WEBVTT - Gregg and Frank's Top-15 Running Back Rankings 0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you 0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160 want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, 0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080 download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy 0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760 Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also, 0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.360 if you want to watch the video of this podcast, 0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000 check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope 0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079 and type in you guess Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find 0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:32.919 us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. Fantasy 0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:46.440 best Friends Forever. M Do Do Do Do Do Do 0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:54.160 Do Do Do Do Do Do do do Yeah, this 0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.800 is the Fantasy best Friends Forever. Here the Fantasy Sports 0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:03.440 Radio Network along sign Frankie Stanfell. I am Greg Sauceman. Greggy. 0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:07.920 What's going on man? Not much? Greggy? Pretty excited? Um. 0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:09.920 You know someone I was talking to you about downstairs. 0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.520 Getting me excited, not only as a Fantasy fan but 0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.080 as a Jet fan of course, is the comments coming 0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.800 out from Josh Norman about Sam Donald. I thought that 0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.280 was great yesterday him talking of Sam Donald playing like 0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.640 a veteran making all the great decisions already in training camp. 0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.000 That's great to read. And then yesterday I caught up 0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.720 on hard Knocks. I didn't catch the first episode last week, 0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.039 and then I watched both of them last night. Stood 0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:31.880 up entirely too late, but it was well worth it. 0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:37.039 A sag. Listen, I love that. Okay, there you go. 0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.080 I didn't. I did not watch Hard Knocks last night 0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.000 yet still the first episode I did. Bless him, list him, 0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:47.240 Davis Landry, I got it or laundry? Um, yeah, no, no, 0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.560 I I like the first episode. I gotta be honest 0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.440 with you. It's what kind of boring they Yeah, I 0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.680 want to like it, but I find myself every single 0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.600 time I watched, no matter what time of day, I 0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.200 wind it like falling asleep for part of it, and 0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.120 I had to rewind it every time. I watched every 0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.560 season and listen to a lot of it was like, 0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.520 all right, I come home from work before Judy gets 0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.639 home and the perfect time to watch, right, I mean, 0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.880 you're probably tired, it was. It was a long day, 0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.839 of course, so that's one of the problems. And then 0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.639 I watched it. So the first episode I watched it 0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.240 when I woke up on like Umi st anymore. I 0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.519 woke up and it was before our draft. So I 0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.239 watched Hard Knocks. I find myself. I guess I wasn't 0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:27.959 falling asleep, but I was like sitting on my phone 0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.960 like on Twitter. Really, it just it just doesn't captivate, 0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.239 doesn't captivate me like Jarvis Landry speech did in that 0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:39.160 first episode, but like not the whole show. I want 0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:40.840 to like it. I watched every year. I just I 0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.320 think it had the opposite effect on me. Actually, eleven 0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.720 PM I put on the first episode and I was like, Wow, 0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:48.720 that was really good. I want to watch the second one. 0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.920 So I just ended up watching bold episodes and then 0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.000 I went to sleep after that. But it's pretty good man. 0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:55.760 And you know, while you know, you feel bad for 0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.240 Hugh Jackson everything that he's going through the whole like 0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.840 him versus Todd Haley thing like you would think, all right, 0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.000 Hugh Jackson, you're one in thirty one in your last 0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.120 thirty two games, maybe you should take some advice from 0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.320 Todd Haley. You know, don't be don't try to be 0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.040 bigger than you are. I mean, Todd Haley just came 0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.639 from the Steelers. He knows what a successful organization he 0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.360 is when he's come from successful organizations in the past, 0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:23.280 so he knows what works. Greg Williams also the coach 0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.960 of the Chiefs and was maniacal and ran a program 0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.560 into the ground and they he was he was crazy. Man, 0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.799 That dude was wild. And Casey oh yeah, and he 0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.160 pretty much got driven out of the Steelers because they 0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.080 didn't like him there either. But look, say what you 0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.200 want to I'm not disputing that at all. But in 0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.560 terms of football acumen, yeah, he had Antonio Brown and 0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:44.160 Levy on Bell, but he got the he got the 0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.440 most out of those guys. You're in a year out, 0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.040 all right, Um, on the program today, we're gonna get 0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.160 into running back rankings, your tears, your debate, your sleepers, 0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.320 your bus, all that good stuff we did without the 0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.760 quarterbacks yesterday. If enjoyed the program, make sure you check 0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.120 that out. Frankie on Monday also came out with a 0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.160 brand new white Boards series video. Pick number five, Yes, 0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.960 pick number five. We pick number three is up next? Correct, 0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.480 I'm gonna just pick eight, Okay, So the little change 0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.440 of plans there, Pick eight will come up next. Pick 0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:16.480 three on the way later this week, we can assume, sir. Okay. Um. 0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.000 So with that all being said, I want to get 0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.880 into the running backs. Before we do. We begin with 0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.440 the stat of the debt, and I'm pretty excited about 0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.560 this one. Greggy. I want to make this clear that 0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.360 Frank goes to me earlier, I have a great stat 0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.240 of the day, like all right, awesome, what is it? 0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.040 And then he goes, well, it's about the Vikings, all right, cool? 0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.640 Well what is it? Oh, you have to say just 0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.120 for the show? Why are you? It's a teaser off 0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.720 their It's literally just a teaser for me, all right, 0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:47.640 you know, like to tease your best friends a little bit. 0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.240 By the way she teasers for first playoff game tonight, 0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.760 how's that going. Did you guys finish? Oh? Well, interdivision? 0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.800 Inter division? So yeah, with the one seed on so 0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:02.719 the playoffs start tonight, would pay the bow socks of 0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.800 this kickball. I would say that we were the one 0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.400 seed on our side of the bracket. Um, it's not 0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.520 I'll be easy. And then of the confidence and then 0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.600 next week it really begins. I think lots of lots 0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.120 of bunts being dropped by Greggy tonight. Yeah, they expected 0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:20.880 to after the first two I dropped last time. They 0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.320 were like's gonna bunt? And like yeah, and did you 0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.360 still successfully bunt for a hit. Yeah, that's embarrassing for them. 0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.680 It's gonna putting the right spot. Man. Wait, so if 0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:30.880 you bunt and then they know what's coming, what what's 0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.240 your counter to that? Do you just like pop it 0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.719 over the third base and then I'm too nervous to 0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:35.880 do that because I think I'll pop it up if 0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.120 I try to do that. So in kickball and the league, 0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:40.840 we plan that you have your pictures man, like right here, 0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:45.880 let's say you have your pictures mound right in the middle, 0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.720 and then on the sides, like right right to the 0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:50.960 right side and to the left side, there's cones and 0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.120 you can't and the third basement or the let's say 0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.400 first basement approaching in can't go past those cones after 0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:00.120 the ball is hit. Why does mean? Because if the 0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.440 possible to a bunt for a hit, and it also 0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.320 shouldn't be a thing anyway, Greg, Well, it's also impossible 0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:12.400 to do some other things. All right, Greg, I trust, 0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.080 I trust you and your your kickball, your kickball skill 0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.599 out the day tomorrow will be my my batting line tomorrow. 0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:23.120 There you go, Frank. So, after Dalvin Cook's injury, starting 0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.440 in week five, Latin Murray and Jerick McKinnon combined for 0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:31.839 three hundred and forty two carries in fifty six receptions 0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.320 in twelve games. That's twenty eight and a half carries 0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:40.440 four point six receptions per game combined between Lithavias Murray 0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.640 and Jerk McKinnon per game last year for the Vikings offense. 0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.480 And I know they don't have Pat Sherber anymore, but 0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.600 um we still, you know, we we like a lot 0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.920 of the pieces that are still involved with this Vikings offense. 0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.760 And I just think this is very reassuring for Dalvin 0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.680 Cook owners, for people who you know, are expecting to 0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.640 draft him. Even Latavious Murray's involved, even if he gets 0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.159 eight to ten touches per game. I mean, these these 0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.520 guys were combining for over thirty two touches a game, Greg, 0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:09.880 So I just thought that was insane for only in 0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:14.640 twelve games carries fifty six receptions. What is their offensive 0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.280 line rank rank? Well, that's not very good, which I 0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.880 also brought up to you downstairs. Um, they lost a 0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.840 few pieces on the offensive line. PFF currently ranks him 0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:28.880 as the offensive line in football, which among the top 0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.200 ten running backs being drafted right now, they are the 0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.600 lowest projected offensive line um, so that's not great. But 0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.960 last year at season's end, they ranked twenty swond so 0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.160 I think this is more of you know, even if 0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.720 Latavius Murray and Jerk McKinnon weren't all that efficient, because 0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.559 I don't think they were. That's part of the reason 0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.320 why we've bashed Jack McKinnon here is because he's never 0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.680 really been an efficient running back. I think that there's 0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:51.280 a lot of volumes to go around here, and I'm 0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:56.280 going to continue to beat that drum in volume over efficiency. 0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.640 Even if the offensive line isn't great, I still do 0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:00.680 think Dalvin Cook is gonna be right there in line 0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.960 for twenty touch per game, maybe over twenty touches. Even 0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.320 if Lutevi's Murray gets his eight to ten per game, 0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.000 I'm not worried about it. I think there's enough to 0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.520 go around for both. Okay, we're gonna get more into 0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.200 Dalvin Cook coming up in a moment, but we're gonna 0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.440 go through the top twenty four running backs on today's show, 0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:17.840 and to do that, we start with the number one 0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.559 overall pick, which, listen, we have said for a while 0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:23.000 it's Todd Gurley or it's Living on Bell, and we 0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.480 haven't really spent much time saying which one it should be. 0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.800 So let me ask you who should it be? Todd 0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.680 Gurley living on Bell. So this might be cop out, 0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.960 but I dude think that it's uh, it's format dependent, 0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.920 and I would take Todd Gurley in standard just based 0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:38.880 on you know, the touchdowns he had last year. And look, 0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:40.640 we're not going to project him for close to twenty 0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.280 touchdowns once again, but just based on the way that 0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.400 they used him. Eighteen rushing attempts from within the five 0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.520 that led all running backs last season. Of his team's 0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.520 rushing attempts within the five. That's also the highest percentage 0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.160 of any running back last season. Fifteen goal line carries 0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.840 also led all running backs last season. So in the 0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.960 non PPR format where touchdowns are so important, I lead 0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.920 Todd Gurley. But in any other format, half point, PPR 0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.080 or full point, I will go with Levian Bell. All Right, 0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:12.360 I think I think it's reasonable. Um, I probably agree. 0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:14.720 I probably agree. In an auction, I'm gonna talk more 0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.720 about auction strategy this week. I have my auction on Monday. 0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.199 Monday's show will be in all auction programs. We get 0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.520 excited for that. UM. In auction I have them priced 0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.439 the same number. I do think it's that close. I 0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.480 agree in the PPR and any sort of PPR, you 0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.600 have to go with lady on Bell. The receptions will 0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.080 be there more often, um in a standard I'm going 0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.240 with or non PBR should say I'm going to Tide 0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.080 Gurley for all the reasons you mentioned. We completely agree 0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.560 on that point. Yeah, and Levian Bell look as good 0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.440 as he is. He's never had more than nine rushing 0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.640 touchdowns in any single season. We all like Levian Bell 0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.160 a lot um. I think he's gonna be over four 0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.240 hundred touches again this year. Look, he was number one 0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.880 in snap share among running backs last year, number one 0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.079 in percentage of team carries plus targets, number one and 0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.320 carries overall. So I think Levian Bell and probably Ezekiel 0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.959 Elliott are the best locks for one hundred plus touches 0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.040 this season. I think it's an easy slam dunk one 0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.760 and two for Todd Gurley and Levian Bell. Not much 0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:08.160 more to same in my opinion. Then you get to 0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.160 three and four, which also we know three and four 0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.880 are and somewhere David Johnson and Ezekie Elliott. But again, 0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.520 Frank we haven't exactly spent much of time discussing, well, 0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.600 who should go first? Are you gonna give me the 0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.360 same compound answer in a non PPR Ezekiel Elliott and 0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.600 the PPR half point, you go with David Johnson. So 0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.600 in not in non PPR and havelf PPR, I'll still 0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.840 take Ezekiel Elliott um because I just think overall, I 0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.880 think he has more upside than David Johnson. We saw 0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:37.640 a couple of years ago what David Johnson and do 0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.400 scored the twenty total touchdowns. But you know there's questions 0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.480 about that offense overall, whether it's Sam Bradford, whether it's 0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.960 Josh Rosen. The offensive line is not great there either. 0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.160 And you know, David Johnson, for what it's worth, looked 0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.520 very good in that first preseason game. Looked like vintage 0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.160 David Johnson. I don't think that I'm not one of 0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.200 these guys who's gonna push him outside the top four 0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.120 because you know some people are trying to get a 0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.679 little bit too sexy and push David Auson down the board. 0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.200 I'm not gonna do that. But in non PPR, just think, look, 0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.520 Zekel Ellett is the Cowboys offense. They've shown that once 0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:09.800 they get inside the red zone, they're just gonna feed, feed, feed. 0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.800 Ezekiel Elliott, he's gonna score. I think there's a lot 0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.240 to score double digit touchdowns. So in non PPR and 0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.240 even half I'll take Zekiel because I think that he 0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.720 can flirt with fifty plus receptions this year based on 0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.920 how many targets are available. Jason Witten gone, Des Bryant 0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.240 gone from this team, Alan Hearns and Michael Gallup, they'll 0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.880 do their thing, even Cole Beasley too, But they're talking 0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.520 up um Zekil like getting more receptions in this past game, 0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.920 and I do buy that. So non PPR and half 0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.400 point I have him three. In the full point PPR 0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.400 just because I think David Johnson has eight plus reception upside, 0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:46.040 I'll put him third. But typically that's how I'm gonna 0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:47.920 rank it. It's it's based on format. Once again, not 0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.000 to give you the compoun answer, but I completely agree 0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.840 with you. Um Again, the more I've read about this. 0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:57.120 Initially I had David Johnson ranked everywhere. Uh I should 0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.880 just say everywhere half point PDR and PPR ahead Ezekue Elliott. 0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:02.520 But the more I thought of that, the more I 0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.840 looked into it, You're right, Frankie, and that David Johnson 0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.040 is in an offense with a lot of unknowns, with 0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.480 the offensive coordinator he's never had before, the quarterback he's 0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.600 never had before. The offense is simply changed. Ezekue Elliott hasn't. 0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:16.440 It's been the same offense as he came into the league. 0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.360 Was also really good about Ezekie Elliott. He's completely healthy 0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.040 and there's no distractions going on in Dallas. Like you 0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.040 mentioned those wide receivers that ultimately will step up for 0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:25.800 Dak Prescott. That's great, but we know this team, this 0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.280 offense is gonna revolve around Elliott, and I'm while I'm 0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.600 sure that Cardinal's offense will rely around David Johnson. Um 0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.320 the questions, the questions are there, and as good as 0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.240 he looked in that first preseason game and as good 0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.000 as he's looked at practice, he's been injured each of 0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:40.679 the last two years and then the end of the 0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.480 year before injured. It's just there's a lot of injury 0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.800 history there, and some of it's flukey, obviously, but some 0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.080 of it's not. And I think that seeing the place 0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.600 that Ezekiel Elliott currently is in makes me feel more 0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.400 comfortable and safer taking him in both the non PPR 0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.520 and the half point PBR, and that's why I go 0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.000 with Elliott over Johnson in those formats. Yeah. Plus, David 0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.079 Johnson is a little bit older than we realize. He's 0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.280 twenty six years old. He had eight hundred and sixty 0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:08.720 six career carries at Northern Iowa. Zeke a little bit younger, 0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:10.480 has some youth on his side, and plus a row. 0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.440 I just think the you know, while people are poo 0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.080 pooing the Cowboys offense, I do think that it will 0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.480 it will be better than the Cardinals offense. The offensive 0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.920 line is clearly better, and I don't think the weapons 0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:21.959 are as bad as people have made it out to seem. 0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.760 So I think that's an easy one. Zeke. Three non PBR, 0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.400 HA PBR full point IGO with David Johnson has the 0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.480 A P plus reception up. All right, let's continue now. 0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.640 And it's interesting because the next couple of picks have 0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.319 kind of the next two pictures in saney. I don't 0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.319 keep breaking down in two because but they've kind of 0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.360 sorted themselves out also over the past couple of weeks. 0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:41.960 I don't know if you so much agree with this. 0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.439 But it used to be a tear I thought of 0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.520 of four guys, and now I feel like that tears 0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.120 two guys, and it's Alvin Kamara and it's stake Kwon Barkley. 0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.559 Everything to me is the dust have settled here a 0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.880 bit with mark Ingram suspension with Stakelan Barkley. I know 0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.880 he's he's battling that hamstrings tweak. It doesn't seem overly serious. 0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.840 And in the EPR you're obviously I would think going 0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.640 Camara there um, but Barkley. In the non PPR people 0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.400 are feeling very comfortable with that. With all the noise 0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.320 talking about how good, how many carries Barkley should get 0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.720 Camara in half pint b BR versus Barkley, I think 0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:15.880 it's a debate. I'm gonna let Frank opine on that, 0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.000 but it certainly seems like five six in some orders 0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:22.000 Camara in Barkley. I think in both PPR formats the 0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.200 full point, in the half point, they're both right there, 0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.640 five and six. In my opinion. In non PPR, I've 0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.600 moved Camara down to really, in my opinion, the bottom 0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.040 of this here, which is within Kareem Hunt behind Melvin Gordon, 0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.440 just because I think those guys have more touchdown upside. 0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.880 And you know, look, Alvin Kamara scored the touchdowns last year, 0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.120 but based on his efficiency where he scored them on 0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:42.520 the field, you know he didn't have a lot of 0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.080 carries from inside the five, inside the red zone. I 0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.160 guess he's gonna catch a ton of passes. That's why 0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.080 you know, in half point PPR, I still have him 0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.000 as my RB six, right behind Sea Kwon Barkley. Um 0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.320 in full point PPR, I think that they're interchangeable. I'm 0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.800 still gonna take se Kwon Barkley overall. So no, my 0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.640 number five over overall? Is he number five ahead of 0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.160 Antonio Brown and he's number five running back? Is he 0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.680 number five overall? In a half point PPR and half 0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:08.920 point PPR, yes, not. In full point I would take 0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.680 Antonio Brown over Sa Kwan full point PPR. So when 0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.400 it comes to any sort of PPR, I'm gonna have 0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.400 Camara over Barkley because I know that Barkley is is 0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.440 that trouble threat, being able to block me gonna run, 0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.040 and being able to catch and those wheel routes that 0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.800 he specialized in at Penn state. Um. I recognize that, 0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:26.520 like it's going to be there in the offense, but 0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.120 I have a lot of weapons with Evan Ingram and 0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.680 with Odell Beckum JG. You're going to read the uh 0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.280 the pet Schermer led running back numbers in the final 0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.240 twelve games once again? Would you like me to do that? 0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.400 If you'd like no, I don't want to. You go 0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.480 back and lit'en to it. I'll read it for you. 0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.880 Three and forty two carries and fifty six perceptions in 0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.160 the final twelve games over pet Schumer led Vikings offense 0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.280 last year with Latavius Murray and Jerk McKinnon. Just think 0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.320 about it. It's mouth watering upside for se Kwon Barker. 0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.360 I think he's one of a handful of running backs 0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.600 who can get three d and fifty plus touches this year. 0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.280 It's just that volume I'll take over Camara in both 0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.960 the half point and actually in any format I'll take. 0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.040 I'll take that volume, that opportunity more so than Camara's efficiency. 0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:09.400 Before we hit the break, I want to get to 0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.600 you at eight four, eight, four, three, six seven nine. 0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.360 Let me go to Logan in Michigan. What's up logan, 0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:21.080 what's up, guys? What's your question? My man? Alright, So, uh, 0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.320 in my home league, I'm drafting at the sixth spot 0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.600 in the ten team PPR league, and so I've done 0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.240 a few mock drafts drafting at the same spot with 0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:29.960 the same format and all that stuff, trying to get 0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.200 ready and uh, like the first round, you know, I'm 0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.680 taking Camara Barkley, second round kind of around the Keenan Allen, 0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.760 Michael Thomas, and then third round it's kind of like 0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.520 Larry fit Stefon Diggs. But in the fourth round is 0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.080 where I'm having my issues up. Um. Usually there's like 0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:49.880 the Marius Thomas um Umari Cooper, um like Marvin Jones, 0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.240 and then there's also like a Joe Mix and Jordan Howard, 0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:53.680 Like where would you guys go with that? In a 0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.280 full PPR. I feel like, um, I feel like Amari 0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.480 Cooper would have the upside, and I don't really want 0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.560 to be re sing on a Marvin Jones, but it's 0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.240 just tough decisions for me. In the PBR, Marvin Jones 0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.240 might least Marvin Jones and de Marius Howards. Did you 0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.479 guys at least interested there? I think wide receiver wid 0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.879 Alamore at Cooper the running backs to the best players there, 0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.080 John Mixon and Jordan Howard. So I think I'd have 0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.320 to go with that. Despite being APPR. Yeah, I agree. 0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.520 If you take a running a wide receiver from the third, 0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:20.920 you're gonna want to get that RB in the fourth. 0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:22.960 But I will say this ten team PPR. If you 0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.239 get McCaffrey in the third, that's where I'm leaning take 0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.160 the wide receiver in the fourth grade. We take a break. 0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:32.040 More running back rankings and debate coming up next, from 0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.560 the NFL to the NBA. Daily Rodo dot com is 0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.000 the place to win millions in daily fantasy. You can 0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.760 get the best DFS NFL coverage all season long for 0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.760 a price of one, or dominate the entire Daily Fantasy 0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.120 Sports realm with the Elite package at per month. If 0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.119 you use the promo code f n T s Y, 0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.040 you get ten percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go 0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.920 to Daily rodo dot com, pick your NFL Elite Package, 0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.480 enter promo code f n T s Y, and you'll 0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.880 be on your way to becoming the next Daily road 0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:17.800 a millionaire. I spent the break looking over um the 0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:24.040 fouls ruled out River on. Just put up sweet director, 0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.840 your officials. This this head, this helmet is mind bogging. 0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.600 What is it you exact like when you so the 0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:34.359 new rule in the NFL is that you can't you 0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.119 can't lead with your helmet whatsoever, as a defender or 0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.200 as a running back. Right, I thought that that was 0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.080 the thing for a while though, well maybe it was. 0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.840 Now that just like overly enforcing it. But they're the 0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:46.760 last three in which in this video that they said 0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:51.440 they're fouls. I like, don't know what the player did wrong. 0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.400 Every time you know, you can watch you can watch 0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.480 the last three francs. This happened during the preseason. So 0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.320 these are all from the preseason Week one. You missed 0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.080 one and see the next wanted in the Browns the 0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.600 Giant game. I don't one after that. Um, these were 0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:07.200 all called against defense. All should be fouls. I don't 0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:08.960 know who they're called against or whatever, but I don't. 0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.320 I didn't. I didn't see anything wrong. The video glitz 0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.639 right when the tackle was happening. That's unfortunate, and I mean, 0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.200 look and for people who are wondering last one explaining actus, 0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.320 I don't get it. I don't care. The Saints quarterback. Right, 0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.000 I don't know what happened. For those wondering like what 0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.000 this might have to do for fantasy, think about it. 0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:29.600