WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: How Chaos Theory Changed the Universe

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, it's me Josh, your old pal, and for

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this week's s Y s K Selects, I've chosen How

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Chaos Theory Changed the Universe first came out in July

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand sixteen, and I have to say I

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's um one of the better science e Stuff

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you should Know episodes of all time, because there's just

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>something about this that grabbed me and Chuck by the

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>callers and said I'm interesting, aren't I? And we said, yes,

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you definitely are. And this one has everything. It has science,

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it has philosophy, it has our understanding of the universe.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Is just all around good episode. So I hope you

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it as much as I did listening to it. Again.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of I

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark with Charles W Chuck Bryant and there's

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Jerry over there. So this is stuff you should know,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the podcast about Chaos Theory. Like, uh, have you ever

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>seen Event Horizon? I did not bad? Great movie? Are

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you crazy? I think it was great? Oh it was

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>so imagining it. I thought it was okay, it was

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>like a love crafty and thing in outer space. Yeah,

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I loved it was all right, I love crafted it.

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I liked it. Um, that's what I think of when

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.559
<v Speaker 1>I think of chaos. You know, there's that one part

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>where they kind of give you like a glimpse behind,

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>like the dimension that this action is taking place in,

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to see the chaos underneath. And you should check that

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>out again. Yeah, I think about Jurassic Park and Jeff

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Goldblum as as the creep Dr Malcolm explaining chaos in

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the little auto driving suv or whatever that was. Yeah,

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what it was called in the script, the auto

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>driving suv scene. Yeah. And you know what, actually rewatched

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the scene and it confirmed two things. One is that

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>he uh, he actually did a pretty decent job for

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a Hollywood movie with a very rudimentary explanation of chaos. Um,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and you watched it for this yeah, yeah, just that scene.

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And then it also confirmed of what a creep that

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>character was. Yeah. If you watch that scene, he's like,

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was all gross and flirty with her

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>right in front of her ex but there's just you know,

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>he's talking to her. I didn't even notice this at first.

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>He like he just like touches her hair out of

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>nowhere for no reason. He's just talking to her and

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>he just like grabs her hair and touches it. And

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, what a creep. I know, if you look closely,

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you can see the hormones emerging through his chest hair. Yeah,

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and I love Jeff Goldblum. It's not a reflection on him.

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>He was basically doing Jeff Goldbloom. Well that's what. Yeah, sure,

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>he's Jeff Goldblum, but I don't think that's how in

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the manner in which he speaks. But I don't think

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he's a creep, do you. Wow, I've got nothing against

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Jeff gold I think he's a I think he's doing

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Goldblum. It was also a sign of the times,

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Like if that movie were made today, doctor what was

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>her name in the movie? Think, Yeah, Dr Sadler would

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>be like, it's very inappropriate to stroke my hair. Yeah, like,

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't touch me. But this was the nineties, nineties, free wheeling,

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it was eight it was nineties, it was the early

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>mid nineties thing. The book came out in and in

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the book, uh Ian Malcolm, who's a Kayetician? Yeah, creep Kaetician? Right?

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>He um? He he goes into even more depth about chaos.

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But that was I mean, that was the first time

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I ever heard of chaos theory was from Jurassic Park,

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and um it really it was really misleading. I think

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the entire term chaos is very misleading as far as

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the general public goes as from what I researched in

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this this for this article, well, yeah, I mean you

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>hear the word chaos as an English speaker and you

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>think frenetic and crazy, out of control. Yeah, and that's

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>not what it means in terms of science like this, right.

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>What it means, I guess we can say up front

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>is is basically the idea that complex systems do not

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>behave in very neat ways that we can easily grasp, understand,

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or measure right, and not even even simple systems don't.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it doesn't always have to be complex. But um,

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to give a shout out in addition to

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>our own article to uh when you know, when it

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to stuff like this, the brain breaking stuff for me, man,

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:43.799
<v Speaker 1>this is a brain breaker. You know how I always

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>go to like blank blank for kids because it always

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>helps if there's a dinosaur mascot on the page. It's

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a sure thing, we can understand it. But the best

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>explanation for all this stuff that I found on the

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>internet was from a website called a bar Um A

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 1>B A R I. M. Publications, which turns out to

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>be a website about biblical patterns and sandwiched in the middle,

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there is a really great, easy to understand uh series

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of pages on chaos there. So I was like, man,

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I get it now, I mean in a rudimentary way, right, Well, yeah, um,

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I think even a lot of people who deal with

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>systems that display chaotic behavior, which I guess is to

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>say basically all systems eventually under the right conditions, UM,

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily understand chaos. Yeah. And they define a complex

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>system is specifically. It doesn't mean just like, oh it's complex,

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is, but specifically, Um, they define it

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in a way that helped me understand. It's a system

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that has so much motion, so many elements that are

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in motion, moving parts. Yeah, that it takes like a

0:05:55.240 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>computer to calculate all the possibilities of like what that

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>could look like five minutes from now, ten years from now.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>So before computers came around, we before the quantum mechanical revolution.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>It was there's a lot more basic. It was like

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>what comes up must come down, stuff like that. Let's

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>talk about that, Chuckers, because when you're talking about chaos theory,

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>it helps to understand how it revolutionized the universe by

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>getting a clear picture of how we understood the universe

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 1>leading up to the discovery of chaos. Right, So, prior

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to the um the scientific Revolution, everybody was like, oh, well,

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's God. The Earth is at the center of

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe, and God is spinning everything around like a top. Right.

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>It was all a theistic explanation. Then the scientific revolution

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>happens and people start applying things like math and making

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>like mathematical discoveries and and and figuring out that there

0:06:56.160 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>are there's order. They're finding order in patterns and predictability

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to the universe if you can apply mathematics to it. Yes, specifically,

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>if you can apply mathematics to the starting point right, right, So,

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>if you can if you can um figure out how

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a system works mathematically speaking, right, you can go in

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and plug in whatever coordinates you want to and watch

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it go. You can predict what what the outcome is

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be, and what this is the it's based

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on what at the time was a totally revolutionary idea

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>um By Initially, I think the cart was the first

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>one to kind of say cause and effect is a

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty big part of our universe, right. Yeah. It was

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of like where this is the the sixteen hundreds where

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>early science met philosophy. They kind of complemented one another

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as far as something that's we're talking about determinism, right,

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So that was the kind of the seeds of determinism

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>was the scientific revolution, and like you said, where philosophy

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and science came together in the form of Descartes, right.

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And then Newton came along and we did a whole

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>episode on him. Yeah, January of this year. That was

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a good one. It was really good. Like I think

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you said in that episode that there's possibly no scientists

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that changed the world more than Newton has. He's he's

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>got legs. People shouted out others and email, but I'll

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>just say he's at the near the top for sure

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>with some other people. The cream. So Newton came along

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and Newton said that was his name, Isaac the Cream Newton, right,

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and anytime he don't to be like cream, Yeah, you

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>just got creamed. So I thought he was a boxer.

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>He's a basketball player. He was much more well known

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 1>as a boxer, but he definitely could dunk as a

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>as a B baller. So um Man, that threw me

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>off a little bit. Yeah, the cream comes along and uh,

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>he basically says, watch this, dude, this causing effect thing

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, I can express it in quantifiable terms.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And he comes up with all of these great laws

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and and basically sets the stage the foundation for science

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>for the next three centuries or so. Yeah, these these

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>laws that were so rock solid and powerful that scientists

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of got ahead of themselves a little and said

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we're done. Like with Newton's laws, we can predict Uh,

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we can predict everything if we have a good enough

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>beginning accurate value to plug into his equations, and they weren't.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a little hubris and a little

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>just excitement about like, well, we figured it all out right,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that that you could take Newton's laws and if you

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>had accurate enough measurements, you could predict what the outcome

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>would be of that system that you plug those measurements

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>into using these simular and at the time, a lot

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of this was like planetary like, well, we know that

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>these planets are here and they're moving and their orbiting.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So if we know these things, we can plug it

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>into an equation and we can figure out what it's

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be like in a hundred years exactly. And

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 1>they've figured out the basis of determinism is what we

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>just said, that if you have accurate measurements, you can

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>take those measurements and use them to predict, um how

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a system is going to change over time using differential equations. Right,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>so this is what this is what Newton comes along

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>and figures out that you can describe the universe and

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>these mathematical terms using differential equations and um. Like you

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>said there was a tremendous amount of hubris, and well,

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you said there's some hubris. I think there's

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of hubris where science basically said, we've

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>mastered the universe, We've uncovered the blueprint of the universe,

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and now we understand everything. It's just a matter now

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of getting our scientific measurements more and more and more exact.

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Because again, the hallmark of determinism is that if you

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>have exact measurements, you can predict an outcome accurately, like

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the pool queue example. Well they're the pool table example, right, right,

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you've got a pool table, let's say you're

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>playing some nine ball. You have that beautiful little diamond

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>set up, you got your cue ball, you put that

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>cue ball, and you you crack it with the queue.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you are super accurate with your initial measurements,

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to mathematically plot out via angles

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>where the balls will end up right exactly, Like you

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>can say, this is what the table will look like

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>after the break, if you know the force, the angle,

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>all those little variable temperature, if there's wind in the room,

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>like the felt on the table, like everything. The more

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>specific you are, the more accurate your end result will be. Right.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And then one of the other hallmarks of determinism is

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 1>that if you take those exact same initial conditions and

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>do them again, the table, the pool table will look

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same after the break. Yeah, which is pretty

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>much impossible for like a human to do with their hands. Sure,

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but the idea at the time of science was that

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>if you could build a perfect machine, sure that could

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>recreate these conditions, it will happen the same way every time, right, Yeah,

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And this, I mean, this led to they had hubris,

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>but you could understand it when like literally in eighteen

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>forty six, two people predicted Neptune would exist within months,

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that would exist, but does exist. And this is not

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>by looking up in the sky like they did it

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>with math and they were right. Yea. So imagine in

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen forty when that happens, they're like, yeah, we kinda

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got the math down, so we're pretty much all

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>knowing well. Plus also for the most part these not

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>just with Neptune, they were finding, um that this stuff

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>really panned out. It held true for everything from um,

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the investigation into electricity to new chemical reactions

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and understanding those, and it laid the scientific revolution, laid

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the basis for the industrial revolution, and just the change

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>inge that came out of the world like that. It

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely there. It is understandable how science kind of was

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>like we got it all figured out well. And like

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>you said, they even Galileo was smart enough to know

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>there's uncertainty in these measurements, like the precision is key,

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so they spent what does the article say, A lot

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of the much of the nineteenth and twentieth century just

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to build better instrumentation to get more and more

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller and smaller and more precise measurements. Right, that was

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like basically the goal of it, right, Yeah, which was

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. That's like exactly what they should have

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>been doing. The problem is there, Like you said, Galileo

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>knew that there was some sort of there, There're gonna

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>be some flaws and measurement that we just didn't have

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>those great scientific instruments yet. Yeah. It's called the uncertainty principle. Okay,

0:13:55.520 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's accuracy, right, But the idea is if you have

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a good enough instrument, you can overcome that, and that

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the the more you shrink the um error in measuring

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the initial conditions, the more you're going to shrink the

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>error in the outcome. It would be proportionate. Right. They

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>were correct. The thing is they were also aware but

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>ignoring in a lot a lot of ways some outstanding problems,

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>specifically something called the end body problem. You know what,

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited about this. I need to take a break.

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good idea. I need to go

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>check out my end body in the bathroom, Okay, and

0:14:42.280 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back, all right. Took we're back. So there's

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>some there's some issues right with determinism. There's some some

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>weird problems out there that are saying like, hey, pay

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>attention to me because I'm not sure determinism works right. Uh.

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And one one is the end body problem. Yeah. How

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>this came about was five. That was King Oscar number

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>two of Sweden and Norway. Yeah, I don't want to

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>leave out Norway both. Uh. He said, you know what,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>let's offer a prize to anyone who can prove the

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>stability of the Solar system, something that has been stable

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long time before that. And a lot of

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the most brilliant minds on planet Earth got together and

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>tried to do this, uh, with mathematical proofs, and no

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>one could do it. Uh. And then a dude name Honoree.

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>You gotta help me there with that, Oh, say the

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. Red Plank, a very nice he was French,

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, and he was a mathematician, and

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know what, I'm not gonna look at

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this big picture of all the planets in the Sun

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and all their orbits. You'd have to be a fool

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to try that. Sure, he said, I'm gonna shrink this down.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Like we talked about shrinking that initial value, you know,

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and um, that initial condition, he shrunk it down. He said,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look at just a couple of bodies orbiting

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>one another, uh, with a common center of gravity, And

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look at this. And this was called the

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>N body problem, Yeah, which was smart to do, because

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the more variables you factor into um a nonlinear equation

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like that, just the harder it's gonna be. So he

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>shrunk it down. So the N body problem has to

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>do with three or more celestial bodies orbiting one another.

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So Plank said, oh, I'll just start with three. Ye. Smart.

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And what he found from doing his equations for this

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>this King Oscar the Sequel Prize um, was that shrinking

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the initial conditions measurement or rate of error right yeah,

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>did not really shrink the the error in the outcome, right,

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>which flies in the face of determinism. What he found

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>was that just very very minute differences in the initial

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 1>conditions fed into a system produced wildly different outcomes after

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a fairly short time. Yeah. Like, let me just round

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>off the mass of this planet at like the eighth

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>decimal point, and you know who cares, who cares? At

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that point? Let me just round that one to a two,

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and that would throw everything off at a at a

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty high rate. And he said, wait a minute, I

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>think this contest is in possible, right, He said, there

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is no way to prude, prud to roof the stability

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Solar system, because he just uncovered the idea

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's impossible for us to predict the um, the

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the rate of change among celestial bodies. Yeah, it's such

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a complex system. There are far too many variables that, uh,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to start with something so minute to get

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the equation whatever, the sum that you want at the end. Well,

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>not only that a sum I guess, but the result

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>not only that, And this is what really undermined determinism

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>was that he figured out that you would have to

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>have an infinitely precise measurement. Yeah, which even if you

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>build a perfect machine that could take the infinitely a

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>perfect machine that could take a measurement of like the

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the movement of a celestial body around another, you, it's

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>literally impossible to get infinite an infinitely precise measurement, which

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>means that we could never predict out to a certain

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>degree the movement of these celestial bodies. Like he was saying, like, no,

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you you can't get you can't build a machine there

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that gets measurements enough that we can overcome this, Like

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>determinism is wrong, Like you can't just say, uh, we

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>have the understanding to predict everything. There's a lot of

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff out there that we're not able to predict. And

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he uncovered it trying to figure out this end body problem. Yeah,

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and King Oscar the sequel said you win, Yeah, bring

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>me another rack of lamb and uh, here's your prize.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>And he won by proving that it was impossible, which

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>is pretty interesting, and that utterly and completely changed not

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just math, but like our our our understanding of the

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>universe and our understanding of our understanding of the universe,

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>which is even more kind of earth shaking. Yeah, he

0:19:55.119 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>discovered dynamical instability or chaos, and um, they didn't have

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>supercomputers at the time, so it would be a little while,

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>about seventy years at m I T until uh, we

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>could actually kind of feed these things into machines capable

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of plotting these things out in a way that we

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>could see, which was really incredible. So there was this

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>dude um seventy years later, uh named um Edward Lawrence

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>or Lawrence. Yeah. Well, first of all, we should set

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the stage the reason this guy he was a meteorologist

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and scientist, not that those are not the same thing, right,

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a scientist who dabbled the meteorology. He was a mathematician, Yeah,

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but he was really into meteorology because it was there

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 1>was a weird juxtaposition at the time where we were

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>sending people into outer space but we couldn't predict the weather. Yeah,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was definitely a blot on the

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>field of meteorology. People were like, do you guys know

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.719
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing? And and meteor all just like you

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>have no idea how hard this is? Yeah, Like, yeah,

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we can predicted a couple of days out, but after that,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's totally unpredictable. It drives as mad and

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not It wasn't just there, um, their reputations that

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>were at stakes, like people were losing their lives because

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of it, right, Yeah. Nine six two there were two

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>notorious storms, one on the East coast and one on

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the west. Uh, the ash Wednesday storm in the east

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Big Blow in the west. That killed a

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, cost hundreds of millions of dollars in damage,

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and people were like, you know, we need to be

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>able to see these things coming a little more because

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.959
<v Speaker 1>it's a problem. And meteorologists were like, why did you

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>do it then? So they thought the key was these

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>big supercomputers. Remember the supercomputers. When they came out the

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>big rooms full of hardware, it was amazing and they

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>were finally able to do like these incredible calculations that

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we could never do before. I know, they were able

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>to like crunch sixty four bites a second. Yeah, we

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>had the abacus and then the supercomputer, nothing in between. Um.

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I looked up the computer that Lawrence was working with,

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the Whopper a Royal McBee. What was the whopper board games?

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Was it called the whopper? W a pr? I can't

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>believe they called it that. So the guy just nicknamed

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it Joshua. No, Joshua was the the software Falcon was

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the old man who designed all this stuff, and his

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>son was Joshua. And that was the password? Oh, that

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>was the password. Yeah, I guess I was too young

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to understand what a password was. Yeah, okay, you didn't

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>even there weren't passwords at the time. Shouted it at

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the computer and they're like, okay, access granted. Yeah, still

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>that movie holds up, does it really totally got to

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>check it out? Yeah, still, very very fun. Young Ali

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Sheety boy had a crush on her from that movie.

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>She was great. Yeah, what else was she in recently?

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't she in something? Well? I mean she kind of

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>went away for a while and then had her big

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>comeback with the indie movie High Art, But that was

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a while ago. Has she been in anything else recently? Sure?

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I saw something and something recently and I

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize that was her. She looks familiar. I was like, oh,

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that's Ali Sheity. I don't know all right. I could

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>look it up, but I won't as it doesn't matter anyway.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I still crushed on her. So the the Royal McBee

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was not quite the whopper. You could actually sit down

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>at it. The Royal McBee, that's the name of that

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a Hamburger too. It was by the Royal

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Typewriter Company and they got into computers for a second.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is the kind of computer that Lawrence was

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>working with, and it was a huge deal, like you

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>were saying Abacus supercomputer. UM. But it was still pretty

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>dumb as far as what we have today is concerned.

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But it was enough that Lawrence is like Lawrence and

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>his ILK, where like, finally we can start running models

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and actually pretty the weather. Yeah, he started doing just that.

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>He did. So he started off with, UM, a computational

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>model of twelve meteorological meteorological calculations, which is very basic

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're infinite meteorological calculations, probably depending I stay it

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong again, Like it sounds like you're about to say

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it wrong and then you pull it out at the

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>last second. Maybe it's really impressive. But h So that's

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>very basic. But he wanted to start out, you know,

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>with something attainable, so he narrowed it down to twelve conditions,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>basically twelve calculations that had you know, temperature, wind, speed, pressure,

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that started forecasting weather. Uh. And then he said,

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it'd be great if you could see this,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna spit it into my wonder machine, the

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>McWhopper Royal MCBE and I'm going to get a print

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>out so you can visualize what this looks like. So

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>things were going well, and he had this print out,

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and everyone was amazed because these these calculations never seemed

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to repeat themselves. He was making like um, like like

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>word art. You remember that. That was the first thing

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>anybody did on a computer. It was to make word

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>art like a butterfly or right, you would print out. Yeah,

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I never could do that. I couldn't either, Like you

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be able to visualize things spatially that you

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>have to have that right kind of brain for that, right,

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>or you have to be following a guide book. But

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you have you ever seen me? You and everyone we know? Yeah,

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I love that movie. That's a great movie. Those little

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>kids in there, they were doing that Oh yeah, yeah, forever,

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>back and forth poop. Well I haven't I haven't seen

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that since it came out. It's been a while. Oh

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>you gotta see it again. Yeah, great movie. Ali's not

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in it. It's a Miranda July right, and she wrote

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and directed to right. She did a great job. It's

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like it's one of those rare movies where like there's

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>just the right amount of whimsy. Is whimsy so easily

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>overpowers everything else and becomes like yeah, yeah, this is

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>like the most perfectly balanced amount of like whimsy you've

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>ever seen in a movie. Yeah, there's too much whimsy.

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I just like terrible Garden State. I just want to

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>punch in the face Terrible. Although I like Garden State,

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but I haven't seen it since it came out. It

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>hasn't aged. Well, it's just when you look at it now,

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just so cutesye and whimsical. It's like, come on, yeah, boy,

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we're getting to a lot of movies today. Oh yeah,

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Well we're stalling and we haven't even talked about butterfly

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>effect yet, which is coming and I'm dreading it. That's

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>why I'm stalling, all right. So where were we? He

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>was running his calculations, printing out his values so people

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>could see it, and then he got a little lazy

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>one day. In this output he noticed was interesting, so

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, I'm gonna repeat this calculation see

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>it again, but I'm gonna to save time, just gonna

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of pick up in the middle, and I'm not

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna input as many numbers, but I'm still using the

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>same values, just I'm not going out to six decimal points.

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>So the print out he had went to three decimal points,

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>so he was working from the print out and didn't

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>take into account that the computer accepted six decimal points,

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so he was just putting in three and expecting that

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the outcome would be the same. Right, Yes, but the

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>outcome was way different, right, And he went whoa, whoa what? Yeah,

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>He's like, what's going on here? There was a big deal.

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean someone would have come up with this eventually

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>probably yeah, but sort of accidentally came upon it. It's

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>neat that this guy did this because it changed his career.

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he went from emphasis on meteorology to an

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on chaos math to stud scientists basically. So, I mean,

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy's got an attractor named after him, you know

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. Yeah, well let's get to that. So

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Lorenz starts looking at this and he's like, wait a minute,

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this is this is weird. This is worth investigating, and

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>like uh like uh, what was his name? Pwankara? He said,

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I need fewer variables, so I'm not going to try

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>to predict weather with these twelve differential equations that you

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>have to take into account. I'm just gonna take one

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>aspect of weather called the rolling convection current, and I'm

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>going to see how I can write it down in

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>formula form. So rolling convection current, chuck is where you know,

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>how the wind is created where air at the surface

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is heated and then starts to rise and suddenly cool

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>air from higher above comes in to fill that that

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>vacuum that's left, and that creates a rolling um or

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>vertically based convection current. Okay you could, I would describe

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it as oven oven, boiling water, a cup of coffee.

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Wherever there's a temperature differential based on a vertical alignment,

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have a role in convection current. Okay, yeah,

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it sounds complex, but he just picked out one thing,

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>basically one condition and this is the one he picked out.

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>But had you seen my hands moving listeners, you would

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh yeah, I know he made little rolling emotions.

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So um, he's like, okay, I can figure this out.

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So he comes up with three three formula that kind

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of describe a rolling convection current, and he starts trying

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to describe this rolling convection current

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>right correct, And so, like I said, he got this

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>these three formula, which we're basically three variables that he

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>calculated over time, and he plugged him in and he

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>found three variables that changed over time, and he found

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that after a certain point, when you graph these things out,

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and since there are three, you graph them out on

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a three dimensional graph, so x, y and z. Again,

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to just be able to visualize this because

0:29:57.800 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's easier for people to understand. He was a very

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>visual guy. All of a sudden, it made this crazy

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>graph that where the line as it progressed forward through time,

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>went all over the place. It went from this access

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to another access to the other axis, and it would

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>spend some time over here, and then it would suddenly

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>loop over to the other one, and it followed no

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>rhyme or reason. It never retraced its path. And it

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>was describing how a convection current changes over time. Right,

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and Lorenz is looking at this. He was expecting these

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>three things to equalize and eventually form a line, because

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what determinism says, things are going to fall into

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of equilibrium and just even out over time.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>That is not what he found. And what he discovered

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>was what poncar A discovered, which was that some systems,

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>even relatively simple systems, exhibit very complex, unpredictable behavior, which

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you could call offs. Yeah. And when you say things

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:04.719
<v Speaker 1>were going all over like if you look at the graph,

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it it's not just lines going in straight lines bouncing

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>all over the place randomly, like there was an order

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to it, but the lines were not on top of

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>one another. Like let's say you draw a figure eight

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with your pencil and then you continue drawing that figure eight,

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna slip outside those curves every time unless you're

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a robot um. And that's what it ended up looking like. Yeah. Yeah,

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it never retraced the same path twice ever. Um. It

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of really surprising properties and at the time,

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it just fell completely outside the understanding of science, right yeah.

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Luckily this happened to Lawrence who was curious enough to

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>be like, what is going on here? And again he

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>sat down and started to do the math and thinking

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>about this and especially how it applied to the weather,

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>right yeah, and he came up with something very famous. Yes,

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the butterfly effect. Yes, uh a, this thing kind of

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>looked like butterfly wings a little bit. Uh and b

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>When he went to present his findings, he he basically

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>had the notion He's like, I'm gonna I'm gonna wile

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>these people in the crowd. In nine two, it's a

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>conference that I'm going to and I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>say something like, you know, the seagull flaps his wings

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and it starts a small turbulence that can one that

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>can affect whether on the other side of the world.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>The small little thing will just grow and grow in

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>snowball and effective things. And he had a colleague goes, like,

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>seagull wings, that's nice, and he said, how about this?

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is the title they ended up with, predictability

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Colin does the flap of a butterfly's wings in Brazil

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>set off a tornado and Texas And everyone was like,

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 1>whoa mind's blown? Should we take a break? All right,

0:32:54.760 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back, all right. So the lawns attractor,

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>uh is that picture that he ended up with, The

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>lawns attractor? And this biblical pattern website that I found

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>described attractors and strange attractors in a way that even

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>dumb old me could understand what you got. So if

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I may, he says, all right, here's the cycle of chaos.

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>He said, Actually, I don't know who wrote this. Woman

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>could have been a small child could have been no

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of undetermined gender. I have no idea but the gender

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>neutral narrator. They said, He's sorry. Think about a town

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that has like in thousand people living in it. To

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>make that town work, you've got to have like a

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>gas station, a grocery store, a library, um, whatever you

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.720
<v Speaker 1>need to sustain that town. So all these things are built,

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone's happy. You have equilibrium. He said, So that's great.

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Then let's say you build some Someone comes and builds

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a factory on the outskirts of that town, and there's

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna be ten thousand more people living there, and they

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>don't go to church. Maybe so, uh did I say church?

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>They needed a church? Okay? I was just assuming this

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is what's caum no, no, no, but you just have

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>more people. So there's you need another gas station and

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>another grocery store. Let's say so they build all these things,

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and then you reach equilibrium. Again, it's maintained because you

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>build all these other systems up. That equilibrium is called

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>an attractor. Okay, So then he said it said, they

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>said he capital he the royal. He said, all right,

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>now let's say instead of that that factory being built,

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and you have those original tin thous and let's say

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 1>three thousand. Those people just up and leave one day,

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and the grocery store guy says, well, there's only seven

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand people here. We need eight thousand people living here

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to make a profit. So I'm shutting down this grocery store.

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Then all of a sudden, you have demand for groceries.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So things go on for a little while, and someone

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>comes in and say, hey, this town needs a grocery store.

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>They build a grocery store, they can't sustain, they shut down.

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Someone else comes along because the demand, and it is

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:43.280
<v Speaker 1>this search for equilibrium, this dinet. Well, you reach equallylibrium

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 1>here and there as the store opens periods of stability,

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>periods of stability, and that dynamic equilibrium is called a

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>strange attractor. So an attractor is the state which a

0:35:55.640 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>system settles on. Stranger attractor is the trajector on which

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it never settles down but tries to reach the equilibrium

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>with periods of stability. Man, does that make sense that

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Bible based explanation was dynamite? I understand it better than

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I did before, and I understood it okay before. That's great,

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>surely can add yeah, yeah, now you're gonna add to it. No,

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that's it. No, I mean like it. Yeah. And attractor

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:30.439
<v Speaker 1>is where if you graph something and eventually it reaches equilibrium,

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a regular attractor. If it never reaches equilibrium, is

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 1>constantly trying to and has periods of stability. Strange attractor.

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't top that. All right, grocery store,

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:43.240
<v Speaker 1>small town. That was great. So um Lorenz, a strange

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>attractor was named a Lorenz attractor named after him. Big deal.

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>They weren't using the word chaos yet. No, but he

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 1>published that paper about butterfly wings, right, the butterfly effect,

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and it coupled with his pictures, the picture of a

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:04.240
<v Speaker 1>strange attractor, which is almost the aside from fractals, almost

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the the the um emblem or the logo for chaos theory,

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 1>the lords attractor is um. It got attention off the bat.

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like plan Cares findings, where he got neglected

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>for seventy years. Almost immediately everybody was talking about this

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>because again, what Lawrence had uncovered, which is the same

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that Planka had uncovered, is that determinism is possibly

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>based on an illusion that the universe isn't stable, that

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the universe isn't predictable, and that what we are seeing

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 1>as stable and predictable are these little periods windows of

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>stability that are found in strange attractor graphs. That that's

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>what we think the order of the universe is, but

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that that is actually the abnormal aspect of the universe,

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and that instability, unpredictability, as far as we're concerned, is

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the actual state of affairs in in nature. And I

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>think as as we're concerned is a really important point

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to chuck, because it doesn't mean that nature is unstable chaotic.

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>It means that our picture of what we understand is

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>order doesn't jibe with how the universe actually functions. It's

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>just our understanding of it, and we're's just so um

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>anthropocentric that, you know, we we see it as chaos

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>and disorder and something to be feared, when really it's

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>just complexity that we don't have the capability of predicting.

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 1>After a certain degree. Yeah, I think that makes me

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>feel a little better, because when you read stuff like this,

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you start to feel like, well, the Earth could just

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.320
<v Speaker 1>throw us all off of its face at any moment,

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:49.280
<v Speaker 1>because it starts spinning so fast that gravity becomes undone,

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and I know that's not right. By the way, I've

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>always loved that kind of science that shows we don't

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>know anything, like Ert Robert Hume, who I know, I

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 1>understand was a philosopher, but he was a philosopher scientist. Um.

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>His whole jam was like causing effect as an illusion

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that like we all we it's it's just an assumption,

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like that if you drop a pencil, it will always

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>fall down. It's an illusion. And this is pre um

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:16.720
<v Speaker 1>gravity understanding gravity, but he makes a good pret gravity

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:20.439
<v Speaker 1>when everyone's just floating around. Yeah, going this pencils got

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>me wacky. But but the point was that you know,

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we we are. We base a lot of our assumptions

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 1>um or a lot of stuff that we take as

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>law are actually based on assumptions that are made from

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>observations over time, and that we're just making predictions that

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>causing effect as an illusion. I love that guy, and

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:45.240
<v Speaker 1>this this definitely supports that idea for sure. Yeah. Sorry,

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm excited about chaos theory. Can't believe it? Well,

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I like that I'm able to understand it

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and enough of a rudimentary way that I can talk

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about it at a dinner party. Well, thank your Bible website. Well,

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 1>once you take the formulas out, yeah, for people like us,

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>we're like, okay, we can understand chaos. Yeah. Then when

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:08.839
<v Speaker 1>somebody says, good, do a differential equation, you're just like,

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>what a different equation? Alright? So earlier I said that

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>chaos had not been used the word chaos to describe

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 1>all this junk. Uh, And that didn't happen until later on,

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and well actually about ten years, you know, but it

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>was kind of at the same time this other stuff

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>was going on with the Lorenz late sixties early seventies.

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a guy named Stevens Smile uh Fields metal recipient,

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know, he's good at math and um he

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>describes something that we now know as the small horseshoe,

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>and it goes a little something like this. Uh so,

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.439
<v Speaker 1>all right, take a piece of dough, like like bread dough,

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and you smash it out into a big flat rectangle

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.800
<v Speaker 1>can do. So you're looking at that thing and you're like, boy,

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope this makes some good bread. This is gonna

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>be so good. So then you do a little roseberry

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.720
<v Speaker 1>on it. Yeah maybe so uh well, see salt. Yeah,

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and then um, lick it before you bake it, so

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know it's yours. No one else can happen. Uh.

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So you you have that flat rectangle of dough, you

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>roll it up into a tube, and then you smash

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that down kind of flat, and then you bend that

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>down to where it eventually looks like a horse shoe.

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So now you take that horseshoe. You take another rectangle

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of dough, and you throw that horseshoe onto that, and

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>then you do the same thing. The smell horseshoe basically

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:40.399
<v Speaker 1>says you cannot predict where the two points of that

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>horse shoe will end up. Yeah, you can roll it

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a million times and they'll end up in a million

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>different places, totally random, different places to totally random. You

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>never know. It's like a box of chocolates. You never

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>know what you're gonna get. You have to say it,

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and that became known. You have to say it. Oh

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:01.959
<v Speaker 1>what a tate Forrest Coump And I can't do that.

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, he's not one. He's not in my repertoire.

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. Although I did see that again part of

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it recently. Does it hold up well? I mean, take

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>out forty minutes of it and it would have been

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a better movie, like all of that coincidence stuff that

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh I love that and also did the smile t

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>shirt Like it was just too much, Like he really

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>hammered it too much. That was the basis of the movie.

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I know. But see it again and I guarantee you,

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>like an hour and a half into it, you'll be like,

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I get it. You know. It was a good Tom

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Hanks movie that was overlooked. A Road to Perdition, Yeah,

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that bad. That was a good one. Great sam In

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>does Oh man, that guy is awesome. Yeah, Oh, what

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:49.879
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna do? He might do something he did

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the James Bot he did Skyfall. Yeah, yeah, I know

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna also that last one that wasn't so great.

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 1>He's got a potential project coming up and he would

0:42:57.320 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>be amazing for it. And I don't remember what it was.

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you see Revolutionary Road? Yes? God have it was

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 1>just like, yeah, you want to jump off a bridge?

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>That like every five minutes during that movie. That was hardcore.

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh he did that one too, huh. Yeah, And don't

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>see that if you're like engaged to be married or

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it, yeah, or if you're blue already. Yeah,

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm yeah to take a really good good mood and

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be like I'm sick of being in a good mood,

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>sit down and watch Revolutionary Road, watch Joe versus the

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Volcano instead? Uh? Where was I smell? Horseshoe? Is what

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that's called? And um? That was he was the first

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>person to actually use the word chaos. Oh he was?

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I think so? No? No, No York was Tom York's dad. Yeah,

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you're right, he wasn't the first person New York correct,

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:49.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's male's horseshoe illustrates a really good point, Chuck,

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:54.799
<v Speaker 1>is it Tom York's dad? Okay, no, but they're both British, Sure,

0:43:54.960 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Yorky's actually one's Australian. No, they're British. Um. So, uh

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>those two points which should which started out right by

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>each other, and then end up in two totally different places.

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>That applies not just a bread dough, but also too

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>things like water molecules that are right next to each

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>other at some point and then uh month later, they're

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in two different oceans. Even though you would assume that

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they would go through all the same motions and everything,

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 1>but they're not. There's so many different variables with things

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>like ocean currents, that two water molecules that were one

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:33.320
<v Speaker 1>side by side end up in totally random different places.

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's part of chaos. It's basically chaos personified or

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 1>chaos molecule fied. So we mentioned York. Where I was

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>going with that was, Um, there was an Australian named

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Robert May and he was a population biologist. So he

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>was using math to model how animal populations would change

0:44:56.080 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>over time, giving certain starting conditions. Uh. So he started

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:05.879
<v Speaker 1>using uh these equations is differential equations, and he came

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 1>up with a formula known as the logistic difference equation

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that basically enabled him to predict these animal populations pretty well. Yeah,

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 1>and it was working pretty well for a while, but

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>he noticed something really really weird, right. He had this formula, Um,

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the logistic difference equation is the name of it. Sure, Okay,

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>So we had that formula and he figured out that

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>if you took our which in this case was the

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>reproductive rate of a animal population, and you pushed it

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>past three, the number three, So that meant that the

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>average animal in this population of animals had three offspring

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in its lifetime or in a season whatever. If you

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>pushed the past three, all of a sudden, the number

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of the population would diverge. If you pushed it equal

0:45:59.800 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to three actually, or more right, it would diverge, which

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>is weird because a population of animals can't be two

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 1>different numbers, you know, like that herd of antelope is

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>not there's not thirty, but there's also forty five of

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>them at the same time. That's called a super position,

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and that has to do with quantum states, not herds

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of antelopes. That was kind of weird. And then he

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 1>found if you pushed it a little further, if you

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 1>made the reproductive rate like three point oh five seven

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. I think it was a different number,

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:35.799
<v Speaker 1>but you just tweaked it a little bit, not even

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to four. We're talking like millions of a of a

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>um of a degree um. All of a sudden it

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>would turn into four, so there'll be four different numbers

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for that was the animal population, and then would turn

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>into sixteen. And then all of a sudden, after a

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 1>certain point, it would turn into chaos. The number would

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>be everything at once, all over the place, just totally

0:46:55.800 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 1>random numbers that it oscillated between. But in all that chaos.

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>There would be periods of stability. Right, you push it

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 1>a little further and all of a sudden it would

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>just go to two again. But beyond that, it didn't

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>go back to the original two numbers and went to

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:12.840
<v Speaker 1>another two. So if you looked at it on a graph,

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it went line divided into two, divided into four eight

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 1>sixteen chaos, two four sixteen sixteen chaos, all before you

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:27.359
<v Speaker 1>even got to the number four of the reproductive right. Yeah,

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 1>And he was working with Mr York because he was

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a little confounded. So he was a mathematician buddy of his,

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 1>James York from the University of Maryland, So they worked

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 1>together on this. In the nineteen seventy five they co

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:44.760
<v Speaker 1>authored a paper called Period three Implies Chaos And man,

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 1>finally somebody said the word. I kept thinking it was

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>all these other people. Yeah, and the this this paper

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>where they first debut the name chaos. Um. They they

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>based it um. Tom York's stay based it on Edward

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence's paper. He was like, you know what, I have

0:48:04.520 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a feeling this has something to do with the Lawrence attractor.

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So that um, that that provided chaos to the world,

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and it it was the basically the third the third

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 1>time a scientist had said, we don't understand the universe

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like we think we do, and determinism is based on

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:31.239
<v Speaker 1>an illusion of order in a really chaotic universe. And this, uh,

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 1>this established chaos. It took off like a rocket. And

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the eighties and the nineties, you know, as you know

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 1>from Jurassic Park, chaos was everything. Everybody's like chaos, this

0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is totally awesome. It's the new frontier of science. And

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>then it just went It just went away, And a

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:48.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of people said, well, it was a little overhyped,

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think more than anything, and I think this

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the current understanding of chaos because it

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually go away. It became a deeper and deeper field.

0:48:56.400 --> 0:49:01.759
<v Speaker 1>As you'll see, Um, people miss took what chaos meant.

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't the a new the new type of science.

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a new understanding of the universe. It was

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 1>saying like, yes, you can still use Newtonian physics, like

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>don't throw everything out the window. You can still try

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and predict weather and still try and build more accurate

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:21.240
<v Speaker 1>instruments and get you know, decent results, but you can't

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>with absolute perfection. Complex systems like determinism. The the ultimate

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>goal of determinism is false. It can never be it

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 1>can never be done because we can't have an infinitely

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 1>precise measurement for every variable or any variable. Therefore, we

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:41.400
<v Speaker 1>can't predict these outcomes. Right, So you would expect science

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:44.879
<v Speaker 1>to be like, what's the point, what's the point of anything? No,

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 1>not science. Well, some some chaos people have said, no,

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this is this is great, this is good. We'll take this.

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Will take the universe as it is, rather than trying

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to force it into our pretty little equations and saying,

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>if the ocean temperature is this at this time of year, uh,

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and the fish population is this at that time, then

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this is how many offspring this fish style, this fish

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>population is going to have. Um, say, okay, here is

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the fish population, Here is the ocean temperature, here all

0:50:18.640 --> 0:50:21.279
<v Speaker 1>these other variables. Let's feed it into a model and

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. Not this is going to happen. What

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>happens instead, And this is kind of the understanding of

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:33.520
<v Speaker 1>chaos theory. Now, it's taking raw data, as much data

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>as you can possibly get your hands on, as precise

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>data as you could possibly get your hands on, and

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just feeding it into a model and seeing what patterns emerge.

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Rather than making assumptions, it's saying, what's the outcome, what

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 1>comes out of this model? Yeah, and that's why like

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>when you see some things like you know, fifty years

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:55.640
<v Speaker 1>ago they predicted this animal be its extinct and it's not. Well,

0:50:55.719 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's because the variations were too complex they tried to predict. Uh.

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 1>And that's why if you look at a ten day forecast, you, sir,

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:10.319
<v Speaker 1>are a fool. All right, It's true, Well, ten days

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:12.320
<v Speaker 1>from now says it's going to rain in the afternoon.

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Come on. But if you take if you took enough

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:19.319
<v Speaker 1>variables for weather for like a city, and fed it

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:22.799
<v Speaker 1>into a model of the weather for that city, you

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>could find, uh, you could find a time when it

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>was similar to what it is now, and you could

0:51:30.600 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>conceivably make some assumptions based on that. You can say, well,

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>actually we can we can predict a little further out

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 1>than we think. But um, it's it's based on this

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:45.879
<v Speaker 1>this theory, this understanding of chaos, of unpredictability, of not

0:51:46.000 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>just not forcing nature into our formulas, but putting data

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>into a model and seeing what comes out of it. Yeah.

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And then at the end of that, you learn like

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>when that animal is not extinct like you thought it

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>would be, you go back and look at the general

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:03.399
<v Speaker 1>thing and you have a more accurate picture of how

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the you know, data could have been off slightly this

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>one value, and then you have more buffalo than you think. Yeah,

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 1>sure you got buffaloed by chaos. And we're not even

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:18.239
<v Speaker 1>getting into fractals. It's a whole other thing. And we

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:23.319
<v Speaker 1>did a whole other podcast in June about fractals and

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Mandel bin Wa mandel Brett, mandel Brett, mandel Brett, and

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 1>go listen to that one and hear me clinging to

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the edge of a clift Clift man. We we should

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 1>end this, but first, um, I want to say, there

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting article it's pretty understandable on Quanta

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>magazine about a guy named George Sara and he is

0:52:49.200 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a chaos theory dude who's got a whole lab and

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is applying it to real life. So it's a really

0:52:57.200 --> 0:53:04.239
<v Speaker 1>good picture of chaos the re inaction. Go check it out. Okay, uh,

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 1>if you want to know more about chaos theory, I

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:09.799
<v Speaker 1>hope your brain is not broken. Yeah, go take some

0:53:09.920 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 1>LSD and look at don't do that. Um, you can

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:17.879
<v Speaker 1>type those words into how stuff works in the search bar,

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:21.360
<v Speaker 1>any of those fractals LST chaos. It'll bring up some

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:24.320
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. And since I said good stuff, it's time

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for a listener. Now, I'm gonna call this rare shout out.

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 1>You get requests all the time. I bet I know

0:53:32.080 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 1>which one is. Really yeah, duding his girlfriend. Yeah, No,

0:53:37.400 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>so far, so good. Hey, guys, just want to say

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I think you're doing a wonderful job with the show

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to the state. My first time listening was during my

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:49.719
<v Speaker 1>first deployment. Uh yeah, when I listened to your list

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on famous and influential films, and I was hooked after that.

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Since I came back state side, I spent many hours

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:59.840
<v Speaker 1>driving to and fro uh see my girlfriend to my barracks,

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:02.759
<v Speaker 1>and I can happily say that they've been made all

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the more enjoyable by listening to you guys. Even my

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>girlfriend Rachel has warmed up to you dudes, which was

0:54:09.239 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 1>not a pleasant I'm sorry, which was a pleasant shock

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to me, as she has told me repeatedly that she

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 1>cannot listen to audiobooks because quote, hearing people talk on

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the radio gives me a headache. End quote. Anyway, I

0:54:21.800 --> 0:54:24.319
<v Speaker 1>hope you guys continue to make awesome podcasts as I'm

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:26.839
<v Speaker 1>headed out on my next deployment. And if you could

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:28.479
<v Speaker 1>give a shout out to Rachel, I'm sure it would

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:30.560
<v Speaker 1>make her feel a little better that I got the

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:33.799
<v Speaker 1>pleasant people on the podcast to reaffirm how much I

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:38.880
<v Speaker 1>love her. That is John, Rachel hanging there. John, be

0:54:39.000 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 1>safe and uh, thanks for listening. Yeah, man, thank you.

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a greed email. I love that one. Glad we

0:54:44.840 --> 0:54:47.120
<v Speaker 1>don't give you a headache. Rachel. Yeah, for she listened

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to this son and she's like, Okay, oh yeah, everybody's

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a headache from this one. Like I I

0:54:51.680 --> 0:54:53.600
<v Speaker 1>came to hate the sound of my own voice from

0:54:53.600 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this one. How You'll be all right. If you want

0:54:57.600 --> 0:54:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with us, you can hang out

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:02.040
<v Speaker 1>with us on Twitter at s y SKA podcast Saying

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 1>goes for Instagram. You can hang out with us on Facebook,

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:06.799
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Stuff you Should Know. You can send

0:55:06.880 --> 0:55:09.360
<v Speaker 1>us an email to Stuff podcast at how Stuff Works

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com and has always joined us at home on

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the web. Stuff you Should Know dot Com. Stuff you

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Should Know is a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff

0:55:19.920 --> 0:55:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Works for more podcasts for my heart Radio because at

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows,