WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: How Nanotechnology Works

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to text Stuff, a production from my Heart Radio.

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. And today we're going

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to look at a classic episode of tech Stuff and

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>originally published on May two, thirteen, and it is titled

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>The Big Deal About Little Generators. This is all about

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a hypothetical sort of technology, nano generators. Uh. Nanotechnology is

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating one. It's also pretty complicated to talk about,

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but Lauren Voge Obama and I try to break it

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>down in this classic episode, So enjoy. So I got

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a little topic I want to talk about today, very little, tiny.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you might call it nano. Yes, in fact,

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we would, because that's the topic technology. Everybody. Everybody's doing nano. Yeah,

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone is, and depending on who you talk to, it's

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>either gonna destroy the world or rescue it. Yeah. So, um,

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>what's the big deal, so to speak, A small thing?

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>The big deal is that it's a very very little deal.

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, one billionth of a deal or a nanometer

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is one billionth of a meter and uh, to give

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you an idea of how tiny this is the average

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>human hair is one hundred micrometers in diameter. Now, a

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>micrometer is a thousand nanometers, so that means that the

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>average human hair is one hundred thousand nanometers in diameter.

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I should point out that that's average. I've seen a

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>number of numbers. Yeah, it's usually between sixty and one twenty.

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>That's normally, that's the average I normally see. But one hundred,

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it's fair enough to say. So, yes, some people have

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>very fine hair. But we're kind of splitting hairs now,

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>aren't we. You've walked right into that one. So we're

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about things on the tiny, tiny scale. Now, we're

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not talking about the atomic scale, because that's actually smaller

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>than the nano scale. Yeah, because an atom is about

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>an atom. When you take the entire atom into account,

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the average atom is about point one nanometers in diameter.

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty teeny. So it's one tenth of a of

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a nanometer. That's the atomic scale. We're getting pretty close

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>to the atomic scale. Yeah. Yeah, Now, if you want

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the nucleus of an atom, do you

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>want to how big that is? Yes? How big? Of course,

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 1>you want to know how big it is? A pleat cheese.

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought I had you. It is point zero zero

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>zero zero one nanometers wide. Good grief, that's just the nucleus.

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So when you when you strip away the electron shell,

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>it's tiny indeed. But anyway, nanoscale, we're talking about things

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>on this really tiny scale. Building machines that are on

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>this scale. Usually people say between one and one nanometers

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is kind of within the nanoscale range. Um, building not

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:03.519
<v Speaker 1>just machines, but but really specific machines that can actually

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>potentially change the world, and um, it's it's pretty phenomenal

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to think of building anything on that smaller scale. You

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>can't even look at these things with a light microscope

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>because they're so tiny because the the wavelength for visible

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>light on the small scale of it over on the

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>violet spectrum, that's about four hundred nanometers for a wavelength.

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about having to use things like scanning

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>telling microscopes to look at the nano scale. Now, these

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>are special microscopes that emit a small charge electric charge

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and then it interprets the data, sends it to a computer,

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and you look at an image on a computer screen,

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>so you're not even really looking at the physical thing.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at a computer image representation of that thing. Right, So,

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>if if nanotechnology is that small, how do you make it?

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, there are a lot of people who

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about things on the nano scale, like, uh, you

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>know computer processor chips using nanotechnology, Uh, nano robots, which

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm told you might know something about a little bit.

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know all kinds of things. How are

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you building these tiny, tiny things if you can't even

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>really see them, if you were depending on a machine

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to do it, for you to be able to look

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>at them, that's a tricky question. I'll there are two

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>different ways, right. There's the the top down approach, which

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>is where you actually drop stuff on it from above.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Not quite, but you build each component and you then

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>put everything together. It's it's kind of like the classic

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>way you build anything, right, Like you would use a

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>top down approach to build say a car. You know,

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you build the frame and then you attach various things

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to the frame. I'm talking like I know anything about cars. Um,

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>so different podcasts, different podcast Scott is way better at

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it than I am. So the other way is the

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>bottom up approach. This is interesting, This is where you're

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>actually building things kind kind of um, like you're growing

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>them almost like you're growing machines UM, and you're doing

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it adom by atom, molecule by molecule, and uh, I'm

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>not really sure which way it's gonna go. This is

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>an early early silent science. Even though it's been around

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of decades, we're still, you know, just

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>barely in the beginning of it. So we'll see which

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>method ends up being the the prevalent one. UM. But

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>there are people working on it on either end, so

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to speak, and to give you an idea of how

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>possible this is. In so we're talking about almost twenty

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Uh, there was an IBM scientist named Don

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Eisler who led a team who demonstrated that they can

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>manipulate individual atoms and they used a scanning tunneling microscope

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>to move atoms to spell I B M, I am

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>so not shot. Yeah, So you can actually there are

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>pictures of this on the internet. If you google you

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>know IBM scanning tunneling microscope. Uh, you can find pictures

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of this where you see the image where each dot

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>represents a separate atom. So they actually use the atoms

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to spell the word. Well, and in two thousand four,

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>again IBM scientists are kind of leading the research in this. Uh,

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they were in Zerich and they they showed that they

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>were able to change the charge state of individual atoms

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>by adding or removing electrons from an individual atom. Yeah.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So again they used a scanning telling microscope and they

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>had a charged point on the tip of that microscope,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>which comes to such an incredibly fine point that they

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>can do these things that can remove an electron from

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>one atom and and put it onto another. So we

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>have the technology to manipulate individual atoms. Now we have

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to get to the point where we can build my

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>lecular structures that work as tiny machines. All right, And

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple different ways we can look into that.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the really popular things that people have been

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about recently are carbon nanotubes. Have you heard of these? Yeah? Yeah,

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the stuff that's supposed to, you know, do everything

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>everything you've ever heard of. Essentially, carbon nanotubes can apparently

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>do well. There there's such a versatile structure. Yeah, and uh,

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm very resilient. Yep. Yeah. It actually all

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>depends on how you how you roll the Yeah, how

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you roll the tube. So, carbon nanotubes, the way you

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>create a carbon nanotube in general them I'm way oversimplifying here,

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>but you take a sheet of carbon atoms, all right,

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they form molecular structure where it looks very like it

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>looks like a series of hexagons. And what you then

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>do is you roll this into a tube. You roll

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the sheet into a tube, and depending on the angle

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you use when you roll it into a tube, that

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>dictates them the properties the carbon nanotube will have. So

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that, of course graphite is composed of carbon,

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>as are diamonds. Yes, but these two materials are have

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>very different properties. Graphites very soft, it's opaque. Uh, diamonds

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>not so soft, usually pretty clear. But the reason why

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they're different is because of the way these molecules are arranged.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>The same thing with carbon nanotubes. So if you arrange

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>them as specific way by rolling the sheet in a

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>specific direction, you can create a material that's hundreds of

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>times stronger than steel and six times is light. Well

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>what could what could possibly be a problem with Well, yeah,

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the problem, as you pointed out, as it's very expensive.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's there's no easy way to do it. It's no

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>easy efficient way right now that we can do it

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>on a mass scale. So it can be done. It's

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be done in very small amounts, like on

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the nano scale amounts, and it's being done in laboratories

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna take several years for that to move

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>from the laboratory to the production room. And um, when

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it does, then we're gonna start seeing lots and lots

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of stuff with carbon nanotubes and it we we see

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>some already. There's some products that use carbon nanotube technology already,

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's not on the scale that the you know,

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>the future of nanotechnology kind of promises us. But I've

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>seen things like everything from a Spider Man type suit

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>made out of carbon nanotubes because if you roll them

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a certain way, they work very like a Gecks skin.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>You could climb walls and things with this stuff, which

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is pretty neat. Yeah, yeah, I've got one on back order.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Um, so that's kind of giving you the

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>lowdown on on where we are now and and you

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 1>can find technology that does incorporate things on the nano scale.

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you're probably using one right now to listen

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 1>to us. Yeah, because if you're using any sort of

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>device that has a microchip, chances are you've gotta transistors

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on that microchip that are on somewhere in the nano scale.

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you have a recent computer, then it's definite,

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, as long as it's not I guess a netbook.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you have one that has a powerful microprocessor,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about transistors that are only a few dozen

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>nanometers wide. So for example, Intel's uh I cors seven

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe are what fortnomes wide? I think, yes, except

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it's Core I seven. Thank Yeah, I should have said

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to Haleem, I wrote about it as the Nehalem. But yes,

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>uh those are um, those are like like forty five

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>nanometers wide. I mean you're talking about stuff that's already

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>out on the market that's at this scale. Hey guys,

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>before we continue this discussion about nanotechnology, let's take a

0:10:52.960 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>tiny little break to thank our sponsors. It was looking

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>at applications of nanotechnology and I found an article on

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>on c net that in which they were talking about

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>using your voice to charge your cell phone. And uh,

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>apparently in order to do this they use they would

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>they would use they should say, would they would use?

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Barry Um tight nate crystals which are twenty three nanometers wide,

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and to do that, it actually creates piezo electricity. It transfers, transfers,

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it transfers of physical energy into electrical energy. Yes, exactly, Karma. Yeah,

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>so you know that's that's pretty neat to imagine that.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, these crystals that are are you know, in

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the teens are not teens, but in the dual digit

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>nanometers size. You know, that's wow, so um so piezzo

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>electric that that essentially means that you're converting kinetic energy

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>into elect to see or vice versa. And then no,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say, this is the same sort

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuff you you've have in things like microphones and speakers,

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing where it's converting uh, one form

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of energy into another. And crystal there's certain crystals that

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>can do this, like quartz that that have this property

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>innately athium, tillium anyway. Um. And then they're the nano robots,

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 1>which are great for you know everything. I read this

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>article written by you know this Jonathan Strickling guy. Yeah,

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and vaguely remember writing that it's been it's been more

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>than a year now. Yeah, but yeah, so nano robots, um,

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of medical applications for those. Yeah, here's the

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>here's the interesting thing about nano robots. Um, they don't exist. Well, yeah,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty much in the micro stage right now to

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>be to be really fair, But assuming that we ever

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>get down to the nano size and are able to

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>build nano size robots, the applications are pretty amazing from

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a medical standpoint. Um. For example, let's say that you

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>have a disease that's affecting a very specific part of

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>your body. And let's say the normal way to treat

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this disease would be that you would have you would

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>take you know, medication. Well, I'm thinking medication really, but

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>we can get to surgery to in a minute. Um.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that it would normally do that you

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>would either get a shot or take some medicine orally

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. You would have to wait for that medicine

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to make its way through your system, uh and to

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>eventually affect the infected area. Okay, so the medicine is

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>already getting diluted through your bloodstream, it's taking time for

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it to reach the infected area. Takes time for it

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>to to uh take effect at the area and so

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole recovery rate is slower than it would ideally be.

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Now with a nano robot, theoretically you could direct it,

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>or if you could find a way of making it autonomous,

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it could direct itself to the infected area and deliver

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a much smaller payload of medication directly to the infected area. So,

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, you're not going to have the side

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>effects that you might have experienced through a larger dose

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of medication because the dose is much much smaller. For another,

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the application is immediate to the infected area, so you're

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about it being much more efficient and having a

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>smaller impact on the patient's overall health. So that's that's

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>an ideal situation. Now for surgery, as you were pointing out,

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that's also a possibility you could create nano robots that

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>would have things like laser cutters that would essentially act

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like a little scalpel, but they would be the incredibly precise,

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>far more precise than any human would be with a scalpel,

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>because they're on the nanoscale. You're talking about something so

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>small that it's blood cells are dwarfing it. So for

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the could be an incredibly precise tool. I'm granted. Do

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you think, well, with advice that's small, how could it

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>really be useful? A lot of these future projections suggests

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that you would not have just one of these little

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>nano robots working. They would there'd be thousands, perhaps millions

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of them working together at the same time, and uh,

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>then you don't have to find a way of getting

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>them out. Or potentially you would have nano robots in

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you all the time, and they could even act as

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a preventive measure and keep you healthy and head off

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>any problems before they could really start, even uh bringing

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>up symptoms. Yeah, you were saying in the article that

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they can be used to do things like break up

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>blood clots or you know, kidney stones. Oh man, and

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they say breaking up is hard to do. You know

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>someone who has suffered from kidney stones. I gotta tell

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you I would love to have had some. Yeah, if

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>nothing else then just to start have someone specific I

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>could scream at um instead of just the the the

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>directionless screaming that I did while I actually had them.

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back with some more big ideas about

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>tiny technology in just a moment after this quick break.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Now there's some big problems that we have to overcome. First,

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to be able to create UM power systems

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on that scale, something to power these robots. So we're

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about batteries and capacitors that are have to be

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>incredibly tiny UM and that's that's a big challenge. Now,

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>some doctors have and engineers have got around that by

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>creating robots that that propelled themselves, or actually they don't

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>really propel themselves, they are propelled externally. UM. There's one

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that used m r I machine and you would use

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the magnets in the m R I really to act

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the robot, so you could actually, you know, kind of

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the robot really was more passive, but you could direct

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it to specific spot within an artery system. Now, I

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>should point out that the scientists who did this did

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it with a pig. Um they were not doing human testing,

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>but it worked went through the pig's arteries, so you know,

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that's ah, it's nothing to sneeze at. Actually, I was

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>reading about a completely different application of nanotechnology. There was

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of fascinating UM. Jennifer Lowell was blogging about it

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>for uh for seen it, and she was talking about

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that you could use nanotech to alter food

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>on the microscopic scale. UM. She actually was quoting Steve

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Bogan and the Guardian. UM. They were talking about essentially

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>how you could if you had a food that to

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>which you were allergic, you could maybe make alterations to

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it so that it would pass from your body without

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>being a problem. That would be interesting trick is you

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>know you could, uh, you could have problems with people

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>who don't particularly genetically modified food. You know, there's a

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that are kind of creeped out by

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the frank and food. UM. And you're talking about messing

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>with things down again on a very very tiny level.

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's pretty that's pretty significant. Um. But Bogan also

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the possibility that packaging could be made um to

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>where the nanotechnology inside the food packaging could sniff out

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>when you know, the food started to give off gassing

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>as it was decomposing and would change color to go, oh, well,

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you know this thing, it's started to turn brown. We

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>need to toss it out without even you know, sniffing

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>it or you know, sticking your finger on it and

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>going it feels kind of weird. Yeah, that would have

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>prevented many, many memorable nights that I've had in my past. Yeah,

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure anyway, So, uh and and to talk a

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about building these robots. One of the

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that scientists are working on is

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to try and create specific can of nano robots called

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>assemblers assemblers. Yet, now, assemblers do what you would think

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they do. They assemble other nano machines. So they could

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>assemble other assemblers, So then you have a self replicating

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>nano robot. Do you see where there might be a

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>problem with this? I feel its edging gradually towards the singularity. Right,

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about the potential for nano robots to

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>replicate themselves at such an incredible rate. And remember, as

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>soon as one gets replicated, it can start replicating, and

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>then the ones that replicates can start replicating, so it's

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>exponential growth. Right. Um, there's a scenario called gray goo.

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Gray goo is this this doomsday scenario where nano robots

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>in order to build more nano robots, they have to

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>create it out of something. You know, they're not building

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it out of nothing. So what they're doing is they're

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they're in this scenario anyway, it is taking carbon out

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of the environment and then building robots with them, so

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're right. Everything a lot of stuff is made

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>out of carbon on on our planet, turns out, So

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea here would be that the robots would start

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to consume all the carbon in an effort to build

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>more robots. And of course, since it's exponential, it gets

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:17.719
<v Speaker 1>faster and faster every passing second. So this Tuesday scenario

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>has the entire world just turning into this writhing mass

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of gray goo as nano robots take over everything. I'm

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>totally seeing the Sorcerer's Apprentice in my head. Sleep well tonight. Yeah,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that we were able to take such a

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>rosy idea and go there with it. Well, I mean,

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 1>it's it's obviously a worst case scenario, but uh, there

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of First of all, we're decades away

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>from getting there. Second of all, there's no guarantee that

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>that's what would happen if we even were able to

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>create the nanotech assemblers. So I think we don't have

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to worry just yet. When the Singularity comes, then we'll

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>start worrying, all right, So we got about twenty years

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 1>al right, guys, I hope you enjoyed this classic episode

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of text Stuff. It was a lot of fun to research.

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I always love the sort of science fiction ee kind

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of topics that we can look into. If you guys

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have any suggestions for future tech stuff topics, let me know.

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Reach out on Twitter or on Facebook. We use the

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>handle text stuff HSW for both, and I'll talk to

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I Heart

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.