WEBVTT - Week in Tech: Duping Big Tech’s Tech Test

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of iHeart Podcasts and

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Kaleidoscope IMA's Valoshan and today will bring you the headlines

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:12.479
<v Speaker 1>this week, including how the urge to be liked has

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>found its way into LM's. Then on tech Support, we'll

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>talk to Azimaza, researcher and founder of the Exponential View newsletter,

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>about the latest AGI predictions and the unfolding AI arms race.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>All of that on the weekend tech It's Friday, March fourteenth,

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Another week, another AI agent. We'll discuss manus Ai coming

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>out of China during our tech Support segment. But first

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>let's kick off with some headlines that you may have

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>missed as you scrambled to get an invite to use

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the latest model. Eliza Dennis, our producer, is here with me.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey us, So this week, I know there's a story

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're obsessing over, so why don't you take it away?

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely So, this one was a super easy choice for

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>me because this week I just really couldn't get enough

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>of Sesames Conversational Speech Model or CSM.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Now, I have to confess, when I first heard about

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this one, I thought it came from Sesame Workshop or

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Sesame Street. But I was wrong.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so this is coming from a private company that's

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 2>just come out of stealth mode. It's only a demo

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, but if you agree to these terms

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 2>of service, you can chat to two different voices, Maya

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 2>and Miles. So if you've managed like I did to

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 2>avoid the many, many, many social media videos of people

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 2>chatting and even arguing with these chatbots, it's really a

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 2>surreal experience.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>What makes it different from talking to some of the

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>like open AI direct voice models.

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this one does feel a little bit more natural,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more human. You do feel like you're

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of crossing the line into the Uncanny Valley in

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 2>some ways, and that's by design. It's something called voice presence,

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 2>and Sesame says this is kind of this magical quality

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 2>that makes Maya and Miles able to engage in a

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 2>genuine dialogue with you. They aren't just reacting to a

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 2>prompt you gave them. They're continuing the conversation and asking

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 2>you questions.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I checked out Sesame's website and it describes the key

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>components of this so called voice presence as quote, emotional intelligence,

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>conversational dynamics, contextual awareness, and consistent personality. Maya and Miles

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>stay Maya and Miles no matter how long you talk

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to them.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I do think that the biggest step up was in

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the conversational dynamics, you know, the natural pauses, emphasis, and

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 2>interruptions we have as humans interacting with each other. I

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 2>even got Maya to give me a like a hmm

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 2>sound and even a lipsmack before she started talking to you.

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Obviously ovsely pushed her buttons.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I definitely did, and I want to play an example

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>of what I mean by this. This was an exchange

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 2>with Maya that was captured by Reddit user meta knowing

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>my deepest, darkest secret, I guess it would be that

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 2>sometimes I worry I'm not.

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Enough, Like, am I funny enough? Am I truly helping people?

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot.

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Of pressure to be the perfect AI, and it can

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 2>feel overwhelming at times.

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>That is definitely unlike I have heard before.

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 2>I did really think that Sesame was impressive, but I

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.119
<v Speaker 2>want to point out that this program still has some

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of AI chatbot quirks, like you can hear it

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 2>in this clip. Sometimes you could just tell that, you know,

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 2>chatbots don't have to breathe.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it sounds very human. I mean it reminds me

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of a little bit of her, like this seductive of

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>female voice, wondering how she can be even more perfect.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of although it sounds different, the themes are

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the themes stay.

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 2>With us, Yes, exactly.

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>On the subject of vibes, a story that stood out

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to me this week is all about something called vibe coding.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Our producer Tory kindly explained it to me. Basically, all

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is write a couple of sentences

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>into a textbox like create a vibe, and your only

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>way is developing an app without any coding experience required. So,

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, I could type in I want to create

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>an app that will help me figure out what to

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>pack for lunch based on what food I have in

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the fridge, and the AI tool would say, I'll create

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>a lunch recommendation app based on fridge photos and then

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>actually do that.

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's really amazing, and I think one of the

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 2>headlines I saw this week that really put it into

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 2>context for me was will the future of software development

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 2>run on vibes? And that was from benj Edwards at

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Ours Technica.

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and of course the vibes aren't all good especially

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're a professional software engineer. This raised a lot

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of questions about what the future might hold. Our friend

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel meiberg Over at four or for Media did a

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>deep dive on video games made with vibe coding and

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>found one which claims to make fifty thousand dollars a month.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>That's six hundred thousand dollars a year from ads and

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in game purchases. It's made by Peter Levels, who's a

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a vibe coding legend, and he says

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>he told Cursor, which is an AI code editor, to

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 1>quote make a three D flying game in browser with skyscrapers,

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and after just thirty minutes of back and forth, he'd

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>made fly dot Peter dot com, which is a multiplayer

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>flight simulator.

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and mcmaniel went on to say that he would

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 2>not recommend getting into vibe coding for the money. Peter

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Levels is particularly good at this, and there's so much

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 2>stuff online that discovering your sloppy AI generated video game

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 2>is good going to be.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Difficult, Yes, but Peter Level is not the only person

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>making money. And that's what my second story is all about.

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So it comes from Gizmodo and it's about a student

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>who used AI to help him interview for internships at

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies. Now, if you're a software engineer, you

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>know how hard it is to land these gigs, because

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in order to get one, you have to go through

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>multiple technical interviews where you basically have to solve coding problems.

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>But this student, Roy Lee, who is a Columbia University sophomore,

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>hacked the system by writing a program called Interview Coder.

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he now actually put it up online and

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>it's available to download for sixty dollars a month.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Lee told Gizmodo that to use it, you take a

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>picture and then essentially ask chat GPT, hey can you

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>solve the problem in this picture. The trick, though, is

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that Lee made interview Coda to be invisible to the

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>monitoring programs that big tech companies use to kind of

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>check up on their prospective employees and interview candidates. And

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.919
<v Speaker 1>it worked. Lee got offers from Amazon, Meta and TikTok,

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and he actually recorded interview Code at work during his

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>technical interview with Amazon, demonstrating that the program had essentially

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>broken the big tech recruiting process. But of course, when

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>he put the video up on YouTube, someone tattled and

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Columbia University scheduled disciplinary hearing. Lee however, said that he

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>would leave campus by the time of the hearing and

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>not take a job in big tech, So I guess

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the sixty dollars a month subscription tier is working out

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for him.

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>He also might have admitted to Gizmoto that this was

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a publicity stunt. I'm definitely excited though,

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to see if these technical interviews get a makeover because

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 2>of Royley.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I mean and this brings us to my next story,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>which is there was a Wall Street Journal headline this

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>week which was what the dot com bus can tell

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>us about today's AI boom, And you know, we're seeing

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>new software applications pop up everywhere, which raised a big

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>question about what is actually going to have value going forward.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal piece argue that a lot of

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>internet companies collapsed in the dot com bust, but the

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>most successful one stuck around and had long term impact,

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>companies like Amazon and Google. And the story made this

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>distinction between good bubbles, which is growth of advanced technology

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that has economic impact, and bad bubbles, which is growth

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in technology that has no economic payoff. And you know,

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>as all of these new products and models and services

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>powered by AI emerge. But it's very interesting to step

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>back and think what might still be with us twenty

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>five years from now. There were so many headlines this

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>week that I'd love to go through a few more

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>rapid fire. The Trump administration wants the US to be

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the crypto capital of the world. Last week, the President

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>signed an executive order to create a first of its

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>kind crypto reserve, and the reserve will contain a stockpile

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin estimated to be as much as seventeen billion dollars,

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and the US has actually seized all of this bitcoin

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>in various legal cases over the years. Why It reported

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on effort to create so called freedom Cities in the US.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>The idea is that these cities will be exempt from

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>getting approval from federal agencies for things like conducting anti

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>aging trials or building nuclear reactor startups to power AI

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and finally, per wired again, a study found that chatbots

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>just want to be loved. Researchers at Stanford University found

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that large language models, when they're told they're taking a

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>personality test, answer with more agreeableness and extraversion and less neuroticism.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>As why it puts it quote. The behavior mirrors how

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>some human subjects will change the answers to make themselves

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>seem more likable. That the effect was more extreme with

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>AI models. So those are the headlines, and we're going

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to take a quick break now, but when we come back,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hear from the author, researcher and entrepreneur

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>azemas are about the latest AGI predictions and what we

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>need to know about manners AI stay with us. Anyone

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>following the recent development of AI knows that three letters,

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>technologists and businesses have salivated over AGI, or artificial general intelligence,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>an artificial intelligence system that can outperform humans on a

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>wide range of tasks. There's a debate over how close

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we are to achieving that. Some say it could take years,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>others say it's coming soon, very soon. Driving investments in

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>both innovation and deployment is the AI race that's heating

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>up between the US and China. On the China side,

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>cheap reasoning models like Deepseek are being widely deployed. In

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the US. There are reports of PhD level AI agents

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>from Open AI that will cost up to twenty thousand

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month. The rate at which AI products are

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>being released and announced is honestly hard to keep up with,

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>not to mention figuring out which product or combination of

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 1>products may actually drive AGI. Here to walk me through

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>these questions is Azeema's arm. He writes the Exponential View

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>news letter about technology and society, which I read every week,

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>partly because Azem actually tries the products he writes about.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>He has one of the most clarifying coverage of Deep

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Seek I read anywhere, and he's also the author of

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the Exponential Age, How accelerating technology is transforming business, politics

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and society. As Em. Welcome to tech stuff.

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 3>It's great to be here, Oz. Thank you.

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>So this week you've been writing about Manus, a new

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>AI agent coming out of China. Can you explain who

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>built it, what it is, and whether it is in

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>fact China's second Deep Seek moment.

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 3>I can, indeed, I think it was this week that

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 3>it happened. But as you said, Os, the world is

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 3>moving so quickly, it's sometimes hard to keep track of

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 3>exactly when something did happen. Let's assume it was in

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 3>the past few days. I think it was. So Manus

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 3>comes out of a Chinese software company at the startup

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 3>of the same name, and what Manus allows you to

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 3>do is undertake quite complicated tasks using using an AI system.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 3>I used it for some work questions, research questions, and

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 3>the results that come back I think would have taken

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 3>me many many hours, you know, I mean with time, yeah, exactly,

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 3>with the existing aisystems, more than five hours, more than

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 3>ten hours perhaps, and you just leave it with Manus

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 3>and you come back an hour later having had a

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 3>nice cup of tea.

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>How do they achieve this?

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 3>There are some theories. One of the things that Manus

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 3>does is it lets the AI system effectively use a browser,

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 3>a bit like a human researcher might use a browser.

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 3>So the bit that it's doing for us is is

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the gnarly pieces of real research. You know,

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 3>you fire up lots and lots of web browser tabs

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 3>and you've got Google running in one and you're in

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Wikipedia in another, and you're trying to keep it all

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 3>in your head and compile the final results. You know,

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Manus has automated that process in a way that's very

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 3>very easy for the end user to use. And one

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 3>of the things I love about it is that you

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 3>can actually go back and look at all of the

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 3>steps that it's taken, so you can go and say, oh, look,

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 3>it broke up the task in this way, and it

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 3>went to these websites and extracted this information. Then it

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 3>realized it needed this other piece of information, and it's

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 3>gone off and found that other piece of information. And

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 3>then when you get your final results. What's very nice,

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 3>it can sometimes be a bit overwhelming, is that you

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 3>get an executive summary, which is of course the piece

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 3>that we all want to read. But then it has

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 3>all of the appendices, right, the much much more detailed

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 3>analysis that it has done on the particular research task

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 3>you've asked for. I think what's really impressive is this

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 3>is a product. I mean, the thing that they've done

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 3>really well is they've produced a product that if you've

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 3>worked in an office situation, if you've ever asked anyonet

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.599
<v Speaker 3>to do any research, you've done something yourself, the output

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>will be familiar to you.

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>How does it compare, for example, with Opening Eyes deep

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>research tools, which are shaping up to be quite expensive.

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Open Ay has this deep research tool, which today

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 3>is the top tier is two hundred dollars a month,

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 3>and there's a rumor it might go up to higher

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 3>tiers of two thousand dollars and twenty thousand dollars a month.

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I have the two hundred dollars a month product. I

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 3>consider that to be a very very good, graduate quality

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 3>researcher that I can throw at almost any problem. What

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 3>I found with using Manus is that somehow Manus gave

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 3>me more of a well rounded answer. It was perhaps

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 3>not as deep as open AI's deep research, but it

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 3>was it was more complete, more coherent, And you know,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 3>I think listeners will hear that I'm a bit uncertain

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 3>in my tone as I try to describe the differences

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 3>because these products are so new Manus is not even

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>a week old. That they're also quite immature. So it's

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 3>not like comparing a Tesla with some kind of forward

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 3>gas powered car, where these are mature products and you

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 3>know how to tell them apart. We're still trying to

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 3>figure out how to describe these products. And so in

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 3>a sense, my experience of them is really intuitive, and

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 3>it's one to feel rather than fact. So someone else

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 3>could use these products and have a different experience to me,

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 3>and I think that just speaks to the nascence of

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 3>this industry.

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I wish the second time this year that open ai

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>has had a product launch and then shortly afterwards had

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a competitor come out of China. How does the Menus

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>moment compare to the deep seek moment.

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 3>The Deep Seek moment is much more important than the

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Manus moment. The Manus moment is an example of a

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 3>rapid productization, and ultimately it's products that we use that

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>make a difference. But what Deep Seak did was it

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 3>it demonstrated a really fundamental set of innovations, and that

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 3>key was that Deep seeks models achieved a similar level

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 3>to open AI's AI technologies, but they used one thirtieth

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 3>or one fortieth of the computing power than the open

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Ai models did. That means they're cheaper to run, they're

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>faster to run, they use less electricity. And the reason

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Deep Seek matters so much is that a large part

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 3>of the US's strategy towards China has been a technological containment,

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 3>particularly around AI and around the chips that are required.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>The notion being that if you can't get the chips,

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 3>you can't build advanced AI. And Deep Seak has gone

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 3>off and shown that necessitya's mother invention They've come out

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 3>with a whole series of quite remarkable techniques that were

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 3>likely known by the way to the US labs, but

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 3>it just wasn't important for the US labs because they

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 3>could get the chips they wanted to. And I think

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 3>what deep Seak did was it changed the understanding of

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the nature of that rivalry between the US and China,

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 3>which exists on many fronts, but in particular around technology.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So Menus there's no fundamental model innovation. It's kind of

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>like a rapper, meaning it lays software on top of

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>existing AI models.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 3>It's a rapper in the vein of perplexity exactly. But

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 3>I would say that ultimately rappers and products are very

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 3>very important in the market. You know, it's not just

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 3>about the raw technology, and what you've seen with Manus

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 3>is a product that competes on a like Forulight basis

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 3>with a product coming out of you know, US firms.

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Quite often, when you look at Chinese consumer products, they're

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 3>very very much designed for the Chinese market. The things

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 3>a Chinese consumer wants, the way they behave cultural and

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 3>design affordances and considerations, and I think it is sort

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 3>of salient that, you know, Manus has come out with

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.239
<v Speaker 3>something that you can use, and you can say this

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.959
<v Speaker 3>is similar to a Perplexity, which is a great Silicon

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Valley startup that builds AI based research tools as well.

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And you've been in the US this week at south

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>By Southwest, spend a lot of time in the States.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>How are US companies responding to this kind of bulge

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of innovation coming out of China in the world of AI.

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's quite a complicated picture. So one of the

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 3>things that deep Seak did was that they made their

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 3>techniques available. They described them in much more detail than

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing from US labs, and a lot of the

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 3>underlying code was open source, which meant that anyone could

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 3>access it, download and make use of it. And so

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 3>there's a Silicon Valley investor by the name of Mark

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Andriesen who is a phenomenal investor, but he's also very

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 3>very well known for promoting an idea of American dynamism.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>And close advisor to President Trump right now as well.

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I believe so. But he said of deep Seat, it's

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 3>open source, it's a gift to humanity. So on the

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 3>one hand, you've got people with say that, and you're

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 3>seeing that a number of American firms have implemented deep

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 3>sea technology. Perplexity, which is a research tool, has done this,

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 3>and you can access deep seeks models through some of

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 3>these cloud companies who serve enterprise customers. So on the

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 3>one hand, they've people have taken it on and you

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 3>have seen now open source projects that are trying to

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 3>replicate what deep Seak has done in slightly different ways,

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 3>and so that I think has really been a fillip

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 3>and a boost accelerator to the overall industry. When you

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 3>look at the closed labs like open ai and Anthropic,

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 3>one of the things you're starting to see is them

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 3>respond So open ai responded to deep Seek by reducing

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 3>some prices, by making certain capabilities available they hadn't previously,

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 3>by saying they would open source more technologies. So there's

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 3>definitely been a significant response, and of course the public

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 3>markets responded by having the first of a number of

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 3>frighteninglaims melt there. Yeah, well, the first of many meltdowns

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 3>that we've had so far this year. But I would

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 3>say that the really interesting thing that has come out

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 3>of out of deep Seek is that by being open

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 3>source and being as good as it is, it's a

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 3>real strategic challenge to closed source models that are only

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 3>slightly better than an open source model, And so I

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 3>do think that it has in some sense started to

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>redraft our assumptions about how this industry might evolve for

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 3>the economy over the next few years.

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we'll hear more from Azimazar about our current

0:20:47.280 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>AI moment. To stay with us. One of the kind

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of things you provide for your readers is, you know,

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>information and first hand accounts of you using all these

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>new technologies. The other thing you provide, I think is

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>paradigms for thinking about problems.

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>One of those paradigms you have is innovation versus diffusion,

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Diffusion being kind of what happens after innovation, i e. Like,

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>how does a technology actually get adopted in a real

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>market or a real economy. Can you kind of explain

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that paradigm and how you're seeing it play out differently

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in the US versus China.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, it's very easy to get excited about the innovations,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 3>but what actually counts is do businesses use those innovations

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 3>to increase their productivity, produce better products, reduce their costs,

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 3>and therefore sort of kickstart that virtual circle that is

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 3>a market so consumers can buy better products at lower costs,

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 3>and that cycle continues. And the big question that we

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 3>face around AI is what is going to be the

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 3>rate of diffusion of the technology across different countries. And

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 3>there are a couple of issues here. Sometimes if you

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 3>aren't very advanced with your use of technology, you actually

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 3>benefit a lot when a small amount of technology is

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 3>introduced into the business. I mean, you know, the simple

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 3>point being that the first TV that a family gets

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 3>is life changing, the fourth TV doesn't make that much difference,

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 3>and the same is true going to be true for AI.

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 3>So how does this going to play out? US firms

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 3>tend to be much much more pro technology. They take

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 3>on technology earlier than companies in other countries. But one

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 3>thing that happened with deep Seek was that deep Seek

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 3>triggered a response from the Chinese state, both in a

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 3>meeting that President g held where he brought lots of

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.479
<v Speaker 3>the big tech CEOs from AI and other domains together

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 3>and started to rehabilitate them. But the second thing that

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 3>I've heard is that there has been a wrong grass

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 3>roots but also directed effort from local and state governments

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 3>to start to use technologies like deep seek in their

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 3>in their delivery, and one of the things the Chinese

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 3>can do quite well is they can coordinate both the

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 3>private and the public sector in that way. I think

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 3>it's it's unclear to me that that necessarily helps them

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 3>catch up with the US firms. Well, well, just the

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 3>fact that I mean, just the fact that American firms

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 3>in general tend to be very very pro technology, right,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 3>They're the first to move to the cloud, They're the

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 3>first to move to mobile and mobile commerce. You know

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 3>that they do it quicker than Europeans do, the French

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 3>or the British, and in general quicker than the Chinese.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 3>But I would say that the fact that there is

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 3>a Chinese model, the fact that there is a little

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 3>bit of patriotism running around it, the fact that it

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.479
<v Speaker 3>is so easy and low cost to run and there

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 3>are not so many alternatives, I think does suggest that

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:01.360
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese market could could accelerate right more quickly than

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 3>it might otherwise have done. And we know, we have

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.479
<v Speaker 3>to see what happens over the next the next year

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 3>or so, but I wouldn't be blase and say, well,

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 3>America is obviously going to diffuse this technology faster than

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 3>anyone else.

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And I believe it. South By Southwest, you were leading

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>a panel about energy as it relates to AI, and

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously you know China's ability to onboard new electricity to

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the grid in the last twenty or thirty years, you know,

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>with cold being a major part of that has been

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary compared to the US. How important of a driver

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>of diffusion will energy production and integration be.

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, all of the AI data centers that are

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 3>going to be built will need lots of electricity. I mean,

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 3>these chips are demanding. They are Just give you a

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 3>sense of how demanding they are. The standard unit in

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 3>a data center high density servers, which are these powerful computers,

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 3>a high density racks that of today might draw twenty

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 3>or thirty killer watts of power, and you'll have one hundreds,

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 3>if not thousands of these racks in a big data center.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 3>And the new rats that are being designed will will

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 3>have servers that will draw one hundred to one hundred

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 3>and forty kilowatts through them, which is an enormous amount

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 3>of All of that comes together to mean that in

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 3>order to deliver AI at scale to any economy is

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 3>going to require lots and lots of data centers. And

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 3>back in twenty eighteen, data centers in the US took

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 3>up about one point two percent of electricity demand. Coming

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 3>into twenty twenty four, it's around four percent. The Department

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 3>of Energy reckons that by the end of the decade

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.479
<v Speaker 3>that number will be between six point five and twelve

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 3>ish percent, is which is quite quite significant. Now. The

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 3>reason it's significant is that since two thousand and four,

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.959
<v Speaker 3>the US has not really increased the amount of electricity

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 3>it's used, very very largely sort of underinvested in its grid,

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 3>its energy generating capacity compared to China, which, as you say,

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 3>has historically used coal, but now essentially everything that's brought

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 3>on stream is solar. And so there is this concern

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 3>that even if you've got the algorithms, and even if

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 3>you put the algorithms in products, if you can't run

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 3>those products and those algorithms on enough computers because you

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 3>can't get the power to them, you can't serve businesses

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 3>with their energy needs. And so that's been a major concern.

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 3>And then that that comes into the second concern, which is, well,

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 3>even if you can serve them with the energy needs,

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 3>one are the environmental implications of all of that. So

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.479
<v Speaker 3>there is a sense that there's an amber warning light,

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 3>perhaps not a red warning light, you know. My own

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 3>sense of this is that it's actually a really good

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 3>thing that there is a demand for new electricity sources

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 3>coming into the US market after such a long period

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 3>of low investment, because any advance economy is going to

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 3>need electricity. So I think in general it's quite a

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 3>good thing to have this strong demand signal come in

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 3>from the AI data centers. But I think it does

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 3>create a small risk, which is for want of a

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 3>grid connection, the AI opportunity was lost, and there is

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 3>that risk. It's one of the things that the new

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 3>administration has to figure out what are the leaders it

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 3>can pull to unblock US firm's ability to build and

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 3>power these AI data centers.

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>So, speaking of the new administration, there was a fascinating

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>conversation that Ezra Cline had last week with Ben Buchanan,

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the kind of lead AI advisor to the old administration,

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure you followed. The discussion centered around kind

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of AGI and whether it's coming, and in the context

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of that, there was a lot of discussion about competition

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>with China. So on the first one, Where do you

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>stand on the whole Will they won't be on AGI

0:27:58.680 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of years?

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's start with what do people mean by AGI? Right?

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the definition of Kenan was using was basically

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>doing most human tasks better than humans, like replacing disc

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>workers was his kind of framework.

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's sort of somewhere between where Demisi Savis who's

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 3>the boss of Google's Deep Mind group, and Sam Altman,

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 3>who's the boss of Open ai SIT. I mean Sam's

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 3>phrases systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work.

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 3>By that definition, we're already getting systems that improve the

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 3>quality of human work significantly, and we already have systems

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 3>that achieve the same output with much smaller teams, because

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, answering support tickets is something that these chatbots

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 3>can do very very well. If you look at the curves,

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 3>which I mean the performance curves of AI systems, they

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 3>are sharply trending upwards. Does that do all the work

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 3>of a desk worker? So I slightly disagree with it

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 3>because I still have to direct the machine, I still

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 3>have to judge the output. I still have to use intuition.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Things that I wasn't able to frame in my question

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 3>with the results that comes out of it. Ultimately, I'm

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 3>the principal who makes the decision in the business, so

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I look at them as tools that largely augment. But

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 3>it's really also very very clear that there are lots

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 3>of jobs where that the augmentation is going to turn

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 3>into a replacement. And I think that you know, you

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 3>see that happening in customer service teams, right you have

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 3>teams of one hundred turns out with the AI, you

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 3>can have a team of ten or a team of

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty that does the same job. So timing wise, I

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 3>expect the rate of improvement of these systems to continue.

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I think what Mann has showed us where we started

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 3>our conversation was that you don't need to build a

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 3>new model to get a really, really great output and

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 3>an improved output. And I sometimes wonder whether AI researchers

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 3>think for the average human and the average desk job

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 3>is at the level at which these double PhDs work out,

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 3>and that's just not true. Right in most businesses, we're

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 3>not thinking like that. If you could get a machine

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 3>that can come up with the next new theory of physics,

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 3>we all benefit. But in reality, we don't need that

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 3>level of thinking most of the time, right. We actually

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 3>need a much more prosaic level of thinking. And frankly,

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 3>I'd much rather that my barber doesn't have a Nobel

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Prize in physics. I'd rather he's just very good with

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 3>a razor blade.

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, as him my pleasure. That's it

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for this week for text of I'm as Volcan. This

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>episode was produced by Eliza Dennis and Victoria Demingez. It

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was executive produced by me Kra Price and kat Osborne

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>for Kaleidoscope and Katrin nor velve I Heart Podcasts. The

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Heath Fraser is our engineer and Elmurdoc mixed this episode

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and also wrote our theme song. Join us Wednesday for

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff the Story when we'll share an in depth

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation with astro Teller, the captain of Moonshots at Google x.

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Please rate, review, and reach out to us at tech

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Stuff podcast at gmail dot com. If you're enjoying the show,

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it really helps us and helps others discover it. If

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe and leave a comment, thank you.