>got to be a cube. But what if I added

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a sphere to the mix two and that these things

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>rotated around usphere. That would give the freedom of motion

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that I need to make this thing work. And that

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>was that That that that was the solution to the puzzle,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>as it were. Yeah, I mean, if you're like me

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and probably lots of other kids in the early eighties,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you took your Rubik's cube apart at some point, did you.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I never I never saw one, and lots of video

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>on this. Yeah, oh yeah, I've got a screw driver

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>out in pretty short order and put those things apart. Uh.

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of cool when you look at the

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you take all those cubs out, you

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>get down to the center and the three x s

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>um and they have each one is tipped with two

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>opposing center cubis. It's kind of cool looking. And then

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense how all these things fit together and

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 1>how it works. Yeah, another way to think about it

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 1>is just think about like a sphere a ball, and

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>then you've got six arms sticking out in in um

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>at right angles from it, so that it forms a

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional plus side plus signed and at the end

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>of each one of these arms is a cube, a

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>colored cube. And though that's the skeleton of the thing.

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And then what what Erno Rubik figured out was that

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>that's all that needed to be attached to the center.

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>You could make the other cubes attached to those those

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>face cubes a center cubes qubis um. You could make

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>some cubes qubs attached to those cubs, and then other

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>cubs attached to the other cubs, and then they will

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>all kind of rotate around each other, but they're all

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>really rotating on three different axis coming out of that sphere.

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a gene like this guy has gotten like if

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he started a craze and is you know, kind of

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>viewed as this great inventor for the toy like math, physics, architecture,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>um like in the in a number of different fields.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>He's ugansical engineering for sure. Yeah, he's viewed as just

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a god in some senses for for cracking this this

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>problem and creating this three dimensional structure that actually works

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in in reality that people can learn and study from.

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So he's figured out this the mechanics of

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it all, but it's still not a puzzle yet until

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he applies these colors. That's what makes it a puzzle, because,

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like we said at the beginning, the idea is that

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>you have all the colors on each side matching one another.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>He applies these colored stickers all over, mixes and twisted

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit, and he's like, I've invented the cube.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.239
<v Speaker 1>And he's like, wait a minute, I don't know how

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to solve the puzzle. So he actually had built this thing,

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>stickered it up and looked at it, I imagine, with

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 1>some level of accomplishment, and then realized that the biggest,

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>probably uh, the hardest thing to do in this whole

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>process still lay in front of him, which was because

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>there were no books out at this point. Right. He

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>invented it. So he had to figure out how to

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>solve his own puzzle. And it took him a while.

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It took him a month from what I saw, Yeah,

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine he worked on this pretty much NonStop

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>to figure this thing out. He he did, and he

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>would like write down like the different different moves, combination

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of moves which now they're called algorithms. Um, it's just

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>types of moves that if you do them in a

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>specific sequence, will solve a specific jumbled Rubik's cube. Right, Um,

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So he wrote them down. He kind of kept track

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of it, and that was like the first the first, um,

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 1>first time anyone had kind of applied analysis to this.

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But it would not be the last. Obviously. He's the

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>New York Times bestseller. His shows by the reason why

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's so difficult to solve a Rubik's cube just by

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>happenstance is that just the sheer number of possible configurations

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>of the cube. Right, each face has nine cubs, and

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>there's six um faces, so there's fifty four cubs, but

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>they all relate to one another, and so if you

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>move one, that's one configuration. If you move it another direction,

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.239
<v Speaker 1>that's another configuration, and so on and so on, and

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>so with these fifty four cubs, Chuck, are you ready

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for this? Yes? The possible number of configurations is forty

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>three quintillion, two hundred and fifty two quadrillion, three trillion,

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and seventy four billion, four hundred and eighty

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>nine million, eight hundred and fifty six thousand possible configurations

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of a Rubik's cube. And one of them one is

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the right one where all six faces are all the

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>same color. Ubi's just one. So just doing it accidentally,

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>your chances are one in about forty three trillion that

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>you're going to stumble upon that right combination that's right,

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty amazing, don't you think. Yes? And by

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, I think I said in their fifty four

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>there's twenty cubes. I believe there's fifty four faces. Yeah,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a deal. Each QB has three sides

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>or two sides, depending on if it's a corner or

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>an edge or one if it's in the center right,

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of confusing. But but nine times six,

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>so nine nine squares or nine different colors squares times

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>six faces is fifty four I think fifty four faces

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>something qubis This is how good at Matthew Man. It's

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really because it's so funny, because it's such a

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>simple little thing. But once you start really breaking it down,

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you're like, we could make this super confusing if we

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>dried hard, for sure. But what people have figured out

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is that they're they're like, you may have like a

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>one and forty three quintillion chance of stumbling across the

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>right configuration by accident. But what people have figured out

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is that there are combination of moves like you know,

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>um uh front right up, up twice and then down.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>That's that's an algorithm. And if you apply that to

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a certain kind of scrambled a certain configuration of a

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>scrambled Rubik's cube, it will bring it back to solved.

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And so people have spent a lot of time developing algorithms.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 1>And that's why erno Rubik was originally doing when he

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, if I do this this and this,

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it will make it solved. And he wrote that down

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>that's what's called an algorithm. Yeah, and I remember in

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the book, like each book had their own little shorthand,

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess, but I remember the one that I had.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>It definitely had the algorithms all spelled out with like

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>shorthand for what each move was called. So it would

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of look like a math problem made out of letters, right,

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like I saw you for up and D for down.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Makes a lot of sense. But then also, um, you

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>can you know there you can move something to the right.

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>You can twist one of the rows of cubes to

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the right, but you can also twist it to the

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>left too, So I saw an apostrophe after like l

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>apostrophe would be counterclockwise left, and then you can add

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a number two, so you do that twice, which is

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>really a d eighty degree counterclockwise turn. So interesting, it

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>really is kind of interesting. It like at first, you know,

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>when I first um went over this article the first time,

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>just taking it in, it's like, how this is pretty neat.

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>But the Rubik's cube I found has many many layers

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to it, and you can really keep going deeply into it. Well,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 1>beyond just playing with the cube and trying to solve it. Like,

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of math involved. There's a lot of

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>physics and mechanics involved. You. I mean, you can get

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>us sucked into it as you like, Buddy, just try

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>not to go insane like Erno Rubik did. He did

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>not when he set that that building on fire. He uh.

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting though, how big of a hit this became.

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Sort of it flew in the face of a lot

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of um like sort of rules of the toy industry

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and that it didn't make sounds um It didn't have

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>interchangeable parts. It didn't have things that you could sell

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>along with it, like, you know, clothing. You couldn't. I

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>guess you could dress your little Rubik's cube, but then

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a special relationship with it, I guess, so

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you could dress it up and be like him Ruby.

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>It didn't have batteries. It was never like well, I

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>guess it appeared on a TV show. Was that a

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>TV show? Yeah it was. It was a Saturday morning

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>cartoon that came on right before pac Man, which was

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>honestly one of the all time great cartoons. Ever. Yeah,

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it just it wasn't marketable though. Like you would think

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>a toy would be. The reason that it appealed and

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>endured is because it is a real challenge and you

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>get a real sense of reward once you've done it right,

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and that really hooks people. It really does hook people.

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And again there's like not there's no shame in going

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and looking up algorithms to solve UM Rubik's cubes, like

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>just processes. And in fact, if you start doing any

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of research on rub excutes, you'll find like there's

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>actually specific UM methods of attack that people suggest for

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>for beginners to start with. There's one called the White

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Cross method classic, which is um entails eating a handful

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of white Cross gas station speed staying up for four

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:33.239
<v Speaker 1>days until you until you get done. It's actually you

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>start with the edge pieces and then you move to

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the corner pieces, putting them all in place, and then

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you um go on from there starting with the white

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>face of the cube. That's right, And uh, this toy

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was a big hit anyway, but it it is endured,

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh not because of stocking stuffers or nostalgia, but it

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is endured all these years later because of competition. Yeah,

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>so let's take a break now and we'll talk about

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>speed cubing right after this. Well, now we're on the

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 1>road driving in your truck. Want to learn a thing

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or two from Josh Man. Chuck gets stuff you should know,

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, Okay, So the Rubik's Cube comes out in

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the world basically in night and the next year, the

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>very next year, countries around the world we're holding national

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>championships for um solving Rubik's cubes as fast as you

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>possibly could. It's called speed cubing. Yes. And then a

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>year after that they all got together, all the champions

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of the countries for the very first Rubik's Cube World

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Championship in the best which is kind of cool. UM.

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's what has kept people going for so long,

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>because there there's people are still trying to beat these records.

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw a kid and it's kind of hard to

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>tell what the top times because they list the top

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>times in these competitions, but I saw a kid on

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube do it in like six seconds or four or

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>five seconds. I saw one do it in three point

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>four seven. Yeah, I don't know how like how it's

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>officially judged though. There's a timer UM and one of

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>those there's one of those mats that you keep your

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>hands on. But like, why does it say that that

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 1>those aren't world records? Then I don't know. That's what

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw was the world record was in two thousand eighteen.

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>It was three point four seven seconds by U shang

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Yu shang Do sorry of China. So you've seen other

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>things listed. I just don't know if there's like the

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>bodies aren't speaking to one another or what. Maybe it's

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that was a a non championship uh time, or even

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>even maybe it was a qualifier or something like that.

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't count as the world record unless you

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>get whatever time is done at the world championship that's

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>considered the world record. Who knows. It's crazy to see

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>how fast these kids and it's usually kids that win

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>um I guess with their little nimble fingers and brain sponges. Uh,

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy how fast they're doing. It doesn't look real.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>It looks like some sort of weird faked video. Yeah.

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And here's the other thing too. I'm glad you mentioned

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>brain sponges because it is like a um an intellectual pursuit,

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>like from the beginning of this this toys release in

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like they win a different route, like you're saying it

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't require batteries. It was you know, um, it doesn't

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>make a noise or anything like that. So they went

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a different route in advertising it and said this is

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>an intelligent game, like I'm sure Isaac Newton discovered gravity,

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>but could he solve a Rubik's cube? You know, So

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they really kind of play that up, and it's true

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>because these kids who are solving or people who are

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>solving Rubik's cubes super fast. It's not just like look

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>or their fingers are just moving forward them. They have

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>memorized hundreds, if not thousands, of these algorithms and have

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>gotten to the point where they can look at a

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>cube and figure out which algorithm is going to solve

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it the fastest, and then when the time starts, they

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>can also move their fingers really really quick. And that's

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>how they're getting these amazing times. It's not just speed

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and dexterity, it's also knowing what algorithm is going to

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>work best. Yeah, for sure, you know, it died out

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly. Like most fad toys, Um, once you sell

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these, you don't need another one unless

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you break yours or something. So it's kind of one

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of those things where, and which is again why it

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>flew in the face of the toy industry because they

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>couldn't sell ancillary products alongside it. But uh, you know,

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it died out pretty quickly and the champion and ship

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>uh two was the last one for about twenty years

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>until the Internet comes along and all of a sudden

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>there are people posting faster times than ever before than

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years earlier. And in two thousand three UM in Canada,

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a speed cuber named Dan Gosby who organized

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a competition in Toronto, and this is where they're getting

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.959
<v Speaker 1>it down to, like twenty seconds, and they have different

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>categories like blindfolded, fewest moves, one handed, feet feet feet dude.

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Last year someone did it in twenty three seconds by foot,

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>which was about the quickest time by hand at the

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>first competition. Yes, and it took them longer to figure

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>out that they had solved it than it did to

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>actually solve it because they had to use a stick

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to turn the Rubik's cube over because they had used

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>their feet to solve it. And I think, uh, when

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you participate, it didn't pay off as well as I

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>thought it would sorright, Uh, you get fifteen seconds to

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the cube over. Um they are all started, uh,

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>like the cubes are all started the same with like

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a computer generated random scramble. It's just fair. You get

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that fifteen seconds, you check it out, you set it

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>on your mat, and then you go And it's just

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like I said, it's amazing to see these things done

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.959
<v Speaker 1>in like sub four seconds. Yeah, because they're they're i mean,

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>their hands actually do kind of blur, like you can't

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>really follow where their hands are at any given time.

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>They barely touch the rubrics cube. And they're using to

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>be fair, they're using specialized speed cubes. They're not just

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>using like off the shelf rubrics cubes. We'll talk about those,

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, talk about them. Sure. Yeah. So so people

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>go to the trouble of getting a speed cube. It's like,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can get one for you can get

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a good one from what I understand, for about seventies

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy five bucks. And these things are literally well oiled

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>machines that are just super fast. Some of them use

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>magnets so that you can tell when they're snapped into place,

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and um, they move a lot more easily and quickly. Um.

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>There you can just look at and be like, that's

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a high end Rubik's cube right there. Yeah, Like you

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>can pay to get your cube serviced, uh and checked

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>out at speed cube shop. So someone will take it apart,

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a technician and they will look at each of those

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>little cubs for defects and like, has it got a

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>little bump here that will slow it down? They'll smooth

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that out, like you said, sometimes they use magnets, um.

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And one of the reasons for the magnets is it

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>creates that snap when a turn is completed. Because if

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you want to move these things really fast, you don't

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>want it to be you know, even if it's an

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>eighth of an inch out of whack, you're not gonna

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to turn it the other way. So you

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to snap and lock into place. Uh, you know

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you want. It's just amazing how how engineered these things

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have become. What in these speed cubing competitions, right well,

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean just to keep up, you've gotta you've gotta

0:32:58.000 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>get yourself a speed cube. If you showed up, like

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to an actual competition with just a regular Rubik's cubeb

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you'd be laughed out of place,

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>but they would they would certainly feel bad for you.

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>You know what they should do is like because you know,

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember them loosening up really well and getting faster

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just because you played with it more. Instead of giving

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone speed cubes and trying to get this ultra red

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Bull record, which they sponsored the events now by the way, Uh,

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>they should give everyone like out of the package. Make

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it as hard as possible. I agree. I think that

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>there would be some um, you know, preteens who are

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>really high strung that would cry if they were confronted

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>with that challenge, if they had to put their speed

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>cube down. Yeah, they'd be like, this is not fair.

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>No one prepared me in my life for this. I

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>did mention Red Bull because it was kind of controversial

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for many years. Uh. The Rubics World Championships uh were

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>co hosted by the World Cube Association with the support

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of the brand. But then clearly some money changed hands

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago. That was the Red Bull

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's Cube World Championship. Uh. You know, red Bull got involved,

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the brand, Rubic got involved, which means there was money

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>changing hands. You're really fascinated with that money changing hands,

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't too well? I mean sure, because it was I

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 1>think everyone saw it as for what it was, which was,

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, there's a corporate sponsor attached to it. Yeah,

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and that that is like a pretty important point because

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>like this was there was already a World Championship and

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>it was like a grassroots organization that had grown up

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and three and they were doing really well,

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden, fifteen years later, red

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Bull comes along attached to the Rubik's Brain is like,

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the way, nerds, this is the real one.

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And so apparently, Um, it was a there was a

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of controversy, like you were saying, but um, now

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they kind of coexist and the Red Bull Rubics sponsored

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>one changed their name from World Championship to World Cup

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>so that they don't step on each other's feet at all.

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about it, that's a pretty big

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>win for this grassroots world cubing association to to be

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>able to keep their original name and not have to

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>change their name. You know, Hats off to them. Hats

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>off indeed. So um, one of the uh, the the

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>things that I said about the Rubik's Cube Chuck is

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's got a lot of layers too, and

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of surprising math involved. Specifically, there is

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a kind of algebra called um group theory, and um

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the things that has long

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of fascinated mathematicians is that there is somewhere in

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 1>there a number of moves. There's an algorithm that has

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>or there's a number of moves associated with any number

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>of algorithms. Man, I'm making this way harder than it

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>actually is. Where it represents the maximum number of moves

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you would need to use to solve any configuration, any

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of the forty three quintillion configurations of a Rubics cube.

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>And some people figured out that this number must exist,

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and brother, they got obsessed with it. From two thousand ten,

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>some people almost set a building full of Rubik's cubes

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 1>on fire. Yeah, I mean they've really researched this stuff

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>to the point where, uh, like computer scientists are looking

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>into this. There was a guy named Thomas rakiki Um

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>who got that the upper limit down to twenty two moves,

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and this is like Google is helping him out with

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the processing power, so they call it God's algorithm. Uh.

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in the case of Rubik's cube. Um they

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>got down to twenty is where they landed, right, Yeah,

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>But God's algorithm can be used for any puzzle really,

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>uh you know? And that is and why do they

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>call it God's algorithm. It's what how God would solve

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the puzzle. So from what I saw is God's God's

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>number is that the maximum number of moves that God

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>would require to solve any configuration of the puzzle. Got

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a little confusing in this article because it's a bit

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of a brain trick. It's like the fewest moves, but

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a maximum number of moves right right exactly. It's

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to wrap your mind around. And then there's

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>actually fewer moves for other algorithms. So I saw God's

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>number is actually probably more like somewhere between nineteen and twenty.

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>But because there are algorithms out there that have to

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 1>be done in no less than twenty moves, that's still

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>God's number. And there's also the Devil's number I saw

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.879
<v Speaker 1>it too, which is the number of moves in an

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>algorithm that it would take to go through all forty

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>three plus quintillion um configurations before you saw it, which

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pretty good name for that one. Yeah,

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>now that's the one that they're on the trail of now.

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But they're they're done at twenty, right they are. But

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's interesting that that we're not

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>entirely certain. It's not like, okay, this has been proven,

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it's done. What the reason why they arrived at twenties

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>because they actually built an algorithm to try to solve

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>these algorithms. They taught an AI basically how to play

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's Cuba. They said, here's a Rubik's cubo teacherself and

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>then they had it play just just some mind numbing

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 1>number of different Rubik's cubes hands trying to solve it,

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and it kept coming up with twenty. And so it

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>came up with twenty enough times that they're like, well,

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:36.320
<v Speaker 1>our computer God has told us that twenty is the

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 1>is God's number. So there you have it. But we

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>no one, it wasn't proven, it wasn't solved. It was

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 1>just like, this thing is so so smart that we're

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go with twenty. So someone still working on

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 1>it then, probably, I guess, But I think I get

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the impression that they have moved on to the Devil's number. So,

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>as you would imagine, with the toy of this caliber,

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 1>they were bound to be other people saying they invented it,

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and battles would ensue. And of course this was the

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>case with the Rubik's cube. UH in ninety seven, when

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Ruby got his Hungarian patent for the Magic Cube, there

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>was another inventor named Larry Nichols who had already patented

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>something very similar in the US. Isn't that amazing? Yeah,

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this was in nineteen seventy two, but his was for

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a two by two by two cube by three by

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 1>three by three, still same concept. And at first he

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was like this is this is hilarious. You know, I

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:32.320
<v Speaker 1>had the same idea, and now it's become a national craze.

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of satisfying. And somebody said, do you have

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>any idea how much money you are losing out on

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 1>right now? You should sue? He said, oh, my gosh,

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I should sue. And I get the impression

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that either the company he worked for or the company

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>he sold the patent to really lead the charge in

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>suing for this patent infringement. Um. But he had a

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty good case. I mean, he had invented it and

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>patented it years before. It was just the number of

0:39:57.040 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>cubes involved was smaller. Yeah. I mean that was another

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 1>guy too, a guy named Frank Frank Fox thinking seventy four.

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>He actually did the three by three by three, but

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he let his patent laps, whereas Nichols did not. And

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>those people like you were talking about that he that

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>actually owned Nichols patent were called uh Molecular Research Corporation.

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>That sounds scary, yeah, and litigious, yeah, yeah, they do.

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So I want to point out, though, it's definitely worth

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>saying out right, there is no evidence, and I don't

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>think anyone's ever leveled in accusation that Erno Rubik stole

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:37.359
<v Speaker 1>this idea. It was just arrived at independently, and he

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:39.879
<v Speaker 1>was working behind the iron curtain at the time too,

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so the chances of any exposure are pretty low. It

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was just some people kind of came up with the

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>same idea at the same time, and Erno Rubis is

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>the one that hit the trite. A federal district court

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:55.919
<v Speaker 1>ruled in favor of Moleculan, but then in eighty six

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and appeals court overturned that, saying only that two by

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>two by two, you uh Rubik's cube, because they started

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>making different variations. Um, they made a smaller one that

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>they said in French. In fact, I remember now I

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>had a little guy on a car key for a

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>short time. Oh yeah, I remember that. I'm not mistaken.

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>But then in nineteen nine, another appeals court upheld the

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>previous appeals court decision. I should I should say. I

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 1>read an article by that guy, uh Nichols who had

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the original patent, and they were like, you know you,

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 1>I think they were suing for like fifty million or something,

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and there were you satisfied with the outcome? He said, yeah,

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I was satisfied. He's like, I got enough to put

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>both of my kids through Harvard, So I'm pretty happy

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>with that. And um, you know, like he invented this

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that he was able to send his kid through

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Harvard with. You know, yeah, that's always interesting when someone

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>wins something like that. But it wasn't like stolen from him, right,

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>It was just he had the patent first and they agreed.

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>You know What's what's even crazier that makes that story

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely insane. He had approached Ideal Toys with and

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they had not bought it, and then they went on

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>years later to buy um the the Erno Rubic version. Yeah,

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>they put out a bunch of difference. They made big ones,

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like the tiny ones I just talked about. I remember

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I had a snake. I did too, and I had

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>no idea what to do with that. I just played

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with it like it was a snake. I did the

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Yeah, I just twisted around stuff. I still

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you were supposed to do with that thing.

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I think eventually the snake would be put together in

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.359
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a three dimensional octagon or something if

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I remember, or hexagon. Yeah. I was way off, but yeah,

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know how to I didn't even try to learn.

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of played with it. I taught mine

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>did drink water. Mine drinks from a cup. It was

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:49.879
<v Speaker 1>very rough. Wickham uh Erno Ruby is still alive and well.

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>He lives in Hungary, still teaches architecture. Uh I imagine,

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 1>has a boatload of money. So he's founded some multiple

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 1>foundations for inventure. That's very cool. Yeah, he has a

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>bowload of money, so much so that his success story

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is considered by some to have been the thing that

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:13.879
<v Speaker 1>opened the gates to capitalism in Hungary. Amazing. Um. They

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>also made him the president of the Hungarian Engineering Academy

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's still I think, shows up once in a

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:24.439
<v Speaker 1>while to the World Championships and maybe the World Cup.

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He didn't seem like a very controversial type.

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Seems like a good guy. And if you really want

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to go crazy, if you've solved a ton of Rubik's cubes,

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but this has kind of made your nostalgic to try

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>something harder. They make a thirteen by thirteen by thirteen

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's Cube, and there's something else called the s Cube

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>as K E W B and it is I don't

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 1>even know what you're supposed to do with it. It's

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 1>like the Snake times a trillion to make. And there's

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:55.879
<v Speaker 1>also a movie called Cube, which is like math oh

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw that, Yeah, yeah, has nothing to do with

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Rubik's cubes. And there is uh, The Pursuit of Happiness

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:06.400
<v Speaker 1>where Will Smith gets a job as a stockbroker because

0:44:06.440 --> 0:44:09.399
<v Speaker 1>somebody sees him solve a Rubik's cuban something like two

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>minutes or less. And apparently while he was promoting that movie,

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>he solved one in less than a minute himself in

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>real life. You mean the movie The Pursuit of Halfwayness.

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Did they explain that in the movie. I'm sure I

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:27.439
<v Speaker 1>never saw it. I just always called it Halpwitness. Did

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you ever see that one where he was like super

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>depressed in his his colleagues at work, like just gaslight

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>him into thinking he's being visited by angels? No? I didn't.

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Did you see the one where he went he was

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 1>from West Philadelphia and he went to live with his

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>rich relatives. Yeah, I did, as he dressed very colorfully.

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>He was I think in bel Air. Uh well, was

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it Bell there? I think I was Santa Barbara? You're right, okay.

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh well, if you want to know more about Will Smith,

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you can type his aim into the search bar at

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com. And since I said Will Smith,

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it's time for listener mail. I've got a coconut tree correction. Hey, guys,

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>correction on something said during the episode The Cult of

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the Coconut when you guys talked about the culpa rishka.

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it's not pronounced that way. It is

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>pronounced culpa rushka. We were way off, all right, She says,

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>uh rushka or rushka depending on transliteration. Simply means tree

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 1>in Sanskrit, also always mispronounced by people in the West.

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Oh well, I don't feel that bad. Yeah,

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>exactly correct pronunciation is uh sounds screwed. Now she's saying

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.399
<v Speaker 1>sanscrit as always mispronounced. Oh oh, I see, so it's

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sand screwed sounds crute. That sounds like a French persons

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:02.839
<v Speaker 1>best I can convey, that's what she says. Wow. Okay, yeah,

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I've always said say script. This person is a real

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>really into words though, and very smart. Uh. Second, the

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 1>coconut tree is just one of the trees considered a

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you pronounce it again, college called cold cold

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:21.399
<v Speaker 1>cook scrow cock. There you getting, You nailed it. Not

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 1>because it is all you need to survive, though, but

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:26.800
<v Speaker 1>because every single part of the coconut tree is useful

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to humans, the bark, the leaves, the fibers, and of

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 1>course the coconuts in their entirety. This concept is tied

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>closely with why Indians culturally revere certain animals e g.

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Cow and plants and trees e g. Banyan and coconut. Okay,

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed on the podcast how you too often go

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 1>out of your way to correctly pronounce words or names

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:53.799
<v Speaker 1>in foreign languages like which is something I appreciate as

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 1>a bicultural, uh penta lingual individual. Perhaps you could explain

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 1>your efforts to include not just Western languages, but Eastern

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>languages too. After all, sal Screwed belongs to the same

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 1>language group as German. If you think about it, I

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.280
<v Speaker 1>think it would be true to the spirit of your show. Guys,

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:14.400
<v Speaker 1>keep up the good work. And that is from Ruta

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>our duty a did Ruta say, did she sign off

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>with later lamos? No? Thanks a lot, Ruta. Yeah, it's

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 1>not like we're like, oh, we'll only go to the

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>trouble of pronouncing something in German or French, which by

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, we don't very often, and we thought we

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>were pronouncing it correctly in the Eastern languages. So sorry, Ruda,

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what sand screwed. I had no idea,

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 1>not just us Chuck. Like a million people just learned that, Yeah,

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>close to a million. I agree. Well, thanks a lot again, Ruta.

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to get in touch with us,

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like Ruda did, you can go to stuff you Should

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Know dot com and check out our social links, or

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you can send us a good old fashioned email to

0:47:55.840 --> 0:48:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff podcast at iHeart radio dot com. Every radio Stuff

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 1>You Should Know is a production of I heart Radio.

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:14.239
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. H