WEBVTT - Hello Barbie

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcomes the Forward Thinking, the

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says life and

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>plastic It's fantastic. I'm Jonathan Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>In today, we're gonna be talking about one of the

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>most fun topics we've ever done in a pretty objective sense,

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>because we're going to be talking about toys. Yeah. Actually

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a very specific and potentially creepy toy. Yes, a toy

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that has had its share of controversy or controversy over

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the course of its entire existence, although the particular one

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about now is a version that has not

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>yet come out as of the recording of this podcast. Yes,

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'm very excited to do some thinking about this

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>particular toy, even though I've learned from one of the

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>parodies of this toy that thinking gives you wrinkles about

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>hot wheels. No, we're going to talk about Barbie, Lauren.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>This idea came from you. Where where did you come

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>across this idea? The interwebs. I was on Twitter, i believe,

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and people were posting links to this article about this

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this new Barbie that is coming out. It was just

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>debuted at Toy Fair in New York that was at

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of February. I think that's a place, by

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, that we absolutely need to send some how

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff works people next year. If by some how stuff

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>works people you mean the three of us, that it

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>would be the best option. I mean, if I have

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to give it up, I would do it because I've

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>been able to go to E three in the past,

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like I shouldn't hug all the childlike

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>joy out of the office. But I definitely want to

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>tend a toy fair at some point. Yeah. Yeah, well,

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, especially because they are coming out with all

0:01:56.080 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of these wonderful new technologically advanced to ways, and not

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of like what kind of plastics they use,

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>although that's a whole other cool thing. Sure, um, but

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>but this this Barbie doll that just debuted is called

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Hello Barbie, and and it kind of Hello World or

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>yeah sure, well, except it's it's a WiFi enabled Barbie

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>doll that can have conversations with you, Like if you

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 1>talk to this doll, it will talk back. That's nothing

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>new because when I was a kid. People my age

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>had dolls where you'd pull a string and it would

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>say something like who interpreted as burned the house, burned

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the house? Yeah, I've seen that movie. Sure, sure well

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that that kind of thing has existed for a long time.

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>There's also the kind of tape deck prerecorded talking dolls,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>like Teddy Ruxpin. Sure, the ones where you would have

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>a cassette. You put the cassette in and then the

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>bear would move its mouth and in time to the

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>words being being a generous way of explaining what it

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>was like time such a such a rigid hug. Yeah,

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>yeah that yeah, that good. That good hard robot hugs

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>preparing us for the future. Hug your cassette player. It's

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the same thing, although your cassette player never

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>looked as funny when your older sister put a Slayer

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>tape in it, so uhair, Teddy Ruxpan's mouth would not

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>necessarily move in time with the lyrics, but it was

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>still pretty funny. Does see Teddy Ruxpan rocking out like that? No? Wait, so, Lauren,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about something a little bit different than the

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>pull string or the cassette player or even the microchip

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>style toys. Like when the Star Wars prequels came out,

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>all the figurines had microchips that would interact with playsets,

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you could get them to they would

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>stand on a little stand, you push the button and

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they would have quotes from that character from the movie.

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>But if you got them in playsets and you put

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>different combinations together, they would have full exchanges, dialogue exchanges.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Simpsons also had a set that was like that. But

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this is even more complex than that. Yeah, this is

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a concept of having a little speaker in Barbie and

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a little microphone in Barbie, and and uh and in

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>using voice recognition so that Barbie knows what you're talking

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>about and can respond appropriately. Yeah. So so if you

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>if you you know, and I imagine the early versions

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of this, the early stages, a lot of the the

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Barbie dolls will be drawing upon a pretty standard array

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of various questions and and jokes and stories that sort

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of thing that would prompt various responses that then the

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>algorithm on the back end, on the cloud side could

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>analyze and send the response that Barbie would give to

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the child. So you might have Barbie ask you what's

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>your favorite color, or if the child were saying something

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>about color, maybe then Barbie would ask, what's your favorite color?

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Because it recognizes the word color and then ends up

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>pulling from this. But that's just the beginning, right, I mean,

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those things that the plan Mattel

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>has for the Barbie doll, and we'll get more into

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>this in a little bit, is for writers to be

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>able to build in new things that Barbie can say,

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>get the voice actress in to record those those words

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>or phrases or whatever, and so the conversation trees can

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.679
<v Speaker 1>get more complex and there can be more of them

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>as the life of the the program continues, right, Because

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not you're not talking to a single plastic product.

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You're talking to the cloud of responses. Here. There's no

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>onboard memory or negligible onboard memory for for this toy.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>It's all being stored and drawn upon through WiFi in

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>your house to a cloud of responses. You're talking to

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the mother brain. Yes, there's there's a cyber Barbie which

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>has Skynet Barbie, which has all the potential things that

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Barbie can say stored in it. And then your WiFi

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>network network communicates to that web server, which then serves

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>up the the appropriate response. Okay, so I have never

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>personally owned a Barbie doll before, but number one, can

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I get one of these now? And number two how

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>much does it cost? But yet? Yeah, not not yet. Um.

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Supposedly it's going to be out in time for the

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>holiday season. Yes, it's sometime this fall, is what Mattel

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>has been saying. I don't think they gave a specific

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>date yet, but they said they're aiming to have it

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>out by the fall. They're still working on it, so

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this is still you know, this is something that is

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>not yet quite ready for consumer purchase. Uh. And the

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>suggested retail price according to an article I saw. I

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>did not see this from the tell however, but according

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to an article, the suggested retail price iss. So it's

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>not cheap, it's it's a it's a fairly expensive toy. Sure, sure,

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you know some some toys, A lot of toys with

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>digital components do range up into that price, though most

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, non WiFi connected run of the mill Barbies

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>are something like ten. Presumably that price also builds into

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>it the idea that this this doll is perpetually going

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to be pulling from a service that's going to need

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>its own maintenance, right, you know that that's an ongoing

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>cost for Mattel. And as far as I know, again,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen anything, but as far as I know,

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no sort of subscription service, like you don't have

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue, like like you're you're you don't have to

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>worry about Mattel holding you hostage and that your child

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to come to you and say Barbie doesn't

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>talk anymore. Yeah, that's why I started cracking up the

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>idea of Barbie being like, oh honey, I'd love to

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>continue this conversation. Ask one of your parents to get

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>there at a card. It's just a low monthly fee.

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>You can do anything. Yeah, that's just the beginning of

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>no of our more cynical and dark commentary we will

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>have on this podcast. What I imagined, sorry, was that

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>your conversation with Barbie will continue after a brief message

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>from our sponsor. Again, and I'm not I'm not criticizing us.

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to take a very critical eye

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to this approach because it's it's not that the approach

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>itself is necessarily right or wrong, but there are ways

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to implement it that are clearly going to be better

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>than other ways. Right, there are things that we absolutely

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>must be cognizant of in order for something like this,

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>which I think the idea of the toy is phenomenal.

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I think about when I was a kid

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and I would play with toys that having this sort

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of capability to really kind of work with my imagination

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and and to feed off of it with out completely

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>supplanting it. So it's not like it's not like you're

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>suddenly a passive audience member watching something, you are interacting

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>with something. I love this idea, but I also realize

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that with this idea comes some concerns that we have

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to we have to be aware of, and we have

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to make sure are addressed if we want to make

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>sure this is done in a responsible way. Absolutely, and

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I do want to pose it right here at the

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>outset that that as goofy and kind of cynical is

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we're all probably going to get about this. I I, personally,

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you guys, do think that Mattel

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is making a good faith effort to make this a

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>good product that is not scary or so I agree

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. Every everything I've read from them

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is pretty cool. Yeah. I think I think, uh, if

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we take the messages that we've seen from Mattel and

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>we we give them the benefit of the doubts saying

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that this is in fact the direction they want to

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>go in, they are they are doing this in a

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>way that is uh much more appropriate than how I've

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>seen it handled in other recent cases. Then I'll talk

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>about a little bit later in this episode. Yeah, I

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly do at least like that. In in the statements

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I've seen from Mattel and the people behind this product,

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they seem to be talking about how they want Barbie

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to be having conversations with the children about like their

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>feelings and about career aspirations and things, rather than let's

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>buy makeup so the boys will like us. Yeah. Yeah,

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean this could definitely be And I think I

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>think the other cool thing is that it's a It's

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>a toy that will continue to evolve as far as

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>its capabilities in communicating because of the way that Mattel

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is trying to continue to write for this doll. Uh.

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also cool that that the largely the

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>child is going to be the one to drive how

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the toy interacts with the child, right, the child. The

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>child's interactions are going to be what guide those kind

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of conversations. So if so, if you have insipid consumerist

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>conversations with your Barbie doll, it's your own fault. I'm

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>just saying that if that's if, if the child is

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>interested in that sort of stuff, there's nothing. I don't

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>see anything wrong with the doll having a conversation about it,

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, sure, sure, And okay, uh, well, let's let's

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>get into a little bit here. Be sure we pontificate

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>too much more about who's who exactly is behind all

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of this, because of course it's Mattel, which is the

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>owner of Barbie. Uh. And they're they're doing this in

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>affiliation with a company called toy Talk, which has made

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>some interactive speech recognition involving apps like like app games before. Um,

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but this is the first time they've moved into the

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>toy market. And the CEO is a guy by the

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>name of or In Jacob, who is the former CTO

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of Pixar. So what he thought was, Hey, those toy

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>story movies, let's make it real. Well, I mean, he

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>worked with Pixar for like twenty years and and everything

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that I've read from him about this product is just

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing but excitement about, like like the kind of market

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>research that Mattel has done and saying that the number

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>one thing that they've always heard from kids, and I

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>do love this is a thing that I am so

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>excited about. In all of the press releases about this,

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>they use kids or boys and girls. It's never specified

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that this is a toy for girls. Just exactly why

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I say child as well. Yeah, yeah, yeah, no, it

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>just it makes me so happy anyway, So thank you guys,

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>if anyone is listening that was responsible for that, Like

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>you are just making my heart grow three sizes. It's

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it's beautiful. Um So yeah. Yeah, they're talking about children

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>asking for Barbie to be able to talk back to them,

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and that this is them fulfilling this this genuine and

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting desire of their of their customer base, right, and

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and doing so in a way that's not limited to

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a vocabulary of fifty phrases or less. Right. That's yeah,

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of stuff we've seen in the past. Yeah,

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but Barbie has talked before, Yeah, yeah, she has. Barbie

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Apparently Barbie has not really listened before. No, and that's

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 1>really the thing. Yeah, to make this an actual conversation

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to you are listening to a series of

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>very short model hous. So I'm curious how this is

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna work? What what? How are they going to um

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>build this sort of like answer like question response or

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>interaction database. How's that gonna actually function between the cloud

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and the doll and the child interacting with it? Okay, well,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean we can talk about both the technology and

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the the sort of the writing process side of it,

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's all part and parcels. So just from a

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>pure technology standpoint, we're talking about a doll that has

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>some form of WiFi receiver in it that can transmitter. Actually,

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>because it can transmit and receive transceiver, I guess I

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>should say, um, so it connects to your WiFi network.

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Presumably I would hope it has some form of password

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>security that s included, because you want that to be

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a secure point. You don't want it to be an

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>entrigue point into your WiFi network. But whatever, so she

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is able to connect into the WiFi network, and then

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you have a button on the belt buckle of the

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Barbie doll that you can press that activates the microphone.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>At that point, you can speak to the microphone which

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is in Barbie's necklace in this doll, and then it

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>will send that message to the cloud based server which

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>will use speech and voice recognition algorithms to analyze that,

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and Barbie will respond and will try to respond in

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a way that matches whatever was said to Barbie. So

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>if you said again something that mentioned color, she might

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>ask you what your favorite color is ye, Or if

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you say, uh, you know, I really want to be

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a veterinarian when I grow up, then maybe she'll start

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>talking to you about how to be a veterinarian. Maybe

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're saying it's time to go to bed now,

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>she said, would you me to tell you a story?

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it could be that sort of stuff and

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>let's defy mom and stay up rebel against the system.

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, Originally this is going to be based upon

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever Mattel has kind of accumulated upon the launch of

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the product, where they've had a voice actress come in

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>record the lines for Barbie, and they have this this

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>range of things to draw upon. What they will also

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to do is analyze the incoming messages sent

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>by children who have talked into the microphone and got

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>sent up to the cloud based server to see the

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of things that kids are talking about and then

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to address those things more directly. Have writers

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>look at that and say, there are a lot of

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>kids who were talking about this one thing that we

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't even we didn't even consider when we were first

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>writing all the potential dialogue here. So let's write some

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>new things. Get the voice actress back in where record

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>some stuff. As it turns out, rocks are really popular,

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>so let's get someone to talk about geology. Yeah, it

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>could very well be something like that, or maybe there's

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>some story that ends up having everyone suddenly really interested

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in marine biology, and it might be let's let's have

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>some some interesting stuff around that with exactly, And the

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>idea being that this in this way, you could have

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a continuously evolving toy, one that would be able to

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>have new interactions and you would not have that case

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of hearing the same thing said four thousand times and

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>your your child gets bored with this toy. You know toy, uh,

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>so you know it has it has a promise of

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>continuing and perhaps even you could argue increasing value because

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of the different interactions that can happen. So that's the

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea, and really, ultimately it's not that that complicated,

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you know. It's it's a pretty simple system, apart from

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you do have to consider it's a

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>very sophisticated algorithm to to recognize speech and voice so

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that you can actually send appropriate responses back down. But

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>everything else is you know, fairly simple. A transceiver and

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>a microphones really and in a battery source, some power

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sources all you need for the doll and uh. That

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is is kind of the basics for how this works

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and how it's supposed to continue to operate over you know,

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>however long Mattel supports it. I can imagine one of

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the reasons Mattel might be looking at things like this,

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>apart from just you know, admirable ambition and pushing the

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.479
<v Speaker 1>boundaries of what toys can do, is that apparently Barbie

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>sales have been down. One of you all put a

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>note in the outline about this, and I was reading

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>about it. The sales have been down recently, and I

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 1>can sort of understand why, because people have been kind

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of getting real about Barbie for a long time now.

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Think about her unrealistic body proportions, and that might not

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be a healthy thing to be, you know, pounding into

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>kids brains that you should somehow be looking like a

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>neptune in our glass monster, or presenting this kind of

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>narrowly constrained, old fashioned face of femininity. Um. And I

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>mean people have sort of rightly been asking the question

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, like where's Barbie the bomb disposal officer?

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>And where's Barbie the astrophysicist? And it's gotten Yeah, but

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a real short punt. So yeah, so I'm not

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>surprised a lot of parents have been less inclined to

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>push Barbie dolls on their kids these days. Even if

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Barbie has been improving lately, there's sort of a lot

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of catching up to do in terms of I don't

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>know what you might call the sort of like progressive

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>credentials of Barbie. Um. But you can also see for

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>this reason why they'd want to take Barbie in a

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>new direction, have Barbie do something that Barbie has never

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>done before, right, and so so it makes sense to me,

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and and frankly, I'm interested to see what a toy

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like this could do. I mean, I don't know if

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I has been the seventy whatever dollar price tag, but

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of thinking, oh man, I'd almost buy

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>one of these that just to see what it's capable of.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't mean to throw a suggestion into

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.239
<v Speaker 1>your heads or anything, but we do work for a

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>company called how Stuff Works, and this is something worthwhile

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of research, I would say, so technically we could probably

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>see about buying one of these on the company dime.

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And you cannot wait to disassemble a Hello Barbie. Also

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like we've got extra mix guys, we could have guest

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>star Barbie. That's true on this podcast. I'm totally in

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>favor of this. I'm not even joking, like, alright, alright

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>at any rate? Okay, Well, to talk about the implications

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of this, Barbie, I think we could just do a

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>really quick refresher on sort of the history of speech recognition,

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>like where are we now in in speech recognition and

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>how do we get here? Right? Well, if if you

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>look back at the history the timeline of speech recognition

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and voice recognition, a lot of them also include things like, uh,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the representation of voice, like the syntheiz synthesizing voice. I'm

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to bother with any of that that that

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>dates all the way back to the nineteen thirties, But

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're getting into actual speech and voice recognition, in

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty nine you had John Pierce of Bell Labs

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially state that it was going to be decades away

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>because it was going to require artificial intelligence. As it

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>turns out, it didn't take that long for at least

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the early advances in speech recognition and voice recognition to

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to really kind of get get the ball rolling. In

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen seventies, you had a guy named Linny Baum

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>from from Princeton University who used the hidden Markov modeling

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>approach to speech and voice recognition. That's largely a pattern

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>recognition methodology where you start to be able to to

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>narrow down categories of stuff based upon input uh, and

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that ended up being the basis for a lot of

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>speech and voice recognition over the next few decades. DARPA

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>got involved in the early seventies and created these SPEE

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Each Understanding Research Program, which involved a ton of different

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>research facilities and universities, had some decent funding for five

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>years and really got things off the ground. You have

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the founding of Speech Works, which is a company that

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>creates over the telephone automated speech recognition technology. By nine

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you started getting dictation speech recognition software, although it was

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>somewhat limited. You had to speak each word very distinctly

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>from every other word. You couldn't just speak without pauses,

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a problem for check off very likely, UH. But several

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>different UH entities came out with speech recognition software that year,

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>including Kurtzwile. We'll talk about Kurtswile a little bit later

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, or at least I'll mention him. By a

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>company called Dragon Systems released a continuous speech dictation software,

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>so you could just speak the way I am now

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and it could continue a leading to natural language recognition, yeah,

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>at least to the point where it could transcribe it,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>if not understand it. By the late nine Microsoft really

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>began to invest heavily in voice and speech recognition companies

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>like Kurtzwil and in Tropic. By two thousand seven, Sirie

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Incorporated was founded UH it would be incorporated into Apple

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>iPhones by two thousand eleven. Two thousand eight, Google would

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>introduce Google Voice Search to iPhones. So this was the

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.959
<v Speaker 1>point where we were getting into more of the natural

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>language recognition, not just being able to transcribe, but to

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 1>actually parse it and and figure out what a person

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>was asking for. Uh. And we're still on that journey, right,

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>We're not at the destination yet. So right now, we've

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>got voice commands being incorporated into all sorts of technology, smartphones,

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>smart television's, uh, set top boxes, video game consoles, security

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>systems in some cases. Uh. And we're still, like I said,

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to that point where natural language is

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>no longer a barrier, where I can speak to a

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>machine the way I would speak to a person and

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the machine would quote unquote understand what I'm saying and

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>respond appropriately. So that's kind of where we're at. So

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so really, whatever you think about this Barbie doll,

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>it is awesome technologically speaking that that this is this

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of technology that you know that DARPA and Great

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Hurts While have worked on is coming to a Barbie doll. Right,

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>That's it's gonna be something that a child can interact with.

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 1>But obviously there is some controversy, oh mega controversy in

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the case of this, I mean, and and it's understandable.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're talking about a toy that children are

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>going to interact with regularly, and it's one that can

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>pick up and transmit voices to a separate server and

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>get responses back. But beyond that, if writers are going

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to write new content based upon the things that children

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>are saying to this doll, that means people are looking

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>at what your kids are saying. And it could very

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>well be a case of is this technological advantage worth

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we are going to have to give

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 1>up some privacy in the process, and that amount of

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>privacy may depend upon the way your kid interacts with

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the doll, or whether or not the kid carries the

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>doll everywhere. And perhaps you maybe you work for the

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Department of Defense and you can't have a doll in

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the house that could potentially record something you say and

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>upload it. That seems like an extreme example, but there

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people who work in very sensitive

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>jobs who could not have something like this in their

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>homes and be completely free of fear that it was

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>going it was never going to come back and haunt them.

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure, well, I mean, and you know, furthermore, this

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is a toy being marketed two kids by a giant corporation,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and how much how much can we trust this giant corporation, Like,

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>are are they genuinely doing this because they want to

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>provide an awesome thing to kids? Or are they doing it?

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Are they doing it to make money? Are they doing

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it to hear your child's innermost thoughts? You know? Yeah? Yeah,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the innermost thoughts thing is the one I think is

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>probably the least likely, simply because I've listened to kids

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>talk and I don't I couldn't really care less. I'm

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely being grew up the old man in that case.

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>But but seriously, I don't. I don't think that's as

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>big a concern as the fact that I mean, clearly,

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>children may end up speaking to a doll and say

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>things that they wouldn't say to perhaps other people, because

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a doll that they're talking to, not a person,

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And that could end up doing things like what if

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>the kid is is expressing uh an opinion about a

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>parent in a way that could be misinterpreted. Perhaps everything

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>in the home is fine, but it could be miss interpreted.

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Or let's say that the kid is expressing an opinion

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that isn't being misinterpreted. These are some serious ethical questions.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>If you've got people who are reviewing this stuff and

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing some statements that are raising eyebrows. What's their

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>role in that? Do they report that? Yeah? I mean,

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is it's hello, Barbie going to be giving testimony at

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>divorce proceedings. This is a serious question. It's I mean,

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's not the intent, you know, I mean,

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it could never be the intent because that would bring

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Mattel into liability issues that no company wants to get into.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's one of those things that you really once

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 1>you think beyond the the original scope and purpose of

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the toy, you know that there are a lot of problems,

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a privacy issue or ethics and morality however

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to define it. There are a lot of

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>questions that this raises. And the thing is that we

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>all have this technology, or maybe not all of us,

0:26:58.240 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but many of us have this kind of technology and

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>corporated into a lot of the stuff we have right now.

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But we're adults, and it's a little different when you're

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>an adult and you can make that decision and as

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>opposed to and presumably you could be cognizant enough to

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>turn things off if you needed to, as opposed to

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>being a kid. Yeah, yeah, I'm just picturing, like what

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of conversation you have to have with your child,

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>like like, so, honey, this is Barbie. She'll talk back

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to you now. Also by she, I mean a team

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of script writing adults in California somewhere who are strangers. So, baby,

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>don't tell Barbie anything like like, how do you you know?

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's six and eight. Don't press Barbie's belt buckle.

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's not that kids are incapable of of parsing

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that kind of information from you. It's just that I'm

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned about whether or not parents would be having

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 1>those kind of conversations with your kids. And I'm concerned,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm inherently squeaked out by the idea of

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>stranger listening to anyone's speech, Like I find that very creepy. Now, personally,

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't know to what extent any child's interaction with

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>this doll would be identifiable to a specific person. We

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>do know that they are supposed to be customized so

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 1>that the doll learns the child's name over time and

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>can actually say the child's name, But again, we don't

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>know necessarily that that is associated with a particular I

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>d I mean, it could be that on the mattel side,

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the server side, that every doll essentially is given the

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>unique identifier. That doesn't that is not directly connected to

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>an actual human being's personal identity. Sure, sure there's no

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>profile that's saying like, hey, this is Susie Johnson. Right, yeah,

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it could be. But but as we all know, it

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>does not take very much information for any system of

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>sufficient depth to identify a person based on just a

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>few pieces of data, right, Like we have discussed that

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>if if you give out your your zip code, that alone,

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>like your zip code and maybe the the uh, the

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>make and model of your car, can be enough to

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>identify a specific person. Like that, it gets to this

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>thing where there doesn't need to be that much data

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>out there for a person to be directly identifiable. And again,

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>unless you're monitoring everything the child is saying to the doll,

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe yeah, there are other ways of course the child

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the child might end up saying things that just that

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>just identify who the kid is based upon the things

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that are being said. Um, there are other questions as well,

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:49.479
<v Speaker 1>For example, uh, is the information encrypted? It better be, like,

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>because if it's not encrypted, then that then someone listening

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in could hear this stuff? Yeah, and that's the concern

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>about anything that's going on over any kind of internet,

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but especially WiFi. Yeah, there was one of the examples.

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I was going to bring up the Samsung Smart TV.

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you guys hear about the brujah about that? Yeah?

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So smart TV that has voice interactivetivity with it voice

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>commands and uh, this was one of those things that

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the media really ran with and some people object to

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they that Samsung was kind of singled

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>out in this way. But here's the story. So the

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Daily Beast did this look at the policies of Samsung

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>accord that relate directly to the smart TV, and it

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that the the stuff you said to the television

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>would get recorded and sent to a third party, which

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>raised a lot of eyebrows. They're like, well, I don't

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>want I don't want to television spying on me and

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>sending this stuff to a third party that's going to

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>end up using it for marketing, research or whatever, you know,

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever purposes. And Samsung I was saying, no, no, no.

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>The third party is there to work on the voice

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>recognition to make sure that the system gets more robust

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and more usable over time. And uh, and this is

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a system that you initiate by using a specific phrase

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in this case would be high TV and then whatever

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>command you wanted to say, just as if you were

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>using an Xbox one and you wanted to use the connect,

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you would say xbox and then the command. So it's

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>an activation phrase. It's not recording everything all the time,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>always and sending it off someplace. That was more or less.

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>The story of the media kind of went with was

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that you essentially have an open mic to the Internet.

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things that Samsung really didn't do

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>very well was that they had said the communication was

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:46.479
<v Speaker 1>encrypted so that when you use your television, added an

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>encryption layer so that anyone who intercepted that message would

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>not be able to see what it actually said. Turns

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>out it was unencrypted. It was unencrypted, and then it

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was sending a transcript of what you said Matt to

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you or TV, and the transcript was also unencrypted, So

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>two chances for someone listening in to see what you

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>had said. Now, granted, you were probably saying something like

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>volume up or volume down, but there's the potential that

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you could have also had another conversation going on that

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>got picked up or other elements that could have been

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>picked up, and it raised the question of well, what

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>if someone were to get access to the hardware remotely

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise and activated so that the MIC is always

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>on and unencrypted, then you just have a bug. You

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>You have got an electronic bug that's also an appliance

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in your house share And at that point, you know,

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like like pick your paranoia poison. You know, are you

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>worried about a hacker getting into your system and uh,

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know figuring out when you're home and when

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not home and when it's safe for someone to

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>go break in. Are you worried about the n s

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>A listening to what you say and you know, the

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>New American Gestapo eventually coming and busting down your door? Right? Yeah.

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>The idea being that even if no one is actively

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>listening to you, we know that there are organizations like

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the n s A that are fully capable of building

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>out this enormous database of recorded material and then being

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>able to search for it again using things like speech

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and voice recognition and transcription services where using a search

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>algorithm they can pull up stuff just using keywords. So

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>even if you're saying, well, no one is directly monitoring

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about. That stuff is being put in

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a is potentially being put in a place where it

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>could be reviewed at a later date, and it's still there.

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And whether you feel like, well, I don't do anything wrong,

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not the point. It's a privacy issue, not necessarily

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone doing something right or wrong. Yeah, I've

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>said this before on the podcast, I believe. But anybody

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>who ever makes the argument that well, if you're not

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>doing anything wrong, you've got nothing to hide, right, just

0:33:55.960 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>say okay, can I read all your email? Yeah? I

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>mean it's it's ridiculous. You know. Anybody who says that

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>just hasn't thought about the issue. I mean, you just

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:10.959
<v Speaker 1>people want certain things private. Yeah, And there's nothing wrong

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>with that necessarily. So the you know, there are a

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of potential concerns with this this doll.

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Now Mattel's part has they they've said that the things

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be recorded are meant specifically for

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>building out that database of of potential things that Barbie

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>could talk about to improve the doll, to improve the doll,

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>to improve speech and voice recognition as well, which is

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>an element of AI, so that is also an admirable

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. And they've said that they will not

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>use it for marketing purposes. Now I don't know if

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that means they won't. They might still use it for

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>marketing research like a focus group. So for example, of

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 1>kids say that, you know, they talked to Barbie and

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>say that they really wish they had such and such

0:34:57.400 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, you know, like some idea, whatever access or

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>or place to place exactly, like something that's something specific

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>than then maybe Mattel would say, we should do another

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.720
<v Speaker 1>run of that, you know, or we should build out

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>this thing and market it because that's a good idea.

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That's why don't we have geologist Barbie. Let's do it. Yeah.

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a lot different from having Barbie say to

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the kid, uh, you know you like shoes, you should

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>really look at this shoe accessory set that's available in

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>stores right now. That would be totally different. Were like, oh, man,

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I really want a pony. I'm the saddest Barbie ever

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>because I don't have a pony, but if only you

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>got you know, my pony Princess from Mattel or well,

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean the other thing would be like, Hey, it's

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>good to see you again. Barbie's got a question for you,

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what features do your parents really want in a luxury

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>city that that would also be inappropriate. And Mattel, for

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>its part, is said that that's not gonna happen. So

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and and like we said, Mantel has been very good

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>about responding to this sort of thing. It's clear that

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they have paid attention to some of the other stories

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that have come out over the past and and and

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think necessarily that they need to abandon this idea,

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>although there are petitions for that, right. Yeah, there's there's

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of petitions out there that have a few

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand signatures each. I I don't think that I personally,

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Although I I approve everyone's right to petition for things

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 1>that they like or don't like, I don't think that

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be enough to stop production on

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the toy or anything. And I think ultimately the best

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>way of not uh supporting it is not to buy

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the toys, you know. I mean, maybe if you're afraid

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that people you meet on the street are carrying a

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello Barbie surreptitiously on their person and pressing the belt

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 1>buckle repeatedly. In that case, you might need to get

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 1>new friends. I mean, it seems like boycotts or boycotts

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and petitions for banning things are rarely effective for new

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>like new products and new works of art, where they

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>typically just bring more publicity. What I think what I

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 1>think it might do, however, is really convinced Mattel that

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>they need to make sure there are they are doing

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>their due diligence in presenting this in the most responsible way,

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>so making sure things like that encryption is in place,

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>making sure that there is the capability to password protect

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>any sort of WiFi connectivity so that Barbie does not

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 1>become an entry point to hackers getting access to your

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 1>WiFi network. Because we we talked about this on I

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>think an episode of tech Stuff maybe, But there was

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the story about the baby monitors that had here. It

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>wasn't about where where there were internet connected baby monitors

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that got hacked by somebody who has started yelling at

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.439
<v Speaker 1>babies to tell them to wake up well and and

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>hacked in the sense that if if it doesn't have

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>password protection, or it has password protection but there is

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a default password that no one ever bothers to change,

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>then you don't. There's not really any hacking necessary. It's

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 1>essentially an open connection for you to to access. Uh. So,

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>so if you know it needs to have something that

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>would prevent that from happening, you don't. Again, you don't

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>want someone to hack into the toy and have Barbie

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 1>say inappropriate things to your kid. That would be that

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>would be all I would be upset. You know. I

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>have another question that may or may not be interesting.

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll see what you'll think before we get into the

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>reasons that I think that this is actually really cool

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and could lead to good advances. Uh. The question would be,

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is this necessarily a good thing in how children's speech develops?

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know if we've ever had a

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>situation before in history where children are going to be

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>interacting back and forth continuously with a with a truly

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>reactive electronic agent, And I wonder how much that would

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>affect the way a child learns to speak. If this

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is a toy that you're giving to a very young

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>child who's you know, still developing their own speech patterns,

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>do you know what I mean? Yeah? Yeah, Well, there

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of um talking robotic books and apps

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and computer programs that for certainly the past decade, maybe

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe fifteen or twenty years, even children have been using

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 1>to learn to read or to uh increase the vocabulary

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, sure, or even just you know, in

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 1>playing games. That's something that I think that more kids

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of this up and coming generation are more used to.

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>So I haven't personally read research about it, although you know,

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say that since the things that Barbie says

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>are completely controlled by the the by Mattel, they can

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:53.280
<v Speaker 1>make certain that Barbie is speaking properly, is using grammar properly.

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>You could even have Barbie be able to answer questions

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>about that sort of thing if that ended up being

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>uh of interest. Now, I doubt that we would ever

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where we have Barbie correcting people's grammar,

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 1>because I think that would I think that would just

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>be obnoxious. Barbie is like, ain't ain't a word stupid?

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Or or I want that toy. They're right, like if

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the if if if the if the child says I

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>did good on my test, and just know you did

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>well on your test, which is odd because you don't

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 1>know how to say well versus good. That that would

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:34.319
<v Speaker 1>have been you know, yeah, yeah, but I think that

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.439
<v Speaker 1>you know the fact that you could you The nice

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>thing is that Barbie is not just randomly constructing sentences

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 1>from a huge group of potential words where she could

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>start speaking like Yoda, She's going to be speaking in

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a way yeah scripted. I think you make a good point, Lauren.

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I I maybe I was overestimating the degree to which

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>this is different than things that came before. I'm just

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:02.399
<v Speaker 1>thinking because because it seems to be offering something that's

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a sort of heightened level of interactivity that actually learns

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 1>from the child. But yeah, children already do interact with

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like sort of speech driven electronic media

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>things that talk at them, just maybe not quite in

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the same way as we're talking here, So maybe maybe

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't make that big a difference. It also it

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of I mean, I understand why some people are

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>finding this sort of creepy because it reminds me of

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>what my initial reaction was when Google Now came out.

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And Google Now is like I I get these little

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>little notifications on my phone, and a lot of them

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>are prompted by my browsing habits using Google Chrome, and

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>all of this is because I have, you know, my

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Android phone, connects through a Google account, so it's all

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in that same sort of playhouse. And if I pull

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.280
<v Speaker 1>up those those things, if I've done something like searched

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for flights to a different city, uh, then it might

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>give me information about that city, like things that are

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>happy thing at the time when I was doing the search, saying, Oh,

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this weekend at that city you were interested in? Is

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>this thing? So if you're gonna go there, you might

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>want to check this out. At first, it starts seeming

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:12.439
<v Speaker 1>creepy because it's like, how does this thing know so much?

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And then you realize, oh, it's just taking the information

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.399
<v Speaker 1>that I'm using in all of my activities and kind

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of cohalating it and curating it in an easy, easily

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>digestible way. So it seems creepy, you know, in you know,

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a first glance, but then it just becomes really useful.

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I could see the same sort of reaction with this,

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the idea being that it's a doll that gradually gets

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to know more and more about the child and how

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to interact with that child based upon the things that

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the child seems interested in. Yeah. So, on the other hand,

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we should look at some of the cool

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>things that this could actually do for the future, because

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a toy like this is more advantageous

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.439
<v Speaker 1>than just that it's fun for kids, Like we could

0:42:56.480 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>actually learn things from it. Sure, for example, I'm in

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:03.399
<v Speaker 1>how to keep developing a speech recognition for one thing. Yeah,

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those things that we've seen lots

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of development over the last several decades, but it's kind

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of slowed down, Like this is one of the reasons

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>actually why I think it's amazing that kurtzwil is a

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>futurist who believes in the singularity, because he has this

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>very strong belief that singularity is just a couple of

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>decades away, very very close now. Uh. And yet he

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>also worked heavily in speech and voice recognition, where it's

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>clear that technological progression does not does not go at

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the same rate for every kind of technology. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And and and things tend to plateau during certain cultural or

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 1>economic or technology technological challenges. You'll have something happening you're

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 1>just like, oh, well, we kind of hit a roadblock.

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's not that we're never going to get around it,

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just it slowed us down. Right, We're not We're

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not progressing at that same uh you know geouh geometric

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>rate that we were earlier and uh so, but it

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>does mean that we can continue to improve on that,

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>which is part of artificial intelligence. So uh it means

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's helping push the discipline of artificial intelligence further,

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>which is exciting. Yeah, the mad scientist in me thinks,

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like man with proper consent, you could use this to

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>learn fascinating things about the development of language and humans.

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But then again, I'm sure there are tons of questions

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.319
<v Speaker 1>about how it would be difficult to wrangle that kind

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of experimentation ethically well, especially like you. You'd also have

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to factor in so many other different variables, things like

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:44.799
<v Speaker 1>the region that you're talking about the Now. Granted, you

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:46.879
<v Speaker 1>also have to keep in mind this is a very

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>expensive toy and it also requires that you have that

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:53.280
<v Speaker 1>WiFi connection. Now. Granted, because the toy is so expensive,

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.359
<v Speaker 1>it's probably pretty safe to bet that the people who

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>are buying it are also people who have WiFi. But

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>it means it means that if you were doing any

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of social study on that, you're looking at a

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>particular democratic Yeah, if you were trying to base it

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>on who who just bought them naturally, as opposed to

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like where you you know, gave them to control. Yeah, yeah,

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>if you went into the wild and yeah, so that

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 1>they could actually use it, because I mean, well, yeah,

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know why, I guess you're for research.

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>You brought kids in then sure, but I think you

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>could do that in a way that would be that

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>would not require, uh, the the actual doll, Like in

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that sense you would you could just set up a

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>camera and microphone in a in a room and have

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:46.359
<v Speaker 1>regular toys for the kid to play with. Because yeah,

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could have the interactive doll and that

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:51.919
<v Speaker 1>would help you just listen to the kid's responses. But

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't need the interactive doll, Like there's no you

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be looking at the back end at all. For

0:45:56.560 --> 0:46:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the Mainly, I'm just saying we need to learn more

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>about the evil heart of man from what children say

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>to their dolls, because a lot of what they say

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>to their dolls is quite disturbing. Also, really, I don't

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 1>remember ever having disturbing conversations with my action. This is

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the thing. People abuse their dolls, don't they, especially especially Yeah,

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.879
<v Speaker 1>well that's a thing I encountered when I was a child.

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:26.319
<v Speaker 1>I remember this anyway one feeling bad now. I never

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>abused my action figure. I went on adventures. But so

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:38.720
<v Speaker 1>back to happy Land. I want to see hello Barbie

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:42.720
<v Speaker 1>based art tech projects. I had an idea just earlier

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>as we were talking. So you've seen um Twitter bots

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>play spam tennis right where, Like we talked about that

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:51.839
<v Speaker 1>in a podcast not too long ago, the one about

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>what happens when a robot breaks the law? You can

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get bots talking to each other. They're they're designed to

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:00.320
<v Speaker 1>respond when people talk to them. What have If a

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>bot talks to a bot, they just keep talking back

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and forth, garbage. What happens if you have Barbie talk

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:11.719
<v Speaker 1>to Barbie? I wonder, I wonder if she if she's

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:15.280
<v Speaker 1>good enough to to hear that it's another Barbie talking

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 1>and to be like, hey, fellow self, how are you doing? Oh?

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I have great, fellow self. I don't know like that

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:25.759
<v Speaker 1>or or what I imagine is they could actually do

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the thing that Doc Brown talks about Back to the

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Future too, where if you see yourself from the future,

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you could destroy the entire universe. Yeah, yeah, I just

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 1>imagine a g I Joe place that just starting to

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>smolder in the background. It's just affecting like toys. Um.

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I I suspect that while we I don't know exactly

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>who initiates conversations using this toy, right I don't, I

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 1>assume that it's the child. So I assume that you

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:59.840
<v Speaker 1>hold down the belt buckle that activates the microphone and

0:47:59.880 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the child ends up saying something or the owner whomever

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 1>says something into the microphone that prompts the beginning. So uh,

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you would first have to be able to time that

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:13.959
<v Speaker 1>out just right right, so that you get the first

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>response from Barbie number one as you're holding down the

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 1>belt buckle for Barbie number two, so that the response

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>from Barbie one goes into the microphone of Barbie two.

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Then you'd have to time it out so that you

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:25.879
<v Speaker 1>could do the same thing with Barbie number two starts

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking to Barbie water. Somebody can come up with like

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>some kind of little large we know setup that that

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 1>has them go back and forth. Use your fingers too,

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean it, I'm just thinking you hear about the

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:42.239
<v Speaker 1>TVs that you want you have to be able to

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>say things to them rather than pressing buttons with your fingers. Look,

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I love a Rube Goldberg device as much as the

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 1>next guy. I'm just saying it's not always necessary to

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 1>do something simple, but uh, I mean I would also

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 1>be interested to see what would happen, Like how long

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 1>would that exchange go before it would break down? Yeah? Yeah?

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And just how how can Vin sing? Is this actually

0:49:01.480 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be to to a kid? Like? Yeah? And

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, because the age range for for toys like

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty enormous in terms of childhood. I mean,

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, at anything from you know, like older than

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the age of might eat Barbie's hand and die up

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 1>through up through puberty. You know, at least is within

0:49:22.440 --> 0:49:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the marketing range of this kind of toy. So is

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it going to be the thing like when we were

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>kids and talking toys came out and we were just like,

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:34.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the lamest thing I've ever seen in my life.

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I went on adventures with maybe again, you sound like

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you were much better adjusted than I was, Jonathan, But

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I think this is a pretty cool idea,

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I'm excited to see where speech recognizing toys

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>go in the future. It is way cooler than what

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they had when I was a kid, which was just

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 1>like you know the polsterring talking toys, Well, there's a

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:04.960
<v Speaker 1>snake in my boots, or the I think they had

0:50:05.000 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>some diaper wedding baby dolls when I was a kid. Yeah. Well,

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and and perennially talking about career aspirations is just cooler

0:50:13.400 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>than wedding diapers. Well, and this technology, this this ability

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 1>to UH for for speech and voice recognition and responses

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and using voice control as a user interface, is something

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue to see creep into more and

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:31.960
<v Speaker 1>more technology around us. And I think the objections to

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Hello Barbie do bring up some points that we need

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to be aware of just moving forward in general, especially

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:41.359
<v Speaker 1>like we've talked about the Internet of Things a lot

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:43.360
<v Speaker 1>on this show, and I love the idea of the

0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Internet of things, but even I as someone who is

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 1>truly enthusiastic about that technology, I recognize that with the

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:54.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong implementation or the wrong level of awareness, it could

0:50:54.200 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 1>end up being problematic at best because the fact that

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:02.840
<v Speaker 1>there are some really serious privacy concerns and some security

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:05.239
<v Speaker 1>issues that you have to think about make sure you

0:51:05.320 --> 0:51:10.280
<v Speaker 1>design everything properly. There was a recent story about people

0:51:10.520 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 1>hacking into WiFi networks using a nest thermostat as an

0:51:15.360 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>entry point. So that's the sort of stuff that you

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have to be aware of. If you're going to have

0:51:19.160 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>this interconnectivity with all these different devices, you need to

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 1>make certain that you keep security at a level that

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to be manageable but also effective enough to

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>discourage most attacks. Now, keep in mind, most of us

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:38.320
<v Speaker 1>are pretty safe from the the the leite hackers out there.

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the folks that have access to tools but

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily uh willing to go and put forth

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of effort to break into a security system

0:51:49.840 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that we need to really be cognizant of most of us. Obviously,

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:56.800
<v Speaker 1>if you hold an important position somewhere or you are

0:51:56.840 --> 0:51:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in the public eye, then it may be different for you,

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>But for the most of us, we just have to

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:04.359
<v Speaker 1>worry about that lower level of security. But still means

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that we need to keep that in mind, and I

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's just gonna be something that we have to

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 1>look for, both for speech and voice recognition type of

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of technologies and just general technologies that gather information about

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the area and send it off somewhere in order for

0:52:19.280 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 1>there to be a reaction in your environment. Because that's

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>always going to pose a potential privacy issue, and if

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we're aware of it, we can implement this technology properly

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in a way that benefits us without putting us to

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:35.760
<v Speaker 1>great risk. At least that's that's my kind of opinion

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 1>about it. I know some people are a little more

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 1>more cautious than I am, and I don't blame them

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 1>one bit in that case, Uh, put put electrical tape

0:52:47.440 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>over your webcam viewers, and don't buy your kid at

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Barbie Dollar. I know, I know people people who are

0:52:55.160 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>just as enthusiastic about technology as I am, who regularly

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:01.239
<v Speaker 1>put a post it note over a web am. I

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:04.279
<v Speaker 1>know folks who are you know, they're not, and they're

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 1>not paranoid that they just they recognize the potential that

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this technology has means of both benefiting us and possibly

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 1>being a security or privacy issue, and and acknowledging that

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is the responsible thing to do. Acknowledging it and making

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that we are as responsible as possible moving forward

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:27.640
<v Speaker 1>means that we can ensure that we have the cool,

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:32.759
<v Speaker 1>awesome future and not the creepy orwellian future. Joe, what

0:53:32.800 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think you've been kind of quiet? I'm just listening.

0:53:38.360 --> 0:53:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You're just recording everything for the future, despite the fact

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that we've literally recorded this and you can literally go

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>back and listen to it whatever you want. Well, yeah, later,

0:53:47.719 --> 0:53:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to analyze the transcript and then figure out

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 1>how to sell you a car that will be a

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:57.319
<v Speaker 1>heck of us doll. Doll, you have a much better

0:53:57.360 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>shot at Jonathan. I know you don't dry, but hey,

0:54:02.920 --> 0:54:04.799
<v Speaker 1>if you take a bunch of dolls together, you can

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 1>use them as a sled to get down the street.

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I used to go on sledding adventures with my action figures.

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Well that about wraps up this episode forward thinking, Do

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys have any other closing thoughts you want before

0:54:17.840 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we we say goodbye to our beloved listeners. I think

0:54:21.200 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm more creeped out by a sled made of barbies

0:54:24.120 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 1>than I am by like random strangers listening to things

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:31.839
<v Speaker 1>that my hypothetical children say into a microphone. So good job, Joe,

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you found something that totally creeps me out. Maybe I'd

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:36.479
<v Speaker 1>be more creeped out about this if I had kids.

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It just seems pretty interesting to me. Yeah,

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:42.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's to also be fair, none of us in

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:45.879
<v Speaker 1>this room have kids, So we're we're also coming from

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this from the standpoint of people who are interested in

0:54:49.719 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 1>technology but also aware of the potential pitfalls. But we

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have a personal steak in this efficient paranoia. Yeah.

0:54:57.200 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 1>But but so if you, guys, if if you are

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in the market, either your yourself, if you are in

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:06.160
<v Speaker 1>this this demographic that is interested in owning this doll

0:55:06.760 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 1>or or if you do have children and have an

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 1>opinion about all of this, let us know. How can

0:55:12.120 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they do that? Jonathan, Well, they can write to us,

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And I would recommend writing to us. If you're going

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to express an opinion that's going to take more than say,

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a hundred forty characters, send us an email. That email

0:55:21.520 --> 0:55:25.359
<v Speaker 1>addresses f W Thinking at how Stuff Works dot com.

0:55:25.480 --> 0:55:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Or you can drop us a line on Twitter, on

0:55:27.640 --> 0:55:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus. On Facebook and Twitter and Google Plus, we

0:55:30.320 --> 0:55:33.439
<v Speaker 1>are f W thinking. Go to Facebook search FW thinking

0:55:33.440 --> 0:55:35.680
<v Speaker 1>will pop right up. You can leave us a message

0:55:35.680 --> 0:55:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, if you have suggestions for future topics, definitely

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:41.319
<v Speaker 1>let us know. We've got a list of those that

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going through. And we love hearing from you guys,

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and and your ideas are fantastic. Often you suggest things

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that just hadn't occurred to us, and they end up

0:55:49.560 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 1>being some of our strongest and most interesting episodes. So

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:54.759
<v Speaker 1>please continue to let us know what you think and

0:55:54.800 --> 0:56:02.359
<v Speaker 1>we will talk to you again really soon. For more

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:05.400
<v Speaker 1>on this topic and the future of technology, visit forward

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Thinking dot Com Problem brought to you by Toyota. Let's

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Go Places,