WEBVTT - can AI create ‘ethical’ true crime?

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I learned about the story from a reporter named Elizabeth

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Hernandez at the Denver Post. She wrote this piece in

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>August about a murder that supposedly happened in Littleton, Colorado.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>On July four, twenty fourteen, just before noon, the Littleton

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Police Department made a decisive move. Harrison, twenty one, a

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 2>college student and part time bartender, had been living a

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 2>life of turmoil and confusion. Harrison admitted to the police

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 2>that he had been in a secret sexual relationship with

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 2>his stepfather for the past two years.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>There was this YouTube channel that made this video and

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it was a pretty wild case.

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to True Crime Case Files. Today we uncover the

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>tragic and complex story of Richard Engelbert, a successful real

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 2>estate agent who's hidden life and secrets led to his

0:00:59.160 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>brutal murder.

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And Elizabeth Hernandez, her editor, told her about these emails

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that the newsroom have been receiving, all linking to this video,

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>all talking about this weird murder. And her editor said,

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>this seems like it's a story made for you. And

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>she read these emails and there were some that just

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>said you should check out this video. This is weird.

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But there were others that were mad at the Denver

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.479
<v Speaker 1>posts that were saying, why aren't you covering this? How

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>could you miss such a big, horrific case.

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 3>It makes sense that people would be upset. This video

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 3>had been seen almost two million times, and frankly, it

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 3>was embarrassing that the story of Richard Engelbert, this grizzly

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 3>murder hadn't been covered by the local paper. How is

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 3>it that an independent YouTube channel was doing a better

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 3>job of doing an investigation than professional reporters. Well there

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 3>was a reason.

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty quickly clear that the story was made up,

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that was invented using AI, and that no such murder

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>had ever happened.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>I talked to Henry Larson, who wrote about this not

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 3>so true true crime phenomenon for FO for Media.

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>My name is Henry Larson. I'm a reporter and I

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>cover typically criminal justice. This is not that at all,

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>so much weirder story about fake crimes.

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 3>The channel was called True Crime Case Files and it

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 3>had about one hundred thousand subscribers and tons of videos.

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>The channel itself seemed to have been making dozens and

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>dozens of similar fake crimes, pumping them out, and it

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>seemed like people were buying into these fake crimes thinking

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they were real.

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm afraid Kaleidoscope and iHeart podcasts. This is kill Switch,

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm Dexter Thomas, I'm.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Goodbye.

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Henry started looking at the YouTube channel and he noticed something.

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of videos on the channel were pretty perverse sexualized.

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Then again, so are a lot of true crime stories.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 3>These ones just always had a particular extra element of drama.

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>That would usually have something to do with someone in

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a position of power murdering or taking advantage of someone

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>who had less power than them, like a sheriff and

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the secretary, or a teacher and a student, a parent

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and their stepchild.

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 3>There were dozens of story with that same setup, and

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 3>just as an example, let me red you some of

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 3>these titles here. So one of them goes judge beats

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 3>college student to death after secret gay affair ends in scandal.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Then couple's wife swap experiment ends in obsession and brutal murders,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 3>or cheating husband murder's loyal wife and claims he was

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 3>on an acid trip. And then of course there's the

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 3>one the reporter of the dever posts got the emails

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 3>about husband's secret gay love affair, with step son, ends

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 3>in grizzly murder, and whatever you're imagining the story is like,

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 3>you're probably right.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I will say that they got progressively more scandalous click

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>baity sexual over time. When this channel first started making

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 1>these videos, they were a little tamer.

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 3>The video of the went viral and alerted the Denver

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Post to this fake channel was definitely from the era

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.559
<v Speaker 3>after the channel had gotten much more scandalous. It told

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 3>the story of Richard Engelbert, a real estate agent who

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 3>lived a seemingly perfect life but was having a secret

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>sexual affair with his step son.

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Richard kept this relationship hidden from everyone, fearing it would

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 2>ruin his reputation and career. In addition to this, he

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 2>continued to meet other men for sex through his work,

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 2>using the homes he showed as secret meeting places.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 3>The whole crime took place in Littleton, Colorado, and the

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 3>video showed pictures of these generic looking rows of suburban homes,

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 3>and for anyone who actually lived there, it was obvious

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 3>that this was not Lyttleton, but for people who don't

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 3>live there, it might have been convincing. All these videos

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 3>look kind of like a lower budget version of something

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 3>you might see on the Hallmark channel. They're usually around

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 3>twenty five minutes long. They're narrated by a host with

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 3>this authoritative radio voice, and there's photos of suburban living rooms,

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 3>and then there's the setup. It introduces the victim or

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 3>the witnesses or the perpetrator with a plausible looking photograph.

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 3>You'll see a smiling businessman with a blue suit and

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 3>bleach white teeth, or an office worker with blonde hair

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 3>and dangling earrings, and then it'll cut to a photo

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 3>of police cars parked outside the crime scene. And stories

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 3>are on par with a lot of true crime stuff

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 3>you might see on TV. Was it obvious to you

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 3>that this stuff was AI generated?

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty clear to me that the narrator was

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>an AI generated voice, that the photos are very weird.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Everyone had impeccable veneers in the headshots that were generated

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and looked very glossy and kind of plasticky, and so

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that made me initially think, oh, okay, this is pretty obvious, right,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>this has been AI generated. But then when you go

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in the comments, there might be a couple people who

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>are raising of red flag saying I don't know about this.

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>I can't find any information about this online, but they

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>were drowned out by people finding specific details from the

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>videos and saying, I can't believe that the police missed this,

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>or I think that there is this theory that was overlooked,

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>or here's this other comment I have about like a

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>material fact that was presented in the video, and that

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at least to me, showed that people were buying into this,

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and combined with the people who are mad at the

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Denver Post for not reporting that story, makes me think

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that this was compelling to at least a fair amount

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of this channel's viewers. Generally, people were interacting with each

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>other talking about the details of this fake case as

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>if it was real.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, just the recap. The images look AI generated. The

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 3>voice is also AI generated. Okay, it's fake and huh,

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 3>people are falling for it. Not surprising. This is the

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Internet and that is where most of us would stop.

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 3>We'd close the window and go back to white day.

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 3>But Henry didn't do that. He kept digging.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I got really intrigued about the kind of person that

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>would make this video. So I found the contact email

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>associated with the YouTube channel and I reached out.

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 3>So hold on this person. They had just left their

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 3>contact email just on their YouTube page.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they had a contact email.

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Not every YouTuber does that. That's actually kind of unusual.

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Why do you think they did that? I don't know.

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, I guess I have the theory. I

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the reason why these videos were

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>being made by this person were because they wanted to

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>be a filmmaker and get some attention.

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 3>So Henry gave him some of that attention. Now, just

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 3>a note in case you want to go and read

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 3>about this. The guy behind the channel, his name is

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 3>out there now if you want to look for it.

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 3>But back when Henry wrote the article and when we

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 3>did the interview, he was referring to him anonymously with

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the name Paul. So that's the name that you'll hear

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 3>in this episode. So, yeah, what's his deal? Why did

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 3>you start all this up? What did he tell you?

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>He graduated from college right before the pandemic, and when

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic hit, he was living with his parents and together.

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of families did all sorts of

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>traditions around this time. Paul and his family decided they

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>were going to watch dateline together, okay, and they watched

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Dateline He told me he really didn't

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>like the show all that much, but he taught himself

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the formula. He taught himself the process of the procedural

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>true crime genre. Here's the characters, here's the Grizzly murder,

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>and this lengthy investigation presenting each of the suspects in turn,

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and then eventually a trial and some resolution for the victims.

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>This is also around the time that chat GPT is

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>really rolling out publicly, and he watches there's like a

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>twitch live stream of AI generated Seinfeld episodes.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 3>Hey, yvone, did you hear about that new restaurant around

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 3>the corner? I remember that. Yeah, they're supposed to have

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 3>the best food in town. Yeah, I forgot all about that.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 4>I heard they just opened up, and I'm dying to

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 4>try it, but it looks so expensive. Maybe we can

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 4>make a deal with the owner, you know, trade them

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 4>some of our jokes for a free meal.

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>He loved it real, he got really interesting. He was like, oh,

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing. This is weird and new and

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>probably cost nothing to make.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 3>So Paul decides to try his hand at AI generated content,

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 3>but before he lands on true crime, he tries a

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 3>different genre.

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 5>First.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>He comes up with the bones of a plot for

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a four to five minute Hallmark style rom com. Crucially,

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>he labels them as AI generated. He calls this channel

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>AI Film Studio. He thinks they're very good. We disagree

0:10:58.320 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on that. I didn't think they were very good when

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I watch them.

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Did you tell him that?

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I asked him if he thought they were good, and

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>he said yes, and I said okay, And they bomb.

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>The videos do terribly that none of them cross over

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>one hundred views, and so for some that might sort

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of been part a lesson that this technology isn't ready.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>There's something weird about this format. You need some more

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>production value, even if you want to use AI in media.

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>The lesson he learns is, don't tell people it's made

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>from AI. Don't tell people's think.

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>The other decision he makes is to focus on true crime,

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 3>and in January of twenty twenty four, he starts the

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 3>True Crime Case Files channel and he tests this idea

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 3>he had that maybe one of the things that was

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 3>holding him back was that he was telling people that

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 3>these videos were AI generated. So he stops doing that.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it turns out that maybe he wasn't wrong,

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 3>because his videos started to take off after that.

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in all honesty, he was success. At least for

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a series of months. His channel was working. It was

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>working so well that other people noticed and started copying

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>his style, his formats, even the exact titles of some

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of his videos.

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 3>And now you can find dozens of channels that are

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 3>all posting similar fake true crime content. There's variations in

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 3>different niches here and there, but it's all basically the

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 3>same format, AI generated images accompanied by AI generated voices

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 3>reading stories that are also probably AI generated.

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>He saw himself at the forefront of this gold rush,

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>this new medium of entertainment, and here he is experimenting,

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>trying something, and so I think part of the allure

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of making AI films for him was the fact that

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it was AI, was the fact that this was a

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>new technology. He told me he does consider himself to

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 1>be a filmmaker, one without a studio or expensive production costs.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Or in this case, I guess a camera.

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Or a camera, yeah, or a microphone.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So how much of a gold rush are we talking?

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 5>Though?

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 3>It's a little hard to say. A few times Henry

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 3>did try asking him how much he was making, but

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 3>he couldn't get a straight answer.

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>He never told me exactly how much money he made.

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I did learn that this was the only thing he

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>was working on, and as far as I know, it

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was his only source of income.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's just stick with the facts for a second.

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 3>This is all fake and nobody's denying that the stories

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 3>are made up. The voice isn't real, the images aren't real. Yes, people,

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people actually are being fooled. But does

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>fake mean bad? Is there anything wrong with what he's

0:13:45.360 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 3>doing here? We'll get into that after the break. So

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 3>true crime. Listen, I don't know how you feel about

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 3>true crime. I've got some feelings. I think a lot

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 3>of people have some feelings about true crime. But let's

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 3>be real, it is an extremely popular genre of I'm

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 3>gonna say content. I'm gonna be as neutral as I

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 3>can here. Not a fan personally, But why did he

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 3>pick true crime? Do you think he.

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Picked true crime because he knew the format? But Paul

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of criticisms of true crime, and this

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>was actually one of the reasons why he justified his work.

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>He said, what I'm doing making these AI videos is

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>actually better than real true crime.

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 3>It's better.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>It's better.

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>It's better because there's no real victims involved. He got

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to make his videos and his money and no one suffered.

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 3>How did you feel about that?

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was wrong. I still think he's wrong,

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and I told him that. I mean, there's the reporter line,

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>which is just injecting fake information into the world is bad.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But there's also the component that true crime as a

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>medium has plenty of flaws that are not just about

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the specific victim of a crime, but also our societal

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>understandings of criminal justice in general. We turn on the

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>evening news on our local TV broadcaster and it leads

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>with a murder in a neighborhood near us, and we

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>think that crime is going up, And we listen to

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a true crime podcast about a serial killer, and we're

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a little more nervous around our neighbors. And there's a

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>real societal impact that a lot of researchers have looked

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>into and analyzed about crime media impacting our perceptions of

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>actual crime.

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So, I think his work in many ways was committing

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the same sins as the true crime genre

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in general.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 3>What you're talking about here is research essentially that shows

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 3>it this stuff also makes us feel like your neighborhood

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 3>is not safe, which is pro Your neighborhood's pretty safe.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 3>You live in the suburbs, You're fine, it's gonna be okay.

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 3>But we watch a lot of this stuff, and if

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 3>it's maybe fun to watch, you know when you just

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 3>want to turn your brain off at the end of

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the day, which I think is what a lot of

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>people do for true crime. Look, I get it, but

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 3>in the back of your mind, it also makes you

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 3>think that the world around you is more dangerous than

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 3>it actually is, and what does that do to you?

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 3>But Paul the AI True Crime creator, he had a

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>different point of view on what he was doing.

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>He said, what he was making is a form of

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>abstract art. He really liked his structural touches that he

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>would introduce into these videos, and at several points he

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>basically said, you know, I make these stories so ludicrous,

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>so insane that people should just assume that they're fake,

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't really happen, and if they don't get it,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that's on that.

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Really it was so like in an absurdist art form.

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he said what he's doing is absurdist start, and

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't regret any of it.

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean like his larger artistic message is lost

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 5>on me because it sounds like complete BS.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 6>I was gonna say, I'm gonna call BS on the

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 6>AI excuse.

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 3>You might have been wondering what actual true crime podcasters

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 3>think about all this stuff. Well you just heard from

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 3>two of them. Hi. I am Bob Mauta and my

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 3>name is Lauren brtcheck out. Bob used to be a

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 3>defense attorney. Then he made a podcast telling the story

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 3>of how his father defended the notorious serial killer John

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Wayne Gacy, and since then he's been a true crime podcaster.

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 3>Lauren is a former television producer, but now she's focused

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 3>on true crime audio. She produced the podcast Happy Face,

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 3>which was about another serial killer, and that's been adapted

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.239
<v Speaker 3>to a show on Paramount Plus. The two of them

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 3>work together on a true crime podcast called Murder on

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Songbird Road. But I think what be happening here, and

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious to hear what you think about this, is

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 3>this may be exposing something about the audience for true crime.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 3>And I think this is one of the things that

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>this person who who are calling Paul is you know

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 3>this point he's trying to make, which he's saying, Well,

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 3>the stuff that he's making, This AI generated stuff is

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 3>actually better than real true crime because no actual victims

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 3>are being exploited.

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 6>That would work with the assumption that the intention of

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 6>all true crime creators is to exploit victims. And that's

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 6>the antithesis of my intention of Bob's intention. And I

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 6>would ask Paul, since he has wrapped this very I

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 6>think disingenuous scam up with the I'm teaching everybody a lesson, Bo,

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 6>what he's doing with the profits?

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 5>Mm hmm, Like are you are you are you sending

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 5>all the proceeds LIKECTIMS organizations, Like are you doing good

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 5>with it to teach your lesson? Or are you just

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 5>using that as a convenient excuse as to why you're

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 5>creating this stuff under the guys that it's actually real.

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 5>But and look, I'm going to devils advocate on Paul's

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 5>behalf here, true criminal defense attorney here. Yeah right, I mean,

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 5>I can't help it. So in terms of I mean,

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 5>there is a large chunk of creators out there in

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 5>the true crime realm that they're they are just they're

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 5>out there peddling the violence of the crimes. They are

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 5>not taking into consideration the victims themselves, their families that

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 5>have to live with these tragedies for generations beyond when

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 5>the crime took place. They're merely just retelling a story

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 5>that's not their story to tell, you know, and really

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 5>in order to just make money and look like I

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 5>have a lot of friends that do it, you know,

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 5>that don't like there aren't deep divers that really just

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 5>kind of sit there and reread. They'll watch a Discovery

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 5>ID thing and they'll go right up an episode about

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 5>it and just.

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 6>Speak about it with authority.

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 5>Right, you know. So it's like, I don't want to

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 5>offend any of the people that do that out there,

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 5>but I think that Paul might have a point as

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 5>to those type of creators because what like, really, at

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 5>the end of the day, what do they bringing to

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 5>the table?

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm hearing YouTube really kind of distinguishing yourself from a

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 3>lot of other people who make true crime podcasts, even

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 3>though you all may you know, be situated in the

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 3>same podcast in the listing right, even in the same genre.

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 3>In this way, we could maybe think of what you

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 3>two do as creating really carefully prepared organic meals. It's

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people who are very happy with a

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 3>bag of Cheetos.

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 6>I right.

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, like a lot of people just do like

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 5>kind of that pulp fiction quick hitter. I want to

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 5>rip open that bag of Cheetos. I want to dive in.

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 5>And it's arguably a much bigger market.

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 3>But remember the Paul talked about his work as holding

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 3>up a mirror to the industry of true crime, which

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I think is actually pretty interesting as a concept. You know,

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 3>show the audience truly what it is that they're looking at.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 3>But that made me wonder about the response of that

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 3>audience when he was talking about his work is absurdist art.

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 3>He's got to be looking at the comments. He's seen

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the same comments you're seeing a lot of people. The majority,

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 3>the bulk of the comments clearly are people who do

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 3>not understand that this is fake.

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in large part also because he would moderate his

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>own comments and delete comments that would call him out

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>for his lives.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Did he tell you that.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he said that he would go in and cut

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>comments that were negative or said that what he was

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>making was fake. He didn't get all of them, but

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>he said that he would try and get as many

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as he could.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Yo, hold on, Okay, I'm sorry man. So at that point,

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 3>saying it's on you. If you don't get it, you

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 3>are manufacturing something that's fake, and you're also manufacturing an

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 3>echo chamber of other people of basically social proof. You know,

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 3>it's like walking into a room and everybody says, wow,

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 3>look at this amazing thing. You think, well, everybody else

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 3>thinks this thing is amazing. I suppose if I think

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 3>it's not amazing, something's probably wrong with me. So if

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 3>you watch the video, look at the comments, everybody else

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 3>seems to think it's real, You're gonna feel kind of

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 3>weird if you don't also go along with that. Also, like,

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's just me. Everybody else seems to think it's real. Yeah,

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 3>that's incredible. So I don't know about you, but maybe

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 3>this does change things a little. Are we trying to

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 3>alert people to the danger of harmful entertainment or we

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 3>just trying to make money or are those two things

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 3>totally compatible. Maybe it's just recognizing that people wanted cheetos,

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 3>and Paul figured out that he could provide people with

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 3>those cheetos really easily, really quickly, and in massive quantities.

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 3>He started picking up the pace, and he was publishing

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 3>videos every day or so. Before long, he put out

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 3>over one hundred and fifty of these things and people

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 3>were watching these. Some people are being fooled. But what

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 3>if some people don't care? If the people just want

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Paul's Cheetos? Is that so bad?

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 6>I'll go further with that metaphor. You are what you eat?

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 6>And are you putting ideas out there into the world.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 6>Are you having an overspill into real life in which

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 6>these crimes could become real?

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if I'm picking up what you're saying here,

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 3>do you think that there's some worry that this AI

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 3>generated stuff becoming more prevalent, which it's getting more and

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 3>more salacious, the details get more and more outlandish, more

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 3>and more silacious, but also seem to get more listens,

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 3>more views, more clicks. That this could start to affect

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 3>how people perceive action cases or even just the news

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 3>and give them ideas.

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, what's to say that AI created you know,

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 5>true crime isn't going to come up with concepts of

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 5>ways to really effectively evade.

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 6>You know, I'll tell you another issue that I have

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:27.479
<v Speaker 6>with it. If you're leaning heavily into sensationalizing what you

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 6>are claiming is real trauma suffered by real people, but

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 6>it's all fake and all made up. You are pulling

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 6>out emotion and concern from real people. And when you

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 6>are exhausting that reservoir, they're going to have a lot

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 6>less capacity to care about real trauma and crime for

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:55.959
<v Speaker 6>other people.

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 3>So and that's a real thing.

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 5>That's a real thing. I mean, we see it especially

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 5>in what we do Dexter in terms of people become

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 5>emotionally invested in cases.

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 6>And I think it's kind of like one of the

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 6>unforeseen side effects of botox that has been studied extensively

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 6>is that when people have been doing it for a

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 6>period of time, they lose their ability to be empathetic

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 6>because when you're listening to somebody in real time, we

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 6>don't realize how much our face is mimicking that person's emotions,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 6>and that gives us the empathy.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 3>That is how wild.

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 5>I had not heard that.

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 3>It makes sense though.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 6>But now just take that and put that over AI

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 6>true crime. It will ultimately be the same thing. We'll

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 6>stop caring about these cases.

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 3>So what now, have we become too addicted to junk food?

0:25:59.800 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 7>Kind?

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Can we or can the platforms do anything about all this?

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 3>That's after the break the channel had around one hundred

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 3>thousand subscribers and across the videos millions of views. It's

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 3>made Henry wonder he might not like this, but was

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Paul actually doing anything against YouTube's policies? So he contacted

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 3>YouTube and asked them, so you head up YouTube, and

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 3>YouTube nuked hiss channel essentially, Yeah.

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Not only that channel, but another three or four that

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>he also had.

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 3>What was the reason that they gave for pulling these

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 3>channels down?

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>YouTube told me in an email they said that Paul's

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>videos had violated YouTube's policies around child safety, particularly their

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>policy and child sexual exploitation.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 3>So not about AI.

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>No, No, he wasn't violating any of YouTube's policies around AI.

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 3>And even though this channel was taken off of YouTube,

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 3>you can still find it on other platforms. He's still

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 3>making this stuff, clearly because it's on Spotify. I found

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 3>it on Amazon Music, all the platform channels that I

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 3>look for, it's on there too.

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he has an RSS feed and a podcast player

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's still generating these true crime stories. Also, they're

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>selling ads ads on all of these yeah, for hummus

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and universities and all sorts of weird stuff. So he's

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>still clearly making money.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 3>So again, YouTube takes down the channel because they say

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 3>it violated child safety policies, not because it was fake,

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 3>and Spotify doesn't really seem to care that it's fake

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 3>or that it's explicit. So for now, there's not really

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 3>any reason for this stuff to stop.

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>True crime is really popular and people love it, and

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>so of course there's going to be ripoffs and parodies

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and scams associated with it. It's just the world we

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>live in now, I think.

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 7>So if you want to know how to make a

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 7>true crime case story video that will go viral, then

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.239
<v Speaker 7>you are in luck because hey, there, and how are

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 7>you doing?

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 3>And now there are tutorials on how to make this stuff.

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:15.360
<v Speaker 7>In this video, I am going to show you how

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 7>you can create your own true crime story video and

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 7>go viral. So are you excited? Well, let's dive right in.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course there are tutorials, right, of course,

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Pandora's box is now open, and there's really nothing to

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>do except hope for a solar flare, right, That's what

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm my fingers are crossed for.

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, at this point, just bring the asteroid man,

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 3>because I don't know what we're gonna do.

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's just clear all the satellites from orbit and

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>start fresh. And I don't know, maybe someone will cut

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all the undersea telecoms cables and we'll be good that.

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that might be it. At this point, I'm

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 3>going to refrain from saying kill switch. I'm going to

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 3>refrain from saying that because that would be too corny.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 3>So you spent months reporting on this, What is your

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 3>takeaway from this?

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple I think the very boring reporter in

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.239
<v Speaker 1>me is like, you know, truth matter is more than

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>ever right, and misinformation is bad. But of course we

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>all know that. I think we have to ask ourselves

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>why we get interested in the media we consume. I

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's a really important part of being a consumer

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in an age where we have so much to choose from,

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>there's so much more of our media diet that's completely

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.479
<v Speaker 1>in our own hands, and we can totally screw ourselves

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>over if we let ourselves.

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I would imagine that there are some people who will

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 3>continuing to listen to Paul's podcasts who know that it's

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 3>fake and who don't care because it's good enough for them.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 3>And not only is it good enough for them. We's

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 3>escalated to something, to a level that Netflix is not

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 3>going to give them because the source material doesn't exist.

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 3>There isn't a husband who is secretly gay who ca

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 3>his wife on a cruise that happens every week. There

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 3>is not a trans person who crosses state lines to

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 3>participate in some drug ring or something like that every

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 3>single week. It's not possible, but AI does make it possible.

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 3>And maybe that's where we are. Maybe we've gotten so

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>addicted to true crime that we we there are people

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 3>who want the fake stuff. This is something Bob also

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 3>brought up.

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think at some point people are gonna

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 5>become like it, Like more and more people are listening

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 5>to it, and they're they're going in or do the

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 5>guys as if it happened, And then when they come

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 5>to realize that it didn't, they're going to be upset.

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 5>But then the question becomes the next time it comes up,

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 5>they be like, well, I know now that it's fake,

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 5>but it was still pretty good.

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 7>Again.

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Look when I when I open a bag of Cheetos,

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I know what I'm in for. Right, And Bob and

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Lauren are also worried about some other real life effects.

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 5>I've got the distinct fear about how it's going to

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 5>add actually move into the criminal justice system, because it's

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 5>only a matter of time before they're able to use

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 5>these same type of programs in terms of creating imagery

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 5>where they're going to be able to bring false evidence

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 5>into cases, like there is nothing stopping somebody from saying, yeah,

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 5>I have a recording of a phone call wherein this

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 5>person just confessed. I mean, the thought of what could

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 5>be in the very very near future is terrifying on

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 5>an entirely different level than in terms of just the

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 5>fact that it's able to create out of whole cloth

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 5>things that don't even exist and make it seem as

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 5>if they do.

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 6>You know, we're seeing it on the political stage right now,

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 6>and so we are gradually becoming more and more comfortable

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 6>with accepting ai.

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 3>AI generated evidence being used in a courtroom. I hope

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 3>we never have to do an episode about that, but honestly,

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 3>at this point, man, give it a couple months, but

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 3>I think what we're starting to learn is that there

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 3>is a segment of the population that knows what they're

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 3>getting is fake and they don't care. Maybe you personally

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 3>are okay with the chat GBT filters that can redraw

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 3>your picture as a Simpsons character, or you're cool with

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 3>the audio generation engines that can turn your lyrics into

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 3>a pop song or a mariachi song or a rap song.

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you personally draw the line at simulated approximations of

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 3>people being murdered, but we should acknowledge that these are

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 3>all uses for the same technology. Thank you so much

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 3>for listening to kill Switch. You can hit us up

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 3>at kill Switch at Kaleidoscope dot NYC with any of

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts, or you can hit me personally at dex

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 3>digi that's d e x d i GI on Instagram

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 3>or blue Sky if that's more your think. And if

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 3>you liked the episode, hopefully you did. If you're on

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts or Spotify, you know, take that phone out

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 3>of that pocket and leave us a review. It really

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 3>does help people find the show, which in turn helps

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 3>us keep doing our thing. Kill Switch is hosted by Me,

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 3>Dexter Thomas. It's produced by Shena Ozaki, darl Of Potts,

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 3>and Kate Osborne. A theme song was written by me

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.959
<v Speaker 3>and Kyle Murdoch, and Kyle also mixed the show from

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:24.959
<v Speaker 3>Kaleidoscope Our executive producers are Oswallashin, mangesh Hati Gadur and

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Kate Osborne. From iHeart our executive producers our Katrina Norvil

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 3>and Nikki Etour. We'll catch you on the next one.