WEBVTT - UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves Talks Trump Tariff Threats

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Let's maybe start with

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the news of the week.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Prime Minister Stromer and others are rebuking

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump and saying he's wrong, and yet they're still

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to stop him escalating. I mean, can you really

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 2>have it both ways or is.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Now the time to go strong against him?

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 3>We absolutely want to de escalate. The future of Greenland

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 3>is for the people of Greenland. But the message that

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 3>I've come here with this week in Davos is that

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 3>I missed all the uncertainty and instability in the world.

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Britain's plan for economic growth, built on the platform stability,

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 3>investment and trade, is actually going very well. We've had

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>six intra straight cuts since I became Chancellor of the Exchequer.

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Inflation is coming down, the Bank of England expected to

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>get back to target in the next couple of months.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 3>And we've done trade deals with India with Career, which

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 3>improving our trading relations with Europe. And despite challenges at

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 3>the moment, we've secured a trade deal with the US

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 3>as well, which means we've got lower tariffs than pretty

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 3>much anywhere in the world.

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, President Trump has gone after your

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 2>starmer also on the sale of an island, which he

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 2>previously approved. So how do you characterize relationships between the

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 2>two right now?

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 3>They're very good. I mean, look, no one wants to

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 3>see what's happening at the moment in terms of Greenland.

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, recognize what the President said last night, you know,

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 3>criticizing decisions of a number of leaders, but previously the

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 3>US administration, including Centre of State Rubio, have supported what

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 3>is happening in Diego Garcia because it's enabling the UK

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 3>US military basis to stay open and to continue the

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 3>vital work they do there for decades to come. And

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 3>so you know, we're confident that that is the right

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 3>decision and has had the support of the US administration.

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 2>But Jesse, if we had a level of anxiousness in

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Davos right now would be like through the roof. And

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.839
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of opinions saying, look are the UK

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and you sleep walking into disaster right now because they

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>were blind sided about what to do with Greenland.

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Like what's your response to those criticisms.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, Denmark is a member of NATO, very close ally

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 3>of the UK and has been a very close ally

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 3>of the United States. Everybody recognizes the importance of the

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Arctic and the High North, and also the challenges that

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 3>we face the Western world, NATO faces in that part

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 3>of the world. We've just done a big deal with

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Norway to sell frigates to them, reflecting those sorts of threats.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 3>So no one is naive around the threats in the

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Arctic and the High North. The question is how to

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 3>face into those challenges, and we firmly believe in the

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 3>UK and across Europe that we do that by NATO allies,

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 3>by friends, working together to secure the best outcomes, not

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 3>unilaterally making decisions about another country.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>What are the risks if this escalates?

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Is it to the economy or does the UK? And

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you're worriy about intelligence sharing with the US and Ukraine.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 3>But all of our focus is on de escalation, not

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>in worst case scenarios. We have worked incredibly closely with

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 3>President Trump the last year because we believe it's in

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 3>our UK national interest to do so. The strategic relationship

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>between the US and the UK, the military and strategic

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>partnership between our countries is more important than the partnership

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 3>between any two countries in the world. And it's very

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 3>important for safety and security of the Western world. That

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>continues and we're determined that it will will do so. Similarly,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 3>the fact that we were able last year to secure

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 3>the Economic Partnership deal with the US and we continue

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 3>work on the Transatlantic markets, work that we're doing at

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 3>the moment to make it easier for our capital markets

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 3>to be better integrated and firms listed in the UK

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 3>and the US raising finance in each other's jurisdictions, greater

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 3>collaboration when it comes to digital assets. All of that

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 3>is in the UK's national interest and will continue to

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 3>pursue our national interest vigorously. But I don't think it

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 3>is anyone's in anyone's interests to escalate tensions or to

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 3>allow rhetoric to be a substitute for hard work and diplomacy.

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 2>But you think to trade deal stands because at the

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 2>moment there is you know, wild speculation about whether everything

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.679
<v Speaker 2>needs negotiating, whether you know President Trump goes really hard.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you model this.

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Or was just urge people to keep call heads Okay,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's what we did all through last year

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 3>and it actually served us pretty well. And whilst trade

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 3>barriers are going up around the world at the moment.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 3>We can all see that in the last year barriers

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 3>to trade with the UK have fallen. We've secured a

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:20.119
<v Speaker 3>comprehensive trade deal with India which will come into force

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 3>in the next few months, just taking legislation through both

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 3>of our parliaments to secure that includes trade in services,

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 3>support for exports and also around government procurement. That's a

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>huge deal. The deal with Career, one of the fastest

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>growing economies as well in the G twenty is very

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 3>important for the UK. But most important probably is the

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 3>trade with our nearest neighbors and trading partners in the EU,

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 3>which was damaged after leaving the EU voting to leave

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 3>the EU in twenty sixteen. We are now fixing that

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 3>by improving trade relations and corporation with our closest allies

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 3>and neighbors.

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And I want to get back to the UNI. Second.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Governor Bailey though, said that you know, he worries about

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>also a President Trump's attax on the FED and that

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>could create shark waves for the UK. Do you agree

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 2>with that.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that people recognize that certainly with this government

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 3>and with me as Chancellor, there's huge respect for independent

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 3>economic institutions, whether that is the Bank of England or

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 3>the Office of Budget Responsibility. One of the reasons why

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the UK has been you know, so has had challenging

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 3>economic times the last few years is because the previous

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Conservative government, particularly under Liz Tras, both played fast and

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 3>loose with the public finances but also undermine the economic

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 3>institutions that make Britain have made Britain a safe and

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 3>secure place to invest. We're undoing that damage, working closely

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 3>with the independent Economic institution, but respecting their independence, and

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 3>that collaboration and fiscal policy supporting monetary policy has enabled

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 3>those six cuts in interest rates, taking rates down to

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 3>three point seventy five percent. It's the fastest speed of

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>rate reduction in the UK in seventeen years, and that's

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 3>only possible because of the stability that we've returned to

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 3>the economy and the decisions they've made on fiscal consolidation,

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 3>and the IMF say that amongst developed economies we have

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>got the fastest pace of fiscal consolidation over the next

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 3>few years. That gives investors confidence around the stability in

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the UK, our grip on the public finances and our

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 3>group on inflation.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's no worry about central banking dependence.

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>That could also impact or inspire maybe some of the

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 2>opposition in the UK were they to come to power.

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, we won a massive majority just a year

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 3>and a half ago. We have three and a half

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 3>years remaining in our term in office, and that our

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 3>economic plan to grow the economy with the stability return

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 3>to the economy, bringing investment in global investment as well

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>as unlocking domestic investment is the right plan. And in

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the next few months, as inflation returns to target with

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 3>lower interest rates which are benefiting both households and businesses,

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 3>that we will see the fruits of that in growth

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 3>and higher living standards.

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Chance, I don't know whether you're a meeting with Scott

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Besson's the Treasury secretary here, whether or if you bump

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>into him and promenade.

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Well ill with Scott last week in Washington. I'm seeing

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Secretary Lotnik later today. Our Prime minister spoke to President

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Trump just over the weekend. You know, as you would expect,

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 3>there are very close relations between our country at all levels.

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 2>See here and Davis yours have an announcement which is

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 2>basically helping out with visas tell Us a little bit

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 2>about that, and do you worry that it's going to

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 2>be drowned in everything.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Else that's going on. Just a little bit of news

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that we have out there.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 3>So I believe in free and fair trade. I believe

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 3>in the benefits to businesses and also consumers of open economies.

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Economies that are open to trade, open to investment, and

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 3>open to talent have always been the most successful economies.

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>And I want Britain, even in a world where others

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 3>are putting up barriers to trade and investment and talent,

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 3>for Britain to be breaking down those barriers. And we

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 3>are announcing today further changes in our global talent routes

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>into the UK for three particular types of visa. The

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 3>first is for foreign businesses looking to expand their footprint

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 3>in the UK, working with them so that they can

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 3>bring in talent as they expand their footprint. Second for

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 3>UK businesses in our industrial strategy sectors, which includes financial services,

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 3>business services, creative industries, clean energy, advanced manufacturing, defense, et cetera.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 3>For those businesses, if they are bringing in talent from

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 3>overseas into the UK, their visas will be The fees

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 3>for those visas will be waived. And then the third

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 3>announcement today is that for really great talent looking to

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 3>come to UK universities again, we'll waive those visas as

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 3>well as a specific scheme for people gold medalists in

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 3>the maths olympiad offering a number of scholarships to UK

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 3>universities for those people, because we want Britain to be

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 3>a magnet for global talent in the same way we

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 3>want it to be the best place in the world

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 3>to trade from and to invest.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 2>In chandswer there's a growing clamor and labor circles, even

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 2>from some of your own Cabinet, for the UK to

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 2>join a customs union with the US that on the.

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Cord No, it was very clear in our manifesto that

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 3>we wouldn't be rejoining the Single Market, the Customers Union,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 3>or bringing back free movement of labor. But what we

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 3>have done already is brought back the Erasmus scheme which

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 3>enables young people both from the UK to go and

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 3>study at European universities and young people from Europe to

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 3>come and study at our brilliant universities in the UK.

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 3>We also have agreements in principle from last May around

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 3>the UK doing a food and farming deal, to reduce

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 3>barriers to trade at the border around electricity trading and

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 3>energy trading, as well as some form of youth mobility

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 3>within the European Union and the United Kingdom. So we're

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 3>making progress and all of that, looking to have another

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 3>summit this year where we can mark ourselves on progress

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 3>against those ambitions and set new ambitions, because that summit

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 3>last year was just the start of improving relations between

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the UK and the U and the EU. And I

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 3>would just say that, you know, these sort of times

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 3>when others are putting up barriers to trade, what Britain

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 3>is arguing for and what I believe in strongly is

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 3>that those of us who believe in free and fair

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 3>trade should practice what we preach and reduce barriers between ourselves.

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 3>That goes to the UK, the EU, Canada and other

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 3>allies around the world. And we are determined to lead

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 3>from the front in that we've already secured trade deals

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 3>with countries around the world. We want to do more

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 3>in the months to come.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 2>But I mean mathematically, just you know, if you leave

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 2>partics to unsaide again, rejoining the Customer Union could be

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>more beneficial so do you see future at any point

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 2>where the UK goes back again that we can't.

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Go back in time. And since we left the EU,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 3>we have done trade deals with India, with the US

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 3>with career and obviously you would lose some of the

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 3>benefits of those trade deals if you were to re

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 3>enter a customs union, and things like the benefits of

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 3>the deal we did with the US for our automotive sector.

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 3>The deal that we have with India is better than

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 3>the deal that any other country has with India. So

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 3>I think you have to consider all of these things

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.359
<v Speaker 3>in the round. I don't think we need to return

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 3>to the Customs Union to seize greater benefits of free

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 3>and fair trade. And we are working peace by piece,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 3>but with a strategic goal in mind, which is to

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 3>make it easier for British businesses to sell into European

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 3>markets and for European businesses to sell in into British markets.

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 3>And when the barriers to trade in other markets are

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 3>going up, we want to create more opportunities for our

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 3>businesses to trade with other countries around the world.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 2>There is of course big news about a new embassy

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Chinese embassy in London today. How do you see actually

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 2>relationship with the UK and China evolving.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we've given planning permission today for a new embassy.

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Obviously China already has an embassy in London. This will

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 3>be a new embassy and move. But you know, if

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 3>you just sort of take a step back, Britain has

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 3>embassies in almost every country around the world, and almost

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>every country in the world has an embassy in London.

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 3>They are absolutely vital for diplomatic relations and also for

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 3>resolving tensions. And so it is right that China has

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 3>an embassy in London in the same way that it's

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 3>important and right that the UK has an embassy in Beijing.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 3>And I was at our embassy in Beijing just last

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 3>January when we restarted the economic and financial dialogue with China.

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 3>It was the first time that we'd had an economic

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 3>and financial dialogue between our countries for six years. And

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 3>whilst other countries had been securing benefits for their financial

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 3>services sectors in growing markets, in China, we refused to engage.

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 3>And that was the wrong thing to do. It was

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>not in Britain's interest and that's why we changed that approach.

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 3>They hosted the Chinese hosted the Economic and Financial diagalog

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Dialogue last year. We secured significant benefits for UK businesses

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 3>and we'll be hosting the next Economic and Financial Dialogue

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 3>with our Chinese counterparts in the UK this year.

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 2>If the US continues being a little bit, you know,

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>not a little bit actually belligerent with Europe, do you

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 2>see the UK being getting.

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Much much closer to China.

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's just look at the numbers. The US trades

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 3>more as a share of GDP with China than the

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 3>UK does. Almost every big country in Europe trades more

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 3>with China than the UK does, and that's because the

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 3>UK under successive conservative governments retreated from the global sphere

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 3>for a number of years and that was a mistake

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 3>and we lost out on growth and trade as a

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>result of it. We are pursuing a very different approach,

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 3>which is to relentlessly focus on our national interest, and

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 3>our national interest means tackling the cost of living and

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 3>growing our economy with more good jobs paying decent wages

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 3>in all parts of our country. And we only achieve

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 3>that if we bring more investment in international and domestic

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 3>and if we achieve more opportunities for firms in Britain,

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 3>employing people in Britain to then sell the excellent goods

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 3>and services that we produce in the UK all around

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 3>the world. And that's exactly what we're doing.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Chansfer.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Back in Westminster, a lot of people in Labor are

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 2>thinking about a challenge to your leadership and to your

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Starmer's leadership in the coming months, especially if the local

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>elections are very bad. What will you tell investors here

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 2>in Davos who might be worried about are more left

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 2>wing a PM and Chancellor getting in.

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I really don't think that people need to worry about that.

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Kere one and massive majority in Parliament and the Parliamentary

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Labor Party, the cabinet want the Prime Minister to succeed.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Even if someone did have the stupid idea of challenging

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 3>the prime minister is incredibly difficult to do so. And

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 3>I have every confidence that Kiir will continue to be

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister all through this term. I will continue to

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 3>be Chancellor and hopefully into the second term as well.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Nigel Faraj is arriving here in Davas.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 2>What would Prime Minister Viros She's doing very well in

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the polls mean for the UK economy?

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Well I think it would be very bad loose for

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 3>the UK economy. Nigel Faraj believes in closed economies. He

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 3>does not believe in the UK being open for trade.

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 3>He sides with our adversaries rather than our friends, including

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 3>with Russia, and they're more in Ukraine. And in terms

0:17:55.840 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 3>of business, he was the cheerleader in chief of leading

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 3>the European Union. He's opposed every trade deal that this

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 3>government has done, including the deal with the US and

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 3>including the deal with India. He doesn't believe in an

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 3>independent central bank or those independent economic institutions which give

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 3>stability to the UK economy. And I do think that,

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 3>you know, businesses should without getting worried, should you know,

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 3>think about the consequences of that and not just sit

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 3>on the sidelines.

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, does having him here in Davos taking meetings,

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 2>I think ars meeting with possibly we don't have confirmation

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the US delegation, does that overshadow some of the work

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 2>that you're trying to do with your delegation.

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>No, not at all. There's no and there's no plans.

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 3>He's got seven MP's in parliament France, and I know

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 3>that people want to get excited or maybe a couple more.

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Who knows how many Tories have defected today. But you

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 3>know he's got a small number of MPs. He's lost

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>almost as many MPs as he's gained in this parliament

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 3>because he's incapable of working with others. I'm not worried

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 3>about Nigel Farrage. I believe that our plan is the

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 3>right one. We are improving the cost of living for

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 3>working people in Britain. We're bringing investment to Britain, inflation

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 3>and interest rates that are coming down this year. Last

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 3>year we had the second fastest growing economy in the

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 3>g seven. Our plan is the right one. It will

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 3>begin to reap dividends this year, especially as inflation gets

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 3>back to target and the benefits of those trade deals

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 3>begin to flow.

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 2>But there is a perception that he's gaining momentum because

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 2>of the defections.

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, you know, you've got these people who

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 3>were defeated a year and a half ago in a

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 3>general election, Robert Jeneric Andrew Rossendale, the other people whose

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 3>names no one remembers, who lost the support of the

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 3>British public a year ago, who are now changing the

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 3>rests and think that that will change their fortunes it owns,

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 3>and I do believe that the British public will see

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 3>through that they kicked the Tories out for a reason.

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 3>They're not going to just re elect them because they're

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 3>now wearing a teal rosette rather than a blue one er.

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 2>There are a lot of questions people want to know

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>about taxes. I know you can't tell us about the

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 2>next budget. I don't know whether you think that this

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 2>new trade tensions could have an impact of the budget.

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>But holistically speaking, if you were to raise taxes again,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 2>would you do it for wealth taxes or a general taxation.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 3>We've just had a budget and what I was able

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 3>to do in that budget was to build a headroom

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 3>of twenty one points seven billion pounds, more than doubling

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 3>the headroom against our fiscal rules. I think that now

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 3>puts us in a very strong position that we will

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 3>not need to do more on that front. I'm not

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to write future budgets today. The

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 3>world is a very uncertain place. But that increase in

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 3>the headroom was very much I think welcome by markets

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 3>and has given greater confidence to people that we can

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 3>have stability on a fiscal front. As well. In addition,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 3>we've been really clear that the spring forecast from the

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 3>OBR will not be a fiscal event in the same

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 3>way that it has been in the past, and reform

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 3>of the Office of Budget Responsibility means that we can

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 3>now move to one major fiscal event a year, so

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 3>that you, Francine and others don't ask me every week

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 3>for a year what tax changes are planned. We don't

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 3>plan any tax changes in the spring, and a very

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 3>much hope after the headroom that we have built in

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 3>through difficult decisions on tax and spending that provides the

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 3>stability that we need.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Every week chanswer. I thought we were more tenacious.

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was every day that we were asking

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 2>you what are.

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>You most looking forward to? In Davas we have one

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>more minute.

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, we talk about disruption, sharks, there's

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot about AI, but is there something what have

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 2>you come here to do?

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 3>This is my fourth time in Davos. I came twice

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 3>as Shadow Chancellor to set out the the opposition approach

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 3>to the economy. I learned a lot during those two

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 3>visits about what international investors were looking for in the UK.

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I knew they wanted stability. I knew they wanted better

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 3>support to leverage in the private sector investment the cash

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 3>that was sitting there but wasn't coming to the UK

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 3>because of that uncertainty. And I know that they wanted

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 3>reform to how our economy works, planning reform, regulatory burdens, lifted,

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 3>better trade opportunities with countries around the world. That is

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 3>what we are delivering as a government now. I'm certainly

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 3>not claiming that the first year and a half in

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 3>office has been easy, or that every decision that we've

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 3>made has been one that's welcomed by business. But when

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 3>you look around the world, when you look at the

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 3>delegations from around the world this week, I hope people

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 3>see in Britain. I hope that businesses see in Britain

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 3>a country that has returned to the stability, that is

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 3>bringing investment, is changing how the economy works and is open,

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 3>open to business, open to trade, open to investment, and

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 3>as I set out today, open to talent as well.