WEBVTT - CPI Print and Google's Antitrust Defeat

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>From Marhard where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Vallet NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Heindel Bloomugswelte Quarters in New York.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Technology coming up.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 2>We go live to the White House to speak with

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Heather Bouchet of the Council of Economic Advisors, her take

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>on today's CPI print and the impacts of the Inflation

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Reduction Act.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Plus, Alphabet loses its anti trust fight with Epic Games

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 3>as a federal court jury in California rules Google Play

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 3>is a monopoly. Will break down the impact of the

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 3>antitrust ruling.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 2>And space surveillance startup true anominally raises one hundred million

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 2>dollars in its latest funning round to ramp up output

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>of its satellite that can track national threats in orbit.

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>We'll discuss with that and so much more throughout this hour. First,

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 2>that's checking on these markets. And while the initial threat

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 2>over the CPI print just running ever so slightly hot,

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 2>and one particular point in the margin generally has died down,

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and we see two tens of percent up on the NASDAK.

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 2>No great shapes we're seeing the two year you'll completely flat,

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 2>having originally just spiked high, we come back down. We

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 2>bribe Brieth what seems to be a bit of a size.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 2>People take on board the fact that really CPI is

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>ultimately slowing, but still some areas are concerned maybe at

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 2>BE rent, maybe at be of course.

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 4>The cost of your cars.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 2>We've got so much to discuss with this inflationary environment

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 2>core CPI.

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 4>Let's get back to it for a moment.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Ed The data they're coming in today basically matching estimates

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 2>and reinforcing bets that the Federal Reserve we'll have to

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 2>keep rates elevated to tame inflation in the longer term.

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 2>But in the here and the now, we just try

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>to really understand where we're dialing back on inflation. We

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 2>want to get the view from the White House Council

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 2>of Economic Advisors, to be precise, the member is Heather Bouchet.

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>You join us now and look consumer prices in general.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>The print came in well where the market had seen it.

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 2>The headline take to bob expectations on the month a

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>month just episod slightly.

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 4>But what was your read on today's print.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, certainly, as you noted, the headline was a bit

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>above market expectations. But when you look at the whole report,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you see that the pace of inflation, you know, in

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>various parts of the report, has been coming down in

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>ways that are really important for consumers. So, for example,

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the pace of inflation for groceries or slower than they

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>have been in over a year. And you know that

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>is consistent with news that we were talking about right

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>after Thanksgiving, where the price of a Thanksgiving dinner was

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>cheaper this year than it was last year. And as

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we look forward to the holiday season, you see that

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>some goods that are going to be important for families,

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>sporting goods or toys or you know, things that they

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>might buy for Christmas, like televisions or whatnot, those prices

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>have also the pace is also slowed there as well.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So there is some good news for consumers in there.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, when you look over the last quarter,

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the annualized rate of headline inflation is about two point

0:02:58.639 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>two percent.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>I would say, though a lot of consumers don't feel it.

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Now you've rightly pointed out that consumer sentiment has been

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 2>picking up. In December, it's up about thirteen percent. I

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 2>think infation expectations they've been dialing back, but well to

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 2>use on the.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Day that we get yet another word of the year.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>One word of the year has been this vibe session,

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and the feeling is that people don't feel great, even

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 2>though the economy seemingly is going pretty great. What do

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 2>you say as an administration when that hits hard on

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 2>a consumer that doesn't feel the way that you're currently

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>talking about this economy right now.

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's be very clear.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>The President has been clear, his economic team has been clear.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>We understand that high prices have been hard on families

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and that this has post challenges. Pocketbook questions are really important.

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the reasons why when I looked at

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this report today, we see actually that wages have now

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>been increasing faster than the pace of inflation for seven

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>months now, and we know that it takes some time

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>for things to you know, kind of for people's perception

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening in the economy to resonate. We're hopeful

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that as we see wages continued hopefully to outpace inflation,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that'll help people be able to get their family budgets

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>back under control.

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>The other thing we see, of course, is for the

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of workers in the economy that are production

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>and non supervisory workers, so not the managers, but the

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>production and non supervisory workers, they have fully recovered their

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>real wages back to where they had been pre pandemic.

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>So that's certainly good news. But we know that the

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>path to recover from this historic virus induced recession that

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we had and all of the challenges that we had

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>getting back up online and the supply chain challenges, so

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>much work went into making things function again in our economy,

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully as people go into this holiday season, they'll

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>see that prices are that the pace is not as

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>high as it was last year, and that'll help with

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer confidence over time.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Heather, thank you for your time. It's ed here in

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco. Our technology audience its workers just have one

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 3>very simple question, what specifics what areas are you you

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 3>seeing the Inflation Reduction Act have a substantive impact in

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 3>lowering inflation? In other words, are there any specific data

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 3>points you can give us that show the IRA has worked.

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me just focus on one today. So we saw

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in today's report on inflation, that the price of new

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>cars has fallen for the past two months, and in fact,

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>actually it's fallen for four out of the last six months.

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that we've been tracking very

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>carefully because of the Inflation Reduction Act is what's been

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>happening with US auto industry as we've made these historic

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>investments and in batteries and in electric vehicles, and of

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>course we've seen that the number of electric vehicles has

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>been rising, and we see that actually the price of

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>those cars, because there's now more competition, has actually come down.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.119
<v Speaker 1>So now the price of an electric vehicle is about

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.679
<v Speaker 1>within three thousand dollars of a car.

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 4>Then that's before the.

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Tax credit that families can receive to buy those new

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles. So that's one place where those investments are

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>helping to bring changes for consumers and families while also

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>creating good jobs here in the United States.

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 3>In that case, he a what is the White House's

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 3>reactions the news overnight that Ford has cut its production

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 3>target for the F one to fifty lightning by fifty

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 3>percent twenty four And what they're saying is they're simply

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 3>matching their output to what is what they see as

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 3>being consumer demand.

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I can't comment on that today in the details,

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we are seeing these historic investments as

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a result of the Inflation Reduction Act. We are seeing

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this uptick in sales for electric fields that we've seen

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Of course, you know this is it

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>is challenging to reshape an entire economy, to build a

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>nuclear energy, clean energy economy. But knowing that the President

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>has done what he could do working with Congress to

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to make sure that business has had the

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>support they need to be able to make these investments,

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>that's where our energy has been focused.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>There is, of course that tension that ultimately inflationary pressure

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been helped by geopolitics, by trade, in particular, by

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the fact that we are having to slow in some

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 2>ways the supply chain between the US and China in particular.

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 2>How much of a help or a hindrance is that,

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 2>particularly the moment we think of what's happening in the

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 2>chip sector.

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, let me just say a couple of things.

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you look at the pace of inflation,

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and if you were to overlay price changes along with

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>changes in what has happened in the supply chain index

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that we look to. You actually see that a big

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>part of why we've been able to get prices down.

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, right, they were at their peak nine point

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>one percent. Now we're at three point one percent for

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>headline inflation. You know, when you look at that shift,

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that mirrors these challenges that we saw

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in supply chains as an outcome of the pandemic, and

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>as businesses had to get up and running, and yet

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>there was still this virus around the world and upended

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>these global supply chains.

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 4>All the work that the.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>President did to make sure that goods were able to

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>be transported, to make sure that the ports were working,

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that played a key role in where we are today

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and getting prices down. And of course global trade isn't

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a really important part of those global supply.

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Chains, Heather.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 3>In the technology industry, there are still companies that are

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>reducing headcount and at the same time AI is driving

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 3>a number of postings which seems to be adding to

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 3>wage inflation because frankly, the numbers are astronomical on offer

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 3>to hire the best talent in AI. Does the White

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 3>House have any data that shows an AI impact on

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 3>the labor force and indeed the economy right now.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, at this moment, this technology is news. So I

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>can't we don't have like a specific estimate, but I

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>can tell you a couple of things. I mean, first,

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this is an issue that the President takes seriously. In fact,

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe today his AI Council is meeting and they're

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>having conversations about these technologies. But you know, one of

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the things that we've seen in past instances where we've

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>seen new technologies is that people's jobs tend to change,

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and it works its way as it works its way

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>through the system. So we expect that, you know, as

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is new technologies come online that'll ship the composition of

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>skills that workers need and how they're they're performing on

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the job. But just know that this is something that

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the administration is certainly focused on, as if the President

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is so focused on making sure that we're building an

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>economy from the middle out and bottom up and prioritizing

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>workers in our economic agenda.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Hebbalshi, the White House Council of Economic Advisors, Thank you

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 3>very much. Now, coming up, Google loses its a trust

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 3>court fight with Fortnite maker Epic Games. We'll discuss well

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>that all means for the two hundred billion dollars per

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>year app store industry. That's next. Google Play deliberately wields

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 3>monopoly power. That's what a federal court jury found yesterday

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 3>after liberating less than four hours following a month long

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 3>trial in San Francisco. The court fight was with Fortnite

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 3>maker Epic Games, which should accuse both Google and Apple

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 3>of being a duopoly in the app distribution marketplace and

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 3>enriching themselves by charging developers excessively high fees to this

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.719
<v Speaker 3>games an Epic reminder actually lost it challenged Apple two

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 3>years ago, the Supreme Court reviewing that one. Let's bring

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 3>in Bloomberg's Mark German and Leah Nyland to break this

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 3>all down. Outline the logic of these nine jurors in

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco. Leah, what was it that they decided on

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 3>and why?

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So they.

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 6>Found that Google wields monopoly power in the market for

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 6>app stores, and that it engaged in any competitive conduct

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 6>by paying different people, including gaming companies and smartphonemakers to

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 6>make the Google Play Store the Saul app store on

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 6>various Android phones. And so it's a little bit different

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 6>than in the.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Apple App Store. You know in the.

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 6>Apple case, you know, Apple does not allow any other

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 6>app stores on the phone, and that's long been its policy.

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 6>And Google, you know, there were all of these payments,

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 6>some worth a significant amount of money. They were paying

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 6>Samsung as much as eight billion dollars over four years

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 6>to ensure that the Google Place or really was the

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 6>best and most accessible access point for people using the

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 6>Android phone. So, I mean, those payments are really what

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 6>people think convinced this jury that you know, Google is

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 6>a monopoly, whereas in the Apple case they didn't really

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 6>have any of that type of evidence.

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 2>To that end, though Mark the reader cross is clear

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>and already actually we've seen both Alphabet and Apple having

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>to think about the business model and ultimately ultimately how

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 2>it evolves.

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Does it change from here on out on the back

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 4>of this ruling.

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 7>Oh, I certainly think so. So there was one remaining

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 7>point in the Apple case with Epic Games, and that's

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 7>heading to the Supreme Court likely in a few months now,

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 7>and that is steering right the ability for any app

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 7>in the App store to point a user to the

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 7>web to complete transaction. That means the user wouldn't have

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 7>to use Apple's billing system therefore saving the developer between

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 7>fifteen and thirty percent off the top in terms of

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 7>that Apple revenue share. And now that this jury sided

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 7>with Google, potentially that puts this idea in the heads

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 7>of the decision makers, the lawmakers on this last point

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 7>to side with Epic Games and against Apple in this case.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 7>But there's a couple things that I want to outline here.

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 7>I think Leigh is completely right. I think this came

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 7>down to optics pr and those side agreements that Google

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 7>had with Spotify, Google and other players to really promote

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 7>the Google Play Store. For those unfamiliar, there's a fundamental

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 7>difference between how app stores work on iOS, the iPhone platform,

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 7>and Android, the Google platform. Android devices have supported side loading,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 7>third party app stores, the installation of apps from outside

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 7>Google Play from the beginning. So the idea here is

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 7>that Google doesn't necessarily have a monopoly on app stores.

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 7>Google has a monopoly on Android smartphones, right, they have

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 7>this ownership over the smartphones. They're paying, like le I said,

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 7>Google to promote Google Play over a Samsung app store, right,

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 7>They're pushing users towards the Google Play Store, right. So

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 7>that's really the fundamental issue here. And in terms of

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 7>how things are going to change. Google, they're probably going

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 7>to have to allow third party billing platforms globally or

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 7>at least in the US because of this lawsuit, and

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 7>in Europe because of the Digital Markets Act in the

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 7>European Union, they're going to have to stop those side deals.

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 7>So you're going to see a lot more flattening and

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 7>potentially more third party app Store is getting traction on

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 7>Android and on the Apple side. Outside of the US

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 7>in the European Union, you're likely to see the same

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 7>thing kickoff in March.

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're going to wait for the new year, but

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 2>for now it looks as though the businesses are going

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 2>to have to realign somewhat. Bluem Meg's Mark Gumm and

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 2>great breakdown there, Len Island. As always, we thank you

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:52.239
<v Speaker 2>so much for the expertise.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, time for talking text so us like Sam Altman

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 3>is back on the conference circuit in touting AIS benefits

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 3>to humanity. In his first public appearance since Altman regained

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 3>control of Open AI, the CEO appeared at a forum

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 3>hosted by Operation Hope to discuss AI's advances. He announced

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 3>that he and John Hope Bryant, the founder of the

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Hope Organization will co chair a new AI ethics council

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 3>based out of Atlanta. Plus, the world's most valuable chip maker,

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 3>in Vidia, has become one of the leading investors in

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 3>AI companies. That's according to estimates by Dealram. The chip

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 3>maker participated in thirty five deals this year, almost six

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 3>times more than last year, making in Vidia the most

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 3>active large scale investor in AI in what was a

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 3>banner year for deal making in the sector and speaking

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 3>of in video, US Commerce Secretary Gina Rimondo says the

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 3>US is looking into the specifics of three new AI

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 3>accelerators that the company is developing for China. The announcement

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 3>comes after vowing earlier this month to restrict any new

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 3>chips that give that country AI capabilities.

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Caroline and that's stick on that one with the Commerce

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of Momundo. So just warning the US efforts to

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>build out the domestic semiconductor industry could be delayed by

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 2>years if companies are required to go through standard environmental reviews.

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Joining US now as someone who knows the space very well,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Ben Nicklish is the CEO of Element Solutions, which produces

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 2>chemicals in almost every EV but also in smartphones. Computers

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and develop the next generation chemicals that are going to

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 2>enable tech advancements. And then to that end, how much

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 2>is there a local domestic supply chain issue from an environmental.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Perspective as well.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so there's been a significant ramp and investment in

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 8>semiconductor capability in North America, but it's a muscle that

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 8>we haven't flexed in a long time, and so we

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 8>are bumping. We are seeing the supply chain bump into

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 8>some issues getting capacity online, but we're confident that it

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 8>will come online and there's a real need and capital

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 8>behind it.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 3>There's just an absolute obsession with GPUs h one hundred

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>AMD's out of three under decks, less discussion about the

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 3>infinite list of other chips and the rule materials needed

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 3>to support that infrastructure build out. What is life like

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>for you?

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 9>You threw the.

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Chaos of twenty twenty twenty twenty one, where there was

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 3>a real chip crunch industry wide.

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so the semiconductor industry has been through real volatility

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 8>in the past several years. There weren't enough chips and

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 8>then there was a big stockpile and so demand softened

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 8>and capacity additions were slowed down. It's been a roller coaster.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 8>We're fortunate to see demand recovering, semiconductor fab utilization increasing,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 8>and our business is very well poised to benefit from that.

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 5>From an element.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 8>Solutions perspective, we sell very small quantities of critical materials

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.359
<v Speaker 8>process chemistries that are used in the fabrication of semiconductors

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 8>and printed circuit boards and the assembly of electronics hardware.

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 8>Fortunately for us, we have ample capacity to meet the

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 8>increasing demand that we expect next year and for many years.

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 3>And trip you touch so many end markets smartphones, electric vehicles,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Are you so far kind of upstream that you don't

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 3>have the sensitivity to pressures on the end market or

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 3>are you recognizing some pain in the consumer?

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 8>So our business is unit driven, right, and we've been

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 8>living through a very significant draw down, one of the

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 8>largest drawdowns in the smartphone market in its history. Similarly

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 8>in the semiconductor market, the automotive market was soft for

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 8>a period back a few years ago. We're starting to

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 8>see that recover. What's great for our business is that

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 8>we're driven not just by units, but content per unit,

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 8>and as cars become computers, as computing power proliferates, and

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 8>as the technical requirements associated with that computing power become

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 8>more challenging. That's a gain for us in terms of

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 8>our volume and value in each unit and the margin

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 8>opportunity associated with it.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 2>How much of a straight line is that inevitable move

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 2>towards evs? For example, we would just had head of

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 2>bouchet On of course, from the White House Council of

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Economic Advisors, and we were putting to her like some

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 2>of the concerns surrounding the fact that the Ford lightning,

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 2>for example, the F one fifty has been cut back,

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the twenty twenty four production has been cut.

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Back and indeed in half. Is it that we will be.

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Bumpy in the road towards the shift toward EV's.

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 4>What is it that you see as a key blocker here?

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 8>Sure if you think back three years ago, the rate

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 8>of penetration of electric vehicles to the global automotive fleet

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't would have paled in comparison to what we've actually seen. Right,

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 8>So automotive electrification has accelerated relative to prior expectations, and

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 8>surely there will be bumps in the road as large

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 8>companies grapple with changing supply chains.

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 3>But the trend is there, you know.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 4>It's not a straight line.

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 8>There's volatility around that line, but the trend is very positive.

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 8>And for Element, you know, we have really differentiated capabilities

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 8>that are enabling the high performance electric vehicles you see

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 8>on the road today, and we get about one have

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 8>to two times the value an electric vehicle versus a

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 8>comparable internal combustion car. So we're excited by that increasing

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 8>penetration and we see a lot of opportunity associated with.

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 2>It, the opportunity being I'm sure market capitalization boosting.

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 4>How are you seeing your investor base change.

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 8>Ben, Our investor base is solid, sturdy, and very compelled

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 8>by the opportunities we have in front of this company

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 8>and the way we've been deploying capital and support of it.

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 8>We are seeing more energy and attention towards our company

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 8>from electrification, from innovation in high end electronics. We talked

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 8>about AI or you were talking about AI earlier. In

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 8>the proliferation of computing power to the edge of the network,

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 8>those technical challenges are ripe for us to benefit from

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 8>and enable.

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Bank the excitation development solutions, goods CAT shop.

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Of course, AI has been all we've been talking about

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 2>for twenty twenty three. Back in twenty twenty two, it

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 2>was all about crypto and it was still kind of

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 2>all talking around the holiday table, as it seems to

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 2>have been a bit on a run at least bitcoin

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 2>or want to dig into that with Kristin Smith, CEO

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>of Lockchain Association, because really all eyes have been on

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 2>the price of bitcoin, but also and also a lot

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 2>of old coins as well. Exuberant seems to have been

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 2>cautiously creeping back. Whether or not that's fundamentally driven on

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 2>the Federal Reserve and inflation, but actually idiosyncratic views that

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 2>we might have more institutional interest from spot bitcoin ETF.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Is that really what's dictating trade for you?

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 10>I think there's a combination of factors. I think obviously

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 10>the Bitcoin ETF, there's a tremendous amount of excitement around that.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 10>You know, as you recall a couple of months ago,

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 10>Gray Scale had a huge victory in the court that

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 10>is basically more or less forcing the SEC to consider

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 10>these applications more seriously. The next big sort of deadline

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 10>for when the SEC might make some move around that

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 10>is in early January, though it really could happen anytime.

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 10>But we're hearing that a lot of different applicants are

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 10>having very productive conversations with the SEC, and so there

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 10>is a lot of hope and optimism that we'll get

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 10>something like that done. I do think though, also that

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 10>you know, as you were saying, twenty twenty three was

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 10>not the great year for crypto, and twenty twenty three

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 10>is almost over. I think there is this real sense

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 10>that you know that the bad actors within the crypto

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 10>industry have been weeded out and what's left is really

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 10>the focus on what the technology can do. And so

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing a lot of optimism not just around bitcoin

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 10>from institutional investors, but sort of returning to the technology

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 10>of crypto, what it can do and how it can

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 10>improve not just finance, but you know, the way that

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 10>we interact on the Internet. So very excited for twenty

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 10>twenty four.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 2>We do end up rather than talking about blockchain and

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the underlying technology, we talk a lot about the trading

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 2>of the assets, and just to go back to bitcoin

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 2>in and of itself a sport atf you're having discussions.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 4>With members of your association.

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Is just how quickly that can actually be enacted. Say

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 2>the SEC goes go for it, You're allowed how many days, weeks,

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 2>months is it until you can actually start.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think that's a little bit unclear. I think

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 10>a lot of it is actually going to depend on

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 10>the SEC and how quickly they move. I know that

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 10>most of the applicants can turn these around pretty quickly.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 10>They have the you know, the infrastructure in place to

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 10>do so it's really getting the sign off, and so

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 10>I do think that is going to be something to

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 10>look for, you know, hopefully when the SEC makes this announcement.

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 3>The fourth Republican presidential debate they talked about crypto. Thought

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 3>that was interesting. Yes, twenty twenty four is ahead. It

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 3>seems like if twenty twenty three the bad actors have

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 3>been weeded out, twenty twenty four the congressional legislatory actors

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 3>might come in and do something for your industry. Yeah.

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 4>No, absolutely.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 10>I think the politics around crypto are shifting more in

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 10>favor of the technology. As you mentioned, we have presidential

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 10>candidates that actually had a debate in New Hampshire on

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 10>this issue just last night, but it also came up

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 10>in the Republican debate with a question with for bag

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 10>Gramaswami and Montsantis. Also seeing congressional candidates include crypto positions

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 10>in their policy platforms, and I think with the next election,

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 10>we're going to see more candidates who are elected to

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 10>Congress who have a better understanding of this technology and

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 10>why it's important for the United States to be competitive

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 10>with this and so I think as we get closer

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 10>to the election, I think the tide is going to turn.

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 10>Certainly doesn't mean we don't have those in Congress right

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 10>now that are not excited about crypto. That is natural

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 10>to have, you know, folks on both sides of the issue.

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 10>But I think increasingly the trend is in favor of

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 10>the technology and the community and the ecosystem, and so

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 10>I think twenty twenty four is really going to be

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 10>sort of a turnaround year for the crypto industry and

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 10>we're very excited about that.

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Kristen, does the Blockchain Association have a scenario for each

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 3>potential outcome? So if Biden is or is not re elected,

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 3>or there is a new administration in the White House,

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 3>do you see different avenues or paths forward for your industry?

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Well, I think there are are a couple of

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 10>key factors. I mean, a lot of personnel is policy,

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 10>and so the people who are appointed are nominated, I

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 10>should say, and then confirmed by the Senate to run

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 10>the independent agencies like the SEC and the CFTC have

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 10>an incredibly important role to play, and so I think,

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 10>you know, whether it's Biden or somebody else, you know,

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 10>Gary Gunsler's not going to be at the SEC forever,

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 10>and so we will see some changes at some point,

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 10>and so figuring out who those people are going to

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 10>be is incredibly important. But you know, we're also looking

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 10>at Congress. I think, you know, if the Senate flips,

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 10>that could have a huge impact. If the House flips,

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 10>that could have a huge impact. So yeah, we do

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 10>a lot of scenario planning. But I think the most

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 10>important thing that we're focused on right now with the

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 10>Blockchain Association is really getting the education across to policy makers,

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 10>Like this is an incredibly complex space. It's not something

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 10>that you can talk about in one conversation and have

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 10>everybody understand what the technology can do and what the

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 10>issues are. And so, you know, regardless of whether Republicans

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 10>or Democrats are in control of the White House or Congress,

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 10>I think there's a pathway forward to having you know,

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 10>sort of reasonable, successful policy, and the core the key

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 10>to that is having the right the right kind of

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 10>education and that that's where we're doing a lot of

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 10>our focus in twenty Wow.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 2>How hard is that education made when one of the

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 2>most powerful executives and suddenly in banking, Jamie Diamonds, saysage

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 2>shut it down if he was in power when it

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 2>comes to bitcoin.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, you know, it's it's it's interesting to see Jamie

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 10>diamond on the same side as Elizabeth Warren. I mean,

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 10>Elizabeth Warren is supposed to be against the big banks,

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 10>and it's very clear they're in cahoots. So I think

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 10>the fact that he said that is is uh, raised

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 10>his eyebrows among you know, certain folks that don't know

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 10>a lot about this space, because it seems sort of

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 10>counterintuitive to have those two that are on the same

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 10>side on this front. And so you know, I think

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 10>I think it actually is a conversation starter and allows

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 10>us to come in and talk about this because you know,

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 10>half of it is you know, getting the attention, uh,

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 10>you know of the policy makers, and this is certainly

0:25:58.359 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 10>an opportunity for that.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Certainly caused a few headlines that one Blockchain Association CEO

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Chris the Smith always great tab you on to reflect

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 2>on the industry all right.

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program, there's a new satellite in town,

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 3>well in space that can track national threats in orbit.

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk with Evan Rodgers, CEO of the

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 3>startup True Anomaly that's up next. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 4>Time now for our VC roundup.

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 2>General Atlantic, the investment firm whose bets have included Facebook,

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 2>now Meta, Airbnb, where it's confidentially filed for an IPO itself.

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 2>According to sources, the firm is considering listening as soon

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 2>as next year, depending on those market conditions. Meanwhile, Changshin

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Memory Technologies is delaying its own IPO and when instead

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 2>consider raising funds privately at about a nineteen and a

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 2>half billion dollar valuation. So the latest Chinese company to

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 2>call of a debut because of volatile market conditions. Meanwhile,

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Essential Ai it's an ay I start up founded by

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 2>two authors of a seminal research paper over at Google.

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 2>It's raised fifty six and a half million dollars in

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 2>new funding led by March Capital. The company will use

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 2>AI for corporate functions like data analysis and automating pretty

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 2>monotonous tasks.

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 3>Ed, all right, let's set out space True Anomaly a

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 3>US startup designing military and intelligence space reconnaissance systems raised

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 3>one hundred million dollars from investors to ramp up its

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 3>output of a satellite that can track national threats in orbit.

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Right Ventures led the series be round, with participation from

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 3>Eclipse Ventures, ACME Capital, and Menlo Ventures joining us. Now delighted,

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 3>says true Anomally CEO and co founder Evan Rodgers. Let's

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 3>start with Jackal, the AOV, but the system more broadly

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 3>explained the technology to.

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 5>Us, Yeah, thank you, ed. So, Jackal is what we

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 5>call on our economous orbital vehicle designed to fly in

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 5>close proximity safely to other satellites as its own onboard

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 5>propulsion capability. That's a chemical system and is equipped with

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 5>five different cameras that allow us to maneuver safely and

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 5>image other satellites at a high resolution pretty much in

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 5>any orbital lighting conditions, whether it's an eclipse or whether

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 5>it's fully lit by the sun. It's designed at a

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.159
<v Speaker 5>cost point that allows these systems to be proliferated at

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 5>a scale that's so far been unachievable by the defense

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 5>industrial base that's been supporting the Space Force and the

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 5>intelligence community to date, So.

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 3>If I'm the US government or I'm Space Force, how

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 3>do I get access to JACK or how do I

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 3>use it? And what are the threats in orbit that

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to gather data on?

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, the Space Force is thinking about transacting with the

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 5>private sector in a variety of ways. We ultimately want

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 5>to transact with the DoD in a way that allows

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 5>us to align incentive so the true nominally can assume

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 5>some of the technical risk that allows us to target

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 5>margins that are interesting to particularly defense investors for future rounds.

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 5>The Space Force hasn't made it very very clear what

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 5>they intend to transact on a typical firm fixed price

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 5>contractor or delivering the satellite for commercial operations or for

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 5>government operations. The Space Force is working on a strategy

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 5>to date to think through that, and we hope to

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 5>be part of the conversation there.

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 3>One partnership you do have is you're going to ride

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 3>on SpaceX at some point next year on your first mission.

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 3>What's that experience like working with SpaceX and the ride

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>share context to get out to orbit.

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX has been an absolutely fantastic partner. You know, the

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 5>reality is that SpaceX has provided launch at a cost

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 5>where companies like trinomily can get ready access to space

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 5>at a price point that doesn't break the bank. Ten

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 5>years ago, a company like trinomially couldn't exist because an

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 5>ecosystem of capabilities and infrastructure and subsystems didn't exist. For

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 5>ture only to have access to a supply chain that

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 5>really has been matured by low cost launch.

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 2>We're working with SpaceX and indeed well the US government.

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 4>What is the US government as an institution like to

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 4>deal with.

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 5>That's a great question, Caroline. It's a complicated relationship. The

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 5>DoD really has responded very positively to what Tronomi is building.

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 5>This company was founded by four co founders that spent

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 5>ten years each in the United States Space Force and

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 5>the Air Force Space as space operations officers. We saw

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 5>the transition of the DoD thinking about the space domain

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 5>as a peacetime domain to thinking about it as a

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 5>war fighting domain, and what we recognized is that that

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 5>required a new defense industrial partner explicitly focused and purpose

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 5>built for thinking about protecting the infrastructure that is in

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 5>space that we've spent hundreds of billions of dollars as

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 5>the United States and allies fielding and that really is

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 5>the backbone of global commerce and intelligence. So they've responded

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 5>very positively, and at the end of the day, it's

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 5>incumbent on turronomily to demonstrate that we can actually build

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 5>and fly safely the systems that we have designed.

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 2>And so, really this unnerving future that you paint of

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 2>war in space is that what it ends up looking

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 2>like is a protection of one's assets out there, rather

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 2>than it becoming some ultimate sort of war zone that

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 2>immediately makes one kind of go to Hollywood in one's

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 2>mind's eye at least.

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, science fiction is sort of a complicated set of

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 5>imaginaries around this and isn't always useful. The truth is

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 5>that our adversaries have spent the last twenty years building

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 5>an arsenal of counterspace weapons designed to target and destroy satellites,

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 5>and that puts the United States and its allies ability

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 5>to project power globally significantly at risk. And these weapons

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 5>are really conventional weapons, everything from missiles that are designed

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 5>to be launched from the surface of the Earth to

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 5>satellites that are designed to attack other satellites. Nobody wants

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 5>a conflict that extends into space. If we have to

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 5>fight that conflict. It needs to be done in a

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 5>way that ultimately doesn't generate debreathe that prevents the access

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 5>to space for future generations. So we can't the words

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 5>have a pyrrhic victory what General Saltzman, who's the chief

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 5>of Space Operations, calls a pyrig victory. The ideal outcome

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 5>is to terrence where we have an infrastructure in the

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.239
<v Speaker 5>space domain, the ability to gather information about what our

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 5>adversaries are doing, to hold them accountable, so that we

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 5>can hold them account on the public stage, understand the

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 5>next creation of systems that need to be built, and

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 5>ultimately deter evan.

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 3>This was a very oversubscribed round one hundred million dollar

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Series B. I know you're yet to reach unicorn status,

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 3>but what we use the cash for? How do you

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 3>grow this year?

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 5>And we're really focused on delivering against the contracts that

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 5>we've signed. To date, we've had pretty exceptional revenue and

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 5>orders traction. We have some really exciting announcements that will

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 5>come out in the next couple of months. Around that,

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm focused on investing in the team and delivering the

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 5>product and scaling production.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 10>A right true.

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Normally CEO and CO founder Evan Rogers call sign Jolly,

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm told from his time in the Space Force. Thank

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 3>you for your time here on bloom bed technology.

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's go back to talking space and because missions are

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 2>always physically taxed for astronauts, but those months long trips

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 2>away from friends, from family, they can also take a

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 2>really heavy emotional and mental toll on one's well being.

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 2>That's why hgc VIVE and its partners has sent the

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 2>first virtual reality headset for mental health usage to the

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 2>International Space Station. The headset is currently being used by

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Danish astronaut Andreas Genson. Here to tell us a little

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 2>bit more about bridging the gap between the science and

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>mental health is Dan O'Brien. He's ahualc VIVE President of

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the Americas. And Dan, what is complex? What is difficult

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 2>about sending such equipment to space?

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's actually very challenging. One we use gravity for

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 9>pretty much all of our technology on the ground and

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 9>in space, we actually had to account for zero gravity

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 9>and actually have a point of reference so that we

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 9>don't have things like drifting away inside of a space station.

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 9>So just the technological achievement to actually send something into

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 9>space like this was pretty amazing. But it's also again

0:33:57.360 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 9>just like you said, on the mental health side, the

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 9>rigors of space is actually pretty isolating, very distracting, and

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 9>it's very challenging for the astronauts. They're dealing with stress

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 9>in minutes, you know, of what we deal with kind

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 9>of in hours or weeks or years. So it's a

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 9>very high stress environment. So we want to actually put

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 9>this product up there so that we could measure how

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 9>we can make it a more efficient and productive environment

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:23.879
<v Speaker 9>for our astronauts.

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Dan, I've spent many more hours this year using virtual

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 3>mixed augmented reality with my feet firmly planted on the

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 3>ground and Earth. I'm sure you have as well. Yes,

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 3>all their differences from the experience the astronauts go through

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 3>of a virtual reality environment in zero gravity, what if

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 3>they relate to you.

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 9>I think you can look at they're doing a lot

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 9>of video experiences as opposed to something that you might

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 9>be just walking around and experiencing. But you can see

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 9>here they actually do a lot of on ground training.

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 9>So here the commander you know, and that video was

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 9>actually doing all of the spacewalk experiences and training before

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 9>he went into that environment. So what we do on

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 9>Earth is the ability to actually do a lot of

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 9>training simulation with our healthcare applications, a lot of high

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 9>stress training that we can use across a lot of verticals,

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 9>not just for NASA, but for first responders, healthcare, defense,

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:25.919
<v Speaker 9>and education. So we actually have a lot of ways

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 9>that we can use it on Earth that we can't

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 9>use it in the space station, but we can actually

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 9>bring those astronauts a lot of experiences that will just

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 9>bring them a lot of calm and serene that they

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 9>can use inside of that environment.

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Then what's the HTC getting out of sending a headset

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 3>up to zero gravity environments?

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think there's a lot for us to always learn.

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 9>We're an innovation company that delves into hardware and software

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 9>and we have been delivering new technology for the industry

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 9>for many years. We were the first company to bring

0:35:56.719 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 9>you a four GLT device or touchscreen device with our smartphones,

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 9>and then we were the first company to bring you

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 9>things like a full room scale walking around virtual environment.

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 9>So for us, it's always about being the innovation leader

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 9>in every aspect. And what we're learning now in space

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:16.720
<v Speaker 9>and being able to actually have an object in space,

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 9>it teaches us a lot about different environments that we

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.879
<v Speaker 9>can actually bring a virtual scenario to. But it's also

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 9>about that training and simulation. We can actually do a

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 9>lot in that space station with our headset and our technology.

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Leader doesn't always mean winner.

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 2>And when we think of vr AR, certainly for this year,

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 2>one goes to meta then one goes to at least the.

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Announcement coming from Apple.

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Sure, do you feel that market share will ultimately be

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 2>yours by being a leader.

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 9>To Well, it's always good to be first, right, But

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 9>at the same time, we are the reference designed for

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 9>so many of those other companies. They usually follow us

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 9>about a year behind us, whether it comes to wireless,

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 9>connectivity and technology. But even looking at Apple, like their

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 9>headset that they're going to announce is already behind and

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 9>what is actually coming out when we look at Meadow,

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 9>they have a different, completely different business model. You know,

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 9>they're looking at the users, the product, they're looking at,

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 9>you know, selling ads. In the metaverse, we're a company

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 9>that actually stands for technology, innovation, humanity. So what we're

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 9>actually trying to accomplish with our brand and our technology

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 9>is actually bringing products and solutions that will actually benefit

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 9>humanity and our users, whether they're consumers or commercial users.

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Cutting face a meta. We thank you for that.

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Dan O'Brien really talking about the marketing landscape and indeed,

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.320
<v Speaker 2>more broadly, the landscape for ARVR is of course HDC

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Vibe President of the Americas. Then that does it for

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 2>this addition of Bloomberg Technology. Has been a lot about

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 2>space air as always fifty percent in orbit, fifty percent

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 2>on a there's a lot of recap.

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Thank you to everyone that's listening to the podcast wherever

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 3>you're getting your podcasts, Apple, Spotify, iHeart, and we post

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 3>them every day on all of the Bloomberg platforms. Really

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 3>really appreciate the feedback on that one from San Francisco

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 3>and out in New York City. Here on planet Earth.

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology.