WEBVTT - FTX Shows Crypto Still the ‘Wild West’

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>My name is Mike Reagan. I'm a senior editor at

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and i'm Data higher Across Asset reporter with Bloomberg.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>This week on the show, Well, just when it looked

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like the crypto market had stabilized following the massive blow

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>up of the Terra ecosystem earlier this year, here comes

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>another big blow up, this one arguably more surprising and

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>even more systemically important to the whole industry. Sam Bakman

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Fried's FTX Exchange. Now, before this, he and his firm

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>were long considered one of the most stable cornerstones of

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the industry, with the third year old billionaire known as

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>FBF even being described as the JP Morgan or Warren

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Buffett of digital assets. Even if you've never even dabbled

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in cry though you've probably watched f t X is

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>funny Super Bowl ad with Larry David, we're seeing FBF

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>paddling around with Tom Brady, or maybe you noticed the

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>f t X logo on the chest of Major League umpires.

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So what does it mean for the market when such

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>a high profile pillar of the industry collapses in a

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>matter of days. We'll get into it with the chief

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>executive and the chief investment officer of a quantitative crypto

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund. But first, fil Donna. You know before every

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>podcast you write down like forty seven questions to ask.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I have so many, so many questions. Now we had

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we actually had SPF himself on this podcast, and I

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>noticed you never asked him like, hey, SPF, when's your

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>thing going to blow up? Well? That but that's the

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>thing about his whole company is that everybody thought they

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>were going to be I mean, they were like the

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>gold Star right. And I'll confess I had a do

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>quan on the podcast one week when it did not

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>occur to me to ask him, when's your thing going

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to blow up? Hopefully no more blow ups. I'm blushed.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>People can't see me, but I'm blushing. But you know what,

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, in crisis, there's opportunity when stuff blows up.

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes traders make the most of it. Yes, I do

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in our guests. This is the perfect

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>week for us to be talking to them. I'm really

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>excited to have them on. We have Sadie Rainey. She's

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a co founder and CEO of Stricks Leviathan and Nico Cordero,

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>he's a ce IO at the company. Welcome to both

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of you, and thanks so much for joining us on

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>this week's show. Thanks for having us. It's really nice

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to be here. Despite this week likewise, great to be here.

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely a rough week, and I do want to

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>get into um all about you guys, and um what

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>you do and how you're faring and what this week

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>has like has been like for for both of you

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and for your teams. But maybe Sadie, we just start

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>start with you and and I'm hoping you can just

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>lay out for our audience what exactly happened this week?

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>What were some of the major factors the major players involved.

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So great question. I think that's actually the question that

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody's trying to figure out right now. What what did

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 1>happen or what is happening? And the big big issue

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>here is really I don't think we have all the

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>pieces of of information. And really it started at the

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>end of last week when there was some back and

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>forth between Finance and f t X on Twitter. You know,

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of I guess allegations going around,

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>which there was an immediate response from f t x um,

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of that everything's fine, We're all fine, um.

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And then suddenly, you know, there was very clear signs

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of distress um for f t X in the market,

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and Finance came forward with an offer to acquire or

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>bail out f t X more or less, which was

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>very quickly rescinded um. And in that whole process there

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was a large run on f t x um which

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>dried up their liquidity, leading to them freezing withdrawals. And

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>now there is a very aggressive attempt by f t

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>X too finds a solution to their liquidity so that

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they can make their investors whole. You know. Also, if

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>i'd be curious if did this catch you guys as

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>much of a surprise as it did the rest of us. Yeah,

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it did to be frank, I mean, the speed of

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>which we turned from you know, small rumors on the

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>internet that didn't seem to have validity into f t

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>X freezing accounts was all in a span of about

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty six hours. And like you mentioned in the opening,

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, f t X was largely considered the most

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>trustworthy institutional player in the space outside of the us

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>UM so not including coin base and others. Um, so, yeah,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. It was. It was quite a shock, um,

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:54.679
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of folks are surprised and angry rightfully. So, yeah, Nicole,

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>I imagine it's and and city. I imagine it's impossible

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to run a crypto hedge fund without having some sort

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of exposure to ft X, you know, either as a

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>client or counterparty in some ways. It is it creating

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>any issues for you guys, Yeah, I mean it is

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>difficult to not have exposure to them, you know, within

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the US. You know, preferably we'd like to keep our

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>capital in the US under US regulated exchanges. But if

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you want access to derivatives, perpetual futures and capital efficiency

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>through the type of instruments that are offered offshore, you like,

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to be off shore, you know. So we

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 1>were there. We're a counter party to them. We do

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have some funds frozen there. It's not the best of situations,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>but luckily for us, we are, you know, place a

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>large emphasis emphasis on risk management, and so we only

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>had a small portion of our portfolio allocated there, simply

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>because this space is the wild West, and you know,

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you expect these things that happened just not to ft

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>X any communications or indications of of one n F

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll be able to withdraw funds. At this time, it's

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a very fluid situation. We're not sure you know what's

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>happening behind the scenes. And Sady, maybe you can talk

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>about just the significance of the events, because we've been

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about how it's been a rough week.

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Obviously crypto markets tanked at one point during the week

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like the horrible sentiment from crypto also had

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>spilled over into the equity space where we saw the

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred also selling off. Just what is the significance, Like,

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>how momentous of what unfolded over the past couple of days.

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>How momentous is it? It's really momentous in this situation.

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've been through a number of market crashes

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, in the past have also traded with Voyager,

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>or we've used Voyager, not for trading, but we've used

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Voyager in the past. We also use block Fire, and

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>when there were some indicators that maybe there they were

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could say over over their skis um,

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we stopped trading with them, you know, well ahead of

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of what happened last spring, and this one I don't

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>think anyone saw coming. You know, it was really quick

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>how it happened. It was really fast. And I was

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>actually speaking at coin al It's last week up in

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco on Thursday, ironically, and one of the topics

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I too talked about was risk and how you know,

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the reason people love this industry is because the crazy

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>returns you can get, but you know, you pay for

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that with with risk, and you have risk across every avenue,

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and counterparty risk is just one of those risks. So

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you really have to make sure that you're looking at,

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the areas out there, um, and you're

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>never literally putting your eggs in one basket because you

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>can never be sure at this stage that everything is

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>what it what it looks like it is on face value.

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Was it also much more shocking considering that we basically

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>had like weeks or even months of a very I

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>guess we could call it a calm market where we

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>really didn't see prices searching or plunging in any way,

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>but just like meandering for a really long time. Yeah,

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's exactly correct. I mean, from the outside

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>looking in, it looked like crypto was stabilizing, has sort

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of forming a foundation from which to find strength after

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the chaos of May and June um and things were

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>starting to trend, you know, upwards again. Things you're starting

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to look um like crypto used to look in the

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>early bowl markets. And then obviously everyone was sidewiped by

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this revelation that you know, very few if anyone, saw coming,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, city, I know sort of one of the

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>appeals of quant investing is that, you know, you let

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the math do the work and you sort of take

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>out the human emotion of things. So this strikes me

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>as something that you know, even a quant strategy is

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>going to struggle with just such an out of the

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>blue occurrence. So I'm curious if you could talk about

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>some of your strategies. Um, I know, you have a

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>market neutral strategy that in theory, you know, should be

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>able to weather a type of collapse in prices like

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this better than a sort of on only or levered

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>up long strategy. How does this type of event affect

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a quant um is it is it the type of

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that you're just you know, as clueless as everyone else,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>or is you know, is there something about being a

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>quant in the space that allows you to navigate it

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a little better. Uh. In general, yes, we I definitely

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>believe we can navigate a lot of these incidents much

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>more efficiently than than a lot of our I guess

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our comrades out there. But really, you know,

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>quant is non human. Uh. You know, it's it's looking

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>at the data, it's it's trusting the data. And but

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to set up your system with a very

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>risk oriented mentality. So you have to you have, the

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>computer can can only be as good as as you

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>let it be in those situations. And you can't just

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>listen to everything that your your signals say. You know,

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to set it up so that you are

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>mitigating risk. Do you always have to have multiple counterparties

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in these this industry, you can't. You can't trade with

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>just one one place. You also have to make sure

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that you have you know, we set maximums for any

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>one counterparty. Um. So even though prices might be the

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>best in trading, might be might be the most profitable

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>with one exchange, We're not going to put eight of

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>our funds there. We just we just won't. We're not

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>willing to do that. And you know, so our portfolio

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>has limits per per trading partner, it has overall limits

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 1>for signals. You know, we are a long short fund

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and our main fund, our system will only go to

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a certain percentage short, so you know, it doesn't matter

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what the market looks like UM, and if all of

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>our signals wanted to short it, we still wouldn't short.

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>We'd only shot up to UM the threshold percentage. So

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have to really make sure that your

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>guard rails are set in place for for a quant fund.

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, having different strategies definitely helps. Having

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a market neutral d FI fund helps in this situation. Having,

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, our d FI fund was you know, has

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you know so far been completely unaffected by this because

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it's self custodied UM using decentralized exchanges, so we don't

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>have the centralized party risk of somebody mishandling our our

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>funds without us knowing it. So the system, though again

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just being repetitive, but the system is only as

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>good as as what you train it to be. I'm

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>sure you guys don't want to sort of give up

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the ingredients of the secret sauce or anything, but I'm

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>curious what sort of some of the main elements are

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of your strategies and I'm guessing trend following and momentum

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>plays a big role. Yeah, and the flagship funds, you know,

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>that's trects. We have systematic in nature, takes direction or

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>exposure both on the lawn and short side. We have

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a mixture of trend momentum, cross sectional momentum us really

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>plain relative value across the assets that we trade, as

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>well as some idiosyncratic signals that are that we found

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>about unique market structure within crypto. UM you know, would

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>pick up the bulk of the of the systematic fund

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and then on the market neutral with DeFi yield funds.

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's largely driven by yield opportunities with a

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 1>with a heavy risk overlay being able to hedge out,

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, crypto data exposure in uh you know, a

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto native way entirely on chain without having to interact

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>with centralized counterparties. So, Nico, can you actually talk more

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about your market neutral fund, because this is something I

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>had been writing about over the summer when UM well

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>and also earlier in the year we had crypto prices

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.359
<v Speaker 1>crashing in May and June and what market neutral strategies

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>do is they tend to hold up better during those times. Right,

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So maybe can you just lay out for our audience

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>what is the market neutral strategy and how is it

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>faring on during weeks like the one we just had. Yeah,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so market neutral in this sense is we have some

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>exposure to crypto price movement through the assets that we're

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>holding within a variety of decentralized that change and other

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>defy protocols. But then we utilize hedging strategies to net

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>out that price exposure. UM. So that way, you know,

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>if ethereum goes up, um, you know, our long holdings

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and ethereum go also go up, but are short exposure

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>goes down and it kind of nets out. There's more

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to it than that, you know, it requires real time

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>rebalancing to account for impermanent loss and and other issues

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that arise onto centralized of changes. But in a nutshell,

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that's how it works. So does this event this week?

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Will it change your strategies going forward? Change the way

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you do business? You know, it sounds like in a

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>way you were, you know, sort of prepared for something

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like this to happen, you know, limiting your counterparty exposure

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of thing. But what's is there a

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>lesson learned that that you'll carry for forward from this

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>week's events. I mean, for one, we'll probably reduce our

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>individual exposure anyone counterparty even more. Um. It gets difficult

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>because there are not a lot of large exchanges with

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>good liquidity that you can trust. And then we've also

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>started the very initial conversations of like around okay, do

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we take our flagship fund and only interact on decentralized

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>options uh to to mitigate the central the centralized counter

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>party risk. Um. So that's early stage discussion. But because

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we run the market neutral DE five fund, we have

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>all the technical infrastructure in place too, self custody our

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>flagship fund and you know, only interact on uh, you know,

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>on chain and Sadie, maybe you can just, um just

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the basics, basically, tell us more

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>about you guys company, how you got interested in crypto,

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you can even fold in a bit about

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>your background and Nicho's background, because you guys both have

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>very interesting, um sort of past lives before your your

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>crypto lives. Sure happy to kind of give a little

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>more color about our background. Um So I'm the co

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>founder of strict Slevive and and UM originally founded the

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>company with Jesse Proudman about five years ago. And I

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>met Jesse when I went to work UM for him

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>at his last startup, UM, which was a private cloud company.

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I was financial controller there. That company was acquired by

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>IBM in so I stayed on led the integration of

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the accounting and finance operations teams into Big Blue. Didn't

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>really love UM going into a three sixty thou person

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>company after being in a sixty person startup. And Jesse

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was a distinguished engineer at IBM, so he UM. You know,

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he ended up in their blockchain group and really fell

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>down the crypto rabbit hole, as we all do. We'd

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>stay good friends. So I knew he was getting more

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and more into crypto and you know, dabbling and mining

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and trading UM, but then really really got passionate about

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>trading and from as a technologist, felt like that was

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a huge opportunity UM. So approached me towards the end

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of seventeen and said, hey, I've got this business idea. UM,

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>what do you think You knew that we needed to

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>have structure and operations and legal and compliance. But that's

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>all stuff that he finds UM as exciting as watching

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>paint dry. So he's like, hey, can you know, do

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to do this? I know that's kind of

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>your wheelhouse. So that's how we started. I was really

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at trading in the space and you know, individually trading.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Back at that point in time in crypto, it was

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>impossible to capture any kind of UM gains efficiently. You know,

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you could see the price discrepancies across different exchanges, but

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>by the time you could actually execute a trade, there

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>was no profit left in it. You know, you couldn't

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>trade by a p I or if you did trade

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>by a PI, you know, trades were dropped or double filled,

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>or would look like they weren't filled, and then two

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>days later they'd show up as completed. And so it was.

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>It was just super inefficient. So UM we started a

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>launch of fund um with actually Jesse as the main

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>investor to start and some of his friends and then

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>m built the trading technology at the same time. UM

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>launched the fund, the first fund in April ofen and

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>by then realized that our technology was just as valuable

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>UM as as our fund methodology was. So UM and

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>stepping back a little bit. After we we formed the

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>company officially in January, we realized we needed somebody with

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>much deeper finance UM skill set than we had. So

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where we were introduced through a friend to Nico

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was you know, it was as soon as

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we met Nico, we we knew like, this is this

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is the person that we're going to grow this company with.

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>So um he joined really early on as well. So

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>when you know, when we went live and April and

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>bought our first bitcoin, which the price at that point

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in time was nine thousand dollars UM thereabouts. UM, you know,

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Nico was there placed our first trade. So it's been

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome to have him at the Helm since then. Yeah, Nico,

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:18.719
<v Speaker 1>why don't you why don't you take it from there?

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>How did you end up in this rabbit hole? Uh?

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>What's your what's your back story? Yeah? Absolutely, um, so high.

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I ended up in the rabbit hole of crypto as

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I used to be in the U. S. Military spense

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of time over in Iraq and Afghanistan. Um it was

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>around two thousand and ten. I think it was the

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>first time I read about bitcoin. UM. I did not

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>put everything I had into it, or I'd be retired

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>on an island right now. But I was entirely fascinated

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>by this concept of decentralized currency that had no intermediaries

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and no overarching control. I mean, it was very hard

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to sit in Iraq and looking around at the you know,

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the complete collapse of their infrastructure and not see the

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 1>value add um, which is not as easily visible from

0:18:58.359 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the streets of the US where we don't have to

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>worry about those things. Yeah, what I'd like to rewind

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and get back to the idea of

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>defy um. You know, as you point out UM, I

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like defy has a bit of a told you

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>so a moment right now after what happens to a centralized,

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>huge important player like f t x UM. So I'm curious,

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>where are the opportunities in defy that are most exciting

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>to you guys, and especially in the you know, the

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>notion of yield farming. I feel like that seemed to

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>get pretty toxic after the collapse of of Terra and

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>it's it's anchor program. UM. So what you know, is

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>yield farming too risky these days? Or or there or

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>their places where you know, it's still attractive. Uh and

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and sort of what projects what you know? Are you

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>are you finding the opportunities in these days? Yeah, definitely,

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>hadn't I told you moment here, Kase. Everybody who operates

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on de FI is sitting with their own capital, in

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>their own self custodied wallets and not worrying about some

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>third party stirring off the their funds um and do

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>any illicit things with it. Um. So definitely, and I

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>told you so a moment. In terms of your farming,

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>there's still plenty of opportunities out there. I mean, this

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is we're very early stages. I know at this point.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, Bitcoin has been around for you know, it's

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been almost thirteen years now since the White paper

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>originally came out, But all of these additional use cases

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>around the centralized finances are still in their infancy. So

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, if the trillions of dollars of global economy,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>even if it captures one percent of it, you know,

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity is still quite massive. Um. And so the

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>opportunity still remains, and we're still pretty bullish on it. Nico.

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk a little bit more about what you

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>guys are doing right now? Maybe you can give us

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>just a bit more specifics. I know, and the notes

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you had sent to us, which granted you sent before

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>everything happened, but you said that there are potentially some

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 1>areas in the space that are undervalued. So can you

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>just tell us a bit more about that from an

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>undervalued or overvalued perspective? Like one of the reasons we

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>built the system we did on the flagship funds because

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that is an impossible number to peg um. You know,

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>she's bit coined, be a million dollars or a thousand

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars or less, like no one really knows, and it's

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>dependent on future IDIO seeing credit events involving the decisions

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>by governments all around the globe. So it's extremely difficult

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to you know, put a number on that. Undervalued in

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the sense that I think people are writing off DeFi

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>after the last year year and a half because of

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the blow ups and the collapses and the amount of

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>money that has been lost is where things are undervalued. Um.

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, these systems are in therifancy, they're not user friendly,

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>but if those problems get solved, you know, there's a

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>ton of value in removing intermediaries and creating a more

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>frictionless um you know, financial system. And again, you know,

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this goes back to discovering this when I was in Iraq. Like,

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this means a lot more to somebody in Africa or

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East or other parts of the world, and

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>it does to us sitting in America, Like, we're not

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not particularly concerned about my bank going to zero

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars and stealing my money or the US government, you know,

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>collapsing in the next five or ten years. But that

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is a really real concern for many people around the globe.

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>What about all coins, because I think you guys also

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>were favorable towards certain old coins. Yeah, we are. I mean,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's it's hard. I think this whole

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>space will look very different in five years than it

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.719
<v Speaker 1>does today, and even more different in ten years than

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it does today. But we that stricts are not particularly

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>fond of the idea that there will be one currency

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to rule them all. They think there are reasons that

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>multiple currencies will continue to persist, and you know, we're

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly excited about the DeFi ones. But you know, decentralized

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>identity is another very interesting area that we're looking at

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>UM and I think it's kind of necessary to take

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the next step in DeFi. So it's all inter related now,

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, is quantz. You guys have your heads in

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the data and you know the algoes and everything. But

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what this week really hammered home for me,

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>as as well as the collapse of Terra, is how

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>important these sort of larger than life personalities can be

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>in crypto, you know, whether it's FPF or do Quan

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and especially you know, these flame wars break out on

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter between you know, Do Kuan and his critics and now,

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out, Finance and f t X, and

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like this kind of machismo bravado alpha male

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>battle that goes on and really can cause some destruction

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in the in the whole space like we've seen. So Sadie,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how you think about that specifically. You know, uh,

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>level headed woman, uh, surrounded by a bunch of bros,

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, duking it out on Twitter. How do you

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of incorporate the risk of all of that into

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>what you do? Yeah, the story of my life being

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of bros, I mean, being a woman in

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>technology to start was was big enough. Uh, you know,

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>lack of diversity, and then I went into crypto, you know,

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>just because it wasn't bad enough. But you know, I

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>have to say I don't work with Brose. I would

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>not describe Nico or any of our team is rose

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:22.719
<v Speaker 1>thankfully they're fantastic. But I have five brothers. That's what

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I meant. He was, Yeah, that five brothers. That's a

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of That's a lot of men in

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>one room. So really, I mean, Setoci Nakamoto had it

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>right by by building this amazing, amazing ecosystem and then

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>never revealing his, her or their identity, you know, not

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Setoci is not out there influencing what's happening UM, which

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is truly magical. Like that is the only reason I

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>would want to meet them is to find out, like

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>how did you when things have gotten so crazy? Sometimes

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 1>like how did you keep your mash up? But you know,

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I think some of these some of these projects where

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the influencers get a little bit larger than life and

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>they get a get to you know, too focused on

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>their social following UM and less focused on the business.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>That's definitely hasn't ended up being a good thing in

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>almost any context. So you know, going forward. It's something

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to really kind of look at more of like, hey,

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>who you know, is the head of this project getting

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too influential? And the holy grail right

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>now in crypto is valuation. You know what it what is?

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>What are the fundamentals of crypto? What are the fundamentals

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of evaluating any specific crypto asset? And we just we

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>don't have that. I mean in traditional markets, you you know,

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you have the c f A society and that's like

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>we have experts basically who can value assets and um.

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>In crypto, we don't have that. You know, there's just

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone kind of uses a different methodology. Everyone has their

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>own into mental methodology. But but when it comes down

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to it, there isn't really a tried and true valuation

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>methodology for cryptos. So we have to use sometimes some

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of these more like I guess non traditional ways of

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>evaluating a project, and you know, the who's leading it

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>and how influential they are is probably going to factor

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>into that a little bit more than maybe it would

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>have previously. You know, social there's a lot of strategies

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>out there that use social social sentiment and social indicators. Um,

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't I'm not saying we're going to

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>go into that direction because we haven't before. But uh,

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>it's uh definitely proven in the last six months at

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>least to be somewhat of a negative indicator if the

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>leader has um a little bit too much of a

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of a voice in a platform, and it definitely makes

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 1>our jobs harder, I think for me and you, Mike

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at least. But but on the on the flip side,

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it's those big personalities that also draw the capital and

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, you know, so it's it's kind of

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a dual edged sword. I guess. Yeah, that's good point.

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you do need to have that charisma, you

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>know people. I was talking to a VC investor recently,

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a very prolific investor here and Europe, and and his

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>comment was, I just write checks to people, you know,

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't even listen to their idea. If I like

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the person, I think they've got potential, Like I write

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that first check and and then I write the second

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>check once I see how good their idea is. UM,

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So you do need that personality for for a lot

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of that money to come in. That's fascinating that that's

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the decision. No one would a single check filled out

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>on No, I never have. I certainly never would. But Sadie,

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can just talk about what some of the

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>um in your what in your estimation are some of

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the unanswered questions that we still have with everything that

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>happened with FTX. Obviously, the word regulation gets thrown around

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but it's not so obvious what that might

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>actually look like. Do we potentially see more regulation of

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>these centralized exchanges? And what else? Does? What else would

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you like answers to? What what questions are out there

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that you'd like answered? Still, so I think really a

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>lot is going to come out in the next week

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>or two about and about the handling of the situation,

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, hindsight bias. We we can go back and

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out what what happened. Um, it would

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>be really great to understand the Alameda um F t

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>X transactions and how how some of that came came

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to be. You know, it would be great to understand

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more why Finance made that offer and

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>walked away so quickly. You know, there's there's a lot

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of rumors around that, and you know, but in the end,

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>like I don't think we'll ever truly know, we're gonna know.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's there's the famous quote, there's what I

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>what I remember happened, what you remember happened, and then

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>there's what actually happened. So we're going to get a

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of that, I think. But the underanswered questions are

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>really how are they going to they how are they

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>going to deal with it? You know, we've got some

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>examples of what I consider to be a really respectable

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.479
<v Speaker 1>way to handle a disaster like this, when with how

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Voyager has handled it. You know, Steve at Voyager I

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>think is a very very admirabile person. It was really

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hard to see him go through that. But I feel

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like they have done a really great job of trying

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to be as transparent with their customers as possible. Others

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>who I won't say, they say because I don't want

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to say the names, all right, So Celsius is I

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>think on the opposite spectrum where, um, you know, what

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they've done to customers is really hard to see, and

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, they I don't believe if cared that much

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>how it's impacted customers, and the transparency just hasn't been there.

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I'm really hoping that this f T

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>x sit oration resolves and that they can restore confidence.

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And no, no matter what happens, I think you asked

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>about regulation. No matter what happens, you know, regulation is coming.

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It's always been coming, especially for for people in the

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>United States. Like if you want to be in the

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>United States and stay in the United States and being crypto,

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you just have to know that regulations coming. It's just

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a fact of life. And we might not like it

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in some aspects, but but it is there, and it

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is it is a protection for investors, right And you know,

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that whole narrative seems to have shifted over the years.

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>You know it it seemed to be at first, you know,

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the lack of regulation in crypto was sort of a

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>big selling point, you know, relative to the hundreds and

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>pages of regulation and traditional markets. But one thing that

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>occurred to me this week is, and it's you know,

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's occurred to others over the years, is

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that crypto seems to be stumbling into the problems that

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>rad FI had solved with regulations in the past, as

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as annoying as those regulations can be. And one of

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>them that really spring to mind to me this week

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is this notion that you know, well, what is uh

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>SPFS empires an exchange? Uh, it was a trading shop.

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know within all crypto exchanges, you know there's

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>also basically a brokera gentleman as well. Where you know,

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>should the regulations go where you know you're either an exchange,

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you're a brokerage, or you're a trading firm and not

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a combo of the threes? Is it too risky to

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of have all those businesses, uh, sort of, if

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>not under one roof, at least under one sort of

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:38.959
<v Speaker 1>central control of an individual like SPF. So having separation

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a basic principle of business. You know,

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>really any any you know, SORR, Sarbanes, Oxley and and

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other um and you know a lot

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of other regulatory requirements really are focused on you know,

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>business controls and segregation of duties. And you know, in

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a highly regulated industry there's still you know, moments where

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>there's just that temptation to sort of well play in

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the gray areas, and you know, inevitably it tends to

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>hurt clients and retail customers and investors. UM. So I

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>think there is inevitably going to need to be regulation.

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a tendency I think to overregulate in UM in

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>situations where you don't understand the nuances of of an industry.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>That is one thing that I worry is going to

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>happen right now with with what happened at FTX, I'm

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>afraid that, you know, there's going to be a little

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a knee jerk reaction to overregulate. Some of

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>those protections are really really important for for our investors.

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've always been compliance focused and compliance first.

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>We've never you know, we we have an in fully

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>engaged compliance firm. UM. You know that's that's on call

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for all of our questions we UM. You know, we

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>have two different legal teams that we work with, so

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we're always trying to make sure that we're playing within

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the rules. But UM, there are a lot of people

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>out there who who uh feel the opposite. And I know,

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Sam Bankman Freed actually got hazed pretty badly

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>recently for for being pro regulation. UM ironically, so go

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>along lawyers is the way to play crypto. Well a

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>rough week indeed, uh, Nico, I assume you're not ready

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to go back to Iraq after this week but Sadio,

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you tempted to go back to IBM after a week

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like this? Um no, I do joke. That's my fantasy

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>occasionally when I'm just like, I worked like a twenty

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>hour day and I'm you know, the markets never stopped,

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, oh, maybe I'll just go work for

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Like that just sounds like really relaxing, And then

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I just laugh. I'm like yeah, and in two weeks

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I would be going crazy. I mean, I love, love,

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>love love the cryptal world. I love blockchain. I'm so

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>passionate about what we're doing. I love going to work

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>every day, and I think I would absolutely go crazy

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>if I ever had to take a job that was,

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, at a big corporation and wasn't playing in

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>this space. Wow what a segue, speaking of going crazy. Wow,

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that's really good, right. I think she planned planned that?

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Did you plan that? Sadie? It is that time for

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the craziest things we saw in markets this week? Pretty

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>normal week though, nothing crazier, nothing at all. I actually

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have a million things. I have a one million crazy

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna need you to narrow that down the one,

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe two if you got too many. I have three

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>how about that. But one is from a listener, Brian.

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope Brian, I'm saying your name correctly. I always

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>say that he flat to us that the Ontario Teacher's

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.760
<v Speaker 1>pension hadn't invested in FTX. That was going around Twitter

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.319
<v Speaker 1>as well, the Big pension invested in f Yeah. Yeah,

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>for mine, I had so Sam big mun Freed. There

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>had been so much about how he was this grand billionaire.

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>He had been worth something like twenty six billion dollars

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>up until very recently, and he suffered midweek a drop

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to his wealth and he as of Wednesday, I think,

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>had been worth somewhere around a billion dollars. On Tuesday

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it had been fifteen point six billion dollars and it

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.240
<v Speaker 1>was the fastest, the biggest one day collapse ever among

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>billionaires tracked by Bloomberg. And I think there's speculation that

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>he might actually be a negative. Yeah, yeah, yeah, no

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but just the job is so so yeah.

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>He should not go near any Ontario teachers. I would

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>have a worried the entire Ontario school system. If how

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>about you guys, what's uh slim pickings this week? I know,

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>but what's the craziest thing you guys saw this week.

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>So I was reading today about this jewel called the

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Fortune Pink, which sold at a Christie's auction is eighteen

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>point eighteen carrot pink diamond. Oh it's mine. If I

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>put it, well, well done, you did well and that

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>so it's sold for twenty point five million dollars. And

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of laughed a little. Well. I think

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it's funny because every time I'm trying to explain like

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.720
<v Speaker 1>n F T S two or crypto to someone and

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they're like, but how does it have value? And I'm like, well,

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, here's somebody paid twenty million dollars for a

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>shiny pink rock, Like, I mean, how does that beautiful rock?

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>It's true, it's a it's a great that's a great comparison.

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say baseball cards. You know what's uh, you know,

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Babe Ruth, baseball cards a piece of cardboard. But you

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>know what's the what's the value to a collector? So

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess a giant pink rock, especially that's got a

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>tire hand out wearing that it tires my hand out

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Yeah, sure, I'm sure. How about Unico anything

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>see this week? Yeah, you know, I was thinking about this,

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and I could not think of anything crazier than what's

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:09.799
<v Speaker 1>already been a topic. But the CEO of one exchange

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>tweeting out that they were going to sell half a

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of another exchanges cryptocurrency resulting in a like

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred styled bank run that completely bankrupted FTX has

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>got to be the craziest thing this week. I know,

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole the whole show is the crazy. I I

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>give it to you, Dico. It sometimes the obvious, in

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>plain sight is the winner. But I I think we're

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>all kind of speechless after after this week. Wow, I'll

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>give you mine, I will say, Uh. The only thing

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that rivals crypto sometimes for for craziness is the art market.

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I love the art market. Um So Paul Allen,

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of Microsoft past way and his estate

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:58.399
<v Speaker 1>sold his art collection. So the donna do not look

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>over at my notes Here're not looking. Don't look in

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>no peeking. But it's time and I regret to inform you,

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Sadie Nico, you're now consistants on our little game show

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>here called the prices precise not the price is right.

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>This is different but the same with yes, the Bullmarket

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>for Lawyers insists that we changed the name. What do

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you suppose the total value when it went up for

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>auction at Christie's on Wednesday evening? Total value for Paul

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Allen's art collection? How many pieces are part of it?

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Sixty artworks. I'm gonna go with two hundred and forty

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>eight million dollars million dollars. That's a very precise price

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>right there. It's a we're playing prices for eight million. Okay.

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>The other two contestants, Sadie, what's what's your guests on

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Paul Allen's art collection? So I believe I've heard from

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a couple of people that he was had really great

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:02.760
<v Speaker 1>taste in art, or he had like quite a collection. Um,

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna I'm gonna go much higher. I'm gonna

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>say you your b is in the books, Nico. This

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is your chance to show up the CEO here and

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>prove why you deserve to be the chief Investment Officer.

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>What's your what's your bid for Paul Allen's sixty piece

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 1>art collection? I remember price prices precise roles are similar

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to another game show you might know. So you could

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>go one dollar, you could go one dollar above the

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>highest highest bid yep, yeah, I'm gonna go with alright, alright,

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you're all away off the mark. But Nico's closest one

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>point five billion dollars for Paul Allen's art collection is

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that nuts one of the biggest ones. Birch Forest by

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Gustav cli Clints. I hope I'm saying that hundred five million,

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>one point five billion, that crazy. Yes, I bought it all.

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 1>By the way you hawk that diamond. Yeah, I was

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>walking on with my diamond, with my pink diamond, and yeah,

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>now you need a bigger apartment to display at all. Yeah,

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Sadie and Nico, we can't thank you enough. I know

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>it must have been a stressful week for you and

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you probably, uh, the last thing you wanted to do

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:30.919
<v Speaker 1>was rehash it all on a podcast, But we really

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you taking the time and helping us understand what

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a crazy week it was. Yeah, thanks for having us, absolutely,

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having Yeah, thank you guys, what goes up.

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week and so then you can

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.399
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg Terminal website and app or

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. We love it. If you

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>took the time to rate and review the show on

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts so more listeners can find us, and you

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>can find us on Twitter, follow me at Reaganonymous, Goldona

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 1>hierarch Is at Bldona Hirach. You can also follow Bloomberg

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts at podcasts. What Goes Up is produced by Stacy Wong.

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, See you next time.