WEBVTT - Week in Tech: Why the Charlie Kirk Video is Everywhere

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>From Kaleidoscope and iHeart podcasts. This is tech stuff, I'm

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>as Voloscian and.

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm care Price.

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Today we get into what the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>assassination tells us about the state of content moderation and

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>also how teens in New York City are responding to

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>having their smartphones banned in schools.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Then, on Chatting Me, a woman turns to chat GPT

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to help her mom with a mysterious ailment.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Her life was very diminished because she couldn't walk upstairs,

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>she was having really poor sleeps because the pain would

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 3>wake her up in the night, and overall, she just

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>started to feel like she was really declining in her health.

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Overall, all of that on the Weekend Tech, It's Friday,

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>September nineteenth.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Hi Cara, Hi os.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So normally we start these episodes a bit more lighthearted,

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but of course, the major news of the last week

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>has been anything but lighthearted with the assassination of the

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>right wing pundit and influencer Charlie Kirk.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it seems kind of like the only news story

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and obviously it does have a lot of overlap

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>with tech, especially social media. From the gaming references inscribed

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on the bullets to the Internet communities. The shooter was

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>part of to the way Charlie Kirk himself sort of

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>reshaped the way social media is used for political organizing.

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and of course there's the countless memes and takes

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 2>following a major news event like this.

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I was actually talking to a friend of mine

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the other day about the video of the assassination, and

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>he said to me, you know, in the old days

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, I might have to go looking for

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this kind of horrific, very disturbing, almost real time content,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>But these days I have to basically do everything I

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>can to avoid seeing it. And that really stuck with me,

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>because in the past, you would have to go in

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>search of this kind of confrontation with a video of

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>someone being murdered in plain sight, but now it's plastered

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 1>over every social media app. Over the last few months,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen all kinds of stories reporting about how the

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms have been pulling back on content moderation,

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>either because of the politics at the moment or simply

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to save costs.

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. You know, I've also seen a bunch of stories

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>about companies like TikTok and meta replacing human content moderators

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>with AI, which apparently has had mixed results.

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to put my hand up because on the

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>face of it, I'm not that drawn to stories about

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>content moderation.

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 2>You fight against them, Actually.

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I fight against them. We get pitched it quite regularly

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.119
<v Speaker 1>by our wonderful producers. The last time was when Facebook

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>replaced their content moderation system largely with these things called

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>community notes, where the community itself flags if something it's

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>misinformation or hateful, et cetera, etc. But this week is

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously something we couldn't avoid, and it feels to me

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I almost feel a little bit embarrassed about not having

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>focus on this earlier, because it feels like one of

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>those frog in the pot moments where it's a little late.

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 2>To jump out and you think we're boiling.

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we're boiling, or perhaps even boiled. It was

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a story and why that really brought it home to me.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>With the headline Charlie Kirk was shot and killed in

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 1>a post content moderation world, the wide article points out

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that very few of the videos of the shooting that

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>are all over various social media have content warnings, and

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>actually a ton of them play automatically before viewers have

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the chance to consent to what they're about to see.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, auto play in this sense is not your friend,

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and I think it probably accounts for the dissemination of

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 2>this video more so than just the average person looking

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 2>for it. And whenever a video like this, most recent

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Kirk killing video comes out, I think about the

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>at which video is now disseminated and how ill prepared

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the Internet is to handle it.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Also, I mean shooting in four K from close up.

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean the horror of this video, at least in

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>what I've read about it, is quite striking. Experts in

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>the wide piece who have been tracking the spread of

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the videos online say that a lot of the platforms

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>are actually failing to enforce their own content moderation rules,

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.239
<v Speaker 1>but also that it's kind of a tricky situation because

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the video falls in between quote graphic content, which is allowed,

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and quote glorified violence, which usually isn't right.

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the fact that this is like a

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 2>major news event, which I'm sure makes it even more complicated.

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Definitely, it's also the culmination of some fairly major political

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and philosophical changes to the way social media platforms are run.

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we all remember when Elon Musk brought Twitter

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty twenty two. He loosened content restrictions pretty

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>much immediately, and Bettie said this was in response to

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>what he claimed was suppression of conservative leaning post hosts.

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Then YouTube and Meta both followed suit. In twenty twenty three,

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>YouTube said that curbing misinformation could lead to quote the

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>unintended effect of curtailing political speech without meaningfully reducing the

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>risk of violence or other real world harm. In twenty

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, Meta cited quote recent elections as a reason

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to quote remove restrictions on topics like immigration and gender

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that are out of touch with mainstream discourse.

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and now the whole Internet is basically four chan basically.

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean. The interesting thing, though, as Wide points out,

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is that the more established platforms do still have real

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>rules around content moderation, and in many cases the circulation

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and distribution of the assassination footage violates those rules. But

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>nonetheless the videos are getting millions and millions of views

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and are still up and circulating widely.

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>So what is your takeaway from all of this?

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's this kind of confection of corrosive and

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>divisive rhetoric online translating into offline, translating back into online.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>This kind of vicious circle or a buros of radicalization.

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's an expert quoted who'd observe people on x

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>commenting on the video of the Charlie Kirk assassination saying

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that it heradicalized them. Now, it didn't say in which direction.

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>We may be able to infer that it radicalize them

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>against the left, but either way, I mean, this is

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>just another moment that I'm very concerned about, and I

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think everyone is will further harden the lines and further

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>feed this beast of online radicalization and real world violence.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, this story really encapsulates practically all of the

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>harms that people fear that social media might unleash onto

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 2>the world. The story that I want to report on

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 2>today has to do with the effects of technology actually

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>on our younger citizens and is a little more lighthearted.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Have you heard about the cell phone band in New York?

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>A little bit, but tell me more so.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>New York City public schools recently became the largest district

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 2>in the United States to ban students from using cell

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 2>phones during a school day. So this is a state

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 2>wide law, and it's something that's happening more and more

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 2>across the country. California and Louisiana also have restrictions, and

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 2>this week marks the second week since the band went

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 2>into effect in New York.

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I kind of can't believe this is happening. It feels

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like the pipe dream of so many digital and social

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>media theorists being an actually in real life, how's it going?

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 2>You know? When I saw it, I was like, is

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.679
<v Speaker 2>this for real? You know, like it feels that sort

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>of unbelievable. I actually did some reporting on this. We

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>have a friend whose child, Ruby is a middle schooler

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 2>in Brooklyn, New York, and they were kind enough to

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 2>send us some voice memos about their experience with the

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 2>phone band. So here are some of the things they

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 2>say are tough about the phone ban.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 4>The one good thing about on phones at school is

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 4>that we can't take videos of other people. I mean,

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 4>sometimes we want to like record something within our phone

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 4>group that we think is funny, like recording one of

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 4>us eating a ginormous hamburger or something funny like that.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes it's hard when it's like a fight or something,

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 4>it's really not good to have.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 2>A phone out.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not having a digital record of all of

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the shenanigans at school is something I think many kids

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>will be grateful for in future and parents are probably

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>grateful for today. But how does this actually work practicing?

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>How do you stop kids from using their phones at school?

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Different schools are actually taking different approaches to the phone band.

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Most of them either confiscate students' phones at the beginning

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 2>of the day and put them in lockers or these

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>magnetic pouches that have locks in them. But Ruby also

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 2>said that some kids and their parents just like literally

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 2>don't care about the rules at all.

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 5>A lot of kids just don't give him their phones

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 5>and they lie that they don't have a device, and

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 5>their parents sign it because their parents don't really care,

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 5>and then they just have their phones out in launch.

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>This probably would have been me to be honest.

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Would your parents have signed the fake waiver that you

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>actually don't have a phone?

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 2>No, they were kind of rule followers, unfortunately, But I

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 2>would have figured out a way to hack. That would

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 2>have been part of the fun of going to school.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 2>There was this article that really caught my eye from

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Gotham Mist, which has this amazing headline from burner phones

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 2>to decks of cards and YC. Teens are adjusting to

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>the smartphone ban, and the reporters of this article talk

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 2>to a bunch of teenagers about how they're adapting to

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>the ban, and a lot of these teenagers are embracing

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 2>their low tech school day. Now they're playing with Polaroid cameras,

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 2>which have made a huge comeback. And it's just interesting

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>to me that teens have been forced into the dark

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 2>and have found new light with things that we were

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 2>just doing twenty years ago.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the twenty year ago equivalent of this.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>When I was a kid, my greatest pleasure was watching

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>TV and playing with my PlayStation one. I lived in

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the countryside in England and we would have these blackouts

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or power out from time to time, I didn't know

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>once every six months, and my mom would bring out

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the candles and then we'd play a board game or

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>play Uno or something which had this kind of sweet

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>nostalgic quality to it. At the same time, I was

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>very happy that we were plugged in most of the time.

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have to do it more than a couple

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of times a year.

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 2>And I think what got you into Oxford was how

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 2>good you were at Uno? Had you been playing PlayStation

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 2>one that whole time? God knows, But in all seriousness,

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 2>there does seem to be a sort of nostalgia among

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 2>gen z for the esthetics of really even the two thousands,

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 2>not even so much the nineties, like the two thousands,

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 2>which is so funny to me about having nostalgia for

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 2>a time where I was just a teenager. One student

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 2>quoted in the article said she's looking into whether the

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 2>school would allow her to bring an MP three.

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Player otherwise known as an iPod iPod, And.

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 2>A teacher talked about how some of his students brought

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 2>in a transistor radio but they didn't know they needed

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to extend the antenna, which he had to help him with.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I love that that is a true that is a

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>true teachable moment because this is like almost like a

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>scene from a from like a feel good atis TV

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>show where the teacher help helps this year, no sun

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to extend their antennae. Exactly beyond fueling the

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>demand for nostalgia tech, is the phone band really changing

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>much about the experience of being at school?

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 2>So that same teacher who extended the antenna said that actually,

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 2>the lunch room is noticeably louder in a good way.

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.719
<v Speaker 2>He said that previously the lunch room was muted, and

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>that this band has really lifted a pall. The teacher said,

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 2>this is a huge difference from last year, when kids

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>would spend twenty minutes in the bathroom checking their phone

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and walk through the halls in silence with their heads down.

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I know this is true because it sounds like a

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 2>description of me in my own house.

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately me too. Ruby mentioned the idea of getting your

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>parents to write letters saying you don't have a phone

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. It's one kind of work around,

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but how compliant to the kids being what are the

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>ways around this they're looking for.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 2>They're coming up with all kinds of ways. So the

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 2>pouches that I told you about that are supposed to

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 2>make phones inaccessible during the day, there's all of these

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 2>tiktoks now showing students breaking into them, and Ruby actually

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 2>says that trying to get them open has become a

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 2>common downtime activity for students. Kids also use their school

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 2>issued laptops to send each other emails or to chat

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 2>each other using Google docs like imagine being so desperate

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that you're dming in Google docs. And of course, you know,

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 2>kids still have access to their phones all the time

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 2>that they're not in school, which is most of the day.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 2>A couple of teachers in the article talked about chaotic

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 2>scenes at the end of the day when kids finally

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 2>get their phones back, which made me laugh. But overall,

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 2>the band seems to be going kind of well, and

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>it may be something that becomes a standard for students

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>around the globe. You know, over half US states have

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 2>at least a partial band in place, and there are

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 2>a ton of other countries that have student cell phone

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:54.239
<v Speaker 2>bands with varying degrees of strictness. Denmark, of course, Australia.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>France has had one for a while but made it

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>even more strict earlier this year, and China has had

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 2>one since twenty twenty one.

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of hard to imagine why it took so long.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Are there any people who are objecting to this? Apart

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>from obviously the students who want to be on their phones.

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 2>All day, there are objectors. Not everybody is happy. The

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 2>president of the National Parents Union actually wrote an op

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 2>ed in USA today saying what we really need are

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 2>smarter rules around phone usage, and that treating all phone

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 2>uses a distraction can cause kids to miss out on

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the ways phones can be helpful to students.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>With all due respect to the president of the National Parents' Union,

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you feel as a certain self selecting quality to that job.

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Is your job to play devil's advocate on every single issue.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 2>That's right. She argues phones can keep kids safe during

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>emergencies and that we should be preparing them for adulthood

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 2>in the modern world by teaching them to have healthy

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>relationships with their phones. And also, some parents don't like

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 2>that they suddenly can't get a hold of their kids

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 2>during the school day.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean also, as a parent of kids in school,

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>the reality of emergency situations, violence, etc. Is also true.

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So I do understand why parents want to be in

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 1>contact with their kids. But as always in life, you're

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>weighing harms, right, and the harm of having your kid

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on their phone all the time at school seems to

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>me is somebod who's not a parent to be quite

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>significant and a good thing to mitigate.

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I think on the whole people really

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>like the effects these bands are having, and not just

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 2>in New York. I actually read this blog post that

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 2>aggregated a bunch of social media reactions from teachers in

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>states with student phone bands across the country. One teacher

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 2>was saying, has the solution really been this easy the

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 2>whole time? Teachers across the country are saying that libraries

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 2>are busier, behavior issues are down, and that you know

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 2>this is anecdotal, but still. One teacher even wrote that

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 2>kids are passing notes to each other in class instead

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 2>of texting and called it quote beautiful.

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>When I was in school, passing notes was quote against

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the rules. But I guess punishment. I guess it's not

0:14:55.440 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>just kids who are nostalgic. Teachers going to be nostalgic too.

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>After the break, Elon Musk is briefly supplanted as the

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>richest man in the world. A podcast company puts out

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>three thousand episodes a week with the help of AI,

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and British members of parliament get accused of using Chat

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to write their speeches. Stay with us, We're back and

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we've got a few more headlines to you this week, and.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Then a story about how chat GPT helped a woman

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>diagnose her mother's mysterious knee problem.

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>But first, Kara, have you had a man named Larry Ellison.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Owner of the island of Lenai I have.

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>That's his Awaiian reoubt. What else do you know about him?

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, he really burst into consciousness this year. He's

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 2>obviously the CEO of Oracle. He's been spending a bunch

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 2>of time at the White House. We talked about him

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 2>announcing the five hundred billion dollars Stargate Data Center project

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 2>with Donald Trump just a few days after the inauguration.

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 2>He also helped finance his son David's acquisition of Paramount,

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 2>and apparently they're also looking at buying Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I think the company is going to be called Para

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Brothers Discover Warner.

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty five really has been the year of Larry Ellison,

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>which is impressive given he's eighty one years old. I

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>read a piece in Bloomberg about him that charts some

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of his enthusiasms. There is the private island, which you mentioned.

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>He also flies a jet, of course. He once shot

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>at his elbow in a high speed bicycle crash and

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>punctured his lung body surfing. He also had a cameo

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Marvel movie Iron Man two and for one

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>brief glimmering moment. Last week, he became the world's richest man,

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>overtaking Elon. Ellison's personal wealth peaked at three hundred and

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>ninety three billion dollars, just ahead of Elon at three

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty four billion dollars.

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 2>How how did he overtake Elon?

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, it all happened because last Tuesday, Oracle announced their

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterly results and they surprised the market with extraordinary growth

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in spend on cloud computing services driven by AI demand

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>at other tech companies. Essentially, so they announced not one,

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>not two, not three, but four multi billion dollar AI

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>contracts for their cloud services with three different clients. One

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of those deals was with open Ai and was worth

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>three hundred billion dollars. So Oracle shares shot up by

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty six percent, and Larry Ellison is Oracle's largest shareholder,

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 1>earning forty percent of the company. So the events of

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>last week shot his personal net worth up by one

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars.

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I said that he fell back behind Elon, though he.

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Did fall back behind Elon, but I think they're they're close,

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>although Elon's crown apparently is safe for now. Our friend

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Nick Thompson who's the CEO of The Atlantic, had an

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>interesting take on the wider implications of this story. He

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about how the fact that Oracle has not built

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>its own large language model makes it an attractive, non

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>competitive collaborator for a lot of other AI companies, and

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so in a strange sense, Oracle's a kind of legacy

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>player has been rewarded for the fact that it wasn't

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at the cutting edge of the air revolution and therefore

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is seen as a non threatening partner by other tech companies.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 2>There's actually more good news for Oracle investors. As of

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 2>the time of this recording, the US and China are

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 2>expected to announce a deal for TikTok's operations in the

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 2>US to be taken over by Oracle, silver Lake and

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 2>in recent Horowitz, with US investors holding about an eighty

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 2>percent stake and Chinese investors owning the rest. But there's

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 2>actually another AI boom a bruin, and this one is

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 2>in the form of podcasts. I read this really crazy

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 2>article in the Hollywood Reporter recently about a new podcast

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 2>company called in Inception Point Ai, which is a name

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 2>that was only possibly created by AI.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, but I don't think the prompt was very

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>good because it's not much of a name for podcast company.

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It's an inception.

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Point as really it's really not, but I guess.

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>A good name for an AI company.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 2>It is a good name for an AI company, which

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 2>this is. So. This podcast network has over five thousand

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>shows and they put out over three thousand episodes per

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 2>week in the last two years. They claim to have

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 2>ten million downloads. Inception Point is saying that their secret

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 2>is that they can make a podcast episode in about

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 2>an hour for one dollar or less, and they use

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 2>AI for everything, choosing episode topics based on Google and

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 2>social media trends and then releasing five different versions with

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 2>different SEO friendly titles to see which ones perform best.

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 2>The ones that do well get scaled up, and the

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 2>production process is largely automated, using one hundred and eighty

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>four custom AI agents to make episodes that are then

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 2>basically just given quick QC quality ch and some sound

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 2>design from a human producer.

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't doubt that you can make an AI podcast

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>episode for a dollar. I do wonder if a dollar

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>will be enough to pay somebody to spend an hour

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to it, or perhaps the audience for these AI

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>podcasts is other AIS.

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 2>It just might be you know, I don't think people

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 2>in the actual podcast industry are very thrilled, but the

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 2>inception points CEO Janine Wright, who actually used to be

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 2>the CEO of the podcast company Wondery, insists that this

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 2>is the future and this is my favorite part. She

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 2>says in the article, quote we believe that in the

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 2>near future, half of the people on the planet will

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 2>be AI, and we are the company that's bringing those

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 2>people to life.

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>What a truly weird quote. When you're starting a new

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>business or fundraising, you always need some kind of bold

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>or provocative mission statement. But we believe that in future

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>half the people in the world will be AI is

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>definitely provocative.

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I want to introduce you to some of these people

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 2>that will make up half of the population of the world,

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:09.239
<v Speaker 2>people including chef Claire Delish. She's a host. I think

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I would imagine a food podcast or nature expert Nigel Thistledown,

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 2>who has to be English or else. He's definitely not real.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 2>The episodes on this network cover everything from weather reports

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 2>to cooking and gardening, and the company is looking into

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 2>turning these AI personalities into chatbots that can then interact

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 2>with listeners, though they claim they want to steer clear

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 2>of developing anything that someone would accidentally have a deep

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 2>relationship with. I don't know how anyone could resist a

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 2>relationship with Chef Claire Delish on the basis of the

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 2>content that she's creating.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I have to say, this story feels

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>like he was hallucinated by it, does AI. I'm also

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>somewhat curious about that ten million download number. Did you

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>find anything about any kind of listener responses to the

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>well of inspiring content?

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, other than all of the women who had fallen

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 2>in love with Nigel thistledown in a parasocial relationship. A

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of people say that these episodes are not very good,

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>and they've also said that they have that kind of

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 2>uncanny quality that still screams text to speech. But Janine

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Wright doesn't really seem to care. In the article, she says, quote,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that people who are still referring to all

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 2>AI generated content as aislop are probably lazy luddites. That's

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I think she's talking to us, because there's a lot

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 2>of really good stuff out there. As for that purported

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 2>ten million download number, a quick glance at the company's

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 2>shows and reviews says they probably don't have a ton

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 2>of listeners. However, with such low overhead, they say they

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 2>only need about twenty downloads per episode to turn a profit.

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Companies take note.

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny that reference to lazy Luddites. We did

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>an episode on tech Stuff a couple of months ago

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>with a guy called Brian Merchant who wrote a book

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>about the real Luddites, who I think anything but lazy.

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>They were kind of pro testers who sacrificed, in many

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>cases their lives during the Industrial Revolution to protest against

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>how the mechanization of work was making people jobless and

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>driving them into poverty. So I think Genine right may

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be wrong on that one. But on the topic of

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>unconvincing AI personalities, have you heard about the most recent

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>throwdown in the British Parliament?

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 2>No? I have not. I don't feels the followed British politics.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think that many people do in Britain

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>alone in the US. But there's an article in the

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>newspaper called The Independent about how several labor MPs have

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>been accused by their conservative counterparts of using AI to

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>write their speeches, and how could they tell well. One

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of the people making these accusations is Conservative MP Tom Tuggandat,

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>who says that labor MP speeches are increasingly starting to

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>have more and more americanisms.

0:23:56.160 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Tom Tuggenhat works with Claire Delish and Nigel Thistledown. Did

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 2>he mention specifically what americanisms are being used?

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the phrase I rise to speak really got Tom

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>hot under the hat. He said, quote I rise to speak,

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I rise to speak, I rise to speak. Chack GPT

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>knows you're there. But this is an americanism that we

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>don't use but still keep using it because it makes

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>it clear that this place has become absurd.

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 2>As an American, I can say I've never once said

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I rise to speak, maybe save for in my high

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 2>chair growing up.

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as a bridge I've never used it either. But

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I did some googling and it turns out I rise

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to speak is frequently used in Congress in the US,

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's had a meteoric rise in British Parliament recently.

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Tom is correct to pointed out last year it was

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>used two hundred and thirty times in the whole year.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>This year it's already been used six hundred and thirty

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>five times, and I think it's the kind of processed

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>type thing that people use in the House of Representatives

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>which is now infiltrated Parliament. And Tom tuggan Dat is

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>blaming chachipt for this lazy MP is using it to

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>write their speeches.

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Are there any other examples of AI in the MP speeches?

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are words like underscore, streamline, navigate, bustling, which

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>often used by large language models and are now popping

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 1>up more and more in Parliament, as are these commonly

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>used AI sentence constructions like not only X, but y

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>or the phrase not merely. And of course I mean

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>there's this interesting socio linguistic question here right, which is

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are all of these MPs actually using chat gibt to

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>write their speeches or have the phrases of chat gibt

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>become so ubiquitous in human language that real humans are

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>unthinkingly now imitating machines.

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 2>That's what I ask myself about your posts on LinkedIn.

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 2>And now to our final segment of the day, Chat

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 2>and Me, where we discuss how people are really using chatbots.

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 2>And remember we want to hear from you, so please

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>send your chat stories to our inbox Tech Stuff podcast

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>at gmail dot com. This week we heard from our

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 2>listener Shalon from Vancouver, Canada, and she told us Chat

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 2>helped her mom with a mysterious medical problem.

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 3>So my mother is seventy four and she started having

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 3>knee pain about a year ago and it kind of

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 3>came out of nowhere, but it was pretty severe and

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 3>it was making it really difficult for her to sleep.

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 3>So obviously she talked to her doctor. The advice from

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 3>the doctor was just give it a little time to

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 3>d and then eventually she went back to the doctor.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 3>The doctor said, okay, fine, we're going to give you

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 3>an X ray. There was absolutely nothing wrong with her knee.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Here's always comforting when you go to the doctor with

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a medical problem like severe pain, and you get a

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>test and the answer comes back nothing wrong with you.

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 2>It gets worse. A few months later, Shanan and her

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 2>mom finally got the doctor to give them a referral

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 2>for a physiotherapist, but the physiotherapist also couldn't find anything

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 2>wrong with her knee. Another nightmare. Shllan told us that

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 2>at this point, the injury was starting to have a

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 2>big impact on her mom's mental health as well as

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 2>her physical health.

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 3>Her life was very diminished because she couldn't walk upstairs,

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 3>she was having really poor sleeps because the pain would

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 3>wake her up in the night, and overall, she just

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 3>started to feel like she was really declining in her health.

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Overall, this sounds quite horrific. Does Chat ride to the rescue?

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 2>This is where Chat comes to the rescue. Shllen's mom

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 2>was visiting her and as a kind of last resort,

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>they turned to Chat GPT. They listed all the symptoms

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 2>and told Chat the whole story, what all the different

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 2>doctors had said. She talked to Chat for about forty

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 2>five minutes, and then.

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 3>It diagnosed her with a condition and gave her exercises

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 3>she needed to do, what she needed to do to

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 3>sleep at night, how she needed to sleep at night,

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 3>how she needed to walk during the day, et cetera,

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 3>et cetera.

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So did it work well?

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.959
<v Speaker 2>Shllon and her mom decided to do an experiment and

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 2>follow Chat's advice religiously for two weeks just to see

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 2>if it helped. Guess what completely healed, and Shalon said,

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 2>it's made a huge difference in her mom's life, not

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 2>just because the pain is gone, but because doctors had

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 2>been kind of dismissing it, and because it was also

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 2>one of the first experiences her mom had had with

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 2>the very scary reality of getting older.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 3>As people age, it's like one thing happens, and then

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 3>the next thing happens, and then the next thing happens,

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 3>and your body is falling apart. And so my mom

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 3>has never had like a major issue that she couldn't

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 3>overcome in her health, and so this was the first

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 3>thing that was like, Okay, I guess this is the beginning.

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Of the end, like it's over for me.

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 3>And so the fact that she has been able to

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 3>overcome this and has her kneeback and her health back,

0:28:50.800 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 3>it's been really life changing for her.

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this week for Tech Stuff.

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kara Price and I'm os Valashin. This episode was

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>produced by Eliza Dennis, Melissa Slaughter, Julian Nutter, and Tyler Hill.

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>He was executive produced by me Kara Price and Kate

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Osborne for Kaleidoscope and Kastrian Norvel for iHeart Podcasts, Kyle

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Murdoch Missy's episode and also write our theme song.

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Join us next Wednesday for the first episode of the

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 2>new podcast on Crisper with Walter Isaacson. It's a five

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>part series that tells the story of how a revolutionary

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 2>gene editing tool was created.

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And please do rate and review the show on Apple Podcasts,

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify, wherever you listen, and also write to us

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at tech Stuff podcast at gmail dot com. We're getting

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so many great submissions for our Chat and me segment

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and we love to get even more. We'll send you

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a T shirt if you you like