WEBVTT - Epstein Backlash Could Fracture Trump’s Coalition + Could AOC Become President? + Will Israel Divide Democrats

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello, They're happy Thursday, and welcome to another episode of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast. In a few minutes kind of an

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I have an interesting conversation with Ben Smith. Some of

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you may remember Ben Smith from the BuzzFeed days, some

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of you may remember Ben Smith from Politico, but he's

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>also co founder of a fascinating still new, it's a

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of years old now, but still fairly new publication

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>called Semaphore. Their goal being to market to the two

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred million what is it? It's the excuse me more

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>than that, the I think seven hundred million English speaking

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>world is the goal. Two hundred million in the in

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the in a certain demographic group of English speakers around

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the world. But we talk a little bit of state

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of the media, a little bit of this state of

0:00:55.640 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>international media, a little bit. I find Semaphore extraordinarily helped

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>full in They have newsletters about every continent, the politics,

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.559
<v Speaker 1>the business of different continents, and I think their daily

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>newsletter on Africa and the Gulf States has made me

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a lot more informed than just reading

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>just trying to, you know, read the Economist or Financial

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Times or New York Times to try to keep track

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff. So I find it to be an

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>exceptional publication. I find Ben to be a fascinating He's

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>got a fascinating view of media in general. But he's

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a New York City guy, and so we spent a

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of time talking about Mom Donnie and the future

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of that race, what does it mean for New York.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>He is a New Yorker through and through, loves his city,

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>loves the history of the city. If you love New York,

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you're going to love this conversation with him. Before I

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>get to it, I got a few other things I

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>want to get to including I want to tell you

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>about an event that I would just participated in yesterday.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>It was about the local news crisis. That was an

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>event in the state of Michigan. This one is about

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the future of independence and whether there is a viable path.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And I moderated an interesting panel with the chair of

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>the Forward Party as well as sort of the chief

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>political analyst of the Independent Center, with the goal being

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to try to build an infrastructure. And that's what's interesting there.

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>It's an infrastructure. The goal is to try to build

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>an infrastructure to help independent candidates when they get swamped

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>at the end by big money, either from Republican super

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>PACs or Democratic superpacks. So they're trying to create an ecosystem,

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know the challenges of that, and I want

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to speak to that in a minute. But it is,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it is, it is. It is the story that won't

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>go away. It is the piece of toilet paper that

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is stuck on the bottom of Donald Trump's loafers, if

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you will, or I guess is a Floorsheim's shoes or

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is that he wears. I'm sure he doesn't

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>do Floorsheim And for those of you who know that brand,

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the throwback to that. But he can't shake Epstein anywhere.

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>And what's interesting is in fact that this independent event

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a few former members of Congress there. I was

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 1>talking with Red Ribbel, a former Republican Member of Congress

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>from Wisconsin who has basically left the Republican Party, and

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>he was speaking to some current members and he wasn't

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>naming names, but he was telling me about how important

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>this Epstein issue is to constituents in the very conservative districts.

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So what this really is so in sort of like

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>reality based land, Epstein is a curiosity of a story.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But in some of the deep red districts and in

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the deep and I've told you this, there's a piece

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Republican base that has been he sent I

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>call it's a form of grooming of sorts. I know

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that word is going to trigger some people, but they

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>have been conditioned is probably the better term to use.

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Some of you are not going to like that I

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>use that, and so conditioned is a better word. But this,

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>these group of voters have been conditioned on the Epstein

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>story that it was sort of the tip of the spear.

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of the way to prove that there

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>was there has been a deep state, that there is

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>this cupal of elites where the rules only apply to

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>them and not to anybody else. And I've told you

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>this before. The importance to these folks that believe in

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>this conspiracy, this conspiracy the elites, that there is a

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>there there to Epstein, and the idea that even Donald

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump can't tell these people that there's a there there

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>because with this group of voters he did, they're not

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>his base. This is the piece of the base that

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>belongs more to the movement than it does Donald Trumps.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>We've learned there's sort of two parts of MAGA. Half

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of it is Trump's and they'll do whatever they say.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>And most of the elected Republicans, not all, but most

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>of the elected Republicans believe there is more to fear

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>from the Trump wing of MAGA than there is to

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>say from the q Andon wing of MEGA. And that's

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>really what this is. This is the q and On wing.

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>This is you know why Mike Flynn is pushing back.

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's sort of the unofficial pope of the

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>remainder of q Andon since there is no que anymore.

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there never was a que or maybe it is

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike Flynn, right, I its or do I dun dun dunk.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>But what Epstein sort of represents for these voters is

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, truth are you are these lawmakers

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>going to keep their word? You know, it's like anything

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>right any elected official if you get caught breaking sort

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of a core promise. You know, voters are used to

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>politicians lying all the time, and there's sort of an

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.679
<v Speaker 1>there's almost like an accepted an acceptability of certain lies.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, going to balance the budget and they're full

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of shit, They're not going to balance the budget. But well,

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but as a voter, you'll weirdly accept that. But when

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you do things like I'll give you an example of

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a famous pledge, read my lips, no new taxes, right,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And there were some people that really took that to

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the bank. And why did they take that to the bank. Well,

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>at that time, it's because there were conservatives that were

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of George H. W. Bush and they thought, oh,

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he's he's gonna you know, he's not a real small

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>government conservative. And so, by the way, those conservatives are right.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, George H. W. Bush was a compromiser,

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and he had a Democratic Congress, and he compromised, and yes,

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>they raised taxes. By the way, it set the country

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>up for an extraordinarily great run on the economy in

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. Built Bill Clinton built upon it. It's not

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.559
<v Speaker 1>like he undid what George HW. Bush did. He built

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>upon it. Another famous sort of pledge that really sort

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>of hurt that person was when Barack Obama said during

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the debate about healthcare, if you like your plane, you

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>get to keep it. It got turned into the lie

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Now, it never harmed Obama's politics personally, right,

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it didn't cost him reelection. In twenty twelve, Part of

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it is he never fully faced reelection when it was

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>fully clear that not everybody was going to be able

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep their plan if they liked it. But it

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>did harm some Democrats. It was a huge It was

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of one of those sort of and this is

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>where I think the Epstein promise falls for this core

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>group of voters. You promised you were going to release this.

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>We knew we couldn't trust the Democrats to release this,

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>but you could release this. And you guys promised to

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>release this. And you know, if you've spent any time

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on X and you follow the Lincoln Project or the

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>podsave they have some or the Bulwark people, they have

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>found pretty much every single tweet that Donald Trump Junior

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>has said about release the Epstein files, every single tweet

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that that Jade Vance has said to release the Epstein files.

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And so for these voters, this was the equivalent of

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>read my lips, no new taxes, or if you like

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>your plane, you get to keep it and it is possible.

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is this is this is what

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump has to fear, is that it's reached that level.

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And how do we know it's reached that level? Because

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>there are a handful of Republican members of Congress that

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are so scared of this issue that they are willing

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to break with Trump on it. Okay, And maybe some

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of them are doing it out of principle. I think

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>most of them are breaking here out of they believe

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>their constituents that there there is a big enough constituency

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in their district that this could cost them reelection, that

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this could be into a primary problem. And so you're

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing there is somewhere between twenty and forty Republicans who

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are absolutely not going to walk the plank here with Trump.

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to look like they're covering something up

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>with Trump. And you saw the movement and that subcommittee

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in the House Oversight Committee, the fact that Mike Johnson

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>just sent him home. Part of this group I was

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>telling you about that. I was the panel panel before

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the one I moderated, featured three former Republican members of Congress.

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>They did Joe Manchin did something as sort of a

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Democrat who's moved to the independence, and then they had

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of three Republican members of Congress. Was red Ribble.

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>It was Ken Buck from a Republican from a former

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Republican from Colorado, and Mark Sandford, former Republican member of

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress from South Carolina. And it was Mark Sandford that

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>said that he can't believe that. It just he was

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>remarking at how broken Congress is and how broken the

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>House is, the fact that Speaker Johnson had to shut

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the place down for fear of members of Congress wanting

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to work their will, like he was appalled at simply, hey,

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't like it that there's two hundred and eighteen votes,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that because it is not on partisan

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>lines and it's on bipartisan lines, you're just shutting the

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>House down. And in some ways, you know, sort of

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the point he was making is that actually is bringing

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>more attention to the issue, and what he thought was

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to quell things actually probably made it worse

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with those twenty to thirty Republican House members who really

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>believe this is an issue that moves their constituents. Look,

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not changing my opinion on whether I think this

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>is a shiny metal It is a shiny metal object

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that has been sort of force fed upon the media ecosystem.

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you algorithms, Thank you hackers of the algorithms. Thank

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you to those and the right, who broke the information ecosystem,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and who trafficked in conspiracy theories and who allowed this

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>thing to get traction. This is why the phrases hoisted

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on your own petard and you reap what you're sew

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>are sayings, because this is the world that many of

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>these folks helped create is now biting them in the

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what. And here's the other problem with conspiracy theory.

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>There's no amount of information that gets released is going

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to be believed. No amount maybe at this point and now,

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>of course, and this is you know, of course, the

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>more Trump denies sort of any sort of or tries

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to detach himself, the more it becomes a newsworthy story

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to go find out, well, what's he hiding? And the

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>more that he acts that he's hiding something, the more,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. I use this with my friend Chris Saliza,

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'll share it with you guys. If you didn't

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>hear the podcast I did with Solissa earlier this week,

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite, there's a Harrison Ford gave what

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think is the best political advice I've ever heard

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in a fictional movie. It's from Clear and Present Danger.

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Ford plays Jack Ryan, and I forgive me if

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>some of you have heard me say this one before.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>But there's this moment, and it's sort of a sidebar.

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>It has really nothing to do with the main part

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of a plot in that movie. But you know, suddenly

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Harrison Ford is in with the fictional president and the

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>president has some sort of his biggest donor has become

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a political problem, and he's got an aid in the

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Oval office telling the fictional president, Hey, you know what,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got to distance yourself from your pal here. You

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>know this is becoming a problem. And Harrison Ford, the

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>CIA guy, overhears and he goes, Oh, you shouldn't do that.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>If they ask you if he's a friend, you say no,

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>he's a close friend. And if they ask you if

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a close friend, you say no, he's your best friend.

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>The point is he's like, don't give him something they

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>can disprove. Don't make your real life relationship the news story.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And Trump has made the relationship itself now a story.

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, here's more wedding photos, and here's a birthday card,

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and here's a poem, and here's a drawing. When all

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump had this is one of those moments where if

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he says I was close friends with the guy I

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>knew he was, I knew he liked him young, I

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't know he liked him that young. We broke off

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 1>when he did this. He had a built in story.

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>But for whatever reason, he is afraid to admit he's

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a member of the elite right. And we know at

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the heart, at the core of the MAGA movement and

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the populist movement in general, it's been to burn the

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>elites to own the Libs has really own the elites

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>right to those cultural whether it's the Ivy League institutions,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media, etc. And Epstein is seen as sort

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of one of the players of the elite now, you

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>know it is there's so Trump feels as if he

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>can't even admit that the relationship that we all know

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>he had with Epstein is something he just wants to

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>pretend didn't happen. I mean, one of the craziest things

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that jad Vance has said in defense of Trump is

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>following the Wall Street Journal story about the infamous birthday

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>card or birthday poem, is Donald Trump doesn't speak that way,

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And you're like, oh, son, you know this is every

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>once in a while you got to remind yourself. Jady

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Vance is sort of a man child rights he's for

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>there's always this sort of weird immaturity that still sort

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of hovers over him. And by the way, anybody in

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>their late thirties early forties, you know, when I was

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in my late thirties or early forties, I still every

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>once in a while I enjoyed being an immature. You know,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you sort of you want to revert back to your twenties.

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>You want to be a snarky. You want to be

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a snark, you want to be a smart ass. But

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you're also a little bit uninformed. And sometimes either he

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>thinks that if he just plays the Jedi mind trick

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>with the base. Donald Trump never speaks this way. What

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>are you talking about? This is the lane. Donald Trump

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is a guy from Queens. Trust me. He has spoken

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that way and then some. So it is this, you know,

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is a feeding frenzy that Donald Trump.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, he is both the arsonist and he has

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>poured gas on the fire. Right he lit the fire

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. With the conspiratorial you know, there's

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>some deep state dark it's all these dark forces, and

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he basically glombed on. You know, these this weird movement

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>existed before Trump was there, and he scooped him up.

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And he loved how loyal they were to him online

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and they became his online warriors. He loved that they

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>saw him as a messiah. They love and he he

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't fully appreciate suddenly what some of the expectations would be.

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And a big one is He's supposed to be the

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>one to prove this crazy conspiracy theory is true. And

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>now what is he doing. He is behaving like the

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>deep state. So look, it's interesting that John Thune is saying,

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>now this is a Mike Johnson problem. Look, eventually this

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is maybe it won't be a problem in the Senate

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>because whatever the House votes to do, the Senate would

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>probably do ninety ten on this front because none of

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>them want to get caught up in this story. And

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>being in favor of transparency is always a better political

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>place to be, whether you're on the left or the right.

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But by the way, I told you, the whole grand

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>jury shenanigans that Trump tried to create with Pam BONDI

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>was a sleight of hand because Trump knew darn well

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that none of this stuff was ever going to get

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>released by a judge, And sure enough, a judge just

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>said that none of this grand jury testimony can be released.

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So it is you and you want to talk about

0:16:55.280 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a spectacle in September or October of Galleine Maxwell, right.

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is like right out of a movie.

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're going to bring them in for a

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>congress bring her in for a congressional hearing. And there's

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a good group of people there that seem pretty insistent.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>This is what Comer wants, this is what timber Chit wants,

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>this is what Massey wants. I don't know if Trump's

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to stop this now. The only

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>thing he now should wish is that he just sort

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of ripped the band aid off a lot sooner, because

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>this becomes a lot more painful for him politically. If

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>this becomes the dominant issue when the calendar turns to September,

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>this can be a sort of summer silly season story

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 1>that he sort of struggles with but gets over, or

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>this could linger and stick with him. You know, I

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>can't help but notice there is a little bit of

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a parallel. Remember things went Things looked like They were

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>going pretty well for Joe Biden in the first five

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>months of his presidency, and he got the checks out

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the door, and he got the vaccines out the door.

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>In July fourth he declared independence from the virus. And

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>then at the end of that month the withdrawal from Afghanistan,

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>and it was a disaster. And then they were trying

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>really hard to make it seem as if it wasn't

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>their fault and they weren't owning the problem. And then

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>infestered and it festered, and I would argue it was

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the end of that presidency. Other things

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>became problematic, but he never politically recovered from this moment.

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump's already in a hole politically, He's already in a

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>lower place than Joe Biden was right before the Afghanistan

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>withdrawal problem. And so Trump already has a substance problem

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>with the voters. They don't like how he's implemented the

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>deportation policy, The Big Beautiful Bill is unpopular. This economy

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is not popular right now because housing's expensive, the cost

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of living is still up, et cetera. And now there's

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this Epstein issue, and so this is he is going

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to wish he just dealt with it in July and August,

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and that he let the house work its will, and

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that he just kept following disclosures, because then it looks

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>like he's not afraid of any of this. But now

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he seems to be afraid of disclosures. So now we

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>have the leaked we have leaked stories that say he

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 1>found out his name was in these files multiple times.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this is what happens when you have

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this sort of He's got a bit of a god

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>complex that he's developed, particularly after going You know, in

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>his mind he's here, he's defeated two impeachments, he's been

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>indicted multiple times and somehow has not had to pay

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 1>any price. He survived one actual assassination attempt and a

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>second potential assassination attempt. So perhaps he, perhaps any of

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>us would have a god comp after going through everything

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>he went through. But he's got the god complex and

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>thinks he can just will anything away, wish anything away,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>do the Jedi mind trick, and his base is going

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>to follow, and it hasn't worked. And now he's so

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>hanging out there and they don't know what to do, right.

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>They seem to be tied up because their most loyal

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>media audience, half of them want more information from him

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and think Trump's hiding stuff from him, and they're not happy.

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 1>So he doesn't. He doesn't. He can't even use his

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>attack the mainstream media. They're out to get me, uh political,

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of uh uh whatever you want to

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>call it. You know that that version of his excuse

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of trying a distraction trick is a little Jedi mind trick.

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not and that one's not working. So he's if

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>he goes into September and this is an unresolved issue

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and we have votes in the House, and I you know,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this economy is going to hold up

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>by the fall all of his tariff That the weight

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of the tariffs are going to start to hit and

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>hit harder and harder as each month goes on, and

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:17.479
<v Speaker 1>we'll have this spectacle of Epstein. I'd be shocked if

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we get Gallainne Maxwell going. But at this point, if

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you're Trump, you might be it's better off doing that

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>because if they look like they're afraid of her, they

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>look like they they don't want to hear from her.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>At this point, it only may make the you know

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the wounded fester even more so. Look, you know my

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>opinion about this story. It's a it's sort of a

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>story being forced upon us by the big tech companies.

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And there's abserd algorithms that got abused by these right

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>wing conspiracy theorists. But here we are so enjoy being

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>hoisted on that petard on this front. But I can

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you this, They've got to find a way to

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>rip the band aid off. They cannot. He waits till September.

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>He may splinter his party, and there is nothing that

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>accelerates lame duck status for a president. Then when the

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>party begins to realize there's always going to be a point,

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and even Donald Trump is going to face this. And

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I brought this up in my substack this week. The

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>question is when there's always a point in a second

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>term of a presidency where the party realizes that guy's

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>not going to be in charge anymore and you start

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to see people peel away. Epstein is now allowing Republicans

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to start peeling away and distancing themselves from Trump faster

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>than I think this White House was prepared for. And

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.959
<v Speaker 1>this isn't something you get back once it starts a

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>drip becomes a leak, becomes a gusher. Don't believe me,

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Go take a look at how the first nine month

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of George W. Bush's second term win. It started off

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>like it was going to go really well after his

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>impressive reelection, and when it started leaking, it suddenly became

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a gusher. And then politically he was in the It

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>was a disaster, and the Republican Party abandoned ship as

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>fast as they could. That's what Donald Trump now has

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>to fear. If he's smart, believe it or not, he

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>should call up his buddy Mike Johnson since he's also

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the you know, basically, Mike Johnson is whatever. His only speaker,

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>only executes his his speakership, when when Donald Trump asked

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>him to, he should be telling Speaker Johnson to get back,

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>go deal with this, release the files. Deal with it now,

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>deal with it in the August recess. You let this

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>come come in September. It's only going to make it worse.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>A few other notes I want to make before we

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>get to my Ben Smith conversation. First of all, thank

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you Google. I made a big deal out of the

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>fact that Google's AI was incorrectly diagnosing me with Parkinson's disease.

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I had an entire sort of obviously bringing it up.

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Somebody's listening over there. And now if you search Chuck

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Todd illness, it says there is no evidence of this,

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and none of this is true, there's no confirmation, etc.

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But this is a reminder of AI is only as

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>strong as the information that gets put into it, and

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>how these large language models are built. What these large

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>language models train on matters a great deal, not a

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And the thing that I learned about Gemini

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>versus chat GPT is interesting here. Chat GPT doesn't sort

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of scour, you know, unless you ask it to sort

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of scrape the internet over the last seventy two hours.

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't automatically do that when searching for information. Google's

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>AI does it, and so frequency of something becomes factual

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>rather than actually discerning to find out if something is

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>true or not. So I hope this is a little

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a reminder of folks that AI has got a

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>long way to go, and that remember what AI is.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just a really smart search engine. If you think

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it's there to help you to it's there to help

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you solve problems, It's not there to solve problems for you.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And I wish, I wish the you know, I understand

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>why the people that lead AI want want, you know,

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>want to be aspirational and oh no, this is you know,

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be like science fiction and you

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>know these these computer models are going to reason even

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>their reasoning is a computer program based on probability. Okay,

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>so it is. I do think that the leaders in

0:25:54.240 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the AI community need to remind people what the large

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>language models are not versus what they are. One other

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>note from a previous episode that I wanted to bring

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>up in my conversation with Lena Khan, we were talking

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>about what are some of the things about AI, what

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are some of the regulatory concerns about AI? And she

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>brought up something called surveillance pricing, which is this idea

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, each of us are individually only going

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to see prices that that retailer thinks, using AI researching

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>us figures out what we can pay. And Lena brought

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>up an interesting scenario. Let's say you have a death

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in your family and you've got to fly to Denver, Colorado,

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>and the program knows knows enough about you and is

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>able to do enough research to know you have to go.

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>They know that you have this relative who died, and

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>so they know you have to pay, have to get

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.479
<v Speaker 1>this ticket that you're going to see. They know that

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you might pay not quite any price, but close to

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>any price. Well, lo and behold. What did Delta Airlines

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>announced earlier this week? Delta Airlines? And I give them

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>credit for being forthcoming about this, but they said in

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>their earnings call that going forward, twenty percent of their

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>fares may be set by basically AI, which means it's

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out what is it how much I

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>will pay versus how much someone else will pay. I

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>don't see how that is anything other than predatory and discriminatory.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I assume that's why we have consumer protections as something

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that we expect our government to do. But the fact

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that we are not yet, we don't yet realize that

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>this is probably something that needs to be regulated and controlled.

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a bit scary. But keep that in mind. Keep

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that in mind. I said, I give Delta. I think

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Delta by the way of the three big airlines. I

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>wish they flew to more cities that I fly to.

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'm going to say. The fact that every

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Delta experience I have is so much better than the

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>other two major airlines that I end up flying more frequently,

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>so I give kudos. It's a In fact, I was

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on a Delta flight today and the pilot came out

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to thank to thank those I happen to be sitting

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in a frequent flyer section, if you will. I'll just

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>leave it at that and think, you know, appreciated the business.

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And da da da dah went through this stuff. I've

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>never had that an American. I've never had that in

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>United It was you know, plus you throw in the

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's free Wi Fi and Delta. It's not

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>free Wi Fi and the other two they do a

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that is there's a reason why it is.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it is right now the more popular airline,

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>but Delta. I will not say nice things about you

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>if you go down this AI surveillance pricing bs because

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it's extraordinarily discriminatory and I think predatory. So I just

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to bring that up because literally had the conversation

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>with Lena con and I think was two days later

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that the news about Delta Airlines was there a couple

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of political notes in North Carolina. Roy Cooper has decided

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to jump in. We kind of knew. I think i'd

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>let you know that it would have been a shock

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to Democrats had the former governor not gotten into the

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Senate race. But what's interesting I told you before Laura

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump has frozen the Republican field, saying she isn't going

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to make a decision until Thanksgiving. However, according to my

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>friends at the Hotline, she actually has to make her

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>decision sooner than that, even though she wents to state

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>law North Carolina requires her to move back to North

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Carolina by late September in order to meet a ninety

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>day party affiliation requirement before the December candidate filing deadline.

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So while Laura Trump wanted to buy time until Thanksgiving,

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>according to my friends in Hotline, that is something she

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>can't do anymore. So with Roy Cooper in, I actually

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>do think because he's going to get a huge financial

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>head start on that, I do think there'll be a lot,

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a she's got an actual deadline in order

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to meet residency requirements. And frankly, I think it's something

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that national Republicans are going to want her. It's going

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to I think this is a double edged sword in

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a midterm year sharing the last name with the sitting president.

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't care which party you are. In any midterm year,

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that's usually not a good place to be. So while

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>being a Trump will clear the field for her, means

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>there'll be no serious primary challenge, She'll have all the

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>money in the world, et cetera, et cetera. She may

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>acquire all of Donald Trump's political baggage. And is that

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>something that is going to make that seed harder to

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>hold or easier to hold? All right, let me tell

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you quick two minutes about this independent there was. There

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>was two interesting pieces of information that I learned from

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.479
<v Speaker 1>it that I wanted to share. One is sort of

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the demographic makeup of self describe independence. I think many

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of us have been telling you for quite some time

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the fastest growing party in America is

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>no party you go around any There's about thirty five

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>states that keep track of that force you to register

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>by party. There's another fifteen where you don't have to

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>register by party. I live in one of those, Virginia.

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>It's that you don't have to declare party to registered vote.

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But among those states that do the fastest growing party

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>has been either no party affiliation independent however, and I

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>think they call it NPA in Florida. Different states call

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it different things. Nearly seventy five percent of all those

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that have been registering as independence are under the age

0:31:56.880 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of forty five. This is primarily a phenomenon of millennials

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and gen Z. And what's also interesting is that the

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>gentleman that was on my panel believed that by twenty

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight, millennials and gen Z combined, so basically, all

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>voters under the age of fifty will outnumber all voters

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>over the age of fifty in the electorate. So this

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is the growing part of the electorate as the older

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>part is shrinking. And what's interesting older voters because once

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you get into the habit of either voting read or

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>voting blue, the older you get, the more likely you

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>keep that habit. You view third party candidates or independent

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>candidates more as spoilers that end up benefiting one party

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>or the other party. That is not where millennials see

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>independent candidates, and that is not where gen Z sees

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>independent candidates. It's fascinating statistic and the question really is

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is this something is the something to build on and

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think it means that if you're going to

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>run as an independent, you really you know that your

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>best potential constituency is going to probably be voters under

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>forty five, which some argue is a is a harder

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>group of voters to get focused early in a campaign,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>which an independent candidate sometimes needs. You can get to

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>those voters late, right when you're under the age of fifty.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot of other things going on, raising kids,

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>do da da, you know, mixing all sorts of things,

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes you don't tune in until late. Older voters

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>today know how they're voting in twenty twenty six, younger

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>voters don't yet know how they're going to vote because

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>they have busier, busier lives and they're still forming their opinions.

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>But I thought that was a fascinating point on that.

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.959
<v Speaker 1>And then the other is this question of whether is

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>there a I don't want to call it a legal loophole,

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but is there a better way for the Green Party,

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Libertarian Party, Working Families, Party, Forward Party, all of them

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>working together and filing essentially class action suits against all

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>these state parties that put up higher barriers. I don't

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>understand how you don't have an equal protection argument that basically, voters,

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're not a registered D or R and you

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>want to either run for office or you either want

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to participate in a primary in some of these states,

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you're being disenfranchised and register have it being forced to

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>have to register with one of the two major parties

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to either get ballot access or to participate

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in a primary. It's a form of coercion. Right is

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that legal? How is that constitutional? So anyway, it's the

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>question is whether all these entities could work together, could

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>do this, because ultimately we're not going to know if

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>independent candidates or a third party movement can really take

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>off unless they get an equal shot at getting on

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the ballot. And right now, ballot access is usually the

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 1>biggest hurdle for many of these candidates. All right, let's

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>sneak in a quick break and when we come back

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Ben Smith, like I said, the quintessential

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker, and I say that with nothing but respect

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and compliment on that front, coming up, Ben Smith, well

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>joining me now is the editor in Cheap of Semaphore.

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 1>It is Ben Smith. I've known him in so many

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of your iterations. I have multiple, many of yours exactly.

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the world, the world that we occupy in

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>media and journalism. But looks semaphore is what do you

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>celebrating your third birthday? Pretty close?

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 2>I will be yeah, yeah, what is it today that

0:35:58.280 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 2>you didn't expect.

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>It to be nearly three years ago? Because I find

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it interesting The goal was smart information for the English

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>speaking world pretty much? Right? Is that? My am? I?

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>You know? Is that? Is that? The is that one

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>line explainer? So where are we in your journey three

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>years later with Justin Smith who he and I have

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>sons who just graduated high school together, so we the

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>insular nature of the media in Washington and New York

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is uh is going to come through in this conversation.

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>But I am where do you? Where are you today?

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.959
<v Speaker 1>And where did you think you would be three years ago? Yeah?

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, congratulations on that check and also you know, on

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 2>your assent from being the editor of the Hotline, which

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:46.919
<v Speaker 2>is what I heard, and it is yeah, we both

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of lived through that unbelievably crazy period of history

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 2>in this in our profession, or like probably both of

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 2>us would have been had we met, you know, we

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 2>been in thirty years earlier and met thirty years ago,

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 2>we would have basically inside gied organizations rising in the ranks.

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 2>One hopes for that, and instead we've just done a

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 2>series of been saying different things.

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>And sort of written the wave of Well, as I

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>say about the story of media over the last one

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, is new technology fragmentation consolidation. New technology fragmentation consolidation.

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And you and I have lived through now two arguably

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we're now are in our second fragmentation period. Right, Internet

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>one point oh was fragmentation number one. That was sort

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of what the hotline was. That was in some ways

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the end of one point zero is what Politico came

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in and did that. And now streaming and where we

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are now is sort of fragmentation. Independent journalism, whatever you

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>want to call it, is fragmentation two point zero. And

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in some ways that's what semaphore right. You guys are

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to challenge traditional media. I'm trying to do it

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in my own way. And here we are, and as

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I joke, and I think you guys probably feel the

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>same way. The goal is to be consolidator, not to

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>get consolidated. But if you get consolidated, it might not

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>be so bad either.

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 2>That's that's a very very good summary, right, and you

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of yeah, I mean I think you may you

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 2>sort of left the old thing at the last possible

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 2>moment to get off the ship and are now, like

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 2>I think, here just in time to blow up and

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 2>get consolidated. So congratulations on it.

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, it's funny you say that. I do feel

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>as if I grabbed the last lifeboat. There are times

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I feel that way.

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 2>The uh but yeah, but so no, I mean, I

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 2>think you know somepore. You know, we launched, We launched,

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 2>I think as people were saying, hey, the web as

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 2>we knew it, in social media as we knew it

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 2>don't seem to be working quite so well as we thought.

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 2>And with a kind of with a thesis that we're

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 2>going to have to reach people one to one and

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 2>also that convening at events are going to be a

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:52.399
<v Speaker 2>big part of this business and a big and sort

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of the core of how you reach pop one to one.

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 2>That second thing has just been truer than we could

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 2>have imagined. Like we built these really in the short

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 2>period time, pretty huge. We have a Davos competitor in

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 2>Washington called the World Economy summit which you actually gatherather

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe I think it was the biggest gathering of CEOs

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 2>in America this year, and we did it in April.

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 2>It'sn be a lot bigger next year. And so I

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 2>think the notion that you could sort of build a

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 2>news organization whose core was convening it was a little

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 2>exotic and has really been truer than we expect it

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 2>in a way, like we said it, but now we

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 2>have really like that's really what we're doing. And then

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the notion that in a world with like where social

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 2>media is really untrustworthy and polarized, where the web is

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 2>really untrustworthy and polarized, you know that we could build

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 2>something and I think maybe more than we expected that. Like,

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 2>there's a group of people, and it's particularly like people

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 2>who make decisions in business and government elsewhere, who just

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 2>like can't afford to be lied to because for them

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 2>news is a tool they used to make decisions. And

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 2>most of the rest of news consumers. I think the

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 2>thesis of a lot of media companies is, oh, like,

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 2>this is entertainment for people. It doesn't have to be true,

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 2>it has to be emotionally engaging, and so like I

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 2>think there's a real split there, and we definitely have

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 2>taken that former path of like, we're news for people

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 2>who really probably know what their philosophy of the world is,

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:21.839
<v Speaker 2>and we're probably not going to change that, but we

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 2>can inform them. We can open that, we can provide

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 2>different perspectives in different legitimate points of view and tell

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.840
<v Speaker 2>them even what people who they despise think about this,

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 2>and that that's a really valuable service. We can tell them,

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 2>we can separate news from opinion. They're not out shopping

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 2>for new points of view on the world or for

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 2>new opinions for themselves. They're trying to understand what's going on.

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, what I find refreshing in what you're doing

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:51.359
<v Speaker 1>is that it's all free. There's no subscription, right, and

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean this. You know there's no subscription at all.

0:40:57.600 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And I know you've said, well, maybe in the future

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll be a subscription model, but I am a huge

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>believer that paywalls are not going to solve the information

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem problem. So explain why you decided to be free

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 1>for all and that you've not I think a lot

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of people assume, well, you're going to be free for

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:18.240
<v Speaker 1>now and then you're going to put up the paywall

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's not happened. Explain that philosophy.

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I would say that I do. I

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 2>don't view business models as philosophical, like I think in

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 2>news people tend to like talk their book and so

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 2>when I was at BuzzFeed, there was an impulse to

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 2>be like, look like, you know, free is democratizing. And

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 2>when I was at The New York Times, is an

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 2>impulse to say, look like, you're you are getting great

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 2>value out of this journalism, you should pay for it.

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 2>And you hear people in particularly there's a way of

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 2>people saying like, subscription is the only like pure way

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 2>to do journalism because you're not corrupted by advertisers, can

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 2>be you can really say what you think, you can

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 2>be honest.

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Ask the New York Times about their captured base of

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 1>subscribers when James Bennett dared to green light and op

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>ed by Tom Cotton when it was a revolt of

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>their paid subscribers, and they panicked, And you're just sitting

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>there going, well, that's no different than advertiser capture. That's

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>audience capture.

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's right. And I think all basically

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 2>all these models in which you are paid to do

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 2>your work like have carry with them real risks that

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 2>it screws up the journalism and the best way to

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe the best way to get away from is to

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 2>diversify and have a bunch and to be having a

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 2>bunch of different models to be. And I think my

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 2>view is I'm pretty agnostic about how you pay for

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the journalism. I do think that we grew up in

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 2>this like utopian moment of just open information and free

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 2>information that was new that I mean, and you know,

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess made a way that probably started with television

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 2>broadcast right broadcast was free as a matter of like

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you can figure out how to make people pay for it.

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure they would have if they could have. I'm

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 2>sure you know, the founders of CBS News, if they'd

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 2>figure out a way to make people pay, like the

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 2>BBC does. They come and they like raid your apartment

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 2>and they see if you have a television, and if

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 2>you do, they make you pay the license fee and

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:04.359
<v Speaker 2>you can be in trouble if you don't. Like that's

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 2>literally how they do.

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 1>That's literally how it works there.

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, Like the inspector will cut like literally bang

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 2>on your door. I knew people I lived there briefly

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.799
<v Speaker 2>who would cover their televisions with like a with like

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 2>a blanket just in case, because they were trying to

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 2>get out of paying.

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Wow. I had no idea. Wow, it's just a.

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Few pounds a year. I mean's you know anyway, But

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:24.799
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to make people pay for broadcasts. It's sort

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 2>of a technological matter. It used to be hard to

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 2>make people pay for the web. Netflix and Spotify trained

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 2>us all to pay. Yeah, I don't think. I mean,

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess my own view is that figuring out ways

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to employ people to gather trustworthy information is maybe even

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 2>is a big crisis. The availability of trust with information

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 2>is another big crisis. But I don't want to like

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:53.000
<v Speaker 2>make it harder to pay journalists because I am ideological

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 2>of that thing too, I guess is my and and

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 2>for our for ourselves, like we're you know, we think

0:43:57.840 --> 0:43:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the advert we were having a great run in the

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 2>advertising business and the sponsorship business. And I don't have

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 2>any plans to charge subscriptions. But if I thought that

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it would help me hire more journalists, so would do it.

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>No, And I, you know, I think there's a role

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>for that, Like when I think about the whole variety

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of things, right when you you can't just be in

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>one category. Yeah, exactly, you know. To me, you know,

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>there's got to be a baseline that's available to everybody.

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, look specialty things, you know, specialty newsletters,

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't you want to have also?

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 2>And also there's more complicated things you can do, like

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 2>in your business. Like I just think that like you're

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 2>putting out, you're producing a good show that is streaming

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 2>rather than television, although the production values are just as

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 2>high as lots of what is on television. And in

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 2>five minutes, like Substack TV is going to come to

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 2>you and say, hey, we are television now and we'd

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 2>like to window your show, like we'll pay you to

0:44:55.320 --> 0:44:57.800
<v Speaker 2>get it two hours earlier, right or something.

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 1>No, I do think that that's where we're headed. You know,

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the Pat McAfee model, that's going to be the model.

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I assume in a year the

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>pod Save America Boys will be on MSNBC. But they

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 1>won't work. But they won't work for MSNBC. They will

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 1>license them, right, they will let everybody's And this is

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a question, and I'm curious if you believe this if

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we are in a temporary period where journalists and content creators,

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:30.759
<v Speaker 1>because it's you know, they're they're related, but they're not

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>always one and the same. But let's put it in

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 1>one that they're all going to own their own work.

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, I look at the you know, I'm doing

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:40.280
<v Speaker 1>some work with Newsphere, which is which is another type

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of model, which is and people it's a it's a

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it's I'm really enjoying sort of just that learning about

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that business model. And it's a different business model than substack.

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:55.240
<v Speaker 1>But I do think there's going to be these different

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>because everybody that's on Newsphere owns their own material. They're

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>just used, they're just licensing to that platform. Do you

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>think that I think I think this is a generational

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 1>shift and this will be the way it works for

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>another decade or so. Are you convinced of this?

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I guess I'm not sure what the

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 2>stakes are of whether you own or you know, whether

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 2>do you own this hour of us talking about we're

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about, you know, eternal truth. So this will have

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 2>value for a long time. But much of what you

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 2>talk about is stuff that isn't that interesting. Tomorrow because

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be overtaken by events. And so I think,

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:35.320
<v Speaker 2>particularly in the news business, what it is to own

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 2>is a little overstated. And I think people are going

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:40.919
<v Speaker 2>to make financial decisions that are pretty boring about which

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 2>pays you more. And I think there's also like is

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it ai training data? That's another form of ownership and

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 2>licensing that might make yesterday's show have a little more

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 2>value or not. But I think it's interesting. I mean,

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I surprises me, actually, But Fox Corp. The parent company

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 2>of Fox News, is way ahead on this, like.

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:01.919
<v Speaker 1>They have been what they do with Fox Nation, back

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 1>with Tucker three years ago.

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 2>They did this, Yeah, but they did like a lot

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 2>of out Let's CN end of this too did like,

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 2>we have an app and it's gonna be like the

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be like the more boring stuff from Jake

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Tapper's book club, God bless him. It's gonna be the

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:18.720
<v Speaker 2>stuff you don't want from our star talent the oh,

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 2>but the new version of it is going to be

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 2>this is our best stuff in an app. And what

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Fox did? They acquire this podcast, right wing podcast called Ruthless. Yesterday,

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 2>they acquired a company called Red Seat Ventures, that is

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the production company for Here's Morgan Tucker, Carlson, Megan, Kelly,

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Bill O'Reilly like they're starting to basically take what they have,

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 2>which is capital, Like they can pay you a bunch

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 2>of money and a real advertising sales operation and to

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 2>and basically between the and a bunch of distribution. I'm

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 2>like to be and I'm Fox, and you're going to

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 2>see these big media companies. Versut which used to be

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 2>MSNBC is going to figure is going to get around

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:00.840
<v Speaker 2>to this soon. I gotta figure and we'll get around

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 2>to this, say like, oh, what we are is a

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 2>collection of shows and talent. That's what we've always been.

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a new or you know what you're describing. You

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>know what you're describing Clear Channel from the nineties, huh

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you know? And and it's where I mean, no, it didn't.

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>And the point is that iHeartRadio. I heard yeah they

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>ended up training. The point is is that this is

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the way I've described where so there's sort of two

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:30.400
<v Speaker 1>there's late stage cable TV right, which is essentially Fox

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>versut whatever the spin off from Warner Brothers is going

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:36.439
<v Speaker 1>to look like, which I assume and and I guess

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>paramount's going to. I assume they don't spin off, they

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>just sell to either the Warner brothers, uh can spin

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>off or versant. But it feels it's very similar. I've

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:50.840
<v Speaker 1>described it. So I'll give you an example. You'll appreciate this.

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>When I was at National Journal in about two years

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>before you guys showed up when I mean you guys

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Politico or what was it called for a brief period

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>before it was politically the Capitol leader of the capital Leader, right,

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And there was a bunch of us that went to

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>David Bradley and went to John Fox Sullivan at the time,

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, we should shut the magazine down and

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 1>put all of the efforts into Congress Daily, which was

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a growing digital product and hotline. You know, we had

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>all we were we were, we were, and and it

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 1>was we had a huge debate about it, and it

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>was sort of the digital side was going, hey, you know,

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and but there was a but there was a bunch

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of revenue still available, and it was sort of like

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:33.479
<v Speaker 1>you didn't want to just throw away that big chunk

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of money. Every think we were talking eight figures in revenue,

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't want to You couldn't and yet everybody

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 1>agreed it was a diminishing asset. That it was that

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 1>eventually the trade association guys that bought all this full

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 1>page advertising in the magazine were going to retire and

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>be replaced by people who realized, no, no, no, no, you

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:53.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want to advertise in a magazine. You want to

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>be in the digital product. But you never know when

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to when to say no to that cash. And that's

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:01.440
<v Speaker 1>what I think is happening with there's a certain amount

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of money to be made in owning some of these

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>cable channels, probably for another just like there was with

0:50:06.239 --> 0:50:07.839
<v Speaker 1>FM radio in the nineties. Yeah.

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the classic sort of innovator's dilemma. And that's why

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:16.239
<v Speaker 2>you can see the Harvard Business School graduates who run WarnerMedia.

0:50:16.280 --> 0:50:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh maybe not in that case, but the basically, like

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the business school guys are and women are looking at

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 2>these companies and saying, great, you've got a declining asset

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:27.279
<v Speaker 2>here with a lot that's throwing off a lot of cash. Like,

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:29.319
<v Speaker 2>get it off our books as quick, you sell it

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:30.839
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of money as fast as you can,

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:32.720
<v Speaker 2>because it's going to destroy the rest of the business.

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, And that's and that's exactly what Comcast and

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 1>wbd's figured out. Holy shit we need in sky dances,

0:50:40.239 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>like no, no, no, these things. We all want to have

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:43.879
<v Speaker 1>those legacy products, right, and.

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:46.800
<v Speaker 2>They're poison actually, and we have to get they're incredibly lucrative,

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 2>but they're going to ultimately destroy the whole company. And

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 2>so the essence, so you're just seeing people like Jettison

0:50:52.160 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 2>these incredibly lucrative cable networks as fascinating likely you know,

0:50:56.080 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 2>like they have no value. It's actually kind of fascinating.

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And yet I don her that. Look, not everybody's going

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:03.359
<v Speaker 1>to go away like what I always describe. And I'm

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 1>curious if you agree with this, which is, look, mainstream,

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 1>there's always a publication, there's always a version of mainstream

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 1>media that's dying. Right. Life Magazine was a major deal

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:19.880
<v Speaker 1>until it wasn't right And at some point having a

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 1>magazine with the best photos around the country no longer

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>meant anything anymore, right because moving pictures was better and

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we had color TV, and Life just sort of it stopped,

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we didn't have this big pearl clutching

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 1>moment where we said, oh my god, mainstream media is dying.

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Life Magazine is dead right. Like, the point is that

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 1>we just evolved, and I think we're having the same thing.

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Cable news is probably going to evolve out of this.

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>But and maybe not all three major networks survive in

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the next decade, but some of them will, right, and

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll and and then there'll be new main you know,

0:51:57.080 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and something on YouTube may become the thing. Maybe the

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>midast much becomes the next CBS News, right, you know that.

0:52:04.280 --> 0:52:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You know there was a time when CBS was a startup.

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, with our competitors around it, and you didn't know

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:12.759
<v Speaker 2>which one was going to win.

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, you know I joke about Meet the Press

0:52:15.800 --> 0:52:18.880
<v Speaker 1>started as an advertisement for a magazine called American Mercury.

0:52:19.520 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Is that right?

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the radio show began. They just bought time. It was,

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they bought that time on radio. It was like buying

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 1>an hour of time at that time and a half hour.

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And it was brought to you by an American Mercury magazine. Huh,

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>which was owned right, which was owned owned by the

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 1>first by the then second host, if you will, fors

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and wells of Meet the Press. No no, no, this said

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the show yeah, yeah, anyway, and he owned and that

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 1>was something you know, he owned Meet the Press for

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>a long time until the NBC finally. Yeah, it was

0:52:54.800 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>an interesting arrangement.

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, this stuff that we grew up feeling, we

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:00.839
<v Speaker 2>sort of we sort of came up into a moment

0:53:00.880 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 2>when it all seems so stable, and that was itself

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:03.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of an illusion.

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that I keep trying to you know,

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I joke about this all the time in our politics.

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I think if you grew up at the time we

0:53:11.440 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 1>grew up, we grew up during the Cold War, and

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 1>America was winning, and we won the Cold War. That

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:20.319
<v Speaker 1>was a big deal. But the Cold War also stabilized

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>us as a country. It stabilized our politics. The two

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:25.359
<v Speaker 1>parties agreed that we had to fight the Cold War.

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:27.880
<v Speaker 1>They may disagree on how to do it, but everybody

0:53:27.880 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 1>agreed on what to do, and both parties kept their fringes.

0:53:31.280 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And now, if you look at our politics today, it's

0:53:33.560 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>actually very similar to the politics pre World War Two,

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's very similar to the politics of the entire

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:41.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century and the media and media partisan media, and

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 1>so in some ways, you and I I've always wondered,

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:48.120
<v Speaker 1>did we grow up in an outlier period of the American.

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Story totally, and I feel like it at times has

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 2>really like affected my news judgment back poorly, Like it

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.880
<v Speaker 2>leaves you with a sort of constricted sense of imagination

0:53:58.920 --> 0:53:59.760
<v Speaker 2>about what could happen.

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:03.839
<v Speaker 1>No, it absolutely well. Let me it's funny you talk

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 1>about who you write for with some of for so

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 1>take the Epstein story. Yeah, I've noticed you have a

0:54:10.239 --> 0:54:13.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of the content creators are having are manufacturing Epstein

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 1>leads because that's how the distribution works, right, In order

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to get tracked on any given day, you have to

0:54:19.120 --> 0:54:23.279
<v Speaker 1>ride what people are on the algorithm. That's not how

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, and that's not how you think. And yet

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a business model for media, and it feels like

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a messy one, not a great one.

0:54:33.640 --> 0:54:35.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, in this case, the model is just

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:39.399
<v Speaker 2>like spreading absolute lies to sell to get people's attention, right,

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the Epstein one is to me, like I mean,

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 2>and I do think there's value to be had by

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 2>trying to explain what's actually going on here, which is,

0:54:47.280 --> 0:54:50.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is the most investigated story of the

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 2>last twenty years by every law enforcement agency, every night,

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:57.439
<v Speaker 2>every everybody who's listening to our phones, every journalist, every

0:54:57.440 --> 0:55:01.359
<v Speaker 2>great journalist and the and there's an enormous amount that's

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:05.080
<v Speaker 2>been reported, and specifically Gawker posted the quote unquote Epstein

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and whatever list. It's his address book. It's been on

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 2>the internet for like what twelve years. It was like

0:55:11.040 --> 0:55:13.839
<v Speaker 2>a medium sized scoop in the year twenty sixteen. And

0:55:15.040 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, and the Washington Post and others have documented

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 2>in great detail his long and warm friendship with Donald J. Trump,

0:55:21.120 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Like again like not only not a news story of

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:25.760
<v Speaker 2>like the nineteen nineties, like you could ask to anybody

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:28.160
<v Speaker 2>in New York like, oh, yeah, they're friends, like not

0:55:28.160 --> 0:55:32.520
<v Speaker 2>not secret in any way. And then all this other

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:34.840
<v Speaker 2>stuff is basically made up, Like it's to me, like

0:55:34.880 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 2>this is pizza gate for people with college educations like

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey Epstein obviously horrific abuser of young women in Florida

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 2>in the early aughts. I think that's about blackmail. The

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:48.000
<v Speaker 2>stuff abit. I mean, this is supported well.

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:49.839
<v Speaker 1>And this gets it to something that I think it's

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 1>been very hard to explain to the average person, which

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is the importance of pedophilia in every single scandal that

0:55:56.719 --> 0:55:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the right wing has tried to create about the left

0:55:59.400 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>right in that Epstein like it's a weird thing. There's

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this weird Mike Flynn was gave voice to it on X.

0:56:07.560 --> 0:56:09.759
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's what made the Epstein story such

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a such a magnet for that same craft.

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a dehumanizing right and the left, because to me,

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:18.680
<v Speaker 2>it's like this is like mephilia is it's like a

0:56:18.719 --> 0:56:21.839
<v Speaker 2>lizard brain like it just feels almost like because it's

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:23.440
<v Speaker 2>not just the right the left. It's the blood Lebels

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:26.440
<v Speaker 2>against the Jews. It's all the laft whers who think

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:29.279
<v Speaker 2>that Donald Trump is secretly trafficking in young women, right Like,

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:32.400
<v Speaker 2>it's to me like it's a conspiracy theory.

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's the ultimate de human Like, what's the what's

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the the minute you work somebody correct, right, and it

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 1>becomes like the minute you throw it at somebody, it

0:56:45.000 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter if it's true or not. Right, deny the denial.

0:56:47.719 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, that's like this horrible thing is

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:53.040
<v Speaker 1>stuck to you. And I think that's what's made it

0:56:53.080 --> 0:56:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a popular sort of word to use to attack an

0:56:56.920 --> 0:57:00.160
<v Speaker 1>opponent because it's immediately dehumanizing, right.

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Because it does happen into almost like a mythological level

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 2>of like like I just think if you look back

0:57:07.080 --> 0:57:10.280
<v Speaker 2>through like human history, people have conspiracy theories about children

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 2>being kidnapped. I mean, what's the pied piper?

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:57:13.360 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Like like I just think this stuff is like really

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 2>deep in our psychees and people are sort of programmed

0:57:19.040 --> 0:57:20.960
<v Speaker 2>to believe it, like we all are, and to pay

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 2>attention to it, and it's hard to ignore and it

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 2>like hooks into something really deep in how people think

0:57:25.800 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 2>about that elites, like what are the elites?

0:57:28.880 --> 0:57:32.240
<v Speaker 1>What are the powerful people up to? And that's yes,

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, it's like and that's the And I guess

0:57:36.880 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the question when does this end? Because I would argue

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's always been there. It's just yeah, the Internet mainstreamed it.

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 2>The Internet mainstreamed it musks like musks sort of like

0:57:47.680 --> 0:57:51.600
<v Speaker 2>gloves off, we're not censoring anything. X sort of really

0:57:51.760 --> 0:57:54.880
<v Speaker 2>super charged it on the right And I don't really

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 2>think I think that if you look back at what

0:57:56.640 --> 0:57:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Burr was being accused of by Hamilton and why

0:58:00.080 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 2>they dueled, Like I think, like really dark sexual smears

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:07.200
<v Speaker 2>are like very very deeply connected to global politics always

0:58:07.240 --> 0:58:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and probably not and.

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:08.520
<v Speaker 1>They always happen.

0:58:09.160 --> 0:58:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just we grew up in a rare era when

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 2>they were being pushed back into the fringes.

0:58:13.400 --> 0:58:14.840
<v Speaker 1>No, and this is where I come back where the

0:58:14.840 --> 0:58:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Cold War. It turns out the only time we will

0:58:17.360 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 1>act with some sensibility as a society is when there's

0:58:21.760 --> 0:58:23.200
<v Speaker 1>an existential threat.

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:27.720
<v Speaker 2>And then honestly, like only sometimes.

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, not a pandemic. That's different. I do think pandemics

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are different. In history has shown that that pandemics are

0:58:33.080 --> 0:58:35.720
<v Speaker 1>actually always divisive. You know this idea that it's only

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:39.440
<v Speaker 1>newly divisive, please go read about nineteen seventeen. Hugely divisive,

0:58:39.680 --> 0:58:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Like pandemics have always been divisive between those that individual

0:58:43.880 --> 0:58:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's that it's human, but it's human basically. Yeah, right,

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it's always been a human you know, individual rights versus

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:53.600
<v Speaker 1>collective action. Right, there's always been this this push and pull.

0:58:55.440 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Nobody has the finger on the pulse of New York

0:58:57.160 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 1>City in the reporting world. I think like you do.

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You're a believer in New York being the center of everything.

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And I say this, and it's.

0:59:03.920 --> 0:59:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Not so much a believer, it's just I mean, like

0:59:05.920 --> 0:59:07.840
<v Speaker 2>it's like I believe that the way I believe I

0:59:07.840 --> 0:59:08.480
<v Speaker 2>should breathe air.

0:59:09.000 --> 0:59:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, and I get it. You know, I

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:14.400
<v Speaker 1>used to. I remember one time having a fight with Brenton.

0:59:14.120 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Say, I'm not making that claim, it's just.

0:59:16.600 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But you'll you'll appreciate this. I remember one time that

0:59:21.720 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they were showing the some local parade on the nightly

0:59:25.960 --> 0:59:28.040
<v Speaker 1>news in New York and I said, why are you

0:59:28.080 --> 0:59:29.920
<v Speaker 1>doing that? Are you going to show the parade in

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Chicago and in Saint Louis And he goes, and Brian goes, well,

0:59:33.120 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 1>one in nine Americans have a connection to New York City.

0:59:35.760 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And I said, so that means eight and nine Americans don't.

0:59:38.680 --> 0:59:41.120
<v Speaker 1>It feels great? And it was right, right right. So

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:44.840
<v Speaker 1>there was this this whole back and forth. But I

0:59:44.920 --> 0:59:49.400
<v Speaker 1>set this up because this is one time where I

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:51.680
<v Speaker 1>am going to agree with you. What happens in New

0:59:51.760 --> 0:59:55.520
<v Speaker 1>York City is going to reverberate around the world. In

0:59:55.560 --> 0:59:58.360
<v Speaker 1>this election, I think this is as big of a

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of a of an election as we had that's not

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a presidential in a long time. I mean the Mamdani election.

1:00:05.160 --> 1:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I think is this is potentially this significant for the

1:00:09.440 --> 1:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>future of New York City. But I'm curious if you

1:00:11.440 --> 1:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>share that view.

1:00:12.280 --> 1:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting. I think it will really reverberate

1:00:14.440 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>all those sort of for the wrong reasons, like as

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:19.280
<v Speaker 2>is often true, sure, like what's happening in New York

1:00:19.360 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 2>is very weird at local Like the path through which

1:00:22.040 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 2>this guy shot up to the Democratic nomination and now

1:00:25.240 --> 1:00:28.440
<v Speaker 2>can't be stopped because you know, because he's facing the

1:00:28.480 --> 1:00:32.480
<v Speaker 2>worst candidates in the world is like very specific and

1:00:32.520 --> 1:00:34.760
<v Speaker 2>I think not necessarily emblematic of what's happening. If you

1:00:34.800 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 2>look at the Senate primary in New Jersey across the

1:00:37.200 --> 1:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>river where Mike No, it's not really it's really representative

1:00:40.880 --> 1:00:44.120
<v Speaker 2>anything except that you really do see and you just

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:47.560
<v Speaker 2>feel it here that the only people who have any

1:00:47.720 --> 1:00:50.840
<v Speaker 2>energy are is the real left, is the hard left.

1:00:50.880 --> 1:00:52.360
<v Speaker 2>In the same way I think that you could feel

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:55.200
<v Speaker 2>in Republican politics that the only people who who had

1:00:55.240 --> 1:00:58.919
<v Speaker 2>any energy was the Trump movement. Like that, and there's

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>really there's passion, and there's energy, and it's young people

1:01:01.640 --> 1:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>and they're not going to adore and they have figure

1:01:05.600 --> 1:01:08.680
<v Speaker 2>and they and the thing that mcdanie really has, which

1:01:08.720 --> 1:01:13.480
<v Speaker 2>I think the kind of previous iterations of the young

1:01:13.600 --> 1:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Left really didn't, is how to communicate with working people,

1:01:17.560 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 2>with people who don't share their ideology, with people who

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>aren't interested in ideology with people who don't want to

1:01:22.920 --> 1:01:25.560
<v Speaker 2>learn some new language to talk about the world and

1:01:25.600 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 2>talk about politics. Mamdani doesn't come, is not trying to

1:01:29.400 --> 1:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>persuade you of anything in particular about gender. He's not

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:38.240
<v Speaker 2>really interested in talking about the control of the means

1:01:38.240 --> 1:01:40.560
<v Speaker 2>of production. He's not like, you know, I mean, if

1:01:40.600 --> 1:01:42.960
<v Speaker 2>you read that, if you're like, if you are someone

1:01:42.960 --> 1:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>who like thinks maybe capitalism is good, you should like

1:01:46.360 --> 1:01:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and you read the DSA manifesto like your hair will

1:01:49.000 --> 1:01:51.480
<v Speaker 2>stand on end. But Mamdani's not out there reading from

1:01:51.520 --> 1:01:55.400
<v Speaker 2>the DSA manifesto. He you know, he's in some ways

1:01:55.400 --> 1:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>of a very normal politician. I think in a way,

1:01:57.160 --> 1:01:58.919
<v Speaker 2>I think the tradition that he's in in New York

1:01:59.400 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 2>is actually the other the last socialist mayor we had,

1:02:02.320 --> 1:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>who was Firella LaGuardia, Like I don't know if he

1:02:04.800 --> 1:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>will pull that off, but LaGuardia was divisive and similar

1:02:08.200 --> 1:02:10.840
<v Speaker 2>ways actually was of the left in a pretty deep way.

1:02:11.680 --> 1:02:15.240
<v Speaker 2>But also it was like relentlessly focused on like building

1:02:15.280 --> 1:02:17.560
<v Speaker 2>stuff and moving stuff around and cleaning up the garbage,

1:02:17.560 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>which is what these meanest blopses actually are.

1:02:27.840 --> 1:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I've always said I think the most the

1:02:30.240 --> 1:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>most impressive thing to me in government is how much

1:02:34.360 --> 1:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>garbage New York City deals with every day.

1:02:36.840 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I probably badly. You know, we just put it in

1:02:38.640 --> 1:02:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the fucking street, Like we just literally like we just

1:02:41.280 --> 1:02:42.720
<v Speaker 2>dump it in the street. No one else in the

1:02:42.760 --> 1:02:44.960
<v Speaker 2>world does this. We just piles the garbage in the

1:02:44.960 --> 1:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>streets and then the rats did it, and it smells.

1:02:47.200 --> 1:02:47.800
<v Speaker 2>It's terrible.

1:02:47.840 --> 1:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, it gets cleaned up every day. Yeah,

1:02:50.960 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, it's gone. Like I'm like, it's

1:02:53.640 --> 1:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>one of those you're like, holy you know, I don't

1:02:56.960 --> 1:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>know another community. You know, we sit here and we

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I always say, the sit here in you know,

1:03:00.880 --> 1:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we love to beat the crap out of government. Government

1:03:02.760 --> 1:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do this. Government doesn't do that. And then I'll say,

1:03:04.800 --> 1:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you a piece of paper and a

1:03:06.160 --> 1:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar bill. Can you take it across country in three days?

1:03:08.600 --> 1:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, our government actually pulls that off for less

1:03:11.400 --> 1:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>than a dollar And it's quite remarkable. And I sort

1:03:15.920 --> 1:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of feel that, you know, we take for granted sometimes

1:03:18.200 --> 1:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>these mundane things that government does almost without us noticing.

1:03:24.600 --> 1:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the New York government, I mean, you know,

1:03:26.520 --> 1:03:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess I mean there's a shocking amount

1:03:30.280 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 2>to me of optimism about Mom Donnie in town among people.

1:03:33.080 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Who there's no choice but to have optimism because he's

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna win. Yeah, not the problem. I mean Cuomo and Adams,

1:03:39.120 --> 1:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean you sit there, You're like, you know, I

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>cannot believe that New York's political elite just sat on

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines while Cuomo came in and ran. What was

1:03:48.920 --> 1:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>anybody thinking if two of the leaders of the Democratic

1:03:52.160 --> 1:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Party are both from Brooklyn and they just what did

1:03:54.720 --> 1:03:56.919
<v Speaker 1>they put like ear muffs on? They wanted to pay

1:03:56.920 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>no attention to what was happening. It was it is

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest sort of leadership failure of a political party

1:04:05.120 --> 1:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that was happening right in their backyard, and they paid

1:04:07.200 --> 1:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>no attention to it until it was too late.

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's true. And Schumer jeffres could have said, hey,

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:15.040
<v Speaker 2>can't the guy is this other person and almost anyone else,

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>and Cuomo took Coo became the establishment candidate. And now

1:04:19.160 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 2>we're in this situation where the people who everybody in

1:04:21.600 --> 1:04:24.560
<v Speaker 2>New York hates most, which are billionaires who spat off

1:04:24.600 --> 1:04:26.920
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter all the time, and they're going to basically

1:04:27.000 --> 1:04:29.960
<v Speaker 2>saying I'm gonna we are going to take not actually

1:04:30.040 --> 1:04:31.840
<v Speaker 2>enough money to make it work, which is, by the way,

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>a billion dollars that's what Bloomberg spent, but a totally

1:04:34.360 --> 1:04:36.520
<v Speaker 2>trivile all amount of money, which isn't even enough because

1:04:36.520 --> 1:04:38.800
<v Speaker 2>New York is so expensive, so big, Like you want

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to buy TV ads in New York, they're going to

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:43.120
<v Speaker 2>put like fifteen million dollars in. That's what like T

1:04:43.320 --> 1:04:46.360
<v Speaker 2>mobile spends in like fifteen minutes. You know, Like it's

1:04:46.360 --> 1:04:48.600
<v Speaker 2>just not it's not It might get you a couple

1:04:48.680 --> 1:04:53.000
<v Speaker 2>of taxicab to try to bribe you to take some

1:04:53.280 --> 1:04:57.320
<v Speaker 2>disgraced elderly gentleman, whether it's Adams or Cuomo. They're deciding

1:04:57.320 --> 1:05:00.320
<v Speaker 2>which one to try to force down the throats of

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the kind of you know of New York voters who

1:05:03.240 --> 1:05:05.840
<v Speaker 2>are kind of cynical about that exact move. Like I

1:05:05.840 --> 1:05:08.760
<v Speaker 2>actually think when people saw flyers and saw TV ads

1:05:09.000 --> 1:05:13.000
<v Speaker 2>from these super pecs supporting Cuomo, I think regular voters thought, oh,

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 2>this is who the billionaires are. Sorry, this is the

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>corrupt old guy the billionaires want us to vote for it. Like,

1:05:17.360 --> 1:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a real dynamic and problem. And Mam

1:05:20.320 --> 1:05:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Donnie like Trump, who was a very underfunded candidate in

1:05:23.840 --> 1:05:27.280
<v Speaker 2>certain ways, pointed to the big money supporting his opponent

1:05:27.320 --> 1:05:29.240
<v Speaker 2>and said, look at this, and people kind of got it.

1:05:30.320 --> 1:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I never, I mean it was like,

1:05:32.400 --> 1:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the choices. Never, And I don't know, is

1:05:36.280 --> 1:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it is it just New York City is New York

1:05:39.160 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>City government just not sexy enough for well intentioned people

1:05:43.040 --> 1:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to run for. I mean, what happened to the woman

1:05:45.880 --> 1:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>who finished second? She seemed to me like, I go back.

1:05:51.960 --> 1:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm I think the sanitation Department's the most impressive department

1:05:54.880 --> 1:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. So you know, you're like, you

1:05:56.920 --> 1:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>know what, you get that done? All right? I'm just

1:05:59.240 --> 1:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, you know it done well.

1:06:02.040 --> 1:06:04.600
<v Speaker 2>She was a solid civil servant, widely viewed as either

1:06:04.640 --> 1:06:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the second or third best sanitation commissioner of the last

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:10.040
<v Speaker 2>ten years. Like okay, we're not talking about like the

1:06:10.280 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 2>and actually there were decent candidates. Brad Lander the controller,

1:06:12.760 --> 1:06:15.400
<v Speaker 2>good candidate. There was like a young yimbie candidate the

1:06:15.640 --> 1:06:18.880
<v Speaker 2>energy is on the left and Mamdani like captured. There

1:06:18.920 --> 1:06:21.120
<v Speaker 2>was something. Really, this wasn't like an accident. He would

1:06:21.120 --> 1:06:24.000
<v Speaker 2>have been I think in a different constellation with a

1:06:24.080 --> 1:06:27.480
<v Speaker 2>stronger establishment contender than Ry Party. My Bay might still

1:06:27.480 --> 1:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>have one, like there was something, there was something really

1:06:30.600 --> 1:06:31.520
<v Speaker 2>real happening there.

1:06:32.040 --> 1:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>If I Keem Jeffries weren't basically the next potential Democratic speaker,

1:06:37.080 --> 1:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he is the candidate that people want to

1:06:40.720 --> 1:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>run for mayor now. I mean, although I think he's

1:06:42.840 --> 1:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>five years ago I thought, yeah, I thought he was

1:06:44.880 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>going to that would be his next move.

1:06:46.720 --> 1:06:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he could have been. He is sort of an

1:06:48.120 --> 1:06:50.200
<v Speaker 2>unknown figure in New York. It's interesting because he's a

1:06:50.280 --> 1:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>very important national figure, but he's not. He's he's always

1:06:52.680 --> 1:06:54.840
<v Speaker 2>been a kind of behind the scenes player, not a

1:06:54.840 --> 1:06:57.959
<v Speaker 2>public figure. But he's a classic legislative leader in that way.

1:06:58.440 --> 1:07:00.280
<v Speaker 2>But I think he could probably walk down the read

1:07:00.320 --> 1:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>in many parts of New York and I own to

1:07:01.800 --> 1:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>know who.

1:07:02.040 --> 1:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>He was interesting, and that's just because he's just not

1:07:06.000 --> 1:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>forced himself to be a New York presence. Way even

1:07:09.640 --> 1:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a Schumer did right, Schumer.

1:07:11.280 --> 1:07:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Wanted Schumer is unmissible. Yeah, my favorite, my favorite line

1:07:17.000 --> 1:07:20.360
<v Speaker 2>about Schumer, which is a John is a roast. John Corzin,

1:07:20.400 --> 1:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>then the Senator for for from New Jersey, said that

1:07:24.320 --> 1:07:27.240
<v Speaker 2>the that that sharing a media market with Chuck Schumer

1:07:27.560 --> 1:07:30.160
<v Speaker 2>was like sharing a banana with a monkey. First he

1:07:30.200 --> 1:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>eats the banana, then he flings his speces at you.

1:07:33.600 --> 1:07:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, that Schubert did not appreciate it.

1:07:37.120 --> 1:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he didn't. I'm sure he didn't. What is

1:07:40.280 --> 1:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>are you surprised he still wants to be the Senate leader?

1:07:45.360 --> 1:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Like it does feel like he's staying past his cell

1:07:48.320 --> 1:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>by date. And when you stay past your cell by date,

1:07:50.840 --> 1:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you risk, as Joe Biden is finding out, you risk

1:07:53.960 --> 1:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>really harming your own legacy unnecessarily.

1:07:58.240 --> 1:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think he probably feels like a

1:08:00.480 --> 1:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of these got a lot of legislive leaders, in

1:08:02.320 --> 1:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>particular the Biden thing. Executives are different, but legislative leaders

1:08:06.400 --> 1:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>you do build this kind of very specialized skill set,

1:08:10.320 --> 1:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>which is these relationships with you know, fifty forty eight

1:08:13.560 --> 1:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>or fifty two very powerful, very eccentric people, and you

1:08:17.760 --> 1:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>think no one else could do this job. And like

1:08:19.840 --> 1:08:22.160
<v Speaker 2>you see why he thinks that, right, Like, sure, that's

1:08:22.200 --> 1:08:23.760
<v Speaker 2>a really strange, hard job.

1:08:23.880 --> 1:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Like, no, it is because you are well you just

1:08:25.840 --> 1:08:29.759
<v Speaker 1>described it well. Most of its time is talking people

1:08:29.800 --> 1:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>off cliffs.

1:08:30.400 --> 1:08:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like and right, and like, how do you get

1:08:32.479 --> 1:08:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Chris Murphy ish shut up about Palestine today like I

1:08:35.640 --> 1:08:38.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know, right, like like, but you do it because

1:08:38.040 --> 1:08:40.240
<v Speaker 2>like there's this other thing in Connecticut, like who knows,

1:08:40.479 --> 1:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's knowing that's kind of stuff about these specific

1:08:43.680 --> 1:08:45.840
<v Speaker 2>people and then being able to raise tons of money.

1:08:45.840 --> 1:08:47.720
<v Speaker 2>And so I think he probably thinks nobody else could

1:08:47.720 --> 1:08:48.200
<v Speaker 2>do this job.

1:08:50.680 --> 1:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>If AOC runs for president, what you you sort of

1:08:55.160 --> 1:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, are the very checked out of ten years

1:08:59.320 --> 1:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>ago would have said, nobody from New York City is

1:09:01.600 --> 1:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be elected president the United States?

1:09:03.160 --> 1:09:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, obviously much less a backbench socialists congresswoman.

1:09:07.000 --> 1:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Right exactly, I'm not ruling anything out for all the

1:09:09.600 --> 1:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons you just subscribed about, mom, Donnie, which is Trump.

1:09:13.120 --> 1:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump did everything the exact opposite of what Republicans thought

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they should do in order to win in sixteen, and

1:09:18.720 --> 1:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>he won, and more importantly, he's reanimated a party. The

1:09:22.000 --> 1:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party is now larger than the Democratic Party. And

1:09:24.920 --> 1:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>they did it by going harder right, not a softer right,

1:09:28.920 --> 1:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>which was of course what was Mitt Romney. The post

1:09:31.880 --> 1:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Mitt Romney recommendation was no, no, no, no, you got to

1:09:34.120 --> 1:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>get softer. No. He went harder, and he diversified the

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>party and he made it different. You know, for whatever

1:09:40.160 --> 1:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you think, it's a different Republican party, but he changed it.

1:09:43.000 --> 1:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>He changed the electorate more than he's changed the elected officials.

1:09:45.720 --> 1:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to sit here and say that. So,

1:09:49.600 --> 1:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, what do you expect? What kind of national

1:09:51.920 --> 1:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>candidate do you expect her to be? And do you assume,

1:09:54.080 --> 1:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, how I assume she's running, do you

1:09:59.240 --> 1:09:59.479
<v Speaker 1>you know?

1:10:00.120 --> 1:10:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess I think that she's obviously she'd be crazy

1:10:02.400 --> 1:10:03.680
<v Speaker 2>not to think hard about it. And I think part

1:10:03.680 --> 1:10:06.439
<v Speaker 2>of it is, you know, she initially had a really

1:10:06.439 --> 1:10:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I think hard time dealing with the spotlight. Like there

1:10:09.120 --> 1:10:10.559
<v Speaker 2>was like you know, there were a lot of threats

1:10:10.560 --> 1:10:12.519
<v Speaker 2>against her, A lot of that I think really rattled

1:10:12.560 --> 1:10:15.400
<v Speaker 2>her personally and and and you saw her kind of

1:10:15.400 --> 1:10:18.240
<v Speaker 2>step back. And I do think like running for president is,

1:10:18.520 --> 1:10:22.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, you really changes your life forever. And I

1:10:22.720 --> 1:10:24.439
<v Speaker 2>don't know where and I don't know where she is

1:10:24.439 --> 1:10:27.040
<v Speaker 2>on that. I think that's a real consideration for anybody.

1:10:27.040 --> 1:10:29.320
<v Speaker 2>And she may want family and this is like she

1:10:29.400 --> 1:10:33.439
<v Speaker 2>had people family mode. People underestimate the extent to which

1:10:33.479 --> 1:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>like real personal decisions are a factor in it. I

1:10:35.800 --> 1:10:37.519
<v Speaker 2>do think she shares with Trump at this point in fact,

1:10:37.520 --> 1:10:40.479
<v Speaker 2>she's a real celebrity and that she's actually like better,

1:10:40.880 --> 1:10:42.679
<v Speaker 2>She's better with this than people realize.

1:10:42.720 --> 1:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Like people, I think she's want to I call her

1:10:44.880 --> 1:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a politically I like to use the phrase political athlete.

1:10:47.320 --> 1:10:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I think she's the real thing.

1:10:48.680 --> 1:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she's one of the best in a big.

1:10:51.040 --> 1:10:53.679
<v Speaker 2>Room, in a small room. She also shares with Mom Donnie.

1:10:53.680 --> 1:10:56.360
<v Speaker 2>And you know, people don't realize this because, like with Trump,

1:10:56.680 --> 1:10:59.479
<v Speaker 2>she's out there talking all the time. Whatever the most

1:10:59.479 --> 1:11:02.879
<v Speaker 2>divisive she says, it is get as with Trump, gets clipped.

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:05.360
<v Speaker 2>And so with Trump, what his enemy's missed was how

1:11:05.400 --> 1:11:07.479
<v Speaker 2>funny he was. He's all you would see was some

1:11:07.479 --> 1:11:10.439
<v Speaker 2>clip of him saying something like totally bananas. Half the time,

1:11:10.479 --> 1:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>it was in the context of a joke that the

1:11:13.280 --> 1:11:15.400
<v Speaker 2>and part of the joke was that the media is

1:11:15.400 --> 1:11:16.960
<v Speaker 2>going to clip this and take it out of context.

1:11:16.960 --> 1:11:19.400
<v Speaker 2>But you, my true follower, are in on the joke

1:11:19.479 --> 1:11:22.479
<v Speaker 2>with me, right, And so, like, I think people missed

1:11:22.520 --> 1:11:24.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of his appeal because they processed him through

1:11:24.240 --> 1:11:26.280
<v Speaker 2>short clips and similarly theyoc you can find clips of

1:11:26.320 --> 1:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>her saying very very strident stuff. She's very she actually

1:11:30.400 --> 1:11:33.599
<v Speaker 2>shares with Mom Donnie, like her style of communications is

1:11:33.640 --> 1:11:36.840
<v Speaker 2>not hyper polarizing. It is about like try, it's not

1:11:36.960 --> 1:11:39.639
<v Speaker 2>about finding the sort of buzziest buzzword. It's the most

1:11:39.640 --> 1:11:44.680
<v Speaker 2>alienating way to speak to people. She's very, very talented,

1:11:45.040 --> 1:11:47.240
<v Speaker 2>and I do think that the question is which I

1:11:47.240 --> 1:11:49.240
<v Speaker 2>think with Mom Donnie, there was also a sense and

1:11:49.240 --> 1:11:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I just like hear this from people who I have

1:11:51.720 --> 1:11:53.639
<v Speaker 2>a very specific conversation with somebody we both know who's

1:11:53.680 --> 1:11:56.160
<v Speaker 2>voting for Mom Donnie, that I was like legitimately shocked

1:11:56.160 --> 1:11:59.400
<v Speaker 2>that she has voted for Mom Donnie last night. Yeah,

1:12:00.200 --> 1:12:02.040
<v Speaker 2>like not a person of the left like at all,

1:12:02.200 --> 1:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>like a person of the you know, active person of

1:12:05.160 --> 1:12:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic center. And I do think, you know, there's

1:12:09.320 --> 1:12:12.640
<v Speaker 2>this sense of just like like this this is like

1:12:12.680 --> 1:12:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the particularly after the sort of Biden train wreck, we

1:12:15.200 --> 1:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>got to sweep everything aside. We've got to the whole

1:12:18.160 --> 1:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>system is broken. We got to blow it up. We

1:12:20.040 --> 1:12:22.800
<v Speaker 2>need new people. This guy is an instrument for that.

1:12:23.600 --> 1:12:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think, you know, the question is how many

1:12:25.120 --> 1:12:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Democratic voters.

1:12:26.640 --> 1:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember a lot of Republicians, by the way, I

1:12:29.720 --> 1:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>heard a lot of Republican voters six and going, I

1:12:31.640 --> 1:12:33.519
<v Speaker 1>don't I know who Trump is. I know he's full

1:12:33.520 --> 1:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of shit, but you know what, Yeah, we need to

1:12:36.360 --> 1:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>blow this up, and he's he's going to blow it up, right,

1:12:39.720 --> 1:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>and they want it Like I.

1:12:40.479 --> 1:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Don't like him, but he's a hand grenade and we're

1:12:42.160 --> 1:12:44.320
<v Speaker 2>going to throw this into Washington, and Mom Donnie might

1:12:44.360 --> 1:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>be the hand grenade. Yeah, AOC or AOC is president

1:12:48.160 --> 1:12:51.120
<v Speaker 2>presidential candidate. Like like I think that if you just

1:12:51.160 --> 1:12:53.840
<v Speaker 2>hate everything, and you know that like all the like

1:12:53.840 --> 1:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the sort of establishment hates her, that just like even

1:12:56.040 --> 1:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>if you think all our policies are dumb, you might

1:12:58.080 --> 1:13:00.720
<v Speaker 2>you could imagine people thinking like, wow, she's really going

1:13:00.760 --> 1:13:02.400
<v Speaker 2>to make those people on TV mad.

1:13:03.200 --> 1:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, which is you know, I've I spent a lot

1:13:05.960 --> 1:13:08.639
<v Speaker 1>of time in northwest Florida and which is a very

1:13:08.720 --> 1:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>conservative part of the conservative part of a conservative state.

1:13:12.920 --> 1:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I've had people say, you know, Trump

1:13:15.400 --> 1:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>was my middle finger, you know, to all you guys,

1:13:18.360 --> 1:13:21.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so in a form, you know, in

1:13:21.560 --> 1:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a way, Mom Donnie could be that.

1:13:25.000 --> 1:13:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean to put a point on it, though, I

1:13:26.080 --> 1:13:27.840
<v Speaker 2>think the Democratic Party of your primer is going to

1:13:27.880 --> 1:13:28.719
<v Speaker 2>start in South Carolina.

1:13:29.400 --> 1:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>You and I don't believe that. I don't believe that.

1:13:31.240 --> 1:13:33.320
<v Speaker 2>I believe you go back to New Hampshire.

1:13:33.600 --> 1:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, I think it may stop Iowa.

1:13:36.479 --> 1:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>The likelihood Iowa a lexa democratic governors in the thirty

1:13:39.360 --> 1:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to forty percent range. They have a legit guy, and

1:13:42.680 --> 1:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a mess on the right and it's

1:13:45.000 --> 1:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of setup as what happened in Kansas.

1:13:47.600 --> 1:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's pissed off about school funding. It's one of those

1:13:50.560 --> 1:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>hyper local school funding has. You know, all, here's the

1:13:54.000 --> 1:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>problem in these conservative states that are that are have

1:13:57.240 --> 1:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of rural areas. School choice in theory sounds good,

1:14:01.000 --> 1:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>but then if you live in certain areas, your choice

1:14:03.120 --> 1:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is homeschool or the school right there isn't really a choice.

1:14:07.640 --> 1:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And Iowa was always very proud of its public school system.

1:14:10.880 --> 1:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I always always had a very strong one. When you

1:14:13.000 --> 1:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>look at those national rankings, it was like Massachusetts its one,

1:14:15.880 --> 1:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Iowa was always in the top five. So yeah, and

1:14:18.960 --> 1:14:22.639
<v Speaker 1>he's a pretty conservative d right, he knows his state,

1:14:22.680 --> 1:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>he was elected statewide. If he wins, I think the

1:14:26.000 --> 1:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>DNC goes back and sucks it up and realizes, you

1:14:28.920 --> 1:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>know what, it's better for the party to start in

1:14:31.080 --> 1:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Iowa because you got to learn to talk to rural

1:14:32.960 --> 1:14:34.559
<v Speaker 1>America and it's the right.

1:14:34.640 --> 1:14:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Sure, and you're gonna have you know, you're you're going

1:14:36.479 --> 1:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>to have a bunch of like Josh Shapiro is out

1:14:39.040 --> 1:14:42.040
<v Speaker 2>there like developing like kind of like Cornpone accents talking

1:14:42.040 --> 1:14:42.400
<v Speaker 2>to world.

1:14:42.479 --> 1:14:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Guess what figured it out and win the caucuses.

1:14:46.040 --> 1:14:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when the caucuses just like dominate to moins, it's

1:14:49.000 --> 1:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>like Obama emphasis, Yeah. And so I guess I think

1:14:51.760 --> 1:14:53.839
<v Speaker 2>whether it starts there, I just think wherever it starts,

1:14:54.080 --> 1:14:56.080
<v Speaker 2>you can kind of take because I think people always

1:14:56.120 --> 1:14:58.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just the preaternal truth that people imagine

1:14:58.479 --> 1:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>in the national primary and the and it's really a narrative.

1:15:01.320 --> 1:15:04.200
<v Speaker 2>And you can certainly tell yourself a story where AMC

1:15:04.400 --> 1:15:07.840
<v Speaker 2>comes in, she wins Iowa, jses New Hampshire and then

1:15:07.880 --> 1:15:10.080
<v Speaker 2>goes to South Carolina. And I think people like one

1:15:10.080 --> 1:15:12.040
<v Speaker 2>of the really interesting things in the mom Donnie races

1:15:12.040 --> 1:15:15.439
<v Speaker 2>that younger black voters are not voting like older black voters, And.

1:15:15.479 --> 1:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, are we going to see that? We've never seen

1:15:17.800 --> 1:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it yet in South Carolina? Will we see it?

1:15:19.720 --> 1:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, right, but I think there is you

1:15:21.080 --> 1:15:23.519
<v Speaker 2>could tell yourself a story where like you're starting to

1:15:23.560 --> 1:15:27.160
<v Speaker 2>where there's this I think seasoned political hack reporters like

1:15:27.280 --> 1:15:30.360
<v Speaker 2>us think like, you know what, like South Carolina is

1:15:30.400 --> 1:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>like mostly older, church going, more women, Black voters, and

1:15:34.080 --> 1:15:35.880
<v Speaker 2>that's the only people who vote, and it pulls the

1:15:35.920 --> 1:15:37.200
<v Speaker 2>party back towards the center.

1:15:37.680 --> 1:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>That's where Bernie Sanders went to die, right right.

1:15:41.400 --> 1:15:45.719
<v Speaker 2>The progressives like just like fundamentally failed to connect with

1:15:45.800 --> 1:15:48.360
<v Speaker 2>that group of kind of working people. They're more likely

1:15:48.400 --> 1:15:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to have for Donald Trump than Bernie Sanders at some level.

1:15:51.360 --> 1:15:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's an eternal truth. I think

1:15:53.320 --> 1:15:56.320
<v Speaker 2>one of your seat mom, Donnie didn't beat Cuomo in

1:15:56.400 --> 1:15:57.880
<v Speaker 2>black districts like Cuomo, but.

1:15:58.360 --> 1:15:59.719
<v Speaker 1>He almost the mayor of Harlem.

1:15:59.880 --> 1:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>But he did went on to well, it's confusing because

1:16:02.960 --> 1:16:04.960
<v Speaker 2>harlemsless black than he used to be about like it's

1:16:05.000 --> 1:16:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the but but Mamdani picked up a lot of like

1:16:08.320 --> 1:16:13.679
<v Speaker 2>younger and working votes, picked up a lot of South

1:16:13.720 --> 1:16:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Asian votes, and then picked up and just he cut

1:16:16.439 --> 1:16:20.280
<v Speaker 2>he he brought CMO's margins down in the places that

1:16:20.320 --> 1:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Cuomo really needed to win with working black vote, with

1:16:23.800 --> 1:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>younger Black voters. And I think like maybe our sort

1:16:27.000 --> 1:16:29.759
<v Speaker 2>of some of our assumptions about the way democratic politics

1:16:29.760 --> 1:16:31.519
<v Speaker 2>work might be a little off and in a way

1:16:31.560 --> 1:16:32.800
<v Speaker 2>that could favor the left.

1:16:33.320 --> 1:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm i am. In some ways it's refreshing. I've

1:16:36.800 --> 1:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>never been more sort of like I'm I am operating

1:16:39.600 --> 1:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>on a you know, don't you know. Don't make any

1:16:42.960 --> 1:16:47.559
<v Speaker 1>assumptions about previous history. Anything. Yeah, anything is possible. And

1:16:47.840 --> 1:16:50.439
<v Speaker 1>here's the reality. The last three of the last four

1:16:50.479 --> 1:16:53.439
<v Speaker 1>times the Democrats have elected a president, the person who

1:16:53.479 --> 1:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>won was not being talked about at this point in time.

1:16:56.120 --> 1:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>In the conversation in nineteen seventy three, nobody was talking

1:16:59.280 --> 1:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>about Jimmy Carter. In nineteen eighty nine, nobody was talking

1:17:02.040 --> 1:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>about Bill Clinton. And in two thousand and five, the

1:17:04.760 --> 1:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama conversation was a point, maybe he'll be Hillary

1:17:07.360 --> 1:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's running me, you know, maybe he'll be or maybe

1:17:10.360 --> 1:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>he'll run for governor of Illinois and then run for

1:17:12.320 --> 1:17:15.519
<v Speaker 1>president in twenty twelve, but they weren't. Fully it was

1:17:15.920 --> 1:17:18.559
<v Speaker 1>really all about her, right, And so the point is

1:17:18.560 --> 1:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, and Pete Boodagic. Did anybody talk

1:17:22.000 --> 1:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>about Pete Bootaget after his failed DNC race other than

1:17:25.960 --> 1:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>he was really good on television interviews? Maybe you ought

1:17:28.280 --> 1:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to do something more right, and all of a sudden

1:17:30.240 --> 1:17:35.599
<v Speaker 1>he runs for president and look without COVID, I still

1:17:35.600 --> 1:17:38.559
<v Speaker 1>think that thing comes down to Buddhajid and Sanders, not by.

1:17:41.320 --> 1:17:44.360
<v Speaker 2>So who who aren't we talking about right now?

1:17:44.400 --> 1:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, if we were talking about him, then they wouldn't

1:17:46.400 --> 1:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>be there right like in someone. But that's my point.

1:17:49.439 --> 1:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's possible somebody who comes close

1:17:52.800 --> 1:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to winning but doesn't in twenty six you know, like

1:17:55.960 --> 1:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>betto O'Rourke in twenty eighteen, like you could picture, there's

1:17:59.280 --> 1:18:02.519
<v Speaker 1>going to be different new candidates that can capture that

1:18:02.640 --> 1:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>all Rourke lost and had a enough juice to.

1:18:09.479 --> 1:18:09.960
<v Speaker 2>The general.

1:18:11.640 --> 1:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's the does he run for governor?

1:18:14.520 --> 1:18:16.479
<v Speaker 2>How Eric Adams pulls it off and he runs for

1:18:16.520 --> 1:18:19.599
<v Speaker 2>governor and just keeps running Yeah, yeah, and then runs

1:18:19.600 --> 1:18:22.759
<v Speaker 2>for president? Right yeah, And I mean it's the point

1:18:22.840 --> 1:18:25.439
<v Speaker 2>is that that's not a crazy notion that that you

1:18:25.439 --> 1:18:27.200
<v Speaker 2>could see, you could see that happen.

1:18:27.320 --> 1:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Final topic I want to hit with you and then

1:18:29.520 --> 1:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you go, and that is I think the

1:18:32.880 --> 1:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>most fascinating issue in the in the next Democratic primary

1:18:37.240 --> 1:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be Israel and the divide and that

1:18:40.200 --> 1:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be. That's going to be the divide

1:18:45.320 --> 1:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that probably gets overcovered by people like you and I.

1:18:48.240 --> 1:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Right the grid we're you know, we're we're probably going

1:18:50.840 --> 1:18:53.599
<v Speaker 1>to over index on it, fairly or unfairly, but in

1:18:53.680 --> 1:18:55.559
<v Speaker 1>some ways it will be when you.

1:18:55.479 --> 1:18:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Say a lot like you and I, do you mean

1:18:57.439 --> 1:18:58.639
<v Speaker 2>Jewish Jewish reporters?

1:18:59.080 --> 1:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't know, Right, that's the point, like, no

1:19:02.160 --> 1:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>matter what you know, suddenly our religion matters when we're

1:19:04.840 --> 1:19:07.799
<v Speaker 1>covering that issue, but not others. But anyway, but I digress.

1:19:09.080 --> 1:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But look, it's look, it's always been tough for Jewish

1:19:12.280 --> 1:19:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Americans that like, hey, we think you know, you can

1:19:15.640 --> 1:19:18.479
<v Speaker 1>not like BB and B pro Israel, right, the idea

1:19:18.520 --> 1:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that there is a middle ground. But I don't know

1:19:20.640 --> 1:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>if if the Democratic primary electorate is willing to have

1:19:24.000 --> 1:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that nuanced debate. And I think it just I just

1:19:26.439 --> 1:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be an unpredictable litmus test. And

1:19:31.240 --> 1:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what what's the right answer as far

1:19:36.360 --> 1:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>as the politics of this going forward in the next

1:19:38.160 --> 1:19:38.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of years.

1:19:38.800 --> 1:19:42.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think people who worked with Done end

1:19:42.520 --> 1:19:45.600
<v Speaker 2>up thinking that the Israel stuff was a netlux the

1:19:45.680 --> 1:19:49.640
<v Speaker 2>more net plus there's an anti Israel, that there is

1:19:49.680 --> 1:19:53.280
<v Speaker 2>an anti Israel plurality or majority in that primary electorate.

1:19:53.680 --> 1:19:55.240
<v Speaker 2>By the way, lots of Republicans say it is real

1:19:55.280 --> 1:19:58.080
<v Speaker 2>too good news. So, like, I think it's a I

1:19:58.120 --> 1:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>think you'll see.

1:19:59.640 --> 1:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>You se populism. Every time there's a right of populism,

1:20:05.400 --> 1:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the first people targeted are the Jews left or right.

1:20:09.040 --> 1:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, that's yep for sure. No mean sort of

1:20:11.640 --> 1:20:13.840
<v Speaker 2>tied up with this idea around it. Yeah, anyway, But

1:20:14.840 --> 1:20:16.800
<v Speaker 2>and mom Donnie, on one hand, I think was really

1:20:16.880 --> 1:20:19.680
<v Speaker 2>unfair like the like was in some ways unfairly accused

1:20:19.800 --> 1:20:24.000
<v Speaker 2>of over at andty semitism, of having said globalized the

1:20:24.000 --> 1:20:25.840
<v Speaker 2>antie fodo and in fact he gave like a very

1:20:25.880 --> 1:20:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Bill Clintonian nonsense defense I've never said it whatever, Like

1:20:31.080 --> 1:20:32.559
<v Speaker 2>it's not what he ran on. But on the other hand,

1:20:32.560 --> 1:20:36.360
<v Speaker 2>he is a very like convict committed pro Palestine activist

1:20:36.479 --> 1:20:37.960
<v Speaker 2>right like if for all his lean and can talk

1:20:38.000 --> 1:20:40.880
<v Speaker 2>about these issues very surefootedly and fluently because he's been

1:20:40.880 --> 1:20:45.160
<v Speaker 2>doing it for fifteen years. And and I think it's

1:20:45.320 --> 1:20:47.080
<v Speaker 2>so I think, I mean, one question is how salient

1:20:47.120 --> 1:20:49.640
<v Speaker 2>will be right, But I think right now it's a

1:20:49.720 --> 1:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>hugely salient issue and Democrats are increasingly andy Israel, and

1:20:52.600 --> 1:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I think there's you're gonna have You're gonna think what

1:20:54.640 --> 1:20:56.679
<v Speaker 2>I bet. I think you'll have a sort of normal

1:20:56.680 --> 1:21:00.639
<v Speaker 2>democratic platform that when elected, I'm not going to cut

1:21:00.800 --> 1:21:02.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm not saying I'll cut funding the Israel,

1:21:02.400 --> 1:21:04.479
<v Speaker 2>but I want to pause funding and do a review

1:21:04.800 --> 1:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the way Trump just did with ukrit right, like we

1:21:07.120 --> 1:21:08.920
<v Speaker 2>want to do We're gonna want to review how our

1:21:08.960 --> 1:21:11.080
<v Speaker 2>age Israel is being used. I bet it's a formula

1:21:11.240 --> 1:21:15.200
<v Speaker 2>like that, and you're going to see like that because like, yeah,

1:21:15.200 --> 1:21:16.320
<v Speaker 2>I think you know, do you want to Are you

1:21:16.320 --> 1:21:17.439
<v Speaker 2>going to keep funding the Netnia?

1:21:17.479 --> 1:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Who wore? What does rama? Manually? Like this question that's

1:21:20.160 --> 1:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>been the you know, and when it comes.

1:21:22.400 --> 1:21:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Close, he tries, he tries to threw the needle and

1:21:24.720 --> 1:21:25.200
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't work.

1:21:25.240 --> 1:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>No, I agree, I don't know.

1:21:27.400 --> 1:21:29.479
<v Speaker 2>But when I watched that news New York results came in,

1:21:29.520 --> 1:21:35.400
<v Speaker 2>my first reaction was like by like, like, forget Rum's

1:21:35.439 --> 1:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>presidential campaign and AOC is gonna go, Wow, there's almost

1:21:39.320 --> 1:21:40.280
<v Speaker 2>future cycles.

1:21:40.840 --> 1:21:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it's I it's one of, to me, the

1:21:43.520 --> 1:21:46.479
<v Speaker 1>hardest hurdle for him to overcome, and there's nothing he

1:21:46.520 --> 1:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>can do about it.

1:21:47.800 --> 1:21:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, And it reminds me a little of Trump in

1:21:49.880 --> 1:21:53.559
<v Speaker 2>the Iraq War, right, like when he just said, like

1:21:53.640 --> 1:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>that war, you know, you're an idiot, that your brother

1:21:55.320 --> 1:21:57.080
<v Speaker 2>was an idiot, that war was a terrible mistake or

1:21:57.120 --> 1:21:59.840
<v Speaker 2>whatever he said, and it was sort of this unsayable

1:21:59.880 --> 1:22:02.799
<v Speaker 2>thingying that turned out to be quite obviously popular inside

1:22:02.840 --> 1:22:05.559
<v Speaker 2>that party. I think is real. I think just the

1:22:05.720 --> 1:22:08.799
<v Speaker 2>partly it's just the nature of our incredibly polarized system

1:22:08.840 --> 1:22:12.760
<v Speaker 2>that the more closer Trump hugs and Yahoo, the more

1:22:12.760 --> 1:22:15.040
<v Speaker 2>idiou is Wrael the Democrats are going to become. And

1:22:15.120 --> 1:22:17.000
<v Speaker 2>yet but also but also I think it's but I

1:22:17.000 --> 1:22:19.400
<v Speaker 2>also think it's a feature of a sort of political

1:22:19.439 --> 1:22:22.720
<v Speaker 2>media campaign to silence pro Bellstadian voices. Like obviously that

1:22:22.840 --> 1:22:25.800
<v Speaker 2>is a real thing, and what you see, like if

1:22:25.800 --> 1:22:28.760
<v Speaker 2>there's any lesson of like how does it work when

1:22:28.760 --> 1:22:31.600
<v Speaker 2>the when powerful forces try to silence the speech like

1:22:32.040 --> 1:22:33.800
<v Speaker 2>are we like we're like you know, how did how

1:22:33.800 --> 1:22:36.400
<v Speaker 2>did that work? With vaccines? Like we're now like incredibly

1:22:36.640 --> 1:22:39.280
<v Speaker 2>like an insanely anti vaccine country. Well, so I look

1:22:39.280 --> 1:22:40.840
<v Speaker 2>at the deep platform, it's going to.

1:22:40.880 --> 1:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Work, right, I've always said the biggest mistake trying to

1:22:43.800 --> 1:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>deplatform Trump. What did he do? He built his own ecosystem,

1:22:46.720 --> 1:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and now everybody's panicked that there's an alternative US.

1:22:49.760 --> 1:22:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I know, and I do think it's strange to me

1:22:51.720 --> 1:22:54.720
<v Speaker 2>that the people who actually really won that fight, the

1:22:55.040 --> 1:22:59.080
<v Speaker 2>people on the far right, the anti vaccine people, are

1:22:59.160 --> 1:23:02.960
<v Speaker 2>now in many cases, like you, like, you know, are

1:23:03.000 --> 1:23:06.360
<v Speaker 2>pushing very hard to silence voices they disagree with, not

1:23:06.400 --> 1:23:07.960
<v Speaker 2>really understanding where this is going to go.

1:23:08.520 --> 1:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean they're very very I think.

1:23:09.960 --> 1:23:11.439
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be a very I think it's going to

1:23:11.760 --> 1:23:15.479
<v Speaker 2>lead to a huge Eddie Israel backlash they see.

1:23:16.040 --> 1:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way you see it a little bit like

1:23:17.160 --> 1:23:19.519
<v Speaker 1>you were, right, Like there's a lot of people on

1:23:19.560 --> 1:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the right upset at Israel about the Syria bombing, right

1:23:22.880 --> 1:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>like that it was gratuitous and it was over the top.

1:23:25.880 --> 1:23:28.599
<v Speaker 1>And you're starting to see and even Trump, WHOA, what's

1:23:28.640 --> 1:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>going on here? Right? Like?

1:23:29.720 --> 1:23:33.840
<v Speaker 2>There is a you know, I mean MATC is a

1:23:33.880 --> 1:23:37.680
<v Speaker 2>coalition that includes very very Provisrael people and like and

1:23:37.800 --> 1:23:40.600
<v Speaker 2>real Eddie Summits, right, it's like a tough coalition to

1:23:40.640 --> 1:23:43.720
<v Speaker 2>hold together, and people all across the spectrum.

1:23:43.960 --> 1:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, at some point, I think this pressure is going

1:23:46.360 --> 1:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to break BB in Israel, But we keep waiting for

1:23:50.000 --> 1:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that over and over. I mean, I do find it.

1:23:52.760 --> 1:23:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess there's a question of it is a non

1:23:54.240 --> 1:23:57.680
<v Speaker 2>BB Israel. Can Democrats like find a way back to

1:23:57.720 --> 1:23:58.519
<v Speaker 2>a non BB Israel?

1:23:58.600 --> 1:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Kit? I don't know, Oh, I think so, But I mean,

1:24:03.160 --> 1:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, I always find Israel. Let me I'll throw

1:24:05.680 --> 1:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>one more question at you. Do you think that Israel's

1:24:07.760 --> 1:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>politics is our future or did we export our politics

1:24:11.080 --> 1:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to them? Meaning? You know, I find it interesting that

1:24:14.280 --> 1:24:19.519
<v Speaker 1>bb IS has gotten more and more power while also

1:24:19.560 --> 1:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>becoming less and less popular. Donald Trump's got more and

1:24:22.840 --> 1:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>more popular powerful, but he's arguably just as unpopular as

1:24:27.080 --> 1:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he was when he began right. In fact, we're starting

1:24:29.360 --> 1:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to see. And yet the left in Israel tried all

1:24:34.920 --> 1:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>sorts of ways to stop BB. Right, they tried, and

1:24:37.880 --> 1:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like same and you're watching the left here in

1:24:40.120 --> 1:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this country try all sorts of ways to stop Trump

1:24:42.320 --> 1:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and they've all failed. They tried in the lawsuit, they

1:24:44.840 --> 1:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>tried creating a centrist party that didn't work, right, Like,

1:24:48.479 --> 1:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they've tried all these things. I look at Israel and

1:24:51.280 --> 1:24:55.439
<v Speaker 1>BB and think, hey, the left, the anti Trump forces

1:24:55.479 --> 1:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>ought to spend more time studying the mistakes of the

1:24:58.080 --> 1:24:59.599
<v Speaker 1>ANTIBB forces in Israel.

1:25:00.560 --> 1:25:02.680
<v Speaker 2>What do you think that's fascinating? What do you think

1:25:02.680 --> 1:25:04.680
<v Speaker 2>those mistakes were, Like, well, what was the alternative?

1:25:06.040 --> 1:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the I think the miss Well, first

1:25:08.280 --> 1:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of all, the Israeli Labor Party just sort of collapsed

1:25:10.920 --> 1:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>after the after the Raben assassination, right, they never arguably

1:25:14.120 --> 1:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>never recovered from that. They had their own their own scandal.

1:25:18.000 --> 1:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think the I think the assumption there was

1:25:21.000 --> 1:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>this assumption that somehow, the further the right that BB went,

1:25:25.000 --> 1:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that it was going to alienate And the fact is

1:25:27.240 --> 1:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it was, you know, BB being sort of always being tough,

1:25:35.400 --> 1:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>uh to those forces trying to sort of get rid

1:25:39.000 --> 1:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of Israel was always going to be better politics than

1:25:41.720 --> 1:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever problems were domestically. And I think, you know, for

1:25:45.479 --> 1:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, the two state solution just never resonated as

1:25:49.840 --> 1:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>much as I think the left thought it would.

1:25:52.439 --> 1:25:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I guess, I guess the the whatever,

1:25:57.800 --> 1:26:00.400
<v Speaker 2>however serious you think the problems are with the imigration

1:26:00.520 --> 1:26:04.879
<v Speaker 2>or the border, can't really talk yourself into a world

1:26:04.960 --> 1:26:07.080
<v Speaker 2>where you're about to be pushed into the sea, right,

1:26:07.120 --> 1:26:09.479
<v Speaker 2>which a lot of Israelis fear like the politics of

1:26:09.560 --> 1:26:11.920
<v Speaker 2>fear in Israel are for like obvious reasons.

1:26:11.600 --> 1:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It's real much more compelling.

1:26:13.160 --> 1:26:14.439
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot more to be afraid of.

1:26:14.920 --> 1:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>No, And I think it's a it's been a very

1:26:16.760 --> 1:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>effective way for baby to keep just keep.

1:26:19.040 --> 1:26:20.760
<v Speaker 2>And I wonder and I wonder if the I mean

1:26:20.800 --> 1:26:22.519
<v Speaker 2>the sort of were to me like where this analogy

1:26:22.520 --> 1:26:26.360
<v Speaker 2>breaks down as you see the numbers immrogration like flopping

1:26:26.360 --> 1:26:28.559
<v Speaker 2>all over the place right now, like people were able

1:26:28.560 --> 1:26:30.720
<v Speaker 2>to like, doesn't seem like people are so just sustaining

1:26:30.760 --> 1:26:33.960
<v Speaker 2>their fear around immigration at all. I mean that I

1:26:33.960 --> 1:26:36.320
<v Speaker 2>find that fascinating. I don't really know it.

1:26:36.880 --> 1:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh what what's happening here on immigration? Yeah?

1:26:40.479 --> 1:26:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right now? I think like Trump's doing what he

1:26:43.240 --> 1:26:46.120
<v Speaker 2>promised and it seems not popular. Wow, popular when he

1:26:46.160 --> 1:26:48.880
<v Speaker 2>promised it, and he's seen it on the border.

1:26:49.360 --> 1:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And but I think that was the mistake. The question

1:26:52.160 --> 1:26:55.599
<v Speaker 1>was what were people upset about the border or or immigration?

1:26:55.640 --> 1:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>They were upset about the border, and I think I

1:26:58.200 --> 1:27:00.719
<v Speaker 1>think that the you know, Stephen Miller or actually wants

1:27:00.760 --> 1:27:03.519
<v Speaker 1>to you know, he had a different agenda, right He

1:27:03.680 --> 1:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to put he believed immigrants were taking jobs from Americans.

1:27:08.360 --> 1:27:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I think fewer taco restaurants and more hands.

1:27:11.160 --> 1:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>That's right. He wants a more American culture, europe eurocentric

1:27:15.800 --> 1:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>American culture, and and so that is I think that's

1:27:19.200 --> 1:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>what's unpopular. I think the border security was popular. I

1:27:23.160 --> 1:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think what was what was unpiped? You know, there's a

1:27:26.200 --> 1:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>there's I was reading something the other day about you know,

1:27:28.680 --> 1:27:32.599
<v Speaker 1>sort of in some ways immigration, the politics of immigration

1:27:32.640 --> 1:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>have been exactly the same, which is, Americans love the

1:27:37.360 --> 1:27:40.519
<v Speaker 1>immigrants that they know, and they and they don't. They

1:27:40.760 --> 1:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>don't like the immigrants they don't know. And that's always

1:27:43.360 --> 1:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and which is ultimately why we don't why Americans are

1:27:47.000 --> 1:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>recoiling it. Why are you getting rid of these people

1:27:49.400 --> 1:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that are are making chicken affordable? Why are you getting

1:27:52.920 --> 1:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>rid of these people that are making produce affordable? What

1:27:55.240 --> 1:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? Hey, that person that cleans my house,

1:27:58.360 --> 1:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>she's really she's terrific, She's not a criminal. Why are

1:28:01.960 --> 1:28:04.759
<v Speaker 1>you attacking her? Why are you scaring her? Right? I think,

1:28:05.040 --> 1:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately we're still there. It's right. Look at how

1:28:08.000 --> 1:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>many times you can write the story of well, I

1:28:10.520 --> 1:28:13.360
<v Speaker 1>voted for Trump, but I didn't want that immigrant to

1:28:13.400 --> 1:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>get deported. I like it, you know, one hundred percent,

1:28:18.920 --> 1:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>because he's a hotel person. He gets it. Every time

1:28:21.960 --> 1:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he's been that argument's been made to him, he gets it.

1:28:25.680 --> 1:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And I at some point, because the polls are showing

1:28:29.360 --> 1:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this is not popular, The question I have is does

1:28:32.400 --> 1:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>he turn on Stephen Miller on this or does Stephen

1:28:35.280 --> 1:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Miller realize is he smart enough to realize what's coming?

1:28:38.360 --> 1:28:40.439
<v Speaker 1>And he sort of and he you know.

1:28:40.560 --> 1:28:42.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they just I mean, they just tasked all that

1:28:42.600 --> 1:28:46.000
<v Speaker 2>money for Ice, right like, but I don't think more

1:28:46.040 --> 1:28:48.200
<v Speaker 2>guys in mass chasing people around the interior is going

1:28:48.280 --> 1:28:49.879
<v Speaker 2>to be a popular thing to do with it.

1:28:49.400 --> 1:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't been the numbers to play.

1:28:51.800 --> 1:28:53.120
<v Speaker 2>It's chasing journalists around.

1:28:53.240 --> 1:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean John Alice's subsect, tod hat a terrific lead,

1:28:56.240 --> 1:28:59.679
<v Speaker 1>which was Trump's never had gotten more of what he's

1:28:59.680 --> 1:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted in six months, right, No president has gotten this

1:29:03.000 --> 1:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>much of what they've wanted in six months than him.

1:29:06.040 --> 1:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>By the way, have you noticed is how unpopular he

1:29:08.400 --> 1:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is right now?

1:29:09.120 --> 1:29:10.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:29:10.560 --> 1:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's across the board, right. None of his policies

1:29:13.760 --> 1:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>are seen as a net positive right now, not tariffs,

1:29:16.520 --> 1:29:18.679
<v Speaker 1>not immigration, And you're just sitting there going.

1:29:19.720 --> 1:29:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Weird weird country where we elect a guy who promises

1:29:22.000 --> 1:29:24.160
<v Speaker 2>all these things and then it just immediately despised him

1:29:24.200 --> 1:29:24.720
<v Speaker 2>when he does them.

1:29:24.760 --> 1:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But isn't it proof we weren't voting for anything, We've

1:29:27.280 --> 1:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>just been voting against and this was like, now Biden

1:29:29.400 --> 1:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and Harris didn't know what they were doing. Get them out?

1:29:31.320 --> 1:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, all right.

1:29:33.680 --> 1:29:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Well Semaphore for it? Who is? Let me close with this?

1:29:40.280 --> 1:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Who is? I think every news organization you need to

1:29:43.200 --> 1:29:45.519
<v Speaker 1>know who. You need to have somebody you compete with,

1:29:45.840 --> 1:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>even if you're not really a competitor. Who do you

1:29:48.439 --> 1:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>view as Semaphore's competitor? Is it? Is it The New

1:29:51.960 --> 1:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>York Times? Is it Axios? Is it BBC? Who is it?

1:29:58.439 --> 1:29:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think a lot of it the FT.

1:30:00.240 --> 1:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a great publication, but also like a

1:30:03.760 --> 1:30:05.479
<v Speaker 2>lot of gosh. I think they were found in the

1:30:05.560 --> 1:30:07.559
<v Speaker 2>nineteenth century, so it was possible it was like the

1:30:07.600 --> 1:30:10.560
<v Speaker 2>sixteenth being Britain. But I think there's an opportunity to

1:30:10.800 --> 1:30:14.240
<v Speaker 2>build a kind of modern, caffeinated version of The Financial Times.

1:30:14.280 --> 1:30:16.720
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing that I think we really see

1:30:16.720 --> 1:30:19.519
<v Speaker 2>ourselves competing with is the World Economic Forum MEDABAS like

1:30:19.560 --> 1:30:24.280
<v Speaker 2>that is a interesting fascinating institution that is, you know

1:30:24.439 --> 1:30:27.639
<v Speaker 2>of also very root in the twentieth century.

1:30:28.560 --> 1:30:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Are you worried at all about being too associated with

1:30:31.560 --> 1:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the wealthiest of of folks? Do you know what I mean,

1:30:35.000 --> 1:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Like when we're having this sort of weird, sort of

1:30:37.200 --> 1:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>populous moment frankly around the world.

1:30:40.560 --> 1:30:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean I think that would be a

1:30:45.120 --> 1:30:45.760
<v Speaker 2>problem to have.

1:30:47.080 --> 1:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a good problem.

1:30:48.439 --> 1:30:51.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like like like if the if the peasants

1:30:51.400 --> 1:30:54.599
<v Speaker 2>with pitchforks are gathering around Semaphore's headquarters, like that would

1:30:54.640 --> 1:30:58.280
<v Speaker 2>be that means you've succeeded a great brand recognition for us. Yeah,

1:30:58.280 --> 1:30:59.479
<v Speaker 2>I think we're not quite there yet.

1:31:00.240 --> 1:31:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the wealthy realized the pitchforks are coming

1:31:02.520 --> 1:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>for them or not?

1:31:06.479 --> 1:31:09.519
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's a the well, like the right now,

1:31:09.560 --> 1:31:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Like I mean, somebody said this to me, like the

1:31:11.320 --> 1:31:15.200
<v Speaker 2>thing you know, uh, the millionaires voted for mom Donny

1:31:15.240 --> 1:31:17.960
<v Speaker 2>and the billionaires are the ones freaking out, Like I mean,

1:31:18.120 --> 1:31:20.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a funny moment where that you also have these

1:31:20.200 --> 1:31:23.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of billionaire populists like like, well, I don't know,

1:31:23.880 --> 1:31:26.360
<v Speaker 2>it's it's a very I mean, I think obviously inequality

1:31:26.400 --> 1:31:28.439
<v Speaker 2>is this huge threat in politics but the way in

1:31:28.479 --> 1:31:31.120
<v Speaker 2>which the billionaires are now themselves these sort of aggrieved

1:31:31.160 --> 1:31:34.120
<v Speaker 2>political actors is a really strange twist. Like I don't

1:31:34.120 --> 1:31:36.519
<v Speaker 2>think that, Like I think Elon Musk and Bill Ackman

1:31:37.080 --> 1:31:39.479
<v Speaker 2>earnestly consider themselves the voices of the people.

1:31:40.120 --> 1:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill Ackman really thinks he's a victim.

1:31:43.680 --> 1:31:45.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's it's incredible to watch, But it's also

1:31:46.200 --> 1:31:48.360
<v Speaker 2>these guys, they're sort of the fact that they now

1:31:48.360 --> 1:31:53.040
<v Speaker 2>are sort of publicly intervening on behalf of these political candidates.

1:31:53.040 --> 1:31:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's just poison politically.

1:31:55.000 --> 1:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>No, it really is.

1:31:55.960 --> 1:31:58.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, right, if we saw those like no

1:31:58.400 --> 1:32:00.880
<v Speaker 2>one was the richest man in the world to bry

1:32:01.040 --> 1:32:03.520
<v Speaker 2>to tell them how to vote. If people hate these people.

1:32:03.400 --> 1:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Ask that poor conservative judge that Randon Wisconsin, please me

1:32:07.360 --> 1:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>your endorsement. Elsk, Yeah, literally made things worse.

1:32:11.160 --> 1:32:13.160
<v Speaker 2>No, And I think right now this sort of the

1:32:13.360 --> 1:32:17.439
<v Speaker 2>like whatever small hope, the very troubled but maybe possible

1:32:17.479 --> 1:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Cuomo and Eric Adams campaigns had has basically been

1:32:20.840 --> 1:32:25.679
<v Speaker 2>snuffed out by the panic of elite the like the

1:32:25.800 --> 1:32:30.599
<v Speaker 2>whole narrative being like the elite billionaire, not even business owners,

1:32:30.640 --> 1:32:33.720
<v Speaker 2>not people who operate, not New York employers. We're not

1:32:33.760 --> 1:32:35.920
<v Speaker 2>talking about like I mean, I'm sure the CEO of

1:32:35.960 --> 1:32:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Pfizer is freaking out too, But we're talking about money.

1:32:38.320 --> 1:32:41.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, hedge fund managers and short sellers who spend

1:32:41.439 --> 1:32:43.280
<v Speaker 2>who often spend like one hundred and seventy nine days

1:32:43.280 --> 1:32:45.840
<v Speaker 2>in the cities that are to pay local taxes are

1:32:45.920 --> 1:32:49.160
<v Speaker 2>having these huge public freakouts. These are not beloved specific leaders.

1:32:49.760 --> 1:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Jessica Tish were on the ballot, would she

1:32:53.240 --> 1:32:54.679
<v Speaker 1>be the would she be the next mayor?

1:32:56.439 --> 1:32:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think she probably would have been had I

1:32:58.320 --> 1:33:00.320
<v Speaker 2>think had she I think it's late now, but I

1:33:00.360 --> 1:33:02.200
<v Speaker 2>think had she gotten in initially, she'd be a very

1:33:02.200 --> 1:33:02.880
<v Speaker 2>strong candidate.

1:33:02.920 --> 1:33:06.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she's Yeah, you're surprised she didn't get pushed

1:33:06.520 --> 1:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>into this by like a Bloomberg who could have probably

1:33:09.320 --> 1:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>talked her into it.

1:33:10.760 --> 1:33:12.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't know, She's not somebody else who

1:33:12.200 --> 1:33:14.559
<v Speaker 2>can be talked to to anything, because she she need

1:33:14.600 --> 1:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>to be. Yeah, she has her own money too, she said.

1:33:17.880 --> 1:33:19.799
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's funny because there is a great tradition

1:33:19.920 --> 1:33:22.639
<v Speaker 2>in New York of the city being and this isn't

1:33:22.680 --> 1:33:24.960
<v Speaker 2>a very small de democratic tradition. But if you think

1:33:25.000 --> 1:33:27.439
<v Speaker 2>about there was a period where New York was kind

1:33:27.439 --> 1:33:30.040
<v Speaker 2>of run by the science of these great New York

1:33:30.080 --> 1:33:32.799
<v Speaker 2>mostly kind of our crowd Jewish families, the Morgan Thaws,

1:33:33.520 --> 1:33:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Robert Moses, like, who felt to some degree like they

1:33:37.160 --> 1:33:40.040
<v Speaker 2>owned the place because they did and operated with a

1:33:40.120 --> 1:33:43.920
<v Speaker 2>level of kind of no bless Obliege actually, and she's

1:33:43.960 --> 1:33:46.439
<v Speaker 2>certainly the inheritor. And I think that's actually a great tradition,

1:33:46.560 --> 1:33:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Like it's some problems with it, but like there's something

1:33:48.880 --> 1:33:52.519
<v Speaker 2>nice about that tradition of people who really feel a

1:33:52.560 --> 1:33:55.080
<v Speaker 2>commitment to the civic life of the city and feel

1:33:55.120 --> 1:33:57.920
<v Speaker 2>grateful and feel a level of gratitude about what they

1:33:57.960 --> 1:34:01.920
<v Speaker 2>were given and are incredible, intense, hard working public servants.

1:34:01.960 --> 1:34:06.000
<v Speaker 2>And she was showing up at four am for Sanateasian

1:34:06.080 --> 1:34:09.160
<v Speaker 2>roll calls when she was a great sanitation commissioner, Like

1:34:09.240 --> 1:34:14.360
<v Speaker 2>she sort of embodies that. I think, like he's a tough, driven,

1:34:14.640 --> 1:34:20.600
<v Speaker 2>driving manager that's not always the personality type of a politician.

1:34:20.960 --> 1:34:22.639
<v Speaker 2>And I think there's a question of does she want

1:34:22.720 --> 1:34:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the political job, but she I think, you know, people

1:34:26.200 --> 1:34:29.599
<v Speaker 2>think she's doing a pretty good job running government agencies

1:34:29.640 --> 1:34:31.760
<v Speaker 2>she runs, so I assume she wants to be mare

1:34:31.760 --> 1:34:32.599
<v Speaker 2>at some point she can.

1:34:32.520 --> 1:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Be I was just going to say, two of the

1:34:34.320 --> 1:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>most difficult ones can be police commissioner, sanitation, and the

1:34:38.120 --> 1:34:40.559
<v Speaker 1>only other tough one I would argue before Mayor would

1:34:40.560 --> 1:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>be the education ahead because that has had its moments

1:34:46.240 --> 1:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. So the fact that she's.

1:34:48.240 --> 1:34:51.519
<v Speaker 2>Thing it with Dora and Mamdane, like yeah, and that's

1:34:51.520 --> 1:34:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the things where I'm done. He's going to like or

1:34:52.920 --> 1:34:55.200
<v Speaker 2>whoever is married. It's one hundred and twenty billion dollar budget,

1:34:55.640 --> 1:34:57.559
<v Speaker 2>and you just like the schools either to get better,

1:34:57.560 --> 1:35:00.800
<v Speaker 2>they're going to get worse, and the cities in the

1:35:00.800 --> 1:35:03.160
<v Speaker 2>subways can get more or less dangerous. Like it's an immediate,

1:35:03.640 --> 1:35:06.880
<v Speaker 2>constant crisis of a job. It's not an ideological sort

1:35:06.880 --> 1:35:09.080
<v Speaker 2>of like the gard person get picked up or it's

1:35:09.080 --> 1:35:12.519
<v Speaker 2>not and one one snowstorm goes wrong like that's the end.

1:35:12.640 --> 1:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, well, Ben, this was I so glad. I

1:35:15.880 --> 1:35:18.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're a you're a real New York City

1:35:18.960 --> 1:35:21.519
<v Speaker 1>sort of savant. I don't know what else to call it.

1:35:21.600 --> 1:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Like take that.

1:35:22.400 --> 1:35:25.599
<v Speaker 2>It's like that's genuinely the nicest thing you could possibly

1:35:25.600 --> 1:35:27.640
<v Speaker 2>have said about me, So I really appreciate it.

1:35:27.680 --> 1:35:29.559
<v Speaker 1>That's like, oh, you love it's been fishing for it

1:35:29.600 --> 1:35:31.800
<v Speaker 1>because you do you love the city, right, I mean

1:35:31.840 --> 1:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you do. You feel like you're of the city and

1:35:33.680 --> 1:35:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you're never gonna leave it, are you?

1:35:35.320 --> 1:35:37.519
<v Speaker 2>No? I think I'm not. I'm stuck here.

1:35:38.360 --> 1:35:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Now I get it. I get it. It's not you know.

1:35:40.920 --> 1:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in the six Borough of New York.

1:35:42.400 --> 1:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>It's called Miami.

1:35:44.640 --> 1:35:46.439
<v Speaker 2>It's always so fun to talk to you, Jeh. Thank

1:35:46.479 --> 1:35:47.719
<v Speaker 2>you for thanks for my friend.

1:35:48.000 --> 1:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I love Sanmophart. By the way, I subscribe. My

1:35:51.080 --> 1:35:55.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite two newsletters to read actually this was are the

1:35:55.280 --> 1:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Africa Newsletter and the Gulf States Newsletter, because.

1:35:58.640 --> 1:36:00.879
<v Speaker 2>Lad, I think we're doing. I think those are very hard.

1:36:00.720 --> 1:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>To match because they're yeah, exactly, I get that information

1:36:05.760 --> 1:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>nowhere else, nowhere else, a little like you're right about

1:36:10.040 --> 1:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the ft every once in a while ft, you know,

1:36:12.439 --> 1:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but not like what you guys are doing. And just

1:36:15.040 --> 1:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I always feel uninformed about Africa. This newsletter has made

1:36:19.000 --> 1:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>me feel much more informed about a continent that we're

1:36:23.479 --> 1:36:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the most news organizations ignore. So kudos and like I said,

1:36:28.400 --> 1:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>keep it up and keep it free for us independent people.

1:36:31.560 --> 1:36:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you, Jef.

1:36:43.479 --> 1:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Hope you enjoyed that conversation. With Ben Smith. I always

1:36:46.880 --> 1:36:50.559
<v Speaker 1>I always learn something from him, and I enjoy debating

1:36:50.600 --> 1:36:54.720
<v Speaker 1>him about all sorts of intricate ways to deal with

1:36:54.760 --> 1:36:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the press and media, et cetera. But let's do a

1:36:57.840 --> 1:37:03.519
<v Speaker 1>little last Chuck. Ask Chuck. We got a lot of them.

1:37:03.560 --> 1:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to try to get through four or five

1:37:06.080 --> 1:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>questions instead of just doing two or three. But a

1:37:08.600 --> 1:37:10.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of it depends on how much I ramble on.

1:37:10.400 --> 1:37:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:37:11.479 --> 1:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>This one comes from Matt j South Windsor, Connecticut, and

1:37:16.040 --> 1:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he says, Hey, I found the Chuck podcast after hearing

1:37:18.080 --> 1:37:20.679
<v Speaker 1>your convo with Chris Salissa really enjoyed it. All right,

1:37:20.840 --> 1:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>look at that selizza. You got me another. You got

1:37:23.120 --> 1:37:26.439
<v Speaker 1>me a podcast listener. I appreciate it. He goes, I'm

1:37:26.439 --> 1:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a lapsed Red Sox fan, but you're talking about the

1:37:28.680 --> 1:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Nationals got me thinking about baseball again. With two MLB

1:37:31.000 --> 1:37:34.519
<v Speaker 1>teams still playing in minor league parks? Is this a

1:37:34.600 --> 1:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Rob Manfred problem? Has he lost the will or ability

1:37:37.439 --> 1:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to hold owners to basic league standards? If teams like

1:37:40.400 --> 1:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Tampa and Oakland can operate like this, is the sport

1:37:42.760 --> 1:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>really sustainable long term best? Matt Jay, I plead you

1:37:45.920 --> 1:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>asked this question. I go hot and cold on Manfred.

1:37:48.960 --> 1:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think you've got to give Manfred credit for

1:37:52.439 --> 1:37:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the rules changes, right, So you know, we sit here,

1:37:57.560 --> 1:38:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we if you're a baseball fan, your program

1:38:00.760 --> 1:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to hate the commissioner. Right, we all hated Bud Ceiling.

1:38:03.479 --> 1:38:05.559
<v Speaker 1>And then like the longer you go, you're like, well,

1:38:05.760 --> 1:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>well he really messed up ninety four. But you know, jeez,

1:38:08.960 --> 1:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the wild card was turned out to be a pretty

1:38:10.760 --> 1:38:12.559
<v Speaker 1>good idea, and this turned out to be a pretty

1:38:12.600 --> 1:38:15.439
<v Speaker 1>good idea. And you know, he got baseball back to

1:38:15.520 --> 1:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>DC and he got baseball into Miami. You know, these

1:38:18.160 --> 1:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>are two things I didn't think was going to happen.

1:38:21.479 --> 1:38:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And with Manfred, I there's a part of me that says, yeah,

1:38:24.280 --> 1:38:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the you know, I put it this way. Look,

1:38:27.320 --> 1:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Manfred was also chief legal counsel even before he became commissioner.

1:38:32.400 --> 1:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>When I look at the state at baseball, where I

1:38:34.680 --> 1:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>get angry as a baseball fan is that is the

1:38:38.240 --> 1:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that the owners canceled the World Series and still

1:38:44.160 --> 1:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a salary cap. I mean, if you're going

1:38:47.840 --> 1:38:51.479
<v Speaker 1>to basically do the worst thing you could do to

1:38:51.520 --> 1:39:00.720
<v Speaker 1>your sport, you better get a financial struck. Sure, that

1:39:00.840 --> 1:39:05.599
<v Speaker 1>is sustainable for a generation and they didn't do it. Look,

1:39:05.680 --> 1:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Baseball it is, you know, the Baseball Union is is

1:39:10.160 --> 1:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>easily the most powerful players union. And by the way,

1:39:13.040 --> 1:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>as we're finding out, if you're if you're following my

1:39:14.880 --> 1:39:18.360
<v Speaker 1>friend Pablo torre Uh and Pablo Tory finds out, the

1:39:18.479 --> 1:39:22.280
<v Speaker 1>NFL p A is probably the worst of the players unions.

1:39:22.640 --> 1:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>And part of that has to do with baseball players

1:39:25.360 --> 1:39:28.799
<v Speaker 1>are more likely to have longer careers than football players,

1:39:28.880 --> 1:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think the football players the players don't get

1:39:31.800 --> 1:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>as active in the union until until they have more

1:39:36.000 --> 1:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>than a cup of coffee in the NFL, and so

1:39:38.280 --> 1:39:40.559
<v Speaker 1>that's it's a lot of players that don't end up,

1:39:40.640 --> 1:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. So I think it's it's unfortunately the the

1:39:43.400 --> 1:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>owners have had a way to sort of take advantage

1:39:46.479 --> 1:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of that a little bit, and they it is the

1:39:50.080 --> 1:39:54.639
<v Speaker 1>nfl PA, you know. I think when Damar Smith was there,

1:39:54.960 --> 1:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>he tried to be a bit tougher with the owners.

1:39:58.320 --> 1:40:00.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, the owners always sort of had control of

1:40:00.760 --> 1:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFLPA when Gene Upshaw, and he was always considered

1:40:05.120 --> 1:40:08.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, secretly always in the in the

1:40:08.880 --> 1:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>always a bit too easy to deal with with the owners,

1:40:12.200 --> 1:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>right not as not as not as pro player as

1:40:14.680 --> 1:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>he could be on that front. And that's sort of

1:40:17.400 --> 1:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>been the reputation of the NFL P a versus the MLBPA.

1:40:21.720 --> 1:40:23.760
<v Speaker 1>But when I look at the fact that baseball is

1:40:23.800 --> 1:40:27.280
<v Speaker 1>about to go through another tough situation, and they do

1:40:27.360 --> 1:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>have a mess on their hands. Okay, the TV deals,

1:40:30.600 --> 1:40:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and this, and the question is is this

1:40:32.400 --> 1:40:36.760
<v Speaker 1>on Manfred right? The two minor league stadiums. You know,

1:40:36.840 --> 1:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think the owners need to get control, you know,

1:40:39.040 --> 1:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>but this is because they don't share revenue equally. They

1:40:44.040 --> 1:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to be as concerned when they have crappy owners.

1:40:47.479 --> 1:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Right in the NFL, they got tired of crappy owner

1:40:52.000 --> 1:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan Schneider, And eventually, essentially it was driven by the

1:40:56.400 --> 1:40:59.559
<v Speaker 1>late Jim Mersey, right. He he he gave voice to

1:40:59.640 --> 1:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>what was a growing majority opinion of those owners. But

1:41:03.360 --> 1:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>because the NFL owners are essentially equal shareholders, when one

1:41:07.120 --> 1:41:10.439
<v Speaker 1>is not when one is dropping the ball, right, And

1:41:10.479 --> 1:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what really irritated the owners about Dan Schneiders

1:41:13.160 --> 1:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>he was they found out he was withholding ticket revenue,

1:41:18.720 --> 1:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the visitor team ticket revenue, that he was keeping more

1:41:24.000 --> 1:41:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of it than he should it's money out of the

1:41:26.439 --> 1:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>owner's pockets. So with baseball, because of the disparity, right,

1:41:31.520 --> 1:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees and the Dodgers don't care if the Rays

1:41:34.040 --> 1:41:37.679
<v Speaker 1>and the A's are mismanaged, right, or have bad ownership groups,

1:41:37.760 --> 1:41:40.439
<v Speaker 1>or have bad relationships with their But if they were

1:41:40.479 --> 1:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>all equal partners and there was a little bit more,

1:41:44.439 --> 1:41:47.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then then there would be I think,

1:41:47.560 --> 1:41:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a better policing by the owners and therefore the commissioner.

1:41:51.320 --> 1:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>When you have weak owners and the fact is the

1:41:55.960 --> 1:41:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a the ownership of the A's is a mess. Should

1:41:59.280 --> 1:42:01.439
<v Speaker 1>have been forced to say sooner, should have should have

1:42:01.479 --> 1:42:06.439
<v Speaker 1>inserted itself into that situation and did it with Tampa Bay.

1:42:06.600 --> 1:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And look, I see the mismanaged the ownership structure of

1:42:12.120 --> 1:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Florida multiple times, right, First it was the garbage man.

1:42:16.160 --> 1:42:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Then it was the diamond dealer from Marlins fans, they'll

1:42:19.479 --> 1:42:22.919
<v Speaker 1>know who I'm referring to say it that, but you know, literally,

1:42:23.000 --> 1:42:27.439
<v Speaker 1>they gave a free franchise. They gave an owner handed

1:42:27.439 --> 1:42:29.559
<v Speaker 1>the he was the owner of the exposed They didn't

1:42:29.560 --> 1:42:32.240
<v Speaker 1>want him owning the team, you know, moving the team

1:42:32.280 --> 1:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to DC and staying the owner. But they couldn't take

1:42:35.200 --> 1:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a team so they traded teams right, and then the

1:42:38.040 --> 1:42:40.760
<v Speaker 1>league took over the Expos franchise and sold it to

1:42:40.760 --> 1:42:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the Learners, and then they gave the Diamond broker the

1:42:44.840 --> 1:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Marlins franchise. So I do think that that if you

1:42:50.479 --> 1:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>believe Manfred has this power, they're there. They've done a

1:42:56.120 --> 1:43:00.280
<v Speaker 1>bad job of policing bad owners and now they have

1:43:00.320 --> 1:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>new ownership. They did finally force to sail in Tampa,

1:43:03.640 --> 1:43:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know, so they are working to try to

1:43:07.400 --> 1:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>fix that situation. But they didn't in Oakland. And I

1:43:11.120 --> 1:43:14.479
<v Speaker 1>have to tell you I feel this way about on

1:43:14.600 --> 1:43:16.519
<v Speaker 1>the Oakland front as I do about what happened to

1:43:16.520 --> 1:43:22.519
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. I think the leagues should be better partners

1:43:22.520 --> 1:43:26.360
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to stadium financing. It was pretty clear

1:43:26.840 --> 1:43:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that Oakland had a fan base for baseball, but the

1:43:30.880 --> 1:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>city of Oakland and the County of Alameda wasn't interested

1:43:35.160 --> 1:43:38.559
<v Speaker 1>in chipping in money. Just like in San Diego, the

1:43:38.600 --> 1:43:40.880
<v Speaker 1>owner of the Chargers couldn't get the community to vote

1:43:40.960 --> 1:43:45.479
<v Speaker 1>for essentially giving taxpayer subsidies to the NFL owner. So

1:43:45.960 --> 1:43:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL decides to take a franchise away from San

1:43:49.320 --> 1:43:52.599
<v Speaker 1>Diego rather than they could have financed the stadium. They

1:43:52.640 --> 1:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>could have turned it into an incredible stadium that was

1:43:55.240 --> 1:43:59.439
<v Speaker 1>a showcase and a host of a Super Bowl. Over time,

1:44:00.160 --> 1:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the owner essentially pay back right. They could have essentially

1:44:03.479 --> 1:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>been the banker for the owner, if you will, or

1:44:05.200 --> 1:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the partner with the owner, and they'd have a franchise

1:44:10.200 --> 1:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't a zombie franchise. The Chargers have zero, Uh,

1:44:15.680 --> 1:44:18.639
<v Speaker 1>they have no fan base in LA. Both the Raiders

1:44:18.640 --> 1:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in Las Vegas and the Rams have more fans in LA. Frankly,

1:44:23.320 --> 1:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know than than than this. You know, the Steelers

1:44:26.120 --> 1:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>probably have more fans in LA than the Chargers. The

1:44:29.000 --> 1:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Packers probably have more fans in LA than the Charge

1:44:31.360 --> 1:44:33.479
<v Speaker 1>than the Chargers, and the Cowboys probably have more fans

1:44:33.479 --> 1:44:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in LA than the Chargers. But San Diego is a

1:44:36.240 --> 1:44:38.879
<v Speaker 1>great football town, and I think the same with Oakland

1:44:39.360 --> 1:44:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and major League Baseball. Had the revenue, they could have

1:44:42.360 --> 1:44:46.559
<v Speaker 1>stepped up. And you know, let's see how you know,

1:44:46.640 --> 1:44:50.599
<v Speaker 1>the the the management of the regional media and all

1:44:50.600 --> 1:44:52.679
<v Speaker 1>of that, and the fact that that's not as shared

1:44:52.720 --> 1:44:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as it is in the NFL. It has created sort

1:44:55.400 --> 1:44:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of haves and have nots in baseball. I'm a believer

1:44:59.479 --> 1:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that baseball can support thirty two franchises, but not with

1:45:03.760 --> 1:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>this current financial structure, not where the Dodgers can do

1:45:06.880 --> 1:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing, but the Twins are limited in what they

1:45:08.920 --> 1:45:12.599
<v Speaker 1>can do. And so if you've got a situation like that,

1:45:12.680 --> 1:45:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to blame the ownership, and you had to,

1:45:15.640 --> 1:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and who works for the owners? Manford works

1:45:18.000 --> 1:45:24.280
<v Speaker 1>for the owners. But you know, I, like I said,

1:45:24.439 --> 1:45:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I do, I am glad Manford made the rules changes

1:45:26.920 --> 1:45:30.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's really helped baseball. But I do think you

1:45:30.320 --> 1:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>really do have to hold both of both Manfred and

1:45:32.960 --> 1:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Sealing responsible for not dealing with a situation that we

1:45:38.360 --> 1:45:41.559
<v Speaker 1>all saw coming that the baseball finances and the lack

1:45:41.600 --> 1:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of a salary cap was going to create more and

1:45:44.240 --> 1:45:50.240
<v Speaker 1>more problems, and it has, and so but I don't

1:45:50.320 --> 1:45:52.759
<v Speaker 1>know if a different commissioner would have made things any differently,

1:45:52.760 --> 1:45:55.559
<v Speaker 1>because ultimately this is an owner issue, and until the

1:45:55.600 --> 1:46:00.120
<v Speaker 1>owners of the Yankees and Dodgers care about whether the

1:46:00.120 --> 1:46:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Oakland A's or whatever we're going to call him right now,

1:46:02.960 --> 1:46:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the Sacramento A's and the Tampa Bay Rays are well

1:46:06.160 --> 1:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>won France. Until they're incentivized to care how well run

1:46:09.200 --> 1:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>other franchises are, I don't know if baseball is going

1:46:12.240 --> 1:46:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to fix itself without having another catastrophic

1:46:17.760 --> 1:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>work stoppage, which I do think is coming soon. I

1:46:20.479 --> 1:46:21.800
<v Speaker 1>bet you you didn't think I was going to have

1:46:21.920 --> 1:46:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that strong and long of an opinion on that one.

1:46:25.600 --> 1:46:27.840
<v Speaker 1>But there you go. You teed me up on that one,

1:46:27.840 --> 1:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>all right. Next question, this comes from Dylan R. From Lebanon, Pennsylvania,

1:46:33.400 --> 1:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and he asked this, do you think we will ever

1:46:35.000 --> 1:46:37.479
<v Speaker 1>see a US sitting president ever get primaried and lose?

1:46:37.600 --> 1:46:39.599
<v Speaker 1>I know we were close with Ford and seventy six

1:46:40.240 --> 1:46:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Carter in eighty. Well never say never. You know. One

1:46:44.000 --> 1:46:47.479
<v Speaker 1>of the one thing we'd never seen until we finally

1:46:47.479 --> 1:46:50.479
<v Speaker 1>saw it was a sitting governor losing a primary. That

1:46:50.600 --> 1:46:55.559
<v Speaker 1>happened to Frank Murkowski, Lisa Murkowski's father, and it actually

1:46:55.560 --> 1:46:59.360
<v Speaker 1>happened due to Frank Murkowski's decision to appoint his daughter

1:46:59.439 --> 1:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Senate. I know, for many Lisa Murkowski is

1:47:02.880 --> 1:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>considered a maverick and in some ways a hero to

1:47:06.880 --> 1:47:12.920
<v Speaker 1>many independent minded voters. But I guess you could call

1:47:12.920 --> 1:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>her a NEPO baby. But that became an issue, and

1:47:15.640 --> 1:47:18.799
<v Speaker 1>a woman named Sarah Palin beat Frank Murkowski in a primary,

1:47:18.800 --> 1:47:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and it looked defeating any executive in a primary extraordinarily hard.

1:47:24.880 --> 1:47:27.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, you could argue that LBJ was going to

1:47:27.280 --> 1:47:29.280
<v Speaker 1>get defeated in the primaries, which is why he ended

1:47:29.320 --> 1:47:32.479
<v Speaker 1>up not running, right even though he won. People forget

1:47:32.520 --> 1:47:35.559
<v Speaker 1>that LBJ win or lose the sixty eight New Hampshire primary.

1:47:35.880 --> 1:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Most people if you think he actually lost, But he

1:47:40.200 --> 1:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>actually he won the primary. He just didn't win it

1:47:42.080 --> 1:47:44.599
<v Speaker 1>by a big enough margin. It was just amazing that

1:47:44.640 --> 1:47:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the sitting president barely could beat clean for Jean McCarthy

1:47:50.200 --> 1:47:55.880
<v Speaker 1>by less than ten points. So I think if a

1:47:55.920 --> 1:47:58.519
<v Speaker 1>sitting president is vulnerable to losing in a primary, they're

1:47:58.560 --> 1:48:02.559
<v Speaker 1>more likely to step down right as we saw with LBJ,

1:48:04.520 --> 1:48:08.680
<v Speaker 1>than not. But I don't know. I think our politics

1:48:08.720 --> 1:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>are so disruptive right now, and I you know, one

1:48:12.080 --> 1:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I'm looking for I think I

1:48:14.240 --> 1:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>think this is going to be one of those years

1:48:16.000 --> 1:48:19.840
<v Speaker 1>where we see a surprising number of incumbents lose primaries.

1:48:21.200 --> 1:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So I know it doesn't really answer your question, but

1:48:25.120 --> 1:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in a period. If we're ever going

1:48:27.160 --> 1:48:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to see a sitting president somehow losing a primary, it's

1:48:31.800 --> 1:48:38.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be in this era if you will. But boy,

1:48:38.640 --> 1:48:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is hard to make happen because presidents,

1:48:42.800 --> 1:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>once they become president, they become the establishment and they

1:48:47.120 --> 1:48:51.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of control the infrastructure and can make it extraordinarily

1:48:51.400 --> 1:48:54.479
<v Speaker 1>difficult to to you know, get the delegates you need

1:48:54.520 --> 1:48:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. But I think if you're so

1:48:56.360 --> 1:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable you could lose a primary with voters, you're going

1:48:59.720 --> 1:49:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to see. Uh, these guys quit before they would actually

1:49:03.880 --> 1:49:07.800
<v Speaker 1>go through with it. All right. This one comes from

1:49:07.800 --> 1:49:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg parts On known. Hey, Chuck, where does all the

1:49:10.160 --> 1:49:12.280
<v Speaker 1>tariff money go? There must be billions coming in, but

1:49:12.320 --> 1:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>who collects in and who controls it? It seems like

1:49:14.360 --> 1:49:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the dollar stream that's just begging for Shenanigans love the cast. Greig. No,

1:49:17.520 --> 1:49:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like tax revenue. It comes into the treasury and

1:49:21.840 --> 1:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so and in fact, they they want to use it

1:49:25.120 --> 1:49:27.839
<v Speaker 1>to sort of and they've been talking, you know, Trump's

1:49:27.880 --> 1:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>been talking up how much revenue is coming in. It's

1:49:30.280 --> 1:49:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like tax revenue. It comes into the treasury. It's

1:49:33.400 --> 1:49:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a tax. It's a tax on on other you know,

1:49:38.400 --> 1:49:41.320
<v Speaker 1>other entities. It's no different, goes into the treasury just

1:49:41.360 --> 1:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like your income tax does. The question is where did

1:49:46.920 --> 1:49:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that money actually come from did it come from the

1:49:50.000 --> 1:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>exporter or did they or did they mark it up?

1:49:54.840 --> 1:49:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And you and I pay for it with an increased price, right,

1:49:58.320 --> 1:50:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So it is, but the money all goes to the

1:50:00.840 --> 1:50:03.320
<v Speaker 1>same place. And this has been one of Trump's arguments.

1:50:03.320 --> 1:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in some ways, I think what Trump wants

1:50:06.880 --> 1:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to go through is essentially ava tax. They don't call

1:50:09.920 --> 1:50:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it that, but essentially getting rid of the income tax

1:50:13.320 --> 1:50:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and essentially going to a form of a consumption tax.

1:50:17.560 --> 1:50:20.559
<v Speaker 1>Now they're not, you know, which is consumption tax attacks

1:50:20.600 --> 1:50:22.759
<v Speaker 1>on everything. But you know what, when you raise tariffs

1:50:23.240 --> 1:50:25.200
<v Speaker 1>ten percent across the board, what have you just done?

1:50:26.360 --> 1:50:29.760
<v Speaker 1>You've just taxed pretty much everything. But no, it just

1:50:29.800 --> 1:50:34.760
<v Speaker 1>goes straight into the treasury. Next question comes from Dan A. Carlsbad, California. Hey, Chuck,

1:50:34.800 --> 1:50:37.439
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening since the original NBC version and I'm

1:50:37.479 --> 1:50:39.920
<v Speaker 1>really enjoying the new format. Well, thank you. The long

1:50:39.960 --> 1:50:42.559
<v Speaker 1>form interviews and sharp inside on current events are great.

1:50:43.000 --> 1:50:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Keep up the great work. Thank you. I'm blushing. I

1:50:45.840 --> 1:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>had a question about candidate recruitment. Given how hard it

1:50:47.920 --> 1:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is to win in states that heavily favor the opposite party,

1:50:50.080 --> 1:50:52.800
<v Speaker 1>why don't parties try to draft non politician celebrities with

1:50:52.880 --> 1:50:55.479
<v Speaker 1>name recognition and brought appeal to shake up races. Even

1:50:55.520 --> 1:50:57.240
<v Speaker 1>if they don't win, it could force the other party

1:50:57.240 --> 1:51:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to spend resources, Like why haven't Tennessee Democrats approach someone

1:51:00.400 --> 1:51:03.800
<v Speaker 1>like Dolly Parton, Eddie George or Taylor Swift or do

1:51:03.880 --> 1:51:06.760
<v Speaker 1>these conversations happen and it really goes far due to

1:51:06.760 --> 1:51:12.439
<v Speaker 1>a lack of interest from the potential candidate. It's more

1:51:12.479 --> 1:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of the latter, right, is that is usually lack of

1:51:15.040 --> 1:51:18.400
<v Speaker 1>interest in said celebrity, especially these days. What celebrity wants

1:51:18.439 --> 1:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to do that to themselves. But there is a specific

1:51:21.000 --> 1:51:25.720
<v Speaker 1>type of candidate that parties do try to recruit in

1:51:25.800 --> 1:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>these one party states where they think if they could

1:51:28.160 --> 1:51:31.600
<v Speaker 1>find the right candidate, and it's not quite a celebrity,

1:51:31.600 --> 1:51:36.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's sort of. It's like public service celebrity, meaning

1:51:37.120 --> 1:51:47.479
<v Speaker 1>a military hero, an astronaut. That's that's usually, or you

1:51:47.479 --> 1:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>know somebody who's famous with their business if you will,

1:51:55.600 --> 1:52:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So you do get attempts like that. Dave Thomas, some

1:52:00.720 --> 1:52:02.920
<v Speaker 1>people wanted him to run for governor of Ohio. He

1:52:03.000 --> 1:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>got into it. My old mentor Doug Bailey tells a

1:52:06.920 --> 1:52:10.479
<v Speaker 1>great story about it. Dave Thomas, you know, was basically

1:52:10.560 --> 1:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>like he founded Wendy's and he was feeling pretty good

1:52:13.000 --> 1:52:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and he was in his ads, and you know, there

1:52:14.880 --> 1:52:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was this idea that he could and at the time,

1:52:16.800 --> 1:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Democrats were dominating governor's races in Ohio, and you know,

1:52:23.280 --> 1:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the problem is desire and Doug. Doug always

1:52:25.960 --> 1:52:28.559
<v Speaker 1>had a very specific question to anybody he worked for,

1:52:28.800 --> 1:52:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and if they couldn't answer the question, he didn't want

1:52:30.640 --> 1:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to work for him, no matter how much money they

1:52:32.040 --> 1:52:34.439
<v Speaker 1>had to spend. And Doug's question was, why do you

1:52:34.479 --> 1:52:36.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be whatever office you're running for? So in

1:52:36.640 --> 1:52:38.439
<v Speaker 1>this case, well why do you want to be governor?

1:52:38.479 --> 1:52:42.479
<v Speaker 1>What do you want to do? And the way he

1:52:42.520 --> 1:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>tells the story is that Dave Thomas sat there and

1:52:45.160 --> 1:52:49.080
<v Speaker 1>said and he had all these big time consultants. He

1:52:49.120 --> 1:52:51.320
<v Speaker 1>brought in all the best, you know, because everybody knew

1:52:51.560 --> 1:52:57.280
<v Speaker 1>rich guy, Dave Thomas, founder of Wendy And he said,

1:52:57.280 --> 1:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, I have to think about that. And the

1:53:00.200 --> 1:53:01.880
<v Speaker 1>next day he calls him up and says, I'm not running.

1:53:02.000 --> 1:53:03.479
<v Speaker 1>He goes, because I don't know why I wanted to run.

1:53:03.520 --> 1:53:06.400
<v Speaker 1>He basically just wanted to run to run and I

1:53:06.400 --> 1:53:09.320
<v Speaker 1>think that happens sometimes with you know, you and I

1:53:09.400 --> 1:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>might think, boy, they would make a great candidate, but

1:53:12.280 --> 1:53:14.679
<v Speaker 1>if they don't have any interest in it, they'll actually

1:53:14.760 --> 1:53:18.160
<v Speaker 1>make a terrible candidate. Right, they're a non paper candidate.

1:53:18.200 --> 1:53:20.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, they might pull well, or they're likable or people,

1:53:20.960 --> 1:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. But look when they happens, it happens. You know,

1:53:25.160 --> 1:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Arnold Schwarzenegger. I don't think Arnold Swarzenegger ever would run

1:53:30.080 --> 1:53:33.240
<v Speaker 1>for governor if it had been a conventional campaign for governor.

1:53:33.920 --> 1:53:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But he was able to get the celebrity. You know,

1:53:36.400 --> 1:53:38.639
<v Speaker 1>you can talk a celebrity into doing it if there's

1:53:38.680 --> 1:53:43.519
<v Speaker 1>like an easy way to do it. And the recall suddenly,

1:53:43.600 --> 1:53:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it got on the ballot and Davis

1:53:46.800 --> 1:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to get recalled, suddenly it was a much

1:53:51.080 --> 1:53:53.920
<v Speaker 1>lighter left. He didn't have to go through a primary. Right,

1:53:53.920 --> 1:53:55.599
<v Speaker 1>and this was before they even had a top two

1:53:55.600 --> 1:54:00.439
<v Speaker 1>in California, but the recall ballot ended up being all party,

1:54:01.280 --> 1:54:03.920
<v Speaker 1>all candidates on the same party. Back then, Arnold was

1:54:03.960 --> 1:54:06.639
<v Speaker 1>a modern Republican, and he might have struggled to win

1:54:06.800 --> 1:54:10.719
<v Speaker 1>a conventional Republican primary, which is was among the reasons

1:54:10.760 --> 1:54:13.840
<v Speaker 1>why he was staying out of electoral politics. And it

1:54:13.880 --> 1:54:17.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't until the basically a loophole showed up, which in

1:54:17.280 --> 1:54:19.519
<v Speaker 1>this case was the recall that got him in to

1:54:19.560 --> 1:54:26.120
<v Speaker 1>do it. So, look, candidates, party leaders constantly are searching

1:54:26.200 --> 1:54:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for what you're just saying. I mean, I think you

1:54:29.840 --> 1:54:31.960
<v Speaker 1>know that you want to. I was just talking with

1:54:32.000 --> 1:54:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman who came to this event featuring you know,

1:54:35.560 --> 1:54:37.560
<v Speaker 1>independence and trying to figure out how you can create

1:54:37.640 --> 1:54:41.320
<v Speaker 1>more of a movement so that independents, you know, don't

1:54:41.320 --> 1:54:43.920
<v Speaker 1>get drowned by money from team Red or team blue.

1:54:43.960 --> 1:54:51.640
<v Speaker 1>When when when they actually get competitive? And I met

1:54:51.680 --> 1:54:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this I met this one gentleman and he was and

1:54:54.080 --> 1:54:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he was saying, you know, do I have the right

1:54:56.120 --> 1:54:58.880
<v Speaker 1>profile to run for office? And he goes and he

1:54:58.960 --> 1:55:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was telling me his profile and he started his own

1:55:01.840 --> 1:55:04.360
<v Speaker 1>business and he turned it into a multimillion dollar bet.

1:55:04.360 --> 1:55:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, I'm gonna stop you right there. I said,

1:55:06.440 --> 1:55:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the greatest halo effect for a candidate description when you

1:55:10.320 --> 1:55:12.520
<v Speaker 1>go to voters is not celebrity and somebody you know,

1:55:12.600 --> 1:55:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it's self made business person. Immediately voters want to hear more.

1:55:19.760 --> 1:55:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Now they may you know, if especially if they've like

1:55:23.520 --> 1:55:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a brick and mortar business, like building their own business,

1:55:26.560 --> 1:55:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that sort of business. Not Wall Street, not that kind

1:55:30.840 --> 1:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of of business person. But really somebody who you know,

1:55:35.360 --> 1:55:39.640
<v Speaker 1>meets a payroll, you know, makes a product or does

1:55:39.680 --> 1:55:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a service that helps everyday people. That's actually some of

1:55:46.160 --> 1:55:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the bed. There are two great halo effects for first

1:55:49.440 --> 1:55:51.720
<v Speaker 1>time candidates. One is what I just described in business,

1:55:51.760 --> 1:55:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and the other's military veteran, especially if military veteran comes

1:55:55.840 --> 1:55:59.240
<v Speaker 1>with Medal of Honor, purple heart, things like that. So

1:55:59.560 --> 1:56:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the celebt everything. It's kind of interesting for you and

1:56:01.760 --> 1:56:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I to talk about. But in some ways, the ideal

1:56:07.000 --> 1:56:10.800
<v Speaker 1>candidate profile for the voter is self made business person

1:56:10.880 --> 1:56:14.000
<v Speaker 1>who wants to give back to the government, or somebody

1:56:14.000 --> 1:56:18.200
<v Speaker 1>who's who you know, who offered up their blood for

1:56:18.280 --> 1:56:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the country by serving in the military, is and is

1:56:22.560 --> 1:56:25.280
<v Speaker 1>willing to continue in public service. Those are probably the

1:56:25.280 --> 1:56:27.200
<v Speaker 1>two best Profilesta all right, I'm going to do one

1:56:27.200 --> 1:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>more question. This comes from Barbara B. I really enjoyed

1:56:30.960 --> 1:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the Lena Khan interview. It was very enlightening. Your comments

1:56:33.520 --> 1:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>about the faulty AI info you found on a search

1:56:36.080 --> 1:56:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of your name made me wonder what might have happened.

1:56:37.920 --> 1:56:40.520
<v Speaker 1>If the mistaken information said that you had died, how

1:56:40.520 --> 1:56:43.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think that might reverberate across the internet. Can

1:56:43.040 --> 1:56:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you imagine how hard it might be for someone who's

1:56:44.840 --> 1:56:48.200
<v Speaker 1>not a public figure to disprove something like that. To

1:56:48.280 --> 1:56:50.480
<v Speaker 1>keep up the good work, Barbara, this is exactly why

1:56:50.480 --> 1:56:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I brought up this situation, you know, because my son

1:56:54.360 --> 1:56:57.160
<v Speaker 1>asked me the same question. By the way, it turned out,

1:56:57.200 --> 1:56:58.880
<v Speaker 1>he never said this to me when I when I

1:56:58.920 --> 1:57:02.040
<v Speaker 1>went public with this with this situation. He goes, Dad,

1:57:02.040 --> 1:57:05.880
<v Speaker 1>my friends have been telling me about you with asking

1:57:05.880 --> 1:57:08.280
<v Speaker 1>me about you with Parkinson's for months. And he goes,

1:57:08.320 --> 1:57:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and I kept telling him there's nothing too, that it's

1:57:09.880 --> 1:57:11.800
<v Speaker 1>just a bad rumor. And he goes, I didn't bother

1:57:11.840 --> 1:57:14.840
<v Speaker 1>telling you about it at home, And I said, you know,

1:57:15.040 --> 1:57:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I said okay. But then he asked me a very

1:57:17.920 --> 1:57:20.600
<v Speaker 1>similar question. He goes, I see that once you said something,

1:57:20.600 --> 1:57:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh, they got to fix it. He says,

1:57:23.600 --> 1:57:26.400
<v Speaker 1>what if you weren't Chuck Todd? And I said, well, I,

1:57:26.600 --> 1:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I don't know how much Chuck, how

1:57:29.120 --> 1:57:32.640
<v Speaker 1>much influence Chuck Todd has anymore. Sorry, I'm channeling my

1:57:32.680 --> 1:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>old Bob Dole. But that is I think that's a

1:57:37.760 --> 1:57:43.800
<v Speaker 1>very fair concern. And you know, you've you've you've I've

1:57:43.800 --> 1:57:47.440
<v Speaker 1>read stories what you just described where somebody is accidentally

1:57:47.480 --> 1:57:50.800
<v Speaker 1>declared dead because maybe somebody you know, had the wrong

1:57:50.840 --> 1:57:53.360
<v Speaker 1>middle initial on a death certificate and it ended up

1:57:53.400 --> 1:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting ready, you know, you you know this

1:57:56.080 --> 1:57:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is something that has happened before, but you're right on

1:57:58.120 --> 1:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the internet it is. And I think this is the

1:58:01.640 --> 1:58:04.760
<v Speaker 1>This gets it to what. I brought this up in

1:58:04.800 --> 1:58:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a previous podcast, but I can't remember which one, so

1:58:07.440 --> 1:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll repeat myself. I think I've told you about a

1:58:10.880 --> 1:58:13.680
<v Speaker 1>project that Frank McCourt, the former owner of the Dodgers,

1:58:14.080 --> 1:58:17.000
<v Speaker 1>had put together called Project Liberty, and one of his

1:58:17.080 --> 1:58:20.640
<v Speaker 1>motivations he wrote this book about about sort of trying

1:58:20.640 --> 1:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to reclaim our data from big tech. And one of

1:58:24.840 --> 1:58:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the points he was making is he describes in the

1:58:27.800 --> 1:58:31.320
<v Speaker 1>book you know, look, Frank McCourt's ownership of the Dodgers

1:58:31.360 --> 1:58:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is most infamous for the high profile divorce which forced

1:58:36.040 --> 1:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>them to sell. It became a storyline on Curb Your Enthusiasm, right,

1:58:41.760 --> 1:58:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that was a rip from the headlines. And so because

1:58:45.280 --> 1:58:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of the settlement, you know, they didn't neither Frank or

1:58:48.840 --> 1:58:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Jamie McCourt had enough money to buy the other one out,

1:58:50.920 --> 1:58:52.200
<v Speaker 1>so they had to sell the team in order to

1:58:52.240 --> 1:58:57.160
<v Speaker 1>settle their divorce. It has been some fifteen years since

1:58:57.200 --> 1:59:00.520
<v Speaker 1>their divorce, and to this day, if you google Frank McCord,

1:59:00.600 --> 1:59:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's among the first things that comes up. And this

1:59:03.000 --> 1:59:06.360
<v Speaker 1>was sort of this was something he's like, at what

1:59:06.560 --> 1:59:09.440
<v Speaker 1>point is that? You know, he goes my ex wife

1:59:09.480 --> 1:59:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and I they both remarried. They both have a pretty

1:59:13.920 --> 1:59:16.760
<v Speaker 1>good relationship because they had kids, their adult children now

1:59:16.800 --> 1:59:20.360
<v Speaker 1>they all get along at family gatherings, et cetera. But

1:59:20.480 --> 1:59:23.160
<v Speaker 1>his identity on the internet, if you google them immediately

1:59:23.160 --> 1:59:24.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of goes back to that moment. It's like, when

1:59:25.080 --> 1:59:27.680
<v Speaker 1>when do you get to control your own biography, your

1:59:27.680 --> 1:59:31.400
<v Speaker 1>own persona, who you are? And the fact is we

1:59:31.560 --> 1:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have no, we don't have any control of that, right

1:59:35.480 --> 1:59:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they do. And this was his he you know, his

1:59:38.240 --> 1:59:39.960
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, and it's a little pie in the sky,

1:59:40.080 --> 1:59:43.280
<v Speaker 1>but he basically wants to sort of reorient the internet

1:59:43.360 --> 1:59:45.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. If you think about it, when you agree

1:59:45.800 --> 1:59:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to terms and services, you agree to terms and services

1:59:48.840 --> 1:59:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on Google or Apple or Amazon's terms, they don't agree

1:59:55.040 --> 1:59:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to terms and services on the user's terms, we don't

1:59:59.600 --> 2:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>get to tell them you know, yes, you're you know.

2:00:02.440 --> 2:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to the EU privacy laws, there's you can control

2:00:05.760 --> 2:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>some cookies now, right. Not every website allows it, but

2:00:08.920 --> 2:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in some website you can control some cookies, especially those

2:00:12.040 --> 2:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that cater to your European users. But that is a

2:00:15.920 --> 2:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, a fundamental issue where we don't control our

2:00:19.520 --> 2:00:22.839
<v Speaker 1>own persona. But you know, one of the more interesting

2:00:22.920 --> 2:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>generational divides on the issue of privacy. For whatever reason,

2:00:27.720 --> 2:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>millennials and Gen Z don't view privacy with the same

2:00:33.200 --> 2:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of concern that older that Gen X or baby

2:00:36.760 --> 2:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>boomers do. And I think part of it is that

2:00:39.240 --> 2:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they've they've been sort of Internet native, right, and there

2:00:42.680 --> 2:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>their whole lives. They in some ways they voluntarily have

2:00:45.160 --> 2:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>put their personas on the Internet, right, and and they've

2:00:47.880 --> 2:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of just they've they've been on the whole time,

2:00:51.720 --> 2:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>their whole lives. And I think until I guess I

2:00:57.080 --> 2:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>would make a plea with my millennial friends here, will

2:00:59.800 --> 2:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you please get angry about privacy and data? I understand

2:01:06.520 --> 2:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>why you assume it's too late, Genie's already out of

2:01:09.120 --> 2:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the bottle, But there are things like this, like, you know,

2:01:13.240 --> 2:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>how do we know if we can? Hey, you say

2:01:15.640 --> 2:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm dead, I'm alive. What do I have to do

2:01:18.440 --> 2:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to tell you this? Right? Things like that getting I

2:01:22.760 --> 2:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>think this is an issue that if when you when

2:01:28.000 --> 2:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you start to talk to people about you're like, hey,

2:01:29.680 --> 2:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I should have more control of this. But

2:01:33.800 --> 2:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we have sort of almost surrendered this idea that we

2:01:36.640 --> 2:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>can somehow wrestle our You know, who owns the data? Right?

2:01:42.280 --> 2:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Do we own our own data? Or does the does

2:01:47.720 --> 2:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the tech company who gathered all of our data individually

2:01:52.600 --> 2:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and put it into one larger file and made a

2:01:54.880 --> 2:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>unique product. Do they own that unique product? One of

2:02:00.240 --> 2:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>us are shareholders of our own data within that unique product?

2:02:07.720 --> 2:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. This is why I always joke why

2:02:10.600 --> 2:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>God invented trial lawyers? Some trial lawyers going to figure

2:02:13.280 --> 2:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>out a class action suit on this, uh, and then

2:02:17.280 --> 2:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>some and and at some point I'd like to think

2:02:20.920 --> 2:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that that there'll be some a political sort of a

2:02:26.080 --> 2:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>rise from the electorate, if you will, about this issue.

2:02:29.440 --> 2:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>But look, this is this what you just asked about.

2:02:35.280 --> 2:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, what do you do if you're not you know,

2:02:36.920 --> 2:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>if you if you don't have a platform like the

2:02:38.960 --> 2:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>one I have in order to say, hey, Google, you

2:02:41.720 --> 2:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>messed up. If you don't have that kind of platform,

2:02:46.080 --> 2:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you wrestle control of your

2:02:48.200 --> 2:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>own persona. I think this is I think this should

2:02:50.400 --> 2:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>be a bigger concern, and I think government should be

2:02:55.360 --> 2:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit more on the side of the consumer on

2:02:57.040 --> 2:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this one. All right, I am I gonna did five questions,

2:03:02.520 --> 2:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>all right. I will try to get better because we're

2:03:04.720 --> 2:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>getting more questions from you guys. I appreciate it. You

2:03:06.800 --> 2:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>can send it to ask Chuck at chucktodcast dot com.

2:03:09.240 --> 2:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You can leave a question the Instagram feed, TikTok feed,

2:03:13.200 --> 2:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube feed, send me a DM on X. I'm not

2:03:18.640 --> 2:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>going to really look at replies on X. That's toxic

2:03:21.800 --> 2:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>bot stuff, but dms I will. I keep my dms open,

2:03:25.560 --> 2:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so you're welcome to come in on that front. However

2:03:29.240 --> 2:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to get a question to us, we do

2:03:31.760 --> 2:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>our best to scoop it up and put it in

2:03:34.080 --> 2:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the queue to get to it at some point. All right.

2:03:37.560 --> 2:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>With that, I hope you enjoy your weekend. Barring massive

2:03:42.520 --> 2:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>breaking news or Congress returning to deal with Epstein, I

2:03:47.240 --> 2:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>will upload again, probably in the next ninety six hours,

2:03:51.400 --> 2:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and with that until I upload again.