WEBVTT - Bush v. Gore: Episode 6 – No Precedent

0:00:16.311 --> 0:00:23.231
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Hey Leon here, Before we get to this episode,

0:00:23.431 --> 0:00:25.191
<v Speaker 1>I want to let you know that you can binge

0:00:25.231 --> 0:00:28.591
<v Speaker 1>the entire season of Fiasco Bush v. Gore right now

0:00:28.791 --> 0:00:33.071
<v Speaker 1>ad free by becoming a Pushkin Plus subscriber. Sign up

0:00:33.111 --> 0:00:36.271
<v Speaker 1>for Pushkin Plus on the Fiasco Apple podcast show page,

0:00:36.871 --> 0:00:44.111
<v Speaker 1>or visit Pushkin dot fm slash Plus. Now onto the episode.

0:00:44.751 --> 0:00:46.830
<v Speaker 1>Previously on Fiasco.

0:00:47.711 --> 0:00:49.871
<v Speaker 2>Voce wins one round, Gore wins the next.

0:00:49.951 --> 0:00:51.231
<v Speaker 3>It is a legal slugfest.

0:00:51.271 --> 0:00:55.631
<v Speaker 2>We've gone from protest certification last night and now contest.

0:00:55.231 --> 0:00:59.590
<v Speaker 4>Florida's ticking clock becomes a second adversary. December twelfth is

0:00:59.671 --> 0:01:02.511
<v Speaker 4>key the dave Florida certifies it's electors.

0:01:02.671 --> 0:01:06.871
<v Speaker 5>The Republican controlled state legislature scheduled a special session to

0:01:06.991 --> 0:01:10.031
<v Speaker 5>name electors just in case the state Supreme Court rules

0:01:10.031 --> 0:01:11.231
<v Speaker 5>against Cavador Borsch.

0:01:11.031 --> 0:01:13.951
<v Speaker 3>By a vote of four to three, the majority of

0:01:13.951 --> 0:01:17.431
<v Speaker 3>the court has ordered a manual recount of all under

0:01:17.511 --> 0:01:20.711
<v Speaker 3>votes in any Florida county where such a recount has

0:01:20.751 --> 0:01:23.471
<v Speaker 3>not yet occurred. The recount shall commence immediately.

0:01:23.711 --> 0:01:26.471
<v Speaker 6>If you do not like political chaos, it's about time

0:01:26.551 --> 0:01:27.431
<v Speaker 6>to head for the storm.

0:01:27.431 --> 0:01:35.151
<v Speaker 1>Cell Sandra Dey O'Connor had a lot on her plate

0:01:35.191 --> 0:01:38.391
<v Speaker 1>On November seventh, two thousand. It was election day, for

0:01:38.431 --> 0:01:40.831
<v Speaker 1>one thing, and she had plans to attend a watch

0:01:40.871 --> 0:01:44.631
<v Speaker 1>party at a friend's house. But first O'Connor was due

0:01:44.631 --> 0:01:46.111
<v Speaker 1>at the United States Supreme Court.

0:01:47.111 --> 0:01:50.031
<v Speaker 7>Well here argument now number ninety nine twelve fifty seven

0:01:50.151 --> 0:01:53.871
<v Speaker 7>Carol M. Browner VERSUS American Trucking Association.

0:01:53.351 --> 0:01:55.911
<v Speaker 1>Where she and the other eight justices were scheduled to

0:01:55.951 --> 0:01:58.911
<v Speaker 1>hear oral arguments in a case involving the Clean Water Act.

0:01:59.111 --> 0:02:05.151
<v Speaker 8>Now why would Congress want that advice on economic and

0:02:05.351 --> 0:02:06.231
<v Speaker 8>energy efficts.

0:02:06.591 --> 0:02:09.151
<v Speaker 1>O'Connor also had an important personal matter to attend to.

0:02:10.031 --> 0:02:12.471
<v Speaker 1>Her husband, John had been sick, and she was trying

0:02:12.471 --> 0:02:13.911
<v Speaker 1>to gather information in his condition.

0:02:14.951 --> 0:02:21.991
<v Speaker 9>On election day, Sandra O'Connor spoke to her husband's neurologist

0:02:22.791 --> 0:02:26.270
<v Speaker 9>for the first time about John's Alzheimer's.

0:02:26.471 --> 0:02:29.791
<v Speaker 1>This is journalist Evan Thomas. He's the author of First,

0:02:30.231 --> 0:02:32.631
<v Speaker 1>a Biography of Justice O'Connor, for which he interviewed her

0:02:32.671 --> 0:02:35.991
<v Speaker 1>family members and former clerks, as well as her husband's neurologist.

0:02:37.311 --> 0:02:40.591
<v Speaker 1>According to Thomas, John had been experiencing memory loss for

0:02:40.631 --> 0:02:43.311
<v Speaker 1>several years, but he had been hesitant to call it

0:02:43.311 --> 0:02:46.551
<v Speaker 1>what it was now. On the phone with his doctor,

0:02:47.151 --> 0:02:48.871
<v Speaker 1>Justice O'Connor was trying to get a handle on her

0:02:48.911 --> 0:02:49.951
<v Speaker 1>husband's diagnosis.

0:02:50.391 --> 0:02:53.751
<v Speaker 9>John had finally started using the word Alzheimer's to talk

0:02:53.751 --> 0:02:57.991
<v Speaker 9>about his condition, and she asked if there was perhaps

0:02:57.991 --> 0:03:03.951
<v Speaker 9>some experimental program that he could be put into to

0:03:04.031 --> 0:03:07.751
<v Speaker 9>keep the loss of memory away for as long as possible.

0:03:07.831 --> 0:03:10.351
<v Speaker 9>Was there some kind of experimental program that could by

0:03:10.431 --> 0:03:10.990
<v Speaker 9>him time?

0:03:11.911 --> 0:03:15.071
<v Speaker 1>Sandra Dey O'Connor had a decision to make. She and

0:03:15.151 --> 0:03:17.871
<v Speaker 1>her husband were both seventy years old, and she'd always

0:03:17.871 --> 0:03:20.471
<v Speaker 1>thought that eventually they would move back to Arizona, where

0:03:20.471 --> 0:03:23.551
<v Speaker 1>they had settled a few years into their marriage. If

0:03:23.591 --> 0:03:25.071
<v Speaker 1>the two of them wanted to do that before his

0:03:25.151 --> 0:03:28.031
<v Speaker 1>dementia got worse, O'Connor would need to retire from the

0:03:28.031 --> 0:03:31.511
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court sooner rather than later. The question was whether

0:03:31.591 --> 0:03:32.191
<v Speaker 1>or not she could.

0:03:32.751 --> 0:03:35.831
<v Speaker 9>They had considered retirement as early as nineteen ninety six.

0:03:36.831 --> 0:03:39.551
<v Speaker 9>President Clinton was president, so they didn't want to retire

0:03:39.831 --> 0:03:41.111
<v Speaker 9>while there was a Democrat there.

0:03:41.431 --> 0:03:44.351
<v Speaker 1>O'Connor was a Republican, and if al Gore won the

0:03:44.391 --> 0:03:47.431
<v Speaker 1>two thousand election, she knew that she would face enormous

0:03:47.431 --> 0:03:49.191
<v Speaker 1>pressure to remain on the bench at least through his

0:03:49.231 --> 0:03:49.871
<v Speaker 1>first term.

0:03:50.151 --> 0:03:52.671
<v Speaker 9>According to her son Scott, they were at least thinking

0:03:53.151 --> 0:03:57.071
<v Speaker 9>about retiring if there was a Republican president if Bush won.

0:04:01.871 --> 0:04:04.631
<v Speaker 10>Good evening, President Reagan today named a woman to the

0:04:04.671 --> 0:04:06.911
<v Speaker 10>Supreme Court and another barrier fell.

0:04:07.271 --> 0:04:10.591
<v Speaker 1>O'Connor had been a justice for nineteen years. She was

0:04:10.631 --> 0:04:12.631
<v Speaker 1>the first woman ever nominated at the Supreme Court.

0:04:13.111 --> 0:04:17.150
<v Speaker 11>She is truly a person for all seasons, possessing those

0:04:17.231 --> 0:04:22.390
<v Speaker 11>unique qualities of temperament, fairness, intellectual capacity, and devotion to

0:04:22.431 --> 0:04:22.831
<v Speaker 11>the public.

0:04:22.911 --> 0:04:25.590
<v Speaker 1>For years, O'Connor was a reliable member of the Court's

0:04:25.591 --> 0:04:28.591
<v Speaker 1>conservative flank, but as the Court moved to the right

0:04:28.711 --> 0:04:31.911
<v Speaker 1>under Reagan and George H. W. Bush, she increasingly found

0:04:31.911 --> 0:04:35.791
<v Speaker 1>herself occupying the court's ideological center, and that was a

0:04:35.831 --> 0:04:36.711
<v Speaker 1>powerful place to be.

0:04:37.271 --> 0:04:40.630
<v Speaker 12>When Senator O'Connor was on the Court for many years,

0:04:40.671 --> 0:04:43.231
<v Speaker 12>she simply was the swing justice at the Court.

0:04:43.791 --> 0:04:46.791
<v Speaker 1>This is Dalia Lithwick, who writes about the law for Slate.

0:04:47.671 --> 0:04:50.511
<v Speaker 1>Lithwick started covering the Supreme Court in nineteen ninety nine.

0:04:50.831 --> 0:04:55.791
<v Speaker 12>She was a Reagan appointee who taxed left on affirmative action,

0:04:55.871 --> 0:05:00.071
<v Speaker 12>on abortion, on church state separation. There was no case

0:05:00.391 --> 0:05:04.911
<v Speaker 12>that wasn't decided in some ways by O'Connor if it

0:05:04.951 --> 0:05:06.190
<v Speaker 12>was a five to four case.

0:05:06.631 --> 0:05:09.351
<v Speaker 1>According to Lithwick, O'Connor didn't get a lot of respect

0:05:09.391 --> 0:05:09.871
<v Speaker 1>from legal.

0:05:09.751 --> 0:05:16.111
<v Speaker 12>Schot She was derided often in polls by snotty law

0:05:16.151 --> 0:05:19.151
<v Speaker 12>students as the stupidest justice. I mean, people really didn't

0:05:19.231 --> 0:05:24.591
<v Speaker 12>think she was, as a doctrinal matter, the smartest justice.

0:05:24.591 --> 0:05:27.591
<v Speaker 12>But what she was was a pragmatist, and so she

0:05:28.591 --> 0:05:31.031
<v Speaker 12>tended to sort of stand in the middle, four four

0:05:31.031 --> 0:05:34.031
<v Speaker 12>on either side and say, what's going to fix this.

0:05:34.671 --> 0:05:37.071
<v Speaker 1>O'Connor didn't like to be thought of as some unprincipled

0:05:37.111 --> 0:05:39.551
<v Speaker 1>weather vane who turned whichever way the wind was blowing.

0:05:40.351 --> 0:05:42.311
<v Speaker 1>Here again is Evan Thomas justice.

0:05:42.391 --> 0:05:47.070
<v Speaker 9>O'Connor cared about the practical impact of the Supreme Court decision.

0:05:47.151 --> 0:05:51.631
<v Speaker 9>She wasn't in love with doctrine. She didn't look closely

0:05:51.831 --> 0:05:55.311
<v Speaker 9>at doctrinal consistency. Was she really cared about was the

0:05:55.391 --> 0:05:57.390
<v Speaker 9>practical impact. How is this going to play in the

0:05:57.471 --> 0:06:00.391
<v Speaker 9>real world.

0:06:01.191 --> 0:06:04.151
<v Speaker 1>On election night two thousand, the O'Connors went to their

0:06:04.151 --> 0:06:06.791
<v Speaker 1>friend's party and watched the returns on a television set

0:06:06.791 --> 0:06:10.711
<v Speaker 1>in the basement den. Shortly before eight o'clock, the networks

0:06:10.711 --> 0:06:13.111
<v Speaker 1>called Florida for Gore, a big.

0:06:12.831 --> 0:06:16.671
<v Speaker 8>Call to make. CNN announces that we call Florida in

0:06:16.711 --> 0:06:18.031
<v Speaker 8>the Al Gore column.

0:06:18.151 --> 0:06:21.151
<v Speaker 6>This is a roadblock the size of a boulder to

0:06:21.231 --> 0:06:21.871
<v Speaker 6>George W.

0:06:21.951 --> 0:06:22.791
<v Speaker 10>Bush's path to.

0:06:22.751 --> 0:06:25.431
<v Speaker 1>The White Given the rest of the electoral map, it

0:06:25.471 --> 0:06:29.510
<v Speaker 1>looked like Gore was about to clinch the presidency. Two

0:06:29.511 --> 0:06:33.431
<v Speaker 1>witnesses later told Newsweek that Justice O'Connor was visibly disappointed.

0:06:34.271 --> 0:06:36.551
<v Speaker 1>This is terrible, she said, before leaving to get a

0:06:36.551 --> 0:06:40.671
<v Speaker 1>plate of food. According to Newsweek, John O'Connor tried to

0:06:40.671 --> 0:06:42.911
<v Speaker 1>clarify for the people still in the room that his

0:06:42.991 --> 0:06:45.831
<v Speaker 1>wife was only upset because a Gore presidency would force

0:06:45.871 --> 0:06:49.590
<v Speaker 1>her to wait another four years before retiring. But Gore

0:06:49.711 --> 0:06:52.951
<v Speaker 1>was not elected president that night, and later, as all

0:06:52.991 --> 0:06:55.671
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuits being filed in Florida were winding their way

0:06:55.711 --> 0:06:59.191
<v Speaker 1>through county and circuit courts, O'Connor's son suggested to his

0:06:59.231 --> 0:07:01.591
<v Speaker 1>mother that the recount battle could end up in front

0:07:01.591 --> 0:07:06.070
<v Speaker 1>of the Supreme Court. It was a jarring thought. The

0:07:06.111 --> 0:07:09.390
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court was supposed to stay above politics. That was

0:07:09.391 --> 0:07:13.191
<v Speaker 1>the premise of legitimacy as an institution. If O'Connor's son

0:07:13.231 --> 0:07:15.631
<v Speaker 1>was right. If the Court got involved in a case

0:07:15.631 --> 0:07:18.391
<v Speaker 1>that directly affected which party took control of the White House,

0:07:19.191 --> 0:07:23.431
<v Speaker 1>that premise would be tested in dramatic fashion. But Justice

0:07:23.431 --> 0:07:26.151
<v Speaker 1>O'Connor did not think that was going to happen, and

0:07:26.231 --> 0:07:34.831
<v Speaker 1>she told her son he was being ridiculous. I'm leon

0:07:34.951 --> 0:07:39.751
<v Speaker 1>Neefok from Prologue Projects and Pushkin Industries. This is fiasco

0:07:40.111 --> 0:07:40.591
<v Speaker 1>Bush v.

0:07:40.751 --> 0:07:45.151
<v Speaker 13>Gore, the lawyers for hold Gore and George W. Bush,

0:07:45.271 --> 0:07:46.991
<v Speaker 13>pedant of the US Supreme Court.

0:07:47.151 --> 0:07:49.631
<v Speaker 9>She was trying to save the country from what she

0:07:49.791 --> 0:07:51.871
<v Speaker 9>saw as a car crack.

0:07:51.831 --> 0:07:55.031
<v Speaker 1>Just as probably the most significant decision in thirty years.

0:07:55.191 --> 0:08:00.351
<v Speaker 2>You cannot imagine a more chance, pressure packed moment.

0:08:01.351 --> 0:08:05.831
<v Speaker 1>Episode six, our season finale. No Precedent How the two

0:08:05.871 --> 0:08:08.511
<v Speaker 1>thousand election was put to rest in a Supreme Court

0:08:08.551 --> 0:08:11.671
<v Speaker 1>case called Bush v. Gole, and how a ruling that

0:08:11.751 --> 0:08:16.431
<v Speaker 1>was explicitly designed to set no precedent ended up changing everything.

0:08:24.511 --> 0:08:26.431
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know this before I started researching the two

0:08:26.471 --> 0:08:29.751
<v Speaker 1>thousand election, But Bush v. Gore was not the first

0:08:29.791 --> 0:08:31.991
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit to crawl out of the swamps of the Florida

0:08:31.991 --> 0:08:35.231
<v Speaker 1>recount and reach the U. S Supreme Court. I had

0:08:35.271 --> 0:08:37.351
<v Speaker 1>always thought the Court swooped in at the very end,

0:08:37.871 --> 0:08:40.351
<v Speaker 1>but this earlier case preceded Bush v. Gore by a

0:08:40.391 --> 0:08:41.591
<v Speaker 1>full fifteen days.

0:08:42.631 --> 0:08:46.191
<v Speaker 6>Drawing on very rarely used legal powers, the Supreme Court has,

0:08:46.231 --> 0:08:49.071
<v Speaker 6>for the first time in American history, decided to step

0:08:49.070 --> 0:08:52.151
<v Speaker 6>into a legal dispute in the midst of a presidential election.

0:08:52.471 --> 0:08:55.151
<v Speaker 1>The case centered on the first big ruling handed down

0:08:55.151 --> 0:08:58.431
<v Speaker 1>by the Florida Supreme Court during the recount. This was

0:08:58.430 --> 0:09:00.711
<v Speaker 1>the one you heard about in episode three, the one

0:09:00.710 --> 0:09:03.551
<v Speaker 1>that forced Secretary of State Catherine Harris to wait nearly

0:09:03.590 --> 0:09:06.430
<v Speaker 1>two extra weeks before certifying the election results.

0:09:06.511 --> 0:09:07.310
<v Speaker 10>Here's the latest.

0:09:07.471 --> 0:09:12.110
<v Speaker 14>Florida's highest state court has blocked the Secretary of State certain.

0:09:12.151 --> 0:09:14.751
<v Speaker 13>What it basically means in an opinion that justice has

0:09:14.790 --> 0:09:18.591
<v Speaker 13>reached unanimously is that the hand counts continue, and the

0:09:18.631 --> 0:09:19.671
<v Speaker 13>hand counts count.

0:09:20.151 --> 0:09:20.910
<v Speaker 2>But the justice.

0:09:20.950 --> 0:09:23.230
<v Speaker 1>The new deadline set by the Florida Supreme Court had

0:09:23.231 --> 0:09:26.871
<v Speaker 1>briefly given the Gore campaign reason for hope. But the

0:09:26.871 --> 0:09:30.430
<v Speaker 1>Bush team quickly appealed the ruling, and this time there

0:09:30.511 --> 0:09:32.751
<v Speaker 1>was only one place left for the case to go.

0:09:32.830 --> 0:09:33.671
<v Speaker 15>To, the U. S.

0:09:33.670 --> 0:09:34.391
<v Speaker 16>Supreme Court.

0:09:34.910 --> 0:09:38.150
<v Speaker 17>Bush is arguing that the state court overreached its authority

0:09:38.391 --> 0:09:41.231
<v Speaker 17>and rewrote election law in a way that violates the

0:09:41.391 --> 0:09:42.350
<v Speaker 17>US Constitution.

0:09:42.790 --> 0:09:45.190
<v Speaker 1>In their petition to the U s Supreme Court, Bush's

0:09:45.271 --> 0:09:48.190
<v Speaker 1>lawyers argued that by pushing back the certification deadline, the

0:09:48.231 --> 0:09:51.271
<v Speaker 1>Florida Supreme Court had improperly changed an election law put

0:09:51.310 --> 0:09:54.310
<v Speaker 1>in place by the Florida state legislature. In doing so,

0:09:54.710 --> 0:09:58.231
<v Speaker 1>they had violated Article two of the Constitution and Title three,

0:09:58.310 --> 0:10:02.350
<v Speaker 1>Section five of the US Federal Code. On November twenty fourth,

0:10:02.710 --> 0:10:04.830
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.

0:10:05.070 --> 0:10:08.030
<v Speaker 6>A huge legal gamble pays off for the Bush campaign.

0:10:08.351 --> 0:10:11.231
<v Speaker 1>Oral arguments were scheduled for December first, The battle for.

0:10:11.231 --> 0:10:15.070
<v Speaker 5>The White House goes before the US Supreme Court, Bush gore,

0:10:15.751 --> 0:10:17.271
<v Speaker 5>and a day for the history books.

0:10:18.910 --> 0:10:21.631
<v Speaker 1>There was something momentous about the Supreme Court intervening in

0:10:21.670 --> 0:10:25.151
<v Speaker 1>a presidential election. But by the time oral arguments rolled

0:10:25.190 --> 0:10:27.870
<v Speaker 1>around in December first, the case had lost a lot

0:10:27.910 --> 0:10:31.991
<v Speaker 1>of its urgency. The certification had come and gone. Catherine

0:10:31.991 --> 0:10:35.310
<v Speaker 1>Harris had already declared Bush the winner. What difference did

0:10:35.310 --> 0:10:37.190
<v Speaker 1>it make now whether the Florida Supreme Court had been

0:10:37.190 --> 0:10:40.951
<v Speaker 1>wrong to set the new deadline. But Bush did not

0:10:40.991 --> 0:10:43.511
<v Speaker 1>want to drop the case, and the Supreme Court kept

0:10:43.511 --> 0:10:44.190
<v Speaker 1>it on the docket.

0:10:44.751 --> 0:10:47.590
<v Speaker 7>We'll hear i arguement this morning in number eight thirty

0:10:47.670 --> 0:10:51.711
<v Speaker 7>six George W. Bush versus the Palm Beach County Canvas.

0:10:51.991 --> 0:10:54.551
<v Speaker 1>In oral arguments, the Gore side made the case that

0:10:54.590 --> 0:10:57.231
<v Speaker 1>extending the deadline did not amount to passing a new law.

0:10:57.710 --> 0:11:00.190
<v Speaker 1>It was merely a judicial interpretation of an existing law,

0:11:00.391 --> 0:11:02.151
<v Speaker 1>something judges did all the time.

0:11:02.111 --> 0:11:05.310
<v Speaker 4>As a way of shedding light on the provisions that

0:11:05.391 --> 0:11:07.751
<v Speaker 4>are in conflict, so long as it's not done in

0:11:07.790 --> 0:11:09.950
<v Speaker 4>a way that conflicts with a federal man.

0:11:10.670 --> 0:11:13.550
<v Speaker 1>The Bush side made the opposite point. What if it

0:11:13.590 --> 0:11:15.950
<v Speaker 1>had been the Florida State legislature that decided to change

0:11:15.950 --> 0:11:19.271
<v Speaker 1>the date of the certification deadline, wouldn't that be considered

0:11:19.271 --> 0:11:21.751
<v Speaker 1>a new law? Why was it any less of a

0:11:21.751 --> 0:11:24.231
<v Speaker 1>new law just because it came from the Florida Supreme Court.

0:11:24.871 --> 0:11:26.830
<v Speaker 1>Here's Ted Olsen speaking in oral arguments.

0:11:26.991 --> 0:11:29.790
<v Speaker 18>I would emphasize that what the Florida Supreme Court did

0:11:29.871 --> 0:11:35.030
<v Speaker 18>is basically essentially say rewriting the statute, were changing it.

0:11:35.351 --> 0:11:38.190
<v Speaker 1>When they issued their ruing three days after oral arguments,

0:11:38.590 --> 0:11:40.951
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court showed a reluctance to interfere with the

0:11:40.950 --> 0:11:41.871
<v Speaker 1>proceedings in Florida.

0:11:43.111 --> 0:11:44.190
<v Speaker 19>The case is submitted.

0:11:45.231 --> 0:11:48.550
<v Speaker 20>The Supreme Court's historic hearing ended with a less than

0:11:48.710 --> 0:11:49.751
<v Speaker 20>historic decision.

0:11:50.590 --> 0:11:53.390
<v Speaker 1>Instead of weighing in on the constitutional issues at hand,

0:11:53.790 --> 0:11:55.830
<v Speaker 1>the Court sent the case back to the Florida Supreme

0:11:55.910 --> 0:11:58.391
<v Speaker 1>Court and asked them to provide an explanation of how

0:11:58.391 --> 0:12:01.751
<v Speaker 1>they had reached their decision. Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice

0:12:01.830 --> 0:12:05.271
<v Speaker 1>Charles Wells was puzzled by the request. The timing just

0:12:05.271 --> 0:12:06.670
<v Speaker 1>didn't make sense to him.

0:12:06.950 --> 0:12:11.910
<v Speaker 19>I talked the whole week before they their order that

0:12:12.030 --> 0:12:16.670
<v Speaker 19>they were going to enter in order. Finding that the

0:12:16.790 --> 0:12:20.631
<v Speaker 19>case had become moot, just dismissed that appeal.

0:12:21.151 --> 0:12:24.311
<v Speaker 1>Instead, the Supreme Court was asking Wells and his colleagues

0:12:24.351 --> 0:12:26.230
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the case and take another stab

0:12:26.271 --> 0:12:26.511
<v Speaker 1>at it.

0:12:26.910 --> 0:12:30.991
<v Speaker 19>They wanted us to revisit it, but we were busy

0:12:31.070 --> 0:12:34.190
<v Speaker 19>visiting other something else at that point.

0:12:35.151 --> 0:12:37.631
<v Speaker 1>You heard about the something else the Florida Supreme Court

0:12:37.710 --> 0:12:40.431
<v Speaker 1>was busy with in our last episode. It was the

0:12:40.471 --> 0:12:43.910
<v Speaker 1>contest lawsuit that the Gore team filed on November twenty seventh,

0:12:44.391 --> 0:12:47.110
<v Speaker 1>after Catherine Harris certified the election for Bush.

0:12:47.190 --> 0:12:49.951
<v Speaker 10>Good evening. It was like an earthquake in Florida. This afternoon,

0:12:49.991 --> 0:12:52.831
<v Speaker 10>the Florida Supreme Court did a life saving exercise on

0:12:52.871 --> 0:12:54.791
<v Speaker 10>al Gore's campaign to be president.

0:12:55.111 --> 0:12:57.910
<v Speaker 1>This was the big one, the one that culminated on Friday,

0:12:57.950 --> 0:13:01.391
<v Speaker 1>December eighth, in the Florida Court shocking both campaigns by

0:13:01.471 --> 0:13:04.310
<v Speaker 1>ordering a last minute hand recount of every undervote in

0:13:04.351 --> 0:13:04.990
<v Speaker 1>the state.

0:13:04.950 --> 0:13:08.151
<v Speaker 10>A manual recount of the so called under votes, and

0:13:08.190 --> 0:13:11.111
<v Speaker 10>they wanted in every part of the states sixty four counties,

0:13:11.391 --> 0:13:13.271
<v Speaker 10>more than forty three thousand votes.

0:13:13.910 --> 0:13:16.790
<v Speaker 1>Under votes, as you'll recall, refers to ballots that didn't

0:13:16.830 --> 0:13:19.950
<v Speaker 1>register a vote for president, often because someone didn't punch

0:13:19.991 --> 0:13:23.391
<v Speaker 1>through their ballot all the way. The Florida Court's ruling

0:13:23.471 --> 0:13:27.550
<v Speaker 1>to manually review all these undervotes created instant uncertainty. With

0:13:27.670 --> 0:13:30.830
<v Speaker 1>so many potential new votes, the race was anybody's game

0:13:30.871 --> 0:13:34.151
<v Speaker 1>for the first time since election Day. The Bush team

0:13:34.190 --> 0:13:37.391
<v Speaker 1>once again turned to the US Supreme Court, this time

0:13:37.511 --> 0:13:40.030
<v Speaker 1>to file an emergency petition to halt the recount.

0:13:40.271 --> 0:13:44.231
<v Speaker 6>The Bush campaign responds instantly, preparing a broad legal counter attack,

0:13:44.391 --> 0:13:47.550
<v Speaker 6>hoping to stop the court ordered recount before it even begins.

0:13:48.070 --> 0:13:51.231
<v Speaker 1>Ted Olsen, a Bush lawyer with years of experience, arguing

0:13:51.231 --> 0:13:53.670
<v Speaker 1>before the Supreme Court thought it was obvious that the

0:13:53.710 --> 0:13:56.871
<v Speaker 1>statewide manual recount could not be done fairly or quickly

0:13:56.950 --> 0:13:59.830
<v Speaker 1>enough to make the electoral College deadline of December twelfth.

0:14:00.231 --> 0:14:04.751
<v Speaker 2>It couldn't possibly be done. The earlier recount procedures of

0:14:04.991 --> 0:14:10.230
<v Speaker 2>just four counties had been moving along very slowly. There

0:14:10.310 --> 0:14:13.430
<v Speaker 2>was no chance that a statewide recount could be done

0:14:14.070 --> 0:14:17.071
<v Speaker 2>by the time of that deadline, And so my concern

0:14:17.310 --> 0:14:20.631
<v Speaker 2>was that the Florida Supreme Court was either ignoring those

0:14:20.710 --> 0:14:26.271
<v Speaker 2>deadlines or wasn't paying sufficient attention to the legal impact

0:14:26.311 --> 0:14:27.311
<v Speaker 2>of those deadlines.

0:14:28.751 --> 0:14:31.431
<v Speaker 1>Bush's forty two page petition was filed at nine to

0:14:31.431 --> 0:14:34.951
<v Speaker 1>eighteen pm on Friday, December eighth, mere hours after the

0:14:34.991 --> 0:14:38.591
<v Speaker 1>Florida Supreme Court ruling was announced. When the petition reached

0:14:38.590 --> 0:14:41.791
<v Speaker 1>the US Supreme Court, it fell to Justice Anthony Kennedy

0:14:41.911 --> 0:14:42.991
<v Speaker 1>to decide what to do with it.

0:14:43.191 --> 0:14:46.471
<v Speaker 6>The first step an emergency request to Justice Anthony Kennedy,

0:14:46.471 --> 0:14:49.031
<v Speaker 6>who was assigned to that region, asking him to block

0:14:49.071 --> 0:14:51.871
<v Speaker 6>the recount while the Court considers whether to take the case.

0:14:52.351 --> 0:14:55.271
<v Speaker 1>Justice Kennedy was a Republican appointee with an independent streak,

0:14:56.231 --> 0:14:59.551
<v Speaker 1>like Justice O'Connor, Kennedy was often a swing vote, though

0:14:59.551 --> 0:15:01.991
<v Speaker 1>he was traditionally conservative on a lot of issues. He

0:15:02.031 --> 0:15:05.471
<v Speaker 1>also liked to surprise people. Here again is Dahalia Liithwick.

0:15:06.111 --> 0:15:08.911
<v Speaker 12>I think the two of them were very much what

0:15:08.991 --> 0:15:12.551
<v Speaker 12>I would call now kind of country club Republicans, the

0:15:12.791 --> 0:15:17.591
<v Speaker 12>kind of eighties Republicans who were socially conservative but not

0:15:19.231 --> 0:15:24.551
<v Speaker 12>rabid movement conservatives the way we've seen. But Kennedy as

0:15:24.551 --> 0:15:27.951
<v Speaker 12>a swing justice was very different. Kennedy was a reliable

0:15:28.031 --> 0:15:31.991
<v Speaker 12>vote for conservative outcomes, but on a handful of cases,

0:15:32.631 --> 0:15:36.110
<v Speaker 12>most notably you know the gay marriage case that came

0:15:36.151 --> 0:15:39.911
<v Speaker 12>about after Bush vy Corp. He would defect and vote

0:15:40.391 --> 0:15:41.671
<v Speaker 12>with the left wing of the Court.

0:15:42.551 --> 0:15:45.911
<v Speaker 1>After the Bush lawyers filed their petition, Justice Kennedy wanted

0:15:45.951 --> 0:15:48.751
<v Speaker 1>Chief Justice Ranquist to call conference as soon as possible

0:15:48.751 --> 0:15:49.870
<v Speaker 1>so they could discuss the case.

0:15:50.991 --> 0:15:56.671
<v Speaker 21>Well, I was in Washington in my office, and I

0:15:56.671 --> 0:15:59.591
<v Speaker 21>remember the Chief Justice called me and told me that

0:16:00.111 --> 0:16:01.470
<v Speaker 21>we should have a conference.

0:16:02.031 --> 0:16:06.511
<v Speaker 1>That's former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. Stevens retired

0:16:06.551 --> 0:16:09.590
<v Speaker 1>from the Court in twenty ten. I interviewed him in

0:16:09.631 --> 0:16:12.791
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine nineteen, just a few months before he died

0:16:12.830 --> 0:16:14.271
<v Speaker 1>at the age of ninety nine.

0:16:14.791 --> 0:16:17.551
<v Speaker 21>During the year I came down here to Florida and

0:16:17.590 --> 0:16:21.991
<v Speaker 21>we had this place down here, and my wife and

0:16:22.511 --> 0:16:27.630
<v Speaker 21>two daughters were planning to fly to Florida on that Saturdays.

0:16:27.671 --> 0:16:30.791
<v Speaker 1>I remember Stevens, who was one of the most liberal

0:16:30.791 --> 0:16:33.191
<v Speaker 1>members of the Court, was skeptical that they needed to

0:16:33.231 --> 0:16:36.711
<v Speaker 1>intervene in the Florida recount. The only justification for doing

0:16:36.710 --> 0:16:39.470
<v Speaker 1>so would be if Bush, the petitioner, was at risk

0:16:39.511 --> 0:16:41.990
<v Speaker 1>of suffering irreparable harm if the vote counting were allowed

0:16:42.031 --> 0:16:44.951
<v Speaker 1>to go on. Stephens didn't see how that was possible,

0:16:45.431 --> 0:16:47.871
<v Speaker 1>and he made his feelings clear to Chief Justice Reanquist

0:16:47.871 --> 0:16:48.631
<v Speaker 1>on Friday evening.

0:16:49.071 --> 0:16:52.951
<v Speaker 21>I told him that the request for a stay did

0:16:53.071 --> 0:16:56.351
<v Speaker 21>the same to have any merit because there was no

0:16:56.471 --> 0:17:00.391
<v Speaker 21>showing a veryrreal injury, and I thought I would like

0:17:00.431 --> 0:17:03.431
<v Speaker 21>to go ahead with my plans and my family.

0:17:04.391 --> 0:17:08.031
<v Speaker 1>Ranquist told Stephens that their conservative colleague Anthony Scalia, known

0:17:08.071 --> 0:17:11.031
<v Speaker 1>to his friends as Nino, felt strongly that the petition

0:17:11.031 --> 0:17:12.350
<v Speaker 1>should get a hearing right away.

0:17:12.791 --> 0:17:16.511
<v Speaker 21>He told me, as I remember that Nino thought the

0:17:16.590 --> 0:17:19.150
<v Speaker 21>issue was a serious one and we ought to have

0:17:19.191 --> 0:17:22.110
<v Speaker 21>a conference on it. So we should plan on meeting

0:17:22.590 --> 0:17:24.031
<v Speaker 21>the following morning.

0:17:24.551 --> 0:17:28.391
<v Speaker 1>Justice stevens vacation was canceled. He wasn't going to Florida.

0:17:28.951 --> 0:17:43.951
<v Speaker 1>Florida was coming to him. On the morning of Saturday,

0:17:43.951 --> 0:17:47.791
<v Speaker 1>December ninth, county canvassing boards all over Florida pulled out

0:17:47.791 --> 0:17:50.311
<v Speaker 1>their boxes of month old ballots, plugged in their vote

0:17:50.350 --> 0:17:53.950
<v Speaker 1>counting machines, and started the process of separating out their undervotes.

0:17:54.551 --> 0:17:57.630
<v Speaker 22>You are looking right now at a live picture of

0:17:57.711 --> 0:18:01.150
<v Speaker 22>the Leon County Library in Tallahassee, Florida. That's where a

0:18:01.271 --> 0:18:05.071
<v Speaker 22>manual recount of some nine thousand, so called under votes

0:18:05.071 --> 0:18:07.551
<v Speaker 22>from Miami Dade County is being counted.

0:18:07.630 --> 0:18:10.711
<v Speaker 1>At this hour, some counties had thousand of under votes

0:18:10.751 --> 0:18:14.191
<v Speaker 1>account while others had just a few dozen. The judge

0:18:14.231 --> 0:18:16.831
<v Speaker 1>overseeing the process gave them all until the following day

0:18:16.870 --> 0:18:20.071
<v Speaker 1>at two pm to get the job done. If the

0:18:20.110 --> 0:18:23.231
<v Speaker 1>recount could be completed by Sunday, December tenth, that would

0:18:23.311 --> 0:18:25.751
<v Speaker 1>leave Florida two whole days to seat its twenty five

0:18:25.751 --> 0:18:30.431
<v Speaker 1>electors before the Electoral College deadline. As recounts got underway,

0:18:30.911 --> 0:18:33.950
<v Speaker 1>representatives from the Bush and Gore campaigns fanned out across

0:18:33.951 --> 0:18:37.511
<v Speaker 1>the state to monitor the proceedings.

0:18:38.671 --> 0:18:42.710
<v Speaker 17>Demonstrators from both sides channed outside public buildings as public

0:18:42.791 --> 0:18:45.390
<v Speaker 17>servants count ballots on the inside.

0:18:45.630 --> 0:18:48.910
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, in Washington, the nine justices of the U. S.

0:18:48.911 --> 0:18:51.190
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court met in their conference room to discuss the

0:18:51.191 --> 0:18:55.071
<v Speaker 1>Bush campaign's petition to stay the recount. It was obvious

0:18:55.150 --> 0:18:58.031
<v Speaker 1>right away that the room was split along ideological lines,

0:18:58.590 --> 0:19:01.630
<v Speaker 1>with Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy both joining the

0:19:01.630 --> 0:19:06.111
<v Speaker 1>Conservatives in support of granting the stay. According to Evan Thomas,

0:19:06.551 --> 0:19:09.751
<v Speaker 1>O'Connor was primarily motivated by desire to contain the chaos,

0:19:10.110 --> 0:19:11.271
<v Speaker 1>for it got worse.

0:19:11.630 --> 0:19:14.311
<v Speaker 9>In the moment. She was trying to save the country

0:19:14.511 --> 0:19:19.431
<v Speaker 9>from what she saw as a car crash. That if

0:19:19.471 --> 0:19:22.470
<v Speaker 9>the recount went on in the state of Florida, it

0:19:22.590 --> 0:19:27.311
<v Speaker 9>was possible that Gore would get ahead. Then you would

0:19:27.311 --> 0:19:29.071
<v Speaker 9>have two sets of electors.

0:19:29.590 --> 0:19:33.031
<v Speaker 1>In this scenario, there would be two competing sets of electors,

0:19:33.590 --> 0:19:36.151
<v Speaker 1>and the next president would be determined through partisan warfare

0:19:36.191 --> 0:19:40.311
<v Speaker 1>in Congress. That was something O'Connor wanted to avoid. As

0:19:40.311 --> 0:19:42.791
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court prepared to make the stay order, Public

0:19:43.431 --> 0:19:44.791
<v Speaker 1>Justice Stevens was dismayed.

0:19:45.431 --> 0:19:50.031
<v Speaker 21>I thought addressing this issue in this way would hurt

0:19:50.031 --> 0:19:56.190
<v Speaker 21>the Court's reputation. The Court generally avoids unnecessarily participating in

0:19:56.311 --> 0:20:00.830
<v Speaker 21>political controversies, and I thought here it was entering into

0:20:01.271 --> 0:20:02.631
<v Speaker 21>uncharged territory.

0:20:05.630 --> 0:20:09.110
<v Speaker 1>At two forty pm on Saturday, December tenth, news broke

0:20:09.150 --> 0:20:10.590
<v Speaker 1>that the Court had grant Did the stay?

0:20:10.830 --> 0:20:11.991
<v Speaker 23>Hang on one second, David.

0:20:11.991 --> 0:20:12.991
<v Speaker 6>They're interrupted me now.

0:20:13.271 --> 0:20:15.950
<v Speaker 13>Bob Franken at the US Supreme Court in Washington has

0:20:15.991 --> 0:20:18.191
<v Speaker 13>a bit of news. Bob, what are they saying up there?

0:20:18.711 --> 0:20:21.630
<v Speaker 4>Very big news. The US Supreme Court has agreed to

0:20:21.671 --> 0:20:24.471
<v Speaker 4>put a stay on the recount in Florida.

0:20:24.751 --> 0:20:27.511
<v Speaker 3>There are a few hundred county election workers across this

0:20:27.630 --> 0:20:29.631
<v Speaker 3>state rather bewildered right about now.

0:20:30.071 --> 0:20:32.590
<v Speaker 1>Most of the canvassing boards throughout Florida were still counting

0:20:32.590 --> 0:20:33.190
<v Speaker 1>at this point.

0:20:33.271 --> 0:20:36.271
<v Speaker 2>I understand this is a live pixture from Cager County, Florida,

0:20:36.311 --> 0:20:39.830
<v Speaker 2>where the recount has in fact stopped because of the

0:20:39.951 --> 0:20:41.751
<v Speaker 2>order of the US Supreme Court.

0:20:42.110 --> 0:20:43.711
<v Speaker 1>If it says stop, I'm going to stop.

0:20:43.911 --> 0:20:46.430
<v Speaker 24>In fact, we're stopping right now until I see if

0:20:46.431 --> 0:20:47.591
<v Speaker 24>we need to keep on stopping.

0:20:48.150 --> 0:20:50.470
<v Speaker 1>A few counties had finished, and a few had not

0:20:50.590 --> 0:20:54.311
<v Speaker 1>yet managed to start. David Boys, one of Gore's most

0:20:54.350 --> 0:20:57.350
<v Speaker 1>trusted attorneys, was at a sports bar called Andrews in

0:20:57.390 --> 0:20:59.791
<v Speaker 1>Tallahassee when he saw the news on one of the

0:20:59.791 --> 0:21:01.710
<v Speaker 1>TV screens, and I thought it was a mistake.

0:21:02.630 --> 0:21:07.390
<v Speaker 15>It just didn't seem possible that the United States Supreme

0:21:07.431 --> 0:21:12.431
<v Speaker 15>Court was going to inter in this election to pick

0:21:12.431 --> 0:21:16.551
<v Speaker 15>the winner, and to do so without even hearing argument.

0:21:17.271 --> 0:21:19.791
<v Speaker 15>They're going to stop the votes from being counted.

0:21:19.791 --> 0:21:23.031
<v Speaker 4>Was obviously presented by Justice Kennedy, Anthony Kennedy, who's in

0:21:23.150 --> 0:21:25.470
<v Speaker 4>charge of this area. I'm reading now it is ordered

0:21:25.671 --> 0:21:28.551
<v Speaker 4>that the mandate of the Floria State Supreme Court is

0:21:28.630 --> 0:21:30.630
<v Speaker 4>hereby stayed pending further.

0:21:31.350 --> 0:21:34.191
<v Speaker 17>It is another dramatic twist in this election saga, now

0:21:34.271 --> 0:21:37.031
<v Speaker 17>thirty two days old, a saga that has left.

0:21:36.870 --> 0:21:39.431
<v Speaker 2>The campaigns, the candidates, and the.

0:21:39.350 --> 0:21:42.351
<v Speaker 18>Country on an extraordinary roller coaster ride.

0:21:42.231 --> 0:21:43.551
<v Speaker 2>That he is not over yet.

0:21:45.471 --> 0:21:49.230
<v Speaker 1>Ordinarily, a stay is a stopgap measure, a way for

0:21:49.350 --> 0:21:51.590
<v Speaker 1>judges to freeze the situation in place until they have

0:21:51.590 --> 0:21:54.670
<v Speaker 1>a chance to review it. But this stay was different

0:21:55.551 --> 0:21:58.430
<v Speaker 1>because of the timeline hanging over the recount process. With

0:21:58.471 --> 0:22:01.430
<v Speaker 1>the Electoral College deadline of December twelfth just three days away.

0:22:02.271 --> 0:22:04.670
<v Speaker 1>The Supreme Court's order to halt the recount all but

0:22:04.751 --> 0:22:07.671
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed that it could not be done in time. Even

0:22:07.711 --> 0:22:09.710
<v Speaker 1>if the Court ended up deciding to edit resume.

0:22:10.150 --> 0:22:13.551
<v Speaker 13>Even the Vice President's battled hardened legal team appeared shocked

0:22:13.551 --> 0:22:14.271
<v Speaker 13>at the set back.

0:22:14.671 --> 0:22:18.350
<v Speaker 25>There's no doubt that by delaying it, it has created a.

0:22:18.390 --> 0:22:20.391
<v Speaker 17>Very serious issue as.

0:22:20.191 --> 0:22:23.350
<v Speaker 25>To whether that count can fully be completed or not

0:22:23.711 --> 0:22:24.871
<v Speaker 25>by December twelfth.

0:22:25.150 --> 0:22:27.590
<v Speaker 1>Though Gore was despondent when he heard about the stay,

0:22:28.271 --> 0:22:31.670
<v Speaker 1>he remained true to his instincts as an institutionalist. In

0:22:31.711 --> 0:22:33.910
<v Speaker 1>a message sent to his top aids on his BlackBerry,

0:22:34.231 --> 0:22:37.230
<v Speaker 1>Gore wrote, please make sure that no one trashes the

0:22:37.231 --> 0:22:40.590
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. But the real risk might have been the

0:22:40.630 --> 0:22:44.590
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justices trashing each other. Justice Stevens was so

0:22:44.671 --> 0:22:47.590
<v Speaker 1>unhappy with the majority's decision that he wrote a dissent

0:22:47.751 --> 0:22:50.471
<v Speaker 1>that his three liberal colleagues signed onto Justice.

0:22:50.511 --> 0:22:54.511
<v Speaker 20>Stevens wrote that stopping this last chance recount may cause

0:22:54.551 --> 0:22:58.071
<v Speaker 20>irreparable harm to Gore, and that it will inevitably cast

0:22:58.110 --> 0:22:59.151
<v Speaker 20>a cloud on those.

0:22:58.951 --> 0:23:02.150
<v Speaker 1>Stephens argued that Bush's claim of a reparable harm was ludicrous,

0:23:02.911 --> 0:23:05.110
<v Speaker 1>that if anyone should be worried about a reparable harm,

0:23:05.231 --> 0:23:06.071
<v Speaker 1>it was Gore.

0:23:06.271 --> 0:23:08.391
<v Speaker 21>And it didn't seem to me that getting the right

0:23:08.471 --> 0:23:12.590
<v Speaker 21>answer in a contested election could ever be an irreable harm.

0:23:12.870 --> 0:23:15.751
<v Speaker 21>That's what you're trying to do in elections.

0:23:15.991 --> 0:23:18.311
<v Speaker 1>I asked Stevens to read part of his descent out loud.

0:23:18.951 --> 0:23:24.350
<v Speaker 21>Counting every legally cast vote cannot constitute irreable harm. On

0:23:24.951 --> 0:23:27.350
<v Speaker 21>the other hand, there is a danger that a stay

0:23:27.471 --> 0:23:31.751
<v Speaker 21>may cause irrebable harm to Respondence and more importantly, the

0:23:31.791 --> 0:23:35.430
<v Speaker 21>public at large, because of the risks that the entry

0:23:35.471 --> 0:23:38.390
<v Speaker 21>of the stay would be tantamount to a decision on

0:23:38.431 --> 0:23:42.870
<v Speaker 21>the merits in favor of the applicants. Preventing the reaccount

0:23:42.870 --> 0:23:46.990
<v Speaker 21>from being completed will inevitably cast a cloud on the

0:23:47.390 --> 0:23:51.111
<v Speaker 21>legitimacy of the election, if it seems to me makes

0:23:51.150 --> 0:23:51.670
<v Speaker 21>some sense.

0:23:54.311 --> 0:23:57.150
<v Speaker 1>Justice Scalia was so angered by Stephen's descent that he

0:23:57.231 --> 0:24:00.870
<v Speaker 1>decided to write a rebuttal. Scalia argued that if Bush

0:24:00.911 --> 0:24:03.311
<v Speaker 1>was right that he'd won the election, the counting of

0:24:03.390 --> 0:24:06.111
<v Speaker 1>votes that are questionable legality would cast a cloud over

0:24:06.150 --> 0:24:10.031
<v Speaker 1>his victory. Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, Scalia wrote,

0:24:10.471 --> 0:24:12.830
<v Speaker 1>is not a recipe for producing election results that have

0:24:12.911 --> 0:24:15.271
<v Speaker 1>the public acceptance the democratic stability requires.

0:24:15.630 --> 0:24:18.590
<v Speaker 26>These are two justices that are going after each other

0:24:18.590 --> 0:24:22.231
<v Speaker 26>with Hammer and Tom and Scalia is stating the Bush

0:24:22.271 --> 0:24:25.471
<v Speaker 26>case far more strongly than the Bush lawyers stayed in

0:24:25.511 --> 0:24:26.111
<v Speaker 26>their briefs.

0:24:27.390 --> 0:24:31.110
<v Speaker 1>It's impossible to overstate how unusually fast the Supreme Court

0:24:31.150 --> 0:24:34.670
<v Speaker 1>was moving. Bush's petition had come in on December eighth,

0:24:35.191 --> 0:24:37.951
<v Speaker 1>the stay had been granted December ninth, and now oral

0:24:38.031 --> 0:24:40.271
<v Speaker 1>arguments have been scheduled for December eleventh.

0:24:39.870 --> 0:24:41.551
<v Speaker 4>At eleven a m total of one and a half

0:24:41.590 --> 0:24:43.991
<v Speaker 4>hours for oral arguments. This is lightning speed, of course,

0:24:44.031 --> 0:24:44.870
<v Speaker 4>by the Supreme Court.

0:24:44.911 --> 0:24:48.551
<v Speaker 1>The Court never likes to rush anything. In their usual schedule,

0:24:48.791 --> 0:24:51.071
<v Speaker 1>months and months go by between when oral arguments are

0:24:51.110 --> 0:24:55.151
<v Speaker 1>heard and when rulings are issued. That gestation period leaves

0:24:55.231 --> 0:24:57.791
<v Speaker 1>time for opinions to be written and rewritten many times over.

0:24:58.511 --> 0:25:01.311
<v Speaker 1>Occasionally it leaves enough time for justices to change their minds.

0:25:02.471 --> 0:25:05.830
<v Speaker 1>With the Electoral College deadline looming, such a leisurely approach

0:25:05.951 --> 0:25:09.871
<v Speaker 1>wasn't possible. The Supreme Court was on a violently compressed schedule,

0:25:10.271 --> 0:25:13.031
<v Speaker 1>and that meant the Bush and Gore lawyers were too.

0:25:13.271 --> 0:25:15.390
<v Speaker 1>They had just over twenty four hours to write and

0:25:15.431 --> 0:25:18.670
<v Speaker 1>submit their briefs. David Boyce led the charge on the

0:25:18.711 --> 0:25:19.831
<v Speaker 1>Gore side.

0:25:19.951 --> 0:25:26.031
<v Speaker 15>This did not come down to nuances of federal law.

0:25:27.150 --> 0:25:31.551
<v Speaker 15>It came down to what had happened in Florida, and

0:25:31.671 --> 0:25:33.471
<v Speaker 15>I knew that barn anybody.

0:25:34.551 --> 0:25:37.670
<v Speaker 1>Boys's central argument was that the Florida Supreme Court wasn't

0:25:37.711 --> 0:25:40.431
<v Speaker 1>making new laws, they were just interpreting ones that were

0:25:40.431 --> 0:25:43.830
<v Speaker 1>already on the books. The Bush team insisted this was wrong,

0:25:44.431 --> 0:25:46.390
<v Speaker 1>that in fact, the Florida Supreme Court had changed the

0:25:46.431 --> 0:25:47.991
<v Speaker 1>rules of the election in the middle of the game,

0:25:48.551 --> 0:25:50.551
<v Speaker 1>and that in doing so they had usurped the power

0:25:50.590 --> 0:25:53.311
<v Speaker 1>of the state legislature. But the last part of the

0:25:53.311 --> 0:25:56.471
<v Speaker 1>Bush brief also included a different argument, one based on

0:25:56.551 --> 0:26:00.031
<v Speaker 1>the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Here again

0:26:00.150 --> 0:26:01.391
<v Speaker 1>is Bush lawyer ted Olsen.

0:26:02.031 --> 0:26:06.870
<v Speaker 2>The elasticity of the rules and the procedures put the

0:26:07.110 --> 0:26:11.191
<v Speaker 2>power in the vote counters. Every time they change the rules,

0:26:11.630 --> 0:26:14.111
<v Speaker 2>they could put their thumb on the scale to make

0:26:14.150 --> 0:26:16.991
<v Speaker 2>it come out a certain way. When you have almost

0:26:16.991 --> 0:26:20.230
<v Speaker 2>a tie in terms of the numbers, all you have

0:26:20.311 --> 0:26:23.350
<v Speaker 2>to do is change a certain amount of those votes

0:26:23.991 --> 0:26:25.271
<v Speaker 2>to change the outcome.

0:26:26.031 --> 0:26:28.270
<v Speaker 1>It was hardly a secret that the manual recounts were

0:26:28.271 --> 0:26:31.870
<v Speaker 1>being conducted under different standards in different counties. Some places

0:26:31.870 --> 0:26:34.511
<v Speaker 1>were counting dimple chads, while others were throwing them out.

0:26:35.671 --> 0:26:38.910
<v Speaker 1>The Bush argument was that this inconsistent application of ballot

0:26:38.911 --> 0:26:41.511
<v Speaker 1>standards was itself unconstitutional.

0:26:46.511 --> 0:26:49.350
<v Speaker 14>This is an ABC News special report.

0:26:52.390 --> 0:26:55.590
<v Speaker 10>Hello again, everybody on Peter Jennings at ABC News headquarters.

0:26:55.630 --> 0:26:58.870
<v Speaker 10>And there is the US Supreme Court with its activist outside,

0:26:58.870 --> 0:27:01.470
<v Speaker 10>both for the Democrats and the Republicans today.

0:27:01.870 --> 0:27:04.791
<v Speaker 1>The oral arguments in Bush v. Gore were scheduled to

0:27:04.830 --> 0:27:07.590
<v Speaker 1>start at eleven am on Monday, December eleventh, a.

0:27:07.671 --> 0:27:10.630
<v Speaker 13>Lawyers for al Gore and George W. Bush head into

0:27:10.671 --> 0:27:13.071
<v Speaker 13>the US Supreme Court in Washington.

0:27:12.671 --> 0:27:14.791
<v Speaker 27>To argue the case in about two minutes.

0:27:14.911 --> 0:27:18.271
<v Speaker 20>The second oral argument in ten days involving the two

0:27:18.311 --> 0:27:21.191
<v Speaker 20>thousand presidential election as scheduled to get under way.

0:27:23.991 --> 0:27:27.230
<v Speaker 1>Dallia Lithwick had only recently started attending oral arguments, but

0:27:27.311 --> 0:27:28.271
<v Speaker 1>she already knew the drill.

0:27:28.711 --> 0:27:30.511
<v Speaker 12>You'd sort of line up in the court. I remember

0:27:30.590 --> 0:27:33.390
<v Speaker 12>they line you up a long time before arguments start,

0:27:33.431 --> 0:27:36.710
<v Speaker 12>and they march you in and they take away your

0:27:36.870 --> 0:27:38.431
<v Speaker 12>everything but your pen and your notepad.

0:27:38.911 --> 0:27:41.870
<v Speaker 1>Oddly, Lithwick and most of the other reporters were seated

0:27:41.870 --> 0:27:43.670
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that they couldn't actually see the

0:27:43.791 --> 0:27:46.510
<v Speaker 1>justices as they spoke from the bench. Instead they just

0:27:46.511 --> 0:27:47.311
<v Speaker 1>heard their voices.

0:27:50.110 --> 0:27:53.950
<v Speaker 7>Well, here argument now in number nine forty nine, George W.

0:27:54.071 --> 0:27:57.231
<v Speaker 7>Bush and Richard Cheney versus Albert Gore at al.

0:27:58.390 --> 0:28:01.951
<v Speaker 12>Beyond the first couple of rows, everybody's views obstructed, everybody

0:28:01.951 --> 0:28:05.671
<v Speaker 12>sitting behind curtains and columns, all the reporters. And there

0:28:05.911 --> 0:28:09.270
<v Speaker 12>was at the time somebody from the press office at

0:28:09.271 --> 0:28:11.511
<v Speaker 12>the Court who would get hand signals so you would

0:28:11.511 --> 0:28:15.231
<v Speaker 12>know for Justice Scalias speaking six, and that was how

0:28:15.271 --> 0:28:16.391
<v Speaker 12>you knew who was talking.

0:28:18.791 --> 0:28:21.071
<v Speaker 1>The air in the room was stifling as Lithwick and

0:28:21.110 --> 0:28:22.911
<v Speaker 1>her colleagues tried to make out what was happening.

0:28:23.350 --> 0:28:26.871
<v Speaker 12>My memory of it is it was, I mean almost

0:28:26.911 --> 0:28:30.391
<v Speaker 12>hanging from the lamps, like it was so packed and

0:28:30.511 --> 0:28:35.231
<v Speaker 12>so hot, and that there was a feeling, at least

0:28:35.231 --> 0:28:37.751
<v Speaker 12>in the press section of the room that we were

0:28:37.791 --> 0:28:40.991
<v Speaker 12>watching history. You don't often have a sense that you're

0:28:41.031 --> 0:28:43.190
<v Speaker 12>going to be telling, you know, your grandkids like I

0:28:43.311 --> 0:28:44.511
<v Speaker 12>was there. I was in the room.

0:28:46.271 --> 0:28:48.831
<v Speaker 1>Ted Olsen remembers the atmosphere as one of spectacle and

0:28:48.911 --> 0:28:49.551
<v Speaker 1>high stakes.

0:28:50.231 --> 0:28:54.071
<v Speaker 2>The entire world was watching. The Supreme Court was surrounded

0:28:54.111 --> 0:28:59.031
<v Speaker 2>by the satellite trucks of the various broadcast networks. The

0:28:59.071 --> 0:29:02.631
<v Speaker 2>court was filled with political figures, members of the United

0:29:02.671 --> 0:29:06.151
<v Speaker 2>States Senate, journalists and people all over the world were

0:29:06.231 --> 0:29:07.311
<v Speaker 2>watching and listening.

0:29:07.671 --> 0:29:11.071
<v Speaker 1>Despite having argued before the Supreme Court on thirteen other occasions,

0:29:11.511 --> 0:29:13.751
<v Speaker 1>Olsen found that he was not immune to the pressure.

0:29:14.191 --> 0:29:19.351
<v Speaker 2>You cannot imagine a more tense, pressure packed moment than

0:29:19.431 --> 0:29:22.471
<v Speaker 2>standing up in front of the all of those people

0:29:22.951 --> 0:29:25.591
<v Speaker 2>and the nine justices, with all of that at stake,

0:29:26.071 --> 0:29:28.271
<v Speaker 2>and I think all of us felt. For God's sakes,

0:29:28.271 --> 0:29:31.631
<v Speaker 2>I hope I can get these words out. One of

0:29:31.671 --> 0:29:34.911
<v Speaker 2>the lawyers made a mistake of three times, I think

0:29:34.951 --> 0:29:37.791
<v Speaker 2>he did, called the justices by the wrong.

0:29:37.631 --> 0:29:39.071
<v Speaker 18>Name, Justice Bar.

0:29:39.151 --> 0:29:41.151
<v Speaker 5>What I'm saying is is then I'm just a suitor.

0:29:41.151 --> 0:29:42.351
<v Speaker 1>You better cut that out.

0:29:43.351 --> 0:29:44.311
<v Speaker 4>I will now give up.

0:29:45.031 --> 0:29:47.591
<v Speaker 2>Your adrenaline is going to be pumping through you. So

0:29:48.271 --> 0:29:51.431
<v Speaker 2>anybody says, are you nervous, of course you're nervous. And

0:29:51.751 --> 0:29:54.631
<v Speaker 2>if you're not nervous, you're not a sentient human being

0:29:55.151 --> 0:29:57.551
<v Speaker 2>or a lawyer. So you have to focus on what

0:29:57.591 --> 0:30:00.271
<v Speaker 2>you're saying. You have to focus on what the justices

0:30:00.311 --> 0:30:03.831
<v Speaker 2>are saying. When they interrupt you, and they interrupt you constantly.

0:30:04.271 --> 0:30:05.111
<v Speaker 18>No, I don't think.

0:30:04.991 --> 0:30:07.950
<v Speaker 23>It's necessary a reliance on you really are not relying

0:30:07.991 --> 0:30:08.511
<v Speaker 23>on those.

0:30:08.311 --> 0:30:10.391
<v Speaker 18>Well, I think those cases support the argument.

0:30:10.431 --> 0:30:12.431
<v Speaker 21>But as we said, if you got to choose one

0:30:12.551 --> 0:30:14.151
<v Speaker 21>version of the word legislature or the.

0:30:14.151 --> 0:30:17.631
<v Speaker 18>Other, I think in different contexts, it's not necessarily necessarily

0:30:17.671 --> 0:30:19.231
<v Speaker 18>the case. And certainly it is.

0:30:19.191 --> 0:30:20.311
<v Speaker 23>True that legislatures.

0:30:21.151 --> 0:30:23.831
<v Speaker 1>As the hearing were on the main thing, anyone was

0:30:23.871 --> 0:30:26.791
<v Speaker 1>listening for recluse as to how the two swing justices

0:30:26.951 --> 0:30:31.031
<v Speaker 1>O'Connor and Kennedy were thinking about the case. O'Connors, how

0:30:31.071 --> 0:30:33.831
<v Speaker 1>the baffled that canvassing boards wouldn't just use ballot standards

0:30:33.831 --> 0:30:35.950
<v Speaker 1>that were based on the instructions that voters received an

0:30:35.951 --> 0:30:36.551
<v Speaker 1>election day.

0:30:37.191 --> 0:30:40.591
<v Speaker 8>Well, why isn't this standard the one that voters are

0:30:40.631 --> 0:30:43.751
<v Speaker 8>instructed to follow for goodness sake? So, I mean, it

0:30:43.831 --> 0:30:46.911
<v Speaker 8>couldn't be clear. Why don't we go.

0:30:47.031 --> 0:30:50.391
<v Speaker 1>There was something else bothering O'Connor to the Florida Supreme

0:30:50.431 --> 0:30:52.791
<v Speaker 1>Court had not responded in any way to the Supreme

0:30:52.831 --> 0:30:55.911
<v Speaker 1>Court's remand and request for clarification on their earlier ruling.

0:30:56.311 --> 0:31:01.990
<v Speaker 8>And I did not find a really response by the

0:31:01.991 --> 0:31:06.351
<v Speaker 8>Florida Supreme Court to this Court's remand in the case

0:31:06.631 --> 0:31:09.991
<v Speaker 8>a week ago, it just seemed to kind of bypass

0:31:10.111 --> 0:31:14.151
<v Speaker 8>sit and assume that all those changes in deadlines were

0:31:14.271 --> 0:31:16.391
<v Speaker 8>just fine, and they'd go ahead and adhere to them.

0:31:16.431 --> 0:31:19.831
<v Speaker 25>And I found out troublesome, your honor, if I could.

0:31:20.471 --> 0:31:22.991
<v Speaker 1>It was about nineteen minutes into oral arguments when the

0:31:23.031 --> 0:31:26.351
<v Speaker 1>issue of equal protection entered the discussion. But it wasn't

0:31:26.391 --> 0:31:29.031
<v Speaker 1>Ted Olson who brought it up. It was Justice Kennedy.

0:31:29.351 --> 0:31:31.591
<v Speaker 23>Well, and I thought your point was that the process

0:31:31.671 --> 0:31:34.511
<v Speaker 23>is being conducted in violation of the equal protection clause,

0:31:34.591 --> 0:31:36.071
<v Speaker 23>and is its standards and.

0:31:36.071 --> 0:31:38.311
<v Speaker 18>The due process clause, and what we know is now

0:31:38.351 --> 0:31:41.071
<v Speaker 18>Kennedy latched onto the issue and tried to get answers

0:31:41.071 --> 0:31:44.190
<v Speaker 18>from David Boys, But because the equal protection argument had

0:31:44.191 --> 0:31:46.911
<v Speaker 18>been such a small part of the Bush brief, Boys

0:31:46.911 --> 0:31:48.951
<v Speaker 18>had spent most of his time preparing to talk about

0:31:48.991 --> 0:31:50.031
<v Speaker 18>other aspects of the case.

0:31:50.391 --> 0:31:53.750
<v Speaker 25>I think there is a uniform standard. The standard is

0:31:53.791 --> 0:31:57.751
<v Speaker 25>whether or not the intent of the voter is reflected

0:31:57.791 --> 0:32:01.231
<v Speaker 25>by the ballot. That is the uniform standard that throughout.

0:32:00.991 --> 0:32:03.471
<v Speaker 23>Very general it runs throughout the law. Even the dog

0:32:03.511 --> 0:32:05.391
<v Speaker 23>knows the difference in being stumbled over and being kicked

0:32:05.431 --> 0:32:07.911
<v Speaker 23>me know it now? You would say that, from the

0:32:07.911 --> 0:32:11.751
<v Speaker 23>standpoint of equal protection clause, could each county give their

0:32:11.791 --> 0:32:14.710
<v Speaker 23>own interpretation to what intent means, so long as they

0:32:14.751 --> 0:32:21.111
<v Speaker 23>are in good faith and with some reasonable basis finding intent?

0:32:22.271 --> 0:32:24.470
<v Speaker 19>I think could that vary from county to county.

0:32:24.671 --> 0:32:27.671
<v Speaker 25>I think it can vary from individual to individual.

0:32:28.231 --> 0:32:31.591
<v Speaker 1>The sudden focus on equal protection was surprising and those

0:32:31.791 --> 0:32:34.591
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy who brought it up. Other justices seem to share

0:32:34.631 --> 0:32:37.231
<v Speaker 1>his concern, and not just the conservative ones either.

0:32:37.351 --> 0:32:40.151
<v Speaker 10>And why this question of equal protection for all Florida

0:32:40.231 --> 0:32:41.191
<v Speaker 10>voters keeps coming up.

0:32:41.311 --> 0:32:44.071
<v Speaker 26>Because Justice Sooner was saying, I'm troubled by this.

0:32:44.471 --> 0:32:45.831
<v Speaker 2>Justice Kennedy is troubled by this.

0:32:46.031 --> 0:32:48.271
<v Speaker 4>Justice Bryer is troubled by this now.

0:32:48.391 --> 0:32:50.991
<v Speaker 18>So I think that was something that really.

0:32:51.111 --> 0:32:54.471
<v Speaker 1>There was something weird about the equal protection claim. Though

0:32:54.471 --> 0:32:56.631
<v Speaker 1>the Bush team was applying it narrowly to the problem

0:32:56.671 --> 0:33:00.271
<v Speaker 1>of inconsistent hand recounts in Florida, its premise was that

0:33:00.311 --> 0:33:02.951
<v Speaker 1>there was something wrong with the decentralized way in which

0:33:02.991 --> 0:33:06.751
<v Speaker 1>all American elections are carried out. Taking the argument to

0:33:06.751 --> 0:33:10.711
<v Speaker 1>its logical conclusion, the country's entire electoral sism them was

0:33:10.831 --> 0:33:15.351
<v Speaker 1>one big violation of equal protection in any event. By

0:33:15.391 --> 0:33:17.991
<v Speaker 1>the time oral arguments came to a close, it was

0:33:18.071 --> 0:33:20.271
<v Speaker 1>clear that the Court would be treating the equal protection

0:33:20.391 --> 0:33:23.911
<v Speaker 1>argument as much more than a sideshow. But how exactly

0:33:23.951 --> 0:33:31.511
<v Speaker 1>they would respond to it was anyone's guess. The nine

0:33:31.671 --> 0:33:33.911
<v Speaker 1>justices met in their conference room to figure out who

0:33:33.951 --> 0:33:37.911
<v Speaker 1>stood where. Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg felt strongly that

0:33:37.911 --> 0:33:41.111
<v Speaker 1>the Court should allow the recount to resume, but Kennedy

0:33:41.271 --> 0:33:44.311
<v Speaker 1>was still focused on Bush's equal protection argument, and it

0:33:44.351 --> 0:33:47.311
<v Speaker 1>appeared that two of his more liberal colleagues, Stephen Bryer

0:33:47.351 --> 0:33:49.991
<v Speaker 1>and David Souter, were hung up on it as well.

0:33:49.951 --> 0:33:53.151
<v Speaker 21>And they both indicated that their feeling it was a

0:33:53.271 --> 0:33:57.151
<v Speaker 21>possible violation. And I had never been able to understand.

0:33:56.671 --> 0:34:00.710
<v Speaker 1>Why Stevens tried to propose a compromise. If most of

0:34:00.711 --> 0:34:03.831
<v Speaker 1>his colleagues agreed that the varying standards for conducting recounts

0:34:03.831 --> 0:34:06.831
<v Speaker 1>were a violation of equal protection, why not send the

0:34:06.871 --> 0:34:09.391
<v Speaker 1>case back to the Florida Supreme Court and asked them

0:34:09.391 --> 0:34:11.551
<v Speaker 1>to come up with one on statewide standard for judging

0:34:11.591 --> 0:34:15.951
<v Speaker 1>voter intent. That way, the recount could resume and proceed fairly.

0:34:16.911 --> 0:34:19.271
<v Speaker 1>But the conservatives on the Court didn't think that prolonging

0:34:19.311 --> 0:34:22.230
<v Speaker 1>the process was an option. It was simply too late.

0:34:22.831 --> 0:34:26.350
<v Speaker 1>The deadline for ceding Florida's electors was December twelfth. That

0:34:26.431 --> 0:34:30.350
<v Speaker 1>was the very next day. Justice O'Connor in particular, was

0:34:30.391 --> 0:34:32.231
<v Speaker 1>worried that if the case went back to the Florida

0:34:32.270 --> 0:34:35.551
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court now, the dispute over electors could enter truly

0:34:35.671 --> 0:34:36.671
<v Speaker 1>uncharted territory.

0:34:37.471 --> 0:34:39.391
<v Speaker 9>Justice O'Connor said, this is a mess. We got to

0:34:39.391 --> 0:34:41.310
<v Speaker 9>stop it now because if we don't stop it now,

0:34:41.311 --> 0:34:42.710
<v Speaker 9>it's going to go on and on, and it's going

0:34:42.750 --> 0:34:45.351
<v Speaker 9>to get worse and Bush is going to win in

0:34:45.391 --> 0:34:45.671
<v Speaker 9>the end.

0:34:45.710 --> 0:34:51.831
<v Speaker 1>Anyways, not everyone thought the situation was so dire. Stevens, Briar, Suitor,

0:34:51.831 --> 0:34:54.591
<v Speaker 1>and Ginsburg all believed that something could still be done

0:34:54.631 --> 0:34:57.230
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, or at least they believed that it wasn't

0:34:57.270 --> 0:35:00.071
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court's job to make that call. Why did

0:35:00.111 --> 0:35:01.951
<v Speaker 1>you think there was time? And they didn't think there

0:35:02.031 --> 0:35:02.350
<v Speaker 1>was time.

0:35:02.591 --> 0:35:06.671
<v Speaker 21>Well, I didn't really feel I had the capacity to

0:35:06.750 --> 0:35:10.591
<v Speaker 21>decide that issue. But if the Florida Supreme Court thought

0:35:10.671 --> 0:35:13.071
<v Speaker 21>it could be worked out, which should let them be

0:35:13.151 --> 0:35:13.951
<v Speaker 21>given a try.

0:35:14.951 --> 0:35:17.751
<v Speaker 1>What ensued was a tug of war, with some members

0:35:17.750 --> 0:35:19.830
<v Speaker 1>of the Court planting their feet and trying to pull

0:35:19.871 --> 0:35:23.951
<v Speaker 1>their colleagues over to their side. The hope was to

0:35:23.951 --> 0:35:25.951
<v Speaker 1>come up with a ruling that wouldn't divide the Court

0:35:26.031 --> 0:35:30.151
<v Speaker 1>on a partisan basis. To that end, Kennedy and O'Connor

0:35:30.151 --> 0:35:33.071
<v Speaker 1>decided to collaborate on an opinion reflecting whatever shreds of

0:35:33.071 --> 0:35:36.830
<v Speaker 1>consensus were available in it. They would argue that the

0:35:36.831 --> 0:35:40.551
<v Speaker 1>statewide recount was a violation of equal protection, a position

0:35:40.631 --> 0:35:43.790
<v Speaker 1>that seven of the justices seemed to agree with. The

0:35:43.831 --> 0:35:46.791
<v Speaker 1>problem was that two of those seven, Brier and Suitor,

0:35:47.311 --> 0:35:49.710
<v Speaker 1>thought the state wide recount could still be revived under

0:35:49.710 --> 0:35:52.830
<v Speaker 1>a uniform ballot standard, while the other five thought the

0:35:52.871 --> 0:35:56.190
<v Speaker 1>game was over. That meant the justices were still divided

0:35:56.230 --> 0:35:58.710
<v Speaker 1>five to four on whether the recount had to end.

0:35:59.511 --> 0:36:01.831
<v Speaker 1>Compromise would have been nice, but it wasn't.

0:36:01.671 --> 0:36:18.390
<v Speaker 14>Necessary, okay. Also, standing by the moment.

0:36:18.111 --> 0:36:19.791
<v Speaker 4>Of truth, it is the moment of truth.

0:36:19.831 --> 0:36:23.350
<v Speaker 25>The Supreme Court may use this moment to determine who

0:36:23.391 --> 0:36:24.950
<v Speaker 25>is the next president of the United States.

0:36:24.991 --> 0:36:26.830
<v Speaker 15>There are many ways this decision could go.

0:36:27.270 --> 0:36:29.591
<v Speaker 1>The Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Bush v.

0:36:29.710 --> 0:36:32.991
<v Speaker 1>Gore at ten pm on December twelfth, the same day

0:36:33.031 --> 0:36:36.310
<v Speaker 1>as the deadline for seating Florida's electors Saturday. The Court

0:36:36.311 --> 0:36:39.071
<v Speaker 1>printed copies of the sixty five page decision and stacked

0:36:39.071 --> 0:36:40.871
<v Speaker 1>them on a table in the press office for the taking.

0:36:41.631 --> 0:36:45.191
<v Speaker 1>Journalists grab copies and sprinted outside to waiting TV cameras.

0:36:45.311 --> 0:36:47.790
<v Speaker 13>The Supreme Court decision from Florida is now out.

0:36:47.991 --> 0:36:50.390
<v Speaker 10>Let's go straight to the court because ABC's Jackie Judd

0:36:50.431 --> 0:36:52.191
<v Speaker 10>and Jeffrey Tubman are standing by.

0:36:54.151 --> 0:36:58.350
<v Speaker 6>The Peter.

0:36:58.391 --> 0:37:01.190
<v Speaker 1>If you can, I will, let me give you the

0:37:01.230 --> 0:37:04.551
<v Speaker 1>typical Supreme Court opinion starts with the summary, helpful guide

0:37:04.551 --> 0:37:07.790
<v Speaker 1>to relevant constitutional questions and how they've been decided. But

0:37:07.871 --> 0:37:09.951
<v Speaker 1>because the Court's ruling on Bush v. Gore had been

0:37:10.190 --> 0:37:12.790
<v Speaker 1>and so quickly, there was no time for that kind

0:37:12.831 --> 0:37:16.711
<v Speaker 1>of sign posting. That made interpreting the decision rather difficult.

0:37:16.911 --> 0:37:19.551
<v Speaker 27>So we're going to have to keep shifting through this decision.

0:37:19.591 --> 0:37:23.230
<v Speaker 27>It is extremely complicated, with all these concurrences and descents and.

0:37:23.471 --> 0:37:24.471
<v Speaker 4>The phrasing of it.

0:37:24.471 --> 0:37:26.270
<v Speaker 26>It's very badly written, to tell you the truth, and

0:37:26.391 --> 0:37:27.871
<v Speaker 26>it sounds Parnie.

0:37:27.911 --> 0:37:30.190
<v Speaker 10>Let's work through this as carefully as we can.

0:37:30.351 --> 0:37:32.671
<v Speaker 16>But let me get to the bottom line here the

0:37:32.791 --> 0:37:36.151
<v Speaker 16>judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is reversed.

0:37:36.671 --> 0:37:41.351
<v Speaker 1>The majority opinion was signed procurium, meaning by the court. Usually,

0:37:41.750 --> 0:37:44.511
<v Speaker 1>this was a sign that a decision was uncontroversial, and

0:37:44.551 --> 0:37:46.391
<v Speaker 1>it was meant to indicate that the Court was speaking

0:37:46.391 --> 0:37:49.990
<v Speaker 1>in one voice. But this opinion was not so straightforward.

0:37:50.431 --> 0:37:53.191
<v Speaker 1>On the one hand, it said that seven justices agreed

0:37:53.190 --> 0:37:55.751
<v Speaker 1>that the statewide recount was a violation of equal protection.

0:37:56.750 --> 0:37:59.591
<v Speaker 1>But the far more consequential takeaway from the opinion was

0:37:59.631 --> 0:38:01.591
<v Speaker 1>that a majority of the court, five out of the

0:38:01.671 --> 0:38:04.510
<v Speaker 1>nine justices, thought the recount had to be shut down

0:38:04.671 --> 0:38:05.230
<v Speaker 1>no matter what.

0:38:05.591 --> 0:38:08.231
<v Speaker 24>And it seems that this really clearly is a victory

0:38:08.471 --> 0:38:09.750
<v Speaker 24>for Governor Bush.

0:38:10.151 --> 0:38:12.511
<v Speaker 21>I read this to say, here's the bottom line.

0:38:12.591 --> 0:38:15.911
<v Speaker 13>We've reversed the Supreme Court opinion of Florida. This election

0:38:16.071 --> 0:38:16.390
<v Speaker 13>is over.

0:38:16.750 --> 0:38:19.911
<v Speaker 1>According to Gore lawyer David Boyce, some of his colleagues

0:38:19.911 --> 0:38:22.511
<v Speaker 1>initially thought that the Court's decision was not necessarily the

0:38:22.591 --> 0:38:23.271
<v Speaker 1>end of the line.

0:38:23.671 --> 0:38:27.671
<v Speaker 15>There was still some hope among some members of the

0:38:27.710 --> 0:38:30.551
<v Speaker 15>Gore camp that we could continue the fight in Florida,

0:38:31.071 --> 0:38:33.951
<v Speaker 15>that we could try to get the vote count we started.

0:38:34.551 --> 0:38:37.711
<v Speaker 15>But at one point al Gore asked me what I thought,

0:38:38.511 --> 0:38:41.710
<v Speaker 15>and I said, it was wrong to shoot you, but

0:38:41.791 --> 0:38:44.390
<v Speaker 15>you're still dead. There's no coming back from this.

0:38:44.951 --> 0:38:46.911
<v Speaker 5>And in the end, what we had was a collision

0:38:47.270 --> 0:38:50.230
<v Speaker 5>between the calendar and the fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution

0:38:50.750 --> 0:38:53.031
<v Speaker 5>guaranteeing equal protection under the law.

0:38:53.431 --> 0:38:55.710
<v Speaker 1>As someone who teaches these issues, I would say this

0:38:55.750 --> 0:38:58.751
<v Speaker 1>is probably the most significant decision in thirty years.

0:38:58.991 --> 0:39:01.231
<v Speaker 14>We've had an appeal, we've taken that appeal.

0:39:01.551 --> 0:39:03.750
<v Speaker 3>There is no appeal from the United States Supreme Court.

0:39:06.031 --> 0:39:09.111
<v Speaker 1>The idea of a conservative majority rallying around equal protection

0:39:09.230 --> 0:39:13.151
<v Speaker 1>seemed absurd many liberal court watchers. Equal protection was maybe

0:39:13.151 --> 0:39:16.391
<v Speaker 1>the most revered legal tenet of progressives, the centerpiece of

0:39:16.471 --> 0:39:19.271
<v Speaker 1>landmark civil rights decisions like Brown v. Board of Education

0:39:19.631 --> 0:39:23.471
<v Speaker 1>and Loving v. Virginia. Justice Ginsberg, who pioneered the use

0:39:23.511 --> 0:39:27.230
<v Speaker 1>of equal protection arguments in fighting sex discrimination, was particularly horrified.

0:39:27.791 --> 0:39:31.470
<v Speaker 1>While drafting her dissenting opinion, Ginsburg included a footnote saying

0:39:31.471 --> 0:39:33.671
<v Speaker 1>that if there was any equal protection violation at work

0:39:33.710 --> 0:39:37.191
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, it was the disenfranchisement of African American voters.

0:39:38.270 --> 0:39:41.511
<v Speaker 1>She was referencing reports of voter suppression, including efforts to

0:39:41.551 --> 0:39:45.151
<v Speaker 1>purge felons from Florida's voter roles. Justice Scalia read the

0:39:45.151 --> 0:39:47.870
<v Speaker 1>footnote in a draft of Ginsburg's assent and accused her

0:39:47.911 --> 0:39:53.591
<v Speaker 1>of using al Sharpton tactics. Ginsburg gruented and took it out. Meanwhile,

0:39:54.151 --> 0:39:57.031
<v Speaker 1>Justice Stevens decided to articulate his frustration in a descent

0:39:57.071 --> 0:39:59.911
<v Speaker 1>of his own. Here he is reading from the last paragraph.

0:40:00.750 --> 0:40:03.551
<v Speaker 21>Time will one day heal the wound to that conference

0:40:03.871 --> 0:40:08.031
<v Speaker 21>that will be inflicted by today's decision. One thing, however,

0:40:08.111 --> 0:40:11.911
<v Speaker 21>is certain, although it will remain never know with complete certainty,

0:40:11.951 --> 0:40:15.271
<v Speaker 21>the identity of the winner of this year's presidential election,

0:40:15.871 --> 0:40:19.591
<v Speaker 21>the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is

0:40:19.671 --> 0:40:23.871
<v Speaker 21>a nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian

0:40:24.071 --> 0:40:29.231
<v Speaker 21>of the rule of law. I respectively dissent. No, that's true.

0:40:29.511 --> 0:40:32.310
<v Speaker 21>I think I hit it right out of the head.

0:40:34.190 --> 0:40:37.031
<v Speaker 1>There was one more important and unusual thing about the

0:40:37.031 --> 0:40:38.230
<v Speaker 1>Court's decision in Bush v.

0:40:38.351 --> 0:40:38.551
<v Speaker 13>Gore.

0:40:39.311 --> 0:40:40.951
<v Speaker 1>It didn't set any precedent.

0:40:41.151 --> 0:40:44.551
<v Speaker 20>The justices, in a highly unusual move, said their ruling

0:40:45.031 --> 0:40:48.910
<v Speaker 20>is limited to the present circumstances only, meaning.

0:40:48.871 --> 0:40:51.631
<v Speaker 1>Justice O'Connor was always cognizant of downstream effects of the

0:40:51.631 --> 0:40:55.430
<v Speaker 1>Court's actions, and during the drafting process in Bush v. Gore,

0:40:55.911 --> 0:40:57.831
<v Speaker 1>she told Kennedy that she wanted it to be clear

0:40:58.111 --> 0:41:00.631
<v Speaker 1>that the Court was only responding to the specific facts

0:41:00.631 --> 0:41:03.190
<v Speaker 1>of the case at hand, and so they added a

0:41:03.230 --> 0:41:06.631
<v Speaker 1>sentence stipulating just that and acknowledging that the problem of

0:41:06.671 --> 0:41:11.751
<v Speaker 1>equal protection and election processes generally presents many complexities. To critics,

0:41:12.111 --> 0:41:14.750
<v Speaker 1>it sounded like the majority was basically admitting that the

0:41:14.791 --> 0:41:17.591
<v Speaker 1>equal protection argument did not deserve to be taken seriously.

0:41:18.431 --> 0:41:19.870
<v Speaker 1>Here again is Dahalialithwick.

0:41:20.351 --> 0:41:25.390
<v Speaker 12>I do remember absolutely being shocked by the Court having

0:41:25.391 --> 0:41:29.031
<v Speaker 12>to explicitly say in the manner of mission impossible, like

0:41:29.111 --> 0:41:31.271
<v Speaker 12>this is going to disappear in a poof of smoke

0:41:31.351 --> 0:41:33.911
<v Speaker 12>in ten seconds. So read it quickly because it doesn't

0:41:33.911 --> 0:41:38.471
<v Speaker 12>stand for everything. For me, that was anathema to what

0:41:38.511 --> 0:41:41.911
<v Speaker 12>the court does. You know, the Court sets out clear

0:41:42.311 --> 0:41:46.951
<v Speaker 12>lasting precedent to guide the next case. It doesn't say, like, dudes,

0:41:46.991 --> 0:41:49.310
<v Speaker 12>we were totally painted into a corner and so we're

0:41:49.311 --> 0:41:52.230
<v Speaker 12>going to make some stuff up and good luck. And

0:41:52.671 --> 0:41:56.710
<v Speaker 12>so I remember that being to me. The thing that

0:41:56.831 --> 0:41:58.790
<v Speaker 12>grabbed me by the throw was they don't even have

0:41:58.831 --> 0:42:01.830
<v Speaker 12>the courage of their own convictions, much less you know

0:42:01.911 --> 0:42:10.750
<v Speaker 12>that the ability to resolve this in any binding, precedential way.

0:42:10.871 --> 0:42:14.390
<v Speaker 17>Peter Tonight al Gore's age describe him as calm, at

0:42:14.391 --> 0:42:17.951
<v Speaker 17>peace with himself and his decision, and very focused on

0:42:18.071 --> 0:42:21.391
<v Speaker 17>his task tonight to do his part to unite the country.

0:42:21.710 --> 0:42:25.710
<v Speaker 1>On December thirteenth, thirty six days after election day, al

0:42:25.791 --> 0:42:28.071
<v Speaker 1>Gore gave a televised address in which he conceded the

0:42:28.111 --> 0:42:30.391
<v Speaker 1>two thousand election for a second and final time.

0:42:31.351 --> 0:42:31.911
<v Speaker 4>Good evening.

0:42:32.831 --> 0:42:35.631
<v Speaker 16>Just moments ago, I spoke with George W. Bush and

0:42:35.791 --> 0:42:39.031
<v Speaker 16>congratulated him on becoming the forty third president of the

0:42:39.111 --> 0:42:42.591
<v Speaker 16>United States, and I promised him that I wouldn't call

0:42:42.671 --> 0:42:46.791
<v Speaker 16>him back this time. Now the US Supreme Court has spoken,

0:42:47.791 --> 0:42:51.471
<v Speaker 16>let there be no doubt. While I strongly disagree with

0:42:51.551 --> 0:42:55.911
<v Speaker 16>the Court's decision, I accept it. I accept the finality

0:42:55.951 --> 0:42:58.551
<v Speaker 16>of this outcome, which will be ratified next Monday in

0:42:58.591 --> 0:42:59.790
<v Speaker 16>the Electoral College.

0:43:00.311 --> 0:43:03.790
<v Speaker 1>Later, George W. Bush offered a few conciliatory remarks of

0:43:03.791 --> 0:43:04.311
<v Speaker 1>his own.

0:43:04.631 --> 0:43:07.231
<v Speaker 11>Vice President Gore and I put our hearts and hopes

0:43:07.230 --> 0:43:12.471
<v Speaker 11>into our campaigns. We shared some emotions, so I understand

0:43:12.511 --> 0:43:16.390
<v Speaker 11>how difficult this moment must be for Vice President Gore

0:43:16.431 --> 0:43:17.071
<v Speaker 11>and his family.

0:43:18.591 --> 0:43:20.551
<v Speaker 1>The only thing left to do was make it official.

0:43:21.391 --> 0:43:24.750
<v Speaker 1>On December eighteenth, Florida's presidential electors gathered at the State

0:43:24.750 --> 0:43:29.191
<v Speaker 1>House in Tallahassee. As expected, all twenty five Republican electors

0:43:29.270 --> 0:43:32.431
<v Speaker 1>voted for George W. Bush, while his brother Jeb looked on.

0:43:33.151 --> 0:43:36.031
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for your attendance and cooperation and fulfilling this

0:43:36.111 --> 0:43:36.871
<v Speaker 2>awesome duty.

0:43:37.671 --> 0:43:39.991
<v Speaker 13>This meeting of the presidential electors is now adjourned.

0:43:40.031 --> 0:43:40.870
<v Speaker 2>Thank you all very much.

0:43:40.991 --> 0:43:41.790
<v Speaker 19>God blessed.

0:43:45.031 --> 0:43:48.230
<v Speaker 1>In Washington the task of officially presiding over the Electoral

0:43:48.230 --> 0:43:51.710
<v Speaker 1>College TWI felt in none other than al Gore, whose

0:43:51.710 --> 0:43:54.111
<v Speaker 1>position as vice president also made him the president of

0:43:54.111 --> 0:43:54.551
<v Speaker 1>the Senate.

0:43:54.951 --> 0:43:57.190
<v Speaker 16>The whole number of the electors appointed to vote for

0:43:57.230 --> 0:43:58.950
<v Speaker 16>President of the United States as well, the.

0:43:58.831 --> 0:44:01.991
<v Speaker 27>Third vice president in history to preside over the certification

0:44:02.071 --> 0:44:03.111
<v Speaker 27>of his own defeat.

0:44:03.750 --> 0:44:04.390
<v Speaker 4>George W.

0:44:04.511 --> 0:44:07.631
<v Speaker 16>Bush of the State of Texas has received for President

0:44:07.671 --> 0:44:09.871
<v Speaker 16>of the United States two hundred and seventy one v.

0:44:10.991 --> 0:44:13.870
<v Speaker 16>Al Gore of the State of Tennessee has received two

0:44:13.911 --> 0:44:17.390
<v Speaker 16>hundred and sixty six votes. May God bless our new

0:44:17.431 --> 0:44:20.991
<v Speaker 16>president and our new Vice President, and may God bless

0:44:21.351 --> 0:44:22.751
<v Speaker 16>the United States of America.

0:44:30.951 --> 0:44:33.671
<v Speaker 1>When the election was finally over and Bush was inaugurated

0:44:33.671 --> 0:44:36.151
<v Speaker 1>as president, it seemed like the stage was set for

0:44:36.230 --> 0:44:38.750
<v Speaker 1>Sandrad O'Connor to announce that she was stepping down from

0:44:38.750 --> 0:44:43.230
<v Speaker 1>the court, but she didn't. According to Devin Thomas, she

0:44:43.270 --> 0:44:44.870
<v Speaker 1>felt that her role in putting Bush in the White

0:44:44.911 --> 0:44:46.511
<v Speaker 1>House made retirement untenable.

0:44:47.431 --> 0:44:52.270
<v Speaker 9>The standard wisdom is that she voted for Bush so

0:44:52.391 --> 0:44:54.671
<v Speaker 9>that she could retire because she wanted to retire, because

0:44:54.710 --> 0:44:57.391
<v Speaker 9>it sounded like that's what they wanted to do based

0:44:57.391 --> 0:45:01.710
<v Speaker 9>on that dinner party outburst. But in fact the opposite

0:45:01.791 --> 0:45:06.430
<v Speaker 9>is true. Because she voted for Bush, she knew that

0:45:06.471 --> 0:45:08.750
<v Speaker 9>she could not retire. It would look like the fix

0:45:08.871 --> 0:45:10.991
<v Speaker 9>was in that She knew that it would look like

0:45:11.071 --> 0:45:13.830
<v Speaker 9>she voted for Bush so that she could retire. So

0:45:13.871 --> 0:45:17.351
<v Speaker 9>she said to her family, look, no white House events.

0:45:17.431 --> 0:45:20.830
<v Speaker 9>We're not gonna hang around with a Bush family. We're

0:45:20.871 --> 0:45:24.791
<v Speaker 9>not retiring. And she didn't, not for another five years

0:45:24.911 --> 0:45:28.151
<v Speaker 9>until her husband's Alzheimer's was so bad she felt she

0:45:28.230 --> 0:45:28.871
<v Speaker 9>had to retire.

0:45:30.951 --> 0:45:34.230
<v Speaker 1>As John's Alzheimer's worsened, O'Connor often brought him to the

0:45:34.230 --> 0:45:36.870
<v Speaker 1>court with her. He sat on the couch in her

0:45:36.871 --> 0:45:40.230
<v Speaker 1>office reading the newspaper while she worked. When he occasionally

0:45:40.270 --> 0:45:43.111
<v Speaker 1>wandered off, Supreme Court guards were always around to keep

0:45:43.111 --> 0:45:47.391
<v Speaker 1>an eye on him. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court's docket filled

0:45:47.471 --> 0:45:50.991
<v Speaker 1>up with cases that touched on Bush administration policy. These

0:45:50.991 --> 0:45:54.351
<v Speaker 1>were major cases about affirmative action, the right to die,

0:45:54.671 --> 0:45:57.911
<v Speaker 1>the rights of prisoners at Guantanama Bay. And if anyone

0:45:57.951 --> 0:46:00.511
<v Speaker 1>still believed that the two thousand election had been low stakes,

0:46:01.031 --> 0:46:02.751
<v Speaker 1>the string of decisions that came out of the Supreme

0:46:02.791 --> 0:46:05.350
<v Speaker 1>Court in its aftermath served as a reminder of just

0:46:05.391 --> 0:46:13.391
<v Speaker 1>how much had been on the line. When O'Connor finally

0:46:13.391 --> 0:46:15.911
<v Speaker 1>retired in two thousand and five, she was replaced with

0:46:15.951 --> 0:46:19.911
<v Speaker 1>Samuel Alito, a relentlessly conservative justice whose arrival shifted the

0:46:19.911 --> 0:46:24.270
<v Speaker 1>ideological balance of the court. In private, O'Connor expressed deep

0:46:24.270 --> 0:46:27.190
<v Speaker 1>frustration with Alito, and she watched with disappointment as the

0:46:27.190 --> 0:46:30.510
<v Speaker 1>court tilted away from her doctrine on abortion rights, affirmative action,

0:46:30.831 --> 0:46:32.031
<v Speaker 1>and a host of other issues.

0:46:32.791 --> 0:46:35.471
<v Speaker 12>She was so full of regret that she, you know,

0:46:35.871 --> 0:46:39.671
<v Speaker 12>immediately on her retirement and being replaced by Alito and

0:46:39.750 --> 0:46:42.350
<v Speaker 12>watching all of the doctrine that she had had her

0:46:42.391 --> 0:46:46.591
<v Speaker 12>thumbprint on got erased. Within like two years. You know,

0:46:46.710 --> 0:46:49.671
<v Speaker 12>every place in which she had been the decider goes

0:46:49.710 --> 0:46:52.911
<v Speaker 12>the other way. And I think she really did feel

0:46:52.991 --> 0:46:56.710
<v Speaker 12>as though she couldn't say it out loud, but that

0:46:56.831 --> 0:47:02.711
<v Speaker 12>she had done something like catastrophically bad for the country

0:47:02.710 --> 0:47:05.310
<v Speaker 12>that she didn't know how to make reparations for. And

0:47:05.351 --> 0:47:08.111
<v Speaker 12>I think, much more so than anyone else, she really

0:47:08.351 --> 0:47:09.631
<v Speaker 12>carried that around with her.

0:47:12.831 --> 0:47:17.071
<v Speaker 1>In twenty thirteen, for the first time ever, O'Connor publicly

0:47:17.111 --> 0:47:19.671
<v Speaker 1>expressed second thoughts about the ruling in Bush v.

0:47:19.831 --> 0:47:20.071
<v Speaker 18>Gore.

0:47:21.230 --> 0:47:23.790
<v Speaker 1>The Supreme Court probably added to the problem. At the

0:47:23.871 --> 0:47:27.191
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, she told the Chicago Tribune. Maybe

0:47:27.190 --> 0:47:29.871
<v Speaker 1>she said the Court shouldn't have even taken the case

0:47:29.911 --> 0:47:34.831
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Five years later, Justice O'Connor announced

0:47:34.871 --> 0:47:38.951
<v Speaker 1>that she was suffering from dementia, most likely Alzheimer's, and

0:47:38.991 --> 0:47:42.831
<v Speaker 1>she retired from public life. She died in twenty twenty

0:47:42.831 --> 0:47:48.151
<v Speaker 1>three at the age of ninety three. In the wake

0:47:48.190 --> 0:47:51.950
<v Speaker 1>of al Gore's concession, a handful of news organizations went

0:47:51.991 --> 0:47:54.830
<v Speaker 1>back to Florida's ballots and tried to figure out whether

0:47:54.871 --> 0:47:56.671
<v Speaker 1>the right person had been elected president.

0:47:56.951 --> 0:47:59.671
<v Speaker 24>The count of more than sixty one thousand punch carts

0:47:59.710 --> 0:48:03.471
<v Speaker 24>optical scan even handwritten votes tallied by a team from

0:48:03.471 --> 0:48:06.871
<v Speaker 24>the Miami Herald, USA Today and a private accounting firm.

0:48:07.471 --> 0:48:09.750
<v Speaker 1>The first major result was released by a consortium of

0:48:09.750 --> 0:48:12.591
<v Speaker 1>news papers that included USA Today and the Miami Herald.

0:48:13.391 --> 0:48:15.831
<v Speaker 1>It came out in April two thousand and one, about

0:48:15.831 --> 0:48:18.431
<v Speaker 1>two and a half months into George W. Bush's presidency.

0:48:19.591 --> 0:48:21.350
<v Speaker 1>The study gamed out what would have happened if the

0:48:21.351 --> 0:48:24.191
<v Speaker 1>recount mandated by the Florida Supreme Court had been allowed

0:48:24.190 --> 0:48:27.711
<v Speaker 1>to continue. It looked at possible outcomes under four different

0:48:27.710 --> 0:48:31.191
<v Speaker 1>ballot standards, ranging from the most lenient to the most strict,

0:48:31.551 --> 0:48:32.991
<v Speaker 1>under vote ballots.

0:48:32.791 --> 0:48:35.831
<v Speaker 24>Those now famous hanging, dimpled and pregnant chads.

0:48:36.111 --> 0:48:39.270
<v Speaker 1>Ironically, the study found that Gore would have only won

0:48:39.431 --> 0:48:43.071
<v Speaker 1>under the strictest standard, and even then the margin would

0:48:43.071 --> 0:48:44.431
<v Speaker 1>have only been three votes.

0:48:44.511 --> 0:48:47.511
<v Speaker 24>So Gore wins using a strict vote counting method, he

0:48:47.591 --> 0:48:51.471
<v Speaker 24>did not support Bush wins using a more liberal method

0:48:51.750 --> 0:48:52.591
<v Speaker 24>he opposed.

0:48:53.111 --> 0:48:55.791
<v Speaker 1>A second major post mortem of the election came out

0:48:55.831 --> 0:48:59.351
<v Speaker 1>just after its first anniversary. This one was the product

0:48:59.391 --> 0:49:01.911
<v Speaker 1>of a million dollar effort that included The New York Times,

0:49:02.190 --> 0:49:05.551
<v Speaker 1>The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The Saint Petersburg

0:49:05.631 --> 0:49:09.350
<v Speaker 1>Times and the Palm Beach Post Together they commissioned a

0:49:09.391 --> 0:49:12.671
<v Speaker 1>non partisan research institute at the University of Chicago to

0:49:12.710 --> 0:49:15.151
<v Speaker 1>spend ten months going through the one hundred and seventy

0:49:15.151 --> 0:49:17.790
<v Speaker 1>five thousand undervotes and over votes from Florida.

0:49:17.991 --> 0:49:22.351
<v Speaker 27>Trained coders, often operating in teams, viewed but did not touch,

0:49:22.431 --> 0:49:25.111
<v Speaker 27>disputed ballots and wrote down what they saw.

0:49:25.791 --> 0:49:29.071
<v Speaker 1>According to that study, if every undervote and over vote

0:49:29.111 --> 0:49:32.310
<v Speaker 1>in Florida had been examined by hand, Gore would have

0:49:32.311 --> 0:49:33.871
<v Speaker 1>won the state by a slim margin.

0:49:34.230 --> 0:49:37.351
<v Speaker 27>Under those circumstances, Gore would have gained to a plus

0:49:37.391 --> 0:49:39.830
<v Speaker 27>one hundred and seventy one largely.

0:49:39.591 --> 0:49:42.830
<v Speaker 1>But as the news organizations themselves acknowledged, this was neither

0:49:42.871 --> 0:49:46.071
<v Speaker 1>here nor there. Though it may have been true in theory,

0:49:46.671 --> 0:49:48.790
<v Speaker 1>there had pretty much never been a scenario in which

0:49:48.831 --> 0:49:52.071
<v Speaker 1>all of Florida's undervotes and overvotes were going to be counted.

0:49:53.351 --> 0:49:55.671
<v Speaker 1>If you imagine the thirty six days after election day

0:49:55.671 --> 0:49:58.270
<v Speaker 1>as a choose your own adventure, there was just no

0:49:58.351 --> 0:50:00.511
<v Speaker 1>fork in the road when that was a serious possibility.

0:50:01.551 --> 0:50:04.071
<v Speaker 1>Even before it was published, an LA Times editor was

0:50:04.151 --> 0:50:06.631
<v Speaker 1>quoted saying that it was entirely possible that most readers

0:50:06.631 --> 0:50:09.831
<v Speaker 1>would look at the report and yawn. The Saint Petersburg

0:50:09.871 --> 0:50:12.910
<v Speaker 1>Time Times asked whether anyone other than political junkies would care.

0:50:13.591 --> 0:50:16.471
<v Speaker 1>In The Washington Post, media critic Howard Kurtz said the

0:50:16.551 --> 0:50:22.190
<v Speaker 1>recount now felt like some distant Civil war battle. There

0:50:22.230 --> 0:50:24.710
<v Speaker 1>was good reason to be skeptical about the public's appetite

0:50:24.710 --> 0:50:28.270
<v Speaker 1>for relitigating the election. Maybe you've already done the math

0:50:28.311 --> 0:50:30.911
<v Speaker 1>in your head, But the first anniversary of November two

0:50:30.951 --> 0:50:34.431
<v Speaker 1>thousand was November two thousand and one, So two months

0:50:34.431 --> 0:50:36.591
<v Speaker 1>after the September eleventh attacks.

0:50:36.511 --> 0:50:39.470
<v Speaker 27>Try to remember the kind of September we just had.

0:50:43.791 --> 0:50:47.230
<v Speaker 27>What consumed us last December is a paragraph for history now.

0:50:47.431 --> 0:50:50.231
<v Speaker 1>A reason George Bush's approval rating was close to ninety percent.

0:50:51.270 --> 0:50:53.871
<v Speaker 1>A poll published in early November showed that if the

0:50:53.911 --> 0:50:57.151
<v Speaker 1>election was held again, Bush would beat Gore nationally by

0:50:57.190 --> 0:51:02.271
<v Speaker 1>twenty six points. Even Gore's former campaign chairman, Bill Day

0:51:02.551 --> 0:51:04.671
<v Speaker 1>said that anyone who was still speculating what the election

0:51:04.750 --> 0:51:08.471
<v Speaker 1>results was wasting their breath. On the editorial page of

0:51:08.471 --> 0:51:12.391
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Tribune, both parties received praise for showing restraint

0:51:12.710 --> 0:51:14.591
<v Speaker 1>at a time when the core temperature of the former

0:51:14.631 --> 0:51:18.830
<v Speaker 1>World Trade Center still hovered near one thousand degrees in

0:51:18.911 --> 0:51:22.710
<v Speaker 1>subsequent years. Whenever anyone asked Justice Antonin Scalia about the

0:51:22.750 --> 0:51:25.991
<v Speaker 1>Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, he would respond, get

0:51:26.031 --> 0:51:29.591
<v Speaker 1>over it. In his book on Justice O'Connor, Evan Thomas

0:51:29.631 --> 0:51:32.711
<v Speaker 1>reported that Scalia privately referred to the equal protection argument

0:51:32.951 --> 0:51:36.071
<v Speaker 1>used to end the Florida recount as a piece of shit.

0:51:59.151 --> 0:52:02.471
<v Speaker 1>Fiasco is a production of Prolog Projects, and it's distributed

0:52:02.511 --> 0:52:06.471
<v Speaker 1>by Pushkin Industries. The show is produced by Andrew Parsons,

0:52:06.710 --> 0:52:11.511
<v Speaker 1>Madeline kaplan Ula Culpa, and me Leon Nathan. Our script

0:52:11.631 --> 0:52:15.591
<v Speaker 1>editor was Daniel Riley. Our editorial consultant was Camilla Hammer,

0:52:16.031 --> 0:52:19.991
<v Speaker 1>and we received additional editorial support from Lisa Chase. Our

0:52:20.071 --> 0:52:22.791
<v Speaker 1>music and score are by Nick Silvester of god Mode,

0:52:22.991 --> 0:52:26.911
<v Speaker 1>with additional music from Alexis Quadrado. Our theme song is

0:52:26.911 --> 0:52:30.391
<v Speaker 1>by Spatial Relations. Our artwork is by Teddy Blanks at

0:52:30.511 --> 0:52:35.071
<v Speaker 1>Chips and y Audio, mixed by Rob Buyers, Michael Raphael

0:52:35.230 --> 0:52:38.871
<v Speaker 1>and Johnny Vince Evans. A final Final V two special

0:52:38.871 --> 0:52:42.551
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Luminary for a list of books, articles, and

0:52:42.591 --> 0:52:45.631
<v Speaker 1>documentaries that we relied on in our research. Click the

0:52:45.671 --> 0:52:49.271
<v Speaker 1>link in the show notes. Thanks to c SPAN, NBC

0:52:49.391 --> 0:52:52.631
<v Speaker 1>News Archive, CNN and Channel twenty and Palm Beach for

0:52:52.710 --> 0:52:56.431
<v Speaker 1>the archival material you heard in today's show. Thanks for listening.

0:53:10.551 --> 0:53:11.230
<v Speaker 23>I don't know