WEBVTT - Who Should You Pick At #12?

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network. Enjoy,

0:00:25.320 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>don yeh As, Welcome your host, Friday, Mine god Bro

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Sat Francis practice, start fall, ladies and tell me yours.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>With that, we walk to you inside a little studio

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty four. This is the BFFs. He is Frank Stamford.

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Sauceman. Franky was happening? Man? We almost

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>had an extended version there. I felt like you were

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going for about twenty seconds there. I've funger than usual?

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Was it? I don't know? Was it? Happy Friday? Greg?

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>How you doing, buddy? How did you sleep last night?

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I slept really, I slept really well. Oh no, I

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>had oh I remember it now. So I had this

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>dream and I was like, I gotta tell yeah, wait still, Frank,

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>what this dream was about? I could not remember it

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>until right now. We don't know what it was. Of course,

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>your boy and this guy in charge of tot Wars.

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a nightmare for you, not really a dream.

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, they put whoever runs it, who

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>runs tot Wars. It's a collection of individual jeff Ericson,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it was jeff Errickson. Jeff Ericson stepped down and I

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>took over it, and I was like, Frank is gonna

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>love this. So I remember that I was charge tot Wars.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I woke up historical laughing that I was in ar,

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>happy that you were somewhat dreaming about me and in

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball. I was, that's how far we can today.

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I woke up. I had the biggest couple of weeks ago.

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg didn't even want to talk baseball, and then he

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>dreaming about it. It would be the first thing you

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>change when it comes to tot Wars. Great everything. What

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? Oh, the are is a bunch of

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>fantasy leagues. I would put money in it. The least

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>should be for money. That's the first thing I would do.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I know that cost money to make money, but they

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>should be for money. The experts is it in the industry,

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>claim a pride to do it. Everyone running that person

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>right now? Some of the notions should we make more money?

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Everybody shown was of Mocia in the news outday. I'm

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>John Wass the Mokia with your BFFs news update. Let's

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>start with the w g C Mexico Championship right now.

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Your leader Justin Thomas. He is at three under through

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>round two through eight He's actually at seven under for

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the tournament. That is a one shot lead on Rory mclroy,

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>who started the day in the lead at six under.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>He still at six under even through six holes. So

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that that's your w g C leaderboard Mexico City Round

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>number two. Let's head over to baseball, and we have

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>some spring training action. Top of the first inning, Rangers

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Royals first spring training game. That is the Cactus League

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>at Sunrise, Florida. Tomorrow a lot of the other teams

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>get started, but we just have one today and that's

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>just on their way. Top of the first no score

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>between the Rangers and the Royals. Let's head over to

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the FanDuel Sports book. Let's check out the card for

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>basketball NBA action tonight as we get set for a

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>big slate of NBA action. You have the Cleveland Cavs

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>at the Washington Wizards. Wizards laying six to thirty six

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>your total. Dallas at the mag Magic that's four point

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite for the Mavericks and that one to twenty and

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a half is your total. Later on tonight the headline

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>matchup the Denver Nuggets at the Okay City Thunder Thunder

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>laying a point and a half to six seed and

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a half your total, and rounding out the Markey matchups

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA tonight, Grizzlies at Lakers. Lakers tendant a

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>half point favorites to thirty four, and have your total Pelicans,

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna make a charge for that eighth seed in

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the Western Conference at the Portland Trailblazers Plicans on the

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>road five and a half point favorites to thirty nine

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>your total in that one. Major League Baseball News you

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and a Sespenis has not begun sprinting all out according

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to his manager Louis Rojas, So stay tuned on that.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Sesspitis missed all of last season with hell surgery. See

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>if he makes it full return this season. That is

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>your BFF sports Grade news update. Now back to Gregor

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>frank other sports grade. The Pelicans a five and a

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>half point favoriteccording to what Shaun just said. That's over.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>At four, we get more injury news now, dude, it's

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>just think everyone's piling on the Pelicans tonight. This is

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the problem though, Greg, that I've noticed at least, and

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into fantasy baseball, of course, I feel like

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the Pelicans are somewhat being overvalued with Zion Williamson. Don't

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>get me wrong. I'm very excited about combination being overvalued

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and Lili, Yeah, for sure. Like Lillard's been ridiculous since

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the start of the new year. The guy has been

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>like dropping fifty points like every other game. Basically, it's

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>been awesome points five and a half point dogs at

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>home are Portland, Greag, we got MSG after this, he's

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>still gonna back up the New Orleans Pelicans. I don't know.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not allowed to change. You might have to rethink

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>things there. That's a lot of points, man, it's a

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of points off. That's one thing guarantee.

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>That's an absolutely couldn't reward on that. Let's move into baseball,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and now's the news and headlines on today's show. Let's

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>let's at least bring that up on today's show. Oh,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have our second edition of Multiple Things here.

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>It will be the second edition of the white Board

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>series with Frank Stanford. We preview picked number one earlier

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>this week on Monday, we go to pick number twelve

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>here to end the week. So we begin and end

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>one to twelve. That's what we'll do later on in

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the program. Also here we will get into money in

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bank at Triple Threat Match of pictures and where

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going similar adp s. I don't freak and I

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>feel differently about the players that are involved in today's

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Money in the Bank contest, So we'll get into that

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>coming out, you know, just about ten minutes from now.

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Before we do any of that, though, let's get some

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>of the headlines for today, Frank, and that takes us now.

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>It begins us well in St. Louis were Paul gold

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Schmidt have a bit of an elbow injury. He says

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not a big deal, He's gonna be fine. I've

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>been down here for Goldschmit. Really started out cold, got

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>hot as the season went on, as he normally does.

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>He's usually a pretty slow starter. Are you in on

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Paul gold Schmidt here? No, I'm not in on Paul

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>gold Schmith this upcoming season. Greg. That's why I actually

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>hate to see this news because whenever there's an injury

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to a player that you weren't in on, that means

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna fall down the draft board, and players who

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>were you were you were in on are going to

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>slightly move up the draft board. It was the same

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>thing with a u Henyo Suarez. I wasn't going to

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>be on Suarez at his draft costs before he had.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>He has slipped a little bit, so maybe I'll look

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>more into Suarez now, But Paul gold Schmidt is someone

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that I was not looking at. Greg. The batting average

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>has come way down from where it has been, and

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>then you're just off all Cardinals. You don't want to.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that they're a good team, which is

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>crazy to say, because they're like a great organization obviously,

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and they always find a way to win like eighty

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>five plus games and they're right in the thick of things.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, outside of Jack Flaherty, I don't think

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're pitching staff is great. They're trying to make

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Martinez a starting pitcher again. They're throwing him back

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in the rotation. Um, who's their closer right now? Is

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the Giovanni Diegos. Andrew Miller hasn't been great the past

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of seasons. I don't think the lineup is very

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>good either. Maybe he'll get better once they call up

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>some of these young kids, Dylan Carlson someone they're very

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>excited about. Paul Goldschman now k percentage up over back

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to back years. His chase rate was the highest of

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>his career. Last year barrel percentage was down. He had

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to sixty. Greg, you have to think, oh, well he

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>got unlucky, right, Paul Goldchman normally it's two eighty two

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>nine expected batting average to sixty two. Well, there's stole

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bases, right, it's Paul Golchman does no,

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't steal basis anymore, Greg, So three bases. Where's Paul

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Goldchman in your it's first base rankings? That is a

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>fair question. And I'm going to stall while I pull

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>that up for you. Uh, and my first base ranks,

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I have Paul gold Schmidt at number seven, whereas he's

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>like the fifth starting the fifth, first basement off the

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>board usually after after how you just driving him I

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>don't way lower seven. Should I lower him more? So?

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I haven't one spot ahead of Josh Bell, But I

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think Josh Bell has a bunch of question marks too.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't he rough second half? Well? He acts? The thing

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is he ended the season really well, like August September.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>It was like June July brutal, Yeah, very bad, and

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>then auguste care That's that's a good point. But Josh

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Bell probably a player you want the points leagu right,

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>good plate discipline, watch a lot doubles streaky. Not a

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>good line up either. There in Pittsburgh who got nine?

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So I have Goldschmidt seven, Josh Bell eight. I have

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Dtail Mayhew nine. You could argue that he should probably

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>be higher. Fine, and then I have Max Mounsey at ten.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I like Max Moncy wearing Paul Goldchman. Well that's because

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you played in ob P. For me, he's probably gonna

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>hit like. Max Moncy is great in OBA and Paul

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Goldschmidt is too. He still walks a lot. But I

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man, it's something about Paul Goldschmian. It just

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>seems like one of these years it might just fall

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>completely on his face. Not a lot of protection in

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the lineup to the RBI. We thought that was last

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>year for a lot of the year. So you know

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>what's crazy. Hogel Schmid is the eighth first basement off

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the board, so I guess I'm not really down on him.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>He said it was fifth a few willmas again. Yeah,

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and NBC he's the eight first basement off the board.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I have him at seven. Maybe I should find a

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>way to move him lower. I don't really want. I

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>just told you how. Move them behind Josh Bell and

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>d G the next next month, all right, talk me

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>into it, alright. Other news and notes from camp. Carlos

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Carrasco hurt again, which is frustrating. Not um serious thing

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>like when he battled last year. But he is banking

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>up um and certainly someone you want to see bounced

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>back have a nice spring, not of a good start. No,

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not, and we reported we not. We reported like

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the BFS are out there on the field watching Carlos Carrasco,

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>but we saw the We're not. That is a factual statement.

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 1>But the reports yesterday or that he left he was

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a leg injury. He was on crutches. It

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>comes out today that it is a hip issue. It's minor.

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw last night lyde Settler, who competes in a

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>ton of NFBC drafts. He's a great high stakes player,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out that Parlos, Carrasco, and Severino went in around

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and sixteen respectively. Round fifteen. Sure I have a

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>shot of calls Carrasco there? Why not? Absolutely? I think

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be some correction. He's gonna about Stecca. Right

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>when do we come back? A couple of news notes.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to Frank was tweeting out trade Turner,

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>so he wants to reveal when he was tweeting about.

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And then we'll get into this week's money in the

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>bank contest the ground a lot more on the way.

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and dominate on fandel and draft kings this season. Compete

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more safe ten

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice. It's what promo code dunk.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily Road dot com backslash dunk to learn more

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>about all right, well, well, well exact with you here

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>on the BFS on a Friday, Gregg sauceman Frank stand

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>for hanging out having too much fun. I need it

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>mans around. I heard on FT this week you got

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a big weekend plan. You have no fiance, which means

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of sitting on your couch and drafting.

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>No draft this weekend, Greg, nothing planned yet, but look

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>there's some time to change that. It's time to get

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in alve getting in a draft. There is no fiance

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. She's off to ball bustin. I shipped her

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>up to Boston Grand going out tonight night on the

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>tap with my brother. He was Johnny Stamfull and Johnny

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>be on his phone looking wrestling backdowns all the night.

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 1>There's no one thing. He watches a lot of SmackDown.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>If he does, it's on demand, it's not live. I

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that much he loves wrestling. I don't.

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he loves it that much. I don't know, man,

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>he really loves wrestling, but I don't really handling his

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>plans on a Friday to watch SmackDown. Johnny Snaffle, Johnny

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Staffle loves wrestling, dude. You know what, I'm gonna have

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>him send me a picture of Legitimately. He has two

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>cases in his room of real wrestling belts, the offensive one,

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like three fifty plus dollar belts, no joke. He asked

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>my parents for them, like every holiday, Birthday, Christmas, he

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>wants a belt. I mean, it's a sick collection. He's

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like the yellow Intercontinental title. He has the Smoking Skull

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>w w F, the heavy one. He's like it's leather

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's like the real championship. He has like twelve

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>of them lined up in like a glass case. It's

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty sick. Well, yeah, he loves wrestling, but not on

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a Friday. He's hanging out with me. We're not watching SmackDown.

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you that. Just go out after SmackDown, well

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>my pre game and watch SmackDown. If that's there, I'm

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna text Well watching some highlights of the

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Royals and Rangers, Greg who were playing right now. I'm

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a text from Frank. I cannot wait. It's

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be him on the couch looking at Rangers, Royals

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>box scores and Johnny Stanfell screaming at his TV at

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Roman Reins. I can't wait for It's gonna be awesome. Alright,

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you have you tweet about trade Turner at last night?

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>What were you tweeting? Yeah, I just wanted to make

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it known. I've I saw the report that he might

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>move down in the lineup, he might bet third, and

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted this out. In his career, Trade Turner has

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>average one stolen base every twelve plate appearances while batting leadoff.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a sample over fifteen d plate appearances. While batting

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in every other spot in the order. In his career,

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>tray Turner has ever once solen base every nineteen point

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>seven plate appearances, just over five hundred and fifty plate

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>appearances combined in every other spot in the lineup outside

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of leadoff. So assuming that he gets six d and

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty plate appearances, Greg, I you know, fired up the

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>old calculator app here on the computer. Your times nineteen

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen point seven. I'm saying this wrong. Take six hundred fifty, Yeah,

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>divided by nineteen point seven. This is why I'm not

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not the math guy, and you're projected thirty three

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases for Trade Turner. Greg, would you be happy

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>with thirty three stolen bases from Trade Turner if you

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>took him in the first round? I agree, I don't

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>because the power is not enough right and need footy

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>stas from him. The power is not there, like it's

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>not enough for your take. The power went up last year. Sure,

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's a chance that it keeps trending up.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe it was just juice ball related anywhere.

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>He's only twenty six years old. Everyone's just assuming the

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>juice ball is gone. I tell you, nobody knows it

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>was gone in the postseason for sure. You know where

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a guy is with him in the auction Yamada. We

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>already went over this key boo him down reserve rounds.

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It might be able to get him in the reserva.

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>You want to know what it do? You know what

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>his a DP is? Right? No? Wow, he goes late

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>almost him him. I'm with you, so it burnt me

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>everywhere last year. I'm back. If someone wins a dollar,

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to I'm not on three, I'll go to alright.

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm just saying it's reserved rounds. Come on, Greg,

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>don't even mention the name. Don't even say the initials

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>c K. I don want nobody to know. New underwear

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>brand coming out carder Key Boom, c K BFFs go

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>kill boom. We should make a cologne line harder Key Boom.

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I like this jokes guy Calvin Klein and my joke. Yes,

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, Greg, you can only be your joke. Greg

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>can only make Calvin Klein jokes. He's the only one

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that can ask about crappy players on this. When I

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>bring up some trap, it's like, what about Taoscar Hernandez.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>When I'm asking Greg about someone relevant, He's like, who's

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that I've never heard of? That guy you probably name

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is someone irrelevant. And if I don't know he's irrelevant,

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's oh yeah, that's gotta be true, you know that? Um?

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, any more news to notice, you know, Let's

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>do some fun. She's on the fun. It's too Friday.

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's have some fun. And this week it's time once

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>again to find out who he's Money in the bank.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Here comes the money. Here we go money talk, Here

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>comes the money cheating Money in the bank. This week

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>here on the bf F S Frank, let's get right

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>into it. This week, we're facing off again some of

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the pictures that are going in the third and fourth round.

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>It's Chris Paddock, aur Nolah and Noah's s God No,

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it's Nderguard Aaronola, two players that were seen as top

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>twelve pictures probably just a year ago. Chris Paddock, of

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>course alone. Hazy's Lazardo was the hottest name uh Young

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>picture wise that was being drafted last season. Now it's

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Paddock and Aaronola going in similar spots. Well, now a

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Synderguard goes about a round later than both of them. Frank,

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>let's start with my guy, Noah Syndergard. He's a player

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that I believe, despite going last on this list, he's

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy I would want want, I would want most

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of my team for me. I'll reveal it right now

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for me, Noah's Syndergard is Mr Buney in the bank.

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll just get right to the chase while you're at it.

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to no Syndergard is extremely frustrating, and

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>we spoke about him with Nick Pollock of Picture List.

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I forgot the acronym that he uses for him, but

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>basically it was along the lines of Noah Synderguard has

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff in the world but doesn't know how

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to pitch. Hopefully having Rene Rivera as his dedicated catcher. Well,

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I actually helped him because last year with Wilson Ramos

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>as his catcher, Noah Syndergard had an ear a over

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>five in games that Wilson Ramos was his catcher. In

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Noa Syndergard's career, Greg, with Renee Rivera as his catcher,

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty games, a hundred and eighty innings pitch that might

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>be a full season out of Noah Syndergard. Would you

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>like these numbers? Greg, let me know a two six

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>five e r A. There's no whip here, but sive

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>ar a. How about two hundred and five strikeouts and

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a hundred eight pitch and he's pitched, could not have

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>any more in He'll say that Renee Rivera is going

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the dedicated catcher for Noah Syndergard this year.

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>But I understand why some people might be out on him, Greg.

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>He tinkers with his pitch makes he relies on his

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>fastball sometimes a little bit too much. He should be

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>throwing his breaking pitches more. I think he has all

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the talent in the world. We all know that about

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Noah Synderguard. They called the guy Thor for a reason.

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's built like an Adonis, and normally I

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>don't usually like that because guys like Aaron Judge and

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Giancarlos Stanton are hurt all the time. Right, Syndergard has

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>dealt with his own injuries managed just a healthy last year.

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You didn't get the performance out of him that you

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>were hoping for, But there is a world, Greg, and

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I realized that a range of outcomes where he does

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>put it all together, manages to stay healthy with Renee

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Rivera as his catcher and puts up you know, bow

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>three's e r a a good whip, two hundred strikeouts

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>dred eighty to two endings pitched. That does remain a

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>possibility for Noah Syndergard. Greg, But let's talk a little

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>bit about some of these other candidates as well. Sure,

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that everything he just positive, Syndard, other than

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the way he's built well and the fact that he

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>sucked last year, Greg, how about that? Sure he's stunk well,

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>he got better, He got better, and look, no Arno

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>has been healthier the past couple of years. Like that,

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you can depend on him for more volume than you

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>can with Noahs Syndergard. I want to tell you, look

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 1>at Chris Paddock here three point three three and you're

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>going right in the paddock god Man, I had the

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>notes worthy for Chris Paddock. Greg all Right, Aaron last

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>year one up with a three eight seven a three

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>A two x fit. He was not great. His fastball

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>was the worst of his career. It got smacked around

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>last year, Greg, And we know he has a great curveball.

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to Arnold, the command was really out

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of whack last year for Aaronola. The walks per nine

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>up over three and a half. You're not used to that.

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Still got a ton of strikeout, still got a ton

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of ground balls, but with those walks going up it

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>also we also saw his whip balloon til one to

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>seven uh from eighteen Greg, he had a three three

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>five e r A out of Aaronola, a three to

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>nine x fit over a strikeout per ending two point

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>four walks per nine, really good groundball rate, a one

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>on four whip and a twenty eight percent hard contact

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>rate last year. The hard contact for Aaronola just has

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to get back to relying more so on that curveball.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>The command has to come back for the fastball. Again.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have a great fastball. It's like he has

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>to use that pitch to set up his secondary pitches.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Curveball change up as well. He gotta get back to

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>mixing things up, and he's gotta command his pitch is better.

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about it when it comes to Noah.

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>But for me, Greg, the track record for Noah from

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteen is nearly on par with Noah synder Guard, if

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.479
<v Speaker 1>not better, And he's been able to stay healthier than

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Synderguard as well. So if he can get back to

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>that picture that he was the four seasons before, then

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I think nobody can really pay off where he's going

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:23.959
<v Speaker 1>right now. As you mentioned, the walks really went up

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>last last year three point five six, very uncharacteristic for him.

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Walked per nine. That's almost over a walk, way over

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a walk more he's ever given up his career per

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>nine eight. Strike has also went up at the first

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>year with real moods. I wonder if that has something

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. Could be really just not going

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>anywhere I'm there. The home runs for nine also went

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>up man one point to zero. Juice ball related possibly

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>home on the five ball ratio, also related highest home

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>in the fly ball ratio of his career at seventeen

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>point four. I don't you mentioned this to me last year,

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>that eighteen if you look at all the numbers for

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Nola, always the outlier, and we thought, all right,

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>My response is I really like that last year was

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we got better. He's never gonna give again. That's not

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. That's the thing, right, So he never is

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>going to do that again. That may have been the

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>year of his career. And the way I responded to

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you last year as well, he just got better that

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that that's it. And you said, well what if he didn't,

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>what if there's just an outlier? And I think it was.

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the picture that you saw last year was

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>a kind of picture that you will see again, at

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>least for Syndergard. The walks or less strike has we're

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less as well. The ex fit was

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>actually exactly the same at three point eight. I think

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Noah Syndergard has more of an ability to be better

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>than he has better stuff than Aaronoa, there's no doubt

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>about put it together, but more of an injury risk

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>than Aaronola as well, only inning He's no Syndergard pitched

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>last year. It was close to season last year. Yeah,

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>but that's the thing. He's never done it, you know,

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like all together with a full season of like the

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>production we're used to. You would only do that for

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred and fifty innings. I got welcome back, Frank,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 1>give you more on Chris Paddock and he'll tell you

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>who his Mr Money in the bank is. Here we go, Money.

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the pros with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer and the

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more safe ten

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk.

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily Rodo dot com backslash Dunk to learn more.

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Blue Here Friday, let's go. Let's break it down, baby.

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're going through our Nola and Noah Syndergard.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I've already told everybody my Mr Money in the Bank

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>right there. It's Noah Syndergard. But there is one player

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>left h in the triple threat draft matchup, and that

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is Chris Padck, the player that actually had the best

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>season in twenty nineteen, better than Aaronola, better than Nowihs

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Synderguard except for the X fit, which was higher than

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>both of them. Extra for Chris Paddock over four ERA

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>A at three point three three. He went nine in

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>seven last year, pitching forty innings nine point eight strikeouts

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>per nine under two walks for nine. Very very good.

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>They're the Babbitt was extremely low at two thirty seven,

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>although you know it wasn't really high throughout his minors career. Frank,

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paddock is going the earliest out of those three.

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean you would draft him the earliest of

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>those three? Well, Greg, you're gonna have to wait and

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>find out after I'm done analyzing Chris Paddock. You mentioned

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the e r A and the X fit. The X

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>fit was higher than the e r A a a little

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>bit over for a zero point nine eight whip. I mean,

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>let's not understate that this guy had a sub one

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>whip last year as a rookie, his first season in

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>major League Baseball with the juice all as well, maintained

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a whip under one case per nine over nine nearly

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>ten at nine point seven nine the walks for nine

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>under two. The guy has phenomenal command. Sheriff Chris Paddock.

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to Matt Modica. Believe he still has Chris

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Paddock as his Twitter avatar as well. It's how much

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>he loves Chris Paddock. We know how great the command

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is when it comes to Paddock seventy one first pitch

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>strike percentage. He establishes the strike early in the count

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um basically fastball changeup combination last year has

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like a Vulcan changeup, they call it. I almost want

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to choose him just because he uses something called a

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Vulcan changeup. G sounds awesome. He needs to continue working

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>on the curveball. The only thing about ten and a

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>half percent of the time last year, and it really

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a great curveball. But everything we've heard in the

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>off season Greg is that exactly is what he's doing,

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is he's working on the curveball. He's developing it. He's

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>called it a quote top shelf curveball. Heading into the season,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody to pay attention to throughout curveball. But Greg, I

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>really do believe that if this curveball just becomes adequate,

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>it's all over for everybody in the league. I mean,

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>look what he did with just a fastball, changeup combination

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>throws mid nineties. That change up keeps everyone all balance.

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And then if he mixes in a curveball that he

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>just uses ten to fifteen percent of the time and

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just a solid curveball, then I do think that

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see the e r A stabilize out, the

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:23.239
<v Speaker 1>babbit might go up a little bit, the X fit

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>dropped down, and he's just going to progress as a

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher. I love everything that I saw from last year.

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Great home roads, was great against both lefties and right

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>e's as well. If I'm projecting him, I think he's

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>given you three five, maybe three six e r A

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy to eighty innings pitched. I really

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like what I saw at a Chris Paddock last year,

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and I really like him going into this year. Greg

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey is my money in the bank winner Chris Paddick.

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Here we go, money talks. You drive Chris Paddock, and

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be money in the bank this fantasy

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>baseball season. Greg, I like Aaron Nola, but I worry

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>about the command issues last year, worry about that fastball,

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and I just worry about No Sindergarten general. Is he

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>ever going to put it all together? I don't mind

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>any of these players, in fact, I like all of them.

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>But if we're splitting hairs and choosing the player who

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>is going to return the most money on his investment,

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be Chris Pattick. We'll see obviously rookie

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>last season. As you mentioned, Frankie, will you get better? Well,

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the question we're gonna have to ask ourselves here,

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>uh during draft Monk for me, don't think no Synderguard,

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>especially because you're getting him around later. All right, And

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.239
<v Speaker 1>with that, it is now time for the continuation of

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Frank's White Boys series. Let you know how this works. Basically,

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Frank is going to take a pick once a week

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>twice a week, depending on what we got going on,

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to draft three rounds with this pick,

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>both in a rhodo format as well as a head

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to head format, and he wants you to get an

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>idea of the players that will be there and how

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to build your team. The idea here is for you

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimately to get an understanding of a what pick that

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you want in the draft and be well, what the

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>team looked like here. So we're gonna get started in

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>just a few moments. I know Frank's getting ready over there,

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>so let's make sure the camera next to Frank is

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>facing him so he's ready to rock here and we

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>will get right it'll it'll be this one here, So

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll move over there. We'll get right into it. Follow me, everybody, Alex,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>follow me over here. There we go. Let's get into

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this here. It is the money in the bank cop

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>contest here Chris Paddock. Frank's winner for me, the clear

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>champion Frank was Noah Syndergarden. He's the guy who's going

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to have the best year and he's costing you the

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>least at the moment. We did number one earlier in

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the week for the white Board series. Number one overall

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>pick was Ronald Kunia and then he followed up with

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of pictures different pictures, which was interesting. Uh. There,

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that was number one overall. Now we go to the

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>other side. We started with one, and now we move

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>on to number twelve. Sean, are we ready to go

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>with alright? So with that we throw it over to

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank Sample with the white board series. Thanks Greg, and

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I had a lot of fun earlier in the week

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>doing the number one pick, but we gotta go to

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the back end of the draft with the number twelve pick.

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we're doing this for twelve team leagues. I

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people play in the NFBC and

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>they play in fifteen team leagues. I participate in a

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>ton of them myself, but most people play in twelve

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.719
<v Speaker 1>team leagues. So that's what we're going to attack today,

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the last pick of the first round if you play

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in a twelve team league. Again, well, we did this

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>during the the fantasy football season, and we would pick

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>two different teams up against each other and then ask

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you which one you liked more at the end of

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the white board today, like we did with the number

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>one pick, we're gonna do it from a Rhodo perspective,

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're also going to do it from a head

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to head points perspective, and I'll kind of break down

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>why there are differences in the players that we are

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>going to draft. So reg you know, that I like pitching.

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>You know that I like to get the and that's

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly what we're going to do. Frankly on both sides.

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>A little foreshadowing here, but with the twelve pick, the

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>first pick, if you have last pick, your number one

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>pick if you have the last pick, is Justin Verlander.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>No surprise here, Greg, and I guess there's a chance

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>he could be drafted by then, but according to a DP,

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he is available here with the twelfth pick, I want

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to get a starting pitcher because by the time it

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>comes back to in the third fourth round range, you're

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be looking at someone like Patrick Corbyn, Luis Castile.

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Those guys are fine and you can still build a

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>pitching stuff around them. I would just feel better personally

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>if I have one of those horses that anchor in

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a Justin Verlander. I'm not worried about Verlander when it

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to the age. When it comes to the cheating scandal, Greg,

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy has had a sub one whip in each

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of the past two seasons while with the Houston Astros,

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and he just continues to get better. I mean, the

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>guy is like a fine one right now in terms

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of real life baseball Fantasy baseball. He's likely going to

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>give you a sub three whip. He's gonna get to

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wins. He's been extremely durable, going over

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>two endings repeatedly in his career. I'm gonna take Justin

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Verlander with my first of two picks here at the

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>back end of the first round. If you have the

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve pick in a twelve team league, starting off the

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>second round on the wheel here, you know, I like

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to get stolen basis to Greg, I like to get

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.719
<v Speaker 1>someone who can do it all. Who is someone who

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>can do it all that's going at this point in

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the draft. Well, it could have been Fernando Tatis Jr.

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's not Fernando Tatis Jr. It's Jose Ramirez. We're

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>just hoping that Jose Ramirez is fine after you got

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>hit by a pitch in spring training the other day.

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is a great way to start

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>off your draft because you give yourself a base with

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>starting pitching and Josi Ramirez. Well, he might not be

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a five category contributor because I don't know how great

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the batting average is gonna be. I probably project him

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for a two seventy to two seventy five batting average.

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't hurt your average, but he's gonna give you

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>stolen basis. I'm midst everything that was happening last year.

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I understand he was a letdown for a lot of

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>people earlier on in the season, wound up, you know,

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>pulling it all together, and still had over twenty home runs,

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>over twenty stolen basis. He was still giving you speed

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>all the while. Second half of the season, you look

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers and he stopped lifting the ball. He

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>got to home run happy, goes back to the second

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>half of where he was just trying to hit too

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>many home runs. He was lifting the ball too much.

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He got back to his normal approach, hitting line drives,

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 1>pulling the ball, and naturally the ball started to go

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the ballpark again. He didn't have to try

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to do anything differently, just be who you are, Joseer Mires,

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's gonna do that again this upcoming season. Greg,

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I would tab him for home runs to thirty stolen bases,

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>good counting stats and a solid batting average at eighty.

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a problem, Greg, with either one of

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Justin Verlander or whose are Mirons don't have a problem

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>with either. Ranthom My question was the suicidal you put

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Justin Burlander on the board. Was there no thought given

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a Max Scherzer in this spot? Well, I think it's

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a fair a question, right, because if Max Scherzer is healthy,

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>which is the biggest question, Uh, he could be better

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>than Justin Verlander on a per star basis. But I

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>think that they're close enough Greg that I will take

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>the picture who has been more durable. We are not

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>worried about any back or neck issues even in the

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>World Series, sure as it was dealing with that issue

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>missed some time throughout the regular season last year as well.

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're close enough on a per game basis.

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Where give me the guy who is healthier, who has

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>been more durable, and that is Justin Verlander. Was there

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>any thought, let's throw it out there, of taking Verlander

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and Max schers are back to back. It's thirteen in

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a roto draft. I wouldn't do it. Maybe in the

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>head to head points league, it's something that I would

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>look into it. Yes, well you are about to find

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.399
<v Speaker 1>out right about that, but I would not go with

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>two starting pitchers there at the back end of the

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>first round. I want to get something offensively for you know,

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in my five by five leagues, you can pump the

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>offensive categories, and especially if you get someone I can

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.439
<v Speaker 1>give you those stolen bases without hurting you any where else.

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what I would want to do with Jose Ra Mirrors.

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of great hitters in that range,

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Alex Bregman, but he doesn't give you anything and stolen

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>basis So for me, I'm going to opt for someone

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 1>who do you taking Ramrors over? I would take Ramirez

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>over Bregman and no one Arronado. He's my number one

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>third base because there is no speed of course, really

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to Ronado and when it comes to Bregman. I

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:19.959
<v Speaker 1>get it. Man, I think I think it makes sense.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because I'm really proud of you. You're going

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>against your gut, which is this guy killed me last year.

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I can't do it again, and here you are jumping

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>right back in Josieerra Mirrors. I agree with it. I'm

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>buying the second half is the real josieer Mirrors because

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw it so often the the year prior to

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the year before that first half an aberration. It'll be fine.

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I like Josier Mirrors. It's a great starts of the team. Man,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I can't start my team with Justin Verlander and Josie

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>ra mirrors or Max Scherzer and Josie Ramirez. Feel really

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>good about myself. I like that, Frankie. Yeah, absolutely, Gregg,

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk more about the head to head points

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>side of things we come back after the break. Obviously

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>here again on the rural side. Number twelve pick started

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 1>team with Justin Verlander and Josie Era mirrs. It's pretty

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>good start, Gregor, all right, let's take a break. When

0:35:57.880 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we're gonna get into the head to

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 1>head side. As Frankie mentioned, we'll find out who he's

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>taking at the turn there and then we'll do the

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>turn after that on both sides. To wrap up the show,

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>really coast coast up next to the ground or BFFs

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>all the way. I want to be the next Daily

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS, competition with Daily

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Rodal dot com and dominate on vandel and DraftKings this season.

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS plus, line

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and much more.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Save ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>code dunk. Visit Daily Rodo dot com backslash dunk to

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>learn more. All right back here, BFFs, he's Frank, I'm Greg.

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? You're wrapping up the show? You have

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to really coast to coast coming your way next, Scotty

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Evase with Mike Carver regularly, here be a fun night

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>as we get you ready for a fury while they're

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously a game on the show yesterday. Uh, Frank, we

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>go back over to you in the Rhodo side of things.

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>You let off with Justin Burlander and Jose Ramirez. Let's

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>move on the head to head side of things, shall we. Yeah,

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>let's move over to the head to head points side

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>of things again. I play in two head to head

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>points leagues. Let's make it three now that I have

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>joined out wards. But my longest standing trying what what

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>greet you? Uh, my longest standing home league is a

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>head to head points league. So I actually do really

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy this format. And I stressed with the first

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>overall pick taking Garrett Cole, because you need starting pitching.

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.359
<v Speaker 1>It is so valuable in a head to head points league.

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Depending on how your points league is set up. Again,

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the league that I play, we get a point

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>per out. You get I would make three points per

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 1>ending pitched. You get bonuses for quality starts for wins,

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 1>half a point for strike out as well, and you

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>lose points for things like hits and and earned runs

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:01.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. But pictures typically get more points in this format.

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So you gotta get at least one, maybe two. I'll

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>let you know in a second. If Justin Verlander is there,

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>he might be gone because pitching gets pulled up the

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>board in a head to head point league. According to

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a DP, Verlander is going to be there. So for

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>today's exercise, I will take Justin Verlander. But if he

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>were gone, I've got to get at least one starting

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>pitcher here. Whether it's Walker Bueller, whether it's Max Scherzer.

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>You cannot escape either of your first two picks in

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a head to head points league without a starting picture.

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I cannot stress that enough. So for all the reasons

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I said, you're taking Justin Verlander on this side, you

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>will also take Justin Verlander in the head to head

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>points league because of the volume, the endings, pitch to

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>strike outs, equality starts, the wins, everything that Justin Verlander does.

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna take a second picture. No, we are not

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.399
<v Speaker 1>going to take a second onon picture because you can

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 1>actually get a really good one or two later on

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 1>at the three four turns, So we'll wait a little

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>bit on that. I want to anchor my team with

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>another hitter here as well. I am not going to

0:38:56.520 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>take Jose Ramirez, while he is also pretty good points

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:02.919
<v Speaker 1>league because he has a good point discipline, he doesn't

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>strike out, he hits a lot of doubles. I'm gonna

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>take Alex Bregman here at the overall pick, with the

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>second round pick of the of the number twelve pick

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in this draft. And Alex Bregman in a points league

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>was the number one hitter last year. He hits a

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.799
<v Speaker 1>ton of doubles. He had more walks than strikeouts last year.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 1>If you worry about the cheating incident when it comes

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to Alex Bregman and you're worried about his performance falling off,

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>first of all, you probably shouldn't, but if you do,

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe just go in a different direction, I would take

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a hitter here still one of Jose Ramirez or A

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Bregman or Nolan Arronado. For me, Alex Bregman is the

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 1>hitter you should take in a head to head points league.

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>He was the number one hitter and points leagues last year. Greg,

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>even if he regresses a little bit, I still think

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be really good. So in Rhodo ball

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>team league, last pick Dustin Verlander and Jose Ramirez on

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 1>the Rhodo side, and head to head points league, Justin

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Verlander and Alex Bregman. Greg, is that all right with you?

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.439
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because we went from Hoosier like you talked

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 1>me a Hosier mirrors on the other side. Then he

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>went to Alex Bregman here. Of course, you never want

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to hit her in points leads last year. I don't

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 1>know what about the steels, but we've talked so much

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>about this early past couple of weeks. How this kind

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of in a head to head categories leage you can

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>put steals, right, you don't, you just don't need it.

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Points leaves kind of the same thing. You don't really

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>work fantasy points, so right, It's not like in fantasy basketball,

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 1>where like blocks are were a lot of points, it

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>steals are a lot of points in fantasy basketball, fantasy

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>baseball well in two points, and they're so rare anyway

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>that you can get by without them. I'm cool with

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Alex Bregman. I also told you earlier in draft season.

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm an only Houranado guy, but diving in a little

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>bit deeper here, Bregman is a better player and the

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>best player here at third base in points lead over

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>No l Aronado. As much as that hurts me to say,

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that, Frank, I'm cool with it, all right.

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So Justin Berlandard Alex Bregman in the head to head

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>points league. Coming back over here in Rhodo, you have

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the last pick in the draft. At the three four turn.

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at picks thirty six and thirty seven. Normally

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I only set up your first three picks. I'm feeling

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a little generous here today on a Friday, we'll do

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the thirty six and thirty seven overall pick. If you

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>play in a roto league, Greg, I love the base

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of stats that Justin Verlander gives you so much that

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I am not going to take a second starting pitcher

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 1>at the three four turn, because at the five six

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 1>turn later on I pick sixty, you get someone like

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paddick or no A synder Guard or Aaronola or

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Zak Granky, And I don't mind any of those pictures

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 1>as my second starting pitcher in a Roto league. So

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to double down on hitting here and I'm

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a few players that I think can contribute

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>across the board. So let's start this off with pick

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty six. We're gonna take Austin Meadows of the Tampa

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Bay Rays, someone who can do a little bit of everything.

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>We saw last year the breakout season from Meadows. There

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>was a lull in the middle there, but ended up

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>finishing out strong. That he's someone who can hit to

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>eight plus thirty home runs, maybe even more power than that.

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't hurt you anywhere, and the fifteen so on

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>basis performed well against left handed pitching last year, even

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as a left handed batter. Really like to see that

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>out of Austin Meadows. He just has to stay healthy,

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>something that you do worry about with Meadows. He did

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>have some injuries earlier in his minor league career, but

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>stayed healthy for the most part last year with the

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Rays. We're gonna double down on hitters here,

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Gregg and I mentioned, I want to get someone who

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>could do it all, and to me, that is Javier

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>bayas Man. I'm gonna take Austin Meadows and Javier Bias.

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Pair these two guys together. I actually think that they're

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty similar players in terms of what they're going to

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>give you. They're not similar in terms of plate discipline.

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Nobody is like Javier Bias. He is one of a kind.

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>He swings and misses a lot. He doesn't walk. His

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>plate discipline is terrible. I tried to doubt him in

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the past and he made me look completely foolish. Now

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.439
<v Speaker 1>you're getting him in the third fourth round. The guy

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.399
<v Speaker 1>was a borderline first round pick last year. Greg He's

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>been extremely consistent between a two seventy and two ninety

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.959
<v Speaker 1>batting average each of the past three seasons. He gives

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>you thirty home runs, good counting SATs. Say what you

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>will about the Chicago Cubs, their lineup is still pretty

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>damn good. There was a report lier today Javier Bias

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the thumb injury from last year is behind him. He's

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>fully healthy, he's good to go. I think he gives

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you twelve to fifteen stolen bass. I think both of

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys, Greg, Greg give you a little bit of everything.

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind the starting pitchers that you can get

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:15.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later on at the five six turn,

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>at the seven eight turn. And because of that, I'm

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna double down on hitters here, Borlander, Jose Miris, Austin Meadows,

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Javier Bias, any issues. Yeah, because in the past you

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have said the third fourth round is your sweet spot

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for pitching, right, use a lot of guys you really

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:31.720
<v Speaker 1>like here. And we talked about it before, Chris Paddock,

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 1>that was Syndergaard, Aaron Nola, Massa hero to not. I'm

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>sorry you, Darvish, h Luisa Varrino was in this cruise,

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that Greggy, all those guys, that's time it gets back.

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>He gone, He's gone. But all those guys, by the

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.919
<v Speaker 1>time is your pick again in the fifth round, they're

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:50.800
<v Speaker 1>probably gone. Probably not Greg really going to the NBC

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 1>A d P. Yeah, I pick sixty. They're gonna be

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>there in rotal leagues. Okay, even someone like Zach Grenky,

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>if you know he could wait a little bit but yeah,

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean according to the ADA, I think you can

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>get someone like Paddick. You know. The thing is, I

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>show you a lot of my draft boards, Greg, that

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 1>are fifteen team draft. That's why you see Paddock and

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and Um Synderguard and Darvish and all these guys. They

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>go in the fourth round in a fifteen team round,

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>but in a twelve teamer they can last till the

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the fifth round the beginning of the six

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 1>So you can actually grab one of those guys a

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit later. The pictures you would be looking at

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 1>here Luis Castillo, Patrick Corbyn, those pictures are fine, but

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think that they're that dissimilar from pictures

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you can get later on. I'm gonna take the hitters

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and really kind of build out my base of hitting stats.

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I know, how any bias is your guy? Obviously have

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 1>to give an outfielder, given that many rotal leaves played

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:39.879
<v Speaker 1>with five outfields, so you do you need ones one

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>here In the first four rounds, Austin Meadows had this

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 1>breakout campaign for Kevin Bay. Let's see if you stay

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:47.240
<v Speaker 1>healthy here in Frank's go back to you and figure

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:48.879
<v Speaker 1>out who we're wrapping up our head to head team

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>with Okay, so I mentioned on this side we can

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>wait on starting pitching head to head points, We're not

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna wait on starting pitching. You have to grab another

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>one here, just because I want someone who is going

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to give a lot of endings, who's going to give

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>me volume, someone who is dependable, and I do think

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that that is Patrick Corbin. Again, He's gone to under

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>endings pitch each of the past two seasons, proven himself

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>wipe out Slider, one of the best in the game.

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 1>The walks went up last year. I want to see

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>those come back down a little bit. Here. In has

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a good team behind him in Washington. He's going to

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:23.440
<v Speaker 1>get run support. He gets to face the Miami Marlins

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. The strikeouts are gonna be solid. I think

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Corban is a very fine sp two. But in

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a points league, I want someone who's going to give

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you a volume, someone who's a little bit more dependable,

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>who's going to give you those endings. Uh. And I

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's a perfect combination with someone like Justin Verlander.

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Again in points league. I'm in points leagues. I'm just

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 1>going to stress starting pitching a little bit more than

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I am in Roto leagues because in Roto you can

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>find those guys who are good on a per enning basis,

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>good on a purse star pieces. Quantity quality over quantity

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>in Roto, quantity over quality when it comes to head

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to head points, Greg, I want to grab a hitter here. Okay,

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna take Austin Meadows. I'm not going to

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 1>take Javier Baias. When I'm going to take is actually

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Xander Bogarts of the Boston Red Sox, who did not

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>lead the league in doubles last year? If not lead

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the league in doubles last year? I asked Greig throughout

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the break. He actually laughed at me and said, that

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was the most ridiculous question you ever asked. No, because

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, let me describe this. I know you

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>have two minutes ago, but like you, just like, hey,

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 1>did Xander Bogers lead league doubles last year? It's a

0:46:26.239 --> 0:46:28.800
<v Speaker 1>fair question. Doing a fantasy baseball show, you think it

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 1>was gonna have that available for you not know what

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you're talking Aboutander, It's easier for you to pull it

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>up on your laptop than for me to like hunch

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:36.759
<v Speaker 1>over here, and I got it. For you. He did not.

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:39.399
<v Speaker 1>His teammate Rothhaeld never has had more than him last season.

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:43.400
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense, and leading the league overall was Nick Castiano's. Well,

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Xander Bogarts has to be close. I'd imagine, right, Greg

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 1>had six less doubles than Nick Castianos all right, so

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 1>he was up there, had over fifty doubles last year,

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 1>and again, from a Points League perspective, a really good,

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>play disciplined Xander Bogarts continues to get better and better right.

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Kind of reminds me of Anthony Rendon from the shortstop position,

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>where he's gonna give you a good batting average. I

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>think the power probably takes a step back. He had

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 1>over thirty home runs last year, probably hits twenty five

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>seven home runs, really good batting average. Even with Mookie

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Betts out in Boston. I like the Red Sox lineup.

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I think people are kind of undervaluing the Red Sox

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too much right now with Mookie Betts

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>being gone. Doesn't strike out so obviously that helps you

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in a Points league. He's gonna hit doubles. Um. I

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:27.319
<v Speaker 1>like grabbing two starting pitchers in my first four rounds

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Points League I think Xander Bogart's is a

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>perfect target from a points league perspective. Greg. Notice I

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have an outfielder yet on this side, because in

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the points leads that I play in, UH standard Points league,

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:41.800
<v Speaker 1>normally you only use three outfielders. Maybe you use four outsiders.

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really going to put an emphasis on a

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>position scarcity. I'm just gonna take players who perform well

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in that format, and Xander Bogarts is one of them. Greg,

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, Alexander Bogarts, I feel good about him. Him

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>and Hobby Baya is both good picks I think in

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that spot in the Points League, though, I think we're comfortable.

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Lexander Bogart's Frank excellent job, which hems like better? Oh,

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I am going to take that. I really like this season.

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>This has all my guys like I loved Meadows last

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:09.879
<v Speaker 1>year too. Kind of sucks that he's going as high

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 1>as he is this season because I'd like to have

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>more shares of him. But someone who I really like

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in Roto this year is Jaby or Bias as well.

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I like the Seam a lot. Obviously. Both teams are great.

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 1>I drafted them ROT a little bit better Jessic, Patrick

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Korby don't even like Patrick Korby. I do not like

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Corbyn. I was on Corban a couple of years ago.

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Greg Hell tell the people a long time ago. Grows up,

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Nash Frank, I'll drag up a fantastic weekend weekend enjoying

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Theory Wilder. Thanks to Sean and Alex downstairs. We will

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 1>do it all again on Monday as we get our

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>position previews, we hope I want to be the next

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Daily rodal dot Com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this season. Compete with the pros with Daily rodal dot

0:48:51.560 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Com optimizer and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS,

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support and

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 1>much more safe temper sent on winning NBA DFS advice

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:05.759
<v Speaker 1>with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily rodo dot com backslash

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Dunk to learn more. H