1
00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:05,320
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg PENL podcast. I'm Paul swing you

2
00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:07,680
Speaker 1: along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

3
00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:10,240
Speaker 1: we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

4
00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:12,520
Speaker 1: you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

5
00:00:12,560 --> 00:00:15,480
Speaker 1: the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

6
00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:17,959
Speaker 1: podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

7
00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,279
Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com. We want to stick with we

8
00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:26,360
Speaker 1: work withdrawing its initial public offering perspectives. After a tumultuous month,

9
00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:29,360
Speaker 1: we are seeing some movement in the bonds going lower

10
00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:33,760
Speaker 1: now at their lowest levels. Wow, at eight seven cents

11
00:00:33,920 --> 00:00:37,080
Speaker 1: uh and a quarter uh per on the dollar. And this,

12
00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:39,320
Speaker 1: you know, comes at a time when borrowing casts are

13
00:00:39,320 --> 00:00:42,160
Speaker 1: supposedly lower. Not for we work joining us nationally, boss

14
00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:45,760
Speaker 1: who covers all things up finance for us here at Bloomberg.

15
00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:49,800
Speaker 1: I'm wondering this doesn't come as a surprise. No, no,

16
00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:52,279
Speaker 1: I mean this is this is something that's been known exactly,

17
00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:55,560
Speaker 1: so it's not a shocker, right. I mean that they

18
00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:58,240
Speaker 1: were going to delay their I p O. The question

19
00:00:58,280 --> 00:01:02,160
Speaker 1: that's looming over everyone's minds two things is when will

20
00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:04,720
Speaker 1: this happen, Will it ever happen? And how are they

21
00:01:04,760 --> 00:01:08,360
Speaker 1: going to raise money without a happening? So what is

22
00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:10,319
Speaker 1: the thinking here? Because I know that they had a

23
00:01:10,319 --> 00:01:13,920
Speaker 1: big debt financing that was gonna was contingent upon them

24
00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:17,000
Speaker 1: going public, that obviously is not going to happen. And

25
00:01:17,040 --> 00:01:19,440
Speaker 1: is Leasa's point out earlier they are going to need

26
00:01:19,480 --> 00:01:22,240
Speaker 1: cash in the relative near term? Is there a plan

27
00:01:22,280 --> 00:01:23,920
Speaker 1: out there for this company? So right now they're in

28
00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:28,320
Speaker 1: talks for multiple things potentially happening here. H soft Bank

29
00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:32,000
Speaker 1: may make another equity injection, but with the ft actually

30
00:01:32,040 --> 00:01:34,480
Speaker 1: reporting that it could be more than a billion dollars,

31
00:01:34,520 --> 00:01:36,920
Speaker 1: I mean that that is huge. Remember, the interesting thing

32
00:01:36,920 --> 00:01:39,800
Speaker 1: about soft Bank making another injection is we're waiting right

33
00:01:39,800 --> 00:01:41,800
Speaker 1: now on whether soft Bank is going to write down

34
00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:44,559
Speaker 1: the stake of their we Work investment. And soft Bank

35
00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:47,280
Speaker 1: is already bleeding right now from a lot of different

36
00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:50,360
Speaker 1: investments that are that are troubled right now. Just to

37
00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:53,080
Speaker 1: put this in a perspective, when Jefferies took a write

38
00:01:53,120 --> 00:01:56,320
Speaker 1: down on their we Work stake of less than one percent,

39
00:01:57,000 --> 00:02:00,480
Speaker 1: it was over a hundred million dollars. And so the

40
00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:05,440
Speaker 1: we Work right down with the stake of almost maybe

41
00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:07,080
Speaker 1: a little more. When you count how much they have

42
00:02:07,280 --> 00:02:11,120
Speaker 1: in UM convertible shares, it could be very significant. So

43
00:02:11,160 --> 00:02:13,720
Speaker 1: how are they going to make another equity injection when

44
00:02:13,760 --> 00:02:17,040
Speaker 1: they're already writing down their existing stake? Could be really

45
00:02:17,080 --> 00:02:20,360
Speaker 1: interesting tension. Another interesting tension is what's going on in

46
00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:23,720
Speaker 1: the C suite at JP Morgan, which I believe was

47
00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:26,480
Speaker 1: going to be the lead banker on the I p OH.

48
00:02:27,120 --> 00:02:29,400
Speaker 1: How big of a liability is this for them? So

49
00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:33,600
Speaker 1: think about how many aspects they have connections to we work, right,

50
00:02:33,680 --> 00:02:36,880
Speaker 1: they have the it's it's something like a margin loan.

51
00:02:36,960 --> 00:02:39,919
Speaker 1: So Adam Newman took out a loan based on his

52
00:02:39,919 --> 00:02:43,200
Speaker 1: his stock hundreds of millions of dollars led by JP Morgan.

53
00:02:43,520 --> 00:02:46,440
Speaker 1: JP Morgan also is responsible for the mortgages for Adam

54
00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:48,920
Speaker 1: Newman's own homes. They also have exposure to a lot

55
00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:51,399
Speaker 1: of the buildings that we work as exposed to and

56
00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:55,120
Speaker 1: so they have some and that's on top of helping

57
00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:57,320
Speaker 1: lead this loan as well as the I p O

58
00:02:57,400 --> 00:02:59,400
Speaker 1: that's not happening. So those are fees you're not going

59
00:02:59,440 --> 00:03:01,520
Speaker 1: to see for J P. Morgan in their upcoming earnings

60
00:03:01,520 --> 00:03:04,040
Speaker 1: report because the I p O obviously never happened. But

61
00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:06,480
Speaker 1: then you also have to wonder how these other moving

62
00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:11,120
Speaker 1: parts affects JP Morgan. Their own investors are also invested

63
00:03:11,120 --> 00:03:13,480
Speaker 1: in early we Work stock. Some of those investors have

64
00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:15,560
Speaker 1: told me that they're not thrilled with the right ups

65
00:03:15,600 --> 00:03:18,280
Speaker 1: and the right downs that maybe UM embedded in JP

66
00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:22,120
Speaker 1: Morgan funds that have we Work shares in them. So

67
00:03:22,600 --> 00:03:25,440
Speaker 1: brought it out from JP Morgan and we work here.

68
00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:28,160
Speaker 1: I mean, there's been a lot of big disappointing deals

69
00:03:28,160 --> 00:03:31,160
Speaker 1: here in twenty nine Uber Lift and just on and

70
00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:32,600
Speaker 1: on the list goes. And this was supposed to be

71
00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:34,800
Speaker 1: the year when the bankers got fat and happy and

72
00:03:34,920 --> 00:03:37,000
Speaker 1: I PO investors got fat and happy. It hasn't worked

73
00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:40,480
Speaker 1: out that way. Has there been any meaningful pushback on

74
00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:43,520
Speaker 1: the bankers and saying, you guys just haven't done a

75
00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:47,400
Speaker 1: very good job this year. Totally, so get this. Tomorrow

76
00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:49,720
Speaker 1: is the day in Silicon Valley that all the big

77
00:03:49,800 --> 00:03:53,080
Speaker 1: venture capitalists will be meeting, and the bankers are not

78
00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:56,520
Speaker 1: invited because they are looking to change the I p

79
00:03:56,600 --> 00:03:58,880
Speaker 1: O model as we know it. They don't like the

80
00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:01,200
Speaker 1: initial pop that got in an I p O and

81
00:04:01,200 --> 00:04:04,200
Speaker 1: they certainly don't like the first day fall you get

82
00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:09,520
Speaker 1: lately with Smile Direct, Club and and Peloton were two

83
00:04:09,680 --> 00:04:12,680
Speaker 1: of the very rare companies to fall on their first

84
00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:14,600
Speaker 1: day of trading that are that big and raise how

85
00:04:14,640 --> 00:04:16,920
Speaker 1: much money? How much is the banker's fault? How much

86
00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:19,920
Speaker 1: is the venture capitalists fault for valuing these companies as

87
00:04:19,960 --> 00:04:21,600
Speaker 1: highly as they have? Well, if you talk to the

88
00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:23,600
Speaker 1: ventral capitalists, what they're gonna do is they're going to

89
00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:27,920
Speaker 1: deflect the responsibility not just away from the venture capitalists,

90
00:04:27,960 --> 00:04:31,520
Speaker 1: but over to soft Bank, which has been really inflating

91
00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:35,080
Speaker 1: some of these um silicon value valuations. And you know,

92
00:04:35,120 --> 00:04:36,520
Speaker 1: there's a lot of people that say a lot of

93
00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:39,039
Speaker 1: these new big fundraisers we're seeing is in response to

94
00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:41,520
Speaker 1: soft Bank really changing the dynamics of the market. Least

95
00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:44,440
Speaker 1: you've covered this a lot too, But the bankers are

96
00:04:44,520 --> 00:04:47,520
Speaker 1: not without blame here for certain. The next big one

97
00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:50,320
Speaker 1: that I think we were waiting on was Airbnb. What's

98
00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:53,640
Speaker 1: the status of that TBD? The thing that's nice. The

99
00:04:53,680 --> 00:04:56,599
Speaker 1: thing that's nice about airbnb is that it does turn

100
00:04:56,640 --> 00:04:59,599
Speaker 1: a profit. It is kind of a darling and you

101
00:04:59,680 --> 00:05:01,360
Speaker 1: no matter you can think about it, when the I

102
00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:04,880
Speaker 1: P O market's bad, it's not that it closes up completely.

103
00:05:05,120 --> 00:05:07,760
Speaker 1: People still want listings and so they're going to look

104
00:05:07,800 --> 00:05:10,400
Speaker 1: for the best possible ones. And so I think Airbnb

105
00:05:10,560 --> 00:05:12,520
Speaker 1: still dangles a little bit of hope in front of

106
00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:15,479
Speaker 1: investors and in front of UM, in front of in

107
00:05:15,520 --> 00:05:18,080
Speaker 1: front of banks as well. Shinali Bassett, thank you so

108
00:05:18,160 --> 00:05:22,080
Speaker 1: much for joining a Shonali's investment banking reporting for Bloomberg News.

109
00:05:22,160 --> 00:05:24,520
Speaker 1: Journey us here on our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, bringing

110
00:05:24,560 --> 00:05:26,120
Speaker 1: us up to date on that news that we work

111
00:05:26,440 --> 00:05:30,240
Speaker 1: UH plans to withdraw its I p O perspectives as expected,

112
00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:33,280
Speaker 1: but still a shocking formative for a company that just

113
00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:34,800
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago I was looking to raise,

114
00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:37,760
Speaker 1: you know, a huge amount on a very high valuation.

115
00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:40,800
Speaker 1: A lot of questions now Number one, where will we

116
00:05:40,839 --> 00:05:43,560
Speaker 1: work raise money? Number two? What does this to to

117
00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:46,320
Speaker 1: investment bankers? And a sort of tom was a year

118
00:05:46,560 --> 00:05:49,800
Speaker 1: generally for I p O s sale was was was

119
00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:53,040
Speaker 1: putting out there? And number three for soft bank at

120
00:05:53,080 --> 00:05:56,240
Speaker 1: what point do they just say forget it, We're gonna

121
00:05:56,320 --> 00:06:15,240
Speaker 1: let you fail. Exactly right time to check in with

122
00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:18,919
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Opinion. We're joined by opinion columnists Brian Cheppetta. Brian

123
00:06:19,240 --> 00:06:21,560
Speaker 1: is a debt markets calumnist. He joins us here in

124
00:06:21,640 --> 00:06:24,280
Speaker 1: our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. So, Brian, I know you're

125
00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:26,440
Speaker 1: out with a column and you're basically saying it could

126
00:06:26,480 --> 00:06:30,039
Speaker 1: be a shaky time for the bond market, but investment

127
00:06:30,040 --> 00:06:32,960
Speaker 1: grade issues are just flooding the market here. So what's

128
00:06:32,960 --> 00:06:35,880
Speaker 1: going on in your side of the credit markets? Yeah,

129
00:06:35,880 --> 00:06:37,680
Speaker 1: I thought it was really fascinating to see that a

130
00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:41,200
Speaker 1: D seven investment grade bond deals cluded the market as

131
00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:44,200
Speaker 1: of the end of last week, which is a record high. UH.

132
00:06:44,440 --> 00:06:48,200
Speaker 1: No month has ever seen so many investment grade companies

133
00:06:48,200 --> 00:06:51,159
Speaker 1: come and borrow, And it's just it's really surprising because

134
00:06:51,160 --> 00:06:55,520
Speaker 1: you saw all this different, tumultuous activity in various corners

135
00:06:55,960 --> 00:06:58,160
Speaker 1: of the markets. But it was steady as she goes.

136
00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:01,480
Speaker 1: I guess uh for corporate And even though they're down

137
00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:04,880
Speaker 1: a little bit this month, first monthly loss this year

138
00:07:05,640 --> 00:07:09,279
Speaker 1: because of yields rising, UH, still out performing treasuries and

139
00:07:09,600 --> 00:07:13,080
Speaker 1: still up year data, pretty strong, pretty strong year. So

140
00:07:13,240 --> 00:07:15,560
Speaker 1: this is this is such a fascinating area because there

141
00:07:15,600 --> 00:07:18,000
Speaker 1: seems to be a flood of cash coming from overseas

142
00:07:18,080 --> 00:07:20,560
Speaker 1: into the US investment grade bond market trying to get

143
00:07:20,600 --> 00:07:23,600
Speaker 1: some yield. Uh, since there is still some yield in

144
00:07:23,640 --> 00:07:27,280
Speaker 1: the United States. That said, Morgan Stanley crunched the data

145
00:07:27,320 --> 00:07:30,760
Speaker 1: and found that liabilities that the event of debt versus

146
00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:34,000
Speaker 1: income have reached their highest level in the investment grade

147
00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:38,080
Speaker 1: corporate sector since two thousand and nine. And they were

148
00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:41,840
Speaker 1: talking about how forty of all investment grade issuers now

149
00:07:42,120 --> 00:07:47,160
Speaker 1: have debt levels more equivalent to junk ratings, even though

150
00:07:47,160 --> 00:07:49,520
Speaker 1: they are still rated with the with the top tiers

151
00:07:49,680 --> 00:07:54,040
Speaker 1: of credit grades. Should people be concerned? Well, I guess

152
00:07:54,040 --> 00:07:56,640
Speaker 1: when I see that all the pushback, I always have

153
00:07:56,760 --> 00:07:59,119
Speaker 1: the thing I always want to see, and maybe maybe

154
00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:02,280
Speaker 1: there is some data out on that is sort of Okay,

155
00:08:02,400 --> 00:08:05,600
Speaker 1: the debt levels are high, but what are the borrowing costs?

156
00:08:05,720 --> 00:08:08,160
Speaker 1: Because yes, it's the highest since two thousand nine, But

157
00:08:08,160 --> 00:08:09,640
Speaker 1: you have to sort of look at where yield levels

158
00:08:09,680 --> 00:08:12,760
Speaker 1: are now relative to where they were ten years ago.

159
00:08:12,840 --> 00:08:16,200
Speaker 1: Because you can borrow, you can refinance, and yes you

160
00:08:16,280 --> 00:08:19,360
Speaker 1: have higher debt, but it's it's cheaper to borrow, So

161
00:08:19,600 --> 00:08:22,080
Speaker 1: I mean sort of the question is the corporate structure,

162
00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:25,640
Speaker 1: I mean, is it is it economically more feasible and

163
00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:28,920
Speaker 1: and better to to actually have have some debt if

164
00:08:28,960 --> 00:08:32,160
Speaker 1: you can borrow it. I'll push back on that. I

165
00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:35,200
Speaker 1: think that you know you're right that it net interest

166
00:08:35,240 --> 00:08:38,760
Speaker 1: costs are coming down, right just simply math, because rates

167
00:08:38,800 --> 00:08:41,000
Speaker 1: are lower and there is so much money and interest

168
00:08:41,120 --> 00:08:44,880
Speaker 1: coming into this market. That's said. The reason why leverage

169
00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:47,280
Speaker 1: picked up to such degree, according to this Morgan Stanley

170
00:08:47,320 --> 00:08:50,560
Speaker 1: analysis was twofold. It was because the borrowing more and

171
00:08:50,920 --> 00:08:54,800
Speaker 1: the revenues are coming down. Right there. The extra debt

172
00:08:54,920 --> 00:08:59,479
Speaker 1: that they are borrowing is not helping them boost their profits.

173
00:09:00,120 --> 00:09:02,959
Speaker 1: And so at what point is debt for debt's sake

174
00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:06,880
Speaker 1: really going to potentially crimp companies as we head into

175
00:09:06,920 --> 00:09:09,280
Speaker 1: potentially another downturn. Yeah, I mean I think that's a

176
00:09:09,360 --> 00:09:11,440
Speaker 1: fair I mean, I think everything that we sort of

177
00:09:11,480 --> 00:09:15,400
Speaker 1: know about this cycle and what companies have been doing

178
00:09:15,720 --> 00:09:18,920
Speaker 1: effectively taking on more debt, doing more share buy backs

179
00:09:18,920 --> 00:09:21,560
Speaker 1: to boost their equity price, I mean, all those things

180
00:09:21,640 --> 00:09:24,960
Speaker 1: are not what you would ideally like to see. But

181
00:09:25,040 --> 00:09:27,560
Speaker 1: I guess the question going forward that people have to

182
00:09:27,559 --> 00:09:30,480
Speaker 1: think about is what else do you do in an

183
00:09:30,480 --> 00:09:34,080
Speaker 1: economy that's growing but not growing that fast? I mean,

184
00:09:34,480 --> 00:09:37,360
Speaker 1: it seems like all of these executives sort of have

185
00:09:37,800 --> 00:09:40,280
Speaker 1: come to the decision that this is the way that

186
00:09:40,320 --> 00:09:42,680
Speaker 1: we go. We we take out debt to maybe finance

187
00:09:42,800 --> 00:09:46,560
Speaker 1: murders and acquisitions, or even just to buy back our shares.

188
00:09:47,160 --> 00:09:49,080
Speaker 1: So what are we seeing in terms of credit quality

189
00:09:49,080 --> 00:09:51,800
Speaker 1: out there? Are we seeing any signs of a deterioration

190
00:09:52,120 --> 00:09:55,040
Speaker 1: in credit quality? Well, I think that the high yield

191
00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:57,080
Speaker 1: market is where you're starting to see a lot of

192
00:09:57,160 --> 00:10:00,160
Speaker 1: investor pushback and some deals had to be show l

193
00:10:00,360 --> 00:10:03,960
Speaker 1: that aren't getting done. I mean there have been downgrades, um.

194
00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:06,800
Speaker 1: I think that Tupperware was the one that was mentioned

195
00:10:07,360 --> 00:10:12,280
Speaker 1: in the Bloomberg News story today being cut to junk UM.

196
00:10:12,320 --> 00:10:16,880
Speaker 1: But overall, UH, downgrades are happening, but not quite at

197
00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:19,600
Speaker 1: the clip. I think that people were really worried about.

198
00:10:19,880 --> 00:10:22,440
Speaker 1: The question will be obviously if for some reason the

199
00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:27,280
Speaker 1: economy gets worse, we head into even even more slow down.

200
00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:29,840
Speaker 1: If that will change, UH, you want to shift gears

201
00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:31,800
Speaker 1: a little bit to the repo market. Since we are

202
00:10:31,800 --> 00:10:33,520
Speaker 1: reaching quarter end and this has been the time that

203
00:10:33,600 --> 00:10:37,160
Speaker 1: people really were worried about, we are seeing overnight repo

204
00:10:37,280 --> 00:10:40,600
Speaker 1: costs go up. How big of a concern is that.

205
00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:44,360
Speaker 1: I think a lot of people are sort of thinking that, Okay,

206
00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:48,080
Speaker 1: the repo market is a problem area and the FED

207
00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:50,760
Speaker 1: doesn't have a quick fix. They're in there doing their

208
00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:55,240
Speaker 1: temporary repo operations for now, and it'll be generally okay,

209
00:10:55,280 --> 00:10:58,000
Speaker 1: we'll muddle through now. But I think everyone's really focused

210
00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:00,800
Speaker 1: on what will the FED come out with UH in

211
00:11:00,840 --> 00:11:02,920
Speaker 1: there are after there are October meeting. What sort of

212
00:11:02,960 --> 00:11:05,880
Speaker 1: permanent solution is there? Are we going back to buying

213
00:11:05,920 --> 00:11:08,840
Speaker 1: more treasuries uh in an attempt to sort of flood

214
00:11:08,840 --> 00:11:11,680
Speaker 1: the system with more reserves, or will they have some

215
00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:14,319
Speaker 1: standing repo facility, But it sounds like they're not as

216
00:11:14,360 --> 00:11:17,160
Speaker 1: close to that as people might expect, So it sounds

217
00:11:17,200 --> 00:11:18,840
Speaker 1: like they might go back to sort of organic growth

218
00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:21,520
Speaker 1: of the balance sheet. Brian Chabot, thank you so much

219
00:11:21,520 --> 00:11:23,360
Speaker 1: for being with us. Thank you. Brian Chabot is a

220
00:11:23,360 --> 00:11:26,000
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Opinion columnist, joining us here in our Bloomberg Gotter

221
00:11:26,040 --> 00:11:28,320
Speaker 1: Active Broker Studios. You can read all of his columns

222
00:11:28,480 --> 00:11:31,560
Speaker 1: at O, P, I N GO, on the Bloomberg Terminal

223
00:11:31,640 --> 00:11:35,560
Speaker 1: or Bloomberg dot com Slash Opinion. His columns are great,

224
00:11:35,720 --> 00:11:38,000
Speaker 1: so are those of his colleague and you can catch

225
00:11:38,040 --> 00:11:59,040
Speaker 1: them all there. Let's shift gears to what's been going

226
00:11:59,040 --> 00:12:01,320
Speaker 1: on in Washington, D see some of the political turmoil

227
00:12:01,360 --> 00:12:04,839
Speaker 1: with respect to the impeachment probe and the hearings last week.

228
00:12:05,120 --> 00:12:08,280
Speaker 1: How much does that trickle into markets? Jeff Powell, managing

229
00:12:08,280 --> 00:12:11,600
Speaker 1: partner at Polari's gray Stone Financial Group, joining us now

230
00:12:11,640 --> 00:12:14,200
Speaker 1: by phone from San Francisco. Jeff, how much did you

231
00:12:14,280 --> 00:12:16,920
Speaker 1: care and pay attention to the political tumult that we

232
00:12:16,960 --> 00:12:20,120
Speaker 1: saw over the past week. Well, I mean, obviously we

233
00:12:20,240 --> 00:12:23,840
Speaker 1: have to pay attention to headline news, and obviously something

234
00:12:23,880 --> 00:12:29,120
Speaker 1: like an impeachment inquiry is a very serious thing. Um. Personally,

235
00:12:29,160 --> 00:12:33,520
Speaker 1: I don't think that a impeachment walk her under the circumstances,

236
00:12:33,559 --> 00:12:36,760
Speaker 1: but it certainly plays into sentiment of marketplace, and it's

237
00:12:36,760 --> 00:12:40,560
Speaker 1: certainly complicates what's going on with our trade negotiations with China.

238
00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:44,200
Speaker 1: So it's a very important thing for us to consider

239
00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:47,079
Speaker 1: to track progress of what's going on there and also

240
00:12:47,160 --> 00:12:51,000
Speaker 1: the impacts of it as in other areas of the marketplace. Yeah, Jeff,

241
00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:53,840
Speaker 1: I've actually been I guess a little bit surprised at

242
00:12:53,840 --> 00:12:57,679
Speaker 1: the market has kind of taken this news in stride um,

243
00:12:57,720 --> 00:12:59,800
Speaker 1: and but I guess the question investors are just trying

244
00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:02,080
Speaker 1: to get a sense of where could this really hit

245
00:13:02,120 --> 00:13:04,080
Speaker 1: me in terms of the economy, And I guess you

246
00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:07,200
Speaker 1: mentioned one area is trade and that's clearly been the

247
00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:09,880
Speaker 1: big driver this market over the last year. So so

248
00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:11,720
Speaker 1: give us your thoughts to kind of how do you

249
00:13:11,720 --> 00:13:17,479
Speaker 1: think this may impact trade negotiations if at all? Well, yeah, absolutely,

250
00:13:17,559 --> 00:13:19,560
Speaker 1: I mean if you think back to May when we

251
00:13:19,920 --> 00:13:24,680
Speaker 1: heard Donald Trump tweet about how he was unhappy with

252
00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:27,640
Speaker 1: the Fed and if the Fed had been more aggressive

253
00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:30,120
Speaker 1: about cuts that we would have as strong in an

254
00:13:30,120 --> 00:13:32,680
Speaker 1: economy as China had, And all of a sudden, we

255
00:13:32,720 --> 00:13:38,360
Speaker 1: had China rethinking what was going on with our trade negotiations. So, uh, Premier,

256
00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:43,240
Speaker 1: she obviously is a lifetime position for him. We obviously

257
00:13:43,280 --> 00:13:48,080
Speaker 1: don't have lifetime positions for our leaders, and so when

258
00:13:48,080 --> 00:13:50,280
Speaker 1: you look at it, I believe the Chinese kind of

259
00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:53,520
Speaker 1: negotiate on kind of a different calendar than we do,

260
00:13:53,720 --> 00:13:56,560
Speaker 1: so they may be in a situation where they tried

261
00:13:56,559 --> 00:14:01,640
Speaker 1: to outweigh outweight President Trump under these circumstances, but it

262
00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:06,400
Speaker 1: certainly weakens his position with trade negotiations with China. Do

263
00:14:06,440 --> 00:14:09,760
Speaker 1: you trade on the headlines, No, we don't at all.

264
00:14:09,840 --> 00:14:13,720
Speaker 1: I mean, but I mean obviously you know things, things spiral,

265
00:14:13,920 --> 00:14:17,880
Speaker 1: and so uncertainty is a major factor. I mean, if

266
00:14:17,920 --> 00:14:19,800
Speaker 1: you just look at what happened in the fourth quarter

267
00:14:19,840 --> 00:14:22,920
Speaker 1: of last year, almost everything that was going on during

268
00:14:23,000 --> 00:14:26,040
Speaker 1: fourth quarter was sentiment of and everybody was worried about

269
00:14:26,080 --> 00:14:30,680
Speaker 1: the potential of a of having an economy that was

270
00:14:30,760 --> 00:14:33,960
Speaker 1: weakening or even going into recession, when there was really

271
00:14:33,960 --> 00:14:36,840
Speaker 1: no evidence of it. We had a strong economy, we

272
00:14:36,880 --> 00:14:40,400
Speaker 1: had really strong earnings. You have the markets drop during

273
00:14:40,400 --> 00:14:43,560
Speaker 1: that time period. So really we're looking at headlines and

274
00:14:43,600 --> 00:14:46,840
Speaker 1: their impact. I mean, you can run into circumstances that

275
00:14:46,920 --> 00:14:51,280
Speaker 1: become self fulfilling prophecies where you have people become more

276
00:14:51,280 --> 00:14:54,000
Speaker 1: and more worried about what's going on economically as a

277
00:14:54,080 --> 00:14:57,320
Speaker 1: result of headlines, which would be a driving factor for

278
00:14:57,400 --> 00:15:01,720
Speaker 1: us to make a decision to get more defensive and portfolios. So, Jeff,

279
00:15:01,760 --> 00:15:04,280
Speaker 1: we are, um, you know, at or near this the

280
00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:06,560
Speaker 1: all time high for the smp fived. You talk a

281
00:15:06,560 --> 00:15:09,840
Speaker 1: little bit about getting defensive. How are you thinking about

282
00:15:09,880 --> 00:15:12,600
Speaker 1: your positioning right here, given where we are in the

283
00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:16,440
Speaker 1: economic cycle, given where the FED is, are you taking

284
00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:19,640
Speaker 1: on additional risk here? Are or are you getting more defensive?

285
00:15:21,720 --> 00:15:23,480
Speaker 1: It's kind of funny you bring that up, but it's

286
00:15:23,480 --> 00:15:26,160
Speaker 1: it's more of a neutral stance right now, more of

287
00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:30,160
Speaker 1: a wait and see um. When we talk about economic cycles,

288
00:15:30,200 --> 00:15:33,560
Speaker 1: I mean I have a very hard time really gauging that.

289
00:15:33,800 --> 00:15:36,120
Speaker 1: I mean, we talked about how long the economy has

290
00:15:36,120 --> 00:15:40,040
Speaker 1: been expanding, yet you've had government intervention going on until

291
00:15:40,080 --> 00:15:43,160
Speaker 1: they'll end the part of two thousand fourteen, we dealt

292
00:15:43,200 --> 00:15:46,640
Speaker 1: with three different quantitative easing time periods in which you

293
00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:50,480
Speaker 1: had the government stepping in and really pressing yields down

294
00:15:50,720 --> 00:15:54,680
Speaker 1: very low as a result of quantitative easing. How do

295
00:15:54,760 --> 00:15:59,880
Speaker 1: you gauge true economic expansion when the government was being

296
00:16:00,120 --> 00:16:03,320
Speaker 1: was involved basically for seven of the years of that expansion.

297
00:16:03,880 --> 00:16:06,960
Speaker 1: So it's challenging. It's it's very challenging to sit there

298
00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:09,840
Speaker 1: and and really step in hard with this. I think

299
00:16:09,880 --> 00:16:14,840
Speaker 1: that we are going to see a a smattering of

300
00:16:14,880 --> 00:16:18,800
Speaker 1: disappointments going into earning season, especially with what's going on

301
00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:21,080
Speaker 1: with tariffs in the trade war that we have going on.

302
00:16:22,080 --> 00:16:25,360
Speaker 1: I think it's hard to get really really aggressive with

303
00:16:25,360 --> 00:16:29,120
Speaker 1: within the markets based upon that. So we're going in,

304
00:16:29,240 --> 00:16:33,520
Speaker 1: we're being we're market weight with what we would typically

305
00:16:33,560 --> 00:16:36,320
Speaker 1: be for a client and their risk levels and so on.

306
00:16:37,080 --> 00:16:40,560
Speaker 1: That being said, we are lower beta stocks more so

307
00:16:40,600 --> 00:16:43,080
Speaker 1: than we would be in a normal circumstance with the

308
00:16:43,120 --> 00:16:46,000
Speaker 1: allocations that we're in. Are you boosting your allocation to

309
00:16:46,120 --> 00:16:52,800
Speaker 1: cash we did about a month ago. We're holding tight

310
00:16:52,840 --> 00:16:56,920
Speaker 1: with what we are now. We have our laundry list

311
00:16:56,960 --> 00:17:01,240
Speaker 1: of names that we like, and we're looking or the

312
00:17:01,360 --> 00:17:04,040
Speaker 1: right opportunity to step back into the market a little

313
00:17:04,080 --> 00:17:07,200
Speaker 1: bit more heavily and get into an overweight position should

314
00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:10,120
Speaker 1: the need arise. So, Jeff, one of the issues I've

315
00:17:10,119 --> 00:17:13,480
Speaker 1: heard about getting a little bit more cautious is utilities reads.

316
00:17:13,800 --> 00:17:17,040
Speaker 1: You know, consumer staples by historical standards, they're not cheap.

317
00:17:18,880 --> 00:17:22,400
Speaker 1: You're absolutely correct, and so, I mean we are market

318
00:17:22,440 --> 00:17:25,280
Speaker 1: weight and all three of those categories, but we are

319
00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:29,399
Speaker 1: not overweighted into them. Uh So, it is something that

320
00:17:29,480 --> 00:17:32,280
Speaker 1: is a little bit more challenging to sit there and

321
00:17:32,280 --> 00:17:34,639
Speaker 1: and chase that kind of performance. I mean, if you

322
00:17:34,680 --> 00:17:37,920
Speaker 1: look at what utilities have done in particular, I mean,

323
00:17:38,040 --> 00:17:41,679
Speaker 1: they've had an amazing run, an amazing year for that

324
00:17:41,760 --> 00:17:44,639
Speaker 1: particular category. But you're absolutely correct, it makes it very

325
00:17:44,720 --> 00:17:48,480
Speaker 1: challenging to go into an area of the marketplace that

326
00:17:48,720 --> 00:17:51,720
Speaker 1: is considered to be expensive even though it's considered to

327
00:17:51,760 --> 00:17:55,000
Speaker 1: be defensive. Jeff pal thanks so much for joining us.

328
00:17:55,040 --> 00:17:58,240
Speaker 1: Jeff's a managing partner for Polarist gray Stone Financial Group

329
00:17:58,560 --> 00:18:01,840
Speaker 1: based in San Francisco. Jeff and just via phone from

330
00:18:01,840 --> 00:18:16,960
Speaker 1: San Francisco giving us his thoughts on the market. A

331
00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:21,000
Speaker 1: lot of workplaces talk about the difficulties of hiring qualified

332
00:18:21,040 --> 00:18:24,159
Speaker 1: people are frankly hiring people in general. There is a

333
00:18:24,240 --> 00:18:27,040
Speaker 1: question of what role artificial intelligence can play in that.

334
00:18:27,200 --> 00:18:29,640
Speaker 1: Joining us now is A L. Graevsky. He's chief executive

335
00:18:29,640 --> 00:18:32,840
Speaker 1: officer of Maya Systems, joining us from San Francisco. I

336
00:18:33,080 --> 00:18:35,119
Speaker 1: can you just talk a little bit about what Maya

337
00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:40,119
Speaker 1: Systems is. Yeah, So, Maya Systems is a recruitment automation

338
00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:44,360
Speaker 1: platform using conversational AI. So we built this conversational AI

339
00:18:44,440 --> 00:18:48,440
Speaker 1: assistant named Maya, who engages with candidates through natural language

340
00:18:48,440 --> 00:18:51,359
Speaker 1: and helps guide them through the recruiting process, helps source

341
00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:55,000
Speaker 1: passive leads for hiring teams, and manage many different phases

342
00:18:55,040 --> 00:18:58,520
Speaker 1: of the process. So I'll just give us a sense

343
00:18:58,560 --> 00:19:04,480
Speaker 1: of you know, what types of companies use your system. Yeah,

344
00:19:04,480 --> 00:19:06,960
Speaker 1: so we work with some of the largest enterprises and

345
00:19:07,080 --> 00:19:09,600
Speaker 1: staffing companies in the world, so six of the eight

346
00:19:09,720 --> 00:19:13,520
Speaker 1: largest staffing businesses, as well as organizations like the Lloyd

347
00:19:14,000 --> 00:19:18,840
Speaker 1: Laureal a b M BEV, very large enterprises like Singapore

348
00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:23,080
Speaker 1: Airlines that leverage the technology to both manage their talent

349
00:19:23,119 --> 00:19:26,840
Speaker 1: pools as well as automate and guide candidates through the

350
00:19:26,920 --> 00:19:30,040
Speaker 1: recruiting process. What's the goal, I mean, why did you

351
00:19:30,119 --> 00:19:34,560
Speaker 1: create this company? Yeah? So what I learned from the

352
00:19:34,640 --> 00:19:37,480
Speaker 1: many years working as a recruiter is that the recruiting

353
00:19:37,480 --> 00:19:42,040
Speaker 1: process is still wildly manual, and you see recruiters spent

354
00:19:42,119 --> 00:19:46,000
Speaker 1: about seventy of their time on what we call repetitive tasks,

355
00:19:46,000 --> 00:19:49,520
Speaker 1: which really slows them down. And later when I actually

356
00:19:49,560 --> 00:19:52,200
Speaker 1: went out and started searching for jobs early in my career,

357
00:19:52,280 --> 00:19:55,360
Speaker 1: I applied about forty jobs her back from two companies.

358
00:19:55,400 --> 00:19:59,840
Speaker 1: It's incredibly frustrating of applications fall into the black hole.

359
00:20:00,280 --> 00:20:02,399
Speaker 1: You have about a fifty seven to one chance of

360
00:20:02,440 --> 00:20:05,080
Speaker 1: getting a job when you apply, so it's a very

361
00:20:05,240 --> 00:20:08,960
Speaker 1: inefficient process. And what we saw was an opportunity to

362
00:20:09,440 --> 00:20:12,920
Speaker 1: build a technology that can really engage and communicate with

363
00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:15,960
Speaker 1: people at a large scale so that we can learn

364
00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:19,679
Speaker 1: about those individuals and then in building that profile and

365
00:20:19,800 --> 00:20:23,080
Speaker 1: understanding their interests, we can help guide them and convert

366
00:20:23,160 --> 00:20:26,440
Speaker 1: them into their next job. So we really saw that

367
00:20:26,560 --> 00:20:30,119
Speaker 1: unique opportunity to bridge the communications gap. It's interesting, you know,

368
00:20:30,160 --> 00:20:34,600
Speaker 1: I think the LinkedIn is really emerged as a recruiting tool.

369
00:20:34,680 --> 00:20:36,200
Speaker 1: Give us a sense of kind of how you either

370
00:20:36,320 --> 00:20:41,960
Speaker 1: compete with or complementary to a LinkedIn type of service. Yea,

371
00:20:42,040 --> 00:20:45,080
Speaker 1: So we we be viewed complementary and that LinkedIn is

372
00:20:45,200 --> 00:20:47,480
Speaker 1: very much a marketplace, and of course they have a

373
00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:52,680
Speaker 1: platform that organizations can um used to source and engage

374
00:20:52,760 --> 00:20:56,159
Speaker 1: passive candidates and and so forth. What we are is

375
00:20:56,880 --> 00:21:00,800
Speaker 1: really an enterprise staff business. We integrate into our clients

376
00:21:00,800 --> 00:21:06,800
Speaker 1: systems and we support recruitment across many different sources. So

377
00:21:07,000 --> 00:21:10,159
Speaker 1: LinkedIn might be one of the sources that are generating

378
00:21:10,280 --> 00:21:13,720
Speaker 1: leads where Maya might engage that candidate and convert them

379
00:21:13,720 --> 00:21:17,280
Speaker 1: through the funnel. Uh, and then of course Maya. The

380
00:21:17,359 --> 00:21:19,960
Speaker 1: really interesting thing about what we're doing is we can

381
00:21:20,119 --> 00:21:24,200
Speaker 1: use the technology to engage our customers database of candidates,

382
00:21:24,280 --> 00:21:27,080
Speaker 1: people that they've engaged within the past. Many of our

383
00:21:27,119 --> 00:21:31,040
Speaker 1: customers have millions of candidates that they've acquired over the

384
00:21:31,119 --> 00:21:34,920
Speaker 1: years and maya can really engage, re engage and surface

385
00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:40,240
Speaker 1: leads directly within your existing pool. So um, in that way,

386
00:21:40,600 --> 00:21:44,280
Speaker 1: sometimes we use the reliance on external sources like LinkedIn.

387
00:21:44,720 --> 00:21:47,720
Speaker 1: So given the fact that you you probably have conversations

388
00:21:47,760 --> 00:21:49,520
Speaker 1: with a lot of different companies, they are trying to

389
00:21:49,560 --> 00:21:53,720
Speaker 1: tailor this to their specific needs. Are you getting any

390
00:21:53,880 --> 00:21:57,080
Speaker 1: sense that there is a shift in what employers are

391
00:21:57,119 --> 00:21:59,920
Speaker 1: looking for in terms of the skills that will determine

392
00:22:00,119 --> 00:22:02,919
Speaker 1: whether a candidate will be successful and will stick around

393
00:22:03,480 --> 00:22:10,679
Speaker 1: versus not. Yeah, so, um, there's absolutely shifts in in

394
00:22:10,880 --> 00:22:15,640
Speaker 1: perspective and how employers are making decisions on candidates and

395
00:22:15,640 --> 00:22:20,280
Speaker 1: and that's probably gonna change on an employer to employer basis. Um.

396
00:22:20,320 --> 00:22:23,000
Speaker 1: You know, really our goal as a as a product

397
00:22:23,080 --> 00:22:26,000
Speaker 1: is is to really learn and understand the candidate and

398
00:22:26,400 --> 00:22:30,439
Speaker 1: surface those insights that might be hidden not on the resume,

399
00:22:30,600 --> 00:22:33,720
Speaker 1: not in the LinkedIn profile. You know, these are insights

400
00:22:33,720 --> 00:22:36,679
Speaker 1: that typically our surfaced from like a phone screen, and

401
00:22:36,720 --> 00:22:40,240
Speaker 1: we'll help build that profile that enriched profile and understanding

402
00:22:40,240 --> 00:22:43,840
Speaker 1: of the candidate as it pertains to the job requirements. Um. Really,

403
00:22:43,880 --> 00:22:48,199
Speaker 1: based on the criteria that the recruiter is looking for

404
00:22:48,440 --> 00:22:51,480
Speaker 1: and then we'll let the recruiter make that educated decision.

405
00:22:51,560 --> 00:22:54,760
Speaker 1: But yeah, companies are gonna very much differ and how

406
00:22:54,760 --> 00:22:58,600
Speaker 1: they think about candidates. Another cool thing that we're doing

407
00:22:58,760 --> 00:23:03,200
Speaker 1: is we're really understanding how candidates are engaging UM and

408
00:23:03,560 --> 00:23:06,840
Speaker 1: how other candidates in the past that we've screened or

409
00:23:06,960 --> 00:23:09,879
Speaker 1: that we've engaged with our performing, so we can help

410
00:23:10,320 --> 00:23:13,639
Speaker 1: our customers make predictions that are really grounded in data

411
00:23:13,880 --> 00:23:18,639
Speaker 1: and and and grounded in analytics over time. Hey, I'll

412
00:23:19,040 --> 00:23:20,520
Speaker 1: ye have ski. Thank you so much for joining us.

413
00:23:20,520 --> 00:23:24,680
Speaker 1: Just fascinating discussion. Ails, the chief executive officer for Maya Systems,

414
00:23:24,760 --> 00:23:27,320
Speaker 1: joining us on the phone from San Francisco, talking about

415
00:23:27,359 --> 00:23:31,680
Speaker 1: the recruiting process, the hiring process, the retaining talent process,

416
00:23:31,680 --> 00:23:37,200
Speaker 1: and how artificial intelligence and other technologies can help recruiters, companies,

417
00:23:37,359 --> 00:23:41,600
Speaker 1: UH and candidates themselves find a better fit. Thanks for

418
00:23:41,640 --> 00:23:43,840
Speaker 1: listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can

419
00:23:43,880 --> 00:23:46,720
Speaker 1: subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

420
00:23:46,760 --> 00:23:49,959
Speaker 1: podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at

421
00:23:49,960 --> 00:23:52,639
Speaker 1: pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa bram Woyds. I'm on Twitter at

422
00:23:52,680 --> 00:23:55,480
Speaker 1: Lisa A. Bramwoit's one before the podcast. You can always

423
00:23:55,480 --> 00:23:57,560
Speaker 1: catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio