WEBVTT - Colonial Pipeline Shutdown: What Comes Next For Supply 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Well, a lot of

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>commodity strategies are telling folks, particularly on the East Coast,

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to get ready to pay more for gas. And it's

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>not just because we're going into the summer driving season.

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It's because we're gonna have a supply problem. Here. Colonial

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>pipeline shut down and that uh pipeline supplies most of

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the East Coast, and let's get the latest on that.

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We're uh pleased to have Jay Hatfield. He's a founder

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Infrastructure Capital Management. Jay, thanks so much

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. And again, you look at the

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>map of the Colonial pipeline and boy, it just goes

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>right up the Eastern seaboard, suggesting that the folks you

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>know on the East Coast are really gonna have some

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>supply issues. What do you how do you think this

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to develop great, well, thanks for having me on. Well,

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's important to note about UM products pipelines

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is that they can be transported using surface transportation. It's

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in other words, barges, UM rail and truck, So we

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>would we were expecting a fairly muted response, which is

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>what we're getting so far. So in fact, if you

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>want to look on the terminal cr c K, you're

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>only seeing about a thirty five cent increase in the

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>gasoline crack to New York Harbor, which makes sense because

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of course that can be supplied by European refineries, where

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what we just block us through the crack spread? What

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is that? So it's just it's the profitability of refining

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>oil into UM gasoline in this in this case, and

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>so what we're not seeing on their screens oils a

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit weak, and and our bob or the your

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>carber's moving up just a tiny bit. But what you

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>can't see on the screens is areas that UM are

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>less liquid and there's no trading, but for instance in

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee and landlocked southeastern states, So there you're likely to

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>get some increase, but it's going to be kepped just

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>by shipping or transportation cost. So other than maybe a

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>few cases of hoarding, we don't expect any significant shortages.

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think it does point out the vulnerability and

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of the energy infrastructure, and in particular UM. More sensitive

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>systems are obviously electricity and to a lesser degree, natural gas,

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>which is what you saw in superstone Urie, where when

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you have the electric market goes out, it tends to

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>shut down other things like natural gas production, whereas refined

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>products like as I mentioned, can be shipped using alternative methods. Jay,

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the issue here is, I mean,

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>do you have any sense for the duration of the

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>shutdown and is there a point where it really does

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>become a supply problem? Well, it's it's the key issue

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is UM safety. So it's the extent that the hack

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>gets into operational software and you have explosive fuels. It's

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>not like just bringing up a regular computer system. So

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not exactly clear how long it could go. But

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>again it's other than some potential for hoarding, it shouldn't

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>be like when the refinery shut down in a hurricane,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we have an actual supply problem. It's just a logistics issue.

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So it kind of it caps the the potential shortage

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that you can just move the product

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>from different refineries, either in the West or overseas, so

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we don't really see this as kept a catastrophe, just

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>perha some localized shortages. I've been trying to figure out

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>all day in terms of the nature of the commodities market,

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>why can't we price in um something like a demand

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>shock or a production squeeze ahead of the forecast x

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>anti so to speak. It doesn't seem like, you know,

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>if we all knew oil was going to be at

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>eight by the end of the year, why wouldn't it

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>go to eighty now? Well, and what app tends to

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>happened with the commodity markets is they develop momentum, either

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>downward or upward momentum. We saw the downward momentum last

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>year and we had negative forty oil. So usually they

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>tend tend to build and they're not going to really

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>have that um spike until we really see the demand. Specifically,

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>what we're watching is Europe. So Europe is about a

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>month find the US in terms of vaccinations, so we're

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>really predicting global travel getton if they do catch up

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as we're expecting, and just the nature of commodity markets.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>They don't, they don't. They're not really good at anticipation,

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>so it'll sort of happen when it happens. J, real quick,

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds kind of what's your call for oil here?

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>We've got a w T I crewed here at sixty

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars fifty cents. Where do you think it is your

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>end um? We think that it'll trade in the seventy

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>eight dollar range with the potential for a superspike. And

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the real reason behind that is um where we're calling

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>OPEC plus plus, which is constraint of the U S producers,

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>mostly due to the capital markets. So we think that

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>will drive prices higher than they've been since two thousand fourteen,

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>because ever since two thousand fourteen, the US has been

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the swing producer. But now the companies have moved to

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>being more value type stocks, so they're not going to

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>ramp up production, which gives us chance for prices to

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of higher. With if there is a supply disruption, not

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>so much just a transportation disruption, we could see, you know,

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a possibility of a superspike, particularly during the summer. All right, Jay,

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. J Hatfield there, CEO

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and founder of Infrastructure Capital Management. Let's get over right

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>now to Will Ride. He's the founder and CEO of

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Grant Shares. They have over one and a half billion

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars of assets under management. At the end of last

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>year they had that, and I'm sure they've been adding

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to them. Will. Um. It's it's a fairly striking move

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking at right now in oil because, um,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>you know the latest stories all say oil climbs with

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>gasolinea's cyber attack knocks out US pipeline. We know that

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was the hot story of the of the weekend. But

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>now all of a sudden, I see Brent crude and

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>nim x w T I just coming down hard. I

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>mean the move is over a dollar in brand in

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the last half hour along what's going on? Yeah, morning, UM.

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't make too much of the use of short

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>term moved this morning, because obviously we had a big

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>move over the last few days. More broadly, you know

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>this year. Um, but I think we could be reacting

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in terms of an over shoot over

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the news of the pipeline attack. Um, that we saw

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you heading into into the weekend. Alright, So well, I'm

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at my on my Bloomberg terminal g l CEO

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Global commodity prices UM. I'm seeing twenty thirty increases when

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I look at ENTER on a year to date basis,

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>increases when I look at energy, metals, agricultural. What are

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we seeing here? Is this simply, you know, just the

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>bounce back play or is this something more structural in

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>commodities going forward? Yeah, I mean I think it's more structural.

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is a new supercycle UM that

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>has started UM but is now in sort of full

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>blown mode here. Uh. And and the reason's kind of

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>twofold that there's no doubt that there are some bounce

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>back plays kind of going on here. I mean, clearly,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we had, you know, a hugely depressed situation last year

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for commodity demand UM that is obviously coming back as

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the world returns to somewhat of a normal mode, but

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>mobility basically increasing. And so we have a record highs

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>now and copper, we have iron ore highs, we have

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>steel prices on the rise at the all the energy

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>complex rising as well, and and that that's understandable because

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that is the same theme as we're seeing with some

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic equity stocks that were badly affected last year.

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think what's less talked about is, in my

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>mind the kind of the the bigger picture here, and

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>that is that there's been woful underinvestment in the commodities

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>sector for many, many years, and that's because of depressed

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>prices UM since the last peak of the last supercycle,

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, around two thousand and eight. So with this

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>under investment, this under investment is now colliding with this

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>huge surgeon demand, causing in my mind, a new supercycle.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I think if the supercycle is not going to affect

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>all commodities uniformly UM, but as we transition as a

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>world to a green energy infrastructure, we're moving away from

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>hydrocarbons and we're moving to a green energy, sustainable future

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that is creating and will create supercycle in many commodities

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>UM that are stands benefit most from this energy transition. Well,

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not hard to to to believe that.

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, we were hearing I've heard similar things from

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>others in the market. I was talking to Jeff Curry

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to day from Goldman sachs Um and I think he

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>would agree what I don't really get is why, what's it?

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>What is it about the commodity market that means you

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>can't price in a demand shock and that kind of

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>under investment x anti Why why can't UM investors really

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>get ahead of these things? You know? Very early? Well,

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that investors can get ahead of it. I mean,

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's one of these things where you know, right now,

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you have in my mind a very um you know,

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting phenomenal where commodities are out casting equities. So when

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you have commodities outperforming stocks, that's typically, at least historically,

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a harbinger of you know, higher inflation. That's not

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily good news for stocks. UM. We've add an environment

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>where commodities of underperformed equities for pretty much since the

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 1>last to the peak of two thousand and eight peak. UM.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So in my mind, this is, you know, something that

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>is real m for and a lot of investors hold

0:10:56.240 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>commodities strategically in the portfolio anyway for diversify reasons UM,

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and so in this particular environment, I think people are

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>moving into commodities in a way that I certainly haven't

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>seen for a number of years to try and hedge

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>themselves against these inflationary risks that we're seeing. Will Ryan,

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We always appreciate

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>getting your thoughts. Will Ryan. He's a founder and CEO

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of Grantit Shares, giving us thoughts here about commodities. You know, again,

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the question for a lot of folks is, uh, you know,

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is this transitory? Are we seeing some of these gains

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in commodity prices and therefore inflation as something that the

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Photo Reserve would like to argue our transitory issues maybe

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, going to the base effect where you're going

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>off a very very easy comps. Or is there something

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.719
<v Speaker 1>more to this in terms of maybe as Will was

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>suggesting a supercycle in commodity prices which may bring some

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>troubling inflation back into the economy. So investors across our

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>border certainly paying attention to the commodity markets. Now, let's

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>talk about getting access to private companies. There is a

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>trading platform called Forge that allows investors to access private

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>markets UH and allows shareholders and investors in privately held

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>firms to liquidated a portion of their shares ahead of

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I P O S or you know, spack um combinations.

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Kelley Rodriguez joins us the CEO of Forge, Kelly, tell

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>us about your company, your platform and UM what kind

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of growth you've seen in in this year of so

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>much activity. Yeah, sure, thank you guys for having me

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>on UM. This has been a very big year post

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>peak of the pandemic. We've seen the numbers expand dramatically.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>We reported that we've just concluded the third record quarter

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in a row in terms of liquidity and volume on

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on Forge. I think we have also seen recently that

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we closed the acquisition of our large as competitor, shares Post,

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and that created really a central ecosystem player and Forge

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>for anybody that wants to buy or sell UM, that

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>wants data or who wants to custody their assets. So

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we're really trying to create something for the broad market,

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>all right. Kelly talked to us about spacks. That's you know,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I've been in the investment business for over thirty years

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and SPACs is the growth of SPACs over the past

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>twelve eight months has really got my attention. It's just exploded.

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>It's always kind of been out there, but it's just

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 1>really exploded over the last twelve months or so. How

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>has that impacted the liquidity event for a lot of

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>investors who might have typically used your platform to sell

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>stock and get some liquidity. Well, so two things. Interestingly,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the spacts are creating additional liquidity on Forge. So if

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the company has announced such as Pioneer UH, you can

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>find buy and sell that spacking company before it's despact

0:13:56.120 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on Ford. So it is bringing a hole another level

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of liquidity for companies that aren't as big as the

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>previous sort of trend in pre i p O unicorns.

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you take a look at the companies

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that have been going public through direct listings or through

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a conventional light PIO the last couple of years, these

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>companies are between nine and a hundred billion dollar valuation

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>companies in the private markets about six and twenty unicorns.

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But the SPACs are coming out and filling a market

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>interest in the sort of low single digit billions, and

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>so really it just looks like UM an alternative form

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of going public. I do think there's been a lot

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of hype around this to last year, and you're gonna

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>start to see it settled down and more of a

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>move to quality. Would have been the most popular shares

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>traded on your platform, I mean pre I p O

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you know private companies that I guess employees um have

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>have shares in and need liquidity, so they put them

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>out there. What do you where do you see the

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>most action? I mean, we have about four hundred companies

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that have trade there on the platform, But the most

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>action isn't a company that's a large cap private that's

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be public in the next day. So I

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>think Talentier back in Q three we did about five

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars of Palenteer volume alone a sauna. Uh,

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look at any of the companies that have

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>gone out Airbnb, just before they go, everybody wants a

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>piece of that that pre I p O company because

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they know what's gonna be liquid it's just a matter

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of the next sort of six ninety days to get

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>through their process. Ll give us a sense of how

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the VC and private equity world has, you know, kind

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of evolved over the past fourteen months as we dealt

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>with this pandemic, because ultimately, you know, those investors come

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to you to get liquidity. What have you seen in

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of you know, kind of that that VC market. Well,

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you're asking that question. We brought something to

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>market a little bit earlier last quarter that was called

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Forge Company Solutions, and this really is meant to primarily

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>serve and put the control back into the company and

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the vcs that backed them around how they're raising primary

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>or secondary capital. And this is a really important thing

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>because these companies are now staying private for so long

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the employee basis and the venture capital funds who have

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten year lives are extending beyond the life

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of their funds and beyond the vesting schedule of their employees.

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So they need liquidity. They need capital, uh, to last

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and to go ten to fifteen years. I think Palanteer

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>was a fifteen to seventeen year old company when it

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>finally went. So they're embracing this because look, it's an

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>employee benefit. You're gonna work for a company for ten

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>years privately, and you need liquidity to pay for a

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>house or send your kids to college. I think Forge

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is the platform that puts that company in that DC

0:16:54.920 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in control to manage that. So, um, when you look

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at the public markets, Um, what difference do you think

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>of Forge makes in terms of the way the public

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>markets then evolve. Well, it's interesting, there's some definite blurring

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of the lines in the last few years of a

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>company can stay private longer and raise the kind of

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>capital that you're seeing now happening. You're sitting rounds in

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>the several hundred million rounds that are the size of

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what an I t O used to look like ten

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years ago. A company can stay private longer and

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>really set a different path in terms of strategic investing

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>longer term value. And so the dynamic of being public

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>really creates a different shorter term quarterly dynamic around the

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>shareholding UH and the objectives of the company. And many

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>managers and CEOs of private companies, myself included, want to

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to invest long term, and if you've

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>got capital available to you in the private markets, you're

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna stay private longer. Kelly Rodriguez, thank you so much

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. We always appreciate chattingthew Kelly Rodriguez, he's

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a CEO of FOURD You giving a sense of how

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, in private investors are looking for liquidity, and

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>some of these venture backed and private equity backed firms,

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>as they wait longer and longer to go public, they're

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 1>able to trade their shares or private chairs on the

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>private market and Forge does that. This is Bloomberg. Now

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in George Bailey right now. He's

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio manager of I G Credit at Aviva Investors.

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>And George, let's let's start just by talking about the issuance.

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.959
<v Speaker 1>It's been insane. I think I read a little bit

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>earlier that issuance at this point in the year is

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the second highest we've seen it since two thousand ten.

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Um Is this just companies that want to get out

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and get some money in the low rate environment? Do

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they see it rising soon? Yeah? I think that is

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a big pot of I mean, we're twenty seventh cent

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>behind the place we saw last year, but yeah, you're right,

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>if you go back to previous years, we're about almost

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the ten pace. So I think that is

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a big part of it. If if you're a corporation

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and you expect high yields going forward, it makes sense.

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Just the issue debt today, especially if you're trying to refinance,

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to end debt rolling off and an issue longer

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>term debt, that just makes more sense. George, What do

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>you make of it when a company like Amazon announces

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.959
<v Speaker 1>a bond offering today and we don't know the amount yet,

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>that's not been disclosed, but you know they've got a

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>jillion dollars of cash on the bounty. They spew incredible

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>amounts of free cash flow. They have no real use

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for the proceeds. What's it tell you when and Amazon

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>dot Com comes to your market. We've seen a few

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>deals this year and even last year actually after the

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, after the pandemic in sort of April May

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of time, um where you do see a big

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>corporations that don't necessarily need to issue debt. They have

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the cash on their balance sheet, but they do it because,

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like you said, it's just cheap financing for them. Um.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So if they can raise the money via the debt markets,

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>then it just makes sense and have that cash as

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>a buffer on the balance sheet. Now no, now that

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>being said, that is part of what we're looking at.

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>So when they issue debt and you raise cash in

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>your balance sheet, it's it's as a credit investor, you're

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>really asking what are they doing with that cash? Are

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>they giving it back to the shareholders? Are they engaging

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the m and A? So really that is the focus

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>going forward. What are you doing as a credit investor?

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what what moves can you make right now

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>with fresh money? Can you can you find value out

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there or can you only hope to I guess preserve

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>your capital. Yeah, evaluation doesn't matter what asset class. Year.

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>In a moment, it seems evaluations are tough to come by.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>There are pockets of investment grade we like, so banking

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in particular, they've just got done a lot of supply

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and we've got that out of the way, so so

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's nice. And also telecom to so with those big

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>supply overhangs out the way, we do see value their

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>further out the curve um. But yeah, also in high

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>yield aswell. If you look at triple bees, so the

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>lower part of investment great quality versus say double bees,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the higher quality part of the high yield market, we

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>do see value there in the front. And where you're

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>you're picking yield, is it's worth it for a similar

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>risk profile, similar fundamentals, just dipping down into that high

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>yield space. George talked to us about credit quality. Here.

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>We're fourteen months into this pandemic and the economic shock

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>that it it caused. Are you seeing material deterioration in

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>certain parts of the portfolio. Not really. The fundamentals are

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>holding up, and I think that will be the case

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>going forward, at least over the near future, while the

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>macro backdrop remains strong. Um So, while we have all

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>the doubst duo with yelling and power and then just

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the macro factors coming through. We have a few prints

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>coming this week with retail sales and other points. I

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 1>think if if the macro back that it should just

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>stay strong. I don't think we'll see many cracks in

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals. The other big part of it as well

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as the markets will just remain open. I mean what

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>you've been talking about, their just the amount of supply

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this year. If the markets remain open and

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>corporations can do that, then that really just keeps the

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals strong. So it's no really cracks to speak of

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>our moment. And default rates also remain pretty manageable. I

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>guess visibility is good as long as vaccinations continue to increase, right,

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:39.239
<v Speaker 1>that's got to be the key, the keystone of the

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>economic recovering. Yeah, and we've seen a lot of credit

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>strategists points of those sort of data points. Now, it's

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>not it's not just looking at the fundamentals or corporations.

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>It's okay, let's look at the vaccine rollout, let's look

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>at the cases, let's look at hospital beds. Um. So

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it's all different data points now, isn't just the fundamentals

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of a corporation? All right, George? The FED has signaled

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>lower for longer, yet there are some inflation pressures. What

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>are you baking into your base cases to the FEDS moves. Yeah,

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>We're started to see that come through a bit in

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the data, these inflationary pressure pressures. And you only need

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to look at the commodity prices over the last six

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>months or so, they've doubled, two quadrupled in some places.

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that come through there, and then we started

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to see it a bit on Friday's non farm payrolls report,

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>some wage inflation coming through. So yeah, it's definitely a concern.

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I think if it stays around sort of the three

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>percent level where the FED wants to see inflation growth

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>but not know out of hand, UM, I think that

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is good for just global growth, and we could see

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>yields move a bit higher. Um. But I think we

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>need to just look at some more data points and

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 1>going forward to see if this really is trans transitory

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>or or whether it could just be more sustained. George,

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I wonder you're a cf A. How much harder do

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you think it is to get now than when when

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Paul took the test? Well, it's much harder back then,

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course, Yeah, we had to go we

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>had to go walk uphill both ways to get to

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the to the testing site. Uh. And aren't they making

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it more difficult now? I don't know. I don't know

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>if they are. Um, it's certainly it's going all digital.

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I know that that that that's the big change. So

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>making changing with the times. George Bailey, thanks so much

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for joining us there. George Bailey, he's a portfolio manager

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>covering the investment grade market for Aviva Investors, getting his

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on these markets here. Credit quality holding in their

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals remain solid. The FED remains on the sideline to

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>search is four yield. This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>put on boul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio m