WEBVTT - Trump's Deployment of Troops Questioned 

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Grossel from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 2>President Donald Trump's efforts to send troops into democratic led

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 2>cities is facing its biggest legal tests yet, with a

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 2>trial this week over his power to deploy the National

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Guard to Portland, Oregon to counter protests. And of course

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>there is the deployment to Chicago, which is in a

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>holding mode right now before the Supreme Court. My guest

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 2>is immigration law expert Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and Knight. There are lawsuits challenging Trump's deployments in Los Angeles, Chicago, Portland,

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and DC making their way through the courts. Have any

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 2>of them so far answered the question of whether he

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>legally invoked Section twelve four h six of Title ten

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>to bring state National Guard troops under federal cos well.

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The closest cases that have done this are the two

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to one panel decision in the Portland case, where the

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of President Trump.

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And they said that the way a court analyzes this,

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they're allowed to analyze it. So at least they got

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that far. They didn't say that the courts can't analyze it,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>but they said they have to use a highly deferential

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>test and that the standard of review was quote, whether

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a colorable assessment of the facts in law

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>within a range of honest judgment, which is a highly

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>deferential standard that basically said, if the President had any

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of decent argument for saying that the Guard needed

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to be deployed in order to either enforce federal law

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>or prevent rebellion circumstances, that would be enough. The dissenting

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>judge said, no, no, no, this is just like a normal

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>factual question where you have a hearing or a trial

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and you come to the factual decision like any trial,

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>was there a murder, yes or no, it's not any

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>difference that's given you have a trial, and in this case,

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>whoever wins under a preponderance of the evidence standard would win.

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And the dissenting judge said that there wasn't enough evidence

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that there was actually any sort of rebellion or other

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>issues in Portland. And so now this two to one

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>decision is now going to go to on bank review.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>The Chief Judge said for the court, without needing anybody

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to ask, the Chief Judge, there should be on bank review.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>And now there's going to be on bank review to

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>determine whether that two to one decision would apply. In Chicago,

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>we have a similar situation where the City of Chicago

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and the State of Illinois also sued, arguing that the

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>deployment of the National Guard in the Chicago areas also

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>violated the Statute and the Tenth Amendment and the posse

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>comitatis law, which prevents federal troops from enforcing civil laws.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And the judge in that case issued a temporary restraining order.

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>The Seventh Circuit upheld the ruling, and the President Trump

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>asked the Supreme Court to lift the tro And now

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court in that case has asked for additional

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>briefing to try to determine whether these words regular forces

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Statute means military forces, and then how that

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>interpretation affects the president's authority to federalize the Guard. And

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so at the moment, that's where we are on these things.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't know exactly what the president can do, what

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the standard of review is, et cetera.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 2>So let's go to the Supreme Court for a second.

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 2>And you know that's because the Trump administration filed an

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>emergency petition to allow them to deploy the troops to Chicago.

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 2>So nine days past before the justices issued this order

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>requesting more information. And this has been a court that's

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>been very quick to answer Trump's emergency requests, usually in

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 2>his favor. What does it tell you that with this request,

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 2>they're asking about the specific wording of the law, which

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 2>says a president may deploy the guard when he is

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>quote unable with the regular forces to execute the laws

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 2>of the United States.

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>What is interesting is they're trying to figure out because

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>there's two different types of I would say armed personnel

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that's discussed. One is regular forces. So who are these

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>regular forces that the president is allowed to use? And

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>then when those quote unquote regular forces fail, then the

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>president is allowed to call in federal service members and

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>units of the National Guard of any state. So the

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>question is does regular forces mean that the president can

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>already send in military troops. That's a little bit complicated

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>because of it is then who are these federal service

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>members that the president is then allowed to send in

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>plus the units of the National Guard of any state.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's the question. Does it mean US military forces

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or does it mean people like FBI, you know, Homeland

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>security investigation and things of that nature, so sort of

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>federal police power force type people, but not actual US

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>military troops. I think it would make a lot less

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>sense if regular forces didn't just mean FBI ice HSI,

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing, the sort of people who enforce

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the federal law, the ATF that kind of group as

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the military. Because of it also meant the military.

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Then who are these quote unquote federal service members that

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>can be called into service if the quote unquote regular

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>forces are not able to execute the law. So that's

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>what I think it means, but we'll have to wait

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and see what the Supreme Court says. It means.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 2>They don't seem to be in a hurry to decide

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 2>because the briefing schedule puts the briefings up until November seventeenth,

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 2>and then they have to decide. So that means what

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 2>three weeks or so where there won't be any deployment

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of troops, correct.

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is one of the most complicated and

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>important consequential questions probably that the Supreme Court has had

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of decades, because it really does

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>get to the heart of what a president can and

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 1>can't do. With regard to using the military in the

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>normal streets of the big cities of America. So this

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is not something to trivialize or to issue any kind

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of quick ruling on. And I think if there was

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>an actual place in America right now that was ungovernable

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and where people couldn't go to work and there were

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>barricades everywhere and nobody could go to school, maybe there

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>would be urgency here. But that's not really the urgency

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone is talking about. There's not a city in America

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>where no one can go to work, or go to school,

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>or get treated in a hospital or any of those

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>major things. At all of these cities. Sports events are

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>still going on, Concerts are still going on, all of

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>these things, and so it's hard to say there's an

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>interrection going on. In a true national emergency where none

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of those things were going on, maybe we'd have a

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>faster ruling. But I think the Court understands here it's

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>better to get it right.

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 2>But is a Supreme Court to look at the facts

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>or are they going to look at the law and

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>interpret that.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, I'm saying they're looking at these facts unofficially

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to determine how fast they're going in the speed of

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the case. But I think what they're going to look

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>at for the decision in the case is the level

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of defference that the President's determination gets. And then based

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on the level of defference, they may remand for a

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>trial or hearing based on that level of difference, or

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they may decide they have enough evidence to move forward

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>with that level of difference and decide, here's what the

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>facts dictate. Based on the level of difference, we decide.

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So it could go either of those two ways, but

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll just have to wait for the Supreme Court to say.

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And plus that may end up being different in Chicago

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>versus in Portland or in Los Angeles. They may decide

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that there is a bigger crisis in one location than

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in another, and so in one location they can deploy

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>the federal troops, and in another location they cannot because

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't rise to whatever new standard they decided to

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>apply in this case.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Let's turned out to Greg Bavino, the chief of the

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Border Patrol's El Centro sector in California, who's been very

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>high profile in the Trump Administration's crackdowns on immigration in

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 2>sanctuary cities. He's been three decades with the Border Patrol,

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>and he's emerged as the face of the Trump administration's

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 2>most aggressive operations against migrants in these democratic led cities.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, he comes from the Border Patrol, from the US

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Customs of Border Protection. He doesn't come from ICE, which

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is the Immigration and Customs Enforcement division that actually is

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in charge with the detention, apprehension, and removal of people

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>who are here illegally. That's who does it. It's nice.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>The Border Patrol has a different mission. They have two

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>different parts. They have one that protects the United States

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>from people trying to cross in between ports of entry,

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and they have a second mission of guarding ports of

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>entry themselves so that people don't get through the ports

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>of entry who shouldn't get through. And this is the

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 1>area of the Border Patrol where mister Baveno comes from.

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And this has happened in the past because what happens

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is that within the Department of Homeland Security they get

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the impression that the people who come through the Border

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Patrol have a more police oriented view of the world

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>because that's what they're doing. They're actually walking around looking

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for crime, so to speak. If they see someone cross

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>the border, then they're going to apprehend them the same

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>way a police officer if they see someone robbing a store,

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they will apprehend them. Whereas ICE traditionally doesn't have that

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>ethos of operating as roving cops on a beat. They

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>have more of a here's a list of people we

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are passed with deporting today, and now we need to

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>either go pick them up at work, or pick them

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>up in the courthouse, or pick them up at home,

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's a much more targeted planned day. That's how

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>ICE likes to operate, is within the targeted planned day

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>for operational concerns. And this has developed over thirty years.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>This is not something that's happened over a day or two.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Because what happens is when ICE starts operating in the

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>same way local police would start operating, which is just

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>look around and try to find crime, then what you're

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>doing is looking around and trying to find people who

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>are there illegally. So just their existence in America is

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>the crime. And whether you like this policy or don't

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like the policy, I'm not even saying anything about the policy.

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I would just hope that the listeners of your broadcast

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>would agree that whether you like it or not when

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that gets implemented. When ICE gets deployed in the same

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>way local police would be deployed, it creates tension on

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the equation, where the people who don't

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like ICE deployed in that manner start protesting, start barricading ICE,

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>start hiding people in their houses, and start doing everything

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they can to resist ICE operating in that manner. And

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>this isn't even new either. You can find stories about

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this every day for the last thirty years. It's just

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that when you do it at a higher scale, you

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>get more of it. Or if you don't do this,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>then you have the people who say, well, we're not

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>getting enough arrests, And it's true, you're not going to

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>get enough arrests if you don't have these roving enforcement

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>arrests that happened where you could just grab thirty people

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>at one place at one location just because you think

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it looks suspicious there. Yes, that will increase the number

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of arrests, but that also increases the level of tension

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're tightening in that area when you do that.

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And again I'm not thinking that, I mean you should

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>do it or you shouldn't do it, but that's why

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration has moved a lot of the ICE

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>agents who are leading these various local locations out of

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>their positions and is trying to bring in border patrol

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>people like mister Bovino, because it's saying we need to

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>change the ethos of ICE and turn it into a

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>police like unit that's roving around looking for crime, so

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to speak. But in this case, again, the crime is

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>just the existence of the human being in America, which

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is what makes it complicated. So you're not observing someone

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>stealing something, or you're not observing someone injuring somebody. You're

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just observing someone standing there and you're asking yourself, is

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this person that's standing there standing there illegally and you

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know they might be, they might not be. But

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the act of asking, over and over and over again

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>creates a level of tension that's completely different than any

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>other kind of police operation creates. And that's why I,

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as I explained previously, I prefers the ethos of saying, look,

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, this person Joe Smith is on a list,

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>they committed a crime or they were ordered deported in

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, and they've managed to stay here

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years. Why do you think that you should defend

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>this person. That's a much easier law enforcement role to defend,

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they like that as opposed to these

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>roving operations.

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Coming up next, the governor of Illinois makes a Halloween

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 2>request to ice. A group of journalists, news advocacy organizations,

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>and protesters are suing the government, claiming that federal agents

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 2>aggressive tactics in Chicago violated their rights. The case has

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 2>grown into something of a referendum on the repeated use

0:14:56.160 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 2>of force by federal agents in the Trump administration crackdown

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 2>on illegal immigration. I've been talking to immigration lawyer Leon

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Fresco of Honda Night Soully on in that Chicago case.

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Federal Judge Sarah Ellis has issued some orders, including requiring

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 2>agents to wear visible identification and issue warnings before using

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 2>weapons like tear gas or pepper spray. And she's expressed

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 2>alarm over videos and photographs that show the agents confronting

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 2>protesters and deploying teargas at a weekend Halloween event. We've

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 2>been talking about Greg Bavino, the Border Patrol chief, and

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 2>she had him on the stand for about an hour

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 2>the other day, asking him about the enforcement tactics, and

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 2>she ordered him to come back every day to report

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 2>to her. But the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals paused

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>that order.

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Why well, the Seventh Circuit issued a vary shit decision

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>putting it on hold. But we can infer from that

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that they agreed with the government's argument that the problem is,

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and you have to look at this from a practical perspective,

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>not just from a well, what's the problem with one

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>hour of coming in and speaking to the judge every day?

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But the truth is, if you're doing that, if you're

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>speaking to the judge every day for one hour, you're

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>legitimately preparing to give that testimony. Because no one just

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sends a witness in to speak to a federal judge

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>without preparation for the testimony, giving them facts, giving them

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>everything that's happening that day. So basically, you will have

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>turned the head of the law enforcement operation into a

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>professional witness. This person wouldn't actually be able to do

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>any other work all day. Their entire day would be

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>devoted to learning the facts that they were going to

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>give the judge that day, preparing the testimony, and then

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>testifying that That would be an entire day of work,

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and the federal government said, that's that been a thing

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's ever existed where we've ever had a federal judge

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>turn a US law enforcement official into a federal witness

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that has to come every day and just do that

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and not actually do the job they're supposed to do.

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>And they point out the federal government correctly that even

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the plaintiffs didn't ask for this, This was just something

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the judge did out of frustration with the federal government.

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So the plaintiffs didn't ask for it, because I doubt

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they would have even imagined the world where such relief

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 1>could have ever been granted. But the judge was so

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>frustrated that the judge granted the relief. And so I

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>do think it was very helpful to the federal government

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to make an argument that, hey, if the plaintiffs don't

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>want something, why is the judge ordering it.

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Still in place? Is her order that Bevino wear a

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 2>body camera and the government has to turn over all

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 2>reports documenting when agents used force against members of the

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 2>public and also the body camera video by tomorrow.

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So correct, all of the sort of what I would

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>call transparency requirements and the use of force are all

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>still in effect, and we will wait and see what

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>both the Seventh Circuit says in principle at the end

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of this and maybe what the Supreme Court says, and

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>if that is hell to be in effect, and that

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>could be something that could actually apply to all of

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the ICE agents nationwide, is that they have to have

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>this sort of use of force transparency that didn't exist previously,

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 1>and they'll have to wear body cameras, they'll have to

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>identify themselves. They can't wear masks, and that would be

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic change from the operating events in a lot

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of places right now.

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 2>They all wear masks except for Bevino. He doesn't wear

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 2>a mask.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 1>He seems to be very confident in this, there's no

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>doubt about that.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Apparently the Trump administration really likes him. Is there a

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 2>shake up? Then? Is the Trump administration trying to rely

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 2>more on the border patrol, which you know a lot

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 2>of these aggressive actions that we see are border patrol,

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 2>not ICE.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Correct, That's what's exactly happening, is the way ICE operates. Yes,

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they're headquartered in DC. Yes they're part of Homeland Security. Yes,

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they're part of the federal government and controlled by the President,

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but they have all these local field offices, and in

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the end, each local field office basically operates as its

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>own satellite that has its own policies, And so it matters.

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>If you have a field office director who is much

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>more oriented toward a aggressive enforcement posture, you're going to

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have more aggressive enforcement in that field office area. Then

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>if you have a field office director who's not focused

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as much on an aggressive enforcement posture. And so in

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>about six or seven cities, the administration has decided to

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>replace the field office directors that were there from ICE,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>move them to DC, and replace them with people who

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>are coming from the Border Patrol to again have this

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of focus on roving enforcement that we were talking

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, where instead of looking for a set number

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of people each day that ICE had determined based on

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>investigations the previous day or the previous week, it would

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>actually say, no, we're going to go to a more

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>aggressive posture and start questioning people on the streets about

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>whether they have a right to be in the United States.

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I haven't heard the answer yet, but the governor of

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Illinois asked ICE not to do any enforcement actions on

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Halloween weekend.

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the type of thing where the way

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that usually gets resolved is there isn't an answer given

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that capitulates to the governor's request, But it's just obviously

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>done in a way where Ice knows that they don't

0:20:55.560 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>want another conflagration happening during Halloween. They detain somebody who

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have been detained, and now everybody's in that sort

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of Halloween frantic mode and riots start happening, and all

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>kinds of craziness occurs. And so I do think you're

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not gonna see an answer that says, Okay, Governor Pritzker,

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we agree with you. We're not going to enforce the

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>law on Halloween. All of these enforcement officers, everybody has

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to remember our human beings.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, don't you think that Bevino. I mean, the point is,

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 2>and why the Trump administration likes him, is to put

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 2>fear into the hearts of immigrants so that they self deport.

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the videos are pretty brutal.

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, the point is this, at the end of the day,

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>putting aside again any personal opinions anybody has, whoever leads

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the operation still relies upon people who live in those communities,

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>who work in those communities, and an inertia gets created

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in all of this despite what people think, where that

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>inertia only allows certain amounts of limitations of conduct to occur.

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you've seen the administration get frustrated and

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>they say, look, we were at we wanted three thousand

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>arrests a day, we were at two thousand. We thought

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we were going to get there. Now we're back at

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>one thousand. What is happening? What's going on? And all

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of this ignores that all of this enforcement needs to

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be done by human beings who have morale issues, who,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, aren't getting paid right now because the

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>government is shut down, and are worried about are they

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to keep their house, Are they

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to make their car payments? Are

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>they going to be able to pay their medical bills?

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>The last thing they're worried about is I want to

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>start creating a massive riot on Halloween. I don't think

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a high priority for these poor agents who aren't

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>getting paid right now. And so I just think, regardless

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of who the leaders are, and regardless even of the

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>message given, there is a certain amount of inertia that

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>exists there where people you can only take them so far.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>And yes, people want to enforce the immigration law, and

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the people there at Ice strongly believe in the importance

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of enforcing the immigration law. But there's an operational reality

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>there that they face every day and that they've seen

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>over the course of years that when you push things

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>too far, they know that then it becomes very difficult

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to unwind that. And so they're just trying to get

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>an equilibrium where they can enforce the law as strictly

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>as they can while still maintaining other forms of order

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>in the society.

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 2>On another issue, Vice President JD. Vance yesterday advocated a

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>slow down in legal immigration. We have to get the

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 2>overall numbers way way down, but he didn't offer a

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 2>firm number.

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think people need to have a realistic understanding of this.

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is something because I teach immigration law at

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>various law schools and that's my first class each semester.

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>As I tell people and I explain, and I say,

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>look in America right now, we have three hundred and

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty million people. And each year, unless it's a year

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>like a COVID year where everything is out of control

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's not a normal year, if you are just

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>running the course of things, you would notice each year

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>if you go to the Department of Homeland Security immigration statistics,

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that one million or so. It fluctuates between about eight

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand and one point two million, but let's just

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>say one million for the purposes of this people a

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>year are given a green card, meaning the right to

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>permanently reside in the United States each year, and that

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>comes from a number of places. It comes from US

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>citizens marrying foreign nationals. That's the largest group by far,

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that's about four hundred thousand people per year. It comes

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>from US citizens bringing in their parents who are foreign nationals,

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and that happen. Happens because when people either marry a

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>US citizen and then they become a citizen one day,

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 1>or an employer sponsors them, which is a much smaller number,

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but they then become a citizen one day, they can

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>then bring their parents. So that's another group. So those

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>parents and then any minor essentially step children. That So

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>let's say you marry a foreign national, if you're a

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>US citizen and that person had a child who was

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>under eighteen, that person can qualify also for a lawful

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>permanent resident status. So that group right there just that

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>group each year is about six hundred thousand people per year,

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>like clockwork, And so the question is will you get

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>rid of any of those individuals? And then between people

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>who come for high skilled work, which is about one

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty thousand a year, plus another group which

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is refugees, which the Trump administration has already zeroed out,

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>so that's gone, but it used to be about one

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand a year, and then assiles, which are people

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>who we didn't know were coming but showed up at

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>our doorstep. That was about one hundred thousand a year.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Now that's been zero about two So the Trump administration

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>can actually say it's cut two hundred thousand or so

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>already from that one million that you're gonna see next

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>year because you're not gonna have refugees or assilies. So

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they can say that, but then there's a debate, Okay,

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>what about those other eight hundred thousand. Is that too

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>much or too little? And I think that's a debate

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that people are having. But honestly, if you're if you

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>unless you're gonna say that a US citizen is not

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed to marry a foreign national and live with them

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>here in America, most of your legal immigration is still

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna be high because that number is the bulk of

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>what our immigration is each year. Is a US citizen

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>marrying a foreign national.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 2>And first Lady Milania Trump brought her parents into the

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 2>United States from Slovenia and they were able to get

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 2>US citizenship through what's known as family based immigration, something

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Trump himself has criticized and dubbed chain migration. So he's

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a pleasure. Leon, Thanks so much. That's Leon Fresco of

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Holland and Knight. And that's it for this edition of

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 2>The Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you can always get the

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 2>latest legal news on our Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 2>find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and at www dot

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot com, slash podcast Slash Law, and remember to

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 2>tune into The Bloomberg Law Show every weeknight at ten

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 2>pm Wall Street Time. I'm June Grosso and you're listening

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg