WEBVTT - Examining the FX Space, Fed Policy Outlook

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 2>This will be the third consecutive week of abbreviated trading

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 2>in the US equity market will be closed Thursday for

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 2>a national day of mourning for former President Jimmy Carter.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Even so, there's been no shortage of FED speak and

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>that will continue. And in a moment we'll be checking

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 2>in with Matt Orton. He is the chief market strategist

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 2>at Raymond James Investment Management. We'll get his thoughts on

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>the FED. But we begin in Sydney and a look

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 2>at currencies. We're joined now by Peter Maguire, CEO of

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 2>XM Australia. Peter, it's always a pleasure, Happy new year

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>to you. Let's begin with your outlook for the dollar.

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 2>I think it's fair to say that the market right

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>now is expecting far fewer rate cuts from the FED

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty five, and I would imagine that in

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>your view that equates to continued dollar strength. Am I right?

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, good morning Doug, and happy New Year, and thank you. Yes,

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 4>I think so. I mean, you know, last week I

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 4>think I took everyone by a bit of surprise. We

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 4>had a one O nine nearly one O nine to

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 4>fifty handle for the US dollar index sitting there at

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 4>about one eight thirty five.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 3>At the moment.

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 4>I feel as though, as you said, you know, do

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 4>we get two rate cuts, one rate cut or no

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 4>rate cuts in twenty five and the momentum is going

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 4>to be to the upside. I feel as though you're

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 4>going to see intervention from the likes of Japan shortly

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 4>at nearly one sixty. For the end, You've got the

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 4>euro sitting at one O three eighty. It's probably parodies

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 4>on its radar, maybe even this month. So I feel, yeah,

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be continued up lift the US dollar

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 4>and its overall strength. There's been a standing over the

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 4>last couple of months. It's been a great trade to

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 4>be in, and I don't think it's going to disappoint

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 4>moving forward.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 2>One of the things we're also keeping a very close

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>eye on the tariff story. Today the Washington Post indicated

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 2>that President electroump Here aids at least we're exploring plans

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 2>for limited tariffs apply to all countries, but only with

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 2>respect to critical imports. Do you have a sense of

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 2>what the market right now is discounting. In the tariff story,

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>is a lot of noise that has to do with

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 2>really not understanding where Trump is at the moment, and

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe a lot of what we're hearing rhetorically has to

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 2>do with a negotiating strategy, and it will be some

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 2>time before we get clarity. And is the tariff story

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>a part of this at all?

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 4>I think it is, Doug And I think you know

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 4>when you're when you're looking at President Trump and the

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 4>way he operates, and that's this is from an Australian

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 4>looking in, certainly unorthodox. Certainly he presents the art of

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 4>the deal and goes in hard to start with and

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 4>then renegotiates, So that could be the storyline there.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 3>We've got to be very patient.

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Because there could be all sorts of in the sense

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 4>of different countries will be responsible for different rates. So

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 4>I feel as though that that will be if they

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 4>don't play ball with him, and then how that moves

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 4>forward to the interpretation from the market, what happens to

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>the likes of China. It's going to be I think

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 4>a very dynamic first sixty days in and I think

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 4>he's going to hit the ground running.

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you mean that there's going to be just broadly speaking,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the foreign exchange, a lot more volatility.

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.399
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I really do, because it creates a sense, as

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, from a trading perspective, you want a little

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 4>bit of certainty. You like a from a risk the

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 4>dynamics of risk and behavioral you want, but you want

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 4>some certainty. And this can change through just a simple

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 4>stroke of a pen or a comment by President Trump

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 4>or his senior advisors. That can really change the perception

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 4>to the market and sentiment quickly, and in turn that

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 4>creates that lovely word called volatility. And I think that

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 4>that will be the frame moving forward, certainly for the

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 4>first quarter.

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 2>I was trucked today by the rally and the Canadian

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>dollar on news that prim mister Trudeau is going to

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>be stepping down here as soon as a new leader

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 2>can be agreed upon for the Liberal Party. What's your

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 2>outlook on the Canadian dollar.

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that that's that's been interesting. I mean,

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 4>it's been massively sold off as we know, over the

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 4>last couple of months, and all the all the commodity

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 4>currencies were similar. Fate Ossie's nearly at sixty cents there

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 4>at one stage and keiw So if you're wrapper three

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 4>of them up and then now you've had a leadership change,

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be surprised to take a little bit more

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 4>uptick as far as.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Strength to the Canadian dollar.

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Let's see who's elected and it's been massively sold off

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.479
<v Speaker 4>from you know that one thirty five hand or come

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 4>mid September all the way through to you know the

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 4>one forty five nearly, so possibly you're going to see

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 4>a one forty two one point four one.

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I just have to see where it goes.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 4>But it's again, it's going to be volatile until we

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 4>get some sort of I suppose indication who's going to

0:04:57.760 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 4>take the leadership.

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned a moment ago, you're looking at the Japanese

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 2>yen where the possibility of intervention is concerned. We're a

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>little bit on the strong side of one fifty nine

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 2>against the greenback at the moment. At what point do

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 2>you think it's not going to be about intervention but

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>about boj policy and the fact that we've got to

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 2>get a rate hike in here, perhaps as soon as

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:18.799
<v Speaker 2>this month.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, twenty fourth, I think is the day that everyone's

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 4>got table. That's when the meeting's on and decision time.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think though I looked at that last week,

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 4>I'm holding that in memory. So if it's above one sixty,

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 4>I think they'd wait. It'll be a wait and see

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 4>game until the twenty fourth and do we see.

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Twenty five basis points?

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 4>As far as a hike and how what's the retrick

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 4>coming out naturally from Governor Uida and the overall I

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 4>suppose again sentiment from the BOJ and policy moving forward,

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 4>and I wouldn't be surprised. I mean, if rates go up,

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 4>that's going to quickly change. I think the footprint as

0:05:55.080 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 4>far as yen versus dollar from a from a market indication.

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 4>So we'll just wait and see. But it's not long

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 4>to wait, you know, two weeks and we'll get a decision.

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at a euro here, this is stunning. I

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>mean a dollar three rate. Now are you looking at

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 2>a world here in the near term where we see

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>euro dollar parody?

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I think so, I wouldn't be surprised, Doug. Do we

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 3>even go lower.

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 4>Everyone's saying you might see a ninety eight or ninety

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 4>nine handled sometime February, So that's what the traders are saying.

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 4>We've just got to see because that US dollars got

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 4>so much uptick. You know, as far as the ECB

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 4>is concerned, you could see another one hundred and ten

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 4>basis of points cut out by December. We've got structural weaknesses.

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 4>We know in Germany, the euro Land is pretty tough.

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 4>You've got CPI preliminary datak for December that's coming out.

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 4>So we've just got to see how all of that

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 4>is interpreted from the market. And yeah, it's I think

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 4>the euro will continue to be sold off and that's

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 4>another great trade.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 3>It's just been extraordinary over the last couple of weeks.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Talk to me a little bit, Peter about your home currency,

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the Aussie. How do things look for twenty twenty five.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 4>It's a great peso at the moment, Dug. We've changed

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 4>the name of it. I think it's the Aussi peso,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 4>not the Aussie dollar. It's been sold off. I said

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 4>to your team, you know, if you haven't made Australia

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 4>a visiting point with a dollar at sixty one or

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 4>sixty cents, that's the Aussie versus the US. Now's the

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 4>time to visit in February because of the buying power

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 4>of your strong US dollar against US, of course, and

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 4>I feel as though that we.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Could be sub sixty.

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm worried about China. I take on board their situation.

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 4>It's a little bit of a proxy as far as

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Ossie versus for the China, So I'm expecting more softness

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 4>there and maybe a fifty eight handle is where we're

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 4>heading to.

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering if there's a surprise right now that you're

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 2>beginning to anticipate something on the horizon that maybe a

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>few people are considering that could really create a lot

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 2>more volatility in in the foreign exchange right now, something

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>that you could share with us. Maybe that's different from

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the dollar story.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 4>I think yes, I feel as possibly the China situation,

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 4>what's going on there as far as their rates, is

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 4>the stimulus going to be the action point that everyone

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.679
<v Speaker 4>thought was going to turn things around.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 3>And I'm worried about China.

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 4>I've just I'm concerned naturally with their real estate market.

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 4>You've got eighteen trillion. I was looking at a comment

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 4>by Barclay. Since twenty twenty one, eighteen trillion in wealth

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 4>has been evaporated or destroyed in property, So that worries me.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Who's holding the debt? And in turn, where does that

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 3>play for Australia.

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 4>We're very reliant on a strong China and that's not

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 4>necessarily the case at the moment.

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Will that necessarily force Beijing to kind of do more

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 2>in the way of intervention.

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 4>Well, it does, and I'm conscious of it. But when

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 4>you've got your ten year running at what is an

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 4>a rand about four point six two four point sixty three,

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 4>investors can really get three hundred basis points risk free

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 4>investment buying US treasuries versus Chinese treasuries. So who's going

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 4>to choose those Chinese government bonds? That's a worry. And

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, with the way your ten years going, you

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 4>might be running higher at you know, by end of month.

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be surprised possibly even a four to seven

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 4>five handle.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Peter, it's always a pleasure. Thanks so much for

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 2>spending time with us. Peter maguire there, he is the

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 2>CEO of XM Australia, joining us here on the Daybreak

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Asia podcast. Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 2>Doug Krisner. In the US equity market today, we had

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 2>a rally in tech megacaps, helping to send the S

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and P to a gain of around six tens to

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 2>one percent. Meta platforms up more than four percent today.

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 2>That was after Jeffrey said that Meta could offer the

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 2>best AI play in the consumers this year. Let's take

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 2>a closer look at the tech trade and markets more

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 2>broadly with Matt Orton. He is the chief market strategist

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 2>at Raymond James Investment Management, joining us from the firm's

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 2>headquarters in Saint Petersburg, Florida. Matt, thanks for being with us.

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Happy New year too. You how things are going well

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 2>for you? Talk to me about this theme of AI.

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 2>It certainly provided a lot of oomph to the market

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 2>last year. Do you think the same will hold true

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty five?

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And uncappy new year to you as well, and always

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>great to join and I do. I think there's a

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of tailwinds to the artificial intelligence trade. I think

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the key difference this year versus what we've seen for

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the past two years is I think a lot of

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the games that we are likely to see are not

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be as concentrated in the handful of hyperscalers

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>where you've seen a lot of the momentum already occur.

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I talked to clients about this basket of AI two

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>point zero companies, kind of who are the capex beneficiaries

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of the artificial intelligence spend on the part of these

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>megacap tech names, and that leads me to electrical equipment

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>head companies. It leads me even to some industrials that

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>are involved in machinery or helping construct some of the

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>data centers or the semiconductor fabs that we're moving back

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to the country. Even within the tech space, you know,

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you have a number of other software companies that are

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>helping to work to develop apps and enable artificial intelligence.

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the trade broadens out, which is

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a keyword for for twenty twenty five. We're not off

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to a great start for the past few trading days

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 1>on the breast side of things, but I think there's

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tailwinds to go and it's all going

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to be backed by earnings and earnings momentum.

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Over the last two years for the S and P,

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 2>I think we had a gain of something around fifty percent.

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 2>That seems stunning. What's the likelihood that we're going to

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 2>remain positive, not necessarily to that extent, but positive for

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 2>US equities and perhaps not ripe for a little bit

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>of a pullback.

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have to kind of disaggregate this

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>idea of a pullback and the ability of US markets

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to continue to push higher. Now. I actually think we're

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>going to see a higher volatility bull market in twenty

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. We're already getting a preview of what that

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>looks like. Iven Some of the uncertainties are on tariffs,

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the path of rates, what's happening with inflation. But that

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean the market can't continue to push higher. And

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that's rooted in the big picture, Doug. It's

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>rooted in the fact that earnings are going to continue

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to move higher. We're looking at thirteen percent or so

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>EPs growth is consensus right now. I think we're going

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>to see that and potentially better. Margins are near record

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>highs currently. I think we're going to be able to

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>sustain that, and so as long as earnings are able

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to deliver, coupled with what I would argue is a

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>very solid fundamental economic backdrop for the United States, along

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>with hopefully some additional deregulation or clarity with respect to

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>taxes going forward. That sets up a very environment that

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>makes me comfortable recommending to clients that when we have

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>five ten percent pullbacks, which I think could be likely

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this year, use those opportunistically use those as buying opportunities

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to help better diversify your portfolio away from just the

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>megacat names that have worked over the past few years.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about the rates environment.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Earlier today, Lisa Cooke, a FED governor, was saying that

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the FED can proceed a little bit more cautiously. The

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 2>labor market seems to be sturdy, although there are lingering

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 2>concerns about inflation, particularly when you begin to consider the

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:40.359
<v Speaker 2>potential inflationary impact of policies from the incoming Trump administration,

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>And a lot of the FED speak over the last

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>several days is skewed more hawkish. We know now as

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 2>a result of what we heard from the FED share

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the last FED meeting that maybe

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 2>only two rate cuts are being predicted for the new

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 2>year instead of four. How are you feeling about the

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 2>outlook for interest rates right now? And how aggressive do

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 2>you feel the FED will be in accommodating?

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think the path for rates is certainly higher

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>than it was, you know, even a month or especially

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a month or two ago. But I think the good

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>news is the market has done a lot of adjusting already.

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>The market is already pricing in only one to two

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>rate cuts for twenty twenty five. So I think any

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>surprises with respect to inflation continuing to make slow but

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>consistent progress a little bit lower, I think that could

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly tip the scales to help rates start to come

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit later in the year. I think

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>there's risks, especially in the near term, to seeing you know,

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>four seventy five five percent or so in the ten year.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>But for longer term investors, those maybe looking to move

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>from cash and lock in longer term yields, I think

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>those are good opportunities to perhaps lock in those yields

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think you're going to stay at those

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>levels for very long. Because again, I do think inflation

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>over the lone term is going to continue to come down.

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just a matter of how slow that path is

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 2>The December employment report, it will be the main attraction

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 2>on Friday. It's going to indicate a lot in terms

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 2>of how well the labor market is performing, and by extension,

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 2>how strong the consumer may be. What's your sense of

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 2>the American consumer right now?

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, dog, I think, and I've thought for a long time,

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but the American consumer isn't a good place. I think

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of economists investors like it. People have missed

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>how strong the American consumer is. I guess. Being based

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, I have the luxury of kind of seeing

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>vacationers on a steady basis and seeing them out at restaurants,

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>continuing to spend money both at high end, medium and

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>low end hotels, and I'll tell you I have not

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>really seen a slowdown even after the hurricanes, people continue

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to come down. And when I talk to management teams

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of consumer oriented companies, a lot of the big picture spending,

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>especially on discretionary trips, kind of the experiences that stays

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in place. There is, however, a bifurcated consumer, and I

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>think selectivity in the consumer space matters a lot. So

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I really discourage clients from trying to take a broad

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>approach to attacking the consumer. You have to be very

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>specific about what consumer you have exposure to, and I'd

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>much rather have exposure to consumers that are more lever

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>towards the high end, towards discretionary experiential travel. Because you're

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>still seeing that play out. You hear it from Visa,

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>from American Express, you hear it from some of the

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>companies that sell those goods or travel. I think that'll continue.

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And what I would pay attention to in the labor

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>report on Friday in particular is wage growth, because wage

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>growth has improved across the board for the economy, but

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a double edged sword. If wage growth comes in

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>higher than expect it, it's just another it's just another

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>challenge for the FED and for the inflation overall to

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to come down, since so much of it is

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>services based inflation.

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 2>So, man, if you're a reasonable optimistic about the domestic economy,

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 2>do you want to be a little bit more exposed

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 2>to small and mid cap names, let's say, as opposed

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 2>to some of the big multinationals at this point, I do.

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean I want to. I still want to have

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>exposure to the multinationals because they're earning story is incredible

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>by and large, but I think the market is really

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>missing the growth that we're likely to see in small

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>and mid cap companies. I certainly understand and appreciate the

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>rate argument and the challenges that higher rates could pose

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to smaller companies, but higher quality small cap companies are

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>already benefiting from lower funding costs. Because rates have already

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>come down one hundred basis points from from the peak

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of where we were last year. You're not seeing challenges

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>for small cap companies with good balance sheets generating free

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. Those companies are very underappreciated by the market.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 1>They're under owned and investor portfolios, and we have near

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>historic valuation different between large and small cap companies. I

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>think there's a very compelling case to be made, especially

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>if you believe that there's going to be strong economic growth.

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a better way to play that

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>than being selective in small caps, particularly with respect to

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are involved in the AI trade and

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>also on the banks, the financials, the deregulatory side of things.

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of ways you can play

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>small in midcaps, and once that part of the market

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.239
<v Speaker 1>starts to move, it can move very very quickly. I

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>would use that pullback in December, we've had to really

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>think about adding exposure to small and midcaps in your portfolio.

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm glad you mentioned the financials because today we

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 2>had news that Michael Barr, the Fedzvice Chair of Supervision,

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 2>plans to step down. We know he was instrumental in

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>getting that plan to force some of the big banks

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 2>to hold more capital. Obviously, the goal here is aspirational.

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 2>You want to prevent bank failures and also prevent systemic

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 2>financial crises. But he may have been potential target for

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the incoming administration. We really don't know. What he did

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 2>say is that he wanted to eliminate the risk.

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Of a dispute.

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 2>But I was struck by the way in which bank

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 2>stocks climbed on that news. The KBW Bank index was

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 2>up today by around to eight tens one percent. Talk

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 2>to me about the outlook that you see in the financials,

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe deal flow M and A activity as well as

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe easier regulations when it comes to the big banks.

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a really good point, Doug, and I think

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>this deregulation theme for twenty twenty five is very, very real.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a huge regulatory burden in this country. I

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>mean we added over ninety thousand new pages in the

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Federal Register last year alone. It is. It is incredibly

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>burdened sum It is a key reason why a lot

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of companies outside of just the fact that they're well financed,

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's a key reason why a lot of companies

0:19:55.200 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to go public. You have an over resource

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>regional bank community banking sector in the United States, and

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>there it's right for consolidation. When I talk to CFOs

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>or CEOs or regional banks, all of them are very,

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>very bullish and enthusiastic about consolidation in the industry. So

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to help on the sea regulation front,

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and specifically with respect to financial regulations, that's also been

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>an incredible burden. So I think seeing tangible changes already

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>takes place, I think that renews the enthusiasm that was

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>there after the Trump election around the financial trade. So

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I still think there's a lot of legs to go there.

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Matt will leave it there. Thank you so much for

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>being with us. Matt Orton is the chief market strategist

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 2>at Raymond James Investment Management, joining from Saint Petersburg, Florida.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Here on the Daybreak Asia podcast. Thanks for listening to

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 2>today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday,

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 2>we look at the story shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 2>in the Asia Pacific. You can find us on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere else you listen.

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Join us again tomorrow for insight on the market moves

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 2>from Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia. I'm Doug Prisoner

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg