1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,640 Speaker 1: Let's get to our guest, Sean Cochrane, head of Research 2 00:00:03,160 --> 00:00:05,560 Speaker 1: c ls A Group, here with us live and in 3 00:00:05,600 --> 00:00:08,119 Speaker 1: our studios in Hong Kong Shan. Great to see you. 4 00:00:09,119 --> 00:00:12,520 Speaker 1: So we've got China slowing, we've got Europe slowing, and 5 00:00:12,960 --> 00:00:17,279 Speaker 1: the US slowing, three very big regions, and you've got 6 00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:19,640 Speaker 1: interest rates on the way up in at least a 7 00:00:19,680 --> 00:00:22,320 Speaker 1: couple of those regions. Are the market's a little out 8 00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:25,480 Speaker 1: of step with what's happening at the moment. Look, it's 9 00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:28,840 Speaker 1: the challenge that the central bankers are trying to manage 10 00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:34,640 Speaker 1: in so far as COVID really put pressures on policymakers 11 00:00:34,720 --> 00:00:38,760 Speaker 1: and regulators that they hadn't seen effectively since the Spanish flew. 12 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:43,199 Speaker 1: And so what that meant was that it triggered a 13 00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:48,360 Speaker 1: willingness globally to push an extraordinary amount of demand support 14 00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:51,240 Speaker 1: through the global system. Because rightly at the time, it's 15 00:00:51,280 --> 00:00:54,760 Speaker 1: easy in hindsight to look back and say, we understand 16 00:00:54,760 --> 00:00:57,160 Speaker 1: how COVID works, and we understand that we have vaccines, 17 00:00:57,200 --> 00:00:59,640 Speaker 1: and we understand there are ways to manage the path 18 00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:01,720 Speaker 1: through when then out of COVID. But if you put 19 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:04,160 Speaker 1: yourself back in the mind's eye of how it actually 20 00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:08,039 Speaker 1: felt in the early stages of code. It's understandable that 21 00:01:08,080 --> 00:01:11,000 Speaker 1: the government's put a huge amount of stimulus into the 22 00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:13,679 Speaker 1: economy because they didn't know what is the flow, how 23 00:01:13,720 --> 00:01:17,440 Speaker 1: bad can it get? But of course the unintended consequence 24 00:01:17,480 --> 00:01:20,360 Speaker 1: of that is when you have success with vaccines, when 25 00:01:20,400 --> 00:01:23,480 Speaker 1: you have an environment where multiple economies are coming up 26 00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:26,800 Speaker 1: with treatment solutions, and we find a path to deal 27 00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:29,560 Speaker 1: with COVID, and then we have an environment where demand 28 00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:33,120 Speaker 1: comes roaring back and the economy is relatively stable, but 29 00:01:33,160 --> 00:01:35,600 Speaker 1: the money has already been provided. Those provisions are there 30 00:01:35,760 --> 00:01:38,080 Speaker 1: and are built up in the reserves for the economy 31 00:01:38,120 --> 00:01:39,720 Speaker 1: to then be spent, and you saw it in the 32 00:01:39,760 --> 00:01:43,120 Speaker 1: savings rates of many economies, and so that pushes the 33 00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:47,600 Speaker 1: demand through later and then the central banks have to relax. 34 00:01:47,960 --> 00:01:51,000 Speaker 1: There's a whole supply side that's complicating as well. But 35 00:01:51,080 --> 00:01:54,360 Speaker 1: I'll stop there just in case. Well, Sean, I mean, 36 00:01:54,400 --> 00:01:56,800 Speaker 1: we still probably haven't haven't seen a flaw from China, 37 00:01:56,840 --> 00:01:59,400 Speaker 1: and we're expecting further stimulus. We're looking at the potential 38 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:02,360 Speaker 1: LPR today as well. What does that mean in terms 39 00:02:02,360 --> 00:02:07,000 Speaker 1: of how you allocate capital towards China? Sure, so what 40 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:09,600 Speaker 1: we would argue is that China has has effectively led 41 00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:12,200 Speaker 1: us into this cycle. So we've got to separate the 42 00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:15,280 Speaker 1: fundamentals from what's in the price, in that the returns 43 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:18,920 Speaker 1: that we capture on securities are primarily determined by what 44 00:02:19,080 --> 00:02:22,720 Speaker 1: we pay. The fundamentals obviously can change the value of 45 00:02:22,760 --> 00:02:25,880 Speaker 1: that with the sufficient passage of time. With China, what 46 00:02:25,960 --> 00:02:28,359 Speaker 1: we'd see is that the market has understood the risk 47 00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:30,640 Speaker 1: in China for a very long time. It's been going 48 00:02:30,680 --> 00:02:33,920 Speaker 1: down for longer than other markets, and its valuations are 49 00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:36,240 Speaker 1: not expensive. And as a result, we would argue that 50 00:02:36,639 --> 00:02:39,959 Speaker 1: China has not bottomed. EM has not bottomed, but EM 51 00:02:39,960 --> 00:02:43,919 Speaker 1: should start to outperform before markets reach a bottom, and 52 00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:45,960 Speaker 1: that is the point at which the long only community 53 00:02:45,960 --> 00:02:48,639 Speaker 1: will start to buy China, and that will be when 54 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:50,919 Speaker 1: the opportunities really arise. So I would suggest that China 55 00:02:50,960 --> 00:02:53,480 Speaker 1: is attracted, but not there yet. It's interesting that you 56 00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:57,120 Speaker 1: started off with a defense of policymakers. I find that 57 00:02:57,280 --> 00:03:01,480 Speaker 1: quite compelling in a sense. Never mind the blame and 58 00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:05,919 Speaker 1: never mind you know, the justification, but right now we're here. 59 00:03:06,639 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 1: Uh do you fear? Do you do? You say that 60 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:12,560 Speaker 1: what's happening now is likely recession on its way. We're 61 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:15,799 Speaker 1: just slowing growth. Absolutely recession in my mind, and that 62 00:03:15,880 --> 00:03:18,400 Speaker 1: as an analyst, I'm speaking from my own personal views. 63 00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:20,920 Speaker 1: C less A prides ourselves and being a house of 64 00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:23,240 Speaker 1: views rather than having a house view. We believe that 65 00:03:23,280 --> 00:03:25,320 Speaker 1: if you can strain the analysts around what they can 66 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:29,359 Speaker 1: say to their clients and how can you offer them 67 00:03:29,360 --> 00:03:32,120 Speaker 1: the intellectual freedom to add the value of we essentially 68 00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:35,160 Speaker 1: in the role of providing ideas to help investors think 69 00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:38,960 Speaker 1: through their investment process. So for me personally, recession is 70 00:03:39,000 --> 00:03:41,800 Speaker 1: effectively baked into the cake because we have an environment 71 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:44,800 Speaker 1: where the economy is slowing down but we must tighten 72 00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:48,080 Speaker 1: into it. And we have supply constraints that are COVID 73 00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:50,920 Speaker 1: related for China but conflict related for the rest of 74 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:55,080 Speaker 1: the world, and there's a geopolitical lens that's now accelerating 75 00:03:55,080 --> 00:03:57,200 Speaker 1: through all of that. It's very hard to believe this 76 00:03:57,240 --> 00:03:59,360 Speaker 1: is easier to deal with. I know we've discussed China, 77 00:03:59,400 --> 00:04:01,240 Speaker 1: but I do want to get your initial reaction to 78 00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:03,000 Speaker 1: that cut in the five and one year It was 79 00:04:03,040 --> 00:04:05,640 Speaker 1: a bit strange there because the read came through as 80 00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 1: a as a change. But they've both been cut and 81 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:09,840 Speaker 1: it certainly looks like that cut to the one year 82 00:04:09,960 --> 00:04:15,360 Speaker 1: potentially not here to the declining property sector. Yeah, I mean, 83 00:04:16,279 --> 00:04:19,920 Speaker 1: ultimately we have an environment where China has to deal 84 00:04:19,960 --> 00:04:23,520 Speaker 1: with a difficult property situation, and the challenge becomes they 85 00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:26,960 Speaker 1: understand that lowering rates aggressively is not necessarily going to 86 00:04:27,080 --> 00:04:30,160 Speaker 1: challenge solve the problem. What they really need to structural solutions. 87 00:04:30,520 --> 00:04:33,640 Speaker 1: And so that's why you're seeing very incremental moves and 88 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:40,400 Speaker 1: policy that's essentially stuck. Yeah, it's it's the debt overhang 89 00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:43,880 Speaker 1: that really concerns policymakers. Otherwise, you know, you you'd figure 90 00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:47,839 Speaker 1: that they'd be stimulating more. And it's really a problem 91 00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 1: that the whole globen faces. If you think about going 92 00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:55,200 Speaker 1: back over the past ten or twenty years, the debt 93 00:04:55,200 --> 00:04:58,760 Speaker 1: crisis is such that you've got some limitations with what 94 00:04:58,880 --> 00:05:01,279 Speaker 1: you can do with with interest streets. So does this 95 00:05:01,440 --> 00:05:04,479 Speaker 1: does this set up for potentially a bigger drop in 96 00:05:04,520 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 1: a sense than what we might have feared. Absolutely, I 97 00:05:07,880 --> 00:05:09,960 Speaker 1: mean we need to be open minded that you could 98 00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:14,400 Speaker 1: see a real decline in the SMP off. Now that's 99 00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:16,640 Speaker 1: going to sound like, oh my, that's how could it 100 00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:19,479 Speaker 1: be so large? But we need to keep in context 101 00:05:19,520 --> 00:05:23,160 Speaker 1: that it comes down to the policy choices. We've avoided 102 00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:27,440 Speaker 1: major drawdowns in markets by aggressive expansion of the monetary base, 103 00:05:28,279 --> 00:05:31,760 Speaker 1: zero interest rates, combined fiscal policy and talk of a 104 00:05:31,839 --> 00:05:35,280 Speaker 1: ludicrous idea of modern monetary theory, which is a ridiculous 105 00:05:35,320 --> 00:05:38,440 Speaker 1: concept that has been disproven through the academic journals for 106 00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:43,640 Speaker 1: decades and decades. But ultimately, if the markets see enough stimulus, 107 00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:47,240 Speaker 1: it can stop the downside. We're regulators and policy makers 108 00:05:47,240 --> 00:05:49,200 Speaker 1: who were complete about face and say, all right, we 109 00:05:49,279 --> 00:05:52,680 Speaker 1: got it wrong. We need to really just move through 110 00:05:52,720 --> 00:05:56,480 Speaker 1: this process, except the challenges realize some insolvency that could 111 00:05:56,520 --> 00:05:59,440 Speaker 1: trigger some serious downside. If inflation is ten cent a 112 00:05:59,520 --> 00:06:02,000 Speaker 1: year for se a years, that real outcome is much 113 00:06:02,040 --> 00:06:04,080 Speaker 1: worse than what you see on the nominal print, and 114 00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:06,400 Speaker 1: that's what everyone's most likely to get wrong in the 115 00:06:06,400 --> 00:06:09,880 Speaker 1: next couple of years. How hawk is you're expecting speakers 116 00:06:09,880 --> 00:06:11,920 Speaker 1: to be at Jackson Hole this week and is some 117 00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:15,200 Speaker 1: of the I guess perhaps anticipation worse than the execution 118 00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:18,040 Speaker 1: of what we actually could hear. Yeah, it's really interesting 119 00:06:18,040 --> 00:06:20,440 Speaker 1: because the central bankers that are on this incredible tight 120 00:06:20,560 --> 00:06:23,440 Speaker 1: rope where they're trying to find the balance. They need 121 00:06:23,480 --> 00:06:26,120 Speaker 1: to maintain as much credibility as possible. They need to 122 00:06:26,160 --> 00:06:28,480 Speaker 1: make the market do their work for them as best 123 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:31,400 Speaker 1: they can. With this view that they're going to keep raising, 124 00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:33,920 Speaker 1: but the market is effectively already bet that they'll pivot. 125 00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:35,960 Speaker 1: So you've seen this inversion of the yield curve. The 126 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:38,960 Speaker 1: expectation that rates will be coming down into next year 127 00:06:39,080 --> 00:06:42,159 Speaker 1: priced into futures markets, and so that's the challenge that 128 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:46,040 Speaker 1: they have. Ultimately, I think that they will have to raise, 129 00:06:46,120 --> 00:06:49,520 Speaker 1: and they'll they'll threaten to keep raising because from their perspective, 130 00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:52,320 Speaker 1: the worst possible scenario is they lose complete credibility in 131 00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:55,159 Speaker 1: the market doesn't believe that they can do anything to 132 00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:58,360 Speaker 1: stop inflation. Ultimately, it's how the long end of the 133 00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:01,840 Speaker 1: curve responds to that that's interesting. My base case is 134 00:07:01,880 --> 00:07:04,000 Speaker 1: that the long end cannot back up in yield terms, 135 00:07:04,120 --> 00:07:07,799 Speaker 1: so the the yield curve inversion worsens, which would reinforce 136 00:07:07,880 --> 00:07:10,160 Speaker 1: my view that there's a recession coming. That's the thing 137 00:07:10,200 --> 00:07:12,520 Speaker 1: we need to watch out of. The message is less 138 00:07:12,520 --> 00:07:15,680 Speaker 1: the message that's relatively straightforward. It's the response to the 139 00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:18,040 Speaker 1: message that matters. So the market was a little early 140 00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:21,800 Speaker 1: in playing the FED pivot. The beginning phase of a 141 00:07:21,880 --> 00:07:25,080 Speaker 1: FED pivot would be slowing of tightening, and we haven't 142 00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:28,320 Speaker 1: seen that yet, but maybe a fifty signifies the beginning 143 00:07:28,360 --> 00:07:32,000 Speaker 1: of that. The middle part would be a pause by 144 00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:35,160 Speaker 1: the Fed, and then the final part would be the 145 00:07:35,160 --> 00:07:38,000 Speaker 1: mission accomplished or at least or maybe even all the 146 00:07:38,040 --> 00:07:41,880 Speaker 1: way to the next move is is cutting by the Fed? 147 00:07:42,880 --> 00:07:46,360 Speaker 1: In in what phase of that might we see? Uh, 148 00:07:46,400 --> 00:07:49,240 Speaker 1: you know, risk assets take off? Well, this is the 149 00:07:49,320 --> 00:07:52,360 Speaker 1: challenging bit. Is that typically what you see and that 150 00:07:52,480 --> 00:07:54,960 Speaker 1: we've we've outlearned some key charts on this. One of 151 00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:57,560 Speaker 1: our recent reports, Global Themes report that goes through the 152 00:07:57,600 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 1: stages of a bear market. But typically we would argue 153 00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:03,760 Speaker 1: we are in a bob arrel classic bear market, which 154 00:08:03,760 --> 00:08:05,520 Speaker 1: means you have the sharp down, then you have the 155 00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:10,440 Speaker 1: reflexive rebounds, and then you have the drawn out fundamental downtrend. Normally, 156 00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:13,320 Speaker 1: the reflexive rebound will come at that pause, not the cut, 157 00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:15,360 Speaker 1: but the pause. It can be a cut, and no 158 00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:17,960 Speaker 1: two cycles are the same. What we've had here is 159 00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:20,680 Speaker 1: anticipation of a slowing of rate, which is your point 160 00:08:20,680 --> 00:08:23,960 Speaker 1: about the markets getting ahead on this. Pivots that's triggered 161 00:08:24,000 --> 00:08:26,360 Speaker 1: a bounce, but markets were so oversold they tend to 162 00:08:26,400 --> 00:08:30,480 Speaker 1: do that anyway. Ultimately, rate cuts when there's a fundamental 163 00:08:30,520 --> 00:08:33,000 Speaker 1: downtrend do not reverse the cycle, and that's my base 164 00:08:33,040 --> 00:08:35,040 Speaker 1: case here. Sean, great to have you with us in 165 00:08:35,160 --> 00:08:37,760 Speaker 1: Hong Kong. Studio Sean Cochrane, head of Research, CLS A 166 00:08:37,920 --> 00:08:39,640 Speaker 1: group with us in Hong Kong,