WEBVTT - US Tariff Threat Risks Own Goal in Solar Trade War

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the B and EF podcast. So, solar module prices are

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>at record lows and oversupply is one of many factors

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>driving this. So what does this mean for the industry overall?

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>In a time of tariffs and protectionism. These record breaking

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>prices are found in Asia, but for manufacturers outside of

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Asia it is a different story. The US government previously

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>placed tariffs on China and recently extended these to parts

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of Southeast Asia where Chinese manufacturers had been setting up.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>This might have the potential to foster a US based

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>solar manufacturing industry, but it also has the potential to

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>slow down solar adoption in the US, where prices really

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>are very different. To explain what's happening on today's show,

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we are joined by Poul Askano from bn EF's Solar Team.

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I am also joined today by a co host, Tom

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Rowlands Reese. Now, if you like this show, make sure

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe or consider giving us a review. Right now,

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom and I though get to speak with Pole. So

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>today we've got a guest and a co host, and

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to start off with my co host, So

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Tom rollins three say.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Hi.

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>That Dana, I promise not to call you by your

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>full name the entire time. You're Tom from here on out.

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 2>That that makes me a lot more comfortable.

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And Paul, welcome to the show today.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Dana.

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So Tom and Paul we have you both joining us

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>from the US, and that's really apt given this conversation

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is about solar, which is a truly global market in

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>many respects kind of you know, the workhorse of the

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy part of the energy transition with such wide

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>scale adoption. But today we're talking about really kind of

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a big change on free market economics here and how

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the US has intervened in this space with tariffs. Now

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we know that China has led to incredibly low prices

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for solar modules all over the world, and the US

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>has set up a different scenario for themselves. So can

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you just give everyone an understanding of what the current

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>situation is with US prices versus Chinese prices? And then additionally,

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what that tariff structure, how as it currently stands,

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>looks like sure?

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, In general, I guess the easy way to understand

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 4>this is to understand the situation between what US developers

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 4>pay for modules versus what everyone else pays elsewhere in

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 4>the world. Is that there's plenty of factories in China

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 4>that are supplying pretty much most.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Of the world except the US in India.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 4>And typically supply of panels is exceeded demand, despite the

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 4>fact that most of these countries have been growing their

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 4>sole installations quite rapidly. But the US doesn't really have

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 4>access to all of those factories in China because since

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 4>twenty twelve they started imposing a different set of tariffs

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 4>that essentially has forced module buyers in the US to

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 4>pick from a more limited amount of factories outside of China,

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 4>mostly in Southeast Asian countries. So what happened is, as

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 4>developers said, less less factories and less less amount of

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 4>modules to pick from, manufacturers logically had a little bit

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 4>more room to play in terms of charging higher margins

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 4>and production costs were slightly higher than than in China

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 4>across some of those countries. So it ultimately happens as

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>of today, developers would pay about three times more the

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 4>modules in the US and what a developer in Europe

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 4>would pay for for instance.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's a pretty hefty impact I presume on the

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 2>cost of developing sola in the US. I suppose a

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>couple of just things to clarify there is for thinking

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 2>about utility scale solar how much is the module actually

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>part of the cost of the project. I'm assuming that

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 2>as modules get cheaper and cheaper, a multiple on the

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 2>cost of modules starts to matter less and less. So

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 2>is it really like a game change of that amount

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>of money? And then what is the US government doing

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 2>to sort of offset that?

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 4>So, to use round numbers, it costs for utility scale

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 4>it costs about a dollar or what to build a

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 4>utility skill solar farm in the US slightly over, but

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 4>just to use PRG numbers, let's just say one dollar

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 4>what and modules, as I said, costs about thirty cents

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 4>a what for those projects, so very easily, about thirty

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 4>percent of the upfront cost of building a utility skill

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 4>solar farm goes into into buying those modules. And the

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 4>reason why the really high module prices haven't had a

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 4>dramatic impact on solar deployments because the US for a

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 4>long time has been paying back in the form of

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 4>tax credits about thirty percent of those upfront costs to

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 4>the project owners, which essentially upsets some of those higher

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 4>prices that developers.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Have to pay for modules.

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 4>So if you think about it from a more first

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 4>principles basis, it's US tax credits subsidizing in a way

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 4>these higher module prices that developers in the US have

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 4>to have to pay for.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 2>So this is costing the US money.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Technically, I mean, tax credits is not it's not a

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 4>direct subsidy, it's not a grant. So their tax credits

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 4>are only subsidies that get materialize if the think gets built,

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 4>if the project gets built. So you could also argue

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 4>in the absence of those tax credits, those projects would

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 4>not get built in the first place. So what you're

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 4>essentially doing is you're reducing some of that expected tax

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 4>collection from this activity that you're incentivizing.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>So the regulation here largely tariffs are really focused on

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>these foreign entities of concern. Can you help define what

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that is and what's really included there.

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so foreign entities of concern is a slightly different

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 4>term than what we would be using in this case

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 4>because the foreign Entities of concern list has a different

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 4>trade implications for the US. What these tariffs are doing

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 4>is broadly targeting solar factories mostly owned by Chinese companies

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 4>in Southeast Asia and historically also in China with the

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 4>first set of tariffs.

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 2>So these tariffs, logically one would expect that both the

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 2>intention and impact would be to benefit US solar manufacturers.

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>So is this what we're seeing?

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Partly and there's quite new once that I will try

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 4>to keep as simple as possible. But making solar panels

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 4>in the US and solar sales is very expensive, and

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 4>even with some of those tariffs, it's still cheaper to

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 4>buy modules from abroad than using modules made in the US. However,

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 4>if the terrors end up exceeding that fifty percent up

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 4>arranged at US in the industry more or lesser expecting,

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 4>then manufacturing sales and modules in the US can be

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 4>quite profitable. And by quite profitable, I mean there's the

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 4>potential to earn more than forty percent in gross margins

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 4>for every single module you sell in the US with

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 4>a US made sell, not only because the market price

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 4>is higher for imported product because of the tariffs, but

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 4>also because the Inflation Reduction Act pays you a lot

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 4>of money to produce in the US. If you're making

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 4>sales and modules, it's going to pay you about eleven

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 4>cents a while, which is already more than what it

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 4>costs to buy a whole module from China, to put

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 4>it into perspective. And then on top of that, if

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 4>you are making sales in the US, there is a

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 4>potential that you're also going to be able to charge

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 4>a premium to the developer or whoever is the end buyer,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 4>because the project might be able to claim a very

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 4>lucrative domestic content subsidy of a ten percent extra on

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 4>top of the subsidy that you're already getting from the IRA.

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 4>And what you're doing with that price premium is essentially

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 4>share that benefit between the project.

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 3>And the developer and U as the manufacturer.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 4>So the combination of production subsidies that lower your overall

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 4>production costs and essentially give you the window to earn

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 4>really high margins, the extra premium that you can charge

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 4>and the fact that prices are structurally high because of

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 4>the tariffs can make US manufacturing very lucrative. However, a

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of the plan factories are still struggling to raise

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 4>financing because of production cost declines in Southeast Asia are continuing,

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 4>and they're probably going to continue, and even if tariffs

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 4>are in the fifteen to fifty percent range of the

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 4>industry respects. This is now going to be a a

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 4>deal breaker for product from Southeast Asia to come into

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 4>the US. And at the same time, it's really really

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 4>complicated to build stuff in the US, to build factories

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 4>in the US. And when it comes to building that factory,

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 4>even if the on paper are on an Excel spreadsheet,

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 4>the economics might look good and you can expect to

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 4>make quite high margins, it takes many years to build

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 4>a cell factory in the US and it's very complicated.

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 4>The permiting tanks a long time, and getting the factory

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 4>connected to the grid can be a serious bottleneck. So

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 4>despite the fact that on paper, as I said, the

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 4>economics might look good, it's still going to take some

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 4>time to build those factories. And who knows what happens

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 4>during the years that you're trying to build your cell

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 4>factory abroad. Who knows where prices are going to go.

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 4>So the risk is quite high. The market risk is

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 4>quite high, so which is why a lot of investors

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 4>have not really been willing to back those factories and

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 4>provide financing. And the only companies that have really been

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 4>able to materialize those investments are companies that have quite

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 4>big balance sheets and have the money to invest themselves.

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So how deep into the supply chain is go? I mean,

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is it the manufacturing facilities that create the finished modules?

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Are we going all the way down to the silicon?

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 4>So technically we most of the tears are applied at

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 4>the cell level, But there's a set of rules in

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 4>some of the terraffs that essentially indirectly targeted Chinese wafers,

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 4>which is this key component to make the silicon cells.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 4>And it doesn't specifically set a TeV on the waiver.

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 4>What does is essentially telling these factories in Southeast Asia

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 4>or outside of China that if they don't want to

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 4>be subject to some of those tariffs, they will need

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 4>to buy wafers silicon wafers from outside of China.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Can I just pick up on something you said previously?

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 2>You just mentioned that a lot of these companies in

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Southeast Asia are Chinese owned. So should that mean that

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 2>if the intention is to compete with China and ultimately

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Chinese companies are getting higher margins subsidized by US taxpayers.

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 2>There's a very cynical take, is that what's happened here

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 2>or is there you know, is it working on some

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 2>level in achieving its subjective.

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Honestly, I don't really know what the end goal is here. Well, technically,

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 4>it's let's bring back US solar manufacturing, and let's incentivize

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 4>a ton of jobs in the US putting panels together

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 4>and making sales and quote unquote making this very sophisticated

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 4>technology that we're going to need to power the energy transition.

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 4>This is the official language. The ultimate goal. I really

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 4>don't understand, because ultimately what's happening is that we're pay

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 4>more for components that are ridiculously cheap everywhere else in

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 4>the world. And then the side effect, which I don't

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 4>know to what extent the US has been aware, is that,

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 4>as you said, Chinese manufacturers have been able to earn

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot of margins because they were the ones who

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 4>had the capital to set up all these factors outside

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 4>of China and then become the main supplier to the

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 4>US from just a different part of the world.

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 3>And because the usolar.

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Demand has been growing quite quickly, the Chinese solo manufacturers

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 4>have been able to benefit from that growth, and they've

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 4>also had a much higher market power selling to the US,

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 4>and they have selling everywhere else in the world while

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 4>they are essentially competing with every other factory across the

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 4>street from weather based in China.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese manufacturers have been very nimble and willing to work

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in other parts of the world. So I'm thinking of

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Mexico and actually for this conversation, really Southeast Asia. So

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>can you talk a little bit about the effectiveness of

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>these tariffs? And I'm actually thinking, I mean that is

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a follow on to what Tom essentially asked, in that

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>we know that it's driving prices up, but is it

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially also stopping imports of Chinese goods or has that

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>been a difficult thing to actually do and is it

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>more or less a you know, an unwinnable game of

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>whack a mole. And I think, to some extent also

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a parallel here is when I think about sanctions and

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>about how difficult it has been to provide sanctions to

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>various countries. You know, the implementation of changing the way

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>global trade and supply chain's work is actually very difficult

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for a government to achieve.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and it's a very complicated puzzle, but ultimately what

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 4>the terrors, if accomplished, is for these Chinese companies to

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 4>just re route the supply chains through Southeast Asia, so

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 4>instead of just selling from their factories in some of

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese provinces, they're just selling from Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 4>or Cambodia. So same ownership, same structure, just factory in

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 4>a different location. And so far, every time there's been

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 4>a new set of terriffs, these companies have been able

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 4>to quite quickly adjust and build the necessary facilities outside

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 4>of China to be able to comply with the new

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 4>tear rules. So initially what they built was where a

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 4>lot of sell and module factories in the countries that

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 4>I listed, and then with a new set of terrors

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 4>that are expected to come now into effect in June

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty four, manufacturers were actually quite impressive in building

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 4>wafer facilities in Southeast Asia as well in order to

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 4>comply with with this new tariffs. So you could argue

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 4>that the US has sup forced some of these Chinese

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 4>companies to make really capix intensive investments outside of China

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 4>and by that also spurring the local economies in Southeast Asia.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 4>But at the end of the day, we're still talking

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 4>about the same suppliers, and surely because prices are slightly higher,

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 4>this has left some room for non Chinese manufacturers to

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 4>also sell into the US market. But those non Chinese

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 4>manufacturers from South Korea, or from some of the Southeast

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Asian countries, or even from the US have historically struggled

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 4>despite the fact that module prices work quite high, just

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 4>because of how quickly the factories in Southeast Asia were

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 4>able to improve and lower costs.

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 2>See what I'm hearing here is that the tariffs are

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily working exactly as intended. Maybe they are still

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 2>accomplishing some of their objectives, but it leads me to

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 2>this really fundamental question, which is what actually is the

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 2>point of all of this. If we're using the language

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 2>of war and this is a trade war, it's like

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 2>there's this battle being fought over a piece of scrubland

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 2>that is of no use to anyone, And you could

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 2>argue it's kind of useful for the for the US

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>to let China just own sol it. Like you know,

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>if it's about electric vehicles, you know, there's the automotive industry.

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 2>It's such a huge industry globally. I get it why

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 2>you would want to fight over that and you know,

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>retain those healthy margins. But for all the time I've

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 2>been at BNAF, our colleague Jenny Chase has always been

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>talking about how nobody makes money manufacturing solar and all

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 2>these Chinese companies, you know, lose money, and you know,

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 2>but they still scale up. So surely this is like

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 2>the worst industry to be fighting over. And in a way,

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 2>letting Chinese modules into the country is just letting the

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Chinese government subsidize the US energy transition as opposed to

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 2>what we have here now, which is the US government

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 2>is subsidizing Chinese companies. So that's just my a take

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 2>that I have, and I kind of put it to you,

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 2>like fight me, like tell me what the point of

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 2>this is, because this seems like the most pointless battle

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:03.239
<v Speaker 2>I can imagine.

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Well as a long term analyst working under Jenny Chase,

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 4>obviously her influence has dictated a lot of my takes too,

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 4>so I'm not going to disagree with her. I'm just

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 4>gonna lay out some of the arguments in favor.

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Of those tariffs that I've heard and read.

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 4>The first one is, it's quite an uncomfortable truth when

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 4>you think about it, to say to the general public

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 4>that let's say solar turns to be turns to generate

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 4>about thirty percent of all electricity in the US by

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty thirty. It's quite an uncomfortable truth to think that

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 4>most of that thirty percent of annual generation in the

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 4>US comes from a component made in China. If you

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 4>think about gas plants, nuclear there are usually some like

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 4>a strong attachment to a US company owning that plant,

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 4>operating and plant creating the components. So it's quite uncomfortable

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 4>for policymakers and guests think about the fact that in

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 4>a few years from now a lot of our electricity

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 4>will come from things stuff made in China.

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 3>So that's one.

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 4>And then the other argument that I've heard is industrial capacity.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 4>So the US, the whole reindustrialization push right now that's

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 4>taking place in the US not only is trying to

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 4>compete against China and create jobs in the US, but

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 4>also it's trying to revitalize the industrial capacity in the

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 4>US in case there was a war, meaning we can

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 4>now again build a bunch of airplanes and a bunch

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 4>of ammunition. The tricky part with this argument is module

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 4>assembly factories are just a big warehouse where you put

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of assembly lines and you put them madge together.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 4>So really, I don't know exactly how you would repurpose

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 4>those factories for some military needs, but it's quite a

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 4>simple process, so I don't know what the actual values

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 4>of having all of those assembly lines in the US.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 4>The second part is a lot of the investments, a

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 4>lot of the sole investments and manufacturers have made in

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 4>the US have come from the same Chinese companies, and

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 4>some of those Chinese companies are heavily involved with some

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 4>of the biggest US developers, So some of the biggest

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 4>US developers rely critically on supply from these manufacturers. So yes,

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 4>there's exceptions like First Solars, probably the most ambitious US

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 4>based manufacturer that has very big ambissions in the US

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 4>and has actually pursued those investments in this scaling up production.

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 4>But a lot of the big announcements come from companies

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 4>that are directly or indirectly owned by Chinese firms.

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to follow on while we're on this topic,

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>and I'm going to tell you a very short anecdote,

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 2>and I'm going to try and keep it brief because

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 2>what you're saying makes me think of something that happened recently.

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I went to Charleston, South Carolina, me and my wife.

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 2>We're from the UK. We're exploring the US men to Charleston,

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina. And near Charleston, South Carolina is the North

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>America's only tea farm. And we went on a tour

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 2>of the tea farm. And the story of that tea

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 2>farm is it was set up in the sixties by

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Lipton because they looked there. It was the Cold War

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 2>and they were looking at global supply chains and they

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>were like, if things go bad, you know, we're not

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>going to have any tea in America, so we need

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 2>to set up a tea guard and they invested heavily

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>in it. Cold War ended, Lipton was like, Okay, that

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter anymore. They weren't interested, so they sold it

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 2>to someone who is more of a te enthusiast. So

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 2>now America has this one little tea garden, this one

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 2>little tea farm. But the point is is that if

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 2>supply chain, you know, if there is a global meltdown,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 2>America still has a way of getting tea that has

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 2>something to scale from. So is the end goal here

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 2>not that we have this super scale US solar industry.

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 2>But we have something a little bit like the Charleston

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 2>tea garden, something that is like a seed from which

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 2>there is a starting point if things go really bad.

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Is that how you see this? Very I would say

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 2>aggressive and expensive strategy ultimately is to make the Charleston

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 2>tea gardens of solar.

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 3>That's an interesting analogy.

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 4>And I guess my first question would always be like

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 4>how much more expensive or how was that t was

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 4>that tea of better?

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Was that tea more expensive?

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 5>It was really nice, award winning I mean, Tom, your

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 5>country and my country have a long history when it

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.719
<v Speaker 5>comes to tea in international disputes, and I would say

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 5>you might be overestimating how much Americans care about tea

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 5>these days.

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, Lypton definitely cared about tea, you know, I

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 2>certainly did well.

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>But actually, then thinking about so the companies that are

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>actually involved here, I want to think about actually the

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>US solar manufacturers who are playing by the rules and

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially are not circumventing the different trade rules that have

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>been set up. They have started a new petition for

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>some additional tariffs. Can you get into that. I think

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be tied very much. Paul by the way,

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with the title of your recent research note, which is

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>US solar manufacturer's call for more expensive modules.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 4>So this is just yet another the solar coaster, as

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 4>they call it here in the US, just becoming more

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.959
<v Speaker 4>and more complicated. So I hope I can explain this

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 4>in simple terms, because it's even confusing for those of

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 4>us who do this for a living and look at those.

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Terrafts full time.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 4>So what happened is there's a new set of tariffs

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 4>that were already approved that are like the circumvention tariffs

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 4>that you mentioned, that will come into effect in June

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty four. What happened because of this deadline

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.959
<v Speaker 4>that was set by the Department of Commerce and then

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 4>extended by two years by the Biden administration. What happened

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 4>is a lot of the factories in Southeast Asia many more, honestly,

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of factories just came out of nowhere, A

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.239
<v Speaker 4>lot of supply pretty much came out of nowhere and

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 4>just started shipping modules to the US that we're going

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 4>to be subject to this new tariffs that we know

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 4>are coming next month. So what happened is there was

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 4>a supply clood in the US as these manufacturers were

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 4>trying to get rid of their product that was going

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 4>to be essentially obsolete once the tariffs kicked in. So

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 4>obviously the dynamics despite of quite a fast growing market

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 4>in the US and the US solar market has been

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 4>growing quite quite rapidly, but supply has supplied the past

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 4>twelve eighteen months has far exceeded installations. So this imbalance

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 4>essentially sent prices plummeting to as low as ten twelve

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 4>fifteen cents awad for very for small budget batches of

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 4>old product that these manufacturers trying to get rid of

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 4>and that was going to be soon obsolete because of

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 4>the tariffs. So that really posts serious difficulties to some

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 4>of the existing manufacturers in the US that already have

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 4>production and I already trying to sell into the US market,

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 4>because now suddenly that we're competing against modules that cost

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 4>ten to fifteen twenty twenty five cents down from about

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 4>forty or more than forty cents.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Just over a year ago.

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 4>So that essentially put a lot of pressure on the

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 4>financials of these like the few manufacturers in the US

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 4>that are actually producing and selling modules. So now these manufacturers,

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 4>which include Handwok q sales and for Solar have asked

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 4>the Commerce Department to impose yet another set of terrors.

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 4>These ones dedicated to some to the four Southeast Asian

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 4>countries that sent about seventy five to eighty percent of

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 4>the modules that the US uses to impose new anti

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 4>dumping and kindavailing duties on these countries because they're arguing

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 4>that they're selling modules at a loss essentially in the

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 4>US and that's really making them struggle financially.

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Now I foreshadowed this at the beginning India. We essentially

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>are talking about three different solar markets. So you've got

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the US, You've got India, and then you've got everywhere else,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>which essentially is well the Chinese market. Can you talk

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>about India and how it may be is the same

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or different from what's happening in the US.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, India has been quite an interesting benefactor of the

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 4>different set of US tariffs. So India is probably the

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 4>only country outside of the US that also has a

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 4>let's call it mildly prohibitive amount of tariffs on Chinese

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 4>solar components. So what happened is because of the high

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 4>prices in the US, a lot of those Indian manufacturers.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 4>A lot of the Indian module assembly factories that have

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 4>a higher production structure than in China were able to

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 4>sell to the US AD quite a good profit, and

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 4>not only because of the tariffs, but also because the

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 4>US has essentially banned polasilicon. The key silicon input to

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 4>make solar silicon panels from the Chinese region are Sunxiang.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 4>A lot of the border agents in the US started

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 4>very carefully reviewing and detaining modules from Southeast Asia that

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 4>had essentially a stamp on them saying those modules were

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 4>made by a big Chinese manufacturer. So what happened during

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 4>that time where porter agents were detaining a lot of

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 4>these modules from Chinese companies is the Indian manufacturers were

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 4>able to appeal to module buyers in the US because

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 4>the risk just because of the nature of the origin,

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 4>because it's like quote unquote an Indian module, but essentially

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 4>just meant it's an Indian assembled module. A lot of

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 4>the US module buyers were really interested in buying from

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 4>these Indian manufacturers because the risk of getting detained at

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 4>the border was much much smaller just for the nature

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 4>of those modules coming from India. So Indian manufacturers were

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 4>able to sell modules at really high prices in the

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 4>US because the US module buyers were willing to pay

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 4>that price in order to make sure that the modules

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 4>get delivered on time. However, with the new set of

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 4>tariffs that have been petitioned now, Indian module assembly factories

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 4>that buy most of their cells from Southeast Asia would

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 4>also be affected by the new duties because essentially those

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 4>duties are at the cell level, the cell that is

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 4>being made in Southeast Asia. But there's a few Indian

0:24:55.680 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 4>manufacturers that are quite ambitious, like Ware or Adani, and

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 4>they're also trying to make cells and modules in India

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 4>and they have quite aggressive capacity expansion plans. And those

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 4>manufacturers would really benefit if these new tariffs get approved

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 4>because they would be able to sell to the US

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 4>terror free at quite a high price and make quite

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 4>decent margins.

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 2>And just to add a little bit more context to that,

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 2>because obviously there's this US opportunity for Indian solar companies.

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 2>How big is the Indian solar market itself? So for

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 2>these Indian companies that now have an opportunity to scale

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 2>and they can see an opportunity in the US, how

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>big is that opportunity compared to the domestic opportunity that

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 2>obviously has been sort of ring fenced for them by

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the tariffs in India.

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't have the India solar deployment numbers of

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 4>the top of my head, but there is a concise

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 4>plan by the government and some of these manufacturers to

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 4>supply most of their domestic demand, and some of the

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 4>tariffs that they have on Chinese solar modules and sales

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 4>are quite high and trying to prevent that. But what

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 4>we've seen, what I can say is what we've seen

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 4>over the past couple of years is that the US

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 4>opportunity was more lucrative than the domestic opportunity. So as

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 4>much as they could, some of these Indian manufacturers would

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 4>try to sell to the US because they could sell

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 4>at much higher prices and make more money than just

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 4>selling to local customers.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>The story of solar has been very much defined by

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>falling prices, and they've never been lower than they are

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>now for other parts of the world. So when it

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to these three x more expensive modules in the US,

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what does the future hold for them in terms of prices?

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to get worse before it gets better

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>or are those prices going to start to come down

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>over time as well?

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Well, our analysis show that if the new set

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 4>of tariffs now are approved, module prices in the US

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 4>will be sustainably high, so around the thirty cent of

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 4>what mark versus prices and free markets just plummeting to

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 4>closer to ten cents a lot, so we'd still see

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 4>that big, big, big gap between what you pay in

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 4>the US versus what you pay in the rest of

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 4>the world. There is some encouraging signs from production in

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Southeast Asia getting cheaper and inputs becoming cheaper, namely polosilicon,

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 4>and that could have set some of that tariff impact

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 4>on prices. But if these new set of tariffs pass,

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 4>we think this is going to essentially make modules consistently

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 4>high in the US compared with the rest of the world,

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 4>where we expect modules to fall eventually to about seven

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 4>cents awat by the end of the decade. I don't

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 4>know if I would call it a missed opportunity, but

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 4>before these new duties were petitioned, we were expecting module

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 4>prices in the US to finally fall quite precipitously as

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 4>production costs in Southeast Asia were falling quite rapidly, and

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 4>those benefits were starting to materialize in the economics of

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 4>solar projects and power purchase agreement prices. And now this

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 4>just came at a blow, so essentially like the US.

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 4>Like the US, some of the US developers started to

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 4>feel what it is to see that the prices of

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 4>modules falling, but just for a few seconds before the

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 4>new set of duties word petitioned. So, I guess if

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 4>you learned something, it's it's just hard to be optimistic

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 4>about paying little for mordules despite what you what you

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 4>see somewhere in their horizon is like, is there a

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:26.959
<v Speaker 4>new duty that will come online? So I guess US

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 4>developers cannot date dream about low prices.

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 2>So you are the lead author of our Clean US

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Clean Energy Market Outlook, where we have our sort of

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 2>medium term forecast of wind and solar, and we published

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>an update that to that this month. With all of

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 2>these developments, did we see it? And with everything you've

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 2>just said, did we see a reduction in our forecast

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 2>for US solar build out in the next few years.

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 4>We haven't fully incorporated the effect of the new duties

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 4>just because they have not been approved and technically, as

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 4>a rule, we don't assume anything forecast that isn't official yet.

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Right now, what we assumed is still that the price

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 4>decline that we were expecting before the new duties were petitioned,

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 4>and I guess we would revise our numbers and do

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 4>our analysis if the new tears get petitioned, and critically,

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 4>when we know how high those tears will be, which

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 4>right now we don't know. We think it's going to

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 4>be somewhere in the range of fifteen to fifty percent

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 4>one five to five zero, but it's like no one knows,

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 4>and whoever tries to guess it is probably going to.

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Be wrong, so we're not even going to try.

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 4>The truth is that the US market has grown quite

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 4>rapidly because of the dynamics that we the dynamics between

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 4>high prices and subsidies that we talked at the beginning.

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 4>If module prices remain in the thirty cent per wad range,

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 4>that's not a deal breaker for the US solar market,

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 4>and developers are still going to continue to build projects.

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 4>And the issues really to grow those solar deployment numbers

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 4>are not really input costs. There the bottlenecks to connect

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 4>those projects to the correct. So there's plenty of people

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 4>out there trying to build solar projects irrespective of what

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 4>those module prices are. Surely those marginle prices now skyrocket

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 4>to forty five cents award or the fifty cents award

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 4>because their tariffs are of two hundred and fifty percent,

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 4>and no one's going to buy modules. No one's going

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 4>to sell modules to the US, and certainly deployments are

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 4>going to be affected. But if mogules remain in that

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 4>thirty cents of ward range, which is more or less

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 4>what could happen in that fifteen to fifty percent range

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 4>that I was referring to, then developers will continue with

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 4>their plans and we're going to pretend nothing happened.

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Got it.

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 2>So what I'm hearing from you is that these tariffs

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 2>affect supply chains more than they do the market itself

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 2>because there are other challenges in the market that are predominant.

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 2>So Paul Dana mentioned the way she framed it was

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 2>quite nice, is that the global solar market is the US,

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 2>India and then everyone else, and China very much is

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the almost exclusive supplier to everyone else. So how big

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 2>a deal is it? For the Chinese solar industry that

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 2>there are these defensive moves keeping them out or at

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 2>least creating hurdles to getting to the US market. Does

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 2>it hurt at all?

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 4>The amount of coverage that the US Trade Drama and

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 4>tear of Drama gets is slightly out of proportion to

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 4>the size of the US solar market compared with the

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 4>rest of the world. The size of the US solar

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:37.719
<v Speaker 4>market is probably about right now fifteen percent of global

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 4>annual solar demand. China alone builds over half of the

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 4>solar projects every year at this point, so in terms

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 4>of size, the US is not really that big of

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 4>a market. Some of these big Chinese manufacturers typically sell

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 4>between five to ten gigawatts of modules to the US

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 4>every year. Now they're ramping up and they have some

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 4>of them have more ambitious targets, which is a slight

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 4>proportion of like the tens or even hundreds of gig

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 4>what's worth of sales and modules that they produce every year.

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 3>However, it's so overblown.

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 4>It's such a big deal because, as Geny Chase likes

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 4>to say, no one makes money in making solar panels

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 4>and solar components. However, the US has been the long

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 4>lasting exception to that where manufacturers are able to make

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 4>margins that are above twenty percent thirty percent in some cases.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 4>So it's really the only lucrative market for most of

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 4>these manufacturers or all of these manufacturers to sell into,

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 4>which is why they are so heavily involved and invested

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 4>in the US market and have been able and have

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 4>essentially agreed to pursue all of these topics intensive investments

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 4>outside of China in order to be able to earn

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 4>those high margins.

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 2>It's really funny. It reminds me of like one of

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 2>those Sci Fi opponents. So if the Chinese solar manufacturers

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 2>are like who the US is trying to battle, it's

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 2>like whatever you throw at them, they kind of make

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 2>them even stronger. So you try and put these tariffs

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 2>in place, and these companies that weren't making money anywhere

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 2>suddenly have an opportunity to profit. Another thing that is

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 2>a big deal thing of this is you know we

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 2>can analyze, oh this helps or this doesn't help, or

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 2>you know this is effective or it isn't effective, and

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, we can be wrong or we can be right.

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 2>But one thing is for sure is that all of

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 2>this creates uncertainty, and one of the big uncertainties potentially

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 2>is this idea that there might be retroactive tariffs. So

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 2>how does that affect the market, and how does it

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 2>affect adjacent industries like you know, our producer can was

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 2>mentioning Dak that might want to benefit from from solar installations.

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that the real challenge here. It sounds like everyone involved,

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 2>both in the US and in China can adapt to

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 2>whatever happens, but they can't adapt to not knowing what

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 2>is going to happen.

0:33:55.280 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 4>I would just slightly clarify and say, rather than retroactive tariffs,

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 4>which makes it sound like there's another set of tariffs

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 4>from the ones that we're talking about, I would rather

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 4>say these tariffs have potential to be retroactive too. And

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 4>that certainly is the biggest uncertainty when it comes to

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 4>understanding how to price in the potential of tariffs into

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.919
<v Speaker 4>negotiations when you try to buy or sell modules. And

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 4>the risk was quite acute at the beginning of the

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 4>tariff petition that was implemented in twenty twenty two, and

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:29.439
<v Speaker 4>it's going to come into effect now in June twenty

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty four.

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 3>But Biden.

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Essentially, the White House and the Biden's administration gave the

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 4>guarantee to developers that they could buy modules tear free

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 4>until June twenty twenty four and install those panels by

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 4>December twenty twenty four. However, now we know there's potential

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 4>for some of those for the new duties have approved

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 4>to be retroactive. We just don't know for sure how

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 4>far back those tariffs are going to go. So that

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 4>certainly creates a lot of uncertainty because now you not

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 4>only do you have to make guesses or estimate how

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.280
<v Speaker 4>how those tarffs could be, you also have to estimate

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 4>when those tariffs actually will apply and if those tears

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 4>will apply to modules that have already bought or mean as.

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 3>A supplier that I've already shipped to the US.

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 4>So that's creating a lot of uncertainty and how negotiations

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 4>for twenty twenty five module deliveries are happening. Generally, what

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 4>happens quite simply is that suppliers have to raise prices

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 4>and whatever that premium is that they agree on with

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 4>the buyer as to like, how do we price in

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 4>this tear risk? Is that a five cents for what

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 4>premium is that a ten cents a WAT premium? Is

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 4>that what two cents of WAT premium? I guess relies

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 4>on how those individual negotiations go. But as you know,

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure you can imagine if you're at the table

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 4>trying to figure these things out when actually signing a

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 4>document and for something that you're going to pay a

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 4>lot of money for, then it makes it highly stressful

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 4>and complicated.

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 3>And this shouldn't be that complicated.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 4>You just buy a component, install on the ground or

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 4>a roof, and now you're creating all of this uncertainty

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 4>around that transaction that makes the whole process much more

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 4>complicated and more expensive because you're going to start to

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 4>suddenly involve lawyers or advisors or accountants to buy a

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 4>component that should be quite straightforward. Imagine now you had

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 4>to always hire a CPA or an accountant to buy

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 4>a new fridge because you don't know if maybe like

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 4>that Siemens or GE is going to charge you like

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent more or twenty five percent more, and it's

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 4>worth for you to pay like a five thousand dollars

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 4>or like one thousand dollars to an accountant around the

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 4>block to tell you, actually you should tell them to

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 4>charge you only five percent more because the terror risk

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 4>is not as high as they as they're trying to

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 4>convince you.

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's the complexity it brings that is maybe

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 2>the challenge.

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Correct Solar is certainly an important element of the energy

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>transition and creating this renewable energy and an electrified part

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>of the energy economy. So I certainly hope that the

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>US will be able to figure out a way to

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>make this economic and we will see what the future holds. Paul,

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining today and sharing your views.

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>And Tom, it's been great having a co host, so

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to hopefully you joining me back here

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>again sometime soon. Today's episode of Switched On was produced

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>by Cam Gray with production assistance from Kamala Shelling. Bloomberg

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>NIF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor should it

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be construed as investment advice, investment recommendations, or a recommendation

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg ANIF should

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not be considered as information sufficient upon which to base

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP, nor any of

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>its affiliates makes any representation or warranty as to the

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this recording,

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and any liability as a result of this recording is

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>expressly disclaimed