WEBVTT - Billionaire's Divorce and Immigration Issues

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Bresso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>An underground market has emerged since the Biden administration announced

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it would accept thirty thou immigrants each month, arriving by

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>air from Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, and Haiti. Applicants for that

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian parole program needs someone in the US to promise

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to provide financial support for at least two years. Off

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in that person is a friend or relative. But what

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>happens if a migrant doesn't have that friend or relative

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to promise financial support. Facebook groups with names like Sponsors

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>US carried dozens of posts offering financial supporters, some demanding

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>up to ten thousand dollars. According to the Associated Press,

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>US Citizenship and Immigration Services warns about potential scams with

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the humanitarian parole program, but there's no indication that applications

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.639
<v Speaker 1>have been rejected because of concerns that potential sponsors might

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>be requesting money joining these. Immigration law expert Leon Fresco,

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a partner at Holland to Night, Leon explain what's happening here,

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So here's what this situation is. Ever since the Russian

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Ukraine, the Biden administration has responded to various

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>events around the world with a new concept calls allowing

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>people to be paroled into the United States. They basically

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>created this bifurcated process whereby an American could actually come

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>forward and step up to the plate and say, you

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'm going to take the financial responsibility responsoring

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>a particular foreign nationals. And then if that person gets

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>vetted and it is used to have sufficient assets to

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>do that, that that too happens. And then the foreign

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>national comes forward and declares they're desired to want to

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>be paroled and to essentially be within the offices of

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this foreign national and assuming those backgrounds checks clear, then

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the person can actually be paroled into the United States.

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>And what a parole is is it's basically a permission

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>document that says for a year, you have legal status

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in America, but at any point we can kick you

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>out within the year if we revoke your parole. And

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 1>within that year, you're gonna have to figure out what

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>you want to do. Do you want to apply for asylum,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do something? You know us, but

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you get to come in for a year and figure

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>out what your plan is. And so what has happened

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is there are obviously many more people who demands to

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>come into the United States, then there are a supply

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of individuals who are willing to actually and legitimately come

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>forward and sponsor people financially for these parole documents. And so,

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like anything, nature of horrors a vacuums, and where people

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>can find a way to make money, they do. And

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>so people have decided, well, what if we were to

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>sell sponsorship to some of these foreign nationals so they

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>can pay to have people sponsor them. And so the government,

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>having found out that this is now happening through various

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>vomitoring of social media and talking to people and doing

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>intelligence work, is trying to figure out, well, given the

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 1>fact that we kind of made this program up in

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the fly and didn't actually say or figure out a

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>way where this would be illegal, what are we to

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>do now? Is this something we will allow to happen?

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Do we have to do something to not permit it

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to happen? And the government has sort of caught betwixt

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>them between there because it seems odd. So you're paying someone,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say, ten dollars for a promise to provide financial support,

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is that a real promise. Are they going to be

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>providing the financial backup that the government is looking for.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's absolutely against for sure the spirit of

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the program. I think the question is what does sponsorship

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>mean in this context. What I mean by that is

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to say, this process generates itself from something that happened

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in where the government was concerned about marriage fraud and

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>what it said was, We're not just gonna let anybody

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>marry a US citizens that U S citizens who marries

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>a foreign national has to make a sufficient amount of

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>income and actually say, if my wife, for my husband,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>whoever the spouse is, that the four nationals ends up

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>using any government resources, then I agreed to be on

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the hook for paying those government resources. The government can't

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>come in and have to sponsor my spouse for me.

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I have to do this. And so that's where the

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>concept is based off of. And although that concept is

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>very very very rarely enforced. The Trump administration was about

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to start doing that near the end of the first

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>term of the Trump administration, to start coming after people

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and asking for money to be paid. It hadn't really

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>been done since now this new program is sort of

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>mimicking that but doesn't have the same statutory guideline, because

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the affidavit of sport was a statutory

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>thing for that marriage issue. And so the question is

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing something that's not even a regulation, because

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>this is all memo. Bay if you're basically writing a

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>memo creating a parole program and creating the sponsorship requirement,

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>does the government have any teeth to whatsoever to punish

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>someone who's being a sponsor just because they're being paid

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a sponsor. And so that's the problem that

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the government has encountered. So it seems like there's a

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>real possibility that fraud is involved. When they're filling out

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the forms and making these promises, they had to say

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>what the relation is to the person? Right right? I mean,

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>for sure, there's definitely if you commit fraud on the

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>form if you say that you intend the papers for

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>benefits of money if they don't actually do it, or

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>if you say you're they're relative and you're not actually

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they're relative, or if you declare that you're doing this

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and good faith and you haven't been paid for it,

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>which I think they're going to try to amend the

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>form to do that that you can for sure, charge

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the person for fraud there, but it's something that I

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>think they didn't even think about at the beginning, that

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>this could be something that would happen. And of course,

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you always when you do one of these programs, have

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.919
<v Speaker 1>to be worried that bad actors will try to manipulate it,

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>because that's been the history of any immigration programs of

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>the United States. You've often said that most of the

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>people who are coming here have someone that they're you know,

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>intend to go to relative shouldn't most of these, you know,

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cubans and Nicaraguans and the Venezuelans have people here

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>who could vouch for them this way, Oh agree. So

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>for the people who would normally have used this program,

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>there was not a problem at all finding a sponsor.

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>And fact there are many many more people who have

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sponsors than there are going to be plots for these

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty six thousand visas a month. The point is, though,

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>there are many people who don't know anybody, and now

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>those people are being told, well, here's a way for

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you to know somebody. But what what is happening is

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>not that there's an insufficient number of people who have sponsors.

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>What's happening is that not every single person in that

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>country has a sponsor, but by buying a sponsor you

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>now open up the possibility of being sponsored to even

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>more people than could have otherwise had that possibility. So

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>these are people who would never have come but now

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>might come because they can acquire a sponsor. I want

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to turn down to this case that's before the Supreme

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Court in two thousand three, sit to Wilkinson fled government

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>persecution in his native Trinidad and Tobega for the United

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>States on a tourist visa. He overstayed the visa and

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>had a son who's a US citizen and who's regularly

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>hospitalized due to severe asthma tax and when the government

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>moved to deport him, Wilkinson asked for what's called cancelation

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of removal, arguing that his son and the boy's mother

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>need him because he's the family's soul breadwinner. The boy's

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>mother suffers from depression and would be left unable to

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>cope medically or financially without his support. And immigration judge

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>denied his request, as did the Third Circuit, and he's

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>asking the Supreme Court to look at his case. So

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>explain the background here whenever a don citizen goes through

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the removal process, if they have a claim that the

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Immigration Court and or the Board of Immigration Appeals applied

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the wrong laws their case, or incorrectly decided the law,

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>or incorrectly did something that violated the constitution, those claims

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of law can be appealed to the courts of appeal.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>What can't be appealed are factual determinations. There's a small

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>exception for factual determinations and asylum cases, but mostly factual

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>determinations cannot be appealed. Now, three years ago, there was

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a decision in the Supreme Court that talked about these

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>waivers of deportation, which is what happens is sometimes a

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>deportation order has entered against you, but you can actually

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>get a waiver where the judge says, Okay, I know

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we can deport you, but we will waive this deportation

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>because you qualify. As a matter of discretion, you qualify

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>for this waiver and so I'll give it to you.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>So you get to say. And what the court said

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is if something is an issue of mixed questions of

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>facts and law, then they can review it. So now

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in this upcoming case that people are asking for review

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Supreme Court. What happens is the following. There's

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>about four thousands plots a year for this type of

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>relief called cancelation of removal. And what it is is

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're here without any status at all period and

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the government is trying to deport you, you can actually

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>avoid deportation if you can prove that you've been here

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>for over ten years. That's the first key thing, and

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>secondly that your deportation is going to be causing. And

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a very difficult standard to meet. An exceptional and

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>extremely unusual hardship to a U. S. Citizen is usually

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a US citizen child, but it can also be a U. S.

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Citizen spoused. And if you could prove that, then you

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>could be allowed to say and actually get lawful permanent residency.

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 1>So the question in this case was that the court

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>felt that the amount of hardship that the person showed

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>was not sufficient to meet this exceptional and extremely unusual

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>heart of standard. We would all agree if the court

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>got the facts wrong in this kind of question, you

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>couldn't review that. You know, if the court thought, let's

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>say they say this person didn't do anything for the community,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and the person said, well, I had evidence that I

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>volunteered in my church, so you should have put that

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in there and waited as a discretionary thing. That kind

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of thing wouldn't be able to be reviewed. But the

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>question is if everybody agrees on the fact, can you

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 1>then make a determination that could be reviewed about whether

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>those facts were sufficient to me this exceptional and extremely

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>unusual hardship standard or is that just for the judge

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to decide and that can't get reviewed, And so that's

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going to be potentially pizzing into the Supreme Court.

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>So you know, a lot of people who have been

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>here for a decade have children who are US citizens,

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not enough to say, well, I have

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>three children who are US citizens and they're gonna miss

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>me and it's gonna be awful for them. Correct, that's

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>considered normal hardship. There's actually a famous Board of Immigration

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Appeals case called matter of Restina's and in that case,

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>the person had something like three or four U. S

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>citizens children, one with a severe mental illness, another one

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>with a severe medical problem. And then the problem was

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>if this person was deported, then not only could those

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>kids not be taken care of, but she also had

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>parents here in the United States and siblings, and the

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>court said, when we put all of this stuff together,

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you barely make it. And so they didn't say, Okay,

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a slam dunk. And that was a case

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for where an immigration just said no, and then the

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Board of Immigration Appeal said, yeah, you you make it,

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.599
<v Speaker 1>but you barely make it. And so that was the

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that was considered exceptional as extremely unusual hardship.

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the question here is does the person

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in this case meet that standard? And you know, to

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>show it, you have to basically show serious medical issues

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 1>or something of that kind that the U s it

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is in relative has that requires not only them to

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>stay here, but perhaps you more importantly to stay here

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>so you can give them the care they need or

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>pay for the care that they need. And that's the

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that's being talked about here. So here,

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that the sun has asthma and the mother

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is depressed, so she can't take care of him or

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>support him financially. So now in this case, the immigration

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>judge said no, did the Board of Immigration take a

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>look at it? Yes, So in every case, both have

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to look at it, the immigration judge and the Board

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of Immigration Appeals, and the decision actually always gets appealed

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>from the Board of Immigration Appeals. But what happens is

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the Board of Immigration Appeals often like here, acts like

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a rubber stamp, so they don't actually issue anything more.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's why people say Board of Immigration a peals,

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes it's actually the immigration judge who they make

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the decision, and the Board of Immigration Appeal just as affirmed,

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and so then that decision gets appealed to the Court

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of Appeals. And so exactly like you said, this case

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>here was the one where the child has as mine.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>They said that, you know, without some mother they wouldn't

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to betically or financially provide for this child

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>who has asked not tax. And they viewed that as hardship,

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>but again not exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. And so

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the question. And you know, this is like a

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>perfect gray area type of case where if you get

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a very sympathetic judge they might approve it. But if

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you're get a judge that doesn't want to approve any

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of these, then they wouldn't approve this. And the question

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is can you set a standard for a case like

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this or is this really just up to the judge?

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what the Supreme Court is going

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to be grappling with. Are the circuits split on this? Yes? Correct,

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the circuits are split on this. And so there are

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>some circuits like the Ninth Circuit who says, yes, this

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>can be reviewed because this is actually not a discretionary determination.

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>This is a legal determination as to whether a specific

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>agreed upon that a fact meets the legal standard of

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>exceptional and extremely unusual art chip. But the Third Circuit says, no,

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this is not a legal question. This is a discretionary question,

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>basically saying have you sufficiently tugged at the discretionary heart

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>strings of the judge who get the relief? And so

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see what the Supreme Court thinks

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>about this. Yet another case that now the Ninth Circuit

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:46.479
<v Speaker 1>is going to hear on banks over temporary protected status

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and so Trump pullback protections from migrants m L. Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua,

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Sudan and also Nepal and Honduras, and the Biden administration

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>has redesignated Haiti and Sudan for TPS. Status. Isn't that

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration's decision whether or not there should be

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a TPS status for a country. I mean, why is

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>this correct? Interestingly, this lawsuit started in the Trump administration

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>when Trump tried to say, look, there's a lot of

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>countries where their nationals were given temporary protective status for

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>disasters that happened in the nineties, and so why here

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in the second part of the twenty one century are

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>people still to stay on the basis of a disaster

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that was supposed to temporarily affect them in And so

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>there was this lawsuit saying, yeah, but what you did

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>was you were acting in a discriminatory manner that violated

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>equal Protection clause, and you also violated the Administrative Procedure

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Act by not explaining the current conditions in the country

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and how those conditions have been effected since that mentor

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of disaster. And so all of this was in litigation,

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and then the Trump administration leeds and the Biden administration

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to come fact and oddly enough, as you point out,

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the Buiding administration doesn't continue the temporary protective status for

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>some of these countries, and it actually continues to choose

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to litigate this issue, and so now this issue where

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the applicants had actually lost in the Ninth circuits, they

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>are actually now getting a full on bond, meaning well

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the full Courtcuse in the ninth circuits there's so

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>many judges. You get twelve judges, which is considered the

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>full court. You get you get an on bank panel

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of well twelve judges. But but those judges are now

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:39.239
<v Speaker 1>going to consider what will be done? Could you an

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>temporary protective states? That way, it affects the question if

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the government wins and wins all of the lawsuits, will

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration simply find a different route to protect

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>these people's fighting effects? Now, because I think what they've

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>had a problem with, at least justifying this intellectually is

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they too think that there's a complication with

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>saying that the conditions justify extensions of EPs. I think

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>they think when that was sort of being done on

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>an automated basis every eighteen months, that was one thing.

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>But once an actual Department of Homeland Security, even if

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it was President Trump's department, it doesn't matter, went through

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the facts and said, look, we need to break this

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>chain of causation. When they feel like it's true, there's

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>not a natural disaster from to justify this continuous of

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>PPS anymore. And so it will be interesting to see

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>what happens after all of this is over. Do they

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>cite some new reason that's more current to protect these

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>people under temporary protective status or does that end up

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>falling away yet again, That's going to be very interesting

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>to see after this litigation is all over. It's supposed

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to be temporary, So why continue to protect people if

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know the reason for protecting them is gone. That's

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of belies the whole the whole PILM. There was

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit of inertia that happened here where when the

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>first happened in there were these earthquakes and hurricanes and

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>things for these countries from Central America, you know. So

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>there was eighteen months and then there was another eighteen months,

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and people sort of understood those first thirty six months,

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and then for the next eighteen months people said, well,

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe we need this last eighteen months. And then once

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you got past those eighteen months, then it was well,

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>people have already been here for five years, six years,

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>they've had U S citizen kids. Now you're going to

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>deport them. What a creation of a tragedy you're doing.

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And so then that was the argument, and that sort

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of was inertia upon inertia upon inertia, and you ended

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>up with this situation where you couldn't emotionally justify kicking

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>people out who's now been here twenty five years. And

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's why Congress has these bills to try to

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>get these folks green cards, but they have not passed.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>And so we are where we are, which is that

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the real purpose of the statute, which is to give

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>temporary relief very difficult to argue that disaster is still

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the basis for someone saying in America, and so the

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>question is what do you do that? So you know,

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>every week there's another immigration problem, more policy that there's

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>news on. So I guess it doesn't come as much

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>as a surprise that a new Gallipo that was released

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>today revealed that Americans are more dissatisfied with immigration into

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the country than they've been in years. Sixtent of respondents

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are dissatisfied with US immigration overall, and that's the lowest

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>reading in a decade, and most say that they want

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>immigration decreased. I wonder if a lot of this is

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 1>because of the bussing of migrants from Texas has led

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to people in different parts of the country, you know,

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>being exposed to the problems of placing migrants. I think

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this is all part of it. I think really what

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>anything comes down to with regard to immigration law, or

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>immigration policy or immigration acceptance by the populace in the

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>United States is the following people of r A VACU.

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>And so what happens is right now the only people

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about immigration are people pointing out that there's a

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>problem with the immigration system. So Biden administration doesn't want

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to spend any time talking about immigration. In fact, in

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the State of the Union, they may have mentioned it

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>for thirty seconds. If they mentioned it for thirty seconds,

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>it was too long. And what really comes down to

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is this, whether you set the level at a high level,

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>or you set the level at a low level, or

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you set the level at a medium level, what the

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>American people want is a strategy of explanation and a

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>feeling that it's not out of control. And that's the

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>key for the Biden administration is to explain to people

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>why the system is the way it is, why it's

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>not out of control to the extent that they can

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.719
<v Speaker 1>explain that what their plan is to get it further

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>under control, and why the system and the decisions they're making.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>This is the key part actually advanced the interests of

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>America and American because a lot of the rhetoric for

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>better and for worse for both because I think it's

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 1>helpful and it's good to be compassionate to the people

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to flee a lot of terrible conditions in their

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>home countries. But a lot of the rhetoric you hear

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>from immigration advocate and from some people in the Democratic

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Party is a rhetoric that centered on the interests of

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the foreign national entering the United States and the problems

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they're suffering. And while that's understandable and sympathetic, you have

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to if you're going to sell a system and a

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and a series of decisions, selling on why that decision

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and that system is good for America and the national

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>interest of nine States. And that's where the Republicans have

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>made very good head road in talking about immigration in

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that way. They constantly use this phrase the national interest,

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and they constantly say that only low levels of immigration

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are good for the national interests of Americans. But because

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they're the only people making this argument, then that's what's

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be assumed, because nobody's making an argument about

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>why moderate levels or higher levels are better for the

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>American interest And so that's why you see this disconnect

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>where more and more and more people continued to say

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on a higher and higher level that low immigration is

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>good for America's national interests and that the current system

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is out of control. So the problem really is moving forward,

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>can to buy the administration explain what it's doing, articulate

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a vision, articulate a system, and explain why that system

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and that vision is in the interests of America and

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Americans well. And also, immigration satisfaction was highest during the

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>early part of former President Trump's term. So this is

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>something that the Biden administration is going to have to

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>answer when it comes time for the elections. Correct, That's

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the point, and the key thing is if you look

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>at our president Trump changed the conversation on immigration. It

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just that he lowered the levels of immigration. People

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>are not so sensitive to the numbers being high or low.

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>People are sensitive to the discussion that the immigration system

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is being tailored to the national interests of the United States,

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and that was constantly a praise that he used, and

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>he constantly tried to explain at least his vision of immigration,

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>which was that the less immigration that there was, the

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>more that was in America's interest. Thanks so much, Leon,

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you always have the answers, and it's a pleasure to

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>have you on the show. That's Leon Fresco of Hondon Knight,

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the wife of billionaire Israel is he in Lander, filed

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>an explosive lawsuit against the Millennial Management chairman and then

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>withdrew it the day after. In the suit, Carol Englander

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>claimed that her husband of forty eight years conducted a

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>year's long campaign of pressure and coercion against her and

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>her girlfriend, having them followed nearly constantly, hacking their emails

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and phones and interfering with their family lives in order

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to get her to sign a post nuptial Agreementzzy Englander

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>has a net worth of eleven point five billion dollars

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, and his a strange

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>wife says he got more than of the value of

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>their marital assets in the post nup. On Friday, Carol

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Englander dropped the suit, which was filed by her and

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>her girlfriend, Swiss art dealer Dominique Levy, a spokesperson for

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.199
<v Speaker 1>england Or, said it was dropped in an effort to

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>resolve this as a family matter. Joining me is Peter Walser,

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>the founding partner of Walzer, Melcher and Yoda and L,

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a family law firm. So Carol Englander is claiming that

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>she signed the post up under darrest. Tell us a

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>little about her allegations. Well, it sounded like what we

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>would call corrosive control, in other words, a pattern of

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>stocking rating, threatenings for having a relationship with her friend Dominique.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>And it sounded like, according to Carol, there was a

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure on her and it was a very

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>unpleasant situation I imagined for all of them after a

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>very long marriage, almost fifty years. Do you know if

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there was a pre nuptial agreement in this case, I

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and there's been no report of that, so

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>one would think, considering the length of the marriage, probably

0:26:56.080 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 1>no premierital agreement. He allegedly got her to sign an

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>agreement before they divorced. Well, I don't know that they're

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>even divorced. There's no indication that they actually got divorced.

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about postnups in general. Do a lot of

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>couples have postnups? Is it unusual? I mean, I've been

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>doing this over forty years and I've done literally hundreds

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of we call them premyoral agreements, and I've done probably

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>five to ten post marrow agreements that actually got signed. Now,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>people come in and they want them, but they often

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 1>lead to a divorce. Basically, they're harder than pups, and

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the standards are a lot different than prenups. What are

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the standards? For example? For prenups, no consideration is required.

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Consideration means something barred in for an exchange, or if

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you give me this, I'll give you that, Whereas in

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a post marital agreement there is a requirement of consideration.

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Somebody's got to get something for what they're giving up.

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>And in this case, if Carol was giving up half

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the marital of state, which could be five billion dollars,

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>she would have to get something in exchange for that.

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to be equal, but there has to

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>be consideration for it. Next. Whereas people in a premarital

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>agreement do not have a fiduciary duty to one another

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in a post marital agreement, they have a fiduciary duty,

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>which means a lot stronger scrutiny of the agreement for

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>fairness and so on. So in addition, in a premarial agreement,

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you can waive the disclosure beyond what's provided, but in

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a postmarril agreement, you can't wait for disclosure. There's got

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a full disclosure to both people signing the agreement.

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>In this case, she claims that he didn't disclose the

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>extent of their marrit assets. Right, she made all the

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>necessary claims to arrests, perhaps fod all those required claims.

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But the problem with that is we don't know the details.

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>But you can imagine she had an attorney review it.

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>She signed the agreement. The agreement, like most agreements between

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>spouse's state, there was no arrest, there was no fraud,

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>she had adequate time to review the agreement and so

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth. So once she does that and

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the agreements notarized, it's hard to say that you didn't

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>know what you were doing or you were pressured. In

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the same day, it's different. Occasionally, at these agreements, the

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>spouses signed between each other on a piece of paper

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about wealthy

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>people who how attorneys who reviewed it, who made a decision.

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>She says that he got most of the marital assets,

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>but he's worth eleven and a half billion, and if

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>she got five percent, that's still a lot of money

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to most people. I was doing the numbers like that too,

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that's not bad. I think I could

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>live on I don't know. I don't know. I might

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>have to, you know, budget on the food, but otherwise

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>i'd be fought. Let's just say that this goes forward.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>How would a judge decide whether or not there was dressed,

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.959
<v Speaker 1>whether or not this pass the test for a post up. Well,

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a great New York case called Hershkowitz versus Levy.

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>You could google and it lays out the anderds. And

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in this twenty twenty one case, which is recent in

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of the law, talks about a post that between

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a self represented attorney and his wife and they agreed

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that after a few thousand and thirteen everything they had

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>would be separate. And then the kidson comes along in

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to set aside the post marital agreement. I guess

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>wife did better than him in the marriage, and he

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>said it was unconscionable, and there was the rest, and

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>she didn't give him enough time to sign it. And

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it really lays out the law for post marital agreements,

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and the case says an agreement between spouses which spare

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>on its base will be enforced according to its terms

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>unless there's proof of unconscionability or fraud. The less overreaching

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>or other duct. Unconsciouent ability means shocking for the conscious.

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just not unfair. So New York's really laid out

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the law for post ups in a nice way in

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>this case. So the person trying to set it aside

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>initially has the burden to show it was unfair. So

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>now we find out that just a day after filing

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this she withdrew it. So what do you make of that. Well,

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>when there's not much of money, a deal could always

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be struck. It's not like money is the issues. And

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>she probably didn't have much of a case except bad publicity.

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>When you're in your seventies, you probably don't need bad publicity.

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And either of them dead, and so a deal could

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>be struck. Now we don't know if a deal was struck,

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>but somebody said, hey, let's let's talk about it. We

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>could work something out with that kind of money. You know,

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe else you wanted was another half billion powers, you know,

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, really, you've got to look what causes these

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>losses between anybody, but especially well the People's not the money.

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It's hurt feelings, it's anger, it's resentment. And if people

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>can sit down and talk, they can make a deal. Now,

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>she made a deal already, but she obviously wanted more,

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and he has more to give. What's he going to

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>do with it? You know, that kind of money, it's

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna make anybody's life different. Now, she could have

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>reacted differently and been angry and said, it's a matter

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of principle, I'm not going to talk to you if

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>ever again, I'll see you in court. But that's time consuming,

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and even though expense is not an issue, it's expensive.

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>But mainly it's aggravating, emotionally disturbing. So at their age,

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>both in the need that kind of straps. So they

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>did the smart thing, you know, with and workout a deal.

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much, Peter. That's Peter Walser of Walls or

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Melcher and yodah. And that's it for this edition of

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can always get the

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>latest legal news by subscribing to the Bloomberg Law Podcast

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>or downloading this show at Bloomberg dot com. Slash podcast,

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Slash Law and attorneys get the latest in AI powered

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>legal analytics, business insights and workflow tools at Bloomberg Law

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>dot com. With guidance from our experts, you'll grasp the

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:39.760
<v Speaker 1>latest trends in the legal industry, helping you achieve better

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>results for the practice of law, the business of law,

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the future of law. Visit Bloomberg Law dot com. I'm

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>joom Bronso and you're listening to Bloomberg