Speaker 1: Team Buck, Welcome to the Freedom Hut. Much to get
Speaker 1: to today. First off, stop panicking over the Delta variant.
Speaker 1: No more lockdowns, no more mask mandates. This is a
Speaker 1: fight we have to win. Plus, our southern border is
Speaker 1: open to the whole world. And Dick Durban tells us
Speaker 1: what the strategy is for the Democrats. An Ivy League lawyer,
Speaker 1: firebomb to police car, and yet there are a lot
Speaker 1: of folks who are rushing to defend the suspect and
Speaker 1: a transmodel on the cover of Sports Illustrated. What are
Speaker 1: we supposed to take from that? We'll get into all
Speaker 1: of it just a moment, but first I've got to
Speaker 1: tell you that the Tunnel to Towers Foundation is incredible.
Speaker 1: They help us keep our commitment to never forget. And
Speaker 1: this year the foundation is honoring GoldStar and fallen first
Speaker 1: responder families with young children and catastrophically injured veterans and
Speaker 1: first responders with two hundred mortgage free homes. Chairman and
Speaker 1: CEO Frank Siller is paying tribute to the fallen by
Speaker 1: walking from the Pentagon to Shanksville and on to Ground zero,
Speaker 1: more than five hundred miles through six states in forty
Speaker 1: two days the month of August through nine to eleven,
Speaker 1: towers of light are to shine at the Pentagon and
Speaker 1: Shanks fill memorials in remembrance. The names of those we
Speaker 1: lost to nine eleven related illnesses are being read aloud
Speaker 1: at a ceremony on September twelve, and on Veteran's Day,
Speaker 1: the names of those we lost in the War on
Speaker 1: Terror will also be read aloud. Do good and help
Speaker 1: America to never forget. Donate eleven dollars a month to
Speaker 1: tunnel to towers at t twot dot org. That's t
Speaker 1: twot dot org t the number two t dot org.
Speaker 1: The COVID panic is never going to stop unless we
Speaker 1: make it stop. You know I've been saying that for
Speaker 1: a long time. You also know that I've told you
Speaker 1: there's a possibility of more mask mandates in the future,
Speaker 1: even after we get to a widespread level of vaccination,
Speaker 1: which we are we've already reached in this country. It's
Speaker 1: already something that we are experiencing. And because of the
Speaker 1: delta variant, you're being told, oh no, there's different rules
Speaker 1: we have to apply now. We have to go back
Speaker 1: to the things we did in the past. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: lockdowns were utterly catastrophic, okay, idiotic. They did not work,
Speaker 1: and no one should have thought they would work. But
Speaker 1: this is a case study. In not just years or decades,
Speaker 1: I would say, in centuries to come, people will look
Speaker 1: back at what our public health establishment did in this
Speaker 1: country and around the world and say, how could they
Speaker 1: have abandoned so many core principles of science, of free
Speaker 1: intellectual inquiry, a freedom of speech. How could they have
Speaker 1: been completely overtaken with groupthink and the herd mentality and
Speaker 1: really acted like anybody who would question this, even from
Speaker 1: within their own ranks, was some kind of a heretic.
Speaker 1: There is an excellent piece in City Journal written by
Speaker 1: John Tierney. I want to share some of this piece
Speaker 1: with you because I think it makes the point incredibly well.
Speaker 1: Here's what he writes, and the title of the piece
Speaker 1: is the panic Pandemic, which I believe was even a
Speaker 1: title that we used. Producer Mark, I didn't ask you
Speaker 1: this before, and we could check. I'm sure we had
Speaker 1: a podcast where I said, stop the panic pandemic, because
Speaker 1: that's what we've been going through. It's an obvious description
Speaker 1: of the reality that we have been seeing, and so
Speaker 1: I wanted to share with you this piece because I
Speaker 1: think he really gets it. I think he really nails it.
Speaker 1: The United States quote suffered through two lethal waves of
Speaker 1: contagion in the past year and a half. The first
Speaker 1: was a viral pandemic that killed about one in five
Speaker 1: hundred Americans, typically a person over seventy five suffering from
Speaker 1: other serious health conditions. The second, and far more catastrophic,
Speaker 1: was a moral panic that swept the nation's guiding institutions.
Speaker 1: Instead of keeping calm and carrying on, the American elite
Speaker 1: flouted the norms of governance, journalism, academic freedom, and, worst
Speaker 1: of all, science. They misled the public about the origins
Speaker 1: of the virus and the true risk that it posed,
Speaker 1: Ignoring their own carefully prepared plans for a pandemic, they
Speaker 1: claimed unprecedented powers to impose untested strategies with terrible collateral damage.
Speaker 1: As evidence of their mistakes mounted, they stifled debate by
Speaker 1: vilifying dissenters, censoring criticism, and suppressing scientific research. If, as
Speaker 1: seems increasingly plausible, the coronavirus that causes COVID nineteen leaked
Speaker 1: out of a laboratory in Wuhan is the costliest blunder
Speaker 1: ever committed by scien scientists. Whatever the pandemic's origin, the
Speaker 1: response to it is the worst mistake in the history
Speaker 1: of the public health profession. We still have no convincing
Speaker 1: evidence that the lockdown save lives lives, but lots of
Speaker 1: evidence that they already cost lives and will prove deadlier
Speaker 1: in the long run than the virus itself. And quote,
Speaker 1: this is stunning, isn't it. You hear these words or
Speaker 1: you read them, if you see this piece in City
Speaker 1: Journal and you say, what the hell were these idiots
Speaker 1: in charge doing lockdown? And remember, there's so many ways,
Speaker 1: and I could just go off on endless criticisms about this.
Speaker 1: There are so many ways though, in which this was
Speaker 1: doomed to fail from the start as a policy. For one,
Speaker 1: we never really locked down. That did not happen. There
Speaker 1: were always frontline workers, There were always people who were
Speaker 1: required to continue to go about their jobs, and there
Speaker 1: were human beings who had to be in contact with
Speaker 1: other human beings. The virus continued to spread, but instead
Speaker 1: of focusing on protecting those who are truly at mortal peril,
Speaker 1: the elderly, those with pre existing conditions, most notably obesity.
Speaker 1: Instead of that, we pretended like twenty two year olds
Speaker 1: should be working on Zoom only from their couch in
Speaker 1: Park Slope, Brooklyn, or in Santa Monica, Los Angeles, or wherever.
Speaker 1: That's what this thing turned into. So they had people
Speaker 1: who were working class delivering their food and keeping the
Speaker 1: lights on for them while they got to do a
Speaker 1: lot of virtue signaling about how seriously they take the virus.
Speaker 1: But this became a religion for people that neither have
Speaker 1: a relationship with God nor have come to grips with
Speaker 1: the fact psychologically that we are all going to die.
Speaker 1: I don't mean from COVID. I just mean, as a
Speaker 1: certainty all of us will die. I will die, and
Speaker 1: I know that. And sure it's a human condition that
Speaker 1: you will at some points. Be you don't want to die,
Speaker 1: and you try to live the longest, happiest, healthiest life
Speaker 1: you can. You take those actions you can to extend
Speaker 1: your life whenever possible. But you know, you wake up
Speaker 1: every day with that knowledge and an understanding that there's
Speaker 1: only so much you can control, and you do the
Speaker 1: best you can, and we all have limited time. That
Speaker 1: psychological predisposition would have resulted in people thinking we're going
Speaker 1: to do what we can. You know, you want to
Speaker 1: stay away from sick people and you want to stay
Speaker 1: as healthy as you can, but you can't control this virus. Instead,
Speaker 1: we were completely misled into thinking that if only we
Speaker 1: obeyed Saint Fauci, everything would be fine, if only that
Speaker 1: sub mediocrity in his little lab coat and his little glasses.
Speaker 1: You know, I just go on TV every three seconds
Speaker 1: to tell the Libs whatever they want to hear about
Speaker 1: the virus. Here he is play club four. Well, Canada
Speaker 1: is doing better, not because we are trying any less
Speaker 1: than they are trying. It's because in Canada you don't
Speaker 1: have that divisiveness of people not wanting to get vaccinated
Speaker 1: in many respects on the basis of ideology and political persuasion.
Speaker 1: And that's something that we have been saying for some
Speaker 1: time now. I mean, political differences are totally understandable and
Speaker 1: a natural part of the process in any country. But
Speaker 1: when it comes to a public health issue in which
Speaker 1: you're in the middle of a deadly pandemic and the
Speaker 1: common enemy is the virus, it just doesn't make any
Speaker 1: sense to essentially disregard or don't pay attention to what's obvious,
Speaker 1: namely that if you look at the numbers, they tell
Speaker 1: you something very important. Ninety nine point five percent of
Speaker 1: all the deaths due to COVID nineteen in this country
Speaker 1: are among vaccinated people. So let's just take him at
Speaker 1: his word here for a second. That was Fauci just
Speaker 1: in the last twenty four hours. Let's just go first
Speaker 1: of all, he's he's a scientist who compares the US
Speaker 1: to Canada, and immediately it's you know the politics Fox
Speaker 1: News whenever they say divisive politics, whenever these lab coat
Speaker 1: tyrants get on TV. You know, the blue check MD
Speaker 1: brigades who were wrong about everything. They love the BLM protests,
Speaker 1: even when they were telling everybody else no protests allowed.
Speaker 1: But BLM protests were about health. I see somebody, especially
Speaker 1: a you know, an upper middle class white liberal who's
Speaker 1: showy about how much they're into BLM. I not only
Speaker 1: see a fraud, I see a moron. I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say this, it's like people that unnecessarily share their pronouns.
Speaker 1: No one cares. Stop being an idiot, and it doesn't
Speaker 1: make you a good person. It makes you a sheep.
Speaker 1: You do whatever the herd is doing, and try to
Speaker 1: fit in so desperately, it's it's pathetic. I just want
Speaker 1: to know that Fauci missed missed a science compares the
Speaker 1: US to Canada. Gee, you know, you know what really
Speaker 1: matters a lot when you're talking about the spread of
Speaker 1: a virus, things like population density. Canada per square per
Speaker 1: square mile has eleven people. The United States per square
Speaker 1: mile has ninety four people, so almost ten x the
Speaker 1: population density per square mile in the United States. Do
Speaker 1: you think should that matter to anybody? Is that is
Speaker 1: that relevant? I think it matters. I think people should
Speaker 1: care about this. I think they should think that it's
Speaker 1: something that we all should pay attention to at some level.
Speaker 1: But then again, I'm basing this on the science. I'm
Speaker 1: basing this on what actually we know from the numbers. Right, Okay,
Speaker 1: it's more like nine times who cares, doesn't matter, it's
Speaker 1: a lot more population density. And here we are playing
Speaker 1: this out with the Fauci I. It's still running around
Speaker 1: saying the delta varied. You gotta get everyone. If the
Speaker 1: vaccines work so well, which they work less well against
Speaker 1: delta than they had hoped, or then they had told us.
Speaker 1: But if the vaccines work so well, then guess what
Speaker 1: we should be back to fully normal today? Because if
Speaker 1: someone is choosing not to get a vaccine, they are
Speaker 1: making a choice and that is something that they get
Speaker 1: to live with. Right. I have not gotten the vaccine
Speaker 1: because I had COVID, so and my family members who
Speaker 1: are at high risk have all gotten the vaccine. So
Speaker 1: it is completely reasonable to say I'm not going to
Speaker 1: do it. But if I were to get super sick
Speaker 1: with COVID in six months and you know, God forbid,
Speaker 1: end up in the hospital, would people be able to say, well,
Speaker 1: you know, he didn't get the vACC Yeah, of course,
Speaker 1: but how many years have we gone through now in
Speaker 1: America where you could choose to get a flu vaccine,
Speaker 1: yes or no, one way or the other, And a
Speaker 1: lot of people died from the flu, and a lot
Speaker 1: of those people didn't get the vaccine. If you believe
Speaker 1: in it, if you want it, you can get it
Speaker 1: and have had plenty of opportunity to get it. The
Speaker 1: argument for imposing this on people, the argument for mandates
Speaker 1: and all the rest of it simply does not add up.
Speaker 1: Doesn't add up. Because you should be you're protected, it's
Speaker 1: good enough. And giving this to twelve year olds or
Speaker 1: two year olds as they want to start doing is reckless,
Speaker 1: and it's rooted in this as a religious belief for
Speaker 1: liberals who are not really liberals, statist leftist authoritarians, progressives,
Speaker 1: it's a religion for them, a religion replacement. And there's
Speaker 1: a lot of moral and intellectual cowardice on the left
Speaker 1: about this point. It's really defined by intellectual and moral
Speaker 1: cowardice when it comes to COVID. They would not speak
Speaker 1: the truth. And that's why when you read this piece,
Speaker 1: for example, in City Journal where they address what happened here,
Speaker 1: it's stunning to see how this was politicized so early on.
Speaker 1: It was used as a weapon against Trump. And what
Speaker 1: they've really ended up doing in all of this is
Speaker 1: destroy public faith in the health establishments, willingness to stay
Speaker 1: out of politics and just do what's best for the patient,
Speaker 1: just do what's best to keep people healthy and alive.
Speaker 1: Do you think any of the lockdowners feel bad about
Speaker 1: the fact that, as the City Journal piece states, quote,
Speaker 1: one in three people worldwide lost a job or a
Speaker 1: business during the lockdowns, half saw their earnings drop. Children
Speaker 1: never at risk from the virus in many places essentially
Speaker 1: lost a year of school. The economic and health consequences
Speaker 1: were felt most acutely among the less affluent in America
Speaker 1: and in the rest of the world, where the World
Speaker 1: Bank estimates that more than one hundred million people had
Speaker 1: been pushed into extreme poverty. One hundred million people pushed
Speaker 1: into extreme poverty. Extreme poverty means going to bed hungry
Speaker 1: at night. Malnutrition. Extreme poverty means not having access to
Speaker 1: properly sanitize water. You know, you get dysentery. You can
Speaker 1: die from that too. By the way, extreme poverty is grinding, misery, pain,
Speaker 1: and despair. One hundred million people pushed into that, according
Speaker 1: to the World Bank, because of lockdowns. Do they count?
Speaker 1: Does that matter to anybody? No, it's so much more
Speaker 1: essential for people who have two homes and could flee
Speaker 1: to one of them. During the pandemics, they had plenty
Speaker 1: of outdoor space to go to to watch MSNBC and
Speaker 1: listen to Mattow and the other geniuses over there and
Speaker 1: mask up double mask What happened to double masking? You'll
Speaker 1: notice it's fallen out of fashion, like a preferred hat
Speaker 1: or the width of men's ties, because that's all that
Speaker 1: ever was a fashion. It was moronic from the beginning.
Speaker 1: Will they admit that, No, they will not. They will
Speaker 1: not admit it because that would be to accept that
Speaker 1: they can be wrong. And if they were wrong about that,
Speaker 1: what else were they wrong about. One thing that I'm
Speaker 1: definitely right about is how amazing my pillows are. I've
Speaker 1: got no Mike Lindell, the inventor of my Pillow well
Speaker 1: over the years and his products have been a game
Speaker 1: changer when it comes to my sleep. Mike fit me
Speaker 1: for my very own my pillow. He also introduced me
Speaker 1: to their wide assortment of other incredible products like their mattress, topper, sheets, towel, slippers,
Speaker 1: and more. Sleep is so important to me, and I
Speaker 1: can assume SAME's true for all of you, right It's
Speaker 1: so important for your hell, for your immune system. You
Speaker 1: gotta get a good night's sleep, for your stress levels.
Speaker 1: Give my Pillow a try and see the difference for yourself.
Speaker 1: Listeners like you have helped build My Pillow into the
Speaker 1: incredible company it is today, and Mike Lindell wants to
Speaker 1: give back to all of you. You can get great
Speaker 1: discounts on my Pillow products by going to my pillow
Speaker 1: dot com right now and clicking on new Radio Listener specials.
Speaker 1: All right, you're going to see the rotational offers up
Speaker 1: to sixty six percent off on products. Products like their pillows,
Speaker 1: mattress topper, and Giza sheets, but also new products like
Speaker 1: their slippers, weighted blankets, robes, waffle blankets and more. All
Speaker 1: My Pillow products come with a sixty day money back
Speaker 1: guarantee andrew promo code buck. That's promo code buck buc
Speaker 1: K for these great radio specials. Make sure you use
Speaker 1: promo code buck and you got that sixty day money
Speaker 1: back guarantee, so you gotta go for it. I mean,
Speaker 1: I've got the My Pillow towels, the pillows of course,
Speaker 1: the mattress topper, the my slippers, amazing products, and Mike
Speaker 1: Lindell stands for freedom and America in the face of
Speaker 1: the cancel culture left. So stand with Mike because he
Speaker 1: stands with us. Go to my Pillow dot com, click
Speaker 1: on new Radio Loosener specials and use that promo code buck.
Speaker 1: So the lockdowners are never going to budge from what
Speaker 1: they've said and how wrong they've been up to this point.
Speaker 1: But you have to remember that it was also largely
Speaker 1: pushed by journalists, as he writes here in this City
Speaker 1: Journal piece, John Tierney writes, the panic was started as
Speaker 1: usual by journalists as the virus spread early last year.
Speaker 1: They high did the most alarming statistics and the scariest images,
Speaker 1: the estimates of a fatality rate ten to fifty times
Speaker 1: higher than flew, the chaotic scenes at hospitals in Italy
Speaker 1: and New York City, the predictions that national healthcare systems
Speaker 1: were also about to collapse. The full scale panic was
Speaker 1: set off by the release in March of twenty twenty
Speaker 1: of a computer model at the Imperial College in London,
Speaker 1: which projected that under unless drastic measures were taken, intensive
Speaker 1: care units would have thirty COVID patients for every available bed,
Speaker 1: and America would see two point two million deaths by
Speaker 1: the end of the summer. British researchers announced the only
Speaker 1: viable strategy was to impose draconian restrictions on businesses, schools
Speaker 1: and social gatherings until a vaccine arrived. It was lockdown
Speaker 1: until vaccine. They didn't really tell us that at the beginning,
Speaker 1: did they no, Because people would have said, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, this is now the new standard. This is
Speaker 1: how we deal with this stuff. Lockdown until vaccine really,
Speaker 1: isn't that? Isn't that a little bit extreme? Sounded? Can't?
Speaker 1: Can't everyone tell right away? Hold on a second, That
Speaker 1: doesn't make any sense. We're gonna lock down that long?
Speaker 1: But they lied, They lied to you. They told you
Speaker 1: it was two weeks to slow the spread. They didn't
Speaker 1: say it was stay locked down until a vaccine comes out.
Speaker 1: And now you can see they're trying to edge into
Speaker 1: we all have rolling lockdowns until the virus is entirely gone.
Speaker 1: It's endemic now, folks, It's going to be within the population.
Speaker 1: There will be COVID outbreaks for the foreseeable future. That
Speaker 1: is just reality. It's just reality. And they're not going
Speaker 1: to be as big, they're not going to be as lethal,
Speaker 1: But it is now very much like the fluid is
Speaker 1: going to be in circulation around the world, and there
Speaker 1: will be a seasonality to it, and there will be
Speaker 1: booster shots, and there will be future variants and all
Speaker 1: the rest of it. So that means, no, we don't
Speaker 1: go back to the things that didn't work to stop
Speaker 1: it in the first place. I might add, it means
Speaker 1: we go back to normal life and people making informed
Speaker 1: decisions for themselves about their health. That's it. I mean,
Speaker 1: the so called Fauciite consensus. I'm the one who calls
Speaker 1: it that. But the consensus of the Fauciites was wrong,
Speaker 1: and they use social media to shut down those who
Speaker 1: disagreed with them. They use whatever tools at their disposal
Speaker 1: to crush descent. They went after researchers like Unitis at
Speaker 1: the Stanford University Medical School. They went after people with
Speaker 1: impeccable credentials who said, what the heck is going on here?
Speaker 1: You guys are wrong. This is a bad idea. The
Speaker 1: numbers don't support it. Shut up, They said, you're helping Trump.
Speaker 1: That's what it's all about. Problem with the left is
Speaker 1: that it's emotion over reason. They're so emotionally invested in
Speaker 1: their hatred of Donald Trump and their desire to feel
Speaker 1: superior because of their politics their fellow human beings that
Speaker 1: you can't really reason with them. You can't have a
Speaker 1: discussion about things like maybe this is more important than
Speaker 1: whether you like Trump or not. Maybe getting this right
Speaker 1: and not crushing freedom, shredding the Constitution and resulting. But
Speaker 1: there's so much unintended consequence of things like lockdowns and masks,
Speaker 1: might I might add I think a lot of people
Speaker 1: thought that masks were much more effective than they were,
Speaker 1: so they were not doing the things that would have
Speaker 1: really helped, like be very cautious about being around a
Speaker 1: sick person. Oh well, I got my mask. My mask
Speaker 1: will keep me safe, you know, just like the doctors wear.
Speaker 1: They never stop the thing. Hold on a second. Doctors
Speaker 1: actually wear and ninety five masks. They don't wear a
Speaker 1: balaclava or a you know, a handkerchief with Biden Harris
Speaker 1: twenty twenty on it. And they have a clean, fresh
Speaker 1: mask every time they go into the o R and
Speaker 1: they keep it on the whole time. They don't and
Speaker 1: they're and you're talking about somebody who's in an environment
Speaker 1: where their body is likely being opened up to pathogens already,
Speaker 1: so you know, you're an extreme circumstance medical circumstances circumstance.
Speaker 1: But people say, oh yeah, you know doctors in the ore,
Speaker 1: same thing is mask on, mask off on the plane,
Speaker 1: mask on, mask off in the restaurant. This is stupid.
Speaker 1: Everybody should know it is stupid. But there are people
Speaker 1: who really want to believe they're smart, and they vote
Speaker 1: Democrat and they're left is they think they're so smart,
Speaker 1: and so it didn't matter how absurd this got, because
Speaker 1: ultimately it was a giant exercise in showing everybody how evolved,
Speaker 1: elevated and elite they were in their thinking and in
Speaker 1: their lifestyle choices around COVID. It's pathetic, it's awful. Anyway.
Speaker 1: I can't recommend this piece more highly by John Tierney
Speaker 1: in City Journal, The Panic Pandemic. It's it's essential. You
Speaker 1: should definitely check it out, and good work from John Tierney.
Speaker 1: So there's no argument for changing election and voting laws
Speaker 1: based on fraud. There certainly is no argument when it
Speaker 1: comes to the outcome of the election that was clear
Speaker 1: and it has been to everyone except one former president
Speaker 1: for a long time. And yet the Republicans win in
Speaker 1: control of state legislatures, are by design trying to make
Speaker 1: it more difficult for some people to vote. Why. The
Speaker 1: answer is very simple. The demographics of America are not
Speaker 1: on the side of the Republican Party. The new voters
Speaker 1: in this country are moving away from them, away from
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, away from their party creed that they preach,
Speaker 1: and instead they're moving to be independence or at even
Speaker 1: vote on the other side to argue and fight against
Speaker 1: that the Republicans and legislative settings are reducing and restricting
Speaker 1: the opportunity to vote. That's what it's all about. Oh
Speaker 1: wait a second, here's a good old dick Durban saying
Speaker 1: some stuff about some things here. When it comes to
Speaker 1: people and the border and the Democrats strategy, the demographics
Speaker 1: of America are not on the side of the Republican party.
Speaker 1: The new voters in this country are moving away from
Speaker 1: the new voters. Gee, that's so interesting. So immigration is
Speaker 1: a tool that Democrats plan to and have been using.
Speaker 1: It's a tool to outvote Republicans. And what you do
Speaker 1: is kick the doors to America as wide open as possible.
Speaker 1: Take those who are least likely to be able to
Speaker 1: contribute on a net basis, Take those who are most
Speaker 1: likely to need state benefits, and who are going to
Speaker 1: arrive and immediately be told, Oh, if you're non white,
Speaker 1: this country owes you some thing. You are owed by
Speaker 1: the country you have just arrived in. You don't owe
Speaker 1: the country. No, no, quite the opposite. Oh no, you've
Speaker 1: probably suffered from white supremacy wherever you came from all
Speaker 1: over the world. You came from Sri Lanka. You came
Speaker 1: from Vietnam, from Haiti, from Venezuela. White supremacy is the
Speaker 1: challenge that you have faced, whether you know it or not.
Speaker 1: That's what the left says, that's part of the narrative.
Speaker 1: So bring in as many people from the rest of
Speaker 1: Whether they speak English or not doesn't matter. Whether they
Speaker 1: know anything about America doesn't matter. They know that there's
Speaker 1: good welfare benefits here. They know that the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: wants them here to outvote those who believe in limited government,
Speaker 1: who believe in constitutionalism. So this is the plan. And
Speaker 1: that's why the open southern border is so interesting, isn't it.
Speaker 1: And there's a Fox supporter who was down there with
Speaker 1: hundreds of people trying to just push through in Del Rio,
Speaker 1: literally pushed through border patrol at a fenced area, and
Speaker 1: it's on video, you can see it. And so we
Speaker 1: sit here and say, how can anyone tell us that
Speaker 1: the border is not effectively an open border. Get you
Speaker 1: get brought into the United States, you get caught, Okay,
Speaker 1: maybe maybe you get turned around and deported. Please try again.
Speaker 1: You'll get in. Anybody who wants to get here now
Speaker 1: illegally can do so. It is not hard. And if
Speaker 1: you're a family unit, you're definitely getting in. If you're
Speaker 1: a child, you're obviously getting in. So when Democrats get
Speaker 1: all huffy indignant about what's really happening here at the
Speaker 1: southern border, just remember that the plan is exactly as
Speaker 1: we've been saying, which is to bring in more people
Speaker 1: who are more likely to vote Democrat, and that means
Speaker 1: importing as many as many individuals illegally and legally from
Speaker 1: the developing world as they possibly can. You know, not
Speaker 1: all individuals are going to be able to come to America,
Speaker 1: not everybody who wants to be in a country that
Speaker 1: is wealthy and has relative rule of law, and at
Speaker 1: least until Democrats are done with it, decent levels of freedom,
Speaker 1: they can all come. So who doesn't get to show
Speaker 1: up here? Who doesn't get to be an American? That's
Speaker 1: the question that Democrats never answer. They are using these,
Speaker 1: as Dick Durban said, these demographic changes that they are
Speaker 1: up breaking the law to bring about in the first place.
Speaker 1: They are using this in order to outvote Republicans and
Speaker 1: create a permanent majority for the Democrat Party. They say
Speaker 1: it out loud, so as much as I'm sure they
Speaker 1: want to argue with me on this and pretend that
Speaker 1: what I'm saying isn't true. They say it out loud anyway.
Speaker 1: Now there's also speaking of what's going on all over
Speaker 1: the world. Wait, did I have Oh, the Ivy League lawyers.
Speaker 1: I was going to talk about China. But you know,
Speaker 1: we'll talk about China tomorrow. Ivy League lawyers headed to
Speaker 1: trial here. This was pretty remarkable. A two New York
Speaker 1: City IV League lawyers are standing trial for the for
Speaker 1: allegedly fire bombing a police cruiser. This will start in
Speaker 1: March of twenty twenty two a police cruiser and distributing
Speaker 1: Molotov cocktails during the George Floyd Riots last summer. Defense lawyers,
Speaker 1: this is from the Washington Free Beacon for Colinford, Maddison,
Speaker 1: Rouge Rahman have been in plea negotiations but have not
Speaker 1: come to terms. They will not take a plea bargain.
Speaker 1: Oh well, that's so. The pre trial motions are scheduled
Speaker 1: for September seventeenth. Dury selection begin March fourteenth, twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1: That's a pretty bold move to to not actually take
Speaker 1: a plea in a situation like this. I mean, they
Speaker 1: are clearly based on everything we know, they are clearly guilty.
Speaker 1: There is surveillance footage of this. They are literally on
Speaker 1: camera firebombing a police vehicle and police officers were there
Speaker 1: and witnessed it. You have eyewitnesses and video evidence of it.
Speaker 1: So explain to me why they would try to roll
Speaker 1: the dice on seven felony charges including civil disorder, arson, conspiracy,
Speaker 1: and federal explosives charges. Okay, and remember lawyers are automatically
Speaker 1: disbarred for felony convictions in New York State. I'm just wondering,
Speaker 1: why would they roll the dice on that. If they
Speaker 1: get convicted. You convicted on seven federal felony charges, a
Speaker 1: judge can make you serve some real time. You know,
Speaker 1: you could go away for years. So what's the Oh, well,
Speaker 1: we know why, we know why they think they can.
Speaker 1: They can do this because quote the accused enjoy widespread
Speaker 1: sympathy and support from New York's legal and media elites.
Speaker 1: Rahman is represented by one of the city's best defense
Speaker 1: attorneys and a former Obama administration official guaranteed her bail
Speaker 1: in the amount of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: Both have been the subject of favorable profiles and New
Speaker 1: York magazine NPR, among other venues. I think they believe
Speaker 1: they can get a not guilty verdict based on Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter b Black lives But I think that's really
Speaker 1: the plan here to just look at the sympathy that
Speaker 1: the left has in New York City for the BLM movement,
Speaker 1: so they will nullify charges of arson, civil disorder, and
Speaker 1: destructive riot. And let me just note, you know, firebombing
Speaker 1: of police cars, the kind of thing that I used
Speaker 1: to believe all Americans could agree on, was really bad.
Speaker 1: It's it's not just about the destruction, although that's obviously
Speaker 1: a part of it. It's dangerous. It's dangerous, as we
Speaker 1: all know. And yet they won't take a plea because
Speaker 1: they think there's enough sympathy for them. They think there's
Speaker 1: enough sympathy for them that maybe the jury just says,
Speaker 1: you know what, the laws don't count. Now, I want
Speaker 1: you to juxtapose this situation with what we just saw
Speaker 1: play out with James Hodgkins, who's the law who's the rioter,
Speaker 1: who just got eight months in federal prison for the
Speaker 1: crime of disrupting Congress. Congress was delayed in what it did,
Speaker 1: disrupting Congress. Oh, eight months in federal prison for that interesting,
Speaker 1: and they're going to go for multi year sentences. I
Speaker 1: can assure you against people who we're getting, you know,
Speaker 1: who actually either destroyed property. He didn't destroy property. This
Speaker 1: guy was just there. He was just there eight months
Speaker 1: in federal prison. Now, how do you get to that, Well,
Speaker 1: his presence, he was trespassing, and his presence was part
Speaker 1: of a group. They say that was well, they say
Speaker 1: all kinds of crazy things about it, but they'll say
Speaker 1: that it was part of an insurrection, that there was
Speaker 1: a threat to Congress from this, that people were terrified,
Speaker 1: all this sort of stuff. And it's remarkable as you
Speaker 1: actually look at this. The federal judge who was presiding
Speaker 1: over this case called it an active domestic terrorism damage
Speaker 1: that will persist for decades. Those who fled will be
Speaker 1: traumatized for the rest of their lives. Makes it harder
Speaker 1: for US diplomats to promote democracy abroad. That's right, this guy,
Speaker 1: this guy at Hodgkins is getting a Paul. I'm sorry
Speaker 1: I said James Paul Hodgkins is getting because I confused
Speaker 1: it with James Hodgkinson, who you should all Remember he's
Speaker 1: the Ernie Sanders supporter who back in twenty eighteen shot
Speaker 1: Representative Steve Scalise is part of an actual mass assassination
Speaker 1: attempt of conservative members of Congress. But Paul Hodgkins, Paul
Speaker 1: Hodgkins pleaded guilty to obstruction of Congress. And if you
Speaker 1: were to read the way the judge set this whole
Speaker 1: thing up, you'd say, well, it's so clear that what's
Speaker 1: really going on here is this guy's being punished for
Speaker 1: at some level. Look, what he did is wrong. And
Speaker 1: I've always said that you can't, right, you can't, you know,
Speaker 1: break in and disrupt Congress. But you had anti Kavanaugh
Speaker 1: people disrupting proceedings on Capitol Hill, blocking, blocking entrances and
Speaker 1: acting like lunatics. You've had Democrats takeover state capitals, trespassing,
Speaker 1: refusing to let people come and go, blocking the business
Speaker 1: of the state legislature. Let's go back to the Scott
Speaker 1: Walker days, what was going on in Wisconsin. So you know,
Speaker 1: these kind of things do occur. The assaults on police officers,
Speaker 1: I mean, that's the most serious charge and that should
Speaker 1: be that should be punished. I mean, you can't start
Speaker 1: throwing punches at cops and doing this sort of thing,
Speaker 1: and people should go to jail for that. I'm want
Speaker 1: to say people should go to jail for that. You
Speaker 1: got to serve some time for that. You can't do that.
Speaker 1: But trespassing and by the way, I say, sometime was
Speaker 1: the officer seriously injured? If the answer is no, but
Speaker 1: a lot of you are probably saying, wait, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, buck, how many BLM protesters who assaulted officers,
Speaker 1: punched them, spat on them? Ah? Yes, you see. This
Speaker 1: is the problem with actually having principles is that when
Speaker 1: you try to apply them consistently, you're very disappointed with
Speaker 1: the American system. You're very disappointed with how our justice
Speaker 1: system plays out. Now. There is one side here that
Speaker 1: always gets more than the benefit of the doubt. They
Speaker 1: get a free pass, while the other is treated terribly
Speaker 1: for reasons of politics. And that is what you are seeing.
Speaker 1: That is actually what is happening here, you know, with
Speaker 1: big tech colluding with the White House to block certain
Speaker 1: opinions and shut down accounts online. I think it should
Speaker 1: be more clear to you than ever that online privacy
Speaker 1: and security is something you have to take an active
Speaker 1: role in. You can't just leave it to big tech
Speaker 1: to do for you because they're selling your stuff and
Speaker 1: you're vulnerable with your online communications. That's why I want
Speaker 1: you to check out Secure. Secure keeps your personal and
Speaker 1: business data away from the prying eyes of big tech
Speaker 1: and hackers. It's perfect for business people who receive and
Speaker 1: send sensitive material via email and instant messaging. Secure that's
Speaker 1: sek you Are is a new way for you to
Speaker 1: protect your information with the ultimate privacy and cybersecurity communications tool.
Speaker 1: They're an instant messaging and email platform hosted in Switzerland,
Speaker 1: protecting your data with the strictest data privacy laws in
Speaker 1: the world. Secure uses proprietary encryption technologies, an independent platform,
Speaker 1: and Swiss privacy laws to ensure complete privacy and security
Speaker 1: of your day data. It assures your personal, business and
Speaker 1: private conversations, messages, and data are kept completely safe and private.
Speaker 1: They don't mind your data and are not subject to
Speaker 1: the Cloud Act. Take back your freedom, privacy and online security.
Speaker 1: Go to Secure that's sek you are Secure dot Com.
Speaker 1: Use coupon code buck for one week free and twenty
Speaker 1: five percent off That's buck at secure dot com. Coupon
Speaker 1: code buck at secure seku are dot com regain your privacy,
Speaker 1: all right. The Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition has a has
Speaker 1: a trans woman who will be on the transwoman will
Speaker 1: be on the cover. Okay, Lana bloom And will be
Speaker 1: the first transgender woman on the cover of Sports Illustrated,
Speaker 1: celebrated as a symbol of beauty. Now, I just I
Speaker 1: know the Left has really lost its mind. I know
Speaker 1: they're you know, they're they're crazy at some level. Um
Speaker 1: that much is as obvious on a lot of issues,
Speaker 1: but on this one, I've just got to say, do I,
Speaker 1: as a heterosexual male, am I allowed to say that?
Speaker 1: This is to me? You know, Sports Illustrated can be
Speaker 1: woke and do whatever they want. But I don't find
Speaker 1: a man who has physically altered uh you know traits,
Speaker 1: you know gotten uh you know, a breast augmentation, essentially
Speaker 1: fake breasts, and had other surgeries and things done. I
Speaker 1: don't find that physically appealing or attractive. In fact, I
Speaker 1: find it. I find it distressing. I find it disturbing.
Speaker 1: I find it's sad. But this is this is not
Speaker 1: about you. See, this is what the left always does.
Speaker 1: At first they want tolerance, then they then they demand uh,
Speaker 1: they demand celebration, right, tolerated, tolerated, Well, now you have
Speaker 1: to celebrate it. That's the next step. And that's what
Speaker 1: you see here. I mean, tolerance in the in the
Speaker 1: context of transgenderism should be you treat everybody as as
Speaker 1: a person with respect and decency and dignity. You're kind
Speaker 1: to people. You don't just scrim it against people. Right,
Speaker 1: That's that's what we could all agree tolerance should mean.
Speaker 1: That's not tolerance for the left is no, no, you
Speaker 1: you can't criticize this thing. You can't criticize the situation.
Speaker 1: That's what they think it is. It's a very different circumstances.
Speaker 1: And look, I think this is weird. I also think
Speaker 1: you know, any guy listening to this, if you were
Speaker 1: on a if you were on a date with someone,
Speaker 1: and by the way, those you say that would never
Speaker 1: happen to me. I mean it's you start to look
Speaker 1: at some of the surgeries, the things they're doing. You know,
Speaker 1: it's I'm just telling you. I mean, I've I've heard
Speaker 1: I've heard I've heard stories. I've heard stories, and you know,
Speaker 1: how should you feel about that? And shouldn't a person
Speaker 1: always have to identify as as trans? I mean there
Speaker 1: are just so you understand where I'm going with this,
Speaker 1: there are media outlets like the Huffington Post who will
Speaker 1: use terms like transphobic for straight men who are not
Speaker 1: attracted to trans women. So so look at what they're doing.
Speaker 1: You're no, I am allowed to. You're allowed to for
Speaker 1: the guys listening to be attracted to what we are
Speaker 1: attracted to when it comes to, of course, consenting adults.
Speaker 1: But that's it. They can't force this upon us. I
Speaker 1: don't have to celebrate this. I don't have to think
Speaker 1: this is normal or okay to elevate a person and
Speaker 1: say this is a beauty symbol. But the Left is
Speaker 1: relentless with this. They are relentless, and we are supposed
Speaker 1: to think that a person who is not not female,
Speaker 1: you cannot actually change your gender be attractive to straight males.
Speaker 1: That's what the elevation to the cover of Sports Illustrator
Speaker 1: is supposed to do. It's supposed to be confusing, it's
Speaker 1: supposed to be political, it's supposed to really be cultural
Speaker 1: pressure on people, and it's just absurd and it's weird
Speaker 1: that they do this to the general public. But the
Speaker 1: Left has an agenda and they're pushing it. They're pushing it.
Speaker 1: So here you go. What a day. Thanks so much
Speaker 1: for being here with me on the Bucks Extent Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Please do spread the word. Also, if you have not,
Speaker 1: I would ask a small favor give me a five
Speaker 1: star rating on Apple Podcasts and give a short review
Speaker 1: or as long as you want about how you enjoy
Speaker 1: the show, and pass the buck give it to somebody.
Speaker 1: Back with you tomorrow with the producer, Mark will be
Speaker 1: hanging out with you. Shields High,