WEBVTT - FFW Micro - Deshaun Watson

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You found Fantasy Football Weekly Micro a deep dive on

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>one player in just five to ten minutes. Now, here's

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Charge. It's Fantasy Football Weekly Micro edition.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us. We put these out Monday

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>through Thursday. Deep dive on one player. We encourage your participation.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>If there's a player you'd like to see us break down,

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>let us know at Paul Charging on Twitter and at

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Knabillie K and a E B L E intent. Yeah,

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>well it's not obvious. Yeah, it's not. And as somebody

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that has languished under charge and all these all these years,

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I've had some people hit me up

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. So I'm glad it's actually transferring over to

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a little Yeah, all right, gaining some followers. I hope

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. Yeah. We've broken down four players, three

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>players this week already. We'll hit our fourth now and

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>one of them was a was a contribution from a

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>listener David Montgomery earlier this week. What makes the kinds

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of players we want to break down? So if you're

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna send us a player, don't give us somebody who

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is coming off injury. So because then the conversation usually

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 1>just turns into well, if he's healthy dot dot dot,

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, then this, and if he's not healthy then that.

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather do somebody else because I don't think the injury,

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the injury conversations of too many unknowns in may you

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>know who knows late Sorry, April, it's not me yet, yeah, April.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's so those are the that's that's somebody

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not, you know, and I liked I like

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 1>it also when there's some shifting sands around the players,

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>like this guy, DeShawn Watson Today's focus. He was the

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>QB twenty five last season in the average in the

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>six games that he played at the end of the year.

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>But you're not drafting him. He's going off the board

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>as QB nine right now. Well, you are not drafting

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>You're not drafting him for the player he was last year.

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You are drafting him for the player he was in Houston.

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And the player he was in Houston was pretty freaking good.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>It was. He was QB four in twenty eighteen, QB

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>four in twenty nineteen, and the QB five in twenty twenty.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Also worth mentioning, he was the most sack QB in

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen, sixth most in twenty nineteen, second most in

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. So he was doing this with not a

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of help on the offensive line especially, and I

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>remember that last year he had it was him and

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks and that was nothing else. Yep. And they

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>know last year he got sacked plenty last year to Cleveland.

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we think of Cleveland is having just dominating

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive line. It's a better run blocking line than pass

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>blocking line. They give up the They had the ninth

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>worst sack percentage last year, and so there's no certainty

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that Deshaun Watson's not going to get sacked a lot.

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But I also think he runs himself into some sacks.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:45.799
<v Speaker 1>And you see this with a lot of mobile quarterbacks.

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields was the most sack quarterback last year by

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a mile. Yeah, I agree. I was looking at the

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>breakdown he Jacoby Brissette had. I think he was sacked

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty times and he played two thirds of the season. Yeah,

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think Deshaun Watson was sacked twenty one times

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and he played six games. Yeah, that's right. And those

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>six games are rough, and we I guess we expected

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 1>them to be rough. But he had a zero touchdown game,

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and then a one, and then a one and then

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a zero, and then things took off in the final

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>couple of couple of games where he looked a lot

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable in that offense. The question is does he

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>ever get back to the player he was in twenty eighteen,

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and twenty. I think he's too good that he

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>has to, because I don't think I don't think we

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>can look at last season and be like, this is

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what he's going to be in Cleveland. He wasn't with

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the team for a majority of the season. He had

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to come back kind of pick up like where he

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>left off in the preseason. There, it's probably a completely

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>different team than they were in the preseason. That first

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>prison's to start with Rougher, him and Jacksonville. I remember that.

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think we just we know what he's been.

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>He's done it over a long period of time. It's

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>not like he did it one year and all this

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff happened and now he's back in. He did this

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for a while. They paid the price because that's what

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he was worth, was a fully guaranteed contract. Everyone two

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>or three first round pick, So he's I think he's

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what his price was worth. It. It's because he

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is so good on the field, and I think he's

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a situation around him where he could This

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>probably is the best situation of his career in terms

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of an offense. He's gonna have Amari Cooper, Elijah Moore, Donovan,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>People's Jones. All those guys do different things. Even in

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>David and Joe Target last year, you mentioned that the

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>old line maybe has some troubles, but it's a lot

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>better than what Houston's was when he was there. So

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm gonna bet on the situation. Stefanski's a

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty good play caller. I feel like he can kind

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of get the most out of de Shaun and at

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>QB nine's a fine price for him, considering his ceiling

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is higher than that. So I mean, I don't have

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>If we were now he was going off the board

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>as QB four, QB five, I'd probably be out. But

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>he's QB nine right now, So I feel like you're

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>not even drafting him at his ceiling. Not his ceiling, sir, yes,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but his ceiling is built largely and his rushing ability, um,

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, And and Deshaun wat and threw plenty of

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in Houston. Didn't necessarily didn't really do that last year,

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>but there's there's more passing upside. But what made him

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>a special fantasy producer was the blend of the passing

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in the rushing. Give me his rushing totals. I think

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got the game log for Deshaun Watson in front

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>of you. Give me his rushing totals in his six games,

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>because I am curious to see what kind of how

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Stefanski used him as a runner, because in my mind,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember a lot of big runs coming from

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. Yeah, so last year used one of the

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>attempts in the yards or so. We have seven first

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>game against Houston, seven for twenty one, six for thirty three,

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>six for twenty two, three for twenty four and a

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdown eight for thirty one and six for forty four.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And I also have the number of his rushing in

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Houston over the four years. Yeah, he averaged almost thirty

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>one rushing yards per game and four rushing touchdowns per season. Okay,

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>those aren't gigantic numbers. Yeah, so that's kind of in

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>line with what is around here. So it's it's it's promising,

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say, Okay, all right, I thought it was.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I thought maybe I thought maybe his usage in Houston

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit higher. This is a scenario in

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland where there's still a lot of miles defeat and

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that's still going to be a run first offense. Nick

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Chubb is the identity of that offense, not to Shaun Watson,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>though maybe that changes. But my worry would be that

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Chemistefanski is who he is. He ran the ball in Minnesota.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>That was a Dalvin Cook led offense in Minnesota. He

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>goes to Cleveland and it's a Nick Chubb led offense

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>in Cleveland, and I just, you know, there's some part

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of me that just wonders if there's gonna be enough

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>volume for Deshaun Watson to be the kind of passer

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that he was in Houston. That's the thing is he

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>had to throw a lot, so he was getting all

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>these yards and all these touchdowns. They were always behind

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in these games, so he had he had to throw,

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and he did a good job. But it was really

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>good for Fancy's kind of like the fancy basketball ferens

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>like Trey Young and the Hawks, like he's a great

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>fantasy basketball player because the team's bad because all he

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>has to do he's do whatever you want and puts

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>up all these points. It's kind of like it kind

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of just feels like that's what Deshaun was in Houston.

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's a very interesting point. But I

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>think maybe the counter would be maybe it will just

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be more efficient now is he could get a lot

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>more touchdowns than he possibly couldn't in Houston. So Deshaun

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Watson is QB nine right now, let's talk Dynasty Empire leagues.

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>In Dynasty and Empire, do you like him more about

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the same or less? Are we talking super flex or

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>It's well, I don't know that really necessarily matters, but

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you know we're not comparing it against other positions, Okay

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for sure? So okay, I mean regardless, QB nine, do

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you like him as the ninth best quarterback more or less?

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Are about there? In Dynasty? I do because I don't

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like the qbs below him, and I think he had

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a law of higher ceiling and those guys that are

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>going right behind him. So I'm in on DeShawn on

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty much any format this year. Okay, all right, I

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>would I'm I'm overall way more cautious on him and

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this offense than you are. I think, let's play the

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>ADP game. Let's see who else. Let's talk about who

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>else is going around quarterback nine. All right, Lamar Jackson

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>at QB eight right now, I gotta take the proven

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>upside that Lamar Jackson's rushing gives you. Obviously lots of

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>question marks about if whether or not where he's even playing,

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and if he's unhappy in Baltimore. That worries me. But

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think right now i'd take I'd take Lamar Jackson,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence. Loved what I saw down the stretch from

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence, and then that playoff game was just so amazing,

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's got to be for his confidence. I mean,

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to know that you can come back from a four

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>pick first half down thirty points or whatever they were

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Chargers, that's gotta being so much to him.

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I think it's hard not to like Trevor

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence what he does, and he's kind better wheels than

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>people realize. I like those two quarterbacks over to Shaun

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's this next year that that worries me.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So we got Dak at QB ten. What's Dak's highest

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>fantasy finish. It can't be well. Back in his running

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>days before he you know, got his ankle destroyed, he

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>was probably a top six seven quarterback. So he's QB ten. Now,

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd still I'd take that. You would take that. I

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>think I would take, But I'm just further down. Okay,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I take to Sean and then to a QB eleven.

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>He's that high. I can't for redrafting concussions, I can't

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>do it. Okay, best ball, I'm more interested because I

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have to sweat what game he might get knocked

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>out of. But in standard redraft, non best ball too

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>worries me a lot. He saw he was doing that

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>taekwon do training to help him fall. You see that

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>he was learn how to take a fall. That's what

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>he's doing. He's literally doing taekwon do training to learn

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>how to better brace himself and when he falls. It's

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of it's kind of smart. I kind of like it,

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, Maybe I don't know. I'm all right. I

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like too, but like to Shawn more. Uh. Last one,

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones at QB twelve because he's got that rushing

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>upside that you have the fourth most rushing yards last

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>year exactly. Um, and in theory that passing game will

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>be better next year, they got a draft to receive

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>were right. I can't believe that these words are coming

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>out of my mouth. I'd rather have Daniel Joe. Okay,

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>that's just ludic. I can't do that. They'll draft a

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>receiver under the assumption they're gonna draft multiple receivers probably. Um.

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm taking Daniel Jones. I've been I'm just I

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>just I was so unimpressed with the Deshaun Watson we

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>saw last year. He just looked like a guy and

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I had a hard time conjuring up the images of

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen and twenty twenty. I am gonna give him

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt. Last year, he six games yep,

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>year away from the game, wasn't used to the cold weather.

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yet you know he's accomlated to that out there. There

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>were some games there's like there's games like wins or

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>something like that against uh against I'm just saying I

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>think his upside is higher than you do. Dak too

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and Daniel Jones. Yeah, you think it's an automatic he

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>returns to form. I do not. I think that's and

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 1>that's but that's his degree of disagree. Right, that's totally fine.

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>QB nine. I don't think you're getting You're not getting

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a discount at QB nine because in every twelve team

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>league there's two or three people who absolutely believe, just

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>like you do, that Deshaun Watson's gonna return to form

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and if he does, QB nine's is a good deal

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's where they're taking him. All right. Last one,

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins or oh you're you're hurting n Watson. You

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>are the Kirk Cousins guy on Twitter? Yeah, I am

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>get so many there's just so much hate out there. Yes,

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I know some guy, some guy posted the top fifteen

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks in the NFC. I saw that and kirk wasn't

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>even listened in the top fifteen. Rock Purdy was ahead,

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, it's just come on, jeez, He's coming up

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a season with forty five hundred passing yards thirty touchdowns, Like, okay,

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>so this season, who you're taking or kirk Um for

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>fantasy purposes, I'm gonna take the guy throwing to Justin

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson all right, Yeah, And t J. Hockinson, who we

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>broke down on an earlier episode of Fantasy Hopeball in

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Micro Edition. When we thank you for listening to the

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly Micro Edition, We'll be back next week

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for more Fantasy Football Weekly Micro's plural and Monday through

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Thursday we put these out. Do you get the big

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>episode of Fantasy Football Weekly every Friday and we will

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to you tomorrow. Everybody, Bye bye,