WEBVTT - How the Fossil Fuel Industry is Undermining Free Speech 

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>There's only one state this year that really has high

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>profile pipeline protests going on. That's Minnesota.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Thirty years ago this week, the Line three pipeline and

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:15.079
<v Speaker 2>Northern Minnesota rupture, spilling one point seven million gallons of

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 2>crude oil into a frozen river near Grand Rapids, Minnesota.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 2>If the river had not been frozen, the oil could

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>have seeped into the Mississippi River and contaminated drinking water

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>for millions downstream. Protests have been ongoing to stop construction

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>rerouting a section of the Line three pipeline, which could

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>impact indigenous communities and local waterways.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Hello and welcome to Drilled. I'm Amy Westervelts. You might

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 3>have heard recently about the Line three pipeline project in Minnesota.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Some people are calling it the next Standing Rock because

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>it's been at the center of protests for years, particularly

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 3>from indigenous tribes in the area. Activist and Authorjanona La

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Duke has been involved in that fight for seven years.

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Here she is talking to PBS News about it earlier

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 3>this month.

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm a grandmother, you know, and we're standing out there.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 4>I have six charges against me for this pipeline, and

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 4>there's a bunch of us that are facing charges for,

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, trying to be a water protector.

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 3>L Duke and others have been part of this seven

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 3>year fight opposing the project throughout the state and federal

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>review processes.

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 4>It is the largest tarzans pipeline in the world. This

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 4>pipeline is the equivalent to fifty new coal fire power plants.

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 4>So you know, if you're trying to save the planet,

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 4>this is not the way to do it.

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't get to Minnesota myself. I'm not vaccinated yet,

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 3>so I don't want to impose myself on the community.

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Plus I have kids. But also this is one of

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 3>those stories where I want to hear from local and

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 3>particularly Native journalists. I did want to see, though, whether

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 3>the evolving Line three story dovetailed it all with something else.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I've been tracking fossil fuel backed anti protest bills. I've

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>written about this a few times. A bunch of other

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 3>journalists have done some great reporting on it as well.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 3>There's some good stuff in huff Post and The Intercept.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 3>I'll drop some links in the show notes for those

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>of you who want to read more. These bills have

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 3>been passed in fourteen states now and proposed in about

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 3>half the states in the country. They differ a little

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 3>bit from state to state, but in general, they increase

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the fines and jail time associated with trespassing dramatically. They

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 3>often bump trespassing up from a misdemeanor to a felony,

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 3>and they seem to be specifically targeting organizers and the

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 3>organizations they work with, with steep penalties for organizing or

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 3>training activists who then trespass, So even if the organizer

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 3>isn't there at the protest, they can still be charged.

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 3>And it turns out there are six six anti protest

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 3>bills making their way through the Minnesota state legislature right now.

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Some of them are bundled together, so it amounts to

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 3>four different legislative packages, but still that's a lot. That's

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 3>important because on top of cracking down on pipeline protests,

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 3>there's growing concern that these bills will be used to

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>quell other sorts of protests too, And remember, Minnesota was

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 3>ground zero for last summer's Black Lives Matter protests. In

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>the days after police murdered George Floyd. To talk about

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota's proposals, where these laws came from in general, and

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 3>how they're moving through the country right now. I asked

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 3>researcher Connor Gibson to join me. He's been keeping tabs

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 3>on these bills really since they started to pick up

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 3>steam in the wake of the standing rock protests. That

0:03:50.600 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 3>conversation coming up right after this quick break. It seems

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 3>like all of a sudden, the piece has picked up again.

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know if that's just like a feeling

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 3>or if that's actually what's happened. So I'm curious to

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>see what you've seen on that front.

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it is the case that these fossil fuel infrastructure

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:27.239
<v Speaker 1>anti protest bills are currently gaining steam in the twenty

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty one legislative sessions of many states. I think the

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>main difference between this year and last year is last

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>year the pandemic really just messed up the strategy. We

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>still saw plenty of bills and laws passed in twenty twenty,

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>but I think it was reduced by the impact of

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, the confusion and cancelations and delays that caused

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>a state legislature. So I suspect what we're seeing in

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one is a lot of what companies intended

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to do last year. They just weren't able to do

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>as much as quickly as they would have liked. But

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that said, bill's still passed in the law during the

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>pandemic in West Virginia, in Kentucky, and this year we're

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing more states continue the trend, including some states that

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>failed to pass bills last year, like Illinois, like Alabama.

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's only one state this year that really has

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>high profile pipeline protests going on. That's Minnesota. Line three

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>revamp being done by Enbridge and being hastened along by

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>many other players in the oil industry makes the situation

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more relevant and urgent in Minnesota than

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in other states. You know, I can't tell you why

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Arkansas cares so much to felamize pipeline protest. They're big

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>pipeline resistance kind of happened a couple of years ago

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Diamond pipeline.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Right Connor, was that? Did that come into play in

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Oklahoma too? Was it the same pipeline, the Diamond pipeline.

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, yes, yep.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 4>It was. I checked.

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 3>So in early twenty seventeen, local newspapers in Arkansas and

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 3>Oklahoma were reporting that tribes, mostly in Oklahoma did not

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 3>approve of the diamond pipeline and that several indigenous activists

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 3>planned to protest it. There was a lot of handringing

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>about whether this would be the quote unquote next standing rock.

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Noticing a theme here, and in February twenty seventeen, Oklahoma

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Representative Scott Biggs proposed the anti protest bill that the

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 3>rest would be based on. Here's a bit of tape

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 3>from that session. The person you'll hear pushing bigs for

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 3>answers is Representative Corey Williams.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 5>This issue has definitely risen to the level of concern

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 5>here in Oklahoma, giving our state status as an oil

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 5>producer energy producer, and what's going on in other states.

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 5>So we took what happened or what bill we passed

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 5>last year with the Critical Infrastructure Bill regarding flying drones

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 5>over refineries or cushing or places like that, and we've

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 5>now expanded that to provide some greater protection for those

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 5>critical infrastructures are necessary for the state to operate. So

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 5>the proposed committee sub basically lines out trespassing, helps define

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 5>what critical infrastructure is, and provides some for some enhanced

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 5>penalties for damage caused by truspassing.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 6>Thank you, mister Shire. When I was looking through some

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 6>of the definitions on this, and a lot of them

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 6>I can see, but a couple of them, I thought, well,

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 6>that's pretty open ended if we wanted to prosecute it.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 6>I think it just says railroad tracks. That's pretty open

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 6>ended thing to consider to be critical infrastructure that would

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 6>have this enhanced penalty along with it. I mean, I

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 6>understand like a power generation facility and substations and things

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 6>like that. I guess my question is twofold, do you

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 6>think that a couple of these definitions might be a

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 6>little bit open ended and allow some abusive prosecution? And

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 6>then secondly, can you tell can you elaborate more on

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 6>you said that this has risen to the level of

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 6>a need. Can you describe the incident that there were

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 6>incidents that have brought us to the forefront?

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 5>Answer your questions Number one, absolutely not. I do not

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 5>believe if prosecutors are abusive in their discretion and their

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 5>role and their function to protect the state. I know

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 5>you disagree with me on that, and we have for

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 5>four years, but no, they're not abusive in their discretion. No,

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 5>I do not disagree. You know agree with you that

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 5>these definitions are open ended. I believe that if you

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 5>have an issue with the industry, I'm pretty sure the

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 5>rail industry could demonstrate how they're vital to Oklahoma. You know,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 5>they're in cushion just south of your district. Is extremely

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 5>vital the oil gas industry for all the rail that's

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 5>pumping in this crewde oil because the pipelines have been protested,

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 5>the pipelines haven't been built, so now they're using rail

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 5>to move that oil, to move those products into our state.

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 3>The Oklahoma bill was pointed to as the one that

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 3>all the other bills were modeled after, but not without

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 3>some help from the fossil fuel industry. In fact, industry

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 3>reps were there the day Oklahoma's bill was introduced, ready

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 3>to answer questions in.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 6>Your last response, I didn't actually hear you elaborate on

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 6>the incidents. It was it just the pipeline incident or

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't think they did damage to property, but obviously there.

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm pretty sure they did a whole lot of damage

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 5>to property in North Dakota, Okay.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 6>Is that please?

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Yes, please join if you if you want to learn more.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 5>We actually have a meeting here at four o'clock today

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 5>with some individuals from North Dakota that are here to

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 5>talk to us, talk to the industry about what they're

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 5>having to deal with the aftermath of those protesters. Up

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 5>there's four o'clock Gripson McBride is sponsoring that open meeting

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 5>to the public. But yes, that is the main reason

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 5>behind this.

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 3>So there's a bit of background on the origins of

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 3>these bills. Now back to my conversation with Connor for more. Okay,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 3>so actually, maybe I'll have you back up a little

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 3>bit and give folks a brief sort of history of

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 3>these bills that you know, they sort of started to

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 3>appear with the Oklahoma Bill shortly after Standing Rock and

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 3>very much were a reaction to that protest.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Sure thing. I'm actually going to take us way back

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in time to September eleventh, two thousand and one, terrible

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>day in world history, when the world trade centers went

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>down and the Pentagon was attacked, and the country was

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in a state of fear and confusion and very much

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>ready to accept so draconian government restrictions in the name

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.719
<v Speaker 1>of our national security and not having to live through

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Again, there were some industries that were

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>starting to have this kind of conversation, and the first

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>more coherent discussion that I saw about critical infrastructure and

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>upping penalties for people that are trespassing on it or

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>near it, or certainly damaging any of the equipment. Those conversations,

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can tell, we're starting to happen.

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and three, two thousand and four, there

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>was a law that was passed in Louisiana, Act one

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven that set in motion the idea that there

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>would be heightened penalties for trespassing on critical infrastructure sites.

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think oil pipelines were included at first in

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that Louisiana law. They added that in twenty fifteen, but

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>at that point some companies, including oil companies, started talking

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>about this. And there is a group that's similar to ALEC,

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>but not nearly as captured and partisan, called the Council

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of State Governments. It is a bipartisan consortium of state legislators.

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>They do produce some model legislation in a way that's

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>similar to ALEC, but in addition to working in ways

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that are much more broad than ALEC does a bunch

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of different kinds of legislative trainings and working groups on

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>various issues. The Council of State Governments produced a report

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that was financed by BP and others that embellished upon

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>some of this, And then I couldn't really tell you

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>what happens between two thousand and six in twenty fifteen.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>As far as my research went, there didn't seem to

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>be any major events. But twenty fifteen, and this is

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>before Standing Rock and before the Dakota Access Pipeline was

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>being hotly protested, Louisiana started updating that critical Infrastructure law

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that it had passed in two thousand and four. Interesting,

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't until two thousand and seventeen, the end

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of the year December, that the American Legislative Exchange Council

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>ended out creating a model bill, Which is just to

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>say that there were some states starting to field test

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>different avenues with which to restrict oil and gas protesters,

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>specifically including Alabama, including Michigan, including Washington. They just hadn't

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>taken coherent shape in terms of this play that we're

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing now, where it's felony level penalties for people who

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>are committing nonviolent acts of trespass coupled with compounded fines

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and jail sentences often for organizations or individuals who are

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>found to be affiliated with those protesters. They don't have

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>to have trespass themselves, they don't have to have damaged

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>anything themselves. Afiliated with somebody that did, they wind up

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>being charged. And the first state that passed both of

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 1>those things in a pretty clear and coherent way with

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma in twenty seventeen. And that's usually where this story

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>starts in terms of people that are following and talking

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>about the issue. But you know, I do think it's

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>important to know that it didn't just explode randomly or

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>not so randomly, but in reaction to Standing Rock. There

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>was activity happening in a lot of these states leading

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>up to that point, and in twenty seventeen things really

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>became codified into the strategy that we've seen. It was

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>later that year the American Legislative Exchange Council passed its

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>model bill internally within itself at a meeting in December

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of that year. And there's really there was some excellent

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>reporting that was done that actually has really helped inform

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and understand how this trend took off. There was a

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>letter that was written to the Legis laders who participated

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in that specific ALEC meeting in December twenty seventeen. They

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>had not yet approved this critical Infrastructure Felony law template

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>law yet. And the American Chemistry Council, which is chemical

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers lobbyists, and the Edison Electric Institute which is electric

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>utility lobbyists, and the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers which

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was the refinery companies, in addition to Marathon Petroleum and

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the American Gas Association which is gas utility companies. They

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>all signed the letter to alex legislators and said, please

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>make a model bill out of this, do it at

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>this meeting, do it in the next few days. And

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they listed a bunch of reasons justifying why a law

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>was needed. One of the examples used with was the

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>valve turners, a nonviolent protest that occurred in order to

0:15:54.480 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>stop development of the Keystone Excel pipeline and the valves.

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Hearner's example was the only example that was used by

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>these lobbyists to justify these laws that didn't have to

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>do actually with oil industry ex employees or people suffering

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>from serious incidents of mental illness committing acts of sabotage

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>against gas infrastructure, so much like we're seeing with the

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Capitol riots where George Floyd gets murdered by police, a

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>bunch of time goes by Republicans theorize about ways to

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>punish the people who are reacting in outrage to the

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>murder of black and brown people in this country by

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>police officers. Then the Capitol riots happened, a bunch of

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>white supremacists stormed the Capitol, and now we're going to

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>be passing anti riot laws to go after black people,

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially for the sins committed by white nationalists. This trend

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in the oil and gas industry struck me as starkly similar.

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>They're justifying going after environmental protesters who are largely non violent,

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>committing access civil disobedience in order to stop the fossil

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>fuel bill out and blaming them with behavior that actually

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to do with environmental activism. Some of the

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>tribal groups in Montana who protested the bill that is

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>currently making its way through that legislature a terrible, terrible

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>bill max sentence of thirty years in prison. MAX finds

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>of one point five million dollars if you are found

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>linked to somebody who is arrested under those offenses. It's

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, an individual protester in Montana would be subject

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to a max five of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars,

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>which is atrocious. That is way bigger than most of

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>these states. The penalties in these states, which are draconian enough,

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>tends to cap around like twenty or twenty five thousand dollars.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Montana has upping it to one hundred and fifty thousand,

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but times ten if you are found to be a

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>supporter of a protest arrested. And of course Keystone xcit

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>all cuts through at least one of the reservations in Montana,

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and I believe that's the Flathead Tribal Reservation. The wow.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>The bill was protested and committee by a lot of

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>different indigenous peoples from different tribal nations and different Native

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>organizations nonprofits in Montana, and they were all concerned not

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 1>only about the ongoing fight over Keystone EXCEL, but just

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>once the law is on the books, who knows what

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>it will be used to punish people for in regard

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to any future infrastructure project. You know that qualified for

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>critical infrastructure.

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 3>And it's quite broad, right the definition of critical infrastructure.

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and I would have to look at Montana's definitions

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>again because all of the states are a little bit different,

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>but roughly following the trend that was set forth by

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the State of Oklahoma and by the American Legislative Exchange

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Council's Model Bill. It includes utility infrastructure, electric transmission lines,

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It includes pipelines of all kinds. It includes water infrastructure.

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Some of them include dams in Louisiana, levies was attempted

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to be added to the definitions last year, which failed.

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>From you know, gas compressor stations, refineries, export terminals, pretty

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>much everything you can think of that as dirty energy

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure qualifies as critical under this bill.

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Right right. I do wonder how much some of these

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 3>laws could be used to tamp down on various other

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 3>types of protests, like the Black Lives Matter protests. Some

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 3>new research done and I'm not sure if it's out

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 3>there yet or not around some groups that have, you know,

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 3>been looking at at what Gibson done has done in

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 3>response both to indigenous tribes in Ecuador suing Chevron and

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 3>to the Standing Rock protests against their client energy transfer

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 3>partners and using RICO. I definitely hear echoes of in

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 3>these in these anti protest laws, especially the recent ones

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 3>where they're going after the quote unquote organizers.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>There's the plot thickens amy because in the bill that's

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>currently being considered in Kansas, and it has already passed

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>the Senate in Kansas, it actually has hearing in the

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>House tomorrow, which is March seventeenth, that bill includes a

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>RICO provision, and wow, I believe is the first overlap

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>between corporations using racketeering anti mafia laws to go after

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>their critics or attorneys or anything plaintiffs that inconvenience them

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it might be at these anti protests. The

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel anti protest laws specifically, I believe RICO is

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>also starting to creep into the broader trend of riot

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>redefinition anti protesting laws where you find the lowest common

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>denominator way to accuse somebody of rioting and then you

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>get to charge them with very very serious felonies. And

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>if some of these states succeed, you know, potentially racketeering

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>implication as well, you know, as if the civil disobedience

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>is organized crime.

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 3>In very simple terms, that is the attempt that's underway

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 3>is to redefine civil disobedience as organized crime, and people

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 3>should know that the RICO laws were created to deal

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 3>with the mob.

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm sorry, just like you know, even the more

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>extreme and I I don't even want to use that

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>word because there's no explosions or violence or threats involved.

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>But like an activist cutting a fence or throwing a

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>carpet over the razor wire and trespassing or even shutting

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>off a pipeline valve, I'm sorry, that's not like walking

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>into somebody's store and breaking their kneecaps for not paying

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>their dues that Month's similar or even nearly as threatening

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>about that?

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you have an account of how many states have

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.239
<v Speaker 3>enacted these laws and then how many are sort of

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 3>in play right now?

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I do, Okay. There are a total of fourteen states

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that have so far passed the fossil Fuel Infrastructure anti

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>protest bills since twenty seventeen. The most recent one was

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one, but the fight actually started years previous,

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's Ohio. They just passed the law in January.

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>That bill carried over from the previous year. After that,

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen bills pop up in Minnesota for a grand

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>total of six bill. I don't know, they're just really

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>disorganized or what. Some of them are concurrent, so it's

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 1>really it's basically for legislative packages in Minnesota in the

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>form of six.

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 3>Bills in MINESDA. That's really interesting to me in the

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 3>context of the Line three protests right now. Is there

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 3>any sense that, like the number of proposals or the

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 3>movement on them it like recently, is connected to some

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of reaction to that protest.

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question. I'm gonna say my gut tells

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>me yes, because in twenty eighteen there was only one bill.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>In twenty nineteen there were two bills, and I believe

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they were they might have been concurrent. And in twenty

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty there were also two bills, and then suddenly this

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>year there's six. There's also there's a little bit of

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>difference between some of them. Some of the bills are

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>more focused on the felonies for the individuals, including the

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>loophole that you're trespassing on a fossil fuel infrastructure facility

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>with the intent to impede or inhibit or in another bill,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>with the intent to disrupt the operation. I'm going to

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and say a aggressive prosecutor would slap me

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>with a felony charge if I was sitting in front

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>of a road because that would impede or inhibit the

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.239
<v Speaker 1>operation of the facility or disrupt the operation. So that's like,

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that's where the loophole is here, Right. They frame this

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>as if it's about property damage, as if it's about violence.

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, All of that's are illegal everywhere it has

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>been all of this nation's recent history and all of

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the state's recent history. You can't hurt people, you can't

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>blow stuff up, you can't damage property, you can't trespass.

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>There are laws on the books to deal with those things.

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So what these bills really aim to change, and the

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota bills illustrate it well, is that there is a

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>loophole put in there that if you're disrupting or interrupt

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the facility in some minor way, you're on the hook

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>for the same level felony offense that is normally reserved

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>for somebody who is abusing or hurting another human being.

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's a good way to put it in.

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 3>An important thing for people to understand that, Like, it's

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 3>not like in the absence of these bills, there has

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 3>just been you know, blanket permissiveness for trespassing and properties.

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Protesting. You know, the people in Standing Rock in addition

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to getting blasted by the cops water cannons and freezing

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>cold temperatures and attacked by dogs and having their arms

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>blown off by concussion grenades and stuff like that. Like

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the people who are arrested can like trespassing

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>those situations, they do end out having to get charged

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>with things, and they do end up having to fight

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that out in court. And I know that for skeptics

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of like kind of protest culture and this like perhaps

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.479
<v Speaker 1>what's seen as a really self righteous liberalism stand up

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for what's right, that really irks some people. But I

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think they think about how the people who engage

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in acts of civil different disobedience really have a lot

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of shit to deal with after that happens or all

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>these myself as an example, right, Like, people are annoyed

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that somebody like me, this college educated white kid like

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>goes and protest the Keystone Excel pipeline in two thousand

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and eleven at the White House, which I did. It

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>was a mass civil disobedience. We all got arrested. We

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>went to jail. We didn't have to go to a cell.

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>We just had to pay our one hundred dollars post

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and forfeit and we got to leave. You know, but

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in many of these situations, that is not what happens.

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You go to jail, you get held, you get out,

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to talk with lawyers, you have to show

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>up for court hearings. You know, several months to several

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>years of your life is potentially disrupted. Even if you

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 1>don't end out going to prison or paying thousands of

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars and fines, you lose a lot of time and

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you lose a lot of money in order to take

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that principal stand. So it's not just a bunch of

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>spoiled kids that don't have to deal with any consequence.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 1>They're really abusing, you know, major loopholes in our legal system.

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>They are accepting those consequences, or the kind of higher

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>calling of saying, no more fossil fuel infrastructure is not okay.

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>More oil spills are not okay. More disruption to the

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>sovereignty of indigenous nations whose treaties we have violated over

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again is not okay.

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So you you were saying there's there's four different

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 3>legislative packages that are kind of in play in Minnesota.

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, and they're all aimed in differing ways that felonies

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>for individual violators as well as going after people affiliated

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>with them as well. So you don't even necessarily have

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to commit the crimes. And this is you know, so

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Sierra Club or a Green Peace or

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>any other organization maybe the American Civil Liberties Union, and

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you're you've like been on email threads with these activists,

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>that raises the question, are you liable for the crimes

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>commit Like a fool I met could go do something

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 1>like spray paint a piece of equipment, and you know,

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that just strikes me as exceptionally unfair that I could

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>possibly be held to account for that thing that I

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't give permission to be affiliated with and I wouldn't

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>have recommended in YadA YadA. So that's a big part

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 1>of the problem with In Kansas, there is a similar bill,

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>as I believe I said earlier, that has passed out

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of one of the legislative chambers and it has a

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>hearing tomorrow. There are some groups locally opposing it. Kansas

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Interfaith Action has testified against the bill. The Kansas SIRA

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Club has testified against the bill, and showing up against them,

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, is the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, as

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>well as the Wichita Regional Chamber. I'm going to go

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead and guess pretty much means Coke Industries and SESNA.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who else in Wichita is a particularly

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>large company, and I'm gonna go ahead and guess that

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>CESSNA doesn't care about this law, so which is probably

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that the lobbyist did mention We've heard a lot from

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>our members about this one, and I was like, yeah,

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I bet I can tell you which one the other

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>bills are. In Montana, that law is being supported again

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>by trade associations that represent many of the usual suspects

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>trans Canada, Enbridge, Exon Mobile. It's the but it's being

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>done through groups that are not quite so obviously. So

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in Montana, one of the groups that is supporting the

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>anti protest law is called the Treasure, State Resource Association

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of Montana and State Resource Association, it turns out, represents

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas companies, among amongst others. I saw the

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>American Chemistry Council is in there, and Bridge and exce

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>on Mobile are members. And then Montana Petroleum Association also

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>supporting the bill in Montana, and I believe it's pretty

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>much the same oil companies that are the members of

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the Montana Petroleum Association as well the other states that

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>are considering bills Alabama and Arkansas. And Alabama that bill

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>has not yet moved. Arkansas's bill has passed in the

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>House and is working its way through the Senate. I

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>could not tell you in either of those states who

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is advocating for it. If those states disclose that information,

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been able to find it. They certainly don't

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>disclose it. And lobbying registrations, although I can't say that

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Coke has registered to lobby in both of those states

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I noticed. And then the kind of outlier, the state

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that I'm afraid will peak a little too much interest

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for some of the wrong reasons is Illinois. Because a

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Democrat is sponsoring the bill in Illinois, and that has

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>been the situation in Illinois since the beginning. So in

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Illinois as well as Wisconsin, there has been a different

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>strategy than has been used in most other states, and

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that is the oil industry appeals to local trade unions

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and the messaging in their hands. This is exactly what

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>happened to Wisconsin. I'm not sure about Illinois. The American

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>patrolluments to put messaging and talking points into the hands

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of the local trade unions, who then lobby Democrats in

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the legislature and championed the law that passed in Wisconsin.

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>In Illinois, I suspect the trend is similar because just

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:44.959
<v Speaker 1>in the last thirty six hours, in addition to Enbridge

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and the American Patrollum Institute and some Illinois based lobbying organizations,

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of trade unions that have just

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>signed on and support of the bill. In Illinois, they're

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be hearing today and I heard that this

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>bill was taken out of the calendar for discussion. I

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know why. I don't have more details, but yeah,

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it means I have no idea of what direction the

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>bill is heading towards. I don't know if that indicates

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>there's some sort of conflict or stall or if you know,

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just there was some procedural reason why they delayed.

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>But I would keep my eyes out for Illinois. They

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>tried to pass a lot in twenty nineteen. It went

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>through one of the legislative chambers, but not the other.

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure they're going to try and fight like

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>hell again this year to get along in the books,

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>because this is a third year in the row that

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>they've they've tried pushing bills through Illinois.

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting. Thank you so much for spending his time

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 3>with me.

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Great, Thank you so much for taking the time

0:32:51.600 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to chat.

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's it for this time again. I will post

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 3>links to other stories about these bills in the show notes.

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 3>There will also be a story on the drillednews dot

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 3>com website with more on these anti protests bills. We've

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 3>covered this there a couple of other times in the

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 3>past as well. If you know about something like this

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 3>happening in your state, or you've heard interesting things about it,

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 3>feel free to shoot me a line. You can reach

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 3>me at Amy at drillednews dot com or on Twitter

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 3>at Amy Westervelt or at we Are Drilled. If you

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 3>would like to get ad free episodes of this podcast,

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 3>think about becoming a Patreon sponsor. That's at patreon dot

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 3>com slash drilled. You'll get ad free episodes. I often

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 3>drop episodes there early. We're going we do some bonus

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 3>content there, and you also have access to exclusive drilled merch.

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Big thank you to some of our latest sponsors Stephanie

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 3>cass Luke Austin, Jason Grant, Rachel Lower, Aaron O'Day, Douglas Potter, Stavros,

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Papa Vassilu, Dan Davis, The Sowest Society, Amy Geezeber's Fun Week,

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Osiander. Thank you guys, you're really keeping us going here.

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:28.760
<v Speaker 3>I am reporting the next narrative season, got a couple

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 3>more interviews left to do on that. It's going to

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 3>be a deep dive on natural gas, where that term

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 3>came from, how it became the quote unquote bridge fuel,

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 3>that the industry talks about it as today, and what

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:48.399
<v Speaker 3>it has to do with the plastics boom. Make sure

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 3>you're subscribed to the podcast so you won't miss that

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 3>when it's ready, and please drop us a rating or

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 3>review if you get a minute. It really helps us

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 3>find new listeners. Thanks again and we'll see you next week.

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 3>M