WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - July 18th, 2025

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance and tech

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Hi, everyone, Welcome to the Bloomberg Business Week Weekend Podcast.

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Carol is off this week interplace, though we had a

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>great rotating crew of co anchors featuring Nora Melinda, Emily Graffeo,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Katie Greifeld, and Isabelle Lee. Another busy summer week. We've

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 2>got global tariffs and how that's affecting US company's supply chains,

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 2>plus fed independence and job security for j Powell. Also

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>a hefty dose of earnings as banks kicked off Q

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 2>two reporting the latest economic news and crypto week in

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 2>the US House. We get into all of that a

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit later, plus Rare Earth's and focus yet again.

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 2>We speak to the CEO of MP Materials on the

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 2>company's multi million dollar deal with the US government to

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 2>boost output of rare Earth magnets. Stateside all that to come.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>We begin, though, with the biggest will he won't he

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 2>story of the week. Speculation over the fate of Federal

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Reserve Chair Jerome Powell set off a short lived tempest

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 2>in financial markets on Wednesday. That volatility was mostly quelled

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 2>after President Trump said he in fact has no plans

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>to fire the central bank chief and was only discussing

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 2>it in concept. Still, the president's remarks left open the

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 2>possibility of ousting Powell, a credible threat that could end

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the Fed's independence and demonstrate the President's power to shake

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 2>up global financial markets. For more, we turned to one

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>of the few people who actually had experience on the FED.

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Layel Brainerd, is the former vice chair of the FED

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Reserve and former director of the National Economic Council under

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>President Biden. She says, any break from bed independence would

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 2>be quote extremely bad.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a lot of continuity. He has clearly

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 3>been very frustrated for some period of time with the

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve and their wait and see mode while they

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 3>wait to see how tariffs are going to affect inflation

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 3>and the economy, and you know, he's very impatient to

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>see rates come down. So I saw those comments as

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 3>being certainly in that same spirit, although of course the rumors.

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 4>Had more urgency to them.

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Of course, subsequent to that, he seems to have pulled

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 3>back the comments, and that's a good thing. I think

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 3>it would be extremely bad for the United States to

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>have a big rupture in the institutional independence of the

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve, which is what that would amount to.

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 5>Exactly, So, how do you think this will affect the

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 5>Fed's credibility in controlling inflation? And more broadly, how will

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 5>this political move really just affect inflation expectations?

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely so, if the President of the United States were

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 3>to go ahead and actually make an effort to remove

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 3>the chair of the Federal Reserve, that would fly in

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 3>the face of decades of institutional convention that puts the

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve in an independent position to pursue the control

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>of inflation as well as keeping labor markets strong. And

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I think it would really raise important questions in the

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 3>minds of investors in the United States and around the

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>world as to whether the institutional environment that really underpins

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 3>the value of treasury securities, the strength of the dollar,

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 3>and the expectation that inflation will remain low and stable

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 3>in the United States, All of those things I think

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 3>would be thrown into question, and that should lead investors

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>to demand more to hold long term treasury, so that

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>should lead to the long end of the curve going up.

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 2>Whenever the Fed Chair gives a press conference, he's asked

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 2>by journalists about the criticism that the President has made

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>or is making about him.

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 6>You've worked with j.

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Powell for years, you know him in your view, how

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 2>does he feel about being this punching bag.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know how he feels personally, but I

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 3>know that anybody in that position would feel that they

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 3>have an important const well institutional responsibility that he was

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 3>confirmed by the US Senate, that there is a legal

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:01.559
<v Speaker 3>set of expectations regarding the as a reserve chairs role.

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 3>And of course monetary policy is set by committee. It's

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 3>not set by the chair alone, and so it is

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 3>the Federal Open Markets Committee that has continue to.

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 6>Hold on rates.

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 3>So it's a much broader institutional environment, and personalizing it

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 3>by this relentless focus on the chair, I think is

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 3>extremely problematic. Again, bad for the United States, and ultimately

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 3>defeats the purpose that I think the President is trying

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 3>to achieve, which is to see rates go down sustainably

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 3>in an environment of growth and low inflation.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 5>When you look at the history of political pressure exerted

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 5>upon the FED, I'm thinking Nixon, arsthur Burns, is today worse?

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 5>Is today different? Or are they more or less the same?

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 3>So I think that the past episodes where we've seen

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pressure on the Federal Reserve Chair two

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 3>lower interest rates for political reasons have ended extremely badly,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen in those episodes high inflation and the

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 3>FED has really struggled to bring inflation back down. So

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a kind of similar set of

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 3>pressures to what some FED chairs have felt in the past,

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 3>but not in the recent past. I think in the

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, during the period that we have seen low

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 3>and stable, moderate what they call the Great Moderation, low

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 3>and stable inflation, there has been a real understanding that

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 3>the President the administration should allow the Federal Reserve to

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 3>conduct monetary policy in a way that establishes their credibility

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 3>on inflation control. So this is a big change relative

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 3>to the last three decades, and it's highly problematic. You know,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the President has said very explicitly that he wants to

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 3>see the Federal Reserve lower rates because every percentage point

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 3>that rates come down, this is what he says, it

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 3>will save him three hundred billion dollars in interest payments

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 3>on the national debt. And of course that's more important

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 3>than ever now that we've just added through the megalaw,

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 3>another four trillion dollars to the national debt. And so

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 3>when you hear the President talking about this, he really

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 3>seems to be very focused on those interest payments. And

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 3>that is exactly the kind of institutional environment that would

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 3>undermine the credibility of the Federal Reserve in fighting inflation

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 3>and could actually lead investors to demand higher interest rates

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 3>on long term treasuries.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 2>That's the great irony in this, this whole situation here.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I just we have twenty seconds left. I just want

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 2>you to make a prediction. Do you think FED Chair J.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Powell will fulfill his term as the chair? I'm inn

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>the Federal Reserve until May of next year.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 3>I certainly hope so, and yes I do.

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, Lalel Brainerd, thank you so much for joining

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>us on Bloomberg BusinessWeek Daily.

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 6>That is, of course.

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Lalel Brainerd, former National Economic Council Director, former Vice chair

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 2>of the Federal Reserve Distinguished Fellow at the Georgetown Sorrow

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Center for Financial Markets and Policy.

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five Easter and

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>listen on Apple Karplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Sticking with the President's threats to House j. Powell, this week,

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 2>we turned to another expert on the Central Bank who

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>spends a lot of time interviewing members of the feed.

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Michael McKee is Bloomberg News International Economics and Policy correspondent.

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Mike joined us from the Rocky Mountain Economic Summit in Victor, Idaho.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 2>It's an event that brings together some of the country's

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 2>top economists and policymakers.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, actually, Jim, there's a bit about an eye roll

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 7>going on with a lot of people because we've been

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 7>through this so many times with Donald Trump, and the

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 7>whole idea of taco came up again. So nobody was

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 7>surprised when he came out and denied the earlier reports

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 7>that he was ready to fire the president. Perhaps his

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 7>early fire the FED chair, but the general feeling has

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 7>been and we talked about this a lot at dinner

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 7>last night, that the President won't do it because it

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 7>doesn't get him very far. It would probably lead to

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 7>a steepening of the yield curve, a widening of spreads,

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 7>the dollar falling, and interest rates would go up rather

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 7>than down in the markets, and it would just create

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 7>a lot of confusion and hurt the Fed's credibility. It

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 7>would also end up in court, so he might try

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 7>to remove the FED chair, but it would take many

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 7>months of legal maneuvering to get that far, and really

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 7>Powell doesn't have that much longer to go as chair.

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>You said that there was a little bit of eye

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 2>rolling because this is sort of a movie that we've

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 2>seen before. Let's take a listen to the rhetoric from

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the president just over the last few months when it

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 2>comes to the chair of the Federal Reserve.

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 8>And the fake news is saying, Oh, if you fired him,

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 8>it would be so bad, it would be so bad.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 8>I don't know why it would be so bad. So

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 8>we have a stupid person. Frankly at the FED. I'd

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 8>go him too late, Powell, because he's always too late.

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 8>I know within three or four people who are going

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 8>to pick I mean, he goes out pretty soon, unfortunately,

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 8>because I think he's terrible. I'd love him to resign

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 8>if he wanted to. He's a done, lousy job. Your

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 8>own pal has been very bad for our country.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 9>We should have the lowest interest rate on earth.

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 10>How we don't.

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 8>He just refuses to do it, and yet he's spending

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 8>two and a half billion dollars rebuilding the bet. He's

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 8>a terrible He's a terrible feed cheer. I'm surprised he

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 8>was appointed. We're not planning on doing it if they

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 8>were very concerned.

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 2>I was President Trump over the last few months his

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 2>rhetoric around Fetchair J. Powell, it's in chronological order, and

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to point people to the park just before

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 2>the last SoundBite where he said he's spending two and

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 2>a half billion dollars rebuilding FED. Mike, is there any

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>there there with this new line of attack when it

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 2>comes to this renovation, Well.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 7>There are questions about why the renovation has gone up

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 7>from one point seven billion to two and a half billion,

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 7>and I suppose those are things that could be investigated,

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 7>and Powell has asked the Fed's Inspector General to look

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 7>into it. The Fed's response so far has been that

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 7>these plans were approved in twenty twenty one, and obviously

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 7>right after that we had a big inflation, and so

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 7>the costs of everything have gone up. They have also

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 7>argue that a lot of things that the administration is

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 7>focused on, or some of the administration officials who tweeted

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 7>about it or focused on, are things that are actually

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 7>not in the final plans, and so it doesn't appear

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 7>that there's a lot there. Is it enough for cause

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 7>to fire a FED governor. That would be up to

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 7>the courts to decide, and as I said, that would

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 7>take some time. So I don't know that that's a

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 7>big deal. That string of Trump quotes, I would also

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 7>point to the one where Trump said I was surprised

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 7>he was appointed. Well, Trump appointed him as chair.

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, Tim is eager to make that point. He did

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 11>also express surprise that Biden renominated him President Biden. I

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 11>do want to get your thoughts, Mike McKee on the

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 11>idea that, Okay, his term as FED chair ends in

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 11>May twenty twenty six. We know that. We also know

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 11>that his term as FED governor doesn't end until January

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty eight. We had Treasury Secretary Scott Besson joined

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 11>Bloomberg Television, and he said that would be very confusing

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 11>for markets if pal did stay on as a governor

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 11>until January twenty twenty eight. What does the precedent look

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 11>like there.

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 7>Well, there really isn't a precedent. The closest you can

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 7>get is back in nineteen fifty one the Treasury Fed

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 7>accord where the Treasury Department and the Fed agreed that

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 7>Treasury would handle fiscal policy and the Fed would handle

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 7>monetary policy, and the FED chairman at the time stepped down.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 7>President Truman appointed a new chair, but the old chair

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 7>stayed on for a couple of years as a governor.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 7>But it wasn't a matter of standing up to the

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 7>administration at the time. He was actually asked to do

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 7>that to lend his experience. In this case, this would

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 7>be a completely unusual situation. The only close analogy I

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 7>could come up with would be Paul Volker, who faced

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 7>a rebellion among his fellow Board governors and the ragged

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 7>Whitehouse told him, we think this means you need to go,

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 7>and he did resign. But it was a kind of

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 7>different situation than we have right now. So this would

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 7>be as Scott Besson said, a completely confusing mess for

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 7>the markets, particularly if the President appointed someone he's seen

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 7>as a toady to him that would just try to

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 7>lower interest rates regardless of economic conditions. The next thing

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 7>that would happen would be Governor Powell would offer a

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 7>speech and it would get massive coverage, and the markets

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 7>would be torn between which ones to believe. It's also,

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 7>and this is important Tim and Katie to realize that

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 7>the Open Market Committee that sets interest rates selects its

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 7>own chairman of that committee, and it doesn't have to

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 7>be the FED Board chairman. So the President could appoint

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 7>Kevin Hassett as the FED Board chair and the Open

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 7>Market Committee could just keep Jay Powell as its chair,

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 7>and so interest rates wouldn't be any different than they

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 7>are right now.

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, Michael McKee, we're gonna have to leave it there.

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Michael mckei Bloomberg News International economics and policy correspondents out

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>there in Victor, Idaho.

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Listen live

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple, Corflay

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and Android Auto. With the Bloomberg Business app. You can

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>all so listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>New York station, just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 2>One company that's certainly been on our radar as of

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 2>late is MP Materials. In fact, the company's also on

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Apple's radar. This past week, Apple announced it would commit

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 2>to a five hundred million dollar deal with MP for

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 2>its rare earth magnets. News of that deal led the

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 2>stock of MP Materials to search twenty percent. Adding to

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the surge was this month's announcement that the US Department

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 2>of Defense wants to make a four hundred million dollar

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 2>equity investment in MP, along with one billion dollars in

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 2>financing from JP, Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs to fund

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>a major new plant. This, of course, comes as the

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 2>US continues to secure domestic manufacturing of these critical supplies

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and push back against China's grip on them. James Litinsky

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 2>is the founder, chairman, and CEO of MP Materials. He

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 2>joined Carol and Me alongside Bloomberg News Economic Statecraft reporter

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 2>and mining and minerals expert Joe Doe on what the

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 2>DoD investment means for the company and for the industry.

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 12>There are three pillars to DoD's investment. DOOD made an

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 12>investment in MP. They also provided us with a long term,

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 12>a ten year price floor contract that allows us to

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 12>earn a fair return on the commodity. And then they

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 12>also provided one hundred percent off take for a new

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 12>magnet facility that we're building that will significantly expand.

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 4>It will ten x our magnet capacity.

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 12>What's so important about this is that with the supply chain,

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 12>as you may have heard me say, if we have

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 12>all the rarests in the world, if we don't have

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 12>the downstream, if we don't have the magnet production, or

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 12>vice versa, if we have magnet production but don't have

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 12>the rare oaths, then you know, it's all for nought.

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 12>And so it's really important to look at this supply

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 12>chain on a vertical basis. And so you really have

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 12>to credit President Trump and his administration and of course

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 12>our partners at the Pentagon for sort of looking at

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 12>this challenge and recognizing that you know, MP has put

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 12>together a vertically in a grin a champion, and the

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 12>best solution to kind of catalyze this supply chain is

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 12>making a substantial commitment to us, which they've done We're

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 12>very excited about that. And lastly, I would just say

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 12>that this is this is a huge win for taxpayers

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 12>because the structure of the deal is such that not

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 12>only is DoD now economically our largest shareholder, but they

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 12>have upside participation in both the commodity and in the

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 12>magna business.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Joe, come on in here, because you understand this

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>space like pretty much nobody else. Talk to us about

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 2>what you see as significant about an investment such as this,

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 2>especially from a position of economic staatecraft.

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 13>Well, I wanted to ask Jim about that. Jim, I

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 13>feel like you're inderplaying. Can you give us size and scope,

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 13>put into context why this is such a big deal

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 13>in your industry and what you think about it.

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Thanks, Jo, it's good to see you.

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think not to get too wonky, but I

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 12>would recommend, since we are on Bloomberg, for those is

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 12>in our investor relations, we obviously put out a deck

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 12>and I really encourage people to look at that and

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 12>we go through a lot of the economics, but I'll

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 12>give you this summary, which is that we have totally

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 12>transformed MP's business overnight. We've gone from you know, the

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 12>Challenge show, as you know is that the Chinese historically

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 12>have sold rare earth set a substantial loss because they

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 12>use it mercantilistically as a strategic source of control of

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 12>the downstream.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 13>Which is a way of saying, Jim, that they will

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 13>flood the market to take market share, which is one

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 13>of the things that has always scared investors away from

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 13>your company and other companies in this space.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 6>Correct.

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 12>And so if you look at the math, we basically

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 12>have transformed MP where we can earn We have long

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 12>term contracted cash lists, so we have ten year agreements

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 12>where essentially, if you kind of look out normalized, you know,

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 12>we believe we can do six hundred and fifty million

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 12>plus of ebadah and this is you know, and again

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 12>look at the various parts, but this has taken our

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 12>business from what was sort of a volatile commodity business

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 12>to a long term, contracted economic platform which enables us

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 12>to further investments downstream and both and those investments downstream,

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.479
<v Speaker 12>we now have one hundred percent off take in DD

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 12>as a customer.

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 4>And if I can't, Joe, let me add one more.

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 12>Point that I think is so important because you hit

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 12>the nail on the head about the Chinese flooding the market.

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 4>The Chinese very thoughtfully realize.

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 12>That, particularly with when we think about physical AI and

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 12>the future of warfare, robotics, drones, the Chinese are willing

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 12>to lose billions to play for trillions of dollars of

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 12>downstream market cap. And when we think about you know,

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 12>our great leaders in technology, whether it's Jensen Wong or

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 12>Elon Musk talking about robotics being potentially the largest industry

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 12>in the history of the world where earth magnets are important,

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 12>very important, extremely critical feedstock to that. And so we've

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 12>got to preserve that trillions of dollars of downstream enterprise value.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 12>And that obviously is what we're about at MP is

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 12>making sure that our downstream industry has that feedstock and

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 12>obviously ensures that we can make those investments.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 13>Jim, the Defense Department is famously not flashy about anything.

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 13>It's hard to argue that this was not flashy. Four

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 13>hundred million dollar equity investment in a publicly traded company.

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 13>Have they ever done this before.

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 12>I think it's a pretty unprecedented situation, and I think

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 12>that this is obviously a very unique circumstance. And obviously,

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 12>you know, we we are honored and humbled by it, Joe.

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 12>And as you know, since we've been talking for many years,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 12>I guess there's the old expression of it takes a

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 12>lifetime of hard work to become an overnight success. We've

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 12>been at this for ten years at MP, and I

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 12>think I think that Dood and the administration realize that

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 12>we've got to look at the supply chain holistically, and

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 12>you know, hopefully this is a model for future other

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 12>scenarios where we have strategic industries that we have to

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 12>return and we've got to figure out a way to

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 12>take on mercantilist economics, and so this is I think

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 12>hopefully a good and model in doing so.

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>So Jim, to that point, you operate in a specific

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 2>portion of sort of the rare Earth space when it

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 2>comes to these magnets. In your view, because you're in

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>this space, where does the US still lag and where

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 2>does the US need to invest in order to try

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 2>to catch up if even possible.

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're vertically integrated, so we at MP, and there's

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 4>nobody like this.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 2>I just mean from the materials and processing perspective, I

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 2>understand you are vertically integrated, but what about for all

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 2>of the rare earths that will be in demand in

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 2>the near future.

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 12>Sure well, so there are two major categories that are

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 12>the light and the heavies, and is part of this announcement,

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 12>DoD is actually also committing some capital for us to

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 12>build out samarium separation at Mountain Pass. Samarium is a

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 12>feedstock into a different kind of magnet that's actually really

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 12>critical for military purposes as well. And so essentially, tim

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 12>if you want to refine, if you want to refine earth,

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 12>so forget the ore bodies around the world, if you

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 12>want to refine and separate them to then become feedstock

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 12>to magnets.

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 4>There are two places to do it.

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 12>There's sort of the Chinese sphere of influence or Mount Pass, California.

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 12>And so I think this basically catalyzes us to move

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 12>downstream and really be able to have MP as an

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 12>economic platform that can encourage additional investment really in all

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 12>spheres in mining and across the stream all the way

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 12>down to magnets.

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 14>You know, Jim, I think people are listening and they're like, yeah,

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 14>you know, if we're thinking about developing our supply chains

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.199
<v Speaker 14>here and making and creating national security for things that

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 14>are so important to so many different aspects of our

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 14>lives here in the United States. People are gonna say, yeah,

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 14>this makes sense, but do you feel like this is

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 14>potentially a step towards you becoming a state owned enterprise?

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh not at all, not at all.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 12>In fact, you know, I think it's actually the opposite,

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 12>which is, for the first time we see an actual

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 12>data point of how we in the West, with free

0:22:56.000 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 12>market capitalism, can take on mercantilism, but doing so in

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 12>a way that is is along with our value system.

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 12>So let's be very clear about this. D D is

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 12>becoming economically our largest shareholder. But they they are you know,

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 12>they will vote with our board and they expect us

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 12>to be a thriving public company. They want us to

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 12>continue to run the company for shareholders, and obviously their

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 12>interest will will be a benefit for taxpayers to the

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 12>extent that they, you know, are we continue to compound,

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 12>which we expect, and then they also have upside sharing.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 4>And so I want to I want.

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 12>To, you know, really remind people that if you look

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 12>at this deal, it was a win win win. Obviously,

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 12>you know, the market likes it. I think there's our

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 12>our economic platform has totally changed. But we're serving a

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 12>key national security initiative enabling trillions of dollars of downstream

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 12>enterprise value to be more secure. But the taxpayer also

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 12>has upside in this, and so I think that this

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 12>is sort of again, it's it's a new model. It's

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 12>unprecedented in a sense, but it's of course because we're

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 12>facing a challenge that we haven't faced before.

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I guess on some level, Jim. The upside the

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 13>tax payer has is if your stock goes up, the

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 13>investment that the DoD hasn't it goes up. I was

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 13>talking to an investor today asking about this, and I said, well,

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 13>what what does it mean for the taxpayer? And they said, really,

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 13>all it means is a better bet on national security issues.

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 13>So I might push back if.

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 12>I may, Yeah, if I may push back, because if

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:21.719
<v Speaker 12>you look at the structure of the deal, it's not

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 12>just the shareholding. There are three pillars. It's the shareholding,

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 12>there's then upside participation in the commodity, and then there's

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 12>also upside participation in our magnet business. So there's actually

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 12>three different mechanisms of upside sharing for the taxpayer.

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 13>And can you clarify one thing in the details the agreement.

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 13>It's one hundred and thirty dollars floor, right, or is

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 13>one hundred and ten Sorry, one hundred ten. It's one

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 13>hundred and ten dollars floor. That is just for the

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 13>actual concentrate refined in metal. That is not batteries, right, Sorry,

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 13>that is not permanent magnets.

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 12>That's all NDPR products. So you're right, concentrate oxide medal.

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 12>And then we're on a downstream though. We also have

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 12>one hundred percent off take for the new facility that

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 12>we're going to build called ten X, and as part

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 12>of that off take, we'll have a minimum EBITDAG guarantee

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 12>and then there'll be a catch up for DoD and

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 12>then we'll share. We're fifty to fifty partners and so again, Joe,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 12>this is this is a transformational public private partnership.

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 15>Right.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 4>But taxpayer was really really well represented in the structure.

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 13>But Jim, one thing, you probably will be getting a

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 13>lot of pushback from investors, from media whoever, saying what

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 13>we just brought up, which is your biggest stockholder will

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 13>be the Defense Department. And doesn't that bring a concern

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 13>that the federal government has so much say in what

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 13>is supposed to be a publicly traded private company.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 12>Well, actually, interestingly, as part of our deal, d D

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 12>will be voting their shares with our board.

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 4>And so I really think that this is again it's

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 4>a new.

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 12>Structure that contemplates the fact that we need to be

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 12>a successful public company.

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 6>So this is very different.

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 12>I know that maybe there's you know, historical examples of

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 12>where the government needed to come in and rescue an industry.

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 4>It's actually the opposite of what's happening here. The government

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 4>wants to.

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 12>Achieve an important national security objective and we at MP

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 12>are able to help them achieve that objective. And so

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 12>they are going to help support us in accelerating investment

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 12>in our space, and they're going to create the conditions

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 12>that allow us to invest with a fair return on

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 12>capital and not be a tax sort of speak by mercantilism.

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 12>And in exchange for that, they're going to expect some

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 12>upside and so again I think this is hopefully it's

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 12>a new model that we can utilize across some of

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 12>these verticals that are really challenging for us, where we've

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 12>been unable to fully reshore industries because we're facing competition

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 12>that is thinking differently again.

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 4>We yeah, oh go ahead, Sorry, we.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Only have a minute left, and I just want to

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 2>hear from you how this deal came together in the

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 2>timeline here, who did you speak to? Who first reached out?

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Trips to Washington, trips to you know, Chicago or Nevada, Like,

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 2>how did it all come together and when did the

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 2>discussions first start.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 12>Well, we've been we've been having a great active dialogue

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 12>with the Pentagon going back to the first Trump administration

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 12>and through the Biden administration and now obviously the Trump administration.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 12>And obviously this is a non partisan issue getting this

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 12>supply chain back. Suffice to say that what we have been,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 12>as you know, in our mission, we've been focused on

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 12>this single point of failure since the inception of the

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 12>company post Liberation Day, as we saw the Chinese utilized

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 12>raref magnets in the trade disputes that that basically the

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 12>cutoff of rareth magnets had the threat of sending our

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 12>economy into a deeptail spent and so that really certainly

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 12>accelerated some of this discussion.

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 14>Got to ask you, though, did you actually talk with

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 14>President Trump about this? Like who finally said got to

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:58.239
<v Speaker 14>do it signed it.

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 12>Well, I think you can look at the the transaction

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 12>documents which which we're signed to the top levels of

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 12>the Pentagon. So this was this was a conversation from

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 12>the very top levels of the Pentagon.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Is that a yes on mister? Is that a yes on?

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 14>The president?

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 12>So this is this is again I don't I don't

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 12>want to specifically name names of who we spoke to

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 12>and how the conversations went about. But again, how about this,

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 12>I will I will tell you that the President has

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 12>directly mandated that we fixed this supply chain and so

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 12>that is that is public.

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 4>You can see that.

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 12>And so the President mandated the secretary on down to

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 12>fix the supply chain. And I think that this is

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 12>this is really bold and decisive action to make that happen.

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 14>Well, investors certainly taking investors certainly taking note, as we said,

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:45.959
<v Speaker 14>your stock up fifty percent. I'm going to say thank you,

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 14>thank you, thank you, because there's three of us, and

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 14>we really appreciated your time and getting having a conversation

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 14>with you on this because it does sound like it's

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 14>pretty significant in terms of what happens with.

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Rare Earth's here in the United States.

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 14>Jim thank you, Thank you staying touch Jim Litinski, He's founder,

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.239
<v Speaker 14>chairman and CEO of MP Materials, and of course our

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 14>own Joe Doe Bloomberg News Economic Statecraft Reportito, Thank you

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 14>so much.

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Catch

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas during

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>app or watch us live on YouTube.

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Back in April, Levi's was one of the first big

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 2>apparel companies to report earnings after President Trump announced sweeping tariffs.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Since then, a number of its competitors, such as American

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Eagle and Gap, have flagged the tariff's impact, along with

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 2>general consumer caution. Wall Street expected a similar fate for Levi's,

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>but instead, Levi's actually announced its revenue outlook to rise

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 2>between one and two percent for the current fiscal year,

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.719
<v Speaker 2>above the average analyst estimate and up from a previous

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 2>view that sales would decline one percent to two percent.

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 2>So is the head to toe Denham Lifestyle paying off.

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Levi Straus chiefinancial and Chief Growth Officer Harmeet Singh expects

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 2>momentum and consumer resilience to overcome tariff uncertainty. He joined

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 2>us alongside Bloomberg News senior editor Nina Trentman.

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:15.719
<v Speaker 16>We delivered a quarter to beat and we raised our

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 16>fullier guidance. A special shout out to our teams around

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 16>the world for what I call delivering the power of

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 16>the end, which is not only growing direct to consumer business,

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 16>but our wholesale business, growing our US business, and our

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 16>international business, growing men's and women's and I can keep

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 16>going on, and that really explains the momentum we have.

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 16>We delivered our third consecutive quarter of high single digit

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 16>growth and growing our profitability, and that is why we

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 16>believe that we're stepping into the second half. We believe

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 16>we can manage through the uncertainty of tariffs.

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 9>The tariff situation is fluid.

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 16>We assumed an incremental ten percent on tariffs from the

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 16>rest of the world and thirty percent from China. Our

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 16>view is we are competitively in a better part to

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 16>manage through this. Sixty percent of our business is international.

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 16>We have a fairly diversified supply chain, and we've been

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 16>agile over the years in managing through some of the uncertainties.

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 16>We've got some mitigation actions. Tim we are working with

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 16>our vendors. A large piece of our growth is driven

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 16>by higher volumes, and that makes a difference when you

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 16>negotiating with the With our ten year relationships. Over the years,

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 16>we are driving higher full price sales because our product

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 16>offers are working, and we are targeting some pricing actions

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 16>with minimal impact to the consumer. You a question about

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 16>twenty six. We are working through that. Some of the

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 16>mitigation actions will continue. We believe the brand momentum continues.

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 16>The brand has never been wronger. You know, this year

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 16>it's all about center of culture driven through music. We've

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 16>got a partnership with Beyonce. We've got a partnership with

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 16>different musicians around the world. Think Dilgitusan in India, I

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 16>think different influences in Europe, etc.

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 10>Next year, maybe I could jump in there quickly. We'll

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 10>we'll ask about the music partnerships in a second. Just

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 10>wondering in terms of earnings. Of course, an interesting thing

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 10>is happening right now. We were expecting teriff clarity by

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 10>July ninth. Now we're hearing from the White House it's

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 10>going to be August first, and that won't be moved.

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 10>But of course you are on the lucky side that

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 10>you have already reported earning. Still, at the same time,

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 10>you gave an outlook, you provided commentary about what you're

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 10>thinking about the future. And you're doing that in an

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 10>environment where we're hearing teriff announcements from the White House

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 10>basically on a quasi daily cadence. How confident and comfortable

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 10>can you be as CFO to provide forward guidance at

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 10>this point given that target, the tariffs are still such

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 10>a moving target.

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, you know, a couple of things give us confidence, Nina.

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 16>Number one, the momentum that we're entering the second half,

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 16>it's been sustained over.

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 9>The last three quarters.

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 16>The second is our product offers the consumer so far

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 16>has been resilient. Our customers, our wholesale retailers are still

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 16>buying our products, especially our new product.

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 9>And because we are a global.

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 16>Company, international for example, has been fairly strong. So as

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 16>we manage through the uncertainty, we are trying to do

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 16>it thoughtfully.

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 9>You know, we don't take anything for granted.

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 16>You know, our view is you've got to continue to

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 16>earn the trust with our consumers every day, and you know,

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 16>especially in moments of crisis, consumers tend to gravitate to

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 16>brands that are relevant and also you know, brands they trust,

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 16>and you know, because we have been around for one

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 16>hundred and seventy years, get a different crisis. That's really

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 16>been the genesis of why we think we can manage

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 16>through it. You know, we talked about the impact, we

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 16>talked about actions that we're taking to mitigate that, and

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 16>more importantly, we're doing different scenarios. I mean, after earnings,

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 16>when we received news about certain tariffs, we went back

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 16>and game plan that through another scenario. So we're working

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 16>through different scenarios. The other piece that gives me more

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 16>confidence is the agility of our supply chain and our

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 16>teams around the world. And you know, let me pause here.

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 16>I hope that addresses your question.

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, Hermie, you mentioned a music partnership that we of

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 17>course all know, Beyonce, and this was a really major

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:45.879
<v Speaker 17>deal for Levi Strauss. I mean you mentioned the brand

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 17>being relevant. I was just at the Cowboy Cotter concert

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 17>and I look around there's Levi's everywhere. How influential was

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 17>this partnership to the company and how much of an

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 17>impact did it have on sales?

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, it's been really important, you know, We've had a

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 16>relationship with Beyonce for decades. She's an icon, She's in

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 16>the center of culture, and we are just privileged and

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 16>honors that she chose us for this partnership. It's had

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 16>an impact. Our women's business is on a roll. You know,

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 16>we have doubled the business over the last many years.

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:22.479
<v Speaker 16>The partnership really accelerated there. We are nowhere near done.

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 16>We think we can double our women's business. You know,

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 16>our women's business is about a little less than forty

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 16>percent of our business. When I joined the company twelve

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 16>years ago, it was about twenty percent. We think our

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 16>women's business can be about you know, half our business.

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 16>And I would say the partnership is important. Her styles

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 16>and what she's wearing, they're selling really well.

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:45.959
<v Speaker 9>You know, take the Beyonce hat.

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 16>You know, I was in Europe, you know, early June,

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.280
<v Speaker 16>and you know I was hearing stories of consumers wanting

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 16>to wig and shop the hat and the product before

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.240
<v Speaker 16>they went to the Beyonce concert.

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 9>They come to our store.

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 16>You know, we have store managers who help customized the product. Emily,

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 16>you know, who runs our store in Regent Street, is

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 16>a great example. And so from my perspective building and

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 16>coming up with these memorable moments for our consumers is

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 16>what connects us with our fans and makes a big difference.

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 2>We should note Harmee saying who we're speaking to now.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 2>He's chief financial and growth officer at Levi Strauss. If

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 2>you're listening on radio, he's dressed head to toe in Levi,

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 2>but he's not actually wearing the Beyonce hat right now.

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 2>So next time he joins us, he can shoot for

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 2>that name.

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 17>Sure he'd look great in the Yeah.

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 10>Harmitd You talked about the importance of your supply chain.

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 10>I'm curious to see what you're hearing from suppliers. We've

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 10>seen about a ten percent decrease in the dollar against

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 10>major currencies around the world since the beginning of the year.

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 10>Are you seeing any demands from suppliers to be paid

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 10>in local currencies to not carry some of that the

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 10>currency volatility that has come with dollar.

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 16>No, you know, we have tenured relationships. We source from

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 16>about twenty eight countries. You know, our relationships are deep,

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 16>have been there for a long long time. Currencies go

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 16>up and down. There are times when the dollar is weaker,

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 16>the times when the dollar is stronger, and you know,

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 16>and I think our supplies, our vendors, and our partners

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 16>are used to that. So we're not seeing any pressure

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 16>to change it into local currency because people have lived through,

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 16>you know, pieces. The more important thing is what goes

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 16>into the production and manufacture. Cotton is a big piece commodity,

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.359
<v Speaker 16>and cotton has a commodity has actually traded down and

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 16>that also helps offset some of the currency pressures. And

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 16>because volumes have been a big piece of us driving

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 16>our growth, you know, and we're thinking long and you

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 16>know as and we believe we can sustain in the

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 16>growth ad mid single digit over a period of time.

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 16>I think that's what helps us ensure there. It's a

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 16>win win both for our manufacturer and vendors as well

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 16>as the brand. And so I think that's how we're

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 16>dealing with it.

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 18>Nina.

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 17>So, while Levi is focusing on direct to consumer, the

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 17>wholesale channel is also growing. Right, what kind of retail

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 17>is specifically doing well for the company? Department stores are

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 17>more so e commerce.

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So it's the magic of the end.

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 16>It's great to see our stores perform well, our comments

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 16>perform well, and wholesale and you know, I mentioned jokingly

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 16>within the company. It's a great trifecta on DDC. We're

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 16>growing comp sales. We just reported our thirteen consecutive cot

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 16>of comp sales growth. We're opening doors, so we're you know,

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 16>increasing our market reach. We have thirty thirty two hundred

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 16>doors right now, we're adding fifty sixty a year, and

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 16>we're growing commerce in the mid single digit. Beside all this,

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.720
<v Speaker 16>wholesale is also growing. And where DDC first really helps

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 16>Norah to your question. You know, our wholesale customers see

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 16>the new product which is introduced in our direct to

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 16>consumer stores, see it, see how the performance is doing,

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 16>and in a lot of cases is working, and that

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 16>gives them the confidence to buy into the product. So

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:30.239
<v Speaker 16>wholesale customers are growing largely because DDC is growing. They're

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 16>seeing the product introduction, they see things working, and that

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 16>makes a big difference. And also with our wholesale retailers,

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 16>our relationships have been here for a long long time.

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Given the tariff uncertainty, are you having serious discussions about

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 2>moving any production or more production or any production excuse

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 2>me to the United States.

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 16>No, Tim, You know, ninety eight percent of all apparel

0:39:57.680 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 16>soul in the US is actually imported, so you know,

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 16>that's not a conversation that's happening. We believe long term

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 16>the tariff uncertainty will clarify and settle well where the

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 16>consumer in the US, you know, doesn't bay the cost

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 16>of the incremental tariffs, and companies like ours, different apparel companies,

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 16>continue to grow their businesses in the US.

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:26.959
<v Speaker 2>HARMI always good to see you. Thanks so much for

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 2>taking the time and joining us on Bloomberg BusinessWeek Daily

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 2>this afternoon. That's hermeat saying, chief financial and Growth officer

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 2>at Levi, Strauss and Company. Also Bloomberg News Senior editor

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Nina Trentman. She's the author of the Bloomberg CFO Briefing newsletter.

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 2>You can sign up for it if you haven't already

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 2>at Bloomberg dot com slash CFO Briefing.

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Listen live

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Applecarplay and

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Android with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.320
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Plenty ahead in our second hour of the weekend edition

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg BusinessWeek, including the shark tank like companies that

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 2>are now feeling the bite of Trump's tariffs and how

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 2>stressed out overworked customs brokers are now left calculating the

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:28.440
<v Speaker 2>bill for those with tariffs. Plus how Binance aided President

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 2>Trump's crypto firm, then its founder sought a pardon that's

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.919
<v Speaker 2>coming up later this hour. First, though, a pulse check

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 2>of the state of US manufacturing in the age of

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 2>tariffs with one of the largest industrial supply companies in

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the US. Fastenal is a roughly fifty two billion dollar

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 2>market cap wholesale distributor of construction and industrial supplies think nuts, bolts, screws, anchors, rivets,

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 2>and other fasteners, as well as other industrial, janitorial and

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:59.959
<v Speaker 2>safety supplies and cutting tools. The company sells to builders, manufactures, governed,

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and more so, it's got a great read on the

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 2>industrial and manufacturing economy in the US. For a look

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 2>at how the company is navigating tariff disruptions, Bloomberg Equities

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 2>reporter Nora Melinda and I caught up with fasten Now

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 2>CEO Daniel Flornes.

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.879
<v Speaker 6>You know, we sell to a wide range of customers

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 6>and industries as you As you mentioned across North America

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 6>and in twenty six countries in total, but mostly of

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 6>North America. Our customer base has been relatively subdued for

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:32.399
<v Speaker 6>the last several years. In the fall of twenty twenty two,

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 6>we saw some indicators saying it was going to slide,

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 6>and we felt that as we moved into the second

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 6>and third quarters of twenty twenty three, and it's been

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 6>really weak since then. About thirty percent of our business

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 6>is very production centered business within manufacturing.

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 2>So are there any signs that that part of the

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 2>business is improving, that those customers are seeing sentiment improve,

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Are you hearing anything from them?

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 6>I think the biggest sign that we're seeing is the

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:06.719
<v Speaker 6>knife has stopped dropping. You know, we were trying to

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 6>catch that falling knife for a two year period. When

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 6>I talk to our district and regional leadership throughout the

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:17.319
<v Speaker 6>throughout the world, the feedback I hear is, you know,

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 6>they're not talking about this two hundred thousand dollars month

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 6>customer whose business is off sixty seventy percent. You have

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 6>a much more stability now. Might be stable at a

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 6>lower level than it would have been two years ago,

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 6>but it's much more stable, and so it allows our

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 6>inherent growth to shine through.

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:36.879
<v Speaker 17>So we've really been in this prolonged downturn, especially in

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:40.880
<v Speaker 17>the industrial economy. Are you seeing any particular green shoots

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 17>or signs of inflection, and if so, which markets are

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:46.280
<v Speaker 17>you most optimistic about.

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so we're seeing some green shoots for us, we're

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 6>seeing some We are seeing some impact and energy. However,

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:00.080
<v Speaker 6>I would say that's probably more us taking market share

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:05.240
<v Speaker 6>than it is a lift in the tide. About twenty

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 6>five percent of our business is outside of the industrial

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 6>and within there we're selling. We're doing quite well. I

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 6>hear a lot of commentary from our folks with data

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:21.919
<v Speaker 6>centered builds with you even warehousing customers. And we've made

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 6>really good inroads over the last three years into the

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 6>government sector. And that primarily was an offshoot of COVID.

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 6>During COVID, when supply chains blew apart, we stepped in

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 6>to serve a lot of that market when they were

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 6>not being served, and those folks have remembered that and

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 6>we've grown our business there.

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 17>So we need to, of course talk about terrariffs. How

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:49.160
<v Speaker 17>have tariffs really changed your thinking about product sourcing, particularly

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:51.720
<v Speaker 17>for fasteners, which we know, of course are primarily sourced

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 17>in China Asia. What other options are you evaluating to

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 17>mitigate the tariff impact here?

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 6>You know? So back in two thous eighteen, we did

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 6>some short term moves of our supply chain, but it

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 6>was fairly limited because you just can't change There's so

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 6>much QC involved with vetting out cut suppliers that you

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 6>couldn't move it fast enough. What we had done quietly

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 6>over the last five six years is continue in that

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 6>progress because the tariffs that were put in place in

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 6>twenty eighteen were sticking and we expected more of it

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 6>to happen, and we wanted to better diversify the supply

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 6>chain for our customer. We did look at a lot

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 6>of options. There aren't a lot of options within North America.

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 6>We looked at some options of doing some manufacturing ourselves.

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 6>The problem is the economics still didn't work. So it

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 6>was really for us more about diversifying supplier base in general.

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Are the economics of that going to work now in

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 2>this new tariff regime? I think during the first Trump administration,

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 2>the goal was to move things out of China, But

0:45:57.600 --> 0:45:59.919
<v Speaker 2>as many companies are learning right now, it doesn't matter.

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 2>It's China, Vietnam, or India. If it's not in the

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 2>United States, there is going to be a terrify on it.

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 2>At least that's what it seems like is going to

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 2>be the case.

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, economics still do not work, and uh and and and.

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 6>Part of the challenge there isn't just the economics, it's

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 6>the amount of time. When we were researching it very

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 6>in depth two and a half years ago, one of

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 6>the one of the challenges is it's easy to find

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 6>a site. It's relatively easy to get a building up

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 6>and get a supply chain set up. When I say

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 6>relatively easy, I mean timeframe of what it takes to

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 6>do it. The most challenging aspect was the production equipment

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 6>of how many how many months it would take to

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 6>get that And so that aspect really pushed us to

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 6>look more at geographic dispersion of supply chain sourcing because

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:56.280
<v Speaker 6>because the economics are are still very challenging.

0:46:56.520 --> 0:47:00.239
<v Speaker 2>So how much of what you sell right now is

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:01.800
<v Speaker 2>actually made in the US?

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 6>If I look across what we're sourcing, what our supply

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 6>our branded suppliers are sourcing, We've always estimated less than

0:47:12.600 --> 0:47:14.919
<v Speaker 6>fifty percent is coming from the US.

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:18.359
<v Speaker 2>And is that going to stay stable in this new

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 2>tariff regime.

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 6>I suspect it will.

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:24.399
<v Speaker 17>Okay, So I know fast and All raised prices back

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 17>in April, especially as a result of tariffs. Historically, I

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 17>mean the company has been able to pass on pricing costs.

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 17>What should even in the feedback here from customers, has

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 17>there been much pushback in terms of the ability and

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 17>appetite for customers, frankly to take on additional pricing, especially

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 17>as we head into the second half of the year.

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:45.839
<v Speaker 6>First off, we sell into a very competitive market. There

0:47:45.920 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 6>is always pushback. The real challenge in the equation is

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 6>his communication. And one thing that helps in our supply chain,

0:47:56.600 --> 0:48:01.240
<v Speaker 6>we're directly sourcing from the manufacturer that's producing the product,

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 6>more so than most of our competitors in the marketplace,

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 6>just because of our scale, and so we have the

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 6>ability to see into the future farther than a lot

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 6>of our competitors, and it puts us in a position

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 6>to communicate very well. It puts us in a position

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 6>to take steps as the inventory is turning. Unfortunately, the

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.479
<v Speaker 6>one unfortunate part of that it also can create a

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 6>fatigue for your customer, and I would say our customer

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 6>is at the fatigue point right now of where it's

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 6>become challenging, but it always is, and it's all about

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:38.720
<v Speaker 6>communication and trust.

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk a little bit about the One

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Big Beautiful Bill Act that became law on the fourth

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 2>of July this year. In the press release for your earnings,

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 2>you didn't mention it, but big picture, what does it

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:50.920
<v Speaker 2>mean for your customers and for your business?

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 6>You know, big picture what it means for our customers

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:56.760
<v Speaker 6>is if you look at some of the depreciation rules

0:48:56.960 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 6>and the timing, it's it makes it very advantageous to

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 6>make capital investment. And so that's the biggest piece that

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 6>we see impacting our customers because our customers have, especially

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 6>on the manufacturing side, an incredible amount of infrastructure that

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 6>they're investing in, and so anything that allows them to

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:24.399
<v Speaker 6>depreciate faster and to improve their return profile is advantageous

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 6>for our marketplace. And that's a key element that we

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 6>talked about in the release.

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I know that you talked a little bit about to

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:32.960
<v Speaker 2>us manufacturing your own products in the US and your

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 2>suppliers doing it, but I'm wondering about your customers and

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the way that these so called America First policies might

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 2>help them reshore manufacturing back to the US. Are you

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 2>seeing any evidence or hearing discussion of your customers beginning

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 2>to move manufacturing back to the US.

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 6>You know, I would say it's fairly limited, but again,

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 6>that's not something that happens in six months that you

0:49:57.040 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 6>set up. We've had some customers set up assembly operations,

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 6>which you can do in a much shorter timeframe as

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:09.399
<v Speaker 6>opposed to pure production where you're manufacturing components yourself, or

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:13.480
<v Speaker 6>you're changing your supply chain to more domestic type supply.

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:18.799
<v Speaker 6>But what we've seen is a lot more willingness of

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 6>making investment even beyond the manufacturing capacity in the short.

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 17>Term, Fastinas refocused on growing with larger customers. What are

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 17>the key drivers there in What additional investments do you

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 17>need to make to enable growth with those customers.

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so a position we've put ourselves in for a

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:41.840
<v Speaker 6>number of years is we have very aggressively made investments

0:50:41.840 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 6>and this was starting back fifteen plus years ago of

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:50.240
<v Speaker 6>slowly building an infrastructure to move the supply chain closer

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 6>and closer to the point of use. And what that

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 6>involved for US is investing in a tremendous amount of

0:50:55.640 --> 0:50:59.439
<v Speaker 6>vending infrastructure, and in more recent years a lot more

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 6>OREFID type infrastructure to measure product movement within a facility,

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:08.440
<v Speaker 6>so that you don't have to to with human capital

0:51:09.640 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 6>physically observe product being diminished. You can monitor it electronically

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 6>and remotely. And and so we've made extremely large investments

0:51:21.520 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 6>over the last ten plus years in vending technology, and

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 6>I'm pleased to say that vending technology is all manufactured

0:51:30.120 --> 0:51:30.959
<v Speaker 6>in the United States.

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was surprised when I went to your website earlier.

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 2>So I was preparing for this to see those of

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 2>those vending machines. It's not something that I've run into

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and certainly in my life, but it's pretty cool to

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:40.840
<v Speaker 2>see that.

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:42.760
<v Speaker 6>Not just so it's a snack machine.

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what That's what I was thinking. It's like,

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a snack machine, but you can't eat what's in there.

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 6>So exactly.

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Hey, we've got about a minute left, and I

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:53.440
<v Speaker 2>just want to talk numbers real quick. Gross profit up

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 2>forty five points forty five point three percent, up from

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 2>forty five point one percent over the second quarter.

0:51:59.040 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 18>Of last year.

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 2>You said it was partially offset by higher import duty

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 2>costs and higher fleet and transport costs. Are those costs

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:07.440
<v Speaker 2>in your view, going to stabilize.

0:52:09.320 --> 0:52:13.800
<v Speaker 6>They're going to continue to rise because because about the

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:16.320
<v Speaker 6>way our supply chain works, we carry a fair amount

0:52:16.320 --> 0:52:19.319
<v Speaker 6>of inventory because we have such dispersion in our locations,

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 6>so we carry quite a few months of inventory. So

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 6>that's going to keep ratcheting up as we're on a

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 6>fightful basis inventory So is that inventory continues to turn,

0:52:28.239 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 6>that will continue to ratchet up a little bit as

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:32.799
<v Speaker 6>we move into the third and fourth quarters and into

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty six. What really helped us during the quarter

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 6>and what drove the improvement our gross margin? Set aside

0:52:42.440 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 6>teriffs for a second, right, we've put in place a

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 6>faster expansion starting last summer to widen our inventory, and

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 6>that's really what drove our margin this quarter.

0:52:53.280 --> 0:52:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Dan Florida, CEO of Fast and All, I really appreciate

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 2>you joining us. Shares up today new all time highs

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 2>three point eight percent.

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live weekday afternoons from two to five Easter

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:11.279
<v Speaker 1>and listen on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:53:11.320 --> 0:53:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube for years.

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:18.840
<v Speaker 2>It was a winning business model. A startup in the

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:21.360
<v Speaker 2>US would have a clever idea for the kind of

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:25.280
<v Speaker 2>everyday product that everybody else wished they thought of. First,

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 2>the design and innovation were American, but the manufacturing was

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:32.839
<v Speaker 2>outsourced to a country with much cheaper production costs, such

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 2>as China, Mexico, or Vietnam. That model was a feature

0:53:36.520 --> 0:53:38.600
<v Speaker 2>of many of the businesses that appear on the hit

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:42.600
<v Speaker 2>TV series Shark Tank, in which entrepreneurs pitch their idea

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to a panel of potential investors. But now, as President

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump plows ahead with promises to upend trade and

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:53.160
<v Speaker 2>force more manufacturing back to the US, the design in America,

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:56.880
<v Speaker 2>made in China model is in doubt. Christina Lindblad is

0:53:56.880 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg BusinessWeek Global Economic Editor. She joined Normal Linda and

0:54:01.160 --> 0:54:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Me to discuss how Shark Tank like companies are feeling

0:54:04.239 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the bite of Trump's tariffs.

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 19>Well, I was actually thinking about how I had watched

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:13.040
<v Speaker 19>a clip of Shark Tank in which these founders told

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:15.560
<v Speaker 19>the judges that they had set up a production line

0:54:15.600 --> 0:54:18.840
<v Speaker 19>in the United States, and one of them said, that's crazy,

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 19>you know, And then it is it is crazy, and

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:25.880
<v Speaker 19>then I thought, how are these companies, so many of

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 19>them which followed, you know, this sort of apple model,

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:33.439
<v Speaker 19>you know, designed in California, made in TK somewhere else,

0:54:34.239 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 19>the cheaper China, you know, and how are they faring

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:43.439
<v Speaker 19>through all of this because you know, they don't have

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 19>the like, you know, lobbying arm and the deep pockets

0:54:46.640 --> 0:54:49.800
<v Speaker 19>to to you know, have their margins be eaten away

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 19>like this. So we decided to go out and we

0:54:53.560 --> 0:54:57.400
<v Speaker 19>actually we we went through a whole we we cast

0:54:57.600 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 19>a whole bunch of companies, and we decided to focus

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 19>on four. And we did basically as toltoos, you know,

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 19>so we it's like directly from from their mouths, and

0:55:08.280 --> 0:55:11.200
<v Speaker 19>we asked them a bunch of questions about how, you know,

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:14.879
<v Speaker 19>what kind of tarifs they were paying right now, and

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 19>what they were looking to do about this, and several

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:21.600
<v Speaker 19>of them said that well, actually some of them said

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:24.320
<v Speaker 19>they had started out making their products in the US

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:27.800
<v Speaker 19>but pretty shortly realized that that wasn't going to work out.

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:31.280
<v Speaker 19>That one of them said the product was so expensive

0:55:31.320 --> 0:55:34.319
<v Speaker 19>nobody bought it, uh, and that they were contacted by

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 19>a Chinese company that was also that was already making

0:55:37.680 --> 0:55:38.880
<v Speaker 19>something like what they made.

0:55:39.840 --> 0:55:40.840
<v Speaker 9>And then the other thing we.

0:55:41.160 --> 0:55:44.359
<v Speaker 19>Heard frequently is that by going to China or going

0:55:44.400 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 19>to some other countries, you get like a full operation,

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 19>like you know, you don't have to be What people

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:53.600
<v Speaker 19>were saying is if you're a small company in the US,

0:55:53.600 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 19>it's like you're having to watch out over all these

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:58.320
<v Speaker 19>parts that there's different parts of production, like you're importing

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 19>this and that, and you know, making shirt's all going

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:03.279
<v Speaker 19>to the plant that in China, like somebody is saying,

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 19>we'll take care of all of that for you. And

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 19>and then also we talked to a person she makes

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:12.440
<v Speaker 19>this this little contraption called a click and carry that

0:56:12.640 --> 0:56:15.760
<v Speaker 19>like you like snap two bags over your shoulders, brilliant.

0:56:15.880 --> 0:56:17.600
<v Speaker 19>I bought one. I'm immediately after.

0:56:18.040 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 6>Do you like it?

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Do you like it?

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 19>On Shark Time the story after before we wrote the story,

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:28.200
<v Speaker 19>because I read the transcript, I thought, oh, yeah, this

0:56:28.320 --> 0:56:30.520
<v Speaker 19>is like your bags. Are we sliding up your shots

0:56:30.840 --> 0:56:33.960
<v Speaker 19>when you go to the green market anyway, And she

0:56:34.120 --> 0:56:37.160
<v Speaker 19>said it would take a minimum of eight months to

0:56:37.239 --> 0:56:39.480
<v Speaker 19>bring this back to the US, and it would involve

0:56:39.560 --> 0:56:43.359
<v Speaker 19>something like getting a mold maker in China because there

0:56:43.360 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 19>are barely any left here in the US to design

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 19>the mold and bring it back and forth, you know,

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:51.479
<v Speaker 19>between I'm sorry, the designers will be here, the mold

0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 19>maker in China, back and forth, sent it back and

0:56:54.040 --> 0:56:57.880
<v Speaker 19>forth for adjustments, right, and finally, once you had the mold,

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:00.960
<v Speaker 19>you still have to import the resins, the plastic resin

0:57:01.000 --> 0:57:03.920
<v Speaker 19>from China, and you'd probably she said, I'd have to

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 19>find a factory that had a high degree of automation,

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 19>you know, So that kind of beats the whole idea

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:15.480
<v Speaker 19>of like job creation, you know, for the tariffs. So yeah,

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 19>it's it just seems like some of these that small

0:57:19.880 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 19>businesses really have a hard time and right now trying

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:24.240
<v Speaker 19>to figure out what's next.

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:27.200
<v Speaker 2>So net net, would it be possible for any of

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:30.400
<v Speaker 2>these companies that you came across in the casting call

0:57:30.840 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 2>to actually do this in the US right now?

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 19>They said that at this at the level of tariffs

0:57:36.240 --> 0:57:38.760
<v Speaker 19>they were facing, and let's be cleared two weeks ago

0:57:38.760 --> 0:57:40.680
<v Speaker 19>when we were talking to them, No, it's not worth

0:57:40.680 --> 0:57:43.120
<v Speaker 19>it for them. I mean, we could be talking to

0:57:43.200 --> 0:57:45.480
<v Speaker 19>them if we were to go back to them, who knows.

0:57:45.480 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 19>After August first.

0:57:46.480 --> 0:57:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the blow some of the podcasting that

0:57:50.960 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we've been.

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Talking about quite a bit over the last few months

0:57:53.000 --> 0:57:56.800
<v Speaker 2>is Okay, who eats the picture that we've gotten from

0:57:56.800 --> 0:57:59.880
<v Speaker 2>talking to different it's sort of like everybody in this

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 2>spply chain, So our earnings will take a hit, will

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:07.160
<v Speaker 2>absorb some of them. Maybe we'll weise prices, consumers might

0:58:07.240 --> 0:58:10.640
<v Speaker 2>pay a little more. That's for big companies. What about

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:14.280
<v Speaker 2>for these tiny companies that are watching every cent well.

0:58:14.480 --> 0:58:17.479
<v Speaker 19>I mean there's one woman who the founder of click

0:58:17.520 --> 0:58:20.400
<v Speaker 19>and carry. She was saying that, you know, she actually

0:58:20.560 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 19>had taken it a loan and sold out a bunch

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:25.600
<v Speaker 19>of stocks in the fall because she was she had

0:58:25.600 --> 0:58:28.320
<v Speaker 19>been selling online and she was actually starting to sell

0:58:28.360 --> 0:58:31.520
<v Speaker 19>through retailers. And she's saying, well, I approached all these

0:58:31.560 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 19>companies with a certain price. This is what I told them, Like,

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 19>I can provide this to you for this price. But now,

0:58:38.560 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 19>like you know, with tariffs, I'm going to have to

0:58:41.920 --> 0:58:45.000
<v Speaker 19>go back to them, you know, and quote them another price.

0:58:45.120 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 19>And she's scared, you know, that some of them will

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:50.200
<v Speaker 19>drop her product because they've only started carrying it a

0:58:50.200 --> 0:58:52.240
<v Speaker 19>few months ago, and some of them she hasn't even

0:58:52.240 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 19>gotten it. I mean, she has enough I think to

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:58.720
<v Speaker 19>supply everyone, you know, all the contracts that she has

0:58:58.760 --> 0:59:01.360
<v Speaker 19>through like you know, early summer. But yeah, a lot

0:59:01.360 --> 0:59:04.760
<v Speaker 19>of companies were talking about how the uncertainty towards the

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:08.080
<v Speaker 19>back end of the year when like you know, they're

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 19>having to restock.

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:13.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like we spoke to Levis CFO and they said

0:59:13.920 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 2>this in earnings to that about what roughly half of

0:59:17.000 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 2>their inventory for the remainder of the year is already

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:22.360
<v Speaker 2>in the US. So that's kind of free and clear

0:59:22.360 --> 0:59:22.920
<v Speaker 2>at this point.

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:26.640
<v Speaker 17>Oh, most definitely. But I know you mentioned earlier you

0:59:26.680 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 17>were talking about a company that you said they were

0:59:29.320 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 17>wanting to pass on some of the tariff impact towards

0:59:32.960 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 17>the customer, but customers are just unwilling to pay.

0:59:36.000 --> 0:59:36.240
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:59:36.240 --> 0:59:38.160
<v Speaker 19>I mean, I think if you're a young business and

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:40.520
<v Speaker 19>you have your foot in the door with some of

0:59:40.560 --> 0:59:43.680
<v Speaker 19>these retailers, you know, and you don't have a long relationship,

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:45.600
<v Speaker 19>you're going to be really scared to do that. So

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 19>mostly we heard the story sounded like it was going

0:59:48.640 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 19>to be the importers eating the tariffs. I mean, I

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:56.280
<v Speaker 19>think there's a misconception, largely because of the way the

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:59.440
<v Speaker 19>White House talks about this, that it's the exporters eating

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 19>the tariffs. And you know, we did hear stories at

1:00:02.320 --> 1:00:07.280
<v Speaker 19>the beginning of Walmart pressuring Chinese suppliers to lower their

1:00:07.320 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 19>prices in order to compensate for the tariffs. But even

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 19>there we heard that many of them were saying, no,

1:00:12.760 --> 1:00:15.600
<v Speaker 19>I mean, a small company just does not have that

1:00:15.760 --> 1:00:19.520
<v Speaker 19>kind of leverage. Really, So what are people.

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:22.040
<v Speaker 17>I mean, you cover the economy more broadly, so just

1:00:22.120 --> 1:00:24.280
<v Speaker 17>outside of this story, if we were to just bring

1:00:24.320 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 17>in a broader context, what are people saying about the

1:00:26.640 --> 1:00:28.920
<v Speaker 17>impact of tariffs on the US economy?

1:00:29.800 --> 1:00:30.480
<v Speaker 13>You know, we.

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:33.760
<v Speaker 19>Haven't seen it in inflation yet, although I think we

1:00:33.840 --> 1:00:38.439
<v Speaker 19>have a print this week which, yeah, which may throw

1:00:38.520 --> 1:00:41.640
<v Speaker 19>some light on all of this. I think it could

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:44.960
<v Speaker 19>be a lot of people say because of this dynamic

1:00:45.040 --> 1:00:47.840
<v Speaker 19>in which many people knew tariffs of some level were

1:00:47.880 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 19>coming right after Trump was elected, right and so, and

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:54.840
<v Speaker 19>there was this big bump you know, the surgeon imports,

1:00:55.840 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 19>we haven't you know, we haven't seen costs go up

1:00:58.200 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 19>because of that because people are selling on the inventory

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:04.480
<v Speaker 19>they already have. I do think there's still a lot

1:01:04.480 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 19>of question marks. And also there's been I mean, this

1:01:06.680 --> 1:01:08.640
<v Speaker 19>kind of whack a mole effect where it's just sort

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:10.800
<v Speaker 19>of like, Okay, it's going to be one hundred and

1:01:10.840 --> 1:01:12.880
<v Speaker 19>forty five, but now we're going to suspend it. Now

1:01:12.920 --> 1:01:16.440
<v Speaker 19>we're going to throw it to August. I'm personally really

1:01:16.520 --> 1:01:19.160
<v Speaker 19>interested in looking at investment figures at some point. I

1:01:19.200 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 19>suspect that this year may be one of the lowest,

1:01:23.280 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 19>may show a big fall off and of corporate investment

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 19>around the world.

1:01:28.080 --> 1:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Which is not exactly the opposite of what Trump, the

1:01:31.240 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 2>president likes to see.

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:36.280
<v Speaker 19>Yes, but I think the uncertainty is just leaving companies

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:37.720
<v Speaker 19>kind of probably saying I'm going.

1:01:37.640 --> 1:01:38.240
<v Speaker 9>To sit it out.

1:01:38.440 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>So that's what I wanted to talk about. You mentioned

1:01:40.080 --> 1:01:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the whack a mole? Is it going to be one

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty five percent? Is it going to be

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>what was on Liberation Day? Do you have to wait

1:01:44.480 --> 1:01:46.560
<v Speaker 2>and see what the letter says. I'm true social to

1:01:46.640 --> 1:01:49.480
<v Speaker 2>understand what the effect of tariffs is going to be

1:01:49.520 --> 1:01:53.560
<v Speaker 2>on the country that you manufacture in. Does it mean

1:01:53.560 --> 1:01:55.760
<v Speaker 2>that there's sort of a stasis here with these small

1:01:55.760 --> 1:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>companies that you talk to, or are they plowing ahead

1:01:58.200 --> 1:02:00.360
<v Speaker 2>and moving forward them.

1:02:00.320 --> 1:02:04.960
<v Speaker 19>Is fortunate and has suppliers in many different countries, and

1:02:05.000 --> 1:02:07.600
<v Speaker 19>they sound like you know, and and they were lucky.

1:02:07.640 --> 1:02:10.480
<v Speaker 19>I think it was you know, Turkey was their main supplier,

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:12.600
<v Speaker 19>and that well, that wasn't one of the countries that

1:02:12.680 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 19>had you know.

1:02:14.360 --> 1:02:15.360
<v Speaker 18>The thing is we're going.

1:02:15.200 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 19>By what liberation date, you know, like the Church, you know,

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:23.720
<v Speaker 19>and Turkey wasn't you know, very severely affected, you know. So,

1:02:24.240 --> 1:02:26.480
<v Speaker 19>but you never know, you never know, I mean, because

1:02:26.520 --> 1:02:31.240
<v Speaker 19>now we're seeing duties used for purposes other than just

1:02:31.440 --> 1:02:34.880
<v Speaker 19>delivering trade deals, you know, in the case of Brazil. Yeah,

1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:38.880
<v Speaker 19>and both so and you know Trump's friendship with Bolsonarow,

1:02:39.360 --> 1:02:41.760
<v Speaker 19>like you know, so that's been an issue where you know,

1:02:41.800 --> 1:02:43.520
<v Speaker 19>we're seeing Yeah.

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Just to clarify that, he basically said that this was

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:49.400
<v Speaker 2>not about the trade deficit, because we have a trade

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:53.520
<v Speaker 2>surplus with Brazil. Instead, this is a punishment for the

1:02:53.560 --> 1:02:58.080
<v Speaker 2>way that U Bolsonnarow is being treated and prosecuted by

1:02:58.120 --> 1:02:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the current president.

1:02:59.120 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 17>So the story, he talks about the fact that some

1:03:01.720 --> 1:03:03.720
<v Speaker 17>founders are saying that they'd like to get some sort

1:03:03.760 --> 1:03:06.560
<v Speaker 17>of notice, even a ninety day notice. Talk to me

1:03:06.600 --> 1:03:07.640
<v Speaker 17>about that. What are they thinking?

1:03:07.720 --> 1:03:12.040
<v Speaker 19>It's interesting I had that before. Yeah, people were talking

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:16.160
<v Speaker 19>about getting an advanced notice, about when when tariffs. One

1:03:16.160 --> 1:03:19.000
<v Speaker 19>person said, just like an advanced notice and when tariffs

1:03:19.000 --> 1:03:21.080
<v Speaker 19>are going to go up. Another one said, can get

1:03:21.200 --> 1:03:23.920
<v Speaker 19>enough an advanced notice? If like there's a group a

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:26.840
<v Speaker 19>of countries, you know, those tarrafs will go up and

1:03:26.880 --> 1:03:31.000
<v Speaker 19>these will go down. You can't really wage a trade

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:34.800
<v Speaker 19>war like that, though, I don't think, you know, yeah,

1:03:34.880 --> 1:03:37.880
<v Speaker 19>so well we're certainly it's maybe you can, but certainly

1:03:37.960 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 19>not how it's being how it's being waged now. Yeah, yeah,

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:47.240
<v Speaker 19>I just think it's it's just like a difficult time

1:03:47.360 --> 1:03:51.720
<v Speaker 19>for people to make decisions, and what came through is

1:03:51.760 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 19>they wish they had more wherewithal, you know, to like adjust,

1:03:56.280 --> 1:03:59.720
<v Speaker 19>and also you know, you're talking about small businesses sometimes

1:03:59.720 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 19>with like I mean some of the people talked to

1:04:01.720 --> 1:04:04.760
<v Speaker 19>had less than three people full time staff.

1:04:04.960 --> 1:04:05.200
<v Speaker 18>You know.

1:04:05.600 --> 1:04:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're shipping one container of something at a time,

1:04:08.120 --> 1:04:11.920
<v Speaker 2>right exactly, which is a tiny portion of what you

1:04:11.920 --> 1:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>see on a cargo ship.

1:04:12.960 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, I mean we had one person who we didn't

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:19.240
<v Speaker 19>end up you know, choosing for the package, who had

1:04:19.240 --> 1:04:21.120
<v Speaker 19>to go back to her old job, you know.

1:04:22.440 --> 1:04:25.160
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, well it's a great piece, Christina. I encourage

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:28.360
<v Speaker 2>everybody to check it out. It is in Bloomberg Business Week.

1:04:28.400 --> 1:04:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Christina Lynn Blad is the editor of it. She's Global

1:04:31.120 --> 1:04:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Economics editor for Bloomberg Business Week. She's also the brains

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:39.000
<v Speaker 2>behind the idea for IT. So everything. Shark Tank addressed

1:04:39.000 --> 1:04:41.560
<v Speaker 2>those questions to Christina Lynn Blade. I got to tune in,

1:04:41.840 --> 1:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>you got to tune in, or you just got to

1:04:44.200 --> 1:04:47.480
<v Speaker 2>read everything in Bloomberg Business Week and get the updates.

1:04:48.200 --> 1:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

1:04:52.160 --> 1:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eastering. Listen

1:04:55.360 --> 1:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

1:04:59.120 --> 1:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>or watch us a live I've on YouTube.

1:05:02.320 --> 1:05:06.840
<v Speaker 2>From navigating tariff uncertainty to navigating tariff costs at the ports,

1:05:07.040 --> 1:05:10.080
<v Speaker 2>being a customs broker used to be a pretty straightforward,

1:05:10.120 --> 1:05:13.200
<v Speaker 2>low drama gig, at least according to Jonathan Lieberman, president

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:17.720
<v Speaker 2>of New York Customs Brokers. It specializes in seafood. Maybe

1:05:17.720 --> 1:05:20.560
<v Speaker 2>there there was the occasional emergency, such as the shipping

1:05:20.560 --> 1:05:23.080
<v Speaker 2>container of crocodile meat that he had to send back

1:05:23.120 --> 1:05:26.600
<v Speaker 2>to Australia because of insufficient paperwork, but most nights he

1:05:26.600 --> 1:05:28.720
<v Speaker 2>could make it home in time for dinner with his wife.

1:05:28.760 --> 1:05:33.000
<v Speaker 2>And two young children after so called liberation. Today everything changed,

1:05:33.040 --> 1:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>so writes Stacy Vanicksmith for Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Stacy's the co

1:05:36.960 --> 1:05:41.120
<v Speaker 2>host of Bloomberg podcast Everybody's Business. Check it out new

1:05:41.160 --> 1:05:45.640
<v Speaker 2>episodes every Friday. Stacy joins us from New York. Stacy,

1:05:45.800 --> 1:05:48.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to start with just what exactly a customs

1:05:48.840 --> 1:05:49.600
<v Speaker 2>broker does.

1:05:50.120 --> 1:05:52.280
<v Speaker 20>That is a great question. Before I started the story,

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:55.080
<v Speaker 20>I didn't know myself. A customs broker is kind of

1:05:55.080 --> 1:06:00.120
<v Speaker 20>a facilitator. They kind of guide help to guide products

1:06:00.120 --> 1:06:03.040
<v Speaker 20>into the country from overseas. They take care of the paperwork,

1:06:03.080 --> 1:06:06.040
<v Speaker 20>They know about regulations. In the case of New York

1:06:06.040 --> 1:06:08.520
<v Speaker 20>customs brokers, like you were saying, they specialize in seafood,

1:06:08.600 --> 1:06:14.120
<v Speaker 20>there are all kinds of sustainability laws, noah, FDA regulations

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:16.040
<v Speaker 20>to navigate, as well as tariffs. So they kind of

1:06:16.200 --> 1:06:17.440
<v Speaker 20>helped facilitate all of that.

1:06:18.360 --> 1:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>So everything was kind of fine and normal until April. Second.

1:06:22.880 --> 1:06:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Then what happened? What did he start to hear from customers?

1:06:26.080 --> 1:06:29.400
<v Speaker 20>Well, it was so interesting, So I guess normally, you know,

1:06:29.440 --> 1:06:32.320
<v Speaker 20>we've had almost no tariffs, a lot of free trade

1:06:32.320 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 20>mostly for decades and decades, and so it was a

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:38.240
<v Speaker 20>pretty straightforward job. But all of a sudden, with Liberation Day,

1:06:38.360 --> 1:06:41.160
<v Speaker 20>all these different tariffs for all these different countries, and

1:06:41.200 --> 1:06:44.320
<v Speaker 20>you know, seafood comes from all over the world, so

1:06:44.440 --> 1:06:47.400
<v Speaker 20>he's been dealing with with dozens and dozens of countries

1:06:47.960 --> 1:06:52.080
<v Speaker 20>and dozens of places all over the US importing these fish.

1:06:52.480 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 20>And you know, he said, all of a sudden, everyone

1:06:54.200 --> 1:06:57.240
<v Speaker 20>was calling wondering, you know, well, if I get the

1:06:57.280 --> 1:06:59.920
<v Speaker 20>fish from here, but they're fillaid here, what does that mean?

1:07:00.000 --> 1:07:02.560
<v Speaker 20>And I mean, people were just panicked because the margins

1:07:02.600 --> 1:07:05.920
<v Speaker 20>are not huge for seafood, and so you know a

1:07:05.960 --> 1:07:08.440
<v Speaker 20>lot of times like something like shrimp, but there was

1:07:08.440 --> 1:07:10.880
<v Speaker 20>a big box of shrimp in his office when I

1:07:10.920 --> 1:07:12.720
<v Speaker 20>came that day, a big box of frozen shrimp in

1:07:12.760 --> 1:07:16.080
<v Speaker 20>his office. Something like shrimp, a ten percent tariff can

1:07:16.120 --> 1:07:19.040
<v Speaker 20>completely wipe out the profit. So they were really panicked

1:07:19.040 --> 1:07:20.959
<v Speaker 20>and just wondering what the rules even were.

1:07:21.600 --> 1:07:25.880
<v Speaker 15>How has it changed his job itself? As Tim mentioned

1:07:25.960 --> 1:07:27.680
<v Speaker 15>at the top of the show, you know, he used

1:07:27.720 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 15>to be able to just make it home in time

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:33.280
<v Speaker 15>for dinner, but now he seems to be spending a

1:07:33.320 --> 1:07:37.240
<v Speaker 15>lot more time at work. Really, how has this specific

1:07:37.400 --> 1:07:40.640
<v Speaker 15>role just gotten so much more stressful and more difficult

1:07:40.720 --> 1:07:42.720
<v Speaker 15>post liberation day, well, for a.

1:07:42.760 --> 1:07:45.600
<v Speaker 20>Couple of different reasons. So initially, you know, it was

1:07:45.720 --> 1:07:47.640
<v Speaker 20>just a lot of paperwork, kind of keeping track of

1:07:47.680 --> 1:07:51.200
<v Speaker 20>shipping containers, occasionally going out to his offices right by

1:07:51.280 --> 1:07:54.240
<v Speaker 20>JFK Airport, occasionally going out to the airport and sort

1:07:54.280 --> 1:07:58.080
<v Speaker 20>of checking on a shipment. Now it's just much different

1:07:58.240 --> 1:08:01.320
<v Speaker 20>because he's got people calling him at all hours asking

1:08:01.360 --> 1:08:04.320
<v Speaker 20>about rules. Also, the Customs and Protection Bureau is just

1:08:04.480 --> 1:08:08.640
<v Speaker 20>issuing all of these new directives and rules all the time,

1:08:08.720 --> 1:08:11.200
<v Speaker 20>like multiple times a week now Apparently that almost never

1:08:11.280 --> 1:08:14.560
<v Speaker 20>used to happen, So he is trying to communicate the

1:08:14.680 --> 1:08:18.439
<v Speaker 20>rules changes to customers. And also there's just a lot

1:08:18.479 --> 1:08:23.000
<v Speaker 20>of confusion over when the tariffs actually hit how much

1:08:23.040 --> 1:08:25.760
<v Speaker 20>they are, So he's getting calls and these are very

1:08:25.800 --> 1:08:28.360
<v Speaker 20>high stakes deals for a shipping container full of like

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:31.800
<v Speaker 20>lobster tails, that can be almost a million dollars worth

1:08:31.840 --> 1:08:34.439
<v Speaker 20>of lobster tails in which case of ten percent tariffs,

1:08:34.479 --> 1:08:37.200
<v Speaker 20>you know, like one hundred thousand dollars. This is just

1:08:37.320 --> 1:08:40.040
<v Speaker 20>so much money for these companies. Oftentimes they don't know

1:08:40.040 --> 1:08:42.639
<v Speaker 20>how to find it. How much time they have things,

1:08:42.720 --> 1:08:45.360
<v Speaker 20>I mean, they used to actually pay the customs brokers.

1:08:45.360 --> 1:08:47.519
<v Speaker 20>They used to actually just cover the tariffs for their

1:08:47.560 --> 1:08:51.000
<v Speaker 20>customers because they were so tiny, And now you know

1:08:51.040 --> 1:08:53.040
<v Speaker 20>the tariffs can be upwards of one hundred thousand dollars,

1:08:53.120 --> 1:08:56.000
<v Speaker 20>So he's helping them to calculate that. He's answering all

1:08:56.040 --> 1:08:58.439
<v Speaker 20>of these calls. There's a lot of confusion over when

1:08:58.479 --> 1:09:00.920
<v Speaker 20>the rules will change, so he's answering that, and then

1:09:00.960 --> 1:09:03.200
<v Speaker 20>just the paperwork itself is a lot more complicated. He

1:09:03.240 --> 1:09:05.200
<v Speaker 20>has to make sure that he's getting this right. There's

1:09:05.240 --> 1:09:07.160
<v Speaker 20>not a lot of time to waste when you've got

1:09:07.160 --> 1:09:10.840
<v Speaker 20>seafood sitting there waiting to be shipped. So he's just

1:09:10.920 --> 1:09:13.240
<v Speaker 20>he's trying to keep his clients updated on the rules.

1:09:13.240 --> 1:09:16.280
<v Speaker 20>He's trying to answer a bunch of questions like late

1:09:16.360 --> 1:09:19.600
<v Speaker 20>late into the night, and also just keep the shipments

1:09:19.640 --> 1:09:20.839
<v Speaker 20>moving as much as possible.

1:09:21.080 --> 1:09:24.320
<v Speaker 2>We've heard from the President repeatedly that the countries themselves

1:09:24.360 --> 1:09:27.080
<v Speaker 2>are paying these tariffs based on your reporting, did you

1:09:27.080 --> 1:09:27.960
<v Speaker 2>find that to be true?

1:09:28.320 --> 1:09:31.120
<v Speaker 20>That is not true. So the importer of record pays

1:09:31.120 --> 1:09:34.840
<v Speaker 20>the tariff. Now in some cases, the company, the overseas

1:09:34.840 --> 1:09:38.320
<v Speaker 20>companies will also be the importers of record. Sometimes they

1:09:38.320 --> 1:09:41.360
<v Speaker 20>will do that, so sometimes that is actually true, but

1:09:41.880 --> 1:09:45.280
<v Speaker 20>it is always the importer of record who pays the tariffs.

1:09:45.320 --> 1:09:48.639
<v Speaker 20>So if you've got, you know, a seafood restaurant importing

1:09:48.680 --> 1:09:51.280
<v Speaker 20>a lot of seafood, they are paying, they are paying

1:09:51.280 --> 1:09:51.839
<v Speaker 20>the tariffs.

1:09:52.439 --> 1:09:54.439
<v Speaker 15>Did you get a sense at all in your reporting

1:09:54.640 --> 1:09:59.120
<v Speaker 15>about just when the uncertainty is going to ease? Of course,

1:09:59.160 --> 1:10:01.799
<v Speaker 15>we had the initial deadline. Now we have this August

1:10:01.840 --> 1:10:05.479
<v Speaker 15>first deadline of when all these deals you know, need

1:10:05.520 --> 1:10:09.960
<v Speaker 15>to be completed. But from your seat, does it seem

1:10:10.040 --> 1:10:14.519
<v Speaker 15>like that initial like Tariff Liberation Day induced shock that

1:10:14.600 --> 1:10:18.799
<v Speaker 15>kind of spread across markets and economies. Has that cooled off?

1:10:19.360 --> 1:10:19.599
<v Speaker 12>No?

1:10:20.080 --> 1:10:22.240
<v Speaker 20>This was I think the most striking part of my

1:10:22.320 --> 1:10:25.320
<v Speaker 20>reporting is just there is so much uncertainty, and uncertainty

1:10:25.360 --> 1:10:27.639
<v Speaker 20>about the uncertainty I would say. I mean, I spoke

1:10:27.720 --> 1:10:31.519
<v Speaker 20>with one of the companies that works with Jonathan Lieberman

1:10:31.880 --> 1:10:34.120
<v Speaker 20>who uses him as their customs broker. One of the

1:10:34.120 --> 1:10:36.360
<v Speaker 20>biggest it's called Sense is the company. It's one of

1:10:36.360 --> 1:10:41.080
<v Speaker 20>the biggest seafood importers in the country, and the owner,

1:10:41.400 --> 1:10:43.519
<v Speaker 20>one of the presidents of the company, said to me,

1:10:43.600 --> 1:10:45.040
<v Speaker 20>you know, he's like, I don't how do you run

1:10:45.080 --> 1:10:46.760
<v Speaker 20>a business if you don't know what the costs are

1:10:46.800 --> 1:10:48.519
<v Speaker 20>going to be. He's like, I don't know what they're

1:10:48.880 --> 1:10:50.720
<v Speaker 20>going to change, when they're going to change. He was

1:10:50.800 --> 1:10:53.519
<v Speaker 20>stopping shipments. He had stopped a lot of the shipments

1:10:53.560 --> 1:10:56.639
<v Speaker 20>from China just because there was so much uncertainty around

1:10:56.720 --> 1:11:00.400
<v Speaker 20>that situation. The costs were potentially so high. There's just

1:11:00.560 --> 1:11:03.800
<v Speaker 20>there's so much uncertainty, and there's not even certainty about

1:11:03.800 --> 1:11:06.599
<v Speaker 20>when we will have certainty. And I think it's just

1:11:06.600 --> 1:11:08.920
<v Speaker 20>making so hard for businesses to plan anything.

1:11:09.160 --> 1:11:13.320
<v Speaker 2>So enter the magic eight ball. This is not a joke.

1:11:13.760 --> 1:11:15.519
<v Speaker 2>There's a magic eight ball in your story.

1:11:16.240 --> 1:11:18.120
<v Speaker 20>There's this was one of my favorit. Every once in

1:11:18.160 --> 1:11:20.839
<v Speaker 20>a while when you're a reporter, something happens that feels

1:11:20.920 --> 1:11:25.000
<v Speaker 20>a little magical. But I went into Jonathan lie Berman's office,

1:11:25.000 --> 1:11:26.559
<v Speaker 20>like I said, it's right by JFK. And he had

1:11:26.600 --> 1:11:29.320
<v Speaker 20>all the stuff you'd expect, huge customs book, It's a

1:11:29.360 --> 1:11:34.320
<v Speaker 20>foot and a half thick of like every different possible product, files, computer,

1:11:34.439 --> 1:11:36.880
<v Speaker 20>and then there was a magic eight ball on his desk,

1:11:37.520 --> 1:11:40.479
<v Speaker 20>And of course I asked about that. I assumed it

1:11:40.520 --> 1:11:43.280
<v Speaker 20>was from his children or something, but no, he bought

1:11:43.320 --> 1:11:46.120
<v Speaker 20>it right after a liberation date. He was taking calls

1:11:46.160 --> 1:11:48.880
<v Speaker 20>after calls from clients he' did for decades. Just they

1:11:48.880 --> 1:11:51.680
<v Speaker 20>were all panicked wondering what was going on. And he

1:11:51.800 --> 1:11:53.439
<v Speaker 20>kept he said, he kept saying, over and over, I

1:11:53.439 --> 1:11:55.040
<v Speaker 20>wish I had a crystal ball. I wish I had

1:11:55.040 --> 1:11:57.240
<v Speaker 20>a crystal ball. And he said while he was talking,

1:11:57.280 --> 1:12:00.760
<v Speaker 20>he just impulse ordered a magic eight ball of Amazon.

1:12:01.960 --> 1:12:02.360
<v Speaker 6>I wonder.

1:12:02.439 --> 1:12:04.320
<v Speaker 20>So now, he says, somebody he just shakes it up

1:12:04.360 --> 1:12:07.360
<v Speaker 20>to see, you know, to answer questions. And you know,

1:12:07.439 --> 1:12:09.040
<v Speaker 20>when I was there, he should get in. It said

1:12:09.520 --> 1:12:11.480
<v Speaker 20>outlook hazy, which seemed appropriate.

1:12:12.680 --> 1:12:15.760
<v Speaker 2>This magic eight ball likely was not made in the

1:12:15.840 --> 1:12:18.920
<v Speaker 2>US and probably would be such a fact.

1:12:18.960 --> 1:12:20.280
<v Speaker 15>It's a terra made in China.

1:12:20.560 --> 1:12:23.599
<v Speaker 6>It was okay, looked it up.

1:12:23.760 --> 1:12:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, there you go. Ever the amazing reporter Stacy Vannick

1:12:28.040 --> 1:12:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Smith writing for Bloomberg Business Week. You can check out

1:12:31.080 --> 1:12:35.479
<v Speaker 2>our story now on the Bloomberg Terminal. It's about customs brokers.

1:12:35.640 --> 1:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>It was a low stress job, not so in the

1:12:38.320 --> 1:12:41.759
<v Speaker 2>age of tariffs. Also check out Stacy's podcast, co hosted

1:12:41.760 --> 1:12:46.599
<v Speaker 2>with Max Chafkin, Everybody's Business. New episodes come out every Friday.

1:12:51.280 --> 1:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

1:12:55.479 --> 1:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Appleclarcklay and

1:12:58.720 --> 1:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Android Otto with the Blue Blog Business app. You can

1:13:01.479 --> 1:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

1:13:05.040 --> 1:13:08.759
<v Speaker 1>York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

1:13:09.760 --> 1:13:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin hit an all time high this past week to

1:13:12.160 --> 1:13:15.240
<v Speaker 2>start what crypto enthusiasts and the Republican majority in the

1:13:15.240 --> 1:13:18.920
<v Speaker 2>House of Representatives have dubbed Crypto Week. After an initial

1:13:19.000 --> 1:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>roadblock from some conservative holdouts, ultimately the House passed a

1:13:23.000 --> 1:13:26.200
<v Speaker 2>series of crypto friendly bills, a huge win for an

1:13:26.200 --> 1:13:29.400
<v Speaker 2>industry that poured millions into last year's elections to promote

1:13:29.439 --> 1:13:33.200
<v Speaker 2>pro crypto candidates. Now, one of the Trump family's crypto

1:13:33.320 --> 1:13:36.559
<v Speaker 2>ventures has received key behind the scenes help from the

1:13:36.600 --> 1:13:40.639
<v Speaker 2>world's largest digital asset exchange, whose founder is a convicted

1:13:40.680 --> 1:13:44.280
<v Speaker 2>felon now seeking a presidential pardon, and critics say the

1:13:44.320 --> 1:13:48.360
<v Speaker 2>relationship poses a conflict of interest for President Trump, so

1:13:48.479 --> 1:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>writes Bloomberg News investigative reporter Zeke Fox. Zeke is also

1:13:53.080 --> 1:13:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the author of the book Number Go Up. Inside Crypto's

1:13:56.400 --> 1:13:58.680
<v Speaker 2>wild Rise and Staggering Fall.

1:13:58.800 --> 1:14:01.439
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, so this is like it's a complicated story, but

1:14:01.560 --> 1:14:06.120
<v Speaker 18>I think it's an important one. So the Trumps, while

1:14:06.800 --> 1:14:11.280
<v Speaker 18>Donald Trump was running for president, started this new crypto

1:14:11.360 --> 1:14:16.679
<v Speaker 18>company which they called World Liberty Financial. And the way

1:14:16.720 --> 1:14:20.280
<v Speaker 18>this company set up, at least at the beginning, three

1:14:20.360 --> 1:14:22.759
<v Speaker 18>quarters of all the money that came into this company

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:26.280
<v Speaker 18>was paid to the Trumps as just a licensing fee.

1:14:26.439 --> 1:14:29.000
<v Speaker 18>So they've made tons of money off it, something like

1:14:29.000 --> 1:14:33.680
<v Speaker 18>three or four hundred million dollars. But as is so

1:14:33.800 --> 1:14:36.719
<v Speaker 18>often the case in crypto, when they started this company,

1:14:36.960 --> 1:14:39.080
<v Speaker 18>they didn't really know what it would do. There was

1:14:39.080 --> 1:14:41.920
<v Speaker 18>some talk about it being like a buying and lending platform,

1:14:42.040 --> 1:14:46.400
<v Speaker 18>borrowing and borrowing and lending platform, but the company had

1:14:46.439 --> 1:14:50.639
<v Speaker 18>really very few coders on staff. They didn't really have

1:14:51.120 --> 1:14:53.080
<v Speaker 18>a team commensurate with all the money they raised. So

1:14:53.080 --> 1:14:56.479
<v Speaker 18>they needed a product, and what we reported was that

1:14:56.560 --> 1:15:01.280
<v Speaker 18>they decided to make a stable coin. Like a cryptocurrency,

1:15:01.280 --> 1:15:03.120
<v Speaker 18>it's always worth a dollar because it's backed by real

1:15:03.200 --> 1:15:06.360
<v Speaker 18>dollars in the bank. And when they went to go

1:15:06.439 --> 1:15:09.479
<v Speaker 18>make this stable coin, because they didn't have a lot

1:15:09.520 --> 1:15:16.360
<v Speaker 18>of programming talent, they called on Binance, the biggest crypto

1:15:16.400 --> 1:15:20.960
<v Speaker 18>exchange owned by cz and what we reported is that

1:15:21.000 --> 1:15:27.280
<v Speaker 18>Binance actually wrote the basic code that powers the world

1:15:27.320 --> 1:15:31.920
<v Speaker 18>liberty stable coin USD one. And so also, in a

1:15:32.640 --> 1:15:37.760
<v Speaker 18>conveniently for him, cz who was only just let out

1:15:37.760 --> 1:15:41.080
<v Speaker 18>of Halfway House last year after pleading guilty through these

1:15:41.120 --> 1:15:45.200
<v Speaker 18>money laundering violations, is seeking a presidential pardon. So his

1:15:45.240 --> 1:15:49.439
<v Speaker 18>company is helping out the Trump's venture while he also

1:15:50.800 --> 1:15:52.919
<v Speaker 18>is looking for this favor for himself.

1:15:53.880 --> 1:15:54.559
<v Speaker 15>So this is.

1:15:54.600 --> 1:16:00.040
<v Speaker 17>One of many crypto currency ventures that the Trump family has, right.

1:16:00.600 --> 1:16:05.360
<v Speaker 18>Yes, I have actually lost track of how many there are.

1:16:05.720 --> 1:16:06.559
<v Speaker 2>You need a whiteboard.

1:16:06.640 --> 1:16:10.519
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, it's it's so confusing that they actually got kind

1:16:10.560 --> 1:16:14.840
<v Speaker 18>of confused themselves the other day. Now the Trumps have

1:16:14.880 --> 1:16:19.479
<v Speaker 18>a meme coin, trump Coin. Those guys announced that they

1:16:19.479 --> 1:16:23.599
<v Speaker 18>were going to make a crypto wallet, and the Trump's

1:16:23.640 --> 1:16:26.760
<v Speaker 18>sons were like, this is not an official Trump project.

1:16:27.320 --> 1:16:30.320
<v Speaker 18>Like these guys can't even keep straight how all their

1:16:30.360 --> 1:16:32.400
<v Speaker 18>different crypto ventures.

1:16:32.000 --> 1:16:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Is Is that unique though, to this trump coin? And

1:16:36.360 --> 1:16:39.599
<v Speaker 2>just this is a little aside, you know, whether we're

1:16:39.600 --> 1:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>talking about I think there's a cologne that I saw recently.

1:16:44.120 --> 1:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>There are the shoes, they're the bibles. This is all licensing, right, Yeah?

1:16:50.360 --> 1:16:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Is that any different than what the Trumps are doing

1:16:52.240 --> 1:16:52.799
<v Speaker 2>with crypto.

1:16:53.479 --> 1:16:57.160
<v Speaker 18>So at first I think it's quite possible that when

1:16:57.200 --> 1:17:00.240
<v Speaker 18>they got into crypto, I mean, they did even work

1:17:00.320 --> 1:17:02.559
<v Speaker 18>with some of the same guys that they'd worked with

1:17:02.600 --> 1:17:05.680
<v Speaker 18>on some of these more traditional licensing deals. Maybe they

1:17:05.680 --> 1:17:07.679
<v Speaker 18>thought it was just another thing where they might make,

1:17:08.080 --> 1:17:11.320
<v Speaker 18>you know, a million bucks here or there by licensing

1:17:11.360 --> 1:17:13.960
<v Speaker 18>their name. But it's turned out to be like on

1:17:14.040 --> 1:17:18.320
<v Speaker 18>a totally different scale. Just since Trump has become president,

1:17:19.160 --> 1:17:23.320
<v Speaker 18>I think Bloomberg Billionaires estimates that he's made six hundred

1:17:23.400 --> 1:17:27.080
<v Speaker 18>million off these different crypto ventures, and it's become a

1:17:27.120 --> 1:17:30.920
<v Speaker 18>way that anybody in the world, even people who are

1:17:30.960 --> 1:17:33.519
<v Speaker 18>citizens of other countries who couldn't donate to his campaign,

1:17:33.960 --> 1:17:41.839
<v Speaker 18>can just give him money. There's another crypto billionaire named

1:17:42.240 --> 1:17:44.680
<v Speaker 18>Justin Sun bought seventeen.

1:17:44.360 --> 1:17:45.880
<v Speaker 2>You might know him as the banana guy.

1:17:46.600 --> 1:17:49.400
<v Speaker 18>Yes, best known for paying six million dollars for banana

1:17:49.439 --> 1:17:53.800
<v Speaker 18>and then then eating it. It's modern art. He bought

1:17:53.840 --> 1:17:58.640
<v Speaker 18>seventy five million dollars of World Liberties tokens, and he

1:17:58.720 --> 1:18:02.160
<v Speaker 18>had been facing a frost lawsuit from the US SEC

1:18:02.560 --> 1:18:04.719
<v Speaker 18>and that was later put on hold. And I should

1:18:04.760 --> 1:18:08.799
<v Speaker 18>say that all these people have mentioned have all denied

1:18:08.840 --> 1:18:12.040
<v Speaker 18>that anything untoward is happening, and they're saying like, hey,

1:18:12.479 --> 1:18:14.200
<v Speaker 18>you know, I just want to invest in these coins

1:18:14.240 --> 1:18:17.240
<v Speaker 18>and it's not related to whatever business that might have

1:18:17.280 --> 1:18:17.919
<v Speaker 18>with the government.

1:18:18.439 --> 1:18:19.200
<v Speaker 7>So all these.

1:18:19.040 --> 1:18:21.400
<v Speaker 17>Crypto ventures that we said may not even fit on

1:18:21.640 --> 1:18:25.920
<v Speaker 17>a whiteboard if we rewind back to twenty twenty one.

1:18:26.120 --> 1:18:29.559
<v Speaker 17>Trump was anti crypto, correct. I'm just trying to catch

1:18:29.640 --> 1:18:29.960
<v Speaker 17>up here.

1:18:30.320 --> 1:18:32.400
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, I mean he said it was a scam. I

1:18:32.479 --> 1:18:34.879
<v Speaker 18>think he said maybe it's all made up.

1:18:35.320 --> 1:18:36.360
<v Speaker 17>Scam against the dollar.

1:18:36.720 --> 1:18:43.400
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, And his first administration initiated some of the lawsuits

1:18:43.439 --> 1:18:48.120
<v Speaker 18>that crypto guys have been so up in arms about.

1:18:48.479 --> 1:18:52.120
<v Speaker 18>But it only really changed during this most recent campaign,

1:18:52.520 --> 1:18:57.320
<v Speaker 18>and there was a very concerted effort, mostly by a

1:18:57.360 --> 1:19:01.240
<v Speaker 18>small group of rich bitcoiners to get Trump on board.

1:19:01.920 --> 1:19:07.280
<v Speaker 18>They got together and donated something like twenty million dollars

1:19:07.320 --> 1:19:11.799
<v Speaker 18>to his campaign. It was a fundraiser at the Bitcoin Convention,

1:19:11.880 --> 1:19:14.680
<v Speaker 18>the annual Bitcoin Convention, and they had the fundraiser who

1:19:14.760 --> 1:19:17.479
<v Speaker 18>raised a twenty million. Then he went out on stage

1:19:17.479 --> 1:19:21.200
<v Speaker 18>in Nashville and gave this speech in which he totally

1:19:21.280 --> 1:19:24.080
<v Speaker 18>changed his position and said Bitcoin's going to the moon.

1:19:24.479 --> 1:19:26.560
<v Speaker 18>I want to lead the way. Let's make this a

1:19:26.600 --> 1:19:30.759
<v Speaker 18>crypto capital of the world. It's really an amazing triumph

1:19:30.840 --> 1:19:31.440
<v Speaker 18>of lobbying.

1:19:31.840 --> 1:19:35.160
<v Speaker 2>On the Binance story, we should know. A Finance spokesperson

1:19:35.200 --> 1:19:37.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't respond to questions about the Coding Helper investment deal,

1:19:37.960 --> 1:19:41.600
<v Speaker 2>but said USD one followed the exchange's quote standard listing process.

1:19:42.120 --> 1:19:44.639
<v Speaker 2>A White House spokesperson declined a comment for the story.

1:19:45.120 --> 1:19:48.519
<v Speaker 2>A spokesperson for World Liberty didn't respond to questions about

1:19:48.520 --> 1:19:51.160
<v Speaker 2>the company's dealings with Finance, but set in an email quote,

1:19:51.400 --> 1:19:54.559
<v Speaker 2>your assertions are factually deficient and designed to further a

1:19:54.600 --> 1:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>political agenda.

1:19:57.000 --> 1:20:00.320
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, I mean this is like quite controversial, so I

1:20:00.360 --> 1:20:05.880
<v Speaker 18>can see why they why people aren't talking about it.

1:20:05.920 --> 1:20:09.200
<v Speaker 18>You know, this work that people familiar with the matter

1:20:09.320 --> 1:20:12.599
<v Speaker 18>told us that Binance did for World Liberty was not

1:20:14.080 --> 1:20:17.639
<v Speaker 18>was not disclosed at the time on and we also

1:20:17.680 --> 1:20:21.439
<v Speaker 18>reported that the Finance has done other things to help

1:20:21.439 --> 1:20:26.639
<v Speaker 18>World Liberty. One of them was so the World Liberty

1:20:26.880 --> 1:20:29.439
<v Speaker 18>is a stable coin. People have to use it for

1:20:29.520 --> 1:20:33.920
<v Speaker 18>the company to make money, and the more people want,

1:20:34.680 --> 1:20:37.479
<v Speaker 18>the bigger this pile of stable coins get. The way

1:20:37.520 --> 1:20:40.040
<v Speaker 18>the company makes money is earning interest on that. So

1:20:41.840 --> 1:20:45.439
<v Speaker 18>right now, of all the stable the USD one coins

1:20:45.439 --> 1:20:48.080
<v Speaker 18>that exist, most of them are actually held by Binance.

1:20:48.560 --> 1:20:51.400
<v Speaker 18>So there's about there's two more than two billion dollars

1:20:51.400 --> 1:20:55.799
<v Speaker 18>of USD one on finance. The interest income that generates

1:20:55.840 --> 1:20:57.160
<v Speaker 18>a lot of it goes to the Trumps.

1:20:57.200 --> 1:21:00.640
<v Speaker 2>But does the USD one that is from is it

1:21:00.680 --> 1:21:01.639
<v Speaker 2>World Liberty Financial?

1:21:01.680 --> 1:21:02.120
<v Speaker 10>Is that right?

1:21:02.160 --> 1:21:02.439
<v Speaker 6>Again?

1:21:02.600 --> 1:21:04.920
<v Speaker 18>They're the issuer. The stable coin.

1:21:04.920 --> 1:21:06.559
<v Speaker 2>Is the Trump is let's just call it. This is

1:21:06.560 --> 1:21:10.479
<v Speaker 2>the Trump family stable coin, a competitors circle stable coin

1:21:10.560 --> 1:21:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and a competitor to tether.

1:21:13.200 --> 1:21:16.960
<v Speaker 18>Yes, okay, and even right now the House is going

1:21:17.040 --> 1:21:20.840
<v Speaker 18>to take up the Genius Act and they're calling it

1:21:20.840 --> 1:21:24.760
<v Speaker 18>Crypto Week. They're going to debate the rules that are

1:21:24.840 --> 1:21:28.080
<v Speaker 18>going to govern these stable coins. And like the rules

1:21:28.120 --> 1:21:30.799
<v Speaker 18>they set might be more favorable to one or another

1:21:30.840 --> 1:21:32.120
<v Speaker 18>of these companies.

1:21:32.040 --> 1:21:32.519
<v Speaker 9>So zeke.

1:21:32.600 --> 1:21:35.160
<v Speaker 17>In this story, here we have cz who pled guilty

1:21:35.200 --> 1:21:38.080
<v Speaker 17>back in twenty twenty three to failing to maintain an

1:21:38.080 --> 1:21:40.760
<v Speaker 17>effective anti money laundering program. Now he wants a part

1:21:40.800 --> 1:21:42.720
<v Speaker 17>in Trump's. The only one that can give it to him,

1:21:43.040 --> 1:21:45.880
<v Speaker 17>is he the only one still cross caught in the

1:21:45.920 --> 1:21:46.720
<v Speaker 17>crosshairs here.

1:21:47.520 --> 1:21:51.439
<v Speaker 18>He has finance was has paid his fine, He's done

1:21:51.439 --> 1:21:57.880
<v Speaker 18>his time on having this criminal record is could make

1:21:57.920 --> 1:22:01.560
<v Speaker 18>it difficult. Right, Finance is the biggest, it's huge worldwide,

1:22:01.600 --> 1:22:03.879
<v Speaker 18>but they've never really been able to establish a foothold

1:22:03.880 --> 1:22:07.439
<v Speaker 18>in the US, and the owner of the company having

1:22:07.800 --> 1:22:10.799
<v Speaker 18>pleaded guilty to this serious felony could make it difficult

1:22:10.880 --> 1:22:15.760
<v Speaker 18>for them to get the required licenses here. So if

1:22:15.760 --> 1:22:18.240
<v Speaker 18>that were wiped away, they might be able to compete

1:22:18.280 --> 1:22:23.519
<v Speaker 18>in this giant market. And like you said, the other

1:22:23.560 --> 1:22:28.960
<v Speaker 18>big companies in crypto, like Coinbase, they were facing serious

1:22:29.000 --> 1:22:33.400
<v Speaker 18>lawsuits under the Biden administration. Those have been dropped. Pretty

1:22:33.439 --> 1:22:38.160
<v Speaker 18>much everybody in crypto has been given the go ahead

1:22:39.360 --> 1:22:39.960
<v Speaker 18>under Trump.

1:22:40.479 --> 1:22:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I got to ask, because your book is called Number

1:22:42.360 --> 1:22:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Go Up. Inside Crypto's Wild Rise and Staggering Fall. You

1:22:45.760 --> 1:22:48.800
<v Speaker 2>wrote you published it at a time when crypto it

1:22:48.840 --> 1:22:53.120
<v Speaker 2>was Crypto winter. How are you thinking about what you've

1:22:53.160 --> 1:22:55.360
<v Speaker 2>learned over the last two years and if that changes

1:22:55.400 --> 1:22:56.559
<v Speaker 2>the narrative of your book at all.

1:22:56.840 --> 1:22:59.639
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, I mean I definitely should have picked a different

1:22:59.720 --> 1:23:02.680
<v Speaker 18>sub title for the book, given that, like crypto is

1:23:02.680 --> 1:23:05.000
<v Speaker 18>always on these boom and bus cycles. But I mean,

1:23:05.040 --> 1:23:09.400
<v Speaker 18>what I've seen in this last like Crypto Recovery, is

1:23:09.479 --> 1:23:14.479
<v Speaker 18>actually nothing that's changed my mind. If anything, it's become

1:23:14.520 --> 1:23:17.960
<v Speaker 18>easier to raise money for crypto projects that have no

1:23:18.000 --> 1:23:20.280
<v Speaker 18>point at all, like this Trump meme coin. They're not

1:23:20.320 --> 1:23:23.080
<v Speaker 18>even claiming this is going to revolutionary, just finance. So

1:23:23.200 --> 1:23:26.439
<v Speaker 18>just like, hey, Trump's famous by this coin, and then

1:23:27.160 --> 1:23:31.080
<v Speaker 18>lots of people are piling in. It's like GameStop mania

1:23:31.200 --> 1:23:31.599
<v Speaker 18>or something.

1:23:31.760 --> 1:23:33.840
<v Speaker 2>So look, I'm not going to ask you to predict

1:23:33.840 --> 1:23:35.559
<v Speaker 2>the future, but do you think we're still in a

1:23:35.600 --> 1:23:38.479
<v Speaker 2>boom bus cycle and this is a boom Oh yeah.

1:23:38.520 --> 1:23:41.320
<v Speaker 18>I mean even people in crypto I think are mostly

1:23:41.360 --> 1:23:46.240
<v Speaker 18>saying this can't go on forever like this. I mean eventually,

1:23:47.320 --> 1:23:50.519
<v Speaker 18>Like with all things, I think that the value has

1:23:50.560 --> 1:23:54.519
<v Speaker 18>to come from actual usage. It has to have real

1:23:54.560 --> 1:24:00.040
<v Speaker 18>world applications. Now, these laws that are being debated, he

1:24:00.680 --> 1:24:03.439
<v Speaker 18>make it so favorable, might be end up so favorable

1:24:03.439 --> 1:24:06.360
<v Speaker 18>for the industry that people will be incentivized to use

1:24:06.360 --> 1:24:09.479
<v Speaker 18>crypto who might not have rtherwise. Wanted to Zeke.

1:24:09.880 --> 1:24:12.719
<v Speaker 2>Always good to see you. Congratulations on this story. Everybody

1:24:12.720 --> 1:24:14.799
<v Speaker 2>read the book. It is a great book. Zeke Fox

1:24:15.000 --> 1:24:18.400
<v Speaker 2>is investigations reporter for Bloomberg News. He's also the author

1:24:18.439 --> 1:24:24.640
<v Speaker 2>of Number Go Up. Inside Crypto's Wild Rise and Staggering Fall.

1:24:24.720 --> 1:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

1:24:30.360 --> 1:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

1:24:34.439 --> 1:24:38.599
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

1:24:38.720 --> 1:24:42.559
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

1:24:42.720 --> 1:24:45.599
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

1:24:45.840 --> 1:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal