WEBVTT - Monopolies In The U.S. Have Threatened Our Democracy: Tim Wu

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. A

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>big question, especially as the big tech giants sell off

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>today and exert an incredible amount of control over markets,

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is how much control should they have over the tech space?

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>How big should they be allowed to get? And weighing

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in on that as Tim Woo, Professor Law of Law

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>at Columbia Law School, also a contributing opinion writer at

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times, author of a new book, The

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Curse of bigness Antitrust in the New Gilded Age, And

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>just if people don't know who you are, your background

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is tremendous. You've worked in the White House, You've worked

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>at the Federal Trade Commission, You've been a law clerk

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for Judge Postner and Justice Brier. So can we just

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>start with why did you write this book? Now? I

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>think the time has come to start really engaging with

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>these questions again, age old questions about how the US

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>economy is structured and how much monopoly and oligopoly we allow.

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>We face these questions before hundred years ago. I think

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's time to face them once again. Is there a

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>difference between a consumer and a citizen? Uh? Well, they're

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, technically the same people. But I think that

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we have more interests than just our identities as as

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>as consumers. In other words, I think some of the

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>reasons you might want anti trust enforcement our citizen interests.

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>That the political stakes of too much private control over

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>political outcomes. Well, yeah, that was one thing. You sort

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of drew a parallel between monopolies and fascism and that

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>basically democracy depends on a certain sort of equality of businesses.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain. Yeah, sure, Now, I mean this is

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a historic and they every monopolies a fascist enterprise. But

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>there there is this there's this dark history I think

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>where countries allow too much domination of the economy by monopolies,

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>too much power centralized in private companies, have shown themselves

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to to to to dictatorship. Um. You know, the

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>most strong examples were Italy in Germany in the nineteen thirties,

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think when people could really angry, if if,

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>if their needs aren't meant, they feel that the economic

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>system is completely unaccountable, they start turning to stronger, uh

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and more radical leaders. And I'm very worried about the

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>politics of our time going in the same direction that

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the twenty century. Do you see a

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>time when there will be government action to break up

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>companies such as Google and Facebook? I think we're do um.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>There hasn't been a major case in more than twenty years.

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And it was once an American tradition that when you

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have a dominant monopolist of company that dominates an industry

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like Microsoft, off A T and T al Cola standard oil,

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>you go back that the adjustice Department would take a

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>run at them. Uh. They didn't always win, but they

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>broke up a lot. So I would imagine we are

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>do So I just want to push back a little

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>bit because you talked about how big corporations can kind

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of exert their power over the political scenario in a

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>disproportionate way. Someone could argue that actually they could also

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>exert their power, uh, you know, in ways that go

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>against the political establishment and have a lot of power,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it's uh, you know, reducing greenhouse emissions, which is

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing, or whether it's increasing diversity among staff.

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So I mean there's a flip side of that too. No, yeah, no,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I hear you. It just depends on what kind of

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>government you believe in, you know, whether you think that

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the decisions should mainly be made by private industry, which

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>even if they make good decisions, you still have to

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>wonder why is that their decision? Or if you essentially

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>believe in democracy, which is more to do with with

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously with representatives making those decisions. So how do we

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>get here? And how do of a regulator or a

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>judge determine when a business has gotten too big? Yeah?

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're in a There's been a forty

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>year campaign to weaken and feeble that the antitrust laws.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Um it has more success with the Republican Party, but

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>has sort of spread to some degree to both parties.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it was on the road the back.

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>It's associated with Robert Borke, the famous almost justice of

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. Yes, it was borked, but his actually

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>his effect was stronger than many actual justices because so

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>he said he kind of rode the coattails of a

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>movement that said the judiciary is out of control, and

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, VI Opposition Roe v. Wade, a lot of

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>other things, and said, we need to uh. And I

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>think what we've done is destroy something that was once

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>very important to the U. S. Economy, which is a

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>supervision of excessively sized companies and and and breakups were necessary.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>As part of the theme of your book, The Curse

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of bigness Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. You right

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>in a way about Louis Lewis Brandeis, former Justice on

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. I'm wondering if you could just tell

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>people who he was briefly and why you brought him

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>into this discussion. Yes, so, Lewis Brandeis is probably most

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>famous as Justice Supreme Court. He was also a key

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>advisor to Woodrow Wilson the nineteen twelve campaign. And I

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>think he is important for his vision of what the

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>economy could or should be. Uh. He saw the economy

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in in deeper terms. He thought the point of a

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>democracy was flourishing of its citizens and human flourishing more generally.

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>And so he said, you know, we really have to

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 1>realize the economy is the biggest factor in most people's lives,

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and they need the economic liberties economic securities before this

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>will be a place that people really want to live.

0:05:57.960 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes I think we've lost sight of that. We're

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of upset with numbers and you know, did the

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Dow go up today or down? And you know what

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>about what the economy does for what it means to

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>be a citizen of this country. So which mega mergers

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>do you see as being the most dangerous currently? That's

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a great question. I think there's a lot of mergers

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't have let happen. I take the airline industry

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as a good example. I don't think other than shareholders

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of airlines that that that's particularly good for passengers. Just

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>have three major airlines. A huge number of hospital and

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical mergers I think have led to higher prices, worst

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>care UM. In the tech sector, I don't think we

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>should have let Facebook buy all its competitors. I think

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the fallout from that politically, security wise, from

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>having one company with so much domination over social networking. UM.

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, every day there's a new scandal. So I

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>think we see the curse of business across the economy.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I'm not saying something radical. I want

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to return to sort of the American tradition of of

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>competition being our guiding light and decentralized power being how

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>we run the country. Just to stick to a couple

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>of luminaries, perhaps just so that we get a little

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of detail about how you kind of frame the book. Um,

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>John Perry Barlow, Yes, people may not remember him, but

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I've got the gray hair to prove it. Um. He

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>really described a lot of these situations back in the

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties. Well, John Perry Barlow was a figure embellic

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of you know, sort of symbolized the nine nineties where

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone assumed that since tech was so different that we

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't need the old rules. You could never really have

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a tech monopoly. Everything was kind of in cyberspace, and

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need to throw everything out the window.

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that approach led us to ignore some

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of the more obvious anti competitive harms that we're starting

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to appear allow allowed. We basically let the tech companies

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have something of an immunity to the antitrust laws for

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>uh for a decade. And I think now we're reaching

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a time of reckoning. So I have to wonder, you know,

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>at what point is bigness? Okay, right, so how do

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you determine whether something is uh not too big or

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>too I mean, it's sort of it is it is.

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>It's an important point, especially in a global world, albeit

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps less so uh now than it was a year ago. Uh.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And and they're big companies globally that are going to

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>potentially knock others out of the out of the water

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>if they're not big enough and have economies of scale. Yeah. No,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that is definitely one of the hardest question.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it's right to just say, well,

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this company got big, so we better break them up

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>because they're they're big, even though I called the even

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>though I called the book the Curse of Bigness. On

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, I think with the benefit of retrospect,

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of retrospect, if you can see how important it is

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to challenge companies that are no longer able even though

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they're big, to compete on the merits, but have resorted

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to increasing numbers of abusive anti competitive measures. Um. You know,

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>take IBM in the seventies, A T and T in

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the eighties, there were huge companies, and thank goodness, I

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>think we challenged them and broke up a T and

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>T because they had become almost like a parasite on

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the you know, they had started to block and control

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>so many lines of conduct that no entrepreneur could get started.

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So when you have a part of the economy you

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>know that just has started to stagnate because of you

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>suspect a company that is immune to competition and has

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>began to suppress all its competitors. That's when it's time

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for antitrust take action. How close do you think we

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are to a dangerous tipping point with respect to how

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>big the biggest companies have gotten. I think we're there.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that we are in an unprecedented level of

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>concentration in the U. S. Economy. I think we've had

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 1>a decline in entrepreneurship and innovation, and I think we're

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna begin to suffer seriously um from all kinds of

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>sectors becoming places that new companies just can't get started,

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>not to mention the effects on employees and suppressed wages.

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're there. That's why I think there.

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the populist political movements are actually

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>reflecting the concentration of the economy, reflecting a sense of

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>powerlessness among the middle classes, and um. The historic trends

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>all suggest that the moment has come to question whether

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we've let the private sector become too concentrated and too unaccountable.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for being with us. Tim Wu

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>was professor of Law, Columbia Law School. He is also

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the author of the new book entitled The Curse of

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>bigness Antitrust in the New guilded Age, And whatever your perspective,

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it is worth reading because it enjoins the debate that

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>affects everybody's life and business. Tim will thank you very

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>much for being here Long Island City as one of

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>two new headquarters. And the big question has been how

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>much will this impact the commercial real estate market in

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>New York? Joining us now Leslie Wallman Himmel Co, Managing

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>partner of Himmel and marrying off properties focused on New

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>York realists eight. Thank you so much for being with us.

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's just start there. I mean, do you think

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to have a material positive impact

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>on commercial real estate prices both in Long Island City

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>as well as elsewhere in this in New York. First, well,

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me here. UM him all americoth

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>properties that we buy office buildings in Manhattan and the boroughs,

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and we've had a partnership for thirty four years. We

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>purchased a full square block in and with the theory

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>being buying in emerging neighborhoods. People in this last week

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have been saying, you were so smart. That's a long

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>time ago. Thirty Yes, it's it's a building at thirty

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>four two Queens Boulevard. And UM, I can't tell you

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>how many phone calls we've gotten saying you're just such

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a you know how to buy an emerging neighborhood. Well, Amazon,

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon effect is going to be a multiplier effect.

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It's fantastic that they're gonna add jobs. And they picked

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Long Island City. We've been thinking for the last three

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>decades as we've watched the area emerge but very slowly

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>compared to Jersey City, Hoboken, Brooklyn, that it should be developed.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Is so close to Manhattan. You go right across the

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty Night Street Bridge, you go right through the tunnel. Um.

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>The big story here as you watch tech stocks are

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>going down, but the tech companies are expanding in New York.

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>New York is the greatest city in the world to

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>help build careers. Amazon, Google, Facebook, they're all growing in

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>New York. And it's definitely going to increase values in

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Long Island City. But that's it should have happened a

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>long time ago. Now you have been part of I

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know how it maybe fifty a hundred transactions at

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>least in New York, and I mean value over two

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. What are the rents gonna do in Long

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Island City? Because I was looking at a report having

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to do with rents in Seattle right to kind of

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>measure another city that is obviously went through the Amazon transformation. Uh,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>last year, rents in downtown Sea, Seattle, we're about forty

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>two dollars per square foot. Now, if you go back

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and nine, I understand there's regular inflation

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and so on, they were thirty one. So we've got about,

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, a ten dollar increase per square foot. Do

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you see that same magnitude of change coming to Long

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Island City and indeed even to Crystal City in Washington

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>across the Potomac from Washington, where they're gonna put their

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Northern Virginia headquarters. The simple answer is yes. This is

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a simple supply and demand UH equation. When you have

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>an expansion of twenty five thousand workers and many residents

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that are gonna be living there, you have the multiplier

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>effect that you're gonna have more people living there, more

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>people working there. UM we needed that. If you look

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at the buildings I d C and Y Factory Felci

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>UH related has to properties Paragon Blanchard. It's been a

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>little quiet in the office market in the last eighteen months.

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>People bought an anticipation of being able to attract the

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>tammy tenants UM paying mid to high forties. That hasn't

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>really happened. Amazon coming to Long Island City is going

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to help attract many other offices. UM. We bought a

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 1>property just to be granular a year ago in Long

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Island City on the right over the bridge, thinking we

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>were going to make it into again a tammy you know,

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>tech advertising, media and internet building, and we decided it

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>was better to keep it as a hybrid between industrial

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and office. UM. Reality is that's another emerging area that

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>last mild distribution. Many companies that no longer are retailing

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>or actually selling online, So that's going to be expansion

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in the boroughs are going to be for sure fraught

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with expansion in that narrow market as well. So when

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I take the seven train out to Queens and I

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>go past this area, one thing that I see is

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>just cranes everywhere and lots of buildings going up. And

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of people have said that there

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>has been an overbuilding. Uh to a certain degree. Does

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>this even it out? Oh? For sure? Um, I think

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, not only on the residential You saw the

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>building is going up like mushrooms that we're just expanding,

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of people got awful, awfully lucky. Um.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Although I do think that T. F. Cornerstone, who's going

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to be developing a lot of the Amazon, they were

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>pioneers in buying all along the waterfront like fifteen years

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>ago and worked with the city to um develop it. Okay,

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>one other thing, infrastructure, right, I mean, how important is

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it to improve the infrastructure, whether it's the subways, whether

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>their parks. I mean there really aren't that many parks

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in Long Island City. There's the waterfront that's it. I mean,

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>how important are sort of these aspects that perhaps the

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>city won't have that much more money to pay for

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>because Amazon isn't paying them that because they're gonna a

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>tax break. Well, there's always the ferries. That would be

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a great right across the right, but it hasn't necessarily

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>evolved yet to the point where it's as easy as

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a subway. So what so how? I mean, how much

0:15:58.120 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>do they have to develop that and who's gonna pay?

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>For sure? The infrastructure needs to be improved. Um, I

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>think though with all the residential buildings that are there,

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you may have a lot of people who prefer to

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>walk to work. Um, those who are going to come

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>from Manhattan. You do have great subway access, and um,

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's always uber. You bring up an interesting

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>point because there are going to be so many other

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>businesses that profit from having such a huge anchor in

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the neighborhood. Right. We used to think of anchors as

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>being big department stores in malls, But now you're gonna

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>have all the ancillary services and products and companies that

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to be supplying not only Amazon but the

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>people that work at Amazon. Does that mean that this

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a much longer kind of increase

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in real estate value? Well, clearly, if you walk around

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Long Island City, there's very little retail, very little street retail. Um.

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I've spent a lot of time actually on weekends walking neighborhoods.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Surprisingly few restaurants, surprisingly few venues there. They're starting to

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>be that um more retails stores and you're gonna have

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>for sure restaurants, coffee shops, etcetera, all growing. It's like

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you have in Brooklyn. So how much will the trickle

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>out effect be away from Long Island City to other

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>parts of the boroughs in Manhattan really wants to know

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>what's next, what's the next area that no one's discussed.

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>That's great, what's next, but also, you know, does this

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of boost the whole market? I think the Bronx

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is next sat An Island for last mile industrial, a

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies that need online if you will, distribution centers.

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be a huge expansion. And I think

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I said the last time you guys interviewed me that

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Midtown East is next. It's so out it's

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>got to come back in happen disclosure, So we're out.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just about the perspective. Anything you want to offer

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>us in terms of Amazon anything. We should that real

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>estate investors should not get ahead of themselves when they

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>hear Amazon's going there. I think it's all good news

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for New York. Um. And you know, we we all

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>have to be mindful though, not to get to euphoric

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on news like this, because reality of numbers are numbers. Um.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>You know New York City's interest rates are going up

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and vacancy is around tem per cent here, So let's

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>not get ahead of ourselves. Um. The interest rates, I

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>know you did a story and that before, have a

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>huge impact on pricing. And uh, we're lucky. We we

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>financed all of our properties in the last few yearsentary

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent rates and now we're looking at

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>five percent rates. So well wait until the check clearance.

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess is a good A good motto. Leslie Wollman Himmel,

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much, co managing partner Himmel and Marong

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Golf Properties. Talking about Amazon dot Com they're coming to

0:18:55.119 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>New York. Well, we want to learn more about the

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>decline in value of cryptocurrencies, and here to help us

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>do so is Leonel Laurent. He is our Bloomberg opinion columnist,

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and he could knows everything about the world of bitcoin

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and cryptocurrencies. Are joining us from our London bureau, and

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of course you can follow Leonel on Twitter at Leonel R. A.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Laurent Alright, why is bitcoin below five thousand dollars right now?

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It's down about three And this decline in cryptocurrency started

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>last week and it's continuing. It's like a thirteen month low. Why, well, hello,

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for the intro. We said I knew

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.959
<v Speaker 1>everything about bitcoin. I actually don't know it's it's it's value,

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it's price. No one does. And you say the set

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>off began last week, maybe the most recent one did,

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But the bigger picture is it began this whole set

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>off at the end of last year. This whole year

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>has just been one long, massive decline. And to an

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>understand why, we have to understand why it blew up

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. And it blew up because essentially

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it was sold as a new, great utopian, disruptive investment

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that would take over the world of payments. It would

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>become the new gold. It would essentially you know, make

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody rich, uh, and it would be you know, there

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>for the taking for a retail crowd. While all the

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of fiddy duddy bankers would sit back and not

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>get it. And like most dreams, you know, myths, you know,

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>sales pitches, it hasn't come true, and it stopped coming true.

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're seeing right now. I'm happy to

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>go into all the various things that have happened recently,

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>all the news, the hard fork, the regulation, but for me,

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the bigger picture is it was it was a loser,

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a losing strategy to begin with. Well, let's dig in

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to the regulatory or i should say,

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department probe into bitcoin in a number of

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the cryptocurrencies. There was a story today talking about how

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors are homing in on a clutch of crypto currencies

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that potentially they may be alleging work together to manipulate prices.

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Last year a bit the incredible rally. How much is

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that contributing to what we're seeing today. Well, honestly, I'm

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>not sure it should be, because this was again obvious

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to us a year ago. It was obvious to us

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year when cryptocurrencies like Ripple would be you know,

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>suddenly up you know, an incredible amount one day and

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>then quickly sold off the next when we saw there

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>were chat rooms where people would pump and dump small

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and new tokens um. You know, the news is that

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the regulators are actually waking up to this and getting involved, right,

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So the news is they're actually going to spend resources

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to work out what's happened. I think, you know

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I'm looking at Tether, this kind of um,

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, coin that was supposedly redeemable for one real

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar um and was therefore used as a dollar proxy

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>on markets to buy bitcoin. I mean, Tether still exist today, right,

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so perhaps what comes out of this has yet more

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>impact on today's market. But you know, as as a picture,

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, you know, don't don't want to keep

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>on playing the same music. But you know, we we

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>who sort of were skeptical year ago that these were

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>real markets with real price discovery and with you know

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>how kind of put itself regulation being proven right, Well,

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you can play the same music, just use a different instrumentally.

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>And all the question I have is that whenever I

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>asked someone to describe to me in detail, okay, what

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is bitcoin and show me how it works somehow or other.

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And within the first let's say thirty seconds of an answer,

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the conversation pivots to blockchain, as if somehow, because they're

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in favor of blockchain, they can kind of downplay the

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>connection to bitcoin. Have you found that as well, So

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>again we have to think about this in terms of marketing. Um,

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, when when bitcoin was going through, because bitcoin

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>has been around for a while, we we forget it's

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>been around for basically ten years. Um, you know, bitcoin

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>has had these booms and bus before, and when corporations

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>realized that it was not going to be possible to

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, get banks and regulated entities to deal with it,

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>they began to sell the idea of blockchain without bitcoin,

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>this idea that underneath it all there is a totally

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>useful use case which is um, you know, I'm not

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>going to boy with the details, but essentially lots of

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>interconnected databases that would you know, work in concerts and

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>be Tampa proof, which again sounds like a great idea

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in theory until companies sat down and tried to actually

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>implement it. And if it sounds messy enough to have

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, a dozen databases trying to work in concert

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>at a company that is just trying to you know,

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>sell a car from from A to B. Then you know, yeah,

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the reality was it was super complicated. So, you know,

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is the original blockchain, and it is one vision

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of a blockchain. But you know, we have seen many,

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>many reasons why this particular blockchain is not at all

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>what it pitched itself to be, which was a kind

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of perfect decentralized, you know, Tampa proof kind of utopian

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>mechanism for essentially handling payments. Well, it definitely doesn't seem

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>utopian today as it continues it's plunge Leonell Laurent Bloomberg

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.239
<v Speaker 1>opinion calumnists, thank you so much for being with us.

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Definitely been quite a swoon. It'll be interesting to see

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>with some of those bitcoin hedge fund returns, will be

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>considering that maybe what if they were leveraged. One concern

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that has been weighing down on these big tech shares

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>has been the trade tensions with China, right, I mean,

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that's been one of the big issues, and that sort

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of brings us to the next topic, which is mergers

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and acquisitions. Cross boarder US companies looking to acquire Chinese

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>companies or uh or vice versa. David Willard joins is

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>now founder and chief executive and managing partner of fifty

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>two Capital Partners based in San Francisco and New York. David,

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of experience both the mergeras and

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions and com Sacks and Cravat Swaine, but also uh

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>with advising with China relations. And what do you see

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>right now? How many calls are you getting from clients

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>concerned that they will never be able to do another

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>cross border transaction? Again, those calls happen with greater frequency

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in this market at LISTA. It is a tense environment

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, the tariffs, the economic sanctions between the United

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>States and China, It's unprecedented. We are in a new normal.

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I tell our clients the appetite for our services is

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 1>interestingly increasing in this tense environment. Clients have a great

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of uncertainty about the market in China. The domestic

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 1>regulations in China are more onerous for US multinationals and

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>private investment firms that are looking to deploy capital into China,

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and with that there's greater uncertainty. But that being said,

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of clients, a lot of US

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>businesses building a ground game right now. There is optimism

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that there will be a good probability of a rebound

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>in M and A in t SO, M and A

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>clients now are building a ground game in anticipation that

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory environment will improve. That's a really interesting development

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing. What does that mean when you say they're

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>building a ground game, Does that mean they're hiring lots

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of lawyers among that? Uh pam. It's a great point

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>among that a lot of American businesses now in building

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a ground game or conducting massive amounts of what I

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>call front end due diligence. Front End due diligence consists

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of conducting major reviews of the regulatory situation. In China,

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>deals that haven't been you know, fully commenced are basically

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>necessitating a lot of front end review and diligence by lawyers,

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>M and A advisors and corporates. That's a major change

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in the market from three or four years ago, when

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>regulations in China were far less ownerous um. As a result,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it goes without saying M and A deals now are

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 1>more expensive. There's a longer lead time to putting deals

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>in place, and with that, the costs of doing business

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>in China and doing M and A have gone up. Okay,

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So can you just give us a state of play

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>as far as how much M and A you're expecting

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>cross border between with the US companies buying Chinese companies

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and how that compares to the past many are we

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing a material slowdown and do you expect that to continue.

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point, and the data is really interesting, Lisa,

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 1>and I want to mention one point, which is this

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>there is a massive reduction across border M and A

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>which with China this year. The data bears that out

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting however, today there's been about eighty billion US in

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>M and A with China. That is a massive reduction

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>from twenty sixteen. But interestingly, the amount of M and

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>A eighteen surpasses the M and A levels and volumes

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of fifteen in preceding years. So while there's been a

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>massive reduction prior to the two preceding years, on a

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>long term historical basis, eighteen has actually been quite robust.

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And so notwithstanding the tariffs, the economic sanctions, the rhetoric,

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>there's still is good appetite to find good deals and

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to get them across the finish line. And that's a

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>really interesting point. I want to mention if someone came

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to you and said, I'm looking to do a technology deal,

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly in either artificial intelligence or some kind of cyber

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>security industry in China, would you say take a number,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>come back in six months and then we'll talk, or

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll just start doing something now. I would start doing

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>something now. It's a great point. We we deal with

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this situation all the time in my firm, and it

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>goes to the point about building a ground game. We

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know when the regulatory environment and China will change.

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>There is a decent probability will see in t a

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>software environment, but that's a question mark. It's important for

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>businesses in America who are sizing up the m and

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>A landscape in China to conduct due diligence now to

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>understand what the risk is that mofcom or major regulatory

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>agencies in China will step into block major deals. That's

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a really important component for dealmaking today in China, and

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it's important to start that ground game now. So where

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>which industries are you seeing the most interest in terms

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of u as companies looking to acquire Chinese ones. It's

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a great point. Software technology still remain robust. Verticals notwithstanding

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the concerns around intellectual property, theft, data privacy, force, technology transfers.

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>We see the headlines, that is still a concern UM,

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so that remains a robust part of M and A.

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>In addition to that, we're seeing a lot of activity

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in non technology verticals, industrials, sustainability related verticals. Those are

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of attention in China. UM. Those have

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>less of a sort of regulatory burden in China for

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the most part, and as a result, US businesses see

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>those non technology verticals, particularly in industrials, is really attractive

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>from evaluation standpoint to those industrials. Businesses in China are

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>comparatively more attractive in this environment. And with that, private

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>equity firms in the U s are dialed into identifying

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunities in those areas. Just quickly, give you twenty seconds.

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you still have to know someone in the Chinese

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>government in order to get a deal done? It's a

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>great question. The short answer is no. UM. I believe

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it's important to have sound advisors in both the US

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and China in identifying ways to get great deals across

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the finish line in China. UM. Clearly, the regulatory situation

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in China is fascinating, but uh, not necessary from my standpoint.

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>But great question, Pim, Well done, Thanks very much for

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>being with us and sharing this information. David Willard is

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the founder and the chief executive and the managing partner

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of fifty two Capital Partners. They're based in Silicon Valley

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and they also have operations in New York. Thanks for

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>being here and thanks for listening. I'm Pim Fox along

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>with Lisa Abramowitz. This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, sound Out, or whatever

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>at Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one.

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide on

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.