WEBVTT - Mailbag Monday | Ben Bringing It, Bench Too

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>This podcast is part of the seventy Sixers podcast network

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>search seventy Sixers podcast wherever you get your pods. Coming

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>off a solid week cap by a great win against

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the Brooklyn Nets, the seventy Sixers now take their act

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 1>on the road against a couple of quality opponents. We

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>cover a lot, from Bentham and Dunk to Danny Greens Threes,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Toby Yes, coffee and not just any coffee, Salt Lake

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>City Coffee. You're called DMS voicemail. We do it every

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>week right here on mail bag work. The seventy Sixers

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of a rare reprieve back to back

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>days without playing games as they sojourn west for the

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>start of a four game road trip. But knock on wood,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the mailbag is still busy, which we totally appreciate, and

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we got some noteworthy storylines learn to reflect upon from

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the week that was. The seventy sixers had a two

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and one week, just a little bit of a hiccup

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>against Portland without one of their all stars, Ben Simmons.

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We can also look ahead to a four game swing

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>through the West which I think you present some good

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>tests for the old squad. I know we talk about

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>all the time celts that this is a new team,

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>but I think every time the team goes on the road,

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I do get just a little bit nervous. But then

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>when I consider the way that this team has performed

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>on the road thus far this season, I feel a

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>little better. I'm looking forward to seeing how they embrace

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this challenge as opposed to being nervous about what could

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>go down. They have been a lot better on the

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>road this year, and it's a refreshing way to go

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>into a four game trip. You know the way I'm

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>feeling about this upcoming four game trip, tell me, I'll

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>be honest, I'm a little envious. There are a couple

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of cities on this trip that, if you look at

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the schedule, you might not think are the most appealing

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>or attractive destinations on the NBA circuit. The Sixers are

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>at Sacramento, Portland, Phoenix, and then Salt Lake City, home

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Jazz. But there are a couple of those

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>cities Sacramento might be surprising to some people. Sacramento and

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>salt Lake concluded that are low key favorites of one

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Brian Seltzer. Salt Lake is a favorite of Lauren Rosen

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. I'm a big nature, clean air. There are

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>some cities where the air just feels fresh. Salt Lake

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>City is one of those. A ten minute drive and

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you're in the beautiful mountains. I'm a big Salt Lake

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>City gal, and I feel you. I would really be

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>happy to go on a trip to anywhere right about now,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but of course, safety first. Glad that the team has

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>been able to be as safe as they have with

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>a condensed travel party. And I'll be getting to other

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>cities at some point in the next I don't know what,

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>three years, four years, five years. Oh yeah, yeah, let's

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 1>go a little bit more optimistic. Maybe within the next season.

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Fingers crossed, let's not jinx it. Yeah. Sacramento, I feel

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>gets a bad rapid times. They have a great brewery

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>around the corner from the hotel. Hopefully I'm not divulging

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>too much. Portland Hetty Crunchy, tremendous donuts, great grub. Phoenix

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is Phoenix in Salt Lake City. Like you said, the

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>right time of year, get up in that mountain air,

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe have an off day, go to Park City, check

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it out. Those are different times, however, No, this is

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a very Lauren Rosen trip. Actually, I love Portland. Portland

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>might be of the NBA cities that I've seen, and

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>now I've seen most of them all but a few.

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Portland is right at the very top for me. I

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>love Portland, love salt Lake. Whenever there are West Coast trips,

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>people get really excited about going to southern California, and

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for me, to be honest, I would take Portland and

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>salt Lake ten times out of ten. Wow, I like that.

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if I would go ten times out

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of ten, maybe like eight and a half times out

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of ten. I would mix in a few stops in

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Portland and Salt Lake in addition to Southern California fair

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>enough and San Francisco fair enough. I have never been

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Staples Center, and I know that that's one

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of the one of the arenas with a lot of

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>just sort of general vibes and ethos that you want

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to experience. So yes, maybe once I've done it, I'll

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>feel differently. But I do love Portland and Salt Lake.

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>And now the people that listen to us know way

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>too much about where I care to travel to, so apologies,

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask one more non seventy six ers question

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>before we open up the mailbag, just because I feel

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>like everyone has to have a take, whoever you are,

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is you do, whether you even like sports

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>or don't any Super Bowl takes anything at all, Do

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I ask you what was your favorite commercial? I gotta

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>be honest, I almost didn't watch it, and I think

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>that that's something important for folks to know about my identity.

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I love sports. There's a reason I work in sports.

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>But I have just been a little sports out lately

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and I almost didn't watch. I don't have much of

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>an affinity for either team that was playing. And then

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, look like it's a cultural moment. You got

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to watch the Super Bowl. So I did turn it on.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>I did believe that the outcome was going to be

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the outcome. I had a feeling. I'm one of those

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>people you never bet against one of the greatest of

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>all time. It's why I never bet against Lebron in

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the finals. It's why I never bet against Tom Brady

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and the Super Bowl. So for someone who almost didn't

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>watch the game, I was proud of myself for having

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the right, you know, take, at least to myself. I

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's fair. I think that's a reasonable way to

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>look at it. I was a fan of the door

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Dash neighborhood ad with Sesame Street, just because that's kind

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of the realm that I'm living in these days. UM.

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Also not too dissimilar along that same theme, the Huggies

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>shot from Home mostly diaper's ad a lot of I

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>think it looked like it was a mashup of homeshot

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>phone videos um mixed in with some professional shots stuff.

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So I like that. Um what else? I feel like

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>there was one more, Oh, general motors, Will Farrell. That

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>was a good one. I don't know if you caught that.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes a little bit play down on Will Farrell and

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that he's, uh, it's slightly stale. But I

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>thought this was fresh good Will Farrell. I found flat

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Matthew McConaughey amusing. I wasn't like I thought they could

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>have done a little more with that, but but I

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>was amused. I was intrigued by flat Matthew McConaughey at

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>some point in the first quarter. So okay, hopefully there

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>aren't too many people. I feel like it might be

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>just about everyone who hit the tap ahead by ten

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen or thirty second, wishing there was even more seconds.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>You could tap ahead with buttons on your pod apps.

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>But at long last, it is time to open up

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>this week's mailbag. You have one new message. How does

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>mailbag Monday work? You have a couple of ways to

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>reach us. You can call it. This is the preferred

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>way our pod line two on five four zero three

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>seven six three seven. That's two on five four zero

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>three pods. Leave us a voicemail any time of the week,

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>day or night about anything related to the seventy six ers,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be more than happy to play. Right now,

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>there's just about a one thousand percent ratio that if

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you leave a voicemail, we are going to play it

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on the pod, dating back to as long as we've

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>been doing this, and the dms are also open. Look

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>for us on Instagram Seltzer six or snaps Lauren m Rosen.

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Lauren's got the same handle on Twitter. I'm at Brian

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Seltzer on Twitter and the sixers main account on IGS

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>opens up a weekly sticker for your submission in their

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>story on Sundays, and that's how you can reach us

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. And if we read your prompt or submission,

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>or play it on the show. You are then entered

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>into a random name picker for a seventy Sixers swag bag.

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>That's it. We'd love to hear from you. Love it

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>every time we get questions. You guys are always engaged.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You guys are always keeping us on our toes. We

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciate them, so keep them coming. This past week saw

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>wins for the seventy six Ers, wrapping up a three

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>game road trip in perfect fashion with a dub at

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte lost the next night at home against the Portland

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Trailblazers without Ben Simmons, and then a big victory on

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Saturday versus the Brooklyn Nats one twenty four to one await.

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Not surprisingly, a lot of people weighing in on that

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>win over the Nats. We will start there do a

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>couple quick hitters. First from Alex the King seven nine

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>five on Instagram. He said the win was amazing. Big

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Ben is violent in a good way, and I am

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not one to promote violence in any way, shape or form,

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>unless it is a Ben Simmons in your face dunk

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on Tyler Johnson. That was awesome. It really really was awesome,

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And I feel that in some cases I'm okay with

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>technical fouls. Yeah, Like obviously you don't want too many

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of them. It was a close game, but I was

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>cool with it if it means that Ben's feeling himself

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's getting demonstrative out there. Ben Simmons is scary

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>when he's calm, right, So a riled up Ben Simmons

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is honestly somewhat terrifying, and I was happy to see

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>him get into that mode. Some underscore eighty five underscore.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I am loving floor general Ben Simmons. His mindset is

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>full on broad Street Bully when we win, I agree.

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought that Ben came out with purpose. Honestly, in

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>looking back a couple days later, I thought his contributions

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>were more impactful than perhaps the final line reflected, at

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>least on offense with the scoring fish with sixteen points,

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve rebounds, eight assists, three steals, helped change the game

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>with his defense on James Hard midway through the third quarter.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>All around, great game from Ben, but his demeanor in

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that game was also something that I took away from

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the wind Laarn and I don't know how we can

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>do a better job of addressing this, So I'm open

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to thoughts from you or from anyone that submits to

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the Mailbag. But I feel that Ben's stat line almost

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>never tells the full story. It always he's more impactful

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>than even sixteen twelve and eight, which is an incredibly

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 1>impactful stat line right the way that he impacts the

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>game on both ends of the floor. We've heard Doc

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Rivers talk about it all season since even before this

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>team actually hit the floor for meaningful minutes. We've heard

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Joel and Bead talk about Joel and Bead talked about

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it on Twitter a couple nights ago to make sure

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>people know how impactful Ben is beyond what the stats say.

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So I wish there was a way that we could

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>just add like a little Ben bump to every stat

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>line that he produces, because he is always making more

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of an impact than that line suggests. And the same

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>could go for a few other players on this team

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. When there are so many good players, the

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>stats don't always tell the full story. Couldn't be in

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>more alignment with you on that sentiment, Larne, and just

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>very quickly as an aside, because we haven't done enough

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>asides already on this edition of mail Bag Monday, you

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Twitter and some love shown by Joel embiad for

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>his fellow players on the Sixers roster. On Twitter, it

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is a fricking get you to the All Star Game

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>LoveFest between Joe, Ben and Tobias. It's great, great support

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>for each other and tremendous camaraderie on social media between

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>three all Star hopefuls for the Sixers. Yeah, you love

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>to see it sets. They have varying sizes of followings,

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>notably Joel Ben they have millions and millions of followers.

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Tobiases a little bit behind in the follower count, but

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Ben and Joel know that, and they know that they

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>can use their audiences to boost the rising tide can

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>raise all ships in this social media of Sixers landscape,

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and I've loved watching the way that they've all been

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>able to leverage their own voices to help one another.

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Tobias has done a little bit more media recently. He

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>did the woj pod and he also has been super

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>super complimentary of Ben and Joel. So to just hear

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>them all spreading the love towards one another, it's it's

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>just been beautiful to see salts. It warms my heart,

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It warms my cold, cold heart. Amen which, Hey, everyone's

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>heart has got to be cold these days. Right now

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>as we're taping this, it's like twenty five degrees outside. Insanity.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, back into the mail bag we go. You

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>have one new message. Yeas me and Morgan on Ig

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>said Brooklyn in that game that Simmons and Curry got

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>back into a groove. I am hype. I've got one

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of two. Hey, look at you. One two year old

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>twins are in the house. My man Asher there he is.

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 1>He's going to come and read one of our submissions.

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>He wants to sleep on my side of the bed

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 1>for naps. Should we let him? Before we address he

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>has me and Morgan's comment, I think, so are we

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>keeping this part in salters? Or is this we're keeping in? Yeah,

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>this is still in. I thought this was like a

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>US question for the mail bag is no, it is.

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It's from Ashury. He wants to know can you sleep

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on my side of the bed for nap? I think

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we should let him? Should let me sleep on my

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>side of the bed? Okay, all right? If he says yes,

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we should, then we shall goodbye, buddy, let's rerack it. Yes,

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>me and Morgan on Ig this was a game talking

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>about the Brooklyn game that Ben Simmons and Seth Curry

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>needed to get back in the groove. I am hype.

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I am as well loved seeing that fade away three

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>from the corner go down for Seth Curry at the

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the first half that put the Sixers back

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in front by one. He only finished with eleven points,

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>but I thought that you saw Seth established that rhythm

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>once again, boosted by that late three in the second quarter,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and then in the third quarter, he was really helpful

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 1>as well, for sure, and that was yet another decisive

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>third quarter for this team. So to see Seth get

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>some shots going in, like you said right before halftime,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and then eight points in the second half really big

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for someone that's had a rough go of it the

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks. We know that he was sidelined due

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to COVID nineteen. Doc Rivers has been very understanding and

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>has urged folks to give Seth a little slack because

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>he's still coming back from something really difficult. Seth has

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>explained that he hasn't been feeling great. We saw him

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>sit out the second half of the Portland game because

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't feeling great. So just from a human perspective,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>really really nice to see Seth succeed against the Brooklyn Nets,

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully he can put together a good road trip

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for himself. But I would echo what Doc said and

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>just make sure you're being patient with this man, because

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this has got to be really difficult for him. He

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously holds himself to a very high standard and it

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>must be hard to not be able to reach that

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>standard because of something that's totally out of your control.

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And I like to presume positive intent, Lauren, with everyone,

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>but if you do, happen to be one of those

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>people who is not being patient with Seth Curry right now,

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>he was shooting sixty percent this time last week from three,

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so let's let's give it a rest. And I think

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>most people are. I think they realize that, yeah, there's

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>ups and downs, especially when it comes with shooting throughout

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a season, and Seth is, in particular trying to navigate

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>this just crazy period and trying to get himself right.

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>But I was, and I'm glad to see that some

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>fans were as well, really happy to see him do

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>his thing at various points in that game against the

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Nets on Saturday. I want to take a quick second

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to remind you of our programming slate here on the

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy Sixers podcast network main feed. Every Monday it's mail

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Bag Monday with myself and Lauren Rosen. Every other Tuesday

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it's co Check with Matt Murphy, the official podcast of

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the Delaware Bluecoats, the seventy six Ers G League affiliate.

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Every other Thursday it is Tom's Talks with the one

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and only radio voice of the seventy six Ers, the

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>incomparable Tom McGuinness. And then on Fridays it's our weekly

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Deep Dive with the Man Devon Givens. We also have

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a brand new show on a brand new feed. It's

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>called The Scoop. It's essentially a daily five minute seventy

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Sixers update that comes to you first thing every morning.

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>All you gotta do is search seventy six or Scoop

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your pods to subscribe or follow along

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>more mail Bag. You have one new message, Jay Harrap,

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty sixers are playing amazing. It's because we got shooters now,

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and I do not disagree with that. I feel that

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. The spacing of this team has looked really good.

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>The ball movement of this team has looked good, the

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>shooting has looked good, and of course this week we

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>saw a couple of cold streaks from the Sixers from

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>deep but just knowing, and it's not coming to my

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>head right now, but one of our players spoke about it,

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and it'll probably come to me as soon as we

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>hang up from this call, Seltz, But about the idea

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that Danny and Seth are always threats, whether or not

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they're scoring high numbers in any given game, Leaving them

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>open is always a mistake and that stretches opponent defenses

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in a way that we haven't seen a ton in

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, especially when they're going to

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>try to double Joel Embiid with If you double Joel

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>embid and you're guarding Danny and you're guarding Seth, who's

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>guarding Ben and Tobias, it really is an interesting thing

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to see the way that other defenses have to deal

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>with this team and have to give respect to guys

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like Danny and Seth. And that's just in the starting lineup.

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>We know we have shooters on the bench as well.

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>How awesome was that when Danny Green in the corner

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>right in front of the Brooklyn bench got the no call,

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and it was probably a fair no call. But listen,

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>if the worst thing that happened from that was that

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>he got so fired up, he went on that run

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of scoring eight straight points to essentially put the game

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in the seventy sixers control for good, terrific moment. And

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it speaks to your point, Lauren, that regardless of what

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>these guys are shooting. To tie this back into the

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>comment that we were talking about with Seth, it's that

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to honor these guys, particularly those two, given

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>their body of work. And I think last year the

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Sixers had some players on their roster who are solid

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>three point shooters who yes, can knock down big shots,

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like a Josh Richardson. And this is no shade or

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>any slight, but he's just he's not one of those

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>dead eye marksmen like Danny Green and Seth Curry, and

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>very few guys are in the NBA for that matter.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But you have to honor players like that, and you

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just sort of know that when Danny or Seth is

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>left open, they're gonna make you pay. I like what

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you said about Danny. I said that he returned to

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the scene of the crime for back to back threes

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>after that egregious no call. There aren't many people in

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the building these days, but when there's a big no

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>call in the building, you can kind of hear a

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>collective sigh or a collective like if there were fans there,

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>they'd be booing and being loud and being crazy. But

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>even without fans, when a no call is as bad

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>as that one on Danny was, you really hear you

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 1>hear a collective sigh in the building. And then it

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was great to see him return to the scene get

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>those back to back threes and really put the game

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>away for the Sixers. I thought that was a great,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>great showing from Danny Green in a crucial part of

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the game for the first time. In this week's Mailbag Monday,

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we go to the podline. You have one new message.

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Seventy sixers have had some situations forward to had a

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>big lead or going into the reporter or their down

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. The best fourth quarter team so far

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in the season, do you think this helps them close

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 1>out teams and put them away. They'd come back a

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit. We are talking about late game performance consistently

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>learn by these seventy sixers. Do we think this helps

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>close teams out and put them away because they've been

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 1>so good in the fourth quarter. Absolutely, we've discussed this

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times. I honestly can't remember at this

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>point where it was seven six Live Countdown Friday Deep

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Dive with Divan or here on the mail bag. But

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I really am a big believer that this fourth quarter success,

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>closing teams out in the fourth especially for new team

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>with a new coach, really conform the foundation for trust

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>and buying. No doubt about it, the Sixers continue to

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>be the best fourth quarter team in the league. Of course,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that means that they are finding themselves in a lot

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of close games scenarios in the fourth quarter, which I'm

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>sure Doc Rivers would be relieved to not find himself

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in as much as this team is. But there will

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of close games down the road for

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this team. There will be a lot of close games

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs for this team. It is cool to

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>see the way that they've figured out a way to

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>navigate tough situations this early in their ten year as

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a group, not just early in the season, but early

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>as a group, early as a group under a new

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff. They really have figured out what late in

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>games is supposed to look like, and to me, it

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>starts on defense. I think this team's fourth quarter defense

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>has been just based on the eye test, not even

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 1>using any of the numbers. Pretty outstanding. I think that

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about stats, you know, there's I think

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>more people these days obviously understand why it makes sense

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to look at things on a per one hundred possession

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>basis that normalizes things for all thirty teams. But let's

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>say if you just took the per game stats traditional

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>stats and you narrowed it down to the fourth quarter,

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Sixers outscored the opposition by around three and a half

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>points per game in the fourth quarter. But if you

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>project that out and normalize it to per one hundre possessions,

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>this is how good the Sixers are in the fourth quarter,

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>outscoring the opponent by an average of thirteen points that

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>would be if they played it that way over the

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>course of one hundred possession game. And the next closest

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>team is Brook and they're doing quick math roughly five

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>points behind the seventy Sixers in their scoring rate in

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, which, again, if you go back to

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the per game stat analysis, they're just about a point

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half pind the Sixers, So that just speaks

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to the differential. Then when you look at it by

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a per one hundred possession basis, shows you how good

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers have been finding ways to close opponents out.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Did any of that make sense? I felt myself speaking

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>in circles. Okay, it made sense to me, and I

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>would just add the last stat I wanted to throw

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>out there. The Sixers have found themselves in I believe eleven, yes,

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>eleven clutch time situations where the game is within five

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe, isn't it within five points in the last

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>five minutes of the game. Cells isn't thought how clutch

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>time is defined. And they've won ten of those eleven opportunities.

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>That's big time. That is a huge stat and if

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they can continue winning close games at this rate, I

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>think it'll be absolutely massive for the team going forward.

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Opponents shooting just forty one and a half percent on

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the seventy Sixers in fourth quarter that is just a

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>tenth of a percentage point behind Houston for the best

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>stat in the league. Opponent shooting just thirty one point

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>six percent from three in the fourth quarter. That is

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the lowest in the league seventy Sixers defense getting it

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>done when it matters the most. Andy Slichter on IG

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>saying the Sixers can finish a game even when the

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>game isn't going to plan, learning to finish speaking to

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 1>the point we just discussed, Yes, Andy Well said, you

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>have one new message. More on Igs, Jonathan underscore Young

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>O three playing Shake Milton more is great for the Sixers,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with him getting more than twenty minutes per game e

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Z win in Caps. I can't say if it's necessarily

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>always going to be easy or simple or direct path,

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>but I do agree that the more Shake Milton plays,

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the more good things happen. Well. Shake

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is just so determined and so confident no matter the scenario.

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>He's always ready to embrace a challenge. He's never afraid.

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The way that he's able to drive through traffic late

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in games, even if he's not having a great night,

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to just really attack an opponent defense and have no

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>fear has really impressed me over and over again from Shake,

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's cool to see him continuing to feel out

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>his role as really a leader of that second unit,

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>even though he's still young in his career, he's sort

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of emerged as a as a calm, cool, collected presence

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for a second unit that is, overall, outside of Dwight Howard,

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty young. Shake Milton in the win over the NAT's

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen points off the bench, six of three from the field,

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>four rebounds and three assists, got a few opportunities when

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he was matched up on James Harden, and Yeah, I

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>think that he is certainly larned taking on a leadership

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>role with the bench. He's a great score, still an

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>evolving score very much this year from what we've seen

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 1>his ability to finish at the rim, but also his defense.

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>I think people should be talking more about that. I

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>know that some people on six or Twitter have brought

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that up, but Shake's been able to hold it down

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty decently on defense, which can only help his cause

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>towards make a complete player. Yeah, and another player that

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind is Tobias Harris there because both of

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>them have shown a ton of improvement this season, but

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they've also both emphasized the fact that they want to

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>improve on defense, and they've definitely done it. I don't

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>see Shake Milton or Tobias Harris as a defensive liability

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I see them as guys that can stick with their man.

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>They can even hang around in a little zone if

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they need to, and it's been cool to see them

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of put their money where their mouth is when

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to improving defensively. Because both of them have

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>back to the podline, which once again so you can

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>enter it in your phone and save it. Two and

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>five four zero three seven six three seven. You have

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>one new message him a tease. This is Grace from

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. I just wanted to give you a shout

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>out on how you stayed so determined in the end

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Pacers game. So proud of you. Keep up

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that strong defense and keep making those steals. Thank you

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for making it such an exciting game. Bye. So the

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>story behind this voicemail, Lauren is that Gloria actually called

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>us right after we were done taping last week's mail

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>bag Monday. So her voice mail reference Matisse Thible's defensive

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>performance against the Indiana Pacers. But because she sent in

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>a great call, one that appreciates Matisse Thible, you have

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to get those calls in and again, I think this

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>underscores the point that you were talking about with the

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>bench and how we're seeing some depth, And I gotta

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, like looking at some of the

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>fellow top contenders if we put the Sixers in that

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>category in the Eastern Conference, I'm thinking of teams like

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn and Boston and Toronto who the Sixers have played

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. Miami, I don't think we could get a

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>fair gage on because they were so decimated in terms

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of roster availability when the Sixers had that two game series.

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>But I like the Sixers depth compared to their fellow

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>top of the Eastern Conference brethren. We haven't seen Milwaukee yet,

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>but I really like the Sixers depth. And a couple

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of these guys who we've talked about over the last

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>few minutes our big reason why the Sixers have shown

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to have good depth. Yeah, I'm with you. It's a

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>guy like Matisse Thybill coming off the bench is such

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a luxury to have. He's one of the best defenders

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly on this team, if not in the league. And

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to have someone like Shake come off the bench with

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>his offense, Matisse come off the bench with his defense.

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Those are weapons that other second units around the league

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to have problems responding to. And it's been

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>cool to see both of them grow again from sort

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>of youngsters on the team into guys that really know

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>their role and can step into their role with confidence

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and with conviction. A guy like Matisse, we talk about

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>his defense all the time, but I think it's worth

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>noting that his stats on defense in steals and particularly

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>deflections always among the top guys in the league, but

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>his minutes are not among his contemporaries in those situations.

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And I liked dear tweets ELTs the other day when

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you talked about Matisse leading the league in deflections per

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty six, because Matise this season is averaging, I believe,

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>just over seventeen minutes a game and still hanging with

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>other defenders stats wise per game. But when you narrow

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it down per thirty six, Matis is far in a

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>way being more productive defensive end when it comes to

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>deflections and steals and loose balls. And I think that's

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>just a phenomenal thing to keep an eye on to

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>that point, and we must be particularly in sync. On

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Mailbag Monday, Matise played twenty two minutes

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Nets on Saturday. He had a team high

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve contested shots. According to NBA dot Com. And now

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it's also important to note that the way that individual

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>teams measure these stats differ from the league website. So

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>it kind of to me, I kind of take with

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>a grain of salt and numbers like that serve to

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>better inform what you're seeing. But yeah, in twenty two

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes twelve contested shots, that's tremendous five deflections, second on

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the team to Ben Simmons, who at eight deflections, and

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Simmons played thirty four minutes. So whether it's stagnated where

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you might have Ben Simmons on the court at one time,

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>then bring on Matisse to take on the opposing team's

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>top perimeter score, or you put them in a lineup

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>together like what we saw at times with Ben Mati

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>plus another All League defender in Danny Green, seventy sixers

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>showing some really great options defensively that they can use

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>scattered throughout a game. Yeah, no doubt about it. We

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>talked about it obviously with last week's mailbag, and I

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>assume that this voicemail is addressing the zone that the

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>two of them, Ben and Matisse that is put up

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>at the top of that two three zone. They were

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>just incredible, really cool thing to maybe look out for

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on a future I don't know, Australian national team, but

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>also on sixers lineups to come as well. Really cool

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to see the two of them developing a chemistry on

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the defensive end, trusting one another and leading the rest

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of the group on defense. And I would also add

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>there was a play that I wanted to reference when

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you said we were going to talk about Matisse from

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the Brooklyn Nets game. He blocked Landry Shammitt from behind.

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>His sort of come from behind block has become one

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of his i'd say, signature defensive plays, grabbed the block himself,

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>took it back down to the other end for Shake

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Milton to hit an immediate three. In the way that

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Landry Shammont, who's another calm, cool and collected great guy

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 1>former sixer. We love Landry Shammitt. You could see in

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>his body language that he was just deflated by what

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Matisse did to him in that one play and it

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>took him a minute to get back into the game.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>So the mental side of the defense that some of

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>these guys can play, I think down the stretch is

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be really huge for this team. Amen to that,

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Vic volcom on igs saying depth is more important than

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of superstars, perhaps in reference to the fact

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that Brooklyn has it's three stars and its lineup with Durant,

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Irving and harden Listen. Well, I would I agree with

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 1>that sentiment. I would also say that it's great to

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>have superstars and depth, which the seventy sixers, by the way,

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>have as well, because they've got their own core of superstars.

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And then you've thrown this depth and I think, like

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we've all seen, it's a reason why the team is

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the East and some house ELTs.

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we've gotten through whatever it's been thirty minutes

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of the mail bag before even mentioning for Concork Moss,

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>who has also looked really good lately thirteen points against

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn with a couple other strong performances after a little

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a lull there for Furkon, but another guy

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to have on your bench that can come off with

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the offensive production that he can give you, especially shooting,

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is just phenomenal. In the fact that we've talked about

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>depth now for twenty minutes and haven't mentioned Furcon yet

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>speaks to just how deep this team is. Yep, Dwight,

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Howard Tyres, Maxie throw them in the mix. Too good

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>looking bench for Doc Rivers and the seventy sixers. You

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have one new message, shifting our focus to what lies

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>ahead for the Sixers. Lauren and I gave you the

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>itinerary Sacramento, Portland, Phoenix, Utah over the next eight days

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Sixers. Talicia Martineau on IG, saying, proud of us.

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I can see the progress. Great win over Brooklyn. We

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>should be fine this week on the road trip. Blue

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Hearts emoji. I think there's gonna be some challenging games.

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I do. I think Sacramento is going to be really interesting.

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>The Kings have been playing well and solidly as of late.

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix made a huge offseason edition headlined by Chris Paul,

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and then Utah has lost I think just once in

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>its last sixteen games, if I have that number up

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to date. And then there's Portland, which knocked off the

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Sixers without its dynamic backcourt duo. So I think there's

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be challenges. Yeah. I mean it's four tough games,

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's four winnable games, but it's also four losable games,

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be cool to see the way

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Sixers are able to cope with being on

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the road as a group for so long. Luckily, the

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>chemistry is really good on this team, and I think

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll be able to at least enjoy some time together.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course distanced and with a little bit less freedom

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>than they're used to, but it'll be interesting to see

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>if this could be a nice bonding experience for the team.

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully fight through and get some gritty wins knocked out

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>against some quality teams. They could come back to Philadelphia

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in whatever it is ten days a much stronger unit

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>together if they if they spend the next ten days

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>strategically where the larn's between postgame work after Sixers games,

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>or just being tired. As an aging person in my

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>mid thirties, I definitely at this stage of the year

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>don't stay up to watch all the West Coast games

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>when they're on national TV. So personally, there's the flip side,

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>which is that back on the East Coast you have

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to stay out for these later start times. But I

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>also really look forward to seeing some of these teams,

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>especially Phoenix, and how they were looking to build on

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the success they had in the bubble when they went

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on that undefeated run, didn't make it to the postseason.

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Now they add Chris Paul, what do they look like?

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>The Utah Jazz Mike Connolly might be banged up, but

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>what's triggered their recent success to shoot up to the

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>top of a really good Western conference. So while my

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>body and mind might be somewhat terrified of the demands

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of the schedule being three time zones away in the

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>days ahead, the basketball fan in me is really looking

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>forward to seeing some of these teams. Well, you know,

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we love a day game here on the broadcast itself,

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and at least we are going to get one of

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>those on Saturday in Phoenix. It could be worse. We

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>could get more than two ten am starts with this group.

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And luckily, in this group of games, the first two

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to be the latest, So six Ers fans,

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>drink your coffee, and the second two more manageable. Especially,

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we love a Saturday day game, indeed, indeed, and I

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>ironically ended up taking that day off my first game

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>off this season. But everyone else back East, no, I'm

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>happy for the three pm Eastern start. All right. That's

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>our male bag covering Sixers, Super Bowl, and underrated road

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>trip destinations everything in between. That road trip conversation at

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the beginning Salts has me very nostalgic. The Salt Lake

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Salt Lake City in Portland, I think two of the

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>most well Portland maybe not underrated, but Salt Lake City underrated.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>For the coffee game, I'm a big coffee gal, especially

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on the road. I like to try different highly rated

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>coffee places. Maybe that makes me a coffee snob. It

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is what it is. But Blue Copper Coffee in Salt

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Lake City and Barista in Poor two of the best

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>cups of coffee you can get in the country. Unfortunately,

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers travel party not allowed to venture out to

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>either establishment. But hopefully next time, when we're all there together,

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we could maybe do a broadcast from a good coffee

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>shop or at least with a good cup of coffee.

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>A yes, B. I mean my one dream back in

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the day was right if we go on the road,

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>take or act on the road and have a gathering

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of displaced out of market Sixers fans. I'm just disappointed

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that you did not cite Milk Creek as your coffee

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>spot in Salt Lake. And I'm not a coffee drinker.

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.479
<v Speaker 1>But I love Milk Creek coffee roasters. I don't know

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Milk Creek. I might have to try that next time

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Salt Lake. My best friend happens one of

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>my best friends, if not my best friend, happens to

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>live in Salt Lake City. But she's not a coffee drinker.

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So when I'm out there visiting, I have to go

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>find stuff myself. And mill Creek I'll have to do

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that next time. These street blocks in Salt Lake City

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>are outrageously long, but that being said, it's only two

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>blocks down the street from the hotel. So the next time, yeah, noted,

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I will have to try it. Okay, so we Yeah,

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly a lot of ground covered on the mailbag. Hopefully

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>none of you taft ahead, and our retention percentage on

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 1>this episode is very high. All in compassing content here

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>on the mailbag. You never know. Hey, We're just happy

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to be able to talk to one another. I hope

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>some of you are as bored as I am these

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>days and managed to listen to that whole thing. If

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you have any coffee takes, then you want to submit

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>those to next week's mailbag. I am all ears, and

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>as always, thank you everybody who's still listening, for continuing

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>to listen, and for submitting all your questions. This has

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>been really fun for us. Be on the lookout this

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>week for more installments in our Black History Month Inspirations miniseries. Also,

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom's Talks will drop on Thursday, a new episode with

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>t Mac and We're back with Divine Givensar and I

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>will on Friday for the latest edition of the Friday

0:34:47.160 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Deep Dive. Talk to you then,