1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:12,600 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:14,080 --> 00:00:17,439 Speaker 2: The single best idea A really interesting Thursday, sort of 3 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 2: midsummer but not summer doldrums. The way this market's going 4 00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:25,200 Speaker 2: in the stimulus to the halves, the financialization of America. 5 00:00:25,280 --> 00:00:27,840 Speaker 2: It's certainly not a dull August. But it was a 6 00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:32,320 Speaker 2: great cross section of guests. Today. Anna Wong joined us, 7 00:00:32,360 --> 00:00:35,560 Speaker 2: of course with the Bloomberg Economics, a brilliant report out 8 00:00:36,200 --> 00:00:39,360 Speaker 2: and really the first one to begin to think about 9 00:00:40,000 --> 00:00:44,519 Speaker 2: not a quarter point twenty five beep cut here by 10 00:00:44,520 --> 00:00:47,120 Speaker 2: the Fed in September vote, could it be two quarter 11 00:00:47,240 --> 00:00:51,080 Speaker 2: points a fifty basis point beat on the labor economy 12 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:52,839 Speaker 2: on the Fed, Anna Wong. 13 00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:56,800 Speaker 3: The two months backward revision of two hundred and fifty 14 00:00:57,000 --> 00:01:01,000 Speaker 3: eight thousand drop in May and June's pay roles was 15 00:01:01,040 --> 00:01:05,200 Speaker 3: a three standard deviation outside of the mean phenomenon, and 16 00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:08,880 Speaker 3: that in a normal distribution means there's only a less 17 00:01:08,920 --> 00:01:12,680 Speaker 3: than a zero point two percent chance to see a 18 00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:16,800 Speaker 3: decline in jobs as large as as in terms of revisions. 19 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:19,920 Speaker 3: And then when we drill into details, they found that well, 20 00:01:19,959 --> 00:01:23,000 Speaker 3: if you look at the private sector revisions, those are 21 00:01:23,280 --> 00:01:25,920 Speaker 3: there's a story there, and the probability of that happening 22 00:01:26,040 --> 00:01:30,119 Speaker 3: is actually not that out of line. You know, it's possible. 23 00:01:30,600 --> 00:01:34,480 Speaker 3: And however, the real black swan really is happening in 24 00:01:34,480 --> 00:01:38,839 Speaker 3: the government sector because normally the collection of government data 25 00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:44,479 Speaker 3: does not go through such big drastic changes in response 26 00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:47,720 Speaker 3: rates as the private sector does. And I did say 27 00:01:47,880 --> 00:01:50,920 Speaker 3: in the black Swan piece, which is that I. 28 00:01:50,880 --> 00:01:54,160 Speaker 4: Think fifty bits could be in play because of all 29 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:57,559 Speaker 4: these revisions, stuff that could happen in the August jobs 30 00:01:57,600 --> 00:02:00,440 Speaker 4: report that could make everything worse, plus the per andary 31 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:01,480 Speaker 4: benchmark revisions. 32 00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:04,280 Speaker 2: Somehow I think we could I'm not going to predict it, 33 00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:08,080 Speaker 2: but we could see more of that Moving towards the 34 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:12,160 Speaker 2: September I believe seventeenth meeting, we have Jackson Hole out there. 35 00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:15,520 Speaker 2: We'll be there with Lisa Bramowitz and Michael McKee leading 36 00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:18,800 Speaker 2: our coverage. All of a sudden interesting Jackson Hole to 37 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:22,440 Speaker 2: say the least, CPI data next week, and of course 38 00:02:22,440 --> 00:02:25,640 Speaker 2: the jobs report for August I believe it's September fifth 39 00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:29,440 Speaker 2: as well. Onto that meeting, we'll see if doctor Wong 40 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:33,440 Speaker 2: gets her fifty basis points really good analysis of the 41 00:02:33,480 --> 00:02:37,720 Speaker 2: American economy with a Midwest field out of the Ohio 42 00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:43,560 Speaker 2: State's Columbus Ohio with Nationwide Kathleen miss Johnson, we. 43 00:02:43,600 --> 00:02:47,440 Speaker 5: Have done that exercise, and part of the calculus that 44 00:02:47,480 --> 00:02:49,160 Speaker 5: we're doing that is you've got to look at this 45 00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:51,320 Speaker 5: live side of things. So I think it may be 46 00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:53,919 Speaker 5: tough to get to five percent. In fact, we see 47 00:02:53,960 --> 00:02:57,600 Speaker 5: it kind of peaking around four point six percent, maybe 48 00:02:57,639 --> 00:03:01,919 Speaker 5: four to seven at most, but you're decline and supply, 49 00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:04,840 Speaker 5: so that means the unemployment rate itself doesn't climb that much. 50 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:07,480 Speaker 2: This came up at least three times today. I've asked 51 00:03:07,480 --> 00:03:10,040 Speaker 2: it before. You know, it's not an original idea, but 52 00:03:10,560 --> 00:03:13,920 Speaker 2: let's go with it. Is a five percent unemployment rate 53 00:03:14,040 --> 00:03:17,720 Speaker 2: in twenty twenty five, the same as a five percent 54 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:23,200 Speaker 2: unemployment rate, say in twenty fifteen. Or to go more granular, 55 00:03:23,520 --> 00:03:27,359 Speaker 2: is Kathleen bus Johnstick did there is a four point 56 00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:32,280 Speaker 2: six percent unemployment rate, the new five percent. There's a 57 00:03:32,320 --> 00:03:36,600 Speaker 2: lot going on on labor demand and labors supply. We 58 00:03:36,720 --> 00:03:39,640 Speaker 2: demand you listen out on your podcast out on Apple, 59 00:03:39,680 --> 00:03:59,720 Speaker 2: on Spotify, and on YouTube podcasts. It's single best idea