WEBVTT - Your Brain on Tech

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Hi, Katie, So, how would you describe your relationship with

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>your smartphone? Um? Dependent? I've got a problem. It's bad.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I would use the word obsessive to describe me. Probably

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>not as much as you, but me too. So that's

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the focus of today's show, technology specifically, are growing dependence

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>on it or should I say our addiction to it? Now,

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we asked all of you to write in and call

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>us with tales from the tech trenches. You had a

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>lot to say. Angie loved Joy on Twitter wrote, I

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>have fiber my algia and no one I've been over

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>using my phone when my thumb on the phone holding

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>hand starts to hurt. Even through the pain, I sometimes

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>soldier through like it's my life's work to check social

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>media and scroll through the news. Ouch. I feel your pain. Well,

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't exactly feel your pain, Angie, but I understand

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>where you're coming from and share a Dupuis, which is

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful last name. On Twitter, told us about the

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>moment she knew she had a problem with tech, writing,

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I realized that when my children were having to ask

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>me questions multiple times because I was engrossed in my phone.

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You know we've all been there, Yes, Nalini Sang on

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter said, I give myself test to see how long

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I will go without looking at my phone, and I

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>feel so quickly. I noticed when a friend's dad forced

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>me to turn off my phone during a dinner. We

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>have a sickness as I type on my phone. Listen.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree with all of the tweets that we got

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>about this subject. We are addicted, and we are unfortunately

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>ignoring our children at times, ignoring our spouses or our friends.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>There's an actual term Brian for it. It's called fubbing

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>p h U B b I n G. That means

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>blowing someone off to look at your telephone. And it's

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>so aggravating, and I'm sure it is for other people,

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>because I'm sure I do it all the time never.

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's maybe not entirely our fault, because

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in hard our phones and these tech platforms are designed

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to addict us, which we talk about in today's show.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That's right, in an attention economy, that's definitely true. We

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>also got this very interesting voicemail from a listener named

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Steve who tried to return to a flip phone. Hi,

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>my name is Steve Glenn. I'm an airline pilot and

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>for eight months last year I went back to a

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>flip phone. I decided I was spending too much time

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>on my smartphone, and so I got a Kyo Seros

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>flip phone like they used in the military, and I

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyed unplugging a bit and not being as accessible

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>all the time. But I finally had to go back

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and buy an iPhone because as an airline captain, I

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>had to access the Internet and access company websites using

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>my smartphone. And also texting is going to a different

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>type of technology where people send pictures and people send

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>files with texts that you just can't do that with

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>with pumps anymore. So I had my my experiment was

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a failure. I had to go back to an iPhone.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I try and limit my use of it more than

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I used to. But I thought you'd like to hear that.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, well, Steve Glenn. A noble effort,

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>we must say, going back to a flip phone. How

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>luddite ish of you. But you can see, Brian why

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be really hard because so much of our

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>day to day activity and interactions require, uh, you know,

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone and not a flip phone. There's even an

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>app Katie called Moment, which I was yes, I have

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>a very long time, and it tells you not only

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>how much time you're spending on your phone, but what

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you're actually doing on your phone. So you kind of

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a lie to yourself and you think, oh, I'm checking

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>my email and you're really on Instagram and Twitter, and

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>then you get sucked into a vortex of crap. Yeah,

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and self loathing for being sucked into a vortex of crap.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, it's a vicious cycle. Clearly, technology is eating

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>up our time, attention, and changing our way of life.

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Loyal listeners, you may recall when we talk with psychologist

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Jane Twangy about the costs and consequences of endless screen

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>time is especially for kids and teens. I encourage you

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>all to listen to that episode if you haven't, its

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>number thirty six. But for this episode, we wanted to

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>get into these topics from the perspective of a tech insider,

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and I can't think of many people better on this topic, Katie,

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>than today's guest Tristan Harris. In his twenties, he sold

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>his tech company to Google and they worked there as

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>an in house design ethicist of all things, which I

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 1>think many people think is probably an oxymoron when it

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.799
<v Speaker 1>comes to big tech companies, But The Atlantic called trist

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>On the closest thing Silicon Valley has to a conscience.

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>His latest project is something called the Center for Humane Technology,

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>which he started in February, bringing together many former insiders

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in the tech world who believe we need to design

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>technology in a different, more humane way. To give you

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>an idea, here's how the Center on its website refers

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube. They say these are

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>not neutral products, they are part of a system designed

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to addict us. Now. I originally spoke with Triston for

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>my Nachio documentary series available gosh on demand and ironically

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, Facebook, and Hulu, but I wanted to continue

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>our conversation. He's such a smart guy an excellent communicator.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So for today's episode, we talked with Tristan about how

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>tech hooks us and what ethical design means to him.

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And to start things off, I asked him how he

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>landed at Google and why he left. Well, UM, I

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>was a tech entrepreneur when I was twenty two at

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a Stanford I started a small tech company and UM

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a long story, but after about five or six years,

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we we soft landed the company at Google, we were acquired,

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>and after a year into being at Google, I became

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of disenchanted with where things in the tech industry

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we're heading that instead of really building tools that were

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>empowering people, it was more and more becoming this race

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>between these different companies of getting people's attention and exploiting

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>people's psychology. And I I felt alarmed by this. And

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I was working with the Gmail team and Gmail has

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>its own problems with people feeling addicted. Uh, And I

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>made this you know, this presentation about Google's moral responsibility

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>and shaping a billion people's attention. It was sort of

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>a slide deck and it exploded. I mean it went

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>throughout the company. Tens of thousands of people saw it.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And um, that led to becoming a design ethicist, where

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I basically was asking the question, which know what had

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>asked before? You know, how do you ethically steer a

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>billion people's attention? We should pause you for a second

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>because you mentioned this slide show. You designed this hundred

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and forty four page Google slide presentation which was called

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a call to Minimize distraction and respect users attention. Yeah,

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and that was in two I mean, this is a

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>long time ago that this these concerns first rose up,

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and you did this as a Google employee, correct, intending

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to sort of share it within your team. But then

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Larry Page saw it and other senior leaders

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>with in the company. And what was the reaction to

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the concerns that you were raising. Yeah, I can't imagine

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>they were super jiggy about that. Well, you know, um,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was nervous about that presentation because I

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>mean I was ready at the time to leave the company.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I kind of felt like this was the thing that

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>was most concerning to me. Um. But before I left,

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to raise alarms about this issue. And I

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>had a whole background prior to this on how people's

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>minds are manipulated, an influence when I was a kid,

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I was a magician. I studied at this persuasive tech lab,

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>so I understood that technology could really manipulate people's minds.

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I made this presentation. So I sent

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it to ten people and said, hey, I want your feedback.

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:42.679
<v Speaker 1>It was just a slide deck head, give me your feedback.

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I went home. I came back the next morning, I

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>checked my email and I had like, you know, a

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred emails about this presentation, and I clicked on the

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, their their links, and when you click on

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the link, it shows you, um, inside of Google slides

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the number of people who are looking at it at

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the same time, and there was something like a hundred

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and fifty people that that morning. When I looked at

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it later that day, there was four hundred. Uh And

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just through the next you know week, it was just exploding.

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and I had heard that Larry Page it

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>had two or three meetings that day where people brought

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it up in conversation with him. Uh And so it

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>became this kind of momentum. I wouldn't I don't want

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to overstate its influence. I mean, I don't think it

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>changed the course of anything, but that it definitely rose

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>alarms and people started to talk about it. But you

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote something that I thought was pretty smart and prescient,

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>which was never before in history. Had the decisions of

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:36.119
<v Speaker 1>a handful of designers, mostly men, white, living in San Francisco,

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>aged thirty five, working at three companies that is, Google, Apple,

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook, had so much impact on how millions of

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>people around the world spend their attention. We should feel

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>an enormous responsibility to get this right. True now more

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>than ever. Um. And so what did Google do in

0:08:54.720 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in response to this besides change your job? Um? Not much.

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was given this space to kind of

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>explore these topics, and I didn't get fired. I really

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 1>just focused on understanding what it meant to hold that responsibility.

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not like we've ever had There's no academic discipline,

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no university that could teach you this is how

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 1>we do manipulation of a billion people's attention, and that

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>never existed before. So this was a new field, and

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so I did mostly a lot of research. Um. And

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of things changing at Google, I tried bringing

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this up with some of the key products that I

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>thought would be most important to change, so Android because

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the home screen, the phone notifications that people billions

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of people live by, Chromes, the web browser. People spend

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>most of their time in UH and Gmail. But it

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>was really hard to get a concerted focus on saying

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we have this is an enormously important topic. This is

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>literally everything, and we need a whole different way of

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this. And I was unsuccessful at getting getting

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>those neems to change inside Google. Well, you must have

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>been considered such a massive disruptor, Tristan. I mean here

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you are saying, hey, hold the phone, everybody, and these

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>companies that are growing like weeds, and obviously the concerns

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that you were raising were anathetical to their business model, right,

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, It's it's funny, Katie, because it wasn't an

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>explicit There was never an explicit responsive we can't do that.

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>You're asking us to make less money? No, you know

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it was I never got that response. There this be

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of the smiling and nodding, but then no traction,

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>no momentum. Right, So I talked to you know, an Android,

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the Android team, and say, well, what if we designed

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it this way we help people check their phone less

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and there'd be this kind of smiling and nodding and yeah,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe we could do that, and there's some teams that

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>are kind of working on that, but then nothing much

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>would really happen. There was no concerted effort. And and

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this is why ultimately I did leave, is because I

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>realized that there needed to be a much bigger public

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation in public demand for this stuff. But I will

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>say there's a difference between and roid, you know, which

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is the how your mobile phone works that doesn't need

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to maximize how much time you spend on the phone.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>It's really it's like, no one goes to work at

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Androids saying, gosh, how do we just steal everyone's time.

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>No one says that YouTube, on the other hand, that

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is their goal. I mean, that is the business model.

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Is more time watching videos equals more money for YouTube.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>That means more attention to the advertisements, right exactly. That

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>means more more attention to the advertising. Advertising is the

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>driving business model behind this, this addiction to stealing people's

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>attention and time. So Tristan, let's just step back for

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a second and talk about how and why these tech

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>companies addict us. It's gone to the point where we

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>check our phones more than a d and fifty times

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>per day. Knowledge workers on average spend a third of

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>their day just doing email. Um, as you said, it's

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of central to the business model of these tech platforms.

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So can you talk to us about, you know, how

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>and why this happened. Yeah, well, you know it starts

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>by you know, someone building an app and saying I

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>gotta get you to use it. So what they what

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they want is they want people, you know, to register accounts.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>They want people to create new accounts and new users

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to show up, and then they want each of those

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>accounts to come back every single day. They want you

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to be hooked, So they have to start finding reasons

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>for how can I get you to come back tomorrow.

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>So if your Instagram and you say, okay, if this

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in the early days of Instagram, I know the guys

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>who made it, they went to school with me, Mike

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and Kevin, you know, and they're thinking, okay, how do

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>we keep people coming back to this photo sharing app?

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And they didn't always have this feature called the number

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of followers you have? Right, why would they add that?

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 1>We think that that's just natural, that's just the world

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we live in. But the number of followers we have.

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Showing that number to you is a good way to

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>get you to come back tomorrow because you want to

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>know if that number went up, And you also want

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>to know how many likes you get on each photo

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you post, and that's another reason to get you to

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>come back. And so think of these as like biological

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>organisms sitting on a table and are mutating these new limbs,

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>which are just these things that are good at getting

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you to come back and to stay longer. And if

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that thing works, it keeps that limb, and it starts,

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it continues to evolve, and so it's involving all of

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 1>these new ways. Likes, um messages, shares, filters, these are

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>all ways to keep you coming back and hooked. But

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>what we think we miss is these cultural externalities. This

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>entire selfie culture where you know, young you know, teenagers

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of women take these selfies over and

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>over again of basically their their appearance. And let's say

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that Instagram didn't have a feature called the number of

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>followers you have. Let's say they never went down that road.

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Would we have an entire culture where everyone's taking photos

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of themselves and posting it on social media if we

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the notion of followers for ourselves. I mean,

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>these design techniques are all being done because they're good

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>at hooking people, but downstream they create these cultural externalities.

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>You have people being more concerned that they're self worth

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is directly tied to how many likes they on in

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that last photo. And um, I think we're confusing a

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>whole generation of children to attach their self worth and

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>belonging to the wrong place, not just children triest On.

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I am always checking my likes on Instagram

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and my followers and has it gone up? And you

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>know what comments have I gotten? And on the one hand,

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I kind of appreciate the community that Instagram allows you

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to have. You do feel like you're kind of relating

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to people who have similar interests, and I appreciate hearing

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>from people. But the flip side of that for me

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is this kind of hunger and almost frantic feeling that, oh,

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I need to get more followers. I need to make

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>sure they like what I'm posting. And I'm embarrassed to

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>admit that. But I'm a sixty one year old woman.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Think about the impact this has on teenagers who are

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>still developing their self esteem and sense of worth. Yeah.

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I think of this a lot like sugar. I mean,

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>think of our human evolutionary instincts. I mean, sugar tastes

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>good to all human animals. We're built to love sugar. Right,

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason because it used to be really rare.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Um It's just like social approval. I mean, there's a

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>reason that it should feel good to get those likes

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and to get that social validation and approval, but we

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>weren't built to get it at this level of frequency

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>dripping into our our mind every you know, five ten

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>minutes with a new batch of notifications on our film.

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of that, two things really struck me from Katie's

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Natchio hour on tech addiction, which is the physiological reaction

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to this stimulus, the stress hormone cortisol that we're getting

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of overdosed on because we feel nervous about our

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>text and our emails and checking them, are not checking them.

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And then dopamine, which is this um this pleasure neurotransmitter,

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>neurotransmitter you know this, I don't um that kind of

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>gives us a high when we're getting social validation on

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>these apps and we're not meant or we weren't designed

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to receive these two things this at the level we are,

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>with the frequency we are. That's right, And I think

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how we can think about how we fix this,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>which is to say, we need to turn the lens

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>back at ourselves and say, what were we built for?

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>You know how? How are all of our evolutionary instincts

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>tuned and how do we respect those instincts. So a

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>good example is something like a simple one that leads

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to phones is trigger colors. So red is a trigger color.

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So every single time you look at your phone and

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you see that red dot with the number of notifications,

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's triggering you into a little bit of a a

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of alarm or or or sort of you know,

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>grabbing your attention, like maybe I should see there's there's

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>something important there that I have to check into. Right,

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>But do we want to be sounding the alarm inside

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of our minds every single time we check our phone

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>with notifications? You know, in the same way that social

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>validation or social approval are really important things to care about.

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>It's useful back in the savannah to know what do

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>my peers think of me? Otherwise how else are you

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>going to survive in the community or the tribe. But

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we weren't meant for a virtual community of tens of

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.719
<v Speaker 1>thousands of people around the world to be dosing us

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>with little bits of social approval and dopamine every ten minutes.

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I think we have to ask how do

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 1>we go back to being in alignment with how our

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.479
<v Speaker 1>human evolutionary instincts work? Before we even talk about that, Trystan,

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to dive in a little deeper on some

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 1>of the techniques that we can be aware of and

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>ways we're being manipulated. You mentioned the red lettering for alerts.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you help us understand other ways they do it

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so we can aware be aware that we're being manipulated.

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, there's just so many. One thing that really

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>struck me in your writing was the bottomless bowl. Can

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you explain what that is? Sure? Um? You know, so

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a bottomless bowl. There's this study that if you give

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>people a bowl of soup, and you know, we think

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we're in control and we choose how much food we eat,

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and you give a bunch of people sitting down at

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the table a bowl setter bowls of soup, and some

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of the bowls of soup um are just regular, there's

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>all the same size, But some of the other bowls

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of soup have a little um pipe at the bottom

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually refilling the bowl of soup as you're

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>drinking it. And the question was would the people who

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>are drinking from the bottomless bowl notice and to stop eating?

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>And the point of the study basically showed that people

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>don't notice the bottomless bowl. Uh. And that is what

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>how our technology works. The Instagram feed and the Facebook

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>feed and the Twitter feed all scroll infinitely, right. They

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>could choose to not do that. They could have stopping cues.

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Your your mind is built for something called a stopping queue,

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>where basically we expect that there's going to be a

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.719
<v Speaker 1>queue that says, Okay, now this is done, and your

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>mind kind of wakes up and figures out what do

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to do next? But if I'm trying to

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>hook your attention and keep you going for as long

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>as possible, my job is to figure out how can

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I remove all of those stopping cues so I can

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>keep you sucked in as long as possible. What other

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>things other than the bottomless bowl? Uh? I was interested

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump's digital campaign advisor was able to plant

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>these ads, and of course we're going to get into

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the political uses of these big tech companies in a minute,

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but that they could measure if red or green or blue,

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the different backgrounds for and and and the kind of

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>words that seem to be attracting more people on the

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>design that would suck people in or kind of agitate them,

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and they were able to figure out what was the

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>most effective way of in essence, trashing Hillary Clinton? Yeah,

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean this, this whole. All of these systems are

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>basically asking one question, which is, you know, how do

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>we get your attention? And the best way to get

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>your attention is what works on your evolutionary instincts? Does

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>red work better on your evolutionary instincts? Are on your mind?

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Does blue work better? Does this word work better for you?

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>If I use this political message? Does that work better

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for you? We've reared so far away from any authentic

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.479
<v Speaker 1>relationship between a person trying to just talk to you

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>versus a person and sitting there scanning all of the

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>things you ever said on social media and trying to

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>figure out you use um. Whenever you talk about a

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>concept like immigration, you always use these three adjectives. And

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>let's say they're positive or they're negative. Right now, if

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a political advertiser, what do I want to do

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate you? Well, I want to use your own

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>words back to you so you most agree with me.

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to start repeating your own viewpoints, your

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>own opinions back at you with your exact word choices.

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So you nod your head in agreement, like, man, that

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>person really understands me and what we've created with social

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>media and Facebook. Beyond the addiction layer, the addiction just

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>sets up the kind of matrix everyone's jacked in. So

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>now the moment they wake up in the morning, their

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>thoughts are being sort of influenced by these phones. The

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>second layer is that we've sold that to the highest

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 1>bidder because of advertising, and we've enabled anyone to go

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in there and say I can target the precise messages

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that will resonate with your specific mind. And that's exactly

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what Cambridge Analytica was in the last election. They were

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to sell campaigns on the on the ability to

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>specifically persuade people using the things that would be most

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>persuasive per mind, so they'd have a profile that your

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>mind is influenced. Um, you know, more by authority. If

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I tell you that the New York Times said this

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was true, then you're really likely to believe it. Or

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>if I told you that Fox News said this was true,

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>then you're really likely to believe it. Um. These are

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>all different ways of influencing people, you know. I think

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to realize that all of our minds can

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>be influenced. That's what I learned as a magician. It

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter how smart you are, it doesn't matter what

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.719
<v Speaker 1>language you speak. Magic and slight of hand works on

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>every single mind. And what we've just enabled is this,

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, arms race for anybody to go in there

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>and do what they want. It's time to take a

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>quick break. We'll be back with Tristan Harris right after this.

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And now back to our conversation with Tristan Harris. Can

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 1>you talk about how tech in general and social media

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in particular have had a corrosive impact on people's perceptions

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>of the news and the issues and basically all of

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>these things we've spoken about since Donald Trump became a candidate. Yeah. Well,

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes people think that these feeds, you know what, what

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>pot what shows it. The inside of your feed is

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>just whatever your friends post, so it's just a neutral tool.

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 1>But this is not true. When you open up that

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Facebook feed, there's actually thousands and thousands of things they

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>could show you, and out of those thousand things, they

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out what will be most likely to

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 1>get you to click to watch, or to share, or

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to like, And it turns out that outrage is really

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>good at getting you to click and to share because

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to tell other people, I can't believe the

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that these guys, these politicians did you know today,

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And so those things enter at the top of everyone's

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>feed So now everybody's going to these feeds, and them, huters,

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>not humans, are selecting out of all the thousands of things,

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the outrageous things. And what that creates are these waves

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of outrage inside of all these human animals. We have

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>these you know, human evolutionary instincts, and you turn your

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>phone over in the morning, and instead of feeling calm

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and opening your eyes and taking a breath and asking

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like what are my dreams or what are my hopes

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>for today? Or what am I grateful for? What I

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>want to do? What am I going to have for breakfast?

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>What am I going to have for breakfast? You know?

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You instead, the first thing you do when you set

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>off your turn off your alarm, after your phone vibrates,

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is you open up one of these feeds and suddenly

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>your mind is like filled with outrage. Screw those democrats

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you wake up to exactly and we have to ask,

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like this totalizing on it on both sides.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>That's The thing is everyone is influenced by this, which

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is why it should be a unifying issue, right. I

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>think that no one wants this to happen to politics.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, once you sort of see where this is

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>all going, we don't want to live in a society

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that's just triggered and filled with outrage, or that's manipulating

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>kids from the first moment they wake up in the

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>morning and they see photo after photo after photo of

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>their friends having fun without them. I mean, it's always

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>true that people are having fun without us. But the

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>question is, do I fill your day in your morning

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>with evidence of that? Do I just make you believe

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the only thing that's going on. I mean, this

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>is crazy, I agree, And I think it's so corrosive

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for kids in general. You know, when you see that

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the suicide rate for teenage girls has I think tripled

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in the last ten years. And if you look at

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>anxiety being the number one mental health disorder in this country,

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>isolation being one of the biggest problems, it's so ironic

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in an error when we're all connected, we've never been

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>so lonely. Yeah. Well, and I think Sherry Turkle was

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>just so precient with her book alone together about this

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, giving having the virtual experience of connection

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>of seeing all these people doesn't mean that as an

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>animal sitting there with the body right and breathing, that

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't need that physical presence. Right. It feels a

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>lot better to be physically present someone than to sit

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the entire day on a screen getting that virtual form

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of presidents. Can I ask you Trystan a little more

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>about like a firm like Cambridge Analytica, because I don't

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think people fully understand how these firms or even tech

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>companies are able to kind of gather absorb these this information,

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>highly personalized information, and then spew stuff out at you.

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm talking on my phone with a friend

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that I really want to buy a

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>new winter coat, can they pick that up and then

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>start sending me ads for winter coats? Because that's happened

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to a couple of my friends. They've experimented. They talked

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>about Emmy Rawsom just for fun to see if suddenly

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they'd get all this stuff about Emmy Rossum, who I

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>really love and I think she's a great person. No,

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>no dis on Emmy, but she got started getting all

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>this information about Emmy Rowsom So that to me is

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>super creepy. I mean, how do they find out all

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>this stuff about us? Well, I mean especially Facebook, I

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>mean the their business. I mean, how much have you

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>paid for your Facebook account? Zero dollars? But we're paying

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>in our attention obviously, Well that's interesting, right, So we

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>don't pay for Facebook. So the question who is paying them?

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's the advertiser, which means that all those people

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>who go to work at Facebook. As much as they say, hey,

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>we want to make the world more open and connected,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but if your business model is serving not people,

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>but the business model is serving advertisers, then guess what.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>All of that information over time is going to be

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>used more and more to make the advertisers more successful.

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise those advertisers aren't going to spend their money on Facebook.

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>So in the long run, Facebook has to be, you know,

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>helping their advertisers be successful. And what that's going to

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>mean is enabling them to access more and more personal

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>information when they target uh, you know, adds to you.

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And so when you send a message to someone else

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, you know, it'll pick up those keywords and

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that will be part of the way that it starts

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>to target and enabling advertisers to target you over time. Well,

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Facebook in parta killer for a second.

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook on Instagram. Um, we sometimes use the euphemism of

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>social media companies different technology platus, so many of them

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>really just Facebook. Yeah. I think we're really in large

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.199
<v Speaker 1>part just talking about Facebook. So the question is, is

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Facebook the worst offender here? Are they doing things that

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>are qualitatively different and more harmful than Google for example? Um? Yeah,

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the challenges it's just a ground. For a second,

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>just how many people use Facebook. There's more than two

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>billion people on Facebook. That's more than a quarter of

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the world's population. Um, that's about the number of notional

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>followers of Christianity who every day are jacked into this

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>system where they start looking at a feed and their

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>thoughts get you know, start flowing into them from these

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 1>one from this one company in California, you know, with

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a handful of engineers who make the design and algorithm decisions.

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>And so the reason I say that is that no

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 1>matter what Facebook us, it's creating exponentially complex consequences for

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>two billion people. So you know, how many engineers speak

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook speak Burmese. I mean, I don't know one

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>zero maybe, and yet Facebook is the number one way

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for people in Burma to access the internet. Facebook is

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the Internet if you're in Burma. And it started amplifying

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>genocides in Burma because it was amplifying this fake news

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>about a specific minority group. So the point is that

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they can't reign in this machine that they've created. They've

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>created this automated machine that, because there's no humans, they're

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>figuring out which thoughts should we put in people's minds.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>It's just the machines calculating what it should put in

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>people's minds based on what's most engaging, and it's starting

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to push thoughts into people's minds and elections and democracies

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>around the world in languages that the engineers at California

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and Menlo Park they don't even speak. And so they've

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>created this kind of monster that they no longer control.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So now what's going on is they're trying to go

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>back and say, how do we reigin this thing in

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>How do we quickly, you know, throw all the firefighters

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:02.959
<v Speaker 1>at this thing and try to save it as much

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>as possible. But I think the challenges we trusted them

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to try and be thoughtful about this whole thing, and

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they didn't see from the very beginning that this is

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the level of influence they had. That they aren't just

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, helping us keep in touch with our friends.

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>They're a political actor. They're steering elections, They're creating addictions,

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>they're making people lonely. I know that some activists and

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Mimar wrote a letter to Mark Zuckerberg about this, about

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the very thing that you were describing in Burma, and

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>he wrote them back personally. But you know, to your point,

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>all the people in the world, it's impossible to monitor

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>these things, isn't it. So before we talk about what

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook can and cannot do, let me ask you about

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg's testimony, because I'm sure you watched it with

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a great amount of interest. Um, what did you think

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>about it? And did you think he was questioned vigorously

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>enough by members of Congress, you know, some of whom

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>still have flip phones. Well, I think that is the issue. Fundamentally.

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>It is clear that you know, the modern realities of

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>how technology companies work have far outpaced the governance capacity

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of really probably any government to stay in touch with

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you know all of the ways that these things are

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>working and evolved in the business model. And you know,

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we were involved in the November first hearings um myself

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and a few other people and briefing major Congress members. Unfortunately,

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't as much time for these latest hearings, and

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it came across, as you know, a whole

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>hodgepodge of issues. Some people are asking about privacy, some

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>people are asking about housing discrimination adds, some people are

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>asking about election integrity, data breaches, Cambridge Altica. So to

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the average person, it feels like, oh man, this is

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>about just a bunch of unrelated things. But I actually

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>want to reframe that. The reason why it felt like

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it's about a bunch of unrelated things and that these

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>harms are showing up everywhere is because Facebook affects every

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>part of society. It affects election campaign pricing, it affects

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>housing discrimination ads where some groups get discriminated by over others.

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>It affects elections, it affects people's privacy. And I think

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the problem is if you think about Facebook is almost

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>like a global government. I mean, how much power does

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg have even over someone like President Trump at

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>controlling people's thoughts and actions, right. I mean, you could

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>argue that he has more power that's completely unaccountable except

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to him, since he's the major shareholder at doing whatever

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>he wants, and we're sort of left to you know,

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>his moral compass and whatever happens, you know, to be

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>running between the his eyes and ears as the way

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>he's thinking about this. Well, what did you think of

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.719
<v Speaker 1>his testimony? Well, you know, I thought he was dodging

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental issue, which is that the business model of

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>advertising and keeping people engaged is the problem. All of

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 1>these issues come down to that one issue, and so

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to distract Congress from that core issue

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that the business model is what incentivizes them to offer

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>better ways for advertisers to take people's personal information and

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>target against it and offer better and better ways to

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>keep people hooked on Facebook for as long as possible.

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's also a little misleading when he said that

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't sell data to anyone, because what they actually

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>do is they allow advertisers to micro target people based

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>on their data. So even though the advertisers themselves don't

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>see the data, that's get all the benefits of that data.

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and and and Facebook is quick to sort of,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, smirk when Congress asked them, why do you

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>sell people's data, because they don't do that. But the

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>point is that it is equivalently the same because advertisers

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are paying Facebook not to own and access your data,

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>not to use it and then spread somewhere else, but

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they're paying to target ads specifically to those people. You

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>can go on Facebook and you can target um conspiracy

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>theorists by knowing what keywords they tend to identify with.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So are you saying that until and allows Facebook changes

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>its fundamental business model, the problem can't be solved. That's

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And the thing is that we can't change

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>their business model overnight, and they can't change their business

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>model overnight, even if actually they saw these issues. So

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I know that there's a lot of work, and we

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>should celebrate the work that they're trying to do right

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>now to try and peel away the problem against their

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>own financial interests. And I think that there's some authentic

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>things that they're doing there, But the question is there's

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>an upper bound to that, And and do they see

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that the fundamental heart of all of these problems comes

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>down to their business model. They're not on our team.

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.479
<v Speaker 1>They're not on democracy's team to help strengthen the fabric

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of society. So long as the people who pay them

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>are the advertisers they're they're not going to be able

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to solve these problems. So if you were Mark Zuckerberg

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and you were in charge of Facebook, what would you

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>be doing to put Facebook back on the side of

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>democracy and the American people and everything that's good and

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>just in the world. The first thing I would do

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't just say I'm sorry and there's this one bad

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>actor way over there in the corner called Cambridge Analytica,

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>but Facebook is fine. I would tell the world I'm

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>sorry that I didn't see that our business model was

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>so corrosive and I feel bad about that. And now

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna do is start a transition plan to

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>get off of this business model. And here's how we're

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that, and here's how much time it's gonna take.

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna happen instantly, but here's how we're gonna

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>work on that. Here's why, and hey, shareholders, here's why

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be regulated if we don't do this.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 1>In the long run anyway, And I would start with that.

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, trust, now, that won't another

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>behemoth just take Facebook's place. I mean, I hate to

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>say it, but when it comes to profits versus ethics,

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 1>profits usually when don't they that that's right? But that's

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>all based on consumer demand. So right now, there's essentially

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook as a monopoly. Um and it's a new species

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of monopoly because all of our anti trust, anti monopoly

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>laws are about um uh, they don't handle zero price monopolies,

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>usually a monopoly as they price discriminate so they can

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 1>control pricing. They can offer one price to you and

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>no different price to someone else, and no one can

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.720
<v Speaker 1>stop them because you know their a monopoly. The challenge

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 1>here is it's a monopoly that's free. So all of

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.320
<v Speaker 1>our antitrust law that's normally about regulating these things doesn't

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>handle free monopolies. And so I think if we change

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>consumer demand and people realize that Facebook doesn't have our

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>best interests at heart, and it never will unless they

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 1>change their business model, then we're starting to see this

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>movement where people do want an alternative. We're not there yet,

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think slowly that's what's happening. I don't know,

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, sorry to play Devil's advocate for a moment,

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but it seems to me, Tristan, that a lot of

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 1>this depends on consumer demand or lack thereof. And there

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>was a big thing, oh, you know people were going

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to quit Facebook. Well, to quote Brokeback Mountain, I just

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>can't quit you Facebook. I mean it's really really hard

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>because people are so addicted to live without it. And furthermore,

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>there was an interesting piece in The New York Times

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>by my friend Andrew Ross Sorkin, and the headline was

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>our privacy has eroded. We're okay with that? I mean,

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>don't you think that. People It's sort of like being

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a frog in a slowly boiling pot of water. People

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have become you know, complacent and in order to it

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and have pretty much accepted this is the new normal. Well,

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I would frame it a little bit differently. I would

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>say that it's a testament to how much of a fabric,

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>basic fabric of our lives it's become that we can't

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>just delete Facebook. So when I say this, I'm not

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>saying that consumer demands going to change and everyone's just

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna quit because you know, in fact, people I know

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook say, with a smug on their face, will

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 1>if you don't like the product, just use a different product.

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>It's like, okay, great, so I'll just switch to that

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 1>other two billion person social network. That's so, that's right

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>there to my right. You know, it doesn't exist. And

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>right now, what we need to do is change the

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of the government and consumer context so that those

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>alternatives can start to as so it becomes harder and

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>harder for them to innovate. And we need make it

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>easier for the alternatives to exist, because we're not going

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to quit. I mean, I still use Facebook every day

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's the best. It's the only way I can

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>get my ideas out to a large enough audience. And

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that speaks to the amount of power that they have,

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>right it's not. And the key thing here is also

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's not just an addiction. They've they've really taken

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>over the fundamental communications fabric and the fabric of staying

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in touch with the people that matter to us. We

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have an alternative, and that's why people aren't just

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>going to delete it. But that doesn't mean people don't

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with it. But aren't there some good

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>things about it. I mean about social media writ large,

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>not just Facebook, but all these different modalities in terms

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of like galvanizing people, getting like minded people to stand

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>up and want more sensible gun laws for example, or

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 1>start you know, stopping genocide in different places because there's

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of a grassroots uprising. Uh, the fact that, yes,

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>we're lonely, but it is nice to be able to

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>look at video of your grandchild if you live far away.

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can think of countless examples of the

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>positive impact this is having. I mean, you're such a

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 1>debbut down or is there anything that well I think

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this is This is such a critical thing because this

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this conversation often makes it seem as if there's this

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>all or nothing choice, like either we have Facebook and

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we we have these these benefits in these costs, or

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>we just don't use Facebook at all. And the question

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is is there a middle way? And as I said

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this in my Ted talk, that it's like, you know,

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we can have social movements that take off with positive

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 1>messages without most of the time creating viral outrage most

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of the time. I mean, these positive social movements are

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>very very rare in comparison to the daily outrage that

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>we experience on these things. The experience of knowing that

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>your friend is you haven't seen for ten years is

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>also visiting a city, um that you find out about

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that only because you had a Facebook account. That's experience

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 1>is great, but it's very, very very rare compared to

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>all the time people spend sort of just mindlessly browsing

0:38:57.080 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and they self report regretting. And I think there's a

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>different way to design all of this stuff. And that's that's,

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, what we're trying to do with our

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>with our work with the Center for Humane Technologies, show

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:08.839
<v Speaker 1>that there actually is a different way to design these

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>products that's not an all or nothing choice. So what

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>does a good Facebook look like? Is it a subscription

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>model where advertisers wouldn't be on the platform, that people

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>would pay to use it, and therefore the business of

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>social media isn't about capturing as much of our attention

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Yeah, think of it like a utility. I mean, um,

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, we would we would pay to have

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>access to a service that's all about benefiting our lives.

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So what I mean by that is, right now, if

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you walked I mean, if you walked into Facebook today,

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and you just interviewed a random sample of people and

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you said, what are you doing with your time today?

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>You as an engineer at Facebook, and you would find

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>every engineer is basically on one goal, which is am

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I keeping people engaged? Scrolling, clicking, liking, hooked or not.

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:57.439
<v Speaker 1>They're only concerned with that goal. And instead, imagine we

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>paid for Facebook. All those engineers go to work and

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they ask, how do we generate positive benefits in society?

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>How do we make this a resource? And Mark Zuckerberg

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>himself back in two thousand five used to talk about

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Facebook as a social utility. He didn't try to defend

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this stuff about news feeds and content and all this

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff, which that came later after they hinge

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>their success on the advertising model. Before that, it was

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a utility. It was an address book. It was something

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I could use to make things happen in my life.

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think, if we paid for Facebook, you don't

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>just see news feeds without the ads. I'm talking about

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a radically different service that is entirely built as a

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>utility to empower us to make new social choices together

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that we wouldn't be able to make without Facebook. Things

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>like Oh, I can find out when my best friend

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>is visiting town that I haven't seen in ten years. Um,

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I can have strangers who when they move to a

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>new city, they can quickly find the groups that they

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>can be in touch with. But it wouldn't be built

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>around news feeds and mindless consumption, which is what it's

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>built around. Now. I want to ask about fake news

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is because listen, these seem to be long term goals, Tristan,

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we have an important midterm elections coming

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 1>up in November, a hugely important presidential election coming up

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:16.439
<v Speaker 1>in um and so what immediately, what can be done

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>about the proliferation of fake news, these bots, Russian influence

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and what we're seeing and general chaos when it comes

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to this platform in general. Yeah, the thing that people

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>should understand is, you know, if I ask you the question,

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>how much more confident do you feel today if an

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>election was to be held that it is less vulnerable

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to outside manipulation and influence than it was in like

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>zero point zero? Correct? These platforms are still highly highly

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to not just Russia, but any state and even

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>non state actors China, North Korea are in the playbook.

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Is now out there, and now anyone can spend money

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook to target information to the audiences that they want.

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:04.919
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just the ads, by the way, there's

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>loads of other techniques. I work with ex intelligence people

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that know about those techniques, and it's still one possible

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to create impersonation accounts, to create fake images that are

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:17.959
<v Speaker 1>dark don't exist, these deep fakes where you can fake

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>videos of people saying things they didn't they didn't say.

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 1>All this is going to get worse, which is why

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 1>we're doing this work. This is the short term, as

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you said, Katie, is if you care about the integrity

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of our elections and our democracy, then you ought to

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>care about how these platforms reform their practices to better

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>protect them from manipulation. Is their awareness part of the solution, though,

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you know, I had a good friend

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I've mentioned this a couple of times on our podcast

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>who got this video and sent it to me about

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>whom Aberdeen and her connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, and

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>she was appalled and have you seen this? And I

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>said day that this is bullshit, this is not true stuff,

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:55.399
<v Speaker 1>but it was so professionally done. And do you think

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 1>that people are at least more skeptical and are kind

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of more educated did in terms of their consumption of

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thing, or or am I just a

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:09.319
<v Speaker 1>little more sophisticated than your average consumer. Well, I'm very

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>worried about this because often we have this feeling that well,

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:14.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm the smart one, and it's only those very persuadable

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>person's way over there that were influenced by Russia. But

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>not right. Look, and you're as a magician, as a kid,

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you realize that everyone feels that way, Like, no, no, no,

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I I'm you know, magic is only gonna work on

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>those dumb people you know, who don't are un educated.

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But I have a PhD. So therefore I'm not manipulated.

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>It's actually the opposite. Usually, the people who are most

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 1>confident are the ones who are much easier to manipulate

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and the you know, we didn't always see society that way.

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Back in the nineteen forties, UM, the United States government

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.360
<v Speaker 1>UH created you know, the Committee for National Morale UH

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and there is also the Institute for propagand Analysis to

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>protect the American psyche from foreign influence. We recognized fundamentally

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>how vulnerable our population was to outside influence. And we

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>actually made it a government campaign funded to make make

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 1>sure there is large public awareness campaigns. And I think

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and other companies need to do much better and

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>step up their job and spend millions and millions of

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars on making sure people are aware of these conspiracy

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 1>theories and needs deliberate campaigns because we're very vulnerable, so

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:14.439
<v Speaker 1>we need some more awareness for sure, but we also

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>need the platforms to crack down on the ways that

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they continue to be vulnerable to outside influence. So what

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>you're saying is that for all the rhetoric, Facebook really

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:26.240
<v Speaker 1>hasn't cleaned up the problem of fakes and foreign influence,

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and it could have as profound in effect this year

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>as it did in It could totally have as profound

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in effect this year as in now. I do want

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to say there's a lot of people working really hard,

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure at Facebook and at Twitter to try and

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 1>clean this up. My point is just that they're not

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>nearly close enough to make us feel confident about our

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>elections not being manipulated. So to close the gap, I

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>think we need to be highly aware and spread this

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>message to everybody we know that these conspiracy theories are

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be very compelling and look very true, and

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they'll spread really quickly. But we're gonna need you know,

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason we have a five second delay on television.

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>You know. We don't want to just automatically broadcast everything

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>instantly to millions of people and have it reshared that

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 1>fast networks. When Donald Trump had been elected president without Facebook,

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not saying that with the political specific political bias,

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I can just tell you that from the perspective of

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>how media works, social media was critical to his election.

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty chilling. What about artificial intelligence? Just on how

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>concerned are you about that? And this trend to give

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>more and more decision making authority to robots or to

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, algorithms or too technology in general, versus having

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:46.240
<v Speaker 1>some kind of human judgment involved. Yeah, this is really

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the critical thing we think of artificial intelligence. People think

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>of the Terminator movies and Arnold Schwarzenegger and you know,

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 1>death bots or something like that, and they think it's

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>all about the future. Oh, and the future will worry

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the AI is going to kill everybody or something like that.

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And what this misses is that we already live inside

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of a system that is governed and run by artificial

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 1>intelligence algorithms. And that's because when you open up a

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Facebook news feed, that's an AI. It's trying to figure

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>out what can I show you that's going to keep

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:17.759
<v Speaker 1>you hooked. When you open up YouTube and you wake

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 1>up two hours later saying, what the hell just happened

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 1>with my time? The reason was because it was playing.

0:46:23.440 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It was an AI that was playing chess against your mind.

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Think if your mind as a chessboard, and you can.

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It's sitting there and it thinks it knows what it

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 1>wants to do and what your goals it has, But

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>YouTube sitting there trying to play chess against your mind,

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>asking what are the videos I can put on AutoPlay

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>next that will keep you on here for as long

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as possible. And just like when Gary Kasprov played the

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 1>AI at chess and it and and Gary lost, it's

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>because the AI was seeing way more moves ahead on

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the chessboard than Gary could see. And at some point

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it can see so many moves ahead that it's done.

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 1>It's it's checkmate against humanity. And the issue that we

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>have right now is that when you land on YouTube

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and it sees that many more moves ahead it's not

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>aligned with our goals, and YouTube also drove fifteen billion

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:11.399
<v Speaker 1>views to Alex jones conspiracy theory videos on its own

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>using AI, So we already have an AI problem right now,

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>which is why it's so critical to bring awareness to

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:21.359
<v Speaker 1>these issues. In closing, Tristan, what are steps that all

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of us can take to protect ourselves from being manipulated

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 1>by tech until our kids from getting addicted to exactly

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>until and unless these companies fix themselves. What can we

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>do in the interim to to protect ourselves as much

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>as we can? Absolutely, I mean, obviously we don't want

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to wait five years for tech companies to finally come around,

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>so we have to have choices we can make right now.

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And the good news is we can. Um A bunch

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of these, by the way, are on our website, Humane

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:53.239
<v Speaker 1>tech dot com. Um. But you know, you can do

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 1>things like turn off all notifications. Most people don't realize

0:47:56.440 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that notifications on your phone are mostly invented by machines

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:03.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a way to get you coming back, saying, oh,

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>ten new friends posted some likes over here. Don't you

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 1>want to see what those are? Just turn all that

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff off. Try to make as many notifications on your

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:13.319
<v Speaker 1>phone off as possible. Um, when I say this, you'll

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:15.280
<v Speaker 1>hear it, but you probably won't do it. So actually

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>consider what you know. Can I turn off notifications? Am

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I willing to make that step? I really recommended. Another

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>thing is setting your phone to gray scale. If you

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 1>feel really addicted, every time you turn your phone over

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and you see those colors, it's lighting up some of

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that dopamine rewards, just even if by looking at it,

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:33.359
<v Speaker 1>And if you set your phone to gray scale, it's

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:37.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of cuts out about fift of that like addictive feeling.

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Our listeners know. Yeah, you go into uh your on

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone, you go into general settings, and then general

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and then accessibility and the scroll all the way to

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the bottom to accessibility shortcut. Well, this is a good example.

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:55.279
<v Speaker 1>And this is where Apple you know, when the new

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:57.239
<v Speaker 1>iPhone comes out in a few months that they can

0:48:57.280 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>make this a lot easier for people. But I really

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>recommend and just not using social media, just you know,

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 1>at least uninstalling it from your phone and only using

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it when you're on a desktop. Um, and that that

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 1>will never happen. By the way, I did do that

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:16.719
<v Speaker 1>with Facebook. I should probably do it with Instagram as well,

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:20.480
<v Speaker 1>um Twitter. I couldn't give up, but it made a

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>huge difference in my life not to have Facebook on

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 1>my phone. I tried to turn my phone screen to

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:29.239
<v Speaker 1>black and white per Tristan's recommendation. That lasted about fifteen

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>minutes because I missed it. I was like, the world

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:35.040
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't feel good with a black and white phone.

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:38.840
<v Speaker 1>See what's my problem, Tristan. You don't have a problem, Katie. Know.

0:49:38.920 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 1>The thing is that I think people need to be

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:43.799
<v Speaker 1>able to switch. I think the thing is people need

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to be able to switch it back and forth between

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 1>color and black and white. The point isn't to stay

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in black and white all the time. It's just that, um,

0:49:49.680 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, keep it in black and white by default,

0:49:51.920 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>because then you you actually get used to it. You

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 1>actually it starts to feel overwhelming to see color. It

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:58.719
<v Speaker 1>feels like whoa, that's that's too much. And that's kind

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of where you want to be is to remind yourself

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that this is a tool in my pocket. It's only

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a tool, and I want to make sure I'm putting

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it in its place. That that's the role I wanted

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>to serve in black and white can be a helpful mind.

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>And what about for kids? Real quickly, Tristan, because a

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of our listeners have children or grandchildren. I find

0:50:16.280 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's quite depressing when I see parents at the

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:22.959
<v Speaker 1>park or playground. They're so you know, they have They're

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 1>so busy looking at their phone. And I'm not being

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 1>judge here because I probably would be doing the same

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:30.399
<v Speaker 1>thing if my kids were younger. But they are not

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:33.520
<v Speaker 1>interacting with their kids in the same way. And it's

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 1>or people having dinner. I don't know. I'm sure you

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 1>all have seen this. Nothing is more depressing than to

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:42.720
<v Speaker 1>see a couple at a nice restaurant on their phones

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>or even a family. I get so bummed out. And

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:48.799
<v Speaker 1>again I'm not being judge e listeners, but it just

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just, I don't know, there's something about it that

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:55.160
<v Speaker 1>just makes me incredibly sad. You know, this is the conversation.

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the culture that we're that these

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 1>design choices are creating, and um, you know, this is

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:02.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be up to us in the short term

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 1>to realize is this the society we want to live in?

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Is this? How is this who we are? Um? And

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a question that all parents have

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to start asking themselves. Um. And you can use the

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 1>tips that we just talked about in the meantime to

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>try and use it less. And finally, finally, there are

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of apps that you recommend to make this

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 1>easier for all of us. Can you just briefly talk

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:25.920
<v Speaker 1>about some of those. Yet you can download and installed Moments,

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:27.799
<v Speaker 1>which is an app for the iPhone that tracks how

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.080
<v Speaker 1>much time you spend. You know, I mean that helps

0:51:30.120 --> 0:51:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to sort of see and get a picture of where

0:51:32.280 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 1>your time is going. But I do really think that

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the much better thing is simply to look at your

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>phone and you know, bleep most of the apps you're

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>not using, turn off notifications, set it to black and white. Um,

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple other tips on on the website. It

0:51:45.480 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>can really make a big difference. And just simply being

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:49.840
<v Speaker 1>aware of this can change your relationship to it. And

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that realizing that you're missing out

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:56.879
<v Speaker 1>on life. Talk about not being present, whether it means

0:51:56.920 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>staring at your phone when you're in a new city

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and you don't even know a your surroundings, or not

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 1>ever being bored, which is the key to creativity. In

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this hour, I did Tristan where You're You're featured. One

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of the things I realized and thought about is the

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 1>part of our prefrontal cortex that allows us to be

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 1>creative that fires up when we have a creative thought,

0:52:19.200 --> 0:52:23.319
<v Speaker 1>cannot really operate or function when we're constantly distracted by

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:27.400
<v Speaker 1>our phone. So you know, every moment, whether it's driving,

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're in the passenger seat of a car,

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 1>or you're just you know, waiting, nobody ever has this

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:37.839
<v Speaker 1>time to just sit and think, and that is absolutely

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:41.440
<v Speaker 1>key to being creative and coming up with ideas and

0:52:41.480 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>having epiphanies of all kinds. And that's one thing I

0:52:45.600 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 1>think about too, This this constant stimulation which only increases

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the cortisol and doesn't allow us to have a moment

0:52:54.239 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>where we can think and consider and contemplate things. That's

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:02.719
<v Speaker 1>be right. And that's why this is such an invisible

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:06.560
<v Speaker 1>problem beneath all other problems, because every choice we make

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:09.319
<v Speaker 1>in our lives is on top of the background of

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>how our mind is feeling, thinking, um choosing, and how

0:53:13.640 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we think feeling. Shoes are basically, you know, never been

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:20.680
<v Speaker 1>more influenced by how our phones shape our attention and

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 1>whether you care about creativity or mental health or loneliness.

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be publishing something soon that's kind of a

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:29.719
<v Speaker 1>ledger of all of these negative externalities, these cultural harms

0:53:29.760 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on society, so that people can really see it all

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in one place, because the effects are so profound and

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:37.799
<v Speaker 1>so invisible. Well, I'm so proud of you raising these

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:41.880
<v Speaker 1>issues at the ripe old age of thirty four being

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty three still but I know the Atlantic called you

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the closest thing Silicon Valley has to a conscience, and

0:53:49.280 --> 0:53:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate everything you're doing, the consciousness you're raising

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>about these issues. If people want to learn more, they

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:00.319
<v Speaker 1>want to actually support what you're doing, triest On, how

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>can we do that? Yeah, just go to the website

0:54:04.400 --> 0:54:06.920
<v Speaker 1>humane tech dot com, which is for our Center for

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Humane Technology, and um, there's ways to get involved, join

0:54:10.239 --> 0:54:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the community, make a donation. Um. You know, we see

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this as a team effort, and this is a team

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:18.439
<v Speaker 1>humanity really protecting and fighting for for the world we want.

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I was more than a little freaked out after speaking

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 1>with Tristan. What about you, Brian? For sure? But knowledge

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is power, as they say, and I think it's time

0:54:30.000 --> 0:54:31.799
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of us to take a hard look

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:35.319
<v Speaker 1>at our tech habits, myself included, and just how much

0:54:35.360 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 1>time they're sucking up in our lives. That's true, and

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're just conscious of it, it does

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 1>help you. And I think there are times when you

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:47.040
<v Speaker 1>can leave it at home. I know parents and people say, well,

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what if my kid calls, what if there's an emergency?

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And I feel that way too, But I also feel

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:55.640
<v Speaker 1>like you have to take a break from it sometimes

0:54:55.800 --> 0:55:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and take a walk, don't listen to our podcast. Wait wait,

0:55:00.680 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>did I just say that? But sometimes you just need

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:05.839
<v Speaker 1>to leave it at home, get outside and be on tether.

0:55:06.000 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Don't have it permanently, you know, attached to your hand.

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:11.920
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I have a friend who has two phones,

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:15.880
<v Speaker 1>one for during the week which has social media and

0:55:15.960 --> 0:55:18.480
<v Speaker 1>all the bells and whistles of a smartphone, and one

0:55:18.560 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for the weekend, which is just texting and calling in

0:55:21.719 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 1>case his kids need to reach him. I thought that

0:55:23.640 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting idea. Must be nice to have such

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>rich friends, Brian. Meanwhile, stop checking your phone a hundred

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:33.359
<v Speaker 1>and fifty times a day, people, Brian. I downloaded that

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Moment app and the worst day I was on my

0:55:36.840 --> 0:55:42.400
<v Speaker 1>phone for ready nine hours now. In fairness, I was sick,

0:55:42.840 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I had like the flu, and I had nothing to

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:50.440
<v Speaker 1>do but lying in bed in my phone. Well, I

0:55:50.480 --> 0:55:53.319
<v Speaker 1>was watching The Crown. If I recall and on my

0:55:53.360 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>phone and you weren't transfixed by the Crown, I can't

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:58.399
<v Speaker 1>believe I was. I was, and it was crazy because

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I had to keep rewinding it because I'm us things

0:56:00.360 --> 0:56:02.320
<v Speaker 1>because I'd be on my phone anyway. I got a

0:56:02.360 --> 0:56:04.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of problems people. That does it for this week's show,

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks as usual to our pod squad over at Stitcher.

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:11.319
<v Speaker 1>That's Gianna Palmer, Jared O'Connell and Nora Richie. And thanks

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:13.800
<v Speaker 1>as well to the team over at Katie Curric Media.

0:56:13.880 --> 0:56:16.880
<v Speaker 1>That would be Alison Bresnik, Emily Beena and Beth Demas.

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Mark Phillips wrote our theme music, and Brian and I

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:23.680
<v Speaker 1>are the show's executive producers. For Better for Worse, I'm

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:26.719
<v Speaker 1>under Katie Couric on social media. Instagram is where I

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:31.840
<v Speaker 1>shine people. Brian tweets his little hard out at Goldsmith b. Meanwhile,

0:56:31.880 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to call in with your stories about discrimination

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and gender bias at work. That number again is nine

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to nine to to four four six three seven, or

0:56:40.040 --> 0:56:44.000
<v Speaker 1>drop us a line at comments at currect podcast dot

0:56:44.040 --> 0:56:46.600
<v Speaker 1>com and by the way, if you haven't already, please

0:56:46.680 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 1>leave us a rating over at Apple Podcast and be

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:52.239
<v Speaker 1>sure to subscribe to the show as well. Thank you

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening, and we'll talk to you next week.