WEBVTT - Why Don't We Have a 15-hour Work Week?

0:00:15.476 --> 0:00:24.396
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. The stock market crash of nineteen twenty nine and

0:00:24.436 --> 0:00:27.276
<v Speaker 1>the great depression that followed quite reasonably scared a lot

0:00:27.276 --> 0:00:31.556
<v Speaker 1>of people. Fortunes were lost, savings disappeared, factories closed, and

0:00:31.676 --> 0:00:35.276
<v Speaker 1>jobs evaporated. The only places doing a roaring trade were

0:00:35.356 --> 0:00:38.916
<v Speaker 1>soup kitchens and breadlines. Things looked bad, with no end

0:00:38.956 --> 0:00:41.356
<v Speaker 1>in sight. But one man wasn't that worried.

0:00:41.916 --> 0:00:45.836
<v Speaker 2>We are suffering just now from a bad attack of

0:00:46.116 --> 0:00:48.596
<v Speaker 2>economic pessimism, so.

0:00:48.676 --> 0:00:51.196
<v Speaker 1>Said famed British economist John Maynard Keynes.

0:00:51.716 --> 0:00:54.996
<v Speaker 2>It is common to hear people say that a decline

0:00:55.036 --> 0:00:58.516
<v Speaker 2>in prosperity is more likely than an improvement in a

0:00:58.556 --> 0:01:01.556
<v Speaker 2>decade which lies ahead of us. I believe that this

0:01:01.836 --> 0:01:06.956
<v Speaker 2>is a wildly mistaken interpretation of what is happening to us.

0:01:07.356 --> 0:01:09.796
<v Speaker 1>People were having trouble keeping a roof over their heads

0:01:09.836 --> 0:01:12.396
<v Speaker 1>and food on the table, but Keynes wanted them to

0:01:12.436 --> 0:01:13.676
<v Speaker 1>look to the far horizon.

0:01:14.236 --> 0:01:18.836
<v Speaker 2>My purpose is to take wings into the future. What

0:01:18.996 --> 0:01:22.236
<v Speaker 2>can we reasonably expect the level of our economic life

0:01:22.316 --> 0:01:26.116
<v Speaker 2>to be one hundred years? Hence, what are the economic

0:01:26.196 --> 0:01:28.876
<v Speaker 2>possibilities for our grandchildren?

0:01:29.756 --> 0:01:33.116
<v Speaker 1>You might recognize the voice reading Keyes's words. It's my colleague,

0:01:33.196 --> 0:01:36.996
<v Speaker 1>the economist Tim Harford from the Cautionary Tales podcast. Tim's

0:01:37.076 --> 0:01:40.236
<v Speaker 1>very familiar with Keanes's rosy predictions about what life would

0:01:40.236 --> 0:01:41.756
<v Speaker 1>look like in the year twenty thirty.

0:01:42.116 --> 0:01:45.116
<v Speaker 3>Kaines thought that the Great Depression was just an economic blip,

0:01:45.156 --> 0:01:48.076
<v Speaker 3>albeit quite a painful one. He predicted that, thanks to

0:01:48.156 --> 0:01:52.076
<v Speaker 3>industrial and scientific developments, the economy would boom, and that

0:01:52.076 --> 0:01:56.516
<v Speaker 3>the standard of living enjoyed by people would improve dramatically. Indeed,

0:01:56.716 --> 0:01:59.556
<v Speaker 3>he suggested that most people would be so rich their

0:01:59.636 --> 0:02:02.516
<v Speaker 3>struggles to make ends meet would be consigned to history.

0:02:02.876 --> 0:02:05.556
<v Speaker 3>At last, they'd earn more than enough money to pay

0:02:05.596 --> 0:02:07.796
<v Speaker 3>their bills in just a few hours each week, with

0:02:07.916 --> 0:02:11.476
<v Speaker 3>the rest of their time freedom up to enjoy life.

0:02:11.516 --> 0:02:14.156
<v Speaker 1>To people in nineteen thirty, these predictions must have been

0:02:14.196 --> 0:02:18.036
<v Speaker 1>mind blowing. Kines believed his grandchildren would enjoy a fifteen

0:02:18.076 --> 0:02:20.876
<v Speaker 1>hour work week, with ample time left not just to

0:02:20.916 --> 0:02:23.236
<v Speaker 1>relax in leisure, but to engage in a host of

0:02:23.276 --> 0:02:28.116
<v Speaker 1>purposeful activities like increased kindness and civic participation. And Caines

0:02:28.116 --> 0:02:31.036
<v Speaker 1>thought our whole attitude towards work would change radically as

0:02:31.076 --> 0:02:31.956
<v Speaker 1>a result.

0:02:32.156 --> 0:02:35.676
<v Speaker 2>When the accumulation of wealth is no longer of high

0:02:35.796 --> 0:02:39.596
<v Speaker 2>social importance, There would be great changes in the code

0:02:39.636 --> 0:02:42.796
<v Speaker 2>of morals. For love of money as a possession, will

0:02:42.796 --> 0:02:47.836
<v Speaker 2>we recognize for what it is a somewhat disgusting morbidity.

0:02:48.116 --> 0:02:51.556
<v Speaker 1>Well, dear happiness lab listener, congratulations, because you are currently

0:02:51.556 --> 0:02:54.796
<v Speaker 1>living in that utopian time that Caine's envisioned. How are

0:02:54.796 --> 0:02:59.916
<v Speaker 1>you enjoying your fifteen hour work week? To Kanses's credit,

0:02:59.996 --> 0:03:02.076
<v Speaker 1>we do have a much higher standard of living than

0:03:02.116 --> 0:03:06.636
<v Speaker 1>our grand parents. We also have smart TVs, dishwashers, microwaves, iPhones,

0:03:06.636 --> 0:03:09.436
<v Speaker 1>and the internet, fun and time saving gadgets the people

0:03:09.476 --> 0:03:12.516
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen thirty could only dream of. But although Kaines

0:03:12.596 --> 0:03:15.316
<v Speaker 1>was right about our increased incomes, he was wrong about

0:03:15.316 --> 0:03:18.076
<v Speaker 1>what would happen to our sense of busyness. Rather than

0:03:18.116 --> 0:03:21.076
<v Speaker 1>living relaxed lives of leisure, people in twenty twenty four

0:03:21.156 --> 0:03:24.796
<v Speaker 1>are working harder than ever. Americans today worked ten percent

0:03:24.916 --> 0:03:28.236
<v Speaker 1>more hours than they did in the nineteen seventies. Economists

0:03:28.276 --> 0:03:30.636
<v Speaker 1>have also observed a shift in the last few decades

0:03:30.916 --> 0:03:33.796
<v Speaker 1>and the usual relationship between a person's wages and the

0:03:33.876 --> 0:03:37.236
<v Speaker 1>number of hours they work. Historically, people who earn less

0:03:37.276 --> 0:03:40.676
<v Speaker 1>money tended to work more hours, but that relationship has

0:03:40.716 --> 0:03:44.036
<v Speaker 1>now reversed. These days, it's higher paid individuals who are

0:03:44.076 --> 0:03:47.396
<v Speaker 1>spending more time at work. They also report significantly more

0:03:47.436 --> 0:03:50.596
<v Speaker 1>time stress than they did in the previous decades. If

0:03:50.676 --> 0:03:52.956
<v Speaker 1>Kans had lived to see what workaholics we've all become,

0:03:53.436 --> 0:03:56.916
<v Speaker 1>he'd be very sad. Instead of a utopian work life balance,

0:03:57.196 --> 0:04:00.356
<v Speaker 1>our generation got side hustles and career cushioning and time

0:04:00.436 --> 0:04:05.796
<v Speaker 1>hacks and over employment and burnout culture. I've been thinking

0:04:05.796 --> 0:04:08.996
<v Speaker 1>about Kynes's predictions a lot these days, because lately I've

0:04:09.276 --> 0:04:12.116
<v Speaker 1>feeling busier than ever. I'm privileged to have a great

0:04:12.156 --> 0:04:14.476
<v Speaker 1>standard of living and a job I love, but my

0:04:14.596 --> 0:04:17.356
<v Speaker 1>to do list feels endless. I spend a lot of

0:04:17.356 --> 0:04:21.076
<v Speaker 1>time feeling frantic, fantasizing that any day now I'll finally

0:04:21.116 --> 0:04:22.676
<v Speaker 1>be able to get through all the stuff on my

0:04:22.756 --> 0:04:25.636
<v Speaker 1>plate so I can take a breather. But that fantasy

0:04:25.716 --> 0:04:28.356
<v Speaker 1>day of rest never seems to come. And what's my

0:04:28.436 --> 0:04:31.876
<v Speaker 1>solution to feeling so so overworked all the time. It's

0:04:31.956 --> 0:04:34.876
<v Speaker 1>usually to double down on my business. I try to

0:04:34.876 --> 0:04:36.676
<v Speaker 1>get through my to do list as quickly as I

0:04:36.716 --> 0:04:40.876
<v Speaker 1>possibly can, so I work long hours and multitask whenever possible.

0:04:41.436 --> 0:04:44.996
<v Speaker 1>But this endless quest to optimize my overloaded schedule usually

0:04:45.036 --> 0:04:48.316
<v Speaker 1>winds up increasing my sense of overwhelmed rather than decreasing it.

0:04:48.716 --> 0:04:51.556
<v Speaker 1>I end up feeling like everything is urgent, and not

0:04:51.676 --> 0:04:54.716
<v Speaker 1>just when I'm at work. Somehow, this obsession with using

0:04:54.756 --> 0:04:57.756
<v Speaker 1>time well leaks into my leisure time too. In the

0:04:57.836 --> 0:05:00.396
<v Speaker 1>rare moments I do get a break, I feel anxious

0:05:00.396 --> 0:05:03.396
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not getting enough productive stuff done, and as

0:05:03.476 --> 0:05:06.036
<v Speaker 1>is probably obvious, none of this overwhelm is all that

0:05:06.076 --> 0:05:10.116
<v Speaker 1>good for my quest to feel happier. This episode about

0:05:10.116 --> 0:05:12.796
<v Speaker 1>the happiness challenges that I struggle with, I'm going to

0:05:12.836 --> 0:05:15.676
<v Speaker 1>explore how I and so many others got this messed

0:05:15.716 --> 0:05:18.516
<v Speaker 1>up when it comes to busyness and productivity. Are we

0:05:18.636 --> 0:05:22.036
<v Speaker 1>doomed to our relentlessly overloaded schedules, or can we claim

0:05:22.036 --> 0:05:25.316
<v Speaker 1>the leisure time that Caine's envisioned as our generation's birthright.

0:05:29.596 --> 0:05:31.516
<v Speaker 1>Our minds are constantly telling us what to do to

0:05:31.556 --> 0:05:34.116
<v Speaker 1>be happy. But what if our minds are wrong? What

0:05:34.156 --> 0:05:36.636
<v Speaker 1>if our minds are lying to us, leading us away

0:05:36.636 --> 0:05:39.356
<v Speaker 1>from what really make us happy. The good news is

0:05:39.356 --> 0:05:41.516
<v Speaker 1>that understanding the science of the mind can point us

0:05:41.556 --> 0:05:44.196
<v Speaker 1>all back in the right direction. You're listening to the

0:05:44.196 --> 0:05:45.996
<v Speaker 1>Happiness Lab with doctor Laurie.

0:05:45.756 --> 0:05:59.316
<v Speaker 4>Santos Okay, Wednesday May twenty nine, six am podcast interview

0:05:59.476 --> 0:06:00.836
<v Speaker 4>with person in the UK.

0:06:01.436 --> 0:06:05.116
<v Speaker 1>Nine am meeting with my lab manager, ten am brainstorm

0:06:05.156 --> 0:06:09.076
<v Speaker 1>meeting for my new course. Eleven am Zoom podcast recording.

0:06:09.516 --> 0:06:11.996
<v Speaker 1>Looking through my schedule on an average day, I'm pretty

0:06:12.076 --> 0:06:14.716
<v Speaker 1>much doing ten plus hours of work. Oh and I

0:06:14.716 --> 0:06:17.636
<v Speaker 1>have to make my husband's birthday cach. What happened to

0:06:17.636 --> 0:06:20.076
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen hour work week that Keenes promised us?

0:06:20.636 --> 0:06:23.076
<v Speaker 5>If you do well in a career a professional era,

0:06:23.236 --> 0:06:26.556
<v Speaker 5>you can actually expect to get busier and busier and busier.

0:06:26.996 --> 0:06:30.436
<v Speaker 1>Writer Oliver Berkman has shared my sense of overwhelm for decades.

0:06:30.756 --> 0:06:33.076
<v Speaker 1>He always had too much on his plate, and like me,

0:06:33.276 --> 0:06:35.956
<v Speaker 1>he tried many a hack to team his overloaded schedule.

0:06:36.436 --> 0:06:39.636
<v Speaker 1>He even reviewed time management techniques and productivity tools for

0:06:39.676 --> 0:06:43.116
<v Speaker 1>The Guardian newspaper in a weekly article called This column

0:06:43.156 --> 0:06:47.196
<v Speaker 1>Will Change Your Life. Oliver desperately tried anything in everything

0:06:47.276 --> 0:06:49.316
<v Speaker 1>to get his packed schedule under control.

0:06:49.676 --> 0:06:54.756
<v Speaker 5>Fancy notebooks to organize your time in year, planners, pens

0:06:54.756 --> 0:06:56.596
<v Speaker 5>that cost too much money, you know, all part of

0:06:56.596 --> 0:06:59.596
<v Speaker 5>an attempt to try to reach this sort of position

0:06:59.796 --> 0:07:02.956
<v Speaker 5>of feeling completely in control of time.

0:07:03.356 --> 0:07:05.796
<v Speaker 1>Things finally came to a head one day about ten

0:07:05.876 --> 0:07:08.756
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Oliver was sitting alone on a park bench,

0:07:09.116 --> 0:07:12.316
<v Speaker 1>sxiously ruminating about all his undone tasks, when a scary

0:07:12.356 --> 0:07:15.716
<v Speaker 1>thought occurred to him, None of this productivity stuff is

0:07:15.796 --> 0:07:18.556
<v Speaker 1>ever going to work. In an instant, he realized that

0:07:18.596 --> 0:07:21.076
<v Speaker 1>no matter how much work and self discipline and time

0:07:21.116 --> 0:07:24.236
<v Speaker 1>management gear he marshaled, he simply was never going to

0:07:24.236 --> 0:07:26.716
<v Speaker 1>feel on top of all he had to do. That

0:07:26.876 --> 0:07:29.276
<v Speaker 1>dream of getting everything he needed to get done done.

0:07:29.636 --> 0:07:31.716
<v Speaker 1>It was always going to remain out of reach.

0:07:32.276 --> 0:07:35.076
<v Speaker 5>The reward for good time management is more work.

0:07:35.436 --> 0:07:38.716
<v Speaker 1>Oliver christent this painful realization the efficiency trap.

0:07:38.996 --> 0:07:42.356
<v Speaker 5>Anything you do to try to use time more effectively

0:07:42.396 --> 0:07:45.476
<v Speaker 5>by becoming more efficient, seems to be a fairly general

0:07:45.596 --> 0:07:47.876
<v Speaker 5>law that what will actually end up happening is that

0:07:47.956 --> 0:07:51.076
<v Speaker 5>you get a lot more busy and a lot more stressed.

0:07:51.396 --> 0:07:53.676
<v Speaker 5>The sort of abstract way of talking about it is

0:07:53.716 --> 0:07:56.956
<v Speaker 5>that if you make a system capable of processing more inputs,

0:07:57.236 --> 0:07:59.276
<v Speaker 5>then it will just attract a lot more inputs. A

0:07:59.316 --> 0:08:01.996
<v Speaker 5>concrete example gives email. Right, if you get really good

0:08:02.036 --> 0:08:04.716
<v Speaker 5>at answering email at a really fast tempo. You end

0:08:04.796 --> 0:08:07.636
<v Speaker 5>up with loads more email because you're getting replies to

0:08:07.676 --> 0:08:09.516
<v Speaker 5>your replies and you have to reply to that, and

0:08:09.556 --> 0:08:12.836
<v Speaker 5>you get a reputation for being responsive. And it doesn't

0:08:12.876 --> 0:08:14.996
<v Speaker 5>just apply to email. If you're in a workplace setting

0:08:15.036 --> 0:08:17.316
<v Speaker 5>where there's some particular kind of project that needs to

0:08:17.316 --> 0:08:19.756
<v Speaker 5>be done and you get a reputation for being really

0:08:19.836 --> 0:08:22.556
<v Speaker 5>fast at completing that kind of project, you're going to

0:08:22.636 --> 0:08:25.756
<v Speaker 5>get loads more of those projects to complete. So that's

0:08:25.796 --> 0:08:27.996
<v Speaker 5>the trap of efficiency. It's an attempt to try to

0:08:28.036 --> 0:08:30.356
<v Speaker 5>get everything done, to get to the end of everything,

0:08:30.476 --> 0:08:33.476
<v Speaker 5>but because the supply is infinite, it's not actually a

0:08:33.476 --> 0:08:36.236
<v Speaker 5>good way to build a more productive or fulfilling life.

0:08:36.276 --> 0:08:38.116
<v Speaker 5>It's just a way to sort of get busier.

0:08:38.556 --> 0:08:41.036
<v Speaker 1>Oliver argues that this sense of overwhelmed has begun to

0:08:41.076 --> 0:08:43.276
<v Speaker 1>take over our entire modern existence.

0:08:43.516 --> 0:08:46.076
<v Speaker 5>But we not only overwhelmed by work tasks, by email,

0:08:46.316 --> 0:08:49.036
<v Speaker 5>by things that we have to do. We're overwhelmed by

0:08:49.236 --> 0:08:53.076
<v Speaker 5>potential experiences. We could have bucket list places we could go,

0:08:53.356 --> 0:08:55.596
<v Speaker 5>things we could be doing on any given evening, people

0:08:55.636 --> 0:08:58.036
<v Speaker 5>to date, depending on your context, you know. So there's

0:08:58.036 --> 0:09:00.476
<v Speaker 5>all these kind of different ways in which there's just

0:09:00.636 --> 0:09:04.036
<v Speaker 5>more experience to be had in the world. So I

0:09:04.036 --> 0:09:07.876
<v Speaker 5>think that leads to sort of permanent state of feeling overwhelmed, A.

0:09:07.876 --> 0:09:11.236
<v Speaker 1>Permanent state of feeling of whelmed. Yep, that pretty much

0:09:11.316 --> 0:09:14.076
<v Speaker 1>describes my life these days, and all of our's tough

0:09:14.076 --> 0:09:16.636
<v Speaker 1>message is that if you're feeling that way too, it

0:09:16.756 --> 0:09:18.916
<v Speaker 1>is at least in some ways, your own fault.

0:09:19.356 --> 0:09:22.276
<v Speaker 5>I never want to underplay the sort of broader societal

0:09:22.276 --> 0:09:24.756
<v Speaker 5>and economic reasons for this, but in some sense we

0:09:24.756 --> 0:09:26.876
<v Speaker 5>do bring it on ourselves, or we at least collaborate

0:09:26.956 --> 0:09:29.796
<v Speaker 5>with the situation, because we're presented with this sort of

0:09:29.956 --> 0:09:32.796
<v Speaker 5>infinity of things to do, and the very first thing

0:09:32.876 --> 0:09:35.516
<v Speaker 5>we say to ourselves is like, Okay, let's find a

0:09:35.516 --> 0:09:37.356
<v Speaker 5>way to do an infinite amount of things.

0:09:37.716 --> 0:09:40.236
<v Speaker 1>One reason is that being busy all the time makes

0:09:40.316 --> 0:09:41.796
<v Speaker 1>us feel kind of important.

0:09:42.436 --> 0:09:45.996
<v Speaker 5>If you are somebody who has your self worth wrapped

0:09:46.076 --> 0:09:48.556
<v Speaker 5>up in your productivity, right, you think that you've got

0:09:48.556 --> 0:09:50.796
<v Speaker 5>to do a certain amount or reach some kind of

0:09:50.796 --> 0:09:54.636
<v Speaker 5>standard to sort of be okay, then being busy is

0:09:54.836 --> 0:09:58.236
<v Speaker 5>proof to yourself that you're in demand, that the spigot

0:09:58.316 --> 0:10:00.836
<v Speaker 5>of opportunities has not dried up, that it's all very

0:10:00.916 --> 0:10:04.436
<v Speaker 5>much part of feeling that you are doing all you

0:10:04.476 --> 0:10:06.356
<v Speaker 5>need to be doing to feel good about yourself.

0:10:06.916 --> 0:10:10.076
<v Speaker 1>I definitely felt called out by this comment. How often

0:10:10.076 --> 0:10:12.516
<v Speaker 1>have people asked me, Hey, how's it going, only to

0:10:12.516 --> 0:10:15.716
<v Speaker 1>get my standard response of Oh, I'm just so busy.

0:10:16.476 --> 0:10:19.716
<v Speaker 1>The frazzled feelings behind that reply aren't fun. But if

0:10:19.756 --> 0:10:22.956
<v Speaker 1>I'm being honest, I do feel weirdly proud of myself.

0:10:23.476 --> 0:10:26.756
<v Speaker 5>We've created this situation that makes busyness into a status symbol.

0:10:26.956 --> 0:10:29.876
<v Speaker 5>So then obviously, by definition, you want to make sure

0:10:29.916 --> 0:10:31.596
<v Speaker 5>that you've got some of that business.

0:10:31.836 --> 0:10:33.996
<v Speaker 1>But there's a cost to seeking out busyness for the

0:10:34.036 --> 0:10:36.756
<v Speaker 1>sake of busyness. We wind up stuck in a painful

0:10:36.756 --> 0:10:40.076
<v Speaker 1>psychological state that the journalist Marilyn Robinson has called a

0:10:40.116 --> 0:10:41.636
<v Speaker 1>sense of joyless urgency.

0:10:42.156 --> 0:10:44.036
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think that is just a very very

0:10:44.076 --> 0:10:47.116
<v Speaker 5>widespread feeling, the sense that you've really got to get somewhere,

0:10:47.156 --> 0:10:49.076
<v Speaker 5>but it's not really the place you'd necessarily want to

0:10:49.116 --> 0:10:51.236
<v Speaker 5>be going, and certainly the process of getting there is

0:10:51.276 --> 0:10:52.476
<v Speaker 5>not what you wanted to be doing.

0:10:52.636 --> 0:10:55.076
<v Speaker 1>How did we all get so hooked into this joyless

0:10:55.076 --> 0:10:58.636
<v Speaker 1>relationship with our busy schedules. Oliver suspects that at least

0:10:58.676 --> 0:11:00.996
<v Speaker 1>some of the problem stems from how humans have learned

0:11:00.996 --> 0:11:01.836
<v Speaker 1>to think about time.

0:11:02.316 --> 0:11:06.036
<v Speaker 5>Going from introduction and widespread adoption of mechanical clocks and

0:11:06.036 --> 0:11:09.116
<v Speaker 5>then into the industrial revolution, we'll get this very long,

0:11:09.356 --> 0:11:13.396
<v Speaker 5>slow process that is characterized by people starting to think

0:11:13.436 --> 0:11:17.076
<v Speaker 5>of time as a resource. And once you have this

0:11:17.156 --> 0:11:20.036
<v Speaker 5>idea that like, there's you and then there's time, and

0:11:20.076 --> 0:11:21.956
<v Speaker 5>you're living your life sort of lined up against the

0:11:21.996 --> 0:11:24.036
<v Speaker 5>sort of a yardstick or a measure of some kind,

0:11:24.076 --> 0:11:26.436
<v Speaker 5>you have to keep up. If you use a bit

0:11:26.476 --> 0:11:28.956
<v Speaker 5>of time wrongly, you're wasting it. You can try to

0:11:28.956 --> 0:11:32.076
<v Speaker 5>squeeze more things into that time, and all of this

0:11:32.116 --> 0:11:34.596
<v Speaker 5>is kind of a spatial metaphor, right, It's all to

0:11:34.636 --> 0:11:37.876
<v Speaker 5>do with time as containers and little boxes. When you

0:11:37.956 --> 0:11:40.756
<v Speaker 5>really get right back down to the experience of being

0:11:40.796 --> 0:11:43.756
<v Speaker 5>in time, it isn't like that at all. We just

0:11:43.916 --> 0:11:46.156
<v Speaker 5>get this one moment and then the next moment and

0:11:46.196 --> 0:11:48.076
<v Speaker 5>then the next moment. I think we really need this

0:11:48.156 --> 0:11:49.796
<v Speaker 5>idea of being able to think about time as a

0:11:49.956 --> 0:11:52.036
<v Speaker 5>resource for all sorts of things. But it's a little

0:11:52.036 --> 0:11:54.716
<v Speaker 5>bit crazy, really when we try constantly to interact with

0:11:54.796 --> 0:11:57.436
<v Speaker 5>time as something that it isn't, which is something we

0:11:57.476 --> 0:12:00.516
<v Speaker 5>can sort of hord or endlessly fit more things into it.

0:12:00.636 --> 0:12:01.956
<v Speaker 5>None of it quite makes sense.

0:12:02.356 --> 0:12:05.116
<v Speaker 1>But there's another way that our thinking about productivity doesn't

0:12:05.196 --> 0:12:08.116
<v Speaker 1>quite make sense, one that relates to the changing phase

0:12:08.156 --> 0:12:11.156
<v Speaker 1>of modern work. These days, a lot of our jobs

0:12:11.596 --> 0:12:14.996
<v Speaker 1>are a bit weird. The happiness lab. We're a turn

0:12:14.996 --> 0:12:15.476
<v Speaker 1>in a moment.

0:12:22.036 --> 0:12:25.636
<v Speaker 6>Up until about the mid twentieth century, we had really clear,

0:12:26.076 --> 0:12:27.876
<v Speaker 6>well defined definitions of productivity.

0:12:28.076 --> 0:12:31.116
<v Speaker 1>Best Selling author and computer scientist Cal Newport has spent

0:12:31.156 --> 0:12:33.436
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time thinking about why modern work is

0:12:33.476 --> 0:12:34.316
<v Speaker 1>so overwhelming.

0:12:34.596 --> 0:12:37.356
<v Speaker 6>So if you're in agriculture, it was bushels per acre

0:12:37.516 --> 0:12:40.316
<v Speaker 6>of land under cultivation, you could measure it. It was

0:12:40.356 --> 0:12:42.636
<v Speaker 6>a number you could change how you planted your crops,

0:12:42.636 --> 0:12:44.276
<v Speaker 6>that you could see if that number went up and down.

0:12:44.436 --> 0:12:48.396
<v Speaker 6>When we got to industrial manufacturing mills followed by factories,

0:12:48.636 --> 0:12:49.756
<v Speaker 6>we could do something similar.

0:12:50.396 --> 0:12:53.076
<v Speaker 1>A factory manager on an assembly line can easily measure,

0:12:53.156 --> 0:12:55.836
<v Speaker 1>say the number of Widgets or Model T Fords produced

0:12:55.876 --> 0:12:59.036
<v Speaker 1>per labor hour. People could just tell if everyone was

0:12:59.156 --> 0:13:03.116
<v Speaker 1>using their time efficiently and contributing to the company's bottom line.

0:13:03.156 --> 0:13:05.196
<v Speaker 6>All that fell out the window with knowledge work, which

0:13:05.236 --> 0:13:08.156
<v Speaker 6>really emerged as a major sector in the nineteen fifties.

0:13:08.716 --> 0:13:12.236
<v Speaker 1>Knowledge workers create useful goods and services not through physical,

0:13:12.276 --> 0:13:15.836
<v Speaker 1>assembly line style labor, but through their thoughts. The modern

0:13:15.876 --> 0:13:21.076
<v Speaker 1>economy is full of such professionals scientists, doctors, writers, professors, attorneys,

0:13:21.276 --> 0:13:24.876
<v Speaker 1>even podcast hosts. But professionals like these don't end the

0:13:24.956 --> 0:13:27.356
<v Speaker 1>day with a bunch of widgets piled up on their workbench,

0:13:27.756 --> 0:13:30.916
<v Speaker 1>and that means it's harder to assess their productivity. Take

0:13:30.956 --> 0:13:33.636
<v Speaker 1>for example, what it would mean to define productivity in

0:13:33.716 --> 0:13:37.356
<v Speaker 1>my own form of knowledge work, making a podcast. How

0:13:37.396 --> 0:13:40.236
<v Speaker 1>could I make the happiness lab as productive as possible?

0:13:41.076 --> 0:13:43.516
<v Speaker 1>I could try to take a mathematical approach and define

0:13:43.516 --> 0:13:46.956
<v Speaker 1>productivity as the number of episodes we make. But should

0:13:46.956 --> 0:13:50.156
<v Speaker 1>I go with the sheer number of episodes? Maybe longer

0:13:50.156 --> 0:13:52.956
<v Speaker 1>episodes are better than shorter ones. Or maybe I should

0:13:52.956 --> 0:13:56.676
<v Speaker 1>count AD revenue per episode or listener downloads. Each of

0:13:56.676 --> 0:14:00.196
<v Speaker 1>these could be a reasonable metric for podcast productivity, So

0:14:00.476 --> 0:14:04.516
<v Speaker 1>what should I choose? Similar kinds of questions pervade pretty

0:14:04.596 --> 0:14:05.636
<v Speaker 1>much all knowledge work.

0:14:06.236 --> 0:14:08.516
<v Speaker 6>We do not get a lot of direct feedback in

0:14:08.596 --> 0:14:11.836
<v Speaker 6>terms of how well is what you're doing right now

0:14:11.916 --> 0:14:15.116
<v Speaker 6>impacting what we care about. It's free floating.

0:14:14.996 --> 0:14:17.516
<v Speaker 1>And things get even more complicated when you ask how

0:14:17.556 --> 0:14:20.516
<v Speaker 1>you should be allocating your time to achieve whatever free

0:14:20.516 --> 0:14:22.796
<v Speaker 1>floating definition and productivity you came up with.

0:14:23.236 --> 0:14:26.316
<v Speaker 6>The typical knowledge worker has many different things they're working on,

0:14:26.716 --> 0:14:28.636
<v Speaker 6>and what they're working on might be different than the

0:14:28.636 --> 0:14:32.396
<v Speaker 6>person right next to them. It can shift. It's more informal. Also,

0:14:32.636 --> 0:14:34.836
<v Speaker 6>how we do our work is very personal, which is

0:14:34.836 --> 0:14:36.836
<v Speaker 6>a real innovation to knowledge work we don't see in

0:14:36.876 --> 0:14:37.516
<v Speaker 6>other places.

0:14:37.916 --> 0:14:41.236
<v Speaker 1>Supervising factory workers on an assembly line is easy. You

0:14:41.276 --> 0:14:43.156
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to best build your widget, and you

0:14:43.236 --> 0:14:46.116
<v Speaker 1>tell your employees, hey, make the widget like this. But

0:14:46.196 --> 0:14:48.636
<v Speaker 1>none of that holds for a job like podcasting or

0:14:48.676 --> 0:14:50.076
<v Speaker 1>teaching or programming.

0:14:50.396 --> 0:14:54.636
<v Speaker 6>Knowledge work is too complicated. It's creative, it's skilled. The

0:14:54.756 --> 0:14:57.596
<v Speaker 6>individual knowledge workers know more about what they're doing than

0:14:57.636 --> 0:15:00.276
<v Speaker 6>the people supervising them. So we got to allow the

0:15:00.396 --> 0:15:04.796
<v Speaker 6>individual workers autonomy. Allow them to have autonomy in figuring

0:15:04.796 --> 0:15:06.796
<v Speaker 6>out how they're going to do their own work.

0:15:07.036 --> 0:15:09.396
<v Speaker 1>But managers did want some way to determine and whether

0:15:09.516 --> 0:15:12.516
<v Speaker 1>or not knowledge workers were putting in useful effort, so

0:15:12.556 --> 0:15:14.636
<v Speaker 1>they came up with what cal thinks is a very

0:15:14.636 --> 0:15:17.476
<v Speaker 1>problematic alternative pseudo productivity.

0:15:17.916 --> 0:15:21.796
<v Speaker 6>So suitor productivity is a crude heuristic that says, visible

0:15:21.916 --> 0:15:25.196
<v Speaker 6>activity that's going to be my proxy for figuring out

0:15:25.196 --> 0:15:27.316
<v Speaker 6>whether or not you're doing useful effort. So the more

0:15:27.516 --> 0:15:30.876
<v Speaker 6>I see you doing things, the more productive. In scare quotes,

0:15:31.276 --> 0:15:33.636
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to assume you're being. This is the dominant

0:15:33.636 --> 0:15:36.316
<v Speaker 6>way I think we measure effective work.

0:15:36.716 --> 0:15:39.756
<v Speaker 1>This need to monitor visible effort led to other changes

0:15:39.756 --> 0:15:43.156
<v Speaker 1>in the knowledge work sector, ones that had nasty implications

0:15:43.156 --> 0:15:45.556
<v Speaker 1>for a worker's sense of autonomy and happiness.

0:15:46.076 --> 0:15:48.076
<v Speaker 6>When the knowledge sector grew as a big sector and

0:15:48.156 --> 0:15:50.596
<v Speaker 6>we said, how are we going to literally organize this work,

0:15:50.796 --> 0:15:52.436
<v Speaker 6>we said, well, let's just do what the factories do.

0:15:53.116 --> 0:15:55.156
<v Speaker 6>You will come to a building, we'll all gather in

0:15:55.196 --> 0:15:57.756
<v Speaker 6>the same place. We'll be there for a long shift,

0:15:58.156 --> 0:16:00.076
<v Speaker 6>so that we can just see that everyone is working.

0:16:00.236 --> 0:16:01.596
<v Speaker 6>That's why I know you're working, because you have to

0:16:01.596 --> 0:16:04.076
<v Speaker 6>come to this building and I can physically surveil you.

0:16:04.716 --> 0:16:08.876
<v Speaker 6>That's suitor productivity. There's nothing about cognitive work that says

0:16:08.916 --> 0:16:10.956
<v Speaker 6>the best way to do this is as many hours

0:16:10.996 --> 0:16:13.396
<v Speaker 6>as possible, or to do it in one contiguous shift.

0:16:13.676 --> 0:16:16.396
<v Speaker 6>But if our main metric for productivity is visible activity,

0:16:16.396 --> 0:16:19.516
<v Speaker 6>then it made life a lot easier for the managers, But.

0:16:19.516 --> 0:16:22.396
<v Speaker 1>Of course such surveillance didn't make life easier for the

0:16:22.476 --> 0:16:23.236
<v Speaker 1>knowledge workers.

0:16:23.596 --> 0:16:26.876
<v Speaker 6>Suit of productivity makes us miserable, and has been making

0:16:26.956 --> 0:16:30.156
<v Speaker 6>us more miserable. It barely worked until about the two thousands.

0:16:30.356 --> 0:16:33.076
<v Speaker 6>Then digital technology enter the scene, and it spiraled out

0:16:33.116 --> 0:16:35.716
<v Speaker 6>of control. Because now I can leave a trace of

0:16:35.716 --> 0:16:38.796
<v Speaker 6>me working or not working by doing emails, et cetera anywhere.

0:16:39.036 --> 0:16:41.876
<v Speaker 6>Now there's an unlimited supply of work. Because one of

0:16:41.876 --> 0:16:44.556
<v Speaker 6>the things the digital age brought to us was zero

0:16:44.636 --> 0:16:46.996
<v Speaker 6>friction work assignment. I can just hey, can you handle

0:16:46.996 --> 0:16:48.396
<v Speaker 6>this sin boom? It's off my plate.

0:16:48.876 --> 0:16:51.836
<v Speaker 1>This emergence of email and slack channels and team meetings

0:16:51.916 --> 0:16:55.596
<v Speaker 1>and group texts meant that workers had way more opportunities

0:16:55.636 --> 0:16:59.956
<v Speaker 1>to show off their visible activity, and managers quickly took notice, Hey,

0:17:00.076 --> 0:17:00.596
<v Speaker 1>I haven't.

0:17:00.396 --> 0:17:02.316
<v Speaker 6>Really been seeing you in the email chains recently. You

0:17:02.316 --> 0:17:05.436
<v Speaker 6>weren't at these zoom meetings. You are slow to respond

0:17:05.516 --> 0:17:09.796
<v Speaker 6>to the slack chack. What's going on? Maybe you're not productive.

0:17:10.076 --> 0:17:12.916
<v Speaker 1>But managers weren't the only ones to embrace pseudo productivity.

0:17:13.236 --> 0:17:17.436
<v Speaker 1>Knowledge workers soon began to internalize this notion. Practices like

0:17:17.476 --> 0:17:20.556
<v Speaker 1>clearing your emails. To achieve inbox zero and being on

0:17:20.636 --> 0:17:24.076
<v Speaker 1>slack after hours became almost as important to workers as

0:17:24.076 --> 0:17:27.676
<v Speaker 1>the projects that made up their true job descriptions, especially

0:17:27.756 --> 0:17:30.636
<v Speaker 1>since incremental progress on the big projects will always be

0:17:30.676 --> 0:17:31.556
<v Speaker 1>harder to show off.

0:17:31.796 --> 0:17:33.556
<v Speaker 6>You don't know if I'm at home or I'm in

0:17:33.556 --> 0:17:35.236
<v Speaker 6>my office, you're not in nearby. You don't know that

0:17:35.276 --> 0:17:37.516
<v Speaker 6>I'm working deeply on an article that leaves no trace,

0:17:37.836 --> 0:17:40.196
<v Speaker 6>but if I'm jumping onto email threads, that does leave

0:17:40.236 --> 0:17:43.556
<v Speaker 6>a trace, And so it biased us towards what's going

0:17:43.596 --> 0:17:48.236
<v Speaker 6>to leave the best trace through the environment of pseudo productivity, evaluation.

0:17:48.356 --> 0:17:50.596
<v Speaker 1>And this desire to leave some tangible evidence of your

0:17:50.636 --> 0:17:53.516
<v Speaker 1>efforts has a terrible effect on the actual output of

0:17:53.556 --> 0:17:54.236
<v Speaker 1>knowledge work.

0:17:54.476 --> 0:17:57.276
<v Speaker 6>So one of the consequences of pseudo productivity is that

0:17:57.356 --> 0:18:00.316
<v Speaker 6>it gets in the way of the ability to give

0:18:00.516 --> 0:18:03.956
<v Speaker 6>the most important things you do unbroken attention. How do

0:18:04.036 --> 0:18:07.036
<v Speaker 6>we get our brain to actually produce value. It's the

0:18:07.076 --> 0:18:10.036
<v Speaker 6>ability to focus intensely on some If you want to

0:18:10.036 --> 0:18:12.556
<v Speaker 6>produce the best things you're capable of using your brain,

0:18:12.876 --> 0:18:15.036
<v Speaker 6>you don't want to be distracted. I want to focus

0:18:15.036 --> 0:18:17.596
<v Speaker 6>on this hard thing I'm doing until it's done. Pseudo

0:18:17.636 --> 0:18:18.836
<v Speaker 6>productivity punishes that.

0:18:19.596 --> 0:18:23.396
<v Speaker 1>I've totally been punished by my internalized pseudo productivity. I'll

0:18:23.396 --> 0:18:25.316
<v Speaker 1>be in the middle of writing a podcast script or

0:18:25.356 --> 0:18:27.916
<v Speaker 1>an academic paper when I'll hear a ding from a text,

0:18:28.316 --> 0:18:30.836
<v Speaker 1>so I peek at my phone, get distracted, and take

0:18:30.916 --> 0:18:33.236
<v Speaker 1>longer to finish the task I'm really supposed to be

0:18:33.276 --> 0:18:36.196
<v Speaker 1>focused on. And that sense of distraction doesn't just bubble

0:18:36.276 --> 0:18:39.556
<v Speaker 1>up during actual interruptions. Whenever I find myself deep in

0:18:39.556 --> 0:18:42.476
<v Speaker 1>a writing project, I'll inevitably think, you know, I haven't

0:18:42.556 --> 0:18:44.676
<v Speaker 1>checked my email in a while. I wonder if there's

0:18:44.676 --> 0:18:48.076
<v Speaker 1>something important next thing. I know, I'm deep in my inbox.

0:18:48.636 --> 0:18:51.836
<v Speaker 1>I've internalized the importance of visible activity so much that

0:18:51.876 --> 0:18:54.676
<v Speaker 1>I start feeling anxious whenever I'm not engaged in it,

0:18:55.156 --> 0:18:57.836
<v Speaker 1>and that anxiety gets worse when my bigger projects fail

0:18:57.916 --> 0:19:00.996
<v Speaker 1>to produce an obvious output. For a while, it feels

0:19:00.996 --> 0:19:03.836
<v Speaker 1>almost easier to spend my time on dumb, pseudo productive

0:19:03.836 --> 0:19:05.396
<v Speaker 1>stuff like clearing my inbox.

0:19:05.716 --> 0:19:08.436
<v Speaker 6>And now we have whole departments, we have whole teams

0:19:08.436 --> 0:19:12.596
<v Speaker 6>and organizations producing a lot less valuable work because we

0:19:12.676 --> 0:19:16.716
<v Speaker 6>are servicing this crude proxy that doesn't actually get to

0:19:16.796 --> 0:19:19.276
<v Speaker 6>the core of what it means to be productive. It's

0:19:19.316 --> 0:19:20.756
<v Speaker 6>completely cross purposes.

0:19:20.956 --> 0:19:24.996
<v Speaker 1>But pseudo productivity doesn't just impair actual work productivity. It

0:19:25.036 --> 0:19:28.476
<v Speaker 1>also increases our stress levels and decreases our happiness.

0:19:28.636 --> 0:19:31.956
<v Speaker 6>There's an unavoidable consequence of pseudo productivity that you're going

0:19:32.036 --> 0:19:35.556
<v Speaker 6>to get overloaded and you're going to stay overloaded. Saying

0:19:35.796 --> 0:19:39.076
<v Speaker 6>yes to someone asking you to do something is very important,

0:19:39.436 --> 0:19:42.676
<v Speaker 6>right because that's a very clear signal of activity. We

0:19:42.716 --> 0:19:44.956
<v Speaker 6>have to get rid of pseudo productivity. We need much

0:19:45.036 --> 0:19:50.956
<v Speaker 6>more humanistic, psychologically aware, and evidence based approaches for saying

0:19:51.436 --> 0:19:55.716
<v Speaker 6>this is what we mean by productivity in the knowledge sector.

0:19:56.276 --> 0:19:58.876
<v Speaker 1>Thankfully, Cal has come up with just such an approach,

0:19:59.156 --> 0:20:02.556
<v Speaker 1>one that he outlines in his fabulous book Slow Productivity,

0:20:02.836 --> 0:20:07.236
<v Speaker 1>The Lost Art of Accomplishment without Burnout. Accomplishment without feeling

0:20:07.316 --> 0:20:11.836
<v Speaker 1>burned out, Sign me up. Cal's idea for slow productivity

0:20:11.996 --> 0:20:14.956
<v Speaker 1>was inspired by the slow food movement, a campaign in

0:20:14.996 --> 0:20:18.476
<v Speaker 1>the late eighties pushing back against fast food culture arguing

0:20:18.516 --> 0:20:20.716
<v Speaker 1>that people should take the time to grow and cook

0:20:20.756 --> 0:20:21.676
<v Speaker 1>their own healthy food.

0:20:21.956 --> 0:20:25.156
<v Speaker 6>Slow food actually gives us a couple really good ideas

0:20:25.156 --> 0:20:27.516
<v Speaker 6>for how to form a reform movement. One it says,

0:20:27.716 --> 0:20:32.516
<v Speaker 6>when dealing with a cultural situation that's displeasing, don't just

0:20:32.596 --> 0:20:35.956
<v Speaker 6>attack what you don't like, give a positive alternative. The

0:20:36.036 --> 0:20:39.676
<v Speaker 6>second part of their reform program was don't just try

0:20:39.716 --> 0:20:42.956
<v Speaker 6>to create the better thing looking forward, make sure that

0:20:42.996 --> 0:20:47.196
<v Speaker 6>you're also drawing from wisdom that is accumulated in the past.

0:20:47.916 --> 0:20:51.676
<v Speaker 1>Cal now applies the same approach to fixing our overwhelmed schedules.

0:20:52.036 --> 0:20:54.996
<v Speaker 1>He turned to knowledge workers of the past, professionals who

0:20:55.036 --> 0:20:57.676
<v Speaker 1>lived back in John Maynard Keynes's day and even before,

0:20:58.196 --> 0:21:01.596
<v Speaker 1>to see how they produce their most effective work. Such

0:21:01.636 --> 0:21:04.596
<v Speaker 1>insights led Cal to develop the three core principles of

0:21:04.596 --> 0:21:06.756
<v Speaker 1>slow productivity, doing fewer.

0:21:06.516 --> 0:21:09.556
<v Speaker 6>Things at once, working at a more natural pace, and

0:21:09.596 --> 0:21:11.796
<v Speaker 6>then obsessing over the quality of what you do.

0:21:12.276 --> 0:21:14.276
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with doing fewer things at once.

0:21:14.636 --> 0:21:18.356
<v Speaker 6>Well, when we're doing fewer things, we are relieving ourselves

0:21:18.636 --> 0:21:23.076
<v Speaker 6>of not just a lengthy task list, but the administrative

0:21:23.116 --> 0:21:25.996
<v Speaker 6>overhead that comes along with each of those items on

0:21:26.036 --> 0:21:28.276
<v Speaker 6>our task lists. And this is something I think people

0:21:28.596 --> 0:21:32.196
<v Speaker 6>often overlook is that when I say yes, I'm not

0:21:32.276 --> 0:21:34.796
<v Speaker 6>just saying yes to eventually, how many hours am I

0:21:34.836 --> 0:21:38.956
<v Speaker 6>going to spend writing the report or doing the committee

0:21:39.196 --> 0:21:40.756
<v Speaker 6>or whatever it was I said yes to. When I

0:21:40.796 --> 0:21:43.116
<v Speaker 6>say yes to something, it's also going to come with

0:21:43.516 --> 0:21:47.556
<v Speaker 6>persistent administrative overhead responsibilities. It's going to be emails back

0:21:47.556 --> 0:21:49.916
<v Speaker 6>and forth with people who are involved in it. All right,

0:21:49.996 --> 0:21:52.356
<v Speaker 6>every Wednesday we got to like jump on zoom, and

0:21:52.396 --> 0:21:54.596
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be cognitive space taken up by the

0:21:54.596 --> 0:21:56.556
<v Speaker 6>fact that, hey, this thing's ongoing in some part of

0:21:56.556 --> 0:21:58.316
<v Speaker 6>your brain wants to think about it. So when you

0:21:58.356 --> 0:22:01.276
<v Speaker 6>say yes the lots of things, even if you're not

0:22:01.636 --> 0:22:05.076
<v Speaker 6>working on the actual projects at the same time, all

0:22:05.116 --> 0:22:08.076
<v Speaker 6>of their administrative overhead begins to pile up. And so

0:22:08.196 --> 0:22:10.476
<v Speaker 6>what happens is the more things I've said yes to,

0:22:10.996 --> 0:22:13.116
<v Speaker 6>the less time I actually have to work on things.

0:22:13.476 --> 0:22:15.436
<v Speaker 1>This hit me like a ton of bricks. When I

0:22:15.436 --> 0:22:17.756
<v Speaker 1>look at my own calendar, I see days and days

0:22:17.796 --> 0:22:20.756
<v Speaker 1>broken up with staff meetings and check ins and random appointments,

0:22:21.356 --> 0:22:25.116
<v Speaker 1>cal calls, commitments like these productivity termites. They eat up

0:22:25.156 --> 0:22:27.316
<v Speaker 1>the big blocks of time in our schedule, so much

0:22:27.356 --> 0:22:29.876
<v Speaker 1>so that little solid foundation is left for the stuff

0:22:29.916 --> 0:22:30.476
<v Speaker 1>that matters.

0:22:31.076 --> 0:22:33.796
<v Speaker 6>And this is a negative feedback cycle that can get

0:22:33.836 --> 0:22:37.356
<v Speaker 6>pretty nasty, because once you have enough of your day

0:22:37.716 --> 0:22:41.236
<v Speaker 6>servicing commitments but not working on them, you fall behind.

0:22:41.796 --> 0:22:44.516
<v Speaker 6>And the only way to escape from the spiral is

0:22:44.516 --> 0:22:47.316
<v Speaker 6>to start reclaiming time outside of work hours, and they

0:22:47.316 --> 0:22:48.996
<v Speaker 6>have to work on the weekends and late at night

0:22:49.076 --> 0:22:52.516
<v Speaker 6>and early in the morning. Doing fewer things at once

0:22:52.996 --> 0:22:55.996
<v Speaker 6>is not the same as doing fewer things overall. In fact,

0:22:55.996 --> 0:22:58.436
<v Speaker 6>you're going to accomplish a lot more per year if

0:22:58.476 --> 0:23:00.316
<v Speaker 6>you keep your plate much more sparse.

0:23:00.796 --> 0:23:02.716
<v Speaker 1>But it's not enough to streamline what you work on.

0:23:03.156 --> 0:23:05.316
<v Speaker 1>You also need to work at a more natural pace.

0:23:05.516 --> 0:23:07.556
<v Speaker 1>As cal looked to the great writers and thinkers of

0:23:07.596 --> 0:23:10.156
<v Speaker 1>the past, he realized they didn't work the way most

0:23:10.156 --> 0:23:10.996
<v Speaker 1>of us do today.

0:23:11.316 --> 0:23:13.676
<v Speaker 6>So a knowledge work emerged. We said, okay, how are

0:23:13.716 --> 0:23:15.516
<v Speaker 6>we going to deal with this? We said, we'll use

0:23:15.516 --> 0:23:19.356
<v Speaker 6>pseudo productivity as our metric for effective action. Well, what

0:23:19.436 --> 0:23:22.276
<v Speaker 6>was the best way to monitor pseudo activity back then?

0:23:22.396 --> 0:23:24.476
<v Speaker 6>We said, we'll run our offices like a factory.

0:23:24.716 --> 0:23:27.396
<v Speaker 1>Managers brought knowledge workers into a building where they could

0:23:27.396 --> 0:23:30.676
<v Speaker 1>be observed. Employees were stuck there for eight hours a day,

0:23:30.836 --> 0:23:34.036
<v Speaker 1>working the entire time. But applying a factory model to

0:23:34.076 --> 0:23:37.676
<v Speaker 1>writing good computer programs or academic papers or podcast scripts

0:23:37.836 --> 0:23:38.836
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work that well.

0:23:39.236 --> 0:23:41.316
<v Speaker 6>So Cognitive work is not something that you can just

0:23:41.716 --> 0:23:43.956
<v Speaker 6>churn out of your mind like a widget, as many

0:23:43.996 --> 0:23:46.156
<v Speaker 6>hours as you want in a row. It's not like

0:23:46.196 --> 0:23:48.956
<v Speaker 6>putting steering wheels on a model T. It needs way

0:23:48.956 --> 0:23:51.676
<v Speaker 6>more ups and downs. I have to get the right information.

0:23:52.116 --> 0:23:53.516
<v Speaker 6>I need to think about what I want to do,

0:23:53.596 --> 0:23:55.996
<v Speaker 6>and then there's periods of great intensity, But then that

0:23:56.076 --> 0:23:58.076
<v Speaker 6>might need to be coupled with periods where I'm really

0:23:58.116 --> 0:24:00.636
<v Speaker 6>pulling back. My brain is recharging and trying to find

0:24:00.676 --> 0:24:04.556
<v Speaker 6>new inspiration. Our brain does not operate like an assembly line,

0:24:04.596 --> 0:24:06.276
<v Speaker 6>but we run it that way, and now I think

0:24:06.316 --> 0:24:07.756
<v Speaker 6>we have a lot of misery because of it.

0:24:07.996 --> 0:24:10.116
<v Speaker 1>Kel argues we need to take a much more humane

0:24:10.116 --> 0:24:12.516
<v Speaker 1>approach to our schedules. We need to build in the

0:24:12.596 --> 0:24:16.236
<v Speaker 1>natural variability that thinking well requires. We need to expect

0:24:16.276 --> 0:24:18.596
<v Speaker 1>that some days will be filled with more progress than others,

0:24:19.036 --> 0:24:21.556
<v Speaker 1>and we need to intentionally build in time to recharge

0:24:21.756 --> 0:24:24.476
<v Speaker 1>without beating ourselves up over it. And cal has a

0:24:24.516 --> 0:24:28.796
<v Speaker 1>specific suggestion for doing this, a practice he calls small seasonality.

0:24:29.356 --> 0:24:32.996
<v Speaker 6>Standard seasonality is what our Neolithic ancestors used to do.

0:24:33.196 --> 0:24:35.956
<v Speaker 6>The winter, I don't do as much work as the fall.

0:24:35.996 --> 0:24:38.156
<v Speaker 6>When I'm bringing into harvest, and you have these variations

0:24:38.196 --> 0:24:41.236
<v Speaker 6>of seasons, so we can shift intensity at smaller scales.

0:24:41.356 --> 0:24:43.876
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to take the three weeks in December before

0:24:43.916 --> 0:24:45.876
<v Speaker 6>we get to the holidays, and I pull back for

0:24:45.876 --> 0:24:49.396
<v Speaker 6>those three weeks. It's a lower intensity period that's not

0:24:49.436 --> 0:24:52.156
<v Speaker 6>as big as a season, but it gives me some variation.

0:24:52.476 --> 0:24:54.836
<v Speaker 6>You could do this at an even smaller scale. I

0:24:54.836 --> 0:24:57.716
<v Speaker 6>don't schedule meetings on Mondays. Don't tell anybody this. When

0:24:57.756 --> 0:24:59.636
<v Speaker 6>someone wants to set up meetings, you can propose all

0:24:59.636 --> 0:25:02.316
<v Speaker 6>sorts of times, just never happen to propose a time

0:25:02.356 --> 0:25:05.116
<v Speaker 6>on Mondays. So now every week you have this first

0:25:05.156 --> 0:25:08.356
<v Speaker 6>day that has a fully different field than the other days.

0:25:08.596 --> 0:25:11.956
<v Speaker 1>But working naturally also requires taking a healthier approach to

0:25:11.996 --> 0:25:12.716
<v Speaker 1>your workspace.

0:25:13.156 --> 0:25:17.076
<v Speaker 6>If our work primarily uses our brain, everything that impacts

0:25:17.076 --> 0:25:19.316
<v Speaker 6>our brain is relevant to our work. So just like

0:25:19.356 --> 0:25:22.316
<v Speaker 6>if I was an athlete and my work primarily involves

0:25:22.316 --> 0:25:25.356
<v Speaker 6>my body, other things I'm doing to my body matters.

0:25:25.396 --> 0:25:28.396
<v Speaker 6>If I'm sort of doing a bunch of squats right

0:25:28.396 --> 0:25:31.076
<v Speaker 6>before a soccer game, it's going to matter. But we

0:25:31.076 --> 0:25:34.076
<v Speaker 6>don't think about this with cognitive work. But the environment

0:25:34.116 --> 0:25:38.276
<v Speaker 6>that our brain is exposed to impacts how our brain functions.

0:25:38.796 --> 0:25:41.116
<v Speaker 6>And so when you see that laundry basket at your

0:25:41.116 --> 0:25:43.596
<v Speaker 6>home office, there's a whole other part of your brain

0:25:43.636 --> 0:25:45.596
<v Speaker 6>that says, we gotta do laundry. When are we gonna

0:25:45.596 --> 0:25:48.836
<v Speaker 6>do laundry? Which means your efforts to write a book, chapter,

0:25:48.956 --> 0:25:51.676
<v Speaker 6>whatever is going to be degraded. So if you make

0:25:51.716 --> 0:25:54.636
<v Speaker 6>a living with your brain, you have to separate where

0:25:54.676 --> 0:25:57.636
<v Speaker 6>you do this brain work from where you live. Location

0:25:57.796 --> 0:25:58.876
<v Speaker 6>matters if you're a.

0:25:58.796 --> 0:26:01.756
<v Speaker 1>Remote worker, Cal recommends finding a spot that doesn't remind

0:26:01.796 --> 0:26:04.556
<v Speaker 1>you of all your other daily pressures. Find a coffee

0:26:04.556 --> 0:26:08.116
<v Speaker 1>shop or co working space, even a large closet, anywhere

0:26:08.116 --> 0:26:10.196
<v Speaker 1>that stops you from c and thinking about all the

0:26:10.236 --> 0:26:12.396
<v Speaker 1>stressful stuff in life, so you can focus on your

0:26:12.396 --> 0:26:15.996
<v Speaker 1>important projects. And once you're settled down to work, Cal says,

0:26:16.036 --> 0:26:18.236
<v Speaker 1>you need to obsess over the quality of what you do.

0:26:18.916 --> 0:26:21.876
<v Speaker 6>Obsessing over the quality of what you do is the

0:26:21.876 --> 0:26:24.356
<v Speaker 6>glue that holds the other two principles together. There's two

0:26:24.356 --> 0:26:27.476
<v Speaker 6>things that happen once you start caring about quality. One,

0:26:27.956 --> 0:26:31.636
<v Speaker 6>it justifies for yourself going slower, because to do things

0:26:31.676 --> 0:26:34.596
<v Speaker 6>really well, you have to slow down. On the flip side,

0:26:34.956 --> 0:26:36.956
<v Speaker 6>when you get really good at something. Because you obsess

0:26:36.996 --> 0:26:39.996
<v Speaker 6>over your quality, you get more leverage and control over

0:26:39.996 --> 0:26:41.836
<v Speaker 6>your work life, and it becomes easier.

0:26:42.436 --> 0:26:45.516
<v Speaker 1>Obsessing over quality can help produce burnout in other ways, too.

0:26:45.836 --> 0:26:49.236
<v Speaker 1>Burnout typically emerges when we experience what clinicians call a

0:26:49.356 --> 0:26:51.996
<v Speaker 1>values mismatch in our work. We want to produce work

0:26:51.996 --> 0:26:54.196
<v Speaker 1>of a certain standard, but we just don't have the

0:26:54.236 --> 0:26:57.196
<v Speaker 1>time or bandwidth to accomplish that. When we can't give

0:26:57.236 --> 0:27:00.196
<v Speaker 1>meaningful projects our full attention and creative energy because we're

0:27:00.236 --> 0:27:03.636
<v Speaker 1>doing so many other things, we feel cynical and overwhelmed.

0:27:04.036 --> 0:27:06.476
<v Speaker 1>But obsessing over the quality of our work prevents that

0:27:06.516 --> 0:27:09.116
<v Speaker 1>sort of values mismatch. We wind up able to put

0:27:09.236 --> 0:27:12.516
<v Speaker 1>our full passion and energy into what truly matters. But

0:27:12.796 --> 0:27:15.796
<v Speaker 1>this ability to focus on what truly matters requires one

0:27:15.916 --> 0:27:19.996
<v Speaker 1>other important, but very painful realization. There may never be

0:27:20.116 --> 0:27:22.556
<v Speaker 1>enough time to do everything we really care about.

0:27:22.956 --> 0:27:25.636
<v Speaker 5>We've got minds that allow us to conceive of an

0:27:25.676 --> 0:27:28.036
<v Speaker 5>infinite number of things we want to do, or could do,

0:27:28.156 --> 0:27:31.036
<v Speaker 5>or should do, and yet we are these sort of

0:27:31.076 --> 0:27:33.196
<v Speaker 5>animals who can only do so much of it.

0:27:33.836 --> 0:27:36.396
<v Speaker 1>The happiness lab or return after the break.

0:27:44.596 --> 0:27:48.356
<v Speaker 5>The desperate side of being a productivity junkie is that

0:27:48.396 --> 0:27:50.876
<v Speaker 5>it is an attempt to sort of not have to

0:27:50.916 --> 0:27:55.356
<v Speaker 5>confront certain truths about either one's own life or human

0:27:55.396 --> 0:27:57.636
<v Speaker 5>life in general, and the fact that you know, in

0:27:57.756 --> 0:28:00.156
<v Speaker 5>case of time management, there just isn't enough time for

0:28:00.196 --> 0:28:01.836
<v Speaker 5>all the things that feel like they matter.

0:28:02.316 --> 0:28:05.876
<v Speaker 1>Former productivity junkie Oliver Berkman now embraces all the tenets

0:28:05.876 --> 0:28:09.956
<v Speaker 1>of slow productivity that Cal Newport described earlier. He does less,

0:28:10.116 --> 0:28:12.676
<v Speaker 1>tries to work at a more reasonable piece, and focuses

0:28:12.716 --> 0:28:15.956
<v Speaker 1>on high quality work. But Oliver thinks there's one more

0:28:15.996 --> 0:28:18.676
<v Speaker 1>painful truth we must confront if we want to find

0:28:18.676 --> 0:28:21.876
<v Speaker 1>the utopian work life balance promised by John Maynard Keynes.

0:28:22.316 --> 0:28:23.836
<v Speaker 5>If you're convinced that in the end there must be

0:28:23.916 --> 0:28:25.956
<v Speaker 5>a time for everything, then you're not going to say

0:28:25.996 --> 0:28:27.516
<v Speaker 5>no to the right things. You're not going to make

0:28:27.556 --> 0:28:29.996
<v Speaker 5>the right choices about what not to spend your time on,

0:28:30.036 --> 0:28:32.156
<v Speaker 5>and as a result, it's just going to be more

0:28:32.156 --> 0:28:33.636
<v Speaker 5>and more stuff incoming.

0:28:34.196 --> 0:28:37.836
<v Speaker 1>Oliver explores this idea in four thousand Weeks Time Management

0:28:37.876 --> 0:28:40.876
<v Speaker 1>for Mortals. The four thousand weeks in the book's title

0:28:40.956 --> 0:28:43.316
<v Speaker 1>refers to the length of the average human life span.

0:28:43.916 --> 0:28:45.476
<v Speaker 1>Pretty sure, right, The.

0:28:45.436 --> 0:28:47.756
<v Speaker 5>Important point is just that it's finite that has an

0:28:47.876 --> 0:28:50.356
<v Speaker 5>end point. It means that there's no reason to assume

0:28:50.556 --> 0:28:52.876
<v Speaker 5>that there will be time in a day or in

0:28:52.916 --> 0:28:54.876
<v Speaker 5>a life to do all the things that feel to

0:28:54.956 --> 0:28:56.756
<v Speaker 5>you like they matter.

0:28:57.036 --> 0:28:58.636
<v Speaker 1>No time in a life to do all the stuff

0:28:58.676 --> 0:29:01.316
<v Speaker 1>that matters. I can't what Oliver is saying here, but

0:29:01.356 --> 0:29:03.276
<v Speaker 1>I find the realization terrifying.

0:29:03.836 --> 0:29:06.756
<v Speaker 5>I do think that humans have, since the beginning of

0:29:06.836 --> 0:29:12.196
<v Speaker 5>humanity railed against their finitude. Most of our worst problems

0:29:12.196 --> 0:29:15.276
<v Speaker 5>with time, the ways we end up procrastinating, distracting ourselves,

0:29:15.316 --> 0:29:18.636
<v Speaker 5>feeling unfulfilled, feeling too busy, feeling overwhelmed, can be traced

0:29:18.676 --> 0:29:23.636
<v Speaker 5>back to various forms of this avoidance. It's because we

0:29:23.676 --> 0:29:26.756
<v Speaker 5>want to make ourselves feel unlimited that we try to

0:29:26.796 --> 0:29:29.436
<v Speaker 5>set up ludicrous productivity systems that are going to enable

0:29:29.516 --> 0:29:30.916
<v Speaker 5>us to do absolutely everything.

0:29:31.316 --> 0:29:33.676
<v Speaker 1>Embracing the idea of a time limited life can help

0:29:33.716 --> 0:29:35.756
<v Speaker 1>us come to terms with the fact that we're simply

0:29:35.796 --> 0:29:38.556
<v Speaker 1>never going to get everything done, which forces us to

0:29:38.556 --> 0:29:40.596
<v Speaker 1>become intentional about what we choose to do.

0:29:41.076 --> 0:29:43.796
<v Speaker 5>You don't get to choose not making tough decisions about

0:29:43.796 --> 0:29:45.356
<v Speaker 5>what you do with your time, but you can make

0:29:45.516 --> 0:29:49.476
<v Speaker 5>wiser or less wise ones. First of all, ask yourself

0:29:49.476 --> 0:29:53.156
<v Speaker 5>how much time you reasonably have available, and then decide

0:29:53.556 --> 0:29:55.916
<v Speaker 5>what are the most important tasks to put into that box.

0:29:55.956 --> 0:29:58.516
<v Speaker 5>So maybe that strikes people as very obvious, but in

0:29:58.516 --> 0:30:01.196
<v Speaker 5>fact I think what people instinctively do instead is the opposite.

0:30:01.196 --> 0:30:02.556
<v Speaker 5>They get up in the morning and say what has

0:30:02.556 --> 0:30:04.036
<v Speaker 5>to be done by the end of the day, paying

0:30:04.036 --> 0:30:06.356
<v Speaker 5>no heed to the question of whether there's actually enough

0:30:06.396 --> 0:30:08.796
<v Speaker 5>time to do it, and then you make bad choices.

0:30:08.836 --> 0:30:10.476
<v Speaker 5>You try to clear the decks, you try to do

0:30:10.516 --> 0:30:12.236
<v Speaker 5>all the short stuff first, and you find you've got

0:30:12.236 --> 0:30:14.556
<v Speaker 5>no time for the really important stuff. You end up

0:30:14.796 --> 0:30:18.996
<v Speaker 5>feeling inadequate and dumb because you didn't get through the list.

0:30:19.036 --> 0:30:22.596
<v Speaker 5>And it's just a sort of recipe for procrastination and psychodrama.

0:30:22.716 --> 0:30:25.516
<v Speaker 5>So it's really just about saying, this is the time

0:30:25.556 --> 0:30:27.716
<v Speaker 5>that is available, given that, what shall I do.

0:30:28.156 --> 0:30:30.796
<v Speaker 1>Oliver admits to struggling with this level of acceptance from

0:30:30.836 --> 0:30:34.476
<v Speaker 1>time to time. Luckily he has sparked time management gurus

0:30:34.636 --> 0:30:36.156
<v Speaker 1>like his wife around to help him.

0:30:36.516 --> 0:30:40.236
<v Speaker 5>I remember on a couple of occasions asking aloud in

0:30:40.276 --> 0:30:42.796
<v Speaker 5>her presence, whether I really had enough time left to

0:30:42.916 --> 0:30:45.236
<v Speaker 5>meet a deadline? On something that I was working for,

0:30:45.516 --> 0:30:47.676
<v Speaker 5>and of course corresponds always like, that's the wrong question

0:30:47.836 --> 0:30:50.836
<v Speaker 5>you have this time. The question is what's the wisest

0:30:50.916 --> 0:30:54.036
<v Speaker 5>use of that time. All of our time is trade offs.

0:30:54.316 --> 0:30:56.956
<v Speaker 5>You're always choosing not to do things, and so the

0:30:57.036 --> 0:31:00.396
<v Speaker 5>question is, just, given this available time, what's the best

0:31:00.476 --> 0:31:03.036
<v Speaker 5>way to spread my attention and energy?

0:31:03.356 --> 0:31:05.676
<v Speaker 1>And Oliver thinks one clearly bad way to spend your

0:31:05.716 --> 0:31:10.596
<v Speaker 1>attention and energy is with constant multitasking. Recognizing your finitude

0:31:10.636 --> 0:31:13.076
<v Speaker 1>and embracing a limited life means coming to terms with

0:31:13.156 --> 0:31:15.116
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you're not going to have time to

0:31:15.156 --> 0:31:17.956
<v Speaker 1>take in every new tweet or blog post or news article.

0:31:18.316 --> 0:31:20.716
<v Speaker 1>Monotasking requires sacrificing all that.

0:31:21.156 --> 0:31:24.516
<v Speaker 5>It's strange how difficult it is. It shouldn't be that difficult.

0:31:24.796 --> 0:31:28.596
<v Speaker 5>Just not always filling every available attentional channel. It's always

0:31:28.596 --> 0:31:33.076
<v Speaker 5>going to feel easier to veer away from that challenging, difficult,

0:31:33.276 --> 0:31:38.916
<v Speaker 5>uncomfortable thing to some pleasant and compelling source of distraction.

0:31:39.236 --> 0:31:41.956
<v Speaker 5>This is especially the case now because we didn't used

0:31:41.996 --> 0:31:44.556
<v Speaker 5>to have places to go when we got distracted that

0:31:44.636 --> 0:31:49.636
<v Speaker 5>were explicitly designed by very well paid geniuses to keep

0:31:49.716 --> 0:31:51.836
<v Speaker 5>us their as long as possible. On the other hand,

0:31:52.476 --> 0:31:54.796
<v Speaker 5>we are part of the problem, right. I mean, it

0:31:54.916 --> 0:31:57.196
<v Speaker 5>is not in my experience anyway that I'm sort of

0:31:57.236 --> 0:32:01.636
<v Speaker 5>sitting writing a chapter filled with joy and absorption and

0:32:01.676 --> 0:32:05.396
<v Speaker 5>then like somehow Edil Musk's Twitter comes and kind of

0:32:05.436 --> 0:32:08.036
<v Speaker 5>grabs me from my desk and drags me kicking and screaming. No,

0:32:08.116 --> 0:32:10.796
<v Speaker 5>it's more like I find the task difficult because it

0:32:10.836 --> 0:32:12.796
<v Speaker 5>matters to me, and I'm not one hundred percent confident

0:32:12.836 --> 0:32:14.716
<v Speaker 5>I can do it, and all sorts of emotions are

0:32:14.756 --> 0:32:17.396
<v Speaker 5>brought up by doing it. On my better days, I

0:32:17.396 --> 0:32:19.996
<v Speaker 5>can say that's that thing again. It's not actually that

0:32:20.236 --> 0:32:22.476
<v Speaker 5>I can't write this chapter, or that I've got to

0:32:22.556 --> 0:32:25.476
<v Speaker 5>go and waste an hour online. It's that writing brings

0:32:25.516 --> 0:32:27.396
<v Speaker 5>up these feelings for me because I care about it.

0:32:28.156 --> 0:32:31.796
<v Speaker 1>We also need to avoid those comforting but pseudo productive activities.

0:32:32.316 --> 0:32:34.596
<v Speaker 1>A big one for me is my daily practice of

0:32:34.676 --> 0:32:35.836
<v Speaker 1>clearing the decks.

0:32:35.836 --> 0:32:37.756
<v Speaker 5>Trying to get through all your email and little stuff

0:32:37.756 --> 0:32:39.156
<v Speaker 5>and all the bits of paperwork needs to be doing.

0:32:39.276 --> 0:32:41.396
<v Speaker 5>People come in, they feel anxious about all this stuff.

0:32:41.396 --> 0:32:43.476
<v Speaker 5>There's an itch that needs to be scratched, So you

0:32:43.516 --> 0:32:45.316
<v Speaker 5>do with all that first, and then you're supposed to

0:32:45.356 --> 0:32:47.036
<v Speaker 5>feel very calm and at piece, and you can really

0:32:47.076 --> 0:32:48.596
<v Speaker 5>focus on the thing that matters.

0:32:49.156 --> 0:32:51.356
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you how many hours of my working

0:32:51.396 --> 0:32:53.956
<v Speaker 1>life are spent on this stuff, just sending off one

0:32:54.036 --> 0:32:57.116
<v Speaker 1>more unimportant message so I can get closer to inbox zero.

0:32:57.596 --> 0:32:59.716
<v Speaker 1>We're doing a bunch of stupid errands just so I

0:32:59.716 --> 0:33:02.276
<v Speaker 1>can cross something off my to do list. When I

0:33:02.276 --> 0:33:04.676
<v Speaker 1>say it out loud, deck clearing is obviously not a

0:33:04.716 --> 0:33:07.636
<v Speaker 1>smart approach, but it feels so scary to leave so

0:33:07.716 --> 0:33:09.036
<v Speaker 1>much stuff undone.

0:33:09.236 --> 0:33:12.516
<v Speaker 5>Prising that we feel anxious. But the wise response to

0:33:12.556 --> 0:33:14.876
<v Speaker 5>that kind of anxiety is to do what one can

0:33:14.996 --> 0:33:18.516
<v Speaker 5>to hang out with the anxiety, to tolerate the anxiety,

0:33:18.796 --> 0:33:21.916
<v Speaker 5>and trying to wean yourself off the practice of clearing

0:33:21.916 --> 0:33:24.556
<v Speaker 5>the decks in response to it, I suppose.

0:33:24.836 --> 0:33:28.516
<v Speaker 1>Oliver admits that the strategies he recommends require emotion regulation,

0:33:29.076 --> 0:33:31.676
<v Speaker 1>but he's come to appreciate how much a more realistic,

0:33:31.916 --> 0:33:35.436
<v Speaker 1>more mortal approach to productivity increases what he's able to

0:33:35.436 --> 0:33:36.156
<v Speaker 1>get done.

0:33:36.356 --> 0:33:38.596
<v Speaker 5>Some people see it as quite depressing. I think it's

0:33:38.636 --> 0:33:41.476
<v Speaker 5>incredibly liberating to be like, it is not your faults,

0:33:41.556 --> 0:33:44.636
<v Speaker 5>that you are a finite human and from that basis

0:33:44.756 --> 0:33:47.836
<v Speaker 5>you can then try and do the most meaningful things

0:33:47.836 --> 0:33:48.396
<v Speaker 5>that you can do.

0:33:50.836 --> 0:33:53.276
<v Speaker 1>I'm still a long way from enjoying the leisure filled

0:33:53.356 --> 0:33:56.716
<v Speaker 1>utopia that Kent's envisioned, but making the show has helped

0:33:56.756 --> 0:34:00.556
<v Speaker 1>me establish better habits. I've put cal Newport's slow productivity

0:34:00.556 --> 0:34:03.956
<v Speaker 1>approach into practice. I started doing less at one time

0:34:04.076 --> 0:34:07.196
<v Speaker 1>and saying no to more projects. And I've stopped checking

0:34:07.196 --> 0:34:09.876
<v Speaker 1>my inbox as the first work task of the which

0:34:09.876 --> 0:34:12.276
<v Speaker 1>gives me more morning hours for the projects I want

0:34:12.276 --> 0:34:15.836
<v Speaker 1>to work on. And I'm already seeing the benefits. I'm

0:34:15.876 --> 0:34:18.876
<v Speaker 1>happy to report that my calendar has slowly begun recovering

0:34:18.956 --> 0:34:22.116
<v Speaker 1>from all of productivity termite damage, and I'll be trying

0:34:22.156 --> 0:34:24.836
<v Speaker 1>out some small seasonality by taking a few weeks off

0:34:24.836 --> 0:34:27.876
<v Speaker 1>from the show. But in spite of this progress, I

0:34:27.916 --> 0:34:30.356
<v Speaker 1>have been struggling more than I expected. With one piece

0:34:30.356 --> 0:34:33.196
<v Speaker 1>of advice you heard today, It was Oliver Berkman's idea

0:34:33.276 --> 0:34:37.196
<v Speaker 1>that we need to embrace time management for mortals. You see,

0:34:37.276 --> 0:34:39.956
<v Speaker 1>I don't really like the idea that I'm finite. I

0:34:39.996 --> 0:34:42.396
<v Speaker 1>hate thinking that I ultimately won't have time for all

0:34:42.396 --> 0:34:44.756
<v Speaker 1>the important stuff in life due to the fact that

0:34:44.836 --> 0:34:47.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to die someday I find the idea that

0:34:47.436 --> 0:34:51.676
<v Speaker 1>I'm limited to four thousand weeks utterly terrifying. But could

0:34:51.676 --> 0:34:54.636
<v Speaker 1>my avoidance of my inevitable demise be doing more harm

0:34:54.676 --> 0:34:57.756
<v Speaker 1>than good? Okay, it helps if I close my eyes.

0:34:58.356 --> 0:35:03.756
<v Speaker 4>I am going to die. I am going to die.

0:35:03.836 --> 0:35:07.316
<v Speaker 1>I am going to die. Could I wind up happier

0:35:07.356 --> 0:35:10.916
<v Speaker 1>by accepting, maybe even well becoming my own mortality? How

0:35:10.996 --> 0:35:12.796
<v Speaker 1>is it literally talking about it right now?

0:35:12.836 --> 0:35:13.356
<v Speaker 5>Us together?

0:35:13.636 --> 0:35:17.716
<v Speaker 1>No, seriously, I hate hate thinking about it. We'll get

0:35:17.716 --> 0:35:20.916
<v Speaker 1>some answers and explore the benefits of memento mori in

0:35:20.956 --> 0:35:23.876
<v Speaker 1>the next episode of The Happiness Lab with me Doctor

0:35:23.956 --> 0:35:24.796
<v Speaker 1>Laurie Santos