Speaker 1: Up next, How woud what Janno called? I'm part of
Speaker 1: the Remember when the media roundly dismissed the idea that
Speaker 1: COVID could have begun as a laboratory accident in Wuhan, China.
Speaker 1: Remember when so called journalists demonized anyone who thought the
Speaker 1: Wuhan lablick theory had legs as a racist, crackpot conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 1: I do. I know you do too. And now it
Speaker 1: looks like the media owes us all an apology for
Speaker 1: not doing their jobs. This is out allowed with Gianno
Speaker 1: called will thank you for joining that. While with Giano
Speaker 1: calls out. Today is a very special day because I
Speaker 1: want to talk to you directly about what's going on
Speaker 1: in our country. As you all, I'm sure are aware,
Speaker 1: we've been living in a scenario whereas freedoms have been you, sir,
Speaker 1: the ability to make money for many Americans has diminished.
Speaker 1: The ability to go outside with your normal everyday clothing
Speaker 1: without the face masks, of course, has been beyond us
Speaker 1: for over a year. The ability to just live your
Speaker 1: life as you have always gone. Why. Because COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: came around, many doctors didn't know what it was or
Speaker 1: how to respond to it, and we understand that it
Speaker 1: was new for all of us. But then there were
Speaker 1: individuals in which we relied on to tell us the truth.
Speaker 1: Certainly we know we weren't going to get that from
Speaker 1: the media person and we were in the midst of
Speaker 1: an election and an economy that was booming was no longer.
Speaker 1: So what do we do. We look for the White House,
Speaker 1: We look for our infectious disease experts to tell us
Speaker 1: how we should move in this pandemic, what should we
Speaker 1: be doing one And for many of us, we didn't
Speaker 1: begin to take it seriously until they canceled the NBA.
Speaker 1: Then that's when it was a true panic that ensued.
Speaker 1: But there was one guy, doctor Anthony Fauci, who was
Speaker 1: supposed that got us through one of the most horrific
Speaker 1: events our country has ever experienced. And unfortunately, I have
Speaker 1: some bad news to report, and I actually have a
Speaker 1: word of the day. The word of the day is finessed,
Speaker 1: doctor Anthony Fauci. Finessed. The majority of the American public
Speaker 1: and the mainstream media was totally complicit in it. They
Speaker 1: were complicit by not taking in all sides of information.
Speaker 1: They were complicit by virtue of listening to one man
Speaker 1: who in some cases did not follow all the science.
Speaker 1: They were complicit because they wanted to ensure that another
Speaker 1: man by the name of Donald Trump was going to
Speaker 1: lose the election. To what costs, people lost their livelihoods.
Speaker 1: But I guess in Trump is in president, so for
Speaker 1: them perhaps it was well worth it. And as you know,
Speaker 1: Dr Anthony Fauci is the director of the National Institute
Speaker 1: of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and he is the media's
Speaker 1: golden boy throughout the coronavirus, almost like another governor that
Speaker 1: we know who was the golden boy throughout the coronavirus,
Speaker 1: Andrew Como, the governor of New York. But thanks to
Speaker 1: the Freedom of Information Act, we now have thousands of
Speaker 1: private emails did doctor Anthony Fauci has sent or received
Speaker 1: talking about COVID nineteen And I'm gonna read one of
Speaker 1: them to you, and I'm sure you will be very
Speaker 1: upset by the fact that we've lived through all of
Speaker 1: this and this man had a point of view that
Speaker 1: he talked about on television and privately through emails he
Speaker 1: was saying something else all together. A writer sent him
Speaker 1: a note asking about face masks while traveling, and he
Speaker 1: said mask are really for infected people to prevent them
Speaker 1: from spreading infection to people who are not infected, rather
Speaker 1: than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection. The typical mask
Speaker 1: you're buying a drug store is not really effective in
Speaker 1: keeping out virus which is small enough to pass through
Speaker 1: the material. He also went on to say, this is
Speaker 1: what really gets me, and we're talking about the country's
Speaker 1: leading infectious disease expert. He said the writer if they
Speaker 1: were to where they didn't need to wear a mask
Speaker 1: during travel, to a very low risk location. All right, now,
Speaker 1: I don't know what very low risk location really means,
Speaker 1: but certainly if we listen to this SoundBite as Dr
Speaker 1: Fauci has described the important to wearing masks and honestly
Speaker 1: flip flopped on him many times, maybe he'll tell us
Speaker 1: what exactly that means, but I doubt it. Take a listen.
Speaker 1: He spoke about my emails. You look at my emails.
Speaker 1: I never in the email said anything derogatory about President Trump. Well,
Speaker 1: the true mark of someone is if they look good
Speaker 1: even when their personal emails come out. So you pass
Speaker 1: the chest that very feel with us with foot fast
Speaker 1: Now I don't know about you, but just listening to
Speaker 1: what he had to say and just hearing the various
Speaker 1: sound bites, I'm a bit confused, and I feel like
Speaker 1: Dr Fauci was also confused by telling us one thing
Speaker 1: and believe in another. Now, interestingly enough, there's been actual
Speaker 1: elected officials in the Senate and the House of Representatives,
Speaker 1: even Donald Trump himself who questioned Doctor Fauci's quote unquote science.
Speaker 1: And I'm a big believer in science. So don't think
Speaker 1: that I'm providing conspiracies here, because we can all find
Speaker 1: a media reporting on this. Senator Rand Paul was one
Speaker 1: of them. He started an argument with Dr Fauci when
Speaker 1: he came before one of the Senate committees. It was
Speaker 1: a congressional hearing on the origins of COVID nineteen and
Speaker 1: theories have circulated throughout the pandemic about whether the coronavirus
Speaker 1: sprouted in a lab and was accidentally or purposefully released,
Speaker 1: And of course the consensus varied in a lot of
Speaker 1: cases where Dr Fauci said no, it was this. The
Speaker 1: media just believed that they didn't listen to any opposing
Speaker 1: viewpoints on the issue, and they just took his word
Speaker 1: as gold. And you know it's honestly just that's not journalism.
Speaker 1: You're supposed to you hear what a person says, you
Speaker 1: investigate and you source it, and then you come to
Speaker 1: your own conclusions. You don't just take the word of
Speaker 1: one individual. And and how do I know this to
Speaker 1: be true? Because whenever Trump said something was true, they
Speaker 1: would say, oh, uh no, we need to we don't
Speaker 1: believe you, We don't believe you. And they would maybe somebody,
Speaker 1: possibly in one of those conservative media outlets, would would
Speaker 1: find something that verifies what he said. Others would say, oh,
Speaker 1: it's just a conspiracy theory, right wing conspiracy theory, just
Speaker 1: like the origins of COVID nineteen. We need to pause
Speaker 1: him for a quie break. We'll be back in a minute.
Speaker 1: So during the Senate Committee hearing, Paul and we're talking
Speaker 1: about Senator Ran Paul focused on the speculation that the
Speaker 1: virus may come from may have came from a lab
Speaker 1: in Wuhan, China, and Dr Fauci. Dr Fauci was questioned
Speaker 1: about this. Paul said, Dr Fauci, we don't know whether
Speaker 1: the pandemic started in the lab and Wuhan or evolved naturally,
Speaker 1: but what we what we want to know? Paul began
Speaker 1: to say, three million people have died from this pandemic
Speaker 1: and that should call us to explore all possibilities. Now,
Speaker 1: Rand Paul has talked about the fact that he believes
Speaker 1: that the virus did originate in Wuhan, China, in a lab.
Speaker 1: But in this instance, he was telling Dr Fauci, Listen,
Speaker 1: we have all these people who have died from COVID nighteen.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't all cards being on the table as to what
Speaker 1: we should be exploring to to see if this is
Speaker 1: true or not? Like, shouldn't we be asking these these questions.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't we be investigating everything? You know what Dr Fauci said,
Speaker 1: He told him he was wrong, flat out, You're wrong. Basically,
Speaker 1: you don't know what you're talking about. Now we're talking
Speaker 1: about Senator Rand Paul isn't just a senator. He's elected clearly,
Speaker 1: he represents his constituency constituency, but he's also a scientist.
Speaker 1: He's a fellow scientist. He's a doctor just like Dr Fauci,
Speaker 1: and he has every right just like we do who
Speaker 1: lost our freedoms and rights over the course of over
Speaker 1: a year. We should be questioning it too, but Dr
Speaker 1: Filgi said, no, you're wrong, and you know what the
Speaker 1: media did. He wrote them off as another Trump conspiracy
Speaker 1: theorist who was against science, even though he's a doctor.
Speaker 1: This is where we are in a place where you
Speaker 1: simply put, cannot just trust something that the mainstream media says.
Speaker 1: If you read it, you better go try to find
Speaker 1: five other sources to verify what you just read. I
Speaker 1: never thought that I would be in a place, especially
Speaker 1: when it comes to science, which we know the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party is supposed to be the party of science, where
Speaker 1: people who are so afraid to be honest. And we're
Speaker 1: talking about now a number of doctors who have lost
Speaker 1: everything because they were honest about what their beliefs were
Speaker 1: with the origins of COVID nineteen, how Ton in new
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen, who legitimately were labeled conspiracy theories. Let's not
Speaker 1: even just talk about that. Let's move on. Let's move
Speaker 1: on beyond just those who were labeled conspiracy theories. What
Speaker 1: about those who said that if you believe that the
Speaker 1: virus occurred in this lab in China, that you were
Speaker 1: a racist. What about that? What about if you Donald
Speaker 1: Trump labeled the virus, which a lot of reporting now
Speaker 1: backs up, and a lot of journalists, if you if
Speaker 1: you're looking at the reporting now, a lot of journalists
Speaker 1: have admitted on the record that they dismissed the the
Speaker 1: origin of the virus coming from the Wuhan lab because
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and Republicans mentioned it. Let this again because
Speaker 1: of the source of it. Instead of investigating it, they decided, Hey,
Speaker 1: you know, we're we're gonna label this, uh, this is
Speaker 1: a racism which we often see on the left. We're
Speaker 1: gonna label this as racist and we're going to We're
Speaker 1: going to say that in this case because Donald Trump
Speaker 1: meant should do. There's some fringe theory that is in
Speaker 1: the back rooms of the internet, the black hole of
Speaker 1: the internet where all Trump supporters lie and don't when
Speaker 1: they reside and don't believe in science. You understand that,
Speaker 1: you who may not have believed the mainstream media, you're
Speaker 1: not crazy. Even though your friends and family maybe have said, listen,
Speaker 1: you gotta stop listening to that. This is what you
Speaker 1: need to do. You need to go do this, that
Speaker 1: and the other because that's what the media said you
Speaker 1: should do. And he said, no, I want to think
Speaker 1: for myself. I want to do the research. I want
Speaker 1: to see the compelling evidence. Of course, we all want
Speaker 1: to be safe. And I'm not saying that folks should
Speaker 1: not have taken precautions. Absolutely they should have, but we
Speaker 1: we we want the press to hold those accountable for
Speaker 1: what they what they told us. But they're not gonna
Speaker 1: They're not gonna do that because they've been complicit. You know,
Speaker 1: it's interesting. There's an individual who's a reporter. He used
Speaker 1: to work for Fox News Channel. He recently tweeted about
Speaker 1: the origins of it. And as we know, China has
Speaker 1: not obliged American investigators to go into this particular lab
Speaker 1: and and and see was there any origins of it theory.
Speaker 1: They've pretty much locked Americans and any health officials out
Speaker 1: of the process. It's a guy by the name of
Speaker 1: Adam hows Ling. He has reported and we're talking about
Speaker 1: the origins of it. He is reported that U. S
Speaker 1: Intelligence now has a Chinese defector with Wuhan Info in
Speaker 1: Chinese trying to produce variants that suggested came from bats
Speaker 1: to cover up that the coronavirus originally came from a lab.
Speaker 1: And we're talking about that that Wuhan Lab in particular.
Speaker 1: Now I'm interested in knowing now with the press taking
Speaker 1: a turn, said, oh maybe that was something to this
Speaker 1: after all. Sorry they we you know, pretty much ended
Speaker 1: livelihoods for millions of people across the across the country,
Speaker 1: and we were complicit and uh not actually getting a
Speaker 1: fact fact based analysis and getting other points of view
Speaker 1: and allow them to speak openly about this. Maybe maybe
Speaker 1: maybe maybe it'll jump in on it now and see,
Speaker 1: you know, how to how to possibly uh verify what's
Speaker 1: what's being reported now I kind of doubt it though.
Speaker 1: You know what, folks, I think what we're looking at
Speaker 1: now is medium outpractice. The institution that is supposed to
Speaker 1: look out for our best interests has failed us. They've
Speaker 1: been derelicting their duties, and now it's upon us to
Speaker 1: look for other sources of information or verify three or
Speaker 1: four times what we read because we just simply put,
Speaker 1: cannot be trusting to an institution that has failed us
Speaker 1: far too many times. You know, you would think when
Speaker 1: officials like CDC former CDC Director Robert Redfield back the
Speaker 1: live leak theory, you would think the media would take
Speaker 1: it more seriously. Some of the scientists that we're working
Speaker 1: in the Wuhan lab. They're back in November twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: were hospitalized with COVID nineteen symptoms. That's back in November
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, among other circumstantial evidence. We've seen other instances
Speaker 1: where there was clearly, in my opinion, a cover up
Speaker 1: by way of China. Why don't you allow people to investigate?
Speaker 1: We know exactly how COVID nineteen would benefit China. They're
Speaker 1: gonna overtake the US economy sooner than they I'd have
Speaker 1: And truthfully speaking, when Trump got in and he was
Speaker 1: ushering in a prosperity that we've never seen before. The
Speaker 1: lowest black unemployment rate ever recorded, the lowest his spending
Speaker 1: unemployment rate ever recorded, the lowest for Asians, winning fifty
Speaker 1: year low. I mean, the list goes on and on.
Speaker 1: With GDP growth rocketing, you know, we can talk about
Speaker 1: spending it. I'm all about us containing our spending as
Speaker 1: a country. I think we all should always should do that.
Speaker 1: But the Trump was spending money, but we had a
Speaker 1: GDP growth that would have allowed us to spend and
Speaker 1: be able to pay whatever debt we head back, especially
Speaker 1: if things were to continue. Also we know China trade.
Speaker 1: Trump was very hard on China when it came to trade,
Speaker 1: and there was a lot of words fired back and forth.
Speaker 1: When it came to trade. We're talking about a trade
Speaker 1: deficited over five hundred billion dollars a year. You're talking
Speaker 1: with the B five million, five hund a billion dollar
Speaker 1: trade deficit with China. And Trump said, hey, we need
Speaker 1: we need to get this this deficit under control. They
Speaker 1: need to be doing better trade with us. We we
Speaker 1: shouldn't be at a deficit. Of course, mainstream media, oh no, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: we can't have that. We absolutely cannot have that. We
Speaker 1: you know, we don't want to get into the fight
Speaker 1: with China. We don't want to get into a fight
Speaker 1: with China. I mean, you're the president of the United States.
Speaker 1: You represent your country. You should be getting the best
Speaker 1: deal for your country. And the economy continued to do well.
Speaker 1: So I can't factually say that China released it, but
Speaker 1: I can say it, in my opinion looks like it
Speaker 1: to me. It in my opinion, looks like that it
Speaker 1: would have benefited them, especially with all the fights that
Speaker 1: were going on when it came to trade. And if
Speaker 1: you can weaken the US economy and thereby other economies
Speaker 1: around the world. You're in a position to really dominate.
Speaker 1: We know that China has been doing work in Africa,
Speaker 1: we know they've been doing work all all across the
Speaker 1: globe because they want to be the world's superpower. We
Speaker 1: understand that. So we we understand exactly what, why, why
Speaker 1: it would make sense for China to release something like
Speaker 1: that from their point of view. I mean, all of
Speaker 1: us obviously suffered because of it. How many people have
Speaker 1: lost loved ones because of this, millions of people across
Speaker 1: the world, And then you look in the US and
Speaker 1: you look state by state. This was a very serious thing.
Speaker 1: And we continue to see evidence that points to China.
Speaker 1: And maybe now the media is beginning to think, oh,
Speaker 1: maybe we should hold them, account of them. But what
Speaker 1: will happen? What would Joe Biden do? We know about
Speaker 1: his son and his business dealings with China, And we've
Speaker 1: heard the reporting from the New York Post and Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's sons business partner who talked about tem percent for
Speaker 1: the big Guy, which he alleged was ten percent of
Speaker 1: whatever Joe Biden's son earned would go to Joe Biden himself.
Speaker 1: We understand that. So can we have faith and a president,
Speaker 1: a commander in chief to take action if we were
Speaker 1: to discover, and it were to be fully verified that
Speaker 1: China unleashed this virus in the world, can we expect
Speaker 1: him to do anything about it? I don't have much hope,
Speaker 1: my friends. I'm gonna be honest with you about that.
Speaker 1: I really don't. Before we move on, let's take a
Speaker 1: quick brand back in a second. I mean, the question
Speaker 1: is that political correctness play a part in all of this?
Speaker 1: Did it? I mean it was? Was that a part
Speaker 1: of it? You can't call people out now because it's
Speaker 1: deemed racist. I don't know, but perhaps it did. I
Speaker 1: know for some folks that truly did. If you read
Speaker 1: the New York Times and the Washington Post, it clearly
Speaker 1: clearly shows that if you if you mentioned China in
Speaker 1: a particular light, especially if it was coming from Trump,
Speaker 1: it was deemed to be racist. We saw what Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi did. She went down to Chinatown in San Francisco
Speaker 1: and said, hey, we're open for business. And I'm not
Speaker 1: sure if that tweet is still up because she called
Speaker 1: Trump essentially a racist for saying, hey, we need to
Speaker 1: close the border um allowing certain people into into the
Speaker 1: country coming from particular regions of the world, it was
Speaker 1: considered racist. Do we see group thinking media? Absolutely? Absolutely.
Speaker 1: Whatever the New York Times says, it's gold for so
Speaker 1: many people in the media, it's the gold standard, especially
Speaker 1: especially that idea. Is disappointing when you see them operate
Speaker 1: with so much liberal bias on these issues on a
Speaker 1: weekly basis, and sometimes they don't even admit it. And
Speaker 1: this is this is what I don't understand. Where are
Speaker 1: the standards in journalism. They've gotta be more, more, more
Speaker 1: honest journalists out there, and I know that there are.
Speaker 1: We had hair is foking on a couple of maybe
Speaker 1: two or three weeks ago. I had hair Is foking
Speaker 1: on talking about integrity and the press. I see some
Speaker 1: of my colleagues in in the in the media, Fox
Speaker 1: News in other places they do. But you see a
Speaker 1: report comes out by them, and people on New York
Speaker 1: Times and other places try to debunk it and ends
Speaker 1: up being true. And you know what, I gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: I am honestly tired of Donald Trump being so right
Speaker 1: on these issues. He'll say something that media will say, oh,
Speaker 1: that's completely outlandish, can't be true. It sounds crazy. And
Speaker 1: to be honest with you, he said some things where
Speaker 1: I'm like, no, that can't be true. It does sound crazy,
Speaker 1: and then he comes out he was right the whole time.
Speaker 1: I'm honestly, I'm tired of it because I expect much
Speaker 1: more from our institutions. I expect much more from our press.
Speaker 1: I expect them to operate with integrity. I expect them
Speaker 1: to be unbiased, which is almost not even a word
Speaker 1: you can apply to the mainstream media because some of
Speaker 1: them are operating like democrats with press passes all day.
Speaker 1: And now we're in a scenario where our lives, our
Speaker 1: livelihood for many of us have been usurped. Folks have
Speaker 1: lost their families and couldn't even go to the funerals,
Speaker 1: they couldn't travel on planes. And we find out that
Speaker 1: one man, Dr Anthony Fauci, and there's thousands of emails
Speaker 1: out there, and I encourage people to go we as
Speaker 1: much of it as you can wasn't completely in totally
Speaker 1: honest with us. And that, my friends, is why I
Speaker 1: needed to speak to you very directly, just one on one,
Speaker 1: because I'm very, very disappointed well where we are as
Speaker 1: a country, and my only hope is that we'll see
Speaker 1: more people who are willing to come out and be honest.
Speaker 1: I'm hoping that there the factor that Adam Howsley is
Speaker 1: reporting on, who has Wuhan info. I'm hoping that that
Speaker 1: person comes to light, and I'm hoping that our government,
Speaker 1: our government takes very serious action if it is proven,
Speaker 1: if it is proven without question and without doubt, that
Speaker 1: China unleashed its virus in the world, that there will
Speaker 1: be legit action taken and no other country will be
Speaker 1: able to do this to us. Again, thank you for
Speaker 1: joining me today on Outline with Giano Caldwell. Thank you
Speaker 1: all again, God bless. If you're enjoying the show, please
Speaker 1: leave us a review and read us with five stars
Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts. If you have any questions for me,
Speaker 1: please email me as Outlied of Gingli Street six dot
Speaker 1: com and I'll try to answer them in our future episodes.
Speaker 1: And please sign up for my monthly newsletter at Gingli
Speaker 1: Street sixt dot com slash you'all a loud. You can
Speaker 1: also follow me on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and parlor at
Speaker 1: Gianno Caldwell and if you're interested in learning more about
Speaker 1: my story, please pick up a copy of my best
Speaker 1: selling book titled Taken for Granted, How Conservatism Can Win
Speaker 1: Back to Americans to Liberalism Failed. Special thanks to our
Speaker 1: producer John Cassio, researcher Aaron Kleinman, and executive producers Debbie
Speaker 1: Meyers and Speaker New Gang, which all part of the
Speaker 1: Ginglish three sixty network