Speaker 1: It is May ninth, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2: This is the warning. Watching the utter.
Speaker 1: Contempt that Homeland Security Ice Barbie Christy Nom has for
Speaker 1: the United States Senate, for the United States Constitution, and
Speaker 1: for the concept of the checks and balances is startling,
Speaker 1: if not surprised. What remains incredible is how many Democratic
Speaker 1: Senators voted to confirm this unfit, sadistic, corrupt woman to
Speaker 1: be the head of the state security apparatus of the
Speaker 1: Trump regime.
Speaker 2: It demonstrated an.
Speaker 1: Appalling lack of judgment that equals the daily decision by
Speaker 1: the forty five Democratic Senators to maintain as their leader,
Speaker 1: the most effeckless man in Washington, the useless Chuck Schumer. Yesterday,
Speaker 1: Christine nom sat in front of the United States Senate
Speaker 1: and did everything she could to please Donald Trump at
Speaker 1: the expense of her oath. She was asked direct questions
Speaker 1: and her answer to some of them the equivalent of hey,
Speaker 1: Madam's secretary, what's two plus two? And her response is
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is great elephant.
Speaker 2: It was appalling.
Speaker 1: Now, two senators distinguished themselves with tough, rigorous, specific questioning
Speaker 1: doing their jobs, Senator Chris Murphy and Senator Chris van
Speaker 1: Holland from Maryland. Both of them put it to Christine Nome.
Speaker 1: Let's watch the responses. Now we'll talk about what it
Speaker 1: is that you're seeing, why it matters, and what Democrats
Speaker 1: have to do next on the other side.
Speaker 3: So I'm just going to put the question directly to you.
Speaker 3: Are you or DHS doing anything to comply with the
Speaker 3: nine to zero Supreme Court order to facilitate his return
Speaker 3: in the United States? Just yes or no?
Speaker 4: This administration is following all federal court orders. Sim prerogative
Speaker 4: conversations with the President of.
Speaker 3: El ask a simple question. I would you know we
Speaker 3: have a limited amount of time. I just asked you,
Speaker 3: Madam Secretary, whether or not you or the Department of
Speaker 3: Homeland Security are taking any action to facilitate the nine
Speaker 3: to nothing Supreme Court decision to facilitate his return. This
Speaker 3: is a very simple question.
Speaker 1: She simply refuses to answer a direct question. Now, if
Speaker 1: I was in the Senate at this exact moment, I
Speaker 1: would have changed direction and I would have said, Madam Secretary,
Speaker 1: tell me about your relationship with Corey Loewandowski. I understand
Speaker 1: that he serves under you in a variety of different positions.
Speaker 1: As a special government employee, can you detail his service
Speaker 1: to you? And I would have let it go from there.
Speaker 1: The Democrats who are asking questions are receiving unparalleled contempt
Speaker 1: from the person who was obligated to answer them, who
Speaker 1: simply refuses to answer a direct question about whether she
Speaker 1: intends to comply whether the administration intends to comply with
Speaker 1: a nine zero Supreme Court decision, And what she's doing
Speaker 1: is hiding behind semanics and demwittering that suggests that it's
Speaker 1: incomprehensible for her to understand the question because mister Abrego
Speaker 1: is an L. Salvador and because as an L. Salvadoran
Speaker 1: citizen he now sits in the L. Salvadoran concentration camp.
Speaker 1: Though it was caused by the malevolence of the Trump
Speaker 1: administration and their recklessness and their disregard for the rule
Speaker 1: of law, rejected by the American courts, there's nothing that
Speaker 1: can be done. And this is the great fu to
Speaker 1: the idea, to the concept of judicial supremacy in this country.
Speaker 1: And in the end, what is decided as what is
Speaker 1: law and what is not is not the domain of
Speaker 1: the president. It is the province of the courts. In America,
Speaker 1: and that is being tested by the consistent, obstinate, reckless,
Speaker 1: deliberate lawlessness of the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: Let's watch some more.
Speaker 5: Do you believe that the US government can detain and
Speaker 5: deport a legal permanent resident for expressing a political opinion
Speaker 5: that the Department that the administration disagrees with.
Speaker 4: The determination you're asking for is based on things that
Speaker 4: you are determining that the Secretary Area of State has
Speaker 4: considered and evaluated. We don't evaluate that the administration, along
Speaker 4: with a partnership with the Department State on what is
Speaker 4: political speech and what's an affiliation with a foreigners? Do
Speaker 4: you believe that's the difference?
Speaker 5: Do you believe that you're asked that you can detain
Speaker 5: it about the direct legal permanent resident for expressing a
Speaker 5: political You have.
Speaker 4: Not detained or we have not deported anybody who's a
Speaker 4: legal permanent resident.
Speaker 5: Y and so you don't have the ability to do that.
Speaker 1: She apparently thinks that life is the Fox News set.
Speaker 1: Now there's also something that must be said, why is
Speaker 1: she not being questioned with giant poster boards set around
Speaker 1: that hearing room of her action, shots of her narcissistic illness,
Speaker 1: put on full display her look at me as her
Speaker 1: inability to stay away from the iPhone camera. Do you
Speaker 1: know who Jay Johnson was? He's this man use the
Speaker 1: Obama era hoo Land Security secretary.
Speaker 2: He kept you safe. And this woman.
Speaker 1: Can't keep her eye on her purse with three thousand
Speaker 1: dollars of cash in it. A little fishy for somebody
Speaker 1: who makes one hundred and sixty seven thousand dollars a year. Now,
Speaker 1: Christy No thought that the way to power in MAGA
Speaker 1: was to detail the joy she took in shooting a
Speaker 1: puppy that embarrassed her, that she didn't train and she
Speaker 1: didn't know how to handle.
Speaker 2: She's a satist and she was voted into power by
Speaker 2: a lot of Democratic senators.
Speaker 1: Had enough, the Democratic senators on the committee must sit
Speaker 1: in a room together with all of their colleagues and
Speaker 1: commit themselves to the daily maximum exercise of their power
Speaker 1: to impede the MAGA regime's ability to degrade and burn
Speaker 1: the Constitution to ashes. Because that is what you are
Speaker 1: watching in this video. You are watching an executive branch
Speaker 1: cabinet secretary tell the United States Senate in a coequal
Speaker 1: branch of government, the Article one branch to go itself.
Speaker 2: That's what you are watching.
Speaker 1: She is lawless, she is incompetent, she is narcissistic, she
Speaker 1: is a sycophant. She is corrupt, and what she is
Speaker 1: leading is immoral, It is wrong, and it is violative
Speaker 1: of the basic rights of Americans and all people to
Speaker 1: be safe in this country under the rule of law,
Speaker 1: under the supreme law of the land, the Constitution of
Speaker 1: the United States. Christy Nome has brought the Homeland Security
Speaker 1: Department into the reality of its worst critics, worst dystopian nightmares,
Speaker 1: and out of control federal agency pushing its jack boots
Speaker 1: down on the neck of American liberty. This sick woman,
Speaker 1: who has betrayed her oath and who stands opposed to
Speaker 1: every American value, is a domestic enemy and would have
Speaker 1: been recognized as such by John Adams, by Thomas Jefferson,
Speaker 1: by Abraham Lincoln, and Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan. She
Speaker 1: is attacking the cornerstones of American life and weaponizing fear
Speaker 1: through the exercise and abuse of power of a federal
Speaker 1: law enforcement agency. There are no words to describe the terribleness,
Speaker 1: the wrongness, and the evil of that she has let
Speaker 1: loose the storm, and she has sent American Gestapo into
Speaker 1: America cities and into America small towns and into Washington,
Speaker 1: DC restaurants, jack booted government thugs, all with masks on
Speaker 1: their faces, too ashamed to wear their badges, to seize
Speaker 1: people and disappear them off the street with no due
Speaker 1: process whatsoever, and they call that justice. There is nothing
Speaker 1: that threatns you more than the idea that there is anybody, no.
Speaker 2: Matter how evil they are, that.
Speaker 1: Stands in a space where by word alone, a finger
Speaker 1: pointed at them by the most powerful people in the country,
Speaker 1: that says they're guilty, that if it should come to be,
Speaker 1: means you will never live in another day of safety,
Speaker 1: and we will all be at risk because in America,
Speaker 1: everybody gets to stand in of a judge, everybody gets
Speaker 1: due process. And so when you see a demagogonist, sicophan,
Speaker 1: a power mad, sick, narcissistic woman point a finger at
Speaker 1: an innocent man and call him a terrorist with the
Speaker 1: power of state backing her up, it should send a
Speaker 1: chill down your spine, and you should understand exactly what
Speaker 1: that is. She's no different than a ripe security secretary
Speaker 1: in nineteen thirty three, pointing a finger at somebody and
Speaker 1: telling you they're a terrorist. No, you know who's a terrorist,
Speaker 1: Christy Nomas. And what she's terrorizing is the US Constitution
Speaker 1: and the American people. And she will be held to account.
Speaker 1: Mark my words. Justice will come for her. Have no
Speaker 1: doubt about that. This outrageousness will not stand. And there
Speaker 1: will be a day. Trust me, she is sitting in
Speaker 1: the dock, stammering, stuttering, her arrogance stripped away, and on
Speaker 1: that day she'll say that I was just following orders.
Speaker 2: That's what they always say.
Speaker 1: Shame on her, and good luck to the Democratic senators.
Speaker 1: At least a couple of them are making progress and
Speaker 1: facing down the gathering evil. When she's back next time,
Speaker 1: they should appreciate what she is, which is this, And
Speaker 1: that is the warning. I'm Steve Schmidt. This is the warning.
Speaker 1: I invite you to join this community where I promise
Speaker 1: to be honest, blunt and direct about what is happening
Speaker 1: in this country. America is in crisis. Follow and subscribe
Speaker 1: to this channel and on substance.
Speaker 2: Thank you