1 00:00:16,311 --> 00:00:23,231 Speaker 1: Pushkin. Hey Leon here, Before we get to this episode, 2 00:00:23,431 --> 00:00:25,191 Speaker 1: I want to let you know that you can binge 3 00:00:25,231 --> 00:00:28,591 Speaker 1: the entire season of Fiasco Bush v. Gore right now 4 00:00:28,791 --> 00:00:33,071 Speaker 1: ad free by becoming a Pushkin Plus subscriber. Sign up 5 00:00:33,111 --> 00:00:36,271 Speaker 1: for Pushkin Plus on the Fiasco Apple podcast show page, 6 00:00:36,871 --> 00:00:44,111 Speaker 1: or visit Pushkin dot fm slash Plus. Now onto the episode. 7 00:00:44,751 --> 00:00:46,830 Speaker 1: Previously on Fiasco. 8 00:00:47,711 --> 00:00:49,871 Speaker 2: Voce wins one round, Gore wins the next. 9 00:00:49,951 --> 00:00:51,231 Speaker 3: It is a legal slugfest. 10 00:00:51,271 --> 00:00:55,631 Speaker 2: We've gone from protest certification last night and now contest. 11 00:00:55,231 --> 00:00:59,590 Speaker 4: Florida's ticking clock becomes a second adversary. December twelfth is 12 00:00:59,671 --> 00:01:02,511 Speaker 4: key the dave Florida certifies it's electors. 13 00:01:02,671 --> 00:01:06,871 Speaker 5: The Republican controlled state legislature scheduled a special session to 14 00:01:06,991 --> 00:01:10,031 Speaker 5: name electors just in case the state Supreme Court rules 15 00:01:10,031 --> 00:01:11,231 Speaker 5: against Cavador Borsch. 16 00:01:11,031 --> 00:01:13,951 Speaker 3: By a vote of four to three, the majority of 17 00:01:13,951 --> 00:01:17,431 Speaker 3: the court has ordered a manual recount of all under 18 00:01:17,511 --> 00:01:20,711 Speaker 3: votes in any Florida county where such a recount has 19 00:01:20,751 --> 00:01:23,471 Speaker 3: not yet occurred. The recount shall commence immediately. 20 00:01:23,711 --> 00:01:26,471 Speaker 6: If you do not like political chaos, it's about time 21 00:01:26,551 --> 00:01:27,431 Speaker 6: to head for the storm. 22 00:01:27,431 --> 00:01:35,151 Speaker 1: Cell Sandra Dey O'Connor had a lot on her plate 23 00:01:35,191 --> 00:01:38,391 Speaker 1: On November seventh, two thousand. It was election day, for 24 00:01:38,431 --> 00:01:40,831 Speaker 1: one thing, and she had plans to attend a watch 25 00:01:40,871 --> 00:01:44,631 Speaker 1: party at a friend's house. But first O'Connor was due 26 00:01:44,631 --> 00:01:46,111 Speaker 1: at the United States Supreme Court. 27 00:01:47,111 --> 00:01:50,031 Speaker 7: Well here argument now number ninety nine twelve fifty seven 28 00:01:50,151 --> 00:01:53,871 Speaker 7: Carol M. Browner VERSUS American Trucking Association. 29 00:01:53,351 --> 00:01:55,911 Speaker 1: Where she and the other eight justices were scheduled to 30 00:01:55,951 --> 00:01:58,911 Speaker 1: hear oral arguments in a case involving the Clean Water Act. 31 00:01:59,111 --> 00:02:05,151 Speaker 8: Now why would Congress want that advice on economic and 32 00:02:05,351 --> 00:02:06,231 Speaker 8: energy efficts. 33 00:02:06,591 --> 00:02:09,151 Speaker 1: O'Connor also had an important personal matter to attend to. 34 00:02:10,031 --> 00:02:12,471 Speaker 1: Her husband, John had been sick, and she was trying 35 00:02:12,471 --> 00:02:13,911 Speaker 1: to gather information in his condition. 36 00:02:14,951 --> 00:02:21,991 Speaker 9: On election day, Sandra O'Connor spoke to her husband's neurologist 37 00:02:22,791 --> 00:02:26,270 Speaker 9: for the first time about John's Alzheimer's. 38 00:02:26,471 --> 00:02:29,791 Speaker 1: This is journalist Evan Thomas. He's the author of First, 39 00:02:30,231 --> 00:02:32,631 Speaker 1: a Biography of Justice O'Connor, for which he interviewed her 40 00:02:32,671 --> 00:02:35,991 Speaker 1: family members and former clerks, as well as her husband's neurologist. 41 00:02:37,311 --> 00:02:40,591 Speaker 1: According to Thomas, John had been experiencing memory loss for 42 00:02:40,631 --> 00:02:43,311 Speaker 1: several years, but he had been hesitant to call it 43 00:02:43,311 --> 00:02:46,551 Speaker 1: what it was now. On the phone with his doctor, 44 00:02:47,151 --> 00:02:48,871 Speaker 1: Justice O'Connor was trying to get a handle on her 45 00:02:48,911 --> 00:02:49,951 Speaker 1: husband's diagnosis. 46 00:02:50,391 --> 00:02:53,751 Speaker 9: John had finally started using the word Alzheimer's to talk 47 00:02:53,751 --> 00:02:57,991 Speaker 9: about his condition, and she asked if there was perhaps 48 00:02:57,991 --> 00:03:03,951 Speaker 9: some experimental program that he could be put into to 49 00:03:04,031 --> 00:03:07,751 Speaker 9: keep the loss of memory away for as long as possible. 50 00:03:07,831 --> 00:03:10,351 Speaker 9: Was there some kind of experimental program that could by 51 00:03:10,431 --> 00:03:10,990 Speaker 9: him time? 52 00:03:11,911 --> 00:03:15,071 Speaker 1: Sandra Dey O'Connor had a decision to make. She and 53 00:03:15,151 --> 00:03:17,871 Speaker 1: her husband were both seventy years old, and she'd always 54 00:03:17,871 --> 00:03:20,471 Speaker 1: thought that eventually they would move back to Arizona, where 55 00:03:20,471 --> 00:03:23,551 Speaker 1: they had settled a few years into their marriage. If 56 00:03:23,591 --> 00:03:25,071 Speaker 1: the two of them wanted to do that before his 57 00:03:25,151 --> 00:03:28,031 Speaker 1: dementia got worse, O'Connor would need to retire from the 58 00:03:28,031 --> 00:03:31,511 Speaker 1: Supreme Court sooner rather than later. The question was whether 59 00:03:31,591 --> 00:03:32,191 Speaker 1: or not she could. 60 00:03:32,751 --> 00:03:35,831 Speaker 9: They had considered retirement as early as nineteen ninety six. 61 00:03:36,831 --> 00:03:39,551 Speaker 9: President Clinton was president, so they didn't want to retire 62 00:03:39,831 --> 00:03:41,111 Speaker 9: while there was a Democrat there. 63 00:03:41,431 --> 00:03:44,351 Speaker 1: O'Connor was a Republican, and if al Gore won the 64 00:03:44,391 --> 00:03:47,431 Speaker 1: two thousand election, she knew that she would face enormous 65 00:03:47,431 --> 00:03:49,191 Speaker 1: pressure to remain on the bench at least through his 66 00:03:49,231 --> 00:03:49,871 Speaker 1: first term. 67 00:03:50,151 --> 00:03:52,671 Speaker 9: According to her son Scott, they were at least thinking 68 00:03:53,151 --> 00:03:57,071 Speaker 9: about retiring if there was a Republican president if Bush won. 69 00:04:01,871 --> 00:04:04,631 Speaker 10: Good evening, President Reagan today named a woman to the 70 00:04:04,671 --> 00:04:06,911 Speaker 10: Supreme Court and another barrier fell. 71 00:04:07,271 --> 00:04:10,591 Speaker 1: O'Connor had been a justice for nineteen years. She was 72 00:04:10,631 --> 00:04:12,631 Speaker 1: the first woman ever nominated at the Supreme Court. 73 00:04:13,111 --> 00:04:17,150 Speaker 11: She is truly a person for all seasons, possessing those 74 00:04:17,231 --> 00:04:22,390 Speaker 11: unique qualities of temperament, fairness, intellectual capacity, and devotion to 75 00:04:22,431 --> 00:04:22,831 Speaker 11: the public. 76 00:04:22,911 --> 00:04:25,590 Speaker 1: For years, O'Connor was a reliable member of the Court's 77 00:04:25,591 --> 00:04:28,591 Speaker 1: conservative flank, but as the Court moved to the right 78 00:04:28,711 --> 00:04:31,911 Speaker 1: under Reagan and George H. W. Bush, she increasingly found 79 00:04:31,911 --> 00:04:35,791 Speaker 1: herself occupying the court's ideological center, and that was a 80 00:04:35,831 --> 00:04:36,711 Speaker 1: powerful place to be. 81 00:04:37,271 --> 00:04:40,630 Speaker 12: When Senator O'Connor was on the Court for many years, 82 00:04:40,671 --> 00:04:43,231 Speaker 12: she simply was the swing justice at the Court. 83 00:04:43,791 --> 00:04:46,791 Speaker 1: This is Dalia Lithwick, who writes about the law for Slate. 84 00:04:47,671 --> 00:04:50,511 Speaker 1: Lithwick started covering the Supreme Court in nineteen ninety nine. 85 00:04:50,831 --> 00:04:55,791 Speaker 12: She was a Reagan appointee who taxed left on affirmative action, 86 00:04:55,871 --> 00:05:00,071 Speaker 12: on abortion, on church state separation. There was no case 87 00:05:00,391 --> 00:05:04,911 Speaker 12: that wasn't decided in some ways by O'Connor if it 88 00:05:04,951 --> 00:05:06,190 Speaker 12: was a five to four case. 89 00:05:06,631 --> 00:05:09,351 Speaker 1: According to Lithwick, O'Connor didn't get a lot of respect 90 00:05:09,391 --> 00:05:09,871 Speaker 1: from legal. 91 00:05:09,751 --> 00:05:16,111 Speaker 12: Schot She was derided often in polls by snotty law 92 00:05:16,151 --> 00:05:19,151 Speaker 12: students as the stupidest justice. I mean, people really didn't 93 00:05:19,231 --> 00:05:24,591 Speaker 12: think she was, as a doctrinal matter, the smartest justice. 94 00:05:24,591 --> 00:05:27,591 Speaker 12: But what she was was a pragmatist, and so she 95 00:05:28,591 --> 00:05:31,031 Speaker 12: tended to sort of stand in the middle, four four 96 00:05:31,031 --> 00:05:34,031 Speaker 12: on either side and say, what's going to fix this. 97 00:05:34,671 --> 00:05:37,071 Speaker 1: O'Connor didn't like to be thought of as some unprincipled 98 00:05:37,111 --> 00:05:39,551 Speaker 1: weather vane who turned whichever way the wind was blowing. 99 00:05:40,351 --> 00:05:42,311 Speaker 1: Here again is Evan Thomas justice. 100 00:05:42,391 --> 00:05:47,070 Speaker 9: O'Connor cared about the practical impact of the Supreme Court decision. 101 00:05:47,151 --> 00:05:51,631 Speaker 9: She wasn't in love with doctrine. She didn't look closely 102 00:05:51,831 --> 00:05:55,311 Speaker 9: at doctrinal consistency. Was she really cared about was the 103 00:05:55,391 --> 00:05:57,390 Speaker 9: practical impact. How is this going to play in the 104 00:05:57,471 --> 00:06:00,391 Speaker 9: real world. 105 00:06:01,191 --> 00:06:04,151 Speaker 1: On election night two thousand, the O'Connors went to their 106 00:06:04,151 --> 00:06:06,791 Speaker 1: friend's party and watched the returns on a television set 107 00:06:06,791 --> 00:06:10,711 Speaker 1: in the basement den. Shortly before eight o'clock, the networks 108 00:06:10,711 --> 00:06:13,111 Speaker 1: called Florida for Gore, a big. 109 00:06:12,831 --> 00:06:16,671 Speaker 8: Call to make. CNN announces that we call Florida in 110 00:06:16,711 --> 00:06:18,031 Speaker 8: the Al Gore column. 111 00:06:18,151 --> 00:06:21,151 Speaker 6: This is a roadblock the size of a boulder to 112 00:06:21,231 --> 00:06:21,871 Speaker 6: George W. 113 00:06:21,951 --> 00:06:22,791 Speaker 10: Bush's path to. 114 00:06:22,751 --> 00:06:25,431 Speaker 1: The White Given the rest of the electoral map, it 115 00:06:25,471 --> 00:06:29,510 Speaker 1: looked like Gore was about to clinch the presidency. Two 116 00:06:29,511 --> 00:06:33,431 Speaker 1: witnesses later told Newsweek that Justice O'Connor was visibly disappointed. 117 00:06:34,271 --> 00:06:36,551 Speaker 1: This is terrible, she said, before leaving to get a 118 00:06:36,551 --> 00:06:40,671 Speaker 1: plate of food. According to Newsweek, John O'Connor tried to 119 00:06:40,671 --> 00:06:42,911 Speaker 1: clarify for the people still in the room that his 120 00:06:42,991 --> 00:06:45,831 Speaker 1: wife was only upset because a Gore presidency would force 121 00:06:45,871 --> 00:06:49,590 Speaker 1: her to wait another four years before retiring. But Gore 122 00:06:49,711 --> 00:06:52,951 Speaker 1: was not elected president that night, and later, as all 123 00:06:52,991 --> 00:06:55,671 Speaker 1: the lawsuits being filed in Florida were winding their way 124 00:06:55,711 --> 00:06:59,191 Speaker 1: through county and circuit courts, O'Connor's son suggested to his 125 00:06:59,231 --> 00:07:01,591 Speaker 1: mother that the recount battle could end up in front 126 00:07:01,591 --> 00:07:06,070 Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court. It was a jarring thought. The 127 00:07:06,111 --> 00:07:09,390 Speaker 1: Supreme Court was supposed to stay above politics. That was 128 00:07:09,391 --> 00:07:13,191 Speaker 1: the premise of legitimacy as an institution. If O'Connor's son 129 00:07:13,231 --> 00:07:15,631 Speaker 1: was right. If the Court got involved in a case 130 00:07:15,631 --> 00:07:18,391 Speaker 1: that directly affected which party took control of the White House, 131 00:07:19,191 --> 00:07:23,431 Speaker 1: that premise would be tested in dramatic fashion. But Justice 132 00:07:23,431 --> 00:07:26,151 Speaker 1: O'Connor did not think that was going to happen, and 133 00:07:26,231 --> 00:07:34,831 Speaker 1: she told her son he was being ridiculous. I'm leon 134 00:07:34,951 --> 00:07:39,751 Speaker 1: Neefok from Prologue Projects and Pushkin Industries. This is fiasco 135 00:07:40,111 --> 00:07:40,591 Speaker 1: Bush v. 136 00:07:40,751 --> 00:07:45,151 Speaker 13: Gore, the lawyers for hold Gore and George W. Bush, 137 00:07:45,271 --> 00:07:46,991 Speaker 13: pedant of the US Supreme Court. 138 00:07:47,151 --> 00:07:49,631 Speaker 9: She was trying to save the country from what she 139 00:07:49,791 --> 00:07:51,871 Speaker 9: saw as a car crack. 140 00:07:51,831 --> 00:07:55,031 Speaker 1: Just as probably the most significant decision in thirty years. 141 00:07:55,191 --> 00:08:00,351 Speaker 2: You cannot imagine a more chance, pressure packed moment. 142 00:08:01,351 --> 00:08:05,831 Speaker 1: Episode six, our season finale. No Precedent How the two 143 00:08:05,871 --> 00:08:08,511 Speaker 1: thousand election was put to rest in a Supreme Court 144 00:08:08,551 --> 00:08:11,671 Speaker 1: case called Bush v. Gole, and how a ruling that 145 00:08:11,751 --> 00:08:16,431 Speaker 1: was explicitly designed to set no precedent ended up changing everything. 146 00:08:24,511 --> 00:08:26,431 Speaker 1: I didn't know this before I started researching the two 147 00:08:26,471 --> 00:08:29,751 Speaker 1: thousand election, But Bush v. Gore was not the first 148 00:08:29,791 --> 00:08:31,991 Speaker 1: lawsuit to crawl out of the swamps of the Florida 149 00:08:31,991 --> 00:08:35,231 Speaker 1: recount and reach the U. S Supreme Court. I had 150 00:08:35,271 --> 00:08:37,351 Speaker 1: always thought the Court swooped in at the very end, 151 00:08:37,871 --> 00:08:40,351 Speaker 1: but this earlier case preceded Bush v. Gore by a 152 00:08:40,391 --> 00:08:41,591 Speaker 1: full fifteen days. 153 00:08:42,631 --> 00:08:46,191 Speaker 6: Drawing on very rarely used legal powers, the Supreme Court has, 154 00:08:46,231 --> 00:08:49,071 Speaker 6: for the first time in American history, decided to step 155 00:08:49,070 --> 00:08:52,151 Speaker 6: into a legal dispute in the midst of a presidential election. 156 00:08:52,471 --> 00:08:55,151 Speaker 1: The case centered on the first big ruling handed down 157 00:08:55,151 --> 00:08:58,431 Speaker 1: by the Florida Supreme Court during the recount. This was 158 00:08:58,430 --> 00:09:00,711 Speaker 1: the one you heard about in episode three, the one 159 00:09:00,710 --> 00:09:03,551 Speaker 1: that forced Secretary of State Catherine Harris to wait nearly 160 00:09:03,590 --> 00:09:06,430 Speaker 1: two extra weeks before certifying the election results. 161 00:09:06,511 --> 00:09:07,310 Speaker 10: Here's the latest. 162 00:09:07,471 --> 00:09:12,110 Speaker 14: Florida's highest state court has blocked the Secretary of State certain. 163 00:09:12,151 --> 00:09:14,751 Speaker 13: What it basically means in an opinion that justice has 164 00:09:14,790 --> 00:09:18,591 Speaker 13: reached unanimously is that the hand counts continue, and the 165 00:09:18,631 --> 00:09:19,671 Speaker 13: hand counts count. 166 00:09:20,151 --> 00:09:20,910 Speaker 2: But the justice. 167 00:09:20,950 --> 00:09:23,230 Speaker 1: The new deadline set by the Florida Supreme Court had 168 00:09:23,231 --> 00:09:26,871 Speaker 1: briefly given the Gore campaign reason for hope. But the 169 00:09:26,871 --> 00:09:30,430 Speaker 1: Bush team quickly appealed the ruling, and this time there 170 00:09:30,511 --> 00:09:32,751 Speaker 1: was only one place left for the case to go. 171 00:09:32,830 --> 00:09:33,671 Speaker 15: To, the U. S. 172 00:09:33,670 --> 00:09:34,391 Speaker 16: Supreme Court. 173 00:09:34,910 --> 00:09:38,150 Speaker 17: Bush is arguing that the state court overreached its authority 174 00:09:38,391 --> 00:09:41,231 Speaker 17: and rewrote election law in a way that violates the 175 00:09:41,391 --> 00:09:42,350 Speaker 17: US Constitution. 176 00:09:42,790 --> 00:09:45,190 Speaker 1: In their petition to the U s Supreme Court, Bush's 177 00:09:45,271 --> 00:09:48,190 Speaker 1: lawyers argued that by pushing back the certification deadline, the 178 00:09:48,231 --> 00:09:51,271 Speaker 1: Florida Supreme Court had improperly changed an election law put 179 00:09:51,310 --> 00:09:54,310 Speaker 1: in place by the Florida state legislature. In doing so, 180 00:09:54,710 --> 00:09:58,231 Speaker 1: they had violated Article two of the Constitution and Title three, 181 00:09:58,310 --> 00:10:02,350 Speaker 1: Section five of the US Federal Code. On November twenty fourth, 182 00:10:02,710 --> 00:10:04,830 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. 183 00:10:05,070 --> 00:10:08,030 Speaker 6: A huge legal gamble pays off for the Bush campaign. 184 00:10:08,351 --> 00:10:11,231 Speaker 1: Oral arguments were scheduled for December first, The battle for. 185 00:10:11,231 --> 00:10:15,070 Speaker 5: The White House goes before the US Supreme Court, Bush gore, 186 00:10:15,751 --> 00:10:17,271 Speaker 5: and a day for the history books. 187 00:10:18,910 --> 00:10:21,631 Speaker 1: There was something momentous about the Supreme Court intervening in 188 00:10:21,670 --> 00:10:25,151 Speaker 1: a presidential election. But by the time oral arguments rolled 189 00:10:25,190 --> 00:10:27,870 Speaker 1: around in December first, the case had lost a lot 190 00:10:27,910 --> 00:10:31,991 Speaker 1: of its urgency. The certification had come and gone. Catherine 191 00:10:31,991 --> 00:10:35,310 Speaker 1: Harris had already declared Bush the winner. What difference did 192 00:10:35,310 --> 00:10:37,190 Speaker 1: it make now whether the Florida Supreme Court had been 193 00:10:37,190 --> 00:10:40,951 Speaker 1: wrong to set the new deadline. But Bush did not 194 00:10:40,991 --> 00:10:43,511 Speaker 1: want to drop the case, and the Supreme Court kept 195 00:10:43,511 --> 00:10:44,190 Speaker 1: it on the docket. 196 00:10:44,751 --> 00:10:47,590 Speaker 7: We'll hear i arguement this morning in number eight thirty 197 00:10:47,670 --> 00:10:51,711 Speaker 7: six George W. Bush versus the Palm Beach County Canvas. 198 00:10:51,991 --> 00:10:54,551 Speaker 1: In oral arguments, the Gore side made the case that 199 00:10:54,590 --> 00:10:57,231 Speaker 1: extending the deadline did not amount to passing a new law. 200 00:10:57,710 --> 00:11:00,190 Speaker 1: It was merely a judicial interpretation of an existing law, 201 00:11:00,391 --> 00:11:02,151 Speaker 1: something judges did all the time. 202 00:11:02,111 --> 00:11:05,310 Speaker 4: As a way of shedding light on the provisions that 203 00:11:05,391 --> 00:11:07,751 Speaker 4: are in conflict, so long as it's not done in 204 00:11:07,790 --> 00:11:09,950 Speaker 4: a way that conflicts with a federal man. 205 00:11:10,670 --> 00:11:13,550 Speaker 1: The Bush side made the opposite point. What if it 206 00:11:13,590 --> 00:11:15,950 Speaker 1: had been the Florida State legislature that decided to change 207 00:11:15,950 --> 00:11:19,271 Speaker 1: the date of the certification deadline, wouldn't that be considered 208 00:11:19,271 --> 00:11:21,751 Speaker 1: a new law? Why was it any less of a 209 00:11:21,751 --> 00:11:24,231 Speaker 1: new law just because it came from the Florida Supreme Court. 210 00:11:24,871 --> 00:11:26,830 Speaker 1: Here's Ted Olsen speaking in oral arguments. 211 00:11:26,991 --> 00:11:29,790 Speaker 18: I would emphasize that what the Florida Supreme Court did 212 00:11:29,871 --> 00:11:35,030 Speaker 18: is basically essentially say rewriting the statute, were changing it. 213 00:11:35,351 --> 00:11:38,190 Speaker 1: When they issued their ruing three days after oral arguments, 214 00:11:38,590 --> 00:11:40,951 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court showed a reluctance to interfere with the 215 00:11:40,950 --> 00:11:41,871 Speaker 1: proceedings in Florida. 216 00:11:43,111 --> 00:11:44,190 Speaker 19: The case is submitted. 217 00:11:45,231 --> 00:11:48,550 Speaker 20: The Supreme Court's historic hearing ended with a less than 218 00:11:48,710 --> 00:11:49,751 Speaker 20: historic decision. 219 00:11:50,590 --> 00:11:53,390 Speaker 1: Instead of weighing in on the constitutional issues at hand, 220 00:11:53,790 --> 00:11:55,830 Speaker 1: the Court sent the case back to the Florida Supreme 221 00:11:55,910 --> 00:11:58,391 Speaker 1: Court and asked them to provide an explanation of how 222 00:11:58,391 --> 00:12:01,751 Speaker 1: they had reached their decision. Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice 223 00:12:01,830 --> 00:12:05,271 Speaker 1: Charles Wells was puzzled by the request. The timing just 224 00:12:05,271 --> 00:12:06,670 Speaker 1: didn't make sense to him. 225 00:12:06,950 --> 00:12:11,910 Speaker 19: I talked the whole week before they their order that 226 00:12:12,030 --> 00:12:16,670 Speaker 19: they were going to enter in order. Finding that the 227 00:12:16,790 --> 00:12:20,631 Speaker 19: case had become moot, just dismissed that appeal. 228 00:12:21,151 --> 00:12:24,311 Speaker 1: Instead, the Supreme Court was asking Wells and his colleagues 229 00:12:24,351 --> 00:12:26,230 Speaker 1: to go back to the case and take another stab 230 00:12:26,271 --> 00:12:26,511 Speaker 1: at it. 231 00:12:26,910 --> 00:12:30,991 Speaker 19: They wanted us to revisit it, but we were busy 232 00:12:31,070 --> 00:12:34,190 Speaker 19: visiting other something else at that point. 233 00:12:35,151 --> 00:12:37,631 Speaker 1: You heard about the something else the Florida Supreme Court 234 00:12:37,710 --> 00:12:40,431 Speaker 1: was busy with in our last episode. It was the 235 00:12:40,471 --> 00:12:43,910 Speaker 1: contest lawsuit that the Gore team filed on November twenty seventh, 236 00:12:44,391 --> 00:12:47,110 Speaker 1: after Catherine Harris certified the election for Bush. 237 00:12:47,190 --> 00:12:49,951 Speaker 10: Good evening. It was like an earthquake in Florida. This afternoon, 238 00:12:49,991 --> 00:12:52,831 Speaker 10: the Florida Supreme Court did a life saving exercise on 239 00:12:52,871 --> 00:12:54,791 Speaker 10: al Gore's campaign to be president. 240 00:12:55,111 --> 00:12:57,910 Speaker 1: This was the big one, the one that culminated on Friday, 241 00:12:57,950 --> 00:13:01,391 Speaker 1: December eighth, in the Florida Court shocking both campaigns by 242 00:13:01,471 --> 00:13:04,310 Speaker 1: ordering a last minute hand recount of every undervote in 243 00:13:04,351 --> 00:13:04,990 Speaker 1: the state. 244 00:13:04,950 --> 00:13:08,151 Speaker 10: A manual recount of the so called under votes, and 245 00:13:08,190 --> 00:13:11,111 Speaker 10: they wanted in every part of the states sixty four counties, 246 00:13:11,391 --> 00:13:13,271 Speaker 10: more than forty three thousand votes. 247 00:13:13,910 --> 00:13:16,790 Speaker 1: Under votes, as you'll recall, refers to ballots that didn't 248 00:13:16,830 --> 00:13:19,950 Speaker 1: register a vote for president, often because someone didn't punch 249 00:13:19,991 --> 00:13:23,391 Speaker 1: through their ballot all the way. The Florida Court's ruling 250 00:13:23,471 --> 00:13:27,550 Speaker 1: to manually review all these undervotes created instant uncertainty. With 251 00:13:27,670 --> 00:13:30,830 Speaker 1: so many potential new votes, the race was anybody's game 252 00:13:30,871 --> 00:13:34,151 Speaker 1: for the first time since election Day. The Bush team 253 00:13:34,190 --> 00:13:37,391 Speaker 1: once again turned to the US Supreme Court, this time 254 00:13:37,511 --> 00:13:40,030 Speaker 1: to file an emergency petition to halt the recount. 255 00:13:40,271 --> 00:13:44,231 Speaker 6: The Bush campaign responds instantly, preparing a broad legal counter attack, 256 00:13:44,391 --> 00:13:47,550 Speaker 6: hoping to stop the court ordered recount before it even begins. 257 00:13:48,070 --> 00:13:51,231 Speaker 1: Ted Olsen, a Bush lawyer with years of experience, arguing 258 00:13:51,231 --> 00:13:53,670 Speaker 1: before the Supreme Court thought it was obvious that the 259 00:13:53,710 --> 00:13:56,871 Speaker 1: statewide manual recount could not be done fairly or quickly 260 00:13:56,950 --> 00:13:59,830 Speaker 1: enough to make the electoral College deadline of December twelfth. 261 00:14:00,231 --> 00:14:04,751 Speaker 2: It couldn't possibly be done. The earlier recount procedures of 262 00:14:04,991 --> 00:14:10,230 Speaker 2: just four counties had been moving along very slowly. There 263 00:14:10,310 --> 00:14:13,430 Speaker 2: was no chance that a statewide recount could be done 264 00:14:14,070 --> 00:14:17,071 Speaker 2: by the time of that deadline, And so my concern 265 00:14:17,310 --> 00:14:20,631 Speaker 2: was that the Florida Supreme Court was either ignoring those 266 00:14:20,710 --> 00:14:26,271 Speaker 2: deadlines or wasn't paying sufficient attention to the legal impact 267 00:14:26,311 --> 00:14:27,311 Speaker 2: of those deadlines. 268 00:14:28,751 --> 00:14:31,431 Speaker 1: Bush's forty two page petition was filed at nine to 269 00:14:31,431 --> 00:14:34,951 Speaker 1: eighteen pm on Friday, December eighth, mere hours after the 270 00:14:34,991 --> 00:14:38,591 Speaker 1: Florida Supreme Court ruling was announced. When the petition reached 271 00:14:38,590 --> 00:14:41,791 Speaker 1: the US Supreme Court, it fell to Justice Anthony Kennedy 272 00:14:41,911 --> 00:14:42,991 Speaker 1: to decide what to do with it. 273 00:14:43,191 --> 00:14:46,471 Speaker 6: The first step an emergency request to Justice Anthony Kennedy, 274 00:14:46,471 --> 00:14:49,031 Speaker 6: who was assigned to that region, asking him to block 275 00:14:49,071 --> 00:14:51,871 Speaker 6: the recount while the Court considers whether to take the case. 276 00:14:52,351 --> 00:14:55,271 Speaker 1: Justice Kennedy was a Republican appointee with an independent streak, 277 00:14:56,231 --> 00:14:59,551 Speaker 1: like Justice O'Connor, Kennedy was often a swing vote, though 278 00:14:59,551 --> 00:15:01,991 Speaker 1: he was traditionally conservative on a lot of issues. He 279 00:15:02,031 --> 00:15:05,471 Speaker 1: also liked to surprise people. Here again is Dahalia Liithwick. 280 00:15:06,111 --> 00:15:08,911 Speaker 12: I think the two of them were very much what 281 00:15:08,991 --> 00:15:12,551 Speaker 12: I would call now kind of country club Republicans, the 282 00:15:12,791 --> 00:15:17,591 Speaker 12: kind of eighties Republicans who were socially conservative but not 283 00:15:19,231 --> 00:15:24,551 Speaker 12: rabid movement conservatives the way we've seen. But Kennedy as 284 00:15:24,551 --> 00:15:27,951 Speaker 12: a swing justice was very different. Kennedy was a reliable 285 00:15:28,031 --> 00:15:31,991 Speaker 12: vote for conservative outcomes, but on a handful of cases, 286 00:15:32,631 --> 00:15:36,110 Speaker 12: most notably you know the gay marriage case that came 287 00:15:36,151 --> 00:15:39,911 Speaker 12: about after Bush vy Corp. He would defect and vote 288 00:15:40,391 --> 00:15:41,671 Speaker 12: with the left wing of the Court. 289 00:15:42,551 --> 00:15:45,911 Speaker 1: After the Bush lawyers filed their petition, Justice Kennedy wanted 290 00:15:45,951 --> 00:15:48,751 Speaker 1: Chief Justice Ranquist to call conference as soon as possible 291 00:15:48,751 --> 00:15:49,870 Speaker 1: so they could discuss the case. 292 00:15:50,991 --> 00:15:56,671 Speaker 21: Well, I was in Washington in my office, and I 293 00:15:56,671 --> 00:15:59,591 Speaker 21: remember the Chief Justice called me and told me that 294 00:16:00,111 --> 00:16:01,470 Speaker 21: we should have a conference. 295 00:16:02,031 --> 00:16:06,511 Speaker 1: That's former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. Stevens retired 296 00:16:06,551 --> 00:16:09,590 Speaker 1: from the Court in twenty ten. I interviewed him in 297 00:16:09,631 --> 00:16:12,791 Speaker 1: twenty nine nineteen, just a few months before he died 298 00:16:12,830 --> 00:16:14,271 Speaker 1: at the age of ninety nine. 299 00:16:14,791 --> 00:16:17,551 Speaker 21: During the year I came down here to Florida and 300 00:16:17,590 --> 00:16:21,991 Speaker 21: we had this place down here, and my wife and 301 00:16:22,511 --> 00:16:27,630 Speaker 21: two daughters were planning to fly to Florida on that Saturdays. 302 00:16:27,671 --> 00:16:30,791 Speaker 1: I remember Stevens, who was one of the most liberal 303 00:16:30,791 --> 00:16:33,191 Speaker 1: members of the Court, was skeptical that they needed to 304 00:16:33,231 --> 00:16:36,711 Speaker 1: intervene in the Florida recount. The only justification for doing 305 00:16:36,710 --> 00:16:39,470 Speaker 1: so would be if Bush, the petitioner, was at risk 306 00:16:39,511 --> 00:16:41,990 Speaker 1: of suffering irreparable harm if the vote counting were allowed 307 00:16:42,031 --> 00:16:44,951 Speaker 1: to go on. Stephens didn't see how that was possible, 308 00:16:45,431 --> 00:16:47,871 Speaker 1: and he made his feelings clear to Chief Justice Reanquist 309 00:16:47,871 --> 00:16:48,631 Speaker 1: on Friday evening. 310 00:16:49,071 --> 00:16:52,951 Speaker 21: I told him that the request for a stay did 311 00:16:53,071 --> 00:16:56,351 Speaker 21: the same to have any merit because there was no 312 00:16:56,471 --> 00:17:00,391 Speaker 21: showing a veryrreal injury, and I thought I would like 313 00:17:00,431 --> 00:17:03,431 Speaker 21: to go ahead with my plans and my family. 314 00:17:04,391 --> 00:17:08,031 Speaker 1: Ranquist told Stephens that their conservative colleague Anthony Scalia, known 315 00:17:08,071 --> 00:17:11,031 Speaker 1: to his friends as Nino, felt strongly that the petition 316 00:17:11,031 --> 00:17:12,350 Speaker 1: should get a hearing right away. 317 00:17:12,791 --> 00:17:16,511 Speaker 21: He told me, as I remember that Nino thought the 318 00:17:16,590 --> 00:17:19,150 Speaker 21: issue was a serious one and we ought to have 319 00:17:19,191 --> 00:17:22,110 Speaker 21: a conference on it. So we should plan on meeting 320 00:17:22,590 --> 00:17:24,031 Speaker 21: the following morning. 321 00:17:24,551 --> 00:17:28,391 Speaker 1: Justice stevens vacation was canceled. He wasn't going to Florida. 322 00:17:28,951 --> 00:17:43,951 Speaker 1: Florida was coming to him. On the morning of Saturday, 323 00:17:43,951 --> 00:17:47,791 Speaker 1: December ninth, county canvassing boards all over Florida pulled out 324 00:17:47,791 --> 00:17:50,311 Speaker 1: their boxes of month old ballots, plugged in their vote 325 00:17:50,350 --> 00:17:53,950 Speaker 1: counting machines, and started the process of separating out their undervotes. 326 00:17:54,551 --> 00:17:57,630 Speaker 22: You are looking right now at a live picture of 327 00:17:57,711 --> 00:18:01,150 Speaker 22: the Leon County Library in Tallahassee, Florida. That's where a 328 00:18:01,271 --> 00:18:05,071 Speaker 22: manual recount of some nine thousand, so called under votes 329 00:18:05,071 --> 00:18:07,551 Speaker 22: from Miami Dade County is being counted. 330 00:18:07,630 --> 00:18:10,711 Speaker 1: At this hour, some counties had thousand of under votes 331 00:18:10,751 --> 00:18:14,191 Speaker 1: account while others had just a few dozen. The judge 332 00:18:14,231 --> 00:18:16,831 Speaker 1: overseeing the process gave them all until the following day 333 00:18:16,870 --> 00:18:20,071 Speaker 1: at two pm to get the job done. If the 334 00:18:20,110 --> 00:18:23,231 Speaker 1: recount could be completed by Sunday, December tenth, that would 335 00:18:23,311 --> 00:18:25,751 Speaker 1: leave Florida two whole days to seat its twenty five 336 00:18:25,751 --> 00:18:30,431 Speaker 1: electors before the Electoral College deadline. As recounts got underway, 337 00:18:30,911 --> 00:18:33,950 Speaker 1: representatives from the Bush and Gore campaigns fanned out across 338 00:18:33,951 --> 00:18:37,511 Speaker 1: the state to monitor the proceedings. 339 00:18:38,671 --> 00:18:42,710 Speaker 17: Demonstrators from both sides channed outside public buildings as public 340 00:18:42,791 --> 00:18:45,390 Speaker 17: servants count ballots on the inside. 341 00:18:45,630 --> 00:18:48,910 Speaker 1: Meanwhile, in Washington, the nine justices of the U. S. 342 00:18:48,911 --> 00:18:51,190 Speaker 1: Supreme Court met in their conference room to discuss the 343 00:18:51,191 --> 00:18:55,071 Speaker 1: Bush campaign's petition to stay the recount. It was obvious 344 00:18:55,150 --> 00:18:58,031 Speaker 1: right away that the room was split along ideological lines, 345 00:18:58,590 --> 00:19:01,630 Speaker 1: with Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy both joining the 346 00:19:01,630 --> 00:19:06,111 Speaker 1: Conservatives in support of granting the stay. According to Evan Thomas, 347 00:19:06,551 --> 00:19:09,751 Speaker 1: O'Connor was primarily motivated by desire to contain the chaos, 348 00:19:10,110 --> 00:19:11,271 Speaker 1: for it got worse. 349 00:19:11,630 --> 00:19:14,311 Speaker 9: In the moment. She was trying to save the country 350 00:19:14,511 --> 00:19:19,431 Speaker 9: from what she saw as a car crash. That if 351 00:19:19,471 --> 00:19:22,470 Speaker 9: the recount went on in the state of Florida, it 352 00:19:22,590 --> 00:19:27,311 Speaker 9: was possible that Gore would get ahead. Then you would 353 00:19:27,311 --> 00:19:29,071 Speaker 9: have two sets of electors. 354 00:19:29,590 --> 00:19:33,031 Speaker 1: In this scenario, there would be two competing sets of electors, 355 00:19:33,590 --> 00:19:36,151 Speaker 1: and the next president would be determined through partisan warfare 356 00:19:36,191 --> 00:19:40,311 Speaker 1: in Congress. That was something O'Connor wanted to avoid. As 357 00:19:40,311 --> 00:19:42,791 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court prepared to make the stay order, Public 358 00:19:43,431 --> 00:19:44,791 Speaker 1: Justice Stevens was dismayed. 359 00:19:45,431 --> 00:19:50,031 Speaker 21: I thought addressing this issue in this way would hurt 360 00:19:50,031 --> 00:19:56,190 Speaker 21: the Court's reputation. The Court generally avoids unnecessarily participating in 361 00:19:56,311 --> 00:20:00,830 Speaker 21: political controversies, and I thought here it was entering into 362 00:20:01,271 --> 00:20:02,631 Speaker 21: uncharged territory. 363 00:20:05,630 --> 00:20:09,110 Speaker 1: At two forty pm on Saturday, December tenth, news broke 364 00:20:09,150 --> 00:20:10,590 Speaker 1: that the Court had grant Did the stay? 365 00:20:10,830 --> 00:20:11,991 Speaker 23: Hang on one second, David. 366 00:20:11,991 --> 00:20:12,991 Speaker 6: They're interrupted me now. 367 00:20:13,271 --> 00:20:15,950 Speaker 13: Bob Franken at the US Supreme Court in Washington has 368 00:20:15,991 --> 00:20:18,191 Speaker 13: a bit of news. Bob, what are they saying up there? 369 00:20:18,711 --> 00:20:21,630 Speaker 4: Very big news. The US Supreme Court has agreed to 370 00:20:21,671 --> 00:20:24,471 Speaker 4: put a stay on the recount in Florida. 371 00:20:24,751 --> 00:20:27,511 Speaker 3: There are a few hundred county election workers across this 372 00:20:27,630 --> 00:20:29,631 Speaker 3: state rather bewildered right about now. 373 00:20:30,071 --> 00:20:32,590 Speaker 1: Most of the canvassing boards throughout Florida were still counting 374 00:20:32,590 --> 00:20:33,190 Speaker 1: at this point. 375 00:20:33,271 --> 00:20:36,271 Speaker 2: I understand this is a live pixture from Cager County, Florida, 376 00:20:36,311 --> 00:20:39,830 Speaker 2: where the recount has in fact stopped because of the 377 00:20:39,951 --> 00:20:41,751 Speaker 2: order of the US Supreme Court. 378 00:20:42,110 --> 00:20:43,711 Speaker 1: If it says stop, I'm going to stop. 379 00:20:43,911 --> 00:20:46,430 Speaker 24: In fact, we're stopping right now until I see if 380 00:20:46,431 --> 00:20:47,591 Speaker 24: we need to keep on stopping. 381 00:20:48,150 --> 00:20:50,470 Speaker 1: A few counties had finished, and a few had not 382 00:20:50,590 --> 00:20:54,311 Speaker 1: yet managed to start. David Boys, one of Gore's most 383 00:20:54,350 --> 00:20:57,350 Speaker 1: trusted attorneys, was at a sports bar called Andrews in 384 00:20:57,390 --> 00:20:59,791 Speaker 1: Tallahassee when he saw the news on one of the 385 00:20:59,791 --> 00:21:01,710 Speaker 1: TV screens, and I thought it was a mistake. 386 00:21:02,630 --> 00:21:07,390 Speaker 15: It just didn't seem possible that the United States Supreme 387 00:21:07,431 --> 00:21:12,431 Speaker 15: Court was going to inter in this election to pick 388 00:21:12,431 --> 00:21:16,551 Speaker 15: the winner, and to do so without even hearing argument. 389 00:21:17,271 --> 00:21:19,791 Speaker 15: They're going to stop the votes from being counted. 390 00:21:19,791 --> 00:21:23,031 Speaker 4: Was obviously presented by Justice Kennedy, Anthony Kennedy, who's in 391 00:21:23,150 --> 00:21:25,470 Speaker 4: charge of this area. I'm reading now it is ordered 392 00:21:25,671 --> 00:21:28,551 Speaker 4: that the mandate of the Floria State Supreme Court is 393 00:21:28,630 --> 00:21:30,630 Speaker 4: hereby stayed pending further. 394 00:21:31,350 --> 00:21:34,191 Speaker 17: It is another dramatic twist in this election saga, now 395 00:21:34,271 --> 00:21:37,031 Speaker 17: thirty two days old, a saga that has left. 396 00:21:36,870 --> 00:21:39,431 Speaker 2: The campaigns, the candidates, and the. 397 00:21:39,350 --> 00:21:42,351 Speaker 18: Country on an extraordinary roller coaster ride. 398 00:21:42,231 --> 00:21:43,551 Speaker 2: That he is not over yet. 399 00:21:45,471 --> 00:21:49,230 Speaker 1: Ordinarily, a stay is a stopgap measure, a way for 400 00:21:49,350 --> 00:21:51,590 Speaker 1: judges to freeze the situation in place until they have 401 00:21:51,590 --> 00:21:54,670 Speaker 1: a chance to review it. But this stay was different 402 00:21:55,551 --> 00:21:58,430 Speaker 1: because of the timeline hanging over the recount process. With 403 00:21:58,471 --> 00:22:01,430 Speaker 1: the Electoral College deadline of December twelfth just three days away. 404 00:22:02,271 --> 00:22:04,670 Speaker 1: The Supreme Court's order to halt the recount all but 405 00:22:04,751 --> 00:22:07,671 Speaker 1: guaranteed that it could not be done in time. Even 406 00:22:07,711 --> 00:22:09,710 Speaker 1: if the Court ended up deciding to edit resume. 407 00:22:10,150 --> 00:22:13,551 Speaker 13: Even the Vice President's battled hardened legal team appeared shocked 408 00:22:13,551 --> 00:22:14,271 Speaker 13: at the set back. 409 00:22:14,671 --> 00:22:18,350 Speaker 25: There's no doubt that by delaying it, it has created a. 410 00:22:18,390 --> 00:22:20,391 Speaker 17: Very serious issue as. 411 00:22:20,191 --> 00:22:23,350 Speaker 25: To whether that count can fully be completed or not 412 00:22:23,711 --> 00:22:24,871 Speaker 25: by December twelfth. 413 00:22:25,150 --> 00:22:27,590 Speaker 1: Though Gore was despondent when he heard about the stay, 414 00:22:28,271 --> 00:22:31,670 Speaker 1: he remained true to his instincts as an institutionalist. In 415 00:22:31,711 --> 00:22:33,910 Speaker 1: a message sent to his top aids on his BlackBerry, 416 00:22:34,231 --> 00:22:37,230 Speaker 1: Gore wrote, please make sure that no one trashes the 417 00:22:37,231 --> 00:22:40,590 Speaker 1: Supreme Court. But the real risk might have been the 418 00:22:40,630 --> 00:22:44,590 Speaker 1: Supreme Court justices trashing each other. Justice Stevens was so 419 00:22:44,671 --> 00:22:47,590 Speaker 1: unhappy with the majority's decision that he wrote a dissent 420 00:22:47,751 --> 00:22:50,471 Speaker 1: that his three liberal colleagues signed onto Justice. 421 00:22:50,511 --> 00:22:54,511 Speaker 20: Stevens wrote that stopping this last chance recount may cause 422 00:22:54,551 --> 00:22:58,071 Speaker 20: irreparable harm to Gore, and that it will inevitably cast 423 00:22:58,110 --> 00:22:59,151 Speaker 20: a cloud on those. 424 00:22:58,951 --> 00:23:02,150 Speaker 1: Stephens argued that Bush's claim of a reparable harm was ludicrous, 425 00:23:02,911 --> 00:23:05,110 Speaker 1: that if anyone should be worried about a reparable harm, 426 00:23:05,231 --> 00:23:06,071 Speaker 1: it was Gore. 427 00:23:06,271 --> 00:23:08,391 Speaker 21: And it didn't seem to me that getting the right 428 00:23:08,471 --> 00:23:12,590 Speaker 21: answer in a contested election could ever be an irreable harm. 429 00:23:12,870 --> 00:23:15,751 Speaker 21: That's what you're trying to do in elections. 430 00:23:15,991 --> 00:23:18,311 Speaker 1: I asked Stevens to read part of his descent out loud. 431 00:23:18,951 --> 00:23:24,350 Speaker 21: Counting every legally cast vote cannot constitute irreable harm. On 432 00:23:24,951 --> 00:23:27,350 Speaker 21: the other hand, there is a danger that a stay 433 00:23:27,471 --> 00:23:31,751 Speaker 21: may cause irrebable harm to Respondence and more importantly, the 434 00:23:31,791 --> 00:23:35,430 Speaker 21: public at large, because of the risks that the entry 435 00:23:35,471 --> 00:23:38,390 Speaker 21: of the stay would be tantamount to a decision on 436 00:23:38,431 --> 00:23:42,870 Speaker 21: the merits in favor of the applicants. Preventing the reaccount 437 00:23:42,870 --> 00:23:46,990 Speaker 21: from being completed will inevitably cast a cloud on the 438 00:23:47,390 --> 00:23:51,111 Speaker 21: legitimacy of the election, if it seems to me makes 439 00:23:51,150 --> 00:23:51,670 Speaker 21: some sense. 440 00:23:54,311 --> 00:23:57,150 Speaker 1: Justice Scalia was so angered by Stephen's descent that he 441 00:23:57,231 --> 00:24:00,870 Speaker 1: decided to write a rebuttal. Scalia argued that if Bush 442 00:24:00,911 --> 00:24:03,311 Speaker 1: was right that he'd won the election, the counting of 443 00:24:03,390 --> 00:24:06,111 Speaker 1: votes that are questionable legality would cast a cloud over 444 00:24:06,150 --> 00:24:10,031 Speaker 1: his victory. Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, Scalia wrote, 445 00:24:10,471 --> 00:24:12,830 Speaker 1: is not a recipe for producing election results that have 446 00:24:12,911 --> 00:24:15,271 Speaker 1: the public acceptance the democratic stability requires. 447 00:24:15,630 --> 00:24:18,590 Speaker 26: These are two justices that are going after each other 448 00:24:18,590 --> 00:24:22,231 Speaker 26: with Hammer and Tom and Scalia is stating the Bush 449 00:24:22,271 --> 00:24:25,471 Speaker 26: case far more strongly than the Bush lawyers stayed in 450 00:24:25,511 --> 00:24:26,111 Speaker 26: their briefs. 451 00:24:27,390 --> 00:24:31,110 Speaker 1: It's impossible to overstate how unusually fast the Supreme Court 452 00:24:31,150 --> 00:24:34,670 Speaker 1: was moving. Bush's petition had come in on December eighth, 453 00:24:35,191 --> 00:24:37,951 Speaker 1: the stay had been granted December ninth, and now oral 454 00:24:38,031 --> 00:24:40,271 Speaker 1: arguments have been scheduled for December eleventh. 455 00:24:39,870 --> 00:24:41,551 Speaker 4: At eleven a m total of one and a half 456 00:24:41,590 --> 00:24:43,991 Speaker 4: hours for oral arguments. This is lightning speed, of course, 457 00:24:44,031 --> 00:24:44,870 Speaker 4: by the Supreme Court. 458 00:24:44,911 --> 00:24:48,551 Speaker 1: The Court never likes to rush anything. In their usual schedule, 459 00:24:48,791 --> 00:24:51,071 Speaker 1: months and months go by between when oral arguments are 460 00:24:51,110 --> 00:24:55,151 Speaker 1: heard and when rulings are issued. That gestation period leaves 461 00:24:55,231 --> 00:24:57,791 Speaker 1: time for opinions to be written and rewritten many times over. 462 00:24:58,511 --> 00:25:01,311 Speaker 1: Occasionally it leaves enough time for justices to change their minds. 463 00:25:02,471 --> 00:25:05,830 Speaker 1: With the Electoral College deadline looming, such a leisurely approach 464 00:25:05,951 --> 00:25:09,871 Speaker 1: wasn't possible. The Supreme Court was on a violently compressed schedule, 465 00:25:10,271 --> 00:25:13,031 Speaker 1: and that meant the Bush and Gore lawyers were too. 466 00:25:13,271 --> 00:25:15,390 Speaker 1: They had just over twenty four hours to write and 467 00:25:15,431 --> 00:25:18,670 Speaker 1: submit their briefs. David Boyce led the charge on the 468 00:25:18,711 --> 00:25:19,831 Speaker 1: Gore side. 469 00:25:19,951 --> 00:25:26,031 Speaker 15: This did not come down to nuances of federal law. 470 00:25:27,150 --> 00:25:31,551 Speaker 15: It came down to what had happened in Florida, and 471 00:25:31,671 --> 00:25:33,471 Speaker 15: I knew that barn anybody. 472 00:25:34,551 --> 00:25:37,670 Speaker 1: Boys's central argument was that the Florida Supreme Court wasn't 473 00:25:37,711 --> 00:25:40,431 Speaker 1: making new laws, they were just interpreting ones that were 474 00:25:40,431 --> 00:25:43,830 Speaker 1: already on the books. The Bush team insisted this was wrong, 475 00:25:44,431 --> 00:25:46,390 Speaker 1: that in fact, the Florida Supreme Court had changed the 476 00:25:46,431 --> 00:25:47,991 Speaker 1: rules of the election in the middle of the game, 477 00:25:48,551 --> 00:25:50,551 Speaker 1: and that in doing so they had usurped the power 478 00:25:50,590 --> 00:25:53,311 Speaker 1: of the state legislature. But the last part of the 479 00:25:53,311 --> 00:25:56,471 Speaker 1: Bush brief also included a different argument, one based on 480 00:25:56,551 --> 00:26:00,031 Speaker 1: the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Here again 481 00:26:00,150 --> 00:26:01,391 Speaker 1: is Bush lawyer ted Olsen. 482 00:26:02,031 --> 00:26:06,870 Speaker 2: The elasticity of the rules and the procedures put the 483 00:26:07,110 --> 00:26:11,191 Speaker 2: power in the vote counters. Every time they change the rules, 484 00:26:11,630 --> 00:26:14,111 Speaker 2: they could put their thumb on the scale to make 485 00:26:14,150 --> 00:26:16,991 Speaker 2: it come out a certain way. When you have almost 486 00:26:16,991 --> 00:26:20,230 Speaker 2: a tie in terms of the numbers, all you have 487 00:26:20,311 --> 00:26:23,350 Speaker 2: to do is change a certain amount of those votes 488 00:26:23,991 --> 00:26:25,271 Speaker 2: to change the outcome. 489 00:26:26,031 --> 00:26:28,270 Speaker 1: It was hardly a secret that the manual recounts were 490 00:26:28,271 --> 00:26:31,870 Speaker 1: being conducted under different standards in different counties. Some places 491 00:26:31,870 --> 00:26:34,511 Speaker 1: were counting dimple chads, while others were throwing them out. 492 00:26:35,671 --> 00:26:38,910 Speaker 1: The Bush argument was that this inconsistent application of ballot 493 00:26:38,911 --> 00:26:41,511 Speaker 1: standards was itself unconstitutional. 494 00:26:46,511 --> 00:26:49,350 Speaker 14: This is an ABC News special report. 495 00:26:52,390 --> 00:26:55,590 Speaker 10: Hello again, everybody on Peter Jennings at ABC News headquarters. 496 00:26:55,630 --> 00:26:58,870 Speaker 10: And there is the US Supreme Court with its activist outside, 497 00:26:58,870 --> 00:27:01,470 Speaker 10: both for the Democrats and the Republicans today. 498 00:27:01,870 --> 00:27:04,791 Speaker 1: The oral arguments in Bush v. Gore were scheduled to 499 00:27:04,830 --> 00:27:07,590 Speaker 1: start at eleven am on Monday, December eleventh, a. 500 00:27:07,671 --> 00:27:10,630 Speaker 13: Lawyers for al Gore and George W. Bush head into 501 00:27:10,671 --> 00:27:13,071 Speaker 13: the US Supreme Court in Washington. 502 00:27:12,671 --> 00:27:14,791 Speaker 27: To argue the case in about two minutes. 503 00:27:14,911 --> 00:27:18,271 Speaker 20: The second oral argument in ten days involving the two 504 00:27:18,311 --> 00:27:21,191 Speaker 20: thousand presidential election as scheduled to get under way. 505 00:27:23,991 --> 00:27:27,230 Speaker 1: Dallia Lithwick had only recently started attending oral arguments, but 506 00:27:27,311 --> 00:27:28,271 Speaker 1: she already knew the drill. 507 00:27:28,711 --> 00:27:30,511 Speaker 12: You'd sort of line up in the court. I remember 508 00:27:30,590 --> 00:27:33,390 Speaker 12: they line you up a long time before arguments start, 509 00:27:33,431 --> 00:27:36,710 Speaker 12: and they march you in and they take away your 510 00:27:36,870 --> 00:27:38,431 Speaker 12: everything but your pen and your notepad. 511 00:27:38,911 --> 00:27:41,870 Speaker 1: Oddly, Lithwick and most of the other reporters were seated 512 00:27:41,870 --> 00:27:43,670 Speaker 1: in such a way that they couldn't actually see the 513 00:27:43,791 --> 00:27:46,510 Speaker 1: justices as they spoke from the bench. Instead they just 514 00:27:46,511 --> 00:27:47,311 Speaker 1: heard their voices. 515 00:27:50,110 --> 00:27:53,950 Speaker 7: Well, here argument now in number nine forty nine, George W. 516 00:27:54,071 --> 00:27:57,231 Speaker 7: Bush and Richard Cheney versus Albert Gore at al. 517 00:27:58,390 --> 00:28:01,951 Speaker 12: Beyond the first couple of rows, everybody's views obstructed, everybody 518 00:28:01,951 --> 00:28:05,671 Speaker 12: sitting behind curtains and columns, all the reporters. And there 519 00:28:05,911 --> 00:28:09,270 Speaker 12: was at the time somebody from the press office at 520 00:28:09,271 --> 00:28:11,511 Speaker 12: the Court who would get hand signals so you would 521 00:28:11,511 --> 00:28:15,231 Speaker 12: know for Justice Scalias speaking six, and that was how 522 00:28:15,271 --> 00:28:16,391 Speaker 12: you knew who was talking. 523 00:28:18,791 --> 00:28:21,071 Speaker 1: The air in the room was stifling as Lithwick and 524 00:28:21,110 --> 00:28:22,911 Speaker 1: her colleagues tried to make out what was happening. 525 00:28:23,350 --> 00:28:26,871 Speaker 12: My memory of it is it was, I mean almost 526 00:28:26,911 --> 00:28:30,391 Speaker 12: hanging from the lamps, like it was so packed and 527 00:28:30,511 --> 00:28:35,231 Speaker 12: so hot, and that there was a feeling, at least 528 00:28:35,231 --> 00:28:37,751 Speaker 12: in the press section of the room that we were 529 00:28:37,791 --> 00:28:40,991 Speaker 12: watching history. You don't often have a sense that you're 530 00:28:41,031 --> 00:28:43,190 Speaker 12: going to be telling, you know, your grandkids like I 531 00:28:43,311 --> 00:28:44,511 Speaker 12: was there. I was in the room. 532 00:28:46,271 --> 00:28:48,831 Speaker 1: Ted Olsen remembers the atmosphere as one of spectacle and 533 00:28:48,911 --> 00:28:49,551 Speaker 1: high stakes. 534 00:28:50,231 --> 00:28:54,071 Speaker 2: The entire world was watching. The Supreme Court was surrounded 535 00:28:54,111 --> 00:28:59,031 Speaker 2: by the satellite trucks of the various broadcast networks. The 536 00:28:59,071 --> 00:29:02,631 Speaker 2: court was filled with political figures, members of the United 537 00:29:02,671 --> 00:29:06,151 Speaker 2: States Senate, journalists and people all over the world were 538 00:29:06,231 --> 00:29:07,311 Speaker 2: watching and listening. 539 00:29:07,671 --> 00:29:11,071 Speaker 1: Despite having argued before the Supreme Court on thirteen other occasions, 540 00:29:11,511 --> 00:29:13,751 Speaker 1: Olsen found that he was not immune to the pressure. 541 00:29:14,191 --> 00:29:19,351 Speaker 2: You cannot imagine a more tense, pressure packed moment than 542 00:29:19,431 --> 00:29:22,471 Speaker 2: standing up in front of the all of those people 543 00:29:22,951 --> 00:29:25,591 Speaker 2: and the nine justices, with all of that at stake, 544 00:29:26,071 --> 00:29:28,271 Speaker 2: and I think all of us felt. For God's sakes, 545 00:29:28,271 --> 00:29:31,631 Speaker 2: I hope I can get these words out. One of 546 00:29:31,671 --> 00:29:34,911 Speaker 2: the lawyers made a mistake of three times, I think 547 00:29:34,951 --> 00:29:37,791 Speaker 2: he did, called the justices by the wrong. 548 00:29:37,631 --> 00:29:39,071 Speaker 18: Name, Justice Bar. 549 00:29:39,151 --> 00:29:41,151 Speaker 5: What I'm saying is is then I'm just a suitor. 550 00:29:41,151 --> 00:29:42,351 Speaker 1: You better cut that out. 551 00:29:43,351 --> 00:29:44,311 Speaker 4: I will now give up. 552 00:29:45,031 --> 00:29:47,591 Speaker 2: Your adrenaline is going to be pumping through you. So 553 00:29:48,271 --> 00:29:51,431 Speaker 2: anybody says, are you nervous, of course you're nervous. And 554 00:29:51,751 --> 00:29:54,631 Speaker 2: if you're not nervous, you're not a sentient human being 555 00:29:55,151 --> 00:29:57,551 Speaker 2: or a lawyer. So you have to focus on what 556 00:29:57,591 --> 00:30:00,271 Speaker 2: you're saying. You have to focus on what the justices 557 00:30:00,311 --> 00:30:03,831 Speaker 2: are saying. When they interrupt you, and they interrupt you constantly. 558 00:30:04,271 --> 00:30:05,111 Speaker 18: No, I don't think. 559 00:30:04,991 --> 00:30:07,950 Speaker 23: It's necessary a reliance on you really are not relying 560 00:30:07,991 --> 00:30:08,511 Speaker 23: on those. 561 00:30:08,311 --> 00:30:10,391 Speaker 18: Well, I think those cases support the argument. 562 00:30:10,431 --> 00:30:12,431 Speaker 21: But as we said, if you got to choose one 563 00:30:12,551 --> 00:30:14,151 Speaker 21: version of the word legislature or the. 564 00:30:14,151 --> 00:30:17,631 Speaker 18: Other, I think in different contexts, it's not necessarily necessarily 565 00:30:17,671 --> 00:30:19,231 Speaker 18: the case. And certainly it is. 566 00:30:19,191 --> 00:30:20,311 Speaker 23: True that legislatures. 567 00:30:21,151 --> 00:30:23,831 Speaker 1: As the hearing were on the main thing, anyone was 568 00:30:23,871 --> 00:30:26,791 Speaker 1: listening for recluse as to how the two swing justices 569 00:30:26,951 --> 00:30:31,031 Speaker 1: O'Connor and Kennedy were thinking about the case. O'Connors, how 570 00:30:31,071 --> 00:30:33,831 Speaker 1: the baffled that canvassing boards wouldn't just use ballot standards 571 00:30:33,831 --> 00:30:35,950 Speaker 1: that were based on the instructions that voters received an 572 00:30:35,951 --> 00:30:36,551 Speaker 1: election day. 573 00:30:37,191 --> 00:30:40,591 Speaker 8: Well, why isn't this standard the one that voters are 574 00:30:40,631 --> 00:30:43,751 Speaker 8: instructed to follow for goodness sake? So, I mean, it 575 00:30:43,831 --> 00:30:46,911 Speaker 8: couldn't be clear. Why don't we go. 576 00:30:47,031 --> 00:30:50,391 Speaker 1: There was something else bothering O'Connor to the Florida Supreme 577 00:30:50,431 --> 00:30:52,791 Speaker 1: Court had not responded in any way to the Supreme 578 00:30:52,831 --> 00:30:55,911 Speaker 1: Court's remand and request for clarification on their earlier ruling. 579 00:30:56,311 --> 00:31:01,990 Speaker 8: And I did not find a really response by the 580 00:31:01,991 --> 00:31:06,351 Speaker 8: Florida Supreme Court to this Court's remand in the case 581 00:31:06,631 --> 00:31:09,991 Speaker 8: a week ago, it just seemed to kind of bypass 582 00:31:10,111 --> 00:31:14,151 Speaker 8: sit and assume that all those changes in deadlines were 583 00:31:14,271 --> 00:31:16,391 Speaker 8: just fine, and they'd go ahead and adhere to them. 584 00:31:16,431 --> 00:31:19,831 Speaker 25: And I found out troublesome, your honor, if I could. 585 00:31:20,471 --> 00:31:22,991 Speaker 1: It was about nineteen minutes into oral arguments when the 586 00:31:23,031 --> 00:31:26,351 Speaker 1: issue of equal protection entered the discussion. But it wasn't 587 00:31:26,391 --> 00:31:29,031 Speaker 1: Ted Olson who brought it up. It was Justice Kennedy. 588 00:31:29,351 --> 00:31:31,591 Speaker 23: Well, and I thought your point was that the process 589 00:31:31,671 --> 00:31:34,511 Speaker 23: is being conducted in violation of the equal protection clause, 590 00:31:34,591 --> 00:31:36,071 Speaker 23: and is its standards and. 591 00:31:36,071 --> 00:31:38,311 Speaker 18: The due process clause, and what we know is now 592 00:31:38,351 --> 00:31:41,071 Speaker 18: Kennedy latched onto the issue and tried to get answers 593 00:31:41,071 --> 00:31:44,190 Speaker 18: from David Boys, But because the equal protection argument had 594 00:31:44,191 --> 00:31:46,911 Speaker 18: been such a small part of the Bush brief, Boys 595 00:31:46,911 --> 00:31:48,951 Speaker 18: had spent most of his time preparing to talk about 596 00:31:48,991 --> 00:31:50,031 Speaker 18: other aspects of the case. 597 00:31:50,391 --> 00:31:53,750 Speaker 25: I think there is a uniform standard. The standard is 598 00:31:53,791 --> 00:31:57,751 Speaker 25: whether or not the intent of the voter is reflected 599 00:31:57,791 --> 00:32:01,231 Speaker 25: by the ballot. That is the uniform standard that throughout. 600 00:32:00,991 --> 00:32:03,471 Speaker 23: Very general it runs throughout the law. Even the dog 601 00:32:03,511 --> 00:32:05,391 Speaker 23: knows the difference in being stumbled over and being kicked 602 00:32:05,431 --> 00:32:07,911 Speaker 23: me know it now? You would say that, from the 603 00:32:07,911 --> 00:32:11,751 Speaker 23: standpoint of equal protection clause, could each county give their 604 00:32:11,791 --> 00:32:14,710 Speaker 23: own interpretation to what intent means, so long as they 605 00:32:14,751 --> 00:32:21,111 Speaker 23: are in good faith and with some reasonable basis finding intent? 606 00:32:22,271 --> 00:32:24,470 Speaker 19: I think could that vary from county to county. 607 00:32:24,671 --> 00:32:27,671 Speaker 25: I think it can vary from individual to individual. 608 00:32:28,231 --> 00:32:31,591 Speaker 1: The sudden focus on equal protection was surprising and those 609 00:32:31,791 --> 00:32:34,591 Speaker 1: Kennedy who brought it up. Other justices seem to share 610 00:32:34,631 --> 00:32:37,231 Speaker 1: his concern, and not just the conservative ones either. 611 00:32:37,351 --> 00:32:40,151 Speaker 10: And why this question of equal protection for all Florida 612 00:32:40,231 --> 00:32:41,191 Speaker 10: voters keeps coming up. 613 00:32:41,311 --> 00:32:44,071 Speaker 26: Because Justice Sooner was saying, I'm troubled by this. 614 00:32:44,471 --> 00:32:45,831 Speaker 2: Justice Kennedy is troubled by this. 615 00:32:46,031 --> 00:32:48,271 Speaker 4: Justice Bryer is troubled by this now. 616 00:32:48,391 --> 00:32:50,991 Speaker 18: So I think that was something that really. 617 00:32:51,111 --> 00:32:54,471 Speaker 1: There was something weird about the equal protection claim. Though 618 00:32:54,471 --> 00:32:56,631 Speaker 1: the Bush team was applying it narrowly to the problem 619 00:32:56,671 --> 00:33:00,271 Speaker 1: of inconsistent hand recounts in Florida, its premise was that 620 00:33:00,311 --> 00:33:02,951 Speaker 1: there was something wrong with the decentralized way in which 621 00:33:02,991 --> 00:33:06,751 Speaker 1: all American elections are carried out. Taking the argument to 622 00:33:06,751 --> 00:33:10,711 Speaker 1: its logical conclusion, the country's entire electoral sism them was 623 00:33:10,831 --> 00:33:15,351 Speaker 1: one big violation of equal protection in any event. By 624 00:33:15,391 --> 00:33:17,991 Speaker 1: the time oral arguments came to a close, it was 625 00:33:18,071 --> 00:33:20,271 Speaker 1: clear that the Court would be treating the equal protection 626 00:33:20,391 --> 00:33:23,911 Speaker 1: argument as much more than a sideshow. But how exactly 627 00:33:23,951 --> 00:33:31,511 Speaker 1: they would respond to it was anyone's guess. The nine 628 00:33:31,671 --> 00:33:33,911 Speaker 1: justices met in their conference room to figure out who 629 00:33:33,951 --> 00:33:37,911 Speaker 1: stood where. Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg felt strongly that 630 00:33:37,911 --> 00:33:41,111 Speaker 1: the Court should allow the recount to resume, but Kennedy 631 00:33:41,271 --> 00:33:44,311 Speaker 1: was still focused on Bush's equal protection argument, and it 632 00:33:44,351 --> 00:33:47,311 Speaker 1: appeared that two of his more liberal colleagues, Stephen Bryer 633 00:33:47,351 --> 00:33:49,991 Speaker 1: and David Souter, were hung up on it as well. 634 00:33:49,951 --> 00:33:53,151 Speaker 21: And they both indicated that their feeling it was a 635 00:33:53,271 --> 00:33:57,151 Speaker 21: possible violation. And I had never been able to understand. 636 00:33:56,671 --> 00:34:00,710 Speaker 1: Why Stevens tried to propose a compromise. If most of 637 00:34:00,711 --> 00:34:03,831 Speaker 1: his colleagues agreed that the varying standards for conducting recounts 638 00:34:03,831 --> 00:34:06,831 Speaker 1: were a violation of equal protection, why not send the 639 00:34:06,871 --> 00:34:09,391 Speaker 1: case back to the Florida Supreme Court and asked them 640 00:34:09,391 --> 00:34:11,551 Speaker 1: to come up with one on statewide standard for judging 641 00:34:11,591 --> 00:34:15,951 Speaker 1: voter intent. That way, the recount could resume and proceed fairly. 642 00:34:16,911 --> 00:34:19,271 Speaker 1: But the conservatives on the Court didn't think that prolonging 643 00:34:19,311 --> 00:34:22,230 Speaker 1: the process was an option. It was simply too late. 644 00:34:22,831 --> 00:34:26,350 Speaker 1: The deadline for ceding Florida's electors was December twelfth. That 645 00:34:26,431 --> 00:34:30,350 Speaker 1: was the very next day. Justice O'Connor in particular, was 646 00:34:30,391 --> 00:34:32,231 Speaker 1: worried that if the case went back to the Florida 647 00:34:32,270 --> 00:34:35,551 Speaker 1: Supreme Court now, the dispute over electors could enter truly 648 00:34:35,671 --> 00:34:36,671 Speaker 1: uncharted territory. 649 00:34:37,471 --> 00:34:39,391 Speaker 9: Justice O'Connor said, this is a mess. We got to 650 00:34:39,391 --> 00:34:41,310 Speaker 9: stop it now because if we don't stop it now, 651 00:34:41,311 --> 00:34:42,710 Speaker 9: it's going to go on and on, and it's going 652 00:34:42,750 --> 00:34:45,351 Speaker 9: to get worse and Bush is going to win in 653 00:34:45,391 --> 00:34:45,671 Speaker 9: the end. 654 00:34:45,710 --> 00:34:51,831 Speaker 1: Anyways, not everyone thought the situation was so dire. Stevens, Briar, Suitor, 655 00:34:51,831 --> 00:34:54,591 Speaker 1: and Ginsburg all believed that something could still be done 656 00:34:54,631 --> 00:34:57,230 Speaker 1: in Florida, or at least they believed that it wasn't 657 00:34:57,270 --> 00:35:00,071 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court's job to make that call. Why did 658 00:35:00,111 --> 00:35:01,951 Speaker 1: you think there was time? And they didn't think there 659 00:35:02,031 --> 00:35:02,350 Speaker 1: was time. 660 00:35:02,591 --> 00:35:06,671 Speaker 21: Well, I didn't really feel I had the capacity to 661 00:35:06,750 --> 00:35:10,591 Speaker 21: decide that issue. But if the Florida Supreme Court thought 662 00:35:10,671 --> 00:35:13,071 Speaker 21: it could be worked out, which should let them be 663 00:35:13,151 --> 00:35:13,951 Speaker 21: given a try. 664 00:35:14,951 --> 00:35:17,751 Speaker 1: What ensued was a tug of war, with some members 665 00:35:17,750 --> 00:35:19,830 Speaker 1: of the Court planting their feet and trying to pull 666 00:35:19,871 --> 00:35:23,951 Speaker 1: their colleagues over to their side. The hope was to 667 00:35:23,951 --> 00:35:25,951 Speaker 1: come up with a ruling that wouldn't divide the Court 668 00:35:26,031 --> 00:35:30,151 Speaker 1: on a partisan basis. To that end, Kennedy and O'Connor 669 00:35:30,151 --> 00:35:33,071 Speaker 1: decided to collaborate on an opinion reflecting whatever shreds of 670 00:35:33,071 --> 00:35:36,830 Speaker 1: consensus were available in it. They would argue that the 671 00:35:36,831 --> 00:35:40,551 Speaker 1: statewide recount was a violation of equal protection, a position 672 00:35:40,631 --> 00:35:43,790 Speaker 1: that seven of the justices seemed to agree with. The 673 00:35:43,831 --> 00:35:46,791 Speaker 1: problem was that two of those seven, Brier and Suitor, 674 00:35:47,311 --> 00:35:49,710 Speaker 1: thought the state wide recount could still be revived under 675 00:35:49,710 --> 00:35:52,830 Speaker 1: a uniform ballot standard, while the other five thought the 676 00:35:52,871 --> 00:35:56,190 Speaker 1: game was over. That meant the justices were still divided 677 00:35:56,230 --> 00:35:58,710 Speaker 1: five to four on whether the recount had to end. 678 00:35:59,511 --> 00:36:01,831 Speaker 1: Compromise would have been nice, but it wasn't. 679 00:36:01,671 --> 00:36:18,390 Speaker 14: Necessary, okay. Also, standing by the moment. 680 00:36:18,111 --> 00:36:19,791 Speaker 4: Of truth, it is the moment of truth. 681 00:36:19,831 --> 00:36:23,350 Speaker 25: The Supreme Court may use this moment to determine who 682 00:36:23,391 --> 00:36:24,950 Speaker 25: is the next president of the United States. 683 00:36:24,991 --> 00:36:26,830 Speaker 15: There are many ways this decision could go. 684 00:36:27,270 --> 00:36:29,591 Speaker 1: The Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Bush v. 685 00:36:29,710 --> 00:36:32,991 Speaker 1: Gore at ten pm on December twelfth, the same day 686 00:36:33,031 --> 00:36:36,310 Speaker 1: as the deadline for seating Florida's electors Saturday. The Court 687 00:36:36,311 --> 00:36:39,071 Speaker 1: printed copies of the sixty five page decision and stacked 688 00:36:39,071 --> 00:36:40,871 Speaker 1: them on a table in the press office for the taking. 689 00:36:41,631 --> 00:36:45,191 Speaker 1: Journalists grab copies and sprinted outside to waiting TV cameras. 690 00:36:45,311 --> 00:36:47,790 Speaker 13: The Supreme Court decision from Florida is now out. 691 00:36:47,991 --> 00:36:50,390 Speaker 10: Let's go straight to the court because ABC's Jackie Judd 692 00:36:50,431 --> 00:36:52,191 Speaker 10: and Jeffrey Tubman are standing by. 693 00:36:54,151 --> 00:36:58,350 Speaker 6: The Peter. 694 00:36:58,391 --> 00:37:01,190 Speaker 1: If you can, I will, let me give you the 695 00:37:01,230 --> 00:37:04,551 Speaker 1: typical Supreme Court opinion starts with the summary, helpful guide 696 00:37:04,551 --> 00:37:07,790 Speaker 1: to relevant constitutional questions and how they've been decided. But 697 00:37:07,871 --> 00:37:09,951 Speaker 1: because the Court's ruling on Bush v. Gore had been 698 00:37:10,190 --> 00:37:12,790 Speaker 1: and so quickly, there was no time for that kind 699 00:37:12,831 --> 00:37:16,711 Speaker 1: of sign posting. That made interpreting the decision rather difficult. 700 00:37:16,911 --> 00:37:19,551 Speaker 27: So we're going to have to keep shifting through this decision. 701 00:37:19,591 --> 00:37:23,230 Speaker 27: It is extremely complicated, with all these concurrences and descents and. 702 00:37:23,471 --> 00:37:24,471 Speaker 4: The phrasing of it. 703 00:37:24,471 --> 00:37:26,270 Speaker 26: It's very badly written, to tell you the truth, and 704 00:37:26,391 --> 00:37:27,871 Speaker 26: it sounds Parnie. 705 00:37:27,911 --> 00:37:30,190 Speaker 10: Let's work through this as carefully as we can. 706 00:37:30,351 --> 00:37:32,671 Speaker 16: But let me get to the bottom line here the 707 00:37:32,791 --> 00:37:36,151 Speaker 16: judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is reversed. 708 00:37:36,671 --> 00:37:41,351 Speaker 1: The majority opinion was signed procurium, meaning by the court. Usually, 709 00:37:41,750 --> 00:37:44,511 Speaker 1: this was a sign that a decision was uncontroversial, and 710 00:37:44,551 --> 00:37:46,391 Speaker 1: it was meant to indicate that the Court was speaking 711 00:37:46,391 --> 00:37:49,990 Speaker 1: in one voice. But this opinion was not so straightforward. 712 00:37:50,431 --> 00:37:53,191 Speaker 1: On the one hand, it said that seven justices agreed 713 00:37:53,190 --> 00:37:55,751 Speaker 1: that the statewide recount was a violation of equal protection. 714 00:37:56,750 --> 00:37:59,591 Speaker 1: But the far more consequential takeaway from the opinion was 715 00:37:59,631 --> 00:38:01,591 Speaker 1: that a majority of the court, five out of the 716 00:38:01,671 --> 00:38:04,510 Speaker 1: nine justices, thought the recount had to be shut down 717 00:38:04,671 --> 00:38:05,230 Speaker 1: no matter what. 718 00:38:05,591 --> 00:38:08,231 Speaker 24: And it seems that this really clearly is a victory 719 00:38:08,471 --> 00:38:09,750 Speaker 24: for Governor Bush. 720 00:38:10,151 --> 00:38:12,511 Speaker 21: I read this to say, here's the bottom line. 721 00:38:12,591 --> 00:38:15,911 Speaker 13: We've reversed the Supreme Court opinion of Florida. This election 722 00:38:16,071 --> 00:38:16,390 Speaker 13: is over. 723 00:38:16,750 --> 00:38:19,911 Speaker 1: According to Gore lawyer David Boyce, some of his colleagues 724 00:38:19,911 --> 00:38:22,511 Speaker 1: initially thought that the Court's decision was not necessarily the 725 00:38:22,591 --> 00:38:23,271 Speaker 1: end of the line. 726 00:38:23,671 --> 00:38:27,671 Speaker 15: There was still some hope among some members of the 727 00:38:27,710 --> 00:38:30,551 Speaker 15: Gore camp that we could continue the fight in Florida, 728 00:38:31,071 --> 00:38:33,951 Speaker 15: that we could try to get the vote count we started. 729 00:38:34,551 --> 00:38:37,711 Speaker 15: But at one point al Gore asked me what I thought, 730 00:38:38,511 --> 00:38:41,710 Speaker 15: and I said, it was wrong to shoot you, but 731 00:38:41,791 --> 00:38:44,390 Speaker 15: you're still dead. There's no coming back from this. 732 00:38:44,951 --> 00:38:46,911 Speaker 5: And in the end, what we had was a collision 733 00:38:47,270 --> 00:38:50,230 Speaker 5: between the calendar and the fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution 734 00:38:50,750 --> 00:38:53,031 Speaker 5: guaranteeing equal protection under the law. 735 00:38:53,431 --> 00:38:55,710 Speaker 1: As someone who teaches these issues, I would say this 736 00:38:55,750 --> 00:38:58,751 Speaker 1: is probably the most significant decision in thirty years. 737 00:38:58,991 --> 00:39:01,231 Speaker 14: We've had an appeal, we've taken that appeal. 738 00:39:01,551 --> 00:39:03,750 Speaker 3: There is no appeal from the United States Supreme Court. 739 00:39:06,031 --> 00:39:09,111 Speaker 1: The idea of a conservative majority rallying around equal protection 740 00:39:09,230 --> 00:39:13,151 Speaker 1: seemed absurd many liberal court watchers. Equal protection was maybe 741 00:39:13,151 --> 00:39:16,391 Speaker 1: the most revered legal tenet of progressives, the centerpiece of 742 00:39:16,471 --> 00:39:19,271 Speaker 1: landmark civil rights decisions like Brown v. Board of Education 743 00:39:19,631 --> 00:39:23,471 Speaker 1: and Loving v. Virginia. Justice Ginsberg, who pioneered the use 744 00:39:23,511 --> 00:39:27,230 Speaker 1: of equal protection arguments in fighting sex discrimination, was particularly horrified. 745 00:39:27,791 --> 00:39:31,470 Speaker 1: While drafting her dissenting opinion, Ginsburg included a footnote saying 746 00:39:31,471 --> 00:39:33,671 Speaker 1: that if there was any equal protection violation at work 747 00:39:33,710 --> 00:39:37,191 Speaker 1: in Florida, it was the disenfranchisement of African American voters. 748 00:39:38,270 --> 00:39:41,511 Speaker 1: She was referencing reports of voter suppression, including efforts to 749 00:39:41,551 --> 00:39:45,151 Speaker 1: purge felons from Florida's voter roles. Justice Scalia read the 750 00:39:45,151 --> 00:39:47,870 Speaker 1: footnote in a draft of Ginsburg's assent and accused her 751 00:39:47,911 --> 00:39:53,591 Speaker 1: of using al Sharpton tactics. Ginsburg gruented and took it out. Meanwhile, 752 00:39:54,151 --> 00:39:57,031 Speaker 1: Justice Stevens decided to articulate his frustration in a descent 753 00:39:57,071 --> 00:39:59,911 Speaker 1: of his own. Here he is reading from the last paragraph. 754 00:40:00,750 --> 00:40:03,551 Speaker 21: Time will one day heal the wound to that conference 755 00:40:03,871 --> 00:40:08,031 Speaker 21: that will be inflicted by today's decision. One thing, however, 756 00:40:08,111 --> 00:40:11,911 Speaker 21: is certain, although it will remain never know with complete certainty, 757 00:40:11,951 --> 00:40:15,271 Speaker 21: the identity of the winner of this year's presidential election, 758 00:40:15,871 --> 00:40:19,591 Speaker 21: the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is 759 00:40:19,671 --> 00:40:23,871 Speaker 21: a nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian 760 00:40:24,071 --> 00:40:29,231 Speaker 21: of the rule of law. I respectively dissent. No, that's true. 761 00:40:29,511 --> 00:40:32,310 Speaker 21: I think I hit it right out of the head. 762 00:40:34,190 --> 00:40:37,031 Speaker 1: There was one more important and unusual thing about the 763 00:40:37,031 --> 00:40:38,230 Speaker 1: Court's decision in Bush v. 764 00:40:38,351 --> 00:40:38,551 Speaker 13: Gore. 765 00:40:39,311 --> 00:40:40,951 Speaker 1: It didn't set any precedent. 766 00:40:41,151 --> 00:40:44,551 Speaker 20: The justices, in a highly unusual move, said their ruling 767 00:40:45,031 --> 00:40:48,910 Speaker 20: is limited to the present circumstances only, meaning. 768 00:40:48,871 --> 00:40:51,631 Speaker 1: Justice O'Connor was always cognizant of downstream effects of the 769 00:40:51,631 --> 00:40:55,430 Speaker 1: Court's actions, and during the drafting process in Bush v. Gore, 770 00:40:55,911 --> 00:40:57,831 Speaker 1: she told Kennedy that she wanted it to be clear 771 00:40:58,111 --> 00:41:00,631 Speaker 1: that the Court was only responding to the specific facts 772 00:41:00,631 --> 00:41:03,190 Speaker 1: of the case at hand, and so they added a 773 00:41:03,230 --> 00:41:06,631 Speaker 1: sentence stipulating just that and acknowledging that the problem of 774 00:41:06,671 --> 00:41:11,751 Speaker 1: equal protection and election processes generally presents many complexities. To critics, 775 00:41:12,111 --> 00:41:14,750 Speaker 1: it sounded like the majority was basically admitting that the 776 00:41:14,791 --> 00:41:17,591 Speaker 1: equal protection argument did not deserve to be taken seriously. 777 00:41:18,431 --> 00:41:19,870 Speaker 1: Here again is Dahalialithwick. 778 00:41:20,351 --> 00:41:25,390 Speaker 12: I do remember absolutely being shocked by the Court having 779 00:41:25,391 --> 00:41:29,031 Speaker 12: to explicitly say in the manner of mission impossible, like 780 00:41:29,111 --> 00:41:31,271 Speaker 12: this is going to disappear in a poof of smoke 781 00:41:31,351 --> 00:41:33,911 Speaker 12: in ten seconds. So read it quickly because it doesn't 782 00:41:33,911 --> 00:41:38,471 Speaker 12: stand for everything. For me, that was anathema to what 783 00:41:38,511 --> 00:41:41,911 Speaker 12: the court does. You know, the Court sets out clear 784 00:41:42,311 --> 00:41:46,951 Speaker 12: lasting precedent to guide the next case. It doesn't say, like, dudes, 785 00:41:46,991 --> 00:41:49,310 Speaker 12: we were totally painted into a corner and so we're 786 00:41:49,311 --> 00:41:52,230 Speaker 12: going to make some stuff up and good luck. And 787 00:41:52,671 --> 00:41:56,710 Speaker 12: so I remember that being to me. The thing that 788 00:41:56,831 --> 00:41:58,790 Speaker 12: grabbed me by the throw was they don't even have 789 00:41:58,831 --> 00:42:01,830 Speaker 12: the courage of their own convictions, much less you know 790 00:42:01,911 --> 00:42:10,750 Speaker 12: that the ability to resolve this in any binding, precedential way. 791 00:42:10,871 --> 00:42:14,390 Speaker 17: Peter Tonight al Gore's age describe him as calm, at 792 00:42:14,391 --> 00:42:17,951 Speaker 17: peace with himself and his decision, and very focused on 793 00:42:18,071 --> 00:42:21,391 Speaker 17: his task tonight to do his part to unite the country. 794 00:42:21,710 --> 00:42:25,710 Speaker 1: On December thirteenth, thirty six days after election day, al 795 00:42:25,791 --> 00:42:28,071 Speaker 1: Gore gave a televised address in which he conceded the 796 00:42:28,111 --> 00:42:30,391 Speaker 1: two thousand election for a second and final time. 797 00:42:31,351 --> 00:42:31,911 Speaker 4: Good evening. 798 00:42:32,831 --> 00:42:35,631 Speaker 16: Just moments ago, I spoke with George W. Bush and 799 00:42:35,791 --> 00:42:39,031 Speaker 16: congratulated him on becoming the forty third president of the 800 00:42:39,111 --> 00:42:42,591 Speaker 16: United States, and I promised him that I wouldn't call 801 00:42:42,671 --> 00:42:46,791 Speaker 16: him back this time. Now the US Supreme Court has spoken, 802 00:42:47,791 --> 00:42:51,471 Speaker 16: let there be no doubt. While I strongly disagree with 803 00:42:51,551 --> 00:42:55,911 Speaker 16: the Court's decision, I accept it. I accept the finality 804 00:42:55,951 --> 00:42:58,551 Speaker 16: of this outcome, which will be ratified next Monday in 805 00:42:58,591 --> 00:42:59,790 Speaker 16: the Electoral College. 806 00:43:00,311 --> 00:43:03,790 Speaker 1: Later, George W. Bush offered a few conciliatory remarks of 807 00:43:03,791 --> 00:43:04,311 Speaker 1: his own. 808 00:43:04,631 --> 00:43:07,231 Speaker 11: Vice President Gore and I put our hearts and hopes 809 00:43:07,230 --> 00:43:12,471 Speaker 11: into our campaigns. We shared some emotions, so I understand 810 00:43:12,511 --> 00:43:16,390 Speaker 11: how difficult this moment must be for Vice President Gore 811 00:43:16,431 --> 00:43:17,071 Speaker 11: and his family. 812 00:43:18,591 --> 00:43:20,551 Speaker 1: The only thing left to do was make it official. 813 00:43:21,391 --> 00:43:24,750 Speaker 1: On December eighteenth, Florida's presidential electors gathered at the State 814 00:43:24,750 --> 00:43:29,191 Speaker 1: House in Tallahassee. As expected, all twenty five Republican electors 815 00:43:29,270 --> 00:43:32,431 Speaker 1: voted for George W. Bush, while his brother Jeb looked on. 816 00:43:33,151 --> 00:43:36,031 Speaker 2: Thank you for your attendance and cooperation and fulfilling this 817 00:43:36,111 --> 00:43:36,871 Speaker 2: awesome duty. 818 00:43:37,671 --> 00:43:39,991 Speaker 13: This meeting of the presidential electors is now adjourned. 819 00:43:40,031 --> 00:43:40,870 Speaker 2: Thank you all very much. 820 00:43:40,991 --> 00:43:41,790 Speaker 19: God blessed. 821 00:43:45,031 --> 00:43:48,230 Speaker 1: In Washington the task of officially presiding over the Electoral 822 00:43:48,230 --> 00:43:51,710 Speaker 1: College TWI felt in none other than al Gore, whose 823 00:43:51,710 --> 00:43:54,111 Speaker 1: position as vice president also made him the president of 824 00:43:54,111 --> 00:43:54,551 Speaker 1: the Senate. 825 00:43:54,951 --> 00:43:57,190 Speaker 16: The whole number of the electors appointed to vote for 826 00:43:57,230 --> 00:43:58,950 Speaker 16: President of the United States as well, the. 827 00:43:58,831 --> 00:44:01,991 Speaker 27: Third vice president in history to preside over the certification 828 00:44:02,071 --> 00:44:03,111 Speaker 27: of his own defeat. 829 00:44:03,750 --> 00:44:04,390 Speaker 4: George W. 830 00:44:04,511 --> 00:44:07,631 Speaker 16: Bush of the State of Texas has received for President 831 00:44:07,671 --> 00:44:09,871 Speaker 16: of the United States two hundred and seventy one v. 832 00:44:10,991 --> 00:44:13,870 Speaker 16: Al Gore of the State of Tennessee has received two 833 00:44:13,911 --> 00:44:17,390 Speaker 16: hundred and sixty six votes. May God bless our new 834 00:44:17,431 --> 00:44:20,991 Speaker 16: president and our new Vice President, and may God bless 835 00:44:21,351 --> 00:44:22,751 Speaker 16: the United States of America. 836 00:44:30,951 --> 00:44:33,671 Speaker 1: When the election was finally over and Bush was inaugurated 837 00:44:33,671 --> 00:44:36,151 Speaker 1: as president, it seemed like the stage was set for 838 00:44:36,230 --> 00:44:38,750 Speaker 1: Sandrad O'Connor to announce that she was stepping down from 839 00:44:38,750 --> 00:44:43,230 Speaker 1: the court, but she didn't. According to Devin Thomas, she 840 00:44:43,270 --> 00:44:44,870 Speaker 1: felt that her role in putting Bush in the White 841 00:44:44,911 --> 00:44:46,511 Speaker 1: House made retirement untenable. 842 00:44:47,431 --> 00:44:52,270 Speaker 9: The standard wisdom is that she voted for Bush so 843 00:44:52,391 --> 00:44:54,671 Speaker 9: that she could retire because she wanted to retire, because 844 00:44:54,710 --> 00:44:57,391 Speaker 9: it sounded like that's what they wanted to do based 845 00:44:57,391 --> 00:45:01,710 Speaker 9: on that dinner party outburst. But in fact the opposite 846 00:45:01,791 --> 00:45:06,430 Speaker 9: is true. Because she voted for Bush, she knew that 847 00:45:06,471 --> 00:45:08,750 Speaker 9: she could not retire. It would look like the fix 848 00:45:08,871 --> 00:45:10,991 Speaker 9: was in that She knew that it would look like 849 00:45:11,071 --> 00:45:13,830 Speaker 9: she voted for Bush so that she could retire. So 850 00:45:13,871 --> 00:45:17,351 Speaker 9: she said to her family, look, no white House events. 851 00:45:17,431 --> 00:45:20,830 Speaker 9: We're not gonna hang around with a Bush family. We're 852 00:45:20,871 --> 00:45:24,791 Speaker 9: not retiring. And she didn't, not for another five years 853 00:45:24,911 --> 00:45:28,151 Speaker 9: until her husband's Alzheimer's was so bad she felt she 854 00:45:28,230 --> 00:45:28,871 Speaker 9: had to retire. 855 00:45:30,951 --> 00:45:34,230 Speaker 1: As John's Alzheimer's worsened, O'Connor often brought him to the 856 00:45:34,230 --> 00:45:36,870 Speaker 1: court with her. He sat on the couch in her 857 00:45:36,871 --> 00:45:40,230 Speaker 1: office reading the newspaper while she worked. When he occasionally 858 00:45:40,270 --> 00:45:43,111 Speaker 1: wandered off, Supreme Court guards were always around to keep 859 00:45:43,111 --> 00:45:47,391 Speaker 1: an eye on him. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court's docket filled 860 00:45:47,471 --> 00:45:50,991 Speaker 1: up with cases that touched on Bush administration policy. These 861 00:45:50,991 --> 00:45:54,351 Speaker 1: were major cases about affirmative action, the right to die, 862 00:45:54,671 --> 00:45:57,911 Speaker 1: the rights of prisoners at Guantanama Bay. And if anyone 863 00:45:57,951 --> 00:46:00,511 Speaker 1: still believed that the two thousand election had been low stakes, 864 00:46:01,031 --> 00:46:02,751 Speaker 1: the string of decisions that came out of the Supreme 865 00:46:02,791 --> 00:46:05,350 Speaker 1: Court in its aftermath served as a reminder of just 866 00:46:05,391 --> 00:46:13,391 Speaker 1: how much had been on the line. When O'Connor finally 867 00:46:13,391 --> 00:46:15,911 Speaker 1: retired in two thousand and five, she was replaced with 868 00:46:15,951 --> 00:46:19,911 Speaker 1: Samuel Alito, a relentlessly conservative justice whose arrival shifted the 869 00:46:19,911 --> 00:46:24,270 Speaker 1: ideological balance of the court. In private, O'Connor expressed deep 870 00:46:24,270 --> 00:46:27,190 Speaker 1: frustration with Alito, and she watched with disappointment as the 871 00:46:27,190 --> 00:46:30,510 Speaker 1: court tilted away from her doctrine on abortion rights, affirmative action, 872 00:46:30,831 --> 00:46:32,031 Speaker 1: and a host of other issues. 873 00:46:32,791 --> 00:46:35,471 Speaker 12: She was so full of regret that she, you know, 874 00:46:35,871 --> 00:46:39,671 Speaker 12: immediately on her retirement and being replaced by Alito and 875 00:46:39,750 --> 00:46:42,350 Speaker 12: watching all of the doctrine that she had had her 876 00:46:42,391 --> 00:46:46,591 Speaker 12: thumbprint on got erased. Within like two years. You know, 877 00:46:46,710 --> 00:46:49,671 Speaker 12: every place in which she had been the decider goes 878 00:46:49,710 --> 00:46:52,911 Speaker 12: the other way. And I think she really did feel 879 00:46:52,991 --> 00:46:56,710 Speaker 12: as though she couldn't say it out loud, but that 880 00:46:56,831 --> 00:47:02,711 Speaker 12: she had done something like catastrophically bad for the country 881 00:47:02,710 --> 00:47:05,310 Speaker 12: that she didn't know how to make reparations for. And 882 00:47:05,351 --> 00:47:08,111 Speaker 12: I think, much more so than anyone else, she really 883 00:47:08,351 --> 00:47:09,631 Speaker 12: carried that around with her. 884 00:47:12,831 --> 00:47:17,071 Speaker 1: In twenty thirteen, for the first time ever, O'Connor publicly 885 00:47:17,111 --> 00:47:19,671 Speaker 1: expressed second thoughts about the ruling in Bush v. 886 00:47:19,831 --> 00:47:20,071 Speaker 18: Gore. 887 00:47:21,230 --> 00:47:23,790 Speaker 1: The Supreme Court probably added to the problem. At the 888 00:47:23,871 --> 00:47:27,191 Speaker 1: end of the day, she told the Chicago Tribune. Maybe 889 00:47:27,190 --> 00:47:29,871 Speaker 1: she said the Court shouldn't have even taken the case 890 00:47:29,911 --> 00:47:34,831 Speaker 1: in the first place. Five years later, Justice O'Connor announced 891 00:47:34,871 --> 00:47:38,951 Speaker 1: that she was suffering from dementia, most likely Alzheimer's, and 892 00:47:38,991 --> 00:47:42,831 Speaker 1: she retired from public life. She died in twenty twenty 893 00:47:42,831 --> 00:47:48,151 Speaker 1: three at the age of ninety three. In the wake 894 00:47:48,190 --> 00:47:51,950 Speaker 1: of al Gore's concession, a handful of news organizations went 895 00:47:51,991 --> 00:47:54,830 Speaker 1: back to Florida's ballots and tried to figure out whether 896 00:47:54,871 --> 00:47:56,671 Speaker 1: the right person had been elected president. 897 00:47:56,951 --> 00:47:59,671 Speaker 24: The count of more than sixty one thousand punch carts 898 00:47:59,710 --> 00:48:03,471 Speaker 24: optical scan even handwritten votes tallied by a team from 899 00:48:03,471 --> 00:48:06,871 Speaker 24: the Miami Herald, USA Today and a private accounting firm. 900 00:48:07,471 --> 00:48:09,750 Speaker 1: The first major result was released by a consortium of 901 00:48:09,750 --> 00:48:12,591 Speaker 1: news papers that included USA Today and the Miami Herald. 902 00:48:13,391 --> 00:48:15,831 Speaker 1: It came out in April two thousand and one, about 903 00:48:15,831 --> 00:48:18,431 Speaker 1: two and a half months into George W. Bush's presidency. 904 00:48:19,591 --> 00:48:21,350 Speaker 1: The study gamed out what would have happened if the 905 00:48:21,351 --> 00:48:24,191 Speaker 1: recount mandated by the Florida Supreme Court had been allowed 906 00:48:24,190 --> 00:48:27,711 Speaker 1: to continue. It looked at possible outcomes under four different 907 00:48:27,710 --> 00:48:31,191 Speaker 1: ballot standards, ranging from the most lenient to the most strict, 908 00:48:31,551 --> 00:48:32,991 Speaker 1: under vote ballots. 909 00:48:32,791 --> 00:48:35,831 Speaker 24: Those now famous hanging, dimpled and pregnant chads. 910 00:48:36,111 --> 00:48:39,270 Speaker 1: Ironically, the study found that Gore would have only won 911 00:48:39,431 --> 00:48:43,071 Speaker 1: under the strictest standard, and even then the margin would 912 00:48:43,071 --> 00:48:44,431 Speaker 1: have only been three votes. 913 00:48:44,511 --> 00:48:47,511 Speaker 24: So Gore wins using a strict vote counting method, he 914 00:48:47,591 --> 00:48:51,471 Speaker 24: did not support Bush wins using a more liberal method 915 00:48:51,750 --> 00:48:52,591 Speaker 24: he opposed. 916 00:48:53,111 --> 00:48:55,791 Speaker 1: A second major post mortem of the election came out 917 00:48:55,831 --> 00:48:59,351 Speaker 1: just after its first anniversary. This one was the product 918 00:48:59,391 --> 00:49:01,911 Speaker 1: of a million dollar effort that included The New York Times, 919 00:49:02,190 --> 00:49:05,551 Speaker 1: The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The Saint Petersburg 920 00:49:05,631 --> 00:49:09,350 Speaker 1: Times and the Palm Beach Post Together they commissioned a 921 00:49:09,391 --> 00:49:12,671 Speaker 1: non partisan research institute at the University of Chicago to 922 00:49:12,710 --> 00:49:15,151 Speaker 1: spend ten months going through the one hundred and seventy 923 00:49:15,151 --> 00:49:17,790 Speaker 1: five thousand undervotes and over votes from Florida. 924 00:49:17,991 --> 00:49:22,351 Speaker 27: Trained coders, often operating in teams, viewed but did not touch, 925 00:49:22,431 --> 00:49:25,111 Speaker 27: disputed ballots and wrote down what they saw. 926 00:49:25,791 --> 00:49:29,071 Speaker 1: According to that study, if every undervote and over vote 927 00:49:29,111 --> 00:49:32,310 Speaker 1: in Florida had been examined by hand, Gore would have 928 00:49:32,311 --> 00:49:33,871 Speaker 1: won the state by a slim margin. 929 00:49:34,230 --> 00:49:37,351 Speaker 27: Under those circumstances, Gore would have gained to a plus 930 00:49:37,391 --> 00:49:39,830 Speaker 27: one hundred and seventy one largely. 931 00:49:39,591 --> 00:49:42,830 Speaker 1: But as the news organizations themselves acknowledged, this was neither 932 00:49:42,871 --> 00:49:46,071 Speaker 1: here nor there. Though it may have been true in theory, 933 00:49:46,671 --> 00:49:48,790 Speaker 1: there had pretty much never been a scenario in which 934 00:49:48,831 --> 00:49:52,071 Speaker 1: all of Florida's undervotes and overvotes were going to be counted. 935 00:49:53,351 --> 00:49:55,671 Speaker 1: If you imagine the thirty six days after election day 936 00:49:55,671 --> 00:49:58,270 Speaker 1: as a choose your own adventure, there was just no 937 00:49:58,351 --> 00:50:00,511 Speaker 1: fork in the road when that was a serious possibility. 938 00:50:01,551 --> 00:50:04,071 Speaker 1: Even before it was published, an LA Times editor was 939 00:50:04,151 --> 00:50:06,631 Speaker 1: quoted saying that it was entirely possible that most readers 940 00:50:06,631 --> 00:50:09,831 Speaker 1: would look at the report and yawn. The Saint Petersburg 941 00:50:09,871 --> 00:50:12,910 Speaker 1: Time Times asked whether anyone other than political junkies would care. 942 00:50:13,591 --> 00:50:16,471 Speaker 1: In The Washington Post, media critic Howard Kurtz said the 943 00:50:16,551 --> 00:50:22,190 Speaker 1: recount now felt like some distant Civil war battle. There 944 00:50:22,230 --> 00:50:24,710 Speaker 1: was good reason to be skeptical about the public's appetite 945 00:50:24,710 --> 00:50:28,270 Speaker 1: for relitigating the election. Maybe you've already done the math 946 00:50:28,311 --> 00:50:30,911 Speaker 1: in your head, But the first anniversary of November two 947 00:50:30,951 --> 00:50:34,431 Speaker 1: thousand was November two thousand and one, So two months 948 00:50:34,431 --> 00:50:36,591 Speaker 1: after the September eleventh attacks. 949 00:50:36,511 --> 00:50:39,470 Speaker 27: Try to remember the kind of September we just had. 950 00:50:43,791 --> 00:50:47,230 Speaker 27: What consumed us last December is a paragraph for history now. 951 00:50:47,431 --> 00:50:50,231 Speaker 1: A reason George Bush's approval rating was close to ninety percent. 952 00:50:51,270 --> 00:50:53,871 Speaker 1: A poll published in early November showed that if the 953 00:50:53,911 --> 00:50:57,151 Speaker 1: election was held again, Bush would beat Gore nationally by 954 00:50:57,190 --> 00:51:02,271 Speaker 1: twenty six points. Even Gore's former campaign chairman, Bill Day 955 00:51:02,551 --> 00:51:04,671 Speaker 1: said that anyone who was still speculating what the election 956 00:51:04,750 --> 00:51:08,471 Speaker 1: results was wasting their breath. On the editorial page of 957 00:51:08,471 --> 00:51:12,391 Speaker 1: the Tampa Tribune, both parties received praise for showing restraint 958 00:51:12,710 --> 00:51:14,591 Speaker 1: at a time when the core temperature of the former 959 00:51:14,631 --> 00:51:18,830 Speaker 1: World Trade Center still hovered near one thousand degrees in 960 00:51:18,911 --> 00:51:22,710 Speaker 1: subsequent years. Whenever anyone asked Justice Antonin Scalia about the 961 00:51:22,750 --> 00:51:25,991 Speaker 1: Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, he would respond, get 962 00:51:26,031 --> 00:51:29,591 Speaker 1: over it. In his book on Justice O'Connor, Evan Thomas 963 00:51:29,631 --> 00:51:32,711 Speaker 1: reported that Scalia privately referred to the equal protection argument 964 00:51:32,951 --> 00:51:36,071 Speaker 1: used to end the Florida recount as a piece of shit. 965 00:51:59,151 --> 00:52:02,471 Speaker 1: Fiasco is a production of Prolog Projects, and it's distributed 966 00:52:02,511 --> 00:52:06,471 Speaker 1: by Pushkin Industries. The show is produced by Andrew Parsons, 967 00:52:06,710 --> 00:52:11,511 Speaker 1: Madeline kaplan Ula Culpa, and me Leon Nathan. Our script 968 00:52:11,631 --> 00:52:15,591 Speaker 1: editor was Daniel Riley. Our editorial consultant was Camilla Hammer, 969 00:52:16,031 --> 00:52:19,991 Speaker 1: and we received additional editorial support from Lisa Chase. Our 970 00:52:20,071 --> 00:52:22,791 Speaker 1: music and score are by Nick Silvester of god Mode, 971 00:52:22,991 --> 00:52:26,911 Speaker 1: with additional music from Alexis Quadrado. Our theme song is 972 00:52:26,911 --> 00:52:30,391 Speaker 1: by Spatial Relations. Our artwork is by Teddy Blanks at 973 00:52:30,511 --> 00:52:35,071 Speaker 1: Chips and y Audio, mixed by Rob Buyers, Michael Raphael 974 00:52:35,230 --> 00:52:38,871 Speaker 1: and Johnny Vince Evans. A final Final V two special 975 00:52:38,871 --> 00:52:42,551 Speaker 1: thanks to Luminary for a list of books, articles, and 976 00:52:42,591 --> 00:52:45,631 Speaker 1: documentaries that we relied on in our research. Click the 977 00:52:45,671 --> 00:52:49,271 Speaker 1: link in the show notes. Thanks to c SPAN, NBC 978 00:52:49,391 --> 00:52:52,631 Speaker 1: News Archive, CNN and Channel twenty and Palm Beach for 979 00:52:52,710 --> 00:52:56,431 Speaker 1: the archival material you heard in today's show. Thanks for listening. 980 00:53:10,551 --> 00:53:11,230 Speaker 23: I don't know