1 00:00:00,280 --> 00:00:03,440 Speaker 1: Cable news is ripping us apart, dividing the nation, making 2 00:00:03,440 --> 00:00:05,880 Speaker 1: it impossible to function as a society and to know 3 00:00:05,920 --> 00:00:08,680 Speaker 1: what is true and what is false. The good news 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:10,800 Speaker 1: is that they're failing and they know it. That is 5 00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:14,840 Speaker 1: why we're building something new. Be part of creating a new, better, healthier, 6 00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:17,920 Speaker 1: and more trustworthy mainstream by becoming a Breaking Points Premium 7 00:00:17,920 --> 00:00:21,520 Speaker 1: member today at breakingpoints dot com. Your hard earned money 8 00:00:21,560 --> 00:00:23,360 Speaker 1: is going to help us build for the midterms and 9 00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:27,320 Speaker 1: the upcoming presidential election so we can provide unparalleled coverage 10 00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:28,560 Speaker 1: of what is sure to be one of the most 11 00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:32,280 Speaker 1: pivotal moments in American history. So what are you waiting for? 12 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:36,360 Speaker 1: Go through Breakingpoints dot com to help us out. Hi, guys, 13 00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:39,159 Speaker 1: joining us now for our weekly partnership segment, we have 14 00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:41,519 Speaker 1: Julia Rock. She's a reporter for the Lever. Great to 15 00:00:41,520 --> 00:00:45,519 Speaker 1: see Julia, Thanks so much for having me so. Wednesday 16 00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:48,320 Speaker 1: night caught my attention. Bernie Sanders had a little spicy 17 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:50,960 Speaker 1: quote on the floor of the Senate. He said, recent 18 00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:54,240 Speaker 1: polls suggest that Congress has a nineteen percent favorability rating, 19 00:00:54,280 --> 00:00:57,320 Speaker 1: and I find that shocking. Clearly, if that nineteen percent 20 00:00:57,400 --> 00:00:59,320 Speaker 1: had any inkling as to what goes on here in 21 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:03,200 Speaker 1: the Senate, that number would be much lower. You actually 22 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:07,200 Speaker 1: have a whole report out detailing what Senator Sanders specific 23 00:01:07,240 --> 00:01:10,040 Speaker 1: frustrations in this particular moment are, So just break that 24 00:01:10,080 --> 00:01:14,560 Speaker 1: down for Austulia. Yeah, so last night the Senate was 25 00:01:15,560 --> 00:01:21,200 Speaker 1: basically going through some motions for provisions to add or 26 00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:25,120 Speaker 1: propose to be added to the big China Competition bill 27 00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:27,920 Speaker 1: that has passed both the House and the Senate, and 28 00:01:27,959 --> 00:01:32,440 Speaker 1: now the two branches need to reconcile a version that 29 00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:35,959 Speaker 1: they can both get behind. And Bernie made that comment 30 00:01:36,040 --> 00:01:41,720 Speaker 1: after Senator Maggie Hassan, a Democrat from New Hampshire, proposed 31 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:45,560 Speaker 1: a corporate tax break that corporations have been pushing for, 32 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:48,960 Speaker 1: pushing to have it included, and basically everything that's past 33 00:01:49,080 --> 00:01:52,440 Speaker 1: Congress in the past year, which obviously hasn't been very much, 34 00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:54,600 Speaker 1: they tried to put it and build back better. They 35 00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:57,120 Speaker 1: tried to get it in the omnibus spending bill, and 36 00:01:57,160 --> 00:02:01,840 Speaker 1: now they want to have it in this China Competition 37 00:02:02,280 --> 00:02:05,600 Speaker 1: bill that is basically guaranteed to pass Congress. It's a 38 00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:08,800 Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty five billion dollar tax break that 39 00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:12,440 Speaker 1: allows corporations to write off expenses that they spend on 40 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:16,320 Speaker 1: research and development from taxes, and it was it was 41 00:02:16,360 --> 00:02:19,840 Speaker 1: included in the twenty seventeen massive tax cut bills, so 42 00:02:19,880 --> 00:02:21,760 Speaker 1: that that was the bill that cut the corporate tax 43 00:02:21,840 --> 00:02:25,040 Speaker 1: rate from thirty five to twenty one percent. And this 44 00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:27,960 Speaker 1: was supposed to be like a very sort of small offset, like, okay, 45 00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:31,520 Speaker 1: corporations are getting this massive tax rate tax break, we're 46 00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:34,240 Speaker 1: gonna you know, you know, take take back this one 47 00:02:34,600 --> 00:02:38,520 Speaker 1: subsidy that they've had for a while. But now you 48 00:02:38,520 --> 00:02:41,359 Speaker 1: know this, the repeal of this tax break is set 49 00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:43,480 Speaker 1: to go into effect, and they want to make sure 50 00:02:43,520 --> 00:02:47,840 Speaker 1: that doesn't happen. So the idea is basically this tax break, 51 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:50,560 Speaker 1: which really doesn't have anything to do with the broader 52 00:02:50,600 --> 00:02:53,920 Speaker 1: bill that they're considering, they're trying to get it attacked 53 00:02:53,960 --> 00:02:57,800 Speaker 1: so that they can go even further than what the 54 00:02:57,840 --> 00:03:01,200 Speaker 1: Trump tax break actually allowed to do. Because the Trump 55 00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:04,239 Speaker 1: tax break within all of that rolled back this one 56 00:03:04,280 --> 00:03:07,079 Speaker 1: little you know, this one little provision to help offset 57 00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:09,880 Speaker 1: the cost of this massive tax break, And now they're saying, no, no, no, 58 00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:12,880 Speaker 1: even that isn't good enough for us. We want to 59 00:03:12,919 --> 00:03:16,120 Speaker 1: go back to even having that beneficial provision in the 60 00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:20,560 Speaker 1: tax code. Yeah. Yeah, and and sort of to your point, 61 00:03:20,600 --> 00:03:22,440 Speaker 1: this bill, you know, because it's one of the few 62 00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:24,960 Speaker 1: things that's going to pass and it has bipartisan support, 63 00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:28,359 Speaker 1: has basically become a vehicle for everything that can't get 64 00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:30,440 Speaker 1: passed through other means. I will say, you know, you 65 00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:33,280 Speaker 1: could argue that this tax brick is related to the 66 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 1: bill because it is supposed to be for research and development, 67 00:03:36,720 --> 00:03:39,680 Speaker 1: but it is just a blanket corporate tax break. And 68 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:43,400 Speaker 1: so why is it, like what persuaded Democrats to go 69 00:03:43,480 --> 00:03:46,120 Speaker 1: along with this when they're supposed to be in favor 70 00:03:46,320 --> 00:03:48,520 Speaker 1: of you know, they're posted to the Trump tax by, 71 00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 1: they're supposed to in favor of lifting taxes on corporation. 72 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:54,080 Speaker 1: So why is it a Democratic senator here who's pushing 73 00:03:54,160 --> 00:03:57,080 Speaker 1: this amendment? Yeah, I mean that's a good question. You know, 74 00:03:57,680 --> 00:04:01,440 Speaker 1: this this senator in particular, facing a tough reelection battle. 75 00:04:02,840 --> 00:04:05,400 Speaker 1: She is, you know, a darling of the US Chamber 76 00:04:05,440 --> 00:04:08,360 Speaker 1: of Commerce. She voted against a fifteen dollars minimum wage, 77 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:11,280 Speaker 1: so you know, maybe this this does really align with 78 00:04:11,320 --> 00:04:14,880 Speaker 1: her ideology and it shouldn't be surprising. What's more surprising 79 00:04:15,280 --> 00:04:18,479 Speaker 1: is that there were only five senators, including Sanders and 80 00:04:18,520 --> 00:04:23,040 Speaker 1: including one Republican who voted against Hassan last night, whereas 81 00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:25,480 Speaker 1: ninety voted with her. And I think, you know what 82 00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 1: that shows is just this like really overwhelming willingness to 83 00:04:29,800 --> 00:04:33,560 Speaker 1: give corporation to tax breaks, you know. And again they 84 00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:36,479 Speaker 1: say it's going to be for research and development. Maybe so, 85 00:04:36,600 --> 00:04:39,760 Speaker 1: but these are the same corporations that got a forty 86 00:04:39,800 --> 00:04:42,960 Speaker 1: percent tax cut under the twenty seventeen tax bill. I 87 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:46,040 Speaker 1: think there would be a decent argument about, you know, 88 00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:49,880 Speaker 1: being able to deduct research and development expenses if you 89 00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:54,039 Speaker 1: didn't have the overall landscape of corporations paying basically nothing 90 00:04:54,080 --> 00:04:56,760 Speaker 1: in taxes. That's what makes it galling here is the 91 00:04:57,120 --> 00:04:59,719 Speaker 1: sort of macro picture. There was another motion that you 92 00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:03,239 Speaker 1: point to from Senator Sanders last night that was also 93 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:07,640 Speaker 1: very frustrating to me, perhaps even more so, and he 94 00:05:08,160 --> 00:05:10,440 Speaker 1: tried to pass an amendment that would require companies that 95 00:05:10,520 --> 00:05:15,400 Speaker 1: receive subsidies under this China Competes bill to stay neutral 96 00:05:15,520 --> 00:05:18,040 Speaker 1: in union campaigns, which by the way, they're supposed to 97 00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:21,560 Speaker 1: do legally anyway, and refrain from buying back their own stocks. 98 00:05:22,240 --> 00:05:25,720 Speaker 1: That failed, So the other one passes overwhelmingly. This one 99 00:05:25,839 --> 00:05:30,560 Speaker 1: fails equally overwhelmingly, with only five Democrats joining Bernie in 100 00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:34,239 Speaker 1: support of basically saying, hey, if you're a union buster, 101 00:05:34,440 --> 00:05:37,120 Speaker 1: you don't get these massive subsidies. And also you shouldn't 102 00:05:37,160 --> 00:05:39,680 Speaker 1: be buying back your own stock, you should be actually investing. 103 00:05:39,720 --> 00:05:43,120 Speaker 1: That's the whole point of this bill. Yeah, I mean, 104 00:05:43,160 --> 00:05:46,760 Speaker 1: it's you know, on the one hand, it's totally unbelievable, right, Like, 105 00:05:47,360 --> 00:05:49,640 Speaker 1: you know, all of these politicians are sort of willing 106 00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:53,640 Speaker 1: to ride on the wave of union organizing, claim they 107 00:05:53,640 --> 00:05:56,120 Speaker 1: support it, you know, it's very popular, et cetera, and 108 00:05:56,160 --> 00:05:58,400 Speaker 1: yet when it comes down to it, will vote against 109 00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:02,080 Speaker 1: this very simple provision that is oftentimes attached to government 110 00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:06,919 Speaker 1: money that corporations, you know, can't can't bust bust unions 111 00:06:06,920 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 1: if their workers are trying to organize. We wrote a 112 00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:12,560 Speaker 1: very similar story actually about a year ago now about 113 00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:16,000 Speaker 1: Bernie trying to include this very provision, the ban on 114 00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:22,000 Speaker 1: buybacks and on corporations that receive these substats from busting unions, 115 00:06:22,279 --> 00:06:24,560 Speaker 1: and he's been basically trying to get it in the 116 00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:27,679 Speaker 1: bill ever since and has been thwarted by his own party. 117 00:06:27,720 --> 00:06:31,680 Speaker 1: Yet every turn very very revealing to see what passes 118 00:06:31,760 --> 00:06:36,400 Speaker 1: easy easily with overwhelming bipartisan consensus and what gets stopped 119 00:06:36,520 --> 00:06:38,279 Speaker 1: dead in its tracks. Julia, thank you so much for 120 00:06:38,279 --> 00:06:40,599 Speaker 1: breaking it down for us. We really appreciate it. Thanks 121 00:06:40,600 --> 00:06:43,480 Speaker 1: for having me kind of a revealing a little bit 122 00:06:43,480 --> 00:06:46,719 Speaker 1: of a meta analysis going on over at the Washington Post. 123 00:06:46,760 --> 00:06:49,080 Speaker 1: Let's go ahead and put this article up on the screen. 124 00:06:49,680 --> 00:06:53,159 Speaker 1: How a billionaire's boys club came to dominate the public 125 00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:57,520 Speaker 1: square again. This being printed in the bezos own Washington Post, 126 00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:01,360 Speaker 1: and what they write is the world's richest man. Elon 127 00:07:01,480 --> 00:07:04,840 Speaker 1: Musk attacked a publication owned by the world's third richest man, 128 00:07:04,920 --> 00:07:07,320 Speaker 1: Jeff Bezos, that would be The Washington Post last month 129 00:07:07,440 --> 00:07:11,600 Speaker 1: for reprinting a column published by the world's thirteenth richest man, 130 00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:15,200 Speaker 1: Mike Bloomberg. The Bloomberg opinion article post by The Washington 131 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:18,160 Speaker 1: Post asked whether must recent investment in Twitter would endanger 132 00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:21,720 Speaker 1: freedom of speech. Wappo always good for a laugh, Musk 133 00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:25,720 Speaker 1: wrote in a tweet with smiling and crying emoji. I mean, 134 00:07:25,760 --> 00:07:28,760 Speaker 1: it's actually like, if you go through what I like 135 00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:31,320 Speaker 1: about this article is that, first of all, they go 136 00:07:31,400 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 1: after Bezos, who does own the outlet it's being published in, 137 00:07:35,160 --> 00:07:37,720 Speaker 1: but they also make it clear that you know, the 138 00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:40,280 Speaker 1: problem isn't just Elon Musk. You have the fact that, 139 00:07:40,320 --> 00:07:43,600 Speaker 1: you know, the public the modern public square is basically 140 00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:46,760 Speaker 1: wholly owned by a whole range of billionaires. And I 141 00:07:47,120 --> 00:07:49,800 Speaker 1: what I what it made me think of is in 142 00:07:49,840 --> 00:07:52,560 Speaker 1: this way, I actually appreciate the freak out over Elon 143 00:07:52,680 --> 00:07:55,840 Speaker 1: Musk because it has raised awares, made it more acceptable 144 00:07:55,880 --> 00:07:58,920 Speaker 1: to say, you know what, maybe billionaires owning a bunch 145 00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:03,120 Speaker 1: of these major public keystions and owning, you know, digital 146 00:08:03,160 --> 00:08:06,080 Speaker 1: media spaces and having so much control over our speech, 147 00:08:06,520 --> 00:08:08,680 Speaker 1: maybe that's not a good thing because finally, for the 148 00:08:08,680 --> 00:08:10,400 Speaker 1: first time, they have someone who they see as a 149 00:08:10,520 --> 00:08:13,440 Speaker 1: threat to potentially what they want to say on these platforms, 150 00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:16,200 Speaker 1: or at the very least, it's a happening. You know, 151 00:08:16,240 --> 00:08:18,560 Speaker 1: you're not crazy for pointing it out. I cannot tell 152 00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:22,040 Speaker 1: you how many times people called us conspiracy theorists whenever 153 00:08:22,040 --> 00:08:25,000 Speaker 1: we would talk about Bezos and Bloomberg during the Democratic right. 154 00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:26,800 Speaker 1: Do you remember that, Yeah, whenever Bloomberg is running. I 155 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:29,320 Speaker 1: did all these pieces about Bloomberg News and about how 156 00:08:29,360 --> 00:08:32,880 Speaker 1: they were stopping their reporters from publishing stuff, and you know, 157 00:08:32,960 --> 00:08:35,040 Speaker 1: everybody in the press was defending this, and I was like, 158 00:08:35,280 --> 00:08:37,840 Speaker 1: this is nuts. You have a guy running for president 159 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:41,320 Speaker 1: who owns one of the most influential news outlets in America. 160 00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:43,559 Speaker 1: If you don't think that's a problem, you're out of 161 00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:46,760 Speaker 1: your freaking mind. Same thing under Bezos, they would be like, oh, 162 00:08:46,800 --> 00:08:50,520 Speaker 1: it's outrageous to bring up the ownership of the Washington Post. Oh, 163 00:08:50,559 --> 00:08:53,440 Speaker 1: the liberals were losing their mind. Do you remember, Ernie. Yeah. 164 00:08:53,440 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 1: And I did the slightest thing about it. I was like, hey, 165 00:08:56,040 --> 00:08:59,440 Speaker 1: you know, it's a real problem when Jeff Bezos owns 166 00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:01,720 Speaker 1: this paper and also has a ten billion dollar contract 167 00:09:01,760 --> 00:09:04,880 Speaker 1: with the Pentagon. I mean, I'm just saying, if you 168 00:09:04,960 --> 00:09:07,480 Speaker 1: think that that isn't tied together, you're an idiot. So 169 00:09:07,880 --> 00:09:10,440 Speaker 1: I continue to go down the list, and at that time, 170 00:09:10,520 --> 00:09:12,440 Speaker 1: you know, when it was a billionaire and they're good graces, 171 00:09:12,679 --> 00:09:15,080 Speaker 1: you act like your nuts, and then oh, all of 172 00:09:15,080 --> 00:09:17,480 Speaker 1: a sudden, oh it's a billionaire owned you know. I 173 00:09:17,520 --> 00:09:20,520 Speaker 1: love these woke liberals now are like, wait, but Elon 174 00:09:20,600 --> 00:09:23,520 Speaker 1: could be controlled by China. I'm like, wake up, people, 175 00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:27,000 Speaker 1: They're all controlled by China. Yeah. Now, look, I've done 176 00:09:27,040 --> 00:09:29,080 Speaker 1: a whole segment on the show about Elon and China, 177 00:09:29,120 --> 00:09:32,160 Speaker 1: I think is a serious problem. That being said, don't 178 00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:36,400 Speaker 1: spare me your crocodile tears, like Bezo who Bezos also 179 00:09:37,360 --> 00:09:40,319 Speaker 1: China problems on Bloomberg is more beholden to China than 180 00:09:40,400 --> 00:09:43,480 Speaker 1: any other single billionaire in the top twenty. So it's like, 181 00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:47,640 Speaker 1: the hypocrisy on this just drives me crazy. But at 182 00:09:47,640 --> 00:09:50,120 Speaker 1: the very least, at least we'll open up the discussion 183 00:09:50,200 --> 00:09:54,360 Speaker 1: for let's at least talk about conflict of interests. Okay, right, right, right, 184 00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:57,320 Speaker 1: because I mean I feel like what we've been saying 185 00:09:57,360 --> 00:10:00,240 Speaker 1: for a long time is you may be good with 186 00:10:00,280 --> 00:10:03,040 Speaker 1: it now. You may be okay if you're like an 187 00:10:03,080 --> 00:10:05,640 Speaker 1: idi logical liberal and you're more or less like, you know, 188 00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:10,040 Speaker 1: pro whatever the Democratic Party is into, you know, not 189 00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:12,360 Speaker 1: like a lefty, but you're kind of in that camp, 190 00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:15,439 Speaker 1: you may be comfortable with Bezos owning the post. He's 191 00:10:15,440 --> 00:10:17,839 Speaker 1: certainly not on the left broadly, certainly not on the 192 00:10:17,960 --> 00:10:21,360 Speaker 1: economic left. We all witnessing the union busting that his 193 00:10:21,480 --> 00:10:23,839 Speaker 1: company links, that his company is going to. But in 194 00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:26,640 Speaker 1: terms of culturally, in terms of being anti Trump, you're 195 00:10:26,640 --> 00:10:29,960 Speaker 1: probably gonna feel safe, safe with Beatos. But the whole 196 00:10:30,040 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 1: question is, like put the individual billionaires and their ideologies aside, 197 00:10:34,600 --> 00:10:37,880 Speaker 1: do you feel comfortable with having a handful of people 198 00:10:38,040 --> 00:10:40,719 Speaker 1: or one individual person having so much control and being 199 00:10:40,760 --> 00:10:44,040 Speaker 1: subject to their whims. So this is the first time, 200 00:10:44,120 --> 00:10:47,120 Speaker 1: really with Elon Musk, that there's been a little bit 201 00:10:47,200 --> 00:10:51,480 Speaker 1: of an awakening of like among the liberal side of like, oh, 202 00:10:51,640 --> 00:10:54,720 Speaker 1: maybe this isn't such a great system we have going here. 203 00:10:54,920 --> 00:10:58,240 Speaker 1: So just like to see that applied consistently. All right, guys, 204 00:10:58,280 --> 00:11:02,720 Speaker 1: we have a new, extra extraordinarily troubling report on just 205 00:11:02,880 --> 00:11:08,280 Speaker 1: how often the FBI is searching Americans data without a warrant. 206 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:09,800 Speaker 1: Let's go ahead and put this report up on the 207 00:11:09,840 --> 00:11:12,640 Speaker 1: screens from the Wall Street Journal. They say FBI conducted 208 00:11:12,679 --> 00:11:17,160 Speaker 1: potentially millions of searches of Americans data last year. The 209 00:11:17,160 --> 00:11:20,600 Speaker 1: report says this was after Congress pushed them to offer 210 00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:23,360 Speaker 1: at least some transparency about what was going on here. 211 00:11:23,400 --> 00:11:24,880 Speaker 1: Let me read a little bit of this piece to you. 212 00:11:24,920 --> 00:11:27,880 Speaker 1: They say the FBI performed potentially millions with searches of 213 00:11:27,880 --> 00:11:31,000 Speaker 1: American electronic data last year without a warrant. US officials. 214 00:11:31,080 --> 00:11:34,360 Speaker 1: Intel officials said Friday, a revelation likely to stoke long 215 00:11:34,400 --> 00:11:37,480 Speaker 1: standing concerns in Congress about government surveillance and privacy g 216 00:11:37,679 --> 00:11:40,360 Speaker 1: you think. An annual report published Friday with the Office 217 00:11:40,400 --> 00:11:43,000 Speaker 1: of the DNI disclosed they had conducted as many as 218 00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:45,800 Speaker 1: three point four million searches of US data that had 219 00:11:45,840 --> 00:11:48,960 Speaker 1: been previously collected by the NSA. More than half the 220 00:11:49,000 --> 00:11:51,959 Speaker 1: reported searches, nearly two million, were related to an investigation 221 00:11:52,080 --> 00:11:55,840 Speaker 1: into a national security threat involving attempts by alleged Russian 222 00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:59,319 Speaker 1: hackers to break into critical infrastructure in the US. Those 223 00:11:59,360 --> 00:12:03,000 Speaker 1: searches include efforts to identify and protect potential victims of 224 00:12:03,040 --> 00:12:07,280 Speaker 1: the alleged Russian campaign. Now, in terms of the legality 225 00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:11,280 Speaker 1: of this, after September eleventh, Section seven oh two was 226 00:12:11,360 --> 00:12:15,559 Speaker 1: passed into law, and that basically authorizes collecting of intelligence 227 00:12:15,559 --> 00:12:19,040 Speaker 1: from an international phone calls and emails about quote, terrorism suspects, 228 00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:23,280 Speaker 1: cyber threats, and other security risks. And data on Americans 229 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:30,120 Speaker 1: is regularly vacuumed up along with those intercepts of foreign communications. 230 00:12:30,679 --> 00:12:33,520 Speaker 1: So for example, they say when a foreign spy is 231 00:12:33,559 --> 00:12:35,560 Speaker 1: communicating with some of the US or when two overseas 232 00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:39,280 Speaker 1: targets are talking about an American. So Congression lawmakers, a 233 00:12:39,280 --> 00:12:41,520 Speaker 1: few of them at least have been saying Okay, well, 234 00:12:41,520 --> 00:12:43,600 Speaker 1: how often does this happen and what do you do 235 00:12:43,679 --> 00:12:45,959 Speaker 1: with this data and how do you search it? Because 236 00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:49,160 Speaker 1: they argue that doing so amounts to a backdoor search 237 00:12:49,240 --> 00:12:53,280 Speaker 1: on Americans that dispenses with the requirements to obtain a warrant. 238 00:12:53,559 --> 00:12:57,240 Speaker 1: Congress last renewed section seven oh two in twenty eighteen. 239 00:12:57,400 --> 00:13:01,160 Speaker 1: Under Trump, it is up for reauthorsation again, So this 240 00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:05,360 Speaker 1: is extraordinarily timely infos So again, basically, the FBI is 241 00:13:05,480 --> 00:13:08,520 Speaker 1: using this sort of legal loophole to be able to 242 00:13:08,520 --> 00:13:12,360 Speaker 1: conduct these searches on Americans without warrants, and it's now 243 00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:15,160 Speaker 1: a live issue in front of Congress whether they're going 244 00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:18,880 Speaker 1: to continue to allow this backdoor and potentially it is 245 00:13:18,880 --> 00:13:22,880 Speaker 1: illegal and unconstitutional violation of americans privacy, right yeah, And 246 00:13:22,920 --> 00:13:24,840 Speaker 1: actually buried down in the bottom of the report, they 247 00:13:24,840 --> 00:13:26,839 Speaker 1: say that if there were at least four instances in 248 00:13:26,840 --> 00:13:30,000 Speaker 1: which the FBI, due to factual consideration, should have sought 249 00:13:30,040 --> 00:13:33,160 Speaker 1: approval from a fiz A court performing performing a search 250 00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:36,800 Speaker 1: and looking at the content of communications, and then didn't 251 00:13:36,840 --> 00:13:39,280 Speaker 1: do that. The FBI has not sought approval from the 252 00:13:39,280 --> 00:13:42,880 Speaker 1: court since the requirement was adopted in twenty eighteen, so 253 00:13:42,920 --> 00:13:46,439 Speaker 1: that means for the last four years they've been doing 254 00:13:46,480 --> 00:13:49,680 Speaker 1: this even though they are required by law in order 255 00:13:49,720 --> 00:13:51,719 Speaker 1: to go to the court. I also love how they 256 00:13:51,720 --> 00:13:55,559 Speaker 1: say stuff like this, A search for your phone number, 257 00:13:55,840 --> 00:14:00,160 Speaker 1: your name, email address, and social Security number does not 258 00:14:00,600 --> 00:14:06,280 Speaker 1: constitute a search under the definition. Excuse me, your email address, 259 00:14:06,720 --> 00:14:09,640 Speaker 1: your phone number, and your social I mean, those are 260 00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:12,800 Speaker 1: three of what the most critical pieces of information about 261 00:14:12,840 --> 00:14:15,520 Speaker 1: a person under which you could pull credit reports. You 262 00:14:15,520 --> 00:14:18,880 Speaker 1: can look at all sorts of open source information. I mean, look, 263 00:14:18,880 --> 00:14:21,080 Speaker 1: I'm not saying a lot of that isn't already out there, 264 00:14:21,120 --> 00:14:23,480 Speaker 1: but that definitely does constitute at least some sort of 265 00:14:23,480 --> 00:14:26,440 Speaker 1: like personal interest search in terms of the US government 266 00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:28,520 Speaker 1: looking into that. Yeah, it's just crazy that they can 267 00:14:28,560 --> 00:14:30,720 Speaker 1: get away with that and not even classify that as 268 00:14:30,760 --> 00:14:33,560 Speaker 1: a search in a database that they control. Well. In 269 00:14:33,640 --> 00:14:38,239 Speaker 1: these procedures in this authorization has continued under both democratic 270 00:14:38,320 --> 00:14:42,040 Speaker 1: and Republican administrations, obviously, and during the Trump administration you 271 00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:45,800 Speaker 1: had a whole full on conversation about Section seven H 272 00:14:45,880 --> 00:14:49,040 Speaker 1: two and fis, the cord abuses and unmasking, and all 273 00:14:49,080 --> 00:14:51,680 Speaker 1: of these terms became very well known on the right. 274 00:14:52,280 --> 00:14:54,000 Speaker 1: And then they just go ahead and do the same 275 00:14:54,040 --> 00:14:58,040 Speaker 1: thing and reauthorize the thing again. So at least that 276 00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:01,400 Speaker 1: pushed some members of Congress a few loan voices to 277 00:15:01,400 --> 00:15:03,800 Speaker 1: push for some level of transparency, and even within that, 278 00:15:04,200 --> 00:15:06,040 Speaker 1: you know, it's really interesting when they when you read 279 00:15:06,080 --> 00:15:08,240 Speaker 1: the report, they phrase it as they conducted as many 280 00:15:08,280 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 1: as three point four million searches. The FBI is like 281 00:15:11,040 --> 00:15:13,760 Speaker 1: it was probably less. It's like, okay, well, why can't 282 00:15:13,800 --> 00:15:16,640 Speaker 1: you just actually give us the number and a full 283 00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:19,560 Speaker 1: picture of what's ultimately going on here. You're right to 284 00:15:19,600 --> 00:15:23,080 Speaker 1: point out that, you know, they they view this as 285 00:15:23,400 --> 00:15:28,440 Speaker 1: technically legal, using this sort of legal loophole established by 286 00:15:28,480 --> 00:15:32,000 Speaker 1: Congress to do backdoor searches without warrants on Americans. They 287 00:15:32,120 --> 00:15:35,040 Speaker 1: view that as legal. But then they acknowledge as you're 288 00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:38,920 Speaker 1: pointing out that there was actually blatantly illegal behavior, and 289 00:15:39,280 --> 00:15:42,400 Speaker 1: everybody's just like, eah, do better next time. I guess 290 00:15:42,560 --> 00:15:46,800 Speaker 1: they're adopting new compliance. Okay, to who who's watching you? 291 00:15:46,880 --> 00:15:50,520 Speaker 1: Where's the you're going to be fired over this? Like? 292 00:15:50,640 --> 00:15:53,240 Speaker 1: What are the details here? How egregious was this? How 293 00:15:53,280 --> 00:15:55,400 Speaker 1: widespread was it? We don't know, Yeah, don't know. This 294 00:15:55,520 --> 00:15:57,640 Speaker 1: is what I mean. I mean, it's completely nuts and 295 00:15:57,720 --> 00:16:01,000 Speaker 1: even then, these new procedures were establish back in January 296 00:16:01,080 --> 00:16:04,120 Speaker 1: of twenty twenty. Okay, it's been like two years, so 297 00:16:04,640 --> 00:16:07,880 Speaker 1: more than two years since that happened. Are you in compliance? 298 00:16:08,080 --> 00:16:10,520 Speaker 1: What does the new regular how did the compliance go? 299 00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:13,200 Speaker 1: Has it been put into place? Is anybody in Congress 300 00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:16,200 Speaker 1: asking this question? No? I mean the amount of things 301 00:16:16,200 --> 00:16:18,720 Speaker 1: that these people get away with on a routine basis, 302 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:20,680 Speaker 1: And just look at all of them. None of them 303 00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:24,200 Speaker 1: ever actually get prosecuted. They get these new jobs, some 304 00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:27,640 Speaker 1: of them at Twitter, even though they're liars. It's just incredible. 305 00:16:27,680 --> 00:16:30,920 Speaker 1: You know, James Comey's like a freaking multi millionaire based 306 00:16:31,000 --> 00:16:33,520 Speaker 1: upon his whole episode and probably now works for some 307 00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:36,960 Speaker 1: contracting company. It's just like that is always how it goes. 308 00:16:37,080 --> 00:16:40,320 Speaker 1: I just think it's disgusting, especially when you reveal these 309 00:16:40,360 --> 00:16:43,960 Speaker 1: things so casually. It's just like report says millions searches, 310 00:16:43,960 --> 00:16:45,960 Speaker 1: and everybody's just like, oh, okay, Well, they're in trusted 311 00:16:46,000 --> 00:16:49,480 Speaker 1: with so much power, and then they're given just complete 312 00:16:49,720 --> 00:16:53,080 Speaker 1: leeway and total lack of accountability when they violate the 313 00:16:53,240 --> 00:16:57,000 Speaker 1: extremely broad rules that have been set for them. So 314 00:16:57,160 --> 00:16:59,680 Speaker 1: when you have that level of power, you have to 315 00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:02,280 Speaker 1: be even more precise. You have to be even more 316 00:17:02,320 --> 00:17:05,840 Speaker 1: They should be even more accountability because yeah, you have 317 00:17:05,920 --> 00:17:08,159 Speaker 1: access to all of this information, all of this data, 318 00:17:08,240 --> 00:17:11,760 Speaker 1: all of his money, all of these resources, and you know, 319 00:17:12,080 --> 00:17:15,600 Speaker 1: at least there's a little bit of transparency here from Congress. 320 00:17:15,760 --> 00:17:18,160 Speaker 1: I seriously doubt because you know what else they do, 321 00:17:18,640 --> 00:17:22,600 Speaker 1: and I saw them using this against some I think 322 00:17:22,640 --> 00:17:25,359 Speaker 1: it's a combination of lefties and Republicans in Congress, but 323 00:17:25,400 --> 00:17:29,280 Speaker 1: I'm not sure. There's some like overly broad terrorism provision 324 00:17:29,560 --> 00:17:31,359 Speaker 1: that some members of the squad are saying, hold on, 325 00:17:31,560 --> 00:17:33,600 Speaker 1: we want to know more about what's going on here, 326 00:17:33,920 --> 00:17:35,560 Speaker 1: and they use this stuff. They still do it to 327 00:17:35,600 --> 00:17:37,440 Speaker 1: paint you as like soft on terror, and why don't 328 00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:39,600 Speaker 1: you want to keep American safe? And this was leaks 329 00:17:39,680 --> 00:17:43,040 Speaker 1: coming from you know, Democratic College, so it's completely bipartisan. 330 00:17:43,760 --> 00:17:46,840 Speaker 1: Just watch when this comes up again for reauthorization, all 331 00:17:46,880 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 1: the concerns, you know, during the Trump administration about this, 332 00:17:50,160 --> 00:17:52,720 Speaker 1: all the concerns that are being raised here. Everyone is 333 00:17:52,760 --> 00:17:55,600 Speaker 1: going to be too afraid to be painted by the 334 00:17:55,640 --> 00:17:58,400 Speaker 1: media soft on terror and probably just get reauthorized once 335 00:17:58,440 --> 00:18:01,400 Speaker 1: again to your detrimental Almost We talked a lot about 336 00:18:01,480 --> 00:18:04,080 Speaker 1: this new Ministry of truth that Biden administration is trying 337 00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:07,119 Speaker 1: to create the Disinformation Governance Board and actually, to their credits, 338 00:18:07,160 --> 00:18:09,840 Speaker 1: C and N press the DHS secretary himself about whether 339 00:18:09,880 --> 00:18:11,919 Speaker 1: he had any concerns and to explain, like, what the 340 00:18:11,920 --> 00:18:14,080 Speaker 1: hell does this thing actually do. Let's take a listen. 341 00:18:14,280 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 1: Would you be okay if Donald Trump were president if 342 00:18:17,760 --> 00:18:21,320 Speaker 1: he created this Disinformation Governance Board or if it is 343 00:18:21,359 --> 00:18:23,680 Speaker 1: in place and he wins again in twenty twenty four 344 00:18:24,000 --> 00:18:26,320 Speaker 1: that he's in charge of such a thing. I believe 345 00:18:26,359 --> 00:18:30,320 Speaker 1: that this working group that gathers together as gathers together 346 00:18:30,440 --> 00:18:35,560 Speaker 1: best practices, make sure that our work is coordinated consistent 347 00:18:35,640 --> 00:18:38,960 Speaker 1: with those best practices, that we're safeguarding the right of 348 00:18:39,040 --> 00:18:42,399 Speaker 1: free speech. That we're safeguarding civil liberties. I think is 349 00:18:42,400 --> 00:18:46,600 Speaker 1: an extraordinarily important endeavor. Oh okay, I mean it's like 350 00:18:46,600 --> 00:18:50,760 Speaker 1: a robot wrote that answer, Crystal, We're safeguarded civil liberties. 351 00:18:51,119 --> 00:18:54,120 Speaker 1: You wouldn't be comfortable with. We are safeguarding civil liberties 352 00:18:54,160 --> 00:18:57,440 Speaker 1: by establishing a Disinformation Governance Board whose job is to 353 00:18:57,480 --> 00:19:00,399 Speaker 1: determine what's disinformation and what is not. With the woman 354 00:19:00,400 --> 00:19:03,720 Speaker 1: who is a provable liar and has pushed disinformation herself, 355 00:19:03,880 --> 00:19:06,880 Speaker 1: not to mention the many lies that Secretary Majorcis has. 356 00:19:07,200 --> 00:19:10,520 Speaker 1: Here's the thing. Governments lie all the time in a 357 00:19:10,520 --> 00:19:13,439 Speaker 1: way that's kind of their job. Okay, we basically accept 358 00:19:13,440 --> 00:19:16,480 Speaker 1: that in America, but we should not have it so 359 00:19:16,520 --> 00:19:19,560 Speaker 1: that these people can decide what is true or not. 360 00:19:20,040 --> 00:19:24,240 Speaker 1: Specifically whenever those powers will come entrench into federal bureaucracy 361 00:19:24,520 --> 00:19:27,560 Speaker 1: and then transferred from one to another, we should not 362 00:19:27,600 --> 00:19:30,560 Speaker 1: be comfortable in any way for these people in order 363 00:19:30,600 --> 00:19:32,560 Speaker 1: to tell us what's true and what's not. We need 364 00:19:32,560 --> 00:19:34,480 Speaker 1: to the full ability in order to debate it. The 365 00:19:34,520 --> 00:19:37,160 Speaker 1: Mass example of her being wrong on Mass in early 366 00:19:37,200 --> 00:19:39,440 Speaker 1: twenty twenty is the perfect one. That's why we can't 367 00:19:39,440 --> 00:19:42,200 Speaker 1: have censorship because by their own logic, that could have 368 00:19:42,280 --> 00:19:46,000 Speaker 1: cost lies. You know. The thing that also was interesting 369 00:19:46,040 --> 00:19:49,159 Speaker 1: in this clip that happened prior to that moment that 370 00:19:49,200 --> 00:19:51,879 Speaker 1: we showed you. She's pressing him just on like, okay, 371 00:19:51,880 --> 00:19:55,040 Speaker 1: what does it actually do? And he can't really you know, 372 00:19:55,080 --> 00:20:00,240 Speaker 1: he gives this very jargon laden, buzzword heavy response. And 373 00:20:00,640 --> 00:20:03,000 Speaker 1: I was reading, you know, pressed by a member of 374 00:20:03,000 --> 00:20:06,119 Speaker 1: Congress on this all, he what he said the board 375 00:20:06,160 --> 00:20:08,400 Speaker 1: actually does? Because this is what makes me so uncomfortable. 376 00:20:08,440 --> 00:20:10,199 Speaker 1: Is like, you can't even give an explanation of what 377 00:20:10,240 --> 00:20:13,920 Speaker 1: this thing actually is in clear length and understandable language, 378 00:20:14,520 --> 00:20:16,600 Speaker 1: so that he says, the board does not have any 379 00:20:16,640 --> 00:20:20,480 Speaker 1: operational authority or capability. What it will do is gather 380 00:20:20,640 --> 00:20:25,320 Speaker 1: together best practices in addressing the threat of disinformation from 381 00:20:25,400 --> 00:20:29,200 Speaker 1: foreign state adversaries from the cartels, and disseminate those best 382 00:20:29,240 --> 00:20:32,360 Speaker 1: practices to the operators that have been executing in addressing 383 00:20:32,440 --> 00:20:35,720 Speaker 1: this threat for years. I mean that's basically like that's 384 00:20:35,760 --> 00:20:39,040 Speaker 1: just basically like word salad. It doesn't have any specifics 385 00:20:39,080 --> 00:20:41,159 Speaker 1: about life. I have what you're actually what is this? 386 00:20:41,400 --> 00:20:43,760 Speaker 1: What are their capabilities? What are they focused on? None 387 00:20:43,800 --> 00:20:46,239 Speaker 1: of that. I have some insight into this because I 388 00:20:46,280 --> 00:20:48,760 Speaker 1: know how the defense world works and how it is 389 00:20:48,760 --> 00:20:51,719 Speaker 1: is they gather experts to create best practices. Then they 390 00:20:51,840 --> 00:20:55,240 Speaker 1: use those internally in order to have policy and also 391 00:20:55,359 --> 00:20:59,360 Speaker 1: distribute it externally. So for example, they'll the defense government 392 00:20:59,440 --> 00:21:02,440 Speaker 1: or the defense industrial complex will create like a best practices, 393 00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:04,600 Speaker 1: here's our strategy, here the type of weapons we look for, 394 00:21:04,800 --> 00:21:06,639 Speaker 1: and then they feed that to the government contracts, and 395 00:21:06,640 --> 00:21:08,640 Speaker 1: the contracts are like, okay, here's the blueprint, and they 396 00:21:08,640 --> 00:21:10,399 Speaker 1: build off of that, So don't act like it doesn't 397 00:21:10,440 --> 00:21:12,679 Speaker 1: have to do with that. Well, that's my point is 398 00:21:12,720 --> 00:21:16,080 Speaker 1: that we know that those best practices are Obviously there 399 00:21:16,080 --> 00:21:19,040 Speaker 1: are meetings right now between the DHS and the Facebook 400 00:21:19,040 --> 00:21:22,080 Speaker 1: and Twitter and others about certain types of content policies, 401 00:21:22,280 --> 00:21:25,560 Speaker 1: which has been exposed through Freedom of Information Act requests 402 00:21:25,560 --> 00:21:27,520 Speaker 1: showing that, you know, at the requests of the California government, 403 00:21:27,520 --> 00:21:30,919 Speaker 1: Twitter is taking stuff down or Facebook, Well, that's exactly 404 00:21:30,960 --> 00:21:32,720 Speaker 1: what's happening here. So they're going to be like, hey, 405 00:21:32,720 --> 00:21:36,120 Speaker 1: here are our best practices on COVID on this. All 406 00:21:36,160 --> 00:21:38,720 Speaker 1: it comes is during the election. You know, Okay, look 407 00:21:38,880 --> 00:21:40,680 Speaker 1: I support mail in ballots. I know a bunch of 408 00:21:40,760 --> 00:21:43,520 Speaker 1: mag of people think that's heresy. But let's say that 409 00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:49,000 Speaker 1: they say that criticizing mail in ballots is you know, disinformation. Okay, 410 00:21:49,119 --> 00:21:52,320 Speaker 1: well now what you know, right slap. Look, I disagree 411 00:21:52,320 --> 00:21:53,840 Speaker 1: with that. I think you're an idiot if you are 412 00:21:53,840 --> 00:21:56,320 Speaker 1: against it, but you know, I think you have a 413 00:21:56,400 --> 00:21:58,920 Speaker 1: right to say it. That's where things become extrad icy, 414 00:21:59,040 --> 00:22:03,560 Speaker 1: especially under elections, which the DHS election security is directly 415 00:22:03,640 --> 00:22:05,920 Speaker 1: under their purview. So that's a perfect example. Yeah, very 416 00:22:05,920 --> 00:22:10,760 Speaker 1: good example. Something I've been talking a lot about here 417 00:22:10,800 --> 00:22:13,439 Speaker 1: is the phenomenon of barstool conservatism. And I know it 418 00:22:13,440 --> 00:22:16,200 Speaker 1: can sound a little cringe, but the basic idea behind 419 00:22:16,240 --> 00:22:17,719 Speaker 1: it is that there are a lot of people who 420 00:22:17,880 --> 00:22:21,320 Speaker 1: voted for Donald Trump who don't care about traditional socially 421 00:22:21,359 --> 00:22:25,360 Speaker 1: conservative values so abortion and guns, and probably more likely 422 00:22:25,400 --> 00:22:28,480 Speaker 1: to be secular. They're mostly men. They're people who are 423 00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:32,760 Speaker 1: anti political correctness and specifically anti woke. Dave Portnoy and 424 00:22:32,880 --> 00:22:37,040 Speaker 1: Barstool kind of typifies that exact type. Both the voter 425 00:22:37,280 --> 00:22:39,960 Speaker 1: and the brand itself is very aligned. So anyway, a 426 00:22:39,960 --> 00:22:41,600 Speaker 1: lot of this has come up in the context of 427 00:22:41,680 --> 00:22:44,920 Speaker 1: Roe versus Wade and how exactly that contingent of pro 428 00:22:45,080 --> 00:22:49,560 Speaker 1: choice Republicans are really just anti woke Republicans previously non 429 00:22:49,560 --> 00:22:52,399 Speaker 1: political and now people who are really really animated in 430 00:22:52,440 --> 00:22:54,240 Speaker 1: the new culture war. How are they going to respond 431 00:22:54,280 --> 00:22:57,720 Speaker 1: to that. Dave himself actually spoke on his podcast. Let's 432 00:22:57,720 --> 00:23:00,159 Speaker 1: take a listen to what he said. If that is 433 00:23:00,160 --> 00:23:05,359 Speaker 1: an issue, I vote Democrat. So it's a great fucking ploy. 434 00:23:05,720 --> 00:23:09,680 Speaker 1: I don't understand, and I thought this in my head too. 435 00:23:09,760 --> 00:23:13,920 Speaker 1: It's like, theoretically Republicans are like less government, small government, 436 00:23:15,160 --> 00:23:19,600 Speaker 1: so like, shouldn't Republicans be pro choice because let the person. 437 00:23:19,640 --> 00:23:22,200 Speaker 1: Now I know the argument, Yeah, you don't want the 438 00:23:22,240 --> 00:23:26,080 Speaker 1: federal government making the laws. You want the state. But overall, 439 00:23:26,480 --> 00:23:29,600 Speaker 1: the less government is just let a fucking woman do 440 00:23:29,680 --> 00:23:32,560 Speaker 1: what she wants with her body, keep the government out 441 00:23:32,560 --> 00:23:34,920 Speaker 1: of it. That's to me what that is. It's like, yeah, 442 00:23:35,000 --> 00:23:37,040 Speaker 1: you can't ban it. If a woman wants it, great, 443 00:23:37,080 --> 00:23:40,840 Speaker 1: she doesn't want it, great, her choice, No government, less government, 444 00:23:40,960 --> 00:23:44,360 Speaker 1: let's government that whatever. It's a crazy thing. It has 445 00:23:44,440 --> 00:23:46,560 Speaker 1: to be said people. I'm sure some people are like, 446 00:23:46,560 --> 00:23:48,119 Speaker 1: that's not your thing. They're gonna be mad. It's a 447 00:23:48,160 --> 00:23:51,000 Speaker 1: super sensitive issue. I don't care. Certain issues you have 448 00:23:51,080 --> 00:23:52,840 Speaker 1: to be like, what the fuck are you talking about? 449 00:23:53,040 --> 00:24:01,760 Speaker 1: This is one of them. All right, How so, how 450 00:24:01,840 --> 00:24:07,160 Speaker 1: is that mac Jones interaction? Great? He's my new best friend. Okay, 451 00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:11,120 Speaker 1: we had to keep the last part so funny. By 452 00:24:11,160 --> 00:24:13,200 Speaker 1: the way, shout out Eddie. Eddie listens to the show. 453 00:24:13,240 --> 00:24:16,720 Speaker 1: He's a cool dude. I like Eddie's his co host, 454 00:24:16,760 --> 00:24:20,040 Speaker 1: big fan of d Let's talk about something I'm comfortable 455 00:24:20,040 --> 00:24:23,720 Speaker 1: with it. It's a hilarious. Oh also, and so I 456 00:24:23,760 --> 00:24:25,800 Speaker 1: wanted to check Rogan is another big leader in the 457 00:24:25,840 --> 00:24:28,960 Speaker 1: barstool con type thing. Somebody has been trashing Democrats for 458 00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:32,399 Speaker 1: like two years politically correct. All of that opened up 459 00:24:32,440 --> 00:24:36,160 Speaker 1: his latest show with Doug Stanhope. The very first thing 460 00:24:36,200 --> 00:24:39,119 Speaker 1: that they talk about, he blasts Row versus Wade. I 461 00:24:39,119 --> 00:24:42,919 Speaker 1: think these are sorry of rovers. Wait, he's like, this 462 00:24:42,960 --> 00:24:47,680 Speaker 1: is crazy, terrible law Texas old once again. But this 463 00:24:47,760 --> 00:24:52,720 Speaker 1: is my point, which is that these two newly culture again. 464 00:24:52,720 --> 00:24:54,439 Speaker 1: He would dispute that he's conservative, and I don't think 465 00:24:54,480 --> 00:24:56,000 Speaker 1: he is, but I do think there's a difference between 466 00:24:56,119 --> 00:24:58,800 Speaker 1: being culturally right wing today and culturally conservative, and I 467 00:24:58,840 --> 00:25:03,639 Speaker 1: would put Portnoy and kind of into that category, whereas 468 00:25:04,040 --> 00:25:06,840 Speaker 1: being culturally conservative is a whole other, more of like 469 00:25:06,840 --> 00:25:11,680 Speaker 1: a nineteen nineties disposition. And so previously Republicans were set 470 00:25:11,880 --> 00:25:14,840 Speaker 1: to win an R plus seven type victory, and my 471 00:25:14,920 --> 00:25:17,600 Speaker 1: friend Ruben Rodriguez on Twitter a great follow by the way, 472 00:25:18,200 --> 00:25:19,840 Speaker 1: I highly encourage you guys to go check him out. 473 00:25:20,359 --> 00:25:22,480 Speaker 1: He said something that I thought was important. He said 474 00:25:22,520 --> 00:25:25,520 Speaker 1: this election was setting up to be a referendum on 475 00:25:25,560 --> 00:25:29,639 Speaker 1: the economy, on COVID, and on political correctness and gender ideology, 476 00:25:29,960 --> 00:25:33,800 Speaker 1: and those three things were going to lead to possibly 477 00:25:33,840 --> 00:25:39,160 Speaker 1: the biggest Republican victory of an entire generation. Now it's 478 00:25:39,200 --> 00:25:41,240 Speaker 1: not going to be that. Now, look, that could change 479 00:25:41,280 --> 00:25:44,440 Speaker 1: how exactly things vote. They probably still win. And look, 480 00:25:44,480 --> 00:25:46,960 Speaker 1: you don't necessarily need barstool cons in order to win 481 00:25:47,240 --> 00:25:50,800 Speaker 1: the election. But a huge portion nearly one third of 482 00:25:50,800 --> 00:25:53,320 Speaker 1: the people who voted for Donald Trump in twenty sixteen, 483 00:25:53,320 --> 00:25:56,720 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty were themselves pro choice, Crystal well In 484 00:25:57,040 --> 00:26:01,600 Speaker 1: those are not the traditional Republicans think. And this is why, honestly, 485 00:26:03,040 --> 00:26:08,040 Speaker 1: in terms of their national commentary, you have heard Republican 486 00:26:08,080 --> 00:26:12,600 Speaker 1: political figures leaning less into the abortion debate until I mean, 487 00:26:12,680 --> 00:26:14,919 Speaker 1: obviously now their hand is forced, but you've heard them 488 00:26:15,000 --> 00:26:18,400 Speaker 1: leaning more into you know, the don't say gay bill, 489 00:26:19,160 --> 00:26:22,159 Speaker 1: more into CRT like, yes, for a reason, this is 490 00:26:22,200 --> 00:26:25,240 Speaker 1: the this is the growth industry within the Republican Party. 491 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:29,600 Speaker 1: And so the problem with this decision and why they're like, 492 00:26:29,680 --> 00:26:31,560 Speaker 1: let's not talk about that, Let's talk about the leak. 493 00:26:31,600 --> 00:26:33,360 Speaker 1: The leak was terrible, right, guys, we hate the leak. 494 00:26:33,400 --> 00:26:35,560 Speaker 1: It was an insurrection, it was literal tarroosts and whatever 495 00:26:36,119 --> 00:26:41,719 Speaker 1: is because yeah, there's a segment of their new followers 496 00:26:41,720 --> 00:26:46,440 Speaker 1: and supporters who are not cool with the media, who 497 00:26:46,520 --> 00:26:49,800 Speaker 1: might be who may even not be like fully pro choice. 498 00:26:49,840 --> 00:26:53,679 Speaker 1: But again, this the overturning of Roe versus Wade is, 499 00:26:54,000 --> 00:26:56,800 Speaker 1: you know, by the numbers, a fairly extreme position and 500 00:26:56,840 --> 00:26:58,879 Speaker 1: one that puts you on a step even with a 501 00:26:58,920 --> 00:27:02,360 Speaker 1: portion of your own base. I mean the part that 502 00:27:02,880 --> 00:27:05,480 Speaker 1: you know, the reason why I definitely don't identify with 503 00:27:05,520 --> 00:27:08,760 Speaker 1: this movement is because you know, economics is core to 504 00:27:08,840 --> 00:27:11,439 Speaker 1: what I care about, and so even though you know, 505 00:27:11,520 --> 00:27:14,439 Speaker 1: in certain areas, I'm like anti woke, although it very 506 00:27:14,520 --> 00:27:16,640 Speaker 1: much depends on exactly how you define that, because I'm 507 00:27:16,640 --> 00:27:18,920 Speaker 1: not with some of the insanity around like oh my god, 508 00:27:18,960 --> 00:27:21,240 Speaker 1: gay people are grooming people, or even some of the 509 00:27:21,280 --> 00:27:26,040 Speaker 1: freak out around CRT. But that's just like to me, 510 00:27:26,200 --> 00:27:29,080 Speaker 1: it's a side issue, and the core issue is economics, 511 00:27:29,119 --> 00:27:31,159 Speaker 1: and I don't know what like I think port noois 512 00:27:31,200 --> 00:27:33,879 Speaker 1: like a union buster and like kind of economically conservative. 513 00:27:34,359 --> 00:27:37,200 Speaker 1: So the party, the part I don't understand is really 514 00:27:37,280 --> 00:27:42,679 Speaker 1: putting wokeness as like your key like central issue to 515 00:27:42,760 --> 00:27:45,760 Speaker 1: your politics. That's the part that I don't understand. The 516 00:27:45,800 --> 00:27:48,879 Speaker 1: one thing I will say is I think that because 517 00:27:49,800 --> 00:27:52,960 Speaker 1: that language has been adopted so much by the right, 518 00:27:53,520 --> 00:27:56,800 Speaker 1: and the sort of like anti censorship language also adopted 519 00:27:56,800 --> 00:27:58,879 Speaker 1: by the right, even though, of course we've demonstrated on 520 00:27:58,920 --> 00:28:00,440 Speaker 1: the show a million ways that there's a lot of 521 00:28:00,480 --> 00:28:04,280 Speaker 1: inconsistencies and hypocrisies happening there. It can be very hard 522 00:28:04,440 --> 00:28:09,880 Speaker 1: for traditional political pundits to put people in the right 523 00:28:10,280 --> 00:28:13,800 Speaker 1: ideological categories, like it scrambles their brain, So Rogan scrambles 524 00:28:13,800 --> 00:28:16,879 Speaker 1: their brains, You and I scramble their brains. In third ways, 525 00:28:16,920 --> 00:28:19,560 Speaker 1: I get accused of being like a right winger because 526 00:28:19,600 --> 00:28:23,640 Speaker 1: you know, oftentimes even though like literally issue by issue, 527 00:28:23,720 --> 00:28:28,280 Speaker 1: I am very left on almost everything, because they just 528 00:28:28,320 --> 00:28:32,480 Speaker 1: can't kind of understand the dynamics of what this means 529 00:28:32,480 --> 00:28:36,280 Speaker 1: and what where it places you politically ideologically. So it 530 00:28:36,320 --> 00:28:38,640 Speaker 1: is an interesting dynamic. I guess that's what I'll say. No, definitely, 531 00:28:38,720 --> 00:28:40,680 Speaker 1: And the reason why I think this stuff is important 532 00:28:40,920 --> 00:28:44,320 Speaker 1: is that. And also another ground on which the left 533 00:28:44,360 --> 00:28:48,440 Speaker 1: can now abandon is there's all this birthing people language 534 00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:51,320 Speaker 1: which is out there. And I noticed with Roe it 535 00:28:51,440 --> 00:28:54,600 Speaker 1: disappeared like the drop of a hat. And what really 536 00:28:54,680 --> 00:28:57,320 Speaker 1: showed me this was Gavin Newsome put out a tweet 537 00:28:57,360 --> 00:29:00,240 Speaker 1: yesterday saying if men could get pregnant, this wouldn't even 538 00:29:00,280 --> 00:29:02,760 Speaker 1: be a conversation, and that you know, was missed. It 539 00:29:03,120 --> 00:29:05,160 Speaker 1: was amazing to me because it just showed me that 540 00:29:05,200 --> 00:29:08,880 Speaker 1: they could drop their unpopular and idiotic woke language in 541 00:29:08,920 --> 00:29:12,920 Speaker 1: a second and pivot to the actually popular position of 542 00:29:13,040 --> 00:29:15,840 Speaker 1: protecting what they you know, women's rights or like how 543 00:29:15,880 --> 00:29:17,960 Speaker 1: they say it. And I was and I was like wow, 544 00:29:18,040 --> 00:29:20,640 Speaker 1: because the reason that the right was winning the new 545 00:29:20,680 --> 00:29:23,360 Speaker 1: culture war is because they were like, we need to 546 00:29:23,400 --> 00:29:28,360 Speaker 1: protect women's sports, like we need to protect like actual gender, 547 00:29:28,880 --> 00:29:33,800 Speaker 1: like traditional gender roles, and not let people brainwash our kids. 548 00:29:34,280 --> 00:29:37,680 Speaker 1: That is a very popular position, and it was amazing 549 00:29:37,720 --> 00:29:40,440 Speaker 1: to me that the left could immediately drop a lot 550 00:29:40,480 --> 00:29:44,760 Speaker 1: of that pivot to the extremely popular position of like, hey, 551 00:29:44,840 --> 00:29:48,800 Speaker 1: like women, women are under attack, and they can just 552 00:29:49,320 --> 00:29:52,400 Speaker 1: pivot to this new ground, which again just scrambles the 553 00:29:52,520 --> 00:29:55,280 Speaker 1: entire new way that this conversation was trending. And so 554 00:29:55,640 --> 00:29:58,200 Speaker 1: I think it's important. Look, I'm obviously a supporter of 555 00:29:59,200 --> 00:30:02,000 Speaker 1: trans writes and trans equality, and you know, I have 556 00:30:02,160 --> 00:30:04,680 Speaker 1: issues with what's going on in Florida. Where I have 557 00:30:04,960 --> 00:30:07,800 Speaker 1: problems is because is because there's an instinct on the 558 00:30:07,920 --> 00:30:11,200 Speaker 1: left to obsess over this language and like condemn you 559 00:30:11,240 --> 00:30:13,520 Speaker 1: as like a hateful bigot if you don't use the 560 00:30:13,680 --> 00:30:16,640 Speaker 1: like birthing people language, which you know, I mean, the 561 00:30:16,680 --> 00:30:20,200 Speaker 1: whole goal should be like broadening the coalition, helping bring 562 00:30:20,240 --> 00:30:22,520 Speaker 1: along people who may not be exactly where you are 563 00:30:22,560 --> 00:30:24,680 Speaker 1: to start with. And when you use language that's very 564 00:30:24,720 --> 00:30:28,480 Speaker 1: like niche academic and you know, off putting from the start, 565 00:30:28,560 --> 00:30:32,400 Speaker 1: like latinx is the perfect example of this, you aren't 566 00:30:32,400 --> 00:30:35,280 Speaker 1: doing the work of broadening the coalition, and in fact, 567 00:30:35,400 --> 00:30:37,840 Speaker 1: you're just you know, sort of trying to virtue signal 568 00:30:37,880 --> 00:30:40,280 Speaker 1: and put yourself in your own little niche club that's 569 00:30:40,320 --> 00:30:43,120 Speaker 1: always going to be politically irrelevant. So that's my issue 570 00:30:43,120 --> 00:30:47,280 Speaker 1: with like the woke language. And it also oftentimes gets 571 00:30:47,320 --> 00:30:50,720 Speaker 1: weaponized to cover by corporate forces, to cover like Disney, 572 00:30:51,040 --> 00:30:55,960 Speaker 1: to cover for their actual like economic abuses. So that's 573 00:30:56,280 --> 00:30:58,280 Speaker 1: my issue, which is a little bit different from what 574 00:30:58,520 --> 00:31:01,720 Speaker 1: your issue ultimately is is. But I did note that 575 00:31:01,840 --> 00:31:05,480 Speaker 1: same thing as you, because you know, when I started 576 00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:09,480 Speaker 1: tweeting about Roe being overturned, I was already because I 577 00:31:09,520 --> 00:31:12,160 Speaker 1: just said women, I didn't say birthing people or whatever, 578 00:31:12,200 --> 00:31:13,920 Speaker 1: you know, and how I didn't have like caveats in 579 00:31:13,920 --> 00:31:17,760 Speaker 1: there whatever. I was actually ready to see in my comments, 580 00:31:17,800 --> 00:31:21,400 Speaker 1: like a backlash about my being insensitive or whatever, because 581 00:31:21,440 --> 00:31:25,200 Speaker 1: we had seen Bernie Sanders tweeted something along these lines 582 00:31:25,240 --> 00:31:28,040 Speaker 1: a while back and got all this backlash about like 583 00:31:28,200 --> 00:31:30,920 Speaker 1: he said something about women and women's rights and got 584 00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:33,040 Speaker 1: you know, backlash in the comments about not using the 585 00:31:33,120 --> 00:31:34,480 Speaker 1: right language. So I was kind of ready for that, 586 00:31:34,520 --> 00:31:37,120 Speaker 1: and I didn't see it at all. I'm not done. Yeah, 587 00:31:37,120 --> 00:31:39,320 Speaker 1: So when it really comes down to it, everybody knows 588 00:31:39,360 --> 00:31:42,840 Speaker 1: this it was bullshit. You know. Well, I think it's interesting. 589 00:31:43,000 --> 00:31:44,760 Speaker 1: I think it's just like you said, there was a 590 00:31:44,800 --> 00:31:47,760 Speaker 1: recognition that like, oh, we're let's like, let's not mess 591 00:31:47,800 --> 00:31:50,160 Speaker 1: this one up by using language that puts us out 592 00:31:50,160 --> 00:31:53,959 Speaker 1: of step with you know, just a sort of maturitarian 593 00:31:54,240 --> 00:31:59,200 Speaker 1: language and sentiments. So interesting. I think it's an interesting phenomenon. Uh, 594 00:31:59,480 --> 00:32:02,120 Speaker 1: you know, not good for the right in my opinion electorally, 595 00:32:02,200 --> 00:32:04,400 Speaker 1: but we'll see how it plays out with It's interesting 596 00:32:04,400 --> 00:32:06,400 Speaker 1: also to see the way that Dave's talking. Okay, guys, 597 00:32:06,400 --> 00:32:11,080 Speaker 1: some very interesting and rather revealing developments on the Democratic side. 598 00:32:11,080 --> 00:32:13,720 Speaker 1: So of course the Democratic Party and many other people, 599 00:32:13,760 --> 00:32:16,120 Speaker 1: by the way, very upset about the leak draft that 600 00:32:16,200 --> 00:32:19,720 Speaker 1: appears to overturn Roe versus way Wade that's going to 601 00:32:19,760 --> 00:32:24,320 Speaker 1: be imminently decided by the Supreme Court. Literally the day 602 00:32:24,440 --> 00:32:29,200 Speaker 1: after this decision leaks, Jim Clyburn, one of the most 603 00:32:29,240 --> 00:32:32,400 Speaker 1: powerful Democrats in the House and really in the country, 604 00:32:32,920 --> 00:32:36,800 Speaker 1: decides to fly down to Texas to campaign on behalf 605 00:32:36,880 --> 00:32:42,320 Speaker 1: of one of the last anti abortion Democratic lawmakers, Henry Quaar, 606 00:32:42,400 --> 00:32:46,160 Speaker 1: who is facing a very tough primary opponent from the left, Jessicasisnares. 607 00:32:46,320 --> 00:32:48,240 Speaker 1: Let's go ahead and throw this tweet up on the 608 00:32:48,240 --> 00:32:51,080 Speaker 1: screen from Ryan Graham. He says, Clyburn planning to rally 609 00:32:51,120 --> 00:32:54,800 Speaker 1: with the party's staunchest foe of abortion rights, the Pelosi 610 00:32:54,880 --> 00:32:57,800 Speaker 1: backed Henry Quaar, because this is all a game of 611 00:32:57,840 --> 00:33:01,000 Speaker 1: ego to them. At this point. He was there, There's 612 00:33:01,000 --> 00:33:04,080 Speaker 1: a video of him speaking at a rally, and I 613 00:33:04,080 --> 00:33:06,959 Speaker 1: mean it really just exposes like what a bunch of 614 00:33:07,040 --> 00:33:09,240 Speaker 1: liars they are when it comes to what they actually 615 00:33:09,280 --> 00:33:12,960 Speaker 1: care about. And they're happy to use this language, existential language, 616 00:33:12,960 --> 00:33:16,960 Speaker 1: apocalyptic language, promise that they're the real, you know, supporters 617 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:20,240 Speaker 1: of women's rights. And yet you have a candidate in 618 00:33:20,280 --> 00:33:24,040 Speaker 1: this race who actually supports those things in Jessica Cisnaros, 619 00:33:24,280 --> 00:33:26,360 Speaker 1: and not only are you not backing her, you are 620 00:33:26,400 --> 00:33:30,320 Speaker 1: actively trying to defeat her. This is a relatively blue 621 00:33:30,360 --> 00:33:33,040 Speaker 1: district too, so it's not like, you know, this is 622 00:33:33,080 --> 00:33:35,440 Speaker 1: really how they could make the argument like, oh, if 623 00:33:35,480 --> 00:33:38,160 Speaker 1: we nominate this lefty person, the district is going to fall. 624 00:33:38,720 --> 00:33:42,240 Speaker 1: The district looks like it's fairly safe for Democrats ultimately, 625 00:33:42,360 --> 00:33:45,120 Speaker 1: so this is all just about making sure they get 626 00:33:45,240 --> 00:33:47,480 Speaker 1: their buddy who's going to take the right vote when 627 00:33:47,480 --> 00:33:49,840 Speaker 1: it comes to who will hold leadership positions. That's all 628 00:33:49,880 --> 00:33:53,760 Speaker 1: they really ultimately care about. Here. Also worth noting this 629 00:33:53,840 --> 00:33:57,560 Speaker 1: is a rematch. Last time around, Cis Narrows came very 630 00:33:57,600 --> 00:34:01,680 Speaker 1: close to winning the Democratic primary. In the runoff, Quaar 631 00:34:01,800 --> 00:34:04,880 Speaker 1: received forty eight point four percent. Cisnaros had forty six 632 00:34:04,880 --> 00:34:08,040 Speaker 1: point nine. Then Quaar won outright in the runoff, defeating 633 00:34:08,040 --> 00:34:09,960 Speaker 1: her by just a couple of percentage points. So it 634 00:34:10,040 --> 00:34:13,799 Speaker 1: was really quite close last time around. We'll see this 635 00:34:13,920 --> 00:34:16,279 Speaker 1: election is just coming up next week. I believe we'll 636 00:34:16,320 --> 00:34:19,719 Speaker 1: see if ultimately the politics of Roe put Jessica over 637 00:34:19,760 --> 00:34:21,759 Speaker 1: the top this time when she wasn't able to get 638 00:34:21,760 --> 00:34:24,120 Speaker 1: it done last time, there's no way to know obviously, 639 00:34:24,239 --> 00:34:26,239 Speaker 1: right as one of the things. Also, Quaar is under 640 00:34:26,239 --> 00:34:29,960 Speaker 1: FBI investigation, by the way, by the way, say there's 641 00:34:29,960 --> 00:34:32,919 Speaker 1: no way to know nothing said, Quaar actually is under 642 00:34:33,000 --> 00:34:37,120 Speaker 1: FBI investigation right now. It's I think it's unclear exactly 643 00:34:37,200 --> 00:34:41,080 Speaker 1: why it's what is it a quasi bribery type scandal 644 00:34:41,200 --> 00:34:44,279 Speaker 1: in terms of campaign finance? Anyway, I don't want the 645 00:34:44,320 --> 00:34:47,080 Speaker 1: lawyers to come after me. He is definitely under FBI 646 00:34:47,120 --> 00:34:49,440 Speaker 1: investigation right ahead of the election, which you know, the 647 00:34:49,520 --> 00:34:52,520 Speaker 1: FBI generally does not do that unless it is something 648 00:34:52,560 --> 00:34:55,279 Speaker 1: which is pretty important. As you said. Pelosi put that 649 00:34:55,360 --> 00:34:58,440 Speaker 1: up there on the screen. Affirmed her support for Quaar 650 00:34:58,520 --> 00:35:01,879 Speaker 1: after the FBI raid, saying, I support my incumbents life. 651 00:35:02,080 --> 00:35:06,000 Speaker 1: That's what I do. Interesting, yeah, very I mean, like 652 00:35:06,040 --> 00:35:07,960 Speaker 1: I said, the one thing they really care about is 653 00:35:07,960 --> 00:35:09,960 Speaker 1: that he's going to make the right vote in their 654 00:35:10,000 --> 00:35:13,320 Speaker 1: opinion when it comes to who remains Speaker, who remains 655 00:35:13,320 --> 00:35:15,520 Speaker 1: in the top leadership positions. They know that he'll be 656 00:35:15,640 --> 00:35:17,959 Speaker 1: a reliable vote for them when it comes to those 657 00:35:18,160 --> 00:35:22,080 Speaker 1: core interests. So it's quite revealing. The last piece that 658 00:35:22,120 --> 00:35:25,000 Speaker 1: our producer James pulled for us here is just you know, 659 00:35:25,280 --> 00:35:29,680 Speaker 1: this is a heavily majority Latino district and obviously Latinos 660 00:35:29,680 --> 00:35:32,400 Speaker 1: have been moving away from the Democratic Party. There was 661 00:35:32,440 --> 00:35:35,880 Speaker 1: an Ipsos Axios Ipsos poll that basically found that a 662 00:35:35,880 --> 00:35:38,239 Speaker 1: lot of Latino Americans just feel like both of the 663 00:35:38,239 --> 00:35:41,200 Speaker 1: parties completely sort of take them for granted and you know, 664 00:35:41,320 --> 00:35:44,160 Speaker 1: don't really do much to actually understand and deliver for 665 00:35:44,200 --> 00:35:46,000 Speaker 1: them in terms of the issues that they care about, 666 00:35:46,040 --> 00:35:49,560 Speaker 1: which I think is certainly the case and certainly likely 667 00:35:49,600 --> 00:35:51,319 Speaker 1: to be the case in this district as well. So 668 00:35:51,680 --> 00:35:54,040 Speaker 1: we'll see how it all plays out. But again, just 669 00:35:54,320 --> 00:35:56,799 Speaker 1: in case you were wondering how sincere Democrats are on 670 00:35:56,840 --> 00:35:59,640 Speaker 1: these issues, they care more about using the issues for 671 00:35:59,719 --> 00:36:02,200 Speaker 1: votes in power, just like the Republicans. By the way, 672 00:36:02,440 --> 00:36:04,959 Speaker 1: then they do actually delivering, and if you had any 673 00:36:05,000 --> 00:36:09,600 Speaker 1: doubt about that, their desire and willingness to line up 674 00:36:09,719 --> 00:36:12,920 Speaker 1: behind Henry Quayar traveled to his district to rally for 675 00:36:13,080 --> 00:36:16,440 Speaker 1: him before his election literally the day after this leak 676 00:36:16,520 --> 00:36:18,960 Speaker 1: decision comes out tells you everything you need to know. There, go, 677 00:36:19,280 --> 00:36:24,000 Speaker 1: all right, guys, thanks for watching. More for you later. Hey, guys, 678 00:36:24,080 --> 00:36:26,440 Speaker 1: Kyle Kolinski is letting us post some of the clips 679 00:36:26,440 --> 00:36:29,440 Speaker 1: from his channel that we think you guys will really 680 00:36:29,480 --> 00:36:32,480 Speaker 1: love in the Breaking Points community on our channel. Yep, 681 00:36:32,600 --> 00:36:35,680 Speaker 1: let's get to it. So I was genuinely surprised by 682 00:36:35,680 --> 00:36:38,680 Speaker 1: the video that you guys are about to see Dana 683 00:36:38,680 --> 00:36:41,520 Speaker 1: Bash of CNN, who usually I am no fan of 684 00:36:41,600 --> 00:36:45,920 Speaker 1: at all. I think she's very milk toast, conventional wisdom 685 00:36:45,960 --> 00:36:51,320 Speaker 1: spewing machine. But she actually pressed a Biden administration official 686 00:36:51,920 --> 00:36:57,360 Speaker 1: over this new thing that they've decided to pursue, which 687 00:36:57,400 --> 00:37:01,600 Speaker 1: is a disinformations are at the Department of Homeland Security. 688 00:37:02,480 --> 00:37:06,600 Speaker 1: Now that's concerning on its own that the government is 689 00:37:06,640 --> 00:37:10,440 Speaker 1: involved in determining what isn't isn't disinformation because of course 690 00:37:10,760 --> 00:37:13,600 Speaker 1: they have their own biases and their own beliefs and 691 00:37:13,640 --> 00:37:16,920 Speaker 1: their own agenda, and they're not objective, they're not neutral, 692 00:37:16,960 --> 00:37:22,120 Speaker 1: they're not balanced. They are effectively operating as the Ministry 693 00:37:22,120 --> 00:37:25,080 Speaker 1: of Truth. Again, it's at the Department Homelandecurity. Now, the 694 00:37:25,160 --> 00:37:30,440 Speaker 1: person who was picked for this position is also incredibly biased, 695 00:37:30,520 --> 00:37:34,319 Speaker 1: and she has her own blind spots. I mean, there 696 00:37:34,400 --> 00:37:38,840 Speaker 1: was She apparently was tweeting about how the Hunter Biden 697 00:37:38,920 --> 00:37:41,640 Speaker 1: laptop thing was Russian disinformation and that it was a 698 00:37:41,640 --> 00:37:43,440 Speaker 1: good thing that it was censored on Twitter and various 699 00:37:43,480 --> 00:37:47,160 Speaker 1: social media outlets. Well, now we know from verification from 700 00:37:47,160 --> 00:37:50,719 Speaker 1: the New York Times including others, that it wasn't Russian disinformation, 701 00:37:51,040 --> 00:37:53,480 Speaker 1: that was really his laptop and those were really the emails. Now, 702 00:37:53,560 --> 00:37:56,319 Speaker 1: I'm not interested in all the personal stuff about Hunter Biden. 703 00:37:56,360 --> 00:37:57,480 Speaker 1: I think that goes too far, and he has a 704 00:37:57,520 --> 00:37:59,239 Speaker 1: right to privacy. Nobody should care about a drug use 705 00:37:59,280 --> 00:38:02,480 Speaker 1: or sex habits or what. But certainly the emails involving 706 00:38:02,480 --> 00:38:05,680 Speaker 1: corruption and business interests and his dad, those are fair game. 707 00:38:06,600 --> 00:38:08,359 Speaker 1: And of course the New York Post was banned from 708 00:38:08,400 --> 00:38:12,040 Speaker 1: Twitter because they ran that story leading up to the election. 709 00:38:12,640 --> 00:38:16,120 Speaker 1: I mean, that is inexcuseable. She defended that, she liked that. 710 00:38:16,200 --> 00:38:19,399 Speaker 1: And now this is the person who's the disinformations are 711 00:38:20,080 --> 00:38:23,720 Speaker 1: for their department, Homeland Security. So Dana Bash of CNN 712 00:38:23,960 --> 00:38:27,320 Speaker 1: is talking to bide administration official here, and she's actually 713 00:38:27,360 --> 00:38:30,279 Speaker 1: going to press him on whether or not this is 714 00:38:30,320 --> 00:38:32,399 Speaker 1: a good idea and why should we have it at all. 715 00:38:32,480 --> 00:38:35,279 Speaker 1: Take a look what you are calling your department is 716 00:38:35,400 --> 00:38:40,440 Speaker 1: calling the Disinformation Governance Board. You unveiled that this week. 717 00:38:40,640 --> 00:38:44,200 Speaker 1: Republicans are calling it or well ian and comparing it 718 00:38:44,239 --> 00:38:47,040 Speaker 1: to the Ministry of Truth in the novel nineteen eighty four. 719 00:38:47,520 --> 00:38:52,480 Speaker 1: Can you clarify what exactly is this? What exactly will 720 00:38:52,520 --> 00:38:57,319 Speaker 1: this Disinformation Governance Board do? Will it monitor American citizens? Dan, 721 00:38:57,400 --> 00:39:01,200 Speaker 1: I'm very pleased to do so. It's I mean, those 722 00:39:01,360 --> 00:39:06,080 Speaker 1: criticisms are precisely the opposite of what this small working 723 00:39:06,120 --> 00:39:10,359 Speaker 1: group within the Department of Homeland Security will do. And 724 00:39:11,480 --> 00:39:13,919 Speaker 1: I think we probably could have done a better job 725 00:39:13,960 --> 00:39:17,160 Speaker 1: of communicating what it does and does not do. So 726 00:39:17,360 --> 00:39:23,640 Speaker 1: the fact is that disinformation that creates a threat to 727 00:39:23,760 --> 00:39:27,640 Speaker 1: the security of the homeland is our responsibility to address, 728 00:39:28,080 --> 00:39:31,920 Speaker 1: and this department has been addressing it for years, throughout 729 00:39:31,960 --> 00:39:35,200 Speaker 1: the years of the prior administration and an ongoing basis 730 00:39:35,560 --> 00:39:39,080 Speaker 1: disinformation from Russia China. We know the problems, but it's 731 00:39:39,120 --> 00:39:42,719 Speaker 1: still not clear to me how this Governance Board will act, 732 00:39:43,000 --> 00:39:45,880 Speaker 1: what will it do? So, what it does is it 733 00:39:46,000 --> 00:39:51,160 Speaker 1: works to ensure that the way in which we address threats, 734 00:39:51,800 --> 00:39:56,840 Speaker 1: the connectivity between threats and acts of violence are addressed 735 00:39:56,880 --> 00:40:02,240 Speaker 1: without infringing on free speech, protecting civil rights and civil liberties, 736 00:40:02,480 --> 00:40:06,640 Speaker 1: the right of privacy, and the board, this working group, 737 00:40:06,800 --> 00:40:12,120 Speaker 1: internal working group will draw from best practices and communicate 738 00:40:12,160 --> 00:40:15,879 Speaker 1: those best practices to the operators. Because the board does 739 00:40:15,880 --> 00:40:19,560 Speaker 1: not have operational authority, will American citizens be monitored? No 740 00:40:20,600 --> 00:40:23,520 Speaker 1: guarantee that, well, so what we do We in the 741 00:40:23,520 --> 00:40:28,440 Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security don't monitor American citizens, don't, but 742 00:40:28,480 --> 00:40:30,399 Speaker 1: we use board change that. No, no, no, The board 743 00:40:30,480 --> 00:40:35,319 Speaker 1: does not have any operational authority or capability. What it 744 00:40:35,440 --> 00:40:39,719 Speaker 1: will do is gathered together best practices in addressing the 745 00:40:39,760 --> 00:40:45,520 Speaker 1: threat of disinformation from foreign state adversaries, from the cartels, 746 00:40:45,960 --> 00:40:49,560 Speaker 1: and disseminate those best practices to the operators that have 747 00:40:49,640 --> 00:40:53,839 Speaker 1: been executing in addressing this threat for years. Republicans are 748 00:40:53,880 --> 00:40:59,600 Speaker 1: criticizing your decision, the administration's decision to choose Nina Jankowitz 749 00:40:59,640 --> 00:41:02,759 Speaker 1: to lead this disinformation board. They say she is not 750 00:41:02,960 --> 00:41:07,880 Speaker 1: somebody who is neutral. Your response, eminently qualified, a renowned 751 00:41:07,920 --> 00:41:13,000 Speaker 1: expert in the field of inutuation. Absolutely so. Would you 752 00:41:13,040 --> 00:41:16,960 Speaker 1: be okay if Donald Trump were president, if he created 753 00:41:17,000 --> 00:41:20,200 Speaker 1: this Disinformation Governance Board, or if it is in place 754 00:41:20,360 --> 00:41:22,680 Speaker 1: and he wins again in twenty twenty four that he's 755 00:41:22,719 --> 00:41:25,000 Speaker 1: in charge of such a thing. I believe that this 756 00:41:25,120 --> 00:41:30,319 Speaker 1: working group that gathers together gathers together best practices, make 757 00:41:30,440 --> 00:41:35,279 Speaker 1: sure that our work is coordinated consistent with those best practices. 758 00:41:35,600 --> 00:41:38,680 Speaker 1: That we're safeguarding the right of free speech, that we're 759 00:41:38,760 --> 00:41:42,680 Speaker 1: safeguarding civil liberties. I think is an extraordinarily important endeavor. 760 00:41:43,280 --> 00:41:46,719 Speaker 1: All right, So before I go comment for comment here 761 00:41:46,719 --> 00:41:49,359 Speaker 1: and break down what he argues, let me just say 762 00:41:49,360 --> 00:41:52,360 Speaker 1: that we learned yesterday. Now, to be fair, I have 763 00:41:52,480 --> 00:41:56,160 Speaker 1: no idea if the disinformations are the Department Homeland Security 764 00:41:56,200 --> 00:41:59,360 Speaker 1: is directly connected to what happened in this instance, but 765 00:41:59,520 --> 00:42:02,319 Speaker 1: the timing, of course is suspicious. So soon like a 766 00:42:02,360 --> 00:42:06,879 Speaker 1: couple of days after this woman is picked. They're independent 767 00:42:07,120 --> 00:42:12,080 Speaker 1: news websites mint press News and Consortium News that just 768 00:42:12,160 --> 00:42:16,319 Speaker 1: had their paypals acted. Their paypals were banned, and in 769 00:42:16,400 --> 00:42:20,239 Speaker 1: one instance, PayPal may even seize the balance of the 770 00:42:20,320 --> 00:42:25,359 Speaker 1: money from Consortium News. Now I have no idea where 771 00:42:25,400 --> 00:42:28,560 Speaker 1: mint press News or Consortium News gets their funding from. 772 00:42:29,000 --> 00:42:32,839 Speaker 1: But frankly I don't care, because even if it is 773 00:42:32,920 --> 00:42:38,040 Speaker 1: some sort of like you know, foreign government, there's that's allowed, 774 00:42:38,120 --> 00:42:41,080 Speaker 1: Like you're allowed to have the BBC functions in the US. 775 00:42:41,440 --> 00:42:45,760 Speaker 1: It's being funded by the UK. So is that not allowed? 776 00:42:46,600 --> 00:42:50,360 Speaker 1: Is It only allowed when the government's funding the news 777 00:42:50,360 --> 00:42:54,000 Speaker 1: outlets or so called news outlets in the US are 778 00:42:54,120 --> 00:42:57,560 Speaker 1: ally governments. If it's an enemy government, it's just not allowed. 779 00:42:58,040 --> 00:43:01,360 Speaker 1: I mean there's you know, I forget which government in 780 00:43:01,400 --> 00:43:05,040 Speaker 1: South America funds tell Asur news, but there's a government 781 00:43:05,040 --> 00:43:07,200 Speaker 1: in South America that funds tell us Heer News. And 782 00:43:07,440 --> 00:43:10,479 Speaker 1: that's where Abby Martin for example, either used to work 783 00:43:10,760 --> 00:43:14,600 Speaker 1: or currently works. This is what it means to have 784 00:43:14,600 --> 00:43:17,640 Speaker 1: a free press. Not only is their corporate media. Not 785 00:43:17,719 --> 00:43:20,480 Speaker 1: only is there you know, US funded media like PBS 786 00:43:20,600 --> 00:43:23,320 Speaker 1: or NPR or something like that. There can be foreign 787 00:43:23,600 --> 00:43:28,600 Speaker 1: government funded media. There could be independent funded media like 788 00:43:28,960 --> 00:43:34,200 Speaker 1: you're allowed to have. That be the case. That's not illegal, 789 00:43:34,840 --> 00:43:38,520 Speaker 1: and if anything, you could argue it's actually it's actually 790 00:43:38,600 --> 00:43:41,640 Speaker 1: a good thing because if you understand what it is 791 00:43:41,640 --> 00:43:43,920 Speaker 1: that you're looking at, then you can get different perspectives. 792 00:43:44,280 --> 00:43:48,120 Speaker 1: You know, the idea of like shutting down on cracking 793 00:43:48,160 --> 00:43:52,000 Speaker 1: down on Russian funded news outlets here I don't agree with, 794 00:43:52,360 --> 00:43:54,719 Speaker 1: not because I agree with their analysis on like the 795 00:43:54,760 --> 00:43:57,399 Speaker 1: war in Ukraine, because I want to know the line 796 00:43:57,400 --> 00:44:02,000 Speaker 1: of argument coming from Vladimir Putin and Russia in the 797 00:44:02,040 --> 00:44:04,920 Speaker 1: situation in Ukraine, even if it just ends up ultimately 798 00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:09,240 Speaker 1: in many instances being like comedy to me being absurdly biased. 799 00:44:10,120 --> 00:44:15,720 Speaker 1: So midpress news and consorting news having their PayPal jacked 800 00:44:15,719 --> 00:44:18,319 Speaker 1: from them, that is not okay. And the other thing 801 00:44:18,400 --> 00:44:21,200 Speaker 1: it shows is, and we've known this because of Facebook, 802 00:44:21,239 --> 00:44:24,759 Speaker 1: We've known this because of Twitter. There really is high 803 00:44:24,840 --> 00:44:29,360 Speaker 1: level coordination between the intelligence agencies and these various outlets 804 00:44:29,360 --> 00:44:33,239 Speaker 1: where they're social media outlets or payment processor outlets that like, 805 00:44:34,080 --> 00:44:38,480 Speaker 1: there are some people at Facebook or Twitter or PayPal 806 00:44:39,040 --> 00:44:43,359 Speaker 1: or other outlets that are kind of taking marching orders 807 00:44:43,400 --> 00:44:46,200 Speaker 1: from the US government or having some sort of collaborative 808 00:44:47,000 --> 00:44:50,200 Speaker 1: thing where they agree on the actions that should be 809 00:44:50,239 --> 00:44:53,920 Speaker 1: taken for certain outlets. And look, you got to call 810 00:44:53,920 --> 00:44:56,920 Speaker 1: that what it is, man. That is authoritarianism. That's what 811 00:44:56,960 --> 00:45:02,760 Speaker 1: it is. It's to go down that road is incredibly 812 00:45:02,800 --> 00:45:06,719 Speaker 1: dangerous because again, it's not like US intelligence officials and 813 00:45:06,760 --> 00:45:10,560 Speaker 1: the US government are solely interested in the truth. They're 814 00:45:10,560 --> 00:45:14,400 Speaker 1: interested in the perspective of the US government. They're interested 815 00:45:14,440 --> 00:45:17,520 Speaker 1: in their own argument line and their own propaganda. And 816 00:45:17,600 --> 00:45:19,880 Speaker 1: to me, the debate ending point on this front is like, 817 00:45:21,160 --> 00:45:24,719 Speaker 1: you do know that a disinformations are. Assuming they had 818 00:45:24,760 --> 00:45:27,759 Speaker 1: control in the lead up to the Iraq War, they 819 00:45:27,800 --> 00:45:30,080 Speaker 1: would have been banning the point of view that Saddam 820 00:45:30,120 --> 00:45:33,719 Speaker 1: Hussein does not have weapons of mass destruction. Now that's 821 00:45:33,760 --> 00:45:36,319 Speaker 1: the correct view, it turns out, but they would have 822 00:45:36,320 --> 00:45:39,160 Speaker 1: banned that why because it didn't jive with what the 823 00:45:39,200 --> 00:45:41,760 Speaker 1: intelligence officials in the US were saying and the argument 824 00:45:41,800 --> 00:45:47,040 Speaker 1: that the government was trying to push. So, like, there's 825 00:45:47,080 --> 00:45:50,120 Speaker 1: no such thing as an actually neutral fact checker, it 826 00:45:50,239 --> 00:45:53,800 Speaker 1: just doesn't exist. Everybody has blind spots. Everybody gets things wrong. 827 00:45:54,080 --> 00:45:56,520 Speaker 1: You know, I wouldn't trust myself in the position to 828 00:45:56,640 --> 00:46:00,320 Speaker 1: determine what is and isn't seen because even though obviously 829 00:46:00,360 --> 00:46:02,480 Speaker 1: I think I'm right most of the time, but there 830 00:46:02,480 --> 00:46:04,799 Speaker 1: could be things I get wrong, and I don't want 831 00:46:04,800 --> 00:46:08,440 Speaker 1: to have the phenomenal power of just pulling down some 832 00:46:08,480 --> 00:46:10,840 Speaker 1: stuff or totally cutting off the funding of an outlet 833 00:46:11,880 --> 00:46:17,239 Speaker 1: and being wrong about it. So it's just it's not 834 00:46:17,320 --> 00:46:19,120 Speaker 1: good man. And we've seen this in a variety of 835 00:46:19,120 --> 00:46:20,920 Speaker 1: different ways. We've seen this manifest in a variety of 836 00:46:20,920 --> 00:46:25,160 Speaker 1: different ways. Chris Hedges had like he had worked for 837 00:46:25,280 --> 00:46:30,400 Speaker 1: RT and he ended up having his entire you know, 838 00:46:30,560 --> 00:46:33,360 Speaker 1: archive of stuff being pulled down. I think it was 839 00:46:33,360 --> 00:46:37,160 Speaker 1: pulled down from YouTube, and there's stuff, you know, the 840 00:46:37,200 --> 00:46:39,400 Speaker 1: idea of like oh, since he worked for art, it's illegitimate. 841 00:46:39,440 --> 00:46:41,440 Speaker 1: He even criticized the Russian government in a lot of 842 00:46:41,440 --> 00:46:44,080 Speaker 1: the stuff, and it was pulled down. I mean, it's 843 00:46:44,120 --> 00:46:46,719 Speaker 1: just it is just authoritarian. Now, let's go through some 844 00:46:46,719 --> 00:46:52,800 Speaker 1: of the arguments that were made here. He says this, 845 00:46:52,800 --> 00:46:56,520 Speaker 1: this working group is there to ensure that the way 846 00:46:56,520 --> 00:46:59,480 Speaker 1: we connect threats are consistent with civil liberties and rights. 847 00:46:59,480 --> 00:47:01,640 Speaker 1: I don't know what that means. I don't know what 848 00:47:01,680 --> 00:47:03,839 Speaker 1: that means. I don't understand what that point means. Then 849 00:47:03,840 --> 00:47:06,920 Speaker 1: he says he's asked will American citizens be monitored? He 850 00:47:06,960 --> 00:47:12,719 Speaker 1: says no, Okay, I'm reminded of when James Clapper of 851 00:47:12,760 --> 00:47:15,239 Speaker 1: the NSA was asked, are you spying on Americans or 852 00:47:15,280 --> 00:47:19,880 Speaker 1: collecting data on Americans? And his response was no, quote 853 00:47:20,040 --> 00:47:22,040 Speaker 1: not wittingly, And then of course we found out through 854 00:47:22,040 --> 00:47:24,920 Speaker 1: the snod and leaks that was a total lie. They 855 00:47:24,920 --> 00:47:29,840 Speaker 1: were connecting collecting metadata on virtually all Americans. So they 856 00:47:30,000 --> 00:47:32,840 Speaker 1: just you know, you can't trust these people. Now supposed 857 00:47:32,840 --> 00:47:36,239 Speaker 1: to take what they say at face value. Then he 858 00:47:36,280 --> 00:47:37,960 Speaker 1: goes on to say, well, they have no authority or 859 00:47:37,960 --> 00:47:41,560 Speaker 1: capability this group does. Okay, so why do they exist 860 00:47:42,080 --> 00:47:44,239 Speaker 1: if they're not actually doing anything. That's one of the 861 00:47:44,239 --> 00:47:46,759 Speaker 1: points he made. No authority, no capability, Okay, so why 862 00:47:46,760 --> 00:47:50,719 Speaker 1: are they doing it? Well, then they go on to say, oh, 863 00:47:51,160 --> 00:47:56,600 Speaker 1: they pass on the information to the quote operators. Oh, well, 864 00:47:56,600 --> 00:47:59,399 Speaker 1: who are the operators? Who are these people? So there 865 00:47:59,440 --> 00:48:02,719 Speaker 1: are people who have the ability and the authority to 866 00:48:03,719 --> 00:48:07,640 Speaker 1: officially crack down on disinformation and pull it from the internet. 867 00:48:08,640 --> 00:48:11,319 Speaker 1: Who are those operators? Because then they would be the 868 00:48:11,480 --> 00:48:15,640 Speaker 1: you know, the disinformation's ours, So you can't say, oh, 869 00:48:15,719 --> 00:48:17,239 Speaker 1: don't worry about it. They have no authority, they have 870 00:48:17,280 --> 00:48:19,799 Speaker 1: no capability. But then they give the information to people 871 00:48:19,800 --> 00:48:23,120 Speaker 1: who do and then they act on it because ultimately 872 00:48:23,200 --> 00:48:26,040 Speaker 1: the game's being given away there. Now you know that 873 00:48:26,160 --> 00:48:30,360 Speaker 1: there are people who crack down on disinformation or so 874 00:48:30,520 --> 00:48:33,120 Speaker 1: called disinformation, I should say, and then they bring it 875 00:48:33,200 --> 00:48:36,440 Speaker 1: up foreign state adversaries or cartels like when they're spreading 876 00:48:36,440 --> 00:48:40,720 Speaker 1: stuff that we don't agree with, that's when we take action. 877 00:48:41,320 --> 00:48:44,359 Speaker 1: But again, what about when you're wrong? What about when 878 00:48:44,400 --> 00:48:46,799 Speaker 1: you guys get stuff wrong. That's not to say the 879 00:48:46,760 --> 00:48:49,000 Speaker 1: intelligence agencies are one hundred percent of the time wrong. No, 880 00:48:49,040 --> 00:48:53,879 Speaker 1: sometimes they get stuff right, but certainly not obvious. It's 881 00:48:53,880 --> 00:48:56,680 Speaker 1: certainly not a given that you know, US intelligence will 882 00:48:56,680 --> 00:48:58,600 Speaker 1: just get stuff right. And I think it really is 883 00:48:58,640 --> 00:49:02,719 Speaker 1: a devastatingly accurate point when Dana Bash says, would you 884 00:49:02,719 --> 00:49:05,680 Speaker 1: be okay if Trump was if this Trump appointed this person, 885 00:49:06,520 --> 00:49:08,920 Speaker 1: And there's not really a good answer there, But I 886 00:49:08,920 --> 00:49:11,920 Speaker 1: can answer the question, of course not. Of course democrats 887 00:49:12,360 --> 00:49:15,799 Speaker 1: and leftists and liberals. If Trump appointed some hack, some 888 00:49:15,880 --> 00:49:18,799 Speaker 1: partisan hack who gets to determine what is in isn't disinformation, 889 00:49:18,960 --> 00:49:21,000 Speaker 1: would I'll be like, Oh, this is a partisan hack, 890 00:49:21,120 --> 00:49:24,239 Speaker 1: this is crazy, this is authoritarian, this is censorship. This 891 00:49:24,280 --> 00:49:26,440 Speaker 1: shouldn't be allowed. There's no such thing as a ministry 892 00:49:26,480 --> 00:49:29,640 Speaker 1: of truth. You know. The difference is, I'm consistent. I 893 00:49:29,680 --> 00:49:32,000 Speaker 1: think it's a hack thing to do and an authoritarian 894 00:49:32,040 --> 00:49:33,480 Speaker 1: thing to do if Biden's appointed the person, or if 895 00:49:33,480 --> 00:49:35,760 Speaker 1: Trump's appointed the person, because again, the government's not supposed 896 00:49:35,760 --> 00:49:39,799 Speaker 1: to be in this business. So I mean, honestly, I 897 00:49:39,800 --> 00:49:45,520 Speaker 1: think there's a case that you this genuinely violates the 898 00:49:45,520 --> 00:49:47,960 Speaker 1: First Amendment, not just the spirit of the First Amendment, 899 00:49:47,960 --> 00:49:50,200 Speaker 1: which is the case with most social media censorship stuff. 900 00:49:50,560 --> 00:49:53,680 Speaker 1: But if the social media outlets or the payment processors 901 00:49:53,840 --> 00:49:58,160 Speaker 1: are banning or censoring at the behest of the US government, 902 00:49:58,400 --> 00:50:02,600 Speaker 1: that might actually be unconstanttional because you're supposed to have 903 00:50:03,000 --> 00:50:06,480 Speaker 1: a free press and free expression, and if the government 904 00:50:06,520 --> 00:50:09,680 Speaker 1: is determining what views are and aren't allowed, that clearly 905 00:50:09,719 --> 00:50:11,960 Speaker 1: violates that. So if there were to be a court 906 00:50:11,960 --> 00:50:14,879 Speaker 1: case over this, I think that the disinformations are might 907 00:50:14,920 --> 00:50:16,920 Speaker 1: not even be allowed to operate, might not even be 908 00:50:16,920 --> 00:50:19,319 Speaker 1: allowed to be a thing. But they're talking about it 909 00:50:19,360 --> 00:50:24,399 Speaker 1: so casually and openly. Look, the argument I'm making is 910 00:50:24,440 --> 00:50:28,920 Speaker 1: not that, you know, disinformation isn't a problem, or misinformation 911 00:50:28,960 --> 00:50:31,319 Speaker 1: isn't a problem. Of course it's a problem, But the 912 00:50:31,360 --> 00:50:34,359 Speaker 1: issue here is anything that you would do to try 913 00:50:34,400 --> 00:50:40,279 Speaker 1: to fix that actually creates a bigger problem, because now 914 00:50:40,320 --> 00:50:42,200 Speaker 1: not only are you gonna have disinformation out there and 915 00:50:42,200 --> 00:50:45,160 Speaker 1: misinformation out there, it's always going to exist, but now 916 00:50:45,760 --> 00:50:50,600 Speaker 1: you have the blunt instrument of censorship that's wielded only 917 00:50:50,640 --> 00:50:55,200 Speaker 1: for things that deviate from the establishment perspective, and that's unacceptable. 918 00:50:55,239 --> 00:50:58,200 Speaker 1: I mean, again, the Hunter Biden laptop thing should be 919 00:50:58,280 --> 00:51:01,440 Speaker 1: game set match on this entire conversation anyway, the fact 920 00:51:01,440 --> 00:51:05,680 Speaker 1: that there were some social media outlets that would crack 921 00:51:05,800 --> 00:51:09,520 Speaker 1: down on people who floated, hey, maybe this virus came 922 00:51:09,520 --> 00:51:13,719 Speaker 1: from a lab in Wuhan. That was something in many 923 00:51:13,719 --> 00:51:16,480 Speaker 1: instances that wasn't even allowed to be discussed. And then 924 00:51:16,640 --> 00:51:20,200 Speaker 1: you know, as time went vib we realized that's certainly 925 00:51:20,200 --> 00:51:22,520 Speaker 1: a possibility. Now I don't know, it's possible came from 926 00:51:22,560 --> 00:51:24,959 Speaker 1: the wet market too, but you should definitely be allowed 927 00:51:25,000 --> 00:51:27,680 Speaker 1: to discuss that. And in the middle of the pandemic. 928 00:51:27,760 --> 00:51:30,720 Speaker 1: As time goes by, you know, the science is evolving, 929 00:51:30,719 --> 00:51:32,560 Speaker 1: We're learning more and more things that we thought were 930 00:51:32,560 --> 00:51:34,879 Speaker 1: common sense were and then these other things become common sense. 931 00:51:35,040 --> 00:51:37,520 Speaker 1: To not be able to talk about that or speculate 932 00:51:37,560 --> 00:51:39,920 Speaker 1: about it or give your own educated guesses try to 933 00:51:39,920 --> 00:51:43,680 Speaker 1: connect the dots on your own, I think that's absurd. Now, 934 00:51:44,280 --> 00:51:46,200 Speaker 1: that's absurd. And it also is absurd that there are 935 00:51:46,239 --> 00:51:48,520 Speaker 1: people who are complete snake oil salesmen and conmen and 936 00:51:48,560 --> 00:51:52,080 Speaker 1: frauds and charlatan's who are you know, putting bogus cures 937 00:51:52,080 --> 00:51:54,839 Speaker 1: out there and stuff and have terribly backwards opinion. It's 938 00:51:54,880 --> 00:51:57,279 Speaker 1: not based on the evidence at all. But again, any 939 00:51:57,320 --> 00:52:01,319 Speaker 1: sort of attempt to fix this actually just creates a 940 00:52:01,360 --> 00:52:03,160 Speaker 1: bigger problem because now we have to deal with the 941 00:52:03,200 --> 00:52:07,560 Speaker 1: issue of like walking on eggshells and nobody being able 942 00:52:07,560 --> 00:52:12,320 Speaker 1: to actually speak their mind, because what if somebody decides 943 00:52:13,040 --> 00:52:20,200 Speaker 1: I disagree with that, can't even allow it. So I mean, look, 944 00:52:20,360 --> 00:52:22,560 Speaker 1: just the next time there's a run up to war, 945 00:52:23,320 --> 00:52:28,759 Speaker 1: remember this because anybody who's countering the narrative, because whenever 946 00:52:28,760 --> 00:52:31,120 Speaker 1: there's a push for war, it's a fever pitch and 947 00:52:31,160 --> 00:52:34,239 Speaker 1: everybody's all in on all the arguments as to why 948 00:52:34,320 --> 00:52:37,080 Speaker 1: the Bady nation is bad. And anybody who comes in 949 00:52:37,120 --> 00:52:38,680 Speaker 1: and tries to temper that and say, hey, here's some 950 00:52:38,719 --> 00:52:41,000 Speaker 1: mitigating facts, here's some nuance. Maybe this isn't as cut 951 00:52:41,000 --> 00:52:43,560 Speaker 1: and dry as as we think. Those could be people 952 00:52:43,600 --> 00:52:46,880 Speaker 1: who get banned because oh, you're you're doing the propaganda 953 00:52:46,920 --> 00:52:52,160 Speaker 1: of quote foreign state adversaries is a bad look man, 954 00:52:52,760 --> 00:52:55,719 Speaker 1: and it is an authoritarian policy. This shouldn't even be 955 00:52:55,800 --> 00:53:01,120 Speaker 1: in the conversation. When it comes to regulation of social media, 956 00:53:01,440 --> 00:53:05,080 Speaker 1: the answer is treat them like public utilities, expand First 957 00:53:05,080 --> 00:53:08,759 Speaker 1: Amendment protections. You still absolutely will not be able to 958 00:53:08,760 --> 00:53:15,960 Speaker 1: do direct threats of violence, libel, slander, defamation, targeted harassment, docsing. 959 00:53:16,000 --> 00:53:19,200 Speaker 1: There are very limited rules. You can't post actual crimes 960 00:53:19,560 --> 00:53:23,040 Speaker 1: because they're criminal, so there will be rules, but the 961 00:53:23,160 --> 00:53:27,200 Speaker 1: rules are the basics. You do not censor based on 962 00:53:27,239 --> 00:53:30,360 Speaker 1: political viewpoint or even controversial takes, or even things that 963 00:53:30,440 --> 00:53:33,440 Speaker 1: might be considered quote unquote hate speech. If it's not targeted, 964 00:53:33,920 --> 00:53:38,480 Speaker 1: you're allowed to do it. The ACLU. The ACLU defended 965 00:53:38,760 --> 00:53:41,640 Speaker 1: neo Nazis and Skokie is it because they agree with 966 00:53:41,680 --> 00:53:44,080 Speaker 1: the neo Nazis and they're racists or bigots or no. 967 00:53:44,800 --> 00:53:48,279 Speaker 1: It was a principal defense that you can't it's a 968 00:53:48,320 --> 00:53:50,400 Speaker 1: slippery slope if you take away their free speech rights. 969 00:53:50,560 --> 00:53:52,640 Speaker 1: The next day they're gonna say, these communists aren't allowed 970 00:53:52,640 --> 00:53:54,520 Speaker 1: to march and say what they're in favor of because 971 00:53:54,600 --> 00:53:57,640 Speaker 1: I don't know. Stalin murdered so many people, and they're 972 00:53:57,680 --> 00:53:59,960 Speaker 1: may be some tankies there and they're apologists for Stalin, 973 00:54:00,120 --> 00:54:02,839 Speaker 1: so it's like Holocaust denial for these people to march. 974 00:54:03,000 --> 00:54:04,600 Speaker 1: They will always. There's no such thing as a little 975 00:54:04,600 --> 00:54:07,160 Speaker 1: bit of censorship. Once you start, there's no stopping, and 976 00:54:07,160 --> 00:54:08,799 Speaker 1: a zillion things are gonna be censored, and it's gonna 977 00:54:08,800 --> 00:54:10,480 Speaker 1: be people you disagree with and people you agree with. 978 00:54:11,480 --> 00:54:13,480 Speaker 1: So that's what we have to do. That's what the 979 00:54:13,520 --> 00:54:16,600 Speaker 1: answer is. But this conversation is not even happening, even 980 00:54:16,600 --> 00:54:19,520 Speaker 1: among people who claim to care about free speech, even 981 00:54:19,560 --> 00:54:22,920 Speaker 1: among people who claim to not want the censorship, Nobody 982 00:54:22,920 --> 00:54:26,200 Speaker 1: gives the obvious answer, regulate all the big social media 983 00:54:26,239 --> 00:54:29,120 Speaker 1: outlets like their public utilities, and there needs to be 984 00:54:29,160 --> 00:54:32,759 Speaker 1: some sort of bill of rights for the payment processors thing, 985 00:54:33,120 --> 00:54:36,520 Speaker 1: because nobody, I mean, think about it like this. If 986 00:54:36,520 --> 00:54:41,440 Speaker 1: there's a mafia hit and the mafia don calls the 987 00:54:41,520 --> 00:54:44,400 Speaker 1: hit man on the phone and says, you know, a 988 00:54:44,640 --> 00:54:48,160 Speaker 1: little Tony's over there on forty second Street and they'll 989 00:54:48,160 --> 00:54:49,960 Speaker 1: be there until five, and then he leaves, so go 990 00:54:50,000 --> 00:54:51,600 Speaker 1: take care of business, if you know what I'm saying, 991 00:54:52,520 --> 00:54:56,960 Speaker 1: And then somebody goes and murders little Tony. Would the 992 00:54:57,040 --> 00:55:00,719 Speaker 1: reaction to that be these people should be allowed to 993 00:55:00,800 --> 00:55:04,359 Speaker 1: use the telephone, ban their ability to use the telephone. 994 00:55:05,280 --> 00:55:08,880 Speaker 1: Nobody would say that, because everybody understands, sort of almost 995 00:55:08,920 --> 00:55:14,120 Speaker 1: innately at this point, that there aren't rules like that 996 00:55:14,520 --> 00:55:19,200 Speaker 1: for the phone. It just is. It just exists. It's 997 00:55:19,200 --> 00:55:22,799 Speaker 1: not the phone company's fault. That that happened, So you 998 00:55:22,880 --> 00:55:25,080 Speaker 1: need to start thinking about social media outlets like that 999 00:55:25,120 --> 00:55:28,800 Speaker 1: and payment processors like that. It's not signing on to 1000 00:55:29,320 --> 00:55:32,759 Speaker 1: disinformation or misinformation or conspiracy theories. To have somebody on 1001 00:55:32,800 --> 00:55:38,520 Speaker 1: social media put out a conspiracy theory or misinformation or disinformation. 1002 00:55:39,480 --> 00:55:43,720 Speaker 1: It's not agreeing with it. To cancel the payment processing 1003 00:55:43,800 --> 00:55:47,239 Speaker 1: for consorting news and mind press news that there, it's 1004 00:55:47,280 --> 00:55:50,080 Speaker 1: not PayPal. If PayPal left them up, that's not them 1005 00:55:50,120 --> 00:55:52,160 Speaker 1: saying I agree with what these people say. It's just 1006 00:55:52,200 --> 00:55:55,279 Speaker 1: that's the nature of the payment processor. There shouldn't be 1007 00:55:55,320 --> 00:55:58,520 Speaker 1: a middleman. Do you understand it. It's it's actually a 1008 00:55:58,600 --> 00:56:00,440 Speaker 1: very simple point, but it escapes a lot of people. 1009 00:56:02,640 --> 00:56:06,319 Speaker 1: You can't set up a group of people who are 1010 00:56:06,360 --> 00:56:09,360 Speaker 1: the overlords of information because they have their own problems, 1011 00:56:09,400 --> 00:56:12,480 Speaker 1: their own biases, their own misunderstandings, their own blind spots, 1012 00:56:13,080 --> 00:56:15,800 Speaker 1: and that creates a bigger problem than the current problem. 1013 00:56:15,840 --> 00:56:18,560 Speaker 1: I'm not saying that the system is perfect or would 1014 00:56:18,560 --> 00:56:20,560 Speaker 1: be perfect if we regulated them like public utilities and 1015 00:56:20,560 --> 00:56:22,720 Speaker 1: at first a member of protections, but it's the least 1016 00:56:22,760 --> 00:56:25,279 Speaker 1: bad of all bad options, and it really is in 1017 00:56:25,360 --> 00:56:30,000 Speaker 1: spirit the American way and embracing the First Amendment. So 1018 00:56:31,560 --> 00:56:35,239 Speaker 1: is not good Man, not good. Dana Bash did a 1019 00:56:35,239 --> 00:56:37,200 Speaker 1: great job there, but the fact that this thing exists 1020 00:56:37,239 --> 00:56:40,840 Speaker 1: is insane. It is not a right wing position to 1021 00:56:40,880 --> 00:56:42,279 Speaker 1: say you've got to get rid of this idea of 1022 00:56:42,400 --> 00:56:44,400 Speaker 1: disinformations are. In fact, I would argue it is a 1023 00:56:44,480 --> 00:56:47,640 Speaker 1: left wing position. The left wing position on all this stuff, 1024 00:56:47,640 --> 00:56:50,160 Speaker 1: whether it be the payment processors, whether it be the 1025 00:56:50,200 --> 00:56:54,880 Speaker 1: social media outlets, the left wing position is expand the 1026 00:56:54,920 --> 00:56:59,920 Speaker 1: First Amendment declare these outlets public utilities and regulated in 1027 00:57:00,040 --> 00:57:02,880 Speaker 1: accordance with the Constitution, And that's it. That's the end 1028 00:57:02,920 --> 00:57:05,440 Speaker 1: of it. Actual crimes are committed, people can be prosecuted. 1029 00:57:05,440 --> 00:57:08,920 Speaker 1: If crimes are not committed. It's called freedom, something we're 1030 00:57:08,920 --> 00:57:12,400 Speaker 1: supposed to all agree with. So that's the left wing position. 1031 00:57:12,800 --> 00:57:15,359 Speaker 1: What Biden is doing here, Why having a disinformations are 1032 00:57:15,680 --> 00:57:17,920 Speaker 1: is arguably a right wing thing, or at the very 1033 00:57:18,000 --> 00:57:20,560 Speaker 1: least it is certainly an authoritarian thing. You could say 1034 00:57:20,560 --> 00:57:22,200 Speaker 1: it's authoritarian left, or you could say it's a right 1035 00:57:22,200 --> 00:57:24,320 Speaker 1: wing position. We don't need to argue over the labels 1036 00:57:24,320 --> 00:57:27,800 Speaker 1: on this point, but you get it. But you get it. 1037 00:57:27,800 --> 00:57:29,880 Speaker 1: It's not a good path to go down and Unfortunately, 1038 00:57:29,920 --> 00:57:36,840 Speaker 1: we're going full speed down that path. Hi. I'm Maximilian Alvarez. 1039 00:57:37,080 --> 00:57:39,240 Speaker 1: I'm the editor in chief of the Real News Network 1040 00:57:39,440 --> 00:57:42,920 Speaker 1: and host of the podcast Working People, and this is 1041 00:57:42,960 --> 00:57:47,040 Speaker 1: the art of class war on breaking points. Firstly, I 1042 00:57:47,080 --> 00:57:49,640 Speaker 1: want to start by wishing everyone out there a happy 1043 00:57:49,720 --> 00:57:53,800 Speaker 1: belated May Day or International Workers Day, which was on 1044 00:57:53,920 --> 00:57:58,200 Speaker 1: May first, earlier this week and today, in the spirit 1045 00:57:58,240 --> 00:58:00,520 Speaker 1: of May Day, I want to talk to you about 1046 00:58:00,560 --> 00:58:04,400 Speaker 1: the workplace as a site of struggle, a place where 1047 00:58:04,440 --> 00:58:08,920 Speaker 1: power and control are often consolidated at the top, but 1048 00:58:09,120 --> 00:58:12,760 Speaker 1: also where power can be collectively challenged and more of 1049 00:58:12,800 --> 00:58:16,440 Speaker 1: it can be transferred to and exerted by those at 1050 00:58:16,440 --> 00:58:19,840 Speaker 1: the bottom. And we're going to focus on one particular 1051 00:58:19,920 --> 00:58:22,479 Speaker 1: way that many of us are taught to deal with 1052 00:58:22,760 --> 00:58:27,840 Speaker 1: or resolve this struggle, quitting. I want to start by 1053 00:58:28,000 --> 00:58:31,960 Speaker 1: telling you two of the most unremarkable stories you've ever heard. 1054 00:58:32,800 --> 00:58:36,240 Speaker 1: They are unremarkable because I'm positive that all of us 1055 00:58:36,320 --> 00:58:40,720 Speaker 1: have told similar stories at one point or another. Like 1056 00:58:40,800 --> 00:58:43,600 Speaker 1: many of you, I've had a lot of different jobs 1057 00:58:43,600 --> 00:58:46,920 Speaker 1: in the past. I was a pizza delivery guy before 1058 00:58:47,000 --> 00:58:52,320 Speaker 1: smartphones existed, back when managers would literally print out directions 1059 00:58:52,320 --> 00:58:56,440 Speaker 1: for deliveries and tape them onto the orders. I've worked 1060 00:58:56,440 --> 00:59:00,200 Speaker 1: a bunch of different retail jobs. I've worked at Ros 1061 00:59:00,200 --> 00:59:04,200 Speaker 1: and yogurt shop, and I've taught in college classrooms. I 1062 00:59:04,240 --> 00:59:07,800 Speaker 1: was a waiter in Chicago, and I've been a temp 1063 00:59:07,920 --> 00:59:12,640 Speaker 1: laborer working in different warehouses and factories in southern California, 1064 00:59:12,760 --> 00:59:16,520 Speaker 1: some as boring as you can imagine, some as nightmare 1065 00:59:16,560 --> 00:59:20,800 Speaker 1: filled as an Upton Sinclair book. But my first real job, 1066 00:59:21,080 --> 00:59:23,960 Speaker 1: which I basically got the day after I turned sixteen 1067 00:59:24,400 --> 00:59:27,360 Speaker 1: thanks to my big brother Zach, was at a small 1068 00:59:27,520 --> 00:59:31,760 Speaker 1: Mexican restaurant chain in Orange County called Pepes, and that 1069 00:59:31,840 --> 00:59:35,520 Speaker 1: must have been around two thousand and two. So the 1070 00:59:35,640 --> 00:59:39,439 Speaker 1: job was basically what you'd expect, exhausting lunch and dinner 1071 00:59:39,520 --> 00:59:43,600 Speaker 1: rushes followed by slow hours filled with cleaning and shooting 1072 00:59:43,640 --> 00:59:47,920 Speaker 1: the ship with coworkers, loud cooks, cracking jokes, and Spanish 1073 00:59:48,600 --> 00:59:51,560 Speaker 1: awesome custom burritos that we got to make during our 1074 00:59:51,640 --> 00:59:56,120 Speaker 1: lunch breaks, the absolute worst smelling bathrooms you've ever been in, 1075 00:59:57,880 --> 01:00:01,360 Speaker 1: and a drive through monitor that beat so loudly when 1076 01:00:01,400 --> 01:00:03,440 Speaker 1: a new car pulled up that it felt like an 1077 01:00:03,480 --> 01:00:06,560 Speaker 1: ice pick being jammed into the base of your skull, 1078 01:00:07,760 --> 01:00:11,880 Speaker 1: and one day that beep finally got to me. Honestly, 1079 01:00:11,960 --> 01:00:13,919 Speaker 1: I had only been at Pepez for a few months 1080 01:00:13,960 --> 01:00:17,240 Speaker 1: and it was fine. You know. I didn't love it, 1081 01:00:17,760 --> 01:00:20,240 Speaker 1: but I loved the food and it was a paycheck. 1082 01:00:21,040 --> 01:00:23,760 Speaker 1: But the manager I worked with was most of the 1083 01:00:23,800 --> 01:00:27,520 Speaker 1: time a real piece of shit pardon my French. And 1084 01:00:27,640 --> 01:00:30,240 Speaker 1: one day he got drunk with the head cook in 1085 01:00:30,280 --> 01:00:32,800 Speaker 1: the back and they basically both passed out in the 1086 01:00:32,840 --> 01:00:37,080 Speaker 1: walk in fridge. Then the lunch rush came and it 1087 01:00:37,160 --> 01:00:41,080 Speaker 1: was just me that awful drive through Beep and a 1088 01:00:41,120 --> 01:00:43,439 Speaker 1: new cook who only spoke Spanish and had been there 1089 01:00:43,480 --> 01:00:47,840 Speaker 1: for about one week. Now, I've been through much worse 1090 01:00:47,920 --> 01:00:51,600 Speaker 1: in my life since then, but at the time this 1091 01:00:51,680 --> 01:00:54,120 Speaker 1: felt like some straight up BS that I just really 1092 01:00:54,160 --> 01:00:57,040 Speaker 1: didn't want to put up with. Again, I was still 1093 01:00:57,040 --> 01:01:00,160 Speaker 1: fairly new. I didn't have any sway with the owner 1094 01:01:00,280 --> 01:01:03,600 Speaker 1: to do anything about the manager, so I quietly put 1095 01:01:03,680 --> 01:01:06,520 Speaker 1: in my two weeks and I quit, and I found 1096 01:01:06,560 --> 01:01:10,360 Speaker 1: a seasonal job at the mall. See I told you 1097 01:01:10,920 --> 01:01:16,840 Speaker 1: unremarkable Now. The other unremarkably common experience I had was 1098 01:01:16,960 --> 01:01:21,360 Speaker 1: standing on the hard, hot concrete floor of a boiling 1099 01:01:21,400 --> 01:01:25,960 Speaker 1: warehouse after a twelve or thirteen hour shift, drenched in sweat, 1100 01:01:26,640 --> 01:01:31,360 Speaker 1: panting alongside fifteen to twenty other panting bodies of various ages, 1101 01:01:32,040 --> 01:01:35,520 Speaker 1: listening to the steely plodding of the floor manager's boots 1102 01:01:35,560 --> 01:01:38,560 Speaker 1: as she walked up the line, pointing at the people 1103 01:01:38,680 --> 01:01:41,040 Speaker 1: she wanted to come back for more work the next day, 1104 01:01:42,320 --> 01:01:45,920 Speaker 1: people who all had families to support and lives to 1105 01:01:46,000 --> 01:01:50,960 Speaker 1: live outside of that hot box. I remember those moments. 1106 01:01:51,600 --> 01:01:54,840 Speaker 1: I remember saying the names of products that we shipped 1107 01:01:54,880 --> 01:01:57,760 Speaker 1: on repeat under my breath, just to keep my brain 1108 01:01:57,840 --> 01:02:01,000 Speaker 1: busy until the manager got to me, and I knew 1109 01:02:01,040 --> 01:02:04,439 Speaker 1: if I still had a paycheck coming. This was in 1110 01:02:04,440 --> 01:02:08,439 Speaker 1: twenty eleven, just over ten years ago, in the wake 1111 01:02:08,480 --> 01:02:13,360 Speaker 1: of the Great Recession. Now every single person standing on 1112 01:02:13,400 --> 01:02:17,280 Speaker 1: that concrete warehouse floor knew how much we all needed 1113 01:02:17,320 --> 01:02:21,560 Speaker 1: the jobs, however shitty they were, and everyone had their 1114 01:02:21,600 --> 01:02:26,320 Speaker 1: own mix of reasons. Financial necessity obviously that was the 1115 01:02:26,360 --> 01:02:29,960 Speaker 1: main one, but it could be to pay off student loans, 1116 01:02:30,200 --> 01:02:35,800 Speaker 1: or to pay a mortgage, car payments, children's school expenses, etc. Etc. 1117 01:02:36,960 --> 01:02:39,040 Speaker 1: And some had to hold onto the jobs for dear 1118 01:02:39,120 --> 01:02:43,760 Speaker 1: life because their paroles depended on it. Either way, there 1119 01:02:43,800 --> 01:02:47,280 Speaker 1: was no real sense of freedom In that situation, I 1120 01:02:47,280 --> 01:02:49,880 Speaker 1: had no choice but to be there. I had no 1121 01:02:50,040 --> 01:02:53,760 Speaker 1: choice but to take our manager's crap. I couldn't find 1122 01:02:53,800 --> 01:02:57,920 Speaker 1: any better options. A few of us could, and management 1123 01:02:58,200 --> 01:03:02,400 Speaker 1: knew that they knew like we all did, that every 1124 01:03:02,440 --> 01:03:05,640 Speaker 1: morning there would be a huddled mass of faceless silhouettes 1125 01:03:05,720 --> 01:03:08,720 Speaker 1: standing in the dark parking lot outside at four in 1126 01:03:08,760 --> 01:03:11,840 Speaker 1: the morning, waiting to see if someone didn't show up 1127 01:03:11,840 --> 01:03:17,640 Speaker 1: for their shift. These are just small, unremarkable snapshots of 1128 01:03:17,680 --> 01:03:21,760 Speaker 1: two completely mundane moments in my working life. My first 1129 01:03:21,800 --> 01:03:24,520 Speaker 1: time quitting a job, which just so happened to be 1130 01:03:24,640 --> 01:03:29,000 Speaker 1: my first job, gave me a very specific impression of 1131 01:03:29,040 --> 01:03:33,520 Speaker 1: my power and agency as an individual worker. This was 1132 01:03:33,600 --> 01:03:36,960 Speaker 1: before Wall Street and a whole mess of greedy people 1133 01:03:37,480 --> 01:03:41,280 Speaker 1: crashed the economy. This was when I was still living 1134 01:03:41,360 --> 01:03:45,800 Speaker 1: at home and didn't have extra expenses like rent and childcare. 1135 01:03:46,880 --> 01:03:48,960 Speaker 1: This was a time in my life when it felt 1136 01:03:49,000 --> 01:03:52,600 Speaker 1: true that I had the ability to protest bad pay 1137 01:03:52,800 --> 01:03:56,760 Speaker 1: or working conditions by refusing to subject myself to them 1138 01:03:57,040 --> 01:04:02,800 Speaker 1: and leaving. And that helped my young conservative conviction that 1139 01:04:02,840 --> 01:04:05,880 Speaker 1: the system was working as it should and that this 1140 01:04:06,080 --> 01:04:10,440 Speaker 1: was me acting accordingly in it the situation at the 1141 01:04:10,440 --> 01:04:15,160 Speaker 1: warehouse was entirely different. I had no real agency there. 1142 01:04:15,880 --> 01:04:18,240 Speaker 1: I needed the money, and this was the only job 1143 01:04:18,280 --> 01:04:22,560 Speaker 1: I could get. At that point, three years after the 1144 01:04:22,560 --> 01:04:26,160 Speaker 1: financial crash, I had begun to see how that system 1145 01:04:26,320 --> 01:04:29,960 Speaker 1: I once had so much faith in was doing everything 1146 01:04:30,160 --> 01:04:33,640 Speaker 1: it could to protect the wealthy and the powerful while 1147 01:04:33,760 --> 01:04:39,000 Speaker 1: tossing working people overboard left and right. Every night, after work, 1148 01:04:39,680 --> 01:04:42,440 Speaker 1: sitting in a living room full of so many memories, 1149 01:04:43,280 --> 01:04:45,640 Speaker 1: in a house that we would soon lose for good, 1150 01:04:46,560 --> 01:04:49,560 Speaker 1: my folks and I would sink deeper into a depressive 1151 01:04:49,600 --> 01:04:53,840 Speaker 1: abyss as we heard talking heads and partisan hacks sing 1152 01:04:53,920 --> 01:04:58,440 Speaker 1: triumphantly about an economic recovery that seemed to be just 1153 01:04:58,840 --> 01:05:06,520 Speaker 1: passing us by. Like so many others, we felt stuck, trapped, helpless. 1154 01:05:07,600 --> 01:05:11,040 Speaker 1: But here's my point. Whether I was a cashier at 1155 01:05:11,040 --> 01:05:14,320 Speaker 1: Pepe's at a time when the economy still felt like 1156 01:05:14,400 --> 01:05:18,200 Speaker 1: it was working and social mobility still seemed like a 1157 01:05:18,240 --> 01:05:21,880 Speaker 1: real possibility, or whether I was working as a warehouse 1158 01:05:21,920 --> 01:05:24,680 Speaker 1: temp at a time when the world itself seemed to 1159 01:05:24,680 --> 01:05:27,640 Speaker 1: have broken apart and we were all just hanging on 1160 01:05:27,760 --> 01:05:31,920 Speaker 1: for dear life. At neither point, and at almost no 1161 01:05:32,080 --> 01:05:34,920 Speaker 1: other point in my life. Did I think there was 1162 01:05:34,960 --> 01:05:39,040 Speaker 1: a third option besides quit and brave the elements, or 1163 01:05:39,080 --> 01:05:44,080 Speaker 1: don't quit, stay and take the crap. At no real 1164 01:05:44,160 --> 01:05:48,080 Speaker 1: point did I or my co workers think seriously about 1165 01:05:48,120 --> 01:05:51,920 Speaker 1: staying and doing something together to fix the problems that 1166 01:05:51,960 --> 01:05:55,680 Speaker 1: we faced at work. Now that's not to say, of course, 1167 01:05:55,760 --> 01:06:01,080 Speaker 1: that there weren't beautiful, tender, life saving moments of camaraderie 1168 01:06:01,120 --> 01:06:05,280 Speaker 1: and solidarity. Moments when a senior worker would stick up 1169 01:06:05,280 --> 01:06:09,440 Speaker 1: for me. Moments when servers and cooks and bus boys 1170 01:06:09,520 --> 01:06:13,160 Speaker 1: formed an unspoken pact to never leave women on staff 1171 01:06:13,200 --> 01:06:17,800 Speaker 1: alone with certain managers. Moments when we actually enjoyed our 1172 01:06:17,840 --> 01:06:22,640 Speaker 1: work together, covered in sweapt listening to music, stacking and 1173 01:06:22,680 --> 01:06:26,240 Speaker 1: loading palettes, and feeling like we accomplished something and that 1174 01:06:26,280 --> 01:06:29,560 Speaker 1: we were worth a damn At many of the jobs 1175 01:06:29,560 --> 01:06:35,160 Speaker 1: I've had, coworkers commiserated and laughed together. We hung out 1176 01:06:35,200 --> 01:06:38,440 Speaker 1: and learned about each other's lives, and we built bonds 1177 01:06:38,480 --> 01:06:43,080 Speaker 1: together that held outside of work. But we never organized, 1178 01:06:43,600 --> 01:06:47,680 Speaker 1: and we never thought about organizing, And when people would quit, 1179 01:06:48,560 --> 01:06:52,560 Speaker 1: it was almost always a hushed affair. At best. We'd 1180 01:06:52,560 --> 01:06:56,120 Speaker 1: have a little sendoff ceremony in the break room on 1181 01:06:56,200 --> 01:06:59,520 Speaker 1: their last day, and you know, if they quit over 1182 01:06:59,600 --> 01:07:06,040 Speaker 1: problems at work, we just quietly nodded our heads, understanding 1183 01:07:06,120 --> 01:07:09,960 Speaker 1: full well why they couldn't take it anymore, while accepting 1184 01:07:10,040 --> 01:07:15,120 Speaker 1: that the problems themselves would go unacknowledged and would remain unchanged. 1185 01:07:16,360 --> 01:07:20,520 Speaker 1: There was no moment of reckoning or self reflection from management. 1186 01:07:21,400 --> 01:07:26,520 Speaker 1: Departing employees were either quickly forgotten or remembered only as disgruntled, 1187 01:07:26,600 --> 01:07:32,720 Speaker 1: dysfunctional troublemakers. Over the past year, however, something has changed 1188 01:07:33,720 --> 01:07:35,920 Speaker 1: with the phenomenon that we've come to know as the 1189 01:07:35,920 --> 01:07:40,720 Speaker 1: Great Resignation Record. Numbers of people have been voluntarily quitting 1190 01:07:40,760 --> 01:07:44,360 Speaker 1: their jobs, reaching a height of four point five million 1191 01:07:44,400 --> 01:07:48,000 Speaker 1: people quitting in November of twenty twenty one alone, the 1192 01:07:48,120 --> 01:07:51,760 Speaker 1: highest number since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started tracking 1193 01:07:51,840 --> 01:07:57,680 Speaker 1: that data. Last year, we saw a ghoulish chorus of 1194 01:07:58,160 --> 01:08:03,560 Speaker 1: business owners, Chamber of Commerce puppets, and corporate serving politicians 1195 01:08:03,640 --> 01:08:08,320 Speaker 1: plastered on every major news network, berating working people back 1196 01:08:08,360 --> 01:08:12,640 Speaker 1: into pre pandemic subservience by calling us lazy and entitled, 1197 01:08:13,240 --> 01:08:16,960 Speaker 1: making baseless claim after baseless claim about how no one 1198 01:08:17,000 --> 01:08:21,000 Speaker 1: wants to work anymore, and then using those baseless claims 1199 01:08:21,280 --> 01:08:25,839 Speaker 1: to justify ending vital COVID relief programs instead of asking 1200 01:08:25,880 --> 01:08:29,840 Speaker 1: themselves why so many people were increasingly unwilling to take 1201 01:08:29,960 --> 01:08:34,960 Speaker 1: low paying, dead end, unsafe, or over exhausting jobs where 1202 01:08:34,960 --> 01:08:39,839 Speaker 1: they were treated as disposable. But historic numbers of workers 1203 01:08:39,920 --> 01:08:44,120 Speaker 1: standing up for themselves forced their hand and changed the narrative, 1204 01:08:45,000 --> 01:08:49,400 Speaker 1: including workers like Beth McGrath, a Walmart employee whose viral 1205 01:08:49,439 --> 01:08:52,679 Speaker 1: resignation video was covered on Breaking Points a while back. 1206 01:08:53,280 --> 01:09:17,520 Speaker 1: Take a listen, all right, attention Walmart shoppers and associates. 1207 01:09:17,720 --> 01:09:20,160 Speaker 1: My name is Beth from Electronics. I've been working at 1208 01:09:20,200 --> 01:09:22,439 Speaker 1: Walmart for almost five years, and I can say that 1209 01:09:22,479 --> 01:09:26,519 Speaker 1: everyone here is overworked and underpaid. The attendant policy is 1210 01:09:27,439 --> 01:09:31,320 Speaker 1: we are treated from management and customers poorly every day. 1211 01:09:31,360 --> 01:09:33,519 Speaker 1: Whenever we have a problem with it, we're told that 1212 01:09:33,560 --> 01:09:37,760 Speaker 1: we're replaceable. I'm tired of the constant gaslight and this 1213 01:09:37,840 --> 01:09:42,799 Speaker 1: company treats their elderly associates like manage it and this job. 1214 01:09:43,000 --> 01:09:49,559 Speaker 1: I quit now. Notice McGrath's deep breathing before she makes 1215 01:09:49,560 --> 01:09:53,439 Speaker 1: her announcement. I could feel that I could feel her 1216 01:09:53,479 --> 01:09:57,560 Speaker 1: breathing in my own chest. I've felt that same trepidation 1217 01:09:57,920 --> 01:10:01,760 Speaker 1: and fear dreamed of doing what people like her have 1218 01:10:01,840 --> 01:10:06,200 Speaker 1: done over the past year, but I never did. There's 1219 01:10:06,200 --> 01:10:09,559 Speaker 1: no one reason why so many people have been taking 1220 01:10:09,600 --> 01:10:13,439 Speaker 1: that step to quit their jobs, and those reasons vary 1221 01:10:13,560 --> 01:10:17,519 Speaker 1: depending on the person and the job. But the fact 1222 01:10:17,560 --> 01:10:21,080 Speaker 1: that so many have taken that step, and the fact 1223 01:10:21,080 --> 01:10:24,520 Speaker 1: that brave people like Beth have refused to go quietly, 1224 01:10:25,360 --> 01:10:28,479 Speaker 1: has meant that employers haven't gotten to exercise the power 1225 01:10:28,520 --> 01:10:32,720 Speaker 1: they typically have to control the terms and determine the 1226 01:10:32,840 --> 01:10:37,320 Speaker 1: learned or unlearned lessons of their employees' departures. Even if 1227 01:10:37,320 --> 01:10:41,320 Speaker 1: these record numbers of quits weren't part of some coordinated 1228 01:10:41,400 --> 01:10:45,679 Speaker 1: collective action, the fact that they have happened en mass 1229 01:10:46,000 --> 01:10:49,200 Speaker 1: and gotten so much attention has meant that the balance 1230 01:10:49,240 --> 01:10:52,720 Speaker 1: of power has shifted ever so slightly. And it's that 1231 01:10:52,920 --> 01:10:56,599 Speaker 1: cumulative mass effect that has forced many employers to actually 1232 01:10:56,640 --> 01:11:02,840 Speaker 1: look inward. Raise wages improves safety conditions and work flexibility, 1233 01:11:03,400 --> 01:11:10,000 Speaker 1: and make better offers to potential hires. And that is significant, 1234 01:11:10,400 --> 01:11:16,879 Speaker 1: But the gains are also unevenly distributed, insecure, and always 1235 01:11:16,880 --> 01:11:22,360 Speaker 1: at risk of rollbacks. I mean, inflation has already outpaced 1236 01:11:22,400 --> 01:11:26,120 Speaker 1: the average wage growth from last year. For instance, from 1237 01:11:26,160 --> 01:11:31,840 Speaker 1: companies unilaterally ripping their pandemic hero pay bumps away from 1238 01:11:31,880 --> 01:11:36,400 Speaker 1: workers to corporate pirates and landlords gleefully jacking up prices 1239 01:11:36,439 --> 01:11:39,760 Speaker 1: on all of us. We've seen how ruthlessly the order 1240 01:11:39,840 --> 01:11:43,679 Speaker 1: giving class will always try to steal back any moderate 1241 01:11:43,720 --> 01:11:47,920 Speaker 1: gains that working people make. And I don't say this 1242 01:11:48,640 --> 01:11:52,320 Speaker 1: to minimize the truly historic importance of the Great Resignation 1243 01:11:53,040 --> 01:11:56,640 Speaker 1: and the sea change it represents in people's basic relationship 1244 01:11:56,760 --> 01:12:00,479 Speaker 1: to work and in their very own sense of self worth. 1245 01:12:01,520 --> 01:12:05,000 Speaker 1: I am deeply proud of anyone who has ever had 1246 01:12:05,040 --> 01:12:08,240 Speaker 1: the bravery to say I am worth more than this, 1247 01:12:09,240 --> 01:12:15,040 Speaker 1: because you are. No matter what the system, your boss are, politicians, 1248 01:12:15,600 --> 01:12:18,720 Speaker 1: or certain toxic bootlocking people in your life may tell 1249 01:12:18,760 --> 01:12:23,880 Speaker 1: you we are worth more, We deserve more, and we 1250 01:12:23,920 --> 01:12:28,439 Speaker 1: need to fight for more. What I'm saying is that 1251 01:12:28,760 --> 01:12:31,760 Speaker 1: there are limits to what quitting can do for us 1252 01:12:31,800 --> 01:12:37,240 Speaker 1: in that fight. Ultimately, it is every individual's decision to make. 1253 01:12:38,000 --> 01:12:41,160 Speaker 1: There is no one size fits all solution here, and 1254 01:12:41,200 --> 01:12:44,520 Speaker 1: I want to be very clear that sometimes the absolute 1255 01:12:44,680 --> 01:12:49,000 Speaker 1: best and safest and healthiest thing to do is quit 1256 01:12:49,000 --> 01:12:52,200 Speaker 1: your job. And the fact that so many people have 1257 01:12:52,320 --> 01:12:56,360 Speaker 1: been looking out for themselves believing that they deserve better 1258 01:12:56,920 --> 01:13:01,000 Speaker 1: and taking that leap to prove it is mind blowing 1259 01:13:01,320 --> 01:13:05,559 Speaker 1: and I think an extremely positive thing. But what is 1260 01:13:05,640 --> 01:13:08,680 Speaker 1: also mind blowing is that there are a lot of 1261 01:13:08,680 --> 01:13:12,160 Speaker 1: working people in this country who also felt that way 1262 01:13:12,520 --> 01:13:16,200 Speaker 1: and still feel that way, who also believe that they 1263 01:13:16,240 --> 01:13:20,160 Speaker 1: deserve better, and who are proving it by staying where 1264 01:13:20,160 --> 01:13:23,559 Speaker 1: they are and fighting for a better and more humane 1265 01:13:23,560 --> 01:13:28,880 Speaker 1: work life. For example, I was up on Staten Island 1266 01:13:28,880 --> 01:13:31,479 Speaker 1: for the Real News two weeks ago to cover the 1267 01:13:31,640 --> 01:13:36,479 Speaker 1: Amazon Labor union rally, which was held before a second 1268 01:13:36,800 --> 01:13:41,080 Speaker 1: and ultimately unsuccessful union election at the LDJ five sorting Center, 1269 01:13:41,600 --> 01:13:43,960 Speaker 1: which is in the same Amazon complex as the JFK 1270 01:13:44,160 --> 01:13:49,040 Speaker 1: eight fulfillment center that successfully voted to unionize last month. Now, 1271 01:13:49,280 --> 01:13:52,080 Speaker 1: since I got back from Staten Island, a lot of 1272 01:13:52,120 --> 01:13:55,719 Speaker 1: people have been asking me to convey what the workers 1273 01:13:55,720 --> 01:13:59,840 Speaker 1: there are doing and why they're doing it. Well, this 1274 01:13:59,880 --> 01:14:03,120 Speaker 1: is pretty much it in a nutshell, you know. My message, 1275 01:14:03,160 --> 01:14:06,600 Speaker 1: as always is don't listen to me, listen to the 1276 01:14:06,600 --> 01:14:11,280 Speaker 1: workers themselves, and this is what workers have been repeatedly saying. 1277 01:14:12,280 --> 01:14:15,880 Speaker 1: We actually published a compilation of on the ground interviews 1278 01:14:15,920 --> 01:14:19,040 Speaker 1: and speeches from the rally on my podcast Working People. 1279 01:14:19,760 --> 01:14:21,760 Speaker 1: So I'm going to play a clip for you from 1280 01:14:21,840 --> 01:14:26,559 Speaker 1: that episode from my interview with Michelle Valentine Nieves, a 1281 01:14:26,600 --> 01:14:29,640 Speaker 1: worker organizer with the Amazon Labor Union who works at 1282 01:14:29,640 --> 01:14:34,240 Speaker 1: the JFK eight warehouse that made history by successfully unionizing 1283 01:14:34,360 --> 01:14:38,600 Speaker 1: last month. Initially, there was none, you know, there was 1284 01:14:38,640 --> 01:14:43,680 Speaker 1: no conversation, and then things started picking up in the 1285 01:14:43,720 --> 01:14:48,200 Speaker 1: direction of organizing when we lost our former manager and 1286 01:14:48,280 --> 01:14:51,600 Speaker 1: I think we were in limbo for about four months, 1287 01:14:52,080 --> 01:14:55,599 Speaker 1: and even then there was overseeing managers we saw maybe 1288 01:14:55,600 --> 01:14:59,160 Speaker 1: twice a week, if even that. We had an overseeing 1289 01:14:59,360 --> 01:15:02,879 Speaker 1: asm for a bit as well, but no store manager 1290 01:15:03,240 --> 01:15:07,559 Speaker 1: and all these things that we wanted to change, and 1291 01:15:07,640 --> 01:15:11,439 Speaker 1: it was passing comments. I want to say, in between 1292 01:15:11,479 --> 01:15:15,280 Speaker 1: transitioning between morning to midshift, you had partners coming in 1293 01:15:15,880 --> 01:15:19,559 Speaker 1: wondering like, why isn't this getting done? Why are so 1294 01:15:19,640 --> 01:15:21,920 Speaker 1: many people calling out? Why do I only have two 1295 01:15:22,040 --> 01:15:28,759 Speaker 1: people for the afternoon rush and having nobody to console remember, 1296 01:15:28,920 --> 01:15:31,720 Speaker 1: just like lower your boys, like you're going to get 1297 01:15:31,800 --> 01:15:34,439 Speaker 1: us in trouble. But it was within that same day 1298 01:15:34,560 --> 01:15:37,000 Speaker 1: I was like, if you're serious, text me after work 1299 01:15:37,040 --> 01:15:40,680 Speaker 1: and I'll let you know because I'm down, and I 1300 01:15:40,720 --> 01:15:44,000 Speaker 1: think in like a record time, I want to say, 1301 01:15:44,000 --> 01:15:47,120 Speaker 1: two or three days, more than seventy percent of our 1302 01:15:47,160 --> 01:15:52,000 Speaker 1: store was already hanging out after work talking about the 1303 01:15:52,040 --> 01:15:54,640 Speaker 1: things we want to see change, and we really just 1304 01:15:54,960 --> 01:15:59,320 Speaker 1: were leaning on one another for once in you know, months, 1305 01:15:59,360 --> 01:16:01,519 Speaker 1: And I really think it was that domino effect of 1306 01:16:01,960 --> 01:16:06,240 Speaker 1: losing a manager who genuinely cared so much about us 1307 01:16:06,320 --> 01:16:08,400 Speaker 1: and who was drived out for the very same reason 1308 01:16:08,400 --> 01:16:11,920 Speaker 1: that we were driven to organize, not being accommodated for 1309 01:16:12,160 --> 01:16:17,720 Speaker 1: not being considered being overlooked and almost bullied and so 1310 01:16:18,439 --> 01:16:22,559 Speaker 1: and were there like at the so like at the time, 1311 01:16:23,280 --> 01:16:27,840 Speaker 1: was at the Buffalo store unionized at this point? Oh yeah, 1312 01:16:28,040 --> 01:16:30,200 Speaker 1: when I tell you it was fast, it was fast. 1313 01:16:30,320 --> 01:16:35,920 Speaker 1: When did our surfile? It was April? Was it? It 1314 01:16:35,960 --> 01:16:39,040 Speaker 1: was like two weeks ago on a Thursday. You know, 1315 01:16:39,160 --> 01:16:43,960 Speaker 1: I was so struck hearing Michelle and other Amazon workers 1316 01:16:44,040 --> 01:16:49,280 Speaker 1: describe how they took that sense of helpless individual desperation 1317 01:16:50,200 --> 01:16:54,560 Speaker 1: and you know, through hard work and worker to worker organizing, 1318 01:16:54,600 --> 01:17:00,479 Speaker 1: through countless conversations, turned that into collective power and collective 1319 01:17:00,520 --> 01:17:04,760 Speaker 1: commitment to stay and fight all of the things that 1320 01:17:04,800 --> 01:17:07,759 Speaker 1: we know about Amazon and how it treats its workers 1321 01:17:07,840 --> 01:17:14,600 Speaker 1: apply here. Backbreaking high speed, heavily surveiled work in massive warehouses, 1322 01:17:15,240 --> 01:17:20,600 Speaker 1: undemocratic top down decisions that directly affect workers' health, safety, 1323 01:17:20,720 --> 01:17:27,720 Speaker 1: and livelihoods, union busting consultants, captive audience meetings, workers berated 1324 01:17:27,760 --> 01:17:32,439 Speaker 1: by anti union propaganda left and right, retaliation, and even 1325 01:17:32,560 --> 01:17:37,840 Speaker 1: arrests of organizers. But one thing that's important to note is, 1326 01:17:38,120 --> 01:17:40,840 Speaker 1: you know, it's not like workers' jobs are Hell on 1327 01:17:40,880 --> 01:17:44,439 Speaker 1: Earth every hour of every single day. There are parts 1328 01:17:44,479 --> 01:17:47,599 Speaker 1: of their jobs that they like. There are reasons it's 1329 01:17:47,640 --> 01:17:51,120 Speaker 1: better for them, are more preferable to work there than 1330 01:17:51,160 --> 01:17:55,559 Speaker 1: to work somewhere else. Many couldn't easily leave, and many 1331 01:17:55,600 --> 01:17:59,480 Speaker 1: didn't want to. And it was clear that Jeff Bezos, 1332 01:17:59,880 --> 01:18:04,920 Speaker 1: Amazon HR or anyone in elective office wasn't going to 1333 01:18:05,080 --> 01:18:07,640 Speaker 1: answer workers cries for help out of the goodness of 1334 01:18:07,680 --> 01:18:11,400 Speaker 1: their own hearts. So workers took it upon themselves to 1335 01:18:11,439 --> 01:18:13,960 Speaker 1: do something about it. And you know, this is the 1336 01:18:14,000 --> 01:18:17,879 Speaker 1: same thing that's been happening with Starbucks workers around the country. 1337 01:18:18,720 --> 01:18:21,200 Speaker 1: When I got to interview workers at the North Charles 1338 01:18:21,200 --> 01:18:24,880 Speaker 1: store in Baltimore, who also made history by becoming the 1339 01:18:24,920 --> 01:18:28,040 Speaker 1: first unionized Starbucks in Maryland last week in a clean 1340 01:18:28,040 --> 01:18:30,920 Speaker 1: sweep election. They told me that a lot of the 1341 01:18:30,960 --> 01:18:34,120 Speaker 1: workers there were trands like them, and it was a 1342 01:18:34,160 --> 01:18:38,160 Speaker 1: special place in that way, and they also for those reasons, 1343 01:18:38,200 --> 01:18:42,479 Speaker 1: really needed the healthcare benefits and so they didn't want 1344 01:18:42,479 --> 01:18:46,880 Speaker 1: to leave. What is truly amazing, I think is that 1345 01:18:46,920 --> 01:18:49,760 Speaker 1: they are doing what I and I imagine many of 1346 01:18:49,800 --> 01:18:54,760 Speaker 1: you have never really thought about doing, banding together and 1347 01:18:54,880 --> 01:18:59,240 Speaker 1: exerting power to make this place where we spend so 1348 01:18:59,360 --> 01:19:02,160 Speaker 1: much of our life because we have to work, a 1349 01:19:02,160 --> 01:19:05,799 Speaker 1: better place to work. For many of us, that seems 1350 01:19:05,880 --> 01:19:09,760 Speaker 1: like an impossible task. But if you look at Starbucks 1351 01:19:09,840 --> 01:19:12,920 Speaker 1: workers and what they are doing right now, you see 1352 01:19:12,920 --> 01:19:16,800 Speaker 1: how possible it really is. Just watch this clip of 1353 01:19:16,840 --> 01:19:20,759 Speaker 1: my Real News interview with Ariana Ayala, a Starbucks partner 1354 01:19:20,800 --> 01:19:23,040 Speaker 1: in New York City and a member of her store's 1355 01:19:23,120 --> 01:19:27,240 Speaker 1: organizing committee, where she describes how quickly things got moving 1356 01:19:27,800 --> 01:19:31,880 Speaker 1: once she and her co workers started talking openly about 1357 01:19:31,920 --> 01:19:36,360 Speaker 1: doing something to improve their situation at work. The second year, 1358 01:19:36,439 --> 01:19:39,679 Speaker 1: I did art ship, which is that's the twelve hour shift. 1359 01:19:40,360 --> 01:19:43,400 Speaker 1: So I did that. That's Thursday, Friday, Saturday, twelve hourship. 1360 01:19:43,439 --> 01:19:48,559 Speaker 1: I did that for a whole year, and like once 1361 01:19:48,600 --> 01:19:50,679 Speaker 1: I did it, I'd say like maybe eight to nine months, 1362 01:19:50,720 --> 01:19:55,040 Speaker 1: it started like affecting my health at my energy levels 1363 01:19:55,120 --> 01:19:57,720 Speaker 1: and the way I was behaving at home, Like I 1364 01:19:57,800 --> 01:19:59,920 Speaker 1: was like snappy at home. I was always in a 1365 01:20:00,040 --> 01:20:02,760 Speaker 1: that mood. It put like a lot of stress on 1366 01:20:02,800 --> 01:20:06,439 Speaker 1: like my relationship and my relationship with my family and 1367 01:20:06,479 --> 01:20:09,280 Speaker 1: my kids. And it was just like wow, after that 1368 01:20:09,400 --> 01:20:11,240 Speaker 1: second year of doing RT, I was like, Okay, I 1369 01:20:11,280 --> 01:20:14,800 Speaker 1: had to change something because during this twelve hours it 1370 01:20:14,880 --> 01:20:19,120 Speaker 1: was just like pounding on my body physically and mentally. 1371 01:20:19,160 --> 01:20:21,720 Speaker 1: It was just like a lot. Then I also there 1372 01:20:21,760 --> 01:20:25,280 Speaker 1: was a pandemic. Yeah, exactly. Does not forget the pandemic. 1373 01:20:26,240 --> 01:20:29,320 Speaker 1: That's another thing that was just like that was much. 1374 01:20:29,560 --> 01:20:31,519 Speaker 1: That was like pretty much the stick that broke the 1375 01:20:31,560 --> 01:20:35,000 Speaker 1: horse's back, like when the pandemic came out and everyone 1376 01:20:35,040 --> 01:20:37,080 Speaker 1: has to work twice as hard and no one was 1377 01:20:37,120 --> 01:20:39,880 Speaker 1: giving a break. People were coming out with COVID left 1378 01:20:39,880 --> 01:20:42,960 Speaker 1: and right. Some people came back to work, some people didn't. 1379 01:20:43,040 --> 01:20:46,080 Speaker 1: There's people that we don't even know if if they 1380 01:20:46,120 --> 01:20:48,639 Speaker 1: passed away, if they recovered, we don't even know because 1381 01:20:48,680 --> 01:20:52,880 Speaker 1: Amazon keeps everything a secret. So it was just a 1382 01:20:52,920 --> 01:20:56,080 Speaker 1: lot it was like all of those things combined. But 1383 01:20:56,120 --> 01:20:58,759 Speaker 1: for the union itself, I think the pandemic was really 1384 01:20:58,800 --> 01:21:01,960 Speaker 1: what pushed it to the point where they were like, Okay, 1385 01:21:01,960 --> 01:21:04,720 Speaker 1: we have to do this, like we have no other choice, right, 1386 01:21:04,800 --> 01:21:07,080 Speaker 1: Like it got people so desperate to the point where 1387 01:21:07,080 --> 01:21:08,719 Speaker 1: we were like, Okay, we're going to do this because 1388 01:21:08,880 --> 01:21:11,719 Speaker 1: there's only like at this point, there's only like twenty 1389 01:21:11,760 --> 01:21:14,639 Speaker 1: of us. But it started out with like maybe four people. 1390 01:21:15,240 --> 01:21:18,400 Speaker 1: Originally it was like maybe four or five people. So 1391 01:21:18,800 --> 01:21:20,760 Speaker 1: it has you have to like really be pushed to 1392 01:21:20,760 --> 01:21:24,080 Speaker 1: the point where Okay, I'm desperate. I'm desperate for change, 1393 01:21:24,240 --> 01:21:25,720 Speaker 1: and this is what we're gonna have to do with 1394 01:21:25,800 --> 01:21:27,640 Speaker 1: That's it. We're just gonna do it. We're going to 1395 01:21:27,760 --> 01:21:31,559 Speaker 1: keep at it until something changes or something happens. Talking 1396 01:21:31,600 --> 01:21:35,840 Speaker 1: to workers like Ariana, I often find myself thinking back 1397 01:21:35,920 --> 01:21:39,720 Speaker 1: to so many times at so many different jobs when 1398 01:21:39,760 --> 01:21:43,439 Speaker 1: I heard some version of that same refrain. If you 1399 01:21:43,439 --> 01:21:47,400 Speaker 1: don't like it, why don't you just leave? Now, we've 1400 01:21:47,439 --> 01:21:51,360 Speaker 1: all heard this phrase before. Sometimes it's posed as a 1401 01:21:51,400 --> 01:21:57,960 Speaker 1: genuine question, sometimes as a suggestion. Other Times it's snarled 1402 01:21:58,000 --> 01:22:01,000 Speaker 1: as an insult that you're really not expect to respond to, 1403 01:22:02,040 --> 01:22:03,920 Speaker 1: And I want to focus on that for a second, 1404 01:22:04,600 --> 01:22:07,000 Speaker 1: because the fact that they're because the fact is that 1405 01:22:07,040 --> 01:22:10,519 Speaker 1: there are a number of different meanings packed into that 1406 01:22:10,560 --> 01:22:14,559 Speaker 1: blunt question. If you don't like what you've got right now, 1407 01:22:15,000 --> 01:22:19,000 Speaker 1: why don't you just switch, abandon your post, and leave 1408 01:22:19,080 --> 01:22:22,400 Speaker 1: it for some other poor soul to deal with. You know, 1409 01:22:22,400 --> 01:22:26,559 Speaker 1: when I first heard this question, the logic rang true 1410 01:22:26,720 --> 01:22:29,920 Speaker 1: in a sort of consumer type way, right. It was 1411 01:22:29,960 --> 01:22:32,240 Speaker 1: similar to when people would ask, if you don't like 1412 01:22:32,400 --> 01:22:36,320 Speaker 1: this or that brand of cereal, or this news channel 1413 01:22:36,920 --> 01:22:39,960 Speaker 1: or this phone service provider, then why don't you just 1414 01:22:40,160 --> 01:22:44,720 Speaker 1: exercise your power as a consumer and switch providers or 1415 01:22:44,840 --> 01:22:48,960 Speaker 1: buy a different brand, or watch a different channel. And 1416 01:22:49,200 --> 01:22:51,840 Speaker 1: you know, it was that sentiment that led me to 1417 01:22:51,960 --> 01:22:55,680 Speaker 1: quit that first high school job at Pepees. In a 1418 01:22:55,720 --> 01:22:59,880 Speaker 1: marketplace where businesses are supposedly competing with one another for 1419 01:23:00,080 --> 01:23:03,880 Speaker 1: customers and workers, it felt like I could leverage that 1420 01:23:04,080 --> 01:23:08,040 Speaker 1: to improve my own lot in life. And you know, 1421 01:23:08,080 --> 01:23:11,680 Speaker 1: that may have been true once, but it is increasingly 1422 01:23:12,000 --> 01:23:16,880 Speaker 1: not the case these days. Instead, what we've got is 1423 01:23:17,040 --> 01:23:21,480 Speaker 1: ninety percent of media operations being owned by four mega corporations, 1424 01:23:22,439 --> 01:23:26,479 Speaker 1: these new techno monopolies like Amazon, Facebook, and Google and 1425 01:23:26,600 --> 01:23:30,679 Speaker 1: Apple are gobbling up every square inch of our digital world, 1426 01:23:31,439 --> 01:23:34,519 Speaker 1: just like big agriculture and the factory farming industry are 1427 01:23:34,560 --> 01:23:38,280 Speaker 1: gobbling up all the farmland and polluting the literal ship 1428 01:23:38,800 --> 01:23:42,479 Speaker 1: out of the surrounding area. And you know, just like 1429 01:23:42,560 --> 01:23:47,280 Speaker 1: most consumer products are owned by a handful of industry behemoths, 1430 01:23:48,280 --> 01:23:53,000 Speaker 1: the illusion of a competitive marketplace and the power of 1431 01:23:53,080 --> 01:23:58,520 Speaker 1: consumer choice is increasingly giving way to an oligopolistic economy 1432 01:23:58,600 --> 01:24:02,280 Speaker 1: where our ability to move and make the market respond 1433 01:24:02,400 --> 01:24:06,599 Speaker 1: to our needs is dwindling down more and more by 1434 01:24:06,640 --> 01:24:10,439 Speaker 1: the day. And that really is the whole endgame here. 1435 01:24:11,400 --> 01:24:14,160 Speaker 1: Because once the question was if you don't like it, 1436 01:24:14,560 --> 01:24:18,479 Speaker 1: why don't you just leave? What they want the question 1437 01:24:18,640 --> 01:24:22,680 Speaker 1: to be is, well, where else are you going to go? 1438 01:24:23,920 --> 01:24:26,760 Speaker 1: And they use their power and their influence to make 1439 01:24:26,800 --> 01:24:31,559 Speaker 1: sure the question is already answered for us. You know, 1440 01:24:31,760 --> 01:24:37,679 Speaker 1: worker's unrestricted freedom to reject insufficient working situations by leaving 1441 01:24:38,479 --> 01:24:42,280 Speaker 1: is necessary to make the whole social contract of capitalist 1442 01:24:42,360 --> 01:24:47,360 Speaker 1: society worth it in theory. In practice, it doesn't really 1443 01:24:47,400 --> 01:24:51,080 Speaker 1: work that way. It's a lot more complicated. Just like 1444 01:24:51,160 --> 01:24:55,400 Speaker 1: human beings, we are much more complicated than that. Sometimes 1445 01:24:55,439 --> 01:24:59,120 Speaker 1: there aren't other jobs to be had. Sometimes you really 1446 01:24:59,200 --> 01:25:02,680 Speaker 1: like your job and you don't want to leave. Sometimes 1447 01:25:02,720 --> 01:25:06,479 Speaker 1: it would cause life altering disruptions to you and your 1448 01:25:06,520 --> 01:25:09,600 Speaker 1: family to lose even one day of pay, and so 1449 01:25:09,680 --> 01:25:13,280 Speaker 1: you can't leave. And the more that you think about this, 1450 01:25:14,040 --> 01:25:15,760 Speaker 1: the more that you start to get into the real 1451 01:25:15,800 --> 01:25:20,120 Speaker 1: deep shit that working people have been asking themselves for centuries. 1452 01:25:21,439 --> 01:25:26,960 Speaker 1: How free am I really in this system? Well, we'll 1453 01:25:26,960 --> 01:25:30,280 Speaker 1: save that for another day. But the point is we 1454 01:25:30,360 --> 01:25:34,040 Speaker 1: have to have more power than quitting in this system allows. 1455 01:25:35,200 --> 01:25:38,920 Speaker 1: If the power that we were promised, the power to 1456 01:25:39,080 --> 01:25:42,559 Speaker 1: use our feet to dictate our own futures and to 1457 01:25:42,640 --> 01:25:46,719 Speaker 1: discipline employers into doing better by their workers, is constantly 1458 01:25:46,760 --> 01:25:50,000 Speaker 1: being eroded, we need to build that power back up. 1459 01:25:50,880 --> 01:25:53,719 Speaker 1: And you know, I think the Great Resignation shows how 1460 01:25:53,840 --> 01:25:57,640 Speaker 1: essential that power is. But we need more than that, 1461 01:25:58,640 --> 01:26:02,639 Speaker 1: and we deserve more than that. We need power in 1462 01:26:02,840 --> 01:26:08,439 Speaker 1: the workplace. We need people staying and fighting. We need 1463 01:26:08,479 --> 01:26:11,520 Speaker 1: to push for the changes that we want to see, 1464 01:26:11,560 --> 01:26:13,880 Speaker 1: and then we need to lock those changes into a 1465 01:26:14,000 --> 01:26:19,600 Speaker 1: binding contract. We need to build strong and durable infrastructures 1466 01:26:19,600 --> 01:26:24,240 Speaker 1: for workers to get and stay organized. Because true power 1467 01:26:24,280 --> 01:26:29,519 Speaker 1: in the workplace comes from the collective. What they want 1468 01:26:30,160 --> 01:26:33,440 Speaker 1: is to rig the game so that a heavily organized 1469 01:26:33,760 --> 01:26:38,000 Speaker 1: and well resourced ruling class is always going up against 1470 01:26:38,040 --> 01:26:43,800 Speaker 1: a permanently disorganized and atomize working class because they know, 1471 01:26:44,840 --> 01:26:47,960 Speaker 1: as is always the case, that there are more of 1472 01:26:48,040 --> 01:26:52,520 Speaker 1: us than there are of them. If we organize ourselves, 1473 01:26:53,160 --> 01:26:56,559 Speaker 1: if we stand together, like workers around this country and 1474 01:26:56,600 --> 01:27:00,040 Speaker 1: around the world are standing together right now, if we 1475 01:27:00,080 --> 01:27:04,559 Speaker 1: stay and fight, we can win. It's more possible than 1476 01:27:04,600 --> 01:27:10,280 Speaker 1: you think. Just look at Starbucks, look at Amazon. Because 1477 01:27:10,280 --> 01:27:13,320 Speaker 1: what scares the bosses more than anything is the day 1478 01:27:13,400 --> 01:27:20,040 Speaker 1: when workers realize that, and that day is coming. Thank 1479 01:27:20,080 --> 01:27:23,320 Speaker 1: you for watching this segment with breaking points, and be 1480 01:27:23,360 --> 01:27:26,080 Speaker 1: sure to subscribe to my news outlet, The Real News, 1481 01:27:26,120 --> 01:27:29,680 Speaker 1: with links in the show description. See you soon for 1482 01:27:29,720 --> 01:27:33,640 Speaker 1: the next edition of the Art of Class War. Solidarity 1483 01:27:33,680 --> 01:27:34,040 Speaker 1: Forever