1 00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:03,760 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here, 2 00:00:03,920 --> 00:00:06,400 Speaker 1: and we here at Breaking Points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,440 --> 00:00:08,640 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:11,760 Speaker 1: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:15,160 Speaker 1: the studio ad staff give you, guys, the best independent 6 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,400 Speaker 1: coverage that is possible. If you like what we're all about, 7 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:19,520 Speaker 1: it means the absolute world to have your support. What 8 00:00:19,560 --> 00:00:22,000 Speaker 1: are you waiting for? Become a premium subscriber today at 9 00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:41,920 Speaker 1: Breakingpoints dot com. Good morning, everybody, Happy Monday. We have 10 00:00:41,960 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 1: an amazing show for everybody today. What do we have, 11 00:00:43,720 --> 00:00:46,080 Speaker 1: Christal indeed, we do. Nice to be back in the studio. 12 00:00:46,080 --> 00:00:48,080 Speaker 1: We had a wonderful time on the road though. Thank 13 00:00:48,120 --> 00:00:50,360 Speaker 1: you to New York and Boston everybody who came out. 14 00:00:50,400 --> 00:00:52,320 Speaker 1: It was great and we'll be posting some of those clips. 15 00:00:52,360 --> 00:00:55,360 Speaker 1: So whether you're premium, that's already the full thing live 16 00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:56,760 Speaker 1: from Boston, but we're going to post some of the 17 00:00:56,760 --> 00:00:59,440 Speaker 1: clips later on as well, so make sure you stay 18 00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:01,720 Speaker 1: tuned for that. Okay, In the show today, we got 19 00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:04,000 Speaker 1: a whole bunch of Twitter stuff, new threads that came out, 20 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:07,480 Speaker 1: new Elon Musk tweets, new media reaction, We also have 21 00:01:07,959 --> 00:01:11,399 Speaker 1: something that is just breaking really this morning. Apparently Dave 22 00:01:11,480 --> 00:01:15,839 Speaker 1: Chappelle brought elon onto stage in San Francisco. It didn't 23 00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:19,000 Speaker 1: go all that well. We have some exclusive video, well 24 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:21,559 Speaker 1: it's not exclusive guests, but some interesting video from inside 25 00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:23,920 Speaker 1: the room, so we'll show you that. We also have 26 00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:27,880 Speaker 1: some updates on that situation with the railroad workers. There's 27 00:01:27,959 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 1: still a chance for Joe Biden to sign an executive 28 00:01:31,480 --> 00:01:34,600 Speaker 1: order to give these workers be paid sick days that 29 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:37,959 Speaker 1: they deserve as all workers do, so we will talk 30 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:40,600 Speaker 1: to you about that. We also have some updates on 31 00:01:40,640 --> 00:01:43,520 Speaker 1: our friend Sam Bankman freed and whether or not he 32 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:47,000 Speaker 1: will be testifying here in DC, potentially even this week. 33 00:01:47,480 --> 00:01:51,440 Speaker 1: We also have some crazy things, horrific tragic things that 34 00:01:51,480 --> 00:01:53,720 Speaker 1: are going on at the World Cup. We've now had 35 00:01:54,200 --> 00:02:01,320 Speaker 1: two journalists die suddenly, unexpected young guys. One of them 36 00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:04,160 Speaker 1: you all might remember we covered this here. He had 37 00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:06,640 Speaker 1: been turned away and actually detained for trying to wear 38 00:02:06,720 --> 00:02:10,799 Speaker 1: a rainbow shirt into the World Cup. He ended up, 39 00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:13,000 Speaker 1: like I said, dying suddenly. So we'll tell you everything 40 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:16,400 Speaker 1: that we know about that. But let's go ahead and 41 00:02:16,480 --> 00:02:18,440 Speaker 1: jump in. We don't have any live shows to promote 42 00:02:18,440 --> 00:02:21,880 Speaker 1: anymore at the moment, for the time anymore nice. So 43 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:23,880 Speaker 1: we'll get right into what's going on with Twitter. Okay, 44 00:02:23,919 --> 00:02:26,120 Speaker 1: let's start with the Twitter file. So the latest that 45 00:02:26,120 --> 00:02:29,520 Speaker 1: we have here were two drops since Thursday, both from 46 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:32,760 Speaker 1: Matt Taiev and Michael Schellenberger, who works currently with Barry 47 00:02:32,760 --> 00:02:35,320 Speaker 1: Weiss's The Free Press. We wanted to start and focus 48 00:02:35,360 --> 00:02:38,440 Speaker 1: really on the Matt Tayib thread and in particular what 49 00:02:38,520 --> 00:02:41,120 Speaker 1: I believe to be the most significant story that's come 50 00:02:41,120 --> 00:02:43,160 Speaker 1: out really of the Twitter files so far. Let's put 51 00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:46,160 Speaker 1: it up there on the screen. What was essentially revealed 52 00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:49,079 Speaker 1: is that Joel Roth, the former head of Trust and Safety, 53 00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:53,120 Speaker 1: indicated in screenshots from Slack messages that he was having 54 00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:58,040 Speaker 1: weekly confabs with federal law enforcement agencies, specifically the FBI, 55 00:02:58,280 --> 00:03:01,320 Speaker 1: the DHS, and the Department of Justice. And in at 56 00:03:01,400 --> 00:03:04,080 Speaker 1: least one known instance, let's put a four up on 57 00:03:04,080 --> 00:03:07,160 Speaker 1: the screen there, guys. The next one. What's very important 58 00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:09,960 Speaker 1: is that and in this one instance, we know that 59 00:03:10,040 --> 00:03:14,160 Speaker 1: the FBI was actually sending reports about a pair of 60 00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:19,360 Speaker 1: tweets to Twitter, specifically asking for them to be taken down. Now, 61 00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:22,480 Speaker 1: the tweets in question, they certainly were bullshit. I mean, 62 00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:26,240 Speaker 1: they were about some fake mail in ballot claims from 63 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:29,160 Speaker 1: the twenty twenty election. However, and I think that this 64 00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:32,120 Speaker 1: underscores the point. It is not the job of the 65 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:36,360 Speaker 1: FBI actually to police misinformation on Twitter or elsewhere. And 66 00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:40,280 Speaker 1: they were clearly flagging tweets in a well established operation Crystal, 67 00:03:40,600 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 1: with weekly meetings with Yoel Roth and with the head 68 00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:48,200 Speaker 1: of Twitter CEOs and others, that indicate then a pattern 69 00:03:48,360 --> 00:03:50,680 Speaker 1: of trying to prepare the environment to get them to 70 00:03:50,720 --> 00:03:53,920 Speaker 1: take down anything that they wanted. Now remember also this 71 00:03:53,960 --> 00:03:56,920 Speaker 1: fits very neatly with the Mark Zuckerberg comments on Joe 72 00:03:57,040 --> 00:03:59,240 Speaker 1: Rogan in which he said that, well, you know, the 73 00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:01,720 Speaker 1: FBI came to us, they told us some sort of 74 00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:04,800 Speaker 1: like hack operation was coming. We thought that's what the 75 00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:07,960 Speaker 1: Hunter Biden story was. We waited a couple of days, 76 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:10,600 Speaker 1: and in frankly, almost in an even more pernicious way, 77 00:04:10,760 --> 00:04:13,040 Speaker 1: they just simply made it impossible to find on their 78 00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:16,240 Speaker 1: platform while you could still technically click the link. They 79 00:04:16,240 --> 00:04:18,640 Speaker 1: didn't go as far as Twitter. But when you put 80 00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:21,679 Speaker 1: I think those two things together, look, did we know it, Yeah, 81 00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:23,920 Speaker 1: we knew it, But to see it, it's start writing 82 00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:27,440 Speaker 1: weekly messages in which he even alludes to his quote 83 00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:31,280 Speaker 1: like secret meetings, like very special meetings, almost as if 84 00:04:31,320 --> 00:04:34,640 Speaker 1: it's a joke. Actually it's not a joke and basically 85 00:04:34,640 --> 00:04:37,200 Speaker 1: confirms something that we all knew, but now we have 86 00:04:37,279 --> 00:04:40,400 Speaker 1: the proof right there in the pudding. And look, I mean, 87 00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:42,520 Speaker 1: I think that's the biggest takeaway from the Twitter files. 88 00:04:42,600 --> 00:04:45,279 Speaker 1: Yet I one hundred percent agree with that. Yeah, he 89 00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:48,159 Speaker 1: jokes about his like he's like, oh, I'm in favor 90 00:04:48,200 --> 00:04:51,000 Speaker 1: of calendar transparency, but he doesn't want to put on 91 00:04:51,080 --> 00:04:55,160 Speaker 1: his calendar literally every week meeting with the FBI again 92 00:04:55,440 --> 00:04:59,320 Speaker 1: for the hundredth time, I really want you all, however 93 00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:02,240 Speaker 1: you feel about these Twitter files, how you feel about 94 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:04,880 Speaker 1: Elon Musk, however you feel about Joe Biden or Hunter 95 00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:07,680 Speaker 1: Biden or Donald Trump or the deep state or any 96 00:05:07,720 --> 00:05:10,400 Speaker 1: of this, I really want you to put aside your 97 00:05:10,440 --> 00:05:16,200 Speaker 1: sort of ideological inclinations and imagine it's whatever president or 98 00:05:16,320 --> 00:05:20,280 Speaker 1: whatever party you hate the most who's in power. And 99 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:26,960 Speaker 1: the nefarious connection between the FBI and these social media 100 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:30,600 Speaker 1: companies that have so much power, and there is no 101 00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:33,440 Speaker 1: transparency around how any of this has done. This is 102 00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:37,080 Speaker 1: the first real, like sort of real time glimpse we've 103 00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:40,839 Speaker 1: gotten into how all of these things ultimately operate. So 104 00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:42,719 Speaker 1: you know, there's been a lot of debate about like, 105 00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:44,480 Speaker 1: oh well, they've shown a lot of right wing exams, 106 00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:46,279 Speaker 1: not about a lot of left wing examples. To me, 107 00:05:46,440 --> 00:05:51,000 Speaker 1: it really doesn't matter which ideological inclination is being censored. 108 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:55,640 Speaker 1: What matters is that this power exists. It's wholly unchecked, 109 00:05:55,920 --> 00:05:59,480 Speaker 1: and it can be wielded against any one, any idea, 110 00:05:59,640 --> 00:06:04,400 Speaker 1: any organization, at any time. And that's the thing as Americans, 111 00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:07,440 Speaker 1: regardless of what your ideology is, that's the thing that 112 00:06:07,480 --> 00:06:11,240 Speaker 1: you should be deeply, deeply concerned about it. And also remember, 113 00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:13,839 Speaker 1: I mean, I think what really underscores this is to 114 00:06:13,880 --> 00:06:15,720 Speaker 1: take it out of the Twitter files themselves and look 115 00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:18,240 Speaker 1: at the most recent example, the story that Ken clipp 116 00:06:18,240 --> 00:06:21,039 Speaker 1: has seen broke here on our show about the truth 117 00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:24,560 Speaker 1: cops about the Department of Homeland Security flagging things as 118 00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:31,520 Speaker 1: misinformation that include the withdrawal from Afghanistan as quote unquote misinformation. Look, 119 00:06:31,839 --> 00:06:35,200 Speaker 1: and I also here's another Twitter file I'm waiting for. Okay, 120 00:06:35,279 --> 00:06:37,040 Speaker 1: deep platform at the President. I get it. I think 121 00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:38,760 Speaker 1: it was very important. I want to know a lot 122 00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:42,520 Speaker 1: about COVID, about the initial lab leak blocks that were happening. 123 00:06:42,640 --> 00:06:46,600 Speaker 1: Who flagged that, what the ongoing meetings were between doctor Fauci, 124 00:06:46,960 --> 00:06:49,760 Speaker 1: the CDC and others. Also turns out that Fauci's daughter 125 00:06:49,800 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 1: actually worked for Twitter at a time during the pandemic. 126 00:06:52,800 --> 00:06:54,560 Speaker 1: That's interesting. I didn't actually know that would have been 127 00:06:54,600 --> 00:06:57,320 Speaker 1: an interesting act of journalism for somebody to flag that 128 00:06:57,400 --> 00:06:59,480 Speaker 1: for us. We only know it because it was deposed 129 00:07:00,160 --> 00:07:03,240 Speaker 1: in a lawsuit. So hm, that's actually there's a lot 130 00:07:03,360 --> 00:07:08,159 Speaker 1: happening here. And then furthermore, from the misinformation piece that 131 00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:12,200 Speaker 1: Ken Klippenstein put out, it shows you also that they 132 00:07:12,240 --> 00:07:15,720 Speaker 1: were flagging things which were directly bad politically for the 133 00:07:15,760 --> 00:07:20,360 Speaker 1: Biden administration, right like not just Afghanistan, but any sort 134 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:23,240 Speaker 1: of not even questioning on the election on Biden and 135 00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:27,160 Speaker 1: criticism of him himself, flagging that to these social media companies. 136 00:07:27,160 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 1: And we know in this instance that Twitter was in 137 00:07:29,960 --> 00:07:34,000 Speaker 1: some cases flagging and taking things down on behalf of 138 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:35,760 Speaker 1: the dj and the FBI. I also think a lot 139 00:07:35,760 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 1: of this crystal stems back to the war on Terror, 140 00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:39,600 Speaker 1: and I think all of us have to be honest 141 00:07:39,920 --> 00:07:42,800 Speaker 1: me specifically, Look, I mean, I think a lot of 142 00:07:42,880 --> 00:07:44,920 Speaker 1: us were okay with the idea that the FBI was 143 00:07:44,960 --> 00:07:47,760 Speaker 1: working deeply with Twitter to like take down isis, and 144 00:07:47,760 --> 00:07:49,360 Speaker 1: everyone's like, oh, that's a good thing, you know, we're 145 00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:51,760 Speaker 1: taking down these tweets. Well, it started to get real 146 00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:56,480 Speaker 1: sketchy in two thousand and like sixteen twenty seventeen, when 147 00:07:56,520 --> 00:07:58,720 Speaker 1: we were straight up going after American citizens and the 148 00:07:58,760 --> 00:08:02,400 Speaker 1: FBI was basically working with them to essentially entrap them 149 00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:05,840 Speaker 1: and put them in prison. Most people were fine with that, 150 00:08:05,920 --> 00:08:08,360 Speaker 1: but people like Glenn and many other civil libertarians were like, 151 00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:11,400 Speaker 1: you don't understand the apparatus which is being built here. 152 00:08:11,440 --> 00:08:14,040 Speaker 1: And I think many of us need to admit that 153 00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:17,520 Speaker 1: what happened there, while it seemed comfortable, those were people 154 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:20,760 Speaker 1: and illegal infrastructure that was set up against them that 155 00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:23,440 Speaker 1: has now come to be expanded in a way that 156 00:08:23,720 --> 00:08:26,840 Speaker 1: nobody predicted. Yeah. I think there were a lot of 157 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:30,000 Speaker 1: people and I will include myself in this, who felt 158 00:08:30,200 --> 00:08:34,440 Speaker 1: very uncomfortable with that power that was being claimed by 159 00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:37,560 Speaker 1: the executive branch under the Bush administration and felt a 160 00:08:37,559 --> 00:08:39,960 Speaker 1: lot more comfy with it under Obama. Yeah, because I 161 00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:42,439 Speaker 1: liked him better, and so I felt like, oh, well, 162 00:08:42,480 --> 00:08:44,960 Speaker 1: this isn't as bad, and you sort of forget that 163 00:08:45,040 --> 00:08:48,480 Speaker 1: they still retained those powers. I mean, you think about 164 00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:51,360 Speaker 1: Obama and the drone strike list and all of those things. 165 00:08:51,800 --> 00:08:56,880 Speaker 1: So this really isn't a partisan story because every president 166 00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:00,440 Speaker 1: that we have had has basically claimed these power and 167 00:09:00,559 --> 00:09:03,600 Speaker 1: use them for their own benefit. So again, to use 168 00:09:03,640 --> 00:09:07,120 Speaker 1: another sort of like counter example, right these examples, yes, 169 00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:11,520 Speaker 1: they focus on censorship predominantly of right wing accounts, which 170 00:09:11,559 --> 00:09:13,679 Speaker 1: again I think you should care about because you should 171 00:09:13,720 --> 00:09:15,920 Speaker 1: know that this power can be wielded against anyone at 172 00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:19,200 Speaker 1: any time. But imagine what Trump could have done with 173 00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:24,440 Speaker 1: these sorts of powers during the George Floyd protests and riots. 174 00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:26,560 Speaker 1: And we know that there was and this is again 175 00:09:26,679 --> 00:09:29,319 Speaker 1: reporting from Ken Clippenstein, we know there was an effort 176 00:09:29,400 --> 00:09:32,080 Speaker 1: within the Deep States to sort of track and surveil 177 00:09:32,640 --> 00:09:35,880 Speaker 1: Antifa activists. There were some takedowns of those accounts on 178 00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:39,160 Speaker 1: Twitter as well. So again, if you don't find you know, 179 00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:42,360 Speaker 1: the examples of libs of TikTok or whatever compelling, think 180 00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:46,000 Speaker 1: about these powers being used by someone like Donald Trump 181 00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:49,400 Speaker 1: that you know is untrustworthy in terms of his sort 182 00:09:49,440 --> 00:09:53,040 Speaker 1: of authoritarian tendencies, and what someone with those inclinations could 183 00:09:53,040 --> 00:09:56,280 Speaker 1: also do against their own ideological foes. You know, some 184 00:09:56,320 --> 00:09:58,800 Speaker 1: of the reportings suggest that again this sort of like 185 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:00,720 Speaker 1: deep state apparatus, who are going to go after, who 186 00:10:00,760 --> 00:10:02,320 Speaker 1: they're going to track, who they're going to surveil, who 187 00:10:02,360 --> 00:10:04,760 Speaker 1: they're going to consider enemies. Some of that start to 188 00:10:04,760 --> 00:10:06,920 Speaker 1: be set up under Trump, and then the Biden administration 189 00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:09,160 Speaker 1: takes it and turns it towards the people that they 190 00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:11,960 Speaker 1: see as political adversaries. That's why I think it's so 191 00:10:12,120 --> 00:10:15,600 Speaker 1: important to take the ideology out of this and recognize 192 00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:19,080 Speaker 1: that this sort of power, total lack of transparency, it 193 00:10:19,160 --> 00:10:23,520 Speaker 1: really is an authoritarian type of system. And this evil 194 00:10:23,720 --> 00:10:27,520 Speaker 1: collaboration between the government and these social media tech companies 195 00:10:27,520 --> 00:10:30,440 Speaker 1: that have so much power in terms of our entire 196 00:10:30,480 --> 00:10:33,959 Speaker 1: democratic infrastructure. Everybody should be really troubled by this part. 197 00:10:34,040 --> 00:10:36,560 Speaker 1: And I do think that this is the most important 198 00:10:36,559 --> 00:10:38,720 Speaker 1: piece that we've seen come out of it. It is 199 00:10:38,960 --> 00:10:42,720 Speaker 1: confirming what the little glimpses that we've already gotten of 200 00:10:42,760 --> 00:10:45,040 Speaker 1: the way that this collaboration happens. We already know that 201 00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:48,560 Speaker 1: these tech companies also collaborate with other governments like Israel. 202 00:10:48,600 --> 00:10:52,280 Speaker 1: For example, Israel's very active at flagging Palestinian activists that 203 00:10:52,320 --> 00:10:54,040 Speaker 1: they think are out of bounds and need to be 204 00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:57,240 Speaker 1: censored or taken down as well. So it really is 205 00:10:57,280 --> 00:10:59,440 Speaker 1: an issue for us going forward as a society. There's 206 00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:01,400 Speaker 1: just no doubt. Let that be the takeaway. And look, 207 00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:03,240 Speaker 1: it also shows this is going on at all the 208 00:11:03,240 --> 00:11:05,280 Speaker 1: other social media companies. The only reason we know is 209 00:11:05,320 --> 00:11:08,520 Speaker 1: because Elon spent forty four billion dollars of his own 210 00:11:08,559 --> 00:11:12,000 Speaker 1: money and apparently doesn't care necessarily about recouping that investment, 211 00:11:12,040 --> 00:11:14,600 Speaker 1: although we'll see how that goes. And that actually brings 212 00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:16,920 Speaker 1: us to the next part. So part two here, let's start. 213 00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:20,200 Speaker 1: Let's put it up there on the screen. Elon is 214 00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:24,520 Speaker 1: making some big changes over at the Twitter platforms. He says, yes, 215 00:11:24,720 --> 00:11:28,640 Speaker 1: it is true. Twitter is set to increase characters from 216 00:11:28,720 --> 00:11:32,520 Speaker 1: two hundred and eighty two four thousand. Now I went 217 00:11:32,559 --> 00:11:34,800 Speaker 1: ahead and checked, it's not a typo, not to eighty 218 00:11:34,840 --> 00:11:37,520 Speaker 1: to four hundred to eighty two four thousand, and I 219 00:11:37,559 --> 00:11:39,920 Speaker 1: got to say, I think this may be the most 220 00:11:39,920 --> 00:11:42,840 Speaker 1: colossal mistake Crystal, that he has made yet, because what 221 00:11:42,960 --> 00:11:46,040 Speaker 1: did we learn with Trump over at truth Social Actually 222 00:11:46,080 --> 00:11:48,880 Speaker 1: the character limit was good for him. Trump's like rambling 223 00:11:48,960 --> 00:11:52,960 Speaker 1: truths which go on and on are awful, they're too long. 224 00:11:53,480 --> 00:11:57,280 Speaker 1: The concise edited nature of the short bites. There is 225 00:11:57,320 --> 00:12:00,440 Speaker 1: something to that format which I will not dispute, does 226 00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:03,800 Speaker 1: not necessarily quote add to better and healthier discourse. But 227 00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:07,679 Speaker 1: in terms of uh, in terms of like being punchy, 228 00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:10,360 Speaker 1: in terms of making a point, in terms of editing 229 00:12:10,440 --> 00:12:12,439 Speaker 1: down like what you're trying to say. Yeah, I have 230 00:12:12,520 --> 00:12:14,760 Speaker 1: always found it actually to be quite useful because if 231 00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:17,720 Speaker 1: you can't make a point like that, it's not really 232 00:12:17,760 --> 00:12:20,400 Speaker 1: necessarily one that's going to resonate with the pubblic well, 233 00:12:20,400 --> 00:12:22,800 Speaker 1: and you can always do a thread, yes, like if 234 00:12:22,800 --> 00:12:24,560 Speaker 1: you want to go on the character if you really 235 00:12:24,600 --> 00:12:26,520 Speaker 1: have something that needs to I mean like these freakin' 236 00:12:26,679 --> 00:12:29,079 Speaker 1: Twitter file threads, like you can go and you can 237 00:12:29,080 --> 00:12:32,040 Speaker 1: do your thirty tweet thread if you really feel like it. 238 00:12:32,080 --> 00:12:35,480 Speaker 1: But yeah, there's listen. This is what makes Twitter twitter. Yeah, 239 00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:37,440 Speaker 1: I mean you can change it, you can make it 240 00:12:37,480 --> 00:12:40,920 Speaker 1: four thousand words and you can still call it Twitter. 241 00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:46,040 Speaker 1: But the central innovation of this platform was the character limits. 242 00:12:46,080 --> 00:12:47,720 Speaker 1: That's the whole thing that made it. Really if I 243 00:12:47,720 --> 00:12:50,080 Speaker 1: even liked one, I liked back when it was one forty, 244 00:12:50,080 --> 00:12:51,880 Speaker 1: when it was half really, yeah, I sort of liked 245 00:12:51,880 --> 00:12:53,600 Speaker 1: that two eighty to be honest with you, but I 246 00:12:53,640 --> 00:12:55,760 Speaker 1: mean four thousand is like, I mean, we could post 247 00:12:55,760 --> 00:12:59,319 Speaker 1: our entire like multiple modelague and it's ridiculous like it 248 00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:04,000 Speaker 1: it becomes there is a space for obviously longer form writing. 249 00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:08,000 Speaker 1: That's what say substack is for. It's called a blog example, yeah, 250 00:13:08,080 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 1: or a blog. So I just feel like, I mean, 251 00:13:10,960 --> 00:13:14,120 Speaker 1: it might make the discourse less sort of snarky and 252 00:13:14,240 --> 00:13:17,440 Speaker 1: mean and ugly. It maybe, I don't know. It's hard 253 00:13:17,440 --> 00:13:20,679 Speaker 1: to say without actually trying it out, but it's just 254 00:13:20,840 --> 00:13:23,800 Speaker 1: it won't really be Twitter anymore. I agree. It's basically 255 00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:26,120 Speaker 1: the death of the central innovation of the platform. And 256 00:13:26,200 --> 00:13:28,120 Speaker 1: on top of that, the head of Twitter product. Let's 257 00:13:28,120 --> 00:13:31,319 Speaker 1: put this out there on the screen today. This underscore 258 00:13:31,440 --> 00:13:33,840 Speaker 1: all the Twitter files is let's not forget the entire 259 00:13:33,880 --> 00:13:37,040 Speaker 1: Twitter Blue saga. So Esther Crawford says, quote on Monday, 260 00:13:37,080 --> 00:13:39,120 Speaker 1: which is today, we are bringing back the ability to 261 00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:41,720 Speaker 1: subscribe to Twitter Blue. It'll be eight dollars a month 262 00:13:41,720 --> 00:13:44,360 Speaker 1: on the web and eleven dollars a month on the iOS. Well, 263 00:13:44,440 --> 00:13:47,000 Speaker 1: that's basically passing on the Apple tax to the consumer. 264 00:13:47,320 --> 00:13:50,360 Speaker 1: We have added a review step before applying the blue 265 00:13:50,400 --> 00:13:52,080 Speaker 1: check mark to an account as one of our new 266 00:13:52,160 --> 00:13:55,760 Speaker 1: steps to combat impersonation, which is against Twitter rules. You 267 00:13:55,760 --> 00:13:59,280 Speaker 1: will start seeing gold check marks in your timeline. Those 268 00:13:59,320 --> 00:14:02,680 Speaker 1: are indicators for businesses. Soon afterwards you're going to see 269 00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:06,400 Speaker 1: great check marks, which are for government and multilateral accounts. 270 00:14:06,559 --> 00:14:08,640 Speaker 1: Big thanks to the Blue team for all of your 271 00:14:08,679 --> 00:14:12,320 Speaker 1: hard work. So I guess, Look, I'm conflicted on this one. 272 00:14:12,600 --> 00:14:14,520 Speaker 1: I don't like the fact that they're passing on the 273 00:14:14,559 --> 00:14:18,360 Speaker 1: Apple tax to the consumer eleven dollars a month on iOS, 274 00:14:18,520 --> 00:14:21,880 Speaker 1: basically making passing it on has kind of screw you 275 00:14:22,160 --> 00:14:25,520 Speaker 1: to Apple, which highlights the fact that they take thirty percent. 276 00:14:25,600 --> 00:14:30,480 Speaker 1: But beyond that, look, Twitter Blue verification itself has always 277 00:14:30,520 --> 00:14:35,040 Speaker 1: been about verifying the actual information on the platform. So 278 00:14:35,640 --> 00:14:39,720 Speaker 1: while sure, I guess it's good that businesses can't be impersonated, 279 00:14:39,960 --> 00:14:42,440 Speaker 1: what about people? And I don't even care about myself, 280 00:14:42,440 --> 00:14:45,000 Speaker 1: but like, there's a lot of other people whose musings 281 00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:48,920 Speaker 1: are noteworthy. Elon himself, remember whenever he tweeted about trying 282 00:14:48,960 --> 00:14:52,160 Speaker 1: to take Tesla private in the stock went haywire. There's 283 00:14:52,200 --> 00:14:54,320 Speaker 1: a lot of accounts like that. So how are you 284 00:14:54,360 --> 00:14:57,200 Speaker 1: going to trust Jeff Bezos or any other market movers, 285 00:14:57,440 --> 00:15:00,280 Speaker 1: whether they are going to actually pay for the blue 286 00:15:00,320 --> 00:15:02,760 Speaker 1: check or not plot twist. I don't think Bezos will 287 00:15:02,800 --> 00:15:05,960 Speaker 1: be paying for it. Also, whenever you look further the 288 00:15:06,040 --> 00:15:08,880 Speaker 1: great check marks for government and multilateral accounts, that one's 289 00:15:08,920 --> 00:15:11,320 Speaker 1: not bad. I think that one is good because that. 290 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:14,760 Speaker 1: But again there's still then in the context of verifying 291 00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:18,480 Speaker 1: and trying to indicate some sort of status to government 292 00:15:18,520 --> 00:15:21,080 Speaker 1: and multilateral accounts, which is good, right, Like you definitely 293 00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:23,360 Speaker 1: want those to have some but it just highlights like 294 00:15:23,400 --> 00:15:26,280 Speaker 1: trying to create a scheme across all different ones. I 295 00:15:26,320 --> 00:15:27,880 Speaker 1: just don't think it's the right move. Well, there's two 296 00:15:27,920 --> 00:15:30,960 Speaker 1: different potential goals here. One is money making and the 297 00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:33,720 Speaker 1: other is actually making the platform better. And I think 298 00:15:33,800 --> 00:15:37,400 Speaker 1: more verification would be better. Yes, obviously the first rollout 299 00:15:37,600 --> 00:15:40,840 Speaker 1: of this had much less verification. I mean, I personally 300 00:15:40,840 --> 00:15:44,200 Speaker 1: really enjoyed the parody potash businesses in particular. That was 301 00:15:44,240 --> 00:15:49,200 Speaker 1: fun for a time. The Eli Lilly insulent incident comes 302 00:15:49,240 --> 00:15:51,920 Speaker 1: to mind. But you know, I don't know that they're 303 00:15:51,960 --> 00:15:54,480 Speaker 1: doing this in the way to really better the platform. 304 00:15:54,520 --> 00:15:56,680 Speaker 1: It seems more like a money making scheme. We'll see 305 00:15:56,680 --> 00:15:58,480 Speaker 1: how the rollout goes. We'll see if they have real 306 00:15:58,560 --> 00:16:00,840 Speaker 1: verification this time. I mean, the way to do this, 307 00:16:00,920 --> 00:16:04,120 Speaker 1: if you actually wanted to make the platform better, would 308 00:16:04,160 --> 00:16:07,600 Speaker 1: be to extend free verification to a broader group of people. 309 00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:10,840 Speaker 1: So it's not just like the special whoever's who get 310 00:16:10,880 --> 00:16:13,120 Speaker 1: the blue check marks, but anyone can go through a 311 00:16:13,160 --> 00:16:15,720 Speaker 1: process to basically get verified I am who I say 312 00:16:15,720 --> 00:16:19,160 Speaker 1: I am. That would be inherently a good thing. The 313 00:16:19,240 --> 00:16:21,120 Speaker 1: other question is, you know what else do you get 314 00:16:21,160 --> 00:16:23,440 Speaker 1: for that eight dollars? Does that mean that your tweets 315 00:16:23,440 --> 00:16:25,080 Speaker 1: are going to be surfaced or your replies are going 316 00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:26,680 Speaker 1: to be surfaced more, they're going to be favored by 317 00:16:26,720 --> 00:16:29,280 Speaker 1: the algorithm. That's again putting your thumb on the scale. 318 00:16:29,320 --> 00:16:33,080 Speaker 1: In terms of quote unquote free speech. It's the antithesis 319 00:16:33,080 --> 00:16:35,920 Speaker 1: of free speech. It's literally paying to have your speech elevated. 320 00:16:36,360 --> 00:16:38,240 Speaker 1: So I still have a lot of questions. And also 321 00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:40,200 Speaker 1: as of this morning, I mean, I'm looking, I'm looking 322 00:16:40,200 --> 00:16:43,440 Speaker 1: at the Twitter Blue Twitter account. I don't see any 323 00:16:43,440 --> 00:16:46,800 Speaker 1: indication this is actually rolled out today so far, it's 324 00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:50,120 Speaker 1: early in the day. We'll see, so I await the 325 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:53,640 Speaker 1: execution of how this all works, but remain highly skeptical. Yeah, 326 00:16:53,680 --> 00:16:56,760 Speaker 1: lots of questions. Again, look, we'll see if it actually 327 00:16:56,840 --> 00:17:00,760 Speaker 1: comes out in terms of verifying the actual information on 328 00:17:00,800 --> 00:17:03,360 Speaker 1: the platform. That's the value of Twitter, that's why everybody 329 00:17:03,440 --> 00:17:05,600 Speaker 1: uses it, that's why they look for it and all that. 330 00:17:05,720 --> 00:17:08,119 Speaker 1: So anything that diminishes that it's not the best. And 331 00:17:08,160 --> 00:17:11,160 Speaker 1: I'm actually fine with verifying people who you know, don't 332 00:17:11,240 --> 00:17:14,040 Speaker 1: quote unquote meet Twitter standards, but I do think there 333 00:17:14,080 --> 00:17:16,120 Speaker 1: has to be some sort of scheme to make sure 334 00:17:16,160 --> 00:17:19,760 Speaker 1: that public and noteworthy figures, not just businesses and governments, 335 00:17:20,160 --> 00:17:24,040 Speaker 1: can't we can actually trust that their accounts are their accounts. 336 00:17:24,200 --> 00:17:28,280 Speaker 1: Same thing that you said, which is, whenever you're preferencing replies, 337 00:17:28,680 --> 00:17:30,840 Speaker 1: then by definition you're in you know, you're kind of 338 00:17:30,920 --> 00:17:35,360 Speaker 1: enacting a shadowman type regime. So that doesn't read as 339 00:17:35,680 --> 00:17:39,080 Speaker 1: free or fair speech either. And right Actually, like I 340 00:17:39,280 --> 00:17:41,359 Speaker 1: really dispute a lot of the whole like freedom of 341 00:17:41,359 --> 00:17:43,480 Speaker 1: reach stuff. I'm for freedom of reach. I think the 342 00:17:43,520 --> 00:17:47,280 Speaker 1: algorithm should be completely fair to everybody because then there's 343 00:17:47,280 --> 00:17:49,719 Speaker 1: no manipulation. And whenever you have it, as long as 344 00:17:49,720 --> 00:17:52,840 Speaker 1: it's consistent with the First Amendment, everybody can be reasonably 345 00:17:53,240 --> 00:17:57,040 Speaker 1: everybody can be reasonably trust to trust that when you 346 00:17:57,119 --> 00:17:59,080 Speaker 1: send a tweet or I send a tweet, that they 347 00:17:59,119 --> 00:18:02,399 Speaker 1: are treated exactly the same. Yeah, that's what actual engagement 348 00:18:02,480 --> 00:18:05,199 Speaker 1: on you know, a real town square, That's what it 349 00:18:05,200 --> 00:18:08,280 Speaker 1: would look like. Yes, yes, I totally agree. And that's 350 00:18:08,320 --> 00:18:12,520 Speaker 1: one piece that to me is notably absent from the 351 00:18:13,000 --> 00:18:16,679 Speaker 1: Twitter files revelations is there's nothing in here about the 352 00:18:16,680 --> 00:18:20,600 Speaker 1: way the algorithm operates, which types of accounts, which types 353 00:18:20,640 --> 00:18:23,840 Speaker 1: of content it elevates, how it's making these decisions, what 354 00:18:23,920 --> 00:18:27,080 Speaker 1: the overall impact on the platform has been. I think 355 00:18:27,160 --> 00:18:29,760 Speaker 1: that is almost as important. I mean, it is to 356 00:18:29,800 --> 00:18:33,119 Speaker 1: be as important as anything else, And maybe I'm particularly 357 00:18:33,160 --> 00:18:36,320 Speaker 1: sensitive to it because YouTube is so algorithmically driven at 358 00:18:36,359 --> 00:18:38,520 Speaker 1: this point that you really see on a day to 359 00:18:38,600 --> 00:18:41,679 Speaker 1: day basis how you know they can make anything just 360 00:18:41,840 --> 00:18:46,720 Speaker 1: arbitrarily super successful and get million plus views. They can 361 00:18:46,760 --> 00:18:49,439 Speaker 1: crush anything and suppress it, and you have no way 362 00:18:49,640 --> 00:18:51,800 Speaker 1: of really knowing. You can look at some of your 363 00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:53,639 Speaker 1: back end stats and say like, well, why is the 364 00:18:53,640 --> 00:18:56,280 Speaker 1: click through rate so high and the view count so low, 365 00:18:56,600 --> 00:18:59,359 Speaker 1: and you can sort of like piece together that the 366 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:03,920 Speaker 1: algorithm screwed you over for whatever reason. But there continues 367 00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:07,480 Speaker 1: to be zero transparency around any of how this operates, 368 00:19:07,480 --> 00:19:09,320 Speaker 1: and I agree with you, Saga, the freedom of reach 369 00:19:09,359 --> 00:19:13,639 Speaker 1: stuff is incredibly, incredibly pernicious. I mean that amounts to 370 00:19:13,680 --> 00:19:16,880 Speaker 1: a shadow band as well. Where Yeah, if certain types 371 00:19:16,920 --> 00:19:19,280 Speaker 1: of content is propped up and put in front of 372 00:19:19,280 --> 00:19:21,119 Speaker 1: a bunch of people, of course it's going to go 373 00:19:21,240 --> 00:19:24,120 Speaker 1: further than if you're just like not displaying people's replies. 374 00:19:24,160 --> 00:19:26,520 Speaker 1: If you're not displaying their tweets, when you have that 375 00:19:26,600 --> 00:19:29,639 Speaker 1: algorithmically driven feed, that's as much of a problem to 376 00:19:29,640 --> 00:19:32,480 Speaker 1: me as anything else. Totally agree. All right. Finally, this 377 00:19:32,720 --> 00:19:36,720 Speaker 1: happened late last night. Dave Chappelle, performing at the Chase 378 00:19:36,760 --> 00:19:41,320 Speaker 1: Center in San Francisco, decides to bring Elon Musk on stage. 379 00:19:41,600 --> 00:19:44,600 Speaker 1: Let's just say the results were unexpected for mister Musk. 380 00:19:44,800 --> 00:20:02,040 Speaker 1: Let's take a listen, make some noise whether riches cheers 381 00:20:08,560 --> 00:20:14,040 Speaker 1: don't expecting VENs luio. It sounds like some of them 382 00:20:14,080 --> 00:20:22,160 Speaker 1: people fired in the audience. Who uh is acious pooing? Also, 383 00:20:22,280 --> 00:20:24,280 Speaker 1: just so you know, the original account that tweeted out 384 00:20:24,320 --> 00:20:28,280 Speaker 1: that video was deleted off of Twitter. Uh, nobody knows why. 385 00:20:28,680 --> 00:20:30,960 Speaker 1: We'll see as to whether Musk himself is a little 386 00:20:31,000 --> 00:20:34,359 Speaker 1: bit sensitive about that. I mean, look, it probably sucks 387 00:20:34,359 --> 00:20:37,119 Speaker 1: to get booed by thousands of people that said, I 388 00:20:37,160 --> 00:20:38,680 Speaker 1: don't really know why it would have been a good 389 00:20:38,680 --> 00:20:42,000 Speaker 1: idea for him to go on stage in San Francisco, 390 00:20:42,440 --> 00:20:44,720 Speaker 1: like we're talking here about Okay, First of all, who 391 00:20:44,720 --> 00:20:46,520 Speaker 1: can afford to go to a Dave Chappelle in downtown 392 00:20:46,560 --> 00:20:50,360 Speaker 1: San Francisco. Obviously only probably rich tech people in San Francisco, 393 00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:53,359 Speaker 1: and those people are probably friends. Dave was really onto 394 00:20:53,359 --> 00:20:54,720 Speaker 1: something when he was like, maybe some of the people 395 00:20:54,760 --> 00:20:57,639 Speaker 1: you fired are here in the audience. Maybe not them specifically, 396 00:20:57,680 --> 00:21:00,640 Speaker 1: but maybe some of their friends actually were in the audience. 397 00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:03,119 Speaker 1: So it was a mistake to think that he is 398 00:21:03,200 --> 00:21:05,080 Speaker 1: the San Francisco hero. Well, I think if he gone 399 00:21:05,119 --> 00:21:08,320 Speaker 1: up in what Miami or you know, any like not 400 00:21:08,359 --> 00:21:10,720 Speaker 1: even like Red State, like half and half type place, 401 00:21:10,760 --> 00:21:13,119 Speaker 1: I mean, he probably would have been fired, but maybe maybe. 402 00:21:13,160 --> 00:21:15,480 Speaker 1: I mean, this was going to be definitely the toughest audience, 403 00:21:15,520 --> 00:21:17,239 Speaker 1: because it is not far fetch to think that there 404 00:21:17,280 --> 00:21:19,280 Speaker 1: were literally people in the audience that he fired. Ye, 405 00:21:19,400 --> 00:21:22,280 Speaker 1: I mean, it's not crazy to think that whatsoever. I 406 00:21:22,400 --> 00:21:25,359 Speaker 1: was looking because I saw some pulling maybe like a 407 00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:28,040 Speaker 1: week or two ago. His approval rating used to be 408 00:21:28,119 --> 00:21:31,399 Speaker 1: really really high with the American public, and now I 409 00:21:31,440 --> 00:21:34,080 Speaker 1: mean his plummet had fallen off a cliff in terms 410 00:21:34,119 --> 00:21:37,000 Speaker 1: of personal popularity. And I also just saw this morning 411 00:21:37,280 --> 00:21:40,800 Speaker 1: actually Tesla as a company, their approval rating has now 412 00:21:40,800 --> 00:21:43,800 Speaker 1: dipped into negative territory for the first time. So I 413 00:21:43,840 --> 00:21:46,120 Speaker 1: don't know if he realizes the way that the public 414 00:21:46,200 --> 00:21:49,040 Speaker 1: is perceiving him right now, and just how like erratic 415 00:21:49,080 --> 00:21:51,720 Speaker 1: and all over the place his management style has been that. 416 00:21:51,880 --> 00:21:54,800 Speaker 1: I mean, whatever you think of him and his politics, 417 00:21:54,840 --> 00:21:57,679 Speaker 1: the terrible decision making Twitter blue, the rollout of that 418 00:21:57,760 --> 00:21:59,720 Speaker 1: was a disaster. The way all of this has been 419 00:21:59,720 --> 00:22:01,679 Speaker 1: going is just sort of like all over the place. 420 00:22:02,119 --> 00:22:05,720 Speaker 1: It has also taken some of the shine off the 421 00:22:05,800 --> 00:22:09,280 Speaker 1: idea that he's this you know, world historic genius and 422 00:22:09,320 --> 00:22:13,000 Speaker 1: he's this brilliant mastermind when all the decision making seems 423 00:22:13,040 --> 00:22:16,560 Speaker 1: so messy and chaotical. Yeah, honestly, I think it's really sad. 424 00:22:16,600 --> 00:22:19,080 Speaker 1: I mean, like the idea that Tesla's negative approval will go. 425 00:22:19,080 --> 00:22:21,040 Speaker 1: I mean, look, also probably too hard right now to 426 00:22:21,040 --> 00:22:22,920 Speaker 1: buy a Tesla anyway in terms of delivery, So maybe 427 00:22:22,960 --> 00:22:25,480 Speaker 1: it's a good thing for would be, but you know, 428 00:22:25,480 --> 00:22:27,640 Speaker 1: I'm taking it out on an electric car company, which 429 00:22:27,680 --> 00:22:30,879 Speaker 1: basically changed the game. Like that's a huge mistake. That said, like, 430 00:22:30,960 --> 00:22:35,240 Speaker 1: he is the CEO of Tesla and CEO of SpaceX, 431 00:22:35,280 --> 00:22:37,280 Speaker 1: and the last thing you actually want to do is 432 00:22:37,320 --> 00:22:39,720 Speaker 1: politicize electric cars. That was one of the things that 433 00:22:39,760 --> 00:22:42,640 Speaker 1: really bothered me about the Inflation Reduction Act when everybody 434 00:22:42,680 --> 00:22:45,720 Speaker 1: started attacking, for example, like the Ford F one fifty lightning. 435 00:22:45,720 --> 00:22:48,040 Speaker 1: I'm like, yo, we're in gen one here, Like this 436 00:22:48,160 --> 00:22:51,680 Speaker 1: is the frontier of the of the electric truck. I'm 437 00:22:51,720 --> 00:22:54,160 Speaker 1: not saying it's great that you know, the mile miles 438 00:22:54,320 --> 00:22:56,480 Speaker 1: is like eighty miles or whatever whenever you put a 439 00:22:56,520 --> 00:22:59,000 Speaker 1: real load, but it's you know, it would the first 440 00:22:59,160 --> 00:23:02,600 Speaker 1: It's something like that. It's not great that said. Look, 441 00:23:02,680 --> 00:23:04,679 Speaker 1: Model T wasn't a great car. Or if you go 442 00:23:04,760 --> 00:23:06,240 Speaker 1: back and if you look at some of the original 443 00:23:06,320 --> 00:23:08,760 Speaker 1: rules rooices from like nineteen ten and what you had 444 00:23:08,760 --> 00:23:10,680 Speaker 1: to do with the handspinning and even some of the 445 00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:12,639 Speaker 1: electric it was bad. It took a long time for 446 00:23:12,720 --> 00:23:14,360 Speaker 1: us to get to the point where we are now. 447 00:23:14,440 --> 00:23:19,960 Speaker 1: So I just let's not culture war and politicize breakthrough 448 00:23:20,000 --> 00:23:23,480 Speaker 1: technology which could genuinely change and even today. I mean, look, around. 449 00:23:23,520 --> 00:23:25,640 Speaker 1: How many tessels and electric cars do you see out there? 450 00:23:25,640 --> 00:23:28,439 Speaker 1: There's a lot that are on the road. That's a 451 00:23:28,440 --> 00:23:31,359 Speaker 1: real victory. That's a breakthrough, not even on climate like 452 00:23:31,400 --> 00:23:35,680 Speaker 1: in terms of our reliance on foreign oil and even 453 00:23:35,800 --> 00:23:39,520 Speaker 1: like our own domestic energy production. This let's keep these 454 00:23:39,560 --> 00:23:42,200 Speaker 1: things separate. Well, but a lot of the public doesn't 455 00:23:42,200 --> 00:23:43,960 Speaker 1: want self a lot more favors on that. I agree, 456 00:23:44,240 --> 00:23:47,040 Speaker 1: I know for real, And that is one area where 457 00:23:47,200 --> 00:23:49,920 Speaker 1: he needs to be really careful, which is my fear, 458 00:23:49,960 --> 00:23:53,240 Speaker 1: is that he will tarnish his genuine like engineering legacy. 459 00:23:53,560 --> 00:23:56,400 Speaker 1: Because you know, there's a great book, it's twenty seventeen 460 00:23:56,600 --> 00:24:00,199 Speaker 1: Elon Musk biography. It's well written because it's before he 461 00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:02,560 Speaker 1: was political in any way. This is the actual story 462 00:24:02,680 --> 00:24:06,359 Speaker 1: of PayPal, of SpaceX, of Tesla, and these are remarkable 463 00:24:06,400 --> 00:24:10,639 Speaker 1: engineering feats of which nobody ever expected to actually happen. 464 00:24:10,680 --> 00:24:13,199 Speaker 1: He's the first person to create like a genuine rocket 465 00:24:13,359 --> 00:24:16,800 Speaker 1: competitor to the Boeing and North I forget exactly what 466 00:24:16,800 --> 00:24:18,760 Speaker 1: it was. There's a monopoly that used to exist in 467 00:24:18,800 --> 00:24:21,040 Speaker 1: the space. We've reduced the price of satellites, like so 468 00:24:21,200 --> 00:24:24,720 Speaker 1: much actual good that has been done on that front, 469 00:24:24,760 --> 00:24:27,240 Speaker 1: and you know, not even ruining his legacy, but changing 470 00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:29,520 Speaker 1: his legacy into something else like that can have major 471 00:24:29,520 --> 00:24:32,439 Speaker 1: detrimental effects on his other not only sources of wealth, 472 00:24:32,440 --> 00:24:34,760 Speaker 1: but like really the genuine good that he has done 473 00:24:35,359 --> 00:24:39,840 Speaker 1: in the sphere of engineering. Personally, I am just irritated 474 00:24:39,880 --> 00:24:41,959 Speaker 1: because I want him to focus less time on like 475 00:24:42,080 --> 00:24:44,359 Speaker 1: trolling on Twitter and more time on making it so 476 00:24:44,400 --> 00:24:46,280 Speaker 1: that I can get Internet at my house. Yeah, that's right, 477 00:24:47,000 --> 00:24:50,480 Speaker 1: that's my starsonal beef. Get on top of starling for 478 00:24:50,560 --> 00:24:53,800 Speaker 1: the East Coast. It's long overdue. Make it so I 479 00:24:53,800 --> 00:24:56,720 Speaker 1: can record segments in my house, and then I will, 480 00:24:57,160 --> 00:24:59,280 Speaker 1: you know, I will overlook some other things, although I 481 00:24:59,280 --> 00:25:03,520 Speaker 1: will still be a so speaking of Elon boomer posting, 482 00:25:04,119 --> 00:25:07,040 Speaker 1: posting outside of normal, let's go to the next part here, 483 00:25:07,320 --> 00:25:10,399 Speaker 1: the Fauci one Elon out of the blue, almost a 484 00:25:10,480 --> 00:25:12,880 Speaker 1: year late to the cycle. Let's put this out there 485 00:25:12,920 --> 00:25:17,879 Speaker 1: on the screen. Tweets out quote my pronouns are prosecute slash. 486 00:25:18,040 --> 00:25:23,879 Speaker 1: Fauci replied this morning quote truth resonates again totally unprompted. 487 00:25:24,640 --> 00:25:29,639 Speaker 1: Also followed up with this is a true top tier 488 00:25:29,840 --> 00:25:32,640 Speaker 1: boomer meme. Let's go to the next one here from 489 00:25:32,760 --> 00:25:37,360 Speaker 1: Lord of the Rains, just one more lockedown, King of Fauci, 490 00:25:37,400 --> 00:25:41,200 Speaker 1: whispering into the cursed king whose mind has been taken 491 00:25:41,240 --> 00:25:43,560 Speaker 1: over it. There actually is quite a bit there again, 492 00:25:43,640 --> 00:25:47,520 Speaker 1: though literally a year late to the cycle. You know. 493 00:25:47,760 --> 00:25:51,119 Speaker 1: The funny thing is, though, is so many people also 494 00:25:51,560 --> 00:25:55,639 Speaker 1: cannot resist taking the bait like he's clearly trolling, and 495 00:25:55,720 --> 00:25:59,439 Speaker 1: yet the freak out on this Fauci tweet and also 496 00:25:59,560 --> 00:26:02,600 Speaker 1: on criticizing yoel Roth, which I'll get to in a 497 00:26:02,640 --> 00:26:05,159 Speaker 1: little bit. I have never It's like it broke. He 498 00:26:05,240 --> 00:26:08,400 Speaker 1: broke people's brains, almost secondary to the way Trump did. 499 00:26:08,440 --> 00:26:11,320 Speaker 1: For example, let's put this up there, doctor Peter Hotez, 500 00:26:11,800 --> 00:26:13,239 Speaker 1: who some of you might have remember from the Joe 501 00:26:13,320 --> 00:26:16,760 Speaker 1: Rogan broadcast. Doctor Fauchi has done nothing wrong except served 502 00:26:16,800 --> 00:26:19,520 Speaker 1: our nation. In the meantime, mister Mustard know two hundred 503 00:26:19,520 --> 00:26:22,120 Speaker 1: thousand Americans and EVEI lost their lives from COVID due 504 00:26:22,119 --> 00:26:25,440 Speaker 1: to this kind of anti science rhetoric and disinformation. It's 505 00:26:25,440 --> 00:26:28,480 Speaker 1: not anti science or disinformation to say you should prosecute Fvauchi. 506 00:26:28,480 --> 00:26:31,919 Speaker 1: That's actually a misusing of saying this. He also says, Elon, 507 00:26:32,000 --> 00:26:33,879 Speaker 1: I am asking you to take down this tweet the 508 00:26:33,960 --> 00:26:38,800 Speaker 1: sanctimony man again, like, who are you criticize the tweet? Whatever? Second, 509 00:26:39,080 --> 00:26:43,199 Speaker 1: I found Yoel roth who again we'll all remember the 510 00:26:43,240 --> 00:26:46,440 Speaker 1: former Trust safety head. He actually after he quit Elon 511 00:26:46,520 --> 00:26:49,080 Speaker 1: musk Twitter did interviews where he defended taking down one 512 00:26:49,119 --> 00:26:53,720 Speaker 1: hunter byden laptop story, defended banning the Babylon be basically 513 00:26:54,200 --> 00:26:58,040 Speaker 1: has been a complete front man for the entire censorship regime. 514 00:26:58,400 --> 00:27:00,879 Speaker 1: So there's like a back and forth going on. Elon 515 00:27:00,960 --> 00:27:05,760 Speaker 1: tweets a segment of his thesis from his PhD where 516 00:27:06,200 --> 00:27:10,280 Speaker 1: and look, some people are saying it's misquoted out of contented. 517 00:27:10,600 --> 00:27:13,560 Speaker 1: This going, okay, listen, go ahead and finish and that 518 00:27:13,680 --> 00:27:15,520 Speaker 1: I'll tell you my RESPONSEI people are one. I'm going 519 00:27:15,560 --> 00:27:18,960 Speaker 1: to defend Youoel roth On. Unfortunately, so Yoel in his 520 00:27:19,119 --> 00:27:23,160 Speaker 1: senior the or sorry, his PhD thesis was, I guess 521 00:27:23,359 --> 00:27:28,720 Speaker 1: arguing in a broader context around when and how teenagers 522 00:27:28,760 --> 00:27:32,160 Speaker 1: should appear on the gay app Grinder. Now you can dispute, 523 00:27:32,160 --> 00:27:34,600 Speaker 1: all right, Okay, here's what I said. It says on 524 00:27:34,760 --> 00:27:38,159 Speaker 1: Grinder there are teenagers and this is an issue because 525 00:27:38,280 --> 00:27:41,320 Speaker 1: this is, like you know, Grinder is oftentimes about queer 526 00:27:41,359 --> 00:27:45,520 Speaker 1: hookups and so he's saying that more effective than trying 527 00:27:45,560 --> 00:27:48,520 Speaker 1: to ban them from the platform, which isn't going to work. 528 00:27:48,800 --> 00:27:50,960 Speaker 1: What you need to do is figure out another way 529 00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:53,439 Speaker 1: for them to be safely on the platform, which, in 530 00:27:53,440 --> 00:27:56,240 Speaker 1: my view, there is nothing wrong with saying. Somebody else 531 00:27:56,440 --> 00:28:00,119 Speaker 1: also grabs some old tweet of his where again, and 532 00:28:00,440 --> 00:28:04,760 Speaker 1: it's he said he linked to an article arguing that 533 00:28:04,800 --> 00:28:09,480 Speaker 1: there is no instance in which high school students can 534 00:28:10,200 --> 00:28:13,560 Speaker 1: consent to sex with the teacher, and he basically like 535 00:28:14,680 --> 00:28:17,119 Speaker 1: agreed with that, but they took it out of context 536 00:28:17,200 --> 00:28:19,200 Speaker 1: and made it seem like he was questioned like, oh, 537 00:28:19,240 --> 00:28:23,840 Speaker 1: maybe students can so listen. Joel Roth was a completely 538 00:28:23,880 --> 00:28:26,080 Speaker 1: ideological actor. Yes, I mean that's the other thing that 539 00:28:26,119 --> 00:28:28,760 Speaker 1: comes out in the Twitter files is like there's a 540 00:28:28,760 --> 00:28:31,400 Speaker 1: lot of people, there's a lot of dysfunction. It's one 541 00:28:31,440 --> 00:28:35,200 Speaker 1: off decision making. Most people in any organization don't really 542 00:28:35,240 --> 00:28:37,399 Speaker 1: want to make decisions because they don't want to be 543 00:28:37,480 --> 00:28:40,400 Speaker 1: on this hot seat. You had Vijayagatti and Yoel Roth 544 00:28:40,440 --> 00:28:43,760 Speaker 1: who were ideological actors. They grabbed the reins. Jack was 545 00:28:43,800 --> 00:28:46,640 Speaker 1: like an absentee boss, and they just did whatever the 546 00:28:46,680 --> 00:28:48,760 Speaker 1: hell they wanted to do, and they came up with 547 00:28:48,880 --> 00:28:50,840 Speaker 1: justifications after the fact. I mean, that's the thing with 548 00:28:50,960 --> 00:28:53,680 Speaker 1: like the Trump stuff. They wanted to ban him, and 549 00:28:53,720 --> 00:28:56,600 Speaker 1: they came up with justifications after the fact to make 550 00:28:56,640 --> 00:28:59,640 Speaker 1: it so that they could justify it, even as they acknowledged, like, 551 00:28:59,680 --> 00:29:02,360 Speaker 1: this is not how we're treating other world leaders. So 552 00:29:03,000 --> 00:29:05,840 Speaker 1: I criticized your Ralph for that. I don't know why 553 00:29:05,920 --> 00:29:08,040 Speaker 1: you're trying to make this like whole like pretend like 554 00:29:08,080 --> 00:29:10,960 Speaker 1: he's some groomer weirdo like on that stuff point. So 555 00:29:11,120 --> 00:29:13,280 Speaker 1: I have an issue with that part of it. Criticize 556 00:29:13,280 --> 00:29:15,640 Speaker 1: you all, Roth, I just did it. He totally deserves 557 00:29:15,680 --> 00:29:18,960 Speaker 1: that scrutiny for his ideological acting at Twitter. This stuff 558 00:29:19,040 --> 00:29:22,920 Speaker 1: is like gross nonsense in my So anyway, Bloomberg came 559 00:29:22,960 --> 00:29:24,840 Speaker 1: out and put it up there on the screen, and 560 00:29:24,920 --> 00:29:27,440 Speaker 1: I just found this remarkable for the way that this 561 00:29:27,560 --> 00:29:29,840 Speaker 1: was phrase. This is from Danahol, who is actually the 562 00:29:29,840 --> 00:29:34,920 Speaker 1: Bloomberg reporter over covering Tesla and SpaceX in San Francisco. 563 00:29:35,000 --> 00:29:37,920 Speaker 1: She says, quote, I was not planning to work this Saturday, 564 00:29:37,920 --> 00:29:41,880 Speaker 1: but Elon Musk's attacks on Yoel cannot be ignored, almost 565 00:29:41,920 --> 00:29:46,160 Speaker 1: as if it's like a strange personal crusade and look, 566 00:29:46,360 --> 00:29:49,440 Speaker 1: I mean you can give your pushback, Crystal. I thought 567 00:29:49,440 --> 00:29:51,880 Speaker 1: it was a little weird what he wrote there that 568 00:29:52,040 --> 00:29:56,480 Speaker 1: said I don't understand and you know, you criticize it 569 00:29:56,800 --> 00:29:59,920 Speaker 1: or you're defending it. On the substance, there seems to 570 00:29:59,960 --> 00:30:05,720 Speaker 1: be be this deep personal connection between the Silicon Valley reporters, 571 00:30:05,760 --> 00:30:10,000 Speaker 1: the tech press, and the former Twitter sensors Vajia Goda 572 00:30:10,400 --> 00:30:12,400 Speaker 1: and yoel And I found this out the hard way. 573 00:30:12,480 --> 00:30:16,840 Speaker 1: Remember back whenever I tweeted my criticism of Vijia and 574 00:30:16,880 --> 00:30:19,480 Speaker 1: Elon replied, and then the Washington Post basically accused me 575 00:30:19,520 --> 00:30:24,120 Speaker 1: of inciting racist attacks against her, emailing James for a 576 00:30:24,200 --> 00:30:27,120 Speaker 1: producer at two am in the morning and being like, 577 00:30:27,160 --> 00:30:29,560 Speaker 1: why exactly did he tweet this? Like what was he 578 00:30:29,640 --> 00:30:33,920 Speaker 1: hoping to accomplish? All this completely bs attacks? And I 579 00:30:34,000 --> 00:30:35,560 Speaker 1: said it was off the record, so I won't go 580 00:30:35,600 --> 00:30:38,520 Speaker 1: into the full specifics of my conversation with that reporter, 581 00:30:38,640 --> 00:30:41,840 Speaker 1: but it was generally implied that there was a relationship 582 00:30:42,040 --> 00:30:45,520 Speaker 1: between the reporter and between Vigaia Goda, and I was like, oh, 583 00:30:45,640 --> 00:30:47,520 Speaker 1: that's what this is all about. I pissed off your 584 00:30:47,640 --> 00:30:50,520 Speaker 1: you because you're her friend, right and it's like you're 585 00:30:50,560 --> 00:30:54,720 Speaker 1: attacking me and Elon because you're personal friends with this lady. Again, 586 00:30:54,760 --> 00:30:57,520 Speaker 1: I won't give you the exact specifics, but that was 587 00:30:57,600 --> 00:31:00,600 Speaker 1: the general contours of what happened, and whenever I was 588 00:31:00,680 --> 00:31:04,880 Speaker 1: yelling at her for basically smearing me, listen for this 589 00:31:04,920 --> 00:31:07,320 Speaker 1: particular article, I'm going to say, I don't have a 590 00:31:07,320 --> 00:31:10,200 Speaker 1: problem with it because of the context that I just explained. 591 00:31:10,280 --> 00:31:13,640 Speaker 1: But your point stands, and no one should be surprised 592 00:31:13,880 --> 00:31:17,280 Speaker 1: that the journalists covering the tech sector or cozy with 593 00:31:17,360 --> 00:31:20,680 Speaker 1: some of the top officials in the tech sector, because 594 00:31:20,720 --> 00:31:23,560 Speaker 1: that's the way all of journalism apparently works at this point. 595 00:31:23,800 --> 00:31:26,680 Speaker 1: You know, it's about your access, it's about your coziness. 596 00:31:26,720 --> 00:31:28,920 Speaker 1: It's about your you know, ability to get into these 597 00:31:28,960 --> 00:31:32,160 Speaker 1: circles and network in them. That's how you get elevated 598 00:31:32,200 --> 00:31:34,960 Speaker 1: in terms of your career prospects, not from holding them 599 00:31:35,000 --> 00:31:38,320 Speaker 1: to account, but from like holding their hands. That's basically 600 00:31:38,360 --> 00:31:40,440 Speaker 1: the way that you get ahead in these industries. You 601 00:31:40,480 --> 00:31:42,880 Speaker 1: say the same thing with Sam bankmuin Freed, right. I 602 00:31:42,920 --> 00:31:45,200 Speaker 1: mean the way that you know, they felt like they 603 00:31:45,240 --> 00:31:47,000 Speaker 1: were buddies with him and they got him and he 604 00:31:47,040 --> 00:31:49,440 Speaker 1: was the cool kid of crypto, and so none of 605 00:31:49,480 --> 00:31:52,920 Speaker 1: the scrutiny that he deserved ultimately was there. And you 606 00:31:52,960 --> 00:31:55,160 Speaker 1: also have to say, like you know, a lot of 607 00:31:55,240 --> 00:32:00,400 Speaker 1: the reporters covering this beat, they are ideologically in saying 608 00:32:00,480 --> 00:32:03,719 Speaker 1: because they're journalists, they are ideologically in favor of censorship. 609 00:32:03,880 --> 00:32:08,440 Speaker 1: So they don't see what Joel Roth and Vijaya Gotti 610 00:32:08,640 --> 00:32:11,680 Speaker 1: were doing as problematic at all. They see them as 611 00:32:11,720 --> 00:32:14,320 Speaker 1: like heroes in this story, and so of course they 612 00:32:14,360 --> 00:32:17,600 Speaker 1: wouldn't apply critical lens because in their view, they're doing 613 00:32:17,640 --> 00:32:20,640 Speaker 1: the right thing. No, I think you're right. There's clearly 614 00:32:20,680 --> 00:32:23,000 Speaker 1: like a weird high school element to this. But the 615 00:32:23,000 --> 00:32:25,280 Speaker 1: reason it matters is these people are all very powerful 616 00:32:25,320 --> 00:32:27,840 Speaker 1: and look, I got my criticisms of the political press. 617 00:32:27,880 --> 00:32:30,120 Speaker 1: Even they would be humiliated to act the way that 618 00:32:30,200 --> 00:32:32,400 Speaker 1: some of these tech journalists are. I think it's crazy, 619 00:32:32,480 --> 00:32:35,400 Speaker 1: like watching Kara Swisher and so some of these other 620 00:32:35,400 --> 00:32:39,200 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Washington Post lady who attacked me like they're basically 621 00:32:39,320 --> 00:32:41,120 Speaker 1: using their I mean, here's what I would say. The 622 00:32:41,160 --> 00:32:43,680 Speaker 1: Bloomberg White House team, I know they would never act 623 00:32:43,680 --> 00:32:46,560 Speaker 1: this way with the Biden team. There is something uniquely 624 00:32:46,720 --> 00:32:49,760 Speaker 1: bad about the Taylor Rens is the Ben Collins, the 625 00:32:49,760 --> 00:32:52,960 Speaker 1: Brandy whatever her name is over at NBC News, plus 626 00:32:53,040 --> 00:32:57,040 Speaker 1: the tech journals, where they are so ideologically committed to 627 00:32:57,120 --> 00:33:01,040 Speaker 1: the entire idea of censorship and misinformation and defending those 628 00:33:01,080 --> 00:33:03,840 Speaker 1: people at all costs. I find it insane because they 629 00:33:03,880 --> 00:33:07,120 Speaker 1: really don't realize how powerful that they actually are. Okay, 630 00:33:07,120 --> 00:33:09,760 Speaker 1: that's a conversation around the media. But let's get back 631 00:33:09,800 --> 00:33:14,160 Speaker 1: to what Elon was actually talking about with Fauci. Because Fauci, 632 00:33:14,520 --> 00:33:17,560 Speaker 1: as we've said, is retiring. This is actually his last month, 633 00:33:17,840 --> 00:33:20,520 Speaker 1: and he went out with a real bang in the 634 00:33:20,560 --> 00:33:22,680 Speaker 1: New York Times to put up there on the screen. 635 00:33:23,280 --> 00:33:25,920 Speaker 1: He says, doctor Anthony Fauci a message to the next 636 00:33:25,960 --> 00:33:29,920 Speaker 1: generation of scientists. I will just highlight what's not in 637 00:33:29,960 --> 00:33:34,840 Speaker 1: the message. Gain of function, anything about funding or researching 638 00:33:34,960 --> 00:33:40,920 Speaker 1: dangerous viruses in labs, anything about the lab league, anything 639 00:33:40,920 --> 00:33:44,160 Speaker 1: about being truthful with the American people. I read the 640 00:33:44,280 --> 00:33:47,920 Speaker 1: entire thing. It is really just like a hagiography to himself, 641 00:33:47,960 --> 00:33:49,880 Speaker 1: which shows you how much of an egotist he is. 642 00:33:50,320 --> 00:33:53,800 Speaker 1: About his long career fighting HIV AIDS by the way, 643 00:33:53,840 --> 00:33:56,000 Speaker 1: which there's a lot of criticis about the way that 644 00:33:56,040 --> 00:34:00,800 Speaker 1: he handled HIV aids and the whole was a some 645 00:34:00,840 --> 00:34:04,560 Speaker 1: of the initial clinical trials and essentially some of the 646 00:34:04,640 --> 00:34:08,240 Speaker 1: policies that he greenlit also at the time, but secondary 647 00:34:08,400 --> 00:34:13,040 Speaker 1: he does not address even once the criticism of himself 648 00:34:13,360 --> 00:34:17,839 Speaker 1: and also his conflation of himself with science, which was 649 00:34:18,080 --> 00:34:21,920 Speaker 1: perhaps the greatest blow to the scientific method and to 650 00:34:22,719 --> 00:34:26,760 Speaker 1: the scientific establishment itself in modern history. I mean, Vinet 651 00:34:26,840 --> 00:34:29,680 Speaker 1: Pissad is highlighted here. Many of the missteps and the 652 00:34:29,719 --> 00:34:34,080 Speaker 1: mistakes of the vaccination campaign are already killing polio vaccination 653 00:34:34,239 --> 00:34:37,839 Speaker 1: campaigns for children. You can expect measles to go through 654 00:34:37,840 --> 00:34:40,120 Speaker 1: the roof after this. A lot of people are going 655 00:34:40,200 --> 00:34:42,080 Speaker 1: to have a hell of a lot more questions around 656 00:34:42,160 --> 00:34:45,839 Speaker 1: child immunizations. They are going to not trust any sort 657 00:34:45,880 --> 00:34:48,640 Speaker 1: of Okay, let me ask you this. If they came 658 00:34:48,680 --> 00:34:50,520 Speaker 1: out and said you need to wear a mask again tomorrow, 659 00:34:50,560 --> 00:34:52,680 Speaker 1: which actually the CDC has come out and said and 660 00:34:52,760 --> 00:34:55,600 Speaker 1: is recommending masks during a holiday travel in the year 661 00:34:55,640 --> 00:34:59,000 Speaker 1: twenty twenty two. When you see that and nobody abides 662 00:34:59,040 --> 00:35:01,920 Speaker 1: by it, you've act actually diminished your own ability to 663 00:35:02,000 --> 00:35:04,960 Speaker 1: influence public opinion. And I think he was at the 664 00:35:04,960 --> 00:35:07,520 Speaker 1: center of it. You always talk about those interviews that 665 00:35:07,600 --> 00:35:09,800 Speaker 1: he gave where he talked about how he would change 666 00:35:10,080 --> 00:35:13,319 Speaker 1: his scientific facts and benchmarks based on what he thought 667 00:35:13,320 --> 00:35:16,680 Speaker 1: public opinion was. Yes, yeah, I mean there's one line 668 00:35:16,680 --> 00:35:19,800 Speaker 1: in here that really stood down to me. He says 669 00:35:20,000 --> 00:35:26,680 Speaker 1: that such truths about viruses may be uncomfortable or politically inconvenient, 670 00:35:26,760 --> 00:35:31,560 Speaker 1: because extraordinary things can happen when science and politics work 671 00:35:31,600 --> 00:35:34,960 Speaker 1: and in hand. I was like, this one comment is 672 00:35:35,040 --> 00:35:38,359 Speaker 1: kind of revealing. I mean, listen, at this point, you know, 673 00:35:38,600 --> 00:35:44,840 Speaker 1: the hagiography of Fauci, the lionizing of him, the making 674 00:35:44,920 --> 00:35:48,440 Speaker 1: him into a saint. I just don't understand how you 675 00:35:48,480 --> 00:35:51,839 Speaker 1: can still sustain it. I can imagine you saying, well, 676 00:35:51,880 --> 00:35:54,400 Speaker 1: I don't know that he deserves to be prosecuted. I 677 00:35:54,400 --> 00:35:56,400 Speaker 1: don't know that, you know, just pinning all the blame 678 00:35:56,440 --> 00:35:59,359 Speaker 1: on this one man that seems a little unhinged, Like, yes, 679 00:35:59,440 --> 00:36:02,520 Speaker 1: I think there is some Fauci derangement syndrome. But I 680 00:36:02,560 --> 00:36:04,320 Speaker 1: was actually I was just talking to a friend of 681 00:36:04,360 --> 00:36:06,960 Speaker 1: mine who's a nurse practitioner over the weekend, who is 682 00:36:07,080 --> 00:36:11,160 Speaker 1: a liberal, and she was telling me how damaging it was, 683 00:36:11,280 --> 00:36:14,640 Speaker 1: especially at the beginning of the pandemic, the straight out 684 00:36:14,719 --> 00:36:17,120 Speaker 1: lies that were going out from the government about how 685 00:36:17,120 --> 00:36:21,359 Speaker 1: many test kits were available, I mean those and that 686 00:36:21,800 --> 00:36:26,399 Speaker 1: was a huge, massive, embarrassing failure at the beginning of 687 00:36:26,480 --> 00:36:29,759 Speaker 1: this pandemic, where other you know, much less developed, much 688 00:36:29,840 --> 00:36:32,200 Speaker 1: less wealthy nations were able to get their acts together 689 00:36:32,239 --> 00:36:35,200 Speaker 1: on testing long before we did, and the government's trying 690 00:36:35,239 --> 00:36:38,040 Speaker 1: to cover it up. Oh, all the test kids are on. No, No, 691 00:36:38,320 --> 00:36:43,680 Speaker 1: they weren't. Obviously the uh of like just obvious lies 692 00:36:43,880 --> 00:36:46,319 Speaker 1: about masking that were the beginning of the pandemic. I 693 00:36:46,360 --> 00:36:48,040 Speaker 1: just don't know how you can look at these things. 694 00:36:48,040 --> 00:36:51,080 Speaker 1: The herd Immunity conference where you know the oh, the 695 00:36:51,120 --> 00:36:55,160 Speaker 1: percentage was constantly changing again based on what and Fauci 696 00:36:55,200 --> 00:36:57,640 Speaker 1: admitted this what he thought the public could handle at 697 00:36:57,680 --> 00:37:02,760 Speaker 1: the time. This to me, public health and politics shouldn't 698 00:37:02,800 --> 00:37:05,400 Speaker 1: be working hand in hand, at least in the person 699 00:37:05,560 --> 00:37:09,080 Speaker 1: of one individual. And he seemed to be trying to 700 00:37:09,719 --> 00:37:13,520 Speaker 1: massage the information or outright lie based on what he 701 00:37:13,960 --> 00:37:17,279 Speaker 1: thought the public could deal with. That is not your job. 702 00:37:17,400 --> 00:37:19,279 Speaker 1: Your job is to tell us what the facts are, 703 00:37:19,400 --> 00:37:22,600 Speaker 1: even if they're bad, even if they're difficult, even if 704 00:37:22,600 --> 00:37:26,040 Speaker 1: you're worried about how the American people will ultimately receive it. 705 00:37:26,120 --> 00:37:29,400 Speaker 1: And so at this late stage in the game, given 706 00:37:29,560 --> 00:37:33,960 Speaker 1: everything that we know, given his own admissions of the 707 00:37:33,960 --> 00:37:36,360 Speaker 1: way that he operated in this pandemic, I don't know 708 00:37:36,400 --> 00:37:40,040 Speaker 1: how you run a piece like this without any like 709 00:37:40,520 --> 00:37:44,040 Speaker 1: any edits, any criticism, anything other than this just sort 710 00:37:44,080 --> 00:37:47,479 Speaker 1: of like glowing portrait that he paints off. It really 711 00:37:47,520 --> 00:37:49,920 Speaker 1: is outrageous. And you know, look, let's put the next 712 00:37:49,920 --> 00:37:51,879 Speaker 1: one up there on the screen. Republicans say that they're 713 00:37:51,880 --> 00:37:55,399 Speaker 1: going to investigate doctor Fauci. We'll see, he's slippery little guy. 714 00:37:55,680 --> 00:37:58,480 Speaker 1: Whenever we were off Crystal, Emily and Ryan did a 715 00:37:58,480 --> 00:38:01,200 Speaker 1: great job of covering his depth position. And I just 716 00:38:01,239 --> 00:38:04,480 Speaker 1: want to read you again what he said whenever he 717 00:38:04,560 --> 00:38:07,200 Speaker 1: was asked about gain of function research. Quote. Gain of 718 00:38:07,239 --> 00:38:10,560 Speaker 1: function is a very potentially misleading terminology and one of 719 00:38:10,600 --> 00:38:13,160 Speaker 1: the reasons why years ago we made the determination it 720 00:38:13,200 --> 00:38:15,600 Speaker 1: would be much better to define the guardrails of experiments 721 00:38:15,640 --> 00:38:18,160 Speaker 1: that would require additional oversight, and we did a way 722 00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:21,760 Speaker 1: because it is very confusing and misleading. And he again 723 00:38:21,840 --> 00:38:25,200 Speaker 1: in this whole exchange, plays all these word games to 724 00:38:25,360 --> 00:38:28,840 Speaker 1: deny funding gain of function research by just changing the 725 00:38:28,920 --> 00:38:32,480 Speaker 1: definition of gain of function research. We have the documents 726 00:38:32,680 --> 00:38:36,000 Speaker 1: you funded it. No ifans or butts. You have funded 727 00:38:36,200 --> 00:38:39,719 Speaker 1: research at the Wuhan Lab and used your position under 728 00:38:39,760 --> 00:38:42,560 Speaker 1: the Trump administration to reverse the previous ban on doing so. 729 00:38:42,920 --> 00:38:47,080 Speaker 1: Then after all this, you still gave money to the 730 00:38:47,160 --> 00:38:51,880 Speaker 1: same organization which funded the Wuhan Lab for back coronavirus 731 00:38:52,000 --> 00:38:55,800 Speaker 1: research in twenty twenty two, of which we have documented 732 00:38:55,840 --> 00:39:00,520 Speaker 1: and shown on the show public record from actual from 733 00:39:00,600 --> 00:39:03,919 Speaker 1: avictual government documents showing the actual amount of funds being 734 00:39:03,960 --> 00:39:06,120 Speaker 1: dispersed by the National Institute of Health. Like we have 735 00:39:06,239 --> 00:39:09,560 Speaker 1: watched the full scale corruption of the science industry. I 736 00:39:09,560 --> 00:39:12,200 Speaker 1: think he's done a tremendous amount of damage on this front. 737 00:39:12,239 --> 00:39:14,120 Speaker 1: And you don't have to like Trump to agree with 738 00:39:14,239 --> 00:39:17,440 Speaker 1: anything that I'm saying. Just ask ask actual nurses as 739 00:39:17,480 --> 00:39:20,240 Speaker 1: you did ask actual doctors. They will tell you about 740 00:39:20,239 --> 00:39:23,680 Speaker 1: what where current like trust public trust is is in science. 741 00:39:23,719 --> 00:39:26,279 Speaker 1: And it's not people like us who are criticizing him. 742 00:39:26,320 --> 00:39:28,239 Speaker 1: It's not our fault that it got there. Like he 743 00:39:28,360 --> 00:39:30,320 Speaker 1: was the person who was in charge. He made himself 744 00:39:30,360 --> 00:39:33,400 Speaker 1: a lightning rod. He's proven lies now to the American 745 00:39:33,440 --> 00:39:35,960 Speaker 1: public and several times, and look, I think he'll get 746 00:39:35,960 --> 00:39:38,200 Speaker 1: away with it. I don't think he will ever have 747 00:39:38,320 --> 00:39:41,600 Speaker 1: any real reckoning that said, like, I hope we get 748 00:39:41,600 --> 00:39:44,279 Speaker 1: more of these types of depositions and or other things. Yeah, 749 00:39:44,360 --> 00:39:46,360 Speaker 1: I mean, I would like there to be a serious 750 00:39:46,480 --> 00:39:49,799 Speaker 1: investigation of the failures in this pandemic, of how we 751 00:39:49,920 --> 00:39:53,719 Speaker 1: ended up with this pandemic, of where our research dollars 752 00:39:53,840 --> 00:39:57,200 Speaker 1: are going towards in terms of preventing a future pandemic. 753 00:39:57,560 --> 00:40:01,160 Speaker 1: I would like to see a serious by partisan government 754 00:40:01,280 --> 00:40:03,440 Speaker 1: effort to accomplish that. I don't have a lot of 755 00:40:03,480 --> 00:40:06,000 Speaker 1: hope that's what we're ultimately going to get. Yeah. Absolutely. 756 00:40:11,600 --> 00:40:16,600 Speaker 1: We have a few updates on the averted rail strike situation, 757 00:40:16,920 --> 00:40:20,120 Speaker 1: so just I'm sure you guys probably recall, but railroad 758 00:40:20,120 --> 00:40:23,799 Speaker 1: workers very unhappy with the working conditions that they have 759 00:40:23,880 --> 00:40:27,200 Speaker 1: been laboring under with basically no paid sick leave or 760 00:40:27,680 --> 00:40:30,680 Speaker 1: real time off, and so they were ready to strike 761 00:40:31,200 --> 00:40:34,759 Speaker 1: because of the Railway Labor Act. Ultimately, Congress, at the 762 00:40:34,760 --> 00:40:37,640 Speaker 1: behest of Biden was able to come in and cram 763 00:40:37,800 --> 00:40:40,440 Speaker 1: down this deal that they a majority of the workers 764 00:40:40,520 --> 00:40:44,120 Speaker 1: voted against that have been struck between the rail bosses 765 00:40:44,239 --> 00:40:47,319 Speaker 1: and the union leaders. So I won't go into all 766 00:40:47,360 --> 00:40:49,719 Speaker 1: the needy gritty of how that went down. But basically, 767 00:40:50,120 --> 00:40:53,680 Speaker 1: end of story. This deal that has one extra day, 768 00:40:53,960 --> 00:40:57,239 Speaker 1: one day of paid sick leave, gets crammed down on them, 769 00:40:57,280 --> 00:41:00,480 Speaker 1: and that is where we stand. However, that does have 770 00:41:00,920 --> 00:41:03,120 Speaker 1: to be the end of the story. Let's go and 771 00:41:03,200 --> 00:41:06,080 Speaker 1: put this up on the screen. So this is from 772 00:41:06,160 --> 00:41:08,520 Speaker 1: common Dreams, they said, Biden is being urged to sign 773 00:41:08,560 --> 00:41:13,640 Speaker 1: an executive order which would guarantee rail workers paid sickle 774 00:41:14,040 --> 00:41:18,920 Speaker 1: Now here's the mechanics of this. Back under Obama, Obama 775 00:41:19,040 --> 00:41:22,920 Speaker 1: actually signed an executive order that would mandate at least seven, 776 00:41:22,960 --> 00:41:24,600 Speaker 1: which was the number of days that these workers were 777 00:41:24,600 --> 00:41:27,640 Speaker 1: asking for, as well, paid sick days for employees of 778 00:41:27,760 --> 00:41:32,360 Speaker 1: federal contractors. Now that should apply to rail workers because 779 00:41:32,400 --> 00:41:37,160 Speaker 1: all of these rail freight companies are in fact federal contractors. However, 780 00:41:37,200 --> 00:41:41,320 Speaker 1: when Obama signed this executive order, for some unknown reason, 781 00:41:41,719 --> 00:41:46,680 Speaker 1: he included a specific exclusion clause for rail workers. But 782 00:41:46,760 --> 00:41:50,640 Speaker 1: there is zero reason why President Biden could not sign 783 00:41:50,760 --> 00:41:54,000 Speaker 1: the exact same executive order, which would be a good thing, 784 00:41:54,239 --> 00:41:57,319 Speaker 1: you know, putting the rail workers aside, mandating at least 785 00:41:57,360 --> 00:42:00,920 Speaker 1: seven paid sick days, and not to have the exclusion 786 00:42:01,040 --> 00:42:05,240 Speaker 1: for rail workers this time around, and in fact urged 787 00:42:05,239 --> 00:42:08,759 Speaker 1: and encouraged by the unions themselves. Bernie, let's go and 788 00:42:08,840 --> 00:42:11,080 Speaker 1: put this next piece up on the screen. Is leading 789 00:42:11,080 --> 00:42:15,040 Speaker 1: seventy two House and Senate Democrats in urging President Biden 790 00:42:15,080 --> 00:42:18,879 Speaker 1: to sign an executive order that would do exactly that. 791 00:42:19,800 --> 00:42:22,600 Speaker 1: So this was their plan after the attempt to get 792 00:42:22,600 --> 00:42:25,680 Speaker 1: six days added through the legislative process. After that failed, 793 00:42:26,000 --> 00:42:29,080 Speaker 1: this is now the new push from union leaders. And 794 00:42:29,880 --> 00:42:33,680 Speaker 1: I just don't see any way, Like, what excuse can 795 00:42:33,719 --> 00:42:38,239 Speaker 1: you make for not doing this. The legal precedent already exists, 796 00:42:38,600 --> 00:42:42,040 Speaker 1: so it's not even a stretch of your legal authorities. 797 00:42:42,320 --> 00:42:45,359 Speaker 1: It's the exact same executive order of that Obama sign. 798 00:42:45,480 --> 00:42:47,319 Speaker 1: All you have to do is get rid of that 799 00:42:47,440 --> 00:42:50,840 Speaker 1: exclusion clause for rail workers, and there you go. You 800 00:42:50,920 --> 00:42:53,920 Speaker 1: have at least somewhat of a win for these workers. 801 00:42:53,960 --> 00:42:57,120 Speaker 1: When you know President Biden claims to be labor, claims 802 00:42:57,160 --> 00:43:00,160 Speaker 1: to be the most pro labor president in history, you 803 00:43:00,239 --> 00:43:04,000 Speaker 1: got a chance prove that you actually care about these 804 00:43:04,080 --> 00:43:06,439 Speaker 1: human beings and that you didn't just sell them down 805 00:43:06,440 --> 00:43:09,319 Speaker 1: the river at the first possible chance. So the next 806 00:43:09,320 --> 00:43:11,240 Speaker 1: one up there on the screen, because this is important. 807 00:43:11,320 --> 00:43:15,120 Speaker 1: The issue is that these people are federal contractors, and 808 00:43:15,160 --> 00:43:18,600 Speaker 1: that is why we have the authority. I actually fully 809 00:43:18,640 --> 00:43:22,759 Speaker 1: support the whole using government policy against federal contractors to 810 00:43:22,760 --> 00:43:25,400 Speaker 1: try and compel behavior because they can choose not to 811 00:43:25,400 --> 00:43:27,680 Speaker 1: do government with business with the government if they want, 812 00:43:27,880 --> 00:43:30,920 Speaker 1: and yet they aren't. And here what Ryan really outlaid 813 00:43:31,120 --> 00:43:34,360 Speaker 1: is that the way that many of these private companies 814 00:43:34,680 --> 00:43:38,560 Speaker 1: have leveraged their private status to boost profits, take government 815 00:43:38,680 --> 00:43:42,360 Speaker 1: and then also use their influence to go after the GOP. 816 00:43:42,520 --> 00:43:45,400 Speaker 1: And what Ryan reveals is that railroad workers were on 817 00:43:45,480 --> 00:43:48,640 Speaker 1: track to get the ten to eleven Senate Republican votes 818 00:43:48,680 --> 00:43:52,200 Speaker 1: for sick days. However, after the Chamber of Commerce came 819 00:43:52,239 --> 00:43:54,680 Speaker 1: out and said that it would quote score the vote, 820 00:43:54,920 --> 00:43:58,200 Speaker 1: four of the hard yes votes evaporated and they only 821 00:43:58,239 --> 00:44:00,200 Speaker 1: got six on the day of the vote. If they'd 822 00:44:00,239 --> 00:44:03,080 Speaker 1: gotten ten or eleven votes, Crystal, they would have actually 823 00:44:03,080 --> 00:44:06,800 Speaker 1: passed a sick leave measure. And so the railroad companies, 824 00:44:06,840 --> 00:44:09,799 Speaker 1: which again make billions of dollars and billions and more 825 00:44:09,880 --> 00:44:12,000 Speaker 1: in profits in the last ten years, and who have 826 00:44:12,080 --> 00:44:15,920 Speaker 1: basically bought the congressional system, used the Chamber of Commerce 827 00:44:15,960 --> 00:44:18,680 Speaker 1: as their lobbying organization to protect their profits. Yes, and 828 00:44:18,719 --> 00:44:22,080 Speaker 1: it's all really a corrupt scheme because the Republicans could 829 00:44:22,080 --> 00:44:25,080 Speaker 1: not afford or in their minds, could not afford getting 830 00:44:25,200 --> 00:44:28,120 Speaker 1: a bad vote scored by the Chamber of Commerce. It's 831 00:44:28,120 --> 00:44:30,399 Speaker 1: like it all rolls together, and I think it's why 832 00:44:30,440 --> 00:44:33,000 Speaker 1: it's important to lay out the exact context here. It 833 00:44:33,040 --> 00:44:36,279 Speaker 1: shows you how powerful the Chamber of Commerce continues to be. 834 00:44:37,160 --> 00:44:40,759 Speaker 1: It shows you how powerful capital in general continues to be. 835 00:44:41,480 --> 00:44:45,920 Speaker 1: Any sort of like pro worker rhetoric. Aside losing mansion, also, 836 00:44:46,160 --> 00:44:49,440 Speaker 1: I think over the Chamber of Commerce scoring just grotesque 837 00:44:49,480 --> 00:44:51,319 Speaker 1: was also a big blow to them. But you know, 838 00:44:51,440 --> 00:44:53,400 Speaker 1: Ryan goes through and I encourage you to read the 839 00:44:53,400 --> 00:44:56,320 Speaker 1: whole story because he really has the in depth breakdown 840 00:44:56,440 --> 00:44:58,640 Speaker 1: of what was happening on Capitol Hill and how these 841 00:44:58,680 --> 00:45:02,120 Speaker 1: negotiations were all unfolded. What the union leaders, and in 842 00:45:02,160 --> 00:45:04,879 Speaker 1: particular this one sort of like militant caucus of rank 843 00:45:04,880 --> 00:45:07,600 Speaker 1: and file workers, what they were pushing for in terms 844 00:45:07,600 --> 00:45:11,600 Speaker 1: of what they wanted legislators to ultimately do. And also 845 00:45:11,760 --> 00:45:16,879 Speaker 1: the deep, deep, and very justified sense of betrayal of 846 00:45:18,239 --> 00:45:21,080 Speaker 1: Biden and the Democrats because again they heard the rhetoric 847 00:45:21,120 --> 00:45:23,840 Speaker 1: about most pro labor president in history. There's a reason 848 00:45:23,840 --> 00:45:26,000 Speaker 1: why they waited until Biden was in the White House 849 00:45:26,040 --> 00:45:29,960 Speaker 1: to really make this move and push for more, and ultimately, 850 00:45:30,160 --> 00:45:34,040 Speaker 1: you know, they ended up with this Presidential Emergency Board proposal, 851 00:45:34,080 --> 00:45:36,799 Speaker 1: which was total shit. Then they end up with this 852 00:45:37,160 --> 00:45:40,600 Speaker 1: negotiation between Pete budhaj Ede and Marty Walsh's labor secretary 853 00:45:40,760 --> 00:45:43,719 Speaker 1: and the union leaders and the rail bosses, which was 854 00:45:43,760 --> 00:45:47,919 Speaker 1: only a moderate incremental improvement. And they said they kind 855 00:45:47,920 --> 00:45:50,920 Speaker 1: of knew from the beginning that they were ultimately going 856 00:45:50,960 --> 00:45:53,520 Speaker 1: to get a deal crammed down on them from Congress 857 00:45:53,560 --> 00:45:55,880 Speaker 1: because of the Railway Labor Act and the way that 858 00:45:55,920 --> 00:45:58,840 Speaker 1: hands so much power ultimately to the rail bosses, the 859 00:45:58,880 --> 00:46:01,960 Speaker 1: way it really strips them of any sort of ultimate leverage. 860 00:46:02,120 --> 00:46:04,680 Speaker 1: But they thought maybe with Biden the Democrats, they could 861 00:46:04,719 --> 00:46:07,520 Speaker 1: get a bit more than what they were ultimately able 862 00:46:07,600 --> 00:46:10,440 Speaker 1: to achieve here. And there were also a lot of 863 00:46:10,560 --> 00:46:15,319 Speaker 1: questions over whether the vote on paid six days that 864 00:46:15,360 --> 00:46:17,680 Speaker 1: went through, that that passed the House and then got 865 00:46:17,680 --> 00:46:19,759 Speaker 1: a majority votes in the Senate but failed because of 866 00:46:19,760 --> 00:46:22,920 Speaker 1: the filibuster in the Senate, whether this was just a 867 00:46:23,000 --> 00:46:26,319 Speaker 1: show vote, or whether they really thought that maybe this 868 00:46:26,400 --> 00:46:31,000 Speaker 1: had a chance to get through. And according to Ryan's reporting. 869 00:46:31,239 --> 00:46:34,000 Speaker 1: You know, there was some indication that they might actually 870 00:46:34,040 --> 00:46:35,799 Speaker 1: be able to get there. Now, I think they knew 871 00:46:35,800 --> 00:46:38,400 Speaker 1: it was a hail Mary. I think they knew their 872 00:46:38,440 --> 00:46:40,840 Speaker 1: goose was kind of cooked at that point because Biden 873 00:46:40,880 --> 00:46:43,319 Speaker 1: decided to side with the rail bosses in such a 874 00:46:43,320 --> 00:46:46,560 Speaker 1: heavy handed manner. But they really thought they had a 875 00:46:46,600 --> 00:46:49,000 Speaker 1: realistic shot at this. And now, like I said, to 876 00:46:49,280 --> 00:46:51,680 Speaker 1: start the block, the real play here is to try 877 00:46:51,680 --> 00:46:54,040 Speaker 1: to pressure Biden to sign this executive order, which there 878 00:46:54,120 --> 00:46:57,680 Speaker 1: is just literally no reason not to do it other 879 00:46:57,760 --> 00:47:01,520 Speaker 1: than just caving to corporate And if you've pulled this, 880 00:47:01,680 --> 00:47:05,280 Speaker 1: if you pulled the American people on this seven paid 881 00:47:05,640 --> 00:47:09,759 Speaker 1: sick days for federal employees of federal contractors, what would 882 00:47:09,800 --> 00:47:12,840 Speaker 1: it pull at seventy percent, eighty percent, I mean, it 883 00:47:12,880 --> 00:47:18,360 Speaker 1: would be overwhelming. This is the most basic of worker 884 00:47:18,680 --> 00:47:21,840 Speaker 1: rights that should be in place for every single worker 885 00:47:21,920 --> 00:47:24,319 Speaker 1: in the country. So if he doesn't do this, I mean, 886 00:47:24,360 --> 00:47:27,600 Speaker 1: it's just it's just already such a betrayal. And this 887 00:47:27,680 --> 00:47:30,319 Speaker 1: is ultimately completely pathetical and it is just straight up 888 00:47:30,360 --> 00:47:33,919 Speaker 1: discrimination against the rail workers because specifically excluded by law, 889 00:47:33,960 --> 00:47:36,120 Speaker 1: which should not be as a total carve out to 890 00:47:36,280 --> 00:47:39,440 Speaker 1: the companies and again, the companies they can do business elsewhere, 891 00:47:39,440 --> 00:47:41,160 Speaker 1: they don't have to do business with the federal government, 892 00:47:41,320 --> 00:47:44,520 Speaker 1: but they make billions in federal government contracts there go, 893 00:47:44,880 --> 00:47:47,320 Speaker 1: federal policy should be that you can't get a contract 894 00:47:47,360 --> 00:47:50,920 Speaker 1: unless you abide by X, Y, and Z work conditions. 895 00:47:51,360 --> 00:47:54,160 Speaker 1: Doesn't sound like crazy to me, not at all. And 896 00:47:54,200 --> 00:47:56,680 Speaker 1: this is a man who promised on the campaign trail 897 00:47:57,080 --> 00:48:00,680 Speaker 1: that he would not give federal contracts to un investors. 898 00:48:01,680 --> 00:48:04,440 Speaker 1: So he used that rhetoric on the trail of using 899 00:48:04,480 --> 00:48:08,080 Speaker 1: the federal government power of the purse in order to 900 00:48:08,120 --> 00:48:11,439 Speaker 1: make sure that companies were doing the basics and doing 901 00:48:11,520 --> 00:48:14,640 Speaker 1: right by their workers. So here's an opportunity to prove 902 00:48:14,680 --> 00:48:17,160 Speaker 1: you actually mean it, Joe Biden. And also, just as 903 00:48:17,160 --> 00:48:18,560 Speaker 1: another side note, I think we're going to talk to 904 00:48:18,640 --> 00:48:20,719 Speaker 1: Lever more about this because they broke the story over 905 00:48:20,880 --> 00:48:23,920 Speaker 1: on their site. But one of the big rail freight companies, 906 00:48:24,120 --> 00:48:28,200 Speaker 1: like immediately after this deal with crammed down workers Throats, 907 00:48:28,400 --> 00:48:32,160 Speaker 1: announced they were doing a big shareholder diffidend. So the 908 00:48:32,200 --> 00:48:34,920 Speaker 1: backstory of all of this, as you always point out, Zager, 909 00:48:35,120 --> 00:48:38,759 Speaker 1: is the record breaking amounts of profit that these companies, 910 00:48:38,760 --> 00:48:40,600 Speaker 1: one of which by the way, is owned by Warren 911 00:48:40,640 --> 00:48:44,960 Speaker 1: Buffett that they are raking in while they deny their 912 00:48:45,000 --> 00:48:49,840 Speaker 1: workers the very basics of Paisick leave. Yeah, I completely agree, 913 00:48:49,920 --> 00:48:51,799 Speaker 1: all right, guys. Nowother big thing that's happening here in 914 00:48:51,880 --> 00:48:55,920 Speaker 1: DC this week is it looks like Sam Bankman Freed 915 00:48:56,080 --> 00:49:00,000 Speaker 1: may testify in front of the House Financial Services Committee 916 00:49:00,080 --> 00:49:03,760 Speaker 1: at least in some sort of a potentially limited way tomorrow. 917 00:49:03,920 --> 00:49:06,000 Speaker 1: So we'll be watching for how all of that goes down. 918 00:49:06,000 --> 00:49:07,520 Speaker 1: But let me give you the back and forth year 919 00:49:07,520 --> 00:49:09,680 Speaker 1: that led to this because it is kind of interesting. 920 00:49:10,000 --> 00:49:12,600 Speaker 1: God put this up on the screen from CNBC. So 921 00:49:12,680 --> 00:49:16,960 Speaker 1: the chair of the House Financial Services Committee is one 922 00:49:17,040 --> 00:49:22,040 Speaker 1: Maxine Waters, who has been pictured arms around Sam Bankman Freed. 923 00:49:22,760 --> 00:49:25,040 Speaker 1: There's a video of her like blowing him a kiss. 924 00:49:25,080 --> 00:49:29,480 Speaker 1: They were obviously very cozy. She had originally, according to 925 00:49:29,480 --> 00:49:34,279 Speaker 1: this report from CMBC, told Democrats on that committee that 926 00:49:34,360 --> 00:49:37,920 Speaker 1: she doesn't plan to subpoena former FDx CEO Sam Bankman 927 00:49:38,000 --> 00:49:41,800 Speaker 1: Freed to testify at the hearing tomorrow about the crypto 928 00:49:41,880 --> 00:49:45,880 Speaker 1: exchange is rapid demise. She informed committee members of that 929 00:49:45,920 --> 00:49:48,520 Speaker 1: decision at a private meeting, and she said she wants 930 00:49:48,520 --> 00:49:52,960 Speaker 1: committee staff to try to persuade Bankman free to voluntarily testify. 931 00:49:54,320 --> 00:49:57,319 Speaker 1: So she does this. She puts out this very nice, like, 932 00:49:57,400 --> 00:50:00,879 Speaker 1: we really appreciate the way you've been transported parent, how 933 00:50:00,880 --> 00:50:04,040 Speaker 1: you've been talking publicly about what happened at FTX. Can 934 00:50:04,040 --> 00:50:06,600 Speaker 1: you please, pretty please come and testify. Obviously those were 935 00:50:06,640 --> 00:50:10,840 Speaker 1: not her exact words. His initial response was basically like yeah, no. 936 00:50:11,600 --> 00:50:14,480 Speaker 1: He said, once I've finished learning and reviewing what happened, 937 00:50:14,480 --> 00:50:16,120 Speaker 1: I would feel like it was my duty to appear 938 00:50:16,160 --> 00:50:17,839 Speaker 1: before the committee and explained I'm not sure that will 939 00:50:17,840 --> 00:50:21,640 Speaker 1: happen by the thirteenth, but when it does, I will testify. However, 940 00:50:21,719 --> 00:50:23,239 Speaker 1: let's put this next piece up on the screen from 941 00:50:23,280 --> 00:50:25,839 Speaker 1: the New York Times. In an early morning post on 942 00:50:25,880 --> 00:50:29,239 Speaker 1: Twitter on Friday, he said he will now appear on 943 00:50:29,320 --> 00:50:32,960 Speaker 1: Tuesday before the House Committee on Financial Services, and it's 944 00:50:33,000 --> 00:50:35,680 Speaker 1: going to focus on the sudden collapse obviously of FTX, 945 00:50:36,200 --> 00:50:40,360 Speaker 1: the crypto exchange that he founded. There's a separate question 946 00:50:40,719 --> 00:50:43,480 Speaker 1: as to whether or not he's going to testify in 947 00:50:43,520 --> 00:50:47,360 Speaker 1: front of the Senate, the affiliated committee on the Senate 948 00:50:47,560 --> 00:50:49,880 Speaker 1: that is led by Shared Brown. He said in a 949 00:50:49,960 --> 00:50:52,839 Speaker 1: letter that if the cryptocurrency trader was unwilling to speak 950 00:50:52,840 --> 00:50:55,400 Speaker 1: to the committee. He was prepared to issue a subpoena 951 00:50:55,520 --> 00:50:58,920 Speaker 1: to compel his testimony. Obviously, this all really matters because 952 00:50:59,160 --> 00:51:02,400 Speaker 1: Sam Bankman Freed has been on this whole like media publicity, 953 00:51:02,480 --> 00:51:05,720 Speaker 1: weird tour, some of which we have covered, and actually 954 00:51:06,239 --> 00:51:07,920 Speaker 1: by the time this post, he may have done another 955 00:51:07,920 --> 00:51:10,960 Speaker 1: interview with Unusual Whales, which we'll be watching very closely 956 00:51:11,280 --> 00:51:14,480 Speaker 1: if it does in fact happen. But when you testify 957 00:51:14,520 --> 00:51:17,200 Speaker 1: in front of Congress, that's a different deal in terms 958 00:51:17,239 --> 00:51:19,840 Speaker 1: of the legal implication. So that's why this is so 959 00:51:19,880 --> 00:51:21,920 Speaker 1: significan yeah, exact, and that's the point. He's willing to 960 00:51:21,960 --> 00:51:24,920 Speaker 1: do interviews with anybody, except whenever it says it a 961 00:51:24,920 --> 00:51:30,959 Speaker 1: little squirrely, whenever you're testifying on under oath, what different day. Look, 962 00:51:31,000 --> 00:51:32,640 Speaker 1: I think we're probably going to get a lot of 963 00:51:32,719 --> 00:51:35,680 Speaker 1: I wasn't aware. I don't recall he seems to be 964 00:51:35,719 --> 00:51:37,120 Speaker 1: the master of that, and every single one of the 965 00:51:37,160 --> 00:51:40,160 Speaker 1: interviews that he's given so far, except for a few, 966 00:51:40,239 --> 00:51:42,640 Speaker 1: he really hasn't been caught on many of his lives. 967 00:51:42,640 --> 00:51:47,160 Speaker 1: And I don't personally trust Maxine Waters, especially like why 968 00:51:47,280 --> 00:51:49,560 Speaker 1: even rule the testimony out with subpoena out in the 969 00:51:49,560 --> 00:51:53,000 Speaker 1: first place. He obviously should be subpoena. That way they 970 00:51:53,080 --> 00:51:55,960 Speaker 1: get to set the conditions, and it's not voluntary. There's 971 00:51:55,960 --> 00:51:58,680 Speaker 1: a lot of questions to still remain, and whether he's 972 00:51:58,719 --> 00:52:01,880 Speaker 1: even actually going to show up, we don't know. He 973 00:52:01,960 --> 00:52:05,480 Speaker 1: says that he is set to testify at the House 974 00:52:05,560 --> 00:52:09,279 Speaker 1: hearing again, though he declined the Banking hearing because you know, 975 00:52:09,320 --> 00:52:10,680 Speaker 1: he said he would be tired or it would be 976 00:52:10,760 --> 00:52:14,840 Speaker 1: too much work, which is obviously ludicrous, and go forget 977 00:52:15,120 --> 00:52:17,400 Speaker 1: at the banking hearings in the Senate, they get a 978 00:52:17,440 --> 00:52:20,319 Speaker 1: lot more time. There's not a lot of time at 979 00:52:20,360 --> 00:52:23,560 Speaker 1: these House hearings whenever they ask questions, it's only a 980 00:52:23,600 --> 00:52:26,799 Speaker 1: few minutes. At the Senate hearings, their committee hearings, they 981 00:52:26,800 --> 00:52:29,160 Speaker 1: have much more leeway in order to not only ask 982 00:52:29,239 --> 00:52:31,799 Speaker 1: more questions, but they can actually do more follow up. 983 00:52:31,880 --> 00:52:34,160 Speaker 1: So I think there's a strategic reason, as he doesn't 984 00:52:34,160 --> 00:52:36,360 Speaker 1: have any real allies on the Senate Banking Committee, or 985 00:52:36,400 --> 00:52:38,720 Speaker 1: at least not the head of the Senate Banking Committee 986 00:52:38,719 --> 00:52:40,120 Speaker 1: the way that he does with the House. Well, and 987 00:52:40,160 --> 00:52:42,440 Speaker 1: you also just wonder what these members of Congress like, 988 00:52:42,719 --> 00:52:45,640 Speaker 1: how sophisticated are they going to be in their understanding, 989 00:52:45,800 --> 00:52:47,560 Speaker 1: how good are their questions going to be, how much 990 00:52:47,640 --> 00:52:50,799 Speaker 1: they really like just even comprehend what happened here and 991 00:52:50,840 --> 00:52:52,920 Speaker 1: what you know they should be prossing on and should 992 00:52:52,920 --> 00:52:55,640 Speaker 1: be asking. I just checked did a cursory glance at 993 00:52:55,640 --> 00:52:58,240 Speaker 1: the members of the House Financial Services Committee. It's unfortunate 994 00:52:58,320 --> 00:53:00,520 Speaker 1: that Katie Porter isn't on there, because she's one person 995 00:53:00,520 --> 00:53:03,080 Speaker 1: that I feel like job would actually do a good job, 996 00:53:03,160 --> 00:53:05,000 Speaker 1: like I feel confident would do a good job in 997 00:53:05,080 --> 00:53:07,839 Speaker 1: terms of questioning him. So we'll see. I think you're right, 998 00:53:08,600 --> 00:53:10,960 Speaker 1: just like in the interview with The New York Times 999 00:53:11,000 --> 00:53:14,239 Speaker 1: that we covered, where he was very evasive and suddenly, oh, 1000 00:53:14,280 --> 00:53:16,520 Speaker 1: he didn't know that they had bought his parents a 1001 00:53:16,560 --> 00:53:19,120 Speaker 1: multi multimillion dollar beach house, and he didn't really know 1002 00:53:19,160 --> 00:53:21,760 Speaker 1: what Alameda was doing, and he just was like barely 1003 00:53:21,800 --> 00:53:25,200 Speaker 1: aware that the company even existed. You'll get a lot 1004 00:53:25,239 --> 00:53:28,040 Speaker 1: of that deflection as well, no doubt about it. But 1005 00:53:28,080 --> 00:53:30,120 Speaker 1: it may still be revealing. You never know if he 1006 00:53:30,200 --> 00:53:33,400 Speaker 1: might slip up and let something out that he really shouldn't. 1007 00:53:33,440 --> 00:53:36,640 Speaker 1: We'll watch it closely. Indeed, all right, another thing we 1008 00:53:36,680 --> 00:53:38,920 Speaker 1: wanted to bring to you today since we've been covering 1009 00:53:39,360 --> 00:53:41,759 Speaker 1: some of what's going on at the World Cup. Is 1010 00:53:41,800 --> 00:53:48,120 Speaker 1: we now have had two separate journalists die collapse very 1011 00:53:48,280 --> 00:53:52,160 Speaker 1: you know, kind of out of nowhere within forty eight hours. 1012 00:53:52,600 --> 00:53:56,000 Speaker 1: So one of them you all may already be familiar with, 1013 00:53:56,080 --> 00:53:57,960 Speaker 1: is a man named Grant Wall. Let's go ahead and 1014 00:53:58,000 --> 00:54:01,239 Speaker 1: put this first piece up on the screen. So this 1015 00:54:01,480 --> 00:54:05,560 Speaker 1: was his I think final Substack post, or close to it. 1016 00:54:05,680 --> 00:54:09,640 Speaker 1: He's a well known journalist, in particular in the soccer world. 1017 00:54:09,680 --> 00:54:12,240 Speaker 1: He also was very well known for his writing about 1018 00:54:12,239 --> 00:54:15,799 Speaker 1: college basketball. He says, free to read what happened when 1019 00:54:15,880 --> 00:54:18,600 Speaker 1: Qatar World Cup security detained me for twenty five minutes 1020 00:54:18,600 --> 00:54:21,759 Speaker 1: for wearing a T shirt supporting LGBTQ rights forcibly took 1021 00:54:21,760 --> 00:54:23,959 Speaker 1: my phone and angrily demanded it removed my T shirt 1022 00:54:24,000 --> 00:54:26,000 Speaker 1: to enter the stadium. I refuse. So sorry. This isn't 1023 00:54:25,960 --> 00:54:29,080 Speaker 1: the last Substack post. This is. We covered this where 1024 00:54:29,280 --> 00:54:33,399 Speaker 1: he was detained for wearing this rainbow T shirt because 1025 00:54:33,400 --> 00:54:38,279 Speaker 1: obviously in Qatar, being gay or expressing support for gay 1026 00:54:38,360 --> 00:54:41,920 Speaker 1: rights is not allowed. They you know, haven't let the 1027 00:54:41,920 --> 00:54:44,880 Speaker 1: soccer players express anything like this, so they detained this journals. 1028 00:54:44,920 --> 00:54:47,640 Speaker 1: This got national media attention. We covered here as well 1029 00:54:47,840 --> 00:54:53,239 Speaker 1: an extraordinary action. And you know, his family really believes 1030 00:54:53,680 --> 00:54:58,880 Speaker 1: that this was ultimately foul play. They his brother, who 1031 00:54:59,200 --> 00:55:03,320 Speaker 1: is gay, who he says is the reason why Grant 1032 00:55:03,360 --> 00:55:07,600 Speaker 1: was ultimately wearing the shirt. He believes that Grant was killed. 1033 00:55:07,680 --> 00:55:09,120 Speaker 1: Let's take a listen to what he had to say. 1034 00:55:09,440 --> 00:55:13,000 Speaker 1: My name is Eric Wall. I live in Seattle, Washington. 1035 00:55:13,040 --> 00:55:18,040 Speaker 1: I am Grant Wall's brother. I am gay. I am 1036 00:55:18,080 --> 00:55:21,080 Speaker 1: the reason he wore the rainbow shirt to the World Cup. 1037 00:55:22,880 --> 00:55:27,080 Speaker 1: My brother was healthy. He told me he received death threats. 1038 00:55:29,880 --> 00:55:34,160 Speaker 1: I do not believe my brother just died. I believe 1039 00:55:34,239 --> 00:55:40,360 Speaker 1: he was killed, and I just beg for anyone horrible. 1040 00:55:40,440 --> 00:55:42,960 Speaker 1: So he says he didn't just die. He believes he 1041 00:55:43,040 --> 00:55:46,280 Speaker 1: was killed. You know, in addition to wearing the rainbow shirt, 1042 00:55:46,400 --> 00:55:50,839 Speaker 1: this is a journalist who was fearlessly critical of the 1043 00:55:50,960 --> 00:55:54,760 Speaker 1: Katari government and also in particular their treatment of migrant workers. 1044 00:55:54,960 --> 00:55:57,040 Speaker 1: Got put this last piece up on the screen. This 1045 00:55:57,160 --> 00:55:59,719 Speaker 1: is one of the final substack posts here. Let me 1046 00:55:59,760 --> 00:56:01,920 Speaker 1: read it little bit of the beginning. He says, the 1047 00:56:01,960 --> 00:56:04,239 Speaker 1: Supreme Committee in charge of Katar's World Cup does not 1048 00:56:04,400 --> 00:56:07,960 Speaker 1: care that a Filipino migrant worker died at Saudi Arabia's 1049 00:56:07,960 --> 00:56:10,360 Speaker 1: training resort. During the group stage, he suffered a fatal 1050 00:56:10,400 --> 00:56:12,920 Speaker 1: blow to the head during a fall in a forklift accident, 1051 00:56:13,200 --> 00:56:15,880 Speaker 1: information that was kept under wraps until being broken by 1052 00:56:15,920 --> 00:56:18,759 Speaker 1: the athletics Adam Crafton and he goes on to be 1053 00:56:19,520 --> 00:56:24,080 Speaker 1: you know, just very critical of the Kataris and their 1054 00:56:24,080 --> 00:56:26,719 Speaker 1: treatment of migrant workers. And this isn't the first post 1055 00:56:26,800 --> 00:56:30,360 Speaker 1: in this regard, so no doubt that they were unhappy 1056 00:56:30,480 --> 00:56:33,720 Speaker 1: with what he was saying. Here. We have no evidence 1057 00:56:33,800 --> 00:56:36,359 Speaker 1: other than that sort of circumstantial evidence of foul play. 1058 00:56:36,440 --> 00:56:38,239 Speaker 1: I do also want to say that he was on 1059 00:56:38,400 --> 00:56:41,239 Speaker 1: a podcast that week and said that he had been sick, 1060 00:56:41,920 --> 00:56:45,640 Speaker 1: he'd had bronchitis, some sort of respiratory ailment, So could 1061 00:56:45,680 --> 00:56:48,480 Speaker 1: it have been you know, complications from that. Ultimately we 1062 00:56:48,560 --> 00:56:51,080 Speaker 1: don't know. But then the update this morning is that 1063 00:56:51,400 --> 00:56:55,200 Speaker 1: a Katari journalist, actually Katari photojournalist, named Khalid al Maslam, 1064 00:56:55,440 --> 00:56:59,640 Speaker 1: he also died. We know very little about the circumstances 1065 00:56:59,640 --> 00:57:03,959 Speaker 1: around his death. But now you have two journalists within 1066 00:57:04,000 --> 00:57:07,160 Speaker 1: forty eight hours who just dropped out out of nowhere 1067 00:57:07,200 --> 00:57:08,839 Speaker 1: at the Katari World Cup, and a lot of people 1068 00:57:08,880 --> 00:57:10,720 Speaker 1: with a lot of questions. Yeah, with Grant. He said, 1069 00:57:10,800 --> 00:57:13,200 Speaker 1: I have three weeks of little sleep, high stress, lots 1070 00:57:13,200 --> 00:57:14,840 Speaker 1: of work can do that to you. Have been a 1071 00:57:14,880 --> 00:57:17,200 Speaker 1: cold over the last ten days turned into something more severe. 1072 00:57:17,520 --> 00:57:19,440 Speaker 1: I could feel my upper chest take on a new 1073 00:57:19,480 --> 00:57:21,800 Speaker 1: level of pressure and discomfort. I went to the medical 1074 00:57:21,800 --> 00:57:23,680 Speaker 1: clinic at the main media center and they said I 1075 00:57:23,720 --> 00:57:26,400 Speaker 1: probably have bronchitis. They gave me a course of antibiotics. 1076 00:57:26,560 --> 00:57:28,560 Speaker 1: So look, I don't know. I mean he was sick. 1077 00:57:28,600 --> 00:57:31,120 Speaker 1: His brother has since now said I can now update 1078 00:57:31,160 --> 00:57:33,640 Speaker 1: that Grant did go to the hospital in an ambulance. 1079 00:57:33,680 --> 00:57:36,720 Speaker 1: Colleagues followed him in an uber. There was no available 1080 00:57:36,800 --> 00:57:39,000 Speaker 1: AED on site, though it sounds as though it may 1081 00:57:39,040 --> 00:57:40,760 Speaker 1: not have made a difference. If my understanding of the 1082 00:57:40,800 --> 00:57:43,960 Speaker 1: medical situation is correct, his body will come home tomorrow. 1083 00:57:44,120 --> 00:57:47,280 Speaker 1: There will be a proper autopsy here in the United States. 1084 00:57:47,440 --> 00:57:50,600 Speaker 1: The family will then release a statement after that, regardless 1085 00:57:50,640 --> 00:57:53,360 Speaker 1: of the outcome. I have nothing to apologize for. Thoroughly 1086 00:57:53,360 --> 00:57:56,880 Speaker 1: corrupt people and organizations remain thoroughly corrupt. Organizations must always 1087 00:57:56,920 --> 00:57:59,240 Speaker 1: be held to scrutiny an account. This World Club never 1088 00:57:59,240 --> 00:58:02,040 Speaker 1: should have taken place where it did. So that is 1089 00:58:02,080 --> 00:58:05,000 Speaker 1: where Grant is, or that's where Eric is right now 1090 00:58:05,720 --> 00:58:07,880 Speaker 1: as to whether he stands by his accusation of foul 1091 00:58:07,880 --> 00:58:10,280 Speaker 1: play or not kind of up in the air. Seems 1092 00:58:10,280 --> 00:58:13,280 Speaker 1: to accept some level of medical situation, but we don't know. 1093 00:58:13,320 --> 00:58:15,480 Speaker 1: And then when you couple it also with the second one, 1094 00:58:15,560 --> 00:58:18,680 Speaker 1: it's very strange about what's happening there. Although apparently there 1095 00:58:18,720 --> 00:58:21,280 Speaker 1: is a COVID outbreak in Doha. That's what a lot 1096 00:58:21,280 --> 00:58:23,440 Speaker 1: of people have been talking about online as well. Just 1097 00:58:23,480 --> 00:58:28,160 Speaker 1: obviously gathering people from not a surprise, who knows, who knows, 1098 00:58:28,360 --> 00:58:32,200 Speaker 1: who knows, but scary stuff, very scary. You know, hearts 1099 00:58:32,200 --> 00:58:34,840 Speaker 1: go out, obviously, the families of these two men with 1100 00:58:34,960 --> 00:58:38,440 Speaker 1: these sudden losses, and you know, it just raised a 1101 00:58:38,440 --> 00:58:40,000 Speaker 1: lot of eyebrows when he had someone who was so 1102 00:58:40,120 --> 00:58:46,520 Speaker 1: prominent as a dissident journalist ultimately meeting such an untimely end. Yeah, 1103 00:58:46,560 --> 00:58:49,000 Speaker 1: waiting for that autopsy, I think that will answer all 1104 00:58:49,040 --> 00:58:53,440 Speaker 1: the questions that we have. All Right, Tager, what are 1105 00:58:53,440 --> 00:58:55,360 Speaker 1: you looking at? Well? One of the better parts of 1106 00:58:55,360 --> 00:58:57,760 Speaker 1: the holidays is that things start to slow down, inviting 1107 00:58:57,800 --> 00:59:00,600 Speaker 1: some reflection on the last year. It's always with reflection, 1108 00:59:00,720 --> 00:59:02,640 Speaker 1: the question is what do you do with that information? 1109 00:59:02,840 --> 00:59:05,360 Speaker 1: You can wallow. You can feel sorry, you'd be despondent, 1110 00:59:05,600 --> 00:59:07,560 Speaker 1: or you can look at the hopeful highlights from the 1111 00:59:07,640 --> 00:59:10,200 Speaker 1: last year, strung together a theme, and then use it 1112 00:59:10,240 --> 00:59:12,760 Speaker 1: to help yourself in the coming months. So I thought 1113 00:59:12,800 --> 00:59:15,120 Speaker 1: for my first monologue back after our awesome live shows 1114 00:59:15,120 --> 00:59:17,320 Speaker 1: in Boston, New York, I would expand on a theme 1115 00:59:17,320 --> 00:59:20,200 Speaker 1: from those shows. It's been a terrible year for media 1116 00:59:20,280 --> 00:59:23,720 Speaker 1: institutions and a great one for the independent minded. I could, 1117 00:59:23,720 --> 00:59:26,120 Speaker 1: of course talk about CNN plus failing, how they just 1118 00:59:26,160 --> 00:59:29,000 Speaker 1: spent three hundred million dollars to shut down after two days, 1119 00:59:29,160 --> 00:59:31,320 Speaker 1: how their ratings are at an all time low. But 1120 00:59:31,440 --> 00:59:33,720 Speaker 1: the way that you know they're really feeling the pain 1121 00:59:34,080 --> 00:59:36,600 Speaker 1: was the recent news that they're laying off ten percent 1122 00:59:36,720 --> 00:59:39,920 Speaker 1: of their entire workforce, including many of their contributors and 1123 00:59:39,920 --> 00:59:43,160 Speaker 1: their low IQ talent like Chris Solissa. That admission by 1124 00:59:43,200 --> 00:59:47,000 Speaker 1: CNN CEO Chris Lickt was very stark. The firings were 1125 00:59:47,000 --> 00:59:51,400 Speaker 1: happening to quote grow audiences for our core news programming 1126 00:59:51,480 --> 00:59:54,600 Speaker 1: and products. In and of itself, it's an amazing statement 1127 00:59:54,640 --> 00:59:57,960 Speaker 1: of failure. It's an admission that hiring brain dead resistance 1128 00:59:58,000 --> 01:00:02,280 Speaker 1: liberal for CNN contributor and then former CIA operatives that 1129 01:00:02,320 --> 01:00:05,720 Speaker 1: they tanked the core brand established in the a's and 1130 01:00:05,800 --> 01:00:08,680 Speaker 1: they have a huge hole to dig themselves out of now. 1131 01:00:08,720 --> 01:00:11,560 Speaker 1: But CNN aside, they are just a broader symptom of 1132 01:00:11,600 --> 01:00:15,440 Speaker 1: a disease, which is Cable itself. Comcast, the parent company 1133 01:00:15,480 --> 01:00:18,600 Speaker 1: for NBC Universal, which of course heads up NBC News, 1134 01:00:18,760 --> 01:00:22,720 Speaker 1: MSNBC and CNBC, also had major cuts to his businesses. Here. 1135 01:00:22,840 --> 01:00:26,439 Speaker 1: The most famous casualty was Shepsmith from CNBC, of whom 1136 01:00:26,520 --> 01:00:29,800 Speaker 1: nobody cared about at all, and it showed that CNBC's 1137 01:00:29,840 --> 01:00:33,560 Speaker 1: foray into political news was also a huge dud. Again, 1138 01:00:33,720 --> 01:00:35,960 Speaker 1: the admission was stark, we have to move back to 1139 01:00:36,040 --> 01:00:39,960 Speaker 1: core programming. Why because the combined revolution of the Internet 1140 01:00:40,080 --> 01:00:43,600 Speaker 1: and the total abolishment of journalistic standards has done untold 1141 01:00:43,680 --> 01:00:47,040 Speaker 1: damage to their overall hierarchy of brands. As far as 1142 01:00:47,080 --> 01:00:50,320 Speaker 1: digital media startups, it was also a dismal year. The recount, 1143 01:00:50,320 --> 01:00:54,120 Speaker 1: which raised some thirty million dollars in twenty twenty, officially 1144 01:00:54,120 --> 01:00:56,280 Speaker 1: folded this month. Their pitch was they were going to 1145 01:00:56,320 --> 01:00:59,320 Speaker 1: be a punchy video news startup that speaks to millennials 1146 01:00:59,320 --> 01:01:01,600 Speaker 1: and the Internet a but they tried to do it 1147 01:01:01,760 --> 01:01:05,880 Speaker 1: by hiring people who are already beloved by legacy media. 1148 01:01:06,040 --> 01:01:09,920 Speaker 1: Barely anyone even noticed or cared when it folded. Vice News, 1149 01:01:10,080 --> 01:01:12,800 Speaker 1: once the hallmark of a generation. They are cutting costs 1150 01:01:12,800 --> 01:01:16,600 Speaker 1: by fifteen percent, laying off employees. The point is legacy 1151 01:01:16,640 --> 01:01:21,440 Speaker 1: brands are suffering terribly and the legacy backed startups are failing. 1152 01:01:21,720 --> 01:01:23,800 Speaker 1: But out here in the internet sphere, it's a different 1153 01:01:23,840 --> 01:01:27,440 Speaker 1: story entirely. Just compare it to this week, Glenn Greenwell's 1154 01:01:27,440 --> 01:01:29,800 Speaker 1: got a new show on Rumble. It's debuting. Both Glenn 1155 01:01:29,840 --> 01:01:32,240 Speaker 1: and Matt Tayebe's substacks are two of the most popular 1156 01:01:32,280 --> 01:01:34,640 Speaker 1: in the entire country, and in fact, one of the 1157 01:01:34,680 --> 01:01:37,680 Speaker 1: major stories of this year. Just broke Who broke it? 1158 01:01:37,840 --> 01:01:40,800 Speaker 1: Matt Tyebe at his substack, Barry Weis and her independent 1159 01:01:40,800 --> 01:01:44,000 Speaker 1: team over at the Free Press. All independent media right 1160 01:01:44,040 --> 01:01:46,880 Speaker 1: now is actually thriving if you care to look for it, 1161 01:01:47,120 --> 01:01:50,760 Speaker 1: and it's not just anti establishment forces people forget. One 1162 01:01:50,760 --> 01:01:54,080 Speaker 1: of the top earners on political substack is resistance liberal 1163 01:01:54,080 --> 01:01:57,960 Speaker 1: professor Heather Cox Richardson, to which I'd say great. I 1164 01:01:58,000 --> 01:02:00,160 Speaker 1: find it cringe, but as long as it's coming from 1165 01:02:00,240 --> 01:02:02,960 Speaker 1: a different source, I don't care. I want everyone to 1166 01:02:02,960 --> 01:02:05,080 Speaker 1: have a voice. The problem in the past is that 1167 01:02:05,280 --> 01:02:09,320 Speaker 1: not everybody did. By the way, contrast cable News, we 1168 01:02:09,360 --> 01:02:12,040 Speaker 1: didn't fire anyone this year. We hired more people, we 1169 01:02:12,120 --> 01:02:15,160 Speaker 1: added an entire new show, we increased our views, our business, 1170 01:02:15,160 --> 01:02:17,240 Speaker 1: and we have major expansion plans thanks to the way 1171 01:02:17,240 --> 01:02:20,080 Speaker 1: that we fund our business. The point is, it's not 1172 01:02:20,120 --> 01:02:23,360 Speaker 1: just about what's going on here. It's a way bigger ecosystem, 1173 01:02:23,560 --> 01:02:25,920 Speaker 1: which you were all a part of. That's what excites 1174 01:02:25,960 --> 01:02:29,360 Speaker 1: me though. And it's not just news, it's legacy entertainment itself, 1175 01:02:29,560 --> 01:02:33,280 Speaker 1: which is really losing its grips on entertainment. The Walt 1176 01:02:33,320 --> 01:02:37,960 Speaker 1: Disney Company, Netflix, Paramount Global, other major players, and Legacy Entertainment. 1177 01:02:38,120 --> 01:02:42,400 Speaker 1: They had a brutal year. Each is getting crushed by 1178 01:02:42,440 --> 01:02:45,440 Speaker 1: the cost of streaming wars where one to twenty projects 1179 01:02:45,440 --> 01:02:47,880 Speaker 1: appears to actually be worth it and is actually good. 1180 01:02:48,120 --> 01:02:50,560 Speaker 1: But look to the frontiers of entertainment. You're seeing a 1181 01:02:50,560 --> 01:02:54,120 Speaker 1: whole new ecosystem emerge. What really struck me was actually 1182 01:02:54,200 --> 01:02:57,560 Speaker 1: a comedian Mark Normandy was speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast. 1183 01:02:57,800 --> 01:03:00,840 Speaker 1: In a recent episode. They were musing about specials. He 1184 01:03:00,920 --> 01:03:03,640 Speaker 1: actually said, having put out a special on YouTube and 1185 01:03:03,640 --> 01:03:07,200 Speaker 1: one on Netflix, he would probably choose YouTube next because 1186 01:03:07,240 --> 01:03:10,040 Speaker 1: he didn't feel that enough people saw it on Netflix. 1187 01:03:10,440 --> 01:03:13,600 Speaker 1: Think about how crazy that is. Rogan himself has also 1188 01:03:13,600 --> 01:03:16,480 Speaker 1: discussed his possibility. Instead of taking money up front from 1189 01:03:16,480 --> 01:03:19,160 Speaker 1: a streaming platform where the presumption was that people would 1190 01:03:19,160 --> 01:03:21,400 Speaker 1: see it, the assumption now is that if you put 1191 01:03:21,400 --> 01:03:23,680 Speaker 1: something out for free, or if you use some sort 1192 01:03:23,680 --> 01:03:26,520 Speaker 1: of hybrid release model like Andrew Schultz did with his special, 1193 01:03:26,840 --> 01:03:30,040 Speaker 1: you will actually be bigger than ever. That is a 1194 01:03:30,160 --> 01:03:33,320 Speaker 1: titanic change in the comedy world. It didn't even exist 1195 01:03:33,360 --> 01:03:35,760 Speaker 1: five years ago. Many of the comedians I just mentioned 1196 01:03:35,800 --> 01:03:38,080 Speaker 1: are doing better than they ever have in their lives 1197 01:03:38,200 --> 01:03:41,960 Speaker 1: while the broader entertainment business is crumbling. Why because those 1198 01:03:42,000 --> 01:03:45,520 Speaker 1: idiots are signing major deals with Barack Obama and Harry 1199 01:03:45,520 --> 01:03:49,000 Speaker 1: and Megan, only to find out nobody cares. The fact 1200 01:03:49,080 --> 01:03:51,600 Speaker 1: is we're living through a moment where your eyes and 1201 01:03:51,640 --> 01:03:54,520 Speaker 1: ears are actually more powerful than the ideas of high 1202 01:03:54,560 --> 01:03:57,160 Speaker 1: placed executives on what they think your eyes and ears 1203 01:03:57,280 --> 01:04:00,200 Speaker 1: should be attuned to. There are still many challenge is 1204 01:04:00,200 --> 01:04:02,320 Speaker 1: ahead for the independent space. Do not get me wrong, 1205 01:04:02,600 --> 01:04:04,560 Speaker 1: but take a look at the story I just sketched 1206 01:04:04,560 --> 01:04:06,880 Speaker 1: out and tell me that they're doing better today than 1207 01:04:06,920 --> 01:04:09,320 Speaker 1: ever before, and I take great joy in that, and 1208 01:04:09,400 --> 01:04:11,160 Speaker 1: I hope it's going to be an even better one 1209 01:04:11,240 --> 01:04:13,840 Speaker 1: for everybody in twenty twenty three. I think it's interesting, 1210 01:04:13,920 --> 01:04:15,800 Speaker 1: Christel when you kind of strange and if you want 1211 01:04:15,840 --> 01:04:18,920 Speaker 1: to hear my reaction to Sagres's monologue, become a premium 1212 01:04:18,920 --> 01:04:24,480 Speaker 1: subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot com, Cristal, what do you 1213 01:04:24,480 --> 01:04:27,160 Speaker 1: take a look at? Well, guys, the American people have 1214 01:04:27,200 --> 01:04:30,560 Speaker 1: been waiting nearly six decades for the truth about what 1215 01:04:30,680 --> 01:04:33,680 Speaker 1: happened to President John F. Kevin Kennedy on that faithful 1216 01:04:33,720 --> 01:04:37,760 Speaker 1: day in November fifty nine years ago. After all that time, 1217 01:04:38,000 --> 01:04:40,560 Speaker 1: under the weight of countless lies and cover ups, the 1218 01:04:40,560 --> 01:04:43,160 Speaker 1: government has never been able to persuade the American people 1219 01:04:43,200 --> 01:04:45,480 Speaker 1: that they have actually gotten the whole story. In fact, 1220 01:04:45,760 --> 01:04:49,960 Speaker 1: polls have consistently shown that majorities reject the official conclusion 1221 01:04:50,080 --> 01:04:53,440 Speaker 1: of the Warren Commission that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone 1222 01:04:53,600 --> 01:04:56,760 Speaker 1: on that day. Only around thirty percent right now believe 1223 01:04:56,880 --> 01:04:59,240 Speaker 1: that official government narrative, and at times that number has 1224 01:04:59,240 --> 01:05:02,680 Speaker 1: been as low as ten percent. Well, this week, after 1225 01:05:03,160 --> 01:05:07,600 Speaker 1: years of obfuscation, we may get new stunning answers to 1226 01:05:07,720 --> 01:05:11,280 Speaker 1: some of the thornious questions around this case. Thanks to 1227 01:05:11,320 --> 01:05:14,120 Speaker 1: a law passed unanimously by Congress back in nineteen ninety two, 1228 01:05:14,200 --> 01:05:17,800 Speaker 1: President Biden is under a December fifteenth deadline to release 1229 01:05:18,080 --> 01:05:22,760 Speaker 1: thousands more long secret documents about the JFK assassination. So 1230 01:05:23,320 --> 01:05:26,000 Speaker 1: what could be released this week? While researchers at the 1231 01:05:26,000 --> 01:05:30,000 Speaker 1: Mary Farrell Foundation, the largest private repository of assassination records, 1232 01:05:30,240 --> 01:05:33,080 Speaker 1: they believe this release could include what they describe as 1233 01:05:33,200 --> 01:05:37,600 Speaker 1: quote smoking gun evidence that the CIA not only knew 1234 01:05:37,680 --> 01:05:40,960 Speaker 1: and had closely tracked Lee Harvey Oswald, but that Oswald 1235 01:05:41,000 --> 01:05:44,760 Speaker 1: had been involved in a CIA operation prior to the assassination, 1236 01:05:44,840 --> 01:05:47,440 Speaker 1: during his time with the Fair Play for Cuba organization. 1237 01:05:47,920 --> 01:05:51,600 Speaker 1: So here is Mary Farrell Foundation Vice president Jefferson Morley 1238 01:05:51,640 --> 01:05:54,600 Speaker 1: describing what could be revealed this week. But it is 1239 01:05:54,640 --> 01:05:58,520 Speaker 1: a representative sample. What the CIA is hiding is what 1240 01:05:58,560 --> 01:06:01,040 Speaker 1: they've always hid, which is their sources and methods as 1241 01:06:01,120 --> 01:06:04,280 Speaker 1: relate to Lee Harvey Oswald. By sources and methods, I 1242 01:06:04,400 --> 01:06:10,400 Speaker 1: mean in spy techniques, infiltration, deception, psychological warfare, wiretapping, and 1243 01:06:10,440 --> 01:06:15,560 Speaker 1: the like. That's been the story since nineteen sixty three. 1244 01:06:15,680 --> 01:06:17,720 Speaker 1: But we can answer that question, what are they hiding 1245 01:06:17,760 --> 01:06:20,520 Speaker 1: with more specificity now, And this is the result of 1246 01:06:20,800 --> 01:06:22,880 Speaker 1: a lot of work by me and other researchers associated 1247 01:06:22,880 --> 01:06:25,760 Speaker 1: with the Mary Farrell Foundation. What the CIA is hiding 1248 01:06:26,120 --> 01:06:29,600 Speaker 1: is a covert operation that involved Lee Harvey Oswald used 1249 01:06:29,640 --> 01:06:32,800 Speaker 1: him for intelligence purposes in the summer of nineteen sixty three, 1250 01:06:33,160 --> 01:06:38,040 Speaker 1: three months before President Kennedy was killed. This is an 1251 01:06:38,080 --> 01:06:43,440 Speaker 1: extraordinarily serious claim and it has profound implications for the 1252 01:06:43,440 --> 01:06:45,840 Speaker 1: official story. The CIA knew far more about the Lone 1253 01:06:45,840 --> 01:06:48,960 Speaker 1: Gunman than they are admitting even today. So this story 1254 01:06:48,960 --> 01:06:51,920 Speaker 1: deserves the closest possible scrutiny. That's why the Mary Farrell 1255 01:06:51,920 --> 01:06:53,800 Speaker 1: Foundation is bring it to the attention of the press 1256 01:06:53,840 --> 01:06:56,600 Speaker 1: and the public. Morley then goes on to argue that 1257 01:06:56,760 --> 01:06:59,960 Speaker 1: personnel files related to the former head of the Psychological 1258 01:07:00,240 --> 01:07:04,320 Speaker 1: Warfare branch of the CIA in Miami would reveal details 1259 01:07:04,360 --> 01:07:08,920 Speaker 1: of this CIA operation involving Oswald, specifically how the CIA 1260 01:07:09,040 --> 01:07:13,240 Speaker 1: intentionally engineered the legend of Oswald communist Fidel Castro fan 1261 01:07:13,400 --> 01:07:16,200 Speaker 1: which become so crucial to pinning a motive on him 1262 01:07:16,240 --> 01:07:19,520 Speaker 1: as the lone killer. Remember, the visial narrative was that 1263 01:07:19,560 --> 01:07:22,120 Speaker 1: Oswald was a notorious member of the Fair Play for 1264 01:07:22,200 --> 01:07:25,640 Speaker 1: Cuba Committee, and his hatred of JFK's anti communist Cuba 1265 01:07:25,640 --> 01:07:28,400 Speaker 1: policy was the reason for his solo decision to murder 1266 01:07:28,520 --> 01:07:32,360 Speaker 1: the president. This public record of his pro Castro radicalism 1267 01:07:32,520 --> 01:07:36,400 Speaker 1: would not exist were not for publicized interactions with an 1268 01:07:36,480 --> 01:07:40,680 Speaker 1: anti Castro organization which was run by Joe Needes and 1269 01:07:40,880 --> 01:07:43,680 Speaker 1: the CIA. Now we have already learned in previous releases 1270 01:07:43,720 --> 01:07:46,240 Speaker 1: that the Fair Play for Cuba Committee itself had been 1271 01:07:46,280 --> 01:07:50,440 Speaker 1: infiltrated by the CIA, so effectively it took two CIA 1272 01:07:50,560 --> 01:07:54,080 Speaker 1: involved Cuba organizations to create the public record of Oswald, 1273 01:07:54,280 --> 01:07:57,120 Speaker 1: communist sympathizer, which the media would be fed and run 1274 01:07:57,160 --> 01:08:00,760 Speaker 1: with as explanation for why he shot Kennedy. This obviously 1275 01:08:00,840 --> 01:08:03,440 Speaker 1: raises a whole lot of questions. We already know from 1276 01:08:03,480 --> 01:08:06,320 Speaker 1: prior releases that the CIA lied to the Warren Commission, 1277 01:08:06,360 --> 01:08:09,600 Speaker 1: the government's official fact finding body, about how much they 1278 01:08:09,680 --> 01:08:13,200 Speaker 1: knew personally about Oswald. But if we learned this week 1279 01:08:13,360 --> 01:08:16,840 Speaker 1: that not only did they know who Oswald was and 1280 01:08:16,960 --> 01:08:19,879 Speaker 1: were they tracking him, but that he was actively involved 1281 01:08:19,880 --> 01:08:22,879 Speaker 1: in a CIA operation, that would indeed be a bombshell 1282 01:08:22,920 --> 01:08:26,160 Speaker 1: revelation and a huge key in understanding what really happened 1283 01:08:26,160 --> 01:08:28,880 Speaker 1: on that day, what else might still be hidden? While 1284 01:08:28,920 --> 01:08:31,760 Speaker 1: the JFK Records Act of nineteen ninety two mandated that 1285 01:08:31,800 --> 01:08:34,120 Speaker 1: all of these files be released in twenty five years 1286 01:08:34,160 --> 01:08:37,519 Speaker 1: time with few exceptions, in spite of that and estimated 1287 01:08:37,640 --> 01:08:40,840 Speaker 1: sixteen thousand documents related to the killing are still being 1288 01:08:40,920 --> 01:08:44,559 Speaker 1: hidden by the government After all these years, we deserve 1289 01:08:44,640 --> 01:08:47,880 Speaker 1: the full truth, and an overwhelming majority seventy percent of 1290 01:08:47,960 --> 01:08:52,160 Speaker 1: Americans want these records revealed now. Trump punted on his 1291 01:08:52,280 --> 01:08:54,840 Speaker 1: legal obligation under this law, and Biden has so far 1292 01:08:54,920 --> 01:08:58,400 Speaker 1: largely done the same. Last year, he released an underwhelming 1293 01:08:58,600 --> 01:09:02,320 Speaker 1: limited batch of documents delayed a more fulsome release, blaming 1294 01:09:02,360 --> 01:09:05,800 Speaker 1: the delay on the COVID pandemic, a risable claim that 1295 01:09:05,920 --> 01:09:08,280 Speaker 1: led to the administration being sued by the Mary Farrell 1296 01:09:08,320 --> 01:09:11,320 Speaker 1: Foundation for failing to comply with the ninety two law. 1297 01:09:11,680 --> 01:09:14,759 Speaker 1: Last year's memo, however, only bought Biden a year's time, 1298 01:09:14,960 --> 01:09:18,160 Speaker 1: and that year is up on Thursday of this week. 1299 01:09:18,479 --> 01:09:21,080 Speaker 1: Will he choose to continue the path of secrecy and lies, 1300 01:09:21,200 --> 01:09:24,479 Speaker 1: or will he finally give us the answers that we deserve. 1301 01:09:24,880 --> 01:09:27,759 Speaker 1: Here is Morley again on what it all means. Only 1302 01:09:27,800 --> 01:09:31,200 Speaker 1: full disclosure on December fifteenth can resolve this question. The 1303 01:09:31,280 --> 01:09:33,400 Speaker 1: joint of these files constitute a clear and simple test 1304 01:09:33,439 --> 01:09:36,200 Speaker 1: for President Biden's order. Will these forty four records be 1305 01:09:36,240 --> 01:09:39,240 Speaker 1: released next week? The Mary Farrell Foundation certainly hopes and 1306 01:09:39,280 --> 01:09:41,960 Speaker 1: expects that they will. We filed our lawsuit to complete 1307 01:09:41,960 --> 01:09:45,280 Speaker 1: the historical record of JFK's assassination as soon as possible. 1308 01:09:46,400 --> 01:09:48,360 Speaker 1: This story is just one example of why we took 1309 01:09:48,439 --> 01:09:51,040 Speaker 1: legal action. There's a lot of talk these days about 1310 01:09:51,080 --> 01:09:54,839 Speaker 1: conspiracy theories and misinformation and a lack of trust in government. 1311 01:09:55,080 --> 01:09:57,880 Speaker 1: But how can we possibly trust our government when the 1312 01:09:57,880 --> 01:10:02,120 Speaker 1: facts surrounding a critical point in American history continue to 1313 01:10:02,160 --> 01:10:06,160 Speaker 1: be concealed decades after the fact. The government is all 1314 01:10:06,240 --> 01:10:09,160 Speaker 1: out of excuses if there is really nothing to hide 1315 01:10:09,600 --> 01:10:13,559 Speaker 1: prove it, and Sager, I just don't know at this point. 1316 01:10:13,640 --> 01:10:15,920 Speaker 1: Listen and if you want to hear my reaction to 1317 01:10:16,040 --> 01:10:22,800 Speaker 1: Crystal's monologue. Become a premium subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot Com. 1318 01:10:22,920 --> 01:10:24,639 Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for watching. It was really 1319 01:10:24,680 --> 01:10:27,160 Speaker 1: great to be back here at the desk after our 1320 01:10:27,160 --> 01:10:29,200 Speaker 1: live shows. Thanks to everybody who came out into all 1321 01:10:29,200 --> 01:10:31,960 Speaker 1: of our premium subs We've got big expansion plans for 1322 01:10:32,000 --> 01:10:34,519 Speaker 1: twenty twenty three, which we teased at the premium shows, 1323 01:10:34,520 --> 01:10:36,200 Speaker 1: and I think we'll do another one of the year 1324 01:10:36,200 --> 01:10:39,000 Speaker 1: in review for our premiums to show you uh yeah, yeah, 1325 01:10:39,040 --> 01:10:40,600 Speaker 1: we should definitely do that, what we did, what we 1326 01:10:40,600 --> 01:10:43,080 Speaker 1: spent more money on over the last year, some of 1327 01:10:43,120 --> 01:10:46,080 Speaker 1: the big expansions that we have and are in discussions 1328 01:10:46,080 --> 01:10:48,639 Speaker 1: with right now. Won't continue to tease it, We'll save 1329 01:10:48,680 --> 01:10:50,280 Speaker 1: it for the premiums. If you want to join us 1330 01:10:50,280 --> 01:10:51,839 Speaker 1: and help us out, link us down in the description. 1331 01:10:52,040 --> 01:10:55,040 Speaker 1: Thanks for supporting Counterpoints and all the other expansion efforts here. 1332 01:10:55,160 --> 01:10:57,080 Speaker 1: We love you, and we'll see you all tomorrow. See 1333 01:10:57,120 --> 01:11:07,040 Speaker 1: all tomorrow.