WEBVTT - The Cycle: Pitching Streamers and Two-Start Pitcher Competition (Ep. 1016)

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome into the cycle, Part three of the week.

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I am Ryan Warmly joined by Mike Mayer. It is

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>our pitching streamers and two start pitcher competition segment. Here

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Mary take us through our pitching streamers for the week.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go right into it, and I'm gonna

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 2>ask for your help a little bit this week because

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I didn't fill it all out, but I.

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Do declined to help.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 3>See, let's just get that out of the way right

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>at the top.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 2>So last week in the YouTube comments, someone called us

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>out and said, I forget exactly what the comment was.

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I should have pulled it up. But they think that

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 2>we can't stand each other because of our chemistry on screen.

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>You keep saying they think this, and I keep saying

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they're just noting it. They're recognizing it from afar.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 3>So I pushed back on it in the comments.

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>I said, this show actually exists because warm and I

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>wanted to do a show together and pitched this idea

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 2>for like over a year. So despite how hilarious we

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 2>are in giving each other a hard time, we are friends,

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>or at least I think we're friends.

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I would have done this show with Kelly if she

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>was available, but I was I was willing to settle.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 3>For Mare fair enough.

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll let the YouTube comments I'm being the nice one

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 2>now so they can get at you for being a

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>clean one.

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Except for the way you express yourself when you're being nice,

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still sounds like you're being starcast.

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>All part. That's just I just have like one you know.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It's why you're such a natural host.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, right, I just have one speed. This is just

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 3>who I am.

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I will say last week, I'm pretty sure the reason

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 2>that the person said that was my fault because like

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I had an I like mentioned Colin Rea and just

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 2>had like an awkward like toss it back to you

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 2>and we're like, you gave me a hard time, And

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure it was my fault that they thought that.

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 3>But like so I'll own that one, but it was

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>my fault.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>No no arguments here. I'm not here to disagree with that.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get into it.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>So Monday, I had and just to remind everyone, we

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>go through streamers day by day to give you kind

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 2>of a streamer for every day of the week. I'll

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 2>usually throw a couple extras in there as well. If

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 2>there are options or if it's just a stay away day.

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 2>We'll say that too, And we lean heavily on the

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy spros Picture streaming tool where you can kind of

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 2>see you know who's available if you sink your leadus.

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 3>You can see who's available.

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>In your league and you know what their matchup is,

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>and you know it'll rate it by VBR to see

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 2>what the best matchups are. So I lean heavily on

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 2>that kind of give you a names of people who

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 2>might be available. So Monday, I have Ben Brown at

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 2>the Marlins, and the backup I have his gun Or

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Hoagland against the Angels. Again the targeting bad offenses here.

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 2>So I'll start off with you know, last week we

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 2>went heavy against the Marlins. This week, starting right back

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 2>up against the Marlins. Tuesday, we'll do Nick Martinez at

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 2>the Pirates. Nick Martinez hasn't had the best season. I'm

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 2>still I don't want to say bullish on him, but

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm still willing to stream him in a matter like

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 2>this against the Pirates.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 3>And the backup I have is.

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Jameson Tyone at the Marlins. Jameson Tyone still pretty available

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of leagues. I actually I keep I

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 2>was actually texting with Dan Harris this morning because we

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 2>keep from the same person in one of our other leagues.

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>We keep getting jameson tyone trade offers, and as much

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 2>as I'm willing to stream him against the Marlins, I'm

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 2>not willing to trade you Zach Netto for jameson Tyon.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 2>It's not going to happen. Even if you throw in

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Ronel Blanco, not going to do it. Wednesday, I had tomy, do.

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>You want to call out who that person is?

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I actually don't know. I only know

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 3>his team name, so I don't know. As my first

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 3>year in the league, I'm still.

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Learning everyone, Okay, but yeah, I actually don't know the

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 2>person's name.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 3>No offense.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Tomi Yuki Sigano, your boy at the Brewers, is the

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 2>name I went with on Wednesday despite the you know,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 2>low strike out numbers, but like you said, been pitching

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 2>much better lately. Overall numbers are good. So, like I

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 2>said before, willing to stream him, and I have a

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 2>couple of backups. On Wednesday, I would probably consider both

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>these names that I like better than Sigano, but I

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 2>have my backups because they're more rostered, and so I

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 2>think they're less likely to be available in your leagues,

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>although I do think they could be availab because they're

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 2>roster of less than fifty percent JP Sears against the

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Angels and then a J Smith Shaver at the Nationals,

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 2>I think are two good options. So Wednesday is a

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 2>pretty good Dame, pretty good day to stream Thursday. I

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously Thursday's usually a small slate. The name I wrote

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>down was Luis Severino against the Angels. Some other names

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>you can look at Luis Lucas Giolito against the Orioles,

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 2>but you know, he's been kind of doing good Gelido

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 2>bad Giolito situation. I don't necessarily know if I trust

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>starting him against the team like the Orioles that like

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 2>has not been good but like definitely has the firepower

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to put a hurting on you. And other than that,

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 2>not a whole lot of other options. Like I would

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 2>say Tyler Anderson, but he's at the Athletics in that ballpark,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 2>not not typically a place I want to stream pictures,

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, that's probably all I would go with on Thursday.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 2>On Friday, Matthew Boyd is a name, but he's at

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 2>the Reds. You know, he's probably he's like fifty percent

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>rostered on Yahoo. So he might be available, but you know,

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. The Reds aren't exactly a high powered offense,

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 2>but you know that is a tough ballpark to pitch

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 2>in Tanner Halck, I'm staying away from. I don't care

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 2>that he has a good matchup against the Oils and

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 2>not not risking eleven runs from Tanner Hawk again. And

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 2>then we always seemed even though like Thursdays, the small slight,

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Friday seems to be like a day we struggle with.

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 3>So like.

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Every week it's Friday, I don't find anybody I know.

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Like there's like Jeffrey Springs, like, but he's against the Phillies.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not doing that. I'm not streaming Springs against the Phillies.

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Run Out Blanco against the Mariners. If he's available, It's

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>like maybe, but it might just be like one of

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 2>those those situations like you've said, like it might just

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>be the kind of day where you stay away.

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Landed Route against the Nationals.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>We say it, We say it every week. Sometimes the

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>best streaming decision is to stream no one.

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 3>That's probably where I'm at.

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 2>Landed Roupe against the Nationals is not terrible, but he

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been great recently either. Andrew Abbot against the Cubs.

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm not doing that, even if he's available. I'm not

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 2>targeting the Cubs. They're they're off on fire.

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 3>I do.

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I do like Abbot, maybe like as a pick up

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>probably and not starting this week though, like if he's available,

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I do like Abbott.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:35.559
<v Speaker 2>Agreed, Agreed, here's a fun one. You are you willing

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 2>to if someone drops Sandil Contra? You are you willing

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to stream him this week against at the Angels?

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 3>You doing it?

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 3>All right? I thought for sure?

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that a Friday or Saturday?

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 3>That's a Saturday? I moved to Saturday.

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Okay, yeah, I would do that. I would do that.

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, that's a good point. I jumped moving on for

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 2>Friday to Saturday. Sandil he's the top name on the

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 2>on the picture streaming tool of someone who should be

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 2>available in your league SA counter at the Angels. Other

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.559
<v Speaker 2>than that, Merrill Kelly against the Cardinals, Like, I'm fine

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 2>with that. I don't love it, but I don't hate it.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Michael Walka against the Twins is fine, but you're not

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna get a lot of strikeout upside there justin Berlander

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 2>been pitching better against the Nationals.

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Do you have any interest in Berlander at Nationals?

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Sorry, I didn't really think about that.

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say we had a lot. I

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 3>would not a dead air there.

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But do you want to do you want to convince

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>me otherwise?

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 3>No, I just think he's been pitching better and it's

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 3>not a matchup. It's fine. Should we just keep going

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 3>with dead air? See how long we can do it.

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm waiting for you to move on now.

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry to not like you.

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I kind of want to lean into it, but I

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 3>know you have to go too, so we got to

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>wrap up.

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's very clear that I have a heart out

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>dating this episode.

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 3>We got four minutes. We're good, We're good. The other

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 3>name is brought.

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned it earlier, Brian Bao again in our previous video,

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Brian Bao against the Oriels. I don't hate that one.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>He's been He's looked fine since coming back. I don't

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Jack Lighter has been better recently.

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm I don't really want to stream Jack Lighter. That's

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 2>the kind of thing where it's like when it's bad.

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 2>It's really bad. So even though it's the White Sox,

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably staying away from that one. What about you,

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Jack Lighter at the White Sox.

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>If it was any other opponent, man, I would say

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>probably not, but I'm not opposed to it, like I'm

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>open to the possibility. I want to ask you this

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>because this is not a streamer, but would you if

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you were forced to start one, would you rather start

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Tanner Hawk or Aaron Nola? This week? Aaron Nola at

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Colorado coming off of a nine earned runs give it

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>up in his last game.

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 3>It could be Aaron Nola on the Moon, and I

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 3>would still take Aarona.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>The correct answer is I don't want to start either.

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm just pointing out Nola has been awful this year.

0:08:58.480 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I I just think if you're going like risk assessment there,

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>I think there's similar risk and much more upside with

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Nola than.

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>All Right, let's get to our two start picture competition.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>We're currently still waiting to see how this week goes.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You have Michael King. I have like I had Hunter

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Green if he wasn't hurt. He obviously was hurt. So

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Shane Boz was my backup film the week before. You

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>clearly won Zach Wheeler in our scoring system forty six

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half points. Kelly's pick for me of Shane

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Smith fifteen point eight points. So that was a predictable

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>blowout there. I appreciate Kelly as always for you know,

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>trying there. The week before, we were waiting to kind of,

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, determine what direction we wanted to go with

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the winner. You put up a poll on X. You

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>did not include quality starts, which I specifically told you

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to do, and my picture had do quality starts and

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>yours had zero. And I think that's the only reason

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that you won. The poll on X was.

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 3>More than more than doubled your results. I don't think

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 3>the quality starts were doing you any favors there.

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, Okay, first of all, more than double is a

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>ludicrous outcome for this. The stat lines were essentially the same,

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Like my guy had two more walks, but also two

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>more strikeouts, one more inning, one more earned run, same

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>number of hits. Both got to it like this should

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>have been like fifty to fifty. You can you at

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>least agree that like this was very much a toss up?

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I agree, Should you want to call it a tie.

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh, I would like to do that. I did. I

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>did seed the decision to the audience, So I think

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in fairness, even though my guy scored more points by

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>our usual scoring system, I think it's ultimately largely like

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>basically a tie. I was. I was open to accepting

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the results of the pole, so I will accept the

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>results of the pole, even if I think it was

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a flawed pole. I know I'm a great I'm I'm

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a class act.

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Is what fifty six point nine percent of the people

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 3>do not lie?

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? All right, so you've won a couple in a

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>row now, and you're probably gonna win this week because

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get Hunter Green because the injury, so I

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>had to go with bringing out a big gun. I'm

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>going to scooball at Saint Louis versus Cleveland. I can

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't mess around with these saving good players, like

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm now on a two game losing streak. Well, Kelly

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and I combined are on a two game losing streak,

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so I got to bring out one of the aces.

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going scooball this week, all right.

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I didn't put a name machine. I figured I would

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 2>do it live. So I've been I've been looking at

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 2>the looking at the list. Let me make sure I

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 2>don't have I haven't yet to use this picture yet.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 2>It looks like I have not, So I'm going to

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 2>go with Framburg Valdez at Tampa Bay and then against

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the Mariners. That's gonna be my my pick for this week.

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, So school Ball versus Valdez. We'll see how

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that one goes this week. Hopefully your boy wormed him

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>bounce back here. And let's wrap things up with our

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>weekend excitement. It's rivalry weekend, which I didn't even really

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>remember that that was the thing. But you know all

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the kind of local team rivalries, you know, Baltimore Washington,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Subway series in New York, Chicago, all that stuff. A

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of fun pitching matchups that we get this weekend.

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale versus Garrett Crochet is a very fun one.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul Skeens versus Christopher Sanchez, who, according to that one

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>ESPN article from a couple of weeks ago, is a

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>top twelve ace in baseball. And then I just kind

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of wrote down, I want to see if Max Meyer

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>can get going again. He was so good early and

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like we haven't really talked about him that much.

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>It's been multiple weeks in a row of very much

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the other direction. His era was two ten on April

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty first, it's now four thirty seven, just three starts later.

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>In those three starts, four innings, five earned runs, five

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>innings five earned runs, six and a third innings five

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>earned runs, So he's allowed five earned runs in each

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of the last three starts. Two of those ended up being,

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, one of those games. He had zero strikeouts

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 1>the game against the Athletics. It's just been very, very

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>bad the last three weeks after a superb start to

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the season. So can he bounce back here against the Rays.

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>The Max Meyer thing pretty much coincides with me trading

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 2>for him, so that's got one of those things where

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>it's probably my fault. He has not been good since,

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 2>like the day I traded Christian Walker for him, But

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 2>I'd still make that trade. I'm still banking on the

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 2>upside for me. I'll do two things. One, I broke

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>down not raining, because it has rained pretty much every

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 2>day here for two weeks. It's kind of insane how

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 2>much rain we've been getting. We seem to go down

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 2>here in Georgia. Like, I'll go like two months without

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 2>any rain, and then I'll just rain every day for

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 2>two weeks. I actually we had like sod installed in

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the backyard a few weeks ago.

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 3>That's now like floating. There's so much water underneath it

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing is before we didn't finish up

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>the pitching streamers for the weekend, so I'll hit those

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 2>real quick for my weekend excitement to close things out.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned Brian Bayle on Saturday against the Orioles as

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 2>an option Jack Lighter.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 3>We were going to stay away Sunday. You said you.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Didn't really want to do Jack Lighter against the White Sox.

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Would you Can I interest you into Kamar Walker again

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>or Kamar Rocker. I should say I was looking at

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Walker Bueler Kamar Rocker against the White.

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Sox equally, like I guess because it's the White Sox.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's much more volatile. Also, Walker Buehler is back

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 2>against the Orioles. I probably wouldn't want to go with

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 2>that one. And then Quinn Priester is projected to start.

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll see if that actually stays true against the Pirates,

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 2>but probably not. Probably not messing around with that either.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 2>So Sunday doesn't look like a great day either, though

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 2>if you did stream Ben Brown on Monday in a

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 2>weekly league, you would also have Ben Brown on Sunday

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>against the Reds, although it isn't Cincinnati unfortunately.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, we will wrap a bear because I am

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>up against it on the clock. Thanks everybody for tuning

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in to not just the segment of the cycle, but

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to hopefully our previous two segments as well on video

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>or on audio. We did some rounding the basis, going

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>through some trending topics, and of course we did our

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>buys and sells and waiver pickups as well in those episodes.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>For Mayor and I, you know we are friends, to

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>be clear, even though I haven't seen Mighty Ducks two,

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>He's still angree with me about that, and so are

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the comments. But for Mayor, I'm Ryan Warman. Thanks for

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>tuning in. We'll see again next time. Thanks for listening

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast. If you love

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the show, the best freeway to support us is by

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, follow

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com. Slash

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy pros MLB