WEBVTT - Vaccine Cliff Looms As Numbers Begin To Drop

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Well, Matt, I consider

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>us very fortunate that every week we get to speak

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>with Lauren Sour the Johns Hopkins University, because there's so

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>much news that just breaks on a daily basis about um,

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the pandemic, therapeutics as well as vaccines. So

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>again today we're joined by Lauren Sauer, Social Professor of

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Emergency Medicine from the Johns Hopkins University. And I should

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>know that the Bloomberg School of Public Health is supported

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>by Michael Larre Bloomberg found their Bloomberg LP, Bloomberg Philanthropies

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and this radio and TV operation. Dr Soer, thanks so

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. I'd love to go to the

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>issue which I think is beginning to develop and we

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of knew it was gonna come, which is we're

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have more supply this vaccine than demand. Is it

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>now time for a big pr campaign to kind of

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>get out the you know, the vote, if you will,

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to get people to get vaccinated. Yeah, absolutely, I think

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it is. I mean I think, um, those access issues

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>that we've talked about, you know, several times on this show, uh,

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and that we've heard a lot about are still remaining

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for certain populations. But I think the push right now

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>has to be convincing those people who have decided not

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to or haven't decided to get vaccinated that now is

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the time, um, and the vaccines available, you can get

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it in many different places. And if we facilitate the

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>ability for people to get vaccine, um, that we can

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>start to get those numbers up again. Well well, I

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>mean in terms of access, President Biden said yesterday that

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>every American is going to be at least five miles

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>from a vaccine side. Is he off with those figures

0:01:55.480 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>or people get Yeah? I think that he is. Not

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>where necessarily the vaccine sites are, but how you access them.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think now is the time where we can

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>start to see creative options for getting vaccine into communities

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>rather than asking communities to go to vaccine. Because even

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>if it's only five miles away. That may mean that

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>someone has to take some time off work, has to

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>get childcare, may have to borrow a car or take

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>public transportation, UM, and all those things. When you add

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>barriers to someone who isn't sure if they're going to

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>get a vaccine, UM, that that creates, you know, something

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that weighs on the side of I just won't get

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it right now. He also he also said that he

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>wants UM employers to guarantee that workers are able to

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>get out and get the vaccine with paid with paid time,

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and also are able to recover from anything paid. One

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that's a concern, I guess is the hesitancy. Right. Um,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we know that America has a big crop of anti

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 1>vax ER's UM and I saw a tweet from Joe

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Wisenthal today that maybe what will help PR and the

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>other their direction. He says Lauren, I'll quote Joe wasn't

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>all directly. So I actually feel like a kind of

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>weird high after my second fiser, like I just took

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>some coding or tramadal or something. Um. It makes me

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>excited to get out there and get my shots because

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>he has something to make it feel better, right, but

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is this something that Paul didn't really feel it. He

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>got his second shot and said, yes, no signs. So

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is there anything that people are reporting that they, you know,

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>feel in the positive sense after these um there were

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>here hearing a lot of reports of that sort of

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>euphoria of just like, oh my gosh, I can take

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a breath, like it feels good and it was exciting,

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and we've made an incredible amount of progress to get here,

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and it does feel like, you know, you can see

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the light at the end of the tunnel. And I

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>think that is not to be discounted. I mean, I

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>know when I got my vaccine, I felt I also

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>felt a sense of before you like, holy moly, the

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>weight has been lifted off a little bit. I'm I'm

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>headed towards protection. We're headed, you know, towards the other

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>side of this, and and it's exciting, um and it's incredible,

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and the work that went to get us there is

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable and shouldn't be discounted. And I think if people

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>are going out and feeling that, that's amazing and they

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>deserve that. Lauren, what do you expect to hear? I

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>guess we're waiting here today about that Johnson and Johnson vaccine.

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is we're going to hear? I

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>have about feeling what we're going to hear is UM

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that it'll be you know, made available again, and there

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>might be some caveats to who can get it, UM,

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>so they may slightly restrict the population. I think we're

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>all sort of waiting, just like you too, to hear

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>what they decide. They look through a ton of data,

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>they've done all of their due diligence. I think it's

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>great to see that this system, um, this adverse event

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>system reporting is working and reporting is happening, and so

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we will probably see it, you know, available again, um,

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>but with a modified allowance for who gets it. Hopefully

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>men in their authorities with a solid dad get the

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>first shot at it, because I think I saw that

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in the preliminary material. I'm definitely excited if, if, and

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>when that's cleared again, I'm headed back to New York

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to get my shot and then we can all play

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>bridge together sans mask. That would be fantastic. Lauren, thanks

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Laurence sour there from the

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins UH School of Medicine, The Bloomberg School of

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Public Health, of course, is supported by Michael R. Bloomberg,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>and you may have guess he's the founder as well

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies, and he runs the

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>TV and radio stations as well. All right, j T,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much for that. Now you brought us the

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>new home sales data at the top of this program,

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Um destroying the survey numbers. We saw one point zero

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>to one million. We were looking for eighty five thousand

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>new home sales month over month, a gain of twenty

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent compared to the survey estimated fourteen point

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>two percent. So really strong numbers. And our next guest says, UM,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the that's the new home sales. The existing home sales

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>market is the un healthiest housing market in ten years.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out why from logan motto Shami. He is

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a housing data analyst, UM also lead analysts for Housing

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Wire out of Irvine, California. Logan, let's talk first about

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the new home sales numbers. Amazing jumps. What what sales report?

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Yea best new home sales reported over ten years. I

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>mean you had the trispector, you had headline numbers, which

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>can be wild month to month. I think people get

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>confused sometimes where you have these really big months and

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>big declines, but headline was great, But the key is revisions.

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>We had positive revisions, and monthly supply is below four

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>point three months on the headline and on a three

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>month average. You've got to keep it simple with a

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>new home sales market because we we focus so much

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>on lumber prices. But as long as monthly supply for

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>new holmes is under four point three months, something that

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>never happened from two thousand to two nine, the builders

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>are happy. No matter what they complain about in any

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 1>surveys or anything, that is all they care about because

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that means they could sell product and that will lead

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to higher housing starts. So as long as that continues,

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and I was I was just gonna ask Logan, does

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that mean they're gonna go out and keep building more?

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Is everybody who knows how to build a house going

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to go and do it right now? Yes? And as

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>long as that supplies that low, we're okay. Now, this

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>sector gets hit harder than the existing home sales market

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>when rates go higher. So the backdrop of higher mortgage

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.239
<v Speaker 1>rates would be problematic because then you've ben the lumber

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>prices really kicking. But for now things are good. Your

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>home sales fine, excellent print, best print in ten years.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Revision is good, monthly supply good great, great way to

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>get into the weekend. Alright, logan. But on the existing

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>home sales, you know, I just in the in the

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>town where I live. As soon as anything goes on

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the market, it's snapped up it and there's just not

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that much apply, I guess. So give us a sense

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of existing snapped up at a price much higher than

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>then you saw in the ad, right, because I know

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>people have been looking for homes around that area and

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they just can't get anything because it jumps right away.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the most unhealthiest market in the last ten years.

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Where the new home sales market has a has a

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>has a different economic backdrop. We just do not have

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of homes. And that's the main issue. Mortgage

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>purchase application demand. If when you do some COVID nineteen adjustments,

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not up that much year over year, but total

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>inventory has been falling since as purchase application data has

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>been rising. And now we have you know, we have

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the best housing demographics ever recorded history, and we have

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the lowest mortgage rates ever recorded history. So when you

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>put that many people into this marketplace, which is always

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>my biggest concern in this period, Uh, you're gonna get

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you need to fear about price escalation. But the but

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the problem is in the past, higher mortgage rates tend

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to balance this out. COVID nineteen has kept mortgage rates

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>artificial love has kept the bond market artificially low with

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>compared to our economic data, Like our economic data warrants

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a ten year yield north of two point But so

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we have we just have a very unhealthy marketplace because

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>literally people are not losing their bids by one or

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>two people, They're losing their bids by eleven and fifteen people.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>That is extremely unhealthy. And we're getting these home price

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>growth without a credit expansion. And this is what concerns

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>me about this period of time, is that price growth

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is really going up, but demand is not really falling

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>through with it. And and that's what that's gonna be

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a problem down the line again when mortgage rates eventually

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>rise and I'm not talking about like six or seven percent,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about well, so logan, I mean, I'm

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>looking I'm hoping to move back to the Tristiate area

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>looking for a nice colonial on a couple of acres

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in Westchester County built I'm hoping the way I envision

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it built in the seventeen eighties, seventeen nineties. Um, what

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you're saying is I should just trash that idea and

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>just buy a couple of acres and and build it myself.

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>If you could find the lumber, then yeah, that'll be

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. You can do it. But yeah, it's

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>just it's just an extremely unhealthy market. I mean, that's

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>just we just and there's no there's nothing that could

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>really solve this in a short term unless mortgage rates

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>go higher, and COVID is impacting the world economy is

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>much harder than ours. Our economic data it's much better,

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's keeping rates low, and it's just it's really

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>frustrating for buyers. I mean, you're just you're not getting

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>outbid by one or two people, You're just getting outbid

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>by many. I mean, some homes are getting thirty or

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>forty offers, and some of the price finals selling prices

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are is insane. Well exactly because even if you do

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>get the house, then you move in and you're going

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to bed knowing that you bought in at the top

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of the market. Well, here, here's here's here's one thing

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>about that. The difference between now and then, let's say

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two to two thousand and five, that was

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>more of a speculative credit bubble where these those weren't

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>really homeowners. There a lot of our investors here. Anybody

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>who buys this home is legit. And the concern is

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not about a housing crash or home prices peeking out.

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>It's that these people all going to stay in their homes.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna lose their jobs or anything anytime soon.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna stay here for a long time. It keeps

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>housing stuck. Being stuck is the worst problem because there's

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>no real there's no velocity quick fix to this. So

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>uh And if you look at our home prices are

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>real home prices, there's so much lower than what Canada, Australia,

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand, France, the UK has, Their real home price

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>growth has been much stronger. So again, my fear for

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>me as always that prices escalates out of control because

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>these are all legit buyers, but sales really aren't growing

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that much and that's that's being stuck. That's the frustrating part.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why I say this is a very unhealthy housing market. However,

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>higher rates should cool this down right because there is

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>no credit bubble this time. There's limits to housing. You're

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>still bounded are the rules of numbers. So hopefully, and

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>especially now that I think supplies some more supply come

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>under market, it just cools this market, John, because guess

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what the demographic passion they're not going anywhere. They need shelter,

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they need somewhere to leven. Hey, look, thanks so much

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Love getting your perspective on all things

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>real estate. Logan Multi Shammi housing data analysts also lead

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>analysts for Housing Wire based in Irvine, California. Matt House

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the housing market in Berlin, and I have to say,

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>as he was saying that the actual prices aren't higher

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>than they are in Canada the UK, um, the prices

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>here are extremely high. I mean, if you want a

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>nice house in the suburbs in the Summit or the

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Greenwich or the Bronxville of Berlin, you have to be

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>prepared to pay um, you know, starting at two million

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and probably and probably higher. Frankly for what you could

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>get in the US. It's incomparable. But what I was

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking is, Paul, if your kids are now going to college,

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you have empty bedrooms, maybe me and my wife could

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just move in with you. Yeah, a little, a little

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb action. We'll talk about that off the air man.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:11.719
<v Speaker 1>That could be a good transaction. We all know the

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>bull call on this equity market. It's driven by the

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve accommodative money, it's driven by a fiscal stimulus,

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the reopening trade. Lots of bullish underpinnings to this market,

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of investors are questioning is that all

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>priced into the markets. Let's get a sense of what

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>traders are really thinking about that. We to do that,

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>we check in with Randy Frederick. He's vice president of

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Trading and Derivatives for the Schwab Center for Financial Research. Randy,

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. I know you

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>guys have your Trader Pulse survey. We really you know,

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to traders and ask traders what they're thinking. What

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>are the thoughts here of these markets as we are

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>hitting kind of you know, kind of all time highs

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>almost on a daily basis. Well, let's go back to

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what you mentioned right off the bat, which is that. Um.

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, many of our traders told us that they

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that the easy games, if you will, in the

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.359
<v Speaker 1>market may have already been built in, not too surprising

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>with the SMP five eighty six percent since it bottom

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>back in March of last year. But they also still

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>have a fairly optimistic views. So in other words, while

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we may not see another eight percent over the next

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, they still think there's upside available. So when

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna know that it's time to sell? Well,

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we ever really know when it's time

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to sell UM, And we don't think selling in the

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>broad sense of like get out of everything, is ever

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. UM. What we often tell our clients

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to do is to take advantage of market volatility. When

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you have little of down dips um, as we were

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of in until to day, we're getting a little

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of a bounce back. UM, those may be opportunities

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to pick up a few extra shares. And when you

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>have markets hitting all time highs like they did just

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>last Friday, maybe you take a little bit of profit

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>off the table. But wholesale selling is just never a

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>really good idea. So nobody rings the bell at the top,

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>as they say, all right, Randy, just give us a

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>sense of kind of when you again survey the traders, UM,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>what are their thoughts towards volatility here? We've seen the

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>VIX pull back pretty significantly here to the seventeen eighteen

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar seventeen eighteen range. Here, what did they think about volatility? Well,

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>what they think about volatility is that they think volatility

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>might actually be a little bit worse in Q two

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>than in Q one, which is kind of interesting because, um,

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it's actually been a lot lower. Q one volatility was

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit higher UM than what we've seen. In fact,

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the VIX hit twelve month lows here just

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of weeks. So UM, But I

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's more of a sort of a response to

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going on at the moment that they received the

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>survey UM, and I think it also had a little

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>bit to do with the fact that when this survey

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>went out, we were seeing interest rates UM hitting a

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>high level we haven't seen in quite a while, and

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the concerns about inflation, I think we're pretty high that

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>has that has come down a bit UM in the

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks. As you know, since April began,

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the ten uere pull back a bit, the

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation worries of sub sided to some extent. And while

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it seemed earlier that many people were sort of, um,

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily trusting of J. Powell that he didn't plan

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates, and I think he's convinced the market. Now,

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>what will the new tax laws if they're put into effect,

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>this new tax plan, if it's put into into law.

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Due to the trading environment, well, you know, the sell

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>off we got when this was first announced is not surprising.

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>When you have the market near or at all time highs.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>We're about one percent below the all time highs, it

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>becomes very sensitive to any sort of news that might

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>be received as negative. Obviously, people believe if their taxes

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to go up that's not a good thing,

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and so the knee jerk reaction is to sell. But

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a bounce back today, not too surprising. Generally,

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the sell officer are overdone. They tend to be a

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit too extreme. What we don't know is a

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of things. First of all, we don't know whether

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be retroactive back to the beginning of or

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>wether it wouldn't kick in until two. We also don't

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>know what the final bill might look like, if or

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>when it ever becomes law. Most of the time, initial

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>proposals are watered down substantially before they finally become law,

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>if they ever do, so, it's really way too early

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>to speculate how that might play out. The interesting thing is,

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems to be focused primarily on the

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>top three tenths of one per cent, which is a

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>very small portion of the population, but also a portion

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>who owns an enormous amount of equities in the market.

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But there seems to be quite a bit of pushback. Um.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it may be just sort of a launching

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>point for negotiation that there's been a lot of pushback,

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as you know, about the potential for raising corporate tax rates.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh so this is an alternative to that. If they

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>don't like corporate tax rate hike, then maybe we should

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>go at individuals. Um. You know. One thing that's interesting

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>about this is that people always complain about how complex

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the tax laws are. If you eliminated the twelve months

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>hold for long term capital gains and you taxed interest

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>divin ends, and capital gains all at the same rate.

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>It would greatly simplify taxes. Certainly it would go up

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>for for some of the high earners, but it would

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>simplify things substantially. So I don't think we know how

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this plays out. We don't even know if any of

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it will come into becoming a law, and if it does,

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it will likely look a lot different. There any thirty

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>seconds left. What are some of the sectors that the

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>traders in your survey are liking right now? Well, one

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that I think is really one of the parts I

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>thought was found very interesting was that last year when

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we did this survey, the top sector that they were

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>optimistic about was financials, which I think turned out to

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>be a very good call, because financials lost four percent

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>last year. They're up seventeen percent year to date. So

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the two worst sectors last year were financials and energy.

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Those are the two best ones this year right now.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Our investors that took this survey told us that they're

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>still optimistic about energy. As much as we talk about

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>green energy and battery powered cars and all these other things,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that still makes up a very small portion of the

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>overall economy. Old time fossil fuels and and tradition energy

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be with us for a very long time.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>It's down like it was last year, but it certainly

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>is not out. And I think this year's rebound is

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a um indicative of that. There are certain fossil fuel

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>cars and motorcycles that I intend to keep forever. I'll

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have to rip them out of my cold day to

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>be around for a while. Randy, thanks so much for

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Randy Frederick, their VP of trading at the

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Schwab Center. All right, now we're gonna focus in on

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the municipal bond market. Eric Kazaski, senior US Muni Strategies

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence, joins us and Um, we had kind

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of a bombshell yesterday on uh, the tax side of things. Eric,

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>how does this affect the muni market in your estimation? Hey,

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>good morning guys. Um. Look, obviously, any time you have

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>higher taxes on the margin, that's going to be good

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>for municipal bonds. Right, people are going to look for

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to lower their tax bill. Um. But I think

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if you if you sort of up back before we

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>had tax reform in two seventeen, right when we had

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>higher taxes, we didn't see like a huge dupremental retail demand.

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the real play here is going to be

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.959
<v Speaker 1>what happens to evaluations in the higher tax states like

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>New York and California, who are already talking about increasing

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>their marginal tax rate in state, and then combined with

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the higher federal tax rate, you could be up in

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the fifties um, and we could see valuations on the

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>debt and those states really take off. All right, So Eric,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>just give us a sense here. We've known for a while.

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>You certainly since President Biden was elected he won the

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>election that probably going to see some taxes go up.

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>What does the you know, medicimal bond market, if you

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>saw fund flows just take off from there or has

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it been kind of a wait and see issue. No,

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it's been consistently strong, and I think a lot of

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with um, you know, fear of

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>higher taxes in the future. And you know, as as

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>the corporate market books frothy um from valuation standpoint, and

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>people want to decouple of equities, they are moving into

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>unis because that uncorrelated as that class with a low

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>historical default rate. Right, So it really checks off two

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>boxes as far as moving to take a seat he

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>even and getting the tax rancomm is a kicker on

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>top of that, what do you expect the changes to

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>be UM when we're when all is finally said and done.

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, has there been any Is there a pool

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>going on in the office as to what we're gonna

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>see at the end of all this? You know what,

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's an opening gander, right and you know, obviously, like

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>given the path negociations, we could be somewhere in the middle.

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>But if I had to guess, I would say that

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>they get somewhere in moving the needle higher and the

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>not in a tax rate to thirty percent range, but

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they might have to give up the efforts to repeal

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the AsSalt limitations. All right, Eric, talk to us about

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the taxable municipal moder Market's a fascinating market to me.

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>What's going on there? You know, flutes are still strong

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and it continues to be one of the biggest performers

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in fixed incomes year. And you know with the talk

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of sort of bringing back you go to America bond

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 1>type program with an infrastructure package later in the year,

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's going to bring more eyes to the sector. UM,

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but it could also bring more supply. With more supply,

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>we could see spreads y amount and it will just

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>make the sector even more attractive than it is right now.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>What's the most attractive aspect and unis are the most

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>attractive area and new needs right now? I mean, what

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing in terms of UM trends that you like?

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>You know what the biggest areas of I would say

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>return growth this year have been longer duration and lower

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in yield. We really seem sort of the long end

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of the curve performed best. And you know, triple A,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>triple B and single A metis have really um you know,

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>come in as far as performing on the high grade standpoint.

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>When you look at you needs lower down into high yield,

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've certainly been big performers. But you know,

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at sort of the subsectors of high

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>yield municipal returns, tobacco has been one of the biggest

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>booster there over the last year. We think there might

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>be some headwinds to com um just given sort of

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administrations begin to talk about how they want

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to increase taxes on cigarettes sales, also limit nicotine in

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>cigaretts and taco products and band mental cigarettes. Right, all

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>of that would be negative from tobacco shipments, which are

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>part of the n s A that fuel up the

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>team in on those bonds, kind of making it tougher

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and tougher the smoke cigarettes, but easier and easier to

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>smoke weed. Matt, So go figure what's going on there?

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Eric has ask you thank you so much for joining us. Eric,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't see you can die from smoking weed? Is

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I know? Ericson goes to little Strategies for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller. Yet on false Sweeney I'm

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast, you can

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio