WEBVTT - Beating The Book: Guessing Lines Week 11

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man down Man, Good Monday morning to do.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 1>It is a number of game right here at the

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>four Spetting Network, serious XEP channel tool for Visa dot Com,

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the Visa f Boobo sling at Game Plus. It is

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Gil Alexander. Jason con is here as well. Good morning

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to you, Jason. How are you? How are you? By

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, good? Thanks, go happy Monday. I couldn't go, Howard,

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't decide between how are you and how you doing?

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's what came out of my It's good on

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>all accounts. Uh. This is Guessing Lines week eleven in

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. That's what we're here for this morning. Of course,

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll briefly touch on Dustin Johnson's amazing coronation at the

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Masters today. Coronation the entire weekend was that for a

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Hall of fame golfer who got it done with the

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>green jacket. This weekend we'll talk about that, uh when

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it comes up sort of organically. Congratulations to everybody who

0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 1>had DJ with their bets. A record twenty under par

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>at Augusta, never been done before his second major of

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>his career. Uh, and of course the NFL will if

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you're just landing on this show for the first time,

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the upcoming week lines. I've been in

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a cocoon. This is a tribute to the old start

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>US radio show of the same name. I've been in

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a cocoon since last night. I don't know the lines.

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I guess them. Chrissie Andrews from the South Point Sports Book,

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the director of that sports book right here behind us,

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the tip of the strip. Uh, he tells us what

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>he's going to post after the show. Right after the show,

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>and within that exercise, we got ourselves some value. And uh.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Last week, what was the line that I thought was

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the most ridiculous was Cleveland And yeah, that should have covered.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that. We'll talk about that in the

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Arizona endings, because I think that is those are obviously

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the two headlines from a Benny standpoint. Let's bring him

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.559
<v Speaker 1>in my mish book of Chris Andrews. Good morning, Chris.

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? I I got questions for you. One.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's just let's start it out. First of all, congratulations,

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you have you have four survivor pools that are still

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>four survivor entries. You and your partners are still available.

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>You and your partner partners plural. Oh, I got a

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of partners. We put in a bunch of stuff

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. So it's like, I gotta win

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>one of these to break even. So yeah, I've got

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. But you are in the circle

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>one right with four entries left. Yeah, yeah, that'll if

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 1>we win that one, that'll pay a few bills. So

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, so we went from three ten to three

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>oh one another. Yeah, the gaunten. The gauntlet begins now.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>But how did you play it this weekend? Did you

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>have all four on one team? No, we had three gutten.

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>We had three with Green Bay. It's made a sweat.

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and uh and then we had one with the Saints.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay they both did they all got through? Um? Yeah.

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Now here's my question of a bookmaking standpoint that game

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>last night is we're watching Baltimore, New England, and New

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>England ends up winning it out right. I don't know how,

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, It's like, it's amazing how it always works

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out for books in the end, That's what it seems like.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But a Sunday night game, you probably weren't having the

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>best week, I would imagine, and then that happens. How

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>big of a decision was that for you? Boy? It

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was big? Yeah, it was big winning that game we

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>wound up not I mean we went to the day

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and not you know, not like a great number, but

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like an okay number. If we lost that game, it

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>would have been really bad. So but we went into

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it and then we need a miracle here because I

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't know New England it beat him, you know, I

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>really didn't. Um, But we got it, you know, and

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it was nice. It kind of salvage the salvage the

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>weekend because Saturday was not very good at all. Yeah,

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and we weren't looking very good going into Sunday night.

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>But that that was a big win for us. Great

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>game plan by Belichick, weather helps um was. But you know,

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you could have said that if the Ravens were up,

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the weather would help them too, probably. So just a

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>great game plan from start to finish for the Patriots.

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Patriots when at twenty three to seventeen as outright seven

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>point dogs, they went it out right, that is uh

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's huge. Four books. Let's start with Thursday, because

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>there's so much to get into from yesterday as we're

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>doing this. By the way, for week eleven. For those

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>who are just here for the first time, we of

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>course go back through all the Shenanigans betting in Otherwise,

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in week ten, what is Thursday Night? Good game? Cardinals

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Seahawks. Oh, that is a good game. Cardinals

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>six and three. Seahawks six and three. Rams are also

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>six and three in the NFC West. Niners not so much.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Not their fault. Huge Thursday game. Uh. Arizona wins yesterday

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>on the Hail Mary. I guess people are calling it

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to Hail Murray, Hail Mary, Hail Mary from Kyler Murray

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to DeAndre Hopkins forty three yards with two seconds left

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>on the clock, and that beats the Bills yesterday and

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>dramatic fashion. After the Bills had scored with just over

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds love, I believe, with thirty four seconds left,

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Stephen dig scored and Stefon Diggs was on the sideline

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>doing a whole bunch of me me, look at me.

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh that's my translation of what I saw thirty two

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>thirty though the Cardinals hook it up on the on

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the Murray to Hopkins play. By the way, Bill O'Brien

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>had no need for DeAndre Hopkins, just want to point

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that out. So if you had the Bills plus two

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half, uh, you end up By the way,

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it's Gill Alexander and Chris Andrews right here in the

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>numbers game at Visa the Sports Betting Network Serious Except

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Channel to A four, Visa dot Com, the Visa that

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Food bos link a game plus guessing lines for week eleven.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Looking back at week ten, Uh, if you had the

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Bills plus two and a half, you end up winning.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>If you have the Cardinals minus two and a half,

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you end up losing. The two is a push and

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the reason for the push here is that when the

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdown was scored with just two ticks of the clock

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>left and the Cardinals go up thirty two to thirty,

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Cliff Kingsbury and staff decided, Uh, we're not going to

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>kick an extra point. We are going to line up

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in a two point conversion formation and we're just gonna

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>take a knee. And that is a genius move. I

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>know that it hurts some gamblers and it and it

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>harm and it and it helped others. But the only

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>way with two seconds left on the clock that you

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>can get beat in that situation, or you can get

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can get beat is if they block the kick,

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>return it for two points and then beat you in overtime.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>So just take the knee. I totally get that move. Now.

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't notion in my head that Kingsbury just looked

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>into and I was like, does he think this is

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>a time down? Like there's a little of that in

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>my head. But I'm gonna give him a benefit of

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the doubt. I think he knew what he was doing,

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>So that one I endorse. We'll get to the Cleveland

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Brown ones later because I have Cleveland Brown's one later

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>because I have a different opinion on that. But Kyler

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Murray twenty two of thirty two for two forty five,

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown, one pick, sack three times, eleven carries for

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty one yards and two touchdowns on the ground. Uh,

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>he's in the m v P conversation everybody. He's gotta

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>be first quarterback with a touchdown in five straight games

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen fifty six. Hopkins ends up seven for a touchdown,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>rake four hundred fifty three total yards for the Cardinals

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and victory. And then there's Seattle, And I don't think

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson is really in the m v p conversation anymore. Uh,

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the The Seahawks have lost three of four s and

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>starting five and oh Wilson was twenty three thirty eight

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for two forty nine but no touchdowns, two picks. He

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>was sacked six times. He was eight for sixty on

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the ground. The Seahawks have ten turnovers in their last

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>four games, including three yesterday. The third was a fumble

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>lost by Wilson. They were minus two in turnovers in

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>their loss yesterday to the Rams to sixteen. It was

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a bad spot for the Seahawks, though the Rams had

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks. If Sean McVeigh couldn't have schemed

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>two weeks to beat that defense, I'm not sure if

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we could call him a genius anymore. That was my

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>buddy Matt Brown's comment. I agree with that, but in

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the end, for me, Russell Wilson another really bad pick yesterday,

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that one at the end of the second quarter when

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they were down seven and he could have run for

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the first down, he threw it in the end zone.

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It was picked just really uncharacteristic plays. But it's Arizona

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>at Seattle on a short weekend. So getting finally to

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the guests, I think it's Seattle not quite a field goal.

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd say Seattle minus two and a half. Gilly, what's

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>our t shirts gonna come out? Your number better? Uh?

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's three with juice on the favorite. And I

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>even see one three and ALP with juice on the dog.

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>My numbers come to pick them. However, and this is

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>purely anecdote. I wish I shouldn't been keeping track of

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this for years. In a shortened weekend like this, I do.

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I prefer a veteran team. I think home field might

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>mean a little something. And I'm gonna give you to

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that in a second. Uh, you know, I like a

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>veteran team, a veteran quarterback, you know. And I was

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be the first to admit I was

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>very late to the Murray party. He's really good and

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I had my serious doubts about him, but this kid's good.

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I however, like I said, he's still you know, young quarterback.

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I still don't like their coach. I don't know if

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 1>you looked into that, uh non extra point or not,

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>but that that was another thing that really helped the books.

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 1>By the way, but you know, Russell Wilson not playing

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>very good ball. So I have these two teams equal,

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I would not go to three, which is really what

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it is, is three and juice. I'm gonna open three

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>flat and they're gonna probably bet me. See I mean,

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they'll bet me settle, uh, which I'm certainly

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>okay with. But like I said, even though I made

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>power rating wise make the game pick on, I give

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Seattle a little bit of a nod because of you know,

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the coach and the quarterback. And when it comes to

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson, Uh, they're really asking a lot of him.

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And yesterday what was that Jalen Ramsey was a cornerback

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>really shut down DK met gap and I think when

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you get in that situation now, not too many guys

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be able to do that, by the way,

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but they're really asking Wilson to do an awful lot.

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it came back to haunt him yesterday, and

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe come back to haunt him a couple of

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>times in the last couple of weeks because Wilson has

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>not looked at good. You know, for years, I've been

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>saying I hate rooting against this guy, but yesterday, you know,

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 1>we kind of needed to beat him and we did. Um,

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, but he's not playing real well right now.

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I got his qbready from yesterday thirty one point one.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the lowest I remember how to him

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I love the guy. I talked about

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>him altiple time. He's terrific. But uh, you know, I'm

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna open three. I think they'll lay it to me.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I'm fine with that, but I do

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of like your number better. To be honest with you,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but you got helped by that nal down and I'm

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>sure you got healthy by the other one that's coming

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>up in in the Cleveland game? What is it? What

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is next Sunday? Speaking of Cleveland, Billy yeat Cleveland. By

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the way, how great was the five early game six

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>late games thing yesterday? Great? H so good? What is

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it this coming week? Are we reverting back to the normal? Yeah? Seven,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>seven and four. We're getting there. We're getting there. That

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>was a great, a great weekend where college football cooperated

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>in terms of not being a really sexy schedule, having

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen postponements or cancelation, and then Dustin Johnson having the

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>decency to run away with the masters. So there wasn't

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>much to watch. They either in the NFL accommodating it

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>with five early games and five that weren't of the

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>sexiest matchups. Right, all the all the good ones were

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in the afternoon. Just from a fan standpoint, what was

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the game with Cleveland again? Who was it? Cleveland? Oh? Boy? Philly?

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>The NFC East leading Philadelphia Eagles now at three five

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and one, they lose to the Giants. A lot of

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>money came in on the Eagles. Eagles ended up as

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a four and a half point closing favorite. They lose

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven to seventeen, broken eight game winning streak against

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. They Giants hadn't beaten them to twenty six.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz thirty seven, two oh eight, no touchdowns, no picks,

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's the sacks, three sacks man as he gets

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 1>sacked all out this year oh for nine on third down?

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles were oh for nine on third down at

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>zero for nine, one for three on four. First game

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Eagles franchise since two thousand four without a

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>third down conversion. Think about that, sixteen years they've gone

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>without getting a third down conversion. They had eleven penalties

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for seventy four yards and then in one of these

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is really the theme of yesterday Analytics

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>gone bad. Whence and the Eagles go for two down

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty one to seventeen in the third quarter. But could

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we please can we please stop with this someone? I mean,

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's so funny how we can anything

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>can be justified. But in that moment, you know, because

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you can, you can take it to you know, chess

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>place plays forward and be like, well yeah, but if

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>then if they end up with the field goal and

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, you'll still be you know, no, no, no, no, no,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>just cut it to three. What are we doing here?

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a third quarter, for God's sakes. So they don't

0:12:58.080 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>get it, by the way, not that it would have

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>mattered perhaps in the end, but it's just you know,

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>they went for two earlier. Okay, that cut it to uh,

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, to a three point game, but then on

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this one, you're not gonna go for a one to

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>cut it to a three point game. I I don't

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>understand anymore. Um So Philly loses, but they still lead

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East at three five and one, again a

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>division that I say to folks, why would you want

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to win this and have a draft pick at least

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 1>nine or ten picks worse than you would if you don't. UM.

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Then there's the Browns. The Browns beat the Texans. Uh

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and they and they beat them by the final score

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of ten to seven. And uh Baker Mayfield was twelve

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty one thirty two, no touchdowns, no picks, sacked on

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>two yards passing. They got it done on the ground,

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>as they should have in that weather. Uh. Nick Chubb

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen for one and a touchdown Kareem Hunt nineteen for

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>one oh four. But obviously the headline of this game

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 1>is it's ten to seven and Chub on a scamper

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>from the brown zoned forty hard line full sprint. Instead

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of going the full sixty, he goes fifty nine and

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>makes a hard left out of bounds at the one

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:13.119
<v Speaker 1>in the clear with under a minute left. So Cleveland

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>minus three ends up pushing Cleveland minus three and a

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>half is a loss. Houston plus three and a half

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is a win. They kneeled twice after that to preserve

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the ten to seven win. Now, unlike the Kingsbury play,

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>let me just say this, this is like the Todd

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Gurley thing against the Packers a few years back or

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, I don't even remember now,

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, where in the case of

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Girley with the Packers, if Gurley goes into the end

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>zone and they kick the extra point, it's still a

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>nine point lead. I think with less than two minutes

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>or less than it was. It was definitely less than

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>two minutes against Aaron Rodgers and the Packers. Okay, it's

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. There might be a little time on the

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>clock where he could do something. Maybe you could make

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the case or that. Even though it's two scores, I

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>still have my doubts this one yesterday. You are essentially

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>turning a nine nine point nine percent win probability into

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent. I get it, it's a percent. Okay,

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna go nuts, But what are we doing? Really?

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>What are these games? Are tough enough to beat betting normally,

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and he goes out of bounds like that, and you're

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>just like, okay, wow, So this makes NFL. This makes

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>betting on the NFL even harder now that guys have

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>these ideas in their head, Like, Okay, everybody's telling me

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I should go out of hounds. By the way, that's

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>what Chuck claimed. Here's here's Dave Purdham in at ESPN

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. He said that at William Hill of the

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>money bet on the point spread was on Cleveland, accorded

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>data reported by the bookmaker an hour before kickoff. Jeff

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Stone back over at bet MGM and Nevada Texans covering

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the spread produced amid six figure swing in favor of

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the House and a collective moan from the crowded betters

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Mirage uh Draft Kings reported taking significantly more

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>money on the Browns and the Texans. Action on Cleveland

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>resulted in what Draft King sports book director Johnny Vello

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>characterized as quote a pretty sizeable swing unquote Johnny's never

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>committed all that stuff. ESPNS win probability metric showed Cleveland

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>had a greater than ninety nine percent chance of winning

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>whether Chubb scored or not at that point, and Cleveland

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>coach Kevin Stefanski said he wouldn't have gotten mad at

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Chub had he scored, but that he had gave Chubb

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the team's code phrase no Moss, instructing him to go

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>down after a first doubt and not score by the way.

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>No moss, of course, made famous by Roberto Duran Heads

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Hands of Stone Manostpira in his UH rematch with Ray

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Leonard when Ray Leonard mugged him, Bolo punched him eighth

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>round t k O in their rematch. Sorry, m Ray

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Leonard fan, I was getting excited. Yes, that's I got

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>carried away. Sorry, I'm sorry, pardon me. So so what

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>was the game anyway? So let's get back Philadelphia Cleveland.

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's say super It gets worth noting that that game

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>went down, was was bent down from fifty four to

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>forty five point five and still went way under, still

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>went away on to Cleveland windy games just two weeks

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in a row and didn't and didn't compare at all

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to the weather the in the in New England last night,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>which was a monsoon. I'll say Cleveland minus three. But Man,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>these decisions that that some teams are making at the

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>ends of games, chrissie, they seem, how can I put this,

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>almost like they're trying to they're trying to be smarter,

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're trying to do what they think is smart,

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>not actually knowing what they're doing. Uh, you know, I'm

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>like you're reading too many books. You know, I'm a

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>big reader. But you know, let's draw the line at

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>some point. You know, not everything of the conspiracy on

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>everything you do is analytically correct. And I would say

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that about silly. Uh. Once again, Gilly, here we go

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>with the same same. I like your number better. Um

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>My power rings come to two. I'm really I'm not

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>enamored with Cleveland, and a lot of it is Baker Mayfield.

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say, uh, but I see three and

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a half juice on the dog, three juice on the favorite.

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, either way you go here, that's the way

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna bet you. I'm gonna open three and definitely

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>take a bet. Um. You know not that I really

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>like Philly perfect. I have a number here that I

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>want to quote from Paul heimbi Kinti's and he goes

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, Paul Hembo h g m bo. Paul Hembo

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. He's a producer at ESPN, and he and

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I have exchanged a couple of direct messages on Twitter. Anyway,

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz has six games with a q b R

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>under fifty, leads the NFL. I mean, we've got to

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>stop making excuses for this guy. And I know we're

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about injuries and all that other stuff. Baker Mayfield

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>has four, you know, so you know, but Wentz is

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly the favorite. There's Cup one of the guys. We

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:01.959
<v Speaker 1>might get to a couple of them later on. I

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>want to go to go hold this right now, but

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>go to go to excuse me. Paul him Bi Keatons

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul Himbow on Twitter. It's a great fall, a lot

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of great little staffs. A little tidbit

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so you might not stick up one. But like I said,

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not crazy but stilly either. My numbers come to two,

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna open three and I'll probably lay it to me.

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's one of those. If I open three and

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a half, they take it. If I open three, they're

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna lay it. I'm gonna open three, definitely take the

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>bed because they just think it's gonna be a tight game.

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not crazy about the way Cleveland's playing either myself.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, for sure. And by the way, Eagles one

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half game lead still in the NFC ET

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>so they can still absorb, you know, some of this,

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And and there was that prop over there at was

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>it was the DraftKings that that they had the NFC

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>East winner. They had this up early in the season.

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if it's still it. There seven and

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a half wins for the NFC East winner and the

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>under was was plus money, and the plus money came down.

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But man, right now, to think team could get to

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>eight wins like Philly would have to go five and

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the way, that ain't happening. There's

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>no way the Giants have to go Giants have to

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>go six and one? Is that right now? They're playing

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>some good football. They ain't going six and one. I

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>got news for you. No, Yeah, Giants would have to

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>go six and one. Yeah, they'd have to go to

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>go eight and eight. They'd have to go six and one. Um,

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and then uh, and then you take a team like

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>what is it, so they're the Giants are three and seven? No,

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>pardon me, they'd have to go five and one. Pardon me.

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Giants would have to go five and one. Giants have

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a bye this week. Yeah, and they're there's seven and

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>three against the spread, they're surprisingly good against. Yeah, they

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>ain't going five one. Yeah. And then Dallas and Washington

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>would both have to go six and one. Good luck

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to you. Yeah, not good? All right, we'll come back

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>more guessing lines is all broad skill, Alexander. It's Chris Andrews,

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the sports book director here at the South Point Hotel Casino. Chrissie,

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>what's next on Sunday morning? Another pretty good one, Atlanta

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>at New Orleans. But we have some question marks for

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans of course. Yeah, so this will have to

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>be if Drew Brees plays line or if he doesn't

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>line breeze yesterday and I go ahead, I'm sorry. I

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>was just gonna interrupted and say I see no lines

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>on this game or the next one either. Save a

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>little time with some of these. Alright, Well, Atlanta's off

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of Bie, so we don't have anything to say about

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the three and six Falcons. H New Orleans does beat

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the Niners yesterday. They do cover. Uh they cover to

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>thirteen was the final score was a ten or nine

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half point closing number. They covered largely because

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>they got two muffed punts from the Niners. So good yeah. Um,

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>but they do get the cover, but largely because of

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>those breezes. By the way, before he went out, actually

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>after he went out, He's here's the thing. He got

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 1>hurt and stayed in the game for the rest of

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the first half, so I can't really say before he

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>got hurt. Breeze was eight of thirteen in the end

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>for seventy six yards, one touchdown, note picks. He was

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>not sacked, but the play on which he was heard uh,

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>he absorbed a big hit that led to a personal

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>foul penalty on Contavias Street with eight minutes twenty seconds

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>remaining in the second quarter. Breeze has missed only six

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>games because of injury in his twenty year NFL career,

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>five of them in twenty nineteen because of a torn

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thumb ligament. People will remember, I didn't even think that

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>was a personal foul. I thought that was an off

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>terrible call, But apparently I did everything he could to

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>not h rough the passer and got called for a

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>horrible call. He got flagged for planned football. Chris flagged

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>for planned football. Jamis came in. He was six of

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>ten for sixty three, no touchdowns, no picks. He was

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>sacked twice. It was all Alvin Camaro on offense. Eight

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>of fifteen on the ground for two touchdowns, seven of

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty three through the air, receiving that is for a

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>touchdown as well three touchdowns for Camara. But the Saints

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>were one of ten on third down, they were one

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of one on four. They only had two hundred thirty

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>seven total yards, but plus two in turnovers, and and

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the ball game right there. The turnovers held the

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Niners to forty nine yards rushing. Uh So, if it's breeze,

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's close to a touchdown. I would

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>say minus six. If it's not breeze, it'll be significantly

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lower than that, probably a field goal. But you said

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no line, so I don't know. Well, I saw

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>some look aheadlines were looking like about six and a

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>half seven, you know, with breeze healthy, I personally like

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a lower. I'm thinking like a five myself. I think

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta is really playing well. Raheem Morris. You know, I

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think he was very good at a Tampa coach.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>He had his moments where he was, but you know,

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe he learned some things and you know the years

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>in between, because he's got this team playing really well.

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>And Atlanta was one of those teams out you know,

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>they have talent and they there was just something missing.

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And maybe Morris is hitting the right buttons, but they're

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>playing well. So I mean to me, like I said,

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a number of five. And while we're on

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 1>the subject, because I think people are putting home field advantage,

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I got a few quotes in here that I want

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to make and I want to credit them properly. Uh.

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Siciliano, the NFL Network said, straight up, going into

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, home teams were six sixty seven and one.

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Straight up. Now they did have they were seven four

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and two, or that they were eleven and two yesterday,

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>but they were favored in nine games, so that's gonna

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>skew things a little bit. But even including yesterday's play,

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:40.719
<v Speaker 1>see this straight up winners, reported Dave Tooley, You know

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>from vs In going into this weekend, home teams were

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy and two against the spread and including yesterday, seventy

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>four and four. So I think people that are adding

0:24:55.440 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>home field advantage. It's a mistake that one war from

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a visa and guy. Yeah, yeah, it's just from Jeff Vogel. Uh.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And he posted this, I believe on Friday, Jeff Vogel

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>vsaan guy great follow on Twitter. This is quoting Jeff

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in these win at Tennessee last night pushed the full

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>season scoreboard differential to plus nineteen for visitors through a

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty four games. Accounting OT games is zero

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep everything at sixty minutes. Bloomfield advantage, it puts

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that quotes right now is minus zero point one four

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 1>points per game. Media result is still a zero, and

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that's which would be an OT game. That was so

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that's quoting Jeff, Sorry, go ahead. That was probably predictable.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>We've seen home field, um, you know, without the fans

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and other sports act the same way. Well, it was.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It was predictable in the sense when when whatever outfit

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>put out the whole grid of games to all two

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred and two fifty six is at NFL games in

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the lines way back when in the middle of the spring,

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>when you did the crunching of the numbers, it was

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>only one and a half even then, and that was

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>already sort of allowing for the fact that it might

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>be nothing. Now, what Chrissy saying is it's nothing at all.

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Come back, Chris, because I don't know if you finish

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>your thought. Well, we'll finish the thought on that coming

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.479
<v Speaker 1>back guessing lines right here Week eleven on a numbers

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>game at Visa the sports betting Networks. Tonight's game is

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>between the Bears and the Vikings Bears three point home dogs. Yeah,

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I will too. Yeah, it feels bears ish to me. Certainly.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>The Bears feel like a good teaser leg as well.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>You can stop Dalvin Cook, which the Bears appeared to

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>be built to do, beat us kirk Cousins in prime time. Yeah,

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people thrown around the Kirk Cousins prime

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>time stat or Monday night football stad where's overdone? Um? Yeah,

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it sets up nicely for the Bears. Let's

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>take a let the little tweets here. We get tweets

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>at beating the book real quick, Fodi Bhura. No better

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>way to start work Monday morning. Thank you Gilling, Chris,

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you for listening. Great Monday morning tradition. Tim Johnson,

0:26:58.320 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the players were just ready to get the

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>game came over with in Cleveland yesterday, especially after the

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>weather they had to deal with Chubb scores, that game

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>probably takes another five to ten minutes. You know what, Tim,

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>You might be right even though they're saying that was

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>their plan, maybe that was behind their plan too. A

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>little bit of that. Let's get out of here. Um

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>nemesis enforcer. Maybe it's a Georgia thing, Chubb and Gurley

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>not scoring at the wrong moment with players in analytics glide.

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>You're telling me, all right, Chrissy, did you did you

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>finish the home field advantage thought? Because I think it's

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a great one. I just want to throw in one

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>more thing. Ed Fang, who really smart guy. I think

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been on DESA a couple of times. I've done

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>his podcast. Yeah, real smart, smart guy coming into this year.

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know how long it was. It was

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>just last year, you know, it was a couple of

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>years involved. He said. Home field advantage wors worth one

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>point seven points. So this standard three that we're giving

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is just too much. And like I said, this year,

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm making my numbers with no home field advantage. Certain

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>cases you give it to. You said, I like the

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks with a little home field advantage this week on

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a short week, and I think that means a little something,

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But ordinarily I think home field essentially needs not All right,

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>let's move on Sunday morning. Okay, this one, there's no

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers whatsoever. Detroit and Carolina. We've got question marks with

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>both quarterbacks, both starting quarterbacks, although from what I hear

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>both are pretty likely to play. But no numbers whatsoever

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that I see. Yeah, I have in my notes. I

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have Bridgewater hurt question mark. That wasn't even sure myself

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of that game. Uh, Carolina, it's Detroit

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>at Carolina. Let's start with the visiting Detroit Lions. Detroit

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>gives up a twenty one lead to Washington only to

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>win it on a fifty nine yard or with no

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>time left, thanks in part and in big part to

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a Chase Young horrific roughing the passer on Stafford well

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>after the whistle, just brutal, and Prater sinks the fifty

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>nine yard or to beat the Washington football team. Stafford

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty three for two seventy six, three touchdowns note picks

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>he sacked once DeAndre Swift the coming out party of

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift. Uh, seemingly more and more every week. Sixteen

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>carries for eighty one yards, five catches for sixty eight

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to touchdown Marvin Jones eight for ninety six in a touchdown,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and Carolina, Uh, they lose to Tampa Bay played with

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks for for a half of this game, and

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>then the Bucks just ran away with it. And I

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>do mean run Ronald Jones the second with a ninety

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>eight yard or to the house the big play Bridge

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater yesterday, eighteen of twenty four for one thirty six.

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think about that, eighteen for one thirty six. Uh

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns where to pick He was sacked once DJ

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Moore four for ninety six in a touchdown, but they

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>were one of nine on third down. They only had

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eighties seven total yards defense set him

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>up at least once in that ballgame. They were out

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>first down by the Bucks thirty to thirteen. They were

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>out gained five forty four to one eighties seven. I

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think I remember a bigger difference in yards in

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a game this year. Four yards geez two ten to

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty five on the ground. Yeah, that's ridiculous right time

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of possession, oh five. So there's no line. If they're

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>if they're both playing, I would think Caroline is a favorite,

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and I would say Carolina a little bit more in

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the field, but I'd say Carolina mine is four. If

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they do. I've got Carolina, mine is three if they do.

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>That's my number again, no home field advantage, no anything,

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and McCaffrey and McCaffrey might play too, right, Yeah, I

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was looking at a Tampa New Orleans and excuse it,

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he's going off on a little bit of a tangent. Yeah,

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking here at New Orleans the week before. Oh, okay,

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Tampa the week before. I'm sorry, Tampa. I mean such

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>an aberration for how poorly they played, you know, uh,

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and then had a fantastic game yesterday. Who really played

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>unbelievably well. So it just shows you how crazy this

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>NFL is from week to week. So about Tampa looked

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>great yesterday and looked absolutely horrible the week before. So uh,

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, but Caroline, I though I've played okay and

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I would have the three over Detroit if both quarterbacks

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>are healthy. Let's do another one. Let's stink another one

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>here before the break. New England at Houston, New England

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>at Houston, New England with the outright winner last night

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in the monsoon in Foxborough. Um, go back to my

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>college days in Boston. I'm like, why why would people

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>live in this weather? It's horrific. I love you Boston though,

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a great place to go. To school. It was

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>just a monsoon. New England gets it done, beats Baltimore

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen, does so as six and a half point

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>closing dogs. Their consensus cam was thirteen of seventeen for

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>one eighteen touchdown. Noe Pacy was sacked once. Jacoby Meyers,

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the law firm of Jacoby Myers for all your personal

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>injury needs one of one as a as a passer

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for twenty four yards of a touch Daddy also caught

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>five for fifty nine. Uh. Damian Harris twenty two for

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>one one on the ground. That was the key. Uh.

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>New England's four and five. Good for Bill Belichick and

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the Patriot. It's there at Houston. Houston, as we mentioned,

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>loses in bad weather to Cleveland. DeShawn was one sixty

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>three one touchdown. Note picks. He was sacked twice. He

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>takes a lot of sacks twice in this one. Two

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>three total yards was all Houston and Muster. I'll say, um,

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I'll say New England minus two and a half at

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Houston Gilley. That's exactly my number, New England and half. Unfortunately,

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>well unfortunately or unfortunately that's not the number I see

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>out there. So once again, I like your number better.

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I see it anywhere from Pick to the Texans as

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>much as a one and a half point favorite. Uh

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you know again, I'm gonna open Yeah. I know Texans

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>have just gone south and the Romeo Cornell by all

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>accounts a wonderful, wonderful human being, but he's not doing

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a great job coaching this team. And I heard they're

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>even thinking about keeping him for next year. I don't

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>know about that. Well, probably the same guy that traded

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins is making that decision. So but I made

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>New England two and a half. That's what my numbers

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>came to. And again I think people are putting in

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>our home gold advantage that should not exist. I'm gonna

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>open Pick again just because I see it at the

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>highest Houston one and a half, So I expect him

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that that Houston on me, which is just funny. Wow.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>So Cleveland Houston was the one that I thought was

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the most perplexing last week, and if Chubb doesn't go

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds, that one works. And here's New England Houston.

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>So clearly it's the Texans that me and the market

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>just don't see eyed eye on, Like I just don't

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>get it with the Texans. What am I missing anything? Nothing?

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>The Patriots are going to win that game. There it is.

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You don't even have to watch. We'll come back more

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>more guessing lines coming back on the numbers game at Visa,

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>these sports betting that where let's get through a couple

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>more of these games here on Sunday. Okay, listen before

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we go further. I don't know if people are listening

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to our show or cooler heads are prevailing, But the

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are going to the favorite right now? Okay, okay,

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>well but if you got if you even see pick them,

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say better now because they're going New England

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to the favorite. They're going to the favorite. Okay,

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna certainly open one and if I feel

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>one and a half opening that because even the pickums

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>are starting to disappear right now. Well we we would

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>love to think that's based on our discussion here before

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the break um, but but I'm saying that does it

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like, how does it even come out the other way?

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>That's nuts to me, Like, I just don't understand what

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the deal is with the Texans. I thought it was

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a miss price number last week against yesterday against the Okay,

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's a pick them so again, you can't

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>bet the Patriots on a tease, on a perfect tease anymore.

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>If you could at one and a half or whatever

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it was on the Texans spots, but man, that would

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>have been sweet. Um. Oh, here's a Joe Pete as

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a Joe Pete tweet. You want to just throw up

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>real quick about the Uh, how incredible is Bernard Longer

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>making the cut at the Masters. Longer has competed in

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a major against Gene Saraz in board and able get

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Diegos born two thousand two opponents born a hundred years

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>apart Sarahs and played his last major at the seventy

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>six Open Championship, Langer's first. Yeah, Bernard Linger, good for him? Uh,

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>getting it done, making the cut, the oldest player to

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>ever make a cut at Augusta. All right, um, alright,

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>cooler heads prevailing, as you're saying on New England at Houston.

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>That one made no sense to me. What's next? Yeah?

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>The boards lighting up? Anyway, Let's move on Steelers at

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars. We're drunk with power right now, Chrissy, aren't we? Uh?

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Steelers Steelers from nine and oh boy boy, Cincinnati was

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the squarest of square dogs yesterday. Felt like I didn't

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>know one person, I said on Primetime Action Friday, and

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I go, you know what scares me about this game?

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know one person who likes the Steelers against

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the number. And that's assuming Big Ben came back, and

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he did. Got the negatives he needed after being on

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the COVID nineteen reserve list from tracing Big Ben yesterday

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>against the Bengals in the UH Steelers thirty six to

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>ten win as six and a half point favorites, he

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>was twenty seven and forty six for three thirty three,

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns, no picks, UH, no sacks. Johnson six six

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for one sixteen that's Deante six for one, sixteen for touchdown,

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.919
<v Speaker 1>ju June nine for seventy seven in touchdown, Claypool four

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for fifty six, two touchdowns. Steelers only needed forty four

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:21.760
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards, but they were plus two and turnovers that helps.

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And they're at Jacksonville, Jacksonville. Get all got all of

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>us who or gave all of us who had the

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Packers and survivor a big scare. Jake Luton eighteen for

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty five one sixty nine, one touchdown, one pick. He

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was sacked three times, James Robinson again filling up the

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>statute twenty three for one O nine only two hundred

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:41.319
<v Speaker 1>sixty total yards of offense for Jacksonville. They were helped

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>by a Keelan cole ninety one yard punt return for

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. Yesterday, I'll say Pittsburgh, Wow. I mean, this

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a big survivor pick for anybody who

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>has Pittsburgh left Pittsburgh minus. You know again, home field

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:55.439
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean anything, but I get a feeling in these

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>lines there in somehow incorporated. So I'll say it's only

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in quote it's Pittsburgh minus ten. Yeah, it's only ten. My, Uh, well,

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>here's a line of and well it was a little

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>later in the day. I'm sure a couple of guys

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>who have a drinking game going diminishing returns. Uh. My

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>power ratings come to sixteen on this game, because, uh,

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:22.439
<v Speaker 1>I think the Jaguars probably as bad as we thought

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they were gonna be at the beginning of a year.

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>And Luton, he I mean he played okay, I mean

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for a guy that didn't get drafted, you know, etcetera, etcetera.

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think it's just Green Bay was

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>just nod into that game yesterday. They were just you know,

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>walking through it. May Mike power rates come to sixteen.

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I see it pretty much a universal pen. You know.

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's actually okay because you know, I know

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh could sleep walk through some of these games too,

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>just like Green Bay did yesterday, and that's probably what

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I would expect them to do this Sunday. You know,

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 1>they got big games coming up, including you know, the

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>following following week against against the Ravens, so they're not

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>going to show everything. So ten, I think it's a

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>fine number, even though my numbers come a lot higher. Chris,

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I have a question for you. Why do you think

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben is not getting any conversation in the m

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>v P race. It has nothing to do with you

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>and get a large future on Ben Roethlisberger to win

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the MVP. Serious Jason's asking questions. I think he's starting

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to now, you know now that I mean because everybody,

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like two or three weeks ago, we just had Russell

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Wilson has been like probably a one to five favorite,

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, everybody just assumed he was going

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to get it, but now it's opened way up and

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think people are opening their eyes to you know,

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Ben needs weapons, but so does every quarterback,

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean you look with what my Homes

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>has a casey um, But yeah he listen, he's got

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>some weapons back that they didn't have it all last

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 1>year in the brief time that he played. But yeah,

0:38:56.880 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll be in the conversation from here on,

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>so and away, Jason, let me see what I could

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>do to enhance your position. We're in free seeing him

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>being in the conversation by having the conversation. So, yeah,

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that is that what you're doing. Well, Well, we influenced

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the Patriot Line universally quickly. We could do something with

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>big bands, I will say with the m v P

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>race though, Patrick Mahomes is Lebron right, Like, I think

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to the point with Patrick Mahomes where you

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>could give it to him every year. Um, with Lebron,

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly the thing, and they just decide, well, we'll

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>give it to this guy this year, We'll give it

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to that guy. But he's always in the conversation. You

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 1>can always make a case for him. I don't think

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes has enough in his on his bookcase yet to

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>be there. But I think we'll get there with him.

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>But this feels to me now that Russell Wilson has

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of abdicated, you know, uh, the throne here, the

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 1>leader in the clubhouse. If I can mix all kinds

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.879
<v Speaker 1>of metaphors, I kind of think it's Mahomes. Who's next.

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray in the conversation before. Yeah, but they they're

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna win their division and probably and they might,

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to have as good of a season

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>as the Steelers are likely or the Chiefs really, Kyler Murray,

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>there's six and three, they're they're tied for the top

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of the division. You never know. Rogers is in the

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:15.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation for sure. Oh yeah, Rogers quietly doing his thing. Yeah,

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a yeah, he's told Brady might get a little bit.

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Brady might get some acknowledgement, you know, you never know. Yeah,

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.240
<v Speaker 1>if you throw out, if you throw out games against

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans, what is it a game against Orlis? Tom

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Brady twenty one touchdowns in two picks. That's pretty I'm

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>told that's good. It's impressive. Forty three years old, or

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty three years old thirty ninety nine said that, uh,

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 1>forty three doing pretty good. Should we know we probably

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:47.879
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't squeeze in one. Well, let's see what's the next

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 1>game here, Chris good one green Bay at Indianapolis. Oh yeah,

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't have enough time to do this, but it

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>is seven and two green Bay against six and three

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis Rogers. In that game against Jacksonville, twenty four of

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:02.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty four for three twenty five, two touchdowns. One Piggy

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>was sacked once. Valdes Scantling Marques Valdes Scantling was a

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>big target four for one forty nine and a touchdown,

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>big seventy eight yard touchdown in that game against Jacksonville

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday in green Bay's twenty four to twenty win, not

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>even coming close to covering the fourteen points. And like

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, for survivor players like myself who had them sweat,

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and then there's Indianapolis, they'll be on extra rest. Remember

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they doubled up Tennessee on Thursday night where Philip Rivers

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>was twenty nine of thirty nine for three oh eight

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown. Note Pixie was sacked once. Naim Hines two touchdowns,

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>one on the ground, one through the air, four thirty

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>total yards of offense, and that strange game Thursday night

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>were Indianapolis felt like Tennessee just stopped playing in the

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>second half. And we went through the whole dissertation Friday

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>about how Philip Rivers won't sneak the football and yet

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they still want it that way. I'll say Indianapolis, but

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>not quite by three, by two and a half. We'll

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>get Chrissie's response. Next Guessing lines Week eleven. Right here

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in a numbers game at Visa the Sports Betting Network.

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Our number two of the numbers game right here at

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Visa the Sports Betty Network. Serious except channel two or

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 1>four Visa dot Com. The Visa have Phobos, Legua Gay

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>plus it is Gill Alexander. Jason Khan is here as well,

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>asking questions through the prism of his bets, just to

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>try to manifest Big Ben too. H m v P.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's gonna happen, but not terrible

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way. I just think he should be in

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. That's all all right. I mean his team

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is undefeated nine and oh you think they can get there?

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Just have him in the conversation. I don't think they'll

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>be undefeated. Undefeated, but if he goes sixteen and no,

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 1>that would help your cause, right for sure. So that's

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>what you should be rooting for. Okay, I'm rooting for that. Okay,

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that's that's you're in. That's you're in. We've identified you're in. Uh.

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It's all about guessing lines for week eleven and trying

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 1>to extract value from the exercise of guessing lines on

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Andrews and I Chrissie Mysa. We've we've already decided

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that we moved to New England Houston line moments ago.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're going with, Chris. Green Bay in Indianapolis

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is an early game still Sunday. No, that got moved

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to the afternoon. It's in the ear that moved to

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the ano. Yeah, because that's a game between division the

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>leaders right there, Indianapolis a co leader with Tennessee in

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the an f C South. I'll say, given given the

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 1>backdrop of what I just mentioned before, but I'll say

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis minus two and a half, you're a shade high.

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 1>It's one and a half and two. Uh, my numbers

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.399
<v Speaker 1>still come to Green Bay one. Um, you know, listen,

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis is playing much better in the last couple of weeks,

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and I still have my questions about them as a

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:32.360
<v Speaker 1>team and Rivers specifically. I quoted himbo before talking about

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Whence having six games under under fifty for a q BR,

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, tops in the league. But uh, well,

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Drew Lock will get to him a little bit from

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Denver second. But there's a bunch with four Rivers is amongst.

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he plays really well and he had a

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>great game. I thought he and the team looked fantastic

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night. But I'm not letting one game, you know,

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:58.359
<v Speaker 1>get ahold of me that much. Um, you know, they

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't playing better as a team. But I still think

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I like green Baby going there and win this game.

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I make them a very slight thing that I make

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a one. I'd like to see I see it one

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half and two. I think I'll open a

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. Yeah, they might get me the

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>colt if I see it dropping on then a drop

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>because I do. I think Green Bay should be a

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 1>very very slight favorite this game. Yeah, and I went

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:27.800
<v Speaker 1>through it Friday eight circumstances against the Titans, where Philip

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Rivers could have snuck the football, they chose not to

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>do it. The eighth time was was a was a

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:35.719
<v Speaker 1>pinch sneak from Jacoby Brissette. So it was sort of

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:40.839
<v Speaker 1>like Philip Rivers finally coming out and uh and saying, uh, yeah,

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't do this, and maybe it's in my contract.

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not letting you guys know. Um, but I

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just think that that is a competitive disadvantage. It was

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>for the Chargers all those years. It is for the

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Cults in those moments. Those are high leverage situations. For

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>those wondering why do you keep harping on the sneak thing,

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>because those are high leverage situations in football games, and

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>when you have money on these, It's the equivalent again

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of runners in scoring position in baseball. It's as if

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>when runners on second and third, batter goes, yeah, I

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 1>can't do this. You're gonna have to sub me out

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>right here. Somebody else gotta come in and do this

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 1>for me. It's just it's the weirdest thing, and it

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was not enough has been made of it throughout his career,

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's rearing its head and I think it will

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>wear its head in a very key situation for the

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Colts moving forward. Just file that away. So you've got

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 1>it as Colts minus one and a half. Is that

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>what you said? You know my question? And somebody brought

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>this up on squitter. I can't remember what. How did

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee not know that that was gonna be a sneak

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>when they brought it and when they brought into Kobe,

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I didn't even realize he was in there

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>by a coach just supposed to understand that, you know. Geez, yeah,

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>you would have thought talk about telegraphing. Yeah, alright, we're

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:58.720
<v Speaker 1>halfway through. What's the next? Cincinnati at your Washington football team?

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Washington still alive the NFC's despite despite their loss to

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Detroit yesterday and Cincinnati again got housed by the Steelers.

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati's two six and one, Washington is two and seven.

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 1>So Washington is what that makes them? A game and

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a half back in the NFC East. Is that what

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:18.479
<v Speaker 1>it comes out to? Yeah? Game and a half back?

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah um. Joe Burrow yesterday twenty one of forty

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 1>against the Steelers for two thirteen, one touchdown note picks.

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He was sacked four times. Tee Higgins is his dude, though,

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that's his target. Seven for one, fifteen and touch down.

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals were oh for thirteen on third downs, two

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:42.720
<v Speaker 1>for three on four, two for three on four. Uh.

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>They were minus two in turnovers. Were the Bengals. They're

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>oh seventeen and one in their last eighteen road games.

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 1>There four twenty and one under Zach Taylor. Should I

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 1>stop because I could go on and on all day

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>with these, But by the way, they're ridiculous on fourth

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:01.400
<v Speaker 1>downs this year, like fourteen of sixteen. Skill Alexander, It's

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Chrissie Andrews. This is a numbers game right here on Visa,

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the sports spending Network, serious XM, channel two oh four,

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Visa dot Com, the Visa app food boastling a game plus.

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:12.320
<v Speaker 1>But Cincinnati oh fort zero for thirteen on third downs

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:16.320
<v Speaker 1>against the Steelers yesterday. Uh. And then there's Washington. Alex

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Smith thirty eight for fifty five and three ninety no touchdowns,

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 1>no picks, sacked twice. Now, I said this before the

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>season even started. I said, if Alex Smith takes even

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 1>one snap and throws one forward pass, and I said,

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if he throws it into the dirt,

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He's your comeback player of the year. Well, barring a

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins or Nick Foles explosion tonight, he will have

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>thrown for the most yards in the NFL this weekend,

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:44.839
<v Speaker 1>three ninety. He is your comeback player of the year. End.

0:47:45.000 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>The discussion with the odds were on him leading the

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>weekend past. Oh man, I'm terrified every time he backs

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:56.399
<v Speaker 1>up to Bess. You're not alone. Yeah, it's just it's

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>just not fun to watch. Terry mcclorin always fills up

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>stat sheets. Seven for nine, Antonio Gibson with two fourth

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:05.799
<v Speaker 1>quarter touchdowns fo six total yards for Washington. Again. They

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>made up a twenty one point deficit in this game,

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>only to lose at the end on a Matt Prator

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:15.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine yard or to win it after Washington tied

0:48:15.400 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it up at twenty four apiece. Three plays was all

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it took to get to Prater's fifty nine yard attempt,

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 1>largely because of Chase Young's horrific roughing the passer penalty.

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Chase Young every day, but man, that was bad.

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnatia Washington, Real barn Burner Washington. I mean, I'll split

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the difference between a pick him and the three, and

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say one and a half to be lazy.

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>It's one or one and a half. I like Washington

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>one little better. In fact, my numbers have sent to

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a very very slight favorite. I'm not sure that's actually correct.

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>A couple of things that really probably should have alerted

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:56.240
<v Speaker 1>us before the game. In the Cincinnati game, Mike Tomlan

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't hear this toy after the game, but

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, we wanted to introduce Joe Brown

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 1>paraphrasing that we wanted to introduce Joe Burrows to the

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers and show him what he has to look

0:49:06.840 --> 0:49:09.720
<v Speaker 1>forward to twice a year for the rest of his career.

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So that team was a little focused. I would say,

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, but you know, Alex Smith played fantastic,

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:22.320
<v Speaker 1>But Jason, what's wrong with the Ben Roethlisberger comeback Player

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Year. You know he's got to be in

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that conversation too, I guess, but it'll go to Alex Smith.

0:49:27.480 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It'll go to Smith. Um, I don't have a bad anyway.

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen the E sixty on Alex Smith? Chris

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 1>he did. It's hard to watch to watch, but it's

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>just why he's even playing. I have no idea. Yeah,

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I think I gotta packed her up. You know, if

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I were he he's made plenty of money and then

0:49:49.120 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>kids pack it up. Yeah, seems like a really good guy,

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, great, you know, I think that ended up

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>having a very good career. People thought he was a bust.

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Ended up having a really good career. Got kaepernicked in

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:06.800
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, played well, and then you know, got mahomes

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas City, a couple of playoff wins with San

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Francisco if I remember correctly, like before Kaepernick like he

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, that great game against New Orleans. Yeah yeah,

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:20.359
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, wishing the best, certainly do just by

0:50:20.360 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the way before we let our influence in the market

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 1>go to our heads, at least from me perfectly. The

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:30.920
<v Speaker 1>cults are going to like a two and a half

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and three point favorite as we speak. I had money

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:37.919
<v Speaker 1>showing on the coal Green Bay one. So maybe it's

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>me that my head is too big, which I guess

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it's too big if you ever saw it. I'm gonna

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 1>open a little higher. I'm gonna see what the market

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>fell that could. Probably I'm looking at two and a

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>half because like there are some trees around. By the way, Christie,

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:52.799
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling better. Yes, you sound like you're feeling much better.

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I've been negative for quite a while. But

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>we had some other issues we had to clear up.

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, okay, good, yeah, yeah, we got plenty more.

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>What's next Tennessee at Baltimore. Well that's good too. So

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee and a co lead for the a f C

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 1>South Division six and three Baltimore now six and three.

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill in the game this past Thursday night was

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:21.960
<v Speaker 1>only fifteen of twenty seven for one seven one touchdown.

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Note Pixie was sacked once. Derrick Henry was nineteen for

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 1>one oh three last night Baltimore in the monsoon against

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots, and again they lose it out right. That

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:35.399
<v Speaker 1>got all of three survivors at a three three ten

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:38.240
<v Speaker 1>went down to three oh one in circa as I mentioned,

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>six six on the on the Eagles, three on the Ravens.

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Lamar was thirty four yesterday for forty nine, two touchdowns,

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 1>one pick. He was sacked twice. Eleven carries for fifty

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 1>five yards. Now, um, here's the thing. There's an epidemic

0:51:56.080 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of bad spotting of football's too. Can I just mention this,

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>There was one really bad spot laid in this game

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for New England. First of all, Baltimore got screwed a

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:04.879
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, one on the bad spot, but one

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:08.959
<v Speaker 1>that Jude on penalty on defense was so ticky. Tech

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Um kept a drive going for New England. But the

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:15.800
<v Speaker 1>spotting thing like this an epidemic. Did you see Miami

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Tech on Saturday? There was at least three occasions

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>twice for the Canes, one for the Hokeys where nine

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>yards were gained or it was just one yard shy

0:52:27.160 --> 0:52:30.319
<v Speaker 1>of the marker two game, and the refs just casually like, yeah,

0:52:30.360 --> 0:52:32.279
<v Speaker 1>my first town, and they moved the change. And I'm

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 1>just like, is anybody gonna complain about this over and

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, Like people are betting on this stuff.

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Stop it. If it's nine yards, it's nine yards. They

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:43.880
<v Speaker 1>should be able to integrate technology into the spotting and

0:52:43.920 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 1>make it a lot more seamless. It's like Todd Wishnev's

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 1>old what he called the zigzag diagonal spotting of referees. Anyway,

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 1>there's one of these in this game too. It was

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>a total monsoon by the end of that game. It

0:52:54.800 --> 0:52:56.799
<v Speaker 1>really looked like Baltimore just wanted to get the heck

0:52:56.800 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>out of there. But Baltimore is facing ten See Tennessee

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:02.680
<v Speaker 1>with a little bit of extra rest. This is a

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 1>tough one to make because I just think if I

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>make it, if it's Baltimore three or four, everybody but

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>will bet Baltimore. If it's Baltimore six or seven, everybody

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>will bet the Titans. I'll just put in no man's

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>land at five and a half and let the hate

0:53:16.640 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 1>wash over me. What is this one going to be? Well?

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like your number better once again, I

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:25.759
<v Speaker 1>see six and six and a half. My numbers came

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to four and a half. Neither team is playing that

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 1>great right now. A month ago this would have been

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a much better game. But like I said, both teams

0:53:37.360 --> 0:53:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I hit the skids a little bit. I

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>don't you know, I've got four and a half. You know,

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>at first glance looked a little cheap, and and maybe

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it is, but the six six and a half looks

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a little too live. But I'm gonna open six just

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:53.279
<v Speaker 1>because there's higher numbers out there, and uh, they want

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to bet me Baltimore. I'm gonna make them lamey to six,

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 1>which I think probably a lot of guys will Interesting.

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a rematch, of course, of the big playoff

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:04.320
<v Speaker 1>game last year, where the Titans are upset the Ravens.

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 1>You get me six or seven, I may, I may

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:09.400
<v Speaker 1>take all those points. I'll take those points in Wentland.

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you beat me, you beat me. Tip

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of the cat. Interesting that is that an afternoon game? Also,

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:16.880
<v Speaker 1>these are afternoon games. Now that's stillings. Now we go

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to the afternoon. Okay, now we'll go to the afternoon.

0:54:19.680 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the point spread mattered in four games yesterday,

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:27.640
<v Speaker 1>yes number that. Well, it ended up mattering in Houston

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland because you know why, well, you know it's still matter.

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:34.280
<v Speaker 1>What can I tell you? Yeah, it ended up mattering

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:38.279
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona Buffalo because you know why. You know, so

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>those are two right there. Well that's football. Well, it's football.

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But now see I would add add there's this extra

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:50.240
<v Speaker 1>layer again of coaches in some cases being more heavy

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:51.840
<v Speaker 1>than they used to be. So in some cases I

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:54.680
<v Speaker 1>applaud it, like again the Kingsbury thing, assuming he knew

0:54:54.719 --> 0:54:56.920
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing there, way to go, he's in

0:54:56.960 --> 0:54:58.719
<v Speaker 1>your head. And in the case of Chub. I'm just

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, do we really what we're doing? I mean,

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I get it goes to a hundred percent

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:06.359
<v Speaker 1>from nine point nine, but okay, and then you know

0:55:06.480 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles thing with the Giants. This is why I

0:55:08.719 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>know this is all like I can't trust any of it.

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:13.879
<v Speaker 1>The fact that Doug Peterson will go for two, sometimes

0:55:13.920 --> 0:55:16.239
<v Speaker 1>correctly and sometimes it's just like, what are you doing now,

0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Doug Peterson? Like why who told you this was the

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:21.279
<v Speaker 1>right play? But I guess they know. I guess they've

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they figured it out that it's for them, it's the

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:28.479
<v Speaker 1>smart play. Okay. Um, not to disparage your your four

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:30.719
<v Speaker 1>times the spread matter thing, but yeah, those were two

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:33.360
<v Speaker 1>quirky endings. But it's football. And I would add that

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it's harder and harder every week in the NFL with

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. What's next? Maybe they were watching The

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Queen's Gambit and they're trying to play again. Well, you know,

0:55:44.320 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's funny you mentioned that. It's what do you mention that?

0:55:47.080 --> 0:55:48.919
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I thought The Queen's Gambit fell off

0:55:48.920 --> 0:55:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the rails like the last couple of episodes. I thought

0:55:51.080 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it was really good for the first five and then

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:55.360
<v Speaker 1>last couple, I was like, that wasn't great. Uh. Parlay

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Producing Number five texted me last night about the Baltimore

0:55:58.800 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 1>New England game and he said, am I crazy? Or

0:56:01.719 --> 0:56:05.120
<v Speaker 1>should New England have gone or no, should Baltimore have

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:08.160
<v Speaker 1>gone for two when they went for one? At one point?

0:56:08.239 --> 0:56:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what's your thinking there? He goes, well,

0:56:10.400 --> 0:56:12.480
<v Speaker 1>because then if New England kicks a field goal, they'll

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 1>only be down eight as opposed to nine. I can't

0:56:16.040 --> 0:56:18.319
<v Speaker 1>remember the situation. And I said to him, exactly what

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you just said. With the Queen's Gambit, which, for those

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:24.040
<v Speaker 1>who don't know, is this series or this this dramatic

0:56:24.080 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>episodic series on on Netflix, and it's rooted in chess.

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:31.279
<v Speaker 1>It's it's fictional, but it's rooted in the sports chess.

0:56:31.280 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And I said to Jeff, I go, you're playing chess,

0:56:33.200 --> 0:56:36.399
<v Speaker 1>they're playing checkers because you're already thinking two steps ahead,

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think these guys are thinking that. So yeah,

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 1>once we start doing that, Once we start, you know,

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 1>if I do two here and then they do three there,

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, we're gonna drive ourselves crazy. Um. Not

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that he was wrong, but I don't think they're thinking

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 1>on that level. All right, what's next? Okay, Dallas at

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota and I see sub sporadic numbers unlessure if they're

0:56:56.520 --> 0:57:00.560
<v Speaker 1>old ones or new ones and mayas I'm sure at

0:57:00.560 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this point is that Andy Dalton will be playing right now,

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:09.279
<v Speaker 1>they've got him questionable, but I think it's likely that

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he played this. Uh this something well, we haven't seen Minnesota.

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 1>They played the Bears tonight again. Yeah, this will be

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:20.600
<v Speaker 1>really hard to make because if Minnesota crushes the Bears,

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this could be pretty high. It's a short week in Minnesota, though,

0:57:27.040 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and copies are on bye week. But I could say

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:32.440
<v Speaker 1>if the Bears crushed Minnesota, I mean this, this is

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to be you know, this will be muted

0:57:34.520 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between. I can't make this line. This is difficult.

0:57:37.840 --> 0:57:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, just to throw it out there, I'll say

0:57:40.120 --> 0:57:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota minus four and a half. But that's just me

0:57:43.160 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 1>hedging both ways. I think you're way light. Yeah, it's

0:57:48.560 --> 0:57:51.240
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between seven and a half and nine. Oh wait

0:57:51.280 --> 0:57:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a minute, really, yeah, I got Minnesota, you know, I mean,

0:57:56.600 --> 0:57:58.800
<v Speaker 1>my numbers come a lot higher than that. I hate

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to tell you. If it's got Minnesota playing really good football, right, now,

0:58:02.760 --> 0:58:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And I say poised to make a run. And I

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:07.400
<v Speaker 1>know you guys like the Bears tonight. I don't. I

0:58:07.800 --> 0:58:11.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely do not. I like Minnesota tonight. And like I said,

0:58:11.320 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this team is poised to make a run.

0:58:13.880 --> 0:58:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And if they looked good tonight, I think it's going

0:58:15.960 --> 0:58:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to be I think they might be looking at double digits. Wow. Now,

0:58:20.640 --> 0:58:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not opinion. Don't get me wrong. I'm not racing

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to beout the Dallas Cowboys in any situation. But I

0:58:27.120 --> 0:58:29.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think Minnesota should be favorites like that over anybody.

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see tonight, We'll see how they play. Could

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:34.280
<v Speaker 1>change my mind. How many games of Dallas covered this year?

0:58:34.440 --> 0:58:40.400
<v Speaker 1>How many games? One game? At one? They covered the

0:58:40.400 --> 0:58:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Steelers that was their first game, one in eight after

0:58:43.520 --> 0:58:47.240
<v Speaker 1>being so, you're saying that's not good, Chris? Is that

0:58:47.240 --> 0:58:49.800
<v Speaker 1>what I'm getting from you? And Andy didn't cover that game.

0:58:49.840 --> 0:58:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It was Garrett. The other guy covered the game. I

0:58:53.040 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 1>forget his name, the breast Scott Yeah, oh no, no,

0:58:56.600 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Gilbert. Yeah, he was the guy who was great. Yeah,

0:58:59.640 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you're right, he's their best looking quarterbacks so far this year.

0:59:02.560 --> 0:59:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Well you know why I remember that because I had

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh and Survivor then to every Survivor week is a

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sweat everything, and now the gauntlet begins. Good lord, how

0:59:10.680 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna play? Your four picks are four entries, Chrissy,

0:59:12.840 --> 0:59:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you can break them up now. Yeah. I don't know

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna do this week, because we've got to

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:23.200
<v Speaker 1>say some powder for Thanksgiving. Thanksgiving that a week. Yeah,

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be tough. I'm looking at those games. That's

0:59:26.200 --> 0:59:30.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be tough. Like an interesting note on Garrett Gilbert

0:59:31.240 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>when he was in Texas, Andrew Luck wanted to go

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to Texas, but they didn't want Andrew Luck because they

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 1>were committed to Garrett Gilbert. Well, he was the guy.

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Gilbert was the guy. If you remember when Colt

0:59:43.440 --> 0:59:45.880
<v Speaker 1>McCoy had weak arm against Alabama, do you remember what

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 1>his arm just went dead? That was Garret Gilbert around. Yeah, yeah, wow,

0:59:51.000 --> 0:59:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that's all. That's when last we heard from Garrett Gilbert.

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:56.560
<v Speaker 1>He was playing in the National Championship kind of things. Well,

0:59:56.560 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>he was in the short lived Football League last playing

1:00:00.360 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>on and he was quite good. Right Yeah, then, yeah,

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had known that before I had bet

1:00:07.160 --> 1:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Steelers I don't know how I feel about

1:00:08.920 --> 1:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that Minnesota Dallas line. But we'll just wait to see

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>what happens tonight. I see where that comes out. Yeah,

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not putting anything up there. It's okay, way too

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>out there. Okay. Next up, another really good game, Chiefs

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Raiders. Che's at the Raiders. Chief that's that's

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the Sunday night game that last. Yeah, let's do that.

1:00:26.320 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's do that second to last, and it's proper lay. Okay, okay,

1:00:30.560 --> 1:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So next up time wise, Miami at Denver. Miami wins again,

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>push at worst on their season win total. For those

1:00:38.440 --> 1:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of us who have Miami over six looking good, it's

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a free roll from here. In two against the spread.

1:00:44.640 --> 1:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins best starts since two thousand one at six

1:00:47.880 --> 1:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and three two uh fifteen of twenty five, six, two touchdowns,

1:00:52.200 --> 1:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>no picks, and it wasn't sacked sal vonam eight six

1:00:56.280 --> 1:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown, two eighty one total yards for the Dolphins.

1:00:59.360 --> 1:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>A blocked hunt for the Dolphins set up their first

1:01:01.520 --> 1:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>score first and goal at the one. Three straight weeks

1:01:03.640 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in which the defense is either scored or set up

1:01:06.600 --> 1:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a short field score, including I think two weeks in

1:01:10.000 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a row now from the one on short fields. Um

1:01:13.680 --> 1:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so we helped out once again by the defense and

1:01:16.240 --> 1:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the special teams in this case. And then there's Denver.

1:01:19.880 --> 1:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Denver gets destroyed yesterday by the Raiders thirty seven to

1:01:24.400 --> 1:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve as four and a half point dogs. There was

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>no comeback from the Broncos this time to make it

1:01:29.920 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>cosmetically acceptable or at least look acceptable. Drew Lock twenty

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>three forty eight for two fifty seven, one touchdown and

1:01:39.000 --> 1:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a career high four picks, sack twice. The Bronchos were

1:01:43.080 --> 1:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>minus five in turnovers, that's all you need to know,

1:01:45.760 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and four of those were Lock picks. Miami will be favorites.

1:01:49.720 --> 1:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>They will be favorites by more than a field goal.

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Say Miami minus four. I like your number way better.

1:01:57.440 --> 1:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I hate to tell you, by the way, numbers like

1:01:59.560 --> 1:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>two and a juice on the favorite, three juice on

1:02:01.760 --> 1:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the duck. You know, we went through this last week.

1:02:05.080 --> 1:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, every wise guy in town and I'm lucky,

1:02:08.840 --> 1:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and every one of them had the Chargers against Miami issue,

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and we said it on this show. And I know

1:02:14.920 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, as you have one team that finds a

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>way to lose every week, and another team that finds

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a way to win every week. And I had nothing.

1:02:24.000 --> 1:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I was that great. I was two and two on

1:02:25.400 --> 1:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the picks that I gave last Monday, but Miami was

1:02:27.840 --> 1:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>one of I like Miami, I listen. I also like

1:02:31.280 --> 1:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Denver yesterday to getting points, but that was another game.

1:02:34.000 --> 1:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Every wise guy in town had Denver, every one of them.

1:02:36.960 --> 1:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>At Denver, we had we need to say we had

1:02:40.160 --> 1:02:42.439
<v Speaker 1>them on both our picks. You know that I got

1:02:42.440 --> 1:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>out voted, um but you know Drew Lock is not

1:02:48.280 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a good quarterback fan Joe is not a good head coach.

1:02:52.800 --> 1:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I like this number a lot higher. My power ring

1:02:55.040 --> 1:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>has come a lot higher. So I will open the three.

1:02:57.280 --> 1:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>They'll take it, they could have it, but I plan

1:03:00.640 --> 1:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>on one and need Miami in this game because they're

1:03:03.400 --> 1:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>much better, much much better than Denver. Yeah. I will

1:03:06.120 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>happily take Miami at three and again tip of the

1:03:08.640 --> 1:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>cap if you beat me Miami. Of course, beating the

1:03:11.680 --> 1:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Chargers by eight charges kept it within one score, but

1:03:14.520 --> 1:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Miami gets it done six and three, season win too

1:03:18.120 --> 1:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>before the season was six, and they are live for

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the division. Love that coming back Guessing lines Week eleven

1:03:23.920 --> 1:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>continues right here on the numbers game at Visa These

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Sports Betting Network. The Guessing Lines Week eleven, brought you

1:03:30.720 --> 1:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>by bet MGM Novad It's my mich book of Christie

1:03:33.000 --> 1:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Andrews from behind the desk here at the South Point

1:03:34.800 --> 1:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Hotel Casino. Chrissy, where where are we? I don't know,

1:03:38.880 --> 1:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but allow me to change the subject at least for

1:03:41.680 --> 1:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>God's sakes, Thanks Chrissy. Back to the back to Miami

1:03:47.040 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and Denver. I talked about Himbo earlier in the show.

1:03:50.440 --> 1:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>He had the list of guys who had qbrs under

1:03:53.560 --> 1:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty once I had the most six lock is sacked. Geez.

1:03:58.760 --> 1:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know. I've been waiting for this

1:04:00.760 --> 1:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>guy to show something. Maybe it's Fanjioho. I don't like

1:04:03.840 --> 1:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the coach. And on the other side, Brian Flores, What

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic coach. This guy has turned out to be.

1:04:12.600 --> 1:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, between him and Mike Gravel, finally we got

1:04:15.040 --> 1:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>two guys out of the Bill Belichick coaching tree that

1:04:18.200 --> 1:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>have shown to be very, very good coaches. And you know,

1:04:21.200 --> 1:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I was against the move to make two of the

1:04:23.280 --> 1:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback, but now that I look at it, he

1:04:26.000 --> 1:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>made the right move. This guy did. Uh, He's incredible

1:04:30.240 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm telling you there's a really well coached team.

1:04:33.840 --> 1:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>They got some talent. You know, they're not there yet,

1:04:37.560 --> 1:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>but they're getting there, and they got the right guys

1:04:39.480 --> 1:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in place. I mean, I'm very bullish on Miami futures.

1:04:42.800 --> 1:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that we haven't met futures for

1:04:44.840 --> 1:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this year to win the Super Bowl. But there's a

1:04:46.680 --> 1:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>good team, but a good coach and a good quarterback. Again,

1:04:48.920 --> 1:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it again from before the season, only three

1:04:51.280 --> 1:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>bets I made under New England season wins over Miami

1:04:54.320 --> 1:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and Dolphins to win the a f C East at

1:04:56.440 --> 1:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>plus eleven fifty and there game back. This could happen.

1:05:01.560 --> 1:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing I said off was Brian Flores

1:05:04.080 --> 1:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to win Coach of the Year at one might be

1:05:06.800 --> 1:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the best way to play the Dolphins, and that's looking

1:05:08.920 --> 1:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty damn good right now too. Dolphins were six to

1:05:11.560 --> 1:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>one to win the East a couple of weeks ago,

1:05:14.000 --> 1:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and I got them. Then they got a tough they

1:05:16.480 --> 1:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>got a tough schedule. I mean, it's probably still not

1:05:19.760 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. They need a little help. I mean, it

1:05:21.880 --> 1:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is really up here about it. But just the fact

1:05:23.280 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're live here at this point is is fun

1:05:25.120 --> 1:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. All right. Yeah, they're not there yet,

1:05:28.200 --> 1:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but they're dawned close. That's a good good I love

1:05:31.280 --> 1:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>him this week against really yeah I do too. At

1:05:33.840 --> 1:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that number at three, my goodness, and Drew luck as

1:05:36.200 --> 1:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, people in Denver will tell you he's not

1:05:38.960 --> 1:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the answer for sure. All right, he's not getting it.

1:05:42.120 --> 1:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's sneak one. Next up, Jets at the Chargers, oh

1:05:46.360 --> 1:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and nine Jets, two and seven Chargers. It's ever been

1:05:49.680 --> 1:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a team oh and nine that's that much worse than

1:05:55.000 --> 1:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the two and seven team because the Charges again Aaron

1:05:57.040 --> 1:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>shots from football outsiders, and they're the most consistent team

1:05:59.720 --> 1:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>every week they show up. He's right, they don't win though.

1:06:02.840 --> 1:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Herbert thirty two yesterday and the loss to the Dolphins

1:06:06.040 --> 1:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>eight point loss for one seven, two touchdowns, one pick.

1:06:08.680 --> 1:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>He was sacked twice. He's the first rookie ever with

1:06:10.840 --> 1:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>two plus touchdown passes in six straight games. But the

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Charges have allowed twenty nine plus points in six straight games,

1:06:18.400 --> 1:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>all seven losses this year by one score, eight points,

1:06:21.280 --> 1:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a fewer seventy three total yards yesterday against the Dolphins.

1:06:25.960 --> 1:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Charges will be more than a touchdown favorite. They'll be

1:06:28.200 --> 1:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>minus seven and a half. I'll say you're a little light.

1:06:32.440 --> 1:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>My power ring has come to nine, and I see

1:06:34.960 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this game in everywhere between eight and nine. I'm gonna

1:06:38.920 --> 1:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>open nine, and uh, I'm sure I'm gonna have the

1:06:43.080 --> 1:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Chargers and some of my Survival picks. But I just

1:06:46.080 --> 1:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>think looking on the sidelines and uh, Anthony Lynn looking

1:06:51.240 --> 1:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>like somebody please get me out of this. It is

1:06:55.120 --> 1:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>really true. He could be this same the hopefully could

1:06:58.120 --> 1:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>be just it's I mean, I guess, I guess we

1:07:01.200 --> 1:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>had Pittsburgh against the Jaguars that was a higher number

1:07:04.000 --> 1:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>than this, but really is can you trust the Chargers

1:07:07.720 --> 1:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in Survivor? The Jets are sorry. The Jets are coming

1:07:11.800 --> 1:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>off their best game at the season and bye week,

1:07:14.400 --> 1:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>best game of their season and a bye week extra

1:07:17.040 --> 1:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>rest for the New York Jets. Chrissy, Oh my god,

1:07:20.720 --> 1:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm gonna have I know, I know you don't.

1:07:23.640 --> 1:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You got to save some of the good dames. Can't

1:07:25.680 --> 1:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>use them all, you know, That's nature of the game.

1:07:28.000 --> 1:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>The Survivor Gaunt, which begins this week, then Thanksgiving, then

1:07:33.080 --> 1:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the following Sunday, three and a seven. We call it

1:07:37.600 --> 1:07:40.439
<v Speaker 1>eight day span coming back numbers game Visa guessing lines

1:07:40.440 --> 1:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>some more for week three, Week eleven, rather next right

1:07:42.840 --> 1:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>here at Visa. All right, let's do let's away, Yes,

1:07:46.000 --> 1:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, we have a couple of minutes. We only

1:07:48.920 --> 1:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have two games left. Yeah, we got Let me give

1:07:50.840 --> 1:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you a little blur. I've teased about this all year.

1:07:53.800 --> 1:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>My book that I'm writing, Okay, was gonna was meant

1:07:58.320 --> 1:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to be and it's would and is. There was a

1:08:01.080 --> 1:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>journal from one super Bowl to the next, like a

1:08:04.360 --> 1:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>year in the life of a bookmaker. Well, needless to say,

1:08:09.800 --> 1:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>this year in the life of anybody is nowhere near

1:08:13.760 --> 1:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what we thought it was gonna be. I've been sharing

1:08:17.080 --> 1:08:20.479
<v Speaker 1>my stuff with Anthony Curtis and the Deep castleman who

1:08:20.520 --> 1:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is his editor, and so far they're loving it. I mean,

1:08:24.439 --> 1:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>think of all this stuff that's happened, you know, first

1:08:26.880 --> 1:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of all, Kobe Bryant's death. We forget all about that,

1:08:30.479 --> 1:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you know. I Mean I started, like with the championship

1:08:34.280 --> 1:08:36.479
<v Speaker 1>games leading into the Super Bowl, and I was just

1:08:36.479 --> 1:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep a daily journal. You know. We had racial unrest,

1:08:40.400 --> 1:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>which unfortunately had to make it into the book. He

1:08:42.720 --> 1:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>couldn't just ignore it because of affecting sports. I tried

1:08:46.160 --> 1:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to keep it to anything that that affected sports strictly

1:08:51.240 --> 1:08:54.479
<v Speaker 1>through the eyes of a bookmaker and the world of

1:08:54.560 --> 1:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>sports and bettings and bookmaker. It's uh, this book went

1:09:01.800 --> 1:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>nowhere near where I thought I was going to go.

1:09:04.439 --> 1:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>How could you have? Yeah, like I said, when the

1:09:08.680 --> 1:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Kobe Bryant thing happened, my first thought was wild. You know,

1:09:12.360 --> 1:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this was a huge curveball. We've almost forgotten about that.

1:09:16.800 --> 1:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>There's been so much that's happened since then, you know,

1:09:19.920 --> 1:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>with COVID and like I said, Rachel unrest and just

1:09:23.479 --> 1:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>things going absolutely bumpers. This year really kept the journal

1:09:28.120 --> 1:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>since last year, and I think this book is going

1:09:30.840 --> 1:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to do fairly well any working title or not yet. Uh.

1:09:36.520 --> 1:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>The working title was like a bookmaker's Season, So you know,

1:09:41.880 --> 1:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know if I'm gonna stick with

1:09:43.120 --> 1:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that or not. You know, like I said, the intention,

1:09:46.160 --> 1:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>what I planned on is nowhere near what I wound

1:09:48.880 --> 1:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>up with. We all and we all remember where we

1:09:51.760 --> 1:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>were when when we got the first text or the

1:09:53.960 --> 1:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>first news of Kobe, and yeah, for sure, and then

1:09:57.640 --> 1:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Chris of course getting COVID himself. You know something else

1:10:01.720 --> 1:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you could pardon me, is you getting and dealing with it,

1:10:06.800 --> 1:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the book. I guess it's not

1:10:07.920 --> 1:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>really sports related. Deal with me. Yeah, I'm a little stuff.

1:10:13.560 --> 1:10:15.519
<v Speaker 1>Have that much to deal with. It wasn't as bad

1:10:15.560 --> 1:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>as it was for other people. Wow, well we'll be

1:10:19.000 --> 1:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>in there. I think it's gonna be an interesting book.

1:10:21.560 --> 1:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>We look forward to that. CHRISY Andrews already the author

1:10:23.920 --> 1:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of Then One Day, available at Amazon. We look forward

1:10:27.120 --> 1:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to that book as when one year, well it's great,

1:10:30.400 --> 1:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>called it. Then one year we'll come back. We'll do

1:10:32.200 --> 1:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the prime time games. Tell you what we like best.

1:10:33.880 --> 1:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Hear guessing lines, Week eleven numbers, game Visa, the sports

1:10:36.320 --> 1:10:40.759
<v Speaker 1>betting networks. To be clear, you like the Bears tonight,

1:10:40.840 --> 1:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I will take the Bears in a teaser. I will

1:10:42.880 --> 1:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not play them straight. I already have the Bears in

1:10:45.640 --> 1:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a teaser open still, so yeah, that's gonna be where

1:10:48.880 --> 1:10:51.519
<v Speaker 1>I end up. I'm not sure about the plus three,

1:10:51.560 --> 1:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>but I'm I'm quite happy with the teaser position, all right,

1:10:54.520 --> 1:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Chris Andrews. Everybody from the South Point Hotel Casino Sports Book.

1:10:58.720 --> 1:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Night, Chrissie Sunday A night, This great game, Kansas

1:11:04.120 --> 1:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>City at Las Vegas. The Raiders the only team to

1:11:07.360 --> 1:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have beaten the Chiefs this year, Chiefs eight and one, coasting.

1:11:11.280 --> 1:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's all one big exhibition for the

1:11:13.160 --> 1:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs to repeat. Can't help that feeling in my head. Um,

1:11:17.040 --> 1:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr. Yesterday and the Raiders win over the Broncos.

1:11:20.240 --> 1:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>And again it was thirty seven to twelve, five for one,

1:11:23.960 --> 1:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty four, no touchdowns, no picks, wasn't sacked, just you know,

1:11:27.920 --> 1:11:31.479
<v Speaker 1>casual day at the officer Derek Carr, Josh Jacob one twelve,

1:11:31.479 --> 1:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. As we mentioned with the Broncos game, the

1:11:34.640 --> 1:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Raiders were plus five and turnovers. That's all you need

1:11:37.680 --> 1:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to know. The Raiders had five total takeaways in their

1:11:40.880 --> 1:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>first eight games, had five. Yesterday won the time of

1:11:44.439 --> 1:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>possession battle thirty five Kansas City coming off of bye,

1:11:50.040 --> 1:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it's the Chiefs minus six and a half. Well,

1:11:55.240 --> 1:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>you're right on, um, I made the game six, so

1:11:59.479 --> 1:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I have no but the six and a half. There

1:12:01.880 --> 1:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>was some sevens around earlier, but they're they're gone. I

1:12:05.080 --> 1:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>see a couple of sevens with juice on the dog. Um,

1:12:10.280 --> 1:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think seven will probably be a take for me

1:12:12.720 --> 1:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in this game. But I think six and a half

1:12:14.479 --> 1:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes you pause and think a little bit.

1:12:16.360 --> 1:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really good place to start. So

1:12:18.280 --> 1:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I have no beef at all with the six and

1:12:19.840 --> 1:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a half. I think that's a good number for a great,

1:12:22.320 --> 1:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>great Sunday night game. I'm proud of myself for hitting

1:12:24.720 --> 1:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that one. Okay, Monday night the Rams at Tampa Bay.

1:12:31.479 --> 1:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>Rams beat the Seahawks yesterday they do so. Um again,

1:12:36.800 --> 1:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>perfect sort of set up for the Rams yesterday. With

1:12:40.000 --> 1:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the bye week, Sean McVeigh had two weeks to scheme

1:12:42.479 --> 1:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>up against his defense. They hadn't Winny by a touchdown

1:12:45.400 --> 1:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>three to sixteen. Um, here's the stat for you, Sean

1:12:51.120 --> 1:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh thirty one and oh when he leads at halftime?

1:12:57.840 --> 1:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>How about that? I saw that. That's pretty good. Here

1:13:01.479 --> 1:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>here's one I even like better. The Rams defense this

1:13:05.320 --> 1:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>year has given up a max of three points in

1:13:09.800 --> 1:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the second halves of eight of their nine games this year.

1:13:14.320 --> 1:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>It feels like they're the most surprising unit of the years.

1:13:16.960 --> 1:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>The Rams defense. Yeah, well, they got Aaron Donald and

1:13:20.640 --> 1:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>they got Jalen Ramsey, and those are the anchors. So

1:13:24.560 --> 1:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>if you have a dominant they have a new coach

1:13:28.000 --> 1:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, and well, but if you have a defensive

1:13:30.080 --> 1:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year, guy on the front line. It

1:13:31.800 --> 1:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just creates havoc and a guy like Jalen Ramsey will say,

1:13:34.040 --> 1:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>come here, d K mccalf, I'm gonna I'm gonna ruin

1:13:36.080 --> 1:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>you today. Those anchors, those are good anchors to have.

1:13:38.760 --> 1:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>But three points max and eight of the nine second

1:13:42.200 --> 1:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>halves thus far this year. I think it was only

1:13:45.040 --> 1:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo we scored a touchdown on offense of the second

1:13:48.120 --> 1:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>half thus far this year. Jared Goff yesterday thirty seven

1:13:51.200 --> 1:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>for three oh two, no touchdowns, no picks. He was

1:13:53.479 --> 1:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>sacked three times. Uh, they were nine of fifty and

1:13:56.160 --> 1:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams were on third downs one of one on

1:13:58.040 --> 1:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>four they were plus two in turnovers. Again, if you

1:14:00.640 --> 1:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>had access to the box score, no better uh you

1:14:04.840 --> 1:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>know line item two, know than turnovers because you can

1:14:07.200 --> 1:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>figure out pretty much who won every game. Not every game,

1:14:09.840 --> 1:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>because there are exceptions and we note them here on

1:14:11.640 --> 1:14:15.599
<v Speaker 1>the show. But turnovers are bigger than anything. Of course,

1:14:15.640 --> 1:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't predict them moving forward. That's the problem. And

1:14:18.040 --> 1:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>then Tampa Bay, as we mentioned, Tampa Bay crushes the

1:14:21.479 --> 1:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers yesterday forty six to twenty three. This was

1:14:25.160 --> 1:14:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a seventeen seventeen game at the half, a twenty nine

1:14:28.800 --> 1:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to six second half of the Bucks and Tom Brady

1:14:32.600 --> 1:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>tom thirty nine for three forty one three touchdowns, Doe

1:14:36.120 --> 1:14:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Pacy we sacked once and as I mentioned earlier versus

1:14:38.680 --> 1:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>teams other than these Saints twenty one touchdowns and two

1:14:42.360 --> 1:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>picks this year. Yesterday hit eight different receivers, God Wins

1:14:46.240 --> 1:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>six for ninety two, Evans six or seventy seven and

1:14:48.720 --> 1:14:52.639
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, Antonio Brown seven of sixty nine, Gronk two

1:14:52.720 --> 1:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for fifty one in a touchdown, on and on, and

1:14:54.760 --> 1:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, Ronald Jones the second twenty three for

1:14:57.000 --> 1:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>one nine two a ninety eight yard touchdown scamper to

1:15:02.320 --> 1:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the house. They were ten of sixty on third down,

1:15:05.040 --> 1:15:06.599
<v Speaker 1>where the Bucks one of one on fourth and again,

1:15:06.600 --> 1:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, probably the biggest yards difference in any

1:15:10.400 --> 1:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>game I remember this season, five forty four to one

1:15:14.360 --> 1:15:19.519
<v Speaker 1>eighties seven versus the Panthers yesterday. So it's the six

1:15:19.560 --> 1:15:21.559
<v Speaker 1>and three Rams the seven and three Bucks. I'll say

1:15:21.600 --> 1:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks are favored. I'm gonna guess four and a half. Chris,

1:15:26.920 --> 1:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>You're way high. It's um three and a half. I

1:15:31.920 --> 1:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>see a couple of three and a half, the juice

1:15:34.040 --> 1:15:38.679
<v Speaker 1>on the dog, I see a couple of threes juice

1:15:38.720 --> 1:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>on the favorite. In fact, it looks like the three

1:15:42.200 --> 1:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and a halves or even disappearing as we speak. I

1:15:47.360 --> 1:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>made the game one this. I love this Rams defense.

1:15:52.680 --> 1:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>They are playing well, and Jared Goff, you know, I mean,

1:15:57.680 --> 1:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>he's not great, but he is pretty good. I think

1:16:00.000 --> 1:16:04.519
<v Speaker 1>has gotten some mocks, maybe undeserved. But this defense of

1:16:04.560 --> 1:16:07.519
<v Speaker 1>the Rams, I just think is, you know, I don't

1:16:07.520 --> 1:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>know if they're the best in the league. I don't know,

1:16:09.520 --> 1:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>but we mentioned they got two anchors in there that,

1:16:13.600 --> 1:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, make them a very formidable opponent. I think

1:16:16.800 --> 1:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna open three and they're gonna I'm sure they'll

1:16:19.840 --> 1:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>probably lay it to me, but I think there's gonna

1:16:23.040 --> 1:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>be a really really tight game. And I think, uh,

1:16:25.760 --> 1:16:30.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, totals seven forty seven and a half, let's

1:16:30.680 --> 1:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>see it a reasonable anymore. I think points will be

1:16:33.600 --> 1:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>at a premium. I think it's gonna be a really

1:16:35.160 --> 1:16:38.479
<v Speaker 1>tight game. And I had at three and a half.

1:16:38.520 --> 1:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I would definitely like to RAM. So I'm

1:16:40.080 --> 1:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna open three RAMS teaser like Rams teaser like, Yeah,

1:16:45.040 --> 1:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I saved my worst gifts for last. But yeah,

1:16:47.000 --> 1:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I would, I would agree with that. And again, if

1:16:48.960 --> 1:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the rams D can do right. If you know, there

1:16:51.960 --> 1:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is a staff shot in my head that sees Aaron

1:16:53.800 --> 1:16:57.519
<v Speaker 1>Donald wreaking havoc one year old Tim Brady, they got

1:16:57.520 --> 1:16:59.479
<v Speaker 1>to make a move around and and the rams DAM

1:16:59.520 --> 1:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>might be able to They can move around for sure. Man,

1:17:01.320 --> 1:17:03.599
<v Speaker 1>there's something that's the key, and it's been the key

1:17:03.680 --> 1:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>for him for years. If you can get him off

1:17:05.880 --> 1:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>his spot, he's less effective. You know, he's not my

1:17:09.040 --> 1:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>homes He's not even Roethlisberger if you get him off

1:17:11.240 --> 1:17:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the spot. But they've protected him well his whole career

1:17:14.920 --> 1:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in New England. When he's protected here at Tampa Bay

1:17:18.320 --> 1:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>has had some really good games. Will they be able

1:17:20.160 --> 1:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to protect him against Aaron Donald. I'm not so sure.

1:17:22.760 --> 1:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I like the rams a little bit in

1:17:25.000 --> 1:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this spot. There's some good games man, Rams Bucks six

1:17:28.920 --> 1:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and three verses seven to three on Monday night. Um,

1:17:31.840 --> 1:17:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't really hold the Raiders in that same but

1:17:33.400 --> 1:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at least on paper eight and one verses six and

1:17:35.680 --> 1:17:38.599
<v Speaker 1>three on Sunday night, Kansas City at the Raiders Green

1:17:38.720 --> 1:17:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Bay at Indianapolis is a good game as well. And

1:17:43.640 --> 1:17:45.559
<v Speaker 1>he read off of buy is a thing, right. That's

1:17:45.680 --> 1:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Andy read and he read off of buy is a

1:17:47.400 --> 1:17:50.519
<v Speaker 1>thing right right. Tennessee at Baltimore is a is a

1:17:50.520 --> 1:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>good looking game on paper as well. And then that

1:17:53.080 --> 1:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Thursday about Thursday, Yeah, that started at all Arizona at Seattle?

1:17:58.280 --> 1:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Who along with the Rams or six and three? So

1:18:00.479 --> 1:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>when we look up and down, Chris, I'll give you

1:18:02.720 --> 1:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>honors here. What do you like the best? If you

1:18:05.000 --> 1:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>put on your betting head, Miami, that would be my

1:18:11.400 --> 1:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>top pick. I like Miami, I said, I love the coach,

1:18:14.840 --> 1:18:18.479
<v Speaker 1>love the quarterback from Miami, the exact offosite for Denver,

1:18:19.120 --> 1:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and don't like the coach a quarterback. I'm not ready

1:18:22.920 --> 1:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to quite sell out on them yet, but I think

1:18:24.880 --> 1:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody in Denver is you know, um, But I like Miami.

1:18:29.000 --> 1:18:31.479
<v Speaker 1>That would be my best bet of the week for me.

1:18:31.520 --> 1:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's uh. I also like Miami. I think

1:18:34.840 --> 1:18:37.439
<v Speaker 1>it's New England. Again. That was the line that was

1:18:37.479 --> 1:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the most perplexing, although you said right afterwards it's sort

1:18:40.080 --> 1:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of moved in our direction. What what the market's fascination

1:18:43.840 --> 1:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is with the Houston Texans I will never understand. I

1:18:47.080 --> 1:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>guess two and a half. Chrissie said Houston was even

1:18:49.760 --> 1:18:51.959
<v Speaker 1>favored in some spots, and I would say, pick them,

1:18:52.000 --> 1:18:54.599
<v Speaker 1>so it's moving our way. And then the other definitely

1:18:54.600 --> 1:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>gone on one are gone New England minus one. Yeah, okay,

1:19:00.280 --> 1:19:04.799
<v Speaker 1>it's coming coming our way. Um yeah, that made no sense.

1:19:05.760 --> 1:19:07.719
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it feels good when you make a guess

1:19:07.720 --> 1:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>and you're like what and then it comes your way

1:19:09.680 --> 1:19:11.479
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the show. And then the other

1:19:11.520 --> 1:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>one was Tennessee. I know you were saying a lot

1:19:14.240 --> 1:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of people will take Baltimore here, but if you're giving me,

1:19:17.040 --> 1:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you said north of six points on Tennessee against Baltimore,

1:19:20.120 --> 1:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll take all those points. It's mostly six and a half,

1:19:24.520 --> 1:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>mostly six and in all right, So so I'm anself.

1:19:28.200 --> 1:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So those are the three I like the best. New England,

1:19:30.120 --> 1:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Miami and Tennessee at a glance. Um, but that's the

1:19:33.720 --> 1:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>point of the exercise. The point of the exercise, like

1:19:35.720 --> 1:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the old Stardust radio show, is too within this uh conversation,

1:19:40.520 --> 1:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>try to extract value on the lines. And usually the

1:19:42.880 --> 1:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>first instinct is the best, and the rest of the

1:19:45.160 --> 1:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>week we spend just talking, talking ourselves out of it,

1:19:48.400 --> 1:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>and maybe sometimes we're dumb to do that. So in

1:19:51.479 --> 1:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the end, then we only have about a minute left.

1:19:54.160 --> 1:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But with your four survivor and I know you have

1:19:55.960 --> 1:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>partners to uh to consult with. UM. This is tough

1:20:00.479 --> 1:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this week because we mentioned the Chargers will be a possibility,

1:20:05.280 --> 1:20:08.519
<v Speaker 1>Chargers hosting the Jets. That's the second biggest line of

1:20:08.560 --> 1:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the week. Do you trust Anthony Lynn and the Chargers.

1:20:11.240 --> 1:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh's the biggest line at Jacksonville. So if you still

1:20:14.520 --> 1:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>have Pittsburgh, that's going to be a team that people use,

1:20:18.680 --> 1:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>even though Jacksonville shows up for these games. New Orleans

1:20:22.400 --> 1:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>is tough because you don't know about Drew Brees right now,

1:20:25.960 --> 1:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City on the road, if you still have them

1:20:28.479 --> 1:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Raiders, I don't know. This is a tough

1:20:34.400 --> 1:20:36.839
<v Speaker 1>We've tried to go with home teams as much as possible.

1:20:36.840 --> 1:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that, you know, even though even

1:20:41.760 --> 1:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>even though hopefill has proven Yah, I got a bunch

1:20:45.680 --> 1:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>of partners. Yeah, this is the hardest week this week,

1:20:50.120 --> 1:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving next week. It's the gone three really tough tough weeks,

1:20:58.120 --> 1:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>including Thanksgiving as its own weekend circle uh UM and

1:21:01.120 --> 1:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this will cut the finally, you know, it's three oh

1:21:02.920 --> 1:21:04.519
<v Speaker 1>one and only one from three ten to three on one.

1:21:04.560 --> 1:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>That's like three or four straight weeks now where it's

1:21:06.680 --> 1:21:12.599
<v Speaker 1>barely dwindled. Now the having begins each and every one

1:21:12.640 --> 1:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of these. Chrissy, can't thank you enough. Appreciate it. Man,

1:21:16.080 --> 1:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>My pleasure, my friend, and my pleasure. All right, we

1:21:18.760 --> 1:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>look for we look forward to the book. Do you

1:21:20.320 --> 1:21:22.519
<v Speaker 1>have an estimated date on this? Are you just saying

1:21:22.560 --> 1:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>some day something? No, I mean, I'm not going to

1:21:24.880 --> 1:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>finish till we do the super Bowl. It's gonna hear that.

1:21:27.200 --> 1:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, that was the book. Okay, I'm super Bowl,

1:21:29.280 --> 1:21:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl. So you know, it's just a journal

1:21:31.840 --> 1:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of everything that's happened, which is quite a bit in

1:21:35.000 --> 1:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>this last year. Jason, by the way, then one year

1:21:38.760 --> 1:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna think about that. Yes, could you imagine Jason

1:21:42.400 --> 1:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>having that kind of impact? I like it. Then what

1:21:45.160 --> 1:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>then one year? Thank you, Chrissy, good luck to all,

1:21:47.920 --> 1:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>good luck with the Bears and the Vikings. Tonight from

1:21:50.360 --> 1:22:00.599
<v Speaker 1>all of us at BC Sports to day now back

1:22:00.640 --> 1:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>back BA