WEBVTT - What Is A Tachyon?

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, do particle physicists ever make mistakes? Oh yeah,

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>all the time. One time I ordered licorice ice cream,

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:18.159
<v Speaker 1>big mistake. I once had garlic ice cream that was

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>That was probably a bigger mistake. Do you know they

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>make garlic ice cream? Yeah, they have pretty experimental flavors,

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>sometimes with ice creams. What I mean is, have physicists

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>ever written papers that, like scientific papers that turn out

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to be wrong? You know, it does happen. The most

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.599
<v Speaker 1>famous example comes from the Maybe the Opera experiment, which

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eleven claimed to have measured neutrinos going

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>faster than the speed of light. Wow. Turns out they

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>just had a cable loose, and when they jiggled it,

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>all the numbers got back into sink and everything was

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>traveling happily less than the speed of light. Oh man,

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>particles can't travel faster than light. Probably not. But you know,

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>if particles could travel fast in the speed of light,

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>physicist are already set up with an awesome name for them.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, they have a good name for this far

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>faster than light particles. They called the garlic kino or

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the liquor on um linker. That's like a terrible pun

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like a not safe for work pun him and I'm

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and welcome to our podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the Universe, a production of I Heart Radio in which

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we take the universe and explain everything in it to you,

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>including things which might not be possible that's right, thanks

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>with that are tasteful and nice, and things that are

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little tacky, things which stretch the boundaries of understanding,

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>things which might even break the laws of physics themselves.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>To be on the pro graam we're going to talk

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>about take eons. Are they real? What are they? Are

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they really tacky? What are they on? Who taught them

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>their sense of style exactly? Um Tacons are a fascinating

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>concept because, first of all, theoret from the theoretical physics

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 1>point of view, they're interesting, like the idea for a

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>tachion is a particle that travels faster than the speed

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of light, and so that already is like immediately arresting,

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>like is it possible? How would that work? What would

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>it mean? Right? But they also exist in science fiction.

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is a particle that it exists in the

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>minds of physicists, but we don't know if it exists

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>in the real world. Yeah, exactly, And it's the really

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting history sort of of the idea. There was a

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>short story written by somebody in which they had particles

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>going faster than the speed of light. So it started

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in science fiction, and then there was a physicist that

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>read that story and thought, could you do that? Would

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that be possible? And sat down and sort of worked

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>out the mathematics of it, and then gave it a name,

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>called it attack eon Um. And then more science fiction

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>writers heard about that and thought, oh, well, this must

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>be a real thing now, And now it's like everywhere

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and science fiction and we heard attack eons everywhere. It's

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like a cosmic bad case of telephone exactly exactly, just

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of an idea of bouncing around, and you know

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>there must be something really to it. If it's really

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>resonating in the minds of physicists and science fiction authors,

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's something tantalizing, something exciting, something people want

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to be true, right, because it it would expand our

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of what's possible in the universe, right, yeah, Or

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it would expand the plot options available to science fiction authors. Right.

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>If you can send particles fast in the speed of

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>light and backwards in time and all sorts of stuff.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Then there's lots of things you can do with your plots.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right. If you follow the laws of physics, all

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>science fiction would be pretty boring. Right, that's right. You

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>know everything in the first scene. You can predict the

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>whole story. Right. Actually, I feel like a lot of

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>science fics is like that. You read one chapter, you

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>know the whole story. You know the whole story. Yeah.

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Did this writer come up with the name for the

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>tacon or was it the physicists who read this story? No,

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it was the physicist. Um. So the story was written

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>by a guy named Blish and the story is called Beep.

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Involves like messages from aliens that come in. At the

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>end of every message, there's a beep and it turns

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the beep and codes like all future messages

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Oops, I just spoiled the story for everybody anyway, um,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because parts of the message traveled fast in the speed

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of light. And so then the physicists read the story

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and came up with it in a n paper of

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>this physicist named Gerald Feinberg, and so he coined the name.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Take on as far as I eroners did. But you

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>know now it's everywhere. It's in the pop culture, everywhere

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you turn. Yeah, he should have named after the author

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The Blisson, I think catch on quite as much or

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the Beeps. No, but you know, I read about the

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>tacons because they're part of the integral part of the

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>plot of one of my favorite comic books and in fact,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous comic books of all time.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>What is Jorge's favorite comic book? I'm dying to know.

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorites. Is it you can throw banana

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.559
<v Speaker 1>peels from the tips of his fingers and make anybody slip.

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a liquorice lady, lady. Wow, there's so many not

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>safer work jokes that can make about the curse lady. Yeah,

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll they'll need to be peeped out. Um exactly. Um,

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So tell me what is your favorite comic book. One

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite comic books, and that, uh is one

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of the most famous comic books of all time is Watchman?

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen the comic book or the graphic novel

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>or the movie. I have read the graphic novel and

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I have seen all eleven hours of the movie, all

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>different versions, all the slow emotion scenes that Zack Snyder added. Yeah, yeah, no,

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I love Mr Tomic who can basically do anything at

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the end of the movie, so all plots can just

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be resolved by Mr Atomic if necessary, Mr Dr Manhattan

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>with his name document professor at I like your version better,

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Mr Atomic. That sounds that sounds better. Now it's a

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Manhattan or Mr Manhattan. I think Dr Manhattan And um, yeah,

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>so he can see Tacon, so that that's kind of

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>how he can and he sort of exists in this

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of quantum you know, uncertainty space time kind of mindset,

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>so he can see the future, see the past, he

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>sees it all sort of at the same time. Um.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>And so that's how the villain in the comic book

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to spoil it kind of gets around

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is he confuses Dr Manhattan by adding a lot of

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>take on interference and so he can't take the future

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't know what's going to happen. M Very clever, Yes,

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>very clever. Um. You also see taggons a lot in

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek. I noticed as like take on I pulses,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>tactionic fields and all sorts of stuff. Anytime they need

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to go back in time or send messages back in

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>time or whatever they're They're always using tacons, right, They

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.119
<v Speaker 1>just always sort of forget to say that these things

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>are not real. Well, you know, they're real in the

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek universe. I suppose they don't really play with

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>all the consequences. You know, if you really did have takions,

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things would break about modern physics. Um,

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had a bit of a tachyonic experience today. Actually,

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that just reminds me. I went to file some paperwork

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for my student who just defended his PhD, and he

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't in town, so he couldn't file it himself. So

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I went to this office in the basement and turned

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in these forms, and the woman at the desk must

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>have thought that it was my PhD, because when I

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>turned the forum, she reached out she said congratulations, as

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>if I was getting my PhD. At this moment, I thought, wow,

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, maybe I went back in time and now

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I looked like I'm twenty seven again. Or maybe she

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't wearing her glasses. That's another It was a pretty

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>dark basement, so I can excuse her. It's in the basement,

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it's in the basement, but his thesis was not on

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>take on. So, but actually we don't know if they're

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>real or not, right like we do. It's a theoretical possibility,

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but we have no confirmation. Do we have confirmation that

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they can exist. We do not know that they cannot exist. Right.

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's a pretty broad caveat because in general, it's

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>really hard to prove the non existence of something. And

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you can always say with an asterisk, like if all

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we know about physics turns out to be wrong or

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a special case of the unit part of the universe

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we're living in, than anything could happen. Right, So in

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>general it's pretty hard to say with a very with

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>absolute certainty, something cannot exist. But you can say, and

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into this more more deeply, that would be

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard to full take eons into our modern understanding

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of physics, right, maybe harder than choking down a whole

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>scoop of licorice ice cream more impleasant than you really

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>wish you would you could go back in time, you know.

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>The The joke is, my wife actually loves licorice ice cream,

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and one time we went to an ice cream place

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and she ordered to scoop to the licorice ice cream

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and I saw her eating her deliciously. She didn't tell

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>me what it was, and I tried to take a

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>bite out of it, and it literally like jumped out

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of my mouth. It was impulsive. Wow, ejected itself from

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>my mouth. That's like your your kryptonite or your taon interference. Yeah,

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, actually there's lots of things can defeat me.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>But one of them on the long list is a

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>licorice ice cream. Yes, one of them upsets your stomach, yeah,

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>or my tongue. Well, attacks is. It's kind of a

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>cool name. First of all, take eons and but and

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>we know that it's in science fiction a lot. It's

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in comic books and science fictions in science fiction. But

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we were wondering how many people out there knew what

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it means and what it refers to it. So I

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>went around the U c ir on campus and I

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>accosted random students and said, hey, would you answer a

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>random zience question? And all of them said yes, And

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>so I asked them about take eons and here's what

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they had to say. Have you ever heard of attack on?

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You know what attack on is? What's your best guess

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a particle which gets admitted from a backle is

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that it I would assume it has something to do

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>with uh space, space, Okay, I have no idea. Okay,

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>not yet. I haven't heard of it, Okay. I've also

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>heard it in a TV show. I think it's in

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the Flash. I think they talk about that, But I

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it is. That sounds cool? Sound cool? No,

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea, okay, oh, no, attack on. I

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it is, but it sounds like something chemical,

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>something from Star Trek. That's literally, as far as my

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>knowledge goes. I'm not actually sure if it's even real

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or not. It could be entirely from science fiction as

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>far as i'm more. Alright, not a single positive answer,

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Not a single positive answer. A lot of people have

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>heard of it, right, Some well, I've never heard of it,

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>but some people heard of it in the context of

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>science fiction or Star Trek or this kind of stuff. Oh,

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Flash, right, I think they have it in

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the TV show with the Flash. Yeah, the Flash must

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have it right, because he breaks all sorts of laws

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of physics. It's basically the laws of physics break particle

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>right anytime you need to break physics just and start

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>some taions. She just called the plot hole on the plot.

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, it's like filling a pothole, right with

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>phil potholes with take eons, filled plot holes with takes. Yeah,

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's done. Not not a common name that people

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are familiar with. Um, So let's break it down, Daniel.

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take a quick break. Let's start with this.

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>What is a tacon alright? So takeon is a theoretical particle, right,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>it's an idea. It's idea for a particle that can

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>travel faster than the speed of light. Right, And remember,

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in relativity we say nothing can travel faster than the

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>speed of light. We say things that have mass can

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>travel less than the speed of light. Thing and approach it.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Things with no mass, like photons, they travel always at

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light. Right, this, so there's the speed

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>limit to the universe, the speed of light in a vacuum.

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Tachons are like, what if something could break that? What

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>if something could move faster than the speed of light?

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>How would that work? And what should we call it?

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's what a tachian is. I like, how that's

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the second most important question about it, not how dis

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>revolutionize our understanding on our ability to travel the costumers,

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like, what are we going to call it? Oh? Yeah,

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>there's big fights over the names of stuff, right. You know,

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>if you come up with a cool idea, you gotta

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>name it so it sticks right and you get the

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>credit for it. You know. This is that famous case

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in particle physics where two groups discovered the same particle

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on the same day and gave it different names right

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the same day, the same day. Yeah, there's a whole

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun whisper stories about how maybe grad students

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>in one group tipped off grad students in the other group. Anyway,

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>they named it on the same day, and they gave

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it two different names. As so now we call that

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 1>particle the j sside particle. We use both names because

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>nobody can agree, right, really, people, you guys have fights

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>about this, Like I wanted to be called J No,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to be called side. Like, well, I think

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>it is personal with the guy who called it j.

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>He's Chinese, and I think jay Is looks like the

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Chinese character for his name, so I think he's basically

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>naming it after himself. But now these are like the

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>kids of divorced parents, you know, end up with the long,

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>complicated names anyway. Yes, so naming things very important, and

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>as you and I have discussed many times in this podcast,

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>physicists don't always do a great job of naming things.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Like sometimes they don't even come up with a new name.

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>They're just like, use a word that already exists in

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>English that means something else to describe some physics thing, right, Like,

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we have particles that have flavor and color, and like

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>part don't have actual flavor and color, so we should

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have come up with different words. So in this case,

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's awesome that they actually came up with

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>a new, cool sounding word. Yeah. I think if you

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>discover a quark, Daniel, you should call it a new

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>flavor licorate, the disgusting quirks, the revolting quirks, the vomit quirks.

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>It turns out vomit is made a little vomit on particles. Technically,

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that's true, Yeah, if you write it in a physics paper, right,

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So um, but it's always fun theoretically to think about,

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like how could this work? What would it mean if

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we took the laws of special relativity and try to

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>use them to describe something going faster than the speed

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of light. What would happen? What exactly would break? How

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>could we tested? That's sort of the point of attacking.

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So it starts with a hypothesis like what if one

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of these particles could go faster than like, what would

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it look like? Yes, exactly exactly what would it look like?

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>How do we see it? Could you like break two

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>things at one so that in the end it's not broken, right, Like,

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you have to break one law of physics and

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that has a consequence somewhere else, and you're like, Okay,

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>well maybe I'll just break that one also, and then

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>things will be honky dory. Right. So sometimes you can

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>make big discoveries by breaking two things at once. Right,

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you can reveal that there were two mistakes to misunderstandings

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we had about the universe. That would be like two

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prizes in one afternoon, two wrongs making it right. Yeah,

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And so that's actually sort of happens here. Um. And

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>so as you folks listening might know. The interesting idea

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and relativity. One of the core ideas and relativity is

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that you can have infinite amount of energy. There's no

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>limit on the energy of particle can have or you

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>can keep pouring energy into a particle, but there is

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a limit on speed. Right. So for example the Large

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Hadron Collider, we push particles using little waves, so they

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>surf and they get more and more energy, but then

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they approach the speed of light and they never really

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>get faster. That doesn't limit us from adding more energy

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to the particles, right, It's kind of like an infinite

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>bucket almost, like you can keep pouring energy into it,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>but the speed just won't won't go over the speed

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of light. Yeah, and if you're a visual person, you

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>can think of sort of a graph. Right. Our basic

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>idea of the relationship between speed and energy is that

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they're they're directly connected. Right. Um, as you go faster,

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you get more energy, and that's true, but then as

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you approach the speed of light, it sort of bends

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>over and asymptotically approaches the speed of light. So you

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>can keep pouring energy in, but the speed never goes higher.

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's this mathematical relationship. You can write it down

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and you can look at it on Wikipedia. Um, you know,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>involves this complicated expression. It's like energy is mass squared

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>over the square root of one minus v squared over

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>C squared. And that's mathematically how you get that expression.

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>The cool thing is you can say, all right, well,

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>what happens if you just plug in velocity is twice

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light? What happens mathematically? What does that mean? Oh?

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I see, like, what have you um cross over that line?

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>What have you assume that you filled the bucket and

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>went over? Yeah, exactly, And you know it's just playing around.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>This is what theoretical physicist due for fun. They're like,

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>let's poke these equations and see what happens. And so

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it does get interesting because on the bottom of the

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>equation um it gets the number inside the square root

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 1>goes negative. Right, so you have like the square root

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of a negative number. And you're probably thinking, what you

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>can't have the square rod of a negative number, right,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Like what number when you multiplied by itself, gives you

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>negative two? Right, Well, there's no real number. You have

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to go to imaginary numbers, which means that this particle

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is imaginary or it has imaginary mass. Well, it means

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it has imaginary energy, right, because the expression is energy

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>is basically mass over this crazy velocity term. If the

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>velocity term goes, it goes imaginary. Then the energy goes imaginary,

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, what what does that mean? So this

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is what I mean by breaking two things. So then

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>physicist thought, okay, well what if we make the top

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the equation also in imaginary. So we make

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the mass imaginary. Then you have velocity grid in the

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, imaginary mass, but real energy like actual energy.

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you just say that this particle has imaginary mass,

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 1>and let's get into what that means. But if you

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>say that it has imaginary mass, then the laws of

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>physics technically don't break. If this particle goes faster than

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>might well, if I don't know that, the loss of

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>physics don't break. We can talk about that a little later.

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>It turns out they break other things also. But this

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>one equation does hold, right, This equation for the relationship

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially between energy and speed does hold. But yeah, it

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>requires you to have imaginary mass, and it also means

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>for other really weird things. For normal particles, as the

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>velocity increases, the energy increases, right Right In this case,

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the equation, as the speed goes up,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the energy actually goes to zero. So the faster it goes,

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the less energy it has. That's pretty weird, yeah, because

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>everything in nature wants to have low energy. So that

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>means this particle will just keep going faster and faster

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and faster to infinity exactly. So as it goes to

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>zero energy, it has infinite speed. Like what does that

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.239
<v Speaker 1>even mean? You know, now you have a particle like

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>infinite speed and imaginary mass but no energy. Right, it's

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty weird thing. But technically maybe could exist. Technically maybe

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>could exist. Right, There's some causality issues we'll talk about

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a little later, but that's sort of the concept. Like,

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the idea of attacking on and it's a fun

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>thing to play with theoretically, And you know this, before

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you think this is a waste of time, remember this

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is how progress is made. You know. This is how,

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, antiparticles were discovered. People were looking at the

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>equations and they were like, what if you flip the

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>sign of this and flip the sign of that. Look

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>looks like this equation would also hold for opposite charge particles.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if they exist. Let's go look, and they

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>did exist and they do exist. Yeah, this is a

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>rich source of searching around for the corners of the

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>equations and seeing they describe some actual physics that might

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>be real that we just hadn't imagined, because there's a

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of crazy stuff out there in the universe that

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>we haven't conceived of. Well, it's kind of a philosophical

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>thing because it's it's you sort of saying that anything

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that can exist mathematically so far we think has existed,

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>right Like, if the equations say that this is possible

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't break everything else, then you keep searching, you

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of so far you sort of you found it. Yeah,

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a subtle point, right. Sometimes we have mathematical descriptions

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>of things and then we look at the mathematics, were like,

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>well the math says that, but physics says no. Right, Like,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes a mathematical equation will have two solutions and one

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of them will be nonsense, and you say, well, that's

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>not physical, so we'll ignore it. But yeah, then you

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder is it really is that? Are we

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>doing science there? Are we just sort of like enforcing

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>our um prejudices, right? Should we be more open minded

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and explore all the possibilities of the math? And sometimes

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the math is all we have, like, look at quantum mechanics.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't even apply your intuition. You just have to

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>blindly follow the math and say, well, quantum mechanics says

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>a particle can appear on one side of the barrier

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and then appear on the other side of the barrier

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>without passing through it. So and then we do the

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>experiments and it happens, right, So sometimes you just have

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to follow the math. Yeah, you're saying, sometimes you have

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of open minded and say, hey, what

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>if mass could be imaginary and let's see what happens. Then, Yes,

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly that's the whole point, right, That's why you

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>poke these equations, because it could just be our prejudice.

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>It could be that the way we're thinking about the

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 1>universe is determined by the way we have experienced it,

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>which is, we know, not typical and not fundamental. Right,

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So we don't want to be um have our eyes

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>closed because of the biases and the way we have

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>lived and grown up, right, So we want to keep

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>our eyes open, and sometimes the math is a very

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>helpful guide. We'll have a great money making scheme for you, Daniel.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>It's called the takeon diet makes your math imaginary. Gee,

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I imagined you were fat, but I guess that was wrong.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>You just had the wrong perspective in physics. Yeah, well,

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>what what's the diet? Run fast in the speed of

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>light and you'll lose weight. I think it's it's go

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>back in time and stop yourself from eating all that

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>liquors ice cream? Is you know, we're recording this podcast

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on pie day, so we should have done all these

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>examples with pie instead of ice cream. Liquor liquorice pie.

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That sounds even more gross than the gurors ice cream,

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>if that's even possible. Here, let's go back in time

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>using tacons and start over and replace search and replace

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>ice cream with pie. But hey, pie and ice cream

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>go well together, So we'll start with ice cream and

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll switch over to pie and then the episode will

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:43.239
<v Speaker 1>be like ala mode. Yeah, they go well together. So um,

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>so let's get into what they actually might look like.

0:22:46.320 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take a quick break, all right, Daniel.

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's attack on. It's a theoretical particle with imaginary

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>mass that can go faster on the speed of light.

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So what what does that even look like? What would

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the attack on look like, what could we interact with it? Yeah,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>here's where it gets really fun is you start to think,

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>how could we see take eons? What experiments could you

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>build to detect them? Right? And um, we think take eons.

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>You know they have mass though it's imaginary, um, and

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we think we could interact with them. We don't know

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>what kind of interactions they might have, but imagine that

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they're visible, right, that they interact with light, then you

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.719
<v Speaker 1>can think about like doing an experiment to look at

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.719
<v Speaker 1>a tack eon. This already gets really tricky because the

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>tagions are moving faster than the light they might be emitting.

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>So you know how like an airplane moving through the

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>air creates a sonic boom because it's moving faster than

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the sound it makes right, Right, That means that you

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>can't hear the airplane coming. Right, one of those airplanes

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>is coming at you, then you're not gonna hear it

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>coming because the sound it's making is trailing behind it,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so you it would just magically appear to you. Yeah.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 1>So it's the same thing for attacking on. Right, If

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>attack on is moving and it's moving faster than the

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>speed of light and it's coming right at you, you

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't see it until it's on top of you, right,

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>it would It would just appear to you. That's just

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>bad manners. I mean, that's just tacky. You know, it's

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>tacky and it's on you. That must have been how

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they got the name attacking and I spilled my liquorice

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>pie all over my suit. Let's just show up at

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy's house and be like, is this why you

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>came up with the name have some Pie? Yeah? In fact,

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact, you would see the tacky on But even

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:44.239
<v Speaker 1>weirder than it just appearing all of a sudden, is

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>it would look like it's going away from you. What. Yeah,

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>when you see something moving away from you, what you're

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>really seeing are a bunch of time slices. Right, you

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>see it's closer to you. Now, it's a little further

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>away from you. A moment later, it's a little further

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>away from you a moment after a Right, that's the

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>order of arrival of images from tachyons. You would first

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>see the photons that are that it admitted when it

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>was close to you, before you saw the photons that

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it admitted when it was far from you. Exactly exactly so,

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>if you play that movie. Your brains gonna be like, oh,

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>there's attacking on moving away from you, right, So attacking on.

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>If you see attacking on moving away from you, it

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>means you just got hit by attacking on. But you

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>would see it, so you would see it. You you

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>almost see it moving backwards and in time, right, like, yeah, exactly,

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you see it moving the reverse direction. It's actually going mm.

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>So that's weird. That's pretty weird, right. It's weird for

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>particles to look like they're going different speeds if they're

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>coming towards you or going away from you. Right. We're

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>just not used to that, and that's because of this

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>weird feature that they travel faster than the information that

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they're sending. Right. Well, that that's kind of one of

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why physicists don't think you can even go

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>faster than the speed flight because it would just be

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>so weird. Yeah, exactly, would break a lot of rules.

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>But you know, sometimes things are weird, and being weird

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean that they're wrong, you know. I think

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the really fascinating things is this question of

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>imaginary mass that we mentioned earlier, Like, I'm still what

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? Well, what does it mean, right, And

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:17.959
<v Speaker 1>you have to think for a moment about what we

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>mean by a particle's mass. When we say, you know,

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.719
<v Speaker 1>electron has a certain mass, what we mean is that

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the particles is stable, like exists, it could hang out

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for a little while. And um, we just did that

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>episode about what particles are and turns out particles are

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>not like the building block of the universe at all.

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>They're just excited states of quantum fields. Right, So what

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>is a particle of of a certain mass. It's a

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>stable excitation of a quantum field, meaning there's this weird

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 1>jelly out there that knows how to wiggle, and it

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>can wiggle in a certain way that sticks around for

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a while. Mass is kind of a marker of how

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>stable the wiggles are. Yeah, exactly. So if you talk

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>about a particle with imaginary mass, you're talking about strange

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>wiggles going through this these quantum fields. Right, These jellies

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>um wiggling in a weird way and not in a

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>way that's stable. Right. Imaginary mass does not mean it's

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a stable particle. It means it's something else. And you're

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to describe it in terms of a particle and

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so you get a weird answer. You know. It's like

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like if you use the language of one thing

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to try to describe something else, it doesn't really make sense,

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. So it's almost like we can we have

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to stop using the word particle and just say wiggles

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in a quantum field. And if you just stop calling

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>it a particle and just call everything wiggles in a

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>quantum field, then you could technically have a wiggle that

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>has imaginary mass. Yeah, exactly right, And it breaks your

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.719
<v Speaker 1>idea of what a particle is. But anyway, what's your

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of a particle is. It's probably wrong anyway, so

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>feel free to break it all, smash it all the heck,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, just using the word particle. Yeah, well, it's true.

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, particles are not fundamental, right, They are an

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>emergent phenomena. They come from how wantum fields wiggle? And

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't know quantum fields are fundamental either or there's

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>something else that makes them. But we do know the

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>particles themselves are not fundamental because you know, they can

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>be created and disappear. So tachons are like a weird

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 1>different way for quantum fields to wiggle and that's what

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>imaginary mass is. It's this. It's a sort of a

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:21.959
<v Speaker 1>breakdown of trying to describe quantum fields in terms of particles. Right,

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's saying you should look at this in a different way.

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But but it could technically exist, like what these fields

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>could wiggle in that way? I don't think so. And

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and the reason is that if you had take eons,

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>then these fields could wiggle in a way that breaks causality. Right,

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And so this is physics, right. The math says, it's fine.

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>The maths is, there's no problem with it. You can

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>incorporate this into special relativity. You get these weird things

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>like zero energy and infinite speed. But you know, the

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>math is happy with it. Physics says no. Physics says,

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.959
<v Speaker 1>but we have these other rules, these other rules, like

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>causes happen before effects. You know, messages have to arrive

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>after their scent, not before. Right. You have to be

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>born after your grandfather, not before this kind of stuff.

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>We impose these requirements on the universe and on the

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics separately. Right, But why why does the

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>universe have to follow causality? Couldn't we, like you said,

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be open minded and imagine a universe that is not causal. Yeah,

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I suppose we could, but it's sort of hard to

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>logically argue for a non causal universe because logic imply

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>requires causality. Right, Well, I feel like you're saying logic

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>requires logic, but what if yes, maybe the universe is

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>not logical. Yeah, so you're saying, like, could we describe

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>could we have laws of physics to describe a universe

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have laws? But I don't know how to

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>do that. It's so fundamental to the way we think.

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's fundamental to the way humanity thinks, not even just

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>about physics. You know, I think that we are storytellers.

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>We weave all of our experiences into stories, and that's

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>how we remember things and forget things and communicate to

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>each other. That's how we build models of the world

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that are that's outside our head. And stories are causal

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>right there, and they're a narrative that I did this,

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and then this happened. I shot this laser beam and

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>then you know, uh this the wall burned down or whatever, right,

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the korish ice cream, and then I threw up right

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>this cause and effect. So you can write stories, I

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>mean science fiction you can write stories that that have

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>tagowns in them. Do you know what I mean? Like,

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you can if you can imagine it, story breaks the story. Right,

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge plot hole. That's why I hate time

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>travel in science fiction because it breaks causality. Right, it

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense. Okay, well let's break it that.

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean? Like, if this particle existed and

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it can go faster than light, what are some of

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the things cool things you could do with it? Right? So,

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in special relativity, if you have something that goes faster

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>than light, what it means is you can break causality.

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>You can kind of go backwards in time. Now, Remember

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we talked about special relatively down another episode, and something

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we talked about is how there's no universal description of

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>how things happen. Right If um, for example, if I

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>shoot UM two laser beams, one to the left and

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>one to the right, and I'm just looking at both,

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I can say, okay, they two laser beams hit the

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>targets at the same time because the target is the

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>same distance away. Somebody else with a different speed might

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>see those events happening at different times. They might say,

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>oh uh, laser beam one hit before laser beam two,

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and somebody else that a dafferent speed might see laser

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>beam two happened before laser beam one. Right, So if

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you can change so you can change the order in

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>which you see things happening based on your speed. That

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just tells you there's no absolute truth to the universe, right, right, Okay,

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>but those things are not causally linked. Right, It doesn't

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>really matter if if laser beam one hits or laser

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>beam two hits. But what if you just had the

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>one laser beam and you press the button? Right? Can

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the laser beam arrive before it leaves? Right? Can laserbeam

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>hit the target before you prey the button? Those two

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>things are costly linked, right, It seems impossible for it

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to get there before you press the button. Well, it's

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>constantly linked. If you go backwards in time, do you

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? Like it arrived because in the

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>future I'm going to press the button. Yeah, But what

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if it arrives and then you change your mind, You're like,

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm not going to hit that laser

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>beam button right now, but it's already arrived. But if

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:21.479
<v Speaker 1>you change your mind, that means you didn't see it

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>do it. I feel like this is a like. You

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>can pick it a different movie to go with your theory.

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>There's the movies that they're not alright, find graphic novels.

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>That's really no like. Seriously, the laser beam arrives and

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>if later you still have a choice to make about

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>whether to press that button, then you could choose not

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to fire the laser beam right and then, But the

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>laser beams already arrived, So how does that work? Anyway?

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>The point is multiverse. Point is the relativity covers that.

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Relativity says that for events that are not causantly linked,

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>or one could happen before the other, you can travel

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>fast enough if you want that you could see either

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>one happen first. But for things that are causally connected,

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>where one has to happen before the other, like pressing

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a button on your laser and then hitting the target,

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no speed you can go to see the laser

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>arrive before you press the button. To do that, you

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>would have to go faster than the speed of light

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to reverse the order of events, and relativity says you can't.

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But what if there wasn't the speed limit? Right? What

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>if you could shoot particles fasten the speed of light. Well,

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>then you could go fast enough so that messages could

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>arrive before their scent. Right, laser beams could hit the

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>targets before you press the button if you go fast

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.719
<v Speaker 1>in the speed of light, so it breaks causality if

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the light goes faster than the speed of light, or

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>if you send a message video TA, if you send

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a message via taions, Yeah, exactly, Okay, so take eons.

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>If they can travel fasten the speed of light can

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of reverse the events, reverse orders of events, so

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that effects happen before causes, right, which is pretty which

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is pretty cool. It would be pretty cool. Sure. Yeah,

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, like, hey, I already ate that pie. Now

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to go back in time and decided not

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to eat that pie. Then you could have eaten the

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>pie and have decided not to eat the pie, and yeah,

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it would break the universe, but at least it wouldn't

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>gain those five pounds that would That would be kind

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of tacky though, if you did that at a restaurant,

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>not if it's liquorice pie, then I totally endorsed just

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>breaking the universe to avoid eating it. So it's almost

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.919
<v Speaker 1>like an anti telephone like it. It sends you sends

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>your message before you even think about sending the message. Yes, exactly,

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's what it's called. It's called a tachonic anti telephone. Exactly.

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>If you had tacons, you could use them to build

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a telephone that sent messages back in time exactly that way.

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what I should tell my kids. It's not that

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't want them to play with my phone, it's

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just that we're an anti telephone. It's an anti telephone.

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't bring it near a telephone. It'll blow up. So

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you're basically saying that tacoons are are kind of impossible

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>because it would break the logic of the universe. Yeah,

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And I mean if you hold causality be a fundamental

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>principle of the universe, which I do, then it's pretty

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to believe that anything could go fast in the

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>speed of light. But the math says tachyons could exist,

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's possible that we're wrong about causality. That it's

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>just it's a prejudice that we've imposed on the universe

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's the way we think, and maybe the universe

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't operate the way we think. Totally possible happened lots

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of times in physics that we've up ended our basic

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the universe, right, and then I've been confronted

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>by reality. Yeah, all right, Well that was cool to

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>learn what attacking is and how it's an imaginary or

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it has imaginary maths and it's theoretically possible but not likely.

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And uh dennity idea of closing this episode with a limerick. Yeah.

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I was doing some research about tacking once and I

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 1>found this hilarious physics poem. Right, It's not that often

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 1>that you find physics and humor and poetry altogether, and

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>so I thought, let's jump on the opportunity. Right, subgenre

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>science fiction. Not many authors specialized in this area, but

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>there is one. This is by a gentleman named Reginald Buller,

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and it goes like this. There was a young lady

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 1>named Bright whose speed was far faster than light. She

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 1>went out one day in a relative way and returned

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the previous night. So there is your physics poetry. I

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>noticed you didn't laugh. Well, I was just hunging up

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on that first line. Um, her name is Bright. That

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a like a plot hole to me. I see, mr.

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>The universe follows the laws of television shows and movies

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is now criticizing the physics poetry for not being accurate. Yeah,

0:36:57.520 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know how many? How many people do you know

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>are called right? Anyways, I'm actually a member of an

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>organization called the Brights. I don't know what to do

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>with that. I'm not joking. Um alright, So thanks to

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone for listening to this non tacky episode about a

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>tack eons, for bending your mind a little bit. And

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>remember that some of those crazy ideas that are in

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>physics his head and science fiction authors are writing about

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 1>they could actually be real, and one day we might

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>discover that the universe is far far stranger than we

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ever imagined. Yeah, and if one day you do discover Takeons,

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>why don't you send a message to yourself backwards of

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>time and let us know such right here, we could

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>do a test right now, right in the future, somebody,

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody discovers take On, send us a message to arrive

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>right now. Wait, hold on, I just got a call.

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait here we go, let me let me pick it up.

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, is it from a lady name Bright. She's

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>pissed at you for insulting her name. Ask her? Ask

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>her in the future of our podcast is a huge success. Okay,

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>hold on, let me texting. Oh well, wait, my phone

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't send things. But wait does send things into the future,

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So it does send things into the future, just not backwards.

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, well, we hope you enjoyed that. See

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you next time. Guys. Thanks for tuning in. If you

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 1>still have a question after listening to all these explanations,

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>please drop us a line. We'd love to hear from you.

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>You can find us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge That's one Word, or email us at

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Feedback at Daniel and Jorge dot com. Thanks for listening,

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explaining the Universe is

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcast from

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.