Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to the Buck Brief.
Speaker 1: Fanny Willis, who was supposed to be the Georgia prosecutor
Speaker 1: who finally managed to get a conviction of Donald Trump
Speaker 1: in state court, She's not going to be on that
Speaker 1: case much longer. In fact, by the time you listen
Speaker 1: to this, she might have already been removed. I'm speaking
Speaker 1: to you Friday morning, after deep diving into all of
Speaker 1: this over the weekend. And here's the thing. If the
Speaker 1: people who were going after Trump were ethical, they wouldn't
Speaker 1: be going after Trump in the way they are in
Speaker 1: the first place, would they. Whether we're talking about Fannie
Speaker 1: Willis or Jack Smith or Alvin Bragg, go down the list.
Speaker 1: There's something in common here, isn't there. These individuals are
Speaker 1: all crazy partisans, and so everything that they're doing here
Speaker 1: is effectively a mission from the Democrat Party. In fact,
Speaker 1: there's plenty of reporting already that whether it's Fani or
Speaker 1: Jack or Alvin, they've all been to different parts of
Speaker 1: the White House. They've all been to visit the Biden
Speaker 1: or different individuals in the White House have talked to them.
Speaker 1: They've had conversations. Why is that going on? Interesting, isn't it? Now?
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you there's a very real chance here
Speaker 1: that not only is Fannie Willis removed from the case.
Speaker 1: I think she's likely to be disparked. I do not
Speaker 1: think they will criminally prosecute her.
Speaker 2: Should they, Yes, will they?
Speaker 1: I don't think so, because I think that the system
Speaker 1: will say, oh, well, she is a prominent black female
Speaker 1: member officer of the court, and she suffered enough, and
Speaker 1: she's been humiliated in all this. But understand, she didn't
Speaker 1: just want to lock up Donald Trump. She wanted to
Speaker 1: lock up nineteen people I think eighteen plus Trump or
Speaker 1: nineteen plus Trump, a whole bunch of folks. Now she
Speaker 1: allowed some of them to already plead out of this,
Speaker 1: this ridiculous racketeering charge. The whole thing is an absolute
Speaker 1: abuse of the law. But this is somebody who was
Speaker 1: threatening to throw people in prison for nothing. She should
Speaker 1: suffer the full consequences under the law of her corrupt action.
Speaker 1: And this is one of the big problems that Republicans
Speaker 1: continuously face. This is one of the major challenges here.
Speaker 1: We don't play as nasty and as dirty as the
Speaker 1: other side, even when they deserve it, and we don't
Speaker 1: make them suffer the consequences of their actions in a
Speaker 1: way that sends a message for the the next time around.
Speaker 1: He said, Okay, I don't want to go too far.
Speaker 1: I don't want to cause problems here, so I'm just
Speaker 1: going to let it go. They've suffered enough now. The
Speaker 1: people who are bringing these politicized prosecutions against Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: they should all lose their law licenses, they should lose
Speaker 1: their jobs, and those who have broken laws in the
Speaker 1: process should go to prison.
Speaker 2: They should have.
Speaker 1: To suffer the consequences of this. Anybody who's been paying
Speaker 1: attention to the Fannie Willis saga, it's the testimony that
Speaker 1: she gave was fascinating but also very frightening in a sense.
Speaker 1: Because you watched this woman when she was up there recently,
Speaker 1: and then also Nathan Wade, her lover that was hired
Speaker 1: for six hundred thousand dollars to help with the case
Speaker 1: against Donald Trump. You watch and you think to yourself,
Speaker 1: this woman was making decisions about whether people should go
Speaker 1: to prison or not. This woman was bringing prosecution udents
Speaker 1: that were destroying careers and lives. That doesn't make me
Speaker 1: feel very good about what's going on in Fulton County, Georgia,
Speaker 1: Atlanta area.
Speaker 2: Right, that's not good.
Speaker 1: That's not encouraging for those of us who wonder, how
Speaker 1: is the judicial system and the prosecutorial system a prosecutorial
Speaker 1: component of it, how's it doing these days?
Speaker 2: The answer is not well.
Speaker 1: And what we have here is, yeah, the Fannie List thing,
Speaker 1: she's lying, she clearly hired her lover. She wasn't honest.
Speaker 1: They keep playing these games, well, what's a relationship, or
Speaker 1: she wasn't honest about when any of this was started.
Speaker 1: And now there's the text messages that have been released
Speaker 1: in court. There's clearly a cover up going on. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's a mess. It's a mess.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: If it wasn't a mess, it would already be over.
Speaker 1: They would have already been able to put this to rest.
Speaker 1: And as I said, I'm making a prediction right now
Speaker 1: that the judge, because as I said, it's Friday morning,
Speaker 1: as I'm doing this podcast, I'm making a addiction that
Speaker 1: the judge will remove.
Speaker 2: Her from the case, has to remove her from the case.
Speaker 1: And then that takes us to a place where, well,
Speaker 1: what happens to this case overall? I know they're going
Speaker 1: to argue and they're going to try to continue this situation,
Speaker 1: but I don't think that that's going to.
Speaker 2: Work very well.
Speaker 1: And I want to get into why, and also some
Speaker 1: of the other legal cases happening right now.
Speaker 2: And I'll just give you this thought.
Speaker 1: It looks to me like the multi pronged legal ambush
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump is such a spectacular failure that it
Speaker 1: may almost on its own, propel him to be.
Speaker 2: The next president of the United States.
Speaker 1: And what could be a bigger failure than that, Not
Speaker 1: only will they fail to imprison him or even convict him,
Speaker 1: he will end up being president again. That is how
Speaker 1: it looks today. I don't know what the future holds,
Speaker 1: but it certainly seems like it is moving in that direction.
Speaker 1: But let's talk about gold for a moment, because things
Speaker 1: can change the economy really fast, and you want to
Speaker 1: prepare before you need to prepare, if you know what
Speaker 1: I mean, before you recognize, oh my gosh, I got
Speaker 1: to make a move. That's why the Oxford Gold Group
Speaker 1: is something you need to check out, because you want
Speaker 1: to have real gold and silver nowadays. I mean we
Speaker 1: barely carry cash, right, I think about this, how much
Speaker 1: of your money is numbers on the screen of a computer,
Speaker 1: Probably all of it these days, Right, maybe you keep
Speaker 1: a couple hundred bucks at home in cash. Having some
Speaker 1: gold on hand just makes sense. It diversifies your holdings.
Speaker 1: Gold increases in value historically over time. You look at
Speaker 1: a long time from look at the last forty years.
Speaker 1: Is gold worth more today or less than it was.
Speaker 2: Forty years ago? That's worth a lot more. So take
Speaker 2: a look at what they do for you. Over the
Speaker 2: Oxford Gold Group.
Speaker 1: Also with inflation and the money printing going on, you
Speaker 1: just want to have some gold on him. Talking about diversifying,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying go all in on gold. You know,
Speaker 1: you want to do something that's smart for you, smart
Speaker 1: for your portfolio. And that's why the Oxford Gold Group
Speaker 1: has experts you can talk to say, Look, this is what.
Speaker 2: I'm looking to spend.
Speaker 1: They want long term customers, they want people that are
Speaker 1: buying gold for them this year, next year, over the
Speaker 1: next five years, with the next ten years. So they're
Speaker 1: going to help you get something that's comfortable makes sense
Speaker 1: for you because that kind of diversification in precious metals
Speaker 1: just makes sense. Oxford Goldgroup dot com slash free. Go
Speaker 1: to Oxford Gooldgroup dot com slash free. Requested infoKit today
Speaker 1: make a purchase of precious metals. You may qualify for
Speaker 1: up to ten thousand dollars in free precious metals. Oxford
Speaker 1: Goldgroup dot com slash free. That's Oxford Goldgroup dot com
Speaker 1: slash free. Now I was talking to you about where
Speaker 1: all these other illegal cases are going, the Florida case.
Speaker 1: Trump has requested that the Florida case begin, I think
Speaker 1: in August, meaning the mar Lago documents case. And this
Speaker 1: is very interesting to me because what this means is
Speaker 1: Trump is trying to box out the j six case
Speaker 1: because you can't run two trials at the same time,
Speaker 1: because he has to be in person for the criminal
Speaker 1: trial every single day. There's no way around that. And
Speaker 1: so he's thinking Judge Cannon, unlike Judge Chuckkin, is not
Speaker 1: some you know, crazy anti Trump partisan, Judge Cannon, will
Speaker 1: at least be fair in terms of process to him.
Speaker 1: And beyond that, I think he thinks that Judge Cannon
Speaker 1: will allow him the full scope of all of his
Speaker 1: different challenges there's classified documents at issue. So if she
Speaker 1: gives him just normal judicial process, he'll easily be able
Speaker 1: to run out the clock. Whereas with Judge Chuckkin in
Speaker 1: the j six case in DC, she'll say no, no, no, deny,
Speaker 1: deny denied. Let's go, let's go, let's go get it
Speaker 1: before a jury, get that conviction. She's basically a prosecutor
Speaker 1: in judicial robes. That's how Judge Chuckkin in DC on
Speaker 1: the January sixth case is operating, has been operating up
Speaker 1: at this point. Same thing with the DC Court of Appeals.
Speaker 1: So what you have now is Trump recognizing Okay, why
Speaker 1: don't and this is the Trump legal team, They've already
Speaker 1: requested this, why don't we try to get the document's
Speaker 1: case to start? Will say, okay, if it starts in August,
Speaker 1: Oh but wait, what about DOJ guidelines that say he
Speaker 1: can't have the case then hmmm, Well that's not really
Speaker 1: Trump's fault, is it. And if he's going to have
Speaker 1: a fair defense, he needs the time to prepare. And
Speaker 1: if the time to prepare means the trial has to
Speaker 1: start in August, well then really the trial should start
Speaker 1: after the election. For mar A Lango, but we'll see,
Speaker 1: we'll see how this all, how this all goes, I mean,
Speaker 1: will the DOJ bring these charges, will they allow this
Speaker 1: to continue as it is? My sense right now is
Speaker 1: that they're going to shut down the Well, the Atlantic case,
Speaker 1: which I moved from, is going to be on hiatus
Speaker 1: for a little bit, because when your lead prosecutor has
Speaker 1: such a spectacular, catastrophic fall from grace in public where
Speaker 1: she shows herself to be just incompetent, dishonest, corrupt, very
Speaker 1: hard to put that forward and have the public view
Speaker 1: this as any kind of a judicial proceeding worthy of
Speaker 1: the name. So I think that Atlanta has probably fallen apart.
Speaker 1: Then we get to the J six trial. You know,
Speaker 1: I'll give you my J sixth sense here in just
Speaker 1: a second. Look, this comes at a really important time.
Speaker 1: Patriot Defender. I've partnered with Patriot Defender. I am a
Speaker 1: Patriot Defender member. Here's what they do. They provide you
Speaker 1: with a no cost legal defense, so that if you
Speaker 1: find yourself attacked.
Speaker 2: For your constitutional rights.
Speaker 1: So whether we're talking about defending yourself second and with
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment, your free speech rights at a town
Speaker 1: hall meeting or at a school board meeting. If you
Speaker 1: suffer consequences from people attacking you for constitutionally protected rights,
Speaker 1: Patriot Defender can provide you with a no cost legal defense.
Speaker 1: So if your business, your income, or your reputation are
Speaker 1: harmed due to the weaponization of government for ideological reasons. Basically,
Speaker 1: if the wokeness comes for you, you have a no
Speaker 1: cost defense option from Patriot Defender. If you're a member,
Speaker 1: membership costs very little, very easy to get to get
Speaker 1: set up. I am one and I'm a partner in
Speaker 1: Patriot Defender because I really believe in what they're doing.
Speaker 1: I think people need to have this, especially if you
Speaker 1: want to be more active in your community. You want
Speaker 1: to be speaking out, you want to be doing things
Speaker 1: to help save this country, you want to have Patriot Defender.
Speaker 1: The website is patriot deefender dot com.
Speaker 2: Very easy.
Speaker 1: Patriotdefender dot com the only membership that goes beyond just
Speaker 1: concealed carried weapon defense. It'll cover what others won't to
Speaker 1: protect you, your family and your livelihood. It treats your
Speaker 1: constitutional rights as sacred, which they are. Patriot defender dot
Speaker 1: com again, go to patriotdefender dot com. Now where do
Speaker 1: I think where do I think this is all heading with.
Speaker 2: The j six trial.
Speaker 1: I think the Supreme Court, which we know now is
Speaker 1: going to be holding arguments oral arguments in April on this.
Speaker 1: It's fascinating is that they're doing what jack Smith. Jacksmith says, hey,
Speaker 1: expedite this, let's go. They say, okay, jack Smith, will
Speaker 1: expedite it, and then the left complains about it, because
Speaker 1: unless the Supreme Court is basically part of the Democrat
Speaker 1: apparatus that is hell bent on locking Trump up, it's
Speaker 1: unacceptable to them. It is unacceptable to them, right, And
Speaker 1: so that then means they'll complain at every step of
Speaker 1: the way, even though they're the ones who have been
Speaker 1: abusing process for political reasons. They're the ones who are
Speaker 1: saying it has to go faster, faster, faster, because the
Speaker 1: public has a speedy right to which the defendant first
Speaker 1: and foremost has the right to a fair defense and
Speaker 1: a speedy trial as the defendant wants one. But it
Speaker 1: doesn't mean, you know, the public doesn't have a right
Speaker 1: to give you a speedy trial that last two days
Speaker 1: if it's going to take a lot more than that
Speaker 1: to go through the process. Right, So it has to
Speaker 1: be fair process. You have to have your due process
Speaker 1: rights respected in the judicial proceedings. And that means it
Speaker 1: can't all be done. Oh you know, your lawyers have
Speaker 1: one day to get back on you know, one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand different documents.
Speaker 2: I mean, obviously there are ways it could be abused.
Speaker 1: Right, they are abusing a process against Trump and then
Speaker 1: complaining when anyone steps in and says enough is enough.
Speaker 1: So's that's where things stand right now. I think they're
Speaker 1: going to have the oral arguments in obviously in April.
Speaker 1: They've already said that. I think the decision comes down
Speaker 1: from a Supreme Court. It will hold that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: does not have total immunity, and the Supreme Court will
Speaker 1: then have structured what immunity for a president means, and
Speaker 1: I think it'll be something along the lines of within
Speaker 1: the scope of established presidential authority and duties. So you
Speaker 1: can't say, oh, I just killed my secretary, you know,
Speaker 1: with a paperweight in the oval office as the president.
Speaker 1: I'm the president, so that's legal. You can't have that.
Speaker 1: But you can say, if the president orders an airstrike
Speaker 1: on foreign territory because he thinks that there's a national
Speaker 1: security threat to the United states. You can't lock him
Speaker 1: up for that, right, stuff like that, or you can't
Speaker 1: lock him up for saying I think the election had problems.
Speaker 1: My lawyers are going to be bringing challenges in court.
Speaker 1: You can't lock them up for that because that's within
Speaker 1: the scope of presidential authority. But he doesn't have total authority,
Speaker 1: and so I think, or rather total immunity, and so
Speaker 1: I think that it will go back down and they'll say,
Speaker 1: all right, now you know what presidential immunity exists and
Speaker 1: does not exist. He does not have total immunity. So
Speaker 1: the trial will be able to proceed. And I think
Speaker 1: that they're going to then try to get the J
Speaker 1: six trial going in probably August. Now, maybe it's boxed
Speaker 1: out by the Florida trial already, in which case, too
Speaker 1: bad for them. Maybe they just can't get it in time.
Speaker 1: Maybe the DOJ realizes that setting that trial in that
Speaker 1: kind of a timeframe would be a problem because that's
Speaker 1: what the DOJ guidelines say. But we'll have to see,
Speaker 1: we'll have to see how that all shakes out. But
Speaker 1: I'm feeling better about Trump's prospects to beat Joe Biden
Speaker 1: than I have all year right now, be honest with you.
Speaker 1: I think Trump is going to win this election, and
Speaker 1: what I've talked to you about today is a big
Speaker 1: part of why I.
Speaker 2: Think he's going to win this election.
Speaker 1: You know, a lot of people are talking about Belize
Speaker 1: these days. Belize a great country. Just talked to friends
Speaker 1: about it yesterday. Fun place to visit, easy Caribbean destination,
Speaker 1: easy flights from Chicago, Minneapolis, Houston, LA, Miami, Atlanta. And
Speaker 1: there's white sandy beaches to greet you, rainforest to explore.
Speaker 1: It's a country that's safe to visit and a great
Speaker 1: place to relax. Float through caves, down a jungle river,
Speaker 1: climb an ancient mine, ruin, swim with nurse, sharks and rays, snorkel,
Speaker 1: scuba dive, amazing stuff. Some of the best diving, actually,
Speaker 1: I think you'll get anywhere in the world is in Belize.
Speaker 1: Belize is fun for so many reasons. Go to belizeesfun
Speaker 1: dot com to get the guide again. That's Belize is
Speaker 1: Fun dot com. Belize is Fun dot com. Thanks for
Speaker 1: hanging to your team. We're gonna put out more videos,
Speaker 1: so if you're not already a subscriber on the YouTube,
Speaker 1: please go to Buckbrief on a YouTube, check out a
Speaker 1: buck brief, and I will talk to you more on Monday.
Speaker 2: Shields High