WEBVTT - Chiefs TAKING OFF? Mahomes-Baker MVP race, Steelers-Bengals predictions | Nick Wright NFL

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What Drip with Nick Wright, Episode three seventy nine.

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>This episode as always in fact, let me just make

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it so you guys can see it is brought to

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you by our friends at boost Mobile. If you're watching

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, when I do other people's podcasts, I turn

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the little mic flag like this to promote my own podcast,

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's in the screen. But when you guys are

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>watching this podcast, you know what podcasts are watching. So

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>my friends a boost Mobile get the added visibility. A

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>big day we have. We're gonna be doing our gambling

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>show later today that you guys will hear tomorrow. We

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>have a ton to do today. It is also my

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>wife and Demons's mother's birthday, so we are going to

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>try to be as efficient with our time as possible

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>because Pal, I'm a little behind on some of the

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>birthday stuff and the birthday is today, so there might

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be some wrapping that needs to be done, purchasing that

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>needs to be done. There Did I did I just

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>moments ago secure the cake? It's possible. Did you hear

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>me on the phone to make sure? Yeah? No, No,

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a social media post. It was a cake

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for your mother's birthday, and you know how old is

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>your mother today? There's no way to tell, and so

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the yeah uh and so no, there's no way to tell.

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't believe it or not, demon's you don't know.

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And so there is just a lot we need to do,

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>which is why I expected today to be a very

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>efficient bang bang bang bang bang. And then the producers

0:01:54.280 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>just chummed the waters reminding me about some ofpal Bill

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Simmons and the Ringer's latest rankings, and I cannot stay away.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So before we even get to straight to voicemail brought

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>to you by Boost Mobile, let me just address two

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>things as quickly as I am able to. So the

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>latest Ringer Top one hundred came out and Bron is

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>outside the top ten, and on he's eleven, And on

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>its face, I don't actually that is within the range

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of what is you know, in my opinion, an acceptable ranking.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But it is what kills me is who is number ten?

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So let me make sure I have this right. And

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a little frustrating to me, and I think

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it's fair. So eleven is Bron? Number ten is durant?

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I knew it didn't. I didn't even see the list.

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I swear I didn't even see the list.

0:02:59.280 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 3>That's crazy.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>There's just no argument that he's better, and there's no

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>argument that he's more available. There's no argument that he's

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>more durable or reliable. So and by the way, Steph

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>was seven. I I don't think I I think Bron

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 1>is still better than Steph. That at least, though intelligent

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>people can disagree like all that that that is a

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>debatable point. I don't get why like people are like, well,

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Bron's forty, Durant's old too, and Durant misses way more

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>time and and so I just that that that just

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>on its and this is not a shot at Kevin Durant.

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>He is if he, Steph and Bron are all rewriting

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>what is really stick for old guys in this league

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:09.559
<v Speaker 1>to do? But it is I don't get why Durant

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is a good that because you

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>can do and this is a great interactive They do

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a really good job with these the visual pieces of

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>these articles. But Durant ended last season fourteenth. I don't

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>know why you've jumped at what happened where he jumps

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to ten. I just don't. I don't I don't get it,

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and again, I think Durant is unbelievable. The Rockets might

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>be my pick to win the championship this year. This

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>is I am not trying to beef with Durant. I

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>just were yet to have the moment, certainly yet to

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>have the moment post Golden State, where there is a

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>credible evidence or even eye to based argument that Durant's better.

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's a little frustrating. The other thing they put

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in there was a quote from Bill where he said,

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>if the Nuggets win the title and he wins MVP, again,

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I assume again I haven't listened to this. I've been

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>so in football mode. I don't think he means finals MVP.

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>He means regular season MVP. He's indisputably one of the

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>ten best players ever, and so I don't think that

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>he being Jokic is what. I don't know if I

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>said that on the front end, I don't think that

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>is necessarily even an incorrect take. It just though, does

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>bear mentioning, because as you guys know, I am the

0:05:52.279 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>self appointed czar of top tens, having to have ten

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>people in them. If you are arguing that if they

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>win this title, they being Denver Joker is top ten,

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>then you are arguing three of the following people are not. Okay,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>bron Kareem, Michael, Magic, Russell, Wilt, Duncan, Kobe, Bird, Dream, Shaq, Steph.

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>That is I think a pretty universally agreed upon top twelve,

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>with respect to Jerry and Oscar and Hell, if we

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>want to go super old school Mike in and with

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>respect to Doctor j and Moses and whomever, that's the

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:58.239
<v Speaker 1>top twelve. So if Joker wins, I think most people

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>are gonna say Dream is out if he's if he's

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in or not, so there, that's the easiest one to

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>take out. I think Bill might say Wilt is out.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't, but I think Bill maybe would. And then

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>then it gets a little tricky, which is who is

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>If we're just saying Dream and Wilt are the easy outs,

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>which and again I think Wilt's the sixth gradest player ever,

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>but you're taking out Kobe, Bird, Shack, Steph. I don't know.

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>So four MVPs, which is what it would be for Joker,

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and two rings would And by the way, I didn't

0:07:56.200 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>excuse me when I said that's not including it, it's

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>not including Durant I didn't even think about that, But

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Durant's not in the top ten. It is top tens

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>are gonna get really prickly for people if let's say

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this hypothetical happens and Joker all of a sudden has

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>multiple rings and four MVPs and has kind of elbowed

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>his way in there, because it's not gonna be as

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>simple as okay, we're just dropping dream who By the way,

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't have as twelfth, I have his tenth. I

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the list I gave you guys was the order of

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>my one through twelve. But is Joker better than Shack?

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I that's it. That's a tough sell. Maybe like it's

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it is. Do we think he's already better than Steph?

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't with one more ring? Maybe it's the there

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going what's going to become popular demons in ten

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>years are all time top tens that do not include

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Kobe or Bird And that is hard for me to

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>wrap my mind around. But I've got Kobe eight, Bird nine,

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's with them ahead of Steph, Shack, Joker. I

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>know some people disagree with it, So it's just that's.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 2>That's the most complete NBA players I've seen. I think

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 2>he has everything. I do think he's probably going to

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 2>sneaking that top ten by the end of everything.

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, he is unequivocally, I don't know if I should

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>say it's one of the greatest. He's one of the greatest,

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>probably five or six offensive players. Ever, I struggle a

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>bit with the defense. Yeah, well he gets the no again.

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think he's like some massive liability defensively.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 3>It's not the but there's some holes on that side now.

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So so Duncan might be the greatest defensive player well

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>dream post Russell. Duncan's one of the two greatest defensive

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>players post Russell. And to me, Duncan's offense is better

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>than Joker's defense obviously, and but offense is worth more

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>than defense. It's tricky. It's tricky. I'm not again, I'm

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>not here to say that's an outrageous take like Joker

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>has earned it. It is also the other thing, just

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>real quick that Bill Bill, when he was talking about Giannis,

0:10:55.200 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the fact that Yannis has only won eight playoff series,

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>which was crazy, like to think about like that he

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>did a builded a really good thing where he's talking

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>about the you know, all time Playoff series one and

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>bron has forty one, Duncan has like thirty five, Kobe

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I think thirty two. Again, this is Bill's thing, not mine.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But from listening to it, Jordan had I think like

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, and he mentioned how Giannis has eight. I

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, wow, like he won four the year they

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>won the titles. Joker has ten. So when we are again,

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this assumes he actually gets to fourteen because he wins

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>four more. I have a little allergy too, saying a

0:11:54.880 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>guy who's been passed round two twice ever and now

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be three times if they win the title,

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>is you know we're gonna bump him ahead of Kobe Bryant,

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>who went to seven NBA finals. Like so that that

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>part of it just is just reflexively it feels I

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>mean Duncan went to six finals. I don't even know

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the conference finals off the top of my head. That

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that part feels wrong. Yeah, but it maybe it's not,

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I the I I do think though for Joker,

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he has reached the ceiling he can get to as

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>far as where he's ranked aps in another title, like

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>wherever he is right now, he winning, he has maxed

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>out how high you can climb based on individual accolades,

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>like he is as high as a one ring player

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>can be. And people can say that's reductive or that's silly,

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's not it's totally fair. In the it's just

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>totally fair. And the guys are telling me Bill said

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he'd be there with Bird and Magic. I think Bill

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>has Magic rated lower than I do. I think Bill has,

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>like to me, Magic is in a slight tier above Bird,

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that Bill has Bird and Magic in

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the same tier. But that okay. For a show that

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I said was gonna go really fast, we just spent

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes on something that wasn't even in the rundown,

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's great. We haven't even gotten to straight to

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 1>voicemail brought to you by Boost Mobile, so let's get

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>right to it. Go ahead, pal, or no, not go ahead.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Brian Branch's one game suspension has been upheld. Lucas scored

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five in his preseason debut, and the Boston Coaches

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>beat the Boston media fifty seven to four. They said,

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think the What's Right crew could score more

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>than four?

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think Demons could hold his own. I

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like they go ahead.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'd have like fifteen alone if we I

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 3>don't know what, like quarters.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They were the problem.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Because it's the staff, the guys X dogs.

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, I mean there's some former pros on the staff. Yeah,

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean former and Missoula was a five year D

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>one player. The problem would be this what what's that look?

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean Joe Mizuela, yea, I would, I would.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Joe Missoula played a higher than thirty games at West

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Virginia and he was greaty.

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 2>He looked like a gritty guy. But yeah, in these

0:14:58.360 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 2>days he's probably got the checkers.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>The word here would be the problem for us. We would,

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I honestly think we maybe would need you like to

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>come off the bench if we wanted, if we wanted to,

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>like if the whole goal was let's get to double

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>digits and funnel it through Demanse. I think if we

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just started the game like that, they would just correctly

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>be like, Okay, he's doubled at all times. The other

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>four idiots got to go four on three and we

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>might just be cooked. I feel like I can't prove it,

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like vic is probably a good athlete.

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I can prove it.

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Me.

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Dan and Matt are just drawn dead that these are

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the things I know, and so it would really we

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>would really need the demands vic two man game to

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>be crushing. I don't know I would have met. I

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>think Paul's probably fine. But you know Matt, Matt, now

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that he's a big bougie executive, you know, is enjoying

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the spoils of success. And I've seen that. I've seen Daniels,

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I've seen Daniel's Twitter avatar picture. I just don't think

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he's instilling a lot of fear in the opposition. Sorry, Daniel,

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm not either. For the record, who just

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>said we've met? Oh yeah, I know no, Oh, I

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>know that, Daniel. But I'm trying to be relatable for

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the audience as well. No, Daniel, he was at the

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Trinage years ago. Okay, we now still haven't even started

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the show. This is a disaster. Like great subscribe review. Please,

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>hopefully everyone's enjoying today's programming. Let's get to the actual

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>topics at hand.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 3>So your chiefs are looking normal again.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>The offense is humming where she Rice is off of

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 2>that six game suspension, Mahomes is saying it's going to

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 2>be hard to keep him off the field. Andy Reid's

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 2>saying that he looks good and he's in shape. Are

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 2>you expecting the Chiefs to kick it into a new

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 2>year with Rashi Rice back? I'm expecting that sixty seventy

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 2>from Holmes in this game.

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh you got a little, you got a little. I

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have a little taste on four and a half

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>or something. I mean, that's that's what that sounded like

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to me. Uh So, here's what I think. I think

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the offense is gonna look excellent. I do want to

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>say I don't know what's going on with Josh Simmons.

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be a serious personal family issue, the

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that he left the team abruptly. Andy won't talk

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>about it. He referred it to Brett Veach. I I

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>have no insight on this, but you know, I would

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>not expect him to play this week. Luckily, Jalen Moore

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>more than acquitted himself well last week, and I think

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he's fine in the short term. I actually think veteran

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Moore is probably about as maybe I'm wrong, as

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>good as rookie Josh Simmons. Josh Simmons is so exciting

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because as a rookie he's been good and so it's

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>about what he's going to be. What I do think

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is the Chiefs are now gonna be able to hit

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>every quadrant of the field and Rashi Rice. I think

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>people had forgotten what Rashi Rice was doing before he

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>got hurt, from the playoffs through the regular season. Once

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>he got a hang of it. And I said this

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>on the show, I'll say it again, and then I

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>want to actually talk about the Lions. I am not

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Rashi Rice is not a conquering hero returning. Okay, Rashie,

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>if it was just he blew out his knee and

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he's been out a year, that would feel one way. Instead, listen,

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>he is incredibly lucky he didn't end his career that

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>day on the Texas Highway, Okay, And he's even luckier

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>he didn't end somebody's life. I am not going to

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>hold that against him forever moving forward, But I also

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>am not going to act like, you know, this is

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a super feel good story, you know what I like.

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So he was very very fortunate that that didn't end

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>worse than it did, and he now has to kind

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of earn back everyone's trust. Now that that has been

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>said on TV and on the pod repeatedly, I now

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable talking about him just the player, and from

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving of his rookie year through when he got hurt,

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>he played nine games, not including the playoffs. In those

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>nine games was eight seven catches for ninety yards a game,

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and in the playoffs he had another two hundred and

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards. He's excellent and he's going to play the

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Juju intermediate role. So Travis will have more open spaces,

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Rashi will have more open spaces. Thornton and Xavier taking

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the tops off the defense, and it's I think the

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs offense is gonna look fantastic. I also, however, want

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the other side of last week's game

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>for a moment, which is the Lions, their media, their fans,

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and most notably their coach and quarterback still as of

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>yes yesterday whining about a correct call. I've never seen

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>anything like it that. Dan Campbell was still and I

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>like Dan Campbell a lot, he was still yesterday complaining

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that they took the Jared Goff touchdown off the board.

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>There seems to be some real it's in dispute whether

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>or not the refs on the field got help from

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>New York or not on it. What there is not

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a dispute on is that that was a penalty. It

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>is the Lion's stance seems to be yes, it was

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>against the rules, but the refs didn't instantly call it.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Therefore it being called is unfair and to the point

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to where now I wish they had just gotten it,

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>because the Chiefs controlled that game regardless, like it is

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a level of whining that for something that was definitively

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>against the rules. That is odd to me. And it's

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>not my it's it's no one's fault but your own

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't know that if Goff is under center

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and goes out for motion, he has to pause for

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a beat, and if he's in shotgun he doesn't. That's

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not being as buttoned up as you should have been.

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's weird to me with a game demands a

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Monday night against Tampa that if they win it, they

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>are effectively back in first place in the conference, and

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>if they lose it, they're four and three, having lost

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a head to head tiebreaker to Tampa and already being

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a game down in the head to head with Green Bay.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just weird, all right. I want to go back

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Chiefs just for a moment to talk League MVP.

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>This segment is presented by our great friends hard Rock.

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Bet all right, go ahead, pal, So.

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Baker has climbed to number two in MVP odds.

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Ahead of him is Mahomes. Those are both of your

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 2>guys that are in the MVP race. We're sponsored by

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 2>hard Rock, so they've created this marker for you. They've

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 2>got a Baker, Mahomes or Baker to win MVP at

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 2>minus one fifty or you could bet the field at

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 2>plus one oh five.

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So here's so shout out to hard Rock on this

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>not just making this and this market is currently available

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, by the way, for making this an either

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>or side meaning I don't love when it's just when

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it's one way markets because then you can't tell what

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the fair price is. Does that make like if it's

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>just a yes bet or just a no bet, you

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>can't you can't get a feel for what the fair

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.360
<v Speaker 1>price is. When it's a two way mark minus one

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty and plus one oh five. There's obviously some juice

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in there because they're not the same number. But those aren't.

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>It's not minus one fifty and for either or and

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>then minus one fifty for no. And I've got to

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you, I think Baker or Patrick to be able

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to get either one of them to win MVP at

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>only minus one fifty is a pretty solid bet. Now,

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>full disclosure, I won't be making it because I already

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>have this bet covered. I have Baker in the preseason

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>at thirty five to one on hard Rock, and I

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>have every year. It's like an annuity. Every year I

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>bet Patrick to win MVP, and then every three years

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.959
<v Speaker 1>or so it pays, so so I already have them.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I have these bets covered. But if you guys remember

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>our preseason gambling show, I said, I thought Tampa was

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be the one seed, and if Tampa's the

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.360
<v Speaker 1>one seed, Baker's got a real shot at m VP.

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I didn't expect it to be this type of, you know,

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>insanely hot start. The reason I like the Baker or

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Patrick piece of it Demon's is so many of the

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>preseason favorites are just out. So obviously Joe Burrow is out.

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Literally I think Lamar's out, Like what the agree. Okay,

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think missing missing two games doesn't knock

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you out, but I just think being one in five, like, look,

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>they would have to go They would have to go

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>ten and one the rest of the way for Lamar case. Right, Okay,

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So then you look at the other teams that could

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>have great records, right, Daniel Jones is not gonna win

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>League MVP because a lot of people think Jonathan Taylor's

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>been the best player on that team. Dan Jones been excellent,

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's just to me, Daniel Jones is not gonna

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be League MVP. But they right now are the one seed, right, Yeah,

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Rogers team only has one loss, he doesn't have the numbers,

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think he's going to so he's not

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna win League MVP. I you go to you know,

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Herbert was a trendy pick. They fell off some. Josh

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Allen is still obviously a viable candidate, but he's had

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>some hiccups the last few weeks. Right, you go to

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the NF seat. Jaden's team isn't that good record wise,

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>So he is and his number has been fine, but

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he's also miss time. He's gotten uphill battle golf. I

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>just I don't see it. Maybe I'm like and also,

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the team's records fine, but you might be like Nick,

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are three and three. No, I understand that,

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But I also feel like Patrick somehow like has a

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>narrative momentum going for him with getting Rashiba back. So

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, to me, Patrick and Baker, their real competition

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>would and I don't think Jordan Loves had some crazy year.

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 1>The real competition demons is Josh and Stafford.

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 3>And if they start winning games.

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>No, no chance, nuts, no, no, I mean, Dak's not

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a better year than Burrow did last year,

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys aren't gonna do better than nine wins

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>like Burrow did, and Burrow didn't have a real shot

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>at it. Stafford is viable, right, but Puka being banged

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>up hurts his chances. Yeah, So I do think Bake

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>you're getting basically you get Baker or Patrick at minus

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>one fifty. I think that's legit. And if you think

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Baker's gonna fall off and the Chiefs aren't gonna have

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a good enough record, you can just take the other

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 1>side of it at plus money. So that's I think

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a sick bet by our friends at hard Rock

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and this show is brought to you by our new

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet. If you love betting on sports,

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>you just love sports and want to try betting, the

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet sportsbook gap makes it simple plus packed

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>with great insights, not stop promos every day of the week.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Week seven kicks off with Steelers Bengals. I'm looking ahead

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>already to Sunday in Kansas City. Hard Rock Bet stats

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>up right here in the app. Here's what the app

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is showing me Arrowhead. You guys, they've won thirteen in

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a row at home as a favorite, their massive favorites

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>over the Raiders and on a six game streak though

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of failing to cover against divisional teams. That's interesting. Maybe

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they snap it Sunday. If so, probably need a little

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>help from cream Hunt, who's scored a touchdown in five straight.

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a weird one. Kreamont has scored a touchdown

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in five straight Week seven games. How about that? Also

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>need Xavier Worthy, He's on a four game touchdown streak

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday games when the Chiefs are favorites. If you

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't tried your first bet on hard Rock Bet, there's

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>still time for you. To get one hundred three dollars

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets. If you win, just places a five

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars bet and if it hits you get not only

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>your winnings but also an extra one hundred and fifty

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars pardon me in bonus bets. And tonight on hard

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet you can get a Thursday Night profit boost

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for the game boost, your same Game parlay or SGP max,

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>so your bet pays extra winnings, new promos every day.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you're listening to this later, just open the

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>app and check out what you've got any day of

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the week. Download the hard Rock Bet app today, take

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a look around and make your first deposit payable in

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>bonus bets, not a cash offer offered by the Seminal

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Tribe of Florida. In Florida offered by Seminal hard Rock

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Digital LLC and all other states, must be twenty one

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one eight

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>eight to eight. Admit it. In Indiana if you are

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>someone you know, as a gambling problem wants help call

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred and nine with it, gambling problem called

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio,

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee or Virginia. All right, demansay, let's get to some

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of these other games quickly, please.

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 2>The Eagles are coming off that two game losing streak,

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the last one being the Giants, and they're head it's

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 2>to Minnesota. And you went from wanting to see the

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 2>passing game to then them just playing a normal game.

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 2>They failed at both those tasks. What do you expect

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 2>to see them? You see out of them in this game?

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Did this line surprise you?

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 3>It's a little weird.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Goals only being point and a half favorites against the

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Vikings team that's going to be starting a backup quarterback,

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a Vikings team that's been fine. But you know, I

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think as wild people. To me, that was that's

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>real evidence Vegas is cooling on the Eagles a bit. Yeah,

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that that they are.

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 3>They're just weird.

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they are weird, and I don't think Saquan is

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to save them. I think, say the

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and eighty touches from last year. Is just

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't seem to me to have the exact same

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>burst in. The offensive line isn't quite as good this is,

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and the defense is just mediocre. This is Demand's an

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for Jalen Hurts two show the world who he

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is and that that's don't clip that that sounded that

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that's because listen, the guys want he's literally the reigning

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl MVP. But so let me rephrase it. For

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles to pull themselves out of this mini spiral,

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Jalen's gonna have to be excellent. That's what I think.

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they have a great defense right now,

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and right now they don't have a great running game.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>What they do have is a good to very good

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive line and star receivers, and so then it falls

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>on Jalen to make the offense work that way, and

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm very interested to see how it goes. Do you

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>go ahead? Do you think that's an unfair.

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's fair.

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just it just seems like none of

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 2>them are on the same page. But no, But yeah,

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you do have.

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 3>The infrastructure go ahead, so to speak.

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's the other thing, I also think if they lose,

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it can really really get away from them. I don't

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>think they have. I don't think they have despite being

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>defending champs.

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 3>The that fear factor.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, like the institutional maturity to not

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>let this get out of hand. And because we saw

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>them when they were defending NFC champs in ten and

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>one a couple of years ago, it spiraled on them.

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 3>And so it's the weird thing.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 2>They seem so distant, like they seem like a disciplined bunch,

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 2>but it just I don't know they.

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just an emotion. Yeah, it's really odd. It's really odd.

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to more on this in tomorrow's Gambling show.

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the old quarterbacks.

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Bengals and Steelers are facing off on Thursday Night Football tonight.

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Cameron Hayward is calling this the Icy Hot Bowl. For

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the only second time in NFL history, two quarterbacks over forty,

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Rogers and Flacco will be facing off.

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 3>What are you expecting from this game? Oh?

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Rogers also called it a great thing for the old

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 2>guys out there.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, listen, I think Pittsburgh will win. I think that

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>if Pittsburgh doesn't win, since he's gonna feel like we're

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>alive if since he wins this game, since he is

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>sitting at three wins having beaten Pittsburgh head to head,

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and Pittsburgh sitting at four wins now, since he has

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>been just the worst team in the league since Burrow

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>went out, or you know, that's a little disrespectful to this.

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 3>Yes, pretty bad.

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Ravenstrey bad too, that is true. But I actually

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I expect Pittsburgh to win this game. The producers had

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a follow up question in here that I'm going to

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>try to do quickly that I think would be fun.

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 2>How would you how would you break down the quarterback

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 2>eras of this century? Could you rank them?

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>So? I don't know that. I'm just I think what

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they want me to do is rank the quarterbacks of

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this century. I don't know about eras, So here is

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a cursory ranking of how I would have it.

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And basically Brett Farve and older are not eligible, so

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. So the one, two, three for this

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>century to me is very simple. Tom Brady is one,

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Patrick is two, Peyton Manning is three. That to me

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is pretty undeniable. Four of the last quarter century. I

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>also think number three vers. Number four is pretty undeniable.

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's Aaron. I think of the two thousands to

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 1>now you're quarterbacking Mount Rushmore. Is Tom Patrick Peyton Aaron.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Five gets tricky because eligible four that fifth spot and

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>tell me in the dock, because I am doing this

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>off the top of my head. If you guys think

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm leaving anybody out, but just eligible for that fifth

0:36:53.200 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>spot is Breeze, Big Ben Lamar and Josh to me,

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>is there is there anyone that I am gonna be like,

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, Nick, what a terrible job that I forgot.

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I would have fifth on that list,

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>be Breeze, I would have sixth on that list, be

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben. Oh there is one guy that is well,

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't hold on. I think is Kurt Warner older

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>than Brett Farv. Kurt Warner is born in seventy one.

0:37:56.520 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna Brett Farv was born in sixty nine, So Kurt,

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that makes it okay? Tom Patrick, Peyton, Aaron, Breeze, Ben,

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Warner, Josh Allen Lamar, and then number ten I'm

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna put Stafford and just so that would mean just

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 1>missing the cut would be Philip Rivers, Cam Russ, Matt,

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Eli. Those are the guys. So that's how But

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I think Aaron listen, Aaron, Aaron. Maybe Aaron had an

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to be at least to pass Peyton and to

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>be the guy that Patrick was chasing before he got

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to Tom, or before he gets to Tom. But Aaron,

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron didn't have the postseason moments for it, like Peyton's

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>final one in Dinner. I actually don't think that moves him.

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to put him that. To me, he

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't jump him above Peyton. And like I think there

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is a gap between Peyton and Aaron, it would make

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>it closer. He'd listen. He certainly wouldn't be ahead of

0:39:53.760 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Patrick and Tom's Tom. But I and I also think

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>everybody has Aaron ahead of Breeze and Big Ben. I

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>just think he's firmly fourth of the two thousands. I

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:15.359
<v Speaker 1>think it's very difficult to have him ranked anywhere else. Hey, guys,

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you ever notice how everything keeps going up? Rent's going up,

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:21.760
<v Speaker 1>streaming service is going up. Your favorite burrito spot suddenly

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>thinks should charge a little extra for Salza. But with

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Boost Mobile, you and your phone Bill, don't have to

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.799
<v Speaker 1>play the will this go up soon? Game? Why? Because

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Boost Mobile is unlimited talk, text and data plan at

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 1>a price that will never go up. In fact, same

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>price you will pay for life. So switch now for

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>unlimited wireless at a price that'll never go up. Only

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>at boost Mobile. After thirty gigs, customers may experience lower speeds.

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Customers will pay twenty five dollars per month as long

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>as they remain active on the boost Unlimited plan. All right, demanse,

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 1>let's quickly get to three other games here before we

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>do our gambling show for tomorrow. Go ahead.

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 2>So you're Jags R headed back to London with they

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 2>always win to face the Rams you put Jacksonville, and

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 2>they're probably not good enough here to win a Super Bowl.

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 2>So is your love fading for them? What's going on there?

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>No, I listen. I just think that they haven't been

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 1>good enough and it's disappointing because a lot of it

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the fact that Trevor and Travis

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>haven't been as good as they need to be. I

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>know they have a good record, and you know Trevor

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>had the great moments against Kansas City and then actually

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>had a good stat line last week, but they scored

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve points against Seattle and Travis. Instead of being you know,

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>one and a half players, they're getting the production of

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 1>like three quarters of a player. So that to me

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 1>concerns me for the Jacks. I'm also the Rams offense

0:41:56.960 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>only scoring seventeen against Baltimore, it you know, flagged to me. Now,

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 1>part of me feels like the Rams went into that

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>game feel with the stance of if we don't turn

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the ball over, we cannot lose. So we're gonna be

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 1>very conservative, very cautious because Cooper Rush is not moving

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball in this defense, and that was correct. So

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 1>if that's the reason that they were the first team

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>not to just move the ball at will against Baltimore

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>other than the Browns, then that's fine. But Pooka might

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>miss this game and he's wildly important, So to me,

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a This is a nice litmus test for

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>both of these teams. Both of them sit there at

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>four and two feeling fine about their record, but also

0:42:55.640 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>probably feeling we can play a little better. And my

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>lean in this game would be that the Rams can

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>get it done. With that said, the Jags are way

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>more used to this trip and it's a much shorter

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>trip for them, so that concerns me a bit.

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Next, that's the Cowboys season has gotten off to a

0:43:15.080 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 2>rough start. Jerry Jones is still hopeful, though, that offense

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 2>is humming, and they play the Commanders this week.

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:22.720
<v Speaker 3>We're coming off that brutal loss to the Bears.

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Is it crazy to say that thirteen seed Cowboys are

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:27.399
<v Speaker 2>still a feisty team.

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 3>This might be a pretty good game.

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, listen, no, I don't think it's crazy at all.

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think the Cowboys are dead to make the playoffs.

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But I also think because the offense has been so

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>good they can beat anybody, and George Pickens playing the

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>best ball of his life. They might get CD back

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>this week, they will get him back, if not this week,

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>the next week. And that Dak is playing great and

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the passing offense has been e lead. The defense is

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>just so bad that they have to score thirty five

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>points Washington. On the other hand, de manse, if they

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 1>lose this game, it might be good night. And I

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>know that sounds premature, but they're right now twelve. They're

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>three and four. I'm sorry, they're three and three. With

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a loss, they'd be three and four, and their next

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 1>three games might be the toughest three game stretch anyone

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>has in the NFL all year at the Chiefs home

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>for the Seahawks, home for the Lions. So this is

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:35.399
<v Speaker 1>a literal must win for the Commanders, all right? Last one?

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Uh so you called the Colts.

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 2>A legit good team of there, they haven't really faced

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 2>any great teams. They got the Chargers coming up, who

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 2>are also riddled with injuries. Is there a chance the

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Colts are still closer to the twenty four Saints than

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the twenty four Vikings.

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 3>No, yeah, and break away.

0:44:52.719 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna just have just absolutely get slaughtered on my

0:44:56.160 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Colts preseason bets. And no, I mean they have a

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>legit offense. The defense isn't as good as the number suggests,

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the offense is excellent, and I you know, I think

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they will likely go to Los Angeles and beat the Chargers.

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And I did not see this season coming for the Colts,

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>but I have to give him credit. All right, let's

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 1>get some listener questions.

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Pal Brett asked, Nick, is it really true that you've

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 2>never seen that you've never seen rounders? That'd be like

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 2>a pro am golfer having not seen happy Gilmore and also, hey,

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 2>what's going on?

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not true that I haven't seen Rounders. Wilde

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>just says that for some reason because he thinks it's funny.

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Not only have I seen Rounders, I'm good friends and

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>play cards with the guy who wrote it and created it,

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Brian Koppleman. So like wild just says it because he's

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:55.319
<v Speaker 1>an idiot. All right?

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:59.799
<v Speaker 2>Next, uh, no, ask do you think Brady Payton Aarro

0:45:59.920 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 2>was more fun to watch her?

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes Alan Burrow Lamar.

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing about Brady Peyton. It felt like a

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>fair fight and they split games. Like Peyton was three

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and two in the playoffs against Tom. Tom won the

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 1>first two, Peyton won the last three. Patrick being four

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>six and one against those three guys combined and having one, one, two,

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>three four straight against them makes it it's fun for me,

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's not as compelling. Why are you shaking your head? Yeah?

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean I don't know, like it's like hard not

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 2>shake my head. Yeah, it's fun for you, and they're

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:50.879
<v Speaker 2>good matchups, you know.

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Like that. But my point is Brady Peyton, Big Ben,

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they all beat each other right like that. That and

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 1>that's just not what we've gotten so far.

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Next, Danny Asha, the Raiders try to reunite Russ and

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Carol at the trade.

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the rudest thing anyone said about Gino in ten years. No,

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>they should not.

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 2>Next Scott asked, you agree that because they don't play

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 2>in preseason games that the first four through six games

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 2>are not near as good as they are before when

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:27.760
<v Speaker 2>they played in preseason games.

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, absolutely, and I think teams are. It's also

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>why it didn't happen this year. But typically teams like

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs that have really tough training camps are usually

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.479
<v Speaker 1>better than the rest of the league in September because

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they're actually ready to play football. All right, Reminder, everybody

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>like rate subscribe Review, We're gonna stick Demonsay and Aragon

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and stick around and do our week seven gambling show.

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>You guys will get that in your feeds tomorrow morning.

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>As long as you are you are subscribed to the pod.

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to all of our each sponsors, hard Rock,

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Bat Boost and of course Zen. Thank you to the

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Volume and the Blue Dock. Talk to you guys soon.

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>What's right