WEBVTT - Vlad Zamfir on the Dangers of Unstoppable Software and What People Get Wrong About Blockchains

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. So Tracy, obviously,

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing a lot of crypto episodes lately, talking

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>about like bitcoin and its future, a lot about Defy lately.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>But of course, like when all this got started, I remember,

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>like years ago, like people thought this was like very

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>like dangerous, sort of like provocative technology that you know,

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>people like, oh, are they gonna ban Bitcoin? Are they

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>going to ban all this stuff? Um, it feels like

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. My opinion is that it feels like

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that stuff is like now the dollar

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>signs are in there, a lot of that stuff has

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>been sort of like forgotten about, her sanitized away. I mean,

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you still see hints of it when people

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about the potential regulatory response on things like DeFi

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and the idea of people create synthetic stocks that basically

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>bypass regulations, Like, there is a hint of it there.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But you're absolutely right that bitcoin and the associated technology

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>blockchain kind of started out as this crypto anarchist dream

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that was very much about maybe not undermining or actually

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you could say undermining or bypassing um existing

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>authorities and creating something that was sort of immutable and

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>also outside of their reach, right, like something that totally

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>has its own internal governance, that is permission list that

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>anyone can access, that is extremely um sort of durable

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to an outside attack, very difficult to thwart. Like this

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>was sort of like the philosophical underpinnings of it. And

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>now you have people on Wall Street talking about like, oh,

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is bitcoin player role in your retirement portfolio like gold?

0:01:56.280 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Or can we trade synthetics soybean futures, uh, the ethereum

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and like all that is like theoretically kind of exciting,

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't feel very uh, it doesn't feel very

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>cypherpunk like at least like how we thought of all

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this stuff in the early days. No. I think it's

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>like that classic thing about if the technology lives long enough,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's eventually going to be co opted by Wall Street

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>and the thing that it probably sought to disrupt, right,

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm thinking again about peer to peer lending and

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>how that was supposed to bypass traditional banks and then

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>eventually all the banks just got in on it. But yeah,

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right, I think with all the excitement over

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency prices as well as the potential for defy. We've

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of drifted away from the original crypto anarchist or

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>cyber punk dream. You know that that raises all kinds

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of questions because there's like this marriage happening between crypto

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and Wall Street, And sometimes I think it's I kind

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of going to be like oil and water, Like it

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>looks good on paper, but can the too really interact?

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:01.799
<v Speaker 1>And then of course, like the question is like, well

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens, Like okay, like maybe they can be tamed

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and be used to profit, but nonetheless, decentralized distributed uh

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>software databases still extremely powerful, and perhaps we forget that

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>some of the original motivation behind it at our peril. Well,

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to push back on that last point, but

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I do I do agree with you that, like there

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is a tension between Wall Street getting in on technology,

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>which is basically all about sort of decentralizing control, right

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and Wall Street slash finance slash banks are very much

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>about having I mean basically they're all about having control,

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>risk control systems in place. Um and so there's sort

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of an open question about how useful a decentralized technology

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to actually be with um to them exactly right. Well,

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, after all, after all this talk of money

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on recent episodes, it's good to go back to philosophy

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and what these systems really are. And

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we have the perfect guests. Are we doing blockchain not bitcoin?

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Kind of kind of? I think that's maybe one way

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to put it. I think we have like the perfect guys.

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of a legendary figure in the crypto world. Um,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be speaking with laud Zamfeer. He's currently

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>an independent researcher for the Ethereum Foundation. He's actually been

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>with involved in the Ethereum project since before launched, actually

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>in April. Before that, he was a very early bitcoiner

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, everyone else likes to talk

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>about price Vlaude rights, the sort of more philosophical pieces

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>about blockchains and this sort of the power of this software,

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>which he seems to recognize both the potential and the

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>risks for uh so extremely influential player in the space.

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>He also characterizes himself, in addition to being a philosopher

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and a formal student of the law, an absurdist. So

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna find out what that means. Vlaud, thank you

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Thanks Joe, I'm a longtime

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>fan of yours. Thank you, And I'm excited to be

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>here and you know, excited to talk about all these

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>pressing issues that we have today in this space. So

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you kick us off? I mentioned your like

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>history a little bit. You're pretty early, You're much earlier

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>into bitcoin than most people. Then you're got involved with

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the Ethereum Foundation before it actually officially launched as a

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>tradeable coin. What do you talk a little bit about

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>your background? What drew you to this space as an

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>area of research and interest. Well, I got into bitcoin

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>during the Cyprus Bilian sort of financial crisis during like um,

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it was like one of those crises where like the

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>government there decided to like seize money from people's make

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>accounts in order to pay back that to the you

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and and then like bitcoin kind of like I saw

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of headlines then because like people were using

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it in order to evade this capture. And so for me,

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like I got into bitcoin as like kind of like

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>revolutionary like financial technology that would like help save people

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>from like capital controls, inflation and like you know this

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of like you know that like the global financial

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>system has been like co opted by like the law everywhere.

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>The bitcoin provided a kind of escape, and so I

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>was in the bitcoin for this kind of escapist you know,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>cipher palm kind of like radical like we can escape

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the central banking system kind of agenda, and like that

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>was exciting. Like I was excited you know, for like

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the future of money at the time, and like I

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was really like a bitcoin and thrown through in that way.

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And then I got interested in ethereum um when I

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of realized that like this you know, just like

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain and not bitcoin kind of story where actually

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>like the technology like is useful way way outside the

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>scope Bitcoin, and it's something where we potentially use this

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to like decentralize, you know, all sorts of things and

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>to disintermediate into like a kind of you know, do

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>things without going through gatekeepers, you know, a way outside

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of just money and finance. And I was interested in

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>like decentralizing academia or like peer review through like content

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>curation and things like this, which are kind of like

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>still in somewhere very much part of ethereum um Um.

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I definitely want to talk about some potential use cases

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of the technology. But I also sort of want to

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>jump in with one major question um, which relates to

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>what you were just saying about the original vision for

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and why you got interested in it. But Joe

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>has been writing a lot about Wall Street embracing ethereum,

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>or being pilled, as he puts it, So I'm just curious, like, what,

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you think what is it about ethereum that

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>has caused it to be embraced by the financial community,

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>like a community that a lot of people would say

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it should probably be bypassing all together. Yeah, and you know,

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in some way you could say that it is, but

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say, like this basically, like the theory is

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>very much not Bitcoin, and it was like set up

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in some way to like fill some of the gaps

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>both like politically and technically that Bitcoin left open, and

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>so ethereum like you know, very much like contrast itself

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to Bitcoin politically, legally, and also has this kind of

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>programmable layer where you can build a lot of applications

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that are basically like not possible in Bitcoin, and those

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>include things like famously all this DeFi stuff that work

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>intro the conversation with that, like is in some way

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>like financial wizard dream today and so and so, there's

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>like in some way like there is interesting financial stuff

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that happens on ethereum and ethereum and the way it's

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like postured and positioned, it's it's not like the future

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>of money and the way Bitcoin is, Like it's hard

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to understated how much not bitcoin etheroreum is because of

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the kind of poor representation that theorem gets in the medium.

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But like if you kind of like are in the scene,

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like you deal very much like ethereum is not a Bitcoin,

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and and I think that that the kind of it's

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>not being bigcoin and it posturing in a way that's

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a much more general morphous you know, you can project

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>your own fantasies onto it. It's not like the future

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of money in the same kind of like you know,

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>clear defined kind of way that bitcoin tries to be.

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And so and so I think it has like a

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>niche and crypto currency and blockchain like it kind of

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>and it kind of like created and changed the way

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that people even think about the space from like you know,

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>just thinking about like this the kind of money and

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>finance narratives actually to get much broader than that which

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in some way, let's it actually provide a safe space

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>for some of the financial activity. But that's also very

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>questionable in terms of like how safe is it really

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to like, you know, do these things without like New

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>York being super down with it? And so on? They

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>what you say, They're like, do these things without New

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>York being super down with It's something that I like

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>struggle with our question a lot because, like, on the

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>one hand, like blockchains are theoretically unsensible, and we could

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>get into how realistic that is, but like that is

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of the story, like Okay, you you set the

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>software free, and you theoretically can't stop it. In theory, though,

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>one can imagine like, um, someone looking at a decentralized

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 1>lending protocol or something that certainly looks like a stock

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>market that runs on the theoreum and saying, you know,

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 1>regular saying this is illegal. This is like securities fraud

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>or selling of unregistered securities. Do you expect an inevitable

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>clash on that level? And do you think people within

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the sort of crypto blockchain community are naive about thinking

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that the law will just sort of not be an

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>impediment in the end, Well, I mean certainly to some extent.

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think what they really think is they think

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that they've thought this through and they see how it

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>will play out, and that they're going to win, and

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that like, you know, the time is right for this

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>revolution and like they can do this without New York's

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>approval and like they're just gonna win, you know. But

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>basically like they have this like view actually like a

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>different view of like the legal reality. They're like they

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>don't they like I think they're ready to call New

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>York's bluff and to say like, hey, like you know,

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't tell us what to do on the blockchain,

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>like this is not New York, you know. But then

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of course you know you're gonna interact with a smart

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>contract and then like get into like a legal relationship

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>with someone in New York and then be suited and

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>then you're like going to the States one day, Like

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's there's obviously ways in which you know

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this is going to come to a head and where

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>people are going to get in trouble legally because of

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the stuff and normally use it a place for conflict.

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like a place where like it's guaranteed that there's

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be conflict. There's no way to get around

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that just because of the basic like let's say legal

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>political realities of of defy and of blockchain and blockchain governance.

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk a little bit more about the mutability

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>idea of blockchain? So Joe just touched on this, and

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to talk about it because it's

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of central to the use case of the technology, right,

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>this idea that you can build a code that can

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>basically exist and be the thing around which like multiple

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>players or two people can come to an agreement and

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it means they don't have to have a middleman, and um,

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it allows for these sort of trust less

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>transactions and things like that. But I guess my question is,

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>like how immutable is blockchain actually, given that we've had

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>incidents of the chain or the code being corrupted, and

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm aware that as we're recording this, I

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's like almost the five year anniversary of the

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Dow attack when you had, you know, someone who basically

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 1>drained the Dow of all the ether it had collected

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from the sale of its tokens. I think that happened

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in like June five years ago something like that. So

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, like how safe, how rely doable is

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain if we're going to be relying on it

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>um for all these different transactions. Yeah, I mean, well

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to impack there, but like these are

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>topics that are very near and dear to my heart.

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And I would say firstly that like, Okay, I think

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>like the true like revolutionary potential blockchain isn't because of

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the immutability thing. Like I don't think it's like, I

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think immutability thing is really anything more than like

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>misinformation or disinformation about the nature of blockchain in order

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to kind of manage the way that we have conflict

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>about blockchain tech, and so like that it's like a

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>tactical misinformation that happened from the start in order to

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>protect the blockchain from like what we're seeing as like

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>political legal adversaries that are too strong for us to

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have like a independent, like legal way to manage dispuse

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>like the Instead, we kind of have this sperchine where

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>basically like we're supposed to not argue about or supposed

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to not really change the protocol. And I think like

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>the real kind of like potential doesn't come really from

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the immutability as much as from the fact that this

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is a new kind of cyberspace. Is that like isn't

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>owned by like the guy who owns this one server.

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Is kind of like a cyberspace that's in a different

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of space that's like maybe more shared than as

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>possible in like today's like software as a service kind

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of model. And so it's this in the ways in

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>which we can fight over and the ways we're gonna

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>have disputes over the governance of this space. I don't

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be limited by immutability, and I

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to actually unlock a lot of value

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in blockchain to kind of for us to get over

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this idea that it's useful because it's immutable, and that

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is trusted because it's immutable. I mean, it's like saying, oh,

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you can trust me, I put myself in a straight jacket.

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Like that's something someone who's not very trustworthy you would say,

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that, someone who's like kind of like maybe

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>up to something else would say and and and and and.

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, you know, basically, like one way to

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>say it is that the norm of not disputing the

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>software was associated tightly with the software, so tightly that

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't even learn about blockchain without learning about the

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>imutabality thing, and that has created this amazing international legal

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>order that is basically extremely depu you know, like it's

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>like says the software is like not allowed to be changed,

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and like it doesn't matter like who wants it or

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like what is happening, Like you know, it's a really

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of radical founding fallacy or founding trick or like

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>founding disinformation in like the cryptocurrency space that we talk

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>about the history of a little more. But all this

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is to say, look, I don't think that it's immutability

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>as much as this question of like this new type

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of space that we could that we have, you know,

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>because like you know, you can't shut down a server

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>or regulate a server in order to regulate a cyberspace

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the way that like it's kind of expected in

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the cyberspace today, and so I think it creates new

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>political and legal ground for dispute and this and and

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to Toshi and co. Kind of tried to front run

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this by saying it's immutable and like we decided that

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the protocol forever. But like that is kind

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of bullshit. But that doesn't mean that blockchain is not useful.

0:15:52.600 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's quite you know, quite the opposite again, So

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about this idea a little bit more So. Obviously,

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>if I'm running an application that's like on Amazon Web

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Services AWS, that's space that they own and I have

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to play by their rules and Amazon has to play

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>by the government's rules, and that's pretty straightforward. If I'm

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>building an application on ethereum, it isn't, uh that obviously

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>creates new things. So what do you talk us through

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like some of the implications of this if we're talking

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>about the real power of blockchain is not the immutability

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>per se, but the idea of like a new I

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.479
<v Speaker 1>guess it's like a new shape of space that exists

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of like outside of the conventional way we

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>think about like service as a software. What makes that

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>so revolutionary? And what do you see as the sort

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of like what's the conflict model I guess within that

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>new role? Yeah, so today the dominant conflict model is

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>like misimutability thing that we kind of just talked about,

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's certainly, you know, not really like sustainable or

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>defensible or like analytically, like you can kind of just

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>tell like not just from history, but like from like

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the institutional arrangements that like Okay, it's like it's obviously

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>not like actually immutable. Like nothing is like really like

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>actually immutable. That's not like a real you know thing

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>for tech objects. You know, there's like always governance, and

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so like the what this basically means that like the

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>model for conflicts for this new space is basically like

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on determined and determined. Basically there's no way that like

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone can say by like decree like what it's going

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to be because basically no one has that legal competence

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>or authority and and it's kind of like it kind

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of is forcing us to reckon with the fact that

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>law doesn't just exist inside national borders and that like

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have to deal with the way we

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have disputes over software that doesn't exist and can't just

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>be subject to this command and control line that you

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier. Well, just to follow up on this a

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, I mean, like what is I mean,

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>what makes it so powerful and revolutionary because like in theory,

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>like with bitcoin, like that is you know, it's really

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to change it may not be strictly speaking permanently immutable,

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but we know, like it is really hard to change.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>But what is the power that gets unlocked in your

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>view by creating this new space, this new type of software.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>It's like the power that's created by you know, having

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhere that's outside of like the jurisdiction of your state authority,

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>which like today and for the most part it's like

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>charged with like maintaining legal order. And so you know,

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it's basically like in some way, like you know, you

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>just aren't subject to the same disputes from the same

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>parties that you like normally would. So like you know, normally,

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 1>if you were to try to start unregistered securities exchange,

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that you can really like just like you know, tell

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you like no, you have to stop, and then like

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, whereas like in crypto like defy today, it's

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>like not so simple basically because it's not clear exactly

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>like how that plays out, like you know, in the

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of the like life span and that conflict. And

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>then if it doesn't play out right, you can actually

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>create a bigger problem through trying to to try and

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>shut it down, um and so and so there's kind

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of like, um, the legal nondeterminism, like a legal uncertainty

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that it makes it difficult to see you know, like

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>how is the unit swap going to be like regulated

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US, for example, or like lots of other

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>questions you know where where where it just there's there's

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>no legal opinion in the world that like it's just right,

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's like a matter of like the like you know,

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>real like legal nondeterminism. And so I think that like

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>creates a tremendous opportunity because it's like politically uncontested territory

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>or politically non uncontested, but politically contested is what I

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>mean territory, uh, and so and so that and so

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a kind of whole place for like, you know,

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>not just people who like want to escape finance, but

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>also people who want to like maintain the same ifty

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of their financial systems. But also not just in finance,

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>but you know because ultimately with like ethereum and like

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>blockchain not bitcoin, we kind of go away beyond just

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>just finance. So two questions here, and they're related to

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the points you were just making. But can you maybe

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>elaborate on the use cases for blockchain technology? Um, you know,

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking a lot about defy defy, UM, making

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>synthetic stocks, things like that. Um, But you mentioned a

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>few other potential use cases like curation earlier, and I'd

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 1>love to hear more about those. But secondly, how desirable

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is it to basically bypass these sensitive or politically contested areas,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, a lot of people would argue that

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>regulation exists for a reason. Um, there's a reason why

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>finance in particular, UM is heavily regulated. So I guess

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe just elaborate a little bit more on on your

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>last point, like why would you want this? Why is

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this a desirable thing to have? Yeah, so so let

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>me say that, Like, Okay, I think answer in a

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>reverse order. Um, So I don't think the escape is

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>like realistic or desirable, but I think what is. You know,

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>something we have to face is the fact that, like

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a national or state authority that can

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>call the shots and so and so what that means

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that we need to develop legal ability legal security without

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>having the ability to rely on like state enforced rules

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and so. What that means is, you know, the nature

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>of law today as we understand it needs to kind

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of like or let me take a step back, Like

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful legal forms today aren't equipped to deal

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>with this particular conflict, and so it creates a trendous

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to for us to find ways to manage our

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>conflicts in a in a in a scope where that

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't easily lend itself to the like existing like most

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>powerful legal forms and so and so that is like

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous opportunity. But I don't think of it as

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>escaping law. I think if it is discovering law actually

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and discovering you know, and and and and being kind

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of like you know, secure in our conflicts without having

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this state that can enforce rules and that so that

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>we can mediate our our experience of law through like

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the state. Because because no one wants to create like

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a global crypto law state that will enforce the rules

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on crypto you know, it's like there's like a push

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>against that kind of like global state in the law

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>and just in like you know, just like basic common

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>sense of like how is this going to be abused

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and corrupted? But thankfully that we have a tremendous legal

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>history in the world, and we have like tremendous amount

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of legal culture and it's not doesn't just boil down

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>to state rules, and so we have an opportunity to

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>have important legal disputes in a way that is in

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>some way not according to the normal status quo. And

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that is trendously interesting. However, as you say, like the

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>idea of escaping law is fallacious and dangerous and facilitates

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bad stuff, and and certainly I don't

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>advocate legal escapism. I like I would love to you know,

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>fight it, in particular in the context of crypto, because

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>like people have this idea that just because it's not

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in this jurisdiction of a state, that that there's no law,

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's just incredibly untrue on like a deep, deep

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>analytical basis, and it keep deep in a political way

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 1>where like it's impossible to escape the law, like it's

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just not that's like not a thing. And so it's

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.959
<v Speaker 1>just like it's just that like the particular you know,

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>state enforced rules legal form that people are like lazily

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>expect to like always work, you know, but even though

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>like you know, it like obviously like doesn't always doesn't work.

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>And so then they and then so then they get

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>themselves crazy thinking like I can escape, you know, like

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the law, but like that's not that's not reality, Like

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, the reality is that like it

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter where you go, like you bring the law

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>with you, and other people will bring a law to you. Um.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think it just forces us to re evaluate

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to letting us escape, and that kind of

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>like new situation where we have like where we have

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to deal with our conflicts in a new way. Um.

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>It's super interesting. Although unfortunately today is dominated by this

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>a mutability norm, which basically is kind of having people

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>pretend like, oh, they can't interfere with the software, like

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the software is just like fully autonomous, which I think

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is crazy talk because like you know, nothing is above

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the law, like nothing is in subject to dispute. I mean,

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>like there's no way in which like software will ever

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>be above the law. And so it's only a matter

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of time before mutability becomes kind of like sidelined and

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>minimize and we have to find another way to be

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>secure in our conflicts around blockchain and cryptom Okay, so

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you say, like it's kind of crazy talk to the

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>immutability norm, but it is also true that if New

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>York regulators were like unite swap is illegal now there

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>they can't. In the past that they could there was

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a entity offering some sort of like exchange that they

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't want. Like I'm thinking, like, okay, like when there

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>used to be betting, you know, more betting markets that

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>were available in the United States on centralized by run

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>by centralized companies or gambling or whatever, and a regulator

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>could say this is illegal now and it would go

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>away and that would be it. But if a regulator

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>said in theory where you can't do you to swap

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>anymore or something like that, it obviously isn't that isn't easy.

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you know, it's not above the law, and maybe

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>immutability is unrealistic. But it's obviously a very different interaction

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>than it was before when it was like say the

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>regulators kicking out online poker site. So in your in

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>your vision, how does this sort of like traditional notion

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of law enforcement and regulation interact with this new with

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>this new uh, with this new model. Yeah, And I

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>mean that's a that's a challenging question. And basically, like

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>the easy thing to say is okay, well, you know

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they get to I mean, they still have like all

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of their like local and also internet legal means, and

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they still have the ability to issue sanctions and to

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>say like oh no, like that's criminal, Like oh no,

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know, don't send money to this address because

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>like you know, or like don't buy like this token

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>because like and you're just like supporting terrorists, like you know.

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>They have this authority to do these things, and those

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 1>will be and there will be like real legal consequences

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>for people who find themselves in the you know, in

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>like let's say, like the scope of US law, which

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>is fast and so it's not like they don't have

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>means of regulating many persons that are in the law

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>who would be maybe using these systems, And so I

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>don't want to minimize that because there's a lot there,

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:42.479
<v Speaker 1>But I also want to say that like you know,

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>because of yes, I mutability, but more more generally, because

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of the these protocols need to be used everywhere, you know,

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>or not everywhere. But we could like if if they

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>were to like say, mandated change to the theory and

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>protocol in order to let them shut down youn swap,

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like that would become like theory in USA or something,

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and it wouldn't be the same, right, so you need

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to kind of like there needs to be like a

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>different level of kind of legitimacy and coordination and opt

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in on a global basis for a dispute brought by

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone to to lead to this change and

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>so and so there's kind of like this sort of

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>like nebulous culture that is going to like you know,

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like judge the legitimacy of this legal order and then

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>say whether like you know like like budge for it,

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and and and in some way immutability already says no,

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like very much like no to all of it, and

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>so like because like that's like the status quote today,

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's quite hard to imagine. However, you know, in the future,

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have like a basically you know, let's say,

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, mediums are having these disputes. It's not going

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to be like, you know, we just like accept state

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>authority to like tell us what to do. I mean,

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>because that's like not the ethos at all, but where

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we like you know, don't want to like do like

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and allow like all of the worst behavior. Like you know,

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>if you want to have like your cake and need

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>it too, you know there there you basically need to

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>be secure about your ability to manage these conflicts and

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to say like you're you have a right to have

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>your sanctions and we have the right to have our sanctions,

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and like you know, we're not even like a single

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>body politic and so and so, like we're not gonna

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.199
<v Speaker 1>understand have like official like here is like you know,

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like the etheroryum, like the sanctions that like the THEORYM

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>will respect or anything like that. But through the course

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>of disputes and through the course of you know, the

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>various like events that are going to happen in crypto,

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>you know these things are going to change basically, and

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you know it's up to kind of like people with

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>right legal minds to kind of try to like front

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>run all these situations and figure out how we can

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>prevent some of these very bad outcomes. So, I mean,

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>just on that note, like what does this actually mean

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for society? And I know this is something that you

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Um and Vitalic have touched upon before. You know, this

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>idea that society is basic built on contracts and what

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about is a new type of contract technology

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>or a new space um for agreeing contracts in and

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially I take your point earlier, but potentially

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>contracts that can sort of like outlive or exist beyond

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the reach of um I guess, uh, coordinated legal systems.

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's one way of putting it, Like what does

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>this mean for society as a whole? Well, I mean,

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's an excellent question that I don't think

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it has like a super simple answer other than like,

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need to reckon with the fact that

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we have this kind of space now that we need

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to govern and to understand like how we have conflict

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>over and around the kind of like first thing to

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>note them that I have to mention it's like, okay, well,

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>smart contracts aren't actually contracts, like like legal contracts like

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>exist in the law, like smart contracts are like in

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the ether, inpersual machine, like in contract a terms like

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>smart contracts and more about execution than actually like contracting,

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and so like you know, they're not really contracts. They're

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>more like something you might use when you're trying to

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>avoid getting into a contract, and then you might accidentally

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>get into a contract in some cases. But in terms

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of contract law, like I mean, you can't expect too

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>much change. I mean, contract law is like you know,

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>like extremely robust, and like, you know, we've been throw

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot in contract law and it's not like you know,

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>like smart contracts are like a new paradigm and contract

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>law really, although they may be a way to, um,

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say, execute some terms of a contract in some cases,

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like for the most part, smart contracts are not legal contracts.

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's kind of in a misnomer that's been

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>both tactical and extremely effective, but also is a leads

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to this kind of idea that like these are contracts

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.239
<v Speaker 1>when they're like not really. And I think that like

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the question of like how do blockchains and cryptocurrency let

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>us organize, you know, how the impact the way that

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we organize aren't isn't going to be like a necessarily

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a contract law reality as much as it's going to

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>be something like in terms of you know, the new

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>spaces and the new intersections of different cultures and and

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and economies and and stuff that that are going to

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>be facilitated in these spaces. But but the question of what,

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>like how will blockchains effect and influence like the way

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we organize the society are you know, deep and uncertain,

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.959
<v Speaker 1>and there is an extent to which like the technology

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>really is you know, better than traditional consistuts protocols, and

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>so like there is a way where like, okay, we

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>know it will help us in some computer systems in

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>like a rather clear way. But in terms of like

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the promise of like social revolution or

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>like a social change in the order, or like a

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>social like you know, like new way like escape or

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>things like this, like those are all like deep leading

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>out of termistic and like very unclear. Like it could

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>just be that like you know, this inspires like the

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>worst kind of global totalitarianism in like a crackdown, as

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>much as it could be that like you know, we're

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>able to use it responsibly in a way where we

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>can you know, justify the maintenance of our freedoms in

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the law. How could this go bad? I mean we

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>were talking earlier before the show, and you you talk

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about this sort of like the danger of unstoppable software.

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the risks if people don't think

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:25.959
<v Speaker 1>about this right or if a sort of like if

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a community can't sufficiently self govern if there does, if

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>if people fail to achieve some sort of like norms

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>about say cutting off some of the most egregious Uh,

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>patterns of behavior that can be done on a blockchain,

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Like what are some of the risks that people should

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about. I don't necessarily want to give people ideas,

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but I will say that, like whatever you have anything

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in the law that isn't subject dispute, you could like

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>imagine it being part of like some Rube Goldberg machine

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that like does some kind of like you know, very

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>unlawful thing in the end. So so so you can

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine that, like you know, each of these

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>indisputable components can together come together to make things possible,

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the sharp increase in ransomware, and like

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, for for one example, that's like kind of

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>like everyone knows about and it won't give anyone ideas

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for me to talk about, Like like ransomware is a

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>good is a good example of something where you know

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:22.479
<v Speaker 1>it's it just makes the business of ransom so much

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>easier to use cryptocurrency. And and so you know that

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>is like some like quite obvious you know, unlawful bad

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>some of different levels conduct that is basically being facilitated here.

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And then we currently don't have the means to really

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>stop or let me rephrase, we don't have the will

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>or the legal strategy like legal capacity to stop. Is

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that something in your view that the cryptocurrency or say

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>people within say the Ethereum network, or I guess you

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>know some of these are different networks, Bitcoin, narrow, et cetera.

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>These things that people who are working on governance in

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>these areas should be more actively thinking about. Absolutely, uh,

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, um people need to be

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>much more secure in their ability to handle conflicts in

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 1>cryptome Um today. They're you know, they have these kind

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of like aggressive postures because like they don't believe that

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they can handle these disputes. They think that if you

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>like delete some coins from some ransomware attack, then like

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>that opens the floodgates to like the government deleting your

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>coins because you didn't pay taxes or whatever. You know,

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine people have like fears about all the

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 1>things that could happen if we started to do anything,

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and and and and people like don't have like the

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>security to like say, look, you know, we can judge

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>these things, and we don't need to say, look, we

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>don't need to delegate to like a system that decides

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>and therefore we captured by the system, like we can

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>have like the legal security and like the responsibility for

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 1>legal judgments in order to you know, have our cake,

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and needed to to like not out un checked state authority,

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>but also to not allow unchecked scammers. Since you brought

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 1>up scamming and ransomware, I'm wondering if we can just

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>go back to that question from earlier about use cases

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>for blockchain, Yeah, because I like what gets you excited

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 1>about potential use cases for the tech? I'm I'm really

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>excited about you know, are this like opportunity that we

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have to both both because of the improvement in the technology,

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but also because of this crazy legal trick and this

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.399
<v Speaker 1>crazy legal reality that like crypto exist. And I think,

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thing that's like most exciting to me

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is like this multidisciplinary mix of like this crazy kind

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of institution which like you know, sometimes passes itself off

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>as tech, but it's really of a very interesting, dynamic, multifaceted,

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>like ontologically very complex type of institution. And I think

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>that like, you know, these although primitive today, stand to

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>become like complex, dynamic, very interesting institutions that get to

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 1>do a lot for us that like currently we don't

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>have in cyberspace. Because like in cyberspace today, we have

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 1>basically a situation where we have a kind of a

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.399
<v Speaker 1>neo feudalism where like our feudal lords who like own

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the big computers like own us. And I'm like not

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>exaggerating by a lot, And so I think there's like

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a state of crisis in cyberspace that crypto helps to

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>respond to, you know, as much as also there's like

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a state of crisis in like global governance and global

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>law and like blockchain crypto kind of like sits in

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that space and can help us provide new realities, new paradigms,

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 1>new places where we can try again and like hopefully

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>not fail this time to have like you know, good

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>governance and to have like you know, institutions that are

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>part of a kind of society that we want to

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 1>live in. So I think I think it's like you know,

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>very much like very much political, and very much in

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>reaction to some of the prevailing political reality. Today. We're

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>basically like you know, power is concentrated and in a

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>way where perhaps um with this decentralized computer or you

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>know kind of like you know, like the servers that

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are like you know, I'm no longer owned the cyberspace, Um,

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 1>we can maybe create and have a new balance of powers,

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>like like like more balance of powers, you know, more

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>rule of law as opposed to just you know, having

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like the feudal lords or like the legislatures or the

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:36.879
<v Speaker 1>states kind of like act lawless and and like lord

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 1>over everyone as if like you know, they own the law.

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Do you envision in like a future theoretically in which

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of like everything that we do online, whether it's

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>something that resembles traditional social networking sharing sharing stories and

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 1>videos and photos of our friends communication, that it could

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.359
<v Speaker 1>all essentially be done in this sort of like new

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>decentralized sort of like crypto based manner. Like is that

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>like a future that seems realistic too? Um, Well, there's

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a number of like technical like legal, economic, you know,

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of lots of barriers, and there's like a

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, just because we have like new primitive forms

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in this direction and like way more possibilities and before,

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that like we're there are yet. I mean,

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like privacy in cryptocurrency is very bad, and there's a

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of basic norms around how we have disputes that

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't really settled in a way that's like secure or sustainable.

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:59.479
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of reasons why you know, we can't

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and we wouldn't, and they would be like a very

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>bad idea for us to try to like do everything

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:09.399
<v Speaker 1>with cryptosystems. That said, you know, it's not clear what

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:14.439
<v Speaker 1>the technical, legal, economic, etcetera. Limits are, and so that's

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>something that's like kind of also subject to ongoing kind

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of discovery, negotiation and so on. It's hard to imagine

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>how that would look safe. It's easier to imagine why

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>people would do it despite it not being safe. And

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>so like I'm you know, concerned because like you know,

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of the like lack of basic infrastructure that's like required

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>for this to be safe. However, the opportunities there, the

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 1>stakes are, they're like the contention is there, like people

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>are ready to fight over these issues and and and

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and and kind of see what happens. Although you know,

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we are still in a position where we could easily

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>see some really bad outcomes when like for example, you know,

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>like the unsoppable software, the like global cyber state, or

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>like the uh, you know, the feudalists just controlling everything.

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a lot of bad outcomes that are kind

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of in the cake today that like could easily get

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>baked you know, into like our reality, but it's not

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it's still like not said in stone yet, it's not

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>clear like you know, these these outcomes will happen, you know,

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm optimistic that we can find better outcomes than than

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>any of these kind of like established ones. I wanted

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the beginning of this discussion, when

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about what attracted you into bitcoin in

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the first place, and then how you got interested in

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the theory um um. And it's a slightly weird I guess,

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>like cultural or values question, but some people would describe

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin community today as being I guess toxic is

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 1>one word, or like openly hostile to outsiders and hostile

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to alternate visions of crypto. And so I'm just wondering,

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>as someone who sits on the opposite side of bitcoin now, um,

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's heavily involved in ethereum, like, how would you

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>characterize the cultural differences between Bitcoin versus ethereum. Yeah, I

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>mean I think, um, you know, Bitcoin has like a

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 1>relatively defined culture, whereas like ethereums culture is still kind

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of like amorphous and people you know, have different like

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sustained different very different politics and views within ethereum. So

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>ethereum kind of is like much more diverse and in

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>some way less toxic than big coin because like the

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the like incentive to like get everyone out who doesn't

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>toe the party line, like isn't really like there as

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>much in ethereum. And so what happens is basically like

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>ethereum is like supports much more diversity, you know, and

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>an ethereum by by virtue of like being more amorphous,

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>by about like being about kind of everything instead of

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just being about money, it kind of has um you know,

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>support from much more efficients. And but that also means

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that like there are like struggles and factions and people

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like having fights over like what is

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>ethereum in a way that doesn't really happen in bitcoin

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin they're kind of just like you know, twenty

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>one million, twenty one million bitcoins and if you don't agree,

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>get out, and if you don't like one magna blocks

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>like get out, and like you know, they have this

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of a toxicity, which which is which is kind

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of like um. I like to describe it as a

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>channel authentication UH strategy where basically it makes it so

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>that like you, if you don't, if you're not like

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>one of them, like you can't really tolerate to be there.

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And so you can kind of just like bird virtue

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of being in those channels, like you're kind of authenticated,

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and it makes it a safe space for them, and

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it also it also helps them reinforce this immutability.

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like earlier Joe mentioned like, oh, it would

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>be very hard to change bitcoin, and the reason is

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 1>because like you have all these uh toxic bitcoiners who

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:54.360
<v Speaker 1>will basically like be horrible to you if you suggest

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that we don't need to do this immutability thing. And

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>not that it's like hard to change the software, it's

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>just like hard to get through the bitcoiners who like

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:03.919
<v Speaker 1>have this kind of like pseudo cult or like real

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>cult or pseudo religion around around Bitcoin. I mean, I

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>guess the question is is, like we've all interacted with that,

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and we sort of know that phenomenon, But could it

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>be that that's a good sort of like survival strategy,

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a good evolutionary strategy. It's like, obviously Ethereum seems to

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>be more open to debate and governance questions seem to

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>be more up in the air and so forth. But

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're trying to like bootstrap a new

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>money into existence in a way that bitcoin is trying

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to do, does it make sense perhaps to create this

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>cult environment so that you go through so that even

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>during the lean times, nobody is threatned. Nobody, nobody who's

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:46.240
<v Speaker 1>involved wants to pivot or no change. Like adversity comes

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, some people might be tempted to

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 1>change the project, but you know, bitcoiners by shedding themselves

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>essentially of people who would be even tempted to think

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 1>about changing the software or changing the project, Like, does

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that create a certain amount of resilience that can survive

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>attacks or periods where the price is low and so forth.

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Kind of, but it also lends itself to be coming

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:11.879
<v Speaker 1>like obsolete or like a relic or like a kind

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of quaint vintage item or something. You know, it's kind

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of no offense. I don't, I don't know, I don't.

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say it. I guess it's let

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 1>me say, it's not the smartest strategy I think in

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the long run, because it's kind of like you know,

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a maximum commitment now, like committing to the position like

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>never change it. Like it's kind of like it gives

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 1>up on their ability to maneuver. Who knows what will

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>happen in the future. And it's kind of like painting

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>yourself in the corner. You may like that corner for now,

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but you might find that one day you have you

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:48.919
<v Speaker 1>have a need to move around. And and I don't

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's particularly tactical. I don't think it's particularly smart.

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And just from like also the point of view of

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like the political agenda of bitcoin, you know, which is

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>also which also which does involve like, you know, having

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 1>some measure of legitimacy ultimately and like good will from

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:11.520
<v Speaker 1>society which is undermined by this kind of like toxic

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>hardline attitude. Yeah. I totally agree with that last point.

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course there's like there's also an irony there.

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like being a technological luod Eye, but

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>at the same time being extremely into this new technology

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that you think is revolutionary and is going to change

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the world. Um, although I guess it's not that new anymore. Um.

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>But just on this note, there was one other thing

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you. Um. So one of the

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>things that makes ethereum different is that it does change, um,

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it does respond to challenges. There's a really vibrant debate

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>over which direction ethereum should go in UM. And there

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.759
<v Speaker 1>are different factions UM, but you could also describe them

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 1>as communities, and they're all sort of talking to each

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:02.240
<v Speaker 1>other about the future or of ethereum or the vision

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>for the future. I'm just wondering, when it comes to

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 1>building consensus in the ethereum community, how helpful is it

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to have a sort of figurehead UM like Metallic uh

0:46:18.239 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 1>to help that happen, because that that also seems to

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>be like a key difference between the ethereum community and

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin that either like sort of has a leader. Yeah,

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's a it's a blessing and a curse.

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean sometimes um, you know, basically like sometimes people

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>expect Metallic to make cause when like you know, he

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like really necessarily want to. Sometimes, you know, it's

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>really really really useful to have UM, you know, hotalic

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be kind of like a cediator of you know, the

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>different political kind of current in ethereum. But basically it

0:46:56.840 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>also it also can lead to a kind of a

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 1>suspension of judgment where basically people think that like, oh,

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:06.400
<v Speaker 1>like you know, if the Italic approves of this, it

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 1>must be great, you know, and so and so they're

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely like cuts both ways. But I would say also

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the Italic is kind of like much more you know,

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>benevolent dictator for theorem to then the theorym like one

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>point oh where like we still have kind of like

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the OLDEVS call and the E I P s and

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we have like this kind of process of you know,

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the core developers and and and and then in which

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is some way, you know, in some way very independent

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and has been for a very long time of Italics

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like influence on day to day basis. So it Italic

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is actually really more like a researcher and like a

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 1>pioneer like future direction as opposed to like you know,

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>providing like any basis or day to day dispute management.

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So to sum up, it's sort of like big picture

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of views. If I'm getting it, it feels like the

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>message what you're trying to say is, you know, there

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:56.799
<v Speaker 1>really is this potential through crypto, through blockchains to create

0:47:56.880 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 1>new regimes of governance that could in many ways be

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>better than what exists now. And some of that may

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be financial, some of that may be political and so forth.

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>But to get there, the community itself has to take

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:13.800
<v Speaker 1>governance more seriously, and that it can't be that if

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 1>if if we're going to replace governance with blockchain governance,

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 1>then the people who manage and sort of like contribute

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to these blockchains have to take the idea of law

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and have to take the idea of potential melieability and

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>regulating and maybe cutting off bad behavior more seriously in

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:34.439
<v Speaker 1>order to get to this point where blockchain has become

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>an important thing. I think, I think that's I think

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that's more or less right. I have life by myself

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:41.719
<v Speaker 1>like having a slight reservation around the idea that law

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is an idea, but like, you know, other than that,

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I think like that's I think that's I think that's right.

0:48:45.640 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think though, you know, it's it's more like

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>having a kind of an ecosystem where like you know,

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like the tech people are doing tech governance and you

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 1>have like people with like a legal disciplinary skill doing

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:03.760
<v Speaker 1>these types of like more dealing with the legal questions

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to trying to have like a kind of

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 1>passing off of this institution as just technology and so

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that the big the big thing really is

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be UM more diverse governance or like a

0:49:16.239 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>more multidisciplinary approach as opposed to kind of like tech

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>centric approach that we kind of have now and and

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:25.799
<v Speaker 1>and so and so it's not so much about like

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 1>developers really being more realistic about law. I mean, developers

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:30.959
<v Speaker 1>don't want anything to do with law, Like they should

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>be isolated from liability. They shouldn't be making these decisions.

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>These decisions are crazy, like like for the developers to

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:39.799
<v Speaker 1>be making, you know, like it's not appropriate to put

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 1>a software developer in this kind of legal position. And

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 1>so I think, you know, there's a there's a there's

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a need for kind of reimagination of the nature of

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>these institutions or for us to have the kinds of

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:57.279
<v Speaker 1>skills and capacity to deal with these governance and law

0:49:57.320 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>issues that just don't exist in technical disciplinary retraining. That's

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:05.399
<v Speaker 1>a really well point. Well, Vlaud, thank you so much

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for UM coming on odd lots. It's great to hear with,

0:50:08.560 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 1>great to speak with one of the original originals in

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the space, one of the big thinkers, and uh, that

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>was a great conversation. I appreciate you joining us. Yeah,

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:21.839
<v Speaker 1>my pleasure really really fun than thanks a lot, take

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>care of luck. So I thought that was actually super fascinating.

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, Tracy, have you come across like people, uh

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:45.799
<v Speaker 1>like on Twitter who like something bad happens, there's something

0:50:45.840 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, bitcoin fixes this. Have you come across

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like that? No? Never, that's no never seen. Yeah, of course,

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>like bitcoin I once wrote down I think I wrote

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>down all the like things that bitcoin was supposed to

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>fix um and it was a really long list. And

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I remember I think the last the last time I

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:09.560
<v Speaker 1>did this was like during the depths of the COVID crisis.

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Can remember some people were talking about blockchain like fixing

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, which again seemed like a bit of a reach. Well,

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean like obviously would people say that a lot

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 1>of times like okay, I think a lot of times

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they're joking or just you know aligned that people will say.

0:51:25.200 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think like Vlood like raises a really interesting point,

0:51:28.560 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>which and you know, if you want to push a

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>deeper or something, it's like, how can bitcoin fix this?

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 1>If like people who are involved in bitcoin don't actually

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is his point, like don't actually

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 1>seem interested in law or governance, and so like, you know,

0:51:45.920 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there's this sort of like belief that like somehow bitcoin

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 1>itself has these powers to like write ills or whatever.

0:51:51.560 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And yet it's not obvious to me that the people

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 1>who are involved in bitcoin in any way, with whether

0:51:56.800 --> 0:52:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's developers or holders or anything at should you have

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 1>any like interest in engaging on what it would take

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to fix x or y totally. Well, this is why

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I brought up the toxicity point, which is like, if

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a community that like kind of describes itself

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>as we are changing the world, but then won't actually

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>talk very much about ideas of how it's changing the world, um,

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that seems problematic to me. And then the other thing

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is like almost by definition, bitcoin tends to be an

0:52:33.600 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 1>exclusionary community. Um, there's a finite supply of coins um

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that will ever be in existence. And it's sort of

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:44.600
<v Speaker 1>like you know, first come, first serve. If you're an

0:52:44.600 --> 0:52:48.800
<v Speaker 1>early adopter, you're kind of worshiped on the platform. And again,

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like if you're trying to recruit people to the cause,

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a weird stance to take. Like to me,

0:52:58.120 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you would want to be much more open

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and much more engaged and willing at least to talk

0:53:04.120 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about potential issues either with cryptocurrency itself or the underlying technology, right,

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and like okay, like bitcoin isn't going to fix everything,

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but even if you want to say like bitcoin to

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 1>like be more of like a core financial infrastructure as

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>opposed to say gold. Right, So it's like obviously, like

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think like ethereum is the same mutable sort

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of like difficult to change properties as Bitcoin, but you

0:53:29.480 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 1>could see like people within that community they're clearly going

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:35.400
<v Speaker 1>for it, Like they're clearly making an effort to plug

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:40.920
<v Speaker 1>themselves into the financial system. Stable coins that run on ethereum.

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, you get bonds, various synthetic equities that run

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 1>somehow are built on top of ethereum, and so they're

0:53:47.000 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>at least like so you know, you could say like

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that community is at least like trying, whereas you know,

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you could see this sort of like yeah, the bitcoin

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 1>communities like fantasy about like everything is going to run

0:53:57.560 --> 0:54:00.400
<v Speaker 1>on a bitcoin standard, but it's not exactly obvious to me.

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, well, how are you going to get there?

0:54:02.080 --> 0:54:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Like what do you wait? Like what what is the plan?

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>And then the actual like plan of like, well, let's

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 1>make this happen then seems to run into the contradiction

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of to make anything happen would require like governance and

0:54:13.640 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 1>effort totally and like engagement and a minimum, which I

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't see happening like I see bitcoin like bitcoiner

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is sort of hiving themselves off in a corner of

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and talking amongst themselves for the most part um,

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:34.480
<v Speaker 1>which again like is unfortunate in many ways and probably

0:54:35.000 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why Ethereum seems to be um

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>making more in roads into traditional corners of finance. But

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:44.320
<v Speaker 1>then again, like there is that open question of whether

0:54:44.400 --> 0:54:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or not cryptos should be doing that in the first place,

0:54:47.360 --> 0:54:50.080
<v Speaker 1>given the original vision of you know, sort of being

0:54:50.080 --> 0:54:55.360
<v Speaker 1>this anti authoritarian, anti establishment technology. Yeah, but I guess

0:54:55.400 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like just like big picture, like I think like Blood's

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 1>message is like super interesting, which is like if you

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:05.719
<v Speaker 1>are like aiming to create power, And I thought it

0:55:05.800 --> 0:55:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was like his description of just the Internet like setting

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 1>aside like state power, this sort of like feudal internet

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that we've built, which is true where it's like almost

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:16.240
<v Speaker 1>everything you do you sort of like pay a Facebook

0:55:16.239 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 1>tex or an Amazon tax or there's just a handful

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:22.319
<v Speaker 1>of like extremely powerful entities. And so it's like if

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you like have like a vision of replacing that power,

0:55:26.400 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>then you sort of like have to like you know,

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:30.799
<v Speaker 1>think about law experts. And you can't just have like,

0:55:31.239 --> 0:55:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, software developers have it be all on them

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to like think about society and think about law, both

0:55:38.080 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>like sort of literal written law and sort of like

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:42.920
<v Speaker 1>common law, etcetera. And so like the sort of like

0:55:43.120 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>call to like take this stuff seriously, it's a it

0:55:45.360 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>was like super interesting and important. Yeah. Absolutely. Also his um,

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea of sort of creating an independent, separate space

0:55:55.640 --> 0:55:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that you can use to create new agreements or try

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to like come to a new consensus like that to

0:56:02.560 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 1>me sounds intriguing, um, although I still have questions about it,

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 1>but like also very very different to um the bitcoin vision. Yeah. Absolutely, Okay, Um,

0:56:15.280 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 1>shall we leave it there. Let's leave it there, all right.

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:21.160
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:56:21.200 --> 0:56:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wi Isn'tal. You can follow

0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:30.400
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our guest on Twitter,

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Vlad zam Fair. He's at flad Zamfair. Follow our producer

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson. Followed the Bloomberg

0:56:38.560 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>head of podcast, Francesca Levy at Francesca Today. And check

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:45.720
<v Speaker 1>out all of our podcast at Bloomberg under the handle

0:56:46.040 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts. Thanks for listening to